Slashdot Mirror


Infineon Execs Plead Guilty to Price-Fixing

An anonymous reader writes "Executives at Infineon Technologies plead guilty to an international conspiracy to fix prices in the DRAM market. Heinrich Florian, Günter Hefner, Peter Schaefer and T. Rudd Corwin, executives for Infineon Technologies, had a felony filed against them yesterday in the U.S. District Court in San Francisco. Each executive could spend up to six months in prison and will have to pay a $250,000 fine. Under the plea agreement, they must also assist the government in its DRAM investigation. Infineon agreed in October to pay a $160 million fine for its role in the conspiracy, according to the Justice Department."

195 comments

  1. An honest question.. by lordsilence · · Score: 5, Insightful

    If there has been a widespread "price-fixing", will there be any refund for those who has bought these overpriced memory devices?

    1. Re:An honest question.. by hajihill · · Score: 2, Insightful

      And if so, how will they determine whom should be recompensed???

      My understanding is this has been going on for a long time. How would we determine what market rates should be?

      --
      Of blankness, I know nothing.
    2. Re:An honest question.. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Insightful

      I'm sure a class-action lawsuit will be along soon. Just wait; you'll recieve a check for 3 cents within the year! Just don't ask what the lawyers got.

    3. Re:An honest question.. by Vicsun · · Score: 1

      No.

    4. Re:An honest question.. by One+Blue+Ninja · · Score: 3, Interesting

      Ahahahahaha! Sure, if you're one of the lawyers who filed the suit... Otherwise, the gov't gets the money. Did you think the lawyers really filed suit on OUR behalf? Come, now... :-) Plus, I'm sure the $160 million fine the company paid paled in comparison to how much extra they charged consumers, and the execs surely made a lot more than the $250,000 fine they have to pay. In essense, pleading guilty and paying the fines is just good business, in the same way that paying a $35 parking ticket in NYC while on a $2,500 service call is just good business... Sad.

    5. Re:An honest question.. by mog007 · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Where is the logic behind this judgement? Ignore that it'll get appealed, and focus on this. A 250,000 dollar fine?! That's insane. These companies make upwards of millions of dollars and you fine them a quarter of a million? $250,000 is what the MPAA has established as fair for uploading a movie through bittorrent.

    6. Re:An honest question.. by cyberise · · Score: 5, Informative

      Sure the companies make the millions of dollars and that is why Infineon was fined that 160 million. Im sure that the $250,000 fine per executive is going to make them feel some hurt in the wallet.

    7. Re:An honest question.. by frovingslosh · · Score: 2, Informative
      pay attention: Infineon agreed in October to pay a $160 million fine for its role in the conspiracy, according to the Justice Department

      But yes, it is crazy to let the actual people who did this off with such a slap on the wrist. They ikely will still draw their fat cat pay checks while in prison if they ever do go too!

      --
      I'm an American. I love this country and the freedoms that we used to have.
    8. Re:An honest question.. by arose · · Score: 4, Funny

      Isn't that a fine for the executive? Why not just use RIAA math and fine them $ 250 000 per sold ram stick?

      --
      Analogies don't equal equalities, they are merely somewhat analogous.
    9. Re:An honest question.. by CosmeticLobotamy · · Score: 1

      No refund of substance, probably, and I'm sure they'll pass the cost of the lawsuit and the fines on to the consumer.

    10. Re:An honest question.. by drjimmy42 · · Score: 3, Informative
      These companies make upwards of millions of dollars and you fine them a quarter of a million?
      That is the fine for the individuals involved. The company was fined $160,000,000. That's slightly more painful.
      --
      If you're not part of the solution, you are part of the precipitate
    11. Re:An honest question.. by mcc · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Not quite. It's a $250,000 fine (and in some cases some short jail terms) for each of the executives and a $1.6 million fine for the company, and it would be awfully weird for any of this to be appealed as it all appears to be part of plea agreements. Unfortunately, this is still quite probably not enough to realistically undo the gains that either the executives (how much did Ulrich Schumacher make a year?) or the company made off of the price fixing action. In fact as far as I can tell it appears that the company fine may not have even been as large as the litigation costs Infineon spent in the court cases that preceded the fine.

      But this just appears to be the model being pioneered for widescale use by the Bush Department of Justice: Corporate crime, defrauding investors and consumers, using a company on which other peoples' livelihoods rest as a device to line your own pockets, antitrust violations, and similar things aren't illegal anymore, exactly; they're just taxed.

      Of course, for whatever reason, we call them fines instead of taxes-- and go through the formality of preceding them with a court case-- but this really isn't much of a meaningful difference. Even if you get caught doing such things it is increasingly rare that the penalty for breaking the law really exceeds the benefits of having broken the law; in some cases, such as the Microsoft antitrust actions of the late 90s, breaking the law and then simply paying the fine for having done so appears to have been the best long-term business decision available. In this sort of context the fines really cease to have any punitive nature and criminality just becomes another potential strategy in the playbook of a discerning executive. The risk is there that you will be made an example, Martha Stewart style, and meaningful jail time will occur and families and careers will be ruined; but the risk is acceptable, and it may turn out to be worth it in the long run even in the worst case scenario.

      As for the government's point of view, the upshot, it seems, at this point is that the government doesn't object in any form to white collar crime, antitrust violations or executive malfeasance; it just wants a cut of the crime's profits.

      Meanwhile, Infineon isn't quite off the hook yet; this fine is just the U.S. response. As far as I know Infineon is facing similar charges in Europe which have not gone through yet...

    12. Re:An honest question.. by timeOday · · Score: 1
      In essense, pleading guilty and paying the fines is just good business, in the same way that paying a $35 parking ticket in NYC while on a $2,500 service call is just good business... Sad.
      Well wait a minute, what about the 6 months of jail time? That seems like a real punishment, if they actually end up serving it. And if they all serve it at once, it won't be too good for business!
    13. Re:An honest question.. by Lars+T. · · Score: 1

      A 250,000 dollar fine and 4-6 months of prison. And that under a plea bargain.

      --

      Lars T.

      To the guy who modded me down from perfect to terrible Karma - Apple haters still suck

    14. Re:An honest question.. by One+Blue+Ninja · · Score: 5, Insightful
      Well wait a minute, what about the 6 months of jail time? That seems like a real punishment, if they actually end up serving it. And if they all serve it at once, it won't be too good for business!
      I hope you're right. But this *IS* America, so rich white corporate execs don't suffer prison time quite the same way everyone else does. Remind me again which cell block Ken Lay, Jeff Skilling, and Bernard Ebbers are in?

      Between shady deals with prosecutors, early parole, and the favors their money can buy, I don't think he'll actually be in for 6 months. If he iis, I'm sure it will NOT be in a hard-core prison.

      Young black male convicted of $1,000 robbery: 20 years hard time.

      Rich white exec, convicted of robbing millions of people out of billions of dollars: a few months in minimum-security.

      And they have the gall to call themselves the "Justice Department".

    15. Re:An honest question.. by drinkypoo · · Score: 2, Insightful

      But this just appears to be the model being pioneered for widescale use by the Bush Department of Justice: Corporate crime, defrauding investors and consumers, using a company on which other peoples' livelihoods rest as a device to line your own pockets, antitrust violations, and similar things aren't illegal anymore, exactly; they're just taxed.

      I dislike President Bush the Chimpanzee (thank god he's not black or I couldn't get away with saying that no matter how much he looked like a monkey) as much as the next guy and often more (around here you see a lot more bush bumper stickers than any other kind of political affiliation) but claiming that this is the fault of the Bush administration is like saying that people who bought an SUV this year are solely responsible for global warming.

      Allowing executives to get away with negligence leading to the deaths of thousands has been business as usual for ages. Allowing execs to get away with defrauding people and companies in order to take their money seems like small potatoes by comparison - and it's a lot older than America, let alone Bush. Not, mind you, that I approve of what's going on... But Bush is a symptom of the system, not a cause.

      --
      "You're right," Fisheye says. "I should have set it on 'whip' or 'chop.'"
    16. Re:An honest question.. by ColdGrits · · Score: 1

      "will there be any refund for those who has bought these overpriced memory devices?"

      Well actually, given that the price-fixing was them holding the prices artificially LOW, I think the question ought to be will you be paying the extra amount (the difference between what you paid and what they should have charged) on those underpriced memory devices...

      --
      People should not be afraid of their governments - Governments should be afraid of their people.
    17. Re:An honest question.. by mcc · · Score: 1

      The Bush administration certainly didn't invent ignoring white collar crime, nor did I say they did. However they are certainly formalizing the current model by which this occurs, I.E. effective taxation, which is why I mentioned them. I would argue you could certainly show the early signs of a shift in general policy towards these things in in the last few years; previous to this white collar crime was largely simply ignored.

    18. Re:An honest question.. by stinerman · · Score: 2, Interesting

      In essense, pleading guilty and paying the fines is just good business, in the same way that paying a $35 parking ticket in NYC while on a $2,500 service call is just good business...Sad

      Which is why its high time for Uncle Sam to start revoking corporate charters for misbehaving corporations.

      That just made me think ... if a corporation is a legal person, then revoking a charter is similar to the death penalty. Furthermore, one could make an arguement that price fixing is not a crime that warrants the death penalty. Hmm...

    19. Re:An honest question.. by Clay+Pigeon+-TPF-VS- · · Score: 4, Informative

      There is no parole for federal crimes. IANAL (yet), but I interned in the USAO in DC 2 years ago. You serve your whole sentence. There is no time off for good behavior.

      --
      Viral software licensing is not freedom, it is in fact GNU/Socialism.
    20. Re:An honest question.. by One+Blue+Ninja · · Score: 1
      There is no parole for federal crimes. IANAL (yet), but I interned in the USAO in DC 2 years ago. You serve your whole sentence. There is no time off for good behavior.
      Well that's the best news I've read all day! :-)
    21. Re:An honest question.. by seanadams.com · · Score: 1

      Why not just use RIAA math and fine them $ 250 000 per sold ram stick?

      I think it was DDR. Make that $500K.

    22. Re:An honest question.. by Concerned+Onlooker · · Score: 1
      A 250,000 dollar fine?! That's insane.

      That's better than the $1 per person fine that executives of GM, Firestone, Standard Oil and Philips Petroleum got for being found guilty of conspiracy when they destroyed mass transit systems all around the nation back in the late fifties.

      --
      http://www.rootstrikers.org/
    23. Re:An honest question.. by Glonoinha · · Score: 1

      That's $250k out of each officer's personal checking account. The company gets to pony up $160M.

      For us, thats like getting hit with a fine of two year's take home salary (like maybe $80k to $100k - I said take home, not gross.) Not something that would destroy us ... no, come to think of it that would destroy some of us.

      --
      Glonoinha the MebiByte Slayer
    24. Re:An honest question.. by afidel · · Score: 1

      Yes, revocation of charter is often referred to as the corporate death penalty, and it does happen occasionally. However any more for it to be applied the business essentially has to have either been setup or run for some time solely as a fraudulent enterprise, misconduct along the lines of simple collusion would most likely NOT qualify a company for revocation. Revocation of charter was somewhat more common in the 19th century because the idea that a corporation existed to serve the common good was much stronger.

      --
      There are 4 boxes to use in the defense of liberty: soap, ballot, jury, ammo. Use in that order. Starting now.
    25. Re:An honest question.. by tepples · · Score: 1

      No, DDR has four arrows. Make that $1000K.

    26. Re:An honest question.. by afidel · · Score: 1

      Damn I hate responding to myself but a good example of revocation in action from the NY State Attorney General can be seen here. As you can see he believed that the corporation was being run primarily as a criminal enterprise and as such it was eligible for the corporate death penalty. I very much doubt that anyone would find similar reason in fact about the Infineon case.

      --
      There are 4 boxes to use in the defense of liberty: soap, ballot, jury, ammo. Use in that order. Starting now.
    27. Re:An honest question.. by sjames · · Score: 2, Interesting

      The really sick thing about it is given the conditions in the 'prison' they will be in, a great many people would line up for a free six month stay there if it were offered. There are no bars, just a hedge outside you're not supposed to go past.

      They can't have prisons like that for everyone because too many people would deliberatly get caught so they could go there.

      Personally, I believe that no prison should be anything but civil to live in nor better than the conditions the poorest law abiding citizen lives under. Note that meeting both conditions will require improving conditions for the law abiding poor in the U.S.

    28. Re:An honest question.. by Clay+Pigeon+-TPF-VS- · · Score: 1

      Not all fed prisons are min security. I worked for the trial agent for a narcotics case for 3 months. The defendants were placed in a maximum security prison (not a club fed).

      --
      Viral software licensing is not freedom, it is in fact GNU/Socialism.
    29. Re:An honest question.. by agbinfo · · Score: 1

      What I have never really understood is why the company has to pay a fine. Sure if the company is privately owned, that makes sense but why do all the stockholders have to pay for the executives' unlawful acts.

      If an executive robs a bank, then he goes to jail and the company doesn't have to pay. Why is this different? Put the executives in jail and have them pay the entire cost.

      At the very least, I hope that the shareholders can sue these thieves in a class action suit or through that the company can sue the executives for loss the cost of the fine and the cost of litigation.

    30. Re:An honest question.. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      No way. 1000k is not enough!! make it $1M to make sure it never happens again!

    31. Re:An honest question.. by Bastard+of+Subhumani · · Score: 0
      For us, thats like getting hit with a fine of two year's take home salary (like maybe $80k to $100k - I said take home, not gross.) Not something that would destroy us ... no, come to think of it that would destroy some of us.
      Bear in mind that these executives probably earn upward of half a million a year. On top of that there's stock options - and those presumably ramped up nicely due the increased profits resulting from the price fixing.

      So it's more like losing six months salary, after winning the lottery.

      --
      Only three things are certain; death, taxes, and apocryphal quotations - Ben Franklin.
    32. Re:An honest question.. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The $205K fines were assessed to the individuals who conspired in the price fixing. Plus they will spend some honeymoon nights in the pokey.

      Infineon Technologies (nee "Siemens Semiconductor") agreed to pay $160,000,000 -- is that enough for you?

    33. Re:An honest question.. by sjames · · Score: 1

      Not all fed prisons are min security.

      I'm aware of that. However, all of the federal prisons rich white guys who commit white-collar crimes might go to ARE minimun security.

    34. Re:An honest question.. by Rude+Turnip · · Score: 1

      Because the company and its stockholders benefitted. When you own stock in a company, you are an owner of that company.

    35. Re:An honest question.. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I call bullshit. Felony robbery sentences for first-time offenders are significantly less than '20 years' and odds are pretty high that by the time they rack up their first robbery charge (unless the crime involved physical harm to the victim) they have copped a couple of misdemeanor pleas over other felony incidents.

      Also, consider that odds of someone getting hurt in a robbery (robbery = misappropriation of property by force or immediate threat of force) are high. People do _not_ get physically hurt by white collar crime.

      If you want to equate price fixing to 'blue collar' crime, try joyriding... that'll get the repeat offender a month or two with good time.

    36. Re:An honest question.. by nacturation · · Score: 1

      I hope you're right. But this *IS* America, so rich white corporate execs don't suffer prison time quite the same way everyone else does. Remind me again which cell block Ken Lay, Jeff Skilling, and Bernard Ebbers are in?

      I guess a different one than Martha Stewart. ;-)

      --
      Want to improve your Karma? Instead of "Post Anonymously", try the "Post Humously" option.
    37. Re:An honest question.. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You forgot to mention the negro convicted of $1000 robbery shot two 7-11 clerks in the head after they laid down on the floor. Texas is great in that respect, gun crimes get full punishment by law, nothing lawyers can do about it.

    38. Re:An honest question.. by arose · · Score: 1

      Yes, if it's in my account...

      --
      Analogies don't equal equalities, they are merely somewhat analogous.
    39. Re:An honest question.. by Barryke · · Score: 1

      I'd take you serious if you where not posting anonymously - afraid its gona hurt your karma?

      --
      Hivemind harvest in progress..
    40. Re:An honest question.. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I'd log in if I took slashdork discussions seriously. I am sure there are other attorneys here who do take these things seriously who'll confirm that this the way violent felony sentencing works.

    41. Re:An honest question.. by MasterOfMagic · · Score: 1

      "Conjugal visits? Not that I'm aware of. Minimum security prison is no picnic. I have a client in there now. The trick is to kick someone's ass or become someone's bitch. Then everything will be alright."

    42. Re:An honest question.. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      I do not have an authorative source on this, but I have heard that quite a few Russians come into Northern Norway and go shoplifting. Not professional shoplifting, just shoplifting food that they can eat. They do this primarily during winter, when the weather on the Kola pennisula is bitterly cold.

      They do not mind being caught. Being caught is a bonus, as they get a warm room and food. If they do get a prison sentence (not very likely) it will hardly be in one of the few maximum security prisons. Most likely they are escorted over the border after the red tape has been sorted out. There are friendly lawyers who make sure there will be a lot of red tape.

  2. In the mean time by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    Infineon blames low chip fixed price for bankruptcy.

  3. Flash: Greed comes to Man Kind by rinoid · · Score: 4, Interesting

    Is this surprising?

    The rest of the world is getting obese just like Americans... everyone is greedy to a point. Some are just able to carry their greed to the point of complete selfishness and totally ignore the high percentage of people who have a hard time just keeping a roof over their heads.

    What the heck will it take? Evolution of the human species? I always think back to those old Star Trek episodes where they land on some planet where the inhabitants laugh kindly at Earth's culture because they have learned to live without greed, take care of everyone, and actually enjoy sex rather than codify it.

    I don't know why I want to write this... mod at your leisure.

    1. Re:Flash: Greed comes to Man Kind by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      I've always been of the understanding that greed is dependant on pride. IE, You deserve more because "You're worth it".

      Back pre-rennaissance, pride was shunned. It was the highest sin against god, it was what got us kicked out of eden. (if you believe in the bible, I dont personally but it has some interesting reading in it)

      We could make it possible again where society shuns pride and earthly possessions, however, not everyone will do it, and the ones that won't will take advantage of everyone else. How can you argue with someone who thinks they're better than you if you don't think very highly of yourself anyway.

      Interesting tangent we've taken.

    2. Re:Flash: Greed comes to Man Kind by TCaptain · · Score: 1

      Unfortunately this IS the evolution of the human species and greed will win.

      Think about it, who's thriving right now? Greedy *$$h*les who make the rules for the rest and break them at their leisure.

      I mean, any one of those execs who will be fined 250G made a lot more than that, and with ANY reasonably skilled lawyer will avoid even minimal jail time. Know what that spells? Profit.

      I make millions and I'm fined thousands, that's the cost of doing business.

      Sigh.

      --
      "I'm not a procrastinator, I'm temporally challenged"
    3. Re:Flash: Greed comes to Man Kind by sploxx · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Your obesity comparison is a bit funny... but
      to add something to this:

      IMHO such things are the reason why there are no free markets and why there never will be really "free markets". Good that they got caught doing this, but this is only the tip of the iceberg.

      People lament over and over again how 'the free market will fix every problem and is the most efficient solution there is...'. Problem is that somehow the feedback of the corporations back onto the government to change the rules and/or the violation of rules (to not abandon competition in this case) removes all oversight and fairness.

      In this 'no-oversight' free market, every participant has to agree to somehow
      1. be very greedy in a rational way to stay competitive
      but also 2. to strictly obey all rules and not to try to use money to influence those rules.

      This is a highly unstable condition and mostly the experiment goes awry well before this condition is ever met.

      It is an utopia and I'd be glad if more of those market-fans would recognize this and stop bashing the left for their utopias... we all have dreams.
      With this I'm also not trying to say that utopias are bad. But one has to remind oneself that in reality, the best you can make are approximations.

    4. Re:Flash: Greed comes to Man Kind by a_hofmann · · Score: 1

      I fear that greed is a feeling as natural as hunger or love. Our human mind is a complex weave of many different aspects, some being good, some bad.

      Ethics teach that a selfish attitude does not help anyone, the last being one self, in the long run. But that idea is as old as human culture and religion, and we seemingly didn't learn much from that time until today.

      You can always try better as individual person, but don't expect the same from society as a whole...

    5. Re:Flash: Greed comes to Man Kind by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      Let's also not forget "Thou shalt not covet thy neighbours Ox". Like you I'm not a belivier, but it seems like the Bible is pretty clear on this; Pride and Greed are bad.

    6. Re:Flash: Greed comes to Man Kind by h4rm0ny · · Score: 2, Insightful


      I fear that greed is a feeling as natural as hunger or love.

      Greed is normally restrained by empathy. Would you take the food from your partner, or your children or your friends for yourself? Would you even steal money from casual acquaintances? Almost certainly not. In all these cases, these are people you can see and recieve feedback from.

      In the business world, you seldom see your victims. In actuality, steps are taken to avoid it. Those who are rich often psychologically divorce the poor into a seperate category, denying they are people like themselves. It's a way of cutting off that feedback.

      --

      Aide-toi, le Ciel t'aidera - Jeanne D'Arc.
    7. Re:Flash: Greed comes to Man Kind by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I bought so many DRAM sticks I had to sell my house :(

    8. Re:Flash: Greed comes to Man Kind by mOdQuArK! · · Score: 1

      Dunno, I always thought of greed as being driven by personal insecurity - trying to gain more material possessions so that you don't worry about being crushed by external forces. The "I deserve this!" attitude is more of a rationale for _why_ they're so desperate to grab all those resources.

      For some people, though, there doesn't appear to be any form of feedback which says "enough!" I personally think that the "greed is good" meme which is constantly echoed & reinforced throughout the U.S. society has a great deal to do with this loss of feedback.

    9. Re:Flash: Greed comes to Man Kind by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I don't really think greed is dependant upon pride. Upon reflection, it seems to be a simple hoarding instinct which our evolutionary ancestors probably needed in order to avoid starving to death during the winter. I would see a fish's tendency to eat itself to death to be another expression of what is essentially the same instinct.

      Though I do think that having an abnormally low (as in psychologically unhealthy low) level of self-esteem can result in failing to act upon one's greed. This might be why it seems like pride is related. :)

    10. Re:Flash: Greed comes to Man Kind by ScrewMaster · · Score: 1

      Why keep picking on us? Come on, admit it: you nurse a secret desire to barrel down the highway at 90+ MPH in a 9 MPG SUV. Unless you mean that we're literally becoming fat in which case would have to agree with you. I know I could stand to lose a few pounds. But I deny that the average American citizen is somehow more "greedy" than anyone else on the planet: our way of life has given us a lot of options to choose from but that doesn't make us greedy. It just makes us more successful. Rather than bitching and moaning about that all the time, any nation that would like achieve the same things (assuming they consider that to be a good road to follow) should look hard at those particular aspects of our society that made it possible. Japan did, with tremendous success. China is doing just that (whether they can manage to balance the requisite freedom required to maintain an innovative, high-tech society with the long-term desire of a totalitarian state to remain a totalitarian state remains to be seen.) India is on the rise as well. All of the above are tough competitors from our perspective ... hopefully we'll get the lead out and start competing again before we lose it all.

      As soon as we define the excessive desire for money and power as the disease that it is, and see that those who are afflicted with this terrible disorder are properly treated (and for those who prove to be incurable, prevented from being in positions where they could injure others) things will get better. I don't see that happening for a while though.

      Notice that I say "excessive" desire since ambition, in and of itself, is not a bad thing. It's often a good thing because it motivates us to work hard to improve our lot in life. But when one's personal ambition becomes dangerous to others, it's time for a reality check.

      Actually, in Roddenberry's Star Trek universe, by the time the Kirk's Enterprise was built the human race had largely achieved what you said about living without greed, etc. Certainly they had learned to enjoy sex (look how many times Kirk got laid, for example.)

      The other rather unrealistically-monolithic species (Vulcans, Klingons, Andorians, Romulans and so forth) were essentially plot devices that Roddenberry used to explore different aspects of human culture and psychology. It was pretty effective, when you think about it.

      --
      The higher the technology, the sharper that two-edged sword.
    11. Re:Flash: Greed comes to Man Kind by sjames · · Score: 1

      Think about it, who's thriving right now? Greedy *$$h*les who make the rules for the rest and break them at their leisure.

      Greed may or may not be a long term successful strategy. The greedy population often does fairly well, but inevitably pushes too hard, then heads get chopped off and mansions get burned down (periodic population crash) and the cycle begins again.

      In actuality, greed may be more of a negative trait in the sense of representing the lsck of rather than the presense of something. Small societies, that is isolated communities seem to have little problem with greed. The larger a society gets, the more problems it has. Perhaps greed is nothing more than a failure of charity to scale well.

    12. Re:Flash: Greed comes to Man Kind by Loco3KGT · · Score: 1

      Fuck you and that comment. Greed predates American culture. Look at the Roman and Grecian empires. Look at the whole reason white people came to North America, South America, and Latin America. Look at the reason white people went to Africa. Look at the reason India was a Brittish colony for so long. It wasn't for furthering other societies.

      Americans did not invent greed. It's just that like most things, we do it better.

      --
      Blessed be he who reads this post, Cursed be he who tells my boss.
    13. Re:Flash: Greed comes to Man Kind by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Sadly, having lived through Maggie's Britain at the end of the 70' and through the 80's I have to say that the US has a long way to go to get anywhere near worldclass greed, corruption and stupidity.

      And living through the ongoing social crash that resulted, I'd suggest that the US is probably advised not to aim for world class in this field.

    14. Re:Flash: Greed comes to Man Kind by Sloppy · · Score: 1
      Heh. It's not even a human thing. My cat will eat all the food I give him, and has no remorse about eating off my plate too, if I'm not paying attention. I bet a T-Rex acts the same way. Or an ameoba.

      Greed isn't some kind of species flaw; it's right there in the premise of game theory. It's mathematical.

      --
      As copyright owner of this comment, I authorize everyone to defeat any technological measure which limits access to it.
    15. Re:Flash: Greed comes to Man Kind by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Pride destroyed Magincia! Pride has no love, truth, or courage.

  4. Now why couldn't the DOJ have by advocate_one · · Score: 2, Interesting

    applied a similar punishment to Microsoft for having violated the Sherman Act??? That's just as serious and the consequences for the customers were just as severe. Artificially raised prices as a result of the monopoly and a lack of choice.

    --
    Donald 'Duck' Dunn: We had a band powerful enough to turn goat piss into gasoline.
    1. Re:Now why couldn't the DOJ have by One+Blue+Ninja · · Score: 5, Insightful

      Because MS is an American company, so the DOJ/US Gov't make money off MS. Infineon is an "evil company" because they're "foreign", and taking advantage of us poor Americans. If it's the other way around, the DOJ doesn't give a damn. Plus, the DOJ is currently too worried about porn.

    2. Re:Now why couldn't the DOJ have by Bastard+of+Subhumani · · Score: 0
      Plus, the DOJ is currently too worried about porn.
      If they're worried that they can't find any, they must be really really stupid.
      --
      Only three things are certain; death, taxes, and apocryphal quotations - Ben Franklin.
    3. Re:Now why couldn't the DOJ have by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It's only because the CIA have been restricting their access to the Internet.

    4. Re:Now why couldn't the DOJ have by Anonym0us+Cow+Herd · · Score: 1

      If they're (the DOJ) worried that they can't find any (pr0n), they must be really really stupid.

      Or maybe, they find it, and they are just shocked!

      They can't believe their eyes!

      So shocked in fact that they have to check again the next day to see if what they saw yesterday was real or not. Upon confirming that it was indeed real, they are so shocked that they are unable to initiate any action. They have to bookmark the site so that they can reconfirm that such evil is actually taking place within our sacred borders.

      --
      The price of freedom is eternal litigation.
    5. Re:Now why couldn't the DOJ have by Bastard+of+Subhumani · · Score: 0

      The director keeps the netnanny admin password on a post-it under his desk. Don't tell anybody, though.

      --
      Only three things are certain; death, taxes, and apocryphal quotations - Ben Franklin.
  5. Where does the money go? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Interesting

    Just interesting to where and how the money gets distributed.

    1. Re:Where does the money go? by secolactico · · Score: 1

      Just interesting to where and how the money gets distributed.

      I'm guessing 10% for the lawyers, the rest for the feds.

      --
      No sig
  6. Of course not. by nurb432 · · Score: 1

    Its not about the consumer, its about the feds getting some extra bucks.

    --
    ---- Booth was a patriot ----
  7. 6 months? by _w00d_ · · Score: 5, Insightful

    We need stiffer penalties against crimes like this. 6 months and $250,000? These execs stand to make tons more conducting illegal business than what they'll have to give up if they get caught. There has to be many more companies using illegal business practices in the US to get ahead, they just haven't been caught yet. This sentencing doesn't seem like it will be a real deterrent for that kind of behavior either.

    1. Re:6 months? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      Every now and then (very rarely), an exec found guilty of wrongdoing will be banned from ever being in a board or CxO position at a corporation again.

      It's usually reserved for making an example out of people though, so you see it for Martha Stewart types of criminals rather than for well-connected Enron types of criminals.

    2. Re:6 months? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yes, I wonder, exactly when were these laws written? This might have been a decent fine 20 years ago. But now... hah the execs could pay this out of pocket and only feel a little hurt that they can't pay off that other house till next year. 6 mo. in prison? Yeah right, it'll end in just a fine. Threaten these guys with 5 and it might be a little more realistic.

    3. Re:6 months? by drinkypoo · · Score: 2, Insightful

      I agree the financial fine needs to be a bit stiffer but so does the prison situation - specifically, we need to send these people to federal pound me in the ass prison, not some cushy place where they get their own room and they get to play croquet with their fellow white-collar inmates on the weekends.

      As I said in a comment over in the bhopal disaster revisited story, the threat of prison sentences and other punishment can actually be effective with these people because they have something to lose. It's not like they're an impoverished mother of three with a crack habit who wishes it would all just stop. They're rich white men with a good standing in society, whose car probably costs about ten times as much as someone who lives below the poverty line makes in a year. Take away their ill-gotten gains and throw them in a prison where they'll get cornholed and infected with an STD when they pull this kind of shit, and I guarantee things will change - not the least of which will be our judicial and corrections systems. There are people who have been thrown in prison under three strikes laws for stupid shit like drug posession offenses, who are now subject to prison rape. HIV is a serious problem among our prison population, and it's possible to get incarcerated and infected because you're a careless pot smoker. Is this our kinder, gentler America?

      I only rant on like that because shit like that would not continue if rich white men were being thrown into those prisons. No one with money (thus power) cares about the situation (or, they're making money on it, and therefore they want to maintain the current system) and it won't change until they do. The system is broken from top to bottom, and the damage is all due to greed.

      --
      "You're right," Fisheye says. "I should have set it on 'whip' or 'chop.'"
    4. Re:6 months? by karnal · · Score: 1

      "and it's possible to get incarcerated and infected because you're a careless pot smoker. "

      Ummm, you need to have a LOT of pot on you for them to haul you off to jail, IIRC. Something about anything under an ounce or something is just possession, if I'm correct. Anything higher, it could be possession with intent, or possibly trafficing (sp?).

      --
      Karnal
    5. Re:6 months? by G-funk · · Score: 1

      I've never met a pothead who's never bought at least an ounce at once for a party, or for a week. It just makes more sense to do that than buy it by the rigger. Doesn't mean you deserve to get "effed in the a" by some rapist / murderer. America is seriously fucked up.

      --
      Send lawyers, guns, and money!
    6. Re:6 months? by Justice8096 · · Score: 1

      White isn't an issue in this - being rich is. If they were rich black or oriental men they'ed still be free. The only reason that there seems to be a corralation with race is that rich people (men and women) whose families have been rich for a long time have more connections will always have it easier. People who are connected with old families because they are famous will also have it easier.
      Even if this were not so, federal prison would still be easier for the rich - all they would have to do is pay off enough inmates to protect them.
      Besides, how many rapists, killers and gang lords do you think are going to be saying "Damn you Ken Lay, I lost my pension over your Enron dealings?" or "Listen - I am so pissed over the Bhopal incident... I think I'm gonna cut you up."

    7. Re:6 months? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Hm, stiffer fines.

      So what would be the appropriate fine for Bhopal?

      Before you answer, remember that Union Carbide is a US company while Infinion isn't.

  8. YRO? by bobbagum · · Score: 3, Insightful

    Why exactly is this in your rights online? Maybe we need a legal section, or perhaps evil companies section

    1. Re:YRO? by Taladar · · Score: 2, Funny

      Without memory chips your computer would have a hard time trying to go online, wouldn't it?

    2. Re:YRO? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      If you can't grasp that YRO is and always has been the legal section, that's your problem, not the editors.

    3. Re:YRO? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Then lets fucking call it "Legal Section" and stop pretending that it's anything at all to do with "Your Rights".

      Actually fuck that no. Lets call it "Michaels Snide Bitchfest: Stuff Michael Believes In"

    4. Re:YRO? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      > If you can't grasp that YRO is and always has been the legal section, that's your problem, not the editors.

      Right. Perhaps we should extend this naming convention:

      Apple = WiFi, War, and Interviews
      Books = Programming, Games, and Linux
      Apache = Computers, Nasa, and Lego

      Hell even better, lets just stick everything in "Your Rights Online", after all it's all "online," and it's "Your Right" to read it.

      Shit, you really are a moron.

  9. Sometimes this sort of behaviour may not be so bad by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 4, Insightful

    I can't help but remember the time when there was a glut of RAM, too many factories were built and RAM was cheap. Yes, that was good, in the short term, but the problem was that the low price lead to manufacturers going out of business and prices shot up.

    The RAM industry is harsh. It's a commodity, and there's probably little profit in it. Little enough to make starting up a RAM factory, or updating the tech, a big financial risk. Above all we need stability in it.

    Yes, market economies are good, but not perfect. Maybe this is an example where some amount of regulation is required to assure a steady supply of quality RAM? In a sense, price fixing can be compared to regulation. It's usually illegal and often undesirable, but maybe sometimes it serves a purpose?

    Yes, I'd like to get cheap RAM, but not at the expense of quality, innovation or stability. It may be bad for us in the long run that Infineon is going out of business. As I understand it, the market is dominated by four major players. Will there be three now? Will it eventually become even more of a monopoly? I hope not. It would be to our detriment.

    Off topic - I wonder when DDR2 is going to ramp up to the point where it's actually better than DDR. From what I've seen, the extra latency kills any performance gains it might have with current chipsets and clock speeds.

  10. Still a lot of bad business out there by SwedeGeek · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Anyone think the Infineon execs will take this as badly as the CEO of CyberNET (see this article)??

    It somewhat still amazes me that these people think because they are supposedly good at business that they are going to be good at breaking the law. At what point does making an amazingly fat paycheck stop a person from wanting more? As incidences like these continue to happen, I get closer and closer to believing it never ends... and that's not even mentioning the big ones like Enron and MCI.

    Here's a vote to salary caps in the corporate world!!!

    1. Re:Still a lot of bad business out there by alphax45 · · Score: 1

      In Nelson Muntz voice:

      "HA HA"

      --
      K Man
    2. Re:Still a lot of bad business out there by gl4ss · · Score: 1

      they were 'good' in the business *because* they were breaking the law.

      the hard thing for them would have been to stop early enough to not get so caught, once they started seeing the profits(that in their mind was partly because of breaking the law).

      --
      world was created 5 seconds before this post as it is.
    3. Re:Still a lot of bad business out there by ilikejam · · Score: 1
      --
      C-x C-s C-x k
    4. Re:Still a lot of bad business out there by Feanturi · · Score: 1

      At what point does making an amazingly fat paycheck stop a person from wanting more?

      Money calls to itself, the more you have, the more you *need*. Particularly if it appears to be coming from an easy source, the urge is to milk it as completely as possible, for tomorrow may bring ruin for those that didn't hoard as much of it. Those of us that aren't rich, that don't have access to ways of making big lumps of money with a handshake and a smile, have still experienced this feeling in video games, haven't we? I know I have, in MMO's. Having several million credits is great, but it is not as good as having twice as much as that, and then that's not quite enough either.

      Ride the gravy train till it breaks, then look for another, that's the rule. Never mind that you have enough money for yourself and your desendants for the next three generations, that isn't enough. I'm not supporting it at all, I hate that mindset, but there it is.

    5. Re:Still a lot of bad business out there by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      > Here's a vote to salary caps in the corporate world!!!

      No need for a salary cap, a 110% tax rate above, say, 150k will do just fine.

    6. Re:Still a lot of bad business out there by WhatAmIDoingHere · · Score: 1

      Don't forget the Adelphia family. The father and sons who stole Over One Billion Dollars from their company.

      If the fines are in the 250,000 region, what's that teaching these people?

      Steal a shitload, ruin people's lives, and we'll take a small amount of your money as punishment and give you 6mo in a minimum security federal resort.

      Why not take all their ill-gotten gains and lock them away for how long it would take the lowest earner in their company to make the kind of scratch that they had stolen?

      I would enjoy watching that case on CourtTV.

      --
      Not a Twitter sockpuppet... but I wish I was.
    7. Re:Still a lot of bad business out there by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yes lets make all the rich people move out of the U.S.

  11. Quotes: by legirons · · Score: 1
    "Infineon has taken aggressive steps to clarify compliance requirements with the US anti-trust law."
    But will it reduce the price of RAM?
    1. Re:Quotes: by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      But will it reduce the price of RAM?


      Uh, NO. someone has to pay that 160 Million dollar fine........and it will be us, the Consumers....

  12. 6 months prison ? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0


    so they will be out in 3months for good behaviour (paroll), if thats all it takes for a multi million dollar executive paycheck where do i sign up ?

    prison is supposed to be a detterant but when you can break the law, collect millions of dollars in bonuses and only spend 3months inside for your crime while your family lives in absolute luxury i would say the system has failed (ken lay would probably disagree)

    perhaps if a hitman decided to take out all these corporate criminals with a sniper rifle and confiscating all their assets so their family can suffer too they might think twice before ripping investors/people off

    sometimes vigilatism is what it takes when the law is percieved to be wrong (see lycos for details)

  13. Hope they learned their lesson... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    ... don't get caught! Price fixing done right is a gravy train like none other.

  14. Re:Sometimes this sort of behaviour may not be so by aldoman · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Sorry, you are suggesting that we regluate the RAM market?!

    The fact of the matter over the last 5 years, RAM prices have dropped and sizes have went through the roof. There is no reason _not_ to expect this to continue.

    CPUs are made by 2 main companies, yet innovation and price drops are very frequent. RAM has 3, so it's even more competitive if you use that logic.

  15. Bah by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Don't get my hopes up like that. I briefly misread the title as beginning "Infinium Execs Plead Guilty" and my heart soared. Then my eyes focused and I was all disappointed.

    Oh well, I guess it's just a matter of time.

  16. german citizen by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    These people are german citizens (as Infineon is german company). Why did they even bother to go in the USA for trial?
    Anyway, what rights does US have to proscute international price fixing?

    1. Re:german citizen by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Extradition treaty.

      Besides, the last thing Germans or anyone in the government of Europe wants is to antagonize the US who now has a pattern of being unreasonable, that the populace has found politically attractive. That is one nervous glance we see occasionally peeping over the Atlantic.

  17. translation by frovingslosh · · Score: 5, Insightful
    Infineon agreed in October to pay a $160 million fine for its role in the conspiracy, according to the Justice Department

    This translates into:

    Infineon stole so much that they could easily pay a $160 million cut to the government, who wanted their share, even though they did nothing to deserve it. In return they let the company continue to do business as usual, and suggest that they price fix in less obvious ways next time. They also asked the company to offer up a few scape goats, who would get a token amount of time in a federal luxury prison like Camp Cupcake or Club Fed, but would be out in even less time than Martha Stewart. The people who bought the artifically high priced memory get screwed.

    --
    I'm an American. I love this country and the freedoms that we used to have.
    1. Re:translation by martin100 · · Score: 1

      if the prices were so "artificially" high, then why did people buy? and if they own something, who is the government to say how much it should sell for? apparently it wasnt so expensive that people stopped willfully purchasing it. i guess the government hates when people exchange money for goods and services at prices agreed to by both parties. i dont need the tyrannical force of the government taking my tax money to help protect me from paying too much for memory. maybe some other chumps do though. i can decide what costs too much and what doesnt on my own. remember, only the government can force you to purchase something at a price not agreed upon by you. and we are buying frivolous lawsuits.

    2. Re:translation by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Insightful
      if the prices were so "artificially" high, then why did people buy?

      You are aware that a supply/demand graph is continuous and it's not that you hit the optimal point and everyone buys your product.. right?
      So there were people willing to buy, but the point is that even though someone else *could* sell for less, they agreed to keep it artificially high. That's collusion against the free market. The point is to let the market decide what the price should be through competition, not some asshats who are already making more money than the GDP of some countries.

    3. Re:translation by frovingslosh · · Score: 4, Insightful

      What part of Price-Fixing is not clear?

      --
      I'm an American. I love this country and the freedoms that we used to have.
    4. Re:translation by realdpk · · Score: 1

      Agreed. I don't think you can call something "overpriced" after you've bought it. If you paid money for it, it was at exactly the right price or below.

    5. Re:translation by Bastard+of+Subhumani · · Score: 0
      if the prices were so "artificially" high, then why did people buy?
      Because they wanted/needed the chips, and that was the best (well, the only) deal thay could get. Why was it the only deal? Because there was a cartel. Sure they had a choice - of the Hobson's variety.
      --
      Only three things are certain; death, taxes, and apocryphal quotations - Ben Franklin.
    6. Re:translation by iive · · Score: 1

      Man, this translation is wonderful!!! Have you ever thought becoming an jurnalist? I am sure a lot of people will want to read translated to normal news!!!!! All you need to start is website :)

    7. Re:translation by nacturation · · Score: 1

      Agreed. I don't think you can call something "overpriced" after you've bought it. If you paid money for it, it was at exactly the right price or below.

      Yes and no. Technically you are correct... paying the inflated price is a better alternative than being denied the benefit of what you're paying for. Such as if a family member were dying in hospital and your car runs off the road into a ditch. That $2000 bill from the tow truck who just happened to be the only one available may be overpriced relative to normal charges, but it's still a bargain compared to not making it to the hospital in time and having your family member die before you could be there.

      --
      Want to improve your Karma? Instead of "Post Anonymously", try the "Post Humously" option.
    8. Re:translation by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Everytime I buy gasoline for my car I comment that it's "overpriced". Except I'm forced to pay for it one way or another if I expect to get to work in a reasonable amount of time.

    9. Re:translation by Eil · · Score: 1


      who would get a token amount of time in a federal luxury prison like Camp Cupcake

      Not federal pound-me-in-the-ass prison?

    10. Re:translation by martin100 · · Score: 1

      you say the point is to let the market decide. what is the market comprised of? buyers and sellers. not the government. only the government has the power of corcion. all other decisions were voluntary. thats the free market. why is the government deciding what prices are "fair"? they are an outside force, they make restrictions with laws, something buyers and sellers cannot do to each other. government intervention violates the rights of sellers, who own their products, and therefore can sell them at any price they like, or not sell them at all. why should my tax dollars go to fucking with companies so you can get the prices you want? so again, if the product is too expensive, do not buy it. if other people think the price is ok, then they will buy, why intervene? your attitude: "me wanty cheap stuff!"

    11. Re:translation by martin100 · · Score: 1

      what part of "nobody is forcing you to buy anything" is not clear? some things sell for more than you would like. too bad. they arent your items, so you have no right to tell anyone how much they sell for. nobody defines "fair" price except the owner of the item. it is not our right to tell others what their items are worth. they are not our items.

  18. Re:Sometimes this sort of behaviour may not be so by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Hmm, I haven't noticed RAM prices drop significantly over the last few years.

    Speeds have gone up, yes, but for a good quality piece of RAM using "current" technology, you're still paying a lot per MB. I've tried buying cheap RAM - these days it just isn't worth it. Too many things to go wrong. I've had several cheap DDR DIMMs die on me. That never happened to me with SDR. So I don't agree that prices have gone down significantly.

  19. Re:Price Fixing by arose · · Score: 1

    Microsoft, Gates, Ballmer. How sick are you now?

    --
    Analogies don't equal equalities, they are merely somewhat analogous.
  20. Priorites? by MisterSquid · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Some are just able to carry their greed to the point of complete selfishness and totally ignore the high percentage of people who have a hard time just keeping a roof over their heads.

    You mean like these people

    What amazes|saddens|stuns|infuriates me is that price-fixing which targets the arguably already-wealthy who can afford high technology purchases is processed relatively quickly while the at best lethal neglect of the managers and owners of Union Carbide will never see a court docket.

    Dumb, stupid me. DRAM prices affect larger markets. The deaths of thousands of impoverished coolies affect no one.

    --
    blog
    1. Re:Priorites? by Lehk228 · · Score: 0, Offtopic

      Simple, the victems of Union Carbide had two properties which made them ineligible for sympathy in the US.

      1. They are not American
      2. They are brown

      I am certain that a disaster killing 1 million or more non-white non-americans would get less than a week of coverage, and only one front page and one feature story. Then 15 years later there would be a $disaster_site Revisited TV special and nobody would watch it.

      <s>
      Proud to be an american
      </sarcasm>

      --
      Snowden and Manning are heroes.
    2. Re:Priorites? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You know, I'm getting really sick and tired of reading people whining about Bhopal. People comparing as "worse than Chernoybl".

      Got news for ya, guys. No one cares. Really. The only thing you're doing is ticking off people who might REMOTELY care by somehow connecting EVERYTHING to it.

      You can blame the managers, and yes, they probably do share part of the blame. But the workers themselves were the ones who caused the disaster.

      Besides, Indians breed like damn rabbits anyway, 40,000 injured/dead is a drop in the bucket.

    3. Re:Priorites? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I bet you would care more if it was your wife, or perhaps your children, who died in that city.

      People like you are part of the problem.

  21. Re:Sometimes this sort of behaviour may not be so by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    No, I was not suggesting anything. Merely pointing out that cut-throat behaviour in a business which makes products whose steady supply we rely on for building our computers may not always be to our advantage.

  22. pls die stpd fck by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    kthx. I know your IT job is in danger of being outsourced, but really you should have chosen a real career instead.

    1. Re:pls die stpd fck by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      kthx.

      Bless you.

      I know your IT job is in danger of being outsourced, but really you should have chosen a real career instead.

      Are keys on your keyboard broken? No? Then use them you fucking twit. And go troll elsewhere.

  23. Profiting? by heller · · Score: 4, Interesting

    See, what confuses me is that other felons aren't allowed to profit from their felonies. That's why drug dealer's houses and cars and boats are taken away. But, these execs still get to keep what they earned during the time they were committing their felonies (minus the 3 months pay they're being fined). I guess it's just more proof that crime does pay.

    1. Re:Profiting? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Three month's salary? There is amusing symbolism in that marriage analogy.

      Okay, maybe more depressing than amusing.

  24. 6 months is a fair amount? by CheesyPeteza · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Rob a bank and you get 25 years. Steal millions and get 6 months. :/

    1. Re:6 months is a fair amount? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I'd imagine a 25 year sentence would involve physical violence, or at least the threat of violence. Also, bank robbery offers you no choice, where you don't HAVE to buy the overpriced ram.

    2. Re:6 months is a fair amount? by imsabbel · · Score: 1

      not to mention what "overpriced" actually means:
      At that time the cutthroat competition lead to sales below manufaturing cost, the fixed prices were just as high as the goods were worth...

      --
      HI O WISE PRINCE. WHT TOOK U SO DAM LONG?
    3. Re:6 months is a fair amount? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      That's the life of the free market. Oversupplying a good to the point of selling below costs means you have to (a) reduce production, (b) raise prices and risk having to sell remaining ram at even lower rate, (c) try to diversify ram production to produce a new market where there isn't a huge supply, and/or (d) sell enough of your stock that you become low on supply again. It reminds me of the story of farmers who never did a through d, resulting in a downward spiral in food prices (as well as many forclosures). The government ended up stepping in and is still to some extent providing subsidies to force farmers into not planting or to buying up "excess" crop so that food prices remain artificially higher than they would be. But at least with farms there's the excuse of trying to prevent starvation; forclosures cause sporadic drops and then rises (when someone else buys the land) in food supply which can lead to a higher starvation rate.

    4. Re:6 months is a fair amount? by back_pages · · Score: 1
      Lou Reed said:

      There are problems in the times, but none of them are mine
      I'm beginning to see the light.

  25. Prices were fixed artificially low by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    to prevent superior competing technology from gaining traction

  26. Re:Sometimes this sort of behaviour may not be so by blahplusplus · · Score: 0

    Thats why planned/regulated economies are better then free market capitalism in regards to certain industries that will always exist.

    Planned economies if the world were under one government would also prevent exploitation and businesses moving out of reach of the law of the land.

  27. Get ECC by ZorinLynx · · Score: 1

    Cheap ECC DRAM may generate ECC errors now and then, but since they are correctable, you will experience much better reliability over cheap non-ECC DRAM.

    ECC only costs a tiny bit more and you get a much less error-prone system. Some systems can even alert you to when ECC errors happen, so if you have a notoriously bad stick, you'll know about it harmlessly, instead of through random unexplainable system crashes.

    I can't believe systems are still made without ECC today, when the incremental cost is so low.

    -Z

    1. Re:Get ECC by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      That's a great idea, but do you know of any Athlon64 boards that take ECC RAM? I've not seen any - maybe they exist but looking for boards that support ECC (unfortunately) greatly reduces your choices :( I *do* want to get an Opteron system, which I would imagine supports ECC, but at the moment I can't justify spending the extra amount of money required for a high end workstation setup.

      Also, I'd rather get RAM that has almost no errors, AND use ECC, rather than *rely* on ECC.

      Also, it's a bit slower typically, but I guess it's worth it. I just wish more boards supported it. I agree, it's dumb that boards are still being made without ECC support. It's not worth saving a few cents to leave out such an important capability.

  28. At least they can get recipes from Martha Stewart. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    nt

  29. Oops by mcc · · Score: 1

    Little problem with the decimal point there, I meant $160 million not $1.6 million. This doesn't change anything I've said though, and that's still less than half of €345 million...

  30. Rambus purchasers should pay attention by Dink+Paisy · · Score: 1
    Based on the article, I believe this lawsuit is related to the allegations that Rambus made earlier. Rambus claimed that DRAM manufacturers were conspiring to price Rambus memory out of the market so they could drive the company out of business and get its technology cheaply.

    Rambus said that Rambus memory should have been priced only slightly higher than SDR SDRAM, based on manufacturing and licensing costs, and that they were always clear with JEDEC on what patents they held and what licensing terms they wanted. Rambus said two things in particular: first, that the high cost of Rambus memory was due to a conspiracy between the DRAM manufacturers, and second, that the claim of submarine patents was a smear campaign by the DRAM manufacturers.

    It seems from this guilty plea that there is enough evidence to prove at least the first of those claims in court. I personally don't have any special insight into who is right, but I do wonder if we were all wrong about Rambus.

    --

    Whoever corrects a mocker invites insult;
    whoever rebukes a wicked man incurs abuse.
    --Proverbs 9:7
    1. Re:Rambus purchasers should pay attention by Lars+T. · · Score: 1

      You mean these guys get fined for selling RAM cheaper?

      --

      Lars T.

      To the guy who modded me down from perfect to terrible Karma - Apple haters still suck

    2. Re:Rambus purchasers should pay attention by Dink+Paisy · · Score: 2, Informative
      The same DRAM manufacturers produced both SDR (and later DDR) DRAM, and Rambus DRAM. Rambus never had fabrication facilities for producing memory, so it relied on the DRAM manufacturers to license its intellectual property, then make and sell RDRAM.

      The price fixing that Rambus alleged was a conspiracy to charge much more for Rambus memory than a competitive market would. Since the same group of companies controlled the supply of both types of memory, they could do this. Rambus claimed that Rambus memory should be about ten percent (IIRC) more expensive than SDR DRAM due to higher manufacturing costs and Rambus IP licensing. The DRAM manufacturers sold it for twice the price of SDR DRAM. If Rambus is correct about the costs, then their claim that the high price of Rambus memory was due to price fixing is plausible.

      --

      Whoever corrects a mocker invites insult;
      whoever rebukes a wicked man incurs abuse.
      --Proverbs 9:7
    3. Re:Rambus purchasers should pay attention by afidel · · Score: 1

      Well they weren't correct from that perspective, there was a LOT more verification steps needed early on in RDRAM's existince. It pushed the fab and material technology of the time MUCH harder than SDR DRAM or even early DDR DRAM. Verification is one of the most expensive components of chips because it takes time (money) and expensive custom machinery to do as well as additional labor or expensive labor replacement devices like sort and pick robots. Basically the inputs would have made RDRAM more expensive anyways. The price collusion was more about trying to drive Hynix from the market to raise long term prices through reduction of world capacity than it was about shutting Rambus from the market, though I'm sure that was a nice side effect for the companies involved.

      --
      There are 4 boxes to use in the defense of liberty: soap, ballot, jury, ammo. Use in that order. Starting now.
    4. Re:Rambus purchasers should pay attention by deaddeng · · Score: 1

      They are fined for colluding, first to drive competitors out of the market--and this succeeded to some extent--and then to coordinate pricing for major OEMs. This is a violation of antitrust laws.

      There are similar investigations underway in Europe and Japan. Infineon isn't done yet, but they got some leniency from the Dept. of Justice for being the first squealer. Still, when is the last time you heard about executives doing jail time for something like this? And the shareholder and consumer class action lawsuits have already been filed.

      Micron, Hynix, and Samsung face the same charges on three continents, and now that at least one conspirator has squealed, the DoJ likely has all the evidence it needs. $160 million will seem a small fine by the time this is over. This is going to cost the DRAM makers billions of $.

      And on the basis of the same evidence, Rambus has already filed a civil antitrust suit. The more DoJ prosecutes and discovers, the more evidence Rambus will have.

      Note to the Dramurai-- if you're going to claim to have a "standards setting" entity like JEDEC, it can't be used to restrain trade or steal IP. Lights out, assholes.

      --
      --- .085 as cool; proving that a little knowledge is dangerous
  31. Troublemakers by Doc+Ruby · · Score: 0, Flamebait

    This is outrageous! Yet another government interference in the free market. When will these all-knowing politicians keep their noses out of commerce, so economics can generate efficiencies, and customers can get on with our vendors in peace? These damn commies in Washington are going to force any capitalists out of the RAM business. Why don't they just go back to lawyering, and leave business and technology to the experts?

    --

    --
    make install -not war

    1. Re:Troublemakers by BattleTroll · · Score: 2, Informative

      What the hell are you on about? Free market does not mean 'companies are free to do what ever the hell they want'!

      The company was found guilty of price fixing, an anti-free market practice. The whole idea behind a free market is that supply and demand have a huge influence over pricing. If you allow companies to conspire to set prices across the board, any power the consumer had to influence prices goes out the window.

      Imagine, if you will, large midwestern agriculture company conspires with world markets to overcharge for grain products. End result? Everyone in the world pays more for the commodity. Do a google search on 'ADM' and 'price fixing' to read about that. Extend that to drug companies, power companies, you name it. Price fixing is bad, very bad, for consumers.

      I suggest you do a little research before going off on a 'government is anti-business' crusade.

    2. Re:Troublemakers by Doc+Ruby · · Score: 1

      I was confused by your ignorance of irony, Battle Troll , until I read your .sig. Then I understood your ignorance of irony.

      --

      --
      make install -not war

    3. Re:Troublemakers by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Bummer that they caught you, huh?

      Meh, pay your fine and take your slap on the wrist.

    4. Re:Troublemakers by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Please do not feed the trolls.

    5. Re:Troublemakers by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Apparently you didn't make your sarcasm clear enough...

    6. Re:Troublemakers by Doc+Ruby · · Score: 1

      Sarcasm is "Flamebait". Welcome to Oceania, 1984.

      --

      --
      make install -not war

  32. Wtf? by Ender+Ryan · · Score: 1
    This is a drop in the bucket, an ice cube next to an ice burg, compared to price fixing by the RIAA, MPAA, Microsoft's monopoly abuse, etc. What about Enron goddammit?

    What a fucking joke. Martha Stewart gets busted for selling $150,000 worth of stock on an insider tip, when she's got BILLIONS, and these guys get "busted", but the real perps with friends in high places get a free ride.

    How many people did these guys, and Martha too, actually really hurt? RAM is still pretty cheap, AFAIK Martha wasn't found to have a history of insider trading... so WTF?

    CDs cost $16 - $20, unreasonable by most peoples' estimation, and the RIAA has been found guilty of price fixing, but noone went to jail. If I want a new retail copy of 'doze XP, it's gonna run over $300, yet all MS's recent competition had to give their stuff away for free, and couldn't get OEMs to preload their stuff even though people were asking for it(BeOS). One of the Enron execs committed suicide out of guilt, and the other execs without a conscience have been given a free ride.

    This is like putting weed smokers in jail for 5 to 10 and letting rapists out after 3 for good behavior. But shit, we do that too in this country, D'oh!

    It seems to me that "Justice" is completely dead in America.

    --
    Sticking feathers up your butt does not make you a chicken - Tyler Durden
    1. Re:Wtf? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Some corrections, and a rather large ones at that:

      1) Martha Stewart was not found guilty, or for that matter, was not even charged by prosecutors for insider trading. Though her actions were quite questionable, there was not enough evidence to support such a charge. Remember innocent until proven guilty? As such, the only charge she was found guilty for was for obstruction of justice (not initially telling investigators everything she knew).

      2) Martha, though quite quite rich, is not worth billions, but rather $300M (after the ~85M drop in her stock value).

      No, this isn't a response to condone her, Infineon, or anyone else's actions/inactions, but merely an attempt to give correct facts.

  33. Ah yes, they're becoming like the Americans by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Because of course people from Germany have never done anything greedy, self-serving or imperialistic before now.

    1. Re:Ah yes, they're becoming like the Americans by Moderatbastard · · Score: 1
      Because of course people from Germany have never done anything greedy, self-serving or imperialistic before now.
      Shhh. I mentioned it once, I think I got away with it.
      --
      1/3 of jokes get modded OT. If you get the joke, mod 1 in 3 insightful/interesting/underrated to restore karma balance.
  34. RAM price charts for 2003, 2004 - bubble in 1H2004 by davidwr · · Score: 1

    The market had a peak in the first half of the year, and memory is only now back to where it was this time last year.

    This chart shows March-December 2004 price levels for 256 meg of PC 2700 DDR. March: $42, June $46, July-November: $38-$40, December: $35. That 5% trading range for 5 months probably postponed a number of purchases. In contrast that same memory was trading in $36-$41 last holiday season.

    PC2100 DDR shows a similar trend in 2003 and 2004.

    More statistics here. Note - if the mouse won't work with the pull-down menus, try your keyboard. January-March are messed up on the 2004 charts, sorry.

    --
    Knowledge is how to play a game, intelligence is how to win, wisdom is knowing what game to play.
  35. Re:Flash: Greed comes to Man Kind - DEMAGOGICAL by faragon · · Score: 1

    Your argument seems to be demagogical for me, as you can argument A->B where A is the Infineon case, and B is "world big problems". And, sorry if I am too much hard, your argumentation it is absoluteny non-sense.

    Industry business is, by design, greedy and competitive; hey, you're living into a heartless neoliberal capitalist society, are this kind of tactics arre new for you? Well, the world, unfortunately it is plenty of them.

    International and local laws avaible to correct these unfair operations should be applied, harder every time the fault is repeated. By the way, related to the human poverty and misery, I hope that some thay will arrive new laws declaring human misery illegal. The easiest way of imposing a point of view is to smash the other. I hope the humanity will not take that way, still to be lazy it is the easiest, I still believe in common efforts to achieve a better world for every one, not just one world for every one. The ideal could be one world for each one, allowing freedom to look with the color that you like, being free de facto (not in the anarchic sense, but socialdemocrat one, respecting the others to be respected, etc).

  36. Re:Sometimes this sort of behaviour may not be so by Fallen+Kell · · Score: 2, Informative

    It was already prooven that DDR2 would not be better then DDR until speeds reached a minimum of 800 Mhz or higher on the FSB. The real difference will be felt at around 1.2 Ghz, which DDR2 can reach, but Intel being Intel (and not actually thinking out tech changes, but believing they can force it down their customers no matter if it is no better then other techs out and more expensive, think RDRAM), has decided to not actually release a chipset to use DDR2 at faster speeds until mid to late 2005. By which time, all customers will have felt the slow performance and get pissed because the PR didn't fit the product. Especially when they are forced to buy something that costs about 1.5-2x the cost of DDR and get no performance gain at all. It is again a case of Intel shooting its foot off in a race because the foot is extra weight, but not realizing that it actually needs that foot to stand on and run with! They have done this many times as of late and it is finally starting to show. Their stock has dropped considerably, their market share has dropped, and God forbid Mr. "I'm in Intel's back pocket" Dell, is going to start selling AMD based systems because companies are demanding it due to lack of progress from Intel over the last 3 years (Intel has been in a stall ever since they released the 3.0C 800FSB P4's, while their competitor has not only ramped up speeds during that time, but also introduced 64bit CPU's as well, which are truely spanking Intel in number crunching, hense why the reason for customer companies' demand for them).

    --
    We were all warned a long time ago that MS products sucked, remember the Magic 8 Ball said, "Outlook not so good"
  37. More Corporate Malfeasance Information by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    There's more wrongdoing going on than just Infineon AG.

    home.comcast.net/~plinius/malfeasance.html

  38. Re:Sometimes this sort of behaviour may not be so by timeOday · · Score: 2, Insightful
    Yes, I'd like to get cheap RAM, but not at the expense of quality, innovation or stability.
    Somehow I don't think price fixing will bolster quality and innovation. And I don't see stability in itself as a good.
    As I understand it, the market is dominated by four major players. Will there be three now? Will it eventually become even more of a monopoly? I hope not. It would be to our detriment.
    That's no reason to allow price fixing. Id argue price fixing is a form of monopoly, since all the producers act as one to collectively manipulate the market price - in essense forming a monopoly. I'm not worried about the number of producers. Sure the barrier to entry is high, but it's a huge market too. And as few a two competitors is enough to keep things competitive, so long as they really hate each other :) (Intel vs AMD).
  39. Damn Government Conspiracy Theorists! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    That's what they are. Conspiracy Theorists! Paranoid goofballs.

  40. When are people going to wake up??? by ActionAL · · Score: 1

    Corporations DO have control of the government. Why? Money. Corporations do change laws and policies to benefit them. Why? Money. Executives do participate in conspiracies. Why? Money.

    At the cost of the citizen. When are people going to fracking wake up and take back our life liberty and freedom? If you think you're a real patriot, wait until the war turns against you.

  41. Europe = reward Infineon! by realitybath1 · · Score: 1

    http://www.theregister.co.uk/2004/03/16/ec_approve s_infineon_state_aid/ They get money handed to them from the euros, and taken from them by the yanks. That article has a link to an older article in which this appears: "Commission officials said that assessment will be based on whether "the proposed project would take place in a sector suffering from structural over-capacity". And they note: "The new Infineon plant is scheduled to produce DRAMs - a market where careful scrutiny of the development of sales proves necessary."" Seeing as how there was an obvious glut in that sector, its amazing these things get passed. Personally, I think white collar crime is the perfect/only place that Sharia law should be implemented. Lets get some blood on those collars!

  42. greed may not be good but selfishness is by gad_zuki! · · Score: 1

    It may not be surprising but it is insulting to see a max sentence of six months for a crime involving MILLIONS. The more the person attempts to steal the more time they should serve. Remind me again how much time you get for stealing a car worth 1,001 dollars?

    >everyone is greedy to a point.

    And who exactly is above this? Greed is extreme selfishness, but we all suffer from selfishness. If we didn't why would we get off our asses, go to school, get a job, start a side project or two or three, etc. You, the poster, obvious have access to a computer and you're literate so you have parken of the "selfishness" you decry pretty well yourself.

    >What the heck will it take?

    Well, less "humans suck" attitude and better ways to deal with ones social and economic problems. A better informed public through a better media. Strict limitations on marketers and ads. Do you really think Americans would be so obese if it wasnt for all that marketing done directly to kids by fast food outlets? etc

  43. The crime earning money while not beeing american by frost22 · · Score: 1

    That whole thing stinks. While US Company Rambus gets off the hook with all its shenanigans (which cost the industry and consumers billions) apparently people working in Germany now get made an example of.

    Disgusting. And, while we are at it - what happend to "no taxation without representation" ? What do you bet US company Micron will not get harmed in this at all, while all the others will take hefty fines ?

    --
    ...and here I stand, with all my lore, poor fool, no wiser than before.
  44. Re:Another honest question.. by edittard · · Score: 0

    How on God's green Earth is this related to rights online?

    --
    At the bottom of the /. main page it says 'Yesterday's News'. Well they got that right.
  45. It's still a scam, just differnet players. by pherris · · Score: 2, Insightful
    Ok, so Schaefer and Corwin have to pay 250k each and the company pays $160m to the US Govt. Like all these fines the US Govt. collects does any of it make it back to those that got burnt over the years? The company I work for buys a over a million a year in DRAM chips so we're been hit by this price fixing. Do we get anything? Of course the answer is no.

    I think companies should be punished for theft and price fixing but I have a problem when the US Govt. just dumps those fines back their coffers (or for tax breaks for the rich instead of reducing the general deficit).

    IMO it's still a scam and the general public is still getting screwed.

    --
    "And a voice was screaming: 'Holy Jesus! What are these goddamn animals?'" - HST
    1. Re:It's still a scam, just differnet players. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      All they are doing is saying it is ok to steal, whatever as long as you give a share to the maffia.

  46. You're absolutely right. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    To the shareholders. The executives should have their families butchered in front of them and then spend their sentence being analy raped by robots.

  47. Re:Sometimes this sort of behaviour may not be so by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    What exactly are you complaining about ? The industry was obviously not so harsh if all the suppliers could agree to not sell any lower than a certain price. If they could not sell lower, there wouldn't need to be any price fixing because supply and demand takes care of it. But they could, except didn't want to, and made sure no one else does, to keep their margins.

  48. yes, the human condition sucks. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    To a very large degree, the very instincts which empowered us to survive on a younger planet are now compelling us to harm one another and ultimately inhibit our true potential as a species.

    What makes a terrorist? The very same level of loyalty and obedience that empowered cave-men to fight to the death for their chief...that is to say, an instinctually-necessary ability to turn off one's capacity for independent thought in order to make the group stronger. All pack animals can do this, and this ability keeps the pack alive.

    What makes an oppressive all-consuming monopoly? The very same hoarding instincts that empowered primitive humans to survive the winter.

    What makes impoverished children? The very same reproductive instincts that kept the species alive in the most dangerous and miserable of circumstances. That is to say, a desire to reproduce that is strong to the point of leaving people feeling incomplete apart from having children, even when it makes absolutely no logical sense (given ones financial state and state in the relationship) to have children.

    Evolution has produced all of these tendencies (and more). I would speculate that ALL of the major problems of our day can be traced back to our inability to act in dis-accordince with our instincts (some people are better at this than others, but the majority suck at it, since the payoff isn't sufficiently visible).

    Will evolution help us overcome this? Or will it require direct tampering (I am thinking nerual-bio integration, genetic manipulation, and so on)? I really don't know, but my money is on direct tampering just because evolution takes too long. :)

  49. funny by Billly+Gates · · Score: 1

    Price fixing is the norm in the industry. Especially if you own a monopoly in say operating systems and Office suites.

    You do not see the government go after them do you? Oh wait its because we need to defend innovation and capitalism.

  50. ProMOS Settlement by Josuah · · Score: 1

    The US$160 million doesn't seem like so much coming right on the heels of the ProMOS settlement.

  51. Potential treble damages for civil actions by mtpruitt · · Score: 1

    As a law student struggling through an antitrust course right now, I can add a few comments. First, remember that these are the individual executives who are pleading guilty, not just the company, which probably means that there is a lot of evidence against them specifically. I am also surprised that these people have already been sentenced. What often happens is that the US Attorney will get the low-level defendants to turn on their peers and testify. After their testimony in another case they are then sentenced. In the current federal sentencing schemes, this is one of the few things that they can use to bargain down their sentence. Otherwise they are pretty bound to a strict calculation of jail time. Perhaps they stonewalled, and refused to help.

    Also, remember that there are civil claims that can be brought by the companies that purchased the DRAM (i.e., Dell) but not the end consumers of the computers (I think). If they are successful, then they get treble damages, which is freakin' huge. The criminal charges do a good job of laying the ground work.

    And, the easy targets fold first at a better rate. So maybe there are larger fish waiting in the wings.

  52. How Dare They?!?!?!?! by DarkMantle · · Score: 3, Funny

    I'm outraged!!! I'm going to stop using Infenion RAM right now!

    **Pulls RAM Out**

    oops... shoulda shutdown first.

    --
    DarkMantle I been bored, so I started a blog.
  53. Just remember... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    ...if you've seen someone get pied... that means they're accessible enough to get close enough to... well.. you know.

  54. SHHH!! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    (looks around nervously) QUIET! THEY'LL HEAR YOU!!! (trembles)

  55. sure, but ... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    sure there's a crime

    sure there's an investigation

    sure there's punishment

    but there is no justice

    someone steals millions and gets six months while others get years for selling a bag of weed or just for being homeless

    ain't america great, eh

    rich peeps sure suck

    scumbags

  56. How can a single company "fix prices"? by Cryogenes · · Score: 1

    It would seem to me that in order to illegally fix prices there would have to be a collusion of all the memory chip makers. How come only the german one is punished?

  57. Not Quite Robbery by andywebz · · Score: 1

    It's not robbery, since people were buying it. Convicted of overcharging millions of people is more appropriate.

    --
    Saying "I'll probably get modded down for this", is a magnet for my -1 mod token. I hate to disappoint.
  58. Re:The crime earning money while not beeing americ by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    What does taxation have to do with it?

  59. I'm sorry.. WHO get's the 160 million??? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    The govt?? Really? Why??

    WTF kinda system is this where the govt. makes
    cash every time they find a company that screwed the populous over??

    Whatever... nothing to see here folks.. move along...

  60. I don't understand by jim_v2000 · · Score: 1

    RAM is cheap... What are the ill effects of price fixing that these guys are so terrible for? I'm not being a troll, I just don't understand. I thought people were free to set their own prices for their goods?

    --
    Don't take life so seriously. No one makes it out alive.
  61. Anyone else have an innocent loved one doing time? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Try 12 years now for a crime they didn't commit.

    Now you want to talk about not having any trust
    in the justice system?

    Justice in america is "Justas much as you can afford"

  62. Re:The crime earning money while not beeing americ by frost22 · · Score: 1

    Taxation is the ultimate symbol of beeing governed. I think people should only be answereable to a set of rules they have democratic control over.

    Two of those guys lived and worked in Germany. If what they did was a crime in Germany, they should have been tried here. If not, they should not have been tried at all.

    Unfortunately we see more and more attempts of the US of A to extend the reach of their laws far beyond their borders. Call it legal imperialism. Most of that isn't even criminal law. For instance I work for a Geramn subsidiary of a british company. Now, out of the blue, we sudddenly have to conform to all kinds of stupid and twisted rules made up by some US regulatory body.

    I could go on. For every idiot in the world trying to sue somebody there apparently is a goofy judge in the US of A willing to take up his case.

    At some point the world will have to make it loud and clear to the US of A that no, we are not governed by you, and no, your rules and your laws don't apply here.

    --
    ...and here I stand, with all my lore, poor fool, no wiser than before.
  63. Finally, a Clear Message is Sent by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    It is NOT okay to fix prices.

    OTOH, it is completely okay to main and kill (find the link to the Bhopal story yourself; I feel to sick already).

  64. OT trouble by Changa_MC · · Score: 0
    Doc,
    I recognized your sig, which is the only reason that I did not instantly dismiss your post as flame-bait.
    Two points:
    A) It's sarcasm, not irony.
    B) It's only sarcasm if you say it sarcastically. Otherwise, it's just flamebait.
    Bv2) If anyone else had written this one, you'd've modded it down too. because it's not at all clear what you were talking about...

    -Sig needed: apply within

    --
    Changa hates change.
    1. Re:OT trouble by Doc+Ruby · · Score: 1

      Thanks for your sympathetic read. My original post was sarcastic, but the post in which I mentioned irony was ironic: I was accosted by a "BattleTroll", who responded reflexively to my provocative post without recognizing its sarcasm, and whose .sig is "Never argue with a fool. Someone watching may not be able to tell the difference". That's irony, right there.

      As for the wisdom of posting such veiled sarcasm, the post has a great effect when taken to be the corporate flackery as which it poses. That's one reason why these "Troll" mods and whines find no sympathy with me: if it's a false premise, refute it easily in a reply. I'm more interested in revealing corporate government than in always being taken at face value. Otherwise, I'd engage in something more productive than posting to Slashdot.

      --

      --
      make install -not war

  65. Too harsh by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
    These people weren't stopping others from forming new DRAM companies. In fact, they were increasing the likelihood that competitors would enter the market by making it profitable. They should only be fined monetarily if their actions should be illegal at all.

    People in the US need to understand the relationship between two questions: "is it a good time to find a job in the US?" and "is it a good deal to make a company in the US?" You need to understand that in order for the answer to the first question to be sustainably "yes", it is necessary for answer to the second question to be "yes." Right now, job creators are being treated as villains in the US, so many of the smart ones realize that if they want to set up shop, it's a better deal to do it elsewhere.

  66. US country club prisons are a myth by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
    I agree the financial fine needs to be a bit stiffer but so does the prison situation - specifically, we need to send these people to federal pound me in the ass prison, not some cushy place where they get their own room and they get to play croquet with their fellow white-collar inmates on the weekends.

    Could you please name a US federal prison where inmates "get their own room and they get to play croquet with their fellow white-collar inmates on the weekends?" Can you even name a state prison where this is so? (I know there are plenty of prisons where inmates get their own rooms for high flight individuals or spies could divulge secrets. I want to know prisons that match all three of your criteria: prisoners have their own rooms, play croquet on weekends and are specifically for white collar criminals.)