Slashdot Mirror


Babylon 5 Movie Starts Filming in April

An anonymous reader writes "According to comingsoon.net, the first theatrical Babylon 5 movie, "The Memory of the Shadows" starts filming in April. The story was written by series creator J. Michael Straczynski."

70 of 397 comments (clear)

  1. excellent by Libertarian001 · · Score: 4, Insightful

    woot

    best...sci-fi...series...ever

    1. Re:excellent by 6079_Smith · · Score: 2, Funny

      best...sci-fi...series...ever

      Shatner! This is betrayal!

  2. pre-emptive mirror by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Informative

    Steven Beck will direct a big screen adaptation of the popular sci-fi TV series Babylon 5. The movie, titled The Memory of Shadows, is intended for theatrical release and was written by series creator J. Michael Straczynski. Production Weekly reports that the project starts filming this April in the UK.

    In "Shadows," the technology of the ancient and extinct Shadow race is being unleashed upon the galaxy by an unknown force, and Earthforce intelligence officer Diane Baker, whose brother was recently killed in a mysterious explosion, it out to find out who is behind the intergalactic conspiracy.

    Joining her is Galen, a techno-mage who has been charged with keeping the technology out of the hands of those who would abuse it.

    1. Re:pre-emptive mirror by Hinhule · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Joining her is Galen

      I like how galen means insane in swedish ;)

  3. Question ... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Interesting

    From the article:

    Joining her is Galen, a techno-mage who has been charged with keeping the technology out of the hands of those who would abuse it.

    I don't recall, but isn't he the guy from Crusade? I only saw two episodes but that name sounds familiar.

    1. Re:Question ... by Abel29A · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Thats correct. Galen was the techno mage...

      Which lead me to fear this film will be more Crusader than Babylon5, and I for one did not really find the whole Crusader spinn-off that great.

      It became to much of a Star Trek clone.....(One ship travelling through space encountering weird aliens...)

      Wheres the fun in that? B5 was all about grand campaign and universe-spanning alliances.

      BTW. The First B5 movie is really great(The one dealing with Earth-Minbari War). The other two less so.

      --
      "If Pac-Man affected us as kids, we'd be running around in dark rooms, munching pills and listening to electronic music"
    2. Re:Question ... by extra+the+woos · · Score: 2, Insightful

      In the beginning and "A call to arms" were both great... The rest of the movies, less so, but still good compared to most trek movies (especially considering they were made for tv movies and only cost like a million each or something lol)...

      I hope he can pull off making this movie as badass as some of the best episodes in the series (severed dreams, into the fire, endgame, etc etc!!!)

      --
      replacing it with NEW Folger's Crystals! (lets see if they notice the difference)
    3. Re:Question ... by ionpro · · Score: 4, Informative

      There were actually five Bab5 movies (/me fires up the FTP client):
      I: In the Beginning (Earth-Minbari War, editorialized by Londo)
      II: Thirdspace (Set Between winning the Shadow War and the assault on earth, the B5 crew finds a portal to another dimension left by the Vorlons)
      III: The River Of Souls (Elaboration on the Soul Keeper concept introduced in one of the first episodes)
      IV: The Legend of the Rangers -- which, by the way, I quite liked. I think it's been much maligned. Ranger movie
      V: A Call To Arms -- this set the backplot for the spin-off Crusade.

      These were all TNT (?) Movies of the Week.

    4. Re:Question ... by tap · · Score: 2, Informative
      You're right about that, it was a pilot for a possible new B5 series on sci-fi. The didn't buy crusade becaue it wasn't bad enough, sci-fi only buys crap series. So JMS came up with a new series that was worse than crusade, but it still wasn't bad enough for sci-fi. So they bought Andromeda, Scare Tactics, and the 3rd season of Lexx instead.

      JMS says lengend of the rangers was killed by Osama bin Laden. After 9/11, the NFL postponed their games. That meant the football season ended later. Which caused B5:LotR to go up against a football game on the east coast. This game just so happened to be the most watched football game ever. So the east cost ratings weren't good enough for a series, but on the west coast, with no game, they were.

    5. Re:Question ... by lightknight · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Bah, Legend of the Rangers sucks. Watched it completely, hated it. It was so...typically Star Trek-esque, I mean "explore new worlds, encounter new species, blah". That gets old.

      What you need is a stationary place for things to develop. DS9 was ok in this regard, but Babylon 5 was great. I mean, things developed. I want nothing more than to see an episode of Babylon where Lita (augmented telepath) returns, removes the mind block from Garibaldi, and watch as Garibaldi does something truly evil to Bester. I mean, at the end, you are just gagging for Bester to get it.

      That said, Garibaldi and Bester were hilarious. Franklin was great, his drama acting really shows. Sheridan and Delenn were great in there own way. But every time Bester showed up, you knew there was going to be some back and forth.

      Third Space (Babylon 5 movie) is where they come across a piece of Vorlon technology, which seems to open greater gateways than that of hyperspace. You find out that it does open to another dimension, but there's something evil waiting on the other end.

      --
      I am John Hurt.
    6. Re:Question ... by Darren+Winsper · · Score: 4, Informative

      Crusade was buggered over by TNT. Anyhow, keep in mind that the first season of B5 was episodic and only hinted at what was to come. Crusade was the same; JMS actually planned to have the ship find the cure early in the second season, discover some massive plot involving earth and shadow technology and end up essentially on the run from Earth Force.

    7. Re:Question ... by mfarah · · Score: 5, Informative
      Thats correct. Galen was the techno mage...

      Which lead me to fear this film will be more Crusader than Babylon5, and I for one did not really find the whole Crusader spinn-off that great.

      It became to much of a Star Trek clone.....(One ship travelling through space encountering weird aliens...)

      Wheres the fun in that? B5 was all about grand campaign and universe-spanning alliances.



      The thing about Crusade was that only the first 13 episodes were filmed, which are usually where you
      introduce the viewers to the series, basic premise, characters, etcetera. The show didn't have a chance to get started.

      SPOILERS AHEAD

      Two scripts were written by JMS but not filmed - episodes 14 and the season finale. They were published at a long gone website and I had a chance to read them.

      In episode 14, the ship finds the ship that attacked the Captain's ship long ago (when Galen
      rescues it), and the Excalibur manages to toast it. In the season finale, they find another one of those, track it down as it flees to its base, where they are confronted by defending fighters, which are... get this... starfuries! Yup, that ship was built by humans using Shadow tech.

      JMS hinted that the plague thing was just the way to introduce the series, and that a cure would be found early (possibly as early as season 2!), but Excalibur would become a FUGITIVE ship in the meantime...

      No, not like trek. :-)

      --
      "Trust me - I know what I'm doing."
      - Sledge Hammer
  4. B5 Series vs Movies by Thenomain · · Score: 3, Interesting

    While I was a devoted watcher of the Babylon 5 series from the first episode, even when my local syndicate started showing it at 1:30 am Sunday Morning, I've been disappointed in every one of the B5 Movies. In fact, I think each movie was progressively worse than the next.

    Have things changed? I don't know. I certainly hope so, but B5 Fan that I am, I'm still probably going to wait until the dollar theatres for this one.

    Unless the previews look absolutely fan-freaking-tastic, of course. Then I'll probably get suckered in, like always. *raises a fist at the sky and shakes it* I swore after Legend of the Rangers, never again. Damn you!

    --
    This now concludes our broadcast day.
    1. Re:B5 Series vs Movies by Rollie+Hawk · · Score: 4, Funny

      In fact, I think each movie was progressively worse than the next.

      That's deep...

      --
      Before any liberals are tempted to mod up one of my comments, a word of warning: I'm actually making fun of you.
    2. Re:B5 Series vs Movies by bl968 · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Any time you go into a movie with preconceptions and your own ideas and what is going to happen or what should happen you will be disappointed. It's like the person who goes into a movie and 15 minutes into it has guessed the ending and of course they don't enjoy the movie quite as much as someone who lets it happen in it's own pace without trying to look behind the scenes for the solution.

      Me personally I enjoyed the series and I have enjoyed the movies. I expect this one to be no exception.

      --
      "GET / HTTP/1.0" 200 51230 "-" "Mozilla/4.0 (compatible; Setec Astronomy)"
    3. Re:B5 Series vs Movies by gbjbaanb · · Score: 2, Funny

      yeah, I thought they got better as they went along too :)

      I think that's what he wrote - the mixed up propositions in that sentence just makes my head hurt.

  5. First Post ... by sarice · · Score: 5, Funny

    Oddly, the first post to this slashdot story
    was submitted 1000 years ago.

    1. Re:First Post ... by ke6 · · Score: 5, Funny

      Zathras wasn't funny. That was Zathras who was funny. Zathras got all of mothers funny.

      No, poor Zathras here likes dirt and bugs. All part of great scheme of things.

    2. Re:First Post ... by Mhrmnhrm · · Score: 5, Funny

      Zathras was cool, but I liked Zathras better ;)

      --
      I suspect that one of these choices is incorrect. Correct.
    3. Re:First Post ... by Y-Crate · · Score: 5, Informative

      "By the by, anybody else find Zathras to be the funniest time-travelling alien ever?"

      Yes, sadly Tim Choate who brought the character to life on screen passed away 2 and a half months ago. :(

      He will be missed.

  6. Not sure if I'm going to see it by MagicDude · · Score: 2, Insightful

    I'm not sure I'm going to want to see it when it comes out. Not because I don't like B5, but I don't get what's going on. I've tried several times to get into B5, but I keep finding myself not understanding what was going on. If I watch an episode in the middle of season 3, I don't get half the references to things that have happened already, so I don't understand what's being done in that episode. I have tried to watch it from the beginning when Sci-fi loops around and starts showing it from season 1 episode 1, but my schedule isn't such that I can set aside that same bit of time every day to watch it, so I invariably end up missing episodes. Being a poor student, I can't afford a TIVO, and I'm not going to buy a VCR just for this (and I'd probably forget to set it sooner or later anyway). Thus I'm continually left out of a series I really want to get into. So when this movie comes out, if I haven't seen B5 through, I don't know if I'd want to go to see this movie if I don't think I'd be able to get what they're talking about in the movie.

    1. Re:Not sure if I'm going to see it by Macrat · · Score: 4, Insightful

      You're the reason the networks have to dumb down programming.

    2. Re:Not sure if I'm going to see it by AmiNTT · · Score: 4, Insightful
      I have to agree. Star Trek was completely ruined for me by Babylon 5. The whole 5 year arc concept is amazing - stuff that you see in the first season, which you think was mildly interesting, suddenly three seasons later becomes really important!

      Each time a season would come out, I'd loose two days to watching the entire thing. The final episode (Sleeping in Light) gets me every single time I watch it.

      I strongly recommend B5 to anyone who likes Sci-fi. Start in season 1 and work your way forwards. It makes far more sense this way. Watch the movies (other than the pilot) AFTER you watch the series. Avoid the temptation of "In the Beginning". It is better that way, in my opinion.

    3. Re:Not sure if I'm going to see it by Siener · · Score: 3, Interesting

      Not because I don't like B5, but I don't get what's going on. I've tried several times to get into B5, but I keep finding myself not understanding what was going on. If I watch an episode in the middle of season 3, I don't get half the references to things that have happened already, so I don't understand what's being done in that episode.

      This is the reason why the networks never really liked B5, but it's also the thing that makes B5 way cooler than any other tv series. Instead of the old "problem of the week" format of most tv series, B5 has a five year coherent story line.

      I love the feeling when in (say) series 4 they reference something that happened way back in series 1. Totally mind blowing: "No way ... that was planned that three years ahead!"

      My wife hates most sf, end even she became an addict after I showed her the dvds.

      PS If you can't afford the dvds, maybe try something like netflix

    4. Re:Not sure if I'm going to see it by Max+von+H. · · Score: 3, Insightful

      I love the feeling when in (say) series 4 they reference something that happened way back in series 1. Totally mind blowing: "No way ... that was planned that three years ahead!"

      All five seasons of B5 were written before the shooting of the pilot episode. It allowed much deeper storylines and made B5 the most consistent sf serie ever, for it wasn't written to please advertisers or even modified to influence ratings. There lies the secret of a good series.

      --
      -- It's always darker before it goes pitch black.
  7. Catch Up by Anonymous+Monkey · · Score: 2, Insightful

    I was never into B5. It was cool and all, but the plots were so interwoven it never grabed me. (Maybe if I saw it from day one things would be diffrent) Aneway, will I need to do any serous catchup before this movie makes sence. BTW, the SCI-FI Icon is a guy from the original Star Trek. w00t! Sory, trekey moment has passed.

    --
    We are the Borg...
  8. Re:Galen by ran93r · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Crusade did have a Galen, played by british actor Peter Woodward, son of the other british actor Edward (affectionately known as edwoodwoodwoodwood). Same guy? Most probably although crusade was pretty much on a par with the dire made-for-tv movies.

  9. B5 movie...info at last! by Random+Chaos · · Score: 4, Informative

    Well, this is news that is long awaited. It looks like this may be a follow-on to the Crusade spin-off series since it is dealing with leftover Shadow technology. Plus Galen, being present in Crusade, draws a link between those two. There have been rumors that Lando might show up in it...and where he goes G'Kar goes too. JMS also made some comments a while back about having to rewrite the script some after Richard Biggs died (Dr. Franklin) so clearly it looks like some B5 crew from the original show might show up beyond the ambassadors.

    Can't wait to hear more news.

    *Waiting for JMS to release some info directly still

    1. Re:B5 movie...info at last! by ce25254 · · Score: 2, Informative
      There have been rumors that Lando might show up in it...and where he goes G'Kar goes too.
      Londo (Mollari) was in Babylon 5, Lando (Calrissian) was in Star Wars films. Probably a typo, but anyway. (Surprised I remember this, actually--I forgot all about Star Wars after seeing Babylon 5.)
  10. As the Comic Book Guy would say... by phaln · · Score: 5, Funny

    Most. Underrated. Series. Ever.

    --
    SNACKS ARE AWESOME
  11. Best Sci Fi Ever? Nah! That would be: Firefly! by Bifster · · Score: 4, Interesting
    best...sci-fi...series...ever

    Not quite.

    Clearly the best Sci Fi series ever is: Firefly :)

    Seriously, if you haven't seen Firefly, rent all 4 disks from Netflix or something, you won't be disappointed. My favorite episode is the last on the disks: Objects In Space. All 9 main characters are interesting, complex, believable, and bounce off each in a manner consistent with their personalities. The action is great, plots are fairly unpredictable, and the writing is packed full of sharp humor.

    For alternate opinions, check out the reviews of the Firefly DVD's on Amazon: 1200 reviews, average rating: 5 stars

    B5 I'd say would be close behind on the rating scale overall... Mostly I think for it's ambition, and intricate tapestry of dramatic plotlines.

    --

    wag more
    bark less

  12. JMS will come through by QuantumFTL · · Score: 2, Interesting

    This spring my boss at the Jet Propulsion Lab invited J. Michael Straczynski out for a tour of the place... I was very lucky to spend an afternoon with him and his wife (shameless pic!). I somehow managed to stave off most of the B5 references that came to me as we were showing him around (but alas I still came off as the fanboy I am).

    I asked him what he thought about the upcoming movie project, whether he thought it would be good or not. He replied, "It's going to be shit." After a moment I caught the sarcasm and I realized that he would not be doing this movie if he didn't have a great story to tell.

    Judging from the stories he has already told, I think it's going to be well worth the wait.

    Cheers,
    Justin Wick

  13. Oh darn... by Vulcann · · Score: 2, Funny

    For a minute I read that as "BabylonX" Movie starts filming...

    No such luck ;).

  14. Also unfortunately... by nebaz · · Score: 2, Informative

    Tim Choate (Zathras) also died recently in a motorcycle accident. :-( link

    --
    Rhymes that keep their secrets will unfold behind the clouds.There upon the rainbow is the answer to a neverending story
  15. Babylon 5 flight sim! by Kaimelar · · Score: 4, Informative

    While you're waiting for the movie, check out the fan-created flight sim, complete with a detailed story, realistic physics, and great ship models:

    http://ifh.firstones.com/

    Enjoy!

    1. Re:Babylon 5 flight sim! by Deusy · · Score: 3, Informative

      There's also the Vega Strike B5 Mod, which is in the unusual position of having a lot of models and nobody to do the plot/scripting.

      There's some really good eye candy in the VS B5 forum.

      --

      Free Gamer - Free games list and commentary

  16. Re:Best Sci Fi Ever? Nah! That would be: Firefly! by lunatik17 · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Unfortunately, both B5 and Farscape suffer from the same problem: they start out bad but turn awesome later (In B5's case, REALLY bad). Firefly is great from beginning to regrettably short end, but they perhaps overdo the western theme a little and it puts some people off.

    --

    Here's my DeCSS mirror, where's yours?

  17. A history of my attempts at watching B5 by Mikito · · Score: 3, Interesting

    In the beginning, I had my first taste of Babylon 5 while I was traveling. My own cable service wasn't showing B5 at the time, so I figured I'd check it out. It seemed bad to the extreme--a bunch of humans and aliens on a space station, with bad lighting and cheesy makeup. It felt like DS9 done on a really cheap budget. If you know the series, it was the last half of the Soul Hunter episode--definitely not the best intro for a newbie.

    My second encounter with B5 was...let's say it was less negative. It was an episode with a character who wore a very 2001-ish astronaut's uniform, and unfortunately for me, it was an episode full of flashbacks and hints of things to come. The episode didn't totally grab me, but it intrigued me enough to seek out the show if the chance came.

    It was the dawn of a new age. The TNT cable network picked up B5 and made it one of their flagship programs. Now I could watch the whole series from the beginning, and I could watch each episode 2 or 3 times a day. And that is exactly what I did. The first time I watched the whole series, I was blown away by the interweaving of plots, the complexity and ambiguity of the characters and the richness of the cultural allusions. The second time through, I could better appreciate all the clues and hints which I had missed. The third time through, and B5 lost a bit of its magic for me. I'd notice flaws in the writing or other faults.

    Crusade, the spinoff series which followed B5, never grabbed my attention the same way. Crusade felt like so many random elements mixed together without ever truly blending.

    I think I would watch a B5 movie, but then again, I'm familiar with the characters and the premise of the show. A big hurdle for a B5 theatrical release is how they can balance satisfying longtime B5 fans against the need to be accessible to people who have never watched the TV series. One of the strengths, and perhaps the strength of the show was its complexity, and I don't think that a 2 or 3 hour movie can encapsulate that.

    --
    Anakin Simpson: If you're not with me, then you're my enemy--ooh, donuts!
  18. Another Trek? Hardly. by Card · · Score: 5, Interesting
    I for one did not really find the whole Crusade spin-off that great. It became to much of a Star Trek clone. (One ship travelling through space encountering weird aliens...)
    JMS's weakness is that while he seems to be very good at the episodic ~42 minute format, his movies aren't that well paced at ~90 minutes. Further, he tends to drop very subtle hints about things that will feature in the plot much, much later (3 - 5 years wasn't unheard of with B5).

    This means that while the pilot movies are filled with action, they tend to appear shallow and sometimes confusing to the casual viewer. Only further developments in the main story or careful analysis of the pilot will give you some clues. Let me give an example.

    The B5 pilot The Gathering is filled with action, lots of characters and a convoluted plot. In the end it appears that "the bad guy" is G'Kar, having smuggled the assassin on the station. Well, yes. Except that G'Kar wasn't behind the turbolift sabotage. Working in the background, Lt. Commander Takashima was trying to escalate this conflict into a full-scale war. See See Lurker's Guide for an analysis. This plot point would later be rearranged and used in 2nd season.

    The similarities in A Call to Arms and Legend of the Rangers suggest to me that the man has a massive story thought out; one which probably would last another 5 seasons and which he would like to tell us eagerly.

    Early on, B5 was compared to Trek, but it turned out to be something different. I suspect that Crusade wouldn't have been your Trek clone, either. Myself, I can hardly wait for the movie and the eventual TV series.

  19. Re:Anyone else find the last episode really lame? by TheRaven64 · · Score: 4, Informative

    Last episode? The episode you're describing was the season finale for season 3, right at the height of the shadow war story arc. There were two complete seasons after that...

    --
    I am TheRaven on Soylent News
  20. Why B5 sucked after season 4 by Magnetic_Monopole · · Score: 2, Informative

    If it doesn't have Claudia Christian, I'm not gonna see it.

    1. Re:Why B5 sucked after season 4 by Ziviyr · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Ivanova, AND a Warlock class Earth ship, one in command of the other. Thats what will make a great movie.

      I've never seen her in command of that much firepower before. Thought a few screws fell loose when she fought Clark's "elite forces"?

      See what happens when she commands a pair of GOD cannons, a wad of railguns, two huge missile banks, and I forget what else...

      --

      Someone set us up the bomb, so shine we are!
  21. Re:Anyone else find the last episode really lame? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Informative

    This guy is clearly a troll... As noted below he's talking about an Season 3 episode, while the entire series ran for 5 seasons.
    Additionally, IIRC Starcraft came out in 1998, while the Babylon 5 show he's talking about aired two years earlier in 1996.

  22. B5's strength lies in the TV series format by Mictian · · Score: 5, Interesting

    I'm a huge old school fan of Babylon 5. Old school in the sense that I started watching when it was in it's late first season / early second season, was back in 1994/1995 (or thereabouts). I'm sure there are plenty of more "seasoned" folks who started with the initial broadcast of the first episode.

    As far as the popularity or "perceived quality" of Babylon 5's seasons go, I think a lot of fans (dare I say most?) would agree that it increased from season one through season three, each successive season being better than the previous.

    To me personally this was the case all the way until the end of season four. But I realize not everyone prefers season four over season three. Many seem to like the grander scale of the Shadow War over the civil war.

    The good thing about season four was that there were hardly any "filler" or non-arc episodes. I assume everyone knows the reason for this so I won't go into it any further (in short: the series was in danger of cancellation after season 4). This is also, at least in my mind, the root cause of the problem with season five.

    JMS, having the initially well laid out and pre-planned story arc completed by the end of season four, was suddenly faced with the fact that the show was renewed for season five (thanks to TNT picking it up from Warner) and he had a very limited timeframe to come up with scripts and some sort of a mini story arc for the last season.

    Add the very last minute leaving of Claudia Christian from the show (which forces JMS to toss out Ivanova's character and come up with a replacement) and you have a recipe if not for disaster, then at least for a "not so great" season. Under the circumstances I would say JMS did a decent job (I remember reading on the usenet B5 newsgroups that 4 or 5 hours a night was pretty much a good night's sleep for him at the time).

    Now don't get me wrong, I hated (and still do) the whole Byron / Tragedy of telepaths subplot. A lot. I don't know anyone among my friends who likes it (and they're pretty much all big fans of B5). Imho the only good part about it is that the annoying teeps get what's coming to them. But the whole thing takes up only about eight episodes from the start of the season (which some will argue is 8 episodes too many). That still leaves almost two thirds to take care of the pretty decent mini arc dealing with the shadow tech and the Drakh's plot concerning Londo and the Centauri.

    I think season five overall is a bit underrated. It has a host of good episodes (including one of my favourites, The Corps is Mother, The Corps is Father) and the latter part of the season is pretty good with a nice build up to the Fall of Centauri Prime. Also, at this point in the series the "weight of history" (for lack of a better term) of the character's and their actions gives a lot of the scenes and drama some extra gravitas, which I like.

    With this rather long and boring rambling I've hopefully arrived somewhere near my actual point. Which is that Babylon 5's main strength in my view is the pre- planned, conceived and written story arc that tells a great story and a bunch of smaller stories intertwined over a (long) period of 110 episodes. It allowes for such wonderful foreshadowing that carefully builds up to the dramatic and climactic events. This is very hard to replicate in the time constraints of a motion picture.

    And this is the reason I believe the four TV-movies haven't been the best B5 can offer (although I personally like In the Beginning a lot). Also this fundamental issue or problem probably can't simply be undone with a larger budget (which the big screen adaptation will likely have compared to the TV-movies).

    So with a somewhat spotty track record of B5 (TV) movies so far and the aforementioned problem my expectations are moderate at best. Having said that, I'll probably be in line to get a ticket to the premiere..

    Btw, in case you already haven't done so, remember to check out The Lurker's Guide's page for The Memory of Shadows @ http://

    --
    "Only two things are infinite, the universe and human stupidity, and I'm not sure of the former" - Albert Einstein
  23. Re:Best Sci Fi Ever? Nah! That would be: Firefly! by hachete · · Score: 4, Interesting

    agree 100%. Bought the DVDs - well worth it. The humour is sharp, the technology not too unbelievable. Space is *silent*. They actually shutdown shipboard systems to avoid detection! Yes! No men in rubber suits! Guns that need oxygen to fire! Serenity is grungy, as it should be. Great characters, action, scripts.

    The humour is a relief from the sheer po-faced gravitas of Voyager and a large part of the ST genre. Humour is what (mostly) set aside the first ST series, and is pretty much absent from the subsequent ST series.

    And I definitely have the hots for Zoey. Whooey...

    h

    --
    Patriotism is a virtue of the vicious
  24. B5 didn't have a 5 year arc..... by JackJudge · · Score: 2, Interesting

    ...although it was supposed to.

    The fact is that news came through the series was gonna be cancelled while they were filming the early stories of season 4. So, in a truly Herculean effort, JMS rewrote the last *two* seasons on the fly, compressing them down into one season.
    The Shadow War was supposed to take up the whole of S4 and the Earth Liberation War was supposed to be the main arc of season 5.
    Then Sod's Law kicks into play and TNT announced they'd pick up the fifth season of B5 as the last episodes of S4 were airing. On the surface this was good news, but unfortunately JMS didn't have enough material left, he'd just filmed it all and used up all his good plotlines.
    This is why season 4 seems rushed and flawed and why season 5 is a stinking pile of crap for the most part. It also explains the very odd series finale. Although it was shown at the end of S5, and appears like that in the boxsets, it was actually filmed at the end of series 4 but they held over transmission for the last year. That's why Claudia Christian appears in it when she'd been absent for the rest of the last series.

    IMHO JMS shoulda ditched the (mostly) lousy plot he used for S5 and used that year to give us a B5 / Crusade hybrid series, kinda sneaking Crusade in the back door. Now that would've been a helluva series, but hindsight is a wonderful thing....

  25. Re:torrents here!!! by Ziviyr · · Score: 3, Insightful

    Please buy the DVDs in support of decent television programming.

    --

    Someone set us up the bomb, so shine we are!
  26. It's good, but... by smacktits · · Score: 3, Funny

    ...nothing will ever surpass the greatness that was Buck Rogers in the 25th Century.

  27. All 5 Seasons by thegameiam · · Score: 3, Insightful

    >>All five seasons of B5 were written before the shooting of the pilot episode.

    Not quite - what there was was a consistent, single story arc which had FAR more detail than a typical series. The episodes were written on a season-by-season basis. JMS wrote the entirety of season 3 himself, but had help for some of the episodes in other seasons.

    I agree that this approach allowed a much richer story to develop, and made it the best SF TV series we've seen yet.

    [ flamebait]That said, the 1st and 5th seasons were comparatively weak (only on the level of good Star Trek, say) [ / flamebait]

    --
    Need Geek Rock? Try The Franchise!
  28. Re:B5 went downhill... by spike1 · · Score: 2, Interesting

    One thing I did hear about crusade was that the cure to the drakh plague would be found quite early on, possibly first season and then they would deal with the little box that talks to the captain which would have even more serious repercussions than the plague.

    But then, we knew it would be something bad due to the way it came into his posession.

  29. Sigh.... by mrshowtime · · Score: 3, Insightful

    Sigh...
    B5 was really good in some places, really not good in other places. Firefly had 12 episodes, four of which I saw which were not entertaining whatsoever and Farscape never seemed to catch my interest, even though I love Sci-Fi and the Muppets. Personally, I liked Lexx, as insane as it was, more than any other of the aforementioned series.

    The best Sci-Fi series EVER, would have to be Dr. Who. Dr. Who was doing EVERYTHING before EVERYONE else and has the best villains ever. Heck, Dr. Who even invented "The Matrix" in 1978, thanks to Douglas Addams. Also, Dr. Who was voted the most popular Sci-Fi show EVER by T.V. guide readers a few years back and is (once it comes back on the air in 2005) the longest running sci-fi show ever.

    Also, ever Buffyverse/Firefly worshipper NEEDS to get "Blakes 7" on dvd to show them how a show like Firefly should be done properly. Blakes 7 is next to Dr.Who as one of the best Sci-fi shows ever made. It's finale in 1982 still holds records for one of the most watched BBC programs ever.

    --
    "Jeremy, you need to get to an internet cafe and cut and paste some appropriate sentiments about me from the world wide
  30. Re:Best Sci Fi Ever? Nah! That would be: Firefly! by SavvyPlayer · · Score: 4, Funny

    No Top 3 Sci Fi Series list is complete without Red Dwarf. A special-effects tour-de-force, RD combines a prophetic future vision with keen insights into the unchanging nature of man's relationship with technology. The only thing holding RD back from being a true contender is its lack of a sense of humor -- it does tend to take itself too seriously.

  31. Bomb by ralphclark · · Score: 2, Insightful

    I loved Babylon 5 unreasonably, but I'm still convinced this movie will bomb because the things that made the series great are *gone*.

    Another thing: other posts analyze why the series peaked at season three. I always wondered about that. The answer, it appears, is that Straczinsky was screwed around by Warner Bros and could never be sure if the series would continue as planned or be axed early. Way to go, Warner, there's nothing quite like shitting on your own doorstep is there? How ironic that the very worst thing that can happen to TV, is TV executives.

    I suppose I shouldn't be surprised since the very same dynamic operates in the movie industry. Just look at Highlander II (oops, sorry for reminding you...).

  32. What happened towards the end (SPOILERS) by Anonymous+Brave+Guy · · Score: 4, Interesting

    As others have pointed out, the episodes were written a season at a time. This partly explains why season 5 was only OK compared to the brilliant seasons 3 and 4: they suspected that they might not be able to make it, so the final episode (ultimately shown as the final ep of season 5 when it did go ahead) was actually filmed at the end of season 4, and a lot of the details seem to have been moved forward a series to guarantee that they were there. Series 5 didn't fit in as well as the others, because most of it was expendable to the main story arc.

    Personally, I would rather they hadn't made that final episode anyway, nor the official final episode to season 4 (the one jumping into the future more and more). IMHO, they should either have done season 5 properly, or have finished everything with Sheridan and Delenn on the ship on the way back to B5, with a stronger voice-over about space being ours to look after now. Alas, the TV execs apparently didn't leave this as an option they could plan for in advance.

    The looking into the future episodes, particularly those so far ahead that all my favourite characters are long-dead and the universe has moved on, always diminished the scale of the main series to me, rather than showing how worthwhile it had all been as I suspect JMS intended. Far better to set another series slightly after the original -- as Crusade would have been, and the film apparently will be -- where you've got the grand framework of the main series as a backdrop, making a difference.

    Oh, and the fates of Marcus and Lennier -- the only two truly honourable characters in the whole series -- were very sad, too. Their destinies may have been perfect for the reality of the series, but if we can save the whole universe, couldn't they at least have found room for two characters in five whole series to have the happy endings they deserved?

    --
    If you disagree, post your argument. (-1, Overrated) isn't your personal censorship tool for views you don't like.
    1. Re:What happened towards the end (SPOILERS) by tntguy · · Score: 2, Insightful

      The looking into the future episodes, particularly those so far ahead that all my favourite characters are long-dead and the universe has moved on, always diminished the scale of the main series to me, rather than showing how worthwhile it had all been as I suspect JMS intended.

      The whole point of that episode was to show that their influence was still extremely strong even one million years in the future. I don't understand how that could diminish the scale. But, I don't understand lots of things, so there you go. :-)

  33. Re:Dunno about that. by SamBeckett · · Score: 2, Funny

    See if I make any effort to save your ass next leap....

  34. Re:What, no Telepath War? by fdiskne1 · · Score: 2, Funny

    What, no Telepath War?


    Now, I'm more of a B5 fan than most people and I love the idea of the upcoming telepath war and all, but I don't think two hours of people opening their eyes real wide while giving a stern look to someone and having the other person fall over dead makes good movie watching.

    --
    But why is the rum gone?
  35. Re:Best Sci Fi Ever? Nah! That would be: Firefly! by CodeArtisan · · Score: 2, Insightful

    True. If it wasn't for the fact the Blake's 7 was the best sci-fi series ever.

  36. Hardware Requirements by rgf71 · · Score: 2, Funny

    Where are they going to get the Amiga/Toasters?

    1. Re:Hardware Requirements by GQuon · · Score: 2, Interesting

      See the other replies.

      But also: Warner Brothers managed to LOSE the cgi files. They were kept in anticipation of re-rendering the show in HDTV when hardware was faster. (Would have come in handy when making the DVDs)

      But they managed to lose the cgi files, so for the "Legend of the Rangers" failed pilot, they had to make new models. And I think they used Maya instead of Lightwave for that.

      --
      Irene KHAAAAAAN!
  37. Re:Anyone else find the last episode really lame? by fzammett · · Score: 3, Insightful

    Although your a troll, I'll feed you...

    This is a common criticism of B5, and it shows an utter lack of understanding of the series, and life in general.

    Life is about evolution and development, in the greater sense as well as a personal sense. One of the biggest steps any person makes is stepping out of the shadows of their parents (pun intended) and walking off that cliff to fly (or fall) on their own. This is a concept that every person should be able to relate to (of course, I'm telilng this to an audience of geeks, the very people who rarely leave their parents' house!).

    B5 took this story and expanded it to galactic proportions, literally. If your mind is capable of thinking in larger terms, then you see the parallel and appreciate it.

    The conclusion of the Shadow war would have been SO much worse if they HAD been able to defeat both the Shadows and Vorlons through the use of force. The Shadows were only ever defeated in the past because the Vorlons had helped, but fighting both is an impossible task (they probably could not have defeated the Shadows militarily alone frankly). It HAD to end in some other way, and, as JMS has stated, they had to think their way out of it. They had to understand.

    This is the same thing that happens for real kids... They rebel, they want to get out on their own, but the real point of epiphany is usually some years later when they realize that their parents were trying to help them all along, not oppress them, but now they are on their own and have to rely on themselves. That's when the rebellious teenagers become good children again, but now as self-sufficient adults.

    B5 took this a step further and asked the question, what if we had two sets of parents with diametrically opposed points of view on how to raise the kids? The kids get caught in the middle obviously, the kids have to fight for the freedom, so to speak, and he parents lose their way because it becomes more about proving their point is right over the other parents.

    If you don't get this, think it through. That of course is the whole point! Suffice it to say though that the Shadow war couldn't have ended any other way without sucking and making the entire thing a shame. This is, contrary to what many people say, the one ending that doesn't do that, but you have to understand it to see that.

    --
    If a pion (n-) collides with a proton in the woods & noone is there to hear it, does lamdba decay into the source pa
  38. Most surprising character development? by chiph · · Score: 3, Funny

    Ambasador Kosh comes out of the closet

  39. Re:Bester & Garabaldi by xVladx · · Score: 2, Informative
    If you want to know the outcome of Bester and Garabaldi's storylines, I highly recommend picking up the Psi Corps trilogy of books. Actually, a lot of the books are really good reading if you're a fan of the series. The ones worth checking out are:

    The Psi Corps Trilogy:
    Dark Genesis
    Deadly Relations
    Final Reckoning

    The first two books actually take place before most of the actual series, but there's some really good backstory involving the founding of the Psi Corps, and Bester's upbringing. The last book actually takes place near the end of the series, and ties up a lot of the litte loose ends left by the series. While the third book is the only one directly dealing with the Garabaldi/Bester situation, the first two are crucial for a plot point near the end of the book.

    Legions of Fire (aka: The Centauri Prime Trilogy)
    The Long Night of Centauri Prime
    Armies of Light and Dark
    Out of the Darkness

    I'm still reading through these books, myself. This trilogy focuses on the events on Centauri Prime between the episdodes The Fall of Centauri Prime and Sleeping in Light. While there aren't as many unanswered questions regarding that storyline, it's been a good read so far, and hopefully the few unanswered questions (especially from War Without End) will get some answers by the time I get through the third book.

    There's also a couple stand-alone novels that fill in some more of the series' backstory...

    The Shadow Within shows what John and Anna Sheridan were doing during the expedition to Z'ha'dum. It's a good book, but not quite as essential to the overall plot as some of the others. You do get some pretty neat insight into one of the characters from the series, though.

    To Dream In the City of Sorrows shows us what Sinclair was up to between the end of the first season and War Without End. Much like The Shadow Within, it's really more about filling in the backstory than resolving loose ends, but it's still worth checking out. There's also a trilogy of books revolving around the Techno-Mages, but I have yet to get around to those. For some reason, I was never a fan of them beyond their one episode in the second season of the show. I always felt them to be a little out of place in the B5 universe, and their frequent occurance in a lot of the more recent B5 stuff just seems like they're being crammed in. This is possibly why I'm not overly stoked about the brief description that we have of TMoS so far. It just seems like it's more likely to be a random story that just happens to take place in the B5 universe, instead of an extension on the original series. What I really would have liked to have seen is more elaboration on the Telepath War that takes place between the last two episodes of the series. There's some information about it in the last book of the Psi Corps trilogy, but not a whole lot.

  40. B5 links [quotes/game] & comments by Lord+Satri · · Score: 4, Informative
    These words are probably useless, too many comments already (/. suffering from its own success). Anyway, there goes some links I have not seen yet in the threads.

    The Lurker's Guide (already in the threads)

    B5 quotes

    More quotes

    I Found Her - Free great B5 game (worthed a look)

    Probably much more interesting links. I *really* liked B5. It helped me see things differently and actively participated in my "growing up". I published a Babylon 5 book of quotes if you're interested. Like many others, I fear a movie won't be good enough. One of the strengths of B5 was telling a story over countless episodes, not only 2 hours. Time will say.

    "We create the future, with our words, our deeds and with our beliefs"
    - Lady Ladira, B5: "Signs and Portents"

  41. Babylon 5 fan-films by GQuon · · Score: 2, Interesting

    ...yes at least the mods keep us happy after the The Babylon 5 Combat Simulator was canceled by Sierra.

    I'm looking forward to the fan film Star Wreck: In the Pirkinning getting Finnished.

    Movies on another site, the space battles, are kind of amusing, but pretty silly.

    --
    Irene KHAAAAAAN!
  42. More grand scale novels by Lonewolf666 · · Score: 2, Interesting

    I have always loved "SF on a grand scale" as Greg Benford would put it; the Lensman and Skylark series of Doc Smith, and Benford's Galactic Center series are some of my favorites.

    Slightly offtopic, have you tried the following?

    -The "Reality Dysfunction" trilogy by Peter F. Hamilton
    -David Weber's Honor Harrington series (first two novels available online at the Baen Free Library), starts with "On Basilisk Station"
    -The Gap series by Stephen R.Donaldson
    -The Miles Vorkosigan Series by Lois Mc Master Bujold

    --
    C - the footgun of programming languages
  43. Re:That wasn't just ANY football game by tntguy · · Score: 2, Funny

    jjjjjjjjjooooooooocccccccckkkkkkkkkks sss!</scream>

  44. Ivanova is God by Wandering+Wombat · · Score: 5, Funny
    "Ivanova is always right. I will listen to Ivanova. I will not ignore Ivanova's recomendations. Ivanova is God. And, if this ever happens again, I will personally rip your lungs out!" And "Commander! Did you threaten to grab hold of this man by the pants and throw him out an airlock? I'd remind you that we are short on pants here. We can't afford to take perfectly good clothing and throw it out into space. Always take the pants off first, I've told you that before. Sorry, she meant to say: 'Stripped naked and thrown out an airlock.' I apologize for any confusion this may have caused."

    And finally... "I could have at least boffed him."

    --
    I like to place meaningful quotes in my sig, so people will know that I know what meaningful quotes are.
  45. Gotta have the whole quote! by Erbo · · Score: 3, Interesting
    "Who am I? I am Susan Ivanova. Commander. Daughter of Andrei and Sophie Ivanov. I am the right hand of vengeance and the boot that is going to kick your sorry ass all the way back to Earth, sweetheart. I am Death incarnate, and the last living thing that you're ever going to see. God sent me."

    And, with that, her White Star begins opening a serious can of whoop-ass on the Earthforce ships...

    --
    Be who you are...and be it in style!
  46. Re:Anyone else find the last episode really lame? by The+Night+Watchman · · Score: 2, Informative

    Last episode? The episode you're describing was the season finale for season 3, right at the height of the shadow war story arc. There were two complete seasons after that...

    IIRC, on one run of the show on Channel 4 in the UK, Babylon 5 was originally only aired up to season 3, and they couldn't get the rights for seasons 4 and 5. So it's not beyond the realm of possibility for some people to think that S3 was the last season of the show.

    A B5 synopses page contains a summary of the next-to-last S3 episode, and at the bottom there's a bit of explanation of what happened with Channel 4.

    --
    "Every jumbled pile of person has a thinking part that wonders what the part that isn't thinking isn't thinking of"-TMBG