Slashdot Mirror


Neuros Audio Releases Its Hardware Schematics

iswm writes "Neuros Audio has released the schematics to their Neuros Digital Audio Computer. Now with open source firmware, hardware schematics, ogg support, tons of other cool features, and an amazing price tag, The Neuros is looking like an awesome competitor in the audio player market."

286 comments

  1. Advertising ? by mirko · · Score: 1, Interesting

    It can be the best product ever, because it is geeky... I am not sure it will beat the iPod which has become a de facto standard.
    I however am looking forward to see it IRL.

    --
    Trolling using another account since 2005.
    1. Re:Advertising ? by which+way+is+up · · Score: 0

      Obviously this is getting hyped here at slashdot because of the sheer geek factor. However, when has the 'geek' factor ever made anything cool to the rest of the world?

    2. Re:Advertising ? by mrdaveb · · Score: 2, Insightful

      It can be the best product ever, because it is geeky... I am not sure it will beat the iPod which has become a de facto standard.

      Maybe it's just the iPod name that is becoming a standard with non-geeks. I expect lots of people think they have an 'iPod' made by Creative or Philips. The same way everyone now has these 'mp3 files' that are actually Windows media, AAC or Ogg.

      There's stilly plenty of opportunity for iPod to lose its dominant position... especially since MS are in the market.

      --
      Homme petit d'homme petit, s'attend, n'avale
    3. Re:Advertising ? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      the ipod is FAR from being a "defacto" standard.

      I do not see AAC files outnumbering mp3 files anywhere. in fact mp3 is the "defacto" standard that no popularity of any hardware can touch.

      ipod is shiny and has a nice idiot interface, THAT is why it is selling decently.

      but it MOST CERTIANLY is not a standard in any way shape or form.

      simply ask the Xbox or GameCube owners about the "defacto" standard that the Playstation is....

      as it has the same market share as the Ipod.

    4. Re:Advertising ? by Reignking · · Score: 1

      Absolutely -- most people don't know what the product category is -- they've only heard of the IPod. When I explain what my IRiver H320 is, I find it easier to say "like an IPod." IPod can't continue this dominance, either...

      --
      One man's Funny is another man's Offtopic.
    5. Re:Advertising ? by Malc · · Score: 1

      "It can be the best product ever, because it is geeky."

      Best player for geeks maybe. Geeks are a minority I'm afraid. And not all geeks want something geeky either.

    6. Re:Advertising ? by SenseiLeNoir · · Score: 1

      Well said...

      I would rather have something that is simple and sounds great, without the waft some "geeky" stuff have. I like my Muvo player, simple, and sweet.

      --
      Have a nice day!
    7. Re:Advertising ? by which+way+is+up · · Score: 1

      I guess some geek was offended by this.. and modded me overrated...

    8. Re:Advertising ? by gilesjuk · · Score: 1

      Microsoft don't have a clue when it comes to hardware products, eg.

      XBox - big ugly console

      Windows smartphones - powerful but poor battery life

      Windows media PC - Just a PC with a tweaked OS

      Tablet PC - nice idea, too expensive

      etc...

    9. Re:Advertising ? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yes, geeks often seem to be extremely over-sensitive. Personally I think they should just get over themselves.

      OTOH, posting with a whinge about moderation is also a no-no on /. So get over yourself!

    10. Re:Advertising ? by _iCeb0x_+(1337+and+k · · Score: 1

      Even though I can't believe some appliance can be a standard, the iPod is more like that than the competition.

      MP3 is a de facto standard, because it's a file format. iPod is one of the players that is capable of playing MP3 files and, by far, the most used/sold.

      I just don't understand the "I do not see AAC files outnumbering mp3 files anywhere" part. The iPod can play MP3 files! If you mean "iTunes Music Store", I understand. But, in this case, the de facto standard should be SoulSeek, Gnutella ou Kazaa.

    11. Re:Advertising ? by FLEB · · Score: 1

      And, it also plays the widely-used .illegal format, which is a big plus for the consumer... does the Neuros?

      --
      Information wants to be free.
      Entertainment wants to be paid.
      You just want to be cheap.
    12. Re:Advertising ? by Yono38 · · Score: 1

      The Neuros plays MP3, Ogg, WMA, and WAV, and has FLAC and MPC unofficially being developed and perhaps someday officially supported.

    13. Re:Advertising ? by Cplus · · Score: 1

      I didn't know that file formats could be illegal. Got any citations on that one?

      --
      "Share your knowledge. It's a way to achieve immortality." -- Dalai Lama
    14. Re:Advertising ? by FLEB · · Score: 1

      Woops... wrong format... that should have been the ".stolen" format, from Steve Ballmer's quote about the most popular file format on iPods being "Stolen".

      --
      Information wants to be free.
      Entertainment wants to be paid.
      You just want to be cheap.
  2. The buzz word of 2004 is... by marika · · Score: 0

    "ipod killer" I wonder if anyone will make an "Ipod Killer Elmo"

    --
    This is totally insecure, but very convenient.
    1. Re:The buzz word of 2004 is... by Total_Wimp · · Score: 3, Funny

      The best part about this whole article is that it _didn't_ include the phrase "iPod killer". Why I'd want any product to kill my daughter's iPod is beyond me anyway. I paid $400 for that thing and I want it to stay alive as long as physically possible.

      Three cheers for the phrase "awesome competitor" instead.

      TW

    2. Re:The buzz word of 2004 is... by Barlo_Mung_42 · · Score: 1

      "Why I'd want any product to kill my daughter's iPod is beyond me anyway"

      The funny thing is that it really is. Just don't get them too close together.
      If you do, the Neuros transforms into a mini Optimus Prime and blasts the iPod to iPieces.

    3. Re:The buzz word of 2004 is... by unitron · · Score: 1
      "If you do, the Neuros transforms into a mini Optimus..."

      If it turns into an Optimus anything that means that it's from Radio Shack which means that it will be what falls to pieces.

      --

      I see even classic Slashdot is now pretty much unusable on dial up anymore.

  3. Official Product of the Slashdot Network by mordors9 · · Score: 3, Funny

    Maybe Slashdot can make some money by letting them license their name. Then all the Nerds could recognize each other in real life by observing their official Slashdot audio player.

    1. Re:Official Product of the Slashdot Network by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      And whenever two or more players come in wi-fi range, they'll sync to send a ceaseless wave of music to the nearest vulnerable wallflower...

    2. Re:Official Product of the Slashdot Network by ivar · · Score: 1

      I realize your comment was tongue in cheek, but given the success of Apple's wildly successful "white headphone" brand mark, maybe something similar would work for Neuros.. Maybe the hacker emblem is a bit unwieldly, but I bet they could work it in...

    3. Re:Official Product of the Slashdot Network by Eclypser · · Score: 1

      I think it's time to come with catchphrases for new slashdot products.
      Slashdot, Beolwolf clustering always available.
      With a name like Slashdot, You know it's been hacked.
      Slashdot, if you haven't heard of it, you don't deserve to use it.
      Slashdot, now with OGG support in every product.
      Slashdot, if this is the first time you've used our product, you will be ridculed.
      Slashdot, your source for open source from the source.

      --
      The comment has already been made. Let's move it along people. Nothing to see here.
    4. Re:Official Product of the Slashdot Network by zallus · · Score: 1

      Don't forget: "Slashdot, FIRST CAHTCPHRASE!!!1"

      --
      I mod down pathetic posts.
    5. Re:Official Product of the Slashdot Network by s-meister · · Score: 1

      Nothing says "mug me" more clearly than white headphones. It's like wearing a kick-me sign. Think of it as evolution in action?

    6. Re:Official Product of the Slashdot Network by ivar · · Score: 1

      Fortunately, I live in a place where fear of theft or violence isn't something that really crosses my mind.

  4. Ogg Support by nycsubway · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Ogg support is very nice, but I hope this device can play other formats as well. One of the things that is making media-playing consumer devices so popular today is the support for all different formats of media. DVD players that can play every type of file format out there, and car cd players that can play mp3. The key to success is multi format support.

    1. Re:Ogg Support by ALecs · · Score: 4, Informative

      It can currently play Ogg, mp3, wma (non-DRM), and wav.

      People are also working on other alternative codecs, including FLAC, musepac and a few others I've heard talk about in IRC.

    2. Re:Ogg Support by TomorrowPlusX · · Score: 2

      If only, two years ago, I had had a viable Ogg option. I finally had the throwaway money to buy a harddisk mp3 player ( to replace my increasingly unreliable MD player ) and literally everything I examined was either a complete piece of crap ( in terms of build quality ) or a complete piece of crap ( in terms of usability ) or a complete piece of crap ( in terms of design ). The sole machine that was any good was the iPod, and it excelled in every way, except for its lack of Ogg support.

      So I bought an iPod, and re-ripped all my CDs ( thank god, not too many ) to high quality MP3 and discarded my oggs.

      Seems like Apple has lit the fire under the feet of competitors who are *now* making increasingly appealing machines.

      I'm sticking with my iPod, but go competition!

      --

      lorem ipsum, dolor sit amet
    3. Re:Ogg Support by Daemonik · · Score: 0
      Ogg support is very nice, but I hope this device can play other formats as well. One of the things that is making media-playing consumer devices so popular today is the support for all different formats of media. DVD players that can play every type of file format out there, and car cd players that can play mp3. The key to success is multi format support.
      Funny, the iPod is the most successful media player currently on the market and it only plays Apple's AAC format plus it's tied to Apple's iTunes software. Don't see too many consumers biatching about it either.

      90% of consumers couldn't tell you the difference between a wav and an mp3, little lone make a purchasing choice based on FLAC compatibility.

      As for Multi-media DVD players, the US consumer market could give a crap about VCD or SVCD compatability, it's the fact that DVD Players are built in Asia where VCD/SVCD was already huge that the support was built into them. It's the Asian market's desire for DivX that is driving it's inclusion as well. As for your fantasy that they can "play every type of file format out there", tell me, does your DVD player support Quicktime? What about Real Media? No? How about XVid encoded AVI's with OGG audio? Didn't think so.

    4. Re:Ogg Support by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      > Funny, the iPod is the most successful media player currently on the market and it only plays Apple's AAC format

      Uh. No.

    5. Re:Ogg Support by Issue9mm · · Score: 1

      Just for clarification, but the iPod does play mp3s, and the iTunes software will convert other formats to AAC as it is imported.

      I haven't tried it with ogg (because I don't have any ogg music), but at least, in a sense, it is multi-format.

      -9mm-

    6. Re:Ogg Support by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The primary customer base of the Neuros appears to be geeks and true audiophiles. (the people who make and record music, not the ones who pay $$$ to listen to audio cables) This market understands the technical implications and can make its decisions from that. A significant minority of vocal customers are using these to replace MD recorders for taping of concerts.

    7. Re:Ogg Support by otuz · · Score: 2, Informative

      With the QuickTime OGG Component installed, you can play and convert OGG-media with iTunes and just about any other QuickTime-enabled app.

    8. Re:Ogg Support by BestNicksRTaken · · Score: 1

      It's "let alone" not "little lone".

      And yeah, I agree with you about the iPod only playing [broken] AAC and MP3 and still selling well (to Joe AOL).

      The Rio Karma is a horrible device IMHO, but it plays FLAC, WAV, MP3, Ogg, WMA.....

      --
      #include <sig.h>
    9. Re:Ogg Support by Rude+Turnip · · Score: 1

      "...iTunes software will convert other formats to AAC as it is imported..."

      This is a somewhat inaccurate statement. While 128kbps AAC is the default encoding format for ripping CDs, there is no sort of conversion going on anywhere...AAC and MP3 files live happily together in the file directories. Furthermore, you can change the ripping format to MP3 in the preferences menu.

    10. Re:Ogg Support by dgatwood · · Score: 1
      It can currently play Ogg, mp3, wma (non-DRM), and wav.

      Wait a sec.... What's the point of an audio player that can't play AIFF (the -standard- audio interchange file format)? And how do you write a WAV implementation that can't play AIFF? It's just a byte-swap on a bunch of header fields....

      Sheesh.

      --

      Check out my sci-fi/humor trilogy at PatriotsBooks.

    11. Re:Ogg Support by dgatwood · · Score: 1
      I think by "will", GP poster meant "can".

      In other words, if you have a format that iTunes can play but the iPod can't, you can tell it "Convert to AAC" and upload the resulting version to the iPod instead.

      --

      Check out my sci-fi/humor trilogy at PatriotsBooks.

    12. Re:Ogg Support by dgatwood · · Score: 1
      That's a load of crap. The iPod can play standard AAC, MP3, AIFF, WAV (Microsoft's broken, byte-swapped perversion of AIFF), and Apple's lossless codec (whatever it's called). In addition, it can -also- play DRMed (which you describe as "broken") AAC.

      FLAC can be easily transcoded losslessly to Apple's lossless codec, so there's no advantage to the Rio there. WMA is an awful format, so no advantage there. I would love to see the iPod support Ogg Vorbis, but... that's the only valid point out of the whole lot, IMHO.

      --

      Check out my sci-fi/humor trilogy at PatriotsBooks.

    13. Re:Ogg Support by lakeland · · Score: 1

      As you note, the difference between AIFF and wav is a byte swap. Further, you didn't even have to read the article to see that the firmware was open since it was lined in the blurb. So, if you would like AIFF support, you know what to do. Hint: It isn't complain on slashdot.

    14. Re:Ogg Support by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You are mentally ill.

    15. Re:Ogg Support by tuffy · · Score: 1
      What's the point of an audio player that can't play AIFF (the -standard- audio interchange file format)? And how do you write a WAV implementation that can't play AIFF? It's just a byte-swap on a bunch of header fields....

      AIFF's Common Chunk is more than just a byte-swapped version of RIFF WAVE's Format Chunk. Though honestly, a player should be able to handle either format since the differences are quite small.

      --

      Ita erat quando hic adveni.

    16. Re:Ogg Support by ryg0r · · Score: 1
      Ogg is a mad format and I prefer it to mp3 but what about people who like to listen to their vast music collection on car stereos? I spend a lot of my 'off-the-computer-time' in the car driving obscenely long distances.

      I have not seen a car CD deck that supports ogg, and to me, this would seem like one of the most important markets to break into. I dont want to re-encode all my oggs into mp3 just to I can here them again.

      I think it would be a wise idea to put ogg in cars.

      --
      Karma whoring .sigs don't work
    17. Re:Ogg Support by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "Woof!"

      Good boy, did you get a bone?

    18. Re:Ogg Support by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      That's why you broadcast to FM, and tune your car radio in to your ogg player.

    19. Re:Ogg Support by pepsee · · Score: 1

      Geez. One day, some company will start selling a portable computer running Emacs, with great battery life. Geeks on /. will complain "but what about the kitchen sink?" The other 99% of the population will ask "but how do I edit my files?".

  5. neuros audio by ccozan · · Score: 3, Interesting

    I have one of these ( practically smuggled from US), and it is impressive what they did. It works perfect, it's open, it works with Linux, you can hack it, you can broadcast radio, etc, etc.

    Kudos to the Neuros Audio! Keep it open!

    1. Re:neuros audio by 3terrabyte · · Score: 1
      I was about to bitch that the only reason this got a headline on slashdot was because it had Ogg support in it. I'm sick of people talking about how bad XING 128 bit encoded mp3's are, so obviously Ogg is so much better.

      LAME encoded mp3's are great. And until you can carry around your whole CD collection in lossless format in your pocket (portable device) then MP3 is here to stay.

      Anyway, after reading the article and what you can do with it, I take it all back. It's awesome.

      --

      Why are there only 19 people folding@home for slashdot?

    2. Re:neuros audio by networkBoy · · Score: 1

      By the time I got here the site was ./'ed
      My main question, which you seem to have answered, is how open is the platform. Since they published the schematics (did they pub gerbers?) I wonder if someone (say me) could start building the boards and shipping out just the PCBs for "roll your own" players?
      -nB

      --
      whois gawk date unzip strip find touch finger mount join nice man top fsck grep eject more yes exit umount sleep dump
    3. Re:neuros audio by Knuckles · · Score: 1

      Well, ogg support is a biggie. I surely won't sit down and rip/encode hundreds of CDs for days and days, and then have them in a format known to be patent-encumbered, support for which in free software can be yanked at any time

      --
      "When I first heard Daydream Nation it quite frankly scared the living shit out of me." -- Matthew Stearns
    4. Re:neuros audio by Darren+Winsper · · Score: 1

      It's the first HD-based MP3 player to have completely open firmware and hardware schematics. Did you really think that wouldn't make the front page?!

    5. Re:neuros audio by Grishnakh · · Score: 1

      There's already no support for MP3 encoding in Free software. If you're about to mention LAME and bladeenc, don't bother: these are illegal to use. That's why they're not included in US Linux distributions. They don't have a licensing deal with the company that owns the MP3 patents, so they can only be distributed in source code form, and you have to compile them yourself. Of course, if you do this and then encode some MP3s without paying a license fee to Fraunhofer/Thompson, then you're a criminal...

      So your comment about yanking support really doesn't apply. There never was any support to begin with; LAME and bladeenc are just skirting the law by distributing only in source form. Of course, if the US becomes even more fascist, they could start going after websites that offer the source code for download, but it's easy enough to distribute stuff on foreign sites like MPlayer, which is distributed from Hungary.

    6. Re:neuros audio by Grishnakh · · Score: 2, Insightful

      These are just the schematics (in PDF form), not gerbers.

      If you're thinking of "rolling your own", forget it. It doesn't make economic sense. Even if you did have the gerbers, making the boards would probably cost a minimum of $100. Then you'd have to buy all the components and solder them on. I don't know what the component cost is, but after looking at the schematics, I noticed that they use several highly specialized chips. You probably would not be able to purchase these chips yourself in singular quantities. If you could, you're now looking at a very difficult job in soldering them onto the boards. If these chips are TSSOP packages, you'll need special soldering tools, which cost several hundred dollars, and require some skill in using (which means you might screw up the first one or two). If these chips are BGAs, however, it's not possible to do those by hand. Unless you happen to have access to a BGA rework lab, complete with a reflow oven, and inspection tools, forget it. And I still haven't gotten into all the miniaturized SMD components that also have to be attached.

      Finally, this still doesn't provide you with a case, buttons, various custom plastic pieces, etc. The LCD might also be a special part. Also, don't forget the value of your time. A project like this would take a long time to complete.

      Your final "roll your own" MP3 player would probably not work, would be ugly, and would cost many times what it'd cost you to just order a Neuros II from their website.

      I'm a big fan of building your own equipment, but you have to know where to draw the line. This isn't like building your own Tivo/PVR, or CarPC. With projects like those, you just need to buy pre-made components (motherboards, power supplies, enclosures, hard drives) and slap them together, then install Linux and spend some time with customization. Fabbing your own circuit boards is an entirely different matter, and simply isn't worth your time unless you're doing something relatively simple, or are making something you intend to sell in large quantities.

    7. Re:neuros audio by networkBoy · · Score: 1

      Actually I work in the high tech business and am not thinking about building only one or two, but several hundred.
      The thought is: provide all the stuff that would be difficult (for the reasons you already outlined) for a person to do on their own, and allow people to be creative in how they deploy the hardware.
      I'm thinking along the lines of building your own PVR with a VIA miniITX board, but lots smaller and cheaper.
      You only need a 4 gig drive but want it very very small do it. You want a 120 gig drive for a hi-fi component fine! do it.
      -nB

      --
      whois gawk date unzip strip find touch finger mount join nice man top fsck grep eject more yes exit umount sleep dump
    8. Re:neuros audio by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      He rather obviously meant decoder support, given he was talking about after he'd encoded the files.

    9. Re:neuros audio by Kiryat+Malachi · · Score: 1

      I've seen someone hand-solder a BGA, without using a reflow oven. We still x-rayed it when he was done, to be sure, but he did manage it. I have no idea how. However, he's a professional electronics technician, and has been working with PCBs for about 30 years now.

      But for the general case, no, it's not possible. TSSOP is about the limit for by-hand, and they're still a pain in the ass to do. I miss DIP sometimes.

      --

      ---
      Mod me down, you fucking twits. Go ahead. I dare you.
      (I read with sigs off.)
    10. Re:neuros audio by Grishnakh · · Score: 1

      Whoops. But it doesn't matter: you still have to pay a license fee for decoding. Check out:
      http://www.mp3licensing.com/royalty/index.html.

      IIRC, Red Hat doesn't come with any precompiled MP3 players for exactly this reason.

      As far as I'm concerned, this is all a good reason to switch to Ogg Vorbis, just as the licensing crap was a sufficient reason to switch from GIF to PNG back when that was under patent protection. The superiority of the format was a bonus.

    11. Re:neuros audio by Grishnakh · · Score: 1

      Considering all the solder balls are under the package, I'd be really interested to know how someone could solder that by hand. That's just baffling.

      DIP's ok, but SOJ is my favorite for hand work. It's surface-mount, and the chips are about a quarter the size of their DIP equivalents. But the pins are large enough and spaced far enough apart that you can solder them with a fine-tipped chisel iron. I've done it many times before. It's easier to solder than to desolder, but neither is particularly difficult once you figure out how, and if you have a steady enough hand. It's much faster to desolder these than DIPs, because you don't need to mess around with solder suckers; you just lift the pins with a mini screwdriver while you apply heat.

    12. Re:neuros audio by serbanp · · Score: 1
      Could you share some more info on how someone could solder the BGA? Was he using a heat gun?

      On the other hand, SSOP is for sissy fads. Yes, when you first transition from DIP to SSOP you have a hard time understanding how can someone solder those by hand, but give it a year or two to adjust. After that the DIP seems h u g e.

      My favorite PITA package is the 4X4 QFN. Being almost leadless and with such a narrow pitch, you have to have good coordination and an excellent flux to do it, but it's doable. This is about the limit to manual soldering without special equipment.

      Serban

    13. Re:neuros audio by Kiryat+Malachi · · Score: 1

      I think he used a heat gun to melt the balls from the opposite side of the board; we were lucky in that it was only a 6 layer and nothing was located directly opposite the BGA (it was, for the record, a MPC561 processor). It was really most impressive, both that he even tried it and that he could hold the package steady enough to line up the balls.

      I just like DIP because I can stab my current lab tech with them when he's not in the lab when he's supposed to be (aka when I need him to be there).

      --

      ---
      Mod me down, you fucking twits. Go ahead. I dare you.
      (I read with sigs off.)
    14. Re:neuros audio by Kiryat+Malachi · · Score: 1

      Yes, heat gun, very steady hands, and a lot of luck.

      Note that I fully admit I can't really solder, which is why I like DIP.

      --

      ---
      Mod me down, you fucking twits. Go ahead. I dare you.
      (I read with sigs off.)
    15. Re:neuros audio by Knuckles · · Score: 1

      you still have to pay a license fee for decoding. (...) IIRC, Red Hat doesn't come with any precompiled MP3 players for exactly this reason.

      Not everybody lives in the US, and, e.g., SuSE distributes decoders in the EU. Obviously they do not think that there is a legal problem with decoding software. So does Debian for that matter, and they /are/ anal about legal stuff (and rightly so). In fact, Debian even distributes Gnome's Sound Juicer CD ripper with mp3 encoding support.

      But be that as it may. If you (and RedHat) are right, it is only one reason more added to the point of my post. Which was that, contrary to the OP's opinion, I do consider ogg support vital, because I won't encode my music collection to mp3 because of current or possible future legal problems

      --
      "When I first heard Daydream Nation it quite frankly scared the living shit out of me." -- Matthew Stearns
  6. Open firmware over open hardware.... by Gopal.V · · Score: 3, Interesting

    So far all the hardware players had that "Ipod Killer" tag, which isn't the TFA :).

    Open firmware is cool - but hardware schematics are more iffy. All in all, I'd put open firmware over hardware schemas any day :)

    Have you seen Simputer General Public License which Simputer uses for their hardware ?. I suppose Neuros has some kind of licensing model at least for defining copyright and that kind of stuff. This is kinda blind faith to re-use or work on.
    1. Re:Open firmware over open hardware.... by JoeBorn · · Score: 1

      Actually we really released the schematics to support the open firmware development. As you know firmware development is pretty reliant on the hardware, so this is more like documentation for that. Second would be to foster additional backpack development, and other 3rd party hardware add ons.

      --
      If you're going through hell, keep going -Winston Churchill
  7. Neuros... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I just ordered one about 2 days ago. They're working right now on audible, flac, and mpc support, and with the open sourcing of the firmware and sync manager it's guaranteed they'll get there. Great little box.

    1. Re:Neuros... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Hey! I ordered one 2 days ago! :)

  8. Cool idea. by nativespeaker · · Score: 2, Insightful

    I actually like this idea -- in order to "kill" the iPod (or somesuch nonsense) you'd actually need a simultaneous music store/sync software/player package that was so much better than the iPod that it would be worth the switch. I think it makes more sense to add features and hack-friendliness to get the appeal of niche markets. Smaller groups, perhaps, but just as loyal -- hmm...sounds like a popular fruit-flavored computer brand.

    1. Re:Cool idea. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Neuros audio is smart enough to realize that they can't directly compete with the iPod, so instead of mimicking it they built it awesome features that you have to buy additional hardware to mimic on the iPod. The neuroscast (MyFi befor they sold the name) built in tuneable FM transmitter hass less than stellar performance in areas with a crowded radio spectum but it works great for me. I can also attest that the internal microphone with recording to .WAV or .MP3 works great for recording lectures. OGG Vorbis support is pretty sweet as are the open source initiatives. The sync software is a little slow, but the Java NDBM works very nicely. The best part though is that they take customer service seriously and are very friendly people. They actively post on the forums at the Neuros website and believe in making the customer happy. Also battery replacement is about $7 instead of the $99 iPod battery replacement.

    2. Re:Cool idea. by Lumpy · · Score: 1

      simple... no firewire, but high speed bluetooth.

      if you only have to get the ipod near the computer to sync and upload that would rule.

      a friend of mine had a HD mp3 player from germany that had no connections other than a power plug for charging, it had 802.11g in it and as long as you were in the house it would wake up, allow you to send or retrieve files from it and then go back to sleep.

      it was great, he had some rare TMBG tracks on it, and offered to let me upload them, I mentioned, "go get your player" and he said, "no, just search your workgroup, there it is, there you want the whole album?"

      it was in his coat pocket by the door.

      Cost him 350 euros in late 2003... sadly we have nothing like this here in the US.

      --
      Do not look at laser with remaining good eye.
    3. Re:Cool idea. by Darren+Winsper · · Score: 2, Informative

      Bluetooth is 100 times slower than USB 1.1, which in of itself is considered too slow for HD-based players. Bluetooth would need a hell of a speed bump to be useful for HD-based players.

    4. Re:Cool idea. by Barlo_Mung_42 · · Score: 1

      "in order to "kill" the iPod (or somesuch nonsense) you'd actually need a simultaneous music store/sync software/player package that was so much better than the iPod that it would be worth the switch."

      Functionality isn't really why the iPod is so popular. I've used it and it isn't any more functional (less so IMO) than some other players. The iSheep like it because they are convinced by a well organized and orchestrated marketing blitz that it is best and that they will be "with it" if they are seen wearing the white ear buds.
      In order to kill it there would need to be another device with an equally effective marketing campaign.

    5. Re:Cool idea. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      i think that is why he said "high speed".

      also, how many times to you transfer 2-10 gig of files to your player? everyone makes a deal about " it would take forever to transfer XXgigs of files!" yet they NEVER do that except for the very first time.

      cripes people get a grip. when you charge it for the first time, start the xfer and GO TO FARKING BED. oh look it's ready and you will never be doing that large of a transfer again so the 10-15 mp3's you add next week will go nice and quick.

    6. Re:Cool idea. by Darren+Winsper · · Score: 1

      My point is that "high speed" would mean a massive jump in speed. Syncing one or two songs wouldn't be a big deal, but people like me have music collections much larger than the capacity of our players and thus transfer 100s of MB at a time. I'd rather do that in five minutes in the morning than set it off at night and hope it's done by the time I leave for work in the morning.

    7. Re:Cool idea. by nativespeaker · · Score: 1

      Apple has the same marketing departments for their computers. If marketing were the only things they had going for them, they'd dominate in computer sales as well. Hell, if marketing could really overcome all shortcomings, we'd probably all be enjoying a frosty Pepsi Blue right now.

      Functionality and word-of-mouth are clearly important factors here. I respect your opinion on functionality (are you referring to features or ease-of-use?), but you must realize that many people disagree.

      I always forget the memes. When a few people disagree with you, they're "oddball wingnut freaks", and when a lot of people disagree with you they're "sheep", right?

    8. Re:Cool idea. by Barlo_Mung_42 · · Score: 1

      They pursue the two campaigns very differently. I don't see nearly as many ads for their computers as I do for the iPod. They are both going for the "Hip" factor though which explains why you see SO many more people on TV and in movies using Powerbooks compared to real life. Apple is just inherently more brandable.

      When I talk about iSheep though I'm talking about real people that I have talked to that insist that the iPod has the "best" user interface. When I ask why they can't really tell me and they just say that it is simple. Simple is fine unless it doesn't do something I wish it would. When I ask how many other music players they have tried they admitted to very few.
      What I mean when I say the Neuros is better IMO (and I have tried an iPod) is that it is easier and faster to get to the content I like; ease-of-use as you say. There are five programmable shortcut buttons that work much like the pre-sets of your car stereo that allow for a very simple yet powerful interface. There are other reasons (such as the FM transmitter and OGG support) but for me the programmable buttons are the biggie.

      I've always been an oddball etc and I've always felt that people who fallow the crowd without really looking into what else is out there are sheep. Do you prefer the term "Marketing Zombies"?

    9. Re:Cool idea. by nativespeaker · · Score: 1

      I think they've got a product with a broader general appeal and a lower price-entry point than a new computer -- that might be why they're pushing it so hard. Remember the ad saturation with the original iMac? That was a big success for Apple, and probably hoisted their asses out of the mud, but I just think switching platforms with a major investment wasn't an option for people the way the iPod is.

      I think the phrase 'simple' is what non-techs are using to describe the ability to choose songs with minimal clicks and finger movement, little learning time, and a high degree of accuracy when selecting. Those programmable buttons are no doubt faster, once you set them up and remember the combinations to activate them, but I found DOS to be a much faster way of operating a desktop PC before Windows began its lurch onto the scene.

      I guess that's kind of my point -- a product generally has to be made for the lowest common denominator in order to be successful on a wide scale. The features you mention (programmable buttons, OGG and FM, etc) are power-user features that will appeal to a smaller yet loyal customer base, and I think it's a wise move, rather than trying to come up something that will appeal to 'sheep' more than the iPod.

  9. Obviously I'm missing something... by which+way+is+up · · Score: 2, Insightful
    The Neuros is looking like an awesome competitor in the audio player market.

    Why exactly ?

    1. Re:Obviously I'm missing something... by Digital11 · · Score: 3, Informative

      I have both an iPod and a Neuros. I got an iPod through the freeipods.com thing, and I've had the Neuros for a little over a year now. The iPod was the shiny new toy for about a month, and hasn't been used since. The Neuros is just better. Better menu interface, better sound, better features.

      --
      I am a leaf on the wind. Watch how I soar.
    2. Re:Obviously I'm missing something... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      *yawn* Because it plays Ogg of course. Anything that plays Ogg will get the slashdot vote.

    3. Re:Obviously I'm missing something... by amabbi · · Score: 0, Offtopic

      I have both an iPod and a Neuros. I got an iPod through the freeipods.com thing, and I've had the Neuros for a little over a year now. The iPod was the shiny new toy for about a month, and hasn't been used since. The Neuros is just better. Better menu interface, better sound, better features. Then give me your iPod, please.

    4. Re:Obviously I'm missing something... by Digital11 · · Score: 1

      LOL... Naah, gonna give it to the wife.

      --
      I am a leaf on the wind. Watch how I soar.
    5. Re:Obviously I'm missing something... by deman1985 · · Score: 1

      That, and if there's something that you don't like about the firmware/menu interface, since you have the source available to you, make your own mods and voila! Your own instant, customized Neuros.

      I have one myself (I'm actually listening to Sneaker Pimps with it as I write) and I'll readily admit that there are things about it that I don't like-- some things that I can change through firmware, and others that I can't, like the slightly bulky casing. Overall, though, it's so much more flexible, has FM transmitting built-in, can function as a multi-purpose portable HD since it doesn't care what else you throw on there, and it was significantly cheaper for the same capacity. While iPods are "neat" and smooth, the Neuros is functionally so much better; try one out and you'll see what I mean.

    6. Re:Obviously I'm missing something... by Kiryat+Malachi · · Score: 1

      can function as a multi-purpose portable HD since it doesn't care what else you throw on there

      You probably don't realize this, but the iPod does this too.

      (I've tried both, and won't be buying a Neuros anytime soon - I don't *need* a built-in transmitter, I just have an external one that stays in my car where it sees use, and the menus on the iPod work perfectly well for me - and anyone else with a fully tagged MP3 collection).

      --

      ---
      Mod me down, you fucking twits. Go ahead. I dare you.
      (I read with sigs off.)
    7. Re:Obviously I'm missing something... by AaronLawrence · · Score: 1

      But it can't play music unless it's loaded with iTunes. Still useful, but much less than it could be. I can see why (to stop casual piracy) but it still sucks.

      --
      For every expert, there is an equal and opposite expert. - Arthur C. Clarke
    8. Re:Obviously I'm missing something... by Kiryat+Malachi · · Score: 1

      iTunes, or ephPod, or any of the other programs existing to load the necessary data into the database that makes the interface work well.

      I'm willing to trade limits on how I load my music (especially given that there ARE GPLed ways to do it) for my player actually having a usable index of the songs that are on it.

      --

      ---
      Mod me down, you fucking twits. Go ahead. I dare you.
      (I read with sigs off.)
  10. Why not FLAC support??? by parvenu74 · · Score: 2, Interesting

    For a device supposedly aimed at developers, and with as big as of a hard drive as this thing has, why doesn't it support FLAC?

    (What would be doubly-nice is if it supported real-time recording to FLAC from a line level input, but I'll bitch and whine about the absence of that feature when they get around to having it at least *play* FLAC...)

    1. Re:Why not FLAC support??? by ALecs · · Score: 2, Informative

      The problem, I believe, is space in the CPU's memory for the codecs. The thing has 64k (yes, k) of memory for running the firmware and decoding audio. Multiple codecs have to be loaded into the chip on a per-song basis.

      Also, I don't know what FLAC would do to the battery life. Since the data rate is so high (compared to a lossy format) you'll be running the disk A LOT more.

    2. Re:Why not FLAC support??? by parvenu74 · · Score: 3, Interesting

      The disk would be running less than recording a line input at 44.1Khz WAV though. The reason I mention this is that a couple of my friends are audio engineer types and keeping an eye open for an iPod-like (loosely speaking) that has lots of storage, can record full quality audio at line level, and perhaps compress to lossy format as well, without shelling out thousands of dollars for "professional" solutions. On-site recording would be less of a need than a portable music library, but if they can kill two birds with one stone... why not?

    3. Re:Why not FLAC support??? by jumpingfred · · Score: 1

      I beleive that the Iriver players do all this.

    4. Re:Why not FLAC support??? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I have a Neuros II 80GB. It can do all of this. It can record to multiple wav bit rates, as well as directly to multiple MP3 bitrates. There is no support for recording directly to OGG (as of firmware 2.25). I love the recording functionality and use it for my dj sets.

    5. Re:Why not FLAC support??? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      An additional limiting factor may be the processing power of the DSP. The Neuros doesn't have a general purpose CPU so that greatly limits how fast it can perform operations that the DSP wasn't optimized for. Writing the .ogg Vorbis decoder was a major challenge due to the limited processing power and lack of floating point suppport. I have no knowledge of what processor support FLAC requires.

    6. Re:Why not FLAC support??? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      If you are an audio engineer, check out the edirol r-1.
      uncompressed 24bit 44.1k recording, and built in stereo omnis. All onto cfdisk.
      I've been looking for a while too, and this is the first thing that has interested me.

    7. Re:Why not FLAC support??? by Lumpy · · Score: 2, Informative

      your friends need to get a clue and ignore the "hard drive" recorders.

      portable DAT recorder works perfectly, and with the right computer DAT drive you can quickly extract the audio files off the tape and into uncompressed 44.1 or 48KHZ wav files.

      I do this all the time, the deck cost me less than $450.00 new and with the Sure pocket field mixer and a pair of high end electret microphones hidden on my lapels I can get extremely good live concert recordings without anyone knowing.

      it records better than any pro-sumer digital recording system made and I certianly have the storage that makes the best products look silly. a pair of T-180 DAT tapes can not be beat.

      I get about 4 hours of recording time per set of AA batteries, and has manual recording capability.

      --
      Do not look at laser with remaining good eye.
    8. Re:Why not FLAC support??? by glesga_kiss · · Score: 1
      The reason I mention this is that a couple of my friends are audio engineer types and keeping an eye open for an iPod-like (loosely speaking) that has lots of storage, can record full quality audio at line level, and perhaps compress to lossy format as well

      Why bother? I can pretty much guarantee that the onboard ADC will be cheap and nasty. What's the point in making a lossless recording passed through headphone quality interconnects and audio-stages? Ever tried recoding line-level in your average soundcard and burning to CD? Yuck!

      Now, one with a digital input...that's a different matter altogether!

    9. Re:Why not FLAC support??? by parvenu74 · · Score: 1

      My friend has something like five DAT recorders for just this purpose. He's also in the market for something iPod-like for hauling around his tunes (Grateful Dead, mainly). An added bonus would be something that can record full quality audio at line input, and a double bonus would be real-time compression to a lossless format like FLAC. He's not looking to retire the DAT's just yet, but is casually keeping an eye open for something that might be able to do the job just as well -- and copying the audio data to the computer at hard drive speeds beats the hell out of real time or slightly faster than real time dumps from DAT to the audio processing workstation.

    10. Re:Why not FLAC support??? by illtud · · Score: 1

      your friends need to get a clue and ignore the "hard drive" recorders.

      portable DAT recorder works perfectly, ... quickly extract the audio files off the tape and into uncompressed 44.1 or 48KHZ wav files.


      I've got an iRiver h120 with giant squid audio mics recording to 44.1 wav (or straight to mp3, if it doesn't matter) which I can drag and drop straight off to my linux box. I can record for 10 hours on the internal battery (though due to the disk being FAT, it'll only do about 2 hours max in one file!). Until you've heard the results and still aren't impressed, you can shove your linear, bulky DAT. There's also the added bonus of it being a 20GB ogg repository (or any other files that might be handy to have in a cigarette packet size). Your couple of T180 DATs are looking mighty small from over here.

      Unless you've tried an iRiver HDD recorder with a proper set of mics, you really don't know what you're talking about. It's going to be down to "is the ADC in your DAT that much better than the iRiver's to outweigh all the pros the iRiver brings to the table?". Without knowing what DAT you've got I can't tell you, but knowing what you get for $450 I'm guessing your flush is well busted.

    11. Re:Why not FLAC support??? by Lumpy · · Score: 1

      I get around 8X the dump rate from the IBM computer data DAT drive. and the linux program I use automatically seperates the audio stream into descreet WAV files based on the chapter marks I make by pressing the mark track button.

      works great, pop in the tape, start the program and by the time I'm done reading email, checking a couple of ebay auctions and get a pop I'm ready to start dealing with the files in audacity. by the time i'm done with the first one all tracks are off the DAT tape.

      unless you NEED to work on all the tracks at once the speed factor really is not an issue.. I do not know of anyone that MUST work on 130 minutes of audio right now.

      I have looked, and nothing can even come close to the DAT's audio quality that is less than $4500.00 and none of them can come close to the total recording time. and the problem with things like the ipod that have record, they do not have manual recording controls with VU meters. so you are stuck with crappy recording as the auto level adjuster goes on pumping the audio on you destrying the recording any dynamic range.

      my other recording device of choise is a minidisc recorder. I get near CD quality when I do not want to risk having my DAT setup confiscated.

      The last concert I went into they looked at it and said, "oh a minidisc player you can go in."

      and I still get great live recordings for my library.

      I know, I'm making the artist's children starve because I'm stealing that live album they refuse to release and sell to me and does not exist.

      I'm evil.

      --
      Do not look at laser with remaining good eye.
    12. Re:Why not FLAC support??? by Lumpy · · Score: 1

      let me know when it can record at 48khz uncompressed for over 2 hours.

      and yes I tried the iriver, it's analog input sucks with a high noise floor and has worthless manual recording level controls.

      i'm making live recordings that rival stuff from the pros, the iriver can not touch DAT.

      oh, bulky? funny, it fit's in my coat pocket quite easily, the size of 2 packs of ciggaretts I can usually carry it, another set of AA's and an extra tape quite comfortably.

      --
      Do not look at laser with remaining good eye.
    13. Re:Why not FLAC support??? by illtud · · Score: 1

      let me know when it can record at 48khz uncompressed for over 2 hours.

      Funny man, I thought you said your battries only did 2 hours, or can you hot swap them? The iRiver will trump that easy, it won't be a contiguous file, but then nor will yours. It tops out at 44.1 but I thought this was gigs you were recording - that's good acoustics if you can actually tell the difference.

      and yes I tried the iriver, it's analog input sucks with a high noise floor and has worthless manual recording level controls.

      I thought you were using an external recording mixer anyway? The noise floor is higher than most DATs, but depending on your environment and what you're recording, it's probably plenty low enough.

      oh, bulky? funny, it fit's in my coat pocket quite easily, the size of 2 packs of ciggaretts I can usually carry it, another set of AA's and an extra tape quite comfortably.

      So... about 4 times the size of the iRiver, then? That's what I mean by bulky. We'll forget the external recording mixer you use with your DAT since you seem to have as well.

      So we have: 44.1 vs 48. 10 hours vs 4 hours (you've got that extra pair of AAs). A higher noise floor, digital inputs & outputs, 100x faster transfer, 4 times smaller. Horses for courses. I know which one I'm sticking with, but thanks for the discourse. Here's a hint - try addressing all the points I raise next time rather than the two (48 & noise floor) that I grant the DAT has an edge on. Then explain why the two points you bring up means that DAT wins despite the other cons. "i'm making live recordings that rival stuff from the pros" makes you sound like you're 17.

    14. Re:Why not FLAC support??? by illtud · · Score: 1

      I said: Funny man, I thought you said your battries only did 2 hours, or can you hot swap them? ...doncha hate it when you do that? (it was 4 hours). Mmmm, tasty crow. Pity, since I was genuinely interested whether you'd get back to me with a proper explanation of why you thought it better.

    15. Re:Why not FLAC support??? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      FWIW, I would not want to record at 48khz because the downsampling to 44.1k for CD would potentially cause substantial quality loss (far worse than starting at 44.1k).

      I am currently looking for a good FLAC or WAV recorder. Currently using an Archos 20GB with Rockbox. It works very well and allows manual level adjustment for each channel. You start recording and never stop since duration is a non-issue. Tape flips? Are you kidding?

      In the real world (at a gig), I find that I have to be careful not to hit any buttons on the unit (if in pocket, lap, etc). I also have some concerns about mechanical noise from my connectors (mics, mic amp), especially when I am moving the unit to check levels.

      I suspect I will be building an enclosure that protects the buttons and prevents any movement of the connectors.

      I have been thinking that I'd really like a vibrating pager motor in my pocket wired the recorder. The idea would be to have the motor go off when you get within n% of clipping. That way you wouldn't have to keep looking at the meter when you think the level has jumped. I really hate being distracted by the equipment when trying to enjoy a show.

    16. Re:Why not FLAC support??? by LinuxTek · · Score: 1

      Have they considered using a Minidisc player? The one I have (MZ-NHF800) has optic line-in plus mic-in, for digital and analog recording. It is a Hi-MD unit, which supports recording in PCM mode, or in compressed mode (ATRAC3 encoding, Sony's proprietary format). You can then upload your music to a computer with the software. Sony has just recently released an utility to convert uploaded music from your device to WAV files. And with 1GB discs, you get 94 minutes of PCM audio, or 2040 minutes with highest compression mode. You have limitless amount of storage, as long as you keep buying minidics.

      All this for $200, btw.

      --
      Signatures are supposed to be funny?
    17. Re:Why not FLAC support??? by TheGratefulNet · · Score: 1

      archos jukebox can record DIRECT spdif in to hard disk. I believe it does create mp3 on the fly, though, so it is compressed. but at least it has no analog stage to force your hand. if you convert from analog to spdif first, then pipe that into an archos, you will get pretty decent sound.

      this is the version that speaks usb2.0 and has the 'old' style look (AA nimh batts, not the flat special one).

      for the best recording I know of, you can get a 'core sound' (google for it) setup that has a decent digital input, can use an ipaq or similar pda, uses a LOSSLESS spdif mmc-style card (by vxpocket) and its bit-accurate for musicans.

      hth. /as a former dat-head from the late 80's and an ex-gdead taper - who knows about DAT and knows the downsides of it, too..

      --

      --
      "It is now safe to switch off your computer."
    18. Re:Why not FLAC support??? by mogrify · · Score: 1

      I believe that FLAC still has to be written for non-floating-point processing. They had to write a similar port (Tremor) for Ogg before it would work on this unit. I hope they do this for Speex as well ... this would allow any willing manufacturer to include support for all three formats. I remember reading a while back that Xiph will donate engineer time to any manufacturer interested in including Vorbis support.

      --
      perl -e 'foreach(values %SIG){$_="IGNORE";}while(){}'
    19. Re:Why not FLAC support??? by boodaman · · Score: 1

      The currently available iRiver products don't have recording capability, except for recording FM broadcasts. I've been through the site, as well as the user guide, for the H3** series, and there's no mention whatsoever of recording anything but FM.

      Is the only option, then, to get an older model used?

    20. Re:Why not FLAC support??? by illtud · · Score: 1

      The currently available iRiver products don't have recording capability, except for recording FM broadcasts.

      I don't think so - the h340 is a beefed-up h1xx, and I think it has the same recording options (except the h1xx's can't do FM recording as the HDD isn't shielded well enough not to screw up the receiver). See the 'view detailed spec' on that page:

      Direct Encoding MP3
      Voice Recording Yes
      Line In Yes
      Line Out Yes
      Optical In No

      Hmm - it may have lost WAV recording and there's an optical in on the h1xx's. Seems like they're going backwards on some features! I'd recommend the h1xx unless you're trying to "rival stuff from the pros", but get a set of powered mics from great squid.

    21. Re:Why not FLAC support??? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I have owned a Neuros Digital Audio Computer for a few months now. It DOES perform line-level (as well as from the built-in microphone or from FM radio) recording to MP3 and WAV formats. It also plays WAV, MP3, OGG and WMA formats. Not as compact as iPod, but WAY more powerful, IMO.

      See NeurosAudio.com

    22. Re:Why not FLAC support??? by MarsLander · · Score: 1
      Well, I have an H340, and it can record from line in or a mic. The older 120/140 models had optical in as well, but this has been removed on the 340.

      The 340 even comes with a small external mic.

    23. Re:Why not FLAC support??? by Lumpy · · Score: 1

      tape record length is over 120 minutes, it's easy to swap batteries between sets when I hit the battery life end.

      I do use a pocket mixer, the LINE INPUTS in the iriver have more noise in them than a low end radioshack mixer, I have almost no noise in the DAT deck's line in inputs... have you even tried to record live with that? the stupid autolevelers pump the audio around so it sounds like a $30.00 boombox casette recording. manual is a wild guess with no indication of any clipping, nice record it either low or clip the hell out of the recording and throw away your time.

      and yes, with a pair of $100.00 sony lapel capsules on me and the mixer I get really good recordings live while standing in the crowd. better than any live album I have ever purchased as the stereo seperation is uncanny (with headphones on you swear you are there) and the overall presence of the recording gives it a very live feeling unlike any released live album.

      DAT is uncompressed 48khz, the input to the deck has a much lower noise floor and is manually adjustable WITH level indicators so I know for a fact that my recording is going to be correct.

      comparing my dat deck to your iriver is like comparing a $300.00 sony pamcorder to a $4500.00 Canon XL2.. yes they both record video, the canon is going to make the sony's video look like utter crap.

      same as the recorded audio, if you do not know the difference then you will never understand.

      enjoy your recordings. I'll enjoy mine.

      --
      Do not look at laser with remaining good eye.
    24. Re:Why not FLAC support??? by Lumpy · · Score: 1

      48khz is AWESOME for making DVDaudio discs..

      currently the rage with high end audio people.

      tape flips? do you even know what DAT is? most longer DAT tapes can record 2+ hours at 48Khz 4+ hours at 44.1.

      --
      Do not look at laser with remaining good eye.
  11. Except by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0, Insightful

    Their product is awesome ... 'except it's the size of a brick.
    Seriously, nobody wants an audio player with a backpack harddrive. At least I don't ... and I'll decide for us all.

  12. I don't want an iPod Killer by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I like my iPod alive, thank you.

  13. With the size of the storage... by Sheetrock · · Score: 1, Interesting
    It's about time for these things to support lossless formats (FLAC/SHN/MKW or even WAV). While OGG is better than MP3 and roughly equivalent to Windows Media format (ASF/WMA), there is still a noticable and irritating artifact in the sound stream from the type of compression employed -- on quality headphones this is especially noticable.

    Does anybody know if such a project is being undertaken for the Neuros? I might even pick one up and hack on it myself for my own edification.

    --

    Try not. Do or do not, there is no try.
    -- Dr. Spock, stardate 2822-3.




    1. Re:With the size of the storage... by tankrshr77 · · Score: 1

      The Neuros supports wav and mp3 playing and recording, as well as ogg playback.

    2. Re:With the size of the storage... by ALecs · · Score: 1

      It supports WAV already.

      Somebody is working on FLAC, too, I think. Not sure who, at the moment, though.

    3. Re:With the size of the storage... by WJMoore · · Score: 3, Informative

      The iPod supports AIFF, WAV (always has) and now Apple Lossless formats... Granted it doesn't play Ogg or FLAC but if it is just lossless formats you want they are available.

    4. Re:With the size of the storage... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      it;'s your crappy encoder.

      I can make an mp3 that an audiophile listening on $30,000.00 speakers though a $100,000 high end amp and preamp can not tell the difference between the CD and the mp3.

      lame -q 0 -b 192

      we did this test for 5 days straight at the local high end audio shop. NONE of the people with "golden ears" could tell the difference.

      but then none of them can tell the difference between $0.39 lamp cord and $12.00 a foot no-ox high end speaker wires either.

      audiophile usually equates to "full of shit".

      no not a troll, just the truth.

    5. Re:With the size of the storage... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      OGG is better than MP3...

      Ogg is "better" than MP3 in the same way a hard drive is "better" than a Word document. It doesn't make sense to make the comparison. Ogg is a container format, MP3 is an audio codec. They are two completely different things.

    6. Re:With the size of the storage... by Knuckles · · Score: 1

      Rio Karma: ogg and flac support, 20 GB

      --
      "When I first heard Daydream Nation it quite frankly scared the living shit out of me." -- Matthew Stearns
    7. Re:With the size of the storage... by Malc · · Score: 1

      There isn't enough storage yet. I need more than 100GB for my FLAC collection. It only takes up 15GB as OGG Vorbis though. And yes, Ogg to my stereo over the Toslink from my iRiver iHP-120 does sound odd at times, especially in the bass area.

    8. Re:With the size of the storage... by x102output · · Score: 1

      bullshit i have me a set of logitech z-680's hooked up to my onboard sound via optical s/pdif. i can tell the difference between my flac albums and mostly any mp3s from lame. and by lame mp3s, i talking --alt-preset standard or --alt-preset extreme. the difference is all in the high frequencies. and i dont have perfect hearing either.

    9. Re:With the size of the storage... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The iAudio M3 plays FLAC, as well as Vorbis, MP3 and WMA.

      More info:

    10. Re:With the size of the storage... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      While OGG is better than MP3 and roughly equivalent to Windows Media format (ASF/WMA)

      Well done Sir! Funniest thing I've read all week.
      Can't believe no-one else picked up on the joke...

      In all seriousness, two rusty tin cans connected with a piece of string are "roughly equivalent to Windows Media format". Except without the licence restrictions & DRM.

    11. Re:With the size of the storage... by Overzeetop · · Score: 1

      Yeah, I'll call (mostly) bullshit on this one.

      I can hear the difference between lame and lossless on several Boston tracks up to between 224 and 256 kbit/s on $90 Sony MDR-V6 headphones. Beyond that I haven't been able to find a source I listen to that makes a difference. That said, I encoded all my CDs to FLAC, and keep a transcoded version at 192 ABR simultaneously. FLAC for the heavy duty listening or future recoding to the "latest greatest", and MP3 for my portable, which usually gets modulated to the car stereo or listened to on cheap earbuds.

      --
      Is it just my observation, or are there way too many stupid people in the world?
  14. I have one. by tankrshr77 · · Score: 5, Interesting

    I actually have a Neuros. I bought one about 2 years ago. Honestly, they're a lot larger than ipods, so I doubt that they will catch on with the portable audio market. It's not really 'pocket-size.'

    However, it is perfect for carrying in a backpack. The built in mic is sensitive enough for recording interviews, and the harddrive can hold alot more than other portable recorders you can buy.

    FM transmitting- I love it, but it's not really powerful enough here in the Washington, DC area with all the background noise to be picked up more than 3 or so feet away.

    The sound quality is decent, but the included headphones broke within two months. I did go jogging with them, so that might be the reason.

    1. Re:I have one. by Ironsides · · Score: 1

      How was your experience jogging with the HD? In my experience HD based players tend to skip when I run, due to the jolt when my feet hit the ground. Thats why I picked up an MPIO FL300 (matchbox size, literally, it fits inside a matchbox), which is flash based and at 1GB enough songs for running and exercise. I've figured that I should use two, one for exercise and one for "sitting still" like on a train and in the car. Will this thing work well that way or will I still have problems on bumpy roads? Also, can I use the USB HD as a standalone USB HD or do Ihave to use it through the Neuros. As a solution to your FM problem, try one of these FM transmitters from Best Buy. They should work over the noise.

      --
      Fly me to the moon Let me sing among those stars Let me see what spring is like On jupiter and mars
    2. Re:I have one. by Unknown+Lamer · · Score: 1

      The key to making the FM transmitter work in DC/Baltimore is to make sure the Neuros is plugged into your ciggarrette light adaptor. Or just take off your external attenna.

      I took off my attenna because I was tired of people changing the radio station on me (I listen to European metal for the most part and the radio sucks) and my Camaro looks better without an attenna :)

      You could also resolder the RF port to the internal attenna and try that.

      Getting a Neuros II would fix it automatically because those things have godly FM transmitters (grr, I convinced a friend to get a Neuros II and I want to steal his head to replace my Neuros I head...I could do it if I swapped the casing...evil).

      --

      HAL 7000, fewer features than the HAL 9000, but just as homicidal!
    3. Re:I have one. by nxg125 · · Score: 1

      How was your experience jogging with the HD? In my experience HD based players tend to skip when I run, due to the jolt when my feet hit the ground.

      That's what the Neuros flash backpack is used for. The design totally rocks, you have a single player that can have a hard drive backpack for normal use, then switch to the flash backpack for doing high impact activities.

    4. Re:I have one. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      How's the battery life? Is there line-in recording?

      Every now and then I take a week-long wilderness survival class, it's out in the woods but with a lot of lectures. I'd like to record all the lectures onto a harddrive, with a good-quality mike so it doesn't matter that I'm sitting in the back.

    5. Re:I have one. by Barlo_Mung_42 · · Score: 1

      They REALLY improved the FM transmitting range in version two. I had a NeurosI that I had to send back right when the NeurosII came out. What they sent me back was a NeurosII. Talk about good customer service! And it works so much better.
      The size doesn't bother me because it works so well for what I need it for. If fits in my vest pocket without a problem. Another feature that makes it better IMO than an iPod is the 5 programmable buttons. They makes finding favorite lists or picking up where I left off in a long recording sooo easy. I love me Neuros!

    6. Re:I have one. by Barlo_Mung_42 · · Score: 1

      Battery life is about 7 hours for mine. If you have access to your car you can charge it with the included car adapter.
      It does have mic in.

    7. Re:I have one. by Oblio · · Score: 1

      Read on the neuros forums for tips on fixing your FM transmitting problems. A little work with a soldering iron and your problems will go away.

      --
      Pax -- Ob
    8. Re:I have one. by cmmike · · Score: 1

      > FM transmitting- I love it, but it's not really powerful enough here in the Washington, DC area with all the background noise to be picked up more than 3 or so feet away.

      install a wired FM modulator in your car. they are available for around 40$ at places like crutchfield.com, and are not too hard to install.

      --
      -- LIVE FATS DIE YO GNU
    9. Re:I have one. by tankrshr77 · · Score: 1

      Honestly, I got the bundle, so I've never done any intensive running with the harddrive backback, only the flash, since it's a pain to carry. However, I've used the harddrive at the track at the gym and working out- haven't had any trouble with it.

  15. Re:Ogg Support - Sorry in advance by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    "It can currently play Ogg, mp3, wma (non-DRM), and wav."

    Yes, but can it play Doom3?

    --
    I actually *do* type this every time.

  16. Comment removed by account_deleted · · Score: 1

    Comment removed based on user account deletion

  17. Unfortunately... by ilithiiri · · Score: 3, Informative

    Also on ThinkGeek, the product cannot be sold outside the US, unlike the iPod. Sigh.. I was looking very much forward to it!!

    --
    If anyone can hear me, slap some sense into me But you turn your head, and I end up talking to myself
    1. Re:Unfortunately... by ALecs · · Score: 1

      See www.cool4u2view.com - he sells outside the States.

      It's also sold in plenty of other places that will sell outside the US.

    2. Re:Unfortunately... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I did recently hear that British law was goin got change shortly so that the broadcast of radio frequencies would be legal. At the time I was investigating which audio player to get, I ended up with a Rio Karma, I talked to some on at the home office who said that any transmission on radio frequency was illegal without the appropriate license and you could end up with a heavy fine.

      (AC as work won't let us log into sites ...)

    3. Re:Unfortunately... by daserver · · Score: 1

      The reason why they can't ship it outside the US is because it can do FM transmitting and its illegal in some countries. :-/ I ordered mine to Denmark (Europe) two years ago from some shop that didn't knew about this (or didn't care :)). I can't remember the name of the company, I found it in the neuros forums.

  18. Where's the FireWire? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    No FireWire, no sale

    1. Re:Where's the FireWire? by nightsweat · · Score: 1

      What, USB 2.0's 480Mbps isn't good enough for you?

      --

      the major advances in civilization are processes which all but wreck the societies in which they occur - A.N. White
    2. Re:Where's the FireWire? by Zorilla · · Score: 1

      As long we have people like him, we will always have plenty of pointless products like monster cable and optical AC-3 inputs for our electronics.

      --

      It would be cool if it didn't suck.
    3. Re:Where's the FireWire? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Let me guess ... you have a PowerMac G4-500 that you are still making payments on.

    4. Re:Where's the FireWire? by PornMaster · · Score: 1

      Except for the fact that FireWire puts less load on the host system than USB does. If you're using a portable music player as a portable hard drive as well, FireWire is a better choice performance-wise, though USB is on every modern PC and FireWire isn't.

    5. Re:Where's the FireWire? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Not for me. I haven't got any USB 2.0 ports you insensitive clod. I do have firewire however.

    6. Re:Where's the FireWire? by nolife · · Score: 1

      I use all three optical inputs that my stereo reciever has and even use the coaxial digital input. The PSX, Xbox, and DVD player use up the three optical audio inputs and my SBLive from my "multimedia platform" computer is connected to the coaxial digital input. I agree with the Monster cable being useless though.

      --
      Bad boys rape our young girls but Violet gives willingly.
    7. Re:Where's the FireWire? by Zorilla · · Score: 1

      Pointless, not useless. The fact that there is usually only one coaxial input on receivers usually forces the user to use optical for other inputs.

      Hell, just to use optical I had to modify some deep setting regarding which input is associated with which mode on the receiver (had to associate the coaxial input from CD player to DVD player). This can really mess things up and get confusing, since the labels on the back of the receiver always stay the same.

      --

      It would be cool if it didn't suck.
    8. Re:Where's the FireWire? by Zorilla · · Score: 1

      D'oh! I meant "just to use coaxial," not optical!

      --

      It would be cool if it didn't suck.
    9. Re:Where's the FireWire? by style7711 · · Score: 0

      If you're going to spend hundreds of dollars on the music player spending $10 one a usb card isn't unreasonable. I'd gladly do it if it meant getting the music player with the features i want.

    10. Re:Where's the FireWire? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      >What, USB 2.0's 480Mbps isn't good enough for you?

      Problem is, Firewire is a constant 400Mbps, and USB 2.0's 480Mbps speed is a "theoretical, peak" limit which cannot be maintained.

      Stop looking at numbers alone... Or do you have a Pentium 4 because it has bigger GHz numbers?

  19. Yeah . . . by erikharrison · · Score: 1

    ...but does it have breakout?

  20. Requires Windows by Foofoobar · · Score: 0

    Can't wait for the hack so that it no longer requires Win-blows

    --
    This is my sig. There are many like it but this one is mine.
  21. Re:Clicky clicky...! by Digital11 · · Score: 1

    It'll play non-drm'd WMA's also.

    --
    I am a leaf on the wind. Watch how I soar.
  22. No, but... by ALecs · · Score: 1

    Somebody has put up a bounty for Tetris on the Neuros. Good luck, though. :)

    http://neuros-firmware.sourceforge.net/cgi-bin/v ie w/Main/TetrisContest

    1. Re:No, but... by CrazyWingman · · Score: 1

      Wow - being that this is an audio player story, I assumed he meant "does it have something other than a headphone jack", i.e. left/right RCA-style audio breakout. :P Will I never learn that people like stupid extras.

  23. Yeah by durtbag · · Score: 1
    Buy these beauties with a hard drive unit and watch the savings pile on top of each other as you add the items to your cart. For example, get the E5c earbuds, a Sound Professionals pre-amp, along with a Neuros II, and your purchase will be discounted by $150.00.

    You mean if I spend like 1000 f-ing dollars on a music player, you'll give me a price break? Gee, thanks. /sarcasm

    --
    itadakimasu
    1. Re:Yeah by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yeah, for that kinda cashola, I could even swing a PHOTO iPod with a few high-zoot accessories. /wit

  24. It can't beat the ipod. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    The physical dimensions are just too big to be able to compete with most consumer-oriented portable hdd players. If they could make it the size of the iPod, they would really have a huge chance of making a dent in the iPod's market share.

    ITS HUGE (I believe it uses standard laptop harddrives. It's easy to upgrade size though, just buy any ol' laptop drive.)

    1. Re:It can't beat the ipod. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Neuros: 5.3" x 3.1" x 1.3", 9.4 oz.
      40 gb iPod: 4.1 x 2.4 x 0.69 inches, 6.2 oz
      Rio Karma: 2.7 in x 3 in x 1.1 in, 5.5 oz

  25. Windows not required by ALecs · · Score: 2, Informative

    I've NEVER hooked my Neuros up to a Windows machine.

    I use a sync program called NDBM (neurosdbm.sourceforge.net). It's written in Java and runs perfectly on Linux.

    There are other Sync managers, too, if you refuse to install Java. Sorune (http://www.sorune.tk/) is written in Perl-Tk.

    1. Re:Windows not required by Foofoobar · · Score: 1

      Cool. Thanks. Now it becomes an option. I was just quoting from their requirements page.

      --
      This is my sig. There are many like it but this one is mine.
    2. Re:Windows not required by ALecs · · Score: 1

      Ah - then we need to tell them to change that page. It's nice to have the CEO's email address and know he reads the mailing lists. :)

    3. Re:Windows not required by Zorilla · · Score: 1

      Can't you just mount it as a USB storage device? I was helping someone set up Linux and it autodetected the player he had and it had already mounted it. No nutty extra software required.

      These specific programs just make things more complicated than they have to be. They also tend to be quickly outdated and have support abandoned. So much easier just to treat it like any other external storage device - both for the learning curve and ease of use.

      --

      It would be cool if it didn't suck.
    4. Re:Windows not required by ALecs · · Score: 1

      Yes - the device shows up as a USB hard drive (USB mass storage) and you can copy files to it.

      However, like many players, it has an internal database of songs that the firmware reads. You need a sync manager to create/update this database so teh Neuros knows what songs it has loaded.

      Without a sync manager, it's a really expensive hard drive with a built-in FM radio. :)

    5. Re:Windows not required by Digital11 · · Score: 1

      I can trump you. He called me from China the other day on Skype. =)

      --
      I am a leaf on the wind. Watch how I soar.
    6. Re:Windows not required by Zorilla · · Score: 1

      You mean, like M3U or PLS file databases - which are also just files on the drive and a de facto standard?

      --

      It would be cool if it didn't suck.
    7. Re:Windows not required by ALecs · · Score: 1

      It's Neuros's (proprietary) own format, but it's documented.

    8. Re:Windows not required by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The neuros database is much more than a m3u file. The m3u really is just a text file with a flat list identifying files to be included. The Neuros database keeps track of information such as artist, album, and genre allowing for rich searching and organizing. In fact the neuros database can contain playlists that function very similar to an M3U file. I am not familiar with the PLS standard so I can't compare it to the neuros database.

  26. Comment removed by account_deleted · · Score: 2, Informative

    Comment removed based on user account deletion

  27. WAV/FLAC recording? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Anyone know anything about the recording quality of this device in lossless formats?

    I am looking for a lossless device for concert recording.

    1. Re:WAV/FLAC recording? by sirReal.83. · · Score: 1

      It can record in WAV (and MP3). When it can play FLAC, and it most likely will, I imagine it will record in it also.

  28. Fun hack by pavon · · Score: 2, Interesting

    This would be an awsome product to hack on. I've been thinking about putting together a car-based mp3 player, and with the firmware now open and most of the functionality there that I want, this might be a better platform to work off of. I was originally planning on going with Mini-ITX hardware (or nano-ITX when it came out), Linux BIOS + LFS system on CF, and entirely custom software (with heavy using existing libraries). This would be much simpler, and result in just as good of a system.

    On the I don't think it stands a chance at doing well in the marketplace though until it cuts it's size down some. The seperate player and hardrive backpack is fine (and infact prefered) for a car based system, but way to clunky for a handheld.

    Lastly, speaking of OGG has anyone had any real-life experiance with the MPIO HD-300? I saw it in Best Buy, and it looked like a really nice system - 20 GB, about the same size as the iPod, felt solid, played OGG MP3 and WMA, was 20 bucks less than the iPod, and supposedly has significantly better battery life. This claim is backed up by the fact that in the past thier flash models have had the best battery life in the industry. On the other hand thier website has horrible english, so I would expect support to be lacking, and I can't find any sites that have actually reviewed the device (just regurgitated the press release, let users post uninformed opinions, and then called it a review). Anyone have some real info to add to this? Especially about its reliability/quality and how well it works with Linux?

    1. Re:Fun hack by Xenna · · Score: 1

      Not quite what you ask for, but I have a good experience using my iRiver H140 as a car player.

      http://xenna.no-ip.com/auto/console.jpg
      http://xenna.no-ip.com/auto/full.jpg

      The remote control works pretty well on the dashboard although the display could be a bit bigger.

      X.

    2. Re:Fun hack by RiffRafff · · Score: 1

      Anyone have some real info to add to this? Especially about its reliability/quality and how well it works with Linux?"

      I, too, am looking forward to testing the HD300. As far as Linux support goes, their owner's manual for the HD300 says nothing about Linux, and includes this rather ominous statement:

      "However, the playlist of HD 300 music must be reorganized to Artist/Album.Genre/Title, via the MPIO Utility in the CD provided with the player, in order to enter into the menu and search for Artisit/Album/Genre/Title when searching for music files from the Navigation Menu. Otherwise, the 'No Playlist!' icon appears and you cannot search for music even with the Artist/Album/Genre/Title Menu."

      Sounds like their software is required to generate a playlist, and that the device is unusable without one.

      Anyone know of any Linux FOSS projects to alleviate this?

      --
      "I might have made a tactical error in not going to a physician for 20 years." -- Warren Zevon
    3. Re:Fun hack by PCM2 · · Score: 1

      Possibly, or maybe you just can't search the catalog without generating one with their software. That's how the iRiver players work. You use a Windows-based utility to generate the catalog file (some OSS alternatives are available, too) and switch on a "browse by ID3" mode in the player. If you don't do that, you have to browse it like a normal directory/file hierarchy -- which is what I actually prefer, anyway.

      --
      Breakfast served all day!
  29. A lot of people by Manan+Shah · · Score: 0, Offtopic

    I think a lot of people (myself included) buy iPod despite its price tag because of its beauty. It is designed so well that people are willing to fork over the extra bucks. As the saying goes, "Make it functional, make it usable, but above all, make it beautiful."

    1. Re:A lot of people by east+coast · · Score: 1

      I think a lot of people (myself included) buy iPod despite its price tag because of its beauty.

      This must be the same reason the Chevy Cavaler sold so well.

      In all seriousness, I think the popularity of iPod is a right time/right place type of issue. Archos was too early and everyone else going for the 20+ gig player market will be too late unless they can really really reduce the price of their player. People are willing to pay for convience and conformity. Windows machines sell so well because they know it and everyone runs it. Even if a better product was produced you'd be hard pressed to get people to switch unless there was major economical factors involved or a majority finally jumps ship on MS/iPod.

      As the saying goes, "Make it functional, make it usable, but above all, make it beautiful."

      Heh... Call me a troll but that's a sad statement. Especially from a slashdotter.

      --
      Dedicated Cthulhu Cultist since 4523 BC.
    2. Re:A lot of people by Manan+Shah · · Score: 0

      " Heh... Call me a troll but that's a sad statement. Especially from a slashdotter." I think a lot of people in the IT industry don't focus on aesthetics, and instead just focus on functionality. Although you want to have functionality, people are naturally attracted to good looking things. Gimp has a lot of functionality but it is ugly as hell. If it had less functionality but was better looking and provided a more 'forgiving' interface to your average user, it would be used much more widely.

    3. Re:A lot of people by east+coast · · Score: 1

      I think a lot of people in the IT industry don't focus on aesthetics, and instead just focus on functionality.

      Nothing against aesthetics but utility is A-1 in my book. Aestetics is good but only if resources allow and it doesn't stand in the way of utility. It's kinda like video games, I'd rather play a smooth game on a good engine than play something with eye candy that makes it lag and jerk.

      --
      Dedicated Cthulhu Cultist since 4523 BC.
  30. Schematics for developers by poptones · · Score: 2, Insightful

    So you think by releasing schematics they make it easy for competitors?

    Tellyawhat: any other established company that wanted schematics could pay a single engineer a month's contract and would get the compete schematic. It's less likely this would be so easily obtainable in the oss crowd, since that would depend on someone with the skills and equipment needed to perform the operation volunteering their time.

    You think you could just take those schematics and go into competition with them? Or better still just go around them and build your own?

    I am 100% certain you would quickly discover you could not even begin to compete on price - that is, unless you have the resources to put together a hundred thousand or so.

    Opening up the platform like this sets a great precedent. They can evolve the player more efficiently while fostering a loyal community. I wish'em the best... and I think I just found my new portable music player.

    1. Re:Schematics for developers by soup_laser · · Score: 1
      I agree with you.

      A company going into direct competition would have an engineer on staff reverse engineer the device. Then the design engineers would recast the design with parts from their own approved vendor list. Additionally they would probably update the design with newer parts and standards.

      The cool thing is that now a company that is making a small quantity of devices, like tools for technicians in a plant or in the field, can incorporate this device. I've seen this done with palm pilots, and that took some work. (no schematics or source code for the palm pilot)

      Here we have a device with DSP's and code to make them go. Plus an RF transmitter/receiver. This is the sort of thing a power company might use to communicate with household power meters. Or maybe someone out there will mod the code enough to talk to their home computer right from the garage. Upload songs without taking the unit out of the car.

      Broadcast an MP3 code to a radio connected to your garage door. Seems like there are alot of options.

  31. Guys...seriously... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I've seen the Neuros. I've used the Neuros. You guys are getting all excited about hacking an MP3 player that just can't play with the big boys yet.

    Size-wise and interface-wise, the Neuros has a long way to go to compete with iPod and Carbon.

    I mean, I like open-source, too. Open-source doesn't always mean 'better'. Get me a smaller Neuros with a better interface, and we'll talk.

    1. Re:Guys...seriously... by Digital11 · · Score: 1

      Word on the street is that its in the works. I can't wait.

      --
      I am a leaf on the wind. Watch how I soar.
  32. It realy comes down to UI, though... by incognitox · · Score: 4, Insightful

    I've got a Neuros...the USB1.1 version from about two years back. I gotta say -- it's a sweet device.

    -- I like the swappable backpack idea because it makes for cheaper upgrading and the ability for more than one person to use the same device with minimal difficulty.

    -- I absolutely LOVE the integrated FM broadcast. This hit the market before everyone and their mother was making add-ons for this functionality, and it's still a really handy feature. It means that _I_ always get to hear my music in other people's cars, because no one else has this ability!

    -- HiSi (the song-identifier) is a pretty nifty gimick, too, although of minimal use (more to the point is the built-in FM reciever...something that I think EVERY audio player should have -- it costs about 20 cents to include at this point, why not do it?!?!)

    (disclaimer at this point -- mine IS the old version)

    !!!HOWEVER!!!

    The one failing of the Neuros is in its interface. Navigation is painfully slow. You cannot queue up songs while it's playing. Organizing songs into playlists inexplicably takes about 3 or 4 seconds once you've decided upon a song and selected "Add to my playlist". There is no way to play a series of albums, so you are stuck playing alphabetically by song title, by artist (and then within the artist by song title) or album-by-album. See previous statment about creating custom playlists. Oh yeah, and for some reason, it takes about 3 seconds to boot each time you start it. My PC starts faster!!

    So, to put it lightly, the interface plain SUCKS! And ultimately, that's what matters. I love the tech aspect of this device. The open-standards are awesome (ogg support used to require a separate version of the firmware -- dunno if that's still true); there's a thriving developer's community which is fully supported by the company. Their customer service is phenominal (a broken mini-audio jack took 5 days to fix -- shipping time to Chicago included!). But the interface needs a lot of work.

    And the interface of an audio player is the make-it or break-it point, IMHO. It's what you see every day. How quickly can you play your music? Good interfaces are invisible. You don't notice that they are there. You just notice that you can get the job done and do it quickly. I think this is more important in the portable-audio market than anywhere else. If I have to make the decision whether or not to turn on my device because there is a 10-second lead-in before music starts and a 5-second end sequence, then they've lost me...

    I haven't had a chance to get my hands on a generation 2 device yet, so perhaps there has been a massive improvement. However, as of now, my next audio player purchase will be an iPod -- unless someone can point me to a better interface!

    --



    ~i = an imaginary being~
    1. Re:It realy comes down to UI, though... by ALecs · · Score: 2, Informative

      You need to run the latest Open-Source firmware.

      Garbage as immensely improved the UI, as has DI (the guys who make the Neuros).

      The latest firmware has the 'Play Queue' - you can add songs to this on the fly, without interrupting playback. It is lost when you shut down the player, though.

      And yes, this works on the Gen-1 devices (I have one, too)

    2. Re:It realy comes down to UI, though... by incognitox · · Score: 1

      That's what I'm talkin' about!!

      As a result of seeing this article I went over to the site and emailed a few questions to the support staff.

      11 MINUTES LATER, I had my reply. That's crazy. That's the kind of customer service I'd like to see everywhere! Stupid interface problems...

      --



      ~i = an imaginary being~
    3. Re:It realy comes down to UI, though... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      talk about verbal diarrhea

    4. Re:It realy comes down to UI, though... by incognitox · · Score: 1

      Thanks!

      I'll definitely check both out (loading latest DI firmware now).

      --



      ~i = an imaginary being~
    5. Re:It realy comes down to UI, though... by JoeBorn · · Score: 1

      In retrospect we probably did release the first version of the device too soon, with something akin to beta firmware. We learned our lesson from that experience.

      But that was 18+ months ago and a lot has changed. Even if you don't upgrade the hardware, you'll find huge improvements on the firmware, which is of course a free upgrade. There have probably been 20+ revisions of the firmware since the original release.

      Whether you use the official or third party firmware, you'll find huge improvements over your experience described above. Please give it a shot.

      Joe Born
      Neuros Audio, LLC

      --
      If you're going through hell, keep going -Winston Churchill
  33. Good for a Beta by njwashor · · Score: 1

    I have a Neuros and the darn thing has given me nothing but problems. I guess that's what you get when you buy a product when it first comes out. I hear the newest one's are being manufactured better, but be warned about the original models.

    A list of the problems I've had:
    Randomly formatted my disc a few times when I first got it.
    The battery charger plug on the device became unsoldered twice (each time I had to return the device to be fixed with a 4 to 6 week turnaround). They told me it must be the plug I was using to recharge it (I used the car charge I bought from them, and the wall AC adapter that came with the device).
    Shortly after getting my free upgrade to USB2.0, the device stopped functioning (could not read the disc). I called tech support, and they actually told me to hit it quite rigorously on the side to get the needle of the hard drive to "unstick". I guess the Toshiba HDs they bought were faulty, and that is what Toshiba told them to recommend to their customers if the needle became stuck. What do you know, it worked!!!
    Since then, the only problem I've had is that the fuse in my car charger blew, but I can fix that on my own.
    Has worked great for what it does, just pray you don't get the beta.

    1. Re:Good for a Beta by H8X55 · · Score: 1

      how did you get your free upgrade to usb 2.0 - i bought my usb 1 neuros last feb and was wondering what they were doing for folks that bought so close to the upgrade time period.

    2. Re:Good for a Beta by Daniel · · Score: 1

      Hm, I bought one over a year ago, and was specifically told that I'd have to pay if I wanted to upgrade it.

      Daniel

      --
      Hurry up and jump on the individualist bandwagon!
    3. Re:Good for a Beta by H8X55 · · Score: 1

      that was my recollection as well.

    4. Re:Good for a Beta by ScrewMaster · · Score: 1

      ... needle of the hard drive

      You must have gotten one of the really early beta models, the ones with the vinyl platters. You can tell if you bump it, and a screeching noise comes out of the headphones.

      --
      The higher the technology, the sharper that two-edged sword.
    5. Re:Good for a Beta by njwashor · · Score: 1

      Nope, they gave us earliest buyers of the Neuros a free upgrade to usb2.0 when it became available.

  34. what is the price? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    what is the price

    1. Re:what is the price? by Yono38 · · Score: 1

      For the 20GB Player and backpack:
      MSRP $249.99

  35. Great concept. Terrible player. by oregonshoegazer · · Score: 1

    Forever silent on the slashdot message boards, I felt like I needed to chime in here.

    The Neuros team needs to refocus its efforts on producing a reliable product. I purchased a Neuros earlier this year and it was remarkably flaky. It is indeed packed with features, to be sure, but when the battery life is less than one hour within two weeks of use, it makes your features less appealing. I had a screen failure, software bugs, and sound quality issues all within my limited exposure to this device. I'm pretty flexible as a tech consumer, but this was just too much.

    Anyway, I would caution any and all people out there considering buying this product to really do your research and make absolutely sure that you really want this mp3 player. Frankly, I found that the headaches associated with its use were astoundingly painful. As much as I wanted to love this device, I would place it far far below the iRiver or iPod in terms of appeal.

  36. Re: Cameras in phones are stupid extras by CyberKnet · · Score: 1

    Picture Caller Id.

    Yes, cameras in phones are usually not even reasonable quality.

    No, not all uses of cameras require great quality.

    Your "stupid extra" can easily be someone else's "I can't read or remember phone numbers, but I can recognize a picture of [Mommy/Daddy]!"

    --
    Video meliora proboque deteriora sequor - Ovidius
  37. MP3 Support? No thanks. by twitter · · Score: 0, Troll
    Ogg support is very nice, but I hope this device can play other formats as well. ... The key to success is multi format support.

    I hope they offer models without MP3 support because I don't want to pay a license fee for a format I don't have. All my music is ogg encoded because, for a long time, it was difficult to get an mp3 encoder. I'm not about to re encode everything to yesterday's, technically inferior, non free format.

    --

    Friends don't help friends install M$ junk.

  38. Re:Great concept. Terrible player. by ALecs · · Score: 2, Interesting

    I, too, have had some issues with the player. In fact, lots of people have. The support forums are absolutely flooded with people who have had problems with their Neuros.

    However, I have to say, that DI has stepped up to the plate and made things right for everybody I've spoken with on the message boards and on IRC. Most of the problems are due to firmware bugs that were worked out (or, at least, worked around) - but DI has been good about fixing the hardware problems, too.

    They have a very reasonable battery replacement policy ($12 + shipping), and have even been resonable about people "hacking" their players (swapping hard disks, doing the FM transmit antenna mods, etc.). Basically, they stand behind their product 100%.

    However, I would caution people outside the States to consider the cost of shipping in case your unit ever has to go back to DI. That's the real killer.

  39. had one for two weeks by ivar · · Score: 1

    Although I haven't had a chance to excercise it's features too much yet, it definitely has an 'open source' feel to it.. yes I'm stereotyping, but by that I mean that it does a ton of really cool things and is functional but seems to be lacking that last bit of polish. A third party syncing agent (ndbm) is preferable to the official one, third party firmware (GarBage) is preferable to the official one etc... In order to really get the most out of a Neuros you really have to have some of the hacker ethic.
    That said, having open source firmware is great, the remaining polish could conceivably come from anywhere..

  40. Re:Great concept. Terrible player. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Yeah, whatever you do, don't buy a MD player. Those things play for two weeks on a single AA, never crash, respond quickly, use cheap media, have great sound quality, and my screen still works. (Hell, my MZ-1 from 1993 still works, except for the battery of course).
    You should definitely turn listening to music on the go into a major engineering undertaking.

  41. Re: Cameras in phones are stupid extras by CrazyWingman · · Score: 1

    A) Just because it's NOT a camera phone doesn't mean it can't have a color display.

    B) I never said a thing about the quality of these cameras.

    C) Why are you calling your toddler on a cell phone (as implied by your "[Mommy/Daddy]")?

  42. Re:Great concept. Terrible player. by oregonshoegazer · · Score: 2, Informative

    Actually I would even disagree with this post. When I emailed DI about the problems I had with my device, I was shuffled around to a number of different departments with little attempt at a proper fix. Eventually I got tired of running up minutes on my cell phone and decided to bag the whole thing and go with the (wince) iPod.

    Thank goodness I ordered through their website and got the 30-day moneyback guarantee. I would absolutely recommend this to ANYone buying a Neuros. Getting it from a cheapy store could mean you're stuck with a $300 link to Neuros' Customer Service department with no other options.

    Upon returning my Neuros, I had to wait for nearly five weeks for the credit to be posted to my card. At this point, I was calling them semi-daily trying to get the matter closed. Frankly, I was very displeased with the whole affair.

  43. Re:Obviously You Need to RTFA by ivar · · Score: 1

    I bought mine two weeks ago and I'd recommend checking out american techpushers.. It's a small, independant business, the guy behind it is very active in the community and he jumps through hoops to keep customers happy. (Probably a good idea since the neuros community forums are quite frank and his business viability is tied directly to positive feedback - hence this plug ;)

  44. nomad jukebox 3 by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    The jb3 has an optical input and records at full uncompressed 16/48 (or 16/44 if you prefer) and they can be found very cheaply (under $200) on auction sites. They come in 20 and 40gb models but can be upgraded/hacked to a 60-80GB+ (?) hard drive.

  45. Re:Great concept. Terrible player. by killmenow · · Score: 2, Informative

    I own six original Neuros USB 1.1 devices. Five of them are 128MB Flash units. One is the 20GB HDD unit.

    One of these does have a problem...apparently with the flash memory. I've updated firmwares in the rest of them and they work well. I am quite fond of my Neuros units.

    It may be you got a bad unit. It does happen.

    On another note, I just realized that since I have multiple of them, I really ought to figure out what the plural of Neuros is...

  46. Re:Obviously You Need to RTFA by Martin+Blank · · Score: 1
    Prices for:
    • 20GB: $250
    • 30GB: $260
    • 40GB: $300
    • 60GB: $350
    • 80GB: $400

    You can also get a 256MB embedded flash version for $140.
    --
    You can never go home again... but I guess you can shop there.
  47. Re:Obviously You Need to RTFA by GORby_ · · Score: 1

    about $ 250 for the 20GB model, and add $ 50 per 20GB up to a maximum of 80GB, with otherwise identical features...

    Very nice price tag for this kind of functionality!

  48. Mod parent down by Xenna · · Score: 1

    And please mod anyone down with sigs and content lik ethis.

    Or do we really want /. to turn into a massive pyramid scheme?

    1. Re:Mod parent down by Digital11 · · Score: 1

      Calm down man. I had totally forgotten I had the freeipods thing in my sig. What do you mean 'content like this'? The guy asked if he could have my ipod (which I've already received) and I told him I'm giving it to my wife. Get a life.

      --
      I am a leaf on the wind. Watch how I soar.
    2. Re:Mod parent down by Digital11 · · Score: 0, Offtopic

      There. Are you happy? My sig is now something much more suitable for replying to someone such as yourself.

      --
      I am a leaf on the wind. Watch how I soar.
    3. Re:Mod parent down by Xenna · · Score: 0, Offtopic

      Much happier

  49. Re:Great concept. Terrible player. by gkuz · · Score: 1
    since I have multiple of them, I really ought to figure out what the plural of Neuros is...

    Why, "Neuroses", of course... Just depends on your pronunciation.

  50. Owning a Neuros by vivin · · Score: 1

    I own a Neuros - I've had it for the past four or five months. I have to say that I am pretty happy with it.

    Initially the UI was a little clunky, but with successive Firmware updates it has gotten much better.

    The unit is bulkier compared to the iPod, but it plays almost any file format - MP3, WMA, OGG...

    Tech support is also amazing. I had a problem with the unit not recharding properly. I sent it over to them and they fixed the unit and sent it back to me in about two weeks. Very prompt.

    --
    Vivin Suresh Paliath
    http://vivin.net

    I like
    1. Re:Owning a Neuros by gilesjuk · · Score: 1

      Even an iPod is bulky when compared to a flash player. If only 10GB flash cards were available, it would make flash players more viable. Two card slots and you'd have 20GB in a small package.

      Now if Sony Ericsson or someone could produce a phone that can control your mp3 player, then you'd not even need to take it out of your pocket. Bluetooth interface to mp3 player.

  51. Re:Great concept. Terrible player. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Take a look at my link on the Neuros forums. We had a great discussion on what the plural of Neuros was. Unfortunately the Kathryn Born (The CEO's sister)tells us that th plural is Neuros units. :P (easiest way to find it is to probably search for posts by khyron)

  52. eh? by Mr_Silver · · Score: 2, Insightful
    The Neuros is looking like an awesome competitor in the audio player market.

    It is? With a market-share of less than 1.5% can someone please tell me how on earth they can remotely be a "competitor"?

    Hell, HP became number 2 overnight simply by playing nice with Apple. Which just goes to show the sad state of affairs with the quality of competition that Apple is up against.

    --
    Avantslash - View Slashdot cleanly on your mobile phone.
    1. Re:eh? by DrWhizBang · · Score: 1

      Hell, HP became number 2 overnight simply by playing nice with Apple.

      hee hee, you said "number 2".

      ok, I need to do some work now...

      --
      Schrodinger's cat is either dead or really pissed off...
    2. Re:eh? by Darren+Winsper · · Score: 1

      Have you considered that it might well be because it's playing in a niche part of the market?

    3. Re:eh? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "Hell, HP became number 2 overnight ..."

      True, HP is "number 2" in a lot of ways.

    4. Re:eh? by Soul-Burn666 · · Score: 1

      "Hey number 2!"

      I have no idea why I remember this quote, but I do.

      --
      ^_^
    5. Re:eh? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I would have said that 1.5% is not too bad in an emerging market like this, but the open aspect of the design is hopefully what will become important here -
      Ideally this sort of thing would lead to lower costs of market entry for new competitors, increasing competition in the mp3 player market.

      While it may currently not be the best-looking device out there (although if you ask me the only room in a normal house where the ipod looks at home is the bathroom..), competing manufacturers using essentially the same guts inside would quickly style their own players to stand out.

    6. Re:eh? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I love your rationale. With a market-share of less than 1.5% (in the OS market) can someone please tell me how on earth they (Apple) can remotely be a "competitor"? think about it, fanboy.

  53. Re:Obviously You Need to RTFA by narsiman · · Score: 1

    You see the 'Cart' on their site. Click on it. It gives you the product catalog. For the lazy clickers here it ranges from $79 to $350.

  54. Bring on the SandBenders by wild_berry · · Score: 1

    Having read William Gibson's Neuromancer, I was wondering when I could have and maintain my own hardware for devices I own. Am I right in thinking that the firmware and some knowledge of the board layout will enable me to fix it and cannibalise the thing?

    I think that this development puts this device in contention for the top of my portable HD/music want list -- against the iRiver.

  55. Re:MP3 Support? No thanks. by GeckoX · · Score: 1

    An audio player that meets your needs, but now that's not good enough. You want one that _only_ plays ogg?

    I'm a _huge_ fan and supporter of ogg, and you're really not helping any, please stop now.

    --
    No Comment.
  56. Non-DRM AAC? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I've got a lot of non-DRM AAC files in my collection ripped from CD to AAC. I'd prefer not to have to rip them again. I like the AAC format and audio quality.

    Some people say they use that playfair thing to remove DRM from iTunes store purchases so they can play them on non-Apple hardware. What hardware is there out there that can play non-DRM AAC, anyway?

    So can the Neuros play non-DRM AAC? Is that what some of those people are referring to?

    1. Re:Non-DRM AAC? by Yono38 · · Score: 1

      No, it cannot. There has been no demand for it, and that is why no one has gone to http://www.freshports.org/audio/faad/ and used this source to add the codec. However, if you want to, it shouldn't take to long to add this to the firmware.

  57. Neuros Support is lacking by jubei · · Score: 1

    When I ordered my Neuros, it came defective, right out of the box. I never was able to use the thing.

    I could exchange it for a new one, but the company refused to pay the shipping both ways.

    Instead I just sent it back for a refund.

  58. Re:Great concept. Terrible player. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    You called tech support on your cellphone? You sure are one retarded person.

  59. Re:Great concept. Terrible player. by mrjackson2000 · · Score: 2, Informative

    i bought a Neuros probly a year and a half ago, i use the battery quite a bit, and can still get an easy 5 hours of play time between charges (2 2 hour trips in the car plus some other running around). and that includes a fair amount of skipping around between tracks. i have had buggy firmware, but i was using a beta so thats expected

  60. Where's the Voice Recognition? by Lars-UT · · Score: 1

    I would really like a player that had the ability to parse track tags and build BNF grammars for speech input based on the same.

    Then I could say, "Artist Yello, Track Oh Yeah, Enqueue".

  61. Let's get to the work by _iCeb0x_+(1337+and+k · · Score: 1

    Okay, okay... I have the schematics and I'm on my way to order the parts and roll my own. I am afraid I'll have to get some surface soldering equipment and... uhhmmm... wait a minute! I think I'll have to find out how to make a multi-layer pc-board.

    Uhhmm... I need some PCB layouts... Are they going to publish those too?

    What are we, less-than-amateur-hobbyists, going to do now?

  62. Re:Obviously You Need to RTFA by DrWhizBang · · Score: 1

    spent about five minutes browsing their homepage and learned all this. The only thing I couldn't seem to find was the price... (^_^) Back I go!

    Click on the little shopping cart beside the product on the product page.

    --
    Schrodinger's cat is either dead or really pissed off...
  63. Gapless playback? by LocoBurger · · Score: 1

    I took a quick looks at the site, so I apologize if I'm off-base here.. Does the new Neuros (or the old one..) have gapless playback? Can I play an album liks it's supposed to be heard, or will I hear infuriating little gaps between the songs?

    For all the Rio Karma bashing I've read on here, I see very little discussion of this (IMO) essential feature. The Karma's got it in spades. I playback albums that I ripped years ago before I even though about gapless playback and they play flawlessly. Try listening to Badly Drawn Boy without gapless playback. Bad things...

    1. Re:Gapless playback? by aonifer · · Score: 1

      Sadly, no, there is no gapless playback, and it doesn't sound like there's going to be anytime soon, based on what I've read in the forums.

  64. Just got my Neuros by Moloch666 · · Score: 1

    Mine arrived last night. Used it in the car today and it worked great. My drive goes from Frederick, MD to Columbia,MD. Kept it on 107.1 the whole time.

    Then I found this this. I'm going to try it when I get home.

    --
    Understanding is a three-edged sword. -- Kosh Naranek
  65. Neuros USB is s-l-o-w by talexb · · Score: 1

    I've had a Neuros for about 18 months now -- nice unit, but slow when downloading from the unit to my Mandrake 10 Linux box. It takes about 20 minutes to transfer about 50-60M or one night's rehearsal recordings. That works out to about 50K/sec, or about .1% of the speed you quoted.

    Every once in a while the HD goes into a skip-skip-skip-skip mode .. you just have to whack the side of the unit to get it to stop.

    Waiting for the 'end record' command to be accepted also takes a while .. almost like the unit needs to encode and dump the last five minutes, rather than just flush the last ten seconds and close the filehandle.

    The fidelity is pretty darn good, and a charge covers a three hour rehearsal nicely. I wish there were better tools, but I guess I should get busy and write them if I feel motivated.

    One final note -- the little (*) icon to the left of the battery symbol is a 'busy' icon. Don't press any buttons while that thing is on. Just wait till it's finished, then go ahead and do whatever.

    1. Re:Neuros USB is s-l-o-w by ValentineMSmith · · Score: 1
      First, I'm going to assume that you got the USB 2 upgrade when D.I. made it available (I've got one of the USB 2.0 Gamma units).

      Assuming you do, as a test, you may want to just copy over a couple of gig of files to your Neuros to see how long it takes. I was originally a little peeved when I got my Neuros back from the upgrade and it didn't seem that much faster. After some experimentation, it appeared to me that the bottleneck was in the sync software adding files to the database.

      If you just copy files by themselves, you'll (most likely) find that it is quite a bit faster (I think it took me something like 20 minutes to copy ~9 gb of music over). Then I just did an orphan search to add everything to the database, which took an additional 3 minutes or so.

      Moral of the story, don't do a straight synchronization when copying a lot of music to the Neuros. Both NDBM and NSM are very slow adding to the database.

      --
      Karma: Chameleon - mostly influenced by bad '80s New Wave music
    2. Re:Neuros USB is s-l-o-w by talexb · · Score: 1

      Nope -- I still have the original firmware (can't remember the rev.level). If there's a new version (I imagine there is), I'll check it out.

      I've just been letting the 2.6 kernel automount the drive and using bash's cp to move stuff over, rather than the application -- it's simpler, and I assume (heh) that it's faster.

      Really, I'm just using this as a portable HD -- recording using the line input and dumping to Linux, on the way to the chorus web site (http://northernlightschorus.com) so anyof the members who missed the rehearsal can listen in.

  66. dumbass apple fans by leoc · · Score: 1
    With a market-share of less than 1.5% can someone please tell me how on earth they can remotely be a "competitor"?


    They are as much a competitor to Apple in mp3 players, as Apple is to Microsoft in desktop OS's.

    --
    STFU about slashdot bias.
  67. Windows-only?!? No Linux, BSD or OS X ?? by javaxman · · Score: 1
    from the product detail page:

    System Requirements
    OS: Microsoft® Windows 98SE/Me/2000/XP

    HUH?!?

    Open source, open firmware, schematics... but Windows-only software support?

    I'm just going to assume that's misleading/incorrect somehow, it probably works like any USB storage class device, but... how odd that they list only Windows OS support...

    1. Re:Windows-only?!? No Linux, BSD or OS X ?? by spungebob · · Score: 1

      "Windows Support" is only in reference to Neuro's own track synching software, NSM. That's their client tool that manages your medial library, copies tracks to the player for you and builds the on-board database that the player needs for playback. As a standard USB device it works fine with Linux, it only needs a third-party tool such as NDBM to build the required database on the player.

      --
      It takes an idiot to do cool things - that's why it's cool!
  68. Re:Ogg Support / Musepack by TornOutOfShape · · Score: 1

    Ogg Vorbis support is indeed nice. Pay attention to Neuros development in the next few months. When it starts to support Musepack, the real fun will begin (twice the battery time, anyone?). For info - Musepack/MPC/MPEG+

  69. Re:Obviously You Need to RTFA by leoc · · Score: 1

    Their FAQ says "10) What is the policy for international orders for Neuros products? For complete information on international policies, click here." but there is no link to click. Do you know what their international order policy is? Will they ship to Canada?

    --
    STFU about slashdot bias.
  70. On 'iPod killers' by mattgreen · · Score: 2, Interesting

    A few people are posting about what would be needed to create so-called 'iPod killers.' Now folks, I don't know what exactly happens, but it seems like once a product becomes mainstream, people like to:

    1. proudly declare they don't use it (optionally including reasons that only make sense to them)
    2. start an open source clone of it
    3. and then evangelize it based on moral goodness

    Regardless of the open source version's merit, you turn people off at step one. Now, I don't know what Apple has done to you, but a killer audio player is not formed out of spite for large corporations or the mainstream. It is made based on realizing where current players falter (battery life, size, UI) and improving on those. Nobody cares if the firmware is open source except the esoteric readers of Slash.

    Seriously, how many projects do you start with the intent to 'kill' another product? And here is a player with Ogg support, now the hivemind complains that it doesn't support FLAC!

  71. Question by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Their site is /.ed at the moment so I have a few questions.

    First, does it have a line in?

    Second, how much does it cost?

  72. Yeah, but it's not an iPod. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    So I'll pass. Once Apple releases a product with these features, I'll buy one.

  73. Never mind... by leoc · · Score: 1

    I found it.

    --
    STFU about slashdot bias.
  74. as a former neuros owner by whiteSanjuro · · Score: 1, Flamebait
    i can assure you that the current state of the machine is horrible. yes, it has great potential, but at the moment it is unrealized, and the hardware, although cool, is not flawless. specifically:
    • the headphone output is rather noisy
    • the FM broadcasting is weak
    • there isn't any form of spdif (input or output)
    • the menu system is slow to respond
    • no gapless playback
    • navigation and synching are tedious on either the pc or player side
    • synch software is quirky to use (win32)
    • the flash memory player seperated from the hd backpack is cool, but the backpack is flipping huge and heavy
    • the battery does not last very long
    • the most important feature to me, ogg vorbis playback, does not work without glitches unless your bitrate is less than 4

    the hardware issues are not going to go away, and i have seen no progress made on any of the software issues. yes its great that the design is open and the software runs in linux and the firmware is open, but it currently does not operate as advertised, so i returned mine very sad. until rio releases a karma with a bigger hard drive that does not explode, shows up as a USB mass storage device, allows sorting by folders, and adds an SD card, i will be using my laptop.
    1. Re:as a former neuros owner by smartdreamer · · Score: 1

      Could you tell us which firmware you are using, when did you buy yours? Since this player constantly evolves dates are importants.

    2. Re:as a former neuros owner by whiteSanjuro · · Score: 1

      according to my CC statements, i bought my player Oct 4 and receieved refund on Oct 31. i was using the 256MB flash/40GB backpack version with firmware 2.25

  75. iRiver does what you describe by PCM2 · · Score: 2, Informative

    The hard disk-based iRiver players do what you describe, including recording direct to uncompressed WAV or optionally to MP3 at configurable bit rates. The line in is both analog and optical -- they have optical in and out, both.

    The only problem is that they're buggy. Some people have reported recording glitches when the player goes to store the captured data to disk, i.e. periodic hiccups in the recording. I haven't really noticed it myself, but I normally record voice. A friend has recorded live music without seeing the problem, either, but enough people have reported it to raise my doubts. Also, there seem to be arbitrary recording length constraints in hardware. I believe they are dependent on the bit rate at which you're trying to record to some extent, but 2 hours seems to be the outside limit for a single file.

    In the past, I might have said to hang on and iRiver would fix these problems with a firmware upgrade. I won't make that mistake again. iRiver's support for this product has been very poor since it was released, promising various firmware fixes and then never delivering, only to move on to whole new product lines while they leave the old customers with buggy hardware that doesn't do what they were told it would do.

    So, proceed with caution. But I have had some decent results recording with the iRiver.

    --
    Breakfast served all day!
    1. Re:iRiver does what you describe by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      actually, this highlights a big problem of mine, finding portable recording devices. But for about $450 you can buy a Solid State PC Card Recorder, a really nice portable recording device that records directly to a compact flash card, so there are no moving parts. They can record up to 16bit/48kHz and have great mic preamps.

      Edirol R-1 is one, and Marantz PMD-670 is another. Also, check out this website. These are better than portable disc recording devices like irivers and better than dat players which are too fragile or really expensive. These things also come with xlr inputs if you want!

      ALso, I saw one out there that could record 24bit/96kHz but it was about $900.

    2. Re:iRiver does what you describe by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Thanks for the info. I run the OSS Rockbox firmware on my Archos 20 GB. That's the best way to get the bugs fixed - don't rely on the vendor.

      The point in this thread about cheap 1/8" connectors is absolutely true. Mechanical noise alone is a huge concern and problem.

      The A/D in most of these player focused devices is an afterthought and does not get the product development attention that the rest of the unit does.

      I did some extensive signal analysis on a nomad III prior to returning it (the proprietary nature of the windows only software was a deal killer).

  76. I must be old by macemoneta · · Score: 1

    I remember when every electronic device you bought came with its schematic in the back of the owner's manual. Manufacturers didn't give up any rights by doing this back then. What's changed?

    --

    Can You Say Linux? I Knew That You Could.

  77. Re:Where's the Voice Recognition? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    And the player responds, "No, no, you're too kind ... enqueue!"

  78. Re:Great concept. Terrible player. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    If they are so reliable, why do you have 6 of them? My 40GB iPod is totally reliable and I only have 1.

  79. Re:as a current neuros owner... by spungebob · · Score: 1
    ... your list needs updating:

    the headphone output is rather noisy
    ?!?! My sound is the most excellent I've ever heard in a portable player. The only time I hear noise is because its in the track itself (ie: on analog recordings remastered for digital)

    the FM broadcasting is weak
    The FM broadcasting is as strong as it can legally be. If you want more you'll have to take it up with the FCC.

    the menu system is slow to respond
    Opinion. It works fine for me - in fact, scrolling works so fast I often end up overshooting the track I'm looking for.

    no gapless playback
    Not 100% gapless, but as close as it can be technically. I find most noticable gaps are imbedded within the tracks themselves and a bit of editing is all it takes.

    navigation and synching are tedious on either the pc or player side
    More opinion. Works fine for me.

    ...the backpack is flipping huge and heavy
    I blame the batteries they use - they're huge and heavy. OTOH, they are standard off-the-shelf batteries and are the biggest reason why their battery replacement only costs $12 + shipping. Remember when the iPod battery policy was to buy a new iPod???

    the battery does not last very long
    I get an average of 6 hours on my 20GB model. How many hours should I be getting...?

    --
    It takes an idiot to do cool things - that's why it's cool!
  80. Re:I must be old(er), Heathkit was even better by antispam_ben · · Score: 1

    I remember when every electronic device you bought came with its schematic in the back of the owner's manual. Manufacturers didn't give up any rights by doing this back then. What's changed?

    Not only did Heathkits have assembly instructions "for dummies" (if you can correctly use a screwdriver, you're most of the way toward building a kit) and schematics, but also a "Circuit Description" section, and as I think back, that section had great value in my learning and understanding of electronics.
    Towards the end of Heathkit that changed, not so much because of their philosophy, but because of technology. I recall mid-70's assembling a small desktop 4-function calculator, where the description told about the power supply, gas-discharge display scanning and keyboard scanning matrices, but nothing about the internal computations, which of course were all internal to one chip which had power, ground, and all the display/keyboard lines.

    As far as your question, I believe schematics were mostly for the convenience of repair technicians, and as products became cheaper, less fixable and more throwaway, there was no more need for the schematic to be included.

    --
    Tag lost or not installed.
  81. Re:Great concept. Terrible player. by Daniel · · Score: 1

    I have to say that while the Neuros has its problems, it's always been perfectly reliable for me. (with the exception of the time that I turned off the socket it was plugged into, then couldn't figure out why the battery wouldn't charge *oops*) The battery life in particular is amazing; I don't know how long it lasts because it just seems to keep going and going. The only time I managed to run it all the way down was when I used it two days in a row and forgot to charge it overnight.

    I suspect the parent poster got a defective unit.

    Daniel

    --
    Hurry up and jump on the individualist bandwagon!
  82. Good by Stonent1 · · Score: 1

    Maybe someone can figure out why the HD erases itself when you remove it from the unit.

    1. Re:Good by Ziviyr · · Score: 1

      Maybe you call it bad names and it hates you.

      With your problem description I can't offer more constructive help. Its not an inherent problem in the design of the Neuros.

      "Mine doesn't have that problem."

      --

      Someone set us up the bomb, so shine we are!
    2. Re:Good by Stonent1 · · Score: 1

      I had a corrupted volume twice (music played fine but the neuros would hang at shutdown). Both times I removed the HD and put it in my laptop. Both times fdisk reported no partitions on the drive. Both times I put the drive unchanged back into the Neuros to have it say the drive needed to be formatted because it couldn't be mounted. The initial problem was the neuros would hang at shutdown. It played music just fine but I couldn't shut it down correctly which eventually gets me to a point where it won't let me access the drive over USB because it can't dismount the drive and switch into portable HD mode. IBM/Hitachi diagnostics report no errors on the drive, and no bad sectors.

  83. Re:Great concept. Terrible player. by killmenow · · Score: 1

    Because I use them for recording. Sometimes, I record six different things in six different rooms (*gasp*) simultaneously!

  84. Re:as a current neuros owner... by whiteSanjuro · · Score: 1

    you must have low standards for audio quality. my karma was silent when i pumped the volume all the way, but there was a consistent background hum/static on the neuros.

    the FM broadcaster for $20 at best buy puts out a much stronger signal than the neuros did

    the menu system is only quick to respond when you are not playing a track, once a track is loaded, it is >2-3 seconds before button presses are acknowledged

    of all your disputes, the gapless is the weakest...the karma implemented PERFECT gapless playback, similar to software players winamp and xmms. all other hardware and software players i have used cannot do this and are thus imperfect replacements for CD players for me.

    i never said it didn't work, i just implied the UI sucked

    i shouldn't need to replace the battery for about 2-5 years if i take care of it, so using cheap batteries is not a good design decision IMHO.

    i was able to get at best 3 hours with 256MB flash/40GB backpack. it was also annoying (although very common) that it would not take advantage of the USB power to recharge.

  85. Re:I must be old(er), Heathkit was even better by macemoneta · · Score: 1
    Yup, I used to do Heathkits as well. But the schematics that manufacturers included were useful for hobbyists as well. Twenty years ago, I even modded a new-fangled thing called a "CallerID" unit to interface it to my computer. What Neuros is doing isn't really new. It's the statement in their announcement that I found weird:

    "The release of such documentation is a relatively new practice and one that remains quite controversial..."

    Maybe it's new to kids running businesses today, but it was standard practice twenty years ago.

    :-)

    --

    Can You Say Linux? I Knew That You Could.

  86. I have one too by gad_zuki! · · Score: 1

    I have one too. Its HUGE. Like a small paperback book. I doubt very few "fashion conscious" consumers are going to look at it, compare it to another device and pick it.

    The build quality is pretty low too, I'm not the only one on the Neuros board with a drive that went bad after less than a year. The warranty is only 90 days too. Tech support even advises people to "tap it firmly" if the drive gets stuck. So they do have some serious problems. Maybe this has been addressed with their new hardware. Dunno.

    On top of it, it has no where near the battery life of most mp3 players. Two 2.5 hours was pretty good, 3 was a rare miracle.

    Its saving grace is that it can broadcast to FM, but depending on the radio market you're in you might have a hard time getting a good signal to your reciever. This isn't the Neuros fault. Its really the FCC limitations kicking in, but sadly my Neuros can't transmit below 91.something. So all those open low-wattage "college radio" stations that the iTrip and other devices use aren't available.

    Right now I'm sporting the 128 meg backpack (I bought the 20gig/128 combo) and its a lot smaller, but hey its 128 lousy megs of music. The Neuros could really be a contender if they upped the quality and pushed out a model that can take SD or Compact flash cards instead of your two options: buy a big ass ugly hard drive backback with lousy battery life or buy the 128 meg backback. I believe they used to sell a 256 meg backback, but that's still pretty small, especially when it doesnt accept any other storage.

    Also, my Neuros is USB 1.1, its only recently they started selling 2.0 backpacks. Also, Some people are confusing line-in with mic-in. The Neuros doesnt do mic-in, you'll need to buy a mic pre-amp to record live shows like you would with a minidisc recorder. The built in mic is lacking to say the least.

    If the implementation was better (especially battery life) and if it had a smaller form factor it could really take off, but as it is, its kinda kludge and once I get tired of only having 128megs of storage I'll probably pick up the Creative Muvo 4gig. If you can live with these limitations, its a pretty cool device, but its not for me anymore.

    1. Re:I have one too by hoxford · · Score: 1

      The hard drive is a component that DI doesn't build so I don't see how you can use that as the basis to question the Neuros build quality. Just like the drive in any computer, they're using standard components that sometimes fail. The 20G in mine was an IBM, if I remember correctly. I say was because I just replaced it with a 60G to get more space.

      As for battery life, using the HD backpack I've gotten through two back-to-back 4.5 hour flights without a recharge. I wasn't skipping around songs and I wasn't using the FM transmitter. Either will impact battery life, it's just the nature of the beast.

    2. Re:I have one too by gad_zuki! · · Score: 1

      >The hard drive is a component that DI doesn't build so I don't see how you can use that as the basis to question the Neuros build quality

      They sold me the HD inside their device, you bet your ass I can use that as a basis for the quality of their products.

  87. Re:as a current neuros owner... by spungebob · · Score: 1

    you must have low standards for audio quality

    Why "must" this be the only reasonable response to my "dispute"? Is this the only way you can envision why someone might have a different opinion than you? You obviously must need to always be right and have the last word so I retract my previous post and apologize for being such a loser.

    --
    It takes an idiot to do cool things - that's why it's cool!
  88. It'll REALLY be hackable when... by mogrify · · Score: 1

    ... you can compile the firmware under Linux. Right now, you need to use the TI-provided Windows-based compiler (and you have to register to get it); but wouldn't it be great if someone figured out how to get gcc to compile for the TI DSP chip in the Neuros?

    --
    perl -e 'foreach(values %SIG){$_="IGNORE";}while(){}'
  89. Re: Cameras in phones are stupid extras by CyberKnet · · Score: 1

    A) Just because it's NOT a camera phone doesn't mean it can't have a color display.
    A> no camera means the picture is much more difficult for John Citizen to get into his phone.

    B) I never said a thing about the quality of these cameras.
    B> It's just the usual argument (jack of all trades does none of them well), but you never mentioned it, point ceded.

    C) Why are you calling your toddler on a cell phone (as implied by your "[Mommy/Daddy]")?
    C> Your toddler has never asked to call you, or for you to call them? (perhaps you don't have kids? If you do ... I'm terribly sorry that this wonder has never happened for you)

    All I am pointing out is that there are *good* uses for a camera in a phone other than featurama. What I left inferred, but unsaid, in my previous comment is that there are many more people than just toddlers who cannot read yet. People whose memories fail them. There are also people who just find a photo of someone calling much more pleasant than just some tiny text of the number and name of the person calling.

    I'm not saying that it is the way they are used most often, but I am saying it is more than just another feature added to incent consumers to spend more money.

    Featurama does exist, and it _is_ usually at the detriment of something else, but cameras are not it.

    --
    Video meliora proboque deteriora sequor - Ovidius
  90. Fskcing troll. by jotaeleemeese · · Score: 1

    Most players can't so what is your flaming, friking, trollish, point???

    --
    IANAL but write like a drunk one.
  91. Re:I must be old(er), Heathkit was even better by serbanp · · Score: 1

    I think he means real equipment, not hobby kits. I still have operator's manuals for HP tools (the then awesome 5 1/2 digit multimeter or the signal generator or ...) where the complete set of schematics is shown. You actually learn a lot when looking at what the designers had to do to make test equipment that stays consistent no matter the climatic changes, age or batch.

  92. Re:MP3 Support? No thanks. by twitter · · Score: 0, Flamebait
    An audio player that meets your needs, but now that's not good enough.

    That's not what I said. I said I wanted something that does not exist right now. I'm sure this is a fine player and I like that it has built in FM radio. If it has zero DRM built into, I'm really enthused. What did I just buy for my wife? A 20GB Iriver. It was smaller.

    You want one that _only_ plays ogg? I'm a _huge_ fan and supporter of ogg, and you're really not helping any, please stop now.

    Yes, I want a player that only supports ogg because it will be cheaper. What's wrong with that? Choice is good, right? Save your negativity for someone who boosts WMA only players.

    --

    Friends don't help friends install M$ junk.

  93. Any sourceforge type place for hardware projects? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I really want to start a hardware based project, but I'd love to see a sourceforge for such a thing. Anyone know of one.

  94. Re:Great concept. Terrible player. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Doesnt sound like you gave them much of a chance to rectify things if you starting demanding your money back less than 30 days later.

  95. Re:Obviously You Need to RTFA by ivar · · Score: 1

    Neuros (the company) won't ship to Canada, but there are resellers who will.. check out this guy.. he provided great service.

  96. Re:MP3 Support? No thanks. by turpie · · Score: 1

    Yes, I want a player that only supports ogg because it will be cheaper.

    Have you not heard of Economies of Scale?

    The market for an Ogg-only player would be tiny and the overheads involved would outway any licensing savings.