Slashdot Mirror


High School Dropout, Self-Taught Chip Designer

circletimessquare writes "The QVC television shopping network has recently found a hit in its product the C64, which emulates the classic Commodore 64 in a small form factor, a joystick. But the story of the designer of the product is more interesting than the product. Meet Jeri Ellsworth [NYTimes. You know what that means], whose life story emulates the golden age of garage-based computer design. She is proof that the passion of the homebrew electronic hobbyist is still a viable force in an age when well-funded and well-staffed corporate design teams dominate chip design."

121 of 816 comments (clear)

  1. No Reg Required... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Informative

    The soul-saver strikes again (Karma Free, for your pleasure):

    Reg Free Link

    1. Re:No Reg Required... by Pompatus · · Score: 2, Informative

      and for all other registration required stuff....

      bugmenot

      Even has extensions for firefox and ie. I'm sure most of you already know about it, but in case you didn't, here it is.

      --

      ----
      Squirrel ... It's not just for breakfast anymore
    2. Re:No Reg Required... by iamhassi · · Score: 4, Funny
      sorry for the troll but.... damn she's cute!!!

      Even if she wasn't a 30 yr old high school dropout self-taught chip designer and was just a normal person I'd still consider her cute.

      --
      my karma will be here long after I'm gone
    3. Re:No Reg Required... by dAzED1 · · Score: 2, Funny

      why aren't you modded as funny?

      You were just being funny...right?

    4. Re:No Reg Required... by pHatidic · · Score: 4, Funny

      So .8333 out of 10? Dude that's harsh.

    5. Re:No Reg Required... by Anonymous+Custard · · Score: 4, Funny

      she really is pretty cute... but look at all the stiff competition you'd find if you tried to pick her up at a hobby show: http://home.earthlink.net/~randy128/expo2002/pix5/ MVC-304S.JPG

    6. Re:No Reg Required... by unitron · · Score: 2, Funny
      But she has her own temperature-controlled soldering station, how can you not fall in love?

      I'll bet she even does wire-wrap.

      --

      I see even classic Slashdot is now pretty much unusable on dial up anymore.

  2. Yes but... by _PimpDaddy7_ · · Score: 4, Funny

    is she HOT?

    1. Re:Yes but... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Yes.

    2. Re:Yes but... by Just+Some+Guy · · Score: 4, Funny

      She's pretty good looking, even if she wasn't a female hard-core geek who designs and fabricates CPUs for the hell of it.

      --
      Dewey, what part of this looks like authorities should be involved?
    3. Re:Yes but... by jericho4.0 · · Score: 2, Insightful
      Considering she fit a C64 + games into a joystick, she could have an AOL account and still have geek cred.

      And since everyone's giving an opinion on this; I give her a 6.5.

      --
      "A language that doesn't affect the way you think about programming, is not worth knowing" - Alan Perlis
    4. Re:Yes but... by gUmbi · · Score: 4, Funny

      is she HOT?

      6 beers.

    5. Re:Yes but... by caluml · · Score: 3, Funny

      Well, she's slim, which in my book is 75% :)

    6. Re:Yes but... by Junior+J.+Junior+III · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Even more remarkable than a hot girl designing microchips, is the fact that QVC is selling something I would actually buy.

      --
      You see? You see? Your stupid minds! Stupid! Stupid!
    7. Re:Yes but... by freshman_a · · Score: 4, Funny

      Even more remarkable than a hot girl designing microchips, is the fact that QVC is selling something I would actually buy.

      even more remarkable is that this is prolly the only article in /. history where a post by an AC consisting only of the word "Yes", in reponse to the question "is she hot?", got modded as "insightful"

    8. Re:Yes but... by b1t+r0t · · Score: 4, Funny
      is she HOT?

      She's female and she knows VHDL. That makes her pretty hot as far as I'm concerned.

      --

      --
      "Open source is good." - Steve Jobs
      "Open source is evil." - Microsoft
    9. Re:Yes but... by c64cryptoboy · · Score: 2, Funny
      QVC is selling something I would actually buy

      I'm sure the small print says "Jeri not included".

      --
      I put the 'fun' in fundamentalism
    10. Re:Yes but... by Zedrick · · Score: 2, Insightful
      Aaaargh! It's like this in the C= community too. When discussing the Commodore One (basically a new improved C64 designed by Jeri), 50% of the posts in comp.sys.cbm and the mailinglists is about that computer itself, the rest is Jeri this and Jeri that...

      I can understand why there are so few females in the business, most of them probably gets overwhelmed by the attention they get because of their gender, and not their merits.

    11. Re:Yes but... by Frogbert · · Score: 2, Informative

      Yes, and I'm sure her girlfriend thinks so too

    12. Re:Yes but... by paedobear · · Score: 2, Funny

      Feh - still hot. Or is there a rule that we can only objectify real women now?

    13. Re:Yes but... by stevedekorte · · Score: 2, Insightful

      ShawnDoc, even transexuals have adam's apples. where is it?

      Btw, I met her at the Vintage Computer Feastival in Mountain View last month. She's a very nice, intellegent (obviously) and beautifully woman (even more obviously).

    14. Re:Yes but... by jaelle · · Score: 2, Insightful

      What really gets old is that none of the guys have the slightest interest in talking tech with us. All they're actually interested in is getting laid. A girl with geek cred adds points, evidently, but you guys really don't give a rats about her or her gadget.

      The reason girls don't do tech? Because there's no one to freakin' talk to, that's why! Millions of guys who do the same thing, and they'll all talk to each other endlessly about it. But not to girl techs. What *we* get is "do you like to..." fill in a whole bunch of blanks about sex.

      Frankly, about the 1000th time, it gets boring.

      --
      You have the right to remain silent. Anything you say will be misquoted, then used against you.
  3. text! by ack154 · · Score: 2, Informative

    Enjoy:

    YAMHILL, Ore. - There is a story behind every electronic gadget sold on the QVC shopping channel. This one leads to a ramshackle farmhouse in rural Oregon, which is the home and circuit design lab of Jeri Ellsworth, a 30-year-old high school dropout and self-taught computer chip designer.

    Ms. Ellsworth has squeezed the entire circuitry of a two-decade-old Commodore 64 home computer onto a single chip, which she has tucked neatly into a joystick that connects by a cable to a TV set. Called the Commodore 64 - the same as the computer system - her device can run 30 video games, mostly sports, racing and puzzles games from the early 1980's, all without the hassle of changing game cartridges.

    She has also included five hidden games and other features - not found on the original Commodore computer - that only a fellow hobbyist would be likely to appreciate. For instance, someone who wanted to turn the device into an improved version of the original machine could modify it to add a keyboard, monitor and disk drive.

    Sold by Mammoth Toys, based in New York, for $30, the Commodore 64 joystick has been a hot item on QVC this Christmas season, selling 70,000 units in one day when it was introduced on the shopping channel last month; since then it has been sold through QVC's Web site. Frank Landi, president of Mammoth, said he expected the joystick would be distributed next year by bigger toy and electronics retailers like Radio Shack, Best Buy, Sears and Toys "R" Us. "To me, any toy that sells 70,000 in a day on QVC is a good indication of the kind of reception we can expect," he said.

    Ms. Ellworth's first venture into toy making has not yet brought her great wealth - she said she is paid on a consulting basis at a rate that is competitive for her industry - "but I'm having fun," she said, and she continues with other projects in circuit design as a consultant.

    Her efforts in reverse-engineering old computers and giving them new life inside modern custom chips has already earned her a cult following among small groups of "retro" personal computer enthusiasts, as well as broad respect among the insular world of the original computer hackers who created the first personal computers three decades ago. (The term "hacker" first referred to people who liked to design and create machines, and only later began to be applied to people who broke into them.)

    More significant, perhaps, is that in an era of immensely complicated computer systems, huge factories and design teams that stretch across continents, Ms. Ellsworth is demonstrating that the spirit that once led from Silicon Valley garages to companies like Hewlett-Packard and Apple Computer can still thrive.

    "She's a pure example of following your interests and someone who won't accept that you can't do it," said Lee Felsenstein, the designer of the first portable PC and an original member of the Homebrew Computer Club. "She is someone who can do it and do it brilliantly."

    Ms. Ellsworth said that chip design was an opportunity to search for elegance in simplicity. She takes her greatest pleasure in examining a complex computer circuit and reducing it in cost and size by cleverly reusing basic electronic building blocks.

    It is a skill that is as much art as science, but one that Ms. Ellsworth has perfected, painstakingly refining her talent by plunging deeply into the minutiae of computer circuit design.

    Recently she interrupted a conversation with a visitor in her home to hunt in between the scattered circuit boards and components in her living room for a 1971 volume, "MOS Integrated Circuits," which she frequently consults. The book concerns an earlier chip technology based on fewer transistors than are used today. "I look for older texts," she said. "A real good designer needs to know how the old stuff works."

    Several years ago Ms. Ellsworth cornered Stephen Wozniak, co-founder of Apple Computer, at a festival for vintage Apple computers and badgered him for the secrets of his Apple I

    1. Re:text! by iocat · · Score: 2, Interesting
      Jerri rules. All you have to do is see her at Classic Gaming Expo , or Vintage Computer Festival, to know she's got more passion than just about anyone there.

      At CGE this year she practically bowled over a kid on her way to see Al Alcorn , who I guess she hadn't met yet. It was awesome.

      --

      Dude, I think I can see my house from here.

  4. Maybe by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny

    Maybe in 20 years she can design a P75. That will show those corparte giants who is boss.

  5. Forgot one key to success by TrollBridge · · Score: 4, Insightful
    "She is proof that the passion of the homebrew electronic hobbyist is still a viable force in an age when well-funded and well-staffed corporate design teams dominate chip design."

    You forgot well-lawyered, for when an uppity innovator dares challenge the corporate status quo. Sadly, all it would take is one lawsuit (ore even the threat thereof) to shut her down.

    --
    There's a Mercedes gap too. I want one and can't afford one, but it's not government's job to do anything about it.
    1. Re:Forgot one key to success by Desert+Raven · · Score: 5, Interesting

      Actually, the one thing that's keeping her from raking in the really big bucks is also what's protecting her.

      She's doing the design as a contractor.

      It's the companies who are making and selling them that will have to take the big risk of lawsuit. By legal standards, she's just a hired gun.

  6. eureka! by bLindmOnkey · · Score: 4, Insightful

    It seems as though nostalgia always sells. I went to a local mall recently and there was a stand that was selling something similar to these-it was an N64 shaped controller with a decent collection of SNES games right in the controller. I know if I had money I'd buy it for a young relative to experience the joys of my own childhood. Wouldn't you?

    1. Re:eureka! by Gr33nNight · · Score: 2, Informative

      Actually, there has been some Slashdot articles mentioning this exact same device. Its an illegal copy of Nintendos roms, usually at horrible quality.

      Buyer beware

  7. that noise you are about to hear ... by Triumph+The+Insult+C · · Score: 3, Funny

    keep your pants on boys ... she's kind of cute

    --
    vodka, straight up, thank you!
    1. Re:that noise you are about to hear ... by JaffaKREE · · Score: 4, Funny

      Definitely cute, but standing next to a male skull with RAM sticks lodged in the cranium serve as an effective deterrent to sexual advances.

    2. Re:that noise you are about to hear ... by grasshoppa · · Score: 4, Funny

      You're new here, aren't you?

      --
      Mod me down with all of your hatred and your journey towards the dark side will be complete!
    3. Re:that noise you are about to hear ... by dimator · · Score: 3, Funny

      Pants officially off!

      --
      python -c "x='python -c %sx=%s; print x%%(chr(34),repr(x),chr(34))%s'; print x%(chr(34),repr(x),chr(34))"
    4. Re:that noise you are about to hear ... by Guppy06 · · Score: 2, Funny

      Maybe, but I prefer the brunette standing next to her.

    5. Re:that noise you are about to hear ... by Dasein · · Score: 2, Funny

      And I'm practically old enough to be your typical slashdotter's father. Seems okay to me.

      --
      You are not a beautiful or unique snowflake -- but you could be if you got off your ass.
  8. don't mod up :( by ack154 · · Score: 5, Funny

    damnit - i really did mean to post as AC ...

  9. NO way by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Insightful

    She is NOT a self-taught CHIP DESIGNER. She is a self-taught FPGA programmer. There is a world of difference, the former is impossible, the latter is trivial.
    The good thing from this story is that I hope employers will open their ears and eyes to the fact that university is USELESS to form engineers when the drive is not there, and that university is just a replacement for forced military service.

    1. Re:NO way by mekkab · · Score: 3, Interesting

      There is a world of difference, the former is impossible, the latter is trivial.

      How is it impossible to be a self-taught chip designer? There are these books like "Principles of CMOS VLSI Design" (Weste, Eshrahian) that are used to TEACH people how do design these chips! Cedra and Smith is another good one for learnin' about transistors and semiconductors.

      I'm not saying you can set up a chip-fab in your closet but you can learn all this stuff.

      --
      In the future, I would want to not be isolated from my friends in the Space Station.
    2. Re:NO way by Mongo222 · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Well isn't that the pot calling the kettle black? The point the original poster was making is that setting up a FPGA is a lot more like coding, than it it ship designing. The skill set, methods and tools are nearly the same. In fact I wouldn't be entirely surprised to find that the joystick/C64 is heavily based on a number of the opensource C64 emulators that are around. Not that I think this subtracts from the coolness factor of what she came up with, but it's not like she layed out a 6502 gate by gate by hand.

    3. Re:NO way by mekkab · · Score: 2, Informative

      There's no way you can learn chipd design without actually designed, building, and testing chips.

      Not true; you use the software. Now, I know you said the software was expensive; but where there is a will, there's a way.

      Ledit student version came with the book; so for under $80 you can start laying out a chip; go to a college campus and you could pick this up used for a song. I'm sure you could also get evaluation and free versions of Verilog, too.

      As for the fabbing, yep, you gotta shell out some bucks to get your design implemented. But $500... thats do-able. No wife, no kids, no other hobbies... you can cough up that kind of money, just not too often! ;)

      --
      In the future, I would want to not be isolated from my friends in the Space Station.
    4. Re:NO way by Fizzl · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Umm... That might be your opinion.
      For you, FPGA programming might be trivial but you are lost when it goes down to hardware. However, not everyone in on the globe have the exactly skillset as you.

      I have education in electrical automation (mainly analogue processes, logics (CS21 et.al.), instrumentation and so forth. Lot of electronics and hardware thou...)
      I'm a self taught programmer in several languages and currently earning my salary at the software side on ARM9 processors.

      To me, both chip design and FPGA design seem quite plausible but too laborous to even try to pursue on my own. Jack of all arts you might say...

      Mathematics and physical phenomenons involved in electrical science are not too complicated anymore. Many before us have already figured much out, and much of that information is available to everyone.

    5. Re:NO way by taniwha · · Score: 3, Insightful
      I built hardware as a ham at school (back when micros were still becominbg available) - I did do a CS degree that inclued exactly 0 hardware/electronics (but I'd been programming for years before I hit college anyway). I worked doing OS stuff (porting unix) thru the 80s and hacking hardware (pals and the like) in my own time - from which I fell into doing architectural design of 2d graphics hardware (pulling apart people graphics libraries and figuring out how to make hardware to do the same things - specing datapaths and state machines for others to build and making C level models of how it should work - that chip grossed $120M) eventually it became easier for me to code in verilog rather than C and cut out the middle man, around the same time I started running Synopsis on my own designs and a while later driving a router and back end timing on them too and doing the occasional hand edit to polygons to fix timing problems.

      You get the idea - it is possible to be self taught - you just have to be smart and work hard - certainly coming in from the architecture side has really helped me - I understand stuff about the software side the hardware guys don't (and vice-versa) I get to sit on both sides of the fence - more recently I've made a deliberate decision to move back to the software side of the biz - for me at least there's more day to day creative work to do on the software side of the house (vlsi tends to be one month of creative design and 11 months of grind making it work - not as much fun as coding up something new every day)

    6. Re:NO way by metroid+composite · · Score: 3, Insightful
      The good thing from this story is that I hope employers will open their ears and eyes to the fact that university is USELESS to form engineers when the drive is not there, and that university is just a replacement for forced military service.
      I'm not sure what University you attended, but the purpose of a university degree is to teach you how to think and research, and to give a broad view of of a field. It's easy enough to be a self-taught programmer without having touched object oriented programming, for instance. Engineering and Software Engineering teach building processes that tend to be robust and have a lot of checks along the way. Sure, if you're good you either come up with your own checks, or maybe you just read a programming style manual from cover to cover and get all the info anyway.

      Point is, University students shouldn't have holes in their knowledge, and should be forced to do creative thought (yeah, there's sucky universities out there, but that's an asside). There's obviously people who learn to think on their own, and people who can get all the info they need for one area of programming or FPGA or whatever, so it's not useful for everyone, just a lot of people. On the other hand, military service teaches a less relevant kind of knowledge (for programmers) and values obedience over independent thought. It's really not the same thing at all (though this may depend on the university I suppose).

    7. Re:NO way by svirre · · Score: 4, Informative

      L-edit is a polygon pusher. You are going to be pretty damn persistent to do anything more than a puny digital design in that.

      For real digital layout you want to use Astro/Synopsys, Encounter/Cadence, Blast Fusion/Magma or Pinnacle/Sierra (Just maybe). None of these are going to cost you less than a few $100K.

      Of cource before you to the point of doing layout you likely want to do synthesis (Although it is not beyond human capability to hand generate netlists). Design Compiler/Synopsys is pretty much the defacto standard but both cadence and magma has credible alternatives.

      After layout you want to check your design for timing. To do this you want a Static Timing Analysis tool (Primetime from Synopsys is pretty much the only choice here for sign-off quality, though you might live with what your back-end tool has built in if you feel brave). To feed the STA tool with good data you need to extract the circuit: StarXTRC/Synopsys, Fire & Ice/Cadence, CalibreXRC are the prime contenders.

      In addition you might want/need to do:
      - Formal verification (To verify your final netlist conforms to your design)
      - Rail analysis (To verify your power grid is adequate)
      - Thermal analysis (To check your device won't melt of fail due to too high junction temperature)
      - Crosstalk analysis (Check for parasitic effects on timing. Required for designs on 0.13um and better)

      A complete tools suite for digital design will likely set you back $1000K. Naturally a lot of smaller designhouses will outsource the the implementation, but they will at minimum require simulators (minimum $5000 a seat) and synthesis ($100000 pr. license)

      As for fabbing, $500? That would be a mighty sweet deal, even for a shared MPW run. With academic discounts and on an old process you might be able to get a slot on an MPW for $5000. On a reasonably modern process (like 0.18um) a engineering run with 6 prototyping wafers (i.e. not a MPW) will set you back somwhere between $50K to $200K

    8. Re:NO way by hazem · · Score: 3, Insightful

      This woman has something that so many engineers are lacking, and that's a focus on what she can accopmlish.

      So many engineers focus on what can't be done, how it's impossible, or how it can't be done with tools/budget available.

      I'd be much more inclined to hire her because she has shown that she has drive, motivation, and a can-do attitude. Those traits easily overcome years of education.

      I can give her education, but there's no way I can give her those other things.

    9. Re:NO way by jaelle · · Score: 2, Insightful

      I suspect that university tends to lock people down creatively. Cripes, you *can't* force 'creative thought'!

      My son, who is now 25, has been designing circuits and programming microproprocessors for years now. He hasn't been in any school since 4th grade. He has never once questioned whether he could do something he wanted to do, he just did it. His latest invention is going to manufacturing now with the support of several VC's, who also have had no problem with the idea that he's 'uneducated'. The fact that he's designed and built working prototypes of a very novel and complex design is proof enough.

      Like Jeri--passion and interest--and knowing that you can--is all you need.

      --
      You have the right to remain silent. Anything you say will be misquoted, then used against you.
  10. A girl-geek and slashdot by Hoi+Polloi · · Score: 5, Funny

    Start rolling out the "She is hot" and "I'd like her to play with my joystick" comments.

    One more thing, can Slashdot's editors please stop whining about NYT's registration? To read their news for free just for filling in some info seems like a generous trade.

    --
    It is by the juice of the coffee bean that thoughts acquire speed, the teeth acquire stains. The stains become a warning
    1. Re:A girl-geek and slashdot by HeghmoH · · Score: 2, Informative

      One more thing, can Slashdot's editors please stop whining about NYT's registration? To read their news for free just for filling in some info seems like a generous trade.

      I don't think the editors care. However, people used to get up in arms about the registration back when slashdot didn't warn people about it. In fact, many people still complain about NYTimes links even with the warning. Your beef is with the complainers, not with the editors.

      --
      Mod down posts with a "Free Mac Mini/iPod" sig, they're spam!
    2. Re:A girl-geek and slashdot by Guppy06 · · Score: 2, Interesting

      "To read their news for free just for filling in some info seems like a generous trade."

      So they turn off the ads after you register?

  11. Finally I can get a Comadore 64... by Socrates+Demise · · Score: 2, Funny

    and see what all of the fuss was about.

    --
    I hate stupid rules... Rules that make sense I don't mind... But the stupid ones just really bug me!
  12. But what about Porn? by DeathFlame · · Score: 2, Funny

    When will someone create a 'joystick' with 30 different kinds of porn, instead of having to use that old 'internet' thing.

  13. SHE? by nycsubway · · Score: 3, Informative

    She?? did this? That is great! I believe this is the first woman I've heard of who has dropped out of school and started a garage-computer company. I'm not being sexist, but it really is the first time I've heard of it.

    1. Re:SHE? by ergo98 · · Score: 2, Insightful

      The fact that it's a "she", is irrelevant.

      It's not irrelevant whatsoever - society puts differing forces on males and females, and as the GP points out it is extraordinarily rare to find a woman excel outside of "the system" (you'll find a good number of examples of men who persevered against the odds, pursuing success in non-traditional ways, but almost no women doing the same). This says more about society than woman, and I think it's largely because society encourages women who don't academically excel to become homemakers and baby machines (no I am not saying that homemakers and parents didn't academically excel, just that it does end up being the "default" profession of many woman in that situation).

    2. Re:SHE? by Tekoneiric · · Score: 2, Insightful

      I totally agree, I'm also a ts and a lesbian. I'm in a long term relationship with one woman; she and I are at the beginning of a relationship with yet another woman. Why is it that some guys insist on belittling intelligent and assertive women? The main reason why there aren't as many woman in the computer and electronics field as men is because people in the education system do what they can to prevent women from choosing those fields. Thankfully things are changing but not fast enough.

      --
      *It's not what you can do for the Dark Side but what the Dark Side can do for you!*
  14. There will always been room for the underdog by suso · · Score: 4, Insightful

    I was just telling my wife about this last night.
    Even when you think that any industry is too hard to break into because there are big companies dominating it, one can still create something that is better or worthwhile to people. Even for the sake that some people want to shop somewhere else, or buy a different brand.

    I mean, think about it, for 50 years cars were being made and the corporations that made them became big 800lb gorillas. But then look, here comes Toyota, Honda, Nissan, Geo, Saturn, Lexus, Kia and now Scion.

    So there is room, just take a look at the history of open source software.

    1. Re:There will always been room for the underdog by acomj · · Score: 5, Insightful

      Cars are a bad metaphore. Mostly made by large comglomerates.

      Lexus and Scion are made by Toyota.
      Saturn made be General Motors,
      Geo, was GM rebrand of cars made by Toyota I beleive
      Subaru - Fuju Heavy Industries
      Kia is from Huyndi (large comglomerate.)

      But your right, software/computers are still places were an individual can make it with hard work and good design.

      Also she is working for a NJ toy manufacturer not out on her own.

    2. Re:There will always been room for the underdog by ConceptJunkie · · Score: 2, Funny

      I think "Scion" is Japanese for "butt-ugly".

      --
      You are in a maze of twisty little passages, all alike.
    3. Re:There will always been room for the underdog by bob65 · · Score: 2, Informative
      Not to mention that

      Lincoln, Mercury, Mazda, Volvo, Jaguar, Land Rover, and Aston Martin are all owned by Ford;

      Chevrolet, Pontiac, Buick, Cadillac, GMC, Oldsmobile, Saturn, Hummer, and Saab are all owned by General Motors; and

      Jeep, Chrysler, Dodge, Mercedes-Benz, Maybach, and CSmart are all owned by DaimlerChrysler.

      Also note that many cars are simply re-brands - i.e. the Saab 9-2 is a Subaru Impreza Wagon, the Mazda Tribute is a Ford Escape, etc... and did you know the Subaru Forestor is sold a Chevrolet Forestor in India?

      and of course as mentioned, Lexus and Scion are just brands of Toyota, Infiniti is just a brand of Nissan, and Acura is just a brand of Honda.

  15. All the flame... by Thunderstruck · · Score: 3, Interesting

    Is starting to have an effect! From the article:

    Her efforts in reverse-engineering old computers and giving them new life inside modern custom chips has already earned her a cult following among small groups of "retro" personal computer enthusiasts, as well as broad respect among the insular world of the original computer hackers who created the first personal computers three decades ago. (The term "hacker" first referred to people who liked to design and create machines, and only later began to be applied to people who broke into them.)

    This column actually notes the distinction between hackers and crackers, well, sort-of... Anyway it sure is refreshing!

    Now if only we could come up with different words for good lawyers and bad lawyers. How about Clawyers?

    --
    Trying to use sarcasm in text-based forums does not work.
  16. Let us hope by boodaman · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Let us hope there are many more people just like her here in America. If there are, the future will be very interesting. If there aren't, we'll find ourselves a nation of passive consumers without any initiative.

  17. Told you So by dshaw858 · · Score: 3, Interesting

    Yes, I know it's a tiny bit off topic, but I wanted to reinforce something that seemed to be overlooked. In a previous Slashdot article, everyone was wondering how to get kids into tech, and how important it is to push extra (and internal) curricular activities at school. I said that that wasn't necessary, and this story goes to prove it. I gotta say, this is a really interesting read... what I wonder is how much more she could have done if she had gone to college and been an electrical engineering major...

    - dshaw

    1. Re:Told you So by __aaclcg7560 · · Score: 2, Insightful

      More schooling may or may not help her. Formal education is useful for learning the basic concepts, but it sometimes stiffles the creative impulse to do something brand new with those concepts that most people won't consider since it haven't been done before.

      She seems to have the classic "I don't have time for this sh*t since I got better things to do" attitude of so many of the big movers in the computer industry (i.e., Steve Wozinak, Steve Jobs, Bill Gates, and John Carmack). If she needs more education to help her solve a problem, she'll seek out on her own.

  18. Apple ][ in a joystick...? by __aaclcg7560 · · Score: 2, Interesting

    The C64 was based on the 6502 processor. So was the Apple ][. Maybe someone will come out with an Apple ][ in a joystick. If Apple was really smart, they would put an Apple ][ inside an IPod.

    The problem with the IPod, you can't claim that your joystick is bigger than anyone else's joystick. :P

    1. Re:Apple ][ in a joystick...? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Informative

      No it wasn't.

      THe C64 was based on the 6510 (a 6502 compatible).

      The Apple II was a 1MHz 6502.

      The Atari 800 and 400 used 1.8MHz 6502A.

  19. I'd hit it! by beldraen · · Score: 3, Funny

    Oh, wrong site.. Sorry.

    --
    Bel, the mostly sane.. "Of course I can't see anything! I'm standing on the shoulders of idiots." -- Me
  20. Well by paranode · · Score: 5, Funny

    She looks like a conniving elf in the picture. So in Slashdot terms, yes she's hot.

  21. Don't Need School to be Educated. by jellomizer · · Score: 4, Interesting

    School is only a method of pointing you in the right direction to become educated and if you learned enough they give you a piece of paper that says you have learned stuff. If it weren't for regulations in such areas almost every job could possibly be done by a person who never graduated from high school or college. A person who is motivated enough will learn without the need of school. They can go the the library them self and learn information. They can read stories about how other people did things, they can educate themselves without the need for school.

    I would like to think school is more a Map to show you were you can go for success. But just like driving on the road you don't always need a Map common since and some exploring will help you get to your location as well, sometimes (usually) a little longer then normal but sometimes a lot quicker. As well with schooling like driving with a Map if you don't know where you are or where you are going the Map is useless.

    That said dropping out of school is still often a bad idea, because while you may get there by chance if you had a better education it will give you at least basic directions to start out on, training people with good research skills and the ability to learn for themselves.

    --
    If something is so important that you feel the need to post it on the internet... It probably isn't that important.
    1. Re:Don't Need School to be Educated. by Zebano · · Score: 3, Insightful

      "I never let my schooling interfere with my education"

      -Mark Twain

      --
      You hate your job? There's a support group for that. It's called "everybody" and they meet at the bar. -Drew Carey.
    2. Re:Don't Need School to be Educated. by Lumpy · · Score: 3, Insightful

      I found that college was more of an atmosphere and an enabler to follow studies. college is a way to make it easier for you to not have to work to feed and house yourself and focus on learning and discovering instead of focusing on survival.

      Some people are forced to do both, the full time student that also worked full time commands much more respect from everyone than the guy that daddy had enough money to pay for everything or the person that was lucky enough to receive a full ride.

      College enables you by providing resources that normally you would have to pay for... it's hard to study Chemistry on your own because the first step is to build a lab.

      Those are the ONLY advantages to college. you can learn EVERYTHING they teach in a college without ever setting foot in one or ever listening to a "professor".

      You do not receive a better education at a college, you receive a better opportunity to learn in an atmosphere that is conducive to learning.

      --
      Do not look at laser with remaining good eye.
  22. impossible? by i41Overlord · · Score: 5, Insightful

    "She is NOT a self-taught CHIP DESIGNER. She is a self-taught FPGA programmer. There is a world of difference, the former is impossible, the latter is trivial."

    Impossible? What about the guys who invented the first chips? Did they go to some class that taught how to build chips which will be invented in the future?

    You can buy the same books that they have at schools. You can learn the same things on your own that you'd learn in schools. Some people (such as myself) are tinkerers, and we learn better by experimenting on our own than we do sitting in a classroom.

    I find it funny that I've also heard people saying you need to go to school to be a programmer or work in the computer industry. Most of us geeks know that's also false.

    1. Re:impossible? by Grishnakh · · Score: 5, Informative

      You haven't worked much with FPGAs, have you?

      FPGAs are programmed in Verilog or VHDL; it's not much different from programming a computer. All you need is a development board with the FPGA plugged in (the FPGA makers make eval boards specifically to support this), and a connection to your PC so you can download the compiled design into the FPGA.

      The problem with FPGAs is that they're very similar to SRAM, and when they lose power, they lose their programming. So they have to program themselves every time they power on, meaning you need a separate ROM chip on the board for it. Worse, because of this and because of the sheer cost per chip of FPGAs, they aren't very good for designs with large production volumes (they are good for small volumes, though, because you don't have to get a custom chip made, which has a high initial cost). So, all you have to do is get your FPGA design converted to an ASIC; there's several companies that specialize in exactly this.

      Basically, all this girl had to do was do the actual HDL design at home, test and debug it on a prototype board, then when it was finished send it to a manufacturer to have them make ASICs in large volume from it. You don't need your own fabrication plant any more than you need your own photo developing lab to make photos.

    2. Re:impossible? by prockcore · · Score: 2, Insightful

      In order to program(not necessarily program well) all you need is a cheap computer and you can use Linux/gcc or Sun's jdk or mono or whatever to compile your programs.

      Sure now, but it wasn't too long ago that you had to spend a large amount of money on a compiler, and a very expensive harddrive, since your sourcecode would take up more space than the floppy your program would eventually live on.

      I remember spending $500 on the Merlin assembler so I could write Apple][ games.

      Plus, all you need to *design* chips is a piece of EE software. There is a difference between designing a CPU, and actually manufacturing one.

      We designed 8bit CPUs in college classes.

    3. Re:impossible? by harrkev · · Score: 5, Insightful

      The Xilinx Spartan family has some very nice FPGAs clocking in at well under $10 right now. So, for small low-speed things like this, they are perfect!

      And as far as the "all this girl had to do" line, no way. All she had to do was:

      1) Implement a 6502 processor. There is a free core or two floating around, which she likely used. Still not exactly trivial, though.

      2) Reverse-engineer and implement the DRAM circuitry. The design does not use DRAM, but you still need to emulate certain portions of the hardware for timing reasons. When DRAM refreshes, the processor has to snooze.

      3) Reverse-engineer and implement the SID sound chip. Fairly major headache.

      4) Reverse-engineer and implement the video circuitry. Major headache. This system even had hardware sprites.

      5) Reverse-engineer and implement the different hardware ports.

      6) Include a bridge that would allow a PC keyboard to emulate a C64 keyboard.

      7) Emulate a cassette drive and load it with warez.

      8) Implement the analog bits of the video and sound circuitry. Maybe somebody else did this.

      In short, I am impressed.

      I have been through an ASIC tape-out. It costs in the neighborhood of $100K. MUCH cheaper to go with a cheap FPGA and serial-EEPROM for stuff like this. Once you get well over 10,000 units shipped, it is time to start looking at an ASIC. Until then, a cheap FPGA is probably your best bet.

      --
      "-1 Troll" is the apparently the same as "-1 I disagree with you."
    4. Re:impossible? by i41Overlord · · Score: 2, Funny

      No, but they had the resources of the US government and their academic institution to back them up. Chip fabrication is not cheap, therefore it really is difficult to get into the chip design field.

      On the contrary, I made an advanced chip fab in my kitchen using only twine, sticks, matches and an old pair of reading glasses. Of course I had an outside contractor (MacGuyver) help me.

    5. Re:impossible? by MagerValp · · Score: 5, Informative

      > 1) Implement a 6502 processor. There is a free core or two floating around, which she likely used. Still not exactly trivial, though.

      No, she did her own core, which is both smaller and faster than the free cores out there.

      > 2) Reverse-engineer and implement the DRAM circuitry. The design does not use DRAM, but you still need to emulate certain portions of the hardware for timing reasons. When DRAM refreshes, the processor has to snooze.

      The NTSC unit is SRAM based. The C64 uses transparent DRAM refresh during the VIC's half of every cycle. The PAL unit will use SDRAM.

      > 3) Reverse-engineer and implement the SID sound chip. Fairly major headache.

      MAJOR headache.

      > 4) Reverse-engineer and implement the video circuitry. Major headache. This system even had hardware sprites.

      Yes, it took her years, and there are still timing glitches. It's amazingly compatible though.

      5) Reverse-engineer and implement the different hardware ports.

      I believe this was fairly easy though.

      > 6) Include a bridge that would allow a PC keyboard to emulate a C64 keyboard.

      IIrc that's a small state machine and a matrix, nothing too hairy.

      > 7) Emulate a cassette drive and load it with warez.

      That was done in software by Adrian Gonzalez. The NY Times article concentrated on Jeri herself, so I guess it's forgivable that they didn't mention that there was a software team as well (Adrian and Robin Harbron were the main programmers, plus me and Mark Seelye helped patch games).

      > 8) Implement the analog bits of the video and sound circuitry. Maybe somebody else did this.

      Nope, all Jeri.

      Those people doubting her hardware skills really shouldn't talk without checking facts, and if you think that designing things in VHDL is as simple as programming in C you need a clue. No, make that two. And for the record, it's designed with a mix of VHDL and schematic capture.

      --

      READY.
      #
    6. Re:impossible? by MilenCent · · Score: 2, Insightful

      You're involved with this project too? Sir, allow me to tip my hat to you and the rest of the team. This is just so cool.

      It's almost enough to make me want to watch QVC to see about picking one up.

  23. Its a computer emulation, not just games. by acomj · · Score: 2, Informative

    What I found interesting about it was that the article hints that you could hook up a keyboard to the device and a drive and have a computer. They keep getting better and better games in these things. Pretty soon PS one in a gamepad.

    Slashdot covered the release of the device here.

    slashdot coverage of the device commodore game device
    I discovered..
    (when I submitted the story 12 hours ago .. cough..cough)

  24. High school dropout by mboverload · · Score: 2, Insightful

    I'm tiured of people saying to need to pass high school. I didn't and I am making 60k a year. Ok, mainly because I'm a fricken genius with this shit, but still.

  25. New York Times? by michael+path · · Score: 5, Funny

    [NYTimes. You know what that means]

    That they're just making shit up?

  26. Bills Gates, too. by i41Overlord · · Score: 2, Insightful

    "Just think what Ms. Ellsworth could have achieved with a proper education. "

    How do you know she doesn't have a proper education? Who says that learning on your own isn't proper?
    Maybe Bill Gates should have stayed in school and got a degree. He could have been rich, I tell you!

    1. Re:Bills Gates, too. by schon · · Score: 4, Informative

      Maybe Bill Gates should have stayed in school and got a degree. He could have been rich, I tell you!

      You do realize that Bill was rich before he founded Microsoft, right? His father is a millionaire.

    2. Re:Bills Gates, too. by Fnkmaster · · Score: 3, Informative

      Rule #1 of business: It's hard to make a billion bucks without starting with at least a few million (or 10) first.

      It takes more than just brains and business sense to make money, it takes capital, and it's hard to get capital without taking smaller amounts of capital and making larger amounts of capital (well, banks are willing to loan you some money, but ironically, only if you have money or assets to back the loan first).

      Most people who make a billion dollars in their lifetime start with a base of some wealth to work from. It's not impossible to go from zero, it's just much harder, since you have to get to a few tens of millions first - in other words, you need that many more lucky streaks, brains, business sense, whatever, without any big busts or screwups in the middle.

      Ya know Donald Trump? His father was a successful real estate developer in the outer boroughs of New York in the first half of this century. Donald took his fathers business, and had the courage and built the connections needed to take it into Manhattan and pursue bigger projects. In other words, he brought something to the table, but no, he didn't do it all from scratch.

      In any case, this is pretty obvious stuff. We can't all leave our children billions of dollars, but you don't need to, to give them the tools to be financial successful. It's not so hard to make and save a few million dollars over the course of your career, by always underspending your earnings, saving money, making smart investments and so on. And giving your children a financially stable platform gives them the opportunity to explore career options and take bigger risks in general, which is a good thing for more than just financial success, it gives you more opportunities to find a career that is rewarding and in tune with your goals in life.

    3. Re:Bills Gates, too. by gordgekko · · Score: 2, Insightful

      > You do realize that Bill was rich before he founded Microsoft, right? His father is a millionaire.

      No, that means his father was rich.

      --
      You want to know who isn't running Firefox 2.x? They spell it "definately" and "rediculous".
    4. Re:Bills Gates, too. by telemonster · · Score: 2, Interesting

      It is rumored Bill's parents had connections with IBM, which led to the contract for MS-DOS. It's all in who you know.

      --
      Southeastern Virginia REPRESENT!
  27. More links by vasqzr · · Score: 2, Informative

    She's turning up a ton of hits on Google

    Here she is at the XGamestation booth: http://www.xgamestation.com/view_media.php?id=109

    Here's another article on her:

    http://home.att.net/~rmestel/articles/on_road_ells worth.txt

  28. Re:just think by Spy+der+Mann · · Score: 3, Insightful

    Just think what Ms. Ellsworth could have achieved with a proper education.

    Maybe not as much... she might have ended up as the employee of some big computer company designing games or the like.

    Maybe it was the *lack* of education that put her in the difficult situations that made her give the best from herself. It was her efforts to go against the tides that made her outstand from the average geeks like us. Maybe that was the pressure needed to turn her into a full-fledged diamond.

    I wish i had her courage to go against the tides and established principles. *Sighs*

  29. Re:Yeah But by hrieke · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Intel hired knitters for wiring the first set of chips back in the day.
    Cobol was designed by a Grace Murray Hopper.
    Frances Elizabeth Snyder Holberton was involved in Fortran's development.
    Ada Lovelace wrote first program to calculate Bernouli numbers.

    If you're going to troll, learn how to troll right.

    --
    III.IIVIVIXIIVIVIIIVVIIIIXVIIIXIIIIIIIIVIIIIVVIIIV IIVIIIIIIVIII...
  30. Finally someone I can relate too by jdjdac · · Score: 5, Insightful
    Being a graduating electrical engineer, ham radio operator, and of the female persuasion....IT IS ABOUT FREAKING TIME I've had someone to truly look up to in terms of technical skill and passion. Her life story is very similar to how I grew up and how I experimented with electronics other 'boys toys.' I always felt like an outcast for enjoying tinkering, be it with trebuchets or radios.

    It really makes you question your role in society...especially when it seems that women are portrayed like idiots or dumb blondes in the media. Or that all I should care about is makeup, clothes, and hair (trust me I'm not that obsessed - just ask my husband). Sometimes even today I ask myself "what they hell am I doing?" "Why didn't I do elementary ed like every girl I know?" It is still something I struggle with even today.

    I always wished I could have had another woman to look up and admire for their technical achievements. I almost never thought it would happen in my lifetime. Congratulations to her on her long list of achievements, and hopefully she can encourage another generation of woman to get into tech....especially engineering!!

    1. Re:Finally someone I can relate too by NullProg · · Score: 4, Interesting

      I always wished I could have had another woman to look up and admire for their technical achievements.

      You mean to say you've never heard of Grace Hopper? Hell I'm male and she's one of my favorite inspirations:

      Grace Hopper

      Enjoy,

      --
      It's just the normal noises in here.
    2. Re:Finally someone I can relate too by miskate · · Score: 2, Informative

      Not long after I got by comp sci degree, I discovered Systers - an "informal organization for technical women in computing". It's not a bad place to start if you're looking for female inspiration - there're some very smart ladies in that group.

  31. Re:I think I'm in love. by jxyama · · Score: 2, Funny
    >The important question, is she single?

    from the lack of the ring... i believe she is...

    but you missed the more important question first:
    is she straight?

    (of course, i assumed the question to the question that comes before that: are you a male?

  32. C-One by FiSHNuTZ · · Score: 4, Interesting

    I really think that it's worth mentioning Jeri's other much more interesting and complicated project, the C-One. If you think the C64 joystick/computer is amazing, take a look at the C-One and you should be substantially more impressed:

    http://c64upgra.de/c-one/

  33. I'll venture a guess: by seanadams.com · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Just think what Ms. Ellsworth could have achieved with a proper education.

    MUCH LESS

    For the really creative problem solver types like her, school is a dangerous reconditioning of one's mind and social outlook. If you're not suited for it, excessive schooling/socialization can kill both your entrepreneurial spirit and your creative talent.

    It is NOT ironic in the slightest that so many great innovators were drop-outs.

    1. Re:I'll venture a guess: by 3Suns · · Score: 2, Interesting

      I think what the parent post was trying to say was that the "proper education" would be one besides our current system, that provides extra resources to smart and inventive people who want to experiment and learn on their own.

      Yeah, you might be able to argue that struggling to make it on her own drove her (and people like her) to excel, but there are definitely many untested and experimental methods of education geared toward the very talented in hopes of boosting their potential.

      Unfortunately, our current educational systems (public and most private schools included) are focused almost entirely on raising the lower bound of aptitude, rather than pay any attention on the best and brightest.

      --

      -3Suns

      ~~~~
      The Revolution will be Slashdotted
  34. Beware the sig by Rufus88 · · Score: 2, Informative

    Sadly, all it would take is one lawsuit (ore even the threat thereof) to shut her down.
    -- Just like it happened to this poor sap [tinyurl.com].


    Beware the sig in the parent post. The link is not work-safe, and the context makes it look like it's relevant to the discussion:

  35. Re:just think by bedouin · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Just think what Ms. Ellsworth could have achieved with a proper education.

    A four to six year delay (depending on if she wanted to pursue a MA/MS) in doing what she really wanted to do, only to work as a code monkey in a cubicle? $100k in debt? If she went to school this likely wouldn't have happened for her.

    She's done something pretty practical, that exemplifies she has some skills most people don't. That's worth way more than some printed scraps of paper with her name on it. This is coming from an overeducated bastard, by the way.

  36. Re:I think I'm in love. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Insightful

    The important question, is she single?

    Important how? Do you suppose she's attracted to horny, undersexed, drooling morons who post on slashdot?

  37. Is Stroker on the joystick? by hal2814 · · Score: 2, Funny

    With all the girl-geek comments going around, has anyone checked to see if Stroker is on the C64 joystick?

  38. Re:should of stayed in school by Grishnakh · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Not only that, but even with an engineering degree from a recognized school, you won't create anything worth having while you're slaving away at your mind-numbing cubicle drone job. You'll just attend meetings, work on some tiny part of a huge project that ultimately gets cancelled before it's ever released, and then finally get canned.

    Sorry, but a silly joystick running 20-year-old video games is a far greater achievement than most individual engineers will ever achieve working for large companies.

  39. Well-funded, well-staffed...???? by inkswamp · · Score: 4, Interesting
    well-funded and well-staffed corporate design teams dominate chip design

    One only need to have been part of one of these mythical "well-funded and well-staffed" corporate teams (or to know someone who has been part of one) to know that the garage-based tech hobbyist is nowhere near extinction. High-power staffing and funds are nothing--NOTHING--next to the power of a real vision. A single person with a great idea and a little know-how can lay waste to any corporate team. Don't get so caught up with the corporate facade that you start to doubt it. Watch how many little companies with great ideas that corporations buy up. They do it so regularly that it hardly makes the news anymore. The real ideas aren't coming out of boardroom discussions.

    And remember that IBM was once the indomitable corporate force and Apple and Microsoft were the little start-ups. That's why people who talk about how Linux won't change anything make me laugh. I don't even use Linux, not even a big fan of it, and I know it has yet to make its biggest impact. That's how this stuff works. Give it time. History repeats itself.

    --
    --Rick "If it isn't broken, take it apart and find out why."
  40. Public schematics for the C64. by BigZaphod · · Score: 2, Interesting

    I love this story, but I have to wonder something here... Didn't the C64 come with schematics? I don't remember for sure, but I know that computers of that era commonly came with them or had them available. If that is the case, did she really reverse engineer it or was it most of a... "hmm.. I have schematics, I can understand them, how about I just translate them to an FPGA and see if I can make it go?"

    Even if that was the case, she still deserves props for thinking of doing it in the first place and then making it happen. I don't mean to make light of her accomplishments or anything.

    Consults Google... Yep, there were schematics available. here is one place to see them.

    1. Re:Public schematics for the C64. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Interesting

      There were no "schematics" for the chips inside the computer, which, after all, are the real brains of the system.

      The fact that she reverse engineered the 6510, the 6567 (VIC-II) video chip, the 6581 SID chip, the 6526 CIA chips, and the the C64's PLA chip is nothing short of amazing. If she had done nothing else at all, she would deserve our wonder and praise.

      - Bo Zimmerman
      (Moderator, C1 Mailing List)
      http://groups.yahoo.com/group/commodoreone

    2. Re:Public schematics for the C64. by harrkev · · Score: 2, Informative

      Yes, schematics of the BOARD were available in the advanced programmer's reference guide.

      But the schematics just show how the board itself is wired up. Yup, this pin of this chip goes to that pin of that chip. You now have about 10% or less of the design. All of the magic happens IN the chips themselves. THAT was the hard part. There is a free core or two for the processor (assuming that it is accurate). However, the sound and video chips are an entirely different story. Those must have been a pain in the butt.

      --
      "-1 Troll" is the apparently the same as "-1 I disagree with you."
  41. I'm in love. by capilot · · Score: 2

    Looks or no looks, she just made sexiest geek alive for 2004 in my book.

  42. She's not the first or only by Sycraft-fu · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Stephanie Kwolek is probably one of the better known female engineers, though she's materials not electrical. She is one of the two people directly responsible for the creation of Kevlar. Got on the order of 28 patents before retiring,a nd these are all real patents for innovative products, not software BS.

    While women are still fighting the stereotypes of the past, there are examples of women excelling in almost every field, even traditonal male only roles such as CEO (eg Carol Bartz, CEO and president of Autodesk).

  43. Re:So, what the hell does she do? by FiSHNuTZ · · Score: 2, Informative

    I've already posted this, but since you seem to not know much about the C-One, feel free to see the homepage for the C-One which has, among other things, schematics, pictures, and ordering information for the beta boards currently available to any interested parties (for about US$400). The C-One is an entire ATX form-factor motherboard.

    http://www.c64upgra.de/c-one

  44. Re:I think I'm in love. by alanwall · · Score: 3, Informative

    no her boy friend is also a geek.Joe Torre if you know of him.An Amiga person.I first met Jeri 6 years ago at AmiWest-and no that girl in some of the old pics links to her is a "friend"

    --
    Amigian and proud of it!
  45. Bzzzt...wrong by WebCowboy · · Score: 3, Informative

    It appears that it's properly licensed.

    Commodore isn't exactly the big juggernaut it was 20 years ago...I'd venture to say that the owner of the brand is not exactly "well lawyered". Rather than aim to shut her down, I think they gladly paid her for the idea in hopes of finally making money off the brand for the first time in ages.

    Of all the big names of the past I'd say Commodore is the safest bet on the emulation scene. The other big players 20 years ago? Apple, Atari, IBM, perhaps you could include Tandy and TI in there as well. There are still big companies behind all those brands, and in some cases they have demonstrated a willingness to defend their rights to those brands even if they no longer support those old products.

    Jeri's a sharp cookie, she has gotten in on the leading edge of a craze. Those retro joysticks (a lot of them pirate NES knockoffs) are all over the malls this Christmas...it's quite possible they will be a real craze next year. Whether they'll remain popular in the long haul I'm not sure. In any case, the original NY Times article is right, Jeri has all the hallmarks of becoming another Woz or Burell or Dr. Roberts. I'd ventrue to say there'll be more neat stuff to come from here in the future.

  46. the first computer programmer by circletimessquare · · Score: 2, Informative

    was a woman

    ada lovelace

    --
    intellectual property law is philosophically incoherent. it is your moral duty to ignore it or sabotage it
  47. Success HS is about doing what you're told by mc6809e · · Score: 2, Insightful

    I wish it were different.

    Clever kids get bored out of their minds doing "busy-work", but that's what you're graded on.

    Welcome to socialized education.

  48. Re:just think by pilgrim23 · · Score: 2, Informative

    I have had a couple of conversations on geek subjects with Jeri. She is a brilliant person. Her education in the subject matter has little to do with it. She naturally has the curious mindset and the self-developed tools to achieve. What formally recognized union card (or as they say in the military: ticket punched) you get may mean something to the middle managers, but it means diddly in the reality of life. The truly brilliant shine no matter what their background, what their training. I personally majored in history yet work in IT and as a hobby I am one of those retro computer nerds the article speaks of. Jeri has done wonders with limited resources in areas the majors developers would not find worth looking into or commercially viable. We of the Retro world salute Jeri Ellsworth for her accomplishments!
    oh and PS: speaking to a post above: in person, Yes, she IS Hot! :)

    --
    - Minutus cantorum, minutus balorum, minutus carborata descendum pantorum.
  49. Sexism by believekevin · · Score: 5, Insightful

    I'm halfway through the responses and haven't yet encountered a single comment about the greatness of this project!

    /. disappoints once again.

    1. Re:Sexism by LittleGuy · · Score: 2, Funny

      I'm halfway through the responses and haven't yet encountered a single comment about the greatness of this project!

      So, is the project HOT?

      --
      Mod Karma -1: I sed bad wurds. If I cep my mouf shut, I wud be at riyses.
  50. So schools not that great for some by kn0tw0rk · · Score: 2, Insightful

    I think that this inllustrates the fact that schools are not for everyone, and also speaks volumes about the support her father gave her in raising and educating her and giving her the confidence to achieve her goals.

    --
    See my art -> http://herbevore.deviantart.com
  51. History of Female Geekdom by jd · · Score: 2, Interesting
    Women have been geeks, nerds and even corporate bosses, for all of recorded history and probably far earlier than that.


    Here is a moderately comprehensive index of women scientists throughout history. Some names are linked to biographies.


    The woman who commands most of my respect, geek-wise, was Mary Annings. She discovered her first new species of dinosaur at age 12, and a second at age 20. She made a living collecting
    (and extracting as necessary) fossils, which she sorted and indexed. It is said that she inspired the tounge-twister "she sells sea-shells by the sea shore". Anyone who can run their own business at age 12, AND make enough to feed herself and her siblings, AND have enough time to recognise a new discovery, is deserving of enormous respect.


    There are two women in history I respect as leaders. Margret Thatcher, although I despised her policies, has few equals when it comes to getting things done.


    However, Britain has had one female ruler who was stonger still. Bodicca (also known as Queen Bodaccea) was betrayed, abused, molested and torured and her father (the King at the time) was savagely murdered in front of her. The tribe she belonged to (the Icini) were scattered and - if caught - butchered. She managed to gather the survivors up, get herself accepted as ruler, turn them into a near-invincible fighting force, and kicked the Imperial Roman army very nearly out of Britain entirely. Most British currancy today bears the figure of a woman in iron-age battle-dress. This figure is derived from the historical Bodicca. Even the legend of "Robin Hood" hasn't had that kind of a grasp on society.


    To me, it seems obvious that women have been significant in many disciplines, throughout history. It begs the question of how much further along society could have been if more had been encouraged. Given the sheer number of names on the list, it also begs the question of why feminists are NOT pointing to such an established, proven history to push for greater equality. The future isn't known, but the past is.

    --
    It's a small world and it smells funny; I'd buy another if it wasn't for the money; Take back what I paid (SoM)
  52. Interesting link by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Interesting
  53. Explain this by Billly+Gates · · Score: 2, Insightful

    How can she design chips without a frabrication plant?

    Sure you can fiddle around with autocad and many other cad electronic design tools but that does not make someone an electrical engineer or chip designer.

    It makes me wonder how she got started and how she got hired and who invested in her idea's and got her work to the fabrication plants that built her products.

    1. Re:Explain this by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Interesting

      She was designing boards and FPGAs and getting some press. So somebody approached her about making a cheap toy version of her stuff.

      It happens. For example the guy below was making a 2600 FPGA and was bought out:

      http://protectedfromreality.com/2600OnAChip/

      In my experience an ASIC designer doesn't get anywhere near the fabs unless they request to get a tour.

      Typical ASIC designers don't ever get access the physical database for the chips they are working on, this is done by "back-end" people. For example many people go to Faraday when the are planning to fab chips at UMC. There are companies that perform FPGA to gate array conversions. (BTW, if you see the words "Structured ASIC" think gate array.)

  54. Emulate a tape drive?! by multipartmixed · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Obviously, I don't know squat about the desgin of THIS unit, but I *am* familiar with the C64's design!

    Why in God's name would you emulate the tape drive as a means to load software?

    It would be one hell of a lot easier to just have the program loader (you know, the piece that lets you pick what game in the joystick you want to play) swap in the right bank of ROM (for a cartridge game), or RAM image, point the virtual 6502's program pointer at the right place (or just twiddle the magic address up there in page $FF and "hit" the "reset" line) and boom! Software running, no extra crap in the way. And you can use the tape buffer. :)

    The "live image" for disk-based, copy-protected games could be scooped easily from a running C64, using.. oh what the hell was it called.. there was some cartridge, possibly by Epyx, where you hit the reset button and BOOM! It dumped RAM to disk, including the position of the program counter, so you could restore saved games in games which didn't save.

    Damn, why can't I remember the name of that cart?

    Anyhow. You'd think it would be more worthwhile making save-to-disk games work (whoever heard of save to tape??!) by backing up data to RAM... you could probably get away with just writing some custom code and point the kernel jump table at it.. I'd be willing to bet that most games (even heavily copy-protected ones) didn't bother doing anything fancy when *writing* to disk. The "proper" kernel API for disk I/O would be trivial to emulate.

    --

    Do daemons dream of electric sleep()?
  55. Jerri Fan Site by Stopher2475 · · Score: 2, Funny

    My question is which one of us is gonna be nerdy enough to collect all the pics of her and make a fan site?