Slashdot Mirror


Walmart Offers Sub-$500 laptop With Linspire

LehiNephi writes "Cnet reports that Walmart is offering a sub-$500 notebook running Linspire. The specs are less-than impressive: a 1GHz VIA C3 processor, 128 MB RAM, 30GB hard drive, and a plain vanilla CD-ROM. Seems overpriced for what you get, but cheap nonetheless. And yes, it does run Linux."

95 of 589 comments (clear)

  1. Seems cheap for what you get ... by airrage · · Score: 4, Funny

    ... you must be unfamiliar with Wal-Mart.

    --
    "This isn't a study in computer science, its a study in human behavior"
    1. Re:Seems cheap for what you get ... by l810c · · Score: 4, Interesting
      I don't understand their pricing structure.

      For $499 you get:
      VIA C3 processor 1.0 GHz
      14.1" LCD panel
      Lindows/Linspire version 4.5
      128 MB memory
      30 GB hard drive
      CD-ROM drive

      For $549 you get:
      1.1 GHz Mobile AMD Athlon 4 processor
      14.1" XGA TFT LCD screen
      40 GB hard drive
      128 MB RAM
      DVD-ROM drive
      Integrated 802.11b wireless networking
      Microsoft Windows XP Home Edition

      Notice the cheapo monitor doesn't say TFT. Besides that for the extra $50 you get Windows Xp Home(Ebay?), Althon & .1 GHz, DVD vs CD, 10GB Xtra HD, Wireless.

    2. Re:Seems cheap for what you get ... by the+unbeliever · · Score: 5, Funny

      that .1ghz also equates to about double the performance of the "1ghz" VIA C3 chip.

    3. Re:Seems cheap for what you get ... by kd5ujz · · Score: 3, Insightful

      This is targeted at the typical walmart costumer. They will buy the $499 laptop, if the 549 laptop was $500, because the $499 is cheaper.

      --
      -William
      God is everything science has yet to explain.
    4. Re:Seems cheap for what you get ... by JeremyALogan · · Score: 2, Informative

      I'm trying to figure out who's making these things. Search google for "Balance" and "laptop" and about all you come up with is things saying "hey... walmart has sub-$500 computers." I'm really wanting some specifics on the specs (eg. as far as I can tell the $50 more one has a parallel port, but no serial... the cheaper doesn't mention either). The "specs" listed for the cheaper one are almost ALL talking about the OS/software. It's like they're trying to convince everyone that they really are ok to use. Also, there's only one pic of it so I can't even self-diagnose.

      Ommited from your list: the $549 one has gigabit ethernet where as the other doesn't even mention ethernet.

    5. Re:Seems cheap for what you get ... by iocat · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Does it have a *battery*? When searching for cheap laptops I found a few at Walmart.com (this was a few months ago) that didn't actually have batteries. They were just basically all-in-one portable PCs.

      --

      Dude, I think I can see my house from here.

    6. Re:Seems cheap for what you get ... by slowbad · · Score: 2, Insightful
      that .1ghz also equates to about double the performance of the "1ghz" VIA C3 chip

      Hardly an exaggeration ... a year ago, for $55, NewEgg sold a Celeron MB populated with a
      VIA 'GigaPro' C3 that would have taken 17 years with Prime95 to complete a single test.

      --
      Sandra identified the C3 chip as Samuel or Ezekiel.
      It certainly would require a miracle of Biblical proportions
      for a VIA 1GHz to beat a Pentium 166MMX ...

    7. Re:Seems cheap for what you get ... by arivanov · · Score: 4, Informative

      No, they are not. We have 30-40 of these we use for developer testing, servers, etc.

      They are 2-4 times faster on IDE access then any 32bit P3-4 system including Xeons. Rest of the IO is also quite good (around 2 times better then comparable P3). As a result they make very good small servers.

      CPU performance is nothing to shout about, but hardly slow. It is similar to PIII at the same speed. Possibly 10-20% slower, but not more. Actually it depends on what are you doing because they have smaller cache then PIII (only 64k).

      Thermals are phenomenal. A C3 eats 1-5W where P3 eats 70+.

      They are rumoured to be extremely sluggish for a completely unrelated reason. The early EPIA (as well as some current non-Via system) motherboards shipped with a Cyberblade on board. It has shared memory. So when a geek takes it his first reaction is to pump up the video frequency and resolution as high as the system can bare. As a result the video is accessing the memory at 150MHz pixel clock. That into a considerable portion of the memory bandwidth. In fact the slowing down between 60 and 90Hz vertical sync is clearly visible. This is no longer the case with newer motherboards which have a fairly decent 2D video with its own memory.

      Overall it depends what you use it for. If you want a silent low maintenance server or test box. It is perfect. If you want a silent typewriter/mail desktop it will do the job. If you want to play doom3 you are got to be kidding.

      --
      Baker's Law: Misery no longer loves company. Nowadays it insists on it
      http://www.sigsegv.cx/
    8. Re:Seems cheap for what you get ... by wirelessbuzzers · · Score: 2, Interesting

      No. They aren't fast, and more importantly they have jack worth of cache and no hyperthreading, but they're respectable due to their very low power requirements and reasonable bus speeds. They're good for building small, low-power computers, which is nice because you want that in a laptop. The latest ones have AES acceleration and random number generation on them.

      The next version (due out... about... now, which means who knows when given VIA) will have additionally no-execute, SHA-1, and Montgomery multiply acceleration (i.e. multiply big numbers fast). Plus they're said to run at 2GHz at 10 Watts, and have a bigger cache. If this is actually true, it will be great for building a backup server, which would have to copy large amounts of data over SSH. Now if only they can build in bzip2...

      --
      I hereby place the above post in the public domain.
  2. Runs Linux by Vampyre_Dark · · Score: 5, Funny

    It DOES run linux?
    Well, I think this is the reason there are no posts. ^_^

    1. Re:Runs Linux by lobotomy · · Score: 2, Informative
      Don't jump to conclusions. This has a Via C3. I just tried to update my server which also contains a Via C3 (low power, low heat, don't need any more horsepower). SuSE will not run on the C3 (but at least they tell you that up front). But guess what? Neither will Fedora Core 2 (yes, I even used the special C3 kernel) nor FC 3. Red Hat dropped support for the C3 but didn't even bother to document that fact. I ended up taking a Celeron processor from an old Barbi FlexATX computer.

      So, don't assume that your Linux will run on a C3. It seems that more and more distros are supporting the AMD/Intel duopoly only and are refusing to support the Via (it's not as though it isn't be made any more).

  3. Equates Linux with Cheap?? by The+UberDork · · Score: 5, Interesting

    So, is this kinda thing gonna shoot us in the foot, and make Linux mean cheap in the public eye? And I mean cheap, NOT inexpensive.

    1. Re:Equates Linux with Cheap?? by phasm42 · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Mod parent up. If this becomes common, people are going to remember Linspire/Linux==slow because it's always installed on slow computers.

      --
      "No one likes working in a hamster wheel, and your shop smells of cedar shavings from here." - TaleSpinner
    2. Re:Equates Linux with Cheap?? by grumbel · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Well, what are people going to do with their Linux-Installation:

      a) Wipe it out and replace it with Windows
      b) Throw the computer into the trashcan
      c) Continue to use Linux because it gets the job done

      I think c) is perfectly ok, b) is rather unlikly and if they do a), what do you expect? Either WinXP will run even more slow or it will be a faster, if its slower, no lose, people will figure its not Linux fault that the computer is slow, if XP is faster, then well, Linux IS actually slow and people will remember it, because its the truth. Can't see anything bad with that.

  4. What everyone wants to know.. by x.Draino.x · · Score: 5, Funny

    But can it run Windows?

    1. Re:What everyone wants to know.. by deft · · Score: 2, Insightful

      The parent is probably going to be modded down as a troll or looked down on, but it really is a valid question... as most people will probably want to install windows so they can use the programs familiar to them.

      --

      There's nothing Intelligent about Intelligent Design.
    2. Re:What everyone wants to know.. by krbvroc1 · · Score: 2, Insightful

      But can it run Windows?

      Well, with 128MB of RAM according to the specs, I wouldn't try iy. At least not a recent version of windows.

    3. Re:What everyone wants to know.. by spdt · · Score: 2, Informative

      I have Windows XP SP1 on an old Dell Latitude CP (Pentium MMX 133, 128 MB RAM, really heavy), and it runs alright. It hasn't driven me completely crazy yet, but then again, it's mostly just for wardriving.

    4. Re:What everyone wants to know.. by nuggetman · · Score: 2, Informative

      ...you're kidding me right? Windows XP and 2000 can both run fine on 128 megs

      --
      ...and that's all there is to it.
    5. Re:What everyone wants to know.. by cduffy · · Score: 4, Insightful

      "Most people"? Naaw. My girlfriend's father is "most people". He doesn't know or care what the OS is or the applications' names are as long as he has email, web access and bare-bones word processing -- and he's out-of-date enough that Windows XP and Office XP will be every bit as foreign as Linspire and OpenOffice.

    6. Re:What everyone wants to know.. by RollingThunder · · Score: 4, Funny

      Within... *hdd grinds* certain defi-*pause*nitions of *hdd melts down due to excessive paging* fine.

    7. Re:What everyone wants to know.. by IO+ERROR · · Score: 5, Funny

      It can run Windows but you're going to have a hard time finding drivers for the Linmodem.

      --
      How am I supposed to fit a pithy, relevant quote into 120 characters?
    8. Re:What everyone wants to know.. by MsGeek · · Score: 3, Informative

      Windows XP might behave this way, but I've gotten 2K running happily in 128MB. No, it doesn't hit swap half as much as you are characterizing.

      I would be more concerned about KDE running happily under such a load. I'd put IceWM on there instead. And don't even think about running OpenOffice.Org...that would kill it DEAD.

      --
      Knowledge is power. Knowledge shared is power multiplied.
    9. Re:What everyone wants to know.. by WIAKywbfatw · · Score: 5, Funny

      Don't worry, the modem works fine under Line.

      --

      "Accept that some days you are the pigeon, and some days you are the statue." - David Brent, Wernham Hogg
    10. Re:What everyone wants to know.. by Xerp · · Score: 2, Funny

      But no-one can get Windows anymore following the recent shutdown of SuprNova and the like... :p

    11. Re:What everyone wants to know.. by vagabond_gr · · Score: 2, Informative

      Don't worry, I'm currently writing the "Windows on a Wal-Mart Balance Notebook HOWTO".

    12. Re:What everyone wants to know.. by jamesbuko · · Score: 2, Funny

      My girlfriend's father is "most people". He doesn't know or care what the OS is or the applications' names are as long as he has email, web access and bare-bones word processing...

      and of lastly porn..lots of it.

    13. Re:What everyone wants to know.. by AstroDrabb · · Score: 3, Interesting
      Informative? WinXP _sucks_ with 128 MB of memory. It is really, really bad. There is nothing fine about it. My brother-in-laws laptop came with Win2K and 128 MB and ran just OK. When I "upgraded" him to WinXP Home, it slowed to a crawl. Windows would take ages to redraw. When I upgraded his memory to 256 MB, WinXP Home ran fine. Anything less then 256 MB for Win XP, just isn't worth it. Win2K didn't even work very well with only 128 MB.

      To be fair, modern Linux distros don't do well with only 128 MB if your using the latest KDE or Gnome. If you switch to Fluxbox, IceWM or another low-mem desktop like XFCE, then it works fine. But switching desktops is not really a good option under MS Windows. There are only a few poorly done desktop replacements for explorer.exe IMO. Not that I think explorer.exe is anything great. It is the cause of _all_ my problems under WinXP, but is is better then the replacements I have tried.

      --
      If Tyranny and Oppression come to this land,
      it will be in the guise of fighting a foreign enemy. -James Madison
    14. Re:What everyone wants to know.. by AragornSonOfArathorn · · Score: 2, Interesting

      I have an old P233MMX touchscreen laptop with 128MB and W2K runs fine on it. I dual-boot, but run 2K because there are no *nix drivers for the touchscreen, and the NT4 drivers work in 2K. Also, note this a Pentium I, heh. It does actually start to slow down as the registry inflates, but it is pretty snappy after a fresh install, and turning off unnecessary services, etc.

      --
      sudo eat my shorts
    15. Re:What everyone wants to know.. by falsified · · Score: 2, Insightful

      No, he means crippled. If someone chooses to install Windows, let them.

      --
      HI, MY NAME IS ISAAC.
  5. Not bad by maxchaote · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Not a bad value for those of us who do low-intensity work like back-end web development and don't have huge libraries of MP3s.

    1. Re:Not bad by rainman_bc · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Hmmm, don't know about you, but as a web developer, sometimes I'm called upon to do some photoshop work - hardly waht I'd call low-intensity...

      --
      09 F9 11 02 9D 74 E3 5B D8 41 56 C5 63 56 88 C0
  6. Plain AND Vanilla! by JDRipper · · Score: 3, Funny

    "and a plain vanilla CD-ROM" Wow! Both plain AND vanilla! Walmart to the T!

    --
    "You know Myra, some people might think you're cute. But me, I think you're one very large baked potato."
    1. Re:Plain AND Vanilla! by Eric+Smith · · Score: 2, Funny
      I really object to the use of the phrase "plain vanilla". Vanilla is very tasty, and is not at all plain. If you doubt it, try making some homemade ice cream without vanilla some time.

      Eddys (known in other markets as Dreyers) used to offer a double vanilla ice cream. Yum!

    2. Re:Plain AND Vanilla! by lubricated · · Score: 2

      and if you want it real good make ice cream with real vanilla beans.

      --
      It has been statistically shown that helmets increase the risk of head injury.
  7. I wonder if they include a disclamer... by wcitechnologies · · Score: 5, Insightful

    I wonder if they include a disclamer for Linspire... a big red "DOES NOT INCLUDE MICROSOFT WINDOWS XP" on the box somewhere.

    I'd almost wager that 80% of the people who buy these (or who buy a computer from WalMart in general) are n00bs, and will try returning the devices because 'there's no microsoft word or internet explorer on it'.

    --
    Electrons are free; it is moving them that becomes expensive.
    1. Re:I wonder if they include a disclamer... by krbvroc1 · · Score: 5, Insightful

      I'd almost wager that 80% of the people who buy these (or who buy a computer from WalMart in general) are n00bs, and will try returning the devices because 'there's no microsoft word or internet explorer on it'.

      Actually, put a 'W' icon linking to Openoffice or AmiWord and a 'E' 'Internet' icon pointing to Firefox and I bet they wouldn't know the difference.

    2. Re:I wonder if they include a disclamer... by bm17 · · Score: 2, Insightful

      If I were I teenager and my parents got me this computer, I would be plenty pissed off. If not immediately, then as soon as I tried to buy gaming software for it.

    3. Re:I wonder if they include a disclamer... by SoCalChris · · Score: 3, Funny

      If I were I teenager and my parents got me this computer, I would be plenty pissed off. If not immediately, then as soon as I tried to buy gaming software for it.

      And if I were your parent, I'd smack your dumb, ingrateful ass around for bitching about the laptop that I just bought you with my hard earned money.

      Then I'd make your lazy ass go get a job and buy your own.

    4. Re:I wonder if they include a disclamer... by bm17 · · Score: 5, Funny

      You just don't undersand! You're not the boss of me! I hate you I hate you I hate you!!!

    5. Re:I wonder if they include a disclamer... by EnronHaliburton2004 · · Score: 2, Funny

      "Mooooooooooooooom! You're so unfaiiir! Everyone else has a brand new iMaaaaaaac, Geeeeeze!"

      **bee boop beep boop boop be doo***

      "Hold on, phone call!"

      "Oh, hi Scott! Yah-huh! Yah-huh! Heeeeheehehehehe. Yah-huh! Yah-huh! heheeeehhhee!"

    6. Re:I wonder if they include a disclamer... by nuggetman · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Need I remind you the last kid that asked for an iMac wound up with his dad designing the "HipE"

      --
      ...and that's all there is to it.
  8. Re:Gotta love Walmart... by Akai · · Score: 3, Insightful

    WalMart is both the symbol and actualization of what is wrong with the USA. Remeber how much you love WalMart when that's the only job available to you, and the wages from your WalMart job are so low you can only afford to shop at WalMart.

    Warts? They are more like sucking chest wounds.

    Anyone who shops at WalMart is party to the destruction of the american middle class, the 40 hour work week, and employer paid health care.

    --
    Please send all UCE to scally@devolution.com so I can f
  9. Call me when... by jacobcaz · · Score: 4, Insightful
    ...I can pick up a dozen laptops for under $500 along with my gallon of pickles for $2.97.

    Seriously, I feel bad for whoever is putting these together for WalMart. They just got a hugenormous client (WalMart) who will be both the best and worst thing that ever happened to them.

    Where I work we split our time between trying to provide excellent service to our non-WalMart customers while keeping WalMart happy because they account for such a huge chunk of our revenue it's not even funny. And that's pretty normal for any company WalMart does business with.

    1. Re:Call me when... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Interesting

      The company I work for, Linspire, is putting these together for Walmart. We are essentially taking over the desktop linux market. Don't feel sorry for us. We know what we are doing and the profits have been huge.

    2. Re:Call me when... by Sycraft-fu · · Score: 3, Informative

      They managed their finances such as not to do this. From the sounds of it, most of their bussiness from Walmart simply went to other home improvement stores, namely Ace and Home Depot.

  10. low spec? by rkww · · Score: 5, Insightful

    This has a faster processor, bigger disk and more RAM than a standard PC from three years ago; what applications have turned up since then that require more than this?

    1. Re:low spec? by jubei · · Score: 2, Informative

      A 1Ghz C3 is probably equivalent to a PII-450, which is starting to get a bit old.

      That being said, I wouldn't mind one, as long as the ram is upgradable.

    2. Re:low spec? by zakezuke · · Score: 2, Informative

      This has a faster processor, bigger disk and more RAM than a standard PC from three years ago; what applications have turned up since then that require more than this?

      Windows Media Player?

      This is not ment as a flame, but I question whether this laptop would be adquate to play anything above and beyond mpeg-2. From my understanding the 1GHz VIA C3 peforms much like a medium speed pentium III and I found that a pentium III 766 was barely adquate for some divx-4 and xvid encodes.

      --
      There is no sanctuary. There is no sanctuary. SHUT UP! There is no shut up. There is no shut up.
  11. The picture by jonfields · · Score: 2, Informative

    Did anyone else notice that it says "DVD" on it?

  12. Not too shabby. by ssand · · Score: 3, Insightful

    Keep in mind this is a notebook, and not a desktop. One for that price really isn't too bad, and would be excellent for someone doing basic computer usage. The biggest issue I see is that it is not windows. That's no big deal, however it can be for those who are not tech savy. With the draconian return policies of software, I can see unsavy users buying software thinking it will run, and finding out they can't.

  13. Not awesome? by StevenMaurer · · Score: 2, Insightful

    I don't know about the author, but I remember the days when twin pentium 90's and 128 Megs of RAM were considered awesome....

    That was about 10 years ago.

    Sure, this thing isn't going to be a screaming game machine, but honestly, how much horsepower do you need for text editing, email, and some casual browsing, anyway?

    1. Re:Not awesome? by OrangeTide · · Score: 4, Informative

      1.5 hours is embarrassing. A VIA C3 1Ghz is about 12W. A Pentium M mobile is about 14W. And a P4 is perhaps 50W.

      This laptop has the right cpu for long battery life. I suspect it has useless batteries in it. And does not have that many power friendly peripherals.

      Apple 1GHz G4 laptop gets about 4.5 hours on a charge. But they have an 8 cell(i think) li-ion pack. As if the number of cells means anything. (Did Walmart print the mAh of their battery pack?). For twice the price you get 10x the laptop.

      P4 laptops go about 2.5 hours on their batteries, typically. (intel's speedstep power management helps dramatically). And Pentium M laptops go 5-6 hours on a charge.

      Really you can pay $200 more for a laptop that goes three times as fast and lasts twice as long. Or pay double and get something that lasts 4 times as long. I really don't see any advantage to buying this laptop. A used celeron laptop would probably be a better deal if you absolutely can't spend more than $500 on a laptop. (my NiMH 600mhz celeron laptop gets about 2.5 hours on a charge, but only after I replaced the NiMH pack with a fresh one)

      --
      “Common sense is not so common.” — Voltaire
    2. Re:Not awesome? by 74nova · · Score: 4, Insightful
      Really you can pay $200 more for a laptop that goes three times as fast and lasts twice as long. Or pay double and get something that lasts 4 times as long. I really don't see any advantage to buying this laptop. A used celeron laptop would probably be a better deal if you absolutely can't spend more than $500 on a laptop
      you point is valid. however, i dont have $1300 for a good laptop. if all i needed was a mobile machine to do day to day stuff with, this would definitely do it for me. everybody knows that to a point, you get more for paying more. buy a 24pk of coke and its $.02/oz cheaper than the 12pks. hell, if you told dell you wanted 100 of those laptops you suggest, youd probably get them even cheaper! oh right, you probably dont have $120,000.

      its all a matter of perspective. to some people that want/need a laptop but dont need a lot of power, cheaper is always better. also, i think there is something about $500 for a laptop. people see that to get a dell desktop is about $500, but to get a walmart laptop ('hey, walmart is a well-known brand' they think to themselves) is now the same price. okay, maybe you need the $550 model to get windows to make that a little more fair. my point is that $500 for a laptop is mad cheap, regardless of the quality. that amount of money has not gotten you a laptop new for some time(if ever). the battery life is terrible, however, ill give you that.

      well, crap. i typed all that and just now saw your recommendation for a used celeron. that is a viable solution, theres a 1ghz dell on ebay for $400 right now.
      --
      use your turn signal! you people act like it's divulging information to the enemy
  14. hmm by lordkuri · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Damn Small Linux, blackbox, and bluetooth, and I think I just found my next remote webserver admin tool. I can't justify $2k for a machine, but less than $600 (tax, etc) might make it really feasable.

  15. But what about the midrange? by incom · · Score: 2, Interesting

    What I'm looking for is a cheap as possible laptop that has an nvidia video chipset, and no windows tax. I want to atleast be able to play UT2k4 on it.

    --
    True genius is grasping a situation like a peice of fruit, and peircing it just right so that it drains dry.
  16. Re:Gotta love Walmart... by StevenHenderson · · Score: 2, Insightful

    As South Park so eloquently pointed out... :)

  17. Re:Gotta love Walmart... by yamcha666 · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Seems someone has been watching a bit too much South Park.

    *Referring to South Park Episode # 8-09*

  18. Re:Gotta love Walmart... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Insightful

    Here Here!!! I would love to be party of killing employer paid health care... and government health care... if we did, maybe there would be wal-marts selling insurance and health care.

    Some people have no friggin concept of the economy and capitalism whatsoever. As if the great founders of America implanted a economic system based around freedoms and capitalism... but they had NO IDEA there would be someplace like Wal-Mart!!! I mean... we just can't compete!!!

    Complete ignorance. People like you put us on the fast-track to protectionism and an isolated economy just so we can give the high-school dropout and union job with full benefits and garuanteed pay raises every year. Nevermind the complete loss of any motivation to outperform your peers and better yourself.

  19. Overpriced? by freeweed · · Score: 5, Interesting

    a 1GHz VIA C3 processor, 128 MB RAM, 30GB hard drive, and a plain vanilla CD-ROM. Seems overpriced for what you get, but cheap nonetheless.

    I can't speak for the US market, but up here in Canada the cheapest new laptop runs you about $1,000, which is about $800 USD. Granted, this is with a 2+ ghz cpu, 256 MB RAM, 20-30GB drive and a dvd-rom.

    However, to pay anything less than this requires checking out the used laptop market. Here we see such gems as a P3-700, 64-96MB RAM, 8-10GB drive selling for $5-600 all the time. Say about $4-500 USD.

    I don't know about you folks, but this looks like a pretty nice deal for those folks who aren't planning on running Doom3 on their laptops. The ram's a bit scanty for any modern OS, but otherwise this is a perfectly good machine to do 99% of what people do with a laptop.

    --
    Endless arguments over trivial contradictions in books written by ignorant savages to explain thunder in the dark.
  20. It runs Linspire by dteichman2 · · Score: 5, Interesting

    The problem with Linspire (Lindows) is that it isn't quite Linux (yes, I know it really is Linux) and it isn't quite Windows. So, end-users might find it difficult. Even a pro seemed to think it was hard to use.

    Can a Red Hat Guru Survive on a Lindows Laptop?

    --


    Silence is golden... and duct tape is silver.
  21. C3 makes for a terrible laptop by etymxris · · Score: 3, Informative

    [I posted this elsewhere, but it's relevant here too.]

    This is a bad choice. I have a C3 933Mhz processor. It performs roughly equivalent to a 300Mhz PIII. Not only this, but it is extremely hot. The C3 was supposed to be cool, but this is one of the hottest laptops I've used. I haven't objectively measured it with a thermistor yet, but the external temp seems about 55 C to 60 C. If I put the laptop on my bare chest it leaves red marks. It may be because the laptop is so thin, or maybe the HSF construction is shoddy.

    The PIII/M is cool, and embarrasses the C3 in terms of performance. This is partly due to C3 being a bad processor, but also largely due to PIII/M being a good processor. In fact, if I was getting an x86 notebook, I wouldn't accept anything except a PIII. I've personally experienced Athlon notebooks, P4 notebooks, and VIA notebooks, and can tell that they are all inferior. I can't speak to Transmeta or Apple branded notebooks.

    If this C3 notebook is at all appealing to you, my advice is to get an old PIII off ebay or reburbished from one of many dealers. You'll pay the same price and get a much higher performing, cooler laptop.

    1. Re:C3 makes for a terrible laptop by etymxris · · Score: 2, Informative
      It's rumored that the design is based off the Pentium III, and not only does it perform quite well, it stays cool too.
      It's more than a rumor. It's a well known fact. The M series sprung from the PIII series. They are both excellent choices.
  22. Re:Microsoft and Walmart. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Insightful

    It is because neither cares if they have friends. They have customers. To a company, customers are infinitely more important than friends.

  23. Re:Notebooks for $500.00? by badboy_tw2002 · · Score: 3, Funny

    If you're buying a computer from Wal-Mart odds are you do not know how to install windows. You probably don't even know how to turn the thing on. You probabably do know how to skin a deer, and you probably own a t-shirt that says "Who Farted?"

  24. for $50 more get a better Laptop by the same maker by soundbyt · · Score: 2, Informative
    If you click on the See Similar link, there is another laptop by the same manufacturer with better hardware that includes XP Home. I bet it will even run Lindo^H^HSpire. Nothing that groundbreaking.

    1.1 GHz Mobile AMD Athlon 4 processor

    14.1" XGA TFT LCD screen

    40 GB hard drive

    128 MB RAM

    DVD-ROM drive

    Integrated 802.11b wireless networking

  25. Re:Incredible by chrisopherpace · · Score: 2, Insightful

    1.) It is cheap- under $500. This is rare. 2.) It runs Linux. Yes, believe it or not, this site does lean towards OSS and *NIX.

  26. I don't think anyone will see the box.. by MadAnthony02 · · Score: 2, Interesting

    The previous Linux/Walmart boxes were never available at the walmart stores, only at walmart.com. While the CNET article doesn't say that it won't be sold in stores, it starts out with with "Walmart.com and Linspire revealed.." and ends with "the computer is available at walmart.com". No mention that it would be available at stores.

    My guess is people who buy computers online are somewhat more savy than those who buy at Wal-Mart stores.

  27. You should change banks by WebCowboy · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Who do you bank with troll, "1st Bank of Joe and Billy-Bob"? My bank has worked properly with Mozilla-based browsers for nearly five years now, and before that only had visual rendering issues except for a brief time after a botched redesign. Tell 'em to get with the program and fix their website so that it conforms to real standards. If they are unresponsive, vote with your dollars and your feet and trot on over to...well...almost any other bank.

    Of course, you could explore other options:

    * shell out extra $ for a copy of WinXP or a machine with it pre-installed

    * break the law and put a cracked or pirated Windows on your machine

    * stick to physically visiting your branch, ATMs and telephone banking

  28. Re:Gotta love Walmart... by TrailerTrash · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Agree 100%. The people I went to high school with never went to college, because the union would get them US$40K a year jobs with full benefits right after high school. They scoffed at college.

    Now (25 years later) we are finding that we (the US) have overpriced our labor to the point were we are non-competitive in any basic industries. Now my former classmates are unemployed, or on strike for years at a time, and up a creek. The slightly more enlightened among them are at a community college trying to make up for lost time.

    Wal*Mart charges a low price and pays a low rate. Don't like it, go to school and get a job doing something other than stocking shelves. No other jobs in Podunk other than Wal*Mart? Move.

    Grow up, people. Wal*Mart only controls the job supply if you let it. Train yourself for something other than stocking shelves or waving UPC's over scanners. Especially since we're automating that function, too.

  29. Way too many stereotypes by OldBaldGuy · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Please watch the stereotypes. I shop Walmart. I also went to private schools until grad school, where I got my Ph.D. in Statistics. I don't hunt, although I do ski and scuba dive. I also employ programmers for things I design.

    1. Re:Way too many stereotypes by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Funny

      So you do have a t-shirt that says "Who farted?"?

    2. Re:Way too many stereotypes by powerlinekid · · Score: 2, Funny

      You have a Ph.D in stats and you're using that to prove you're not an idiot?

      --

      can't sleep slashdot will eat me
    3. Re:Way too many stereotypes by upsidedown_duck · · Score: 2, Funny

      I shop Walmart. I also went to private schools until grad school, where I got my Ph.D. in Statistics.

      I think you meant to say: "I work at Walmart. How may I help you?"

      --
      -- "Makes Little Debbie look like a pile of puke!" - Moe Szyslak
  30. Re:uk $2 = £1 by jacksonj04 · · Score: 2, Informative

    Nevertheless, the term is correct. Mathematics = maths. It's called British English, get used to it.

    --
    How many people can read hex if only you and dead people can read hex?
  31. Re:Does the average user want linux? by narcc · · Score: 2

    I know it's Linspire, but still the average user doesn't know to configure their digital camera with linux, or recompile the kernel.

    The average user will, most likely, never have to recompile the kernel. As for the digital camera, that's a problem for the camera manufacturer to solve. Wal-mart can put enough preasure (if they want) on manufacturer to include software for Linspire.

    I figure wal-mart supporting linux (in its own greedy way) just may be a good thing.

  32. Which C3? Nehemiah? by green+pizza · · Score: 2, Informative

    Which version of the C3 does this notebook use?

    Notebooks based the C3 come in two flavors: Ezra and Nehemiah. The Nehemiah at 1 GHz is almost twice as fast as the Ezra at 1 GHz.

    The tip-off would be the chipset, if it was known. The Nehemiah is almost always used with the CLE266 chipset with a 266 MHz FSB.

  33. Re:Gotta love Walmart... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Insightful

    You must really be young.

    It reminds me of West Virginia coal mines of the 1920's and 30's and their company-owned towns. Your monthly wages never exceeded your monthly costs for rent, food, clothes and your kids 'education' in the company owned and run stores and schools, so you we always in debt to the company.

    People originally flocked to Walmart because the low prices allowed them to keep more of their income from their middle class jobs and spend it on other things besides food and clothes. But, as Walmart drove the middle class jobs out of town, many found that they could no longer afford to shop any place else.

    Now that most of the Walmart merchandise has "Made in China" labels on it, Americans have completed the task of sending their remaining jobs and income overseas and in doing so are funding a Marxist dictatorship bent on our own destruction. America, truly a "company store" again. Add to that the fact we that sending what money we have left to Mid-Eastern Oil producing states so we can drive SUV that get 12 mpg and proof of our insanity is complete.

    Pr0n, booze, drugs and Walmart. What a sad commentary.

  34. Re:Thinkpad by narcc · · Score: 2

    The parent AC must think all laptops are 'thinkpads'. Hell, it worked for kleenex -- why not IBM?

  35. How ironic by poptones · · Score: 3, Insightful

    Because when I first saw the price and specs on the thing the first notion that popped into my head was trying one of them and putting ubuntu on it.

    Then I saw the other machine that has an "Athlon 4" CPU in it (whatever that is) for fifty bucks more and comes with built-in wireless networking. "Oh boy," I thought, and headed over there to check that one out. And of course, the one that has wireless networking comes with XP.

    Gonna be real easy "taking over the desktop market" when you can't even get installed in a machine with wireless networking support...

  36. Re:Microsoft and Walmart. by westlake · · Score: 2, Funny
    It is because neither cares if they have friends. They have customers. To a company, customers are infinitely more important than friends.

    a pity to post this as an A,C,. because it deserves to be modded up.

  37. Re:Gotta love Walmart... by jacobcaz · · Score: 2, Informative
    • Anyone who shops at WalMart is party to the destruction of the american middle class, the 40 hour work week, and employer paid health care.
    You just earned yourself a fan. My wife still shops at WalMart and will occasionally drag me along. The few times a year I'm in there just reminds me how much I hate WalMart.

    And don't forget, not only are they leading the destruction of the middle class, they are also responsible for generating about $1000 in annual revenue for every US citizen. They have the power to do what they want in any market segment they turn their crushing retail powers towards.

    Note I didn't say they had the power to be the best in any market segment they turn their attention towards; they just have enough resources (i.e. CASH) they can crush all the quality vendors until there is no other practical choice but WalMart.

  38. Re: Healthcare as a business expense by fyngyrz · · Score: 5, Interesting
    Much of healthcare's expense is welfare for lawyers. My ex, a general surgeon in rural Montana who had never been the subject of a lawsuit, was paying seven figures for her yearly liability insurance. Seven figures. That is frigging insane. She is an awesome, awesome surgeon, and she is not greedy by any means. At times, she took chickens in payment from the farmer folks. Sometimes pies - I liked the pies better, I have to say. Most - not some, but most - of her fees, when she got fees, went to the insurance companies. From there, they go to the lawyers, and their lawsuit-happy clients.

    The American people let the legislators pull the wool over their eyes by allowing absurd jury awards, shuffling personal responsibility off to the nearest set of (presumably) deep-pocket targets, and otherwise fostering the stupidity du jour. So mostly, I think they get what they deserve. Eventually, maybe they'll get up off their lazy asses and force the legislature to behave responsibly. I try, and I get a lot more done than you'd think since I can use $$$ as a lever, but it's not enough. The insurance companies and the lawyers have more.

    I'm a business owner. I pay for healthcare for all my employees. They get a full ride -- dental, eyes, health and life. You don't even want to know what it costs me. The only good news is I can still afford to do it. In about five years, if things keep going as they are, I'll be forced to raise our software prices, because there won't be any margin remaining to cover it. And that's for a product that technically has paid back our investment in it; originally, it was $499, and these days we sell the same thing, plus tons of upgrades done in the meantime, for $50 -- we're that far down the curve. It absolutely sickens me that the curve is reversing because of lawyers and other parasites.

    Gah. I hate this subject.

    --
    I've fallen off your lawn, and I can't get up.
  39. Re:Gotta love Walmart... by zors · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Because we all know that societies that forbid competition thrive far more than capitalist ones. After all, thats the real reason that capitalist societies are in the shitter, especially in technological areas. and quality of life. right?

    Healthy and fair competition is the best thing for society, in nearly every arena.

  40. Re:Dont get burned by ebooher · · Score: 2, Informative

    No, he isn't the only one. Look here:
    http://www.webservertalk.com/message444851-1.html

    I've been in touch with a couple of other purchasers of this laptop now, and one of them agreed to break his warranty seal and investigate the ACTUAL part number etched on the CPU chip. He had the $598 model, advertised as an "Athlon XP-M 1600+". The actual OPN on his CPU is AHM1100AV53B, which if you refer to AMD's part# breakdown guide, is a 1.1GHz (not 1600+) mobile Athlon 4, not an XP-M.

    Though, I'm not sure you can blame this one on Wal-Mart. It isn't like it is a Wal-Mart brand named computer. They are buying it, just like all their other products, from a third-party manufacturer. Now, they may have a lot of muscle to lean in on that third-party, but ultimately it's a cheap knock-off being shipped in directly from Asia vs. the quality knock-offs with things like the IBM badge on them being shipped in directly from Asia.

    --
    "Genius may shine aloof and alone, like a star, but goodness is social, and it takes two men and God to make a Brother."
  41. Re:Gotta love Walmart... by beliavsky · · Score: 2, Informative

    If this post is regarded as "insightful", I must say that the moderators need to learn some economics. Do you think that WalMart pays less than Goldman Sachs because the big shots at Goldman Sachs are kind and generous people? If certain WalMart employees don't earn that much, it's because no other employer is bidding more for their skills. That's what their labor is worth on the free market. WalMart is a great benefactor of the lower and middle classes, because it expands their purchasing power. If you think WalMart is mean, try starting a small business, hiring away WalMart employees at higher wages, and making a profit. THEN you have to right to bash WalMart. Talk is cheap.

  42. Banking needs IE by cbr2702 · · Score: 2, Informative

    Or what about installing IE with Wine?

    --


    This post written under Gentoo-linux with an SCO IP license.
  43. Re: Healthcare as a business expense by wytcld · · Score: 3, Informative

    Have you checked the breakdown of the precent of malpractice insurance that goes to lawyers, against the amount the insurance companies merely pocket? People get mad at the doctors, and get mad at the lawyers (I mostly avoid dealings with both myself), but how do the insurance firms avoid anyone noticing how incredibly much money goes to them - not just for malpractice, but for medical insurance itself. If you eliminated the insurance companies from the racket, it would cut something like 30% off our medical costs.

    As for the suits against doctors, the majority of suits are against just a few doctors in any state. The states where the medical association actually disciplines doctors they get complaints against end up with much lower malpractice insurance, because there's less malpractice, because in medicine as in most professions it's about 10% of the people who make 90% of the screwups. So what malpractice insurance gives doctors is the freedom from having to discipline their own. Start yanking licenses from the idiots, and the problem goes away. But of course the insurance firms don't want the problem to go away. They make money coming (medical insurance) and going (malpractice insurance).

    It's a protection racket.

    --
    "with their freedom lost all virtue lose" - Milton
  44. Re:Gotta love Walmart... by Firedog · · Score: 2, Informative

    Not only that, but Walmart also contributes a lot to Republicans, who in turn are actively pursuing the destruction of the american middle class, the 40 hour work week, and employer paid health care, as you said.

    Why shop at stores that contribute to the destruction of the American way of life? Check out buyblue.org and choosetheblue.com and shop accordingly...

  45. Re:Gotta love Walmart... by blanks · · Score: 2, Insightful

    No, you will forget that we will still have the choice to work at mcdonalds or blockbuster, the other 2 predatory corporations that all share the same business plan. Move into small towns, destroy the economy, remove jobs, and basically take over any type of industry that might have existed in the past.

    Yes you can save money, but their is allways a price, be it quality, ethics, or price.

    Personally My ethics are not so cheap as to be willing to give them away so easily to save a few bucks.

  46. Re: Healthcare as a business expense by fyngyrz · · Score: 3, Insightful
    It's a protection racket.

    I agree. However, the insurance companies can only do what they do because the chain of responsibility that turns the legislators into power brokers for the insurance companies enables them to.

    I see the chain of responsibility in this order:

    1. The people
    2. The political parties
    3. The legislators
      • The lawyers
      • The insurance companies

    The insurance companies have what amounts to a license to mint money. The legislators gave it to them.

    The lawyers also have a license to mint money, and the legislators gave it to them as well.

    The political parties only produce candidates that will toe the line and produce pork.

    The people give the political parties the the power to do this, and they have not moved to take it away.

    The legislature has in turn very carefully made it very difficult (with the single exception of California as far as I know) for the people to have any power whatsoever in changing how the system works. They do this by distracting the gullible majority with bullshit issues like drugs and "obscenity" and useless, unproductive wars in third-world countries, while they avoid dealing with healthcare and tort reform as if it was the plague. And of course, to them, it is the plague, because of the level of political pork that arises from the back room intercourse they engage in with the insurance industry. Screw that up, and they could lose income and the cushy job. And they know it.

    The tea went into Boston harbor for far less reason than all of this adds up to. American citizens are the ones bending over; so who can really blame the legislature if they go for a quick sample of ass? Stand up for yourself, vote the incumbents out of office -- no matter who they are -- next time around and send a coherent message. Or don't, and pay through the nose for your healthcare.

    --
    I've fallen off your lawn, and I can't get up.
  47. Re: Healthcare as a business expense by fyngyrz · · Score: 2, Interesting
    No, there's a lot more to it than the liability for surgery. There's also the liability for the office staff (nurses and nurse-practicioners and so on, unless the surgeon doesn't have their own office -- she does, though) and general liability for non-surgical stuff, out-patient stuff and so on. It's not about just the one policy. It's about her total insurance bill, which was absolutely insane.

    But it goes deeper than this for the medical care consumer. Liability is applied at many levels, when you're talking about surgery. All of these fine folks have to carry liability:

    • any specialists that get their toes into the act
    • the surgeon and their MD and/or FACS assistants -- many surgeries involve multiple docs with knives and other instruments of torture
    • the anesthesiologist
    • the radiologist
    • the hospital
    • the lab
    • the clinic that hosts the doctor
    ...and it all folds into the fee you pay, because they can all be sued if something happens to you that your lawyer likes. On top of this, all of these people are trying to make a living, the hospital has to support what is really an astonishing infrastructure and so on -- the resulting prices are fubar.

    Now, I don't know about you, but I don't mind paying for top notch healthcare, the tools to implement it, and the facilities to perform it in. But I sure as hell mind paying for for a zillion dollar award because someone left a sponge in, or because some dipstick handed out the wrong meds. And that's what insurance is. It is us, paying for them.

    --
    I've fallen off your lawn, and I can't get up.
  48. Comment removed by account_deleted · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Comment removed based on user account deletion

  49. So who's taking the hit? by carlmenezes · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Sorry to sound like a wet blanket, but there have been past stories about how walmart pressurizes it's suppliers to lower costs to the point of even bankrupting them. So, what I'm wondering is, who is it this time? Sure, it's great to have a laptop for less than $500, but hey, is some poor guy suffering to provide this pricing? or not? Anyone?

    --
    Find a job you like and you will never work a day in your life.