Slashdot Mirror


Medical Students Profile Middle-Earth's Gollum

An anonymous reader writes "Several medical students and a lecturer in 'old age psychiatry' have written up their analysis and final diagnosis of Gollum in the British Medical Journal. Other readers note the possibility of metal toxicity from the One Ring in their Rapid Responses." Hopefully everyone has had a few days off to 'Research' this by watching RotK's extended cut.

164 comments

  1. Lead poisoning! by mOoZik · · Score: 3, Funny

    It was lead, I tells ya! ;)

    Site's melted. :(

    1. Re:Lead poisoning! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Interesting

      Still no cure for cancer. Glad the LOTR fanboys with the power to make a difference are focusing on important issues. What next, a deep analysis of Lord Vader's life support system?

    2. Re:Lead poisoning! by msh104 · · Score: 0, Offtopic

      the extended "return of the king" is over 40 minutes longer... well worth your money if you ask me.

    3. Re:Lead poisoning! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      Glad the LOTR fanboys with the power to make a difference are focusing on important issues.
      Yeah, there's been like a tsunami in Asia and stuff.
    4. Re:Lead poisoning! by mOoZik · · Score: 1

      I didn't mean to suggest otherwise. The site was Slashdotted before I could even check it out, thus my tongue-in-cheek suggestion of lead poisoning. :)

  2. Re:it's not loading by bird603568 · · Score: 0

    i would have to agree there 3 replys and its down. Maybe they can but an award on there site? Can somnebody get a google cache up?

  3. Wow by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny

    I'm glad our educational system has progressed to the point that students can get acclaim for watching fantasy movies and devoting their time to "studies" of this kind. The human condition is so much better off now. Thank you very little.

    1. Re:Wow by spikexyz · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Yes, cause students should spend every second on serious study. That's the way to stay sane.

    2. Re:Wow by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Get a freaking life. I bet you complain about everything.

    3. Re:Wow by Bastard+of+Subhumani · · Score: 2, Funny
      Yes, cause students should spend every second on serious study. That's the way to stay sane.
      Difference is that these days you can major in things that 10 years ago were hobbies - you know, that you did after class.

      I mean, Master of Arts in Klingon?

      --
      Only three things are certain; death, taxes, and apocryphal quotations - Ben Franklin.
    4. Re:Wow by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      So...you're British, eh? Or just like to complain?

    5. Re:Wow by cenonce · · Score: 5, Interesting

      My wife is a psychology professor. One of her class exercises in Abnormal psychology is to have students "diagnose" a charcater from a movie. She says it helps students get interested in the topic to be able to write about a movie in which they are interested. Sure, she gets the standards: Norman Bates from "Psycho", Jack Nicholson's character in "One Flew Over the Cuckoo's Nest" and Glen Close from "Fatal Attraction". But she has recently gotten Jake Gyllenhall's character from Donnie Darko. I don't think she has gotten a paper on Gollum yet.

      BTW, since the site has been blasted by Slashdotters, I can't get read it, but her guess is that Gollum has dissociative identity disorder. I'll be interested to see what the article says.

    6. Re:Wow by geekoid · · Score: 1

      why not? It was created as an actual language.

      Now, I would have a hard time paying for my sons education if his goal was to achieve a Master of Arts in Klingon, but who are we to tell others what their degree should be?

      --
      The Kruger Dunning explains most post on /. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dunning%E2%80%93Kruger_effect
    7. Re:Wow by RenaissanceGeek · · Score: 2, Funny
      Hello! These are MEDICAL students! An EXTREMELY important part of their field is the ability to arrive at diagnoses when presented with a set of symptoms. (It's so important that Discover magazine devotes one of its montly columns to the narration of a tricky medical diagnosis: it's called "Vital Signs.")

      And who says that those symptoms HAVE to come from firsthand observation? If they did, no doctor could ever phone up a colleague for a consultation, or derive any worthwhile conclusions from reading a patient's chart.

      In fact, I once read a rather interresting passage in a novel about a retired physician who intended to spend his declining years diagnosing the maladys of the characters from great works of literature. The example given is from Hamlet. In Act III, Scene IV, Hamlet kills Polonius, and proceeds to hide the body. According to what I read, it could be derived from Hamlet's responses in Act IV, Scene I to queries as to the body's location (e.g. "if you find him not within this month, you shall nose him as you go up the stairs into the lobby.") and others that Hamlet had hid the body in with the King's chamber-pot (to mask the smell of rot), and it was unlikely to be found accidentally, as the King suffered from constipation.

      Unfortunately, I believe that the novel was borrowed, as I can't find it on my shelves.

      --
      What is the difference between a small revolutionary change and a large evolutionary change?
    8. Re:Wow by RenaissanceGeek · · Score: 1

      Gah. I return my volume of The Complete Shakespeare to the shelf, only to find the novel that I failed to name above:
      The Cunning Man
      by
      Robertson Davies

      --
      What is the difference between a small revolutionary change and a large evolutionary change?
    9. Re:Wow by lawpoop · · Score: 1
      "But she has recently gotten Jake Gyllenhall's character from Donnie Darko"

      How hard is that? There are several scenes in the movie where he's with a psych[ologist|iatrist], and one where she even diagnoses him for his parents. I guess you could say that, as the audience, we see things that he may not tell his shrink. On the other hand, according to the movie, he clearly has no mental problems whatsoever; he's just the animated dead, gotten off of God's uh, line, and he has to get reality back in order. See? Simple.

      --
      Computers are useless. They can only give you answers.
      -- Pablo Picasso
    10. Re:Wow by hchaos · · Score: 2, Interesting
      BTW, since the site has been blasted by Slashdotters, I can't get read it, but her guess is that Gollum has dissociative identity disorder. I'll be interested to see what the article says.

      The site seems to be back up, but for those too lazy to read the article, the final diagnosis is schizoid personality disorder.

      Dissociative Identity Disorder (in the article, referred to as multiple personality disorder) was ruled out because his two personalities are aware of each other and are present simultaneously and have conversations with each other. In DID, only one personality will manifest itself at a time, and the personalities are unaware of each other.

      Schizophrenia was ruled out because he does not show evidence of delusions.

    11. Re:Wow by yuri+benjamin · · Score: 2, Insightful

      OTOH, studying Klingon or Quenyan as part of a linguistics degree could be a useful mental exercise.

      --
      You make the mistake of thinking you can educate the fundamental stupidity out of people. You can't.
    12. Re:Wow by vsprintf · · Score: 3, Funny

      . . .the final diagnosis is schizoid personality disorder.

      Unfortunately, the diagnosis comes too late to help poor Gollum who refused to seek professional help and died during the commission of a theft. Let this be a warning to all who suddenly develop a taste for sushi and flashy jewelry to seek help from your local Elf immediately.

    13. Re:Wow by zakezuke · · Score: 2, Funny

      OTOH, studying Klingon or Quenyan as part of a linguistics degree could be a useful mental exercise.

      But it's hard to pickup chicks when you can speak Klingon, except other chicks that also speak Klingon.

      --
      There is no sanctuary. There is no sanctuary. SHUT UP! There is no shut up. There is no shut up.
    14. Re:Wow by yuri+benjamin · · Score: 3, Funny

      Try Quenyan then. Chicks dig LotR.

      --
      You make the mistake of thinking you can educate the fundamental stupidity out of people. You can't.
    15. Re:Wow by mattjb0010 · · Score: 1

      I'm glad our educational system has progressed to the point that students can get acclaim for watching fantasy movies and devoting their time to "studies" of this kind. The human condition is so much better off now.

      I don't know about you, but I'd like medical doctors to be able to diagnose diseases.

    16. Re:Wow by the+original+m0nk · · Score: 5, Funny

      and - trust me on this - if the chick speaks klingon, not only do you NOT want to pick her up, but chances are good that she could pick YOU up, soviet russia be damned.

    17. Re:Wow by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      My assumption is that they went off of the books. They seemed to have a bit of information, from the books, that wasn't in the movies.

      Literature is lost on the modern world. ANY book that is transposed to the silver screen loses all that it had that was of value.

    18. Re:Wow by Chris+Mattern · · Score: 1

      > seek help from your local Elf immediately.

      But is Elf-help really that effective? I mean, all you may doing is raising your Elf-esteem.

      Chris Mattern

    19. Re:Wow by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Unfortunately, the diagnosis comes too late to help poor Gollum who refused to seek professional help and died during the commission of a theft. Let this be a warning to all who suddenly develop a taste for sushi and flashy jewelry to seek help from your local Elf immediately.

      Or your confessor, or your God. No joke intended.

    20. Re:Wow by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Groooan.

      That was awful. You're fired.

    21. Re:Wow by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Just wondering, what do you have?

      You seem to have to display your name twice each time you post, and it's not a sig, you actually type a bunch of spaces and then your name the second time. Really, what's up with that dude?

    22. Re:Wow by hesiod · · Score: 1

      > No joke intended.

      No substance intended.

    23. Re:Wow by hesiod · · Score: 1

      "Pretentious? Moi?"

      Everything has "value." Just because you don't derive the same value, it is not necessarily devoid if it.

  4. HIPAA Violation! by Average_Joe_Sixpack · · Score: 5, Funny

    Revealing Gollum's private medical information constitutes a violation of the Health Insurance Portability and Accountability Act of 1996.

    1. Re:HIPAA Violation! by pe1rxq · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Does that act cover the medical information of the deceased to? (Lava stream usually are kind of lethal....)
      And if it does is there a maximum time limit? (This is supposed to happened a long time ago)

      Jeroen

      --
      Secure messaging: http://quickmsg.vreeken.net/
    2. Re:HIPAA Violation! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Heh :). Nice one--wish I had mod points right now!

    3. Re:HIPAA Violation! by Yonder+Way · · Score: 2, Insightful

      That's a very American-centric joke. Considering this was done in the UK, not nearly as funny.

    4. Re:HIPAA Violation! by jabuzz · · Score: 4, Interesting

      In five days time due to the wonders of the Freedom of Information Act there is no such thing as privacy in medical records in the U.K. any more - period. Want full disclosure of Tony Blairs recent operation, then it's all yours provided you cough up the money.

    5. Re:HIPAA Violation! by stienman · · Score: 1

      (Lava stream usually are kind of lethal....)

      Lava is more dense (higher mass per volume) than Gollum. He should have floated only partially submerged in a tortured agony.

      Oh, and HIPAA doesn't cover any creatures other than humans, so Gollum is unprotected by this act anyway.

      -Adam

    6. Re:HIPAA Violation! by Catbeller · · Score: 1

      Ah, but Gollum was a hobbit, and Tolkien once, during a commercial break, told an interviewer that hobbits were humans. Short and furry footed, but still of the race of men. HIPAA applies specieswise.

    7. Re:HIPAA Violation! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      Absolute nonsense.

      Practices will have to supply anonymised info on their population and practice guidelines etc. Patient personal data WILL NOT be available. Any healthcare personnel releasing this information would be subject to action by their professional regulators, as they always have.

    8. Re:HIPAA Violation! by Hes+Nikke · · Score: 1

      But don't we not like the **(*)AA anyway? :P

      --
      Don't call me back. Give me a call back. Bye. So yeah. But bye our, well, but alright we are on a shirt this chill.
    9. Re:HIPAA Violation! by PsiPsiStar · · Score: 1

      Yes, but being a danger to himself and others, maybe we should ask his legal guardian. That'd be Elrond, right?

      --

      ___
      It's the end of my comment as I know it and I feel fine.
    10. Re:HIPAA Violation! by kaladorn · · Score: 1

      Oddly, I'm having trouble placing 1996 in the Third Age of Mankind. I'm thinking it might just have (allegedly) happened before 1996. Does the act cover historical recovery of those deceased before 1996? (Or who never actually lived?)

      I think not. And the fact that you would invoke legalese tells me you are an emissary of Sauron. Only the Dark Lord would use Lawyers.

      --
      -- Mal: "Well they tell you: never hit a man with a closed fist. But it is, on occasion, hilarious."
    11. Re:HIPAA Violation! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Your books have commercial breaks? Wow. Where do you shop, cause I don't want to buy books from there... :P

    12. Re:HIPAA Violation! by BigBlackDog · · Score: 1

      >> Only the Dark Lord would use Lawyers.

      Leave Darl McBride out of this. Mind you, there is a case for a shrink

      --
      /* This comment may not be thread-safe */
  5. Gollums equipment by Xpilot · · Score: 4, Funny

    My friend and I theorized that under that dirty little loincloth of his, Gollum probably doesn't have much of his manhood left, having shrivelled up and dried off after centuries of disuse. Maybe we should write it up and send off our theory to the British Medical Journal too. I'd feel so erudite seeing my name published there.

    --
    "Backups are for wimps. Real men upload their data to an FTP site and have everyone else mirror it." -- Linus Torvalds
    1. Re:Gollums equipment by blahbooboo · · Score: 1

      He probably didn't have much manhood to start with...he was, after all, a hobbit! :D

    2. Re:Gollums equipment by afd8856 · · Score: 2, Funny

      not likely. Imagine Golum being a voyeurist. He has invisibility, has a lot of time to burn, what else can he do than polish his "ring"?

      --
      I'll do the stupid thing first and then you shy people follow...
    3. Re:Gollums equipment by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      So he lost his "Precious" in more ways than one?

    4. Re:Gollums equipment by Bloater · · Score: 2, Insightful

      The Gollum CG model is anatomically correct... There is a scene in one of the films where you see his wee willy winkle.

    5. Re:Gollums equipment by Kalak · · Score: 1

      That is way more information than I needed. And a picture I don't want to see.

      --
      I am, and always will be, an idiot. Karma: Coma (mostly effected by .hack)
    6. Re:Gollums equipment by yuri+benjamin · · Score: 1

      There is a scene in one of the films where you see his wee willy winkle.

      Please excuse me while I go and gauge out my eyes. *shudder*

      --
      You make the mistake of thinking you can educate the fundamental stupidity out of people. You can't.
    7. Re:Gollums equipment by ZeeExSixAre · · Score: 1

      Maybe someone can sell off his penis for more than the $40,000 an American urologist paid for Napoleon's penis: here

    8. Re:Gollums equipment by Brian_Confucius · · Score: 1

      I don't think it was in the films, but the DVD special features (for Two Towers) shows it off at every opportunity. Same with the troll from Fellowship of the Ring. Loincloth in the movies; going commando on DVD.

    9. Re:Gollums equipment by PsiPsiStar · · Score: 1

      Please excuse me while I go and gauge out my eyes. *shudder*

      You're going to measure your eyes?

      --

      ___
      It's the end of my comment as I know it and I feel fine.
    10. Re:Gollums equipment by Reziac · · Score: 1

      "under that dirty little loincloth of his, Gollum probably doesn't have much of his manhood left, having shrivelled up and dried off after centuries of disuse."

      Damn, I didn't realise Gollum was a Slashdotter...

      --
      ~REZ~ #43301. Who'd fake being me anyway?
    11. Re:Gollums equipment by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Not a hobbit, but some kind of related species (a "proto-hobbit").

      Considering the lifestyle and values of hobbits (fairly hedonistic!), I'm not at all sure how "inadequate" you should expect them to be...

  6. star wars & neurology by cbnewman · · Score: 5, Interesting

    my neurology professor gave a lecutre about neurologic disorders in star wars. the most interesting part was the observation that yoda may have suffered from William's Syndrome

    1. Re:star wars & neurology by lawpoop · · Score: 1

      Oh, is that what causes people to have a lifespan almost a millenium long?

      --
      Computers are useless. They can only give you answers.
      -- Pablo Picasso
    2. Re:star wars & neurology by zephc · · Score: 1, Funny

      from the page: "...mental retardation coupled with an unusual facility with language, a love for music..."

      So... it... must-be-named... after-William....... Shat-NER!

      --
      "I would say that 99 per cent of what my father has written about his own life is false." - L. Ron Hubbard Jr.
    3. Re:star wars & neurology by Erik+Hollensbe · · Score: 2, Funny

      No, that would require acting in iambic pentameter.

    4. Re:star wars & neurology by Scrameustache · · Score: 1

      yoda may have suffered from William's Syndrome

      It makes you green, with 3 fingers?

      --

      You can't take the sky from me...

    5. Re:star wars & neurology by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Having had contact with several Williams syndrome (WS) children and young adults, I can say that they speak quite normally (unlike Yoda). However their ears can be slightly pointy.

      The Wikipedia article doesn't mention it, but people with WS display poorer performance at spatial processing tasks than normal people. For example, they find it difficult to replicate toy block configurations even when they are allowed to see the original configuration while they are being tested. I doubt that a Jedi Master like Yoda would have this kind of difficulty in locating objects (or maybe that's where the force comes in?).

  7. Er.. Not Paranoid by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Does it still count as paranoinia if you are right?
    They reckon Gollum was 'feeling' persecuted by being watched by The Eye of Sauron - classic schizo fantasy elements in our world but in Middle Earth in fact true. -
    Now if only they Dentists would take me seriously when I tell him the MPAA are monitoring my downloads through my fillings.

  8. I don't know about Gollum... by Pecisk · · Score: 4, Funny

    but web site diagnosis is clear: slashdotted.

    --
    user@ubuntubox:~$ stfu This server is going down for shutdown NOW!
    1. Re:I don't know about Gollum... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      What I want to know is... why doesn't slashdot get slashdotted?

    2. Re:I don't know about Gollum... by hesiod · · Score: 1

      They have enough bandwidth & server capacity to handle the traffic. They slowly grew to be huge, but when its huge numbers jump to another site that hasn't had the same growth period, *SPLAT*

      easy enough

  9. Erm.. by Turn-X+Alphonse · · Score: 0, Flamebait

    He's a fictional character, who was written by a guy who can no longer talk. So you can't tell WHAT is wrong with him, because we have no evidence of it.

    So untill we can revive corpses, lets stop being silly.

    --
    I like muppets.
    1. Re:Erm.. by sailforsingapore · · Score: 5, Insightful

      Let the students have their fun. I'm sure this study was done with tongue firmly planted in cheek.

    2. Re:Erm.. by blike · · Score: 4, Insightful

      No need to get your panties in a wad, they're not "being silly".

      No one is saying that the author intentionally characterized Gollum with a certain disorder in mind. It was an excercise in psychiatry. If a human presented with these signs, this is how they would approach it.

    3. Re:Erm.. by Bastard+of+Subhumani · · Score: 0
      So untill we can revive corpses, lets stop being silly.
      I'm a dead man of Dunharrow, you insenstive clod!!!!!!
      --
      Only three things are certain; death, taxes, and apocryphal quotations - Ben Franklin.
  10. My personal conclusion... by Faust7 · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Gollum suffers from a severe case of being a book/movie character with behavior patterns that may have some similarities to real-world ailments, but which are ultimately artificial constructs of Tolkein's/Jackson's minds and therefore fruitless to "research." :D

    1. Re:My personal conclusion... by TheLoneCabbage · · Score: 1

      Every party has a pooper, that's why we invited you!

    2. Re:My personal conclusion... by DrEldarion · · Score: 1

      Thank you, Franck.

    3. Re:My personal conclusion... by biobogonics · · Score: 2, Informative

      Gollum suffers from a severe case of being a book/movie character with behavior patterns that may have some similarities to real-world ailments, but which are ultimately artificial constructs of Tolkein's/Jackson's minds and therefore fruitless to "research."

      It's well known that medical students often go off on far out diagnostic limbs (particularly when doing self diagnosis). Hence the old medical proverb "When you hear hoofbeats think of horses, not of zebras."

    4. Re:My personal conclusion... by Reziac · · Score: 1

      Kinda makes you wonder about Tolkein's/Jackson's minds, eh? ;)

      --
      ~REZ~ #43301. Who'd fake being me anyway?
  11. Metal toxicity? by RenaissanceGeek · · Score: 4, Interesting
    Hmmm. Could the ring have been made of a gold/mercury amalgamation? That WOULD explain it's being maleable enough to fit fingers of different sizes.

    Now, to figure out just what alloy that it was that the embedded scrollwork was made from which would glow red at a temperature below the melting point of the amalgam (something with phosphorous in it, perhaps?)....

    --
    What is the difference between a small revolutionary change and a large evolutionary change?
    1. Re:Metal toxicity? by Rosonowski · · Score: 1

      That, or it was magic.

      Failing that, it might have just been a poor fit on everyone but Sauron.

      --
      01101001 01100001 01101101 01101110 01101111 01110100 01100001 01101100 01100001 01110111 01111001 01100101 01110010
    2. Re:Metal toxicity? by Have+Blue · · Score: 1

      It's not just "below the melting point"- the Ring does not seem to absorb heat at all. It's at or below room temperature after being in a fire for several seconds. Maybe the scrollwork is made of the same stuff as those "magic" coffee mugs? :P

    3. Re:Metal toxicity? by Monkey+Angst · · Score: 1

      In the films, it did show (although very subtly) the ring changing sizes after it was removed from Sauron's gauntlet and held in Isildor's hand.

      --
      stripShow - Where WordPress meets webcomics
    4. Re:Metal toxicity? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful


      I'm glad to see people trying to figure out why a magical ring which turns its wearer invisible can fit any size finger.

    5. Re:Metal toxicity? by MegaFur · · Score: 1

      I think the ring was made from, among other things: gold, cruelty, malice, and will to dominate all life. I believe the ring was also made partially with Elvish forging techniques unknown to us now that we would (perhaps mistakenly) refer to as "magic".

      --
      Furry cows moo and decompress.
    6. Re:Metal toxicity? by MegaFur · · Score: 1

      "Not even a dragon's fire could harm that Ring." -- Gandalf

      --
      Furry cows moo and decompress.
    7. Re:Metal toxicity? by penginkun · · Score: 1

      See, it doesn't MATTER what kind of metal was used...maybe it was mithril! Hey, who knows? The point was that Sauron imbued it with the greater portion of his power. The ring was Sauron to a certain extent, and thus (at least somewhat) alive. That it was made of metal is irrelevant. It could have been made of stone and done the same things. We could call it magic, but that would be a little like calling the sun a big ball of fire. Accurate, but so unrefined as to seem utterly childish.

    8. Re:Metal toxicity? by hesiod · · Score: 1

      > that would be a little like calling the sun a big ball of fire. Accurate, but so unrefined as to seem utterly childish.

      Ummm, it's a story about magic, trolls, elves, etc. It's already childish.

    9. Re:Metal toxicity? by penginkun · · Score: 1

      True that. OK, it's magic. 8^) (cue The Cars...)

  12. Not Entirely Accurate, Anyway by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Actually, the diagnosis is not entirely accurate.

  13. Reminds of of an old Styx tune .... by Luscious868 · · Score: 4, Funny

    "Too much time on my hands...."

    1. Re:Reminds of of an old Styx tune .... by dswensen · · Score: 2

      Yeah, why don't these medical students published in the British Medical Journal get lives?

    2. Re:Reminds of of an old Styx tune .... by fisheye1969 · · Score: 1

      Unlike you of course who is too busy to bother with this kind of nonsense... :P

    3. Re:Reminds of of an old Styx tune .... by born_to_live_forever · · Score: 1

      ...as opposed to Slashdotters, who have enough time on their hands to waste it on reading your pointless posts (and mine)?

      --

      - Peter Ravn Rasmussen

  14. And... by Doc+Squidly · · Score: 2, Interesting

    and it would also violate the Privacy Act of 1974.

    --
    I think I think, therefore I think I am.
  15. Reminds me of an old Dusty Springfield tune .... by Zims+Manson · · Score: 0

    "I Just Don't Know What To Do With Myself"

  16. Check google news for clips by bishr · · Score: 5, Informative

    Google news has a few articles about it - here's clips from the original article via other articles on google. By the way, slashdotting a medical journal is a bad thing - I'm a medical student and I rely on these resources to guide or double-check decisions, or to keep up to date.

    "A space occupying lesion such as a brain tumour is unlikely as his symptoms are long standing. Gollum's diet is extremely limited, consisting only of raw fish. Vitamin B-12 deficiency may cause irritability, delusions, and paranoia. His reduced appetite and loss of hair and weight may be associated with iron deficiency anaemia. He is hypervigilant and does not seem to need much sleep. This, accompanied by his bulging eyes and weight loss, suggests hyperthyroidism. Gollum's dislike of sunlight may be due to the photosensitivity of porphyria. Attacks may be induced by starvation and accompanied by paranoid psychosis. ... On initial consideration schizophrenia seems a reasonable diagnosis. However, in the context of the culture at the time it is unlikely. Delusions are false, unshakeable beliefs, not in keeping with the patient's culture. In Middle Earth, the power of the ring is a reality. The passivity phenomena Gollum experiences are caused by the ring, and these symptoms occur in all ring bearers. Gollum does not fulfil the ICD-10 criteria for the diagnosis of schizophrenia.

    The presence of two personalities, Gollum and Sméagol, raises the possibility of multiple personality disorder. ..."

    "There is no disorder of the form of thought. He uses neologisms such as "triksy" and "hobbitses." Gollum has nihilistic thoughts, believing that he is a murderer, liar, and thief; although there is some basis in fact for this and he shows little guilt or remorse. He is preoccupied with, and deeply desires, the ring. He has obsessive thoughts but no compulsions, though he would do anything for the ring. He is hostile towards Frodo, the current owner of the ring. He has paranoid ideation about Sauron ("the eye is always watching") and about Samwise Gamgee ("the fat hobbit... he knows"). Gollum has difficulty controlling his thoughts and actions, exacerbated by prolonged contact with the ring. As Gandalf and Frodo have similar symptoms in the presence of the ring, we can attribute this somatic passivity to the ring. There are features of dissociation. Smeagol has separated his personality and is now Gollum as well."

    "Gollum displays pervasive maladaptive behaviour that has been present since childhood with a persistent disease course. His odd interest and spiteful behaviour have led to difficulty in forming friendships and distress to others," she said.

    "He fulfils seven of the nine criteria for schizoid personality disorder, and if we must label Gollum's problems we believe that this is the most likely diagnosis,"

    Wiki entry on Schizoid

    1. Re:Check google news for clips by Bastard+of+Subhumani · · Score: 0
      The presence of two personalities, Gollum and Sméagol, raises the possibility of multiple personality disorder. ..."
      Next up: possession of two (2) legs strongly suggests a biped, claims report.
      --
      Only three things are certain; death, taxes, and apocryphal quotations - Ben Franklin.
    2. Re:Check google news for clips by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Most apes have 2 legs but aren't bipeds ;)

    3. Re:Check google news for clips by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Also a medical student and can confidently say that slashdotting the British Medical Journal is for a couple of hours is not going to harm many people. Its for social health science, teaching and news rather than cutting edge medical research. I can't imagine anyone relying on it to make urgent clinical decisions.

    4. Re:Check google news for clips by stimpy · · Score: 1

      Cows and horses have 2 legs, also...

    5. Re:Check google news for clips by kps · · Score: 1

      Many years ago, the British Medical Journal was a simple but honest medical journal. Then, it happened into possession of a wondrous ring that made it more visible. Unable or unwilling to resist this corrupting influence, the BMJ has over many years deformed into a grotesque birdlike creature recognizable by its diet of crickets, it ducklike call, and its monstrously overgrown left wing.

  17. Without reading the article, my immediate thought by ylikone · · Score: 1, Insightful

    is that gollum is a obsessive compulsive, paranoid schizophrenic. Am I right?

    --
    Meh.
  18. dioxin by fuck_this_shit · · Score: 0, Offtopic

    that ukrainian dude looks like a pudgy gollum by now

  19. Re:Without reading the article, my immediate thoug by FuzzzyLogik · · Score: 1

    actually.. you miss the fact that he has split personalities... which if i recall correctly is called Dissociative personality disorder... throw that in there too...

  20. Re:Without reading the article, my immediate thoug by Xformer · · Score: 1

    Not to mention dissociative personality disorder.

    Of course, being under the influence of an embodiment of evil for 500 years may have those effects... who knows?

    --
    All I want is a kind word, a warm bed and unlimited power.
  21. Re:it's not loading by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    You must be new here.

    Moll.

  22. Trusts them not, those doctorses by ilsa · · Score: 0

    Hello! Has it occured to these medical geniuses in the making that Gollum is not human? That his physiology and biochemistry might be naturally very different from what their textbooks suggest is "normal"? Unless these people also happen to have degrees in veterinary science and xenobiology, any "conclusions" they reach is pure conjecture.

    Oh yeah, and if that weren't enough, Gollum is fictional.

    In the immortal words of a thousand Fark headlines, "Still no cure for cancer."

    --
    -- I Am Not A Terrorist.
    1. Re:Trusts them not, those doctorses by wheany · · Score: 0, Offtopic

      You suck.

    2. Re:Trusts them not, those doctorses by petrus4 · · Score: 1

      Words truly cannot express how much I (and I'm guessing a very, very large portion of the rest of the world's population) despise this particular usage of the word hello.

      While we're on the subject of the Lord of the Rings, I tend to think people who use/encourage such linguistic mutilations should be legally required to learn the Black Speech of Mordor...because that way if they really want a language to mutilate, that one is sufficiently ugly already (of course, it was designed to be) that in that case it wouldn't matter.

      Learn a greater appreciation for, and usage of, the English language, you unlettered Philistine. If you were to do some serious research you would probably discover that it is substantially different from the bastardised pathois which you customarily utter.

      Methinks Caesar is rolling over in his grave. In the case of the Americans, culturally speaking it truly is a scenario of the barbarians themselves having formed their own empire.

    3. Re:Trusts them not, those doctorses by man_ls · · Score: 1

      You, sir, have murdered the Queen's English.

      To the gallows!

    4. Re:Trusts them not, those doctorses by sailforsingapore · · Score: 1
      In the immortal words of a thousand Fark headlines, "Still no cure for cancer."

      ...And yet, you are sittig here cracking wise about it. So, for the moment, let the medical student have some fun, unless you are planning to get up from the computer, stop reading /. and go save the planet.

    5. Re:Trusts them not, those doctorses by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      As I recall, Gollum was originally a halfling. Because he was a halfling, he would have approximately the same biochemistry as a Midget or Frodo or Sam.

      Are you insulting midgets?

      BTW, Gollum was real; I met him through a tear in the fabric of space-time.

    6. Re:Trusts them not, those doctorses by The+Dark+P · · Score: 1

      Actually, Hello or Hullo, as it was originally, were exclamations of surprise co-opted to serve as a greeting following the advent of the telephone. Thus the above usage is closer to it's original meaning than the common meaning today.

    7. Re:Trusts them not, those doctorses by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Caesar did not speak English but rather Latin as his first language,Greek being his heavily-used second language; he likely also acquired some bits of various Celtic and/or Germanic languages among the Helvetii, Belgicae, &c. I don't see what link there is between the cliched, but perfectly grammatical, use of "Hello" in the grandparent posting and the parent posting's final paragraph, unless it is that both the are motivated by an ignorant anti-Americanism that the pseudointellectual set has adopted as a badge of membership in the Eurotrash cultural hegemony.

      By the way, it is not a "particular usage," it is a "particular use." "Usage" refers to a process or continuum, it cannot refer to a single point event.

      Also, the "t" in patois is not aspirated. This particular error (aspirating a consonant that is not supposed to be aspirated) is a hypercorrection that Caesar's own contemporary, and sometime social enemy, Catullus ridicules in his poetry as a sign of someone with great pretensions but little actual intellect to back those pretensions up.

      As for the style of your last sentence, let us say merely that Fowler would be rolling over in *his* grave. "Truly" is unnecessary, as is "themselves" (as it is made redundant by "their own"). As for matters of fact, I will assume from the Commonwealth spelling that you are British. (The key to this identification is your orthography for "bastardised" - a spelling which, it should be pointed out, is Francophone, being distorted from the original Greek -iz[o] by passing through Latin and then French on its way into English, courtesy of the conquering Norman French [who have successfully conquered and held only the one country, England, a fact that the heavily Frenchified descendents of the noble Anglo-Saxons and Brythonic Celts have tried to obscure by inviting in a bunch of half-Hun ex-Allobroges and letting them rename themselves "the House of Windsor"], while the American spelling attempts to restore both the pronunciation and the etymology by re-asserting the original Greek spelling of with a z, or, as you lime-sucking, public-school-beastliness-enjoying prats would say, a zed. This Greek ending makes "bastardize" a fascinating term for you to use, as "bastardize" is itself a bastardization - taking in "bastard" from Middle English, "izo" from Greek via Latin and French, and "atio" from Latin.)

      If you resent the fact that I'm posting as an anonymous bastard, you can comfort yourself with knowing that I had modpoints, and decided this was more effective than blasting you into the "flamebait" oblivion you deserve.

  23. The Conclusion: by schtum · · Score: 1

    "Gollum displays pervasive maladaptive behaviour that has been present since childhood ... His odd interests and spiteful behaviour have led to difficulty in forming friendships ..."

    Wow, that sounds a lot like me, and nearly everyone else who reads Slashdot, I'd bet. He is ultimately diagnosed as schizoid. Raise your hand if you can honestly say you don't exhibit at least 3 of those symptoms.

    1. Re:The Conclusion: by Nasarius · · Score: 1

      Yeah, I'd say the last four criteria probably describe a lot of /.ers. But, IIRC, mental illness of any kind is a matter of degree (severity). Many may exhibit some of these symptoms, but not nearly to the degree of a true schizophrenic.

      --
      LOAD "SIG",8,1
    2. Re:The Conclusion: by budgenator · · Score: 2, Informative

      One of the things that make your first psyc clinical so challenging is how normal the patients are, not how abnormal.

      --
      Apocalypse Cancelled, Sorry, No Ticket Refunds
    3. Re:The Conclusion: by hesiod · · Score: 1

      I'm starting to believe that psychiatrists are all idiots or scammers. All of these different "disorders" have mostly the same symptoms & actions. I have over half of those listed in the link, but then it says "Excludes Asperger's Syndrome," which has pretty much the exact same symptoms. There are about 20 "different disorders" that all present the same problems, but psychiatrists have an economic incentive to tell us they are all different and have different causes. Conveniently, they claim they can treat all of them, if only they can find the right drug for you to buy. Unfortunately for you, the drugs all cost $400 a bottle and there are a few dozen to go through before finding the one that "works" (the one powerful enough to keep you sufficiently fucked up constantly so you forget how much life sucks).

      Cynical? Naw, it's a "personality disorder," it's not my fault! Blame the brain! Somewhere along the line of history, it seems to have forgotten which chemicals go where, leading to these "imbalances" we hear so many commercials about. Strange how they have become so much more prevalent in high-stress, low-nutrition times. Nope, it's a condition that just "happens."

  24. Pointless because of the ring? by Lord_Dweomer · · Score: 1
    While I completely understand the purpose of the study, I don't think it is useful to match Gollum up to any disorders that we recognize today. Why?

    Because we don't know the effects of the ring psychologically. We have some vague descriptions, and we get to see some of the results, but nobody has a clue how that thing works etc.

    --
    Buy Steampunk Clothing Online!
  25. Re:Metal toxicity? ;-) by Scrameustache · · Score: 1

    That WOULD explain it's being maleable enough to fit fingers of different sizes.

    Does it explain its malevolance, slipping off fingers at the worst possible moments, or refusing to come off when it would be best if it did?

    I didn't know mercury was sentient...

    --

    You can't take the sky from me...

  26. Gollum is *way* older than 587! by Weaselmancer · · Score: 5, Interesting

    Ok, even by Slashdot standards this is going to be a seriously geeky post. Prepare yourself - you have been warned.

    Gollum is at least 969 years old, and probably a whole lot older. Proof follows.

    In the Silmarillion, there is a quote in "Of The Rings of Power and the Third age" that goes as follows:

    ...the One Ring was indeed found again, by a chance more strange than even Mithrandir had foreseen; and it was hidden from Curunír and from Sauron. For it had been taken from Anduin long ere they sought for it, being found by one of the small fisher-folk that dwelt by the River, ere the Kings failed in Gondor;

    Gollum found the ring while there was still a ruling king in Gondor, before the reign of the Stewards.

    The reign of the Stewards began in TA 2050, after the death of King Eärnur at the hands of the Witch-King. So we know that Gollum had the ring before TA 2050.

    The ring was destroyed in TA 3019. That makes Gollum at least 3019-2050=969, and that's only if he found the ring on the very day the Stewards claimed Gondor.

    The Third Age begins with the defeat of Sauron by the Last Alliance. The earliest Gollum could have found the ring would be the day Isuldur lost it (TA 2), so he could be as old as 3019-2=3017.

    So Gollum is somewhere between 969 and 3017 years old. Splitting the difference makes him probably around 2000 or so. In any event, he's a lot older than 587.

    So how's that? Geeky enough for you? =)

    --
    Weaselmancer
    rediculous.
    1. Re:Gollum is *way* older than 587! by brittm · · Score: 1

      I've only this to say, Bravo!

    2. Re:Gollum is *way* older than 587! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      That must mean Gollum is Jesus!

    3. Re:Gollum is *way* older than 587! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Wrong interpretation of "ere the Kings failed in Gondor." That doesn't necessarily mean that there was a ruling King at the time, just the the Kings of the past failed. Otherwise it would have been "ere the King failed in Gondor."

    4. Re:Gollum is *way* older than 587! by gmhowell · · Score: 1

      They have this fun new pasttime called 'fucking a member of the opposite sex'. It's like masturbation, but way, WAY better.

      Seriously.

      This joke would have been funnier if it weren't for the fact that even nerdier types have already corrected your errors:)

      --
      Jesus was all right but his disciples were thick and ordinary. -John Lennon
  27. Re:Metal toxicity? ;-) by Artifakt · · Score: 1

    Malable, sentient & malevolent?
    It's that stuff the T2 was made out of, Duh!
    Forget going to Mt. Doom, we'll just take it to the particle accellerator torus at Orthanc.

    --
    Who is John Cabal?
  28. My Diagnosis: One Ring Addiction Disorder. by meldroc · · Score: 2, Insightful

    One thing that was mentioned in the movie commentaries, but not mentioned in the medical journal reports is that the One Ring, along with other mystical phenomena, provides sensations of euphoria to its bearer. Also, if a bearer is deprived of contact with the One Ring, he experiences symptoms akin to withdrawl. All bearers of the One Ring experienced these symptoms, but because Gollum had possession of the Ring for over five centuries, his symptoms are extreme. So, on top of Antisocial Personality Disorder, Dissociative Personality Disorder, as well as Obsessive Compulsive Disorder, I would have to diagnose Gollum with addiction to the One Ring, and have him checked into a substance abuse treatment center as soon as possible.

    --

    Meldroc, Waster of Electrons
  29. Re:Without reading the article, my immediate thoug by budgenator · · Score: 1

    No the personalities can directly communicate ruling out Dissociative personality disorder. The ring allways struck me as parasitic in nature, feeding of the current owner's normalicy and promoting it's own agenda; but I'll admit a certain symbiotic element in that it prolong it's host's lifespan. So it would seem more like a possesion rather than an illness.

    --
    Apocalypse Cancelled, Sorry, No Ticket Refunds
  30. House by DJTodd242 · · Score: 3, Funny

    When asked for comment, Dr. Gregory House muttered something sarcastic and hobbled away.

    1. Re:House by Art+Tatum · · Score: 1

      He should have stuck to playing Bertie Wooster.

    2. Re:House by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Or the Prince Regent!

  31. Read the comments too. by Julian+Morrison · · Score: 1

    They're at least as interesting as the article.

  32. Wrong! by ewe2 · · Score: 3, Informative

    You are SO wrong. If there was a prize for geeky wrongness, you are it. You are the wrongest LoTR geek on the planet and here is why: you didn't read the book.

    The book says in Appendix B, The Tale of Years, Third Age and I quote

    2463 The White Council is formed. About this time Déagol the Stoor finds the One Ring and is murdered by Sméagol.

    Which makes him only 556 years old. I hereby banish you to an eon of nerd. Go, and never return! And take those medical students with you!

    --
    insecurity asks the wrong question irritation gives the wrong answer
    1. Re:Wrong! by HiThere · · Score: 2, Insightful

      But how old was he when the ring was found? Based on that assertion (i.e., appendix B) he might well be 580 or older. (Hobbits reach their majority at when? 30? 33?)

      --

      I think we've pushed this "anyone can grow up to be president" thing too far.
    2. Re:Wrong! by Weaselmancer · · Score: 1

      You are the wrongest LoTR geek on the planet and here is why: you didn't read the book.

      Oh that's so true! To confess completely, I don't even know how to read. The Silmarillion quote was beamed into my head by grey aliens the one night I forgot to wear my tinfoil nightcap. The rest I learned from watching the Rankin & Bass cartoons.

      What we have here is a discrepancy in Tolkien's work, of which there are more than a few. All his writing was continually in flux as he wrote and re-wrote his stories, which he did continually throughout his life. So you're a little premature banishing me to an "eon of nerd". What I've found has just as much chance of being Tolkien's true intentions as what you have found.

      --
      Weaselmancer
      rediculous.
    3. Re:Wrong! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Oh no! You mean Lord of the Rings never really happened?

    4. Re:Wrong! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      LoTR is more canonical than Silmarillion, as the latter was published without being subject to Tolkien's final edits.

  33. Some unregarded aspects of the ring and diet by j_w_d · · Score: 3, Interesting

    The article was interesting and enteraining. I did notice a couple of unconsidered aspects. First, the ring renders the wearer transparent to visible light. Depending on upon its response in the ultraviolet spectrum (UV-B exposure is necessary), this could have induced some Vitamin D deficiency. This would have been exacerbated by Gollum's increasing photophobia, growing nocturnal habits and finally his relocation to a subterranean habitat. In addition to rickets, restlessness and irritability are possible symptons of inadequate Vitamin D.

    --
    ------ The only greater hazard to your liberty than n politicians is n+1 politicians.
  34. please mod up parent by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    pseudo-mod: "+3 Funny"

  35. whoosh goes the joke over your head by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I was being sarcastic. Thanks for stopping by to explain the joke, though. Good work.

    -dswensen

  36. Amnesia by rishistar · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Well, coincidentally the BBC have a report about movies which have amnesiacs acting as they are supposed to.

    Finding Nemo and Memento are amonst the gud'uns. Overboard and the Tom'n'Jerry movie are amongst the bad'uns.

    The research was done by the National Society for Epilepsy, so its being used as a publicity piece I guess to highlight misconceptions about amnesiacs. Epileptics can suffer from amnesia as part of their condition. This does make it different to the subject story - which I guess is just a bit of speculative fun from people with too much time on their hands.

    --
    Professor Karmadillo Songs of Science
  37. Dates are wrong by StrawberryFrog · · Score: 2, Insightful

    This can't be right: "Sméagol (Gollum) is a single, 587 year old ... When Gollum was 25, the ring was stolen by Bilbo Baggins".

    The events of "The Hobit" must be at most a decade or two earlier than those of LotR. By the time that Bilbo aquired the ring, Gollum was already far gone; thus he must have been over 500 years old when he lost the ring to Bilbo.

    Gollum's main aliment is a powerful addiction to the strong magic that both sustained and ravaged him over the centuries. Hobbits, which Gollum basically is, do not normally live to be over 150.

    Jackson's movies worked with that angle, having him look and act like a totally ravaged junkie.

    --

    My Karma: ran over your Dogma
    StrawberryFrog

    1. Re:Dates are wrong by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The birthday party is Bilbo's 111th; Frodo leaves 17 years later. I don't remember how old Bilbo was when he went on his trip, but assuming he was 30 (I suspect that he's a little older), the longest that could have passed between the theft of the ring and the beginning of the fellowship is 98 years. However, note that Smeagol is 587, but GOLLUM was 25 when the ring was stolen. They must imagine that the Gollum personality only appeared 25 years before the Ring was stolen. Or, they are mistaking Bilbo's age for Gollum's, or some other such error.

  38. BMJ Christmas Edition by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    The BMJ has a tradition that the Christmas edition of the journal usually consists of spoofs. Some of it often makes extremely good reading, even to the non-medic.

    So - to those who consider this a 'serious article in a well-respected journal' - chill out!

  39. overlooking the obvious? by walterbyrd · · Score: 3, Interesting

    To me the movie made it clear that gollum's mental problems were the result of:

    1) Magic power of the ring.

    2) 550+ years of solitude.

    3) Terrible guilt.

    1. Re:overlooking the obvious? by Alsee · · Score: 0

      I think Gollum's symptoms were all caused by Hot Grits.

      -

      --
      - - You can't take something off the Internet! That's like trying to take pee out of a swimming pool.
  40. So, just in case you have forgotten by oliverthered · · Score: 1

    Yep, looks like it. I'd like to know what made Cherie smile like that and tip her head to the side.

    "Happy New Year

    So, just in case you have forgotten, from 1 January 2005:

    all NHS organisations must reply within 20 working days to any credible written request for information from anywhere in the world
    the request can be made by email or written on a piece of paper and made to any member of staff
    it does not have to refer to the Freedom of Information Act
    you cannot ask the reason for the request, or question its reasonableness you can work with the person requesting information to help them clarify what it is they are after so that you can best meet the request
    and, from 1.1.05, the European Environmental Information Regulations take effect which means that any verbal or written question about [the environmental effects of your services or products] must be answered
    as well as maintaining your publication schemes"

    --
    thank God the internet isn't a human right.
  41. Must complete clinicals. Only then, a doctor .... by PsiPsiStar · · Score: 2, Funny

    When 900 years old he reaches, be so healthy he will not. Hmmph!

    --

    ___
    It's the end of my comment as I know it and I feel fine.
  42. Elephant Man? by Woogiemonger · · Score: 1

    I just got done watching Elephant Man.. brilliant movie... in it, there actually IS a medical diagnosis of John Merrick (The Elephant Man), but not so much a psychological one. I'd say he'd pretty much be in the same situation as Gollumn, except for the all-powerful mind control ring of invisibility that is.

    1. Re:Elephant Man? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Huh?

      Even if the symptoms were similar (which they aren't), the two situations are fundamentally different. Most importantly, a disorder that has affected a person since birth is a world away from one that is caused by some event or series of events in one's adult life (Smeagol was an adult by the time he found the ring).

  43. You would have mental problems too by joemontoya · · Score: 0

    If you were in the process of becoming an undead with part of Sauron's consciousness in your head. Any bearer of the Ring other than a Hobbit would have been become Sauron with several centuries. The Hobbits were so closely connected to the Earth that they were resistant to it's power in a way that no other living creatures were, except Bombadil.

  44. Nerdy Award by WMD_88 · · Score: 1

    This is easily the nerdiest story I've ever read.
    *bows* to the overlords

  45. Pedant alert! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
    Learn a greater appreciation for, and usage of, the English language, you unlettered Philistine. If you were to do some serious research you would probably discover that it is substantially different from the bastardised pathois which you customarily utter.
    Perhaps you meant patois, you linguistically-prescriptivist pedant? The bastardized/Romanized form of the Greek word "pathois" doesn't make much sense in this context. Get off your high chair and back under that bridge.
  46. Still Wrong! by ewe2 · · Score: 1

    You can't blame Tolkien for not checking your sources. Even the Tale of Years is under suspicion, but at least it provides a factual basis. You might get away with such remarks about Galadriel for instance, but Gollum is much firmer ground even if the odd errant statement about the Ring got out. And remember, if you find a discrepancy, point it out, don't just run away with theories. You didn't even post where you found that line, so the non-geeks could check.

    But I didnt add Smeagols apparent age at the time of finding the Ring. 587 is a very good guess, but he could have been as old as 611 (55 at the time).

    --
    insecurity asks the wrong question irritation gives the wrong answer
  47. Comment removed by account_deleted · · Score: 1

    Comment removed based on user account deletion