Slashdot Mirror


Tsunami Satellite Images

JakeisBland writes "Here is a collection of before/after satellite pictures of the devastation in Asia due to the tsunami/earthquake."

101 of 732 comments (clear)

  1. wow by scapermoya · · Score: 2, Informative

    This really puts the disaster into perspective, im shocked.

    --
    Beware the Jubjub bird, and shun the frumious Bandersnatch.
    1. Re:wow by Compact+Dick · · Score: 2, Informative

      There were at least two other articles pertaining to the earthquake and tsunami.

    2. Re:wow by LiquidCoooled · · Score: 2, Informative

      wtf?
      http://slashdot.org/article.pl?sid=04/12/26/143722 8&tid=99
      There are others, slash isn't exactly known for doing things once only.

      --
      liqbase :: faster than paper
    3. Re:wow by Gentlewhisper · · Score: 5, Insightful

      Current death tolls approaching 130k people.

      If you thought 9/11 was big think again, we are talking about FOUR HUNDRED 9/11s here.

    4. Re:wow by Kiryat+Malachi · · Score: 3, Insightful

      I've said it before, I'll say it again.

      It's a natural disaster. A large one, to be sure, but the Colombia volcano in 1985 killed around 25,000, Mont Pelee in 1902 killed 25,000, and let's not forget the Tangshan earthquake in 1976, which killed between 250,000 and 650,000 people. There's a qualitative difference between something that happened because Mother Nature got titchy, and something that humans planned and carried out.

      Different. You can't compare them on the same scale.

      --

      ---
      Mod me down, you fucking twits. Go ahead. I dare you.
      (I read with sigs off.)
    5. Re:wow by b0r0din · · Score: 2

      Not to nitpick about loss of life, but that's only forty 9/11s, not four hundred.

      Although I agree, it's an awful loss.

      The worst is that a lot of these deaths could have been prevented. But then, no one can predict mother nature.

    6. Re:wow by BottleCup · · Score: 2, Informative

      I dont think it is appropriate to make jokes about this catastrophe. I just saw a video footage someone took in Aceh, Indonesia. If you think satelite photos are shocking, think again. If you want to watch this I recommend you go to lokitorrent. Its the KATC tsunami video in wmv format.

      The video was taken from the upper level of a 2 storey house (from the balcony to be exact). The view outside shows turbulent water rushing and submerging many houses. Its horrible and looks as if the house is right in the middle of an ocean during a turbulent storm, only there's no rain.

      Then there's a voice of a woman crying saying something to the effect of so and so was in the car... and she weeps uncontrollably. There's another woman's voice trying to console her. I couldnt make out everything what they were saying because of the difference in dialect (I'm from Malaysia), but it was enough to make me feel very sad and sorry for all those poor people there. :(

    7. Re:wow by Ilgaz · · Score: 3, Insightful

      9/11: Terrorists
      Iraq: USA
      This one: Nature

    8. Re:wow by shadowmas · · Score: 4, Interesting

      i'm a sri lankan. i wasnt in the effected area but the footage that i saw was so disturbing i simply stopped watching tv after a few hours.

      busses with people still in it were swept away as if they were paper boats. people who were trying to hold on to a building were swept away one by one. and while all this was happenning the people who were taping the scene along with a few others who were on a bridge could do nothing to help. it makes you feel completly helpless.

      so many people have died that even identifying them is simply impossible. most of the dead are being buried in mass graves. and most of them havent even been identified.

      its simply unbreable.

    9. Re:wow by tdemark · · Score: 2, Interesting

      You can also see the sat photos here, with the difference that I aligned the images so you can toggle between before and after views.

      I submitted this link last night, but, of course, it was rejected in favor of the plain, individual sat photos.

      - Tony

    10. Re:wow by garethwi · · Score: 2, Interesting

      If you thought 9/11 was big think again, we are talking about FOUR HUNDRED 9/11s here.

      Or one Iraq War, so far.

    11. Re:wow by alexre1 · · Score: 4, Insightful

      It's sad that this type of inward looking nationalistic thinking is the norm these days. When will people realize that we are responsible for all of humanity? Does no one teach social responsability anymore? Let me let you in to a little secret here. The rest of the world *is* under an obligation to help SE Asia. Under a *big* obligation. Why? Because of international treaties? Nope. Because of legislation, or UN decisions? Nope. As humans, we are morally responsable for the welfare and well-being of the rest of the world.

    12. Re:wow by bshroyer · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Or one-fifth of a Saddam.

      --
      The cure for cancer is coming: Reovirus
    13. Re:wow by Omnifarious · · Score: 3, Insightful

      And Saddam took 15-20 years, where we've only had 2 so far. Give it time.

    14. Re:wow by Anonymous+Bullard · · Score: 4, Insightful
      Or one-twentieth of US dickwaving in Vietnam.

      Shhh, hush now. You're spoiling it.

      When asked "how many died in Vietnam war", nine out of ten Americans give the ballpark of "60,000". The two, perhaps three million Vietnamese deaths don't simply register.

      Of course the USA still refuses to accept responsibility for the continuing tragedy caused by the massive Agent Orange contamination that is still killing and causing birth defects among the Vietnamese population.

      More recently the US and UK war machines have scattered hundreds of tons of toxic and carcinogenic depleted uranium (used in hardening projectile shells) across Iraq. Does anyone think these two countries will ever take responsibility of the devastating consequenses affecting the current and future generations of Iraqi civilians?

      While I can reason the deaths and injuries caused by the Indian Ocean Tsunami to be part of the cost of our existance on a living planet (I say this knowing that close friends of mine lost many friends and relatives, and my own relatives holidaying in Thailand only barely escaped death thanks to help by quick thinking locals), I find no good excuses for sending massive war machines to foreign countries to kill massive numbers of locals and to poison their lands for generations to come.

      --

      Should invading one's peaceful neighbours be opposed, or rewarded with trade deals?

    15. Re:wow by ckaminski · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Oh please, you're comparing apples and automobiles man, not even in the same class. You losing your posh home (by the standards of these people) and car is nothing compared to dying a miserable death from malaria, dysentery or starvation, or lack of potable water.

      Not. Even. Fucking. Comparable.

  2. Cisco by sjrstory · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Even Cisco has posted Earthquake and Tsunami Relief on their main page. I guess a good chunk of their CCIEs are affected by this :)

    1. Re:Cisco by aixou · · Score: 2, Informative

      Forgive a bit of humor in the midst of tragedy, but it seems that Apple has led the pack yet again, only to be copied by Microsoft.

      Seriously though, I think donating a little bit of money is the least one of us can do. It really puts things in perspective when something like this happens.

    2. Re:Cisco by opec · · Score: 2

      What a shame. You people have turned even simple donations into a competition.

  3. Tsunami by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Insightful

    This is simply amazing. I think that every so often Mother Nature decides she needs to show everyone who's boss, a sort of bitchslap to bring the nations of the world together; if only for a little while.

    1. Re:Tsunami by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Informative
      If anyone wants to know more about what "Mother Nature" did then I would recommend the wiki entry

    2. Re:Tsunami by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Funny

      If only we had fed more virgins to the volcano this never would have happened! Forget the tsunami warning system, we need a more aggressive volcano-feeding program immediately!

  4. one point about the Sri Lankan pictures... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Informative

    it's worth noting that the pictures show Kalutara, a town about 25 miles south of Colombo, and situated on the west coast of Sri Lanka, which pretty much escaped major damage and loss of life compared to the the south and eastern coastlines.

    Flooding caused at least 40 deaths in Kalutara, though...

    1. Re:one point about the Sri Lankan pictures... by OffTheLip · · Score: 5, Insightful

      The people of Galle, one of the hard hit areas on the west coast, might take exception to your comment about escaping major damage.

  5. Are you stingy? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 4, Interesting
    1. Re:Are you stingy? by MvD_Moscow · · Score: 2, Insightful

      USA does not export democracy and freedom. The US does start wars for their own needs (e.g. oil) but not for freedom. And don't start about the US wanting to fight terrorist, if the US really wanted to fight terrorists they should have invaded Saudi Arabia not Iraq. Afterall, in terms of freedom they were on similar levels.

    2. Re:Are you stingy? by Carewolf · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Actually the US has inserted more corrupt dictatorships than they have inserted democratic governments. The dictators were prefered for many years because they were less likely to turn socialist than a democratic country was.

    3. Re:Are you stingy? by XenonDif · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Well we Guatemalans were REAL happy when the CIA strafed our capital with fighter jet and "liberated us from democracy" durring that charming coup they put togeter. This plunged our country into 30 years of civil war and military dictatorship. Next time we'd apreciate it if you could keep your freedom and democracy and just send us the medicine.

    4. Re:Are you stingy? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Insightful
      Bush could have scored some real points if say he'd cancelled his $40 million "I got elected again" party and given the money to the cause.


      You know, a person who looks at a catastrophy like this and says "hey, here's an opportunity to play politics" probably needs to rethink their lifestyle.

    5. Re:Are you stingy? by chialea · · Score: 2, Informative

      There are of course more, but I just wanted to mention one: Congo. They managed to finally wrest their freedom from Belgium, and the CIA shows up trying to put poison in the president's toothpaste (seriously). It's unclear as to whether the US or Belgium actually were responsible for killing him, but the US has certainly admitted it was going to.

      Lea

    6. Re:Are you stingy? by ScentCone · · Score: 4, Interesting

      Bush could have scored some real points if say he'd cancelled his $40 million "I got elected again" party and given the money to the cause.

      Reminds me of the scene in - was it Animal House? - where the witless, self-important sorority girl participating in the dance planning committee says something to the effect of, "I don't see how anyone can have a party when there are hungry people in the world!"

      But of course, dramatically not having a party doesn't magically create self-sufficient economies, rule of law, rational discourse, and all of the other things that make countries more able to weather trouble. If our Atlantic coast cities were built the way the tsunami-impacted areas are, our recent hurricane season would have been catastrophic. But we have the infrastructure and financial resiliance that comes from our industrious culture. South Asia is working on that too, but they have a lot of catching up to do... and now even more.

      If the plight of a million people living and dying in misery should be a reason to cease the celebration of our nation's recurring elections and the success of our constitutional structure, then we should stop every party, all the time. Many, many more millions live in what we would call deathly misery, tsunamis or not. How, oh how can we enjoy, strengthen, and insure our prosperity under those circumstances? Or, is the cancel-the-party political camp so breathlessly partisan, and so desparate to score a fleeting shot on Bush (only appreciated by the same crowd anyway) that it takes a more immediate calamity like this to leverage that bit of theatre?

      People who say "Bush should have done X" (even as all sorts of critical things were already under way the same day as the earthquake, and will be for years now) are being sleazy opportunists. To imagine that Bush won't take the opportunity of the upcoming inaugural to comment on the Asian disaster is ridiculous. Now: please comment on why Clinton and his show-biz supporters threw such big parties, even as people were dying - in numbers just as big, but in slow motion - throughout Africa, and Burma, and North Korea. Oh, that's right: he "felt their pain," and that took care of it, right?

      --
      Don't disappoint your bird dog. Go to the range.
    7. Re:Are you stingy? by The+Dobber · · Score: 2, Insightful


      Nicely said. But I still contend that our priorities are seriously out of whack when we spend $40 million for a elitist party and pledge (initially) $15 million in aid for what can only be one of the worst disasters ever.

      I voted for the W both times. He's been pulling some big boners of late though.

  6. A couple more images by centipetalforce · · Score: 5, Informative

    http://eobglossary.gsfc.nasa.gov/Newsroom/NewImage s/images.php3?img_id=16774Very
    http://eobglossary.gsfc.nasa.gov/Newsroom/NewImage s/images.php3Devastating
    If you donated to lokitorrent but not this, I don't know what to say to you...

  7. So much for clean water.... by YITBOS · · Score: 3, Interesting

    It's almost disgusting to see how much the color of the water changed... it's bad enough they have hundred upon hundreds of bodies lying around rotting, but the water looks disgusting even from the sky... just imagine the smell. I wonder how long it will take, with all the flooding and then the following withdrawl of the water, before it's a nice, clean blue ocean beach again?

    1. Re:So much for clean water.... by Malc · · Score: 5, Informative

      Have you thought that perhaps most of that discolouration is no more than just sediment such as top soil? It isn't necessarily related to human activity at all.

      If I were there, smell would be the least of my worries. I'd be more concerned about things such as cholera, and other miscellaneous tropical diseases and the general environment that means even a simple scratch can become life threatening.

  8. Re:don't hear too many by oz_canetoad · · Score: 5, Informative

    From the CIA world book on Sri Lanka;

    Buddhist 70%, Hindu 15%, Christian 8%, Muslim 7% (1999)

    I can see why you wouldn't, but continue to play your banjo...

  9. Videos by Vicsun · · Score: 4, Informative

    Here you can find videos of the tsunami captured by tourists.
    Here you can find torrents of said videos in case the original site dies under the load.

    1. Re:Videos by adpowers · · Score: 2, Informative

      Wave of Destruction has a lot of photos on their website and large collection of BitTorrent videos.

  10. Helping by gregbaker · · Score: 5, Informative
    Perhaps this would be a good time to donate to the Red Cross? (US, Canadian, others)

    The Canadian one, at least, is a fast online credit-card donation. You can print out your tax receipt right away. (hey, before midnight gets it in for this tax year, right?)

    Or, there are plenty of other organizations that would be happy to receive a donation.

    1. Re:Helping by adeydas · · Score: 2, Informative

      Google and Amazon have put up a list of sites too. You may donate to those NGO's too.

    2. Re:Helping by mjfrazer · · Score: 3, Informative

      And Canadian donations to MSF, Red Cross, Oxfam, Care Canada, and two others I cannot recall are matched 1:1 by the Canadian federal government.

  11. Re:Philosophy 101 by nagora · · Score: 2, Interesting
    I'm pointing out that the cause does matter when considering the importance of an event.

    I agree; I was idly pointing out the implications of two common beliefs: 1: that there is no such thing as free will, which implies that human actions are no different from "natural" actions or disasters, and 2: that there is a god, in which case there again is no difference becase in both the human and natural cases god is equally culpable for letting it happen.

    Personally I believe in free will and not in gods, so it really was idle speculation and "Philosophy 101". Given what I belive, I agree totally with your post but it did occur to me that ours is simply one view point and there are others. I'm not quite sure why that wound you up so much but I wasn't trolling.

    TWW

    --
    "Encyclopedia" is to "Wikipedia" what "Library" is to "Some people at a bus stop"
  12. Re:do we know what actually caused this? by AndyCater · · Score: 3, Interesting

    The indian ocean tectonic plates are historically very active. Look at the major earthquakes and a lot are in/round Java. Ditto volcano eruptions: Tambora 1813?? and Krakatau 1883 Just one of those things - it will happen again in due course when the plates move again. There were apparently three plate shifts - one of them almost immediately off the Andaman isalnds, but the first was down near Aceh.

  13. Re:A thing I don't understand by Kiryat+Malachi · · Score: 2, Informative

    I couldn't find any figures for even a rough total of US private donations, but, as of 12/29, American donations to the Red Cross *alone* stood at USD18 million. That does not count donations to other charities or the last day and a half of donations. Pfizer alone (corporations count as private to me) donated 10 million, plus an additional 25 million in medical supplies.

    --

    ---
    Mod me down, you fucking twits. Go ahead. I dare you.
    (I read with sigs off.)
  14. Rescue efforts update... and some thoughts by asliarun · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Speaking as an Indian, a big heartfelt THANKS for all of you who've empathised with the tragedy and have helped the rescue efforts. It's in trying times like these that one's faith in humanity is restored.

    Thankfully, in spite of Indian bureacracy being well Indian bureaucracy, rescue and rehabilitation efforts are going on VERY effectively. An enormous number of people in India, be it the government, armed forces, or even the common woman/man is pitching in. Most companies here have setup collection boxes and at the very least, we're donating medicines, soaps, toothbrushes, disinfectants, clothes, utensils, non-perishable food items etc. There's also an army of volunteers who's landed in the disaster struck areas with truckloads of donated stuff and are distributing it to the needy.

    Strangely enough, it seems that too many clothes are being donated! A friend of mine is physically helping out with the rescue efforts and he tells me that there's piles and piles of clothes lying around but of little use to anybody. Well, i guess too much help is always better than too little help.

    Another thing that amazes me is the resilience of the common man or woman. Here are people living on the edge of poverty, getting hammered everyday with issues like eking out an existence. Perhaps they've scrounged and saved enough to get their daughters married, hidden a few hundred rupees in a hole in the wall. Perhaps they've just bought a shiny new radio or a bicycle. What do they wake up to? A tsunami that takes away their children, their friends, and everything they own. What do they do? Shrug it off eventually and mark it off as karma, god's will, or god's punishment depending on their religion (no, most poor Indians cannot afford the luxuries of athesim or agnosticism). Then, they take it one day at a time and slowly start rebuilding their lives.

    You want to see miracles, mental strength, and the answer to life, the universe, and everything? You don't have to look far in times like these.

  15. This just in... by Hobadee · · Score: 3, Funny

    ...President Bush and his International coalition (of which the next largest nation is contributing half of what we are) has just added Mother Nature to his axis of evil, saying that she is helping terrorists, as well as committing terrorist acts herself. Bush has given Mother Nature an ultimatum, telling her to leave this planet within the next 24 hours or we will declare war on her. It is expected that Mother Nature will stay and fight, but looks as if this will be another victory by the Bush administration.

    --
    ...Had this been an actual emergency, we would have fled in terror, and you would not have been informed.
  16. Tsunami Warning System by xpeeblix · · Score: 3, Informative

    While there there has been an International Tsunami Warning system in place since 1965, the affected countries were not part of that system and had no mechanism in place to allow for early warning.

    NPR has a few good reports on the problem.

    Cringely has a rather interesting solution that does not rely on governmental action, though with a serious flaw. It only relies on earthquake data, which isn't necessarily conclusive, nor the only cause of Tsunami's.

    1. Re:Tsunami Warning System by EvilStein · · Score: 2, Insightful

      I was reading something earlier about this, and that such a warning system would not be wanted because it could potentially scare off tourists, thus causing financial losses for the areas tourism industry.

    2. Re:Tsunami Warning System by Neophytus · · Score: 2, Interesting

      It is misleading to describe it as an "international" tsunami warning system as that gives the perception it's reach is wider than the pacific basin.

  17. Re:Don't get me wrong, but.. by immerrath · · Score: 2, Insightful

    You sir, Mr.Grandparent poster, are a moron. Why are all the forums on the internet filled with fucking asshats like you? Why do you think it matters whether more people died now or in 2001? Can you not see that regardless of how many people died in which disaster, sympathy and help is required now, as it was required then? Will you fucking grow up and be human?
    There is no sense in comparing disasters.
    PS. I do not mean to insult you personally, just the idea you are putting forward.

  18. Over here in Finland (and Scandinavia I bet) by Aggrajag · · Score: 3, Insightful

    Most (all?) of the official New Year celebrations and fireworks have been cancelled. The money will be given to aid helping those who suffered from the tsunami.

    At the moment there are more than 200 Finns and over 2000 Swedes missing and most likely all of them are dead. To see things in perspective: Finland has a population of 5.2 million, Sweden around 9 million. Everyone with basic math skills can calculate what that would mean if it had happened for tourists from US.

    1. Re:Over here in Finland (and Scandinavia I bet) by Necroist · · Score: 2, Interesting

      In Singapore, fireworks have also been cancelled and countdown shows have been cancelled. I'm proud of my country, with so many people chipping in, from executives, to your low-middle class workers. Whether is it $1 pitched in, or $100,000, I think its really heart-warming to see people all over the world taking out their wallets (or other items) to help the victims of this terrible disaster.

    2. Re:Over here in Finland (and Scandinavia I bet) by XenonDif · · Score: 4, Informative

      Meanwhile, Bush is planning to spend $30-$40 million in lavish inaguration festivities.

    3. Re:Over here in Finland (and Scandinavia I bet) by tuxette · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Yeah, it pretty much the same deal in Norway. Various official fireworks have been cancelled, and officials are encouraging people to donate the money relief charities that they otherwise would have spent on expensive fireworks.

      --
      People say I'm crazy, I got diamonds on the soles of my shoes...
  19. You're missing the difference. by raehl · · Score: 3, Insightful

    40,000+ people die in car accidents every year. Thousands are killed in floods every few years. Millions die every year from famine.

    Death, and to a lesser extent, death from natural disasters, is pretty common. A lot of death from a natural disaster is less newsworthy than a little death from a terrorist attack.

    There's also an information problem - it was a lot easier to get information out of new york on 9/11 than it is to get information out of a devastated remote area in Thailand.

  20. I've said it before and I'll say it again by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Insightful

    WWI: 16-18 million.
    WWII: 40 million.

    On a single day in the American Civil War, approximately 30,000 men were killed.

    Feel free to dispute those figures, they vary from source to source. You'll not escape the orders of magnitude.

    That's what war is like in the age of modern machinery. 9/11 was murder, not war.

    1. Re:I've said it before and I'll say it again by MightyMartian · · Score: 5, Insightful

      Well, the fact remains, that under international law, the attack on the Pentagon was not a legal act of war. It was not preceded by a declaration of war, it was not done by soldiers fighting under a flag, and it involved the intentional killing of civilians.

      I don't have any problem with the US battling terrorism. Battling terrorism is a good thing, even if it isn't a winnable thing. Overthrowing the Taliban was a good thing. They were nothing more than an arm of a much larger international terrorism ring and were only recognized by three countries as the lawful government of Afghanistan anyways.

      Attacking Iraq was a) stupid, b) illegal and c) has mired the US in a mess that no one else wants and it will be pumping money and manpower into for years to come.

      --
      The world's burning. Moped Jesus spotted on I50. Details at 11.
    2. Re:I've said it before and I'll say it again by Chrax · · Score: 2, Insightful

      But my point is that international law means dick. The USA continuously flouts it. The only use it has is justifying the West's desires to go to war with smaller countries.

      For example, when the Japanese destroyed most of the Russian Navy in a surprise Sunday Morning attack, the British praised it as a brilliant tactical move. When they did the *exact* same thing to the US, the British called it cowardly, and nowadays would call it illegal. But that doesn't mean a thing to anybody but the citizenry that is supposed to be mobilized one way or another.

      Summary: International Law is made to be enforced and broken at the convenience of those powerful enough to do so. It does not actually apply to war.

    3. Re:I've said it before and I'll say it again by MightyMartian · · Score: 2, Insightful

      > But my point is that international law means dick. The USA continuously flouts it. The only use it has
      > is justifying the West's desires to go to war with smaller countries.

      I agree that the US has flouted international law, but I think the answer is to strengthen international law, and not to promote a gang of international criminals into some sort of pseudo-state by claiming that the attack on a military target like the Pentagon was legitimate.

      > For example, when the Japanese destroyed most of the Russian Navy in a surprise Sunday Morning
      > attack, the British praised it as a brilliant tactical move. When they did the *exact* same
      > thing to the US, the British called it cowardly, and nowadays would call it illegal. But that
      > doesn't mean a thing to anybody but the citizenry that is supposed to be mobilized one
      > way or another.

      A quaint little war you might have heard about happened in between Port Arthur and Pearl Harbor. This quaint little war wiped out the old gentlemanly game of aristocratic diplomacy, and along with it many older notions.

      > Summary: International Law is made to be enforced and broken at the convenience of those
      > powerful enough to do so. It does not actually apply to war.

      Nonsense. Because lesser men cannot comprehend the high ideals of greater men doesn't make those high ideals less worthy or any less necessary to enforce. The US is being taught a very big lesson in Iraq about the dangers of running your own show without international support. We already see subtle changes in the second term of this administration, suddenly talk of an invasion of Iran seems to have disappeared.

      There will always be violations of international law, just as there are violations of domestic law. I don't see anybody saying that murder should be demoted as a crime because people still kill each other.

      --
      The world's burning. Moped Jesus spotted on I50. Details at 11.
  21. It was so much easier to be blase about it by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Insightful

    ...or make poor tsunami jokes when there were no pictures that showed the magnitude of the tragedy.

    Seeing the BBC report that showed the young coupld silently carrying their two dead children and seeing the picture of the beach covered with debris -- and then realizing the "debris" consisted of human bodies -- brings the point home that real humans suffered a real tragedy halfway across the world.

    Damn, I'm getting tears in my eyes just remembering those pictures.

  22. Re:Philosophy 101 by Kiryat+Malachi · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Because if God overrules free will, even once, he's made the entire thing meaningless. If he, even once, says "Hey, humans, I'll save you from the consequences of your collective choices", he's just made free will meaningless, because its no longer free - its free 'to a point'. By giving us free will, God inherently relinquishes both his right and his duty to overrule our actions.

    Trying to make a valid philosophical argument by comparing police to God is bunk, man. The police aren't omnipotent, omniscient, and they aren't the ones who have the ability to decide whether or not we get free will. Of course, anyone who stands by is partly culpable. However, if God intervenes, he destroys the idea of free will. The only way to maintain free will is to stay out of it; as such, by rigorously asserting free will, God becomes non-culpable - he has, in essence, said "I will not interfere, because the consequence of interfering once is to mean that I must take responsibility for all of your actions that I allow to occur." It is, in an odd sort of way, similar to the search engine DMCA exemption - software that indexes material is legal and non-culpable, even if it indexes illegal material, except if it ever filters out some undesirable material on basis of copyright or legality, at which point it immediately becomes culpable for all such infringing material found on the service.

    This is just one more reason why God is a bunch of crap. Study the origin of ethics and look into hard vs. soft command, and you'll begin to come towards my point of view, which is that ethics in and of themselves point to the non-existence of God via contradiction.

    --

    ---
    Mod me down, you fucking twits. Go ahead. I dare you.
    (I read with sigs off.)
  23. Perspective, yes, but not as personal as this: by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Informative

    The sattelite images show the extent of damage, but remains impersonal. This picture graphically shows the actual devastation and number of deaths..

    http://img145.exs.cx/my.php?loc=img145&image=ruumi ita4ft.jpg

    1. Re:Perspective, yes, but not as personal as this: by madprof · · Score: 5, Insightful

      After seeing this I feel physically revolted.
      Every one of those people could well be someone's brother or sister, or parent....or child....

    2. Re:Perspective, yes, but not as personal as this: by abelsson · · Score: 4, Informative

      Horrific. I just donated $150 to the red cross. I had been thinking about it, but it was that image that pushed me over the edge.

    3. Re:Perspective, yes, but not as personal as this: by jnguy · · Score: 2

      God. That image is quite disturbing, but necessary. You make a very good point, that image just made it very personal. Thanks for sharing...

    4. Re:Perspective, yes, but not as personal as this: by operagost · · Score: 2, Informative

      Here's hoping the Red Cross actually uses it to help the victims instead of putting it "towards preventing future tsunamis."

      --

      Gamingmuseum.com: Give your 3D accelerator a rest.
  24. per capita counts are unusable by klang · · Score: 5, Informative

    Denmark: 300M DKR (USD$55M) at a population of 5.4M .. that's $10,14 per capita ..
    USA: USD$45M at a population of 293M .. that's $0,15 per capita

    both theese sets of numbers are what the Government provides, not what is collected privately. (no taxreductions are given for donations in Denmark)

    I guess that every country will give what it can.

    1. Re:per capita counts are unusable by klang · · Score: 2, Informative

      As of writing, the numbers were correct.

      Now the "per capita" number for US has gone up by a factor of 10.

      I don't have the latest numbers from Denmark.

      Private contributions are still not counted.

  25. Yes very graphic. by Martin+Spamer · · Score: 2, Informative

    As the image formed on the top of my screen, you first notice the smashed buildings. As as I scrolled down I though 'are those bodies ?' and I scrolled further I realised yes there are bodies in there. Eventually you reach the bottom of the screen and the true horror of the situation is shown.

  26. images and video links by spoonyfork · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Lots of images and video of the tsunami and aftermath at http://www.waveofdestruction.org/.

    --
    Speak truth to power.
  27. Donate by XenonDif · · Score: 3, Informative
  28. Re:Ill conceived humour by CheeseTroll · · Score: 2, Informative
    Did you RTFA, or just make assumptions based on the headline?

    "Economic losses will be in the tens of billions of dollars, if not more, and the scale of human suffering is enormous," the Insurance Information Institute said in a report.
    "However ... relatively little insurance is sold in the affected countries, meaning that insured losses are likely to be modest relative to the scale of the disaster."

    "Acts of God" are generally what insurance is FOR. The term covers most weather-related incidents (as opposed to acts of war, or other human-caused events), so their label is quite correct, and not an effort to evade paying claims.

    --
    A post a day keeps productivity at bay.
  29. Media role by wannabgeek · · Score: 2

    mod me down as flamebait/troll if you want, but I would like to compare the media's attitude now and during 9/11. When 9/11 happened, western media refrained from showing gory scenes out of respect for the dead. But when it came to this disaster, they had no-holds-barred coverage - showing people's arms and legs and devastation. Is it not double standards? According to an article in Indian Express, a CNN executive Chris Cramer justified by saying that they showed no images of 9/11 because there were no images to show. The bodies had been incinerated. Lame excuse, if there ever was one, don't you think? PS: I have submitted an article to slashdot on the same, but it was rejected.

    --
    I'm much more funny, interesting and insightful than the moderators think
  30. Why not warn people ourselves? by Futurepower(R) · · Score: 3, Informative


    Date: Tue, 28 Dec 2004 22:04:31 -0200
    From: Futurepower [futurepower_usa (-AT-) yahoo.com.br]
    To: "U.S. Geological Survey National Earthquake Information Center" [sedas (-AT-) neis.cr.usgs.gov]
    Subject: NEIC: Why didn't you warn about the Tsunamis?

    Question:

    I haven't seen this discussed anywhere.

    Why didn't the NEIC call the U.S. State Department, so that they could warn people about the Tsunamis?

    The earthquake position and magnitude was known 6 hours before the waves arrived in Thailand, I understand. Wouldn't almost every person's life have been saved if Thailand, for example, had had warning?

    Michael

    _____________


    Reply:

    Michael,

    Phone calls were placed to the State Department operations center, the White House situation room, the U.N. Department of Humanitarian Affairs, the Pacific Tsunami Warning Center, as well as several other organizations within 90 minutes of the occurrance of this earthquake.

    The problem is the absence of local warning systems in the countries surrounding the Indian Ocean. There were no systems or response plans in place to warn the local populace.

    Stuart Sipkin
    USGS/NEIC

    _____________


    Stuart,

    I have a suggestion for a local tsunami warning system. There continues to be an enormous amount of earthquake activity in the area around Indonesia. It seems likely that there will be another big earthquake. Next time there is an earthquake that is likely to cause a tsunami, call me, any time of night or day. I will promise to call at least 30 hotels within 2 hours. I will promise to get 10 friends involved. They will promise to call 30 hotels each, also. We would each take a different country.

    My suggestion is that we would use Google to find hotels, for example in Sri Lanka. This is one of the hotels I found there, a 5-star hotel with more than 400 rooms:

    Galadari Hotel
    The Businessman's Home in Sri Lanka
    64, Lotus Road,
    Colombo 1.
    Sri Lanka.
    Tel: 94-1-544544
    Fax: 94-1-449875
    E-Mail: galadari (-AT-) sri.lanka.net

    "The Galadari Hotel is in the heart of the city in Colombo, over looking the beautiful Indian ocean."

    Big hotels answer their phones 24 hours a day. Presumably there is a staff of at least 200 at that hotel, for three shifts. I think if one person were told, everyone else would know soon. They don't want their family and friends and neighbors near the water to die, and they know how to reach them, even if they have to ride a motorbike to those who don't have phones.

    There are two easy ways to prove that a call about an earthquake is not a hoax. I would tell the person who answered the phone that it is an emergency and I need to talk to a manager. I would tell the manager to check the USGS web site at http://earthquake.usgs.gov/. Any 5-Star hotel, and most others of any size, have internet access. I would also tell the manager that, if the water at the beach receded, people had only a few minutes to get to safety. I would ask the manager to get staff members to call radio and TV stations in their area.

    You said in your message, "The problem is the absence of local warning systems in the countries surrounding the Indian Ocean. There were no systems or response plans in place to warn the local populace."

    It seems to me that this is a workable plan for a local tsunami warning system. It wouldn't cost much. Using Skype, a two minute call to any land line phone in Sri Lanka is about 40 U.S. cents, for example. Using iConnectHere's most expensive service, a two minute call is 80 cents.

    1. Re:Why not warn people ourselves? by gatkinso · · Score: 2, Insightful

      1) USGS knew there was an earthquake, but not a tsunami. Plus they *did* make the calls to the appropriate people specified in their operations plan.

      2) Had you called a hotel with such a warning they would have called you a kook (or whatever the word for kook is in the various languages) and hung up.

      3) Even had it worked, way to go you just saved all the tourists lives but the natives would have still suffered horribly as most of the areas hit were not tourist attractions. I life saced is a life saved and is a noble achievement - but we still would have seen 100K+ dead.

      The problem pertaining to the populace not being warned was that the countries hit decieded it was not cost effective to put a warning system in place. Strangely, I have read that such a system can make things worse as people rush to the shore when a warning is sounded to watch the incoming wave.

      --
      I am very small, utmostly microscopic.
  31. Worldwide Earthquake Activity by sunsrin · · Score: 3, Informative

    in the last seven days here. The Andaman and Nicobar islands has experienced more than 60 aftershocks !
    In related news, the tsunami split one of the islands in Andaman & Nicobar into two. Here is what one of the officials say ..

    Another island, Trinkat, appears to have been split in two, said S.B. Deol, inspector-general of Andaman and Nicobar. "Part of the island has been submerged, while one half is visible," he said.

  32. Re:Over 120 000 people lost their lives by Harlequeen · · Score: 2, Informative

    By your own statistics,

    Foreign aid

    The USA comes bottom of the graph in terms of giving as a percentage of GNI/GDP. (page 25)

    And considering the percentage of this aid going to Israel, let alone Iraq. Your generosity does not seem so shiny.

  33. Deaths could be in the millions by Spy+Handler · · Score: 2, Insightful
    Yesterday I saw the Brit tourist videos posted on Slashdot and thought it didn't look that bad.... they looked similar to footage from the big Mississipi flood of '95 (or was that 94)

    But apparently that video was shot in a place where the tsunami wave wasn't that severe. According to this MSNBC article, entire towns were completely wiped out in some parts of Indonesia. An Indonesian ambassador says that the death toll in just one Indonesian province could exceed 400,000.

    That's just.... unbelievable. This is probably going to be the biggest natural disaster in human history.

    1. Re:Deaths could be in the millions by Maxite · · Score: 2, Informative

      ".... they looked similar to footage from the big Mississipi flood of '95 (or what that 94).

      Try the Great Flood of '93, which created what appeared to be a sixth great lake. Of course, the damage caused by this tsunami will most definately exceed the damage caused by the Great Flood.

      "This is probably going to be the biggest natural disaster in human history."
      Unlikely, as I am willing to bet that there have been incidents where more humans were killed than this one. This is going to rank up amongst the top though, and is certainly going to be memorable for the reason that it is recent.

      --
      Ah, you found me!
    2. Re:Deaths could be in the millions by pclminion · · Score: 2, Informative
      This is probably going to be the biggest natural disaster in human history.

      Not likely.

      On November 12, 1970, a cyclone struck Bangladesh and killed 300,000 people. In the year 1991, 139,000 died on April 30 (another cyclone). And just over a month later another cyclone struck killing another 126,000. See here

      There are mostly unverifiable records that 830,000 people died in the earthquake which struck Shaanzi (in China) in 1556. And again in China, the Tangshan earthquake of 1976 killed (officially) 255,000 but some estimates placed the toll closer to 655,000.

      This planet is dangerous, and huge numbers of people die en mass on a regular basis. We need to express sympathy and provide help, but being horrified isn't necessary. This is the normal way of things.

  34. Re:A thing I don't understand by spikexyz · · Score: 2, Insightful

    An American life is worth more that Sri Lankian life or any other life in the eyes of the US Government and Media.

  35. A photo of dead bodies scattered all over... by antdude · · Score: 3, Interesting

    Not an aerial map, but still related to tsunami event. link.

    Warning: Very gross and disturbing!

    --
    Ant(Dude) @ Quality Foraged Links (AQFL.net) & The Ant Farm (antfarm.ma.cx / antfarm.home.dhs.org).
  36. Re:do we know what actually caused this? by THEbwana · · Score: 3, Funny

    Well - I live in Europe and my guess is that the media will soon find a way to blame:
    0. Bush (he's gotta have something to do with this, right?)
    1. Global warming (since its clearly happening much more often now compared to last year; 1 tsunami compared to 0 during last year).

  37. Composite images by AstroDrabb · · Score: 4, Interesting

    The images look a lot more powerful when you stack two in layers and set the top layer transparency to around 80%. You can really see all the homes under water. I put some together here

    --
    If Tyranny and Oppression come to this land,
    it will be in the guise of fighting a foreign enemy. -James Madison
  38. Reality Check by SoupaFly · · Score: 3, Informative
    Get your facts straight next time. All money donated specifically for 9/11 was allocated for exactly that. Here is a follow-up on the long-term use of remaining funds.

    The amount of money donanted after 9/11 was large in relation to the need. That seems to be less likely with this disaster.

  39. Re:Ill conceived humour by budgenator · · Score: 3, Insightful

    Hard to imagine that too many people living in tin-roofed cardboard shacks, and worrying about where their next meals is going to come from, are going to have property insurance. Now I understand why they are teaching critical thinking in public schools.

    --
    Apocalypse Cancelled, Sorry, No Ticket Refunds
  40. Re:Ill conceived humour by Reality+Master+101 · · Score: 2, Interesting
    Have you ever actually filed a home insurance claim? Thought not.

    You're probably used to car insurance, which indeed are run by going-to-hell jerks. That's mainly because there's so much fraud in car insurance.

    Home insurance is a whole different animal. When I had to file a home insurance claim, dude was offering to give me more money than I actually wanted. I actually turned down a full replacement of wallpaper in our kitchen -- he offered to replace it because one little corner had been damaged.

    It might just be my insurance company, but I doubt it. It's just a different deal.

    --
    Sometimes it's best to just let stupid people be stupid.
  41. Dignity in Death. by The+Cydonian · · Score: 2, Informative
    There's a view fast becoming popular back in India that the international media is using double standards when it comes to showing dead bodies; in 2001, CBS, CNN etc refused to show charred corpses at Ground Zero for privacy and sensitivity reasons, but in 2004, any corpse anywhere is fair game.

    Then, of course, there are those who vehemently believe you need shock and gore to get aid pouring in.

    1. Re:Dignity in Death. by Headw1nd · · Score: 2, Insightful
      The situation is different when it comes to trying to convey the scale of tragedy. One of the most humanizing aspects of the 9/11 atttacks were the listings of victims' photos, names, and biographies, as in the NYT's "Portraits of Grief." These efforts tried to attach humanity to the numbers.

      Here, there can be no such reckoning- the size of a listing of the names alone would be staggering. The true character of this disaster lies in the anonymous dead- the people who have not been identified, who will never be identified because everyone they knew and love were killed alongside them. There is no way to convey the true nature of this horror other than to show it, especially to people who have never seen death so shockingly stark. Anything less is abiguity. A mass grave covered over is nothing but a field of turned earth, spilled blood no more than a dark stain.

      The pictures I have seen in the papers have been of debris, no more compelling than the debris left by an atlantic hurricane. Only images like this can show the true loss.

      Does this mean they should be broadcast carelessly? Emphatically no. Some people, such as children, should be sheltered from things like this, lacking the abiliity to understand anything like this with the experience they have gained thus far. The pictures, however, need to be taken. Records must be made. People need to be given the oppourtunity to see for themselves, otherwise we run the risk of recording tragedy in souless numbers, and remembering nothing.

    2. Re:Dignity in Death. by Ubergrendle · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Privacy has nothing to do with it. CNN, CBS, FoxNews would film their own mothers being raped if it meant better ratings.

      They're afraid of press-corps blacklisting by the Whitehouse, for circumventing 'unofficial' policy.

      I am of the believe that the truth can only make you stronger. As horrific as it is for me to sit looking at this picture, I still cannot imagine how painful and terrible it would be to experience this in person.

      --
      John Maynard Keynes: "When the facts change, I change my mind. What do you do?"
  42. Moving at the speed of government by Galvatron · · Score: 3, Insightful
    Colin Powell stated that he fully expects the eventual US aid to the region to top $1 billion. Over the past few days, aid has been raised from $15 million to $35 million, and now to $350 million. Plus, the military which you are so down on has dispatched a aircraft carrier group to help with physical manpower. Finally, a task force is being dispatched to determine where future funds should be allocated to do the most good.

    I'm not a huge fan of Bush by any stretch of the imagination (I voted against him in November), but I can't fault the US government's behavior so far. They authorized a small amount of money to begin with, to help with the most urgent needs (sending food, clearing bodies, and so forth), and over the next few weeks and months will continue to increase the commitment as the specific needs of the countries who have been hurt are ascertained.

    The world rallied around the US after 9/11, irrespective of past tensions and difficulties, and I don't think anyone here has forgotten that. We'll do everything within our power to help rebuild those countries devastated by the tsunami, just give us time to get through the bureaucracy, and to make sure our money is going to the right place (someone earlier posted about how in India, so many donations of clothing have been recieved that there are piles of stuff no one wants to wear just lying around. Imagine if the US sent over $100 MILLION of unnecessary clothing).

    --
    "The question of whether a computer can think is no more interesting than that of whether a submarine can swim" -EWD
  43. Re:Over 120 000 people lost their lives by jericho4.0 · · Score: 2, Informative
    I'm continually dismayed by efforts to spin critisism of Israels forign policy into anti-Semitism, blatent at that.

    This report, backs up the factual statement that Israel has been the biggest recipiant of US $ than any nation since 1976, and has recived, by far, the largest total amount of any nation.

    Oh, and also that Jews are planning to take over the world via Hollywood.

    --
    "A language that doesn't affect the way you think about programming, is not worth knowing" - Alan Perlis
  44. Rhetorical by Jeremiah+Cornelius · · Score: 4, Interesting
    Question.

    Why can't we get these images from Fallujah?

    --
    "Flyin' in just a sweet place,
    Never been known to fail..."
  45. As a Christian Libertarian... by SonicSpike · · Score: 5, Insightful

    As a Christian Libertarian... I half agree with you and halfway don't.

    My faith says that yes, we should help our brother in time of need, however my political philosophy says the government shouldn't be the ones to do it.

    Legally, internationally, politically we are under NO obligation or responsibility to do such - nor should we be. However since we do have an abundence of wealth, I don't see a problem with the government having am emergency aid fund, or even low interest loans for foreign countries in times of crisis. But this should be used rarely and saved for large scale disasters such as this.

    I don't think that the US Gov should dispense money to anyone out there who has a papercut however. The country shouldn't be overly philantropic.

    As a Christian, yes I feel obligated to help anyone who needs help when they do - it is just the right thing to do. I would rather give my money to a private fund that I know, respect, and trust to properly distribute my donations. The government is usually the LAST place to trust in terms of spreading goodwill.

    --
    Libertas in infinitum
  46. Re:Make that *$350M*, fuckwad. by gothzilla · · Score: 2, Insightful

    AFTER being chastized by the world, AFTER it became known that Bush's 2nd inaugural party was going to cost $40 million (yes, 2nd party). Raising the amount isn't being done out of true charity for the hundreds of thousands of people who died or for the millions who lost everything, it's being done as damage control. That's whats so sad about it.

  47. Slamming the Red Cross? by valkraider · · Score: 2, Informative

    Not exactly. The RedCross responds to ALL disasters and many more places where relief is needed. The only error was that many people expected their donations to go directly to 9/11 only.

    In response the Red Cross changed their donation policies and guidelines to better reflect what actually happens with the money.

    http://www.pbs.org/newshour/updates/redcross_06-05 -02.html
    http://www.redcross.org/press/disaster/ds_pr/02060 5dsfunds.html

    Basically now, if you give to the "Disaster Relief Fund" they use it wherever they see fit, and if you give to the "International Response Fund" if you want the funds to go exclusively to the tsunami relief efforts.

    In addition they have all sorts of other areas you can "designate" such as Military efforts, Local chapters, Vaccination efforts, etc etc.

    When it comes to charities - the Red Cross and Red Crescent(American and International) are about as real and helpful as you get. They help everyone everywhere.

  48. Please donate by rsax · · Score: 3, Informative

    If you are worried that your donations won't reach the right people then consider donating to CARE. They seem to have some of the lowest administration costs among relief agencies. Over 90% goes to affected victims.

  49. Satellite Imagery 101 by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Once again, the rush to post by the Slashdot community has revealed that geeks can be just as irrational as others.

    The images presented here are nearly useless for before/after analysis. Here are some of the things that are necessary for proper analysis:

    (1) Images for comparison should be taken with the sun in approximately the same position. Changes in shadow and illumination can exaggerate or obscure local effects. A brightly reflecting roof in the before image can appear so dark in the after image that is looks like the building has been destroyed. This is the case in many of these image sets, since they have been obtained up to twelve hours apart. Compare the shadows to see this effect.

    (2) Ideally, satellite images for comparison shall be obtained from approximately the same angle. Many of these are not, with the result that walls exposed by the lower angle of the before image and shining brightly in the sun appear to be missing entirely in the after image. In fact, they are missing, but not because of destruction; these walls are simply covered by roof overhangs. Their absence does make the difference between before and after seem more extreme, however.

    (3) Satellite images for comparison should ideally be cropped identically. These images are cropped in such a way that a casual comparison between them would suggest that entire coastal areas have been inundated when, in fact, they are not. In most cases, the coastlines remain, but because of the cropping it looks like they are under water.

    (4) Georeferencing is not essential, but it is highly desireable. The absence of latitute, longitude or scale markers on these images makes them unfit for serious analysis. At the very least, Slashdotters should perform their own georeferencing with a GIS program before commenting, lest they be mislead.

    Naturally, no one will read this post since it was the result of sober reflection rather than a foaming, irrational outburst written within minutes of the appearance of the article.

  50. Corrected allignment by KMSelf · · Score: 3, Interesting

    AstroDab, nice concept. I've corrected the allignment and posted results here.

    You're welcome to post these to your own site, crediting DigitalGlobe (as you should your own work) and myself.

    --

    What part of "gestalt" don't you understand?

    1. Re:Corrected allignment by AstroDrabb · · Score: 2, Insightful

      They look nice. I didn't credit "my work" because I did it in two minutes, hence the mis-alignment. Also, would I be allowed to credit modified versions of these images without permission from the copyright holder? Or are the original images public domain?

      --
      If Tyranny and Oppression come to this land,
      it will be in the guise of fighting a foreign enemy. -James Madison
  51. FLV format by hackrobat · · Score: 2

    I've converted the videos to Flash Video (FLV) (my blog).