Slashdot Mirror


Start Your Own Open Source-Based Telecom

prostoalex writes "George Ou shows how with the help of open-source VOIP server Asterisk you can start your own telecommunications company for under $6000 '...you can build a phone system that can support 72 analog telephones or fax machines, 100 IP hard or soft phones on site or remote, a T1 line to the public telco for 23 simultaneous external PSTN connections, multiple IP-based IAX trunks to multiple remote offices for seamless toll-bypass 4-digit dialing, IVR, and almost unlimited voice mail for everyone - for under $6,000 in a 1U chassis. Such a price point is easily 10 or more times cheaper than a commercial alternative,' writes George."

207 comments

  1. Speed reading... by mikael · · Score: 3, Funny

    100 IP hard or soft phones on site or remote

    For a moment I thought that read

    ... 100 IP hard or soft porn sites ...

    --
    Vintage computer adverts: http://www.vintageadbrowser.com/computers-and-software-ads
    1. Re:Speed reading... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      100 IP hard or soft porn sites

      Hell, I've got at least twice that number saved in my home directory alone...

  2. Re:i think it's easier.... by Skye16 · · Score: 1

    They dropped their prices a few months ago; it shouldn't be 30$ a month now!

    What I want is to be able to setup my own cell phone tower* that funnels my "cell phone" calls over voip.

  3. And I shall call mine... by GillBates0 · · Score: 4, Funny

    mah-Bell

    --
    An Indian-American Hindu committed to non-violent thought/speech/action alarmed by the global explosion of radical Islam
    1. Re:And I shall call mine... by soxos · · Score: 0

      my local voip business got the ill communication

      Ok, one more
      In America
      first you get the local voip market share
      then you get the power
      then you get the women

      apologies and carry on

    2. Re:And I shall call mine... by dfj225 · · Score: 1

      I think mine shall be Cow Bell.

      --
      SIGFAULT
    3. Re:And I shall call mine... by ZX81 · · Score: 1

      Asterisk history was made today:

      The first CVS commit from a plane at 23,000 feet!

      http://www.sineapps.com/news.php?rssid=456 :-)

      Go Kram you sup3rl337 dude!!!!!!

      --
      -={ Security does not exist - give up }=-
  4. we use it for order status menu system by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0, Flamebait

    We programmed up some oracle queries called by python to do a order status menu system. It has been running great for a year now. The problem is your average joe or even run of the mill programmer ain't gonna be able to do it. Then again I am not a run of the mill programmer and have enough smarts to pull it off.

    1. Re:we use it for order status menu system by OgreChow · · Score: 4, Funny

      Mod -1, Arrogant

    2. Re:we use it for order status menu system by lucabrasi999 · · Score: 2, Funny
      Then again I am not a run of the mill programmer and have enough smarts to pull it off.

      Too bad you don't have the Testicular Fortitude to post as a logged in user.

    3. Re:we use it for order status menu system by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      give the guy a break. it's obvious his boss put him in a do or die situation. he probably gets zero recognition for his tremendous contribution to the office. no pats on the back, no power, no real money....just a very bright programmer with very little personality or people skills. posting AC is pretty much par for the course for ppl like that...

    4. Re:we use it for order status menu system by atheos · · Score: 3, Interesting

      We have done a similar thing with our Asterisk phone server, in that we allow our customers to check the status of their order through our phone system.
      It turned out to be incredibly easy, using a php console script through asterisk AGI and festival to read back the customers tracking number.
      We also have our fax machine configured to fax a document to an e-mail address, if it's sent to that persons extension number. We have all incoming external fax's now going directly to e-mail to save on paper, which makes junk fax far less offensive and costly.
      It really blew my bosses mind when I added an extention via an IAXy device going to my own home. It will now be used when the boss is on business trips, so that he has access to his phone extension in almost any hotel room. (all it needs in a dhcp enabled network)
      I can't think of a better phone system for an office environment than Asterisk.

    5. Re:we use it for order status menu system by Vancorps · · Score: 1
      Televantage by Artisoft also sports those features, we are in the process of migrating to it from our current Cisco VOIP service. So much better, we also got an API so we can tie in phone numbers with our database so when a customer calls their info automatically pops up on the screen of the person taking their call. If we don't have any info for them then we pop up a form to add them.

      Good little system, I wonder how pricing compares to Asterisk?

    6. Re:we use it for order status menu system by atheos · · Score: 1

      Good little system, I wonder how pricing compares to Asterisk?


      We have 5 Cisco 7940's, 2 Cisco 7960's,
      a TMD400 with 4 fxo cards, a T100P (t1 card)
      running on a compaq proliant 3000.
      Our total cost was less than $3000 including the phones.
    7. Re:we use it for order status menu system by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You're confusing courage with stupidity.

    8. Re:we use it for order status menu system by magnanimous+cowherd · · Score: 1

      Ah ah ahchoo,

      sorry, I'm alergic to bullsht.

      We've got our asterisk pxb connecting to various databases from various major vendors. It's not that hard, and the parent poster is overrating him/her self.

    9. Re:we use it for order status menu system by Vancorps · · Score: 1
      Sounds like pricing is fairly comparable. We currently have about 60 Cisco 7940 phones all attached to Cisco powered switches, naturally that solutions costs a bit more.

      The televantage system will run fine on a P3 650 box so hardwdare wise its not too bad. Software is where the price becomes comparable. The new system we are implementing allows us to use regular analog phones or realistically anything that can in any wawy connect to the server. Gives us a lot of options. I can operate with all the same functions from my cell phone in an airport, I like that.

  5. Re:Obligatory Steps to Profit by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    ...
    4. Buy aeron chairs
    5. MEGA-profit!!!

  6. Re:i think it's easier.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Sometimes I wonder if they will come out with a WiFi version for cell phones. In some cities, you could literally walk around and use the WiFi system of Starbucks or other open system and use that as a VoIP solution. Then the towers would be used to pick up the signal where the WiFi starts to drop off.

  7. it's nice until by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Interesting

    you discover that office class IP telephones are expensive as all hell.

    we went with a NEC digital phone system with 2 wic cards for T1's incoming. the CSU cost us $12,000.00 but the Phones are only $185.00 each.

    phones of the same quality in IP phones are neat $350.00 each, and that adds up fast when you look at around 100 phones plus 2 smaller CSU's that are set up as virtual offices at the ends of other T-1' for the sattelite offices with analog fallback if the connected T-1's fail plus allow us to bypass long distance charges by using least cost routing.

    dont get me wrong, but an asterisk solution to replace what i just bought would be close in price and require a few weeks to get it working. I simply pay the local company to install it and maintain it.

    1. Re:it's nice until by MichaelKaiserProScri · · Score: 3, Informative

      Use Cisco ATA-186's with a nice analog 2-line callerid phone. Total cost about $180 per station.

    2. Re:it's nice until by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Polycom IP500 @ $183
      http://www.c-source.com/ttechnote.asp?part_n o=2200 11530001

      If your network ain't up to scratch use cheap 3com dual speed switches at the endpoints which will do a reasonable Qos job.

      Use an IAX or SIP termination provider (or 2) and setup a secure connection to them you don't need the T1 lines or the hardware interfaces for them.

      use a similar setup at the sattelite offices.

      I reckon it is alot cheaper to run but the real killer is when you want to make changes and don't need to pay extra for an engineer.

    3. Re:it's nice until by Vancorps · · Score: 1

      Better solution, televantage, use regular analog phones, total cost per phone, bout $10. No idea why your WICs are so expensive, perhaps you got hosed.

    4. Re:it's nice until by clawDATA · · Score: 0

      You don't need IP phones for every line. Any POTS phone will work. How much is a plain POTS "business" phone? $30 in bulk? Less? In his diagram there are three channel-banks, giving 72 POTS lines.

      Asterisk ties the branches together using VOIP or whatever's available, but each phone doesn't need to be capable of VOIP.

      Asterisk "simply" (ha!) replaces the PBX.

      --
      "This is totally insecure, but very convenient."
    5. Re:it's nice until by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I am running Polycom IP500's and they are less that $200 brand new. They support multiple lines and everything you could want in a business class phone. The sound is amazing and it supports most codecs out of the box.

    6. Re:it's nice until by christooley · · Score: 1

      Polycom SoundPoint IP 500's retail for $279 and the going rate for them is $180-$190. They are at least as nice (usually nicer) than any NEC phones I've seen. They're multi-protocol and have all the same features as the Cisco 7940's.

  8. welp... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    i for one ... welcome our new Telecomunication overlords...

  9. VoIP is coming along by jbich · · Score: 0

    I work for a company setting up a large voip network, and I must say the technology/software is really coming along.

    Some of the features that asterisk can do is amazing.

    And it's all open source to boot! All you need to do is pay for hardware (servers, and voip cards) and a good coffee machine to keep you awake during all the phone calls you eves drop on using ZapBarge ;)

    --
    ---- How absolute the knave is! We must speak by the card, or equivocation will undo us. -Shakespeare
    1. Re:VoIP is coming along by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      I like my coffee Hot and Strong.

      I like my coffee the way I like my men: Tall, Black and Strong...

  10. I am currently running Asterisk by x.Draino.x · · Score: 5, Interesting

    here at work on a test machine, and at home on my XBOX! It's really incredible all the features that are available in Asterisk. Once you get the hang of the configs.. and there's probably only 3-4 configs you will mess with, it's a breeze. I have call routing rules setup to call my house phone, if I don't answer in so many seconds, it will dial out to my cell phone. Someone has also written a bluetooth presence script so it knows when your at your desk ( as long as the server is near your desk ) and when your gone so it knows which phone to call. Pretty slick. Not only is Asterisk been fun to play with, I've learned tons about telecom that I didn't know before.

    1. Re:I am currently running Asterisk by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Asterisk on an XBox? You're an idiot.

    2. Re:I am currently running Asterisk by x.Draino.x · · Score: 1

      Mark Spencer, the original creator of Asterisk and owner of Digium put Asterisk on an XBOX. Is he an idiot too?

    3. Re:I am currently running Asterisk by m3talsling3r · · Score: 1

      This just fixed a problem I have. Thanks for this post. Very useful.

      --
      My sig is as boring as you...
  11. How many ISPs by doombob · · Score: 1

    There are so many ISPs right now that are just a step or two away from doing this. The company I work for has been promoting the use of Vonage with our high speed wireless to get away from using a land land with the phone company. And since Vonage came up with a WiFi phone our customers would be able to use it anywhere there is one of our hotspots.

    Most of the information that I have seen on VoIP has pointed to the fact that this could happen soon. Our customers have been yelling about this for months now.

  12. McTelco by ackthpt · · Score: 1
    you can start your own telecommunications company for under $6000 '.

    They dropped their prices a few months ago; it shouldn't be 30$ a month now!

    must resist urge to rule world with iron fist ...

    What I want is to be able to setup my own cell phone tower* that funnels my "cell phone" calls over voip.

    Check your local zoning rules. You may find the following:

    NIMBY -- Your neighbors don't want that sh!t in their own back yard

    Your same neighbors would be only too happy to buy in if you undercut the prices of the telcos (but they'll still be NIMBY)

    --

    A feeling of having made the same mistake before: Deja Foobar
    1. Re:McTelco by peawee03 · · Score: 1

      Hell, *I* wouldn't mind a wifi phone tower in my back yard, as long as I can use it as free broadband as well :)

      --
      I wish I could write clever and witty sigs.
    2. Re:McTelco by Skye16 · · Score: 1

      I live in the middle of BFE - my nearest neighbor is half a mile away. I'm more worried about the FCC or whoever it is that governs who gets to touch what part of the whatever spectrum. :(

    3. Re:McTelco by Greyfox · · Score: 1

      I'm pretty sure you can build an amateur tower in your back yard and your neighbors can't say shit about it. I seem to recall that some neighborhood associations tried to sue owners of those old 8 meter dishes and got their asses handed to them. Something about not being able to restrict non-commercial communications or something like that...

      --

      I'm trying to teach myself to set people on fire with my mind... Is it hot in here?

  13. Just the basic hardware... by JaredOfEuropa · · Score: 4, Insightful

    It's nice to see such an impressive setup for such a low price, but to "start your own telco" for real, you'd need a bit more I think:
    - Billing and invoicing software
    - Provisions for wiretaps (if mandated by your local gov't)
    - Customer service (unless you're not going to provide any)
    etc.

    --
    If construction was anything like programming, an incorrectly fitted lock would bring down the entire building...
    1. Re:Just the basic hardware... by w1r3sp33d · · Score: 1
      Wiretap is easy, span the switchport and run a network sniffer. You can play back the conversations via vomit.

      I understand you can do CDR analysis directly from the database to bill back uasage, somebody have firsthand on this?

      Customer service, these days? Just throw them in a queue, give them some brainwashing MOH and let them rot!

    2. Re:Just the basic hardware... by Shadow+Wrought · · Score: 1
      This also has the potential to answer the ??? section of the profit equation...

      1. Set up own telco
      2. Create numerous obscure charges for the bill (ne ???)
      3. Profit!

      --
      If brevity is the soul of wit, then how does one explain Twitter?
    3. Re:Just the basic hardware... by lucabrasi999 · · Score: 4, Funny
      Customer service

      Yeah. That would be a real problem Verizon provides great customer service today and I would have to invest heavily in trying to equal their support level.

      Gotta go now, I've been on hold for 45 minutes...

    4. Re:Just the basic hardware... by twiddlingbits · · Score: 1

      I think that is called Fraud!

      However with all the fees for that and this on my phone bill I wouldn't miss another one. The damn things are even on my cell phone too! It might be fun to see who doesn't notice a $1.99 fee with some fancy nonsensical name like, Federal IP Network Useage Packet Toll Surcharge Recovery Fee.

    5. Re:Just the basic hardware... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Personally, I think the setup is perfect to start your own Telecom:

      Operator: "Welcome to Ghetto Bell. What you want?"
      You: "Yes. I'd like the number for Jane Doe."
      Operator: "What for? She your girlfriend?"
      You: "Uhm...yeah. See, she just moved and..."
      Operator: "And SHE didn't give you her number, because she don't want to hear from you, fool."

      CLICK!

    6. Re:Just the basic hardware... by Chicks_Hate_Me · · Score: 1

      "Welcome to Verizon, how may we provide you with outstanding service today?"

      Everytime I hear that, I cringe. If you think being a Verizon customer is bad, try being a CLEC...

      you: "I need to get xxx-xxx-xxxx forwarded"
      Verizon rep: "No, MLT shows it's not out of service."
      you: "Mam, your tech went out there and found exposed wire, dial tone is intermittant."
      Verizon rep: "Sorry, MLT shows that it is fine."
      you: *stabs self with a pencil*

    7. Re:Just the basic hardware... by kryocore · · Score: 1

      - Customer service (unless you're not going to provide any)

      Just outsource it to India

    8. Re:Just the basic hardware... by kryocore · · Score: 1

      Also, for the billing software, I've seen some open source solutions for WebHosting services. I bet it wouldn't be hard to use it for a telco system.

    9. Re:Just the basic hardware... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I don't know about wiretaps but the CDR analysis is fairly easy.

    10. Re:Just the basic hardware... by sumdumass · · Score: 1

      The funny thing is i have had almost the exact same conversation.

      something else that is scarry, i had a free juno webacount once. Their modems were located about a third of a mile from my house. The software set the computer to call with the area code and the result was a long distance call to a building i could basicaly throw a rock at from my front porch. Well after arguing with the local telco they decided to drop the charges but the verizon service continued to bill me until they disconected my service. Then I went to the PUC office and complained. Verizon acted like it was my fault thier billing software think a local call is long distance but eventualy restored service. I was only down for around 6 months. There was another carier in the area but they wouldn't hook me up until i paid the verizon bill. Well i tell you 12hours a day 6 days a week for 29 days of long distance costs a little mor ethen most used cars i have purchased. Thank go my nextell worked.

    11. Re:Just the basic hardware... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Are there recognized software for biiling and invoicing runing with asterisk based telco systems?

  14. Re:i think it's easier.... by OverlordQ · · Score: 1

    I think you're missing the scale here, this wouldn't be for J Random HomeUser and a single line.

    --
    Your hair look like poop, Bob! - Wanker.
  15. All these VOIP phones by Amiga+Lover · · Score: 0

    All these VOIP phones that are going to use IP addresses. Maybe.

    Could this be the killer app of the net in the 21st century that forces the adoption of IPV6?

    1. Re:All these VOIP phones by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Or could this be the killer app that forces the adoption of NAT routing?

    2. Re:All these VOIP phones by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Why are you giving your telephones internet/publicly routable IP addresses?

    3. Re:All these VOIP phones by NoMoreNicksLeft · · Score: 2, Interesting

      I keep trying to convince my own bosses, to convince their bosses to offer IPv6, as a special package, only to the slashdot-type crowd. (Certainly don't want to support it with the "my win98 no worky" customers). No one takes it seriously.

      I do wonder if we'd make the front page here, being the first US company to offer true IPv6 broadband. Would anyone care, would any of you guys sign up, just for that reason alone?

    4. Re:All these VOIP phones by Daniel+Boisvert · · Score: 1

      I'd sign up with comcast for IPv6, provided I got my own static IP block. As it is now, I tend to be a DSL guy, because:

      a) I don't like sharing my bandwidth with the entire neighbourhood without my own traffic-shaping in place
      b) DSL works when the power goes out. What good are UPS's if you can't stay online? ;)

      If you guys offered me IPv6 with static IP's, I'd go with you in a heartbeat. (at least until Verizon brings FIOS to my town :)

    5. Re:All these VOIP phones by Adams4President · · Score: 1

      Nah, most people (and when I say 'most people', I mean 'all people') are using their VoIP phones behind a router.

    6. Re:All these VOIP phones by NoMoreNicksLeft · · Score: 1

      Actually, my email is comcast only because im at 21,000ft from the CO. I work for a DSL provider, that hates Verizon pretty vehemently.

      We already offer static IP, none of the PPPoE shit that everyone else does. With IPv6, I can imagine handing every customer their own block of v6 (though probably only 1 IPv4 addr). We could truly make it a "no support" service, as in if Joe Sixpack calls up asking for help "configurating his PI version 6 addremess", we say "sorry, we don't support that". (Though, a clueful user reporting a loss of connectivity or routing issues would get support with that).

      I know that at least some of the web is accessible, and there are supposedly several EFnet servers you can reach with IPv6. Don't know how useful it would be, but just bragging rights alone have to be worth something, right?

    7. Re:All these VOIP phones by caino59 · · Score: 1

      hell yah - sign me up!

      there's some fellows I work with that would be hella interested

    8. Re:All these VOIP phones by twiddlingbits · · Score: 1

      ...I know that at least some of the web is accessible, and there are supposedly several EFnet servers you can reach with IPv6.. Wanta explain that one? An IPv6 TCP/IP stack or IP v6 Web address won't work with IPv4 on the Internet routers. However, IPv6 is backward compatiable. Perhaps you happened to hit some routers that can handle v6 over v4 with tunneling. (See http://www.cisco.com/warp/public/759/ipj_3-1/ipj_3 -1_routing.html)

    9. Re:All these VOIP phones by NoMoreNicksLeft · · Score: 1

      Portions of the internet are themselves capable of doing IPv6 routing, or so I thought. Some of the dns rootservers are accessible via IPv6, and have AAAA records. Those domains with AAAA records are themselves accessible via IPv6, some being webservers, others being (at least one) efnet irc server.

      Or so I thought. I may be wrong on any of all of the previous though. It still doesn't seem like I'm imagining it when I thought I read that at least a few backbones were routing IPv6.

    10. Re:All these VOIP phones by Vancorps · · Score: 1
      Last I checked there are already ISPs that offer IPv6. My ISP is one of them, they are Mountain Telecom based in Phoenix. They primarily offer IPv4 but if I asked for a v6 address they will give me one.

      Probably not representative of public access seeings how we have special arrangements with them. They provide us with lots of free services in exchange for a skybox at our auction.

    11. Re:All these VOIP phones by twiddlingbits · · Score: 1

      Unless you are hooked onto a V6 network (there are a few like 6Bone) you can't get to a V6 ONLY address. V6 sites are listed at ipv6.org. Try your research again and let me know what happens. Maybe your ISP is one of the few who ARE on a V6 network.

    12. Re:All these VOIP phones by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      They work behind the existing firewalls and routers; no change here.

    13. Re:All these VOIP phones by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I don't like sharing my bandwidth with the entire neighbourhood without my own traffic-shaping in place

      The only thing DSL does not share is the bandwidth from your house to the CO. Considering everyone in your neighborhood terminates in the same CO and uses the uplink from there, what is the difference?
      With cable, shared at the pole or not, I can recieve the maximum amount I pay for (4000/384) any time of the day or night. You arguement makes no sense from a technical perspective.

    14. Re:All these VOIP phones by rob_squared · · Score: 1

      Maybe, one day, when I accidently type an IP into a phone, it will actually ring somewhere...

      --
      I don't get it.
  16. Cost to build cost to maintain by TwoEdge77 · · Score: 2, Insightful

    And so I expect this person to support and manage the system 24/7. There are other costs involved, not just turn it on and walk away.

  17. Been doing this already for some time. by jaredmauch · · Score: 3, Informative
    I operate our VoIP system at my employer. We have over 120 users across the globe where their mgmt has purchased/acquired them phones, be it soft-phones (xten works nicely) or the nice Cisco 7960 IP phones.

    We have a few PRIs in some locales which is nice for PSTN termination, but for the most part, we've got an excellent service and we mostly use it for conference calling. We regularly do several hundred hours of conference calling, and the flexability of each user having their own extension is nice.

    We've considered reselling the service, since it would be fairly easy to do, just record some custom IVRs and take those CDRs out of the sql backend and bill them. These things may actually happen, or not.. but th ease in setting up the system and making it work through the power of Asterisk is great. I love it and am using it to operate my home lines as well.

  18. It ain't bad, but it sure ain't scalable by Miniluv · · Score: 4, Informative

    I work for a moderate sized telephony services provider, and I can attest that getting above the single T1 "toy" deployment written about here gets really, really hard. The Digium cards are crap, there's very little documentation, and if you try and run multiple carriers then have fun. In a few years this stuff might be pretty decent, and for small office deployments its great, but other than that it is ass.

    1. Re:It ain't bad, but it sure ain't scalable by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      sorry but a T3 or OC3 are pretty damned easy to get.

      and unless you are wasting time getting analog phones over that connection there is no use other than Incoming IP bandwidth.

      the point is adding a T1 for 24 outgoing/incoming lines to communicate with at that area's old and outdated analog phone system... get digital to the rest of the planet.

    2. Re:It ain't bad, but it sure ain't scalable by bill_mcgonigle · · Score: 1

      The Digium cards are crap

      Care to elaborate?

      --
      My God, it's Full of Source!
      OUTSIDE_IP=$(dig +short my.ip @outsideip.net)
    3. Re:It ain't bad, but it sure ain't scalable by TheMysteriousFuture · · Score: 1

      The Digium cards are crap

      Care to elaborate?


      Sure.

      For example, their TDM400 cards, they will randomly stop working and you'll just get static on the line when you pickup. The only way to fix it is to unload and reload the kernel modules.

      This problem has been widely reported by numerous people on the mailing list. Digiums only action has been to offer to send a replacement card if you call em (which does nothing).

      Don't believe me? Search the mailing list

      --
      .sig
    4. Re:It ain't bad, but it sure ain't scalable by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Also see this post in this story for more on tdm troubles.

  19. And when it breaks... by torinth · · Score: 3, Insightful

    Who's going to have it fixed within 24 hours?

    a) Big company with a trained staff and warehouse full of warranty/replacement parts.
    b) The guy who put it together over two weeks while reading a HOWTO.
    c) Nobody, and your business misses a week of calls while guy from (b) tries to figure out what happened.

    1. Re:And when it breaks... by glomph · · Score: 1

      Bullshite.
      ---
      Replacement parts = generic PCs and line cards, if you are interfacing to a conventional PBX or TELCO lines. Some warehouse, 12 cards would fit in a shoebox.
      ---
      This is a Linux app, not Windoze. It does not break by itself, just sitting there, or under use. I've had it in worldwide production for almost a year. It is 100% solid, even in very complex modes.

    2. Re:And when it breaks... by LWATCDR · · Score: 1

      Actually you can get paid support for Astrix. There are companies that make a living installing and servicing Astrix systems.
      BTW my company currently is using an older Comdial system. Guess what? It is a pain to get spare parts to keep it running. Not only that we where out for over a week because BellSouth let us down. After the hurricanes we had phone service for a day or two until the UPS at the COs ran down. Then it took a week to bet the phones back the first time. After the second storm same thing. No phones until FPL got the power up even though we had a generator.

      --
      See my blog http://ilovecookes.blogspot.com/ for light hearted technical information.
    3. Re:And when it breaks... by drooling-dog · · Score: 2, Insightful
      You had to know that this discussion was going to go the way of the Microsoft response to Linux.

      The rational position is to take a hard look at the actual value of this "support" relative to what you're paying for it, keeping in mind that its high cost stems largely from the closed and proprietary nature of the products being supported. It would be surprising if a competitive independent service & support industry for open source telephony didn't spring up, and once it does it is likely to considerably more economical than the premium brands.

    4. Re:And when it breaks... by webview · · Score: 1

      This is so true even at the much larger level than the geek reading the HOWTO. Just the other day my Vonage service went out (for the first time ever) and it really showed me how unstable the whole system is.

      I was pretty much helpless. I called Vonage and was on hold forever, then they had the typical like why is your computer not working technical support questions (replace computer with phone).

      Fortunately it just 'came back on' the next morning. I have had pretty good service with them, but going through the whole support issue was a nightmare, especially for a phone. I honestly can't remember when my POTS line went down.

      As much as I hate to say it, I think the ILEC is more capable of fixing problems.

    5. Re:And when it breaks... by chill · · Score: 2, Interesting

      a) Big company with a trained staff and warehouse full of warranty/replacement parts.
      b) The guy who put it together over two weeks while reading a HOWTO.
      c) Nobody, and your business misses a week of calls while guy from (b) tries to figure out what happened.


      This is so funny!

      I used to work for a major telco deploying/configuring cell backhaul ATM equipment and your post reminds me of a deployment in Pensacola, FL.

      b) The guys running the fiber at the new facility cut the pair 1' short, so they wouldn't reach if strung thru the runs. The only way to make them reach was to string them tight, about neck high across the facility.

      Everything -- except the ATM switch I was programming -- was on battery-backed power. Of course there was a storm and we lost power 3 times that night.

      The big telco had sold their fiber making plant a couple of months ago. Part of the agreement was that said telco would purchase fiber ONLY thru the new company for the next year.

      Said company was OUT OF STOCK on the fiber we needed and it would take FOUR WEEKS to get some made and shipped. It was a violation of the contract to get some anywhere else. I finally had some expressed from one of the telco's European warehouses -- which counted as 'stock'.

      a) The cell crew that was recently hired to replace the experienced, but much more expensive, crew that was recently laid off. This was the crew that screwed up the fiber and redundant power to begin with.

      c) Customers in Pensacola, FL and Mobile, AL who had to wait an extra week for the new towers to go online while this shit was fixed.

      Oh, and don't even get me started on the THREE HOUR, 13 PERSON conference call that was had to discuss how to handle peak/non-peak billing charges when a user crosses time zones.

      All from two of the biggest names in the business.

      -Charles

      --
      Learning HOW to think is more important than learning WHAT to think.
    6. Re:And when it breaks... by AK+Marc · · Score: 1

      a) Big company with a trained staff and warehouse full of warranty/replacement parts.

      Like the time my CSU was going bad? It reported errors on the T1. The T1 reported errors on the line. The CSU was marked with a big "Property of AT&T" sticker with associated inventory numbers. So, the CSU was apparently property of AT&T, the line was purchased through AT&T. We had intermittent problems on the line for more than 6 months until AT&T finally was able to determine that the problem was the CSU, then told us that we needed to replace out CSU. We danced around another month while they tried to explain that the CSU with their name on it and was being charged for in the bill was our property and responsibility, and not that of AT&T. Then we gave in and bought a CSU ourselves because we couldn't keep taking the outages.

      Yeah, the big boys are so easy to deal with. But at least they are more expensive, so you feel better.

  20. Reminds me of a story about Steve Wozniak by aardwolf204 · · Score: 1

    This reminds me of a story about Steve Wozniak that might not be true. I was told by a lineman once that Wozniak had perfected his blue box and hooked it up to a switch board in his attic. He supposedly charged a flat rate free to his neighbors for the ability to dial into his switch board and dial out long distance using the blue box.

    All I could dig up was this. The lineman could have been yanking my chain. Comments appreciated.

    --
    Im dreaming ofa big bndwdth, That can resist the /.crowd.May ur days b merry & bright & may al
    1. Re:Reminds me of a story about Steve Wozniak by Catbeller · · Score: 1

      Under current law, the Woz would probably be in Federal prison until he was dead, dead, dead. Hell, he might be a Terrorist(TM)!

      Change a word's definition, and amaze your friends! Kill your enemies! Imprison the annoying!

    2. Re:Reminds me of a story about Steve Wozniak by un1xl0ser · · Score: 1
      He spoke for a few hours at The Fifth HOPE and didn't mention anything like that. Talked about phreaking stuff, but didn't mention that.

      If you weren't there, you can download the keynote here.

      --
      v4sw6PU$hw6ln6pr4F$ck 4/6$ma3+6u7LNS$w2m4l7U$i2e4+7en6a2X h
    3. Re:Reminds me of a story about Steve Wozniak by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Did this lineman play for the Raiders?

      You can't trust anybody who plays for the raiders.

    4. Re:Reminds me of a story about Steve Wozniak by squiggleslash · · Score: 1
      Well, I'm shocked. Really shocked. I think there's only one response to this story:
      I am stunned that Steve Wozniak has adopted the tactics and ethics of a hacker to break into the telephone system
      Who'd have thought, huh? Who'd have thought...
      --
      You are not alone. This is not normal. None of this is normal.
    5. Re:Reminds me of a story about Steve Wozniak by squiggleslash · · Score: 1
      I forgot to preview and typed a + instead of an = for the A link: http://money.cnn.com/2004/07/29/technology/apple_r eal/

      You know, if Slashdot is going to implement this dumb "2 minute rule", could they at least let us edit our misformatted messages in that time rather than force a delay of two minutes before we can post a correction?

      --
      You are not alone. This is not normal. None of this is normal.
  21. The system is only a part of the cost by QuantumRiff · · Score: 4, Informative

    We just did a VOIP implementation at work this last summer, and while we did not go with asterix, we did get a pretty good price (went with shoretel). However, the biggest single cost of all, was not the T1 installation, or the servers, or the software, it was replacing phones. Replacing 65 phones at our company at about $280 each was a pretty penny. Of course, with asterix you can find relatively cheap SIP phones, but they don't have all the fancy features, LCD's, that make it easy to use, POE, etc. So a hint for all you thinking of looking at VOIP, look at 3 very important things:
    1. Yearly costs (maint, support, etc)
    2. Upgrade costs. (how much is it to add each additional person. ie. phone+system capacity+licencing+anything else)
    3. purchase costs ( for everything, T1 installation, installers, etc)
    Look in that order. Many are cheap up front, but their phones are proprietary and cost a fortune, or can't expand in the chassis.

    --

    What are we going to do tonight Brain?
    1. Re:The system is only a part of the cost by srl100 · · Score: 1
      "> However, the biggest single cost of all ... was replacing phones"

      Would one of the handset gateway solutions from Citel Technologies http://www.citel.com/ have been suitable?

      These handset gateways allow you to keep your investment in TDM PBX phones (Norstar, Meridian, Definity, Dterm, ...) but interfaces them to SIP networks.

  22. Office-class phones by glomph · · Score: 5, Informative

    Check out the Sipura SPA-841 ($90. at voxilla.com, etc.). That is MUCH BETTER than the Fujitsu 'office-class' overpriced phones in common use in my 1000-line office.

  23. Doing it now by gregmac · · Score: 4, Informative

    I'm setting up Asterisk right now for use in our small office. Actually, it's basically setup now and I'm just waiting for my phones to get here.

    Total cost for the hardware was under CDN$2000 (8 phones, 2-port fxs adapter for analog phones/fax machines, 4-port fxo card for incoming lines, and the PC). I probably spent about 40 hours total after deciding to use asterisk learning about it, configuring everything, and testing. Even at billable $60/hr, that works to $4400, which is a lot less than a comparable commercial system (I got quotes). It didn't actually cost that much anyways, since I don't get paid $60/hr. ;)

    We now have a phone system that has an IVR menu, pratically unlimited voicemail, and every other feature you'd expect in a phone system, plus when we open a branch office later this year I can use VoIP trunks to make intra-office calls pretty much free (and easy - encouraging communication between offices).

    The system we have now is getting old, to add voicemail to it is $3000 by itself, plus the time to configure it (actually, I'd probably have to get someone to come in and set it up, since I only know the basics of how to program a few features). It can't do VoIP at all (unless you were to plug something into a CO port .. but then you'd have to dial it like an external number, and the other office wouldn't be able to call an extension directly).

    This hasn't even gotten into the advanced stuff I can do fairly easily that wouldn't be possible with another system (without spend a LOT of money) -- such as, IVR status updates on system status; allowing customers to query their account balance etc.

    --
    Speak before you think
    1. Re:Doing it now by eric2hill · · Score: 1

      You didn't shop in the right place. I installed a Nortel Compact ICS phone system in a CPA's office a few months ago. It has 4 trunk lines, up to 32 extensions (came with 5), caller ID and voice-mail. The whole system cost $2100 new in a box and I charged about $500 to install it. New phones are around $100 per phone.

      --
      LOAD "SIG",8,1
      LOADING...
      READY.
      RUN
  24. Re:Cost to build cost to maintain by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Well obviously first you outsource support to India, then you walk away.

  25. Looking at this recently. by Blapto · · Score: 4, Informative

    I've been looking at deploying a similar system in an office I work with. As far as I can see, the main advantage is thus:
    I can take calls in, on a London number, have them handled by someone in the office, who puts them through to someone just like she normally does and they go to that employee at home. Provided he/she has broadband at home, no extra cost. Brilliant. It's not going to cost us $6000 to implement, more like $300/phone and $500 for the server, we don't need a system of the scale demonstrated, and should make the money back.
    Not to mention, pretty cool!

    1. Re:Looking at this recently. by glomph · · Score: 2, Informative

      I'm doing EXACTLY that right now. We set it up almost a year ago. The biggest cost is when you have to interface Asterisk to an existing conventional PBX (IF you need to do this, we did). Because then, you have to deal with the specially-trained people who install & provision the trunk card on THAT end. This can cost anywhere from $1000 - $12000 depending on equipment & locale.

      If you can just do it with new IP phones on everyone's desk, it gets MUCH simpler.

    2. Re:Looking at this recently. by Blapto · · Score: 1

      No, I'll be getting in ISDN to provide our connection to the telecoms network, through Pipex. * will be our PBX as well.

    3. Re:Looking at this recently. by glomph · · Score: 1

      That is totally cool, then. Just get the Digium PRI card (assuming you are trunking), or any of the many supported BRI cards if you are going that route. It's really easy to get PRIs to work on Asterisk.

    4. Re:Looking at this recently. by msi · · Score: 1
      they go to that employee at home. Provided he/she has broadband at home

      Thats the best reason I have seen for not getting broadband at home.

  26. Digium cards are NOT crap by glomph · · Score: 1

    total bullshite. The T1/E1 cards are great. I run a bunch of Asterisk boxes worldwide, using these cards. Never a problem.

    1. Re:Digium cards are NOT crap by alienmole · · Score: 1

      Elsewhere in this thread, Tracy Reed describes a serious problem with a Digium TDM400P 4 port FXO card. It sounds pretty crappy to me.

      There's a big distinction between a smart & knowledgeable guy setting this stuff up for his own company, and doing it professionally where you're reselling systems. In the latter case, you're going to have many more configurations to deal with, so are more likely to run into problems. Also, paying customers are much less inclined to want to work around limitations or put up with problems than you might be if you're doing something for yourself or your own company.

    2. Re:Digium cards are NOT crap by glomph · · Score: 1

      I would not do anything in production with the FXO/FXS cards. My experience with these has been marginal, or worse. If I needed a bunch of these, I'd get a channel bank, and use Asterisk with that.

      In a sense they are glorified modems (barely), and as such inherit all the analog flakiness.

      I have used the PRI/T1/E1 cards, in a bunch of places, with 100% success & reliability.

      Just to prove I am not a total Digium fanboy (except for Asterisk itself!), I can state categorically that their little IAX client box, the iAXY, is an unmitigated horror.

    3. Re:Digium cards are NOT crap by alienmole · · Score: 1

      Thanks for the reply. Good to know. I'm trying to find out what I can expect to work and not work before jumping in, and more importantly, before advising interested clients to try it.

    4. Re:Digium cards are NOT crap by Miniluv · · Score: 1

      Ahh yes, the single example disproving the rule. Right. Doesn't work with hardware bub. I've got a couple dozen in a single room and one port on every single one is unusable. Plug a T1 into it for any length of time and start seeing errors. If I didn't say it before, I should say I think they have promise. They definitely can be a force in the industry if they can solve some quality control issues. There are some definite issues with documentation, especially at a very low level, however thats natural of young open source projects. I just don't like seeing articles such as the one linked espousing this as the way to be truly disruptive without acknolwedging the limitations of the solution proposed.

  27. This would have been nice by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    20 years ago

  28. Ahahahaha by Jailbrekr · · Score: 2, Informative

    I work in telecom. I find the 6 grand price tag humorous. If you want a soft PBX (which has been done in the past, with mixed results), by all means go for it. You can converge IP with telephony so you will require multi disciplined support staff to keep it running. But don't think even for a moment that you can set up your own phone service provider for $6000. Try multiplying it by 10 and that will be a good start. Then keep dumping money into it for the next 2 years because you sure as hell won't be making a profit until you reach critical mass, AND learn how to balance userbase vs hardlines.

    --
    Feed the need: Digitaladdiction.net
    1. Re:Ahahahaha by nolife · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Can to give some insight on some of the hidden costs that were not mentioned?

      --
      Bad boys rape our young girls but Violet gives willingly.
    2. Re:Ahahahaha by AK+Marc · · Score: 1

      You can converge IP with telephony so you will require multi disciplined support staff to keep it running.

      Just because you only work with people too stupid to walk and chew gum at the same time doesn't mean that everyone suffers that affliction. There really isn't that much difference between packet switched and circuit switched communications.

      But don't think even for a moment that you can set up your own phone service provider for $6000. Try multiplying it by 10 and that will be a good start. Then keep dumping money into it for the next 2 years because you sure as hell won't be making a profit until you reach critical mass, AND learn how to balance userbase vs hardlines.

      You completely miss the point. With a $6k investment to be able to handle the first customer, you don't need critical mass. You sign up one or two at a time and you are fine. Learning how to balance userbase vs hardlines is easy. You talk as if you know phone stuff, but you are pretending to not know about Erlangs and other such quite easy ways of dealing with the problem of balancing users and hardlines.

  29. My own telecom? Really? Wow! by Brento · · Score: 4, Funny

    Lemme get this straight: for just $6,000, I can start my own telecom, just like the big boys? I can bleed millions of dollars in red ink and employ mindless unionized drones who provide horrendous customer service while simultaneously driving my customers away? I can run miles of fiber through the neighborhood only to provide people with 384k upload speeds?

    Wow, where do I sign up?

    --
    What's your damage, Heather?
  30. Not a "telecom" by Dun+Malg · · Score: 4, Insightful
    "Start Your Own Open Source-Based Telecom"

    This isn't a way to start your own telecom. There's no means of interfacing with the system at large other than by buying the services of an existing telecom at regular commercial rates. You can't, for example, realistically offer me and fifty of my random neighbors cheaper phone service in our houses with this. This is simply a way to build a PBX-type phone system that can inexpensively serve more than one physical location over an IP network. Timothy apparently doesn't understand the difference between being a telecommunications provider and simply owning a PBX or key system.

    --
    If a job's not worth doing, it's not worth doing right.
    1. Re:Not a "telecom" by Teancum · · Score: 2, Interesting

      While I will agree with you that at some point trying to turn an asterix system into a full-fledged telecom company would take more than the $6000 mentioned in the article, it would be a good start.

      Also, just like many medium to large business use a PBX for substantial savings, you could put a system like this into a block of downtown businesses and help to share the cost for connecting to commercial telecom providors... in effect becoming your own telecom.

      The #1 problem would not be the technical side of things, which Asterix would certainly help with, but with the legal side of trying to start a telecom. Registering with the local public utility board and getting compliance with the whole host of regulations that come from trying to become a telephone company would probably be your undoing.

      But if you are a high school aged kid that wants to do a little better than the old tin can between the treehouse and his bedroom, you can indeed run some CAT-5 cable from your house to a neighbor and "wire up" your neighborhood as your own private telephone company... and even use regular telephones. This is something that would have been impossible to do back when I was in high school under the old Ma Bell equipment providors. I think it would be a fun project, and even include some wireless access points to help cross streets in a private phone network. You might even pick up a girlfriend (by offering free telephone service for her and her friends).

  31. ASDI Phones? by Unit3 · · Score: 2, Informative

    IIRC, doesn't Asterisk let you use any ASDI phone? As such, there should be lots of nice cheap phones you can use (such as the ones specifically recommended by Digium). You need to make sure you can get the programming codes for the phones you buy, but that isn't as difficult as it once was.

    --
    -- sudo.ca
  32. Is Asterisk a secured VoIP system? by IronChefMorimoto · · Score: 3, Interesting

    My company is considering the Avaya IP Office Small Office Edition standalone VoIP system. It's basically a box the size of a small router or other piece of network hardware + (I believe) an external computer/server that runs the voicemail storage.

    I saw the product demonstrated at a local vendor and found it to be rather impressive -- move phones around, customize voicemail prompts/forwarding, conferencing, etc. And it was all inclusive in this box. The add-ons included analog device plug-in cards, a pro version of the IP software to allow phone control from computers, etc. I'm getting pricing later this week on the system.

    My question is -- is Asterisk secured/encrypted like a proprietary system? Like Avaya IP Office? One of the bigs things we were told is the security of the calls from the system vs. other, more open standards VoIP systems.

    Just curious.

    IronChefMorimoto

    1. Re:Is Asterisk a secured VoIP system? by glomph · · Score: 2, Insightful

      For audio security, you do NOT (or better not) rely on something in the phone switch (Asterisk/Avaya/whatever) to do it. You need endpoint-to-endpoint encryption. Sipura equipment (among others) does this as a standard feature. Then the switch just shuffles the bits along.

      In my multioffice/worldwide Asterisk setup the various sites connect to each other via CIPE or Open VPN tunnels, so at least the bits that leave the office are scrambled.

    2. Re:Is Asterisk a secured VoIP system? by mfarver · · Score: 2, Informative

      Asterisk can be pretty secure.. and it can be pretty unsecure depending on your config. SIP and most of the VOIP protocols are by default unencrypted. VPN or VLAN should be used whenever privacy is required.

      The big thing about Asterisk is control..

      My Mitel phone systems are not my own despite having paid up front for them. They have licensing, limited documentation and pay for software upgrades. Mitel won't even let me pay to attend a user level training course unless I have a "endorsement" from the vendor who sold me the hardware. Since becomeing a vendor requires a $20k initial capitol outlay, I have a limited choice of vendors.

      With Asterisk I can roll my own or pay someone to do it for me.. and if the vendor tries to squeeze me I can swap vendors. Asterisk is open enough and well documented: even if I don't understand everything, I still can understand enough to tell when the vendor is stretching the truth. Bad customer service is pretty much standard in the telecom world.

      My biggest gripe about Asterisk is that is it do not have the fancy (and propriatary) digital phones with multiple soft line and speed dial keys... but thats a trade off.

      Open Source gives the customer leverage, and levels the paying field. And sometimes it even costs less.

    3. Re:Is Asterisk a secured VoIP system? by sydbarrett74 · · Score: 1

      I would advise you to stay away from Avaya. My previous employer used their S8500 solution and it was a joke. Overpriced, broke down all the time, the customer service was a joke -- Avaya is a dog of a company. If you're going proprietary, look at Cisco or something.

      --
      'He who has to break a thing to find out what it is, has left the path of wisdom.' -- Gandalf to Saruman
    4. Re:Is Asterisk a secured VoIP system? by q2k · · Score: 1

      Before you plunk down the cash on Avaya you should take a look at Zultys. Open SIP standard, runs on a Linux appliance, CDR is stored in a mySQL dB. It's not as open as Asterisk, but it's more flexible than an Avaya solution. By using a server that is built around SIP, you maintain flexibility to change pieces and different phones later. If you buy Avaya now, you are buying Avaya for the lifetime of the system. Upfront cost should be comparable either way - but I think the more open solutions will cost less over time.

    5. Re:Is Asterisk a secured VoIP system? by TheMysteriousFuture · · Score: 1

      Asterisk is open enough and well documented

      haha. Hahhaha.HAHhah

      Excuse me a moment.

      BWHAHHA AHHA AHHAH AHA H AHAHHA HA HA AHAHHAHAHa hHA AH AHHA AHA HAHHAHHAHA HA AHHA AHHAHAHHAHA

      okay, I'm done.

      --
      .sig
  33. Multiple voIP adapters behind NAT? by Avenger · · Score: 1

    Hmmm maybe some one here more knowledgeable than I about voip will be able to answer this question. I own a multi-family dwelling, and I have a business class internet connection which I share with the other people living in the house. If we each got our own voip adapter (I am thinking the Linksys Vonage adapter) could we all use them and have our own individual phone lines? Or another way of saying this is "can I have 5 voip adapters behind a NAT router" and still have them work?

    --
    Of all the things I miss .... I miss my Mind the ...... ummmmmm what is that word.
    1. Re:Multiple voIP adapters behind NAT? by glomph · · Score: 1

      Yes, you certainly can have multiple adapters behind NAT. If you want this to actually work, don't use some crapball home-NAT-router, you will need one that prioritizes the voice packets above all else. I suggest a cheapo linux box using iptables.

    2. Re:Multiple voIP adapters behind NAT? by Avenger · · Score: 1

      Good, I am glad to hear this. I actually have a HotBrick LB2 router, which does QOS and (if Frontier ever get off their ass and get better phone lines out my way) has two broad band connections on it so it should be able to load ballance between a DSL line and a cable internet line. NOTE: This is not a recomendation for the Hotbrick as I am having all sorts of issues with it and routing.

      --
      Of all the things I miss .... I miss my Mind the ...... ummmmmm what is that word.
    3. Re:Multiple voIP adapters behind NAT? by zaphodb001 · · Score: 1

      I have a Linksys Router that provides QOS on a per port (physical or logical) basis. Attaching ANY terminal adapter to the port will support the QOS function. I actually have a Lingo Terminal adapter plugged to port 4 of my Linksys router with QOS enabled and have found the voice application works well. You can replicate this on each port as needed.

  34. No redundancy... by MeatEntity · · Score: 1

    ...but the point still stands well. This is cheap and works. At this price point, paying for a second setup would still be effective.

  35. Re:My own telecom? Really? Wow! by tomstdenis · · Score: 3, Funny

    Before you can run a successfully inept business you have to attend a MBA-mill and get your business speak about you.

    And then you can synergize the process and run it into the ground while taking millions in bonuses every time you fart or something...[nortel...]

    Tom

    --
    Someday, I'll have a real sig.
  36. Re:Has he done this yet? by stupidfoo · · Score: 1

    Well, there's this thing called "support". Initial costs may be low, but how about ongoing maintenance costs? Redundancy? Failure rates?

  37. same difference :) by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    976-0XXX to 976-9XXX

  38. A sample Asterisk AGI script by Lancer · · Score: 3, Informative
    Here's a link to a sample AGI (Asterisk Gateway Interface) script that accepts an ISBN number punched in by the caller and returns the Amazon price of the item.

    http://ruk.ca/code/amazon.pl

    Perhaps the mods were right and you were trying to be funny, but I'd hate for others to think that you were performing rocket science with your mad coding skillz.

    --
    Outside of a dog, a book is man's best friend. Inside a dog it's too dark to read. - Groucho Marx
  39. Screenshots? by McCall · · Score: 0

    I don't get it. I visited Asterisk and I don't see any screenshots of the program running.

    I thought all open source programs posted screenshots on their site, thats how people tell how good the software is!

    (Yes... I am joking....)

    1. Re:Screenshots? by Rhinobird · · Score: 1

      Here ya go...a pic of gnophone:
      http://www.gnophone.com/images/gnophoneshot.jpg


      From the gnophone page:
      Gnophone is an open source internet telephone that allows you to make calls to other GnoPhone users or to an Asterisk PBX Gateway.

      --
      If Mr. Edison had thought smarter he wouldn't sweat as much. --Nikola Tesla
  40. Connection to POTS? by querencia · · Score: 2, Interesting

    I RTFA and I think I understand all of the components -- there's one thing I'm not sure I get:

    Once you've got this system set up, where is the connection to POTS? How do you make calls to / receive calls from the normal old circuit-switched phone network?

    If the answer is that you pay for this service from your telco (or other VOIP gateway provider), then you aren't really starting your own telco, are you?

    1. Re:Connection to POTS? by stratjakt · · Score: 3, Informative

      That's what your T1 line is.

      No, this isn't starting a telco. This is setting up a PBX for your office, large or small. Timothy just doesn't grok the difference.

      --
      I don't need no instructions to know how to rock!!!!
    2. Re:Connection to POTS? by querencia · · Score: 1

      Thanks for the response... so for your t-1 line, you'd have to make a deal with your telco to route a bank of phone numbers to your pbx system via the t-1. Is there any other way to get this done? Can you operate your own PBX to POTS gateway? I'm already sensing that this is probably a stupid question.

    3. Re:Connection to POTS? by Anomalyst · · Score: 2, Informative

      I am by no means an expert, but you can get get POTS connectiveity for independent lines in less than T1 chunks, I believe these are the FXS cards which should be available in 1/2/4 line flavors.

      --
      There is no right to feel safe thru security vaudeville at the expense of everyone's freedom, privacy and tax money.
    4. Re:Connection to POTS? by querencia · · Score: 1

      I am by no means an expert, but you can get get POTS connectiveity for independent lines in less than T1 chunks, I believe these are the FXS cards which should be available in 1/2/4 line flavors.

      Sure, but you still have to pay your telco for 1/2/4 lines in that situation, right?

    5. Re:Connection to POTS? by ghqman · · Score: 3, Informative

      Right, you still need to pay to interconnect with the telephone network so you can be billed for call completion etc.

  41. Great by Greyfox · · Score: 1

    Now all I need is a cell phone that'll switch between VOIP whenever a WAP is available and regular old cell service when one isn't. I wouldn't expect a cell provider to stand for such a thing, so that'd probably end up having to be a roll-your-own project.

    --

    I'm trying to teach myself to set people on fire with my mind... Is it hot in here?

    1. Re:Great by $$CALL+NOW · · Score: 1
      I think this is the phone you were looking for.

      "Motorola ... launched its CN620 phone, a dual-mode GSM/Wi-Fi device that can make and receive voice calls on a cellular network or enterprise WLAN."

    2. Re:Great by Greyfox · · Score: 1

      Hmm yeah that looks like a spiffy device. If it actually works the way the various articles claim they do, I could finally tell Qwest to take a squat on the cosmic utensel. And if the power goes out, it looks like I should still have coverage via the cell network. Sweet!

      --

      I'm trying to teach myself to set people on fire with my mind... Is it hot in here?

  42. Re:Cost to build cost to maintain by xarius76 · · Score: 1

    You would be *very* surprised that with proper monitoring, you really can turn it on and walk away.

    I run asterisk in a corporate environment where it supports ~120 office employees (local and remote), 2 PRI's, extensive IVR menus, robust voicemail for each employee and also custom scripts which handle meeting scheduling where the system calls YOU when your meeting time is up.

    Turning it on and walking away from it has been handled nicely from the software side. It's the hardware side YOU need to take care of.

  43. Easier said than done by pele_smk · · Score: 3, Interesting

    I have an asterisk server setup to serve myself, and have commercial hard phone access. Can we get an estimate on the maintenance cost? Businesses don't want to leave the blame on themselves. I definitely see the boom in your normal ISP serving up voip, but I don't see your local tech company serving up its own voip. Asterisk isn't a tough setup, but asterisk isn't the only thing needing setup. I think security might want to take a chunk out of the costs.

    If asterisk servers end up being the new hip tool, I'm ready for the next hip hack, Asterisk war driving. Wireless access at these "affordable" technology companies and "affordable" voip access gives way to free phone calls for sniffers. So we've "war driven" bluetooth, wifi, netcams, security cams; oh ya, I'm ready for voip. Come to think of it, take a stroll within a few feet of my apartment and have a phone call. Access is free!!

    I'm also a college student without a life. So maybe I'm being a bit tough on the security end, but even though everyone is different, I'm sure I'm not the only curious kid.

  44. Re:And more... by symbolic · · Score: 1


    If you're running a local service, it might not be too difficult, but if you're tapping into a wholesalier network for long distance, determining who gets billed what can be a nightmare. This is it might be a good idea to use a clearing house- they take care of all the out-of-local-network billing issues, and send you a bill for the cost. You in turn, bill your customers based on whatever arrangement you have set up. Also, don't forget that as traffic increases, you might have need for other components, like gatekeepers. If you want to provide reliable service, you'll want to double up on everything so that you'll have a failover plan if your primary goes down. This will definitely add some to the cost.

  45. What about the 5-9's rule? by pnice · · Score: 1

    Isn't there something about a Telco/Phone Provider being required to provide uptime 99.999% of the time throughout the year? Meaning a phone company is only allowed to be down for like, a few minutes a year tops? That was what we were always told at the last ISP turn ISP/Telco a year or so ago. Of course, they were up maybe 85% of the time throughout the year (although they were new and I think their customers understood that it was kind of in "beta" stage)

  46. gee, what a great ad for Asterisk by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I didn't know /. was taking ads.

    This one was disguised as a post. Clever.

    The hardware vendors that Asterisk causes muchas sales for, paid what each for the /. ad?

    I'd like the same rate.

    1. Re:gee, what a great ad for Asterisk by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Hm, so what, any story that talks about Linux is an "ad for Linux"? Because, you know, companies supporting Linux must be paying for the "stories".

    2. Re:gee, what a great ad for Asterisk by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      No, read the comment again. The beneficiaries are the hardware vendors. Every new tryout of Asterisk results in a few kilobucks of NEW revenue to the I/O card vendors, as this is the kind of stuff Joe Schmoe Geek doesn't have lying around. It's actually easier and cheaper to buy a used Nortel Meridian or Lucent Definity box, which does just what was being described here and doesn't take being a programmer to make work. That itself may be an odd concept here on /. but out there on the Planet With Women, it's more accepted. The point being made is that /. comes amazingly close to being an infomercial sometimes, in the guise of an information exchange.

  47. Cbeyond by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Has anyone looked into Cbeyond. It allows you to use your existing system and Telephone. The system also allows you to use multiple t1's and allocates 80k per call.

    anyone?

  48. Re:Cost to build cost to maintain by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    In Soviet Russia, YOU support telephone company.

    I apologize, I just couldn't resist...

  49. Dear astrix fanboy by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
    It does not break by itself, just sitting there, or under use.

    Allow me to pass along some wisdom from the late Mister Douglas Adams (may he rest in peace):

    The major difference between a thing that might go wrong and a thing that cannot possibly go wrong is that when a thing that cannot possibly go wrong goes wrong it usually turns out to be impossible to get at and repair.

    Just because you think it won't break doesn't mean it actually won't, and at the worst possible time.

    1. Re:Dear astrix fanboy by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      And it's Asterisk. Not Astrix or AssTricks or Whatever. Insensitive clod.

    2. Re:Dear astrix fanboy by cymen · · Score: 1

      His message applies to payed solutions to. Why is this relevant? If you have to cover your ass all the time, why are you breathing air?

    3. Re:Dear astrix fanboy by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      His message applies to payed solutions to[sic].

      Generally, when you pay for an expensive bit of technology, it comes with an SLA or something similarly useful; as opposed to the free solution where you're on your own support-wise. There's nothing wrong with taking the free route, as long as one has the ability to deal with any problems that will arise. However, if one lacks the knowledge and/or experience (or comes across a really really funky situation), then one is shit out of luck, and gets to explain to their superiors why their wonderful money saving solution does not function (and trust me, the higher-ups don't give a shit about how much money you've saved them when their phones don't work). In all the IT environments I've worked in, the higher-ups love a paid-for solution because when it fails there will be adequate support to get things back up and running (and if there isn't, at least they've got somebody to point their fingers (and maybe lawyers) at). Its all well and good that the grandparent poster has such confidence in the product he's using, but that won't save him when an issue that he can't handle arises.

  50. Haylo? Haylo? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    This is Latka. Haylo? I pour hot grits down my pahntz.

  51. Can this be a telecom by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Is a celphone company a telecom? How about a phone card company? If you consider these companies to be telecoms then yes, your Astrix box can be a small telecom. All but the very biggest telecoms buy access from other telecoms. Even the big telecoms pay eachother for traffic they pass to each other. Your T1/E1s will give you connection to the POTS and network card gives you access to IP for internal or internet traffic.

  52. Joker by Donny+Smith · · Score: 1

    He couldn't have been serious...

    Redundancy - of course it's zero (single everything except phones which are useless redundant if you've got no connection). Which means double the cost (HA software and network equipment) to failover the services...

    To me it seems okay for a small-to-mid size office or niche ISP (village/island/etc.).

  53. Latency - delay in transmission of your voice. by kyoorius · · Score: 2, Informative

    One thing that bugs me about voip is the latency. It deadens the conversation and often leads to collisions between 2 people speaking. QOS in routers can probably solve this problem in the future, but for now there is not much one can.

    I set up an asterisk box about 2 weeks ago, configured it to peer with about 10 different voip providers, and have been testing/logging one way and round trip latency.

    A typical land line can experience between 60-90ms of latency. I found that latency on voip lines range from 90-250m (IAX2,ulaw codec, optonline cable modem service). We also did a test using 2 Skype clients (both on optonline's network). The latency was about 280ms.

    I will be posting results on the voip-info.org wiki soon.

    ~Rolan

  54. But isn't this commercial too? Or did he mean non- by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    free?

  55. Re:Cost to build cost to maintain by x736e65616b · · Score: 1

    Couldn't help it:

    When running Asterisk in Soviet Russia, the TELEPHONE CALLS YOU!

    -j

  56. sip/h.323/bt headset? by LinuxHam · · Score: 1

    I'm looking for a way to use a bluetooth headset with my laptop to make voip calls both inside my house and from hotels with broadband. I'd like line 2 to ring at my laptop no matter where I am, and can run a Linux vmware guest on the laptop to fill any connectivity gaps. Can this be done with asterisk and a linejack card at home and some kind of utility on a linux vm guest?

    --
    Intelligent Life on Earth
  57. Predictions Anyone? by popo · · Score: 1


    Anyone care to predict what monthly national unlimited IP service is going to cost (not including access/bandwidth) in 5 years?

    My bet is free. (Not just for p2p Skype style technology, but for conventional VOIP).

    The revenue here is going to be on international and other network-out billables. (not to mention a very small amount of ad revenue from web interface impressions).

    Vonage and others are going to get destroyed by whoever goes free first: GooglePhone, HotmailVoice, etc.

    --
    ------ The best brain training is now totally free : )
  58. Open Source Telephony Using Asterisk and VOIP by irabinovitch · · Score: 1

    Daryll Strauss will be presenting on this topic at SCALE 3x. His seminar "Open Source Telephony Using Asterisk and VOIP" will will approach Asterisk and VOIP from the ground up. It starts with an introduction to the technology and terminology used in telephony. It will point out some examples of the technology that can be used. Once the base is established, the talk will move on to describe some typical telephony applications and show how Asterisk and VOIP can be used to solve them.

    There will also be a panel on "The Future of VoIP and Open Source". With speakers from Vonage, SIPphone and others.

    If you want to check out the exhibit hall you can get a free pass with the promo code "free". For a discounted full access pass use the promo code "NEWSP".

  59. Like the big guys are any better. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    We spent three months once trying to get a random dropped-call problem fixed. The phone company blamed the company that set up our PBX. The company that set up our PBX blamed the phone company. Neither of them could fix it.

  60. Musimi.dk by Frodo420024 · · Score: 1
    That's probably the way Musimi.dk runs - supposedly by a single person. It provides straight IP telephony to anyone with relevant hardware. Quality is great, international calls cheap, network breakdowns so far none.

    (I'm not associated with Musimi, just a happy user.)

    --
    I'm in a Unix state of mind.
  61. Asterisk on non-Linux platforms by nuintari · · Score: 1

    We run a FreeBSD shop, and would rather stick to our usual rather than include a Linux box on the network. Has anyone had any luck with this? Will it run at all on non linux unix systems?

    I know its karma doom, but I'd rather not run Linux.

    --

    --Nuintari

    slashdot : where an opinion can be wrong.

    1. Re:Asterisk on non-Linux platforms by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Informative

      I've gotten the 4 port Digium TDM boards to work perfectly in recent builds of FreeBSD 5. Check for the zaptel port in /usr/ports.

    2. Re:Asterisk on non-Linux platforms by aminorex · · Score: 1

      Mod parent up, 15 14 13 12 11 10 9 8 7 6 5 4 2 1 POST

      --
      -I like my women like I like my tea: green-
  62. Huh? by cdcopier · · Score: 1

    I just started reading about this and wondered...what about phone numbers? Is there one number and then you have to assign extensions? What about dialing out lines? How do actual numbers play in? I am new to this. Any help app.

    1. Re:Huh? by glomph · · Score: 1

      Typically you deal with some kind of TELCO, who gives you phone number(s). These days, you'd go with Broadvoice, or VoicePulse, or NuFone, or any of the myriad VoIP providers. Typically you get an inbound number with your account, and get additional numbers for a smallish fee (2 bucks/mo). You can easily set up asterisk to treat these inbound calls differently, it's not like some old-fashioned crap PBX where you call the main single number, and then enter an extension when the robot requests it. (Although it's easy enough to do this if you have to).
      Dialing out is an easier proposition. There is no concept of 'lines'. You can make as many outbound calls as you like, within the constraints of your bandwidth. Ditto for inbound. If I get a call while I'm on my VoIP phone, asterisk kicks the call to a second phone (AND I get a call-waiting beep in my ear, as well). This stuff Just Works. If you are at all facile with Linux, you gotta use Asterisk as your VoIP platform. If not, buy a VoIP adapter at voxilla.com, and get a nice Broadvoice coupon. Broadvoice is Asterisk (and any other self-supplied hardware) friendly. Vonage is the opposite, you pretty much have to use their sealed boxes (that sucks). And the use of soft phones (meaning anything that is not THEIR locked equipment) is heavily restricted and taxed.
      Plus, they cost considerably more. I'm just a happy customer, not some astroturfer....

    2. Re:Huh? by cdcopier · · Score: 1

      Wow...Thanks for the help guys. Few more questions. glomph, you mentioned the outbound calls, but didn't elaborate...dougnaka said they have the analog lines from the (phone company?), but is this how you do it? Will you please explain how the outbound works?

      Thanks again

    3. Re:Huh? by glomph · · Score: 1

      The way I described it, there is no analog leaving your house. Those companies like Broadvoice take a SIP (ordinary UDP) connection either from an Asterisk server (if you want or need that) or directly from a SIP phone or SIP adapter (which converts a normal phone into a sip phone). The low-end Sipura adapter works great, it's what I'm using now. Or you can use a 'soft phone' which turns a computer into a SIP phone, but that usually sucks, you need a microphone/headset, or something, and you look/feel like a wired monkey. Check out store.voxilla.com to see a selection of the hardware. For simple cases of personal use, you really don't need to mess with Asterisk, just buy a SIP adapter and use the Broadvoice coupon that comes with it. You get the signup and first month for free, and there is no cancellation penalty, so it is zero risk. [I have absolutely nothing to do with Sipura, voxilla or Broadvoice, just a satisfied customer!]

    4. Re:Huh? by cdcopier · · Score: 1

      Do you have any other links I can read up on SIP etc. I am new to VoIP and need some insight. What about long distance calls and international? Are the conversations recorded by any of the above services? I am thinking about using this at an office of 12-15 people and need to know if I need to record the conversations (by law) or if they are recorded by someone else and I don't have to.

    5. Re:Huh? by glomph · · Score: 1

      They do long-distance and international, it's all pretty much the same. Recording? Are you John Ashcroft or something? You can set up Asterisk to record calls. The services don't do this. (I sure hope not!).

      You can drown yourself in SIP information with a few minutes of Google-searching.

      The site I use for most of my reference is http://voip-info.org which is very well-maintained. It might not be the best starting place, but there are links to everything there, related to Asterisk, SIP, and IP telephony in general.

    6. Re:Huh? by cdcopier · · Score: 1

      Cool...Thanks again!

    7. Re:Huh? by cdcopier · · Score: 1

      One last last thing lol...What about local numbers? I guess that's out the the question? No way to keep an existing local number? What about an existing 1800 number?

    8. Re:Huh? by glomph · · Score: 1

      This feature is called Local Number Portability. (LNP). Broadvoice claims to support it in most parts of the country. I haven't tried doing it yet.
      But I will be, soon.

    9. Re:Huh? by cdcopier · · Score: 1

      Do you recmmend using voxilla for the phone also? I saw the $89 they have and didn't know if it was worth getting. Or do you know any other good sites that sell phones?

    10. Re:Huh? by cdcopier · · Score: 1

      Also, there is only one adaptor with free service...What makes the $99 better than it?

  63. Toll avoidance by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    He mentions "multiple IP-based IAX trunks to multiple remote offices for seamless toll-bypass"... What offices is he referring to? For toll avoidance you'd have to make sure you have a connection to quite a few POPs in different area codes so you could convert your IP call into a PSTN call.

  64. I run asterisk by dougnaka · · Score: 1
    for my companies phone system. We use nufone for our incoming/outgoing 800# and long distance. It's $.02/minute for inbound or outbound LD, so we have an inbound 800 # for most of our calls. We also have 2 digium cards and 6 analog lines plugged into them, we do this for outbound 800# and local calls.

    It works pretty much exactly like a normal phone system, everyone has a cisco 7960 VoiP phone plugged into their ethernet port and their computer plugged into the phone, or a switch on their desk for both. People get extensions, and dial 9 to get out, voicemail system sends you an email with a .wav file (surprisingly small). My phone rings and it's homer simpson saying "I wasn't asleep"... errr or a non-copyright version of someone that sounds like homer simpson...

    The system is easy to configure (pay someone to do it initially), easy to monitor, and very powerful and flexible.

    We are in Utah, have a 1.5MB DSL and a VPN to our NJ office, and they're just more extensions on the phone system.

    We have had a couple problems with Asterisk, our PCI cards are sharing IRQ's and I need to fix that to rid us of a weird beeping.
    Also, someone from NJ calling out gets bad calls when we're downloading stuff, We've got a QoS router, but it needs more tweaking.. if only there were 2 of me...

    I've used nortel and Intellisomethin pbx's and have always hated them. I love asterisk, and have no plans to return to $20,000 pile of crap windows NT floppy disk everything is $500 extra and technical help is $200/hr phone systems again!

    --
    My Linux Command of the Day site : LCOD
    1. Re:I run asterisk by cdcopier · · Score: 1

      Thanks for your help. I assume you get your phone lines (out bound) from your local telephone co.?

    2. Re:I run asterisk by dougnaka · · Score: 1
      Outbound Long Distance all goes over Nufone. Outbound local and 800/866 goes over the local lines. You can easily configure this behaviour, but for some reason when we try 800/866 over nufone we get errors, probably they don't want to be liable for the 800/866 origination fees?

      --
      My Linux Command of the Day site : LCOD
  65. Asterisk's Flexibility by PhotoGuy · · Score: 1
    After having used Altigen in a previous life, and recently trying out and setting up an Asterisk system, I am most impressed.

    It takes a bit more to get your head around some of the configuration items, but once you grasp a few basic concepts, it is incredibly flexible, and extremely powerful.

    One of the nice touches is a wide library of pre-recorded professional phrases. Additionally, you can have custom ones recorded (with something like a 48 hour turnaround), in the same voice, for something like $20 for three recordings. Quite a deal for a very professional office PBX (or mini-telco). (The prerecorded library has some hilarious phrases, recorded in that same professional voice; definitely worth a download of the asterisk source, just to play the .wav's.)

    I believe I have heard that Vonage uses Asterisk.

    The only problem I have had with the system, is occasionally with Digium's cards an extension will get "stupid" (no dial tone, just static); from what I have read, some reshuffling of interrupts (Digium cards like having their own interrupt), and getting a slightly more modern motherboard (mine is '98), would help this problem. It occurs fairly rarely.

    --
    Love many, trust a few, do harm to none.
    1. Re:Asterisk's Flexibility by glomph · · Score: 1

      PhotoGuy definitely gives the essence of what Asterisk is: Pretty Damn Simple. Totally nukes the business model of the special-hardware, special-closed-software proprietary phone world.

      The Allison Smith recordings that PhotoGuy refers to are worth the price of admission. Request a bogus extension? She tells you straightaway: "Weasels have eaten our phone system!"

      I really do not recommend using the FXO/FXS card method of interfacing to the phone company or analog phones. That is pretty cheesy under all circumstances. Trunking to PRI or plain old T1s with the appropriate Digium cards is a snap, and the lines do not go 'stupid'.

  66. The Beatles will sue you ... by A+nonymous+Coward · · Score: 1

    ... unless Apple (computers) beats Apple (record company) and ends up owning that song, how's it go ...

    Michelle ....

    Mah belle ...

    sont des .... something or other

  67. if i was smart by louden+obscure · · Score: 1

    don lapres would be selling this for me and i could retire somewhere where it's warm and pleasant all the time and my money would be untouchable by the feds.

    --
    Serenity now, insanity later.
  68. Readable version by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
  69. No need to go VOIP if you want cheap PBX ... by hieronymus · · Score: 1

    There are is so much very lightly used PBX equipment floating around due to business closings etc. You can get a nice Lucent or NEC system for pennies on the dollar for what you would pay new.

  70. You might make the /. headline... by Andrew+Cady · · Score: 1

    but you wouldn't be the first. My cable ISP does this.

  71. Not nearly as cheap or easy as it looks by Tracy+Reed · · Score: 4, Interesting

    I have been doing just this very thing for the last year and a half. And let me tell you, it is NOT as easy as it would first seem. You really need a huge amount of capital to make this work.

    I tried to self-bootstrap an asterisk based telco as my PRIMARY business supplimented with general Linux consulting with more than just $6k in the bank.

    Here are some of the difficulties I have run into (and solved, but like I said, it has been a long, hard, expensive road):

    1. The technology is COMPLICATED. This means inherently less reliable and big learning curve.

    2. Asterisk is still unstable (even the stable version). A bug due to a completely untested patch added to the latest stable made me look like an idiot in front of a customer.

    3. Standards are lacking. Asterisk often does not support all of the features of many voip phones. What do I tell a customer when there are buttons on their phones that don't do anything?

    4. Asterisk has no billing system built in. Not a fault of asterisk but you can count on having to write your own. There are no existing open sources systems because they are everyones bread and butter. Nobody is giving theirs up so you can use it to compete against them.

    5. Asterisk has no nice end user interface. Again, no real fault of asterisk but you can count on investing in LOTS of developer time. Asterisk configuration is complicated and to make an extensive interface is bound to be very costly.

    6. I have had some bad luck with hardware from Digium. I am willing to chalk that up to bad luck. But the support from Digium is just unusable. I have left a dozen phone messages. Never once got a call back. I had to RMA a part that failed in production after just a few days of use. Yes, we tested the phone system etc and it all looked good. Then a daughterboard on the TDM400P (4 port FXO card) started causing the whole card to fail intermittantly. It took a lot of head scratching and days of calling digium, waiting on hold, eventually ending up in their voicemail box, leaving a message, and waiting for callbacks which never came to actually track down the cause of this intermittant problem. I originally started talking to them on Dec 17 regarding this. They suggested that the card was sharing interrupts and this was the reason it did not play well. On the 21st they said they had seen this problem before. On the 28th they admitted it was a hardware design flaw and offer to RMA the card. Why did they tell me to check shared interrupts then and waste a week of my time? I don't know. Around this time we find out that unloading the driver and reloading it would temporarily fix it but this had to be done on average twice a day. Note that the system is now in production. Worst possible case. So they are going to ship me a new card and I can send back the old card while we keep rebooting the system/reloading the driver on average twice a day. On the 29th very early in the AM I replied to their email with all of the info they need to ship me a new card and I expressed an extreme sense of urgency hoping the card would be overnighted the same day. On the 30th they emailed me an RMA number. I was told I could expect tracking info any minute. A couple days go by with no word from Digium. On January 4th I get an email telling me the card is on backorder! They expect more cards in on the 6th. So I on the 6th I email them to check if it had been shipped because I still had no tracking info and no card had arrived. This has all been interspersed with many phonecalls which were never returned btw. I am only citing emails because I have a record of them. On or about the 10th I call to see what the status is. The shipping personis not available but the operator promises he will call me back the same day wth some info. No phone call. On the 11th (yesterday, as I write this) I call again and explain I did not get a phone call. They are very apologetic and put me on hold while they look into it. After a few minutes I am informed that the card was never shipped! They promis

    1. Re:Not nearly as cheap or easy as it looks by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      RE: point #6

      I hate to tell you this, but don't expect the new TDM to solve ANYTHING. Trust me.
      This problem is prevalent and there have been numerous threads on the Asterisk-Users (and a couple on dev) mailing list regarding this exact problem.

      There are various theories floating around as to what the problem is exactly.

      Some people are chalking it up to the complete and total lack of voltage regulation on the card.

      Others blame bad drivers.

      Still others say it's faulty modules that take down the entire card.

      Me? I don't really care what the problem is, I just expect my $300 card to work properly.

      I highly suggest you go out right now and get a channel bank if you need fxs/fxo that actually works. Thankfully the T1 interface cards seem to be more or less stable. (...other then echo problems of course...)

    2. Re:Not nearly as cheap or easy as it looks by Tracy+Reed · · Score: 1

      This is very discouraging news. I have a T-1 card and it works great. I have had a couple reports of echo from people using the T-1 but nothing reproduceable. From my overall positive experience with the T-1 card and my own single port FXS cards I thought Digium was making good stuff but the TDM seems to be confounding them. If this new TDM does not work this customer is definitely not going to be willing to spring for a T-1 card and a channel bank so I will have to eat that cost if they are even willing to give me another couple of weeks to get that hardware in and installed. If not then I expect this customer will also want a refund on their system which means I will lose thousands more not to mention a great deal of labor on the install. :(

  72. Re:My own telecom? Really? Wow! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Don't forget to hire lots of high priced consultants too! I need more work (currently billing a large telecom at a huge rate). I've been doing this for 5 years and don't see any end in sight.

    Let me know if you need an enterprise architect to design the systems so you don't get sued over failed E911 calls. I'll cut you a deal and only charge $150/hr.

  73. great place for DID's livevoip.com by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Snome Phones 190's have linux inside and kick butt with features.. I think its the only phone with no licence fees and build by a company that care. you can load your own voice rings. And they got intercom features. These phones are from Germany .. so forget cicsco crap and playing.. you can compile your own on these babies.. I see these things being the next best thing to options for the open source world.. crazy

    they where like made for Astrisk

    inphonix has some good deals for canadians.. wish broadvoice would accept canadian cards.. bummer

    Vontage sucks.. but once your into voip u will pickup on that quick..

    oh anyone know the name for the linksys pap2-na so I can download the firmware off the unlocked version and put on a vontage locked one.. I really wanna load vontage pap2's into unlocked ones.. they are decent little (sipura knock offs for the price you can't touch it)

    Anyway.. Voip kicks ass

    Oh babytel.ca is a decent canadian voip just wish they had a better set of local numbers

    can't call local parts to the toronto DID's that just silly.. whats that all about..

    Anywayz my $40 worth

  74. Real life VoIP Prices by q2k · · Score: 1

    If you want a commercial class VoIP PBX expect to pay about $800 - $1200 per user for hardware, software licenses, and installation. I do this for a living and invariably the final price is right in that range. If you want open source with more support look at Pingtel, although the feature set is not as robust as Asterisk. If you want open SIP standards built on Linux look at Zultys. For a mid size company with multiple offices, a VoIP system can pay for itself fairly quickly when you start bypassing the phone company and doing all your inter-office calls over your WAN. We have clients looking at reducing their annual phone bill by a million dollars or more. We can even do handset to handset encryption (3DES or AES), not that we have any real reason to. It makes a cool customer demo though!

  75. Re:My own telecom? Really? Wow! by George_Ou · · Score: 1

    This is the author of the original blog.

    I never said anything about "starting your own telecom". The blog that pointed to me said that. Please check the original blog.

    http://blogs.zdnet.com/Ou/index.php?p=25

  76. We spent even less for a call centre by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    At my company, we created a four user call center with Asterisk. The four operators were given a soft phone and asterisk was set up to accept calls by our master PBX.
    We spent $500 for the server, $1200 for the consulting company who set it up, $500 for xc-ast and some $200 for the softphones. The system has multiple prioritized call queues, full call monitoring, voicemail, IVR etc and has been working like a breeze for the last three months.
    I prefer not to think how much it would cost with a traditional PBX to have the same level of functionality. And now, the operators can work from home using VPN access (and the reporting software tells us when they're online or what).

  77. Its not just the basic hardware... by nethead23 · · Score: 1

    Right, ist no real problem to setup an SIP Proxy serving several thousand people, but it IS a problem to get a decent accounting/billing and customer support going! In addition to this you need all systems, including the PSTN Gateways and the in/outgoing T1 Lines redundant which adds quite some $$$ to the budget. And Asterisk is a system designed for beeing used as a company size PBX, NOT as large scale SIP-Proxy. If you really wanna start your own telco you better use the Sip Express Router (SER) from the "Frauenhofer Institut" germany. See http://wwww.ser.org .

  78. Re:Cost to build cost to maintain by nethead23 · · Score: 1

    You can run a dozen of HA Linux Systems together with a couple of Cisco-Boxes for termination and have it easily managed by 3 persons 24/7. Been there, done that.

  79. What about network outages? by NateCoz · · Score: 1

    I think the idea of IP Telephony is great, until you need to have a system that works 24/7.

    Consider that "works" doesn't just apply to your local setup; it also applies to your internet provider.

    As an example, yesterday in Pennsylvania, New Jersey, and Delaware (USA) Verizon's internet service was interrupted. The end result was no internet traffic.

    In such a situation, while it's great to have the low cost of IP telephony, how are you going to send or receive calls when you have no internet service?

    The traditional telecoms have a very robust physical network, which is independantly powered. Even while internet service was down, Verizon's phone network was still running, without a hiccup.

    Take into account the cost of having the same reliability when caluclating the overall cost of an IP telephony system.

  80. Re:Cost to build cost to maintain by AK+Marc · · Score: 1

    And so I expect this person to support and manage the system 24/7. There are other costs involved, not just turn it on and walk away.

    For the cost that I've seen some contracts with the Big Guys, you could hire a tech or two to live with the system 24/7. So, if you want to pay a few thousand a month for support, I'm sure you can find someone competent to support it. Counting upgrades, support contracts, and normal maintenance, (but not the install) I've seen phone systems from the Big Guys that cost $50k per year for 200 phones. You tell me if you think that is reasonable and whether you think you could get someone to support a system 24/7 for that. Oh, and if you are wondering, that wasn't even for 24/7 support.

  81. Re:Sweet.. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    No, but I'll lend you a book about grammar.