Slashdot Mirror


FBI E-Mail Server Breached

voma writes "The FBI said Friday it has shut down an e-mail system that it uses to communicate with the public because of a possible security breach. The bureau is investigating whether someone hacked into the www.fbi.gov e-mail system, which is run by a private company, officials said. 'We use these accounts to communicate with you folks, view internet sites, and conduct other non-sensitive bureau business such as sending out press releases,' Special Agent Steve Lazarus, the FBI's media coordinator in Atlanta, said in an e-mail describing the problem."

223 comments

  1. Look at this spam I just got today by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny

    From: rmueller@fbi.gov
    To: anonymouscoward@slashdot.org
    Subject: The FBI can help you!

    CONFIDENTIAL INFORMATION YOU WANT TO KNOW.

    This is the agency they want banned from the INTERNET!

    "The Federal Bureau of Investigations" shows you how to get the facts on anyone using our files.

    LOCATE MISSING PERSONS, find lost relatives, obtain addresses and phone numbers of old school friends, even skip trace dead beat spouses. This is not a Private Investigator, but a GOVERNMENT agency DESIGNED to automatically CRACK YOUR CASE with links to thousands of our secret files.

    Find out SECRETS about your relatives, friends, enemies, and everyone else! -- even your spouse! With the New - "FBI"

    You will be AMAZED at what you can discover:

    LICENSE PLATE NUMBER - Get anyone's name and address with just a license plate number! (Find that girl you met in traffic!)

    DRIVING RECORD - Get anyone's driving record!

    SOCIAL SECURITY NUMBER - Trace anyone by social security number!

    ADDRESS - Get anyone's address with just a name!

    UNLISTED PHONE NUMBERS - Get anyone's phone number with just a name- even unlisted numbers!

    LOCATE - Long lost friends, relatives, a past lover who broke your heart!

    E-MAIL - Send anyone anonymous e-mail that's completely untraceable!

    DIRTY SECRETS - Discover dirty secrets your in-laws don't want you to know!

    INVESTIGATE ANYONE - Use the sources that private investigators use (all on the Internet) secretly!

    EX-SPOUSE - Learn how to get information on an ex-spouse that will help you win in court! (Dig up old skeletons)

    CRIMINAL SEARCH - BACKGROUND CHECK - Find out about your daughter's boyfriend! (or her husband)

    FIND OUT - If you are being investigated!

    NEIGHBORS - Learn all about your mysterious neighbors! Find out what they have to hide!

    PEOPLE YOU WORK WITH - Be astonished by what you'll learn about the people you work with!

    EDUCATION VERIFICATION - Did he really graduate college? Find out!

    "The FBI" will help you discover ANYTHING about anyone, with clickable hyperlinks and no typing in Internet addresses! Just download the software and go! You will be shocked and amazed by the secrets that can be discovered about absolutely everyone! Find out the secrets they don't want you to know! About others, about yourself!

    LIMITED TIME OFFER -- ORDER TODAY! ONLY $20 (US)

    You can access the "FBI" NOW so you can begin discovering all the secrets you ever wanted to know! You can know EVERYTHING about ANYONE with "The FBI".

    - Works with all Internet Explorer browsers and all versions of AOL
    - Windows Versions available Only!

    DON'T WAIT TO GET STARTED? It's as easy as 1, 2, 3. ORDER TODAY - While this agency is still legal!

    1. Re:Look at this spam I just got today by dhakbar · · Score: 0, Redundant

      This wasn't a troll... this was a quite funny and entertaining parody of a spam message many of us have received.

    2. Re:Look at this spam I just got today by bobbyjack · · Score: 1

      If you actually think about this post, it's making some very important points, very cleverly. Shame it was posted AC.

    3. Re:Look at this spam I just got today by mfender9 · · Score: 1, Funny

      But what are they going to do for the nation's penis size?

    4. Re:Look at this spam I just got today by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Funny

      please, for a nation of our status florida is average sized at the very least and we shouldn't be so fixated on it. it's all how you use it.

  2. Request by mingot · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Neal, when you post an article like this the only thing anyone cares about is what OS (and especially if it was microsoft) got ownz0red. Please try to put this information in the summary. Thank you.

    1. Re:Request by ScentCone · · Score: 1

      That piece of their e-mail operations was run by AT&T. Or, was that SBC? It's all a blur...

      --
      Don't disappoint your bird dog. Go to the range.
    2. Re:Request by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2

      Neal, when you post an article like this the only thing anyone cares about is what OS (and especially if it was microsoft) got ownz0red. Please try to put this information in the summary. Thank you.

      It may have been non-Microsoft, hence censored.

    3. Re:Request by LurkerXXX · · Score: 1, Funny
      The 'editors' here don't even read their own site to prevent dupe stories. Now you think they are going to actually read the article posted, and also do background research for it?

      Dream on.

    4. Re:Request by kg4gyt · · Score: 3, Insightful

      It could be Linux, just with a poor pick for a password, or unpatched, or even configured incorrectly. Can't always immediately blame the OS, configuration can be just as large of a problem.

    5. Re:Request by Ant2 · · Score: 1

      Linux

      http://uptime.netcraft.com/up/graph/?host=www.fb i. gov

    6. Re:Request by say · · Score: 3, Funny

      But Netcraft confirms it, mail.fbi.gov is dead!

      More seriously, netcraft sez http://www.fbi.gov was running Sun-ONE-Web-Server on Linux when last queried at 4-Feb-2005 18:26:45 GMT. Whatever that is.

      --
      Roses are #FF0000, violets are #0000FF, all my base are belong to you
    7. Re:Request by Frank+T.+Lofaro+Jr. · · Score: 2, Informative

      http://uptime.netcraft.com/up/graph?site=www.fbi.g ov

      says it is running Linux.

      Perhaps that is why Slashdot didn't post the operating system in the summary.

      --
      Just because it CAN be done, doesn't mean it should!
    8. Re:Request by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Insightful

      says it is running Linux.


      It doesn't really. It says it's hosted by Akamai. Which means that the data is unreliable at best. Netcraft is actually detecting the OS and Web server software of Akamai's content serving nodes, which are most likely completely different from the FBI's actual servers.

      See this FAQ item from Netcraft for more information.
    9. Re:Request by ak_hepcat · · Score: 1

      Based on the recent merger murmurings, wouldn't that company be ABCST&T?

      Pronounced Abscessed, of course.

      --
      Support FSF: Stop thinking with your wallet, and think with your imagination. (cc/non-commercial)
    10. Re:Request by bonch · · Score: 1

      If only this same attitude was applied to "A WINDOWS MACHINE WAS HACKED!" articles.

    11. Re:Request by BlueTooth · · Score: 2, Interesting

      THANK YOU! I'm not a MS fanboy or anything, but this is a very good point. A well configured, well patched Windows machine (especially a server) isn't going to be very vulnerable. The same can be said of Linux. Further, an unpatched, poorly configured Windows machine will drop dead very quickly, and the same can be said for Linux. You might even argue that a talentless admin would have an _easier_ time securing up a Windows machine (since sever 2003, anyway, where all services shipped off).

      Yes, there seem to be a lot more exploits found for Windows, and yes an unpatched windows box will probably drop dead _faster_ than a similarly out of date linux box, but a lot of this can be attributed to market penetration.

      --
      SPAM
    12. Re:Request by hdparm · · Score: 1
      People, why would this mean that their email server is on that same machine? Most likely it is not. What you need to query is

      smtp00.fbi.gov.

    13. Re:Request by PDXNerd · · Score: 1

      Their relay might be different than what is used internally as well.

      One additional point of interest from TFA - "The bureau is in the process of switching its e-mail accounts, officials said."

      Does this mean that they are converting their systems over to something new or just those compromised email servers? They probably had help on the inside (of the hosting company)...

    14. Re:Request by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful

      what does the web site link have to do with the underlying mail infrastructure? netcraft ain't going to tell you jack.

    15. Re:Request by Shakes268 · · Score: 0

      I agree. With Linux gaining marketshare it will eventually be a case of which OS is better administered and not necessarily how broken the actual software is. Sure, there will be bugs pop up but even with MS machines most of the worms that wreaked havoc were proliferated by machines that had not had a previously available patch applied. Lazy admins or people who can't administer correctly are the cause for most problems.

    16. Re:Request by brlancer · · Score: 2, Interesting
      I'm not a MS fanboy or anything, but this is a very good point. A well configured, well patched Windows machine (especially a server) isn't going to be very vulnerable.

      I call bullshit.

      Will it be a cakewalk to crack? No. Will it be "very vulnerable"? Yes. Why, you ask? Because there are vulnerabilities that are still unpatched years after reports. Many "minor" vulnerabilities are actually stepping stones to administrator privileges; Bugtraq has more than a few posts regarding stringing a half dozen "minor" ones together.

      Can you make a Windows server secure? I don't think so--not to the degree which would be necessary, and not to the level which a *nix box could achieve with the same amount of effort (time+money). This is especially true WRT services that use IIS.

      I'm not being a Linux/Unix/Be zealot--I've been a Unix admin and a Windows admin and the failure is in the design of the system. Windows was never designed (and still is not being designed) with security in mind. It's that simple and reading a few security manuals will evidence that.

      --
      Someone asked if I had patched against MSBlast; I said yes, I installed Linux.
    17. Re:Request by 4of12 · · Score: 1

      Yes, I think MS gets more abuse than their software deserves on /.

      Your points are all good except that last one:

      but a lot of this can be attributed to market penetration.

      Consider market penetration of MS IIS vs Apache and consider the number of exploits each has seen.

      --
      "Provided by the management for your protection."
    18. Re:Request by iminplaya · · Score: 1

      But Netcraft confirms it, mail.fbi.gov is dead!

      So are Paul McCartney, God, and BSD(Yay Slashdot!).

      --
      What?
    19. Re:Request by John+Whitley · · Score: 2, Insightful

      A well configured, well patched Windows machine (especially a server) isn't going to be very vulnerable.

      That's true as long as you say directly vulnerable. However, in any IT shop you also need to consider indirect vulnerabilities. E.g. the server itself may be secure, but someone's got to administer that system periodically. How secure are the system(s) used by the admins, or other systems on the network? All an attacker needs are some common user apps w/ holes on *some* systems that connect to the open internet (e.g. email, web browsers). With such a foothold established, the internal network and systems become subject to further analysis and attack. Small steps until the target is attained...

      In short, a well set-up server is like having good basic household security: locks on doors and properly secured windows. These methods are useful, but simply won't stop a determined attacker.

    20. Re:Request by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      ...GMT. Whatever that is.

      Greenwich Mean Time.

    21. Re:Request by BlueTooth · · Score: 1

      Perhaps my level of success with Windows is an artifact of lowered expectations...not in terms of security, but in terms of what you can do with it and still have it be secure. My Windows machines live behind a couple layers of firewall, and have most services shut off...I relegate the job of serving things to the public Internet to the Linux box (which also make extensive use of firewalls as a first line of defense).

      IIS, IE, SMB ... these aren't things I would want exposed to the public internet (incidentaly we run some intranet apps on IIS->IE, but the public site is running apache with all but the esentials turned off).

      --
      SPAM
    22. Re:Request by BlueTooth · · Score: 1

      As I hinted in a reply to sibling-post, my views were more desktop OS centric. Desktop should not need an admin because home users simply shouldn't have to think that hard to have a secure/stable computing environment. I don't really know why anyone would use a Windows box for much more than an active directory server on a LAN.

      --
      SPAM
    23. Re:Request by virtual_mps · · Score: 1
      http://uptime.netcraft.com/up/graph?site=www.fbi .gov
      says it is running Linux.
      Perhaps that is why Slashdot didn't post the operating system in the summary

      Or perhaps because the OS of the web server has absolutely nothing to do with the OS of the mail server?
    24. Re:Request by Refrozen · · Score: 1

      I call you on bullshit, the grandparent is right, a fully patched, properly configured Windows server is going to be secure. Windows does have a small (user/file permissions) design flaw, which I find Unix to do near perfectly, but still, Windows can be secure, it's just, personal users don't 'have time to be bothered'.

      Oh yeah, and uninstall IE.

  3. How? by The+Grey+Clone · · Score: 5, Funny

    How was this said in an e-mail if their e-mail server was down?

    1. Re:How? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

      It was obviously sent via the impenetrable forces of an AOL mail account, which never goes down.

    2. Re:How? by superpulpsicle · · Score: 1

      Come on, the FBI is like Don King. Believe half of what they say at best.

    3. Re:How? by Gyorg_Lavode · · Score: 1

      How many email servers can you send through right now?

      --
      I do security
    4. Re:How? by liquidsin · · Score: 5, Funny

      I'm more interested in how they use an email account to view internet sites...

      --
      do not read this line twice.
    5. Re:How? by VB · · Score: 5, Funny

      It came from fbipressrelease723@hotmail.com

      --
      www.dedserius.com
      VB != VisualBasic
    6. Re:How? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      So, the FBI used smtp.comcast.net to relay this information?

    7. Re:How? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      LOLZ

    8. Re:How? by Shabbs · · Score: 1

      HA! I was waiting for them to say "We had to turn off the CPU... you know, that big grey box thing underneath the monitor - the CPU."

      Oh man.

      --
      Mark
    9. Re:How? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      That's easy. They use an Agora server.

    10. Re:How? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Some sites require registration. I'm assuming this means these email addresses are used for this purpose.

    11. Re:How? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Pssst...that's the hard drive.

    12. Re:How? by commodoresloat · · Score: 2, Interesting

      You beat me to it! My first experience with the WWW was retrieving documents through email. I still remember the sense of excitement realizing I could get documents mailed to me by another computer. I didn't know what the web was at the time (this must have been 1992 or 1993; it was well before Mosaic). I don't know if it was the same software (don't recall the name agora) but it was the same trick, and it rocked. I remember being blown away when I learned about lynx; thinking, wow, I don't have to wait for the computer to email it to me!

    13. Re:How? by Aeiri · · Score: 1

      Sent from: fbiagent007@aol.com

    14. Re:How? by quarkscat · · Score: 1

      Just a shady bit of disinformation for the
      American public - no doubt it was the dropbox
      for the server logs from the replacements for
      their CARNIVORE network.

    15. Re:How? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      maybe the same company also runs a proxy there for them?

      just a thought

  4. WWW or SMTP by anandpur · · Score: 1

    Are thay use WWW to send/receive e-mails like HotMail (WebDEV) or SMTP like every one else

    1. Re:WWW or SMTP by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

      Are thay use WWW

      You maen tah intarweb?

      A bird whispered in my ear that they use avian carriers with security bits turned on.

    2. Re:WWW or SMTP by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "...with security bits turned on."

      Better than having their "naughty bits" turned on.

    3. Re:WWW or SMTP by JFitzsimmons · · Score: 1

      RFC 1149

      --
      Beware he who would deny you access to information, for in his heart he dreams himself your master. -Anonymous
  5. Re:confused by dlt074 · · Score: 0

    they explain that in the other email.

  6. are you sure? by museumpeace · · Score: 0, Redundant

    the post says The FBI said Friday it has shut down an e-mail system that it uses to communicate with the public because of a possible security breach. .... Special Agent Steve Lazarus, the FBI's media coordinator in Atlanta, said in an e-mail describing the problem."
    I mean WHICH FBI email server was he using to send the message? How do we know its really Agent Steve and not somebody named 133thaxxor?

    --
    SLASHDOT: news for people who can't concentrate on work or have no life at all and got tired of yelling back at the TV.
    1. Re:are you sure? by grub · · Score: 5, Funny


      and not somebody named 133thaxxor?

      My name is Lee Thaxxor, you insensitive clod!

      --
      Trolling is a art,
    2. Re:are you sure? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Well, no worries guy--he was talking about someone named L33.

    3. Re:are you sure? by B3ryllium · · Score: 1

      With a name like Lazarus ... eyebrows should be raised.

      From the DEAD!

  7. Even worse... by the_skywise · · Score: 1

    How can we verify it was REALLY from them if it didn't come from their usual IP Address!?

    Maybe *this* is the hack! :)

  8. Server was running Linux Sun-ONE-Web-Server/6.1 by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Informative

    From netcraft: Linux Sun-ONE-Web-Server/6.1

  9. Dupe! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    "Slashdot said Friday it has shut down an e-mail system that it uses to communicate with the public because of a possible security breach. The bureau is investigating whether someone hacked into the www.slashdot.org e-mail system, which is run by a private company, officials said. 'We use these accounts to communicate with you folks, view internet sites, and conduct other non-sensitive bureau business such as sending out press releases,' Special Agent CoyboyNeal, Slashdot's media coordinator in Atlanta, said in an e-mail describing the problem."

  10. Familiar Special Agent by Anonymous+Cowherd+X · · Score: 0

    'We use these accounts to communicate with you folks, view internet sites, and conduct other non-sensitive bureau business such as sending out press releases,' Special Agent Steve Lazarus, the FBI's media coordinator in Atlanta, said in an e-mail describing the problem.

    Is that the same Special Agent Steve Lazarus who works in the marketing department at Yahoo and who is known for his CIA, FBI and NSA trolls?

    1. Re:Familiar Special Agent by B3ryllium · · Score: 1

      *Bzzt* Sorry, that would be "Special" Agent Steve Lazarus.

    2. Re:Familiar Special Agent by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Dunno, but Google turned up this:

      http://www.lee-high-alumni.org/81-2registered.ht m
      ----

      1981 Steve Lazarus
      Email: laz263(at)msn.com
      City: Duluth
      State: GA 30096
      Telephone: (770) 232-9197

      Comments or Bio:

      One year at East Tennessee State after graduation, joined the Air Force in 1983. Finished up school, stayed in the A.F. as a military police officer until 1996 when I left to take a job as a Special Agent with the FBI. Hit the jackpot and got stationed in the Atlanta field office--closest I've been to home since graduation.

      Have a beautiful wife of eighteen years (that's how long we've been married, not her age), three daughters 9-13, a dog, and a mortgage--in short, the American dream. Glad I stumbled on this web site; would love to hear from any of you.

      ----

      I'm probably going to hell for this....

    3. Re:Familiar Special Agent by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Stop saying "Bzzt". It's annoying.

  11. And as a followup... by Tackhead · · Score: 4, Funny
    > "We use these accounts to communicate with you folks, view internet sites, and conduct other non-sensitive bureau business such as sending out press releases," Special Agent Steve Lazarus, the FBI's media coordinator in Atlanta, said in an e-mail describing the problem.

    In a followup e-mail describing the problem, Special Agent Laz Steverus said "No sensitive information was compromised, but today is a good time to remind citizens that the FBI is in posession of approximately 22,000,000,000 (TWENTY TWO BILLION DOLLARS) in uncollected judicial judgements from spammers, a portion of which we're trying to return to you folks. Just visit our web site, and read our press release, and it will instruct you in how to help us get this money back to you..."

    1. Re:And as a followup... by jacksonj04 · · Score: 1

      That was worryingly insightful

      --
      How many people can read hex if only you and dead people can read hex?
    2. Re:And as a followup... by Shamanin · · Score: 1

      We use these accounts... view internet sites,

      Great, now someone is using tax payer funded accounts to view www.sexyvixens.com (just a made up site... I think)

      --
      come on fhqwhgads
    3. Re:And as a followup... by Aeiri · · Score: 1

      www.sexyvixens.com (just a made up site... I think)

      No, it exists.


      ...Hey I only pinged it, jeez!

  12. Cool name. by Gulik · · Score: 5, Funny

    Man, what I wouldn't give to be "Special Agent Lazarus." Everything you do sounds cool -- I mean, it might be an utterly boring document about e-mail usage, but you still get to call it "the Lazarus Report."

    1. Re:Cool name. by rxmd · · Score: 5, Funny
      Man, what I wouldn't give to be "Special Agent Lazarus." Everything you do sounds cool -- I mean, it might be an utterly boring document about e-mail usage, but you still get to call it "the Lazarus Report."
      Even better: when you die, you're brought back to life by Special Agent Jesus!
      --
      As a state gets corrupt, its laws multiply; the most corrupt states have the most numerous laws. (Tacitus, Annales 3:27)
    2. Re:Cool name. by nadadogg · · Score: 2, Funny

      Even better: when you die, you're brought back to life by Special Agent Jesus!

      Then you have sex with your mom!
      [/heinlein]

      --
      i use linux and windows oh god how can i have an opinion
    3. Re:Cool name. by gstoddart · · Score: 2
      Man, what I wouldn't give to be "Special Agent Lazarus."
      Everything you do sounds cool


      You know, for very similar reasons, I thought to myself "oh yeah, sure, I believe an article that claims to come from Special Agent Lazarus".

      It sounds like such a hackneyed/stereotyped name that I didn't initially believe it. Wierd.

      --
      Lost at C:>. Found at C.
    4. Re:Cool name. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      Even better: when you die, you're brought back to life by Special Agent Jesus!

      Then you have sex with your mom!

      "Then"?
    5. Re:Cool name. by Ced_Ex · · Score: 1

      Is there's a "Special Agent Lazarus", there has got to be a "Regular Agent Lazarus".

      I mean, if everyone was "special" then how do you separate the cream from the milk?

      Despite what their moms told them, not everyone is special.

      --
      Live forever, or die trying.
    6. Re:Cool name. by CreatureComfort · · Score: 1



      Or your cloned twin sisters... now that's hot!

      hmmm.... so just how many kittens would god have to kill for that one?

      --
      "Unheard of means only it's undreamed of yet,
      Impossible means not yet done." ~~ Julia Ecklar
    7. Re:Cool name. by nadadogg · · Score: 1

      There's no cost too high.

      --
      i use linux and windows oh god how can i have an opinion
    8. Re:Cool name. by GreyWolf3000 · · Score: 1
      Only if you're Catholic.

      Ok...that was bad. Sorry.

      --
      Slashdot: Where people pretend to be twice as smart as they really are by behaving like children.
    9. Re:Cool name. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      He, my name is Lazarus! (Lazare in French, actually).

      I've met another Lazarus ONCE in my life. Unfortunately, he was quite boring, or so I thought.

    10. Re:Cool name. by Feanturi · · Score: 1

      You know, for very similar reasons, I thought to myself "oh yeah, sure, I believe an article that claims to come from Special Agent Lazarus".

      Yeah, that's it exactly, but even before I saw his name, I was already chuckling at the mention that this report about the breached email server came in the form of an email. Think about that for a moment... Then I noticed the name and laughed harder. The report was quite possibly made by the actual intruder, which if true, makes this hilarious, that's why I'm still grinning right now.

    11. Re:Cool name. by kminchau · · Score: 1

      Well don't worry about the e-mail server, I Believe that it will come back from the dead... especially with "Special Agent Lazarus" on their side (his resume says that he has experience in this matter).

      --
      "Never underestimate the power of the Slashdot!"
  13. Well........ by Prince+Vegeta+SSJ4 · · Score: 1
    can't you already register your own .mil domain? Some security.

    HERE

  14. They use an email server to surf the web??? by dos4who · · Score: 3, Interesting
    "'We use these accounts to ...view internet sites...".

    I'm sorry, but when I hear a media spokesperson hiccup like that, my bullshit detector sends up an immediate flag. What was this email server really used for???

    --
    "Yes, I have a Disaster Recovery Plan. It's called my Resume"
    1. Re:They use an email server to surf the web??? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Guess what, RMS uses email to surf the web too. Once I emailed him about a web page and he mailed back "uh sorry, don't have web, please send me these pages". So I sent him these pages.

      That's how real geeks do it!

    2. Re:They use an email server to surf the web??? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      FBI pr0n, what else (possibly not work-safe)

    3. Re:They use an email server to surf the web??? by lowrydr310 · · Score: 1
      It just means their spokesperson isn't very technologically literate.

      I equate this spokesperson to people who think AOL is the internet.

    4. Re:They use an email server to surf the web??? by MajorDick · · Score: 1

      "Making Fun of a Person who uses AOL is like making fun of a Legless Child in a WheelChair"

      A Quote from my GEEK Calendar.....

    5. Re:They use an email server to surf the web??? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      wow now thats really geeky to use sturdy caps

    6. Re:They use an email server to surf the web??? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Porn

    7. Re:They use an email server to surf the web??? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      uh, maybe they have a proxy server on the same network??

      just a thought as it is a private company

  15. FBI raids themselves by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny

    The FBI reportedly surrounded the building (after leaving it) and broke down the front door, only after realizing they had the keys. They confiscated the computers and surrounding evidence for further investigation. "It must be an insider doing the hacking, these systems were secure." said agent r0\/ l337zki.

    1. Re:FBI raids themselves by runderwo · · Score: 1
      The FBI reportedly surrounded the building (after leaving it) and broke down the front door, only after realizing they had the keys.
      So, after realizing they had the keys, they broke down the front door anyway? Yep, sounds like the FBI alright...
  16. In other news... by teledyne · · Score: 5, Funny

    ... the FBI, for a short time, became mysteriously more productive within the span of 12 hours. Some say that their coffee was spiked with a new secret uber-caffeine, while others say a lack of spam in their e-mail boxes allowed them to work more freely.

    Not only that, but personnel over at the Central Intelligence Agency as well as the National Security Agency have also become more friendlier. One employee was noted saying, "Thank God! I was so fucking tired of those guys sending me pics of Goatse!"

  17. GMAIL by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    The bureau is in the process of switching its e-mail accounts, officials said.

    BETTER GET GMAIL!!!

  18. Non Event by I8TheWorm · · Score: 4, Informative

    The key phrases are run by a private company and We use these accounts to communicate with you folks, view internet sites, and conduct other non-sensitive bureau business such as sending out press releases.

    I'm sure, like the NSA, that the FBI has (at least) two networks. One that is internal only for confidential/sensitive communication/files, and one for outside communication such as this one. At the NSA, they are completely seperate, with no ability to copy/move files from one to the other.

    --
    Saying Android is a family of phones is akin to saying Linux is a family of PCs.
    1. Re:Non Event by nharmon · · Score: 1

      All you need is one floppy disk, or one hard copy.

    2. Re:Non Event by I8TheWorm · · Score: 1

      Yes, but no ability to copy/move files from one to the other, at least with regards to the NSA, means no floppies, no USB, etc... Really, meaning no ability at all.

      --
      Saying Android is a family of phones is akin to saying Linux is a family of PCs.
    3. Re:Non Event by Master+Bait · · Score: 0, Troll

      There's no guarantee that the operation of the FBI's other network isn't also farmed out to a similar incompetent cheap-labor dweeb with appropriate Republican political connections.

      --
      "Only in their dreams can men truly be free 'twas always thus, and always thus will be."
      --Tom Schulman
    4. Re:Non Event by idontgno · · Score: 1
      ...with regards to the NSA, means no floppies, no USB, etc... Really, meaning no ability at all.

      I'm pretty sure the fine folks at Ft. Meade don't confiscate eyeballs and fingers. But admittedly, if you can't trust your personnel to not deliberately transfer data manually between nets, you might as well fire them all.

      --
      Welcome to the Panopticon. Used to be a prison, now it's your home.
    5. Re:Non Event by StalinsNotDead · · Score: 1

      Haven't you seen The Recruit? I believe it's covered in the movie. Only, it was the CIA.

      --
      Thanks to the internet, we can now all die alone together! -SomeWoman
    6. Re:Non Event by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      A JWICS connected machine won't write to any external media (including paper) lest you have some seriously high-level privs. Even then, there is some rather effective non-repudiation technology in use. Any other epiphanies you care to share?

    7. Re:Non Event by Gyorg_Lavode · · Score: 1

      Though, if it were, the other network's operator would have all of the same accreditations for sensitive but unclassified and classified information that the FBI would have had had they managed it.

      --
      I do security
    8. Re:Non Event by I8TheWorm · · Score: 1

      with appropriate Republican political connections

      Why in the world would you try to turn this into a partisan issue? Are you suggesting that democrats/libertarians/independants wouldn't farm out work?

      Gheez, the things people will do for mod points...

      --
      Saying Android is a family of phones is akin to saying Linux is a family of PCs.
    9. Re:Non Event by I8TheWorm · · Score: 1

      Not really, if I understand it correctly.

      At the NSA, there are two pc's on every desk. One connects to the local, classified network. The other connects to the outside world for research, or goofing off and reading /., or whatever. It would be entireley possible to farm out the work on the outside network and never have to worry about that networks admin even knowing who the people are that are hitting it, much less give them access to any sensitive information at all.

      The folks at my ISP have no idea what's behind my router and firewall at home, and have no credentials on my network. However, they do have access to the fileshare on their network where some of my test websites are hosted.

      Did I understand your post correctly? You should re-read it and see if it makes sense to you :)

      --
      Saying Android is a family of phones is akin to saying Linux is a family of PCs.
    10. Re:Non Event by fm6 · · Score: 1

      That would make sense. But then again, the NSA is notoriously uptight about releasing this kind of information. (There's a story about how the air conditioning in NSA headquarters doesn't work, because nobody had the authorization to tell the contractor how many people were going to work in the building.) So either your story is a good, but unauthorized, guess. Or you've just spilled a government secret, and will shortly be moving to Guantanamo!

    11. Re:Non Event by I8TheWorm · · Score: 1

      It's ok, I hear the weather down there is nice this time of year... who are those guys in the black suburban waiting by my car?

      Anything I know about the NSA is from a former employee of theirs who I happened to be in contact with for some time. What I told here was 100% of the information I could ever get out of him regarding working there.

      Now, maybe after reading this, they'll do a background check, cross reference, find him, and he'll be the one hanging out at Club Gitmo.

      "Garcon, another Mai Tai please?"

      --
      Saying Android is a family of phones is akin to saying Linux is a family of PCs.
    12. Re:Non Event by CEPi · · Score: 0

      ...and i told them dont shut down the Carnivore project...

    13. Re:Non Event by T-Ranger · · Score: 1

      Simple to solve. Everytime you get in 20 computers, go down to your local hardware store and get a tube of caulking. No more USB. Or just set up your OS so the users can mount external storage.

    14. Re:Non Event by fm6 · · Score: 1

      The weather's fine, but the recreational facilities leave something to be desired.

    15. Re:Non Event by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "How come I can't add Anonymous Coward to my friends list?"
      'cause I'm an employee of NSA... or was it CIA, damn it is so bloody secret that I don't remember who I am working for...

    16. Re:Non Event by dschuetz · · Score: 1

      But admittedly, if you can't trust your personnel to not deliberately transfer data manually between nets, you might as well fire them all.

      It's not that most people can't be trusted, but that one or two people certainly can't be trusted, and you don't know who those people are.

      I was saying just the other day, there has not been a single major spy (that I'm aware of) who wasn't a Trusted insider. Who had the clerances, who had the accesses, who had the ability to do exactly what you're saying - manually transfer data from one system to another (or to his briefcase).

      *That* is why systems are separated, and why there are logical and physical controls enforcing that separation. Not because the staff is untrusted, but because spies are trusted (we just don't know which one is the spy).

    17. Re:Non Event by Master+Bait · · Score: 1

      I said that because outsourcing is one of the gods of conservatives.

      --
      "Only in their dreams can men truly be free 'twas always thus, and always thus will be."
      --Tom Schulman
    18. Re:Non Event by I8TheWorm · · Score: 1

      It's really one of the gods of thrifty-can't-see-the-forest-for-the-trees managers, regardless of their political leanings. Just because Kerry said he didn't like outsourcing doesn't at all mean there aren't liberal or democratic CEO's/Managers sending work offshore. It's typically the less experienced MBA type that thinks if something works on paper, then it works IRL.

      --
      Saying Android is a family of phones is akin to saying Linux is a family of PCs.
  19. Oh shoot by SilverspurG · · Score: 4, Funny

    How was I supposed to know?

    I'm sitting here in the training cubicle. The guy in the cube next to me decides to check his voicemail... ON SPEAKERPHONE. After he dials in his password (for the entire office to hear) I call softly over the cube wall,"I now have your password."

    A tense silence followed, and I could tell that the general perception was "Yeah right--you're just the new guy."

    So I brought up my handy DTMF generator and started replaying his password over and over (at a low volume, but just loud enough so that people in adjacent cubes could hear).

    How was I supposed to know that he had the Admin password for the e-mail server stored in his voicemail?

    At the same time... What sort of dumbass checks their voice mail on speakerphone in public office space?

    --
    fast as fast can be. you'll never catch me.
    1. Re:Oh shoot by karnal · · Score: 1

      Our phone switch doesn't actually play the DTMF tones; it just gives a short "beep" to let you know you've entered a digit....

      On the other hand, it does show up on the display, though, so I'm sure some of the more creative people could just pick up a random phone, hit redial, and watch the numbers fly by, noting that certain combinations of numbers aren't passwords (3337 skips through a message and erases it) etc.

      --
      Karnal
    2. Re:Oh shoot by SilverspurG · · Score: 1

      Our phone switch doesn't actually play the DTMF tones

      I've seen that sort of option on telephones which insist on making some sort of noise for the user. How does that work on speakerphone, though? Unless you're using some sort of proprietary internal phone system which passes the numbers to the switchboard without using the standard tone signals.

      --
      fast as fast can be. you'll never catch me.
    3. Re:Oh shoot by Junta · · Score: 1

      One thought: pressing a key mutes the speaker (or emits alternate sound) before making the noise, noise stops before mute breaks. It's not as if you could hear anything over the tone anyway...

      --
      XML is like violence. If it doesn't solve the problem, use more.
    4. Re:Oh shoot by karnal · · Score: 1

      Proprietary is right. It's a 10 year old phone switch, and the phones are digital, not analog -- I'm assuming they're using some hacked form of ISDN signalling protocol.

      When I was doing computer support, it was fun to walk into an executive's office and smell burnt electronics -- they'd try to plug their analog modem into the digital circuit, and it would fry the modem.

      --
      Karnal
    5. Re:Oh shoot by Drakonite · · Score: 1

      Digital phones have been used in offices for quite a long time now... I'd imagine a lot of digital phone systems could be setup this way pretty easily.

      --
      Shoot Pixels, Not People!
    6. Re:Oh shoot by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      what sort of dumbass checks their voicemail on speakerphone in public office space?

      My boss does. Frequently. He also makes credit-card transactions (verbal and touch-tone) via speakerphone. Oh the fun I'll have if I'm laid off...

  20. This means war!!! by toocoolforschool · · Score: 3, Funny

    Director Mueller wants his email (gunslinger_cute@fbi.gov) back with a vengeance.

  21. No sensitive information? Re-think that by flinxmeister · · Score: 4, Insightful

    I have worked with FBI agents on a few things, and I can't imagine this email server didn't have sensitive info flow through it.

    I'm sure it's FBI policy to avoid it, but it's like a bank...how many people do you think send account numbers, SSN's, etc. to a bank via email? Do you think most people are going to see "fbi.gov" and not think it's safe to email them?

    Regardless of what they say, IF this server was compromised, I bet the attacker saw all sorts of interesting things. It's not their fault, but it's probably more serious than they are letting on.

  22. Or did he? by NMerriam · · Score: 5, Funny

    Special Agent Steve Lazarus, the FBI's media coordinator in Atlanta, said in an e-mail describing the problem.

    Is this some sort of intelligence test? You get an email press release from someone saying the email account they use for press releases isn't reliable?

    --
    Recursive: Adj. See Recursive.
  23. How long is this line going to hold? by PMuse · · Score: 2, Insightful

    'We use these accounts to communicate with you folks, view internet sites, and conduct other non-sensitive bureau business such as sending out press releases,' Special Agent ... Lazarus said ...

    We'll be seeing the first article any time now about classified material having been sent over this server. Some one start a pool.

    --
    "We reject as false the choice between our safety and our ideals." --The American President (20.1.2009)
  24. hm by EMH_Mark3 · · Score: 2, Funny

    Does that mean we need to change our passwords again?

    --
    Burn the land and boil the sea, you can't take the sky from me
  25. Kinda makes you wonder... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    With all of the technical know-how of people here on slashdot ... Has Slashdot ever been breached?

    1. Re:Kinda makes you wonder... by the_mad_poster · · Score: 1

      With "all the technical know-how" on Slashdot, it's probably a spambot by now....

      --
      Alito: A vote for Alito is a punch in the eye to put that bitch back in her place!
    2. Re:Kinda makes you wonder... by dr_dank · · Score: 1

      Happens all the time. They especially like to submit stories to the main page that have already been up, even on the same day. Shameless.

      --
      Where does the school board find them and why do they keep sending them to ME?
  26. Risk of compromise is low by Jack+Taylor · · Score: 2, Insightful

    According to the BetaNews Article Officials said the actual risk of a system compromise was fairly low. So the question is, what did the sysadmin see that prompted him to shut the system down?

    --
    One good turn - gets all the covers.
    1. Re:Risk of compromise is low by PurpleFloyd · · Score: 1
      Perhaps the risk of a system compromise? An analogy might be bomb threats - while almost all are made by bored kids looking to stir up trouble, the potential for damage if the threat is real means it's prudent to evacuate the area, call in the bomb squad, and take other preventative measures. Similarly, although the risk of a system compromise is low, it is not a bad idea to take the system offline and make absolutely sure it is safe before any other buisiness is conducted through it.

      In cases like this, while the risk is low, the potential for damage is high - better to take the safe road.

      --

      That's it. I'm no longer part of Team Sanity.
    2. Re:Risk of compromise is low by Jack+Taylor · · Score: 1

      I agree with you - I was just wondering about the specifics. What would you see on a system that would give you just a slight suspicion it had been compromised, rather than knowledge outright? Suspicious activities in the logs? (and what would they be, exactly?) Maybe the sysadmin saved the root password somewhere on his laptop and then left it on the train? That sort of thing...

      --
      One good turn - gets all the covers.
    3. Re:Risk of compromise is low by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      For agencies like the FBI/CIA/NSA merely detecting a breach is enough. It is no different than when anything with classified information is missing it is assumed that it was captured by an enemy who would want to use that information to do the most damage and not that it was just misplaced.

  27. Special Agent Lazarus? by i_want_you_to_throw_ · · Score: 1

    Lazarus? Really? Special Agent Jesus? By definition he should be able to resurrect the server and dole out retribution.

    1. Re:Special Agent Lazarus? by CreatureComfort · · Score: 1


      Nah... he specializes in forgiveness. There's no place for that kind in today's FBI.

      --
      "Unheard of means only it's undreamed of yet,
      Impossible means not yet done." ~~ Julia Ecklar
  28. Old news... by shamowfski · · Score: 1

    I like to see stuff on slashdot I didn't read on cnn 4 hours ago...

    1. Re:Old news... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      welcome to /.

  29. Re:Server was running Linux Sun-ONE-Web-Server/6.1 by eln · · Score: 2, Funny

    Well then, I guess Netcraft confirms it: Linux-Sun-ONE-Web-Server/6.1 is dying.

  30. I'm shocked and apalled by b00m3rang · · Score: 3, Funny

    How could someone actually read someone else's email without their permission? Next these crackers will be listening to other people's phone calls. Then what, a knock on the door in the middle of the night?

  31. No Wonder 9/11 Happened! by eno2001 · · Score: 1, Interesting
    The FBI said Friday it has shut down an e-mail system that it uses to communicate with the public because of a possible security breach. The bureau is investigating whether someone hacked into the www.fbi.gov e-mail system, which is run by a private company, officials said. 'We use these accounts to communicate with you folks, view internet sites, and conduct other non-sensitive bureau business such as sending out press releases,' Special Agent Steve Lazarus, the FBI's media coordinator in Atlanta, said in an e-mail describing the problem.

    OMFG!!!! The FBI can't tell the difference between the web www.fbi.gov and e-mail user@fbi.gov! Not only that, but they use their e-mail system to "view internet sites"???!!! WTF!!!? That's like a friend of mine asking me about a web address that looks like: http://user@fbi.gov! And the final nail in the coffin is that Special Agent Steve Lazarus sent an e-mail describing the problem to "communicate with you folks". Any guess that they are still using the same web/e-mail system to send out the press release? Wahoo it's so fun to participate in the idiotry of Slashdot!!! ;P

    --
    -"...bad old ideas look confusingly fresh when they are packaged as technology" - Jaron Lanier (Digital Maoism on Edge.o
    1. Re:No Wonder 9/11 Happened! by eno2001 · · Score: 2, Funny
      I also fail it as I can't tell the difference between a
      <B> and a </B>
      .
      --
      -"...bad old ideas look confusingly fresh when they are packaged as technology" - Jaron Lanier (Digital Maoism on Edge.o
    2. Re:No Wonder 9/11 Happened! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Well, some sites require you to register with a real email address before you can view their content.

    3. Re:No Wonder 9/11 Happened! by Beardo+the+Bearded · · Score: 1

      Or preview and submit, apparently. ;)

      --

      ---
      ECHELON is a government program to find words like bomb, jihad, plutonium, assassinate, and anarchy.
    4. Re:No Wonder 9/11 Happened! by MooseGuy529 · · Score: 1
      OMFG!!!! The FBI can't tell the difference between the web www.fbi.gov and e-mail user@fbi.gov! Not only that, but they use their e-mail system to "view internet sites"???!!! WTF!!!? That's like a friend of mine asking me about a web address that looks like: http://user@fbi.gov!

      There was a gospel concert at my school once, and they gave out programs with something that vaguely looked like either a web or email address:

      www.BrotherDennis@aol.com

      Some people are too stupid to have a computer. That includes most AOL users, and any and all people who refuse to absorb simple knowledge such as the difference between an email and a web address. Once, my mom tried to convince me that the (WWW) address of her school's webmail was webmail@city.k12.state.us...

      --

      Tired of free iPod sigs? Subscribe to my blacklist

    5. Re:No Wonder 9/11 Happened! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Is there something wrong with "http://user@fbi.gov"? Looks like a valid URL to me...

    6. Re:No Wonder 9/11 Happened! by eno2001 · · Score: 1

      FTP maybe. But not e-mail address or web address.

      --
      -"...bad old ideas look confusingly fresh when they are packaged as technology" - Jaron Lanier (Digital Maoism on Edge.o
    7. Re:No Wonder 9/11 Happened! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      duh. only in ie, still ok in all other browsers tho (not in rfc apart from ftp tho)

    8. Re:No Wonder 9/11 Happened! by eno2001 · · Score: 1

      Hmmm... I wouldn't know as I haven't used IE on a regular basis in quite a few years. And since I'm pretty much a Linux user... I didn't know they make IE for Linux. ;P Well, you get the drift. You DO, don't you? Or am I assuming too much about your intellect?

      --
      -"...bad old ideas look confusingly fresh when they are packaged as technology" - Jaron Lanier (Digital Maoism on Edge.o
    9. Re:No Wonder 9/11 Happened! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
    10. Re:No Wonder 9/11 Happened! by eno2001 · · Score: 1

      Thanks for the uninmportant news tidbit. I still don't see your point. Was there ever one?

      --
      -"...bad old ideas look confusingly fresh when they are packaged as technology" - Jaron Lanier (Digital Maoism on Edge.o
  32. Pick for password. by www.sorehands.com · · Score: 2, Funny
    1 2 3 4

    Isn't that a good password?
    I use it on my luggage too.

    1. Re:Pick for password. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Bastard. Printing my password all over the net. Now I'll have to change it ...

    2. Re:Pick for password. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Idiot. The password to your luggage is 1 2 3 4 5.

  33. zerg by Lord+Omlette · · Score: 4, Funny

    Out of curiosity, does the FBI have any "normal" agents? Cause if they're all "special" agents, are they really that special?

    --
    [o]_O
    1. Re:zerg by vanza · · Score: 2, Informative

      A guy who used to work with me joined the FBI and got a "special agent" title right away. He also said everybody there was a "special agent", so maybe they just want to feel special.

      --
      Marcelo Vanzin
    2. Re:zerg by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Special agents in training are called "agents". Once you graduate Quantico official, everyone's a "special agent".

    3. Re:zerg by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      They make the ones who ride the short bus the "special" agents and give them jobs like media relations.

    4. Re:zerg by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      because most of them are ..ahem, special

    5. Re:zerg by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Because they're "special".

    6. Re:zerg by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "Cause if they're all "special" agents, are they really that special?"

      They use "special" the same way as in "Special Olympics"...

    7. Re:zerg by Happy+go+Lucky · · Score: 2, Interesting
      Out of curiosity, does the FBI have any "normal" agents? Cause if they're all "special" agents, are they really that special?

      It's a way of constraining them. If you ever go to a federal building and see a bunch of people standing around claiming to be the "Federal Police," they're actually titled "special

      police officers." The reason for this is that no Fed actually has true general police powers. The way the statute is written, they have the powers of "sheriffs and constables" when in the course of some other duties.

      However, they're walked on an amazingly short leash compared to, say, your city's police department. And for good reason: the feds have a large proportion of people too stupid to function as real cops.

      I believe that "Special Agents" are the same situation. They have arrest and warrant powers when in the course of investigating certain matters explicitly given them by statute, but they don't get to just roll up and arrest you if you slug your wife while driving drunk or whatever.

      For the "Special Police Officers," see 40 USC 318. I don't know how that affects "Special Agents."

    8. Re:zerg by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Virtual Case File sure makes them seem Special as in Olympics

    9. Re:zerg by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Well, everybody working at McDonalds is a "manager"...

    10. Re:zerg by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Out of curiosity, does the FBI have any "normal" agents? Cause if they're all "special" agents, are they really that special?

      They're all special. First thay have to graduate in a special school for special children, then they can get a job as special agents. Some of them even participate in special olympics, they are that special.

    11. Re:zerg by indiechild · · Score: 1

      I thought agents in training are called "officers"... like "Officer Starling"? Or maybe I've been watching too many movies.

    12. Re:zerg by phreakmonkey · · Score: 1
      To further elaborate on the design of the system:

      The broader your geographical jurisdiction, the narrower your enforcement powers and vice-versa.

      For instance:
      A federal police officer (FBI, Customs, &etc) can only enforce federal laws, but they can do it anywhere in the USA. (E.g. they can chase you across state lines &etc.)

      A state officer (State Troopers, &etc.) can enforce federal or state laws, but only within their own state. So they can pull you over for speeding or issue warrants, but they can't go into other states to get you. (For that, they just call the next jurisdiction over. :)

      A city / municipal officer can enforce federal, state, or local city laws, but they have the narrowest geographical jurisdiction of power.

      At least- that's how the system was designed. It isn't always applied that way these days. Many exceptions have been granted that make the whole thing a cluster that many LEOs don't even understand. {sigh}

      -pm

    13. Re:zerg by Happy+go+Lucky · · Score: 1
      A federal police officer (FBI, Customs, &etc) can only enforce federal laws, but they can do it anywhere in the USA. (E.g. they can chase you across state lines &etc.)

      Nope.

      A Federal Special Police Officer has little or no police powers off of Federal property. However, under the Assimilative Crimes Act he has the power to enforce state and local laws, when such laws apply on Federal property.

      A Federal Special Agent can enforce Federal law anywhere in the United States, but only those specific Federal laws which his agency is chartered to enforce. For instance, a special agent from the Bureau of Immigration and Customs Enforcement can't do anything with the Pure Food and Drug Act, or the 1968 Gun Control Act.

      A state officer (State Troopers, &etc.) can enforce federal or state laws, but only within their own state. So they can pull you over for speeding or issue warrants, but they can't go into other states to get you. (For that, they just call the next jurisdiction over. :)

      Negative. Staties and locals are rarely-to-never commissioned to enforce Federal laws. And their jurisdictional boundaries are set by each individual state's laws. For instance, here in Colorado, I, as a local cop, essentially have statewide arrest powers which would exceed citizen's arrest powers. State Troopers are actually constrained to enforcing specific statutes. It's very rare that they can act as peace officers in contexts with no connection to traffic, transportation, public roads, motor vehicles, or the safety of the Governor and the Legislature.

      As for jurisdictional boundaries, there's a doctrine called "Fresh Pursuit." It says basically that, if I'm pursuing someone who I reasonably believe has committed a crime, I can follow him no matter how far he runs, so long as my pursuit is continuous and uninterrupted and I have jurisdiction over the place where the original crime occurred.

      At least- that's how the system was designed.

      It wasn't really designed. Our system of justice, viewed as a US-wide whole, is a clusterfsck. It's confused and muddled and you can tell that it originated with something confused and muddled like the English Common Law as interpreted by fifty-one different sovereign entities. It just sort of happened.

  34. omg by phyruxus · · Score: 1

    has that joke ever been more ontopic? mod parent up!
    :-D

    --
    "A witty saying proves nothing." ~Voltaire
    "d'Oh!" ~Homer
  35. Here come the conspiracy theories... by Jack+Taylor · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Sending out press releases designed to provoke your suspect is a tried and tested method in law enforcement. What if they had a mission-critical email server that had been hacked but had to stay online no matter what? (Think of secure intelligence channels.) This press release could be to try and prevent him from coming back...

    It would also explain how they were able to send the email ;)

    --
    One good turn - gets all the covers.
  36. No way by Srsen · · Score: 1
    Special Agent Steve Lazarus, the FBI's media coordinator in Atlanta, said in an e-mail describing the problem.
    Or DID he?
  37. This Story is Surprising... Why? by Greyfox · · Score: 2, Insightful
    I mean look at the recent news. Not like they employ the brightest IT grapes in the bunch. I guess the NSA is snapping up all of those guys. Notice how whenever you hear about some government agency fucking up an IT project, it's never the NSA? So we know where all of the good IT talent in the government is...

    I guess I shouldn't hit below the belt like that but I'm still pissed off about millions of my dollars (And they were all MY dollars thptt!) being wasted on Virtual Case File. I bet some corrupt individuals got really, really rich off that project, too...

    --

    I'm trying to teach myself to set people on fire with my mind... Is it hot in here?

    1. Re:This Story is Surprising... Why? by sfjoe · · Score: 1

      Notice how whenever you hear about some government agency fucking up an IT project, it's never the NSA?

      That's because the first rule of working at the NSA is that you NEVER talk about the NSA.

      --
      It's simple: I demand prosecution for torture.
    2. Re:This Story is Surprising... Why? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Do you know that NSA really stands for "No Such Agency" or "Never Say Anything"?

  38. 0mg L00n1x w4z 0wnz0r3d!!! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    This can't be!! Linux is secure!! Microsoft is teh suck!

  39. Irony of irony by nikkelitous · · Score: 1

    I love the irony of the FBI sending an E-mail press release explaining how they use E-mails for press releases.

  40. Host by 101percent · · Score: 1

    Surprisingly the site runs linux.

    1. Re:Host by Shakes268 · · Score: 1

      Just a matter of time. As Linux continues to gain popularity and makes its way into more corporations, home desktops and government agencies it becomes more and more of a target.

  41. Who wants to bet? by hanshotfirst · · Score: 2, Interesting
    I'll wager 10:1 the "hacker" breaching the system was the RIAA bot searching for P2P software and mp3's on the server.

    Originally I started thinking of this post as a joke, THEN I started thinking... what if the FBI really DID have a server with a collection of confiscated mp3's being held as "evidence" for "review" by agents at their convenience? And what if RIAA really did have such as hack-bot programmed and authorized to shutdown P2P systems?

    Food for thought.

    --
    Why, oh why, didn't I take the Blue Pill?
    1. Re:Who wants to bet? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      come on now.. don't you know FBI drones don't listen to music?!

    2. Re:Who wants to bet? by dn15 · · Score: 1

      Interesting idea. But I get the impression that the server that was "hacked" was specifically for email. I doubt the FBI would store that sort of evidence on a mail server, let alone in a location that is sufficiently accessible to the public for a bot to stumble across it.

  42. Re:No sensitive information? Re-think that by TykeClone · · Score: 1
    Too many.

    It's even more surprising to see the number of people who think a bank's domain "kind of looks like their own bank" and go ahead to register for online banking (giving SSN's, addresses, and account numbers) to the wrong bank - often in the wrong country.

    --
    A fine is a tax you pay for doing wrong and a tax is a fine you pay for doing all right.
  43. Pure Poetry by corporatemutantninja · · Score: 1

    Did anyone else notice that the RIAA spokesman's name is "Lamy"?

    --
    Actually, I was trying to be Insightful, not Funny.
  44. Special agent Lazarus by theendlessnow · · Score: 2, Funny
    I heard that special agent Lazarus was currently trapped somewhere between matter and anti-matter doing battle with his counterpart from an alternate universe.

    Frankly, I think we've all been duped by this false news post.

  45. Posted to the wrong story....

    --
    Actually, I was trying to be Insightful, not Funny.
  46. "Breached"? How? And to what extent? by Ars+Dilbert · · Score: 2, Insightful

    An "E-mail system used to communicate with the public" sounds like an Internet facing SMTP gateway. I can't be sure, obviously, but that's the most likely type of a system that got "breached". The really juicy stuff, the e-mail servers that host the mailboxes, would be on the internal network, and much better protected against hacks.

    If an SMTP gateway was supposedly "breached", what could that entail? Somebody was able to relay through the server? Wooo, big deal! There are like a bazillion open relays out there. Or someone installed a trojan that allowed them to intercept the SMTP traffic? Again, it is not a big deal. The e-mail messages were sent to the public, and SMTP traffic being sent to the outside mail servers isn't encrypted or secure in any way anyhow. It can be intercepted, and e-mail can be read, at any upstream router.

    This has been blown out of proportions, IMO.

    1. Re:"Breached"? How? And to what extent? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      how? their boxed was owned thats how.. to what extent and how we will never know 100%, its the FBI remember?

  47. Uhoh by jav1231 · · Score: 1

    One way you can tell it isn't within the FBI is that they aren't saying, "Yeah, George "DarkRathe" Smith hacked into our mail server." A buddy of mine did this years ago. I believe it was either a government web server or they had a list of modem numbers they were hacking. They got in. Played around for about an hour before the knock came at the door. The guys at the door were not amused.

  48. He went on to say by BlueTooth · · Score: 1

    "We use these accounts to communicate with you folks, view internet sites, and conduct other non-sensitive bureau business such as sending out press releases," Special Agent Steve Lazarus, the FBI's media coordinator in Atlanta, said in an e-mail describing the problem.

    He went on to say, "This b0x p0wn3d by daHax0r2000"

    --
    SPAM
  49. Bigger Picture by afxgrin · · Score: 1

    The person who hacked the mail server was also the one who notified Slashdot about the mail server getting shut down.

  50. What's next Bill Gates? by agent · · Score: 1

    No one will get his address, because Windows is so secure.

  51. FUD to keep the attention off of this site. by agent · · Score: 1

    http://www.robotwisdom.com
    or this site.
    http://english.aljazeera.net
    Peace.

  52. A hacker con is being held in DC by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    starting today. Today the FBI's mail server gets Pwn3d. Hmmmm. Nah, those two things couldn't possibly be related...

  53. Special Agent Steve Lazarus! by RichardX · · Score: 1

    With a name like that he should have his own TV show and action figure!

    They could even merchandise a breakfast cereal. Kids could help him by buying cereal to defeat the Evil Doctor Haxxor and his army of netbots

    --
    Curiosity was framed. Ignorance killed the cat.
  54. MOD PARENT UP! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    n/t

  55. Special Agent by grouse · · Score: 1

    A special agent is a federal investigative employee who has powers of arrest and is usually armed. This is "special" when compared to the powers of an ordinary federal employee, not to other agents within the FBI.

  56. wait...the PR was an EMAIL? by jayloden · · Score: 1

    "Special Agent Steve Lazarus, the FBI's media coordinator in Atlanta, said in an e-mail describing the problem."

    Does anyone else find that amusing?

    -Jay

  57. Duh by Dachannien · · Score: 1

    Gmail, of course!

    1. Re:Duh by NaDrew · · Score: 1
      Gmail, of course!
      I help run a fairly popular message board. As is common on these systems, a member stepped out of line once too often and we had to suspend him for a week. We sent him the standard "stand in the corner for 7 days and think about what you've done" email. His reply was that his First Amendment rights were being violated because we weren't letting him post, and that we'd be hearing from his lawyer.

      And what do you know, two minutes later we received an email from his lawyer.

      Who apparently uses Gmail.

      And who posted from the same IP.

      So we all had a little laugh over that and then banned him. I can't wait for his next stupid move; he's already tried two sock puppets. Not that any of this is on topic, but the "Gmail, of course!" reminded me of it.
      --
      Vista:XPSP2::ME:98SE
  58. No, their WEBSERVER... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    ...runs Linux. That does not necessarily mean that the EMAIL server in question is the same machine or was running Linux either.

  59. Re:No sensitive information? Re-think that by camusflage · · Score: 1

    I'm sure it's FBI policy to avoid it, but it's like a bank...how many people do you think send account numbers, SSN's, etc. to a bank via email?

    And what makes you think we don't monitor for that type of thing? Heaven help the fool who sends sensitive customer information unencrypted out of here. Re-education with a large wooden mallet usually ensues.

    --
    The truth about Scientology, Xenu, and you: Operation Clambake
  60. The WB Get Lex Sweepstakes by l0ungeb0y · · Score: 1

    Obviously this is just some rabid Smallville fan trying to get a leg up on the competition for the Get Lex Sweepstakes where you gain access to Lex Luthors email account. By hacking the account, he figured he'd be able to change the password and lock everyone out of the WB competition. Of course, he figured Lex might not have an email account at the FBI, but he figured it was as good as any a place to start... well... turns out Lex didn't. Lex does however have a lexluthor@verizon.com address. So the perp sends his apologies to the FBI for any undue alarm caused.

    And ... Uhhhmmm .... I of course have no idea as to who this person is or his whereabouts.

  61. Easy Way to Figure that Out by spdt · · Score: 1

    Just do a quick, harmless little port scan on their mail server when it comes back up.

    Remember:
    25 -> SMTP
    80 -> HTTP
    443 -> HTTPS (More likely than plain HTTP; they are the FBI, after all)

  62. FBI Honeypot by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Thank you for your support.

    Dear reader, you have now opted in to a new and exciting program in government monitoring. You are now a member of our cyber-terrorists group. Active participation earns you amazing awards such as escorts, email, telephone, and web surfing archives, and are brought to you by the freedom isn't free crowd out of that great state of Texas!

  63. Yikes. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I don't know whether they're talking about their webserver or their email server, but they're joking themselves if they think correspondence directed to asmith@fbi.gov (first initial, last name) is unclassified.

    I did cash-only, non-1099'd, no-real-name-on-file work gathering data for the FBI in 2002. The vast majority of the communication I had with my contact was through said "unclassified" channels, including various reports I wrote up, and scheduling of meeting times and locations. The physical meetings were when we exchanged most of the physical stuff (cash and documents), but if somebody really gave a rat's ass about what I, and I'm sure a lot of others did, their "unclassified" system would be a nice jumping off point.

    I doubt I'll be working for them again any time soon.

  64. Netcraft so what? by RevDigger · · Score: 1

    Why are you kids laboring under the delusion that the web server OS - as reported by Netcraft - has any bearing on what the mail server OS might have been?

    They uh...needn't be the same machine.

  65. Us & Them by MSTCrow5429 · · Score: 2, Interesting
    'We use these accounts to communicate with you folks, view internet sites, and conduct other non-sensitive bureau business such as sending out press releases.'

    You folks? Gee, thanks alot, we don't trust you much either.

    --
    Slashdot: Playing Favorites Since 1997
  66. The Lazarus Report... by ImaLamer · · Score: 1

    ...no matter what, the evidence you buried just keeps coming back

    *ducks*

  67. The "usually armed" part is NOT special. by Ungrounded+Lightning · · Score: 2, Interesting

    A special agent is a federal investigative employee who has powers of arrest and is usually armed. This is "special" when compared to the powers of an ordinary federal employee, not to other agents within the FBI.

    Only the powers of arrest part is "special". A mind-boggling range of government employees have federal permission to carry guns. (And this permission, like post-office driving rules, overrides state laws.)

    This was apparently first noticed when an airport security employee leaked the list of agencies whose members could carry thorugh airports. In 1997, according to a GAO study (the source for info in this libertarian party press release) the nubmer of agencies was 45 and the number of gun-toters approaching 60,000 and had grown by over 2,400 in the previous year. I've heard nothing to indicate that the number has not continued to climb since then.

    Some non-law-enforcement worker categories:

    Poultry inspectors.
    Disaster aid workers.
    IRS auditors.

    Some agencies with "special agents":

    Small Business Administration
    NASA
    Department of Education
    U.S. Fish & Wildlife Service
    Department of Veterans Affairs

    The Energy Department has access to machine guns and other agencies can summon tanks and military helicopters.

    According to the Western Journalism Center these agencies have SWAT teams:

    The National Park Service
    the Department of Health & Human Services

    --
    Bantam Dominique roosters crow a four-note song. Once you've heard it as "Happy BIRTHday" you can't NOT hear it that way
  68. Re:No sensitive information? Re-think that by j+h+woodyatt · · Score: 1

    Yeah, what flinxmeister said.

    I once posted something here on Slashdot that got me an interview with an FBI Special Agent (I wasn't in trouble--more like: I was a good candidate for a supporting witness). So, out of the blue, I get this email claiming to be from an FBI agent.

    What's the first thing you do when that happens? View the raw source and look at the headers. Start back-tracking the return path and see if it isn't obviously bogus. Eventually, I had to go through this weird game of telephone tag before I could feel confident I wasn't being gamed by someone pretending to be the freaking FBI.

    Would somebody please tell me who is to blame for the fact that the FBI has outsourced its Internet presence to somebody basically indistinguishable from an Al Qaeda front on the first glance at the mail headers? How freaking difficult is it for FBI email to come from a return path terminating in an actual fbi.gov domain MTA? Jeebus!

    --
    jhw
  69. Re:No sensitive information? Re-think that by flinxmeister · · Score: 1

    And what makes you think we don't monitor for that type of thing? Heaven help the fool who sends sensitive customer information unencrypted out of here. Re-education with a large wooden mallet usually ensues.

    Heh heh...I banking industry fanboy? Well, there's always a first. (j/k)

    Of course...I'm talking about sensitive information into a bank...by customers. I have yet to encounter a bank or credit union who will close an account (or apply a large wooden mallet treatment) because the member/customer sends too much information via email.

    What I'm talking about is people who sent things TO the FBI. Anonymous tips, etc. I'm sure there are people who are interested in the information, and if joe random had a servers eye view of all of it for any length of time....well let's just say that email is probably always more fun to read than it should be...almost definitely more sensitive than they are letting on.

  70. One question.. 3rd party management? by DamienMcKenna · · Score: 1

    OK. Let me get this straight. You have one of the country's most secretive organizations, one that deals with vast quantities of highly secretive data, and they hired an outside company to manage their public email? Um, duh!! Surely they could have hired one or two geeks to do this for them instead?

    Damien

  71. Carnivore by bsandersen · · Score: 2, Funny

    They used to use carnivore to read our mail. Maybe they just thought it would be nice to take turns and let us read their mail for a while.

  72. It would explain things by slashdot_commentator · · Score: 1

    I report all phishing attempts my mailbox recieves to the FBI. I usually go to the trouble of looking up the network provider, server latitude & longitude, the DNS server, and the domain information. Haven't seen one in months.

    --
    There is no America. There is no democracy. There is only IBM and AT&T and DuPont, Dow, General Electric, and Exxon
  73. This Close... by XFilesFMDS1013 · · Score: 1

    You are this close, |--|, to insulting Special Agents Fox Mulder and Dana Scully. And they won't be happy about that.

  74. In case it got /,-ed... by Chr0n0 · · Score: 1

    someone should mirror www.fbi.gov
    :)

  75. The US govt is irresponsible by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    The more they add fucking electronics and computers and software the more our elections will be rigged, the "confidential informants" compromised, god know what else with their huge ass databases full of OUR INFO!

    The Shit were seeing is a fucking catastrophic disaster.

    WAKE UP AMERICA!

  76. Re:FBI Honeypot - irrelevent by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0


    Thank you for your support.

    Dear reader, you have now opted in to a new and exciting program in government monitoring. You are now a member of our cyber-terrorists group. Active participation earns you amazing awards such as escorts, email, telephone, and web surfing archives, and are brought to you by the freedom isn't free crowd out of that great state of Texas!

    if the electronic vote is allowed to exist then everything, and I mean EVERYTHING is 0w3nd.

    WAKE UP AMERICA!

  77. It was Mulder, I tell you by Space_Soldier · · Score: 1

    Maybe Fox "Spooky" Mulder isn't happy that X-Files has been canceled 2.5 years ago, and he is out of the job.