Slashdot Mirror


Use A Regular Phone For Cellphone Calls

nizo writes "Not too long ago I decided to get rid of my landline, however I miss being able to make a call with a regular phone, especially long calls that might drain my battery. It would also be nice if I didn't have to hunt for my cellphone at home when it rings. Well, it looks like there is a simple solution with a Cell Socket, a cradle for your cellphone that can be used to attach your cell line to one or more regular phones." Even better, for those with a landline or VoIP phone, would be a system that automatically picks the cheapest route out for any given call.

248 comments

  1. psh, rotary beats that anyday by biryokumaru · · Score: 5, Interesting
    stolen from hack-a-day:

    a rotary cellphone

    --
    When you're afraid to download music illegally in your own home, then the terrorists have won!
    1. Re:psh, rotary beats that anyday by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
    2. Re:psh, rotary beats that anyday by desplesda · · Score: 2, Informative

      We've discussed this before.

    3. Re:psh, rotary beats that anyday by thundercatslair · · Score: 0

      If I had more knowledge in electronics I would love to make this. Imagine bringing that on the bus and busting it out to call someone, everyone would be amazed, you could pick up so many women with it. Remember women are like voltron, the more you put together the better it gets.

    4. Re:psh, rotary beats that anyday by Scurra+UK · · Score: 2, Informative

      You can often get them on eBay, they're known as Pokias (check out pokia.com for the bloke who started it all)

    5. Re:psh, rotary beats that anyday by That's+Unpossible! · · Score: 1

      What i want is a cell phone in the shape of one of those old rotary handsets... just the handset, not the base with the dial on it. Nice heavy feel in your hand. Small enough where it wouldn't be a complete pain in the ass to carry it around, but still bizarre enough to be funny.

      --
      Ironically, the word ironically is often used incorrectly.
    6. Re:psh, rotary beats that anyday by iMaple · · Score: 1

      What i want is a cell phone in the shape of one of those old rotary handsets... just the handset, not the base with the dial on it. Nice heavy feel in your hand. Small enough where it wouldn't be a complete pain in the ass to carry it around, but still bizarre enough to be funny.

      Apple .. r u guys listening. Maybe a cell phone version of the iPos scroll wheel (It might just be too cool you know)

    7. Re:psh, rotary beats that anyday by vikramrn · · Score: 1

      Perheps you are referring to something like the Nokia 3650...It has the buttons in a rotary fashion...

      Or were you referring to the handset of a rotary dial phone? In which case it would be too impractical to carry around anyway.

    8. Re:psh, rotary beats that anyday by kilodelta · · Score: 0

      Dang it, you beat me to it. All you'd need to do is add a charging/dc rectifier so you could plug it in and use AC power if need be, while also charging the batteries.

      One of my co-workers is a retro fanatic. He wants to build one of those into an old WE500 set. Wouldn't be too hard to incorporate it into a trimline phone either.

    9. Re:psh, rotary beats that anyday by ockegheim · · Score: 2, Funny

      That's nothing... Maxwell Smart used a rotary-dialled portable phone... in his shoe in 1968.

      --
      I’m old enough to remember 16K of memory being described as “whopping”
    10. Re:psh, rotary beats that anyday by Dorothy+86 · · Score: 1

      he had shoes? 99 captured all my attention ;)

    11. Re:psh, rotary beats that anyday by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Women are nothing like Voltron. They're more like a black hole that sucks you into a hellish world of nagging and bitching. Sometimes I wish I was gay.

  2. Color by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Does it come in any other color than white?

  3. Enter Asterisk... by PornMaster · · Score: 3, Insightful

    I think that you'd be able to hack something together with Asterisk to do the "Even better, for those with a landline or VoIP phone, would be a system that automatically picks the cheapest route out for any given call." bit.

    1. Re:Enter Asterisk... by LostCluster · · Score: 0

      Let me be the first to ask... what's Asterisk?

    2. Re:Enter Asterisk... by Eric+Giguere · · Score: 4, Funny

      A short Gaul whose best friend is Obelix... oh, wait, I thought you meant Asterix, not Asterisk...

      Eric
      See your HTTP headers here
    3. Re:Enter Asterisk... by vslashg · · Score: 0, Flamebait
      Let me be the first to ask... what's Asterisk?
      No kidding. I wish there was some tool to help answer those kinds of questions.
    4. Re:Enter Asterisk... by Prophetic_Truth · · Score: 2, Informative

      Asterisk is an open sourced pbx project that has really matured. Some people still gripe about its scripting, and difficultly to set up, but I find it a breeze. If you're relaly interested check out the Asterisk Wiki.

      --
      time is a perception of a being's consciousness
      time is your 6th sense, the wierd ones are 7+
    5. Re:Enter Asterisk... by Kevin108 · · Score: 0

      Tell them we need strawberries...

      --

      It's a perfect time for being wasted.
      A perfect time to watch the stars.
      - Burden Brothers, "Beautiful Night"
    6. Re:Enter Asterisk... by IBeatUpNerds · · Score: 1

      Perhaps you could. But is it really worth it? I spent months at my previous job dealing with Asterisk code. Ga-freaking-ross. I'd rather be debugging random memory corruption on vxWorks :)

    7. Re:Enter Asterisk... by dave420 · · Score: 1

      You can do it with any telephony software, be it analogue stuff or VoIP. It's called "least cost routing", and has been done ever since variable-rate routes appeared.

    8. Re:Enter Asterisk... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      There's a company called Norwood Systems which offer that sort of landline / VoIP / mobile connectivity.

      From what I understand, you can wander around with a bluetooth headset and it will receive and route calls to you anywhere in your office. I'm not completely sure of the technicalities. They have a 'How it Works' page but it doesn't go into the details (http://www.norwoodsystems.com.au/).

  4. I tell you... by Faust7 · · Score: 3, Funny

    Just the cosmically wrong image of my sleek Nokia cell sitting right next to a black Western Electric rotary phone is enough to make me want one of these.

    1. Re:I tell you... by soft_guy · · Score: 1

      Actually, I've been *really* wanting an antique Kellogg 925 bakelite phone vintage 1930s. The problem is that I no longer even have a landline to use it on. This would be cool.

      --
      Avoid Missing Ball for High Score
    2. Re:I tell you... by Analogy+Man · · Score: 1

      Although you can't take that old rotoray with you to the beach, after 50 years there is probably no degradation in performance and it won't drop calls. I won't be dumping my land line any time soon!

      --
      When the people fear their government, there is tyranny; when the government fears the people, there is liberty.
  5. um... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny

    Even better, for those with a landline or VoIP phone, would be a system that automatically picks the cheapest route out for any given call.

    For those with a VoIP phone, there's already such a system: always use the VoIP phone.

    1. Re:um... by Geoffreyerffoeg · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Two words: local calls.

      Two more: unlimited minutes (for a certain type of call).

    2. Re:um... by blueorder · · Score: 1

      True...but it's only a couple buck more a month to have unlimited minutes nation wide with Vonage while a much heftier monthly bill will occur if you try unlimited minutes on cell...

      --
      blueorder
    3. Re:um... by karnal · · Score: 1

      But if you already have a cell phone plan, even the cheap plans give you free nights and weekends...

      This means you could use your cell phone after 9pm (or whatever the time is) to make calls, and then get a cheaper plan for VOIP since you'll only be using it during the other hours (6-9pm) that you'll be home.....

      --
      Karnal
  6. Out of batteries? by game+kid · · Score: 2, Funny
    I miss being able to make a call with a regular phone, especially long calls that might drain my battery. ... Well, it looks like there is a simple solution with a Cell Socket, a cradle for your cellphone that can be used to attach your cell line to one or more regular phones."

    Apparently the server needs a Cell Socket.

    I can't wait for the page to be...well...not-Slashdotted.

    --
    You can hold down the "B" button for continuous firing.
  7. Re:Article Text Without FUD by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I think we have a new /. sub-culture.

  8. Well... by Seabass55 · · Score: 2, Funny

    "especially long calls that might drain my battery."

    It seems like a simple solution would be to not talk on the phone so long.

    1. Re:Well... by Doppler00 · · Score: 2, Insightful

      And you can always just plug the phone in and use a headset. This would be exactly the same as using a landline (wired phone), only you can unplug the phone when it's done charging!

    2. Re:Well... by paulkoan · · Score: 3, Funny


      Exactly. What is a slashbot doing on the phone anyway?

      Haven't they heard of email? Or IM? Or text messages?

      Or any other technology that means you aren't reminded everytime that it is another human you have to talk to.

      --
      This signature intentionally left blank
    3. Re:Well... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      Thee proper nomenclature ist `SLASHDOTTER'.

      You Have Been Warmed!

    4. Re:Well... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Your cow is being milked.

  9. interesting by blew_fantom · · Score: 3, Interesting

    with cell phone plans getting cheaper, this looks to be a viable alternative what with national call plans and competitive prices from all providers. the only thing of course, is that to have DSL, you need an actual phone number/line. unless everyone is going to run to cable, land lines are here to stay. that and many places don't even have cell towers anywhere near them so cell phones are useless in many areas anyway. in that respect, i don't see the land line market dying anytime soon.

    1. Re:interesting by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Interesting

      I'm not so sure about DSL requiring a phone number. I know it needs a phone line, but according to some Speakeasy promotional materials, one of the advantages of signing up for their DSL service is you can drop your landline service if you don't use it. Maybe this is new, but I'm not at all surprised.

    2. Re:interesting by technobard · · Score: 3, Informative

      When SBC first started offering DSL (many moons ago), they would only install it on a second line. This second line did not require a phone number. They have since moved away from that, but for reasons too long to get into, I still have service setup that way. Whenever I talked to them, they always encourage me to switch to the Yahoo DSL branded offering. They really want the line back.

    3. Re:interesting by wayne1932 · · Score: 1

      I have an SBC DSL line. I have fiber to the curb. When I finally found out I could get DSL, the Phone man run a new pair to the back of my house to the NIC, and installed a circuit card in the pedestal. Later the DSL installer came to the house, ran a CAT-5 cable through my attic and installed the modem in my computer room.

      I think two lines are just a convenience in FTTC areas, otherwise filters are necessary to prevent interference.

    4. Re:interesting by k.ellsworth · · Score: 1

      Here in Chile, IFX Networks, offers a "clean pair (phone line without phone service on it, just the cooper wire)" for xDSL Connections, for like 2US$ more.

      my wife and i, have each a 1000 minutes cell plan, so a land line is "useless" for our scenario.

      ummm cellsocket sound nice, not that cheap, but nice

      --
      Putting a windows cd backwards, plays evil messages, but it gets worse, putting it right, installs windows.
    5. Re:interesting by delirium+of+disorder · · Score: 1

      Get the Yahoo service. I used the old second line SBC (It used to be ameritech) DSL for years. I just upgraded a few months ago and am now getting 300kbps easily down (at times over 700kbps). Before I could only get around 60kbps down on average 300kbps max.

      --
      ------ Take away the right to say fuck and you take away the right to say fuck the government.
    6. Re:interesting by MaceyHW · · Score: 1

      Actually, Verizon allows "naked DSL" (sadly they don't call it that) is some locations. My parents own a small store in NH, and in making the switch to voip and a local DSL provider, they discovered that they could ditch both of their verizon phone lines. dont' know how it works exactly, but they have DSL and no phone lines. It doesn't make any sense to me from a business perspective, but....

    7. Re:interesting by Overt+Coward · · Score: 1
      the only thing of course, is that to have DSL, you need an actual phone number/line. unless everyone is going to run to cable, land lines are here to stay

      Looking with a longer-term view, high-speed WiFi can eliminate the need for landlines altogether, as you can use a broadband WiFi connection rather than cable or DSL.

  10. Cheapest route is easy by Tony+Hoyle · · Score: 2, Interesting

    I have a set of lookup tables on my asterisk server which do this.

    Of course the cheapest route is always analogue, so it's not a great advert for VOIP :)

    Not sure I'd want my mobile phone to link to it though.. that's a separate number that only a few trusted people know.

    1. Re:Cheapest route is easy by G27+Radio · · Score: 1

      Of course the cheapest route is always analogue, so it's not a great advert for VOIP :)

      I'd have to disagree there... Broadvoice.com has some pretty cheap unlimited packages--especially if you BYOD (bring your own device, such as Asterisk.) I've only been trying them out a little while, but to be honest I haven't been incredibly impressed with their support (hard to reach over the phone, occasional high latency at some locations, etc.) But for $20/mo you get unlimited calling to 21 countries (including US and Canada.)

      Of course, if you're not making many non-local calls, I guess analog is still the way to go. Especially if you don't already have high-speed Internet.

  11. TFA by Teclis · · Score: 2, Interesting

    I hope their phone system is built better than their webserver.

    I can't RTFA right now, so my only concern is the ability to adapt to different cell phone manufacturers, and what about newer cell phones after purchase. Otherwise, this actually doesn't sound like too difficult a project, but it's the idea that counts. This kind of device can easily be created with a few components and a PIC for under $10.

    --
    Never let your sense of morals prevent you from doing what's right. --Isaac Asimov
    1. Re:TFA by TheGavster · · Score: 1

      No, you see, the phone system *is* the webserver. Who says 56K over cell isn't fast enough to handle web services?

      Well, apart from the way the page doesn't load.

      --
      "Because Science" is one step from "Because old book". Try "Because of my experiment testing my falsifiable assertion".
    2. Re:TFA by complete+loony · · Score: 1

      From TFA:
      "CELLSOCKET kits for Motorola V60, V120, T720, T730, T731, V300, V400, V500, V505, V525, V547, V555 and V600 now only $99.95"

      --
      09F91102 no, 455FE104 nope, F190A1E8 uh-uh, 7A5F8A09 that's not it, C87294CE no. Ah! 452F6E403CDF10714E41DFAA257D313F.
  12. Kid's telephone by Sprotch · · Score: 1

    They stopped selling those nifty phones for kids... Paranoia?

    1. Re:Kid's telephone by RobertLTux · · Score: 1

      No i would call it stupidity and bad engineering 1 ~90 percent of the rf from the cell phone is going out the antenna (remember SWR type stuff) 2 handsfree kits should work with any phone made in the last 3 years (standard 2.5 mm stereo plug) 3 therefore you should design the phone: 1 with a handsfree jack and earpiece 2 so that the antenna gets pointed away from the head 4 profit!!

      --
      Any person using FTFY or editing my postings agrees to a US$50.00 charge
    2. Re:Kid's telephone by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      More likely it's uncommon sense combined with a baffling willingness to put safety ahead of profit.

  13. Re:Article Text Without FUD by mrdaveb · · Score: 4, Informative

    Why is this same joke being modded funny on every story where it gets posted? If anyone were to bother to RTFA, they would see it is a pretty straight-forward article. What could there even be FUD about?

    --
    Homme petit d'homme petit, s'attend, n'avale
  14. Fast Forward by classzero · · Score: 5, Informative

    Cingular offers a device called a fast forward. You put the device in a cradle that connects to the landline and it automatically forwards all calls to your landline while charging your device.

    1. Re:Fast Forward by classzero · · Score: 1

      I'm sorry, I worded that post wrong. You put the cell phone in the fast forward cradle and all calls are routed to whatever landline is plugged into the cradle.

      I have got to start using the preview button.

    2. Re:Fast Forward by DrewCapu · · Score: 5, Informative
      Cingular offers a device called a fast forward. You put the device in a cradle that connects to the landline and it automatically forwards all calls to your landline while charging your device.
      You're more likely to get a better score if you give a link about what you're talking about :)
    3. Re:Fast Forward by classzero · · Score: 1

      I would but I'm at work and my firewall won't let me get to that particular page. If I told you where I'm working you'd fall out of your chair laughing.

    4. Re:Fast Forward by grozzie2 · · Score: 5, Funny

      you are working at a place where the firewall wont let you got the cingular site, but will let you post on /. --- I'll take a wild guess that you must be somewhere in the support department at cingular...

    5. Re:Fast Forward by BigZaphod · · Score: 4, Funny

      Oh, dang. I thought the fast forward would let you skip ahead in time during conversations... :-)

    6. Re:Fast Forward by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Nah, the fast forward allows your team to proceed directly to the next pit stop without having to complete any further tasks.

    7. Re:Fast Forward by puto · · Score: 1

      Pretty funny but I am someone who works for Ma cingular, well if you have access to anything it is to Cingular.com. Very few people on our network can get to the outside world.

      Puto

      --
      The Revolution Will Not Be Televised
    8. Re:Fast Forward by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Thereby saving interested parties the trouble of typing "fast forward cingular" into Google and clicking the first result? Gotcha.

      (-1, Redundant)

    9. Re:Fast Forward by metao! · · Score: 1

      There is also Norwood Systems http://www.norwoodsystems.com/, who are doing some interesting stuff with routing calls via Bluetooth and VOIP (inside offices and such), as well as working on Project Bluephone.

    10. Re:Fast Forward by Fizzl · · Score: 2, Funny

      That would be sweet...

      Me: Sir, have you considered the possibility that the problem might be at your end?
      Customer: What?!? Fuck you, you wise-ass! Get your shit fixed now or I'll sue you!
      Me: Alright... Calm down sir. Let me explain...
      [Press the 30 minute skip button]
      Customer: Ah, hmm... Yes, it seems to be my own firewall after all. Guess you were right. Thanks for help!
      Me: No problem at all! I'm here to serve!

    11. Re:Fast Forward by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      Cingular offers a device called a fast forward. You put the device in a cradle that connects to the landline and it automatically forwards all calls to your landline while charging your device.

      Ehh, who wants a landline. That's why I have a cell phone. I already have enough monthly bills, I'd rather get Voom for the money.

    12. Re:Fast Forward by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Better do it fast....

      Voom = dead.

  15. Easy solutions... no extra kit required by KillerCow · · Score: 4, Insightful

    I miss being able to make a call with a regular phone, especially long calls that might drain my battery.

    When you get home, plug your phone into the charger. If you use it, leave it plugged in.

    It would also be nice if I didn't have to hunt for my cellphone at home when it rings.

    Leave it in the same place... attached to the charger.

    1. Re:Easy solutions... no extra kit required by egburr · · Score: 1

      I do exactly that. However, I have been utterly unsuccessful at convincing my wife to do the same with hers. Her battery is dead more often than charged; she checks her voicemail more often from my phone than from hers. Of course, she also handles her keys the same way; there have been times we've spent half an hour looking for her keys because she just sets them down wherever she finds convenient at the time.

      --

      Edward Burr
      Having a smoking section in a restaurant is like having a peeing section in a swimming pool.
    2. Re:Easy solutions... no extra kit required by zakharin · · Score: 0

      I actually tried that. The phone was not charging at all while in use and the battery went dead in the middle of a call due to the backlight turning on every time I accidentally disconnected the cable and had to reconnect it.

    3. Re:Easy solutions... no extra kit required by nizo · · Score: 1

      Sadly I only have a cradle charger, which makes it impossible to talk on the phone while it charges. I hate carrying it around at home, so leaving it in the charger makes sense but the ringer isn't loud enough to hear everywhere in my new house, which means I miss calls unless I am carrying it. Plus I keep picturing a big tumor on my side where it hangs all day, which makes me want to carry it around the house even less :-)

    4. Re:Easy solutions... no extra kit required by locnar42 · · Score: 1

      Plus I keep picturing a big tumor on my side where it hangs all day, which makes me want to carry it around the house even less :-)

      And yet you have no problem holding it next to your head for who knows how long.

      My only real complaint with using the cell phone is that they tend to get warm during long calls.

    5. Re:Easy solutions... no extra kit required by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      This is your wife, and you're about to spend a few hours finding a place to sleep tonight.

    6. Re:Easy solutions... no extra kit required by matt_maggard · · Score: 0, Troll

      One of the things that sometimes bothers me about slashdot is that when someone points out some new product and how it solves problem XYZ and makes their life easier/better, then a bunch of people jump in to say that you could have had the same thing for free/cheaper by simply doing something less-simple/intuitive/elegant. The same thing has been going round and round with the mac mini. Everyone says just get a Dell custom configured this way and that and you'll save $50 bucks and have a low-end LCD. When will people realize that ISN'T what everyone wants. Sometimes its worth some extra money for the thing you like better. Whether it allows you to use the ol' corded phone that you always liked or have a whisper quite unix system, if you feel its worth it, SPEND the money - that's what its for!

      Sorry, rant over. It just gets frustrating when people find neat things and then they get told that their preferences should be different. And it always seems to lean towards not spending anything...

    7. Re:Easy solutions... no extra kit required by DocSavage64109 · · Score: 1

      My only real complaint with using the cell phone is that they tend to get warm during long calls.

      That warmth is just your body absorbing the radio waves, much like a microwave oven cooking a burrito :)

    8. Re:Easy solutions... no extra kit required by ckaminski · · Score: 1

      Most of that warmth is the battery discharging.

    9. Re:Easy solutions... no extra kit required by Mornelithe · · Score: 1

      Good, this story didn't have enough Mac Mini content. I'm glad we're back to normal now. :)

      So what you're saying is: some people here like to see how far they can stretch their money, and they should not talk about their preferences (note: I'm just playing devil's advocate and exaggerating).

      In your example specifically, there are plenty of people here creaming all over the Mac Mini. Go check out the GNUSTEP article or the Gnome article, and you'll find a not insignificant number of posts saying, "GNUStep is nice, but I'm getting a Mac Mini," or "Gnome is ugly. OS X is better, and that's why I'm getting a Mac Mini." They're not concerned with the fact that OS X and Macs are, at best, tangentially related to the story.

      There are at least as many people who talk about Mac Minis and OS X in any article they can conceivably tie it in to as there are people saying, "Just get a big-ass (in comparison) Dell computer and save $50." The Dell people may just be more visible because you disagree with them.

      --

      I've come for the woman, and your head.

    10. Re:Easy solutions... no extra kit required by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      If you have a Sony Ericsson phone, try bluemote (http://www.geocities.com/saravkrish/progs/bluemot e/). If you set it up right, you can have a popup in your computer when you get a call.

    11. Re:Easy solutions... no extra kit required by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You'd like my ex better, and I think I might like your wife better than my ex. I don't get stressed about those things. Maybe we can arrange some kind of swap or something...

    12. Re:Easy solutions... no extra kit required by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      For those of you looking to do this, try http://www.swappernet.com/

    13. Re:Easy solutions... no extra kit required by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I'm confused about the point of this product.. Why not just use your landline phone when you are near it and move to next to your landline phone when you aren't near it but want to be. And if someone else calls you on your mobile then move near to where your mobile phone is if its not already on you?

    14. Re:Easy solutions... no extra kit required by No-op · · Score: 2, Funny

      ditto for me... I know all women aren't like that, but sometimes it feels that way. my wife will put her driver's license, atm card, and folding money into whatever pocket is convenient, or sometimes into whatever bag she's carrying at the time (!)

      although that's changed for the better as the years go by, it still scares the crap out of me. I like to keep my wallet and keys in the same two places all the time, so I don't even have to think about where they are and if I have them or not. maybe that's just me...

      --
      EOM
  16. google cache by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Informative
    1. Re:google cache by nizo · · Score: 1

      I can't decide if I should feel happy that my article was accepted or sad that I caused the destruction of a poor innocent website. I should have ordered one before I posted the article, because now they will probably raise the price to pay their extra bandwidth fees :-(

  17. Slashdot product test theory by billyradcliffe · · Score: 5, Funny

    A company has a product. Slashdot notes the companies product. Company's website becomes Slashdotted. Product == No Good.

    How does one come to this conclusion?

    The company's website is Slashdotted, therefore it cannot handle a massive amount of traffic, therefore they did not expect this much interest in their product, because they have little faith in said product, because, well, they developed it and they themselves think it sucks, so it must suck.

    Just a thought... ;)

    Awesome concept though...I would love this. One of the biggest things I hate about talking on a cell phone for an extended period is how warm the phone gets cause of the battery.

    1. Re:Slashdot product test theory by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Funny

      One of the biggest things I hate about talking on a cell phone for an extended period is how warm the phone gets cause of the battery.

      Think of how warm your brain gets cause of the transmitter.

    2. Re:Slashdot product test theory by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      >One of the biggest things I hate about talking on a cell phone for an extended period is how warm the phone gets cause of the battery.

      I especially hate it now with our northern-hemisfere full blown winter!

    3. Re:Slashdot product test theory by theVP · · Score: 1

      I wonder how often Slashdot gets Slashdotted...

      --
      "No one is more miserable than the person who wills everything and can do nothing." -Emperor Claudius 10 BC - AD 54
  18. But will it... by pintpusher · · Score: 5, Funny

    interface with my shoe phone?

    --
    man, I feel like mold.
    1. Re:But will it... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      And my wrist phone?

    2. Re:But will it... by dangrover · · Score: 1

      Or my banana phone?

    3. Re:But will it... by cylcyl · · Score: 1

      Yes, but the interface is oral, so you must insert foot in mouth for efficient operation.

  19. Important Note for users with dialup internet by Veovis · · Score: 4, Interesting

    For those of you who live in an area without high speed internet access, devices like these will not allow you to use your cellphone to make calls to analog (traditional) internet service providers. (Same applys to mobile/flea market merchants with credit card terminals that dial into their processing center) 99.9% of cellphones are on a digital network (CDMA/TDMA/iDEN/GSM/GPRS/etc) and can not provide the channel clarity needed for analog signals

    1. Re:Important Note for users with dialup internet by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      What on earth are you talking about? This has nothing to do with internet service at your house.

      This is an "adapter" that routes your normal phones over your cellphone service. If you can stand in your house and talk on your cellphone, then you can use this. No internet service required. You plug the cellphone into the cradle, and plug a -normal phone- into the cradle. When you pick up the normal phone and dial, your call is placed using the cellphone network. The voice quality will be exactly the same as if you were actually using the cellphone because that's what you're doing.

    2. Re:Important Note for users with dialup internet by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Oh, and also forgot to add - yes, you can call any phone you want to. Since you're just using your cellphone's service, if you can call it with the cellphone, then you can call it with this device. This is not Skype. This is not VoIP (Vonage, CallVantage, etc).

    3. Re:Important Note for users with dialup internet by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      ah... I'm retarded. Parent poster is indeed correct. Sorry I misread. Mod all these down, and all that jazz.

    4. Re:Important Note for users with dialup internet by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Interesting

      Same applys to mobile/flea market merchants with credit card terminals that dial into their processing center) 99.9% of cellphones are on a digital network (CDMA/TDMA/iDEN/GSM/GPRS/etc) and can not provide the channel clarity needed for analog signals

      Bull. Do you know what kind of modem a credit card terminal uses to authorize transactions? A 300 baud old POS. Why? Because there isn't much data to send to the credit card company, and a 300 baud modem will work with the crappiest, noisiest POS phone lines.

    5. Re:Important Note for users with dialup internet by zakezuke · · Score: 1

      A 300 baud old POS. Why? Because there isn't much data to send to the credit card company, and a 300 baud modem will work with the crappiest, noisiest POS phone lines.

      And 300baud has the shortest handshake time. From dial to connect is typicaly under 15seconds in my experence where 1200/2400 typicaly under 30 seconds. 14.4k and above can be higher than 30 seconds.

      But take the time to listen to those credit card terminals. Many of them i've noticed handshake on the second tone... i.e. 1200/2400.

      And further... You can get mobile terminals that are cellphones onto themselves.

      --
      There is no sanctuary. There is no sanctuary. SHUT UP! There is no shut up. There is no shut up.
    6. Re:Important Note for users with dialup internet by Detritus · · Score: 1

      I thought most of them used Bell 202 modems, which are 1200 bps FSK. I salvaged some of them out of old credit card verification terminals for use with packet radio.

      --
      Mea navis aericumbens anguillis abundat
    7. Re:Important Note for users with dialup internet by hackstraw · · Score: 1

      99.9% of cellphones are on a digital network (CDMA/TDMA/iDEN/GSM/GPRS/etc) and can not provide the channel clarity needed for analog signals

      Even though I'm familiar with the differences with analog and digital signals, this at first seems a bit ironic. To those that have bought into the marketing hype about digital speakers, cable TV, and telephones, I guess they are scratching their heads.

      As an AC points out, credit cards use a 300 baud modem over an analog line. And anyone that has heard a modem, well it sounds like noise, and I would assume that the digital filters that they use on cell (err, mobile) phones would completely screw up that type of communication.

  20. Phonelabs Dock-n-Talk is an universal dock by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Informative

    The Dock-n-Talk seems to be a much better product than the Cellsocket.

    http://www.phonelabs.com/prd05.asp

    It claims to work with over 400 cell phone models and has a bunch of features not found in the Cellsocket.

    While we are on it, does anyone know of a product that allows you to make landline calls THROUGH your cellphone? Here is my idea:

    1) Landline phone hooked up to a cell phone (Phone A)
    2) You have another cell phone (Phone B)
    3) Both cell phones are on UNLIMITED Mobile-to-Mobile plan.
    4) You place a call from Phone B to Phone A and tell Phone A to dial a number through your landline.
    5) You chat on the phone for 3 hours AND USE UP NO MINUTES since you are on Mobile-to-Mobile connection.

    Viola, UNLIMITED PEAK MINUTES AT PRICE OF 2 CELL PHONES, CHEAPO 2-PHONE PLAN, AND UNLIMITED LANDLINE!!

    1. Re:Phonelabs Dock-n-Talk is an universal dock by wondermog · · Score: 0

      I am the owner of a Phonelabs Dock N' Talk, and I must say, it is feature packed, 100% reliable, and otherwise indistinguishable form a regular landline phone. Being a heavy cellphone user, I don't have any number memorized with the exception of my own, opting to select them from my Sony Ericsson T616 phonebook. I was pleased to find that holding the pound key activates the built-in voice dial feature of the teleophone. In addition, I have not had a single problem with the phone being buggy or otherwise malfunctioning while interfaced with the device. It's an excellent product and I can see no aspect in which a competing product could improve on its design. note: I have absolutely no affiliation with Phone Labs, other than being a customer of theirs.

      --
      freeminimacs, just becau
    2. Re:Phonelabs Dock-n-Talk is an universal dock by zarthrag · · Score: 2, Interesting

      For the price of a landline AND two cellphones, you just might find an unlimited plan :-p

      --
      Why can't all fpga/microcontroller manufacturers just release free optimizing compilers???
    3. Re:Phonelabs Dock-n-Talk is an universal dock by smootherxp · · Score: 1

      Repeate post:

      "While we are on it, does anyone know of a product that allows you to make landline calls THROUGH your cellphone? Here is my idea:"

      SBC/ATT ATTWS/Cingular has been transitioning to this model for years. SBC is the parent company of Cingular. This is the reason for the double merger. SBC would like to be a one-stop telecommunications place. 3G (3rd Generation) and 4G (4th Generation) models are to use your cell phone at home while your phone connects to a home station and receives calls transmitted over a broadband (VOIP). Then when going to a WiFi area your phone automatically picks up the Wifi signal and uses WiFi service. Then going to work your phone would use a cellular connection 100mb+ for all Internet network and cell service.

      Cingular has UMTS in 4 markets Seattle and 4 other services. This is high-speed cellular service. Cingular will continue to lead the way into the 3G world. I have been a Verison user for 5 years and recently (4 months ago) started working in the NOC for ATTWS/Cingular. With the added merger of SBC/ATT will have the complete technology to provide a one stop shopping for all your GSM 3G technologies?

    4. Re:Phonelabs Dock-n-Talk is an universal dock by paul185 · · Score: 1

      Actually, the Dock-n-Talk does this. http://dock-n-talk.com/

    5. Re:Phonelabs Dock-n-Talk is an universal dock by PoopJuggler · · Score: 0

      At least their webserver works a lot better...

    6. Re:Phonelabs Dock-n-Talk is an universal dock by jweage · · Score: 1

      If you don't mind using a VoIP provider. The Sipura SPA-3000 will do this.

      Josh

    7. Re:Phonelabs Dock-n-Talk is an universal dock by Trogdor · · Score: 1

      Same idea only better. Call anyone during peak hours with only one cell phone.

    8. Re:Phonelabs Dock-n-Talk is an universal dock by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Why dont you just get the unlimited calling plan from Packet8 www.packet8.net for $20 a month? would be much cheaper than having 2 cell phones.

    9. Re:Phonelabs Dock-n-Talk is an universal dock by magefile · · Score: 1

      Erm ... let's say that's $30/month for each phone (both cells, plus the landline). At $90 a month, given that you're dealing with all sorts of crap setting it up, and that the quality won't be good (degraded at every switch from one place to the next), wouldn't it be smarter to go with something like Verizon's unlimited minutes (including long distance) plan for about $95 a month?

      I don't work for Verizon; I just use 'em 'cuz Cingular coverage in my area is weak. I'm sure other providers have similar plans.

  21. Doesnt asterisk do least cost routing? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Doesnt asterisk do least cost routing?

  22. wait for competition by edstromp · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Cellsocket is a great idea. I looked into them extensively about 2 years ago. But they didn't make a version for my cellphone, and worse, they were quite slow to develop new adapters for new phones. This is a great market for such a device, but I honestly don't think it'll really take off until the cell manufacturing companies start making this a default must-have accessory with every new phone.

    Nothing sucks more than being forced to buy an old, outdated phone, just so you can use the Cellsocket.

    1. Re:wait for competition by aberson · · Score: 1

      I've designed a similar, cheaper, and more universal product that will be available soon, I posted about it later in this article

  23. LCRs by mindriot · · Score: 5, Informative
    Even better, for those with a landline or VoIP phone, would be a system that automatically picks the cheapest route out for any given call.

    Basically, you're looking for something like Least Cost Routers (anybody wanna translate this?). These things have been very popular in Germany ever since the telecom market was deregulated. In Germany you can use other (landline) telecom providers through a Call-By-Call system, dialing the provider's prefix before your actual phone number if you want to use a provider other than your default one (e.g., 01033 for German Telekom, 01013 for Tele2). There's whole websites dedicated to providing lists of the cheapest call-by-call providers. These LCRs can store such lists of providers and their rates for different types of calls (i.e., local, long-distance, other countries, cell phone networks, etc.) at different times of the day/week, and the automatically prefix the number you dial with the cheapest provider's. Of course, lists can be updated manually or automatically. Now, I'm not sure if anybody has built such a device with cell vs. landline vs. VoIP in mind, but if that exists, other Slashdotters who can be bothered to look it up instead of working ;-) will surely post links...

    FWIW, there's also an isdn4linux-based LCR tool and corresponding phone rate databases (see English summary at bottom) available. For cell/landline/VoIP solutions, if there's nothing else available, there is probably a good starting point.

    1. Re:LCRs by hawaiian717 · · Score: 1

      My parents used to have a fax machine (made by Panasonic I believe) that had this capability. It didn't seem to work all that well though.

      --
      End of Line.
  24. Mod parent up. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    wish i had some mod points..

  25. Telular by jammer+4 · · Score: 4, Informative

    I had a Cell Socket for a while, then it died. Plus, I couldn't upgrade that one phone either since it was only compatible with a few models.

    What I settled on was a Telular box. It's a company that makes high end boxes for companies that need phone service where there isn't anything but cell. They've got a bunch of products and it works pretty good for most needs. You can even hook it into a phone system so you can route your companies long distance through it to use free long distance minutes.

    FYI, Sprint is doing a trial with Telular boxes in selected cities as a way to replace your land line.

  26. Re:Article Text Without FUD by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    For some reason, these people find old jokes funny every time they hear them. The mods must not have any sense of humor.

    Irony works by saying something that's not expected. So since I expect a soviet russia, old korean, cmdrtaco, etc joke on every discussion, it's not ironic so it's not funny.

  27. small issue by way2trivial · · Score: 1

    if it's anything like my vox.link (same idea, from radio shack) you have to use DTMF touchtones (incl # to 'send') it's generating a real dialtone.

    --
    every day http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Special:Random
  28. Health benefits by kaedemichi255 · · Score: 1

    Also might be good for those users that have a cellphone next to their brain 24/7. Although the risks are "undetermined," better safe than sorry :)

  29. Helps Avoid Phone Numbers & Phones by smug_lisp_weenie · · Score: 1

    With a system like this you could just buy a mondo cell phone plan and use your cell for all your calls- When you're at home, you just plug in the phone, and now it's your home phone number- I like it!

  30. Social Experiment by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
    • Mod this post down if you are utterly revolted by Linux enthusiasts' disgusting hygiene.
    • Mod this post up if you don't know what the above refers to.
  31. Nix the analog ISP, use the cell phone by aquarian · · Score: 1

    This shouldn't be a worry if you have a digital cell phone. A simple cord turns your phone into a modem. With Verizon, for example, you get full internet access, billed simply as regular phone minutes. There's no additional charge. The speed is only 14.4, but that's plenty for email, credit card validation, etc.

  32. cell phone cordless phone by lemonboy · · Score: 3, Informative

    according to an advertisement in CE magazine this cordless phone from uniden will allow you to make calls from your cellphone using the handsets in the house...via the dead bluetooth http://www.uniden.com/productpop/00_productpop.cfm ?prd_code=ELBT595

  33. Record cell phone conversations! by aquarian · · Score: 2, Funny

    Another benefit of this is being able to record cell phone conversations, if that's something you need.

  34. VOX Link by BigIrv · · Score: 1

    Seriously, this is just like an OLD product from VOX Link.

    Their website seems to have gone away http://www.vox2.com/, but here is an article that mentions them http://www.entrepreneur.com/mag/article/0,1539,288 176,00.html

    --

    --Good morning fellas; Hand me that thing; Boy, this work's hard; Guys, break's over.
  35. I WISH I HAD MONEY by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I've had this idea for _YEARS_.

  36. LOL by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I think the results speak for themselves. Nice job!

  37. As someone that did this in 1992... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    what's the big deal? You could buy analog POTS interfaces for cellphones to use to connect to answering machines back before voicemail was commonly available. I had a 110V answering machine running off of an inverter in my car just like the ~300 or so other people I installed them in. It was a very common thing to do. I also had one at home connected to my demarc point. Add a 12V power supply plus free calls from Sprint since I sold their service, and whole-house cell-phone service in 1992!

  38. Option #2 by torinth · · Score: 2, Informative

    Another option would be to get a VOIP phone (i.e. Vonage) for home, and have it simultaneously ring your cell phone when it's called. Then you can just have people dial the VOIP phone when they want to reach you, leaving you to decide which line to pick up.

    Of course, this means you'd need to get a new line with a recurring fee if you don't already have a VOIP line, which will cost you $20+ per month instead of whatever fixed rate the cell-socket costs. But its worth considering.

  39. Nothing new actually by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    There was a similiar item available for certain models of Nokia phones a couple years ago that did the exact same thing. The market didn't embrace the concept then but I could easily image that it could now.

  40. But is anyone going to use it? by dadjaka · · Score: 1

    Even though you've got a dock, I bet most people will keep using their mobile as a mobile. That's what it was designed for, after all.

  41. Stupid Trick by scovetta · · Score: 1, Interesting

    I've been using this (stupid) trick to talk to my girlfriend (long distance): Party A: Forward your cell phone to Party B's Land-line, then call your own cell phone FROM your own land-line. Now you're both talking on normal-size phones, and you're using cellular minutes (good for night/weekends). Sure, you're double-paying slightly, but it's definately worth the not-brain-tumors.

    --
    Wer mit Ungeheuern kämpft, mag zusehn, dass er nicht dabei zum Ungeheuer wird. --Nietzsche
  42. I got one about a year ago. Here's my impression. by Ungrounded+Lightning · · Score: 3, Interesting

    I got one of these about a year ago.

    I recently built a vacation/retirement house in a remote area (where I could get a landline but can't get DSL or cable internet) and got cellphones to use during the construction project - then decided to try using them with a cell socket rather than installing a landline. Didn't work as well as I'd like.

    My phone is an older Nokia model and the service AT&T (now Cingulair) wireless. That company is the only carrier available in the area - and no GSM, just TDMA (and maybe AMPS but I can't tell for sure).

    The Cell Socket works reasonably well for voice calls.

    It provides charging current when the cellphone is ON hook, but stops when the phone is engaged in a call. (Apparently the power brick is too small to power the cellphone and POTS-emulator line at the same time.)

    The Cell Socket doesn't provide a dial tone. Instead (if you pick up the POTS phone when the cellphone is plugged in and ready) it provides a series of three beeps. Apparently these emulate the three beeps you get at the front of an intercept recording. My guess is that this is intended to keep people form trying to use modems and FAX machines with the Cell socket.

    I tried programming a modem to use it (ignoring the wait-for-dialtone). But even at the lowest speed setting it would not work with the TDMA cellphone service.

    (I hear you can get 1200 baud or so through an AMPS cellphone connection. Unfortunately, my phone was a Nokia with AT&T firmware, and (as far as I can tell) those (at AT&T's insistence) can not be forced to make an AMPS call when a digital carrier is available. So I couldn't test that.)

    So it's good for:
    - Making long distance calls on your cheep cell plans comfortably.
    - Eliminating your long-distance carrier on your landline.
    - Using your cellphone anywhere in a house when there's only a few good spots for the signal.
    - Putting voice-only service into a remote location, where a landline would be expensive to run (or used too little to justify the expense when you already have a cellphone).

    But it's not good for:
    - Data
    - FAX
    - Long calls with little time between them to recharge the cellphone battery.

    --
    Bantam Dominique roosters crow a four-note song. Once you've heard it as "Happy BIRTHday" you can't NOT hear it that way
  43. Reception by Autobahn · · Score: 2, Informative

    Another advantage of this that nobody's noted yet is that you don't have to worry about reception. My apartment gets such poor cell coverage that I drop calls just walking around. With one of these I could put my cell in the spot where it got the best reception and leave it there. Or I could just stop pacing maniacally, but then I'd have to cut down on the coffee...

    1. Re:Reception by ari_j · · Score: 1

      My problem is that cell reception at my apartment is so unreliable that I need my landline to make any truly important first-impression call, such as to a potential employer or business associate. The majority of my calls are fine to use the cell phone for, but anything particularly sensitive needs the special reliability and sound quality guarantee of a land line.

  44. They used a regular webserver... by Farrside · · Score: 1

    To receive /. calls!

  45. Cheapest? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Just get unlimited long distance + local from your phone company for $49.95/mo and be done. It really can't get much cheaper.

  46. You need a different cell phone. by Jerry · · Score: 2, Interesting

    My wife and I have LG VX3100A cell phones, We consider her number to be the "home" phone, regardless of where she is. She uses her phone about 1800 minutes per month and I use about 200 minutes per month. She recharges her phone every Sunday and Wednesday or Thursday, and I recharge my phone every Sunday whether I need to or not.

    Getting rid of the land line was the best communication move we ever made. It got rid of the telemarketers, too.

    --

    Running with Linux for over 20 years!

    1. Re:You need a different cell phone. by k.ellsworth · · Score: 1

      almost same scenario at my home, my wife's cell phone number is like the home number.

      bye bye landline.

      --
      Putting a windows cd backwards, plays evil messages, but it gets worse, putting it right, installs windows.
    2. Re:You need a different cell phone. by frankmu · · Score: 1

      you might want to pay a visit to donotcall.gov and list your cell numbers before the telemarketers get to it.

      --
      Supreme executive power derives from a mandate from the masses, not from some farcical aquatic ceremony.
    3. Re:You need a different cell phone. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      heh.

      There are few things sweeter than telling a telemarketer "This is a cell phone. Please remove this number from your database." Where I live it is illegal to telemarket to a cell phone so this invariably draws an extremely prompt and permanent response.

      As for the article...

      If I don't want the phone near my head I use one of it's hands-free options. I live by myself so usually I just put it on speaker but I have a headset as well. I also have a policy of trying to meet for coffee, lunch or a beer in lieu of really long phone conversations.

      If I wanted to do specifically what the product slashvertised does, I would just forward my cell to the number I wanted to use. No special hardware, no airtime, works with any phone, can even do it at a friends house.
      Frankly, the product looks like a solution in search of a problem. I cannot imagine that I would ever buy a product that gives me all the disadvantages of a landline while maintaining the expense and limitations of a cell.

    4. Re:You need a different cell phone. by magefile · · Score: 1

      It's already illegal (in the states) to telemarket to a cell phone. On the few instances my cell phone's been called by a telemarketer, they've freaked as soon as I told 'em it was a cell.

  47. GPRS, Cell v.s. Analog dial up?, VOIP in future? by cocoacow · · Score: 1, Informative

    Now here's a question... Or an insight; whatever... I have been using my GPRS data connection for a while, through my cell, to make data connections. While being slower then wifi of any sort (except for these damn congested hotel networks), it is a great tool for say, traveling on a train, and making my connection. Cingular does not make this a vey easy thing to do, but thanks to a lot of patience, and research, i found a few web sites that really helped me out with getting this connection made. With Cingular/AT&T, the data package for full on GPRS all the time is 20 dollars a month, and it's always on as long as your in the GPRS network. The speed seems to be higher then regular dial up, and keeps me connected.

    Link:
    http://www.taniwha.org.uk/gprs.html Great link to scripts to make this possible in many ways with many phones.

    Now the future as I see it is using something similiar to Skype, or VOIP technology to enable this as a way that i can be making calls through my computer, and paying for a GPRS connection that is always on. While it's nice to be able to just ring through on the cell, I think 20 dollars a month for a VOIP connection anywhere I can recieve GPRS would be FINE and Dandy! Feel free to add to this if anyone has done any other legwork into this idea.
    Now, I figure this might be rate as offtopic, in fact, I fear it, but I see this as being related to some of the other things people have said so far on this topic. Now, I have looked at this product, (thank you anonymous coward for the easy link to the cached site
    (here) http://64.233.161.104/search?q=cache:ZWgMwpNIwucJ: www.cellsocket.com/+cellsocket&hl=en

    Now this is interesting.. This was mentioned in an earlier article, on Nov 22, 03.
    Are we behind in the times?
    http://boogle.cc/index.php?blogid=1&archive=2003-1 1 Gotta search for the word cellsocket, can't seem to find an anchor to sink my digital teeth into.

    I guess this seems like a neat product, but I want more. And I also question why this wasn't released as ?news? on slashdot till now? Hmmmmm
    Well, let me know if anyone has any ideas on the other stuff I went rambling off on. Always on VOIP everywhere would rock my world harder then any hardline home phone thingamajig... Let's make the most of our collective brains, and start up the saucestorm of knowledge.. let it flow free :)

    --
    `B Flicks, `Cool Lick'ah, `Sweet Talk' `in' ManG'
  48. Going wireless off of wireless by ryeng321 · · Score: 1

    Has anyone tried using a local cordless phone system of one of these cellsockets? I would be interested to know if you can use a multiple handset system such as the ones made by, Siemens, AirWaySystem, or panasonic http://siemens.ca/ http://airwaysystem.com/ http://panasonic.ca/

  49. Re:cell phone cordless phone by cocoacow · · Score: 1
    --
    `B Flicks, `Cool Lick'ah, `Sweet Talk' `in' ManG'
  50. Ditch the landline for FAX machines by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I still like using a regular FAX machine for sending and recieving so I keep my land line around. Too much hassle with alternatives. Would be nice to use this device with my 'ol FAX to finally give 'ma bell the ax.

  51. Ok, by fireman+sam · · Score: 1

    so we have the inconvenience of a fixed phone with the cost* of a mobile.

    Has this guy not heard of a battery charger?

    *In Australia off peak calls with mobiles are about $0.50 per minute local calls on land lines are about $0.30 flat rate.

    --
    it is only after a long journey that you know the strength of the horse.
    1. Re:Ok, by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Exactly. It's a complete no brainer here (long distance rates - 90% of my call are LD): -Cell phone? 66 cents a minute -Landline? 2.25 cents a minute -VoIP? 1.9 cents a minute (or free, depending...) (Calling cards and others around same prices too) -Skype and others (using phone adapter)? free... Really, it's all cheap - but the cell phone, which I really don't use. I hardly have a need for a cell, it takes up space, don't like it, and FAR too expensive (35x more expensive than VoIP). Plus if I want a new cell phone, I have to pay a ridiculous high fee upfront and have bad rates, or agree to a 2 or 3 year term at like 40$+ a month - no thanks! My cell remains uncharged, sitting at home 360 days a year.

  52. Re:Heh by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Slashdot paid mods modded this in the most non-subtle way ever seen.

  53. psh, Star Trek beats that anyday by cybersaga · · Score: 2, Funny

    I'm still waiting for a trek style comm badge that works as a phone.

    1. Re:psh, Star Trek beats that anyday by Talinom · · Score: 1

      I'm partial to the original communicator style. Yes, there are similar in style looking flip phones.

      No. Gotta have the original style on this one. If it is made I'm buying it.

      --
      "Giving money and power to governments is like giving whiskey and car keys to teenage boys." - P.J. O'Rourke
    2. Re:psh, Star Trek beats that anyday by notthe9 · · Score: 1

      We damn near could do it. I am utterly convinced we could build a phone similar to a bulky bluetooth headset. Simple, small screen (like the Jabra BT800), no games, SMS, none of that crap. Voice dialing (including voice input of numbers) or an optional BT dialer if we can fit it. Take away the buttons and screens, and the things are practically non-existant. Battery would be most of the bulk of the headset-phone.

    3. Re:psh, Star Trek beats that anyday by tonsofpcs · · Score: 2, Informative

      Someone doing Pokia style bluetooth handsets did one [its just a bluetooth handset, but you just stick the phone in your pocket]:
      http://cgi.ebay.com/ws/eBayISAPI.dll?ViewItem&cate gory=42393&item=2282460229&rd=1

    4. Re:psh, Star Trek beats that anyday by biryokumaru · · Score: 1
      this functions more like the actual comm badges on star trek:

      http://www.vocera.com/products/products.shtm

      --
      When you're afraid to download music illegally in your own home, then the terrorists have won!
    5. Re:psh, Star Trek beats that anyday by ckaminski · · Score: 1

      Oh, a com-badge. I got a tricorder, tho: o ne/>

  54. Cingular... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    ...they offered this months ago... don't know how the billing works though

  55. old news by d-ude · · Score: 1

    These have been around for years. My buddy has one of the first models they made. It worked with the 51xx/61xx models of Nokia phones. It also was the better model that he bought, that featured an external antenna connector. He would use it with a 2-line cordless phone around the house so he could answer whichever phone happened to ring. It has drawbacks though. He finds that he never gets text msg. notifications and only the GSM phones will pass CID info. He gets echo problems if he doesn't turn down the volume on the phone also. I'd like to see one of the new models that work with the Motorola phones and see how they work.

    What i'd really prefer is a 'base station' that plugs into my landline and lets me use a second NAM on the phone to place local calls through the cell instead. I remember seeing some stuff in the Nokia programming menu that alluded to something like that possibly but never found anything else about it.

  56. Re:interesting (DSL doesn't require a "phone line" by Penis_Envy · · Score: 1

    DSL does not require a "phone line." If you look at speakeasy, you'll see "onelink" which does not require phone service. Yes, it requires the POTS copper loop, but not the phone service. I think it costs something like $5 more than getting DSL added to a phone line (for renting the loop from the telco.)

  57. HAHAHA...M$..HAHAH...ROFLROFL by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    M$ hahahaha

    lollolrofl
    M$
    hahaha

    M$ INsecurity!!!

    hahah..that is so damn funny every time I hear it! Hey..how about this one...M$ LookOUT! hahahaa

    You must be on M$ payroll! Astroturfer! Troll!
    roflrofl Linux is soo teh c001!!! BSD is dying!!

    This is the year of Linux on the desktop!

  58. i think ive seen this before... by bdbolton · · Score: 1

    I want to say I saw a commercial, at least a year ago, with shaq running around his mansion trying to find his cellphone. Then in the next seen he just plugs his cell phone in a cradle and all the house phone rings....

    or maybe i was all just a dream :/

    1. Re:i think ive seen this before... by Picard102 · · Score: 1

      I saw it too, this type of technology has been around for a while now.

  59. Simpler solution: by man_ls · · Score: 4, Interesting

    Call-Forward your cell phone to your landline. It won't cost anything as long as you're forwarding to another local number (same area code)

    for Verizon Wireless customers, this is

    *72 + 10-Digit Number to Forward + SEND, wait for the tone, END. (to deactivate, *720 + SEND, wait, END)

    1. Re:Simpler solution: by lordkuri · · Score: 3, Informative

      watch your ass on that one... from Verizon's site:

      Airtime applies to forwarded/transferred calls even if you send the call to wireline telephones. When forwarding calls to phone numbers outside your local calling area, you'll be billed for any toll, long distance, and airtime charges incurred. Additional per-minute charges may apply to all forwarded calls.

      I know here in Central IL, it's 10 cents per minute plus airtime for all forwarded calls. I got out of my contract 3 years ago when they implemented that.

    2. Re:Simpler solution: by willpall · · Score: 1

      That would only work for incoming calls. I have a feeling the purpose of the Cell Socket and similar items is to allow you to ditch your landline connection altogether.

      --
      Libertarian: label used by embarrassed Republicans, longing to be open about their greed, drug use and porn collections.
    3. Re:Simpler solution: by CptnSbaitso · · Score: 2, Informative

      Verizon may be nice, but at least with my T-Mobile plan, I get a seperate pool of "Call Forwarding" minutes (500 per month). When forwarding I have two options: 1.) If I use the option on my phone which says "Forward when unable to answer" (which lets the phone ring first, THEN forwards it), it pulls from the special "Call Forwarding" minutes. (That's good). 2.) If I "Forward all calls" (the phone forwards the call immediately), it pulls from my regular "Whenever" minutes. (That's bad.) So, I just let it ring on my cell phone first before forwarding. Hopefully, you'll have the same luxury (at least, if you are with T-Mobile). Just be careful; T-Mobile got me with this one. HTH, --CptnSbaitso

    4. Re:Simpler solution: by sampson7 · · Score: 1

      That's fine if you have a land line.

      I got tired of paying $20 a month for a phone I rarely used + $50 a month for a cell phone I use constantly.

      So I got rid of the land line. Just cancelled it. But, I have a fairly large apartment. I usually don't carry my cell around with me when I'm at home and I often miss calls (especially since I'm always leaving my cell on vibrate).

      For someone with only 1 cell line, a product like this is great.

  60. Got one a couple of years ago by bluyonder · · Score: 1

    I live in a valley with a large hill between the house and the cell tower. The cell socket I have has a connection for an external antenna. I ran a coax line up to a high gain yagi antenna on the roof in order to get a signal. You can also get a power booster to improve the signal. When I got it, they only made them for the Nokia. The sound quality was not very good and I had to clean the connectors often. I imagine that they have improved some in the last couple of years. Since Cingular is going GCM, I had to change phones. The old Cell Socket won't work with the new phone so I am now using Cingulars Fast Forward. With Fast Forward you have to make outgoing calls with the cell phone, which for me means holding the cell phone up against the bedroom window to get a signal. Makes for shorter phone calls.

    1. Re:Got one a couple of years ago by karnal · · Score: 1

      Keep in mind that Fast Forward still requires a line into your house, which for me just makes it a convenience item, and not a full land line replacement...

      --
      Karnal
  61. hands free kit/3 watt booster by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    If a company can make this for home, why can't I get one for my car so I can implement real hands free operation. (with a speaker and a mic, not this wire bs)

    I wish the cellular companies would just let me use my old phones that I already have this equipment for. Besides, they were tougher and had better radios which made for better reception in more places.

    Phones currently on the market are POS, sure they can play games, take pictures, and play mp3s... Why can't they put a decent radio in them and provide car kits? I'd trade all the bells and whistles for those two "features" alone!

    1. Re:hands free kit/3 watt booster by Ash-Fox · · Score: 1

      Why do you need car kits when you got bluetooth enabled devices availible for your car that more or less the exact same thing?

      I prefer that to having some stupid car kit that becomes useless the day I replace the mobile.

      --
      Change is certain; progress is not obligatory.
  62. No, Doesn't work like that by mrmike37 · · Score: 1

    Actually, you plug in your phone and your phone signals Cingular to forward the call to another number. All the base unit is is a charger that signals the phone to signal Cingular.

    --
    Really, I'm not trying to be clever with my signature.
    1. Re:No, Doesn't work like that by karnal · · Score: 1

      signals the phone to signal Cingular.


      Say that 3 times really fast...

      --
      Karnal
  63. You insensitive clod! by Lawrence_Bird · · Score: 3, Funny

    My cellphone doesn't work inside the house!

    1. Re:You insensitive clod! by michaela · · Score: 1

      It's not cheap, but from the specs it should work.

      http://www.digitalantenna.com/cellamprep_DA4000SBR .html

      --
      That is all.
  64. SBC/ATT ATTWS/Cingular by smootherxp · · Score: 1

    SBC/ATT ATTWS/Cingular has been transitioning to this model for years. SBC is the parent company of Cingular. This is the reason for the double merger. SBC would like to be a one-stop telecommunications place. 3G (3rd Generation) and 4G (4th Generation) models are to use your cell phone at home while your phone connects to a home station and receives calls transmitted over a broadband (VOIP). Then when going to a WiFi area your phone automatically picks up the Wifi signal and uses WiFi service. Then going to work your phone would use a cellular connection 100mb+ for all Internet network and cell service.

    Cingular has UMTS in 4 markets Seattle and 4 other services. This is high-speed cellular service. Cingular will continue to lead the way into the 3G world. I have been a Verison user for 5 years and recently (4 months ago) started working in the NOC for ATTWS/Cingular. With the added merger of SBC/ATT will have the complete technology to provide a one stop shopping for all your GSM 3G technologies?

  65. VOX Link-$200! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    "Seriously, this is just like an OLD product from VOX Link."

    Hehe. $200, I better hold onto mine.

  66. Re:I got one about a year ago. Here's my impressio by smootherxp · · Score: 1

    "But it's not good for:
    - Data
    - FAX
    - Long calls with little time between them to recharge the cellphone battery."

    Data? If you live in one of the 4 UMTS markets you can receive faster data transmitions through your Cingular service then through your cable modem.

  67. beware: read the fine print by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    This is not true for all cell phone service. It depends on your plan. On AT&T Wireless (actually now Cingular), I enabled call forwarding from my cell to my home line.

    No warning of fees / nothing was said until I got my bill and found that they charged $0.45 / minute. And I mean per minute it was enabled, not per minute I actually talked on a forwarded call. Not cool.

    1. Re:beware: read the fine print by stephanruby · · Score: 1

      Hopefully, someone will mod the parent up.

  68. Re:GPRS, Cell v.s. Analog dial up?, VOIP in future by smootherxp · · Score: 1

    "Now the future as I see it is using something similiar to Skype, or VOIP technology to enable this as a way that i can be making calls through my computer, and paying for a GPRS connection that is always on."

    Right. With the 3G and 4G plans at Cingular and the parent company SBC you will use them for all your needs. Via UMTS you will have 100mb+ wireless data connections. This is currently only in 4 markets and it will take a year before more markets are included because of the mergers.

    It is the main reason for all the SBC/ATT mergers. SBC is planning on providing VOIP for your Cell phone. Stick with us we are leading the way in technology. Cingular is on the GSM model ... find out more on the http://www.gsmworld.com website.

    Also if you get a chance see who is running the "Americas" GSM migration plan.

    T-Mobil also uses GSM but they are far behind Cingular. Verison Sprint and Nextel all use proprietary protocols not GSM Open Standards.

  69. I own one by TheLeftist · · Score: 1

    I own the bluetooth cellsocket and it is incredible. Usually things like this do not work close to what they advertise - this thing does and in a big way I LOVE THIS! I just wish they had one that would work with more than 1 phone at a time

    1. Re:I own one by TheLeftist · · Score: 1

      Dont even know what I own.. I own the phonelabs dockandtalk not the cellsocket..

  70. I forgot to mention by TheLeftist · · Score: 1

    I was thinking of purchasing one of these, and I did purchase mine AFTER I dropped my blackberry in the canal behind my house late one night while i was doing some last minute boat work. Now I use 800MHZ phones that are 8 bucks each.

  71. Doesn't work for everyone by Sycraft-fu · · Score: 1

    If you live out east in a studio apartment, perhaps, that works quite well. In my house, anyhwere I put the phone will be inconvienent to get from at least two other locations I'm likely to be and leave me jumping up and running to grab it. It simply takes three phones to have one in easy access everywhere. It's also not a particularly large house by Arizona standards. Plus, I find the reception really vaires throught my house. It's full strength in some places, rather weak in others.

    I'd be interested in something like this, I think (I can't get at the site so I'm speculating as to what it does). I'd like to dock my cellphone in a single location that gets good service, then have a number of other phones around the house that tap in to it.

    1. Re:Doesn't work for everyone by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      If you live out east
      I've never heard anyone say that before. It's always been "out west." Kinda funny and I had to share. =D

      Go east, old timer.
      Ambiguous choice instead of manifest destiny.

  72. They don't support the #3 US cell carrier (Nextel) by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I guess it's tough to find the "chirp" button on your old rotary phone so you can make wireline phone-to-radio calls.

  73. Not a hack by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Interesting

    Asterisk already does least-cost-routing -- you even have a few different options to do it. Don't want to buy the CellSocket... use your BLUETOOTH phone with Asterisk. My celphone has unlimited incoming minutes. I dial my asterisk box and hangup... then it calls me back and gives me a dialtone. No outgoing minutes used.

    1. Re:Not a hack by StormKrow · · Score: 1

      okay for clarification.

      You're talking about something like this.

      you're across town, you've got a hot date this weekend with the girl next door.

      You decide to call her from the office to make plans.

      Call your PBX machine.

      Hang up.

      It calls you back.

      (incomming call minutes kick in)

      Dial-tone.

      You call the girl next door from your phone, with the PBX machine acting as a proxy.

      (like so?)

      --
      Who cares about the ozone layer?...thanks to CFC's I can write my name......IN CHEESE!!!
  74. The problem with this is by YrWrstNtmr · · Score: 1
    5) You chat on the phone for 3 hours

    The intersection of the set of geeks who would go through this hassle and put up with the less than ideal fidelity, and the set of people who would actually talk on the phone for 3 hours is pretty damn small.

    I can't imagine many teenage girls doing all that.

  75. We use these at work... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I have four of these in my truck at work, it runs through the pbx. The only thing different from a normal POTS line, or an old AMPS cell is that you hit the # sign to "send" the call.

  76. Phones? by saihung · · Score: 1

    Looks nice. Would be even nicer if they worked with brands other than Motorola. Hasn't this site been in "other phones real soon now" mode for a while?

    1. Re:Phones? by aberson · · Score: 1

      I've designed a similar, cheaper, and more universal product that will be available soon, I posted about it in a later comment

  77. Re:I got one about a year ago. Here's my impressio by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Bummer about it being no good for a fax. I've run in to many situations where I wished I could fax something via my phone.

  78. I just finished a similiar project by ianmalcm · · Score: 1
    Just yesterday I completed a bluetooth conversion of a payphone handset.It has a range of 30-50 feet and is much easier to hold and shoulder than a regular mobile. Theres just something about gripping a ceramic handset and metal coil shielding.

    Someone said I should sell these.

  79. Welcome to the 21st Century by moby · · Score: 1

    We've been waiting for you :)

  80. Heh by cameldrv · · Score: 1

    I once worked for an ISP that massively abused this feature. They had about 20 cell phones, all set to forward to their main hunt group. The brilliant part was that there was no limit to the number of simultaneous calls that could be forwarded from a single phone number, and it even worked across LATA boundaries. This sort of service would otherwise have been very expensive, as at the time, and I believe now, running a T1 across a LATA boundary required provisioning multiple segments, each at around $1k a month. This gave them 20 virtual POPs, covering a significant chunk of the state, for only a few hundred dollars a month. At some point I believe cell phone companies instituted a per-minute charge for forwarding, and that was the end of that.

  81. I just did this! by donaggie03 · · Score: 2, Interesting

    My group and I just finished something very similar to this for our senior project at Texas A&M. We used a Nokia 6100 and a land line phone, a DTMF decoder, a SLIC to convert from single ended to hybrid signals, and a Stamp microcontroller. We chose to drop the land-line subscription altogether. It worked out really well :)

    --
    Three days from now?? Thats tomorrow!! ~Peter Griffin
    1. Re:I just did this! by whatch+durrin · · Score: 1

      Got a link to your senior project report? I'd love to build one of these for home.

      --
      ***
      Radio Shack. You've got questions...we've got blank stares(TM).
  82. Except Cell Socket is new by BobPaul · · Score: 1

    stolen from hack-a-day:

    Except that my parents bought one of these when I was back in the 8th grade under a different name. That would have put it back at 1998-1999 sometime (if I can subtract right...)

    Perhaps Hack-A-Day stole the idea from one of the origional implimentations.

    1. Re:Except Cell Socket is new by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It's not particularly the idea that was stolen from Hack-a-Day, and most of the stuff on Hack-a-Day isn't created by the owner of the page, anyway.

      It's just the article that was stolen

  83. Cellular Antennas and More by macdaddy · · Score: 1
    I highly recommend that if you plan on using your cell in your home that you invest in a couple different products. First and foremost is a quality cellular antenna. I recommend those made by Wilson Electronics. I've had excellent luck with them. The basic magnet mount antenna by Wilson can be found on eBay or Amazon for around $30-40. It gives me on my brand new LG VX7000 an extra bar or so. You cell phone antenna is neither properly tuned (or long enough) nor does it use enough juice to give you an adequate signal boost. The external antenna fixes all those issues.

    Second I recommend acquiring a headset. You'll need a wireless headset like the bluetooth Jabra BT200 so you can walk around. However if you can rig up your antenna-boosted cell phone to a regular landline headset like the Plantronics DT12 then I'm sure you'll save on costly dead battery replacements on the BT200 (impossible, so you have to buy a new one which is why replacing one costs so much). I have a DT12 and love it.

    And lastly, back to Wilson Electronics, I also recommend the use of a cellular amp if you have reception problems in your house. Wilson makes some excellent cellular amplifiers with an external antenna like the 301103 I mentioned above with the low-profile "stealth" antenna model 301106. It sounds like an excellent product overall.

    I have but one wish for my cellular needs. My folks live in an area with very little cellular coverage. You can get a bar, sometimes two on the 5 mile treck off the highway to their house. You can get 3-4 bars in some places on the highest peaks of the hills around their home. The of course are at the bottom of one of those hills, and are on the wrong side of the hill. You can however get a signal at the top of that hill and about 150 down the driveway. If I can get the signal on my cell then surely a quality external antenna and amp can do much better. What I would like to find is some device that can act as a digital interface to the cellular network. That device would need to connect to a commodity network such as Ethernet (wifi, copper, or fiber), transmit the signal over the network to another node, and have that node take that same signal and put it out on another antenna at that new site. This is really quite similar to what their amp does already, although it's not dumping the signal onto a completely different network and rebroadcasting it; the amp simply rebroadcast the amplified signal on the internal antenna at full strength. You cell phone should look for the tower with the strongest signal and thus will use the internal antenna (this also means you don't have to physically connect your antenna to your cell). Now I know things like this can be done with fancy commercial first-responder equipment like what NYC now uses post-9/11 to merge all the various city agencies together on demand. They can put a cellular call through to a person's 2-way if need be. What I'd do with something like this is put Wilson's large trucker antenna and amp down the driveway a couple hundred yards where it can get a decent signal. Then I'd dump it on fiber back to the house where I'd rebroadcast it on an inside antenna like the 301103. It's a cellular bridge of sorts, or a repeater depending on how you look at it. Does anyone know of such a thing?

  84. God forbid by glitch23 · · Score: 0

    that you actually train yourself to put your cell phone down in the same spot after you are done talking so you don't have to go searching it the next time it rings. Do unwired phones just screw with your life to no end?

    --
    this nation, under God, shall have a new birth of freedom. -- Lincoln, Gettysburg Address
  85. I created this in college... And it worked! by akira69 · · Score: 1

    This was my senior design project in college. Or similar to it. We had grandios ideas, but got it working (hackingly I must admit). Motorola does not freely release code for interfacing digitally with their data port. Thank god for old analog phones: https://courses.ece.uiuc.edu/ece445/cgi-bin/view_p roject.pl?spring2001_25

  86. Forward Cell phone, call cell phone by pkesel · · Score: 1

    We've done it for years. Forward your cell phone to whomever you wish to call, and then call your cell phone. We did this all through college to get free long distance. The call from local land line to local cell was free, no cell minutes used since the phone was never activated.

    But then the rules may have changed since those years. And now I'm a successful adult who doesn't care that I have a $250 a month cumulative phone bill.

    --
    - Sig this!
    1. Re:Forward Cell phone, call cell phone by Vegeta99 · · Score: 1

      Yeah, it's been fixed for about 3 years now. Forwarding minutes, at least wit AT&T Wireless, are charged at your over-the-limit rate, usually $0.35/min or so. Bastards.

  87. Features!!!! by halaloszto · · Score: 1

    This cellsocket is a complete faliure.

    Anyone who uses a cellphone for more than a week knows, that you _never_ dial a number on your cellphone. There is the phonebok! Nobody will want to use a paper phonebook or memorize numbers of relatives and friends anymore. When you are out in town, you use your cellphone with the built in phonebook, and when you are home you revert to dialing 12 digit numbers? You have to admit that this will never be popular.

    vajk

  88. Re:Phonelabs Dock-n-Talk universal cable mess by klausner · · Score: 1
    The problem with Dock-n-Talk is that it doesn't seem to be a dock. From what I can tell, you must have a matching cable for your phone, which then lays around on the table connected by said cable. Or use Bluetooth, with the security risks, and still have your phone laying around.

    Cellsocket is a dock. The phone plugs in, like a real desk charger. To my mind, a much more elegant solution.

  89. Re:Article Text Without FUD by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    The dinner is prepared!

  90. Old stuff by great_snoopy · · Score: 1

    I have such a setup for about 4 years, and even at the initial setup date 4 years ago this was not "cutting edge". It seems that you have just discovered an old technology.Congratulations :)

  91. My solution by zazzel · · Score: 1

    My solution to the problem is a Siemens Gigaset Sx353 DECT base station with Bluetooth:

    as soon as my cell phone (SonyEricsson T610) is in range (and mostly in its desk stand, recharging, it is available as an additional line for every phone connected to the Siemens base station.

    Very nice solution, especially since cell calls to landline phones are currently cheaper than my ISDN line. Reason: Arcor, my ISDN+DSL provider is terribly expensive in regular phone calls, but their DSL is cheap. Guess why they don't bundle any VoIP routers with their DSL offers :)

  92. Definitely by Futurepower(R) · · Score: 1


    Yup, BroadVoice.com is the best.

  93. Funniest pseudo-science I've read today. by Futurepower(R) · · Score: 1


    Oh, great, a cool line from the cell phone anti-marketing department.

  94. Why? by nastyphil · · Score: 1

    > long calls that might drain my battery. It
    > would also be nice if I didn't have to hunt
    > for my cellphone at home

    Why not leave your phone plugged into its charger? Then it is always in the same place and full of juice.

    --
    Dialectician. Archology.
  95. GSM phone by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    The czech company Jablotron made a 'mobile' GSM phone with the size of a desk phone.
    http://www.jablotron.cz/en/index.php?pid=p roducts/ gdp-02
    It was already featured on CNN - as some kind of a quirky gadget, but it seems that it hit the spot. There are already hundreds of thousands ordered units.
    It can run on battery or AC power from adaptor, and has a big display ... a nice choice for elderly people, or others that find current miniature hi-res displays too straining to their eyes.

  96. Seconded. by Atario · · Score: 2, Insightful

    I have never understood people who have these problems with cell phones.

    Can't find it? Easy: keep the damn thing on you! I assume you take it with you in some way when you leave the house...keep doing that when you're at home. In my case, that means my pocket. I have yet to misplace my phone for even a minute. Over several years. How difficult, eh?

    Always running out of charge? How about plugging it in to charge when you drop it from your pocket (or whatever)? In my case, that means plugging it in when going to bed (along with dumping all the keys, wallet, etc., and in the same spot). I have yet to run out of charge. Over several years. Gee, amazing, huh?

    --
    "A great democracy must be progressive or it will soon cease to be a great democracy." --Theodore Roosevelt
  97. Already Exists by Samhain138 · · Score: 1

    Where I work (and in many companies around Israel) it's already being used.
    When an employee calls a cellular number, it automatically uses a real cellphone on the same cellular network to make the call.
    This probably saves tons of cash for a big company.

    I read that it's an Israeli invention (and patent) but I'm not sure.
    Does anyone know how it's called and who makes these things?

  98. PBX sockets by C0vardeAn0nim0 · · Score: 1

    here in brasil cals from cell phone-to-cell phone are cheaper than calls from land line-to-cell phone, so many comapanies are ataching cell phones to their PBX sistems so any call to numbers starting with 7,8 or 9 (is mandatory that cell phones numbers begins with one of these digits) are routed through the mobiles. some say the cost savings pays the cost of the equipment really soon.

    --
    What ? Me, worry ?
  99. So, do Slashdot subscribers see this article ... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    ... since it appears to be nothing more than an advertisement for a particular product?? ;^)

  100. Would it work with TIVO? by DeeFresh · · Score: 1

    Any idea if this would work with TIVO? I don't have a landline, just cellular, so its a pain to find a landline every two weeks to dial into the service.

  101. Re:I got one about a year ago. Here's my impressio by MindStalker · · Score: 1

    I think he means modem to modem data, cingular only connects you to the internet.

  102. I have one... my impressions by martone66 · · Score: 1

    I have a Cellsocket for my Verizon Motorola T730. Overall, it's an okay solution.

    My main problem is lack of cell reception at my house. If I stand outside on the deck or next to a window, I have marginal reception and can *usually* make a call. However, service inside the house is useless... ie, the phone might ring, but the call will cut out immediately.

    I was thinking that the Cellsocket with its external antenna would eliminate my problems. I could just place it next to the window and all would be fine.

    That turned out not to be the case. The antenna that the Cellsocket came with actually turned out to have worse reception than the phone's itself in my case. When plugged into the Cellsocket, the phone would show 2 or 3 bars of service. However, I would not be able to place calls, or my calls would drop within the first minute.

    I finally solved the problem by buying an external antenna... a magnetic one that I believe is intended to mount on top of your car temporarily. I bought that and an adapter to screw into the Cellsocket's antenna connection. After putting the antenna on top of a metal filing cabinet next to the window, my reception problems disappeared. Oddly enough, my phone shows only one or two bars of signal strength, but my calls very rarely drop anymore.

    My last complaint is the firmware seems to be a bit flaky. Sometimes the speed dial doesn't work. Sometimes I can place calls through a connected phone, I can hear who I'm calling, but they can't hear me. Cycling the cellphone's power seems to fix that one.

    Oh, and any calls which require touchtone input (especially accessing my voicemail) require the input on the docked cellphone itself, not the attached phone.

    Overall, it's a decent product. It's allowed me to use my cellphone inside my house, which I was almost unable to do before. But due to its unreliability, I had to suck it up and pay for a landline.

  103. Cellphone vs. dialtone by PiratePTG · · Score: 1
    From the original article: especially long calls that might drain my battery. It would also be nice if I didn't have to hunt for my cellphone at home when it rings. Well, it looks like there is a simple solution with a Cell Socket, a cradle for your cellphone

    We use the Cellsocket in the intercom and IFB systems in news vans and satellite trucks a lot. There is one caveat about extended use - the Cellsocket will NOT charge the cellphone while it is being used. So your battery will eventually drain and your call will be dropped. Also, the Cellsocket will not give you a traditional dialtone. It gives you a few beeps when you pick up a POTS phone to let you know it's working.

    Another device we use is called a Telular, which will give you a dialtone when you pick up the attached phone. The Telular devices were originally designed to be an emergency backup for landlines (hang one on the wall by your PBX, trunk gets cut, patch in the Telular and you have dialtone). They have also been pressed into service where the last mile would be too expensive (mountain cabins, hunting camps, etc). Telular's downside is that they have been slow to keep up with changing technology, and their phones have to be ordered for specific providers and are not reprogrammable if you change providers.

    With the slow demise of analog cellular service, TV stations and news gathering vehicle owners have been pretty much screwed by the cellular companies. The digital delay messes with the field reporter's IFB, you can't run a modem or fax over digital service, and the options to digital cell service are too expensive.

    --
    The number 1 problem of working in a cubicle - 23 power cords, 1 outlet...
  104. Verizon is not nice by lorcha · · Score: 1
    They're not so bad, either. Forwarded calls are simply charged at whatever airtime rate applies. So if you forward during peak hours, you deplete your peak minutes.

    If you forward during nights or weekends, it's free.

    --
    "Avoid employing unlucky people - throw half of the pile of CVs in the bin without reading them." -- David Brent
  105. It's not a hack... by lorcha · · Score: 1

    ... if it's alrady a feature.

    --
    "Avoid employing unlucky people - throw half of the pile of CVs in the bin without reading them." -- David Brent
  106. Motorola phones? by Guspaz · · Score: 1

    I'm not certain, as I haven't looked into it, but I have a Motorola v551, and I believe you can make voice calls from a computer with the Phone Tools software (And the USB cable for the phone).

    And if you can't, I'm still having a blast shoving WarCraft 2 and Final Fantasy 7 midi onto the thing and using them as ringtones. It might only have 24 polyphony, but I can barely notice dropped notes, and the MIDIs sound great.

  107. similar product but MUCH cheaper by aberson · · Score: 1
    (I know this post sounds really shady, but if you look at my profile you'll see that I'm not just here spamming slashdot, I'm a regular reader and poster)

    I have designed a device similar in function to the Cellsocket/Dock-n-Talk/Cidco Merge, but that will work with almost any cellphone instead of the few brands that those devices work with, and will cost a SMALL FRACTION of the price of the those products - I estimate around $25. My device will also work with VoIP softphones, such as Skype, and audio over AIM/iChat/etc.

    With my device, the user must perform all dial and answer functions at the cellphone itself, but can use a regular telephone to speak once the call is established. So, you get many of the advantages of the other products for a cheaper price - something I think many Slashdotters would be interested in.

    It is not yet available in quantity, but if you are intersted in more information, please email me. A few beta units will be available soon and I'm looking for a few good geeks!

    email is: spam-SlashdotPhone with the URL at the top of this post (Please leave the "spam-" in there)

    (I was trying to encode the email address, but /. wouldn't let me!)

    Adam

    1. Re:similar product but MUCH cheaper by The+Conductor · · Score: 1
      You and at least two other people. But none of them went to market until recently because the only cost-effective ways of hooking a cellphone to a landline phone were patented in 1984. The company that had the patent wasn't able to competently manufacture it, but they found out they could make more money suing people who re-discovered their idea than they could actually making a product.

      I was informed of this by someone who--you guessed it--developed a product to deliver a dial tone from a cellphone. Fortunately he caught wind of the issue before he had sunk too much money in development. A previous company had to pay $1 million after getting ambushed by this patent.

      I wish I had links to document this. It is a textbook example of how the current patent system stifles innovation instead of promoting it.

    2. Re:similar product but MUCH cheaper by Thuktun · · Score: 1

      Ask and ye shall receive.

      You appear to be referencing Telular, who sued over the Vox2 VOX.LINK product. Telular does not seem to have any similar products, and they blasted the VOX.LINK consumer product off the market.

      Telular's press release cites the following patents:

      Patent 4,658,096 - System for interfacing a standard telephone set with a radio transceiver
      Patent 5,715,296 - Concurrent wireless/landline interface apparatus
      Patent 5,949,616 - Suspension having relief against flexure movement interference (??!!)

      (That last one appears to be a typo in their press release. I hope.)

    3. Re:similar product but MUCH cheaper by The+Conductor · · Score: 1
      Good links there, but the 2003 date seems too late to be the case that was described to me (I seem to remember it as being in the early 90's...before the internet horizon). That would make Vox2 at least the 3rd concern to be snagged by this patent.

      By looking at the patents...well that third one is out to lunch... but it looks like you could work around those patents by hooking to the cellphone through Bluetooth, or putting adapters at each phone to communicate through the phone lines by something other than analog POTS.

  108. Only sort of true by lindsayt · · Score: 1

    Veovis is right that *this device* will not allow you to use you cellphone to connect a computer to an analog dialup ISP. However, at least with T-Mobile this is moot because you can do that without any devices except your phone.

    I do *NOT* pay for gprs packet service from T-Mobile. However, sometimes I find myself in the middle of nowhere (Waterloo, IA) in a hostile environment (my mother-in-law's spyware-infested computer) and am dying for any other way to get a safe connection. Since long-distance is free on my cell phone, I hook my V600 up to my Powerbook (either with the cable or by bluetooth), use the modem scripts from here and dial in to the back-up modem pool offered by my DSL ISP. Sure, it only goes at 9600Kbps, but that's a totally free connection anywhere in the US. It's good enough for email.

    T-Mobile's network is smart enough to tell that it's a data call, not a voice call, but it's billed within my minutes (as minutes) and not as data service (as bytes). With unlimited weekend and evening minutes, there's literally no cost whatsoever.

    I don't know about the poor sods who are still on CDMA/TDMA, but those of us with GSM can still choose not to pay for GPRS service if we choose.

    --
    I did not design this game/I did not name the stakes/I just happen to like apples/And I am not afraid of snakes-AniD
  109. Siemens had something like this.... "2phone" by danimrich · · Score: 1
    Even better, for those with a landline or VoIP phone, would be a system that automatically picks the cheapest route out for any given call.

    Siemens had something liekt his a couple of years ago for their S35i phone (and other compatible phones). It was a charging cradle that was connected to the phone line. When you got a call on your mobile you could pick it up on the landline phone. Also, if you made a call using the landline phone, it could be directed via the mobile if the prefix matched one of the programmable prefixes stored in the device. There was also a "least-cost routing" feature for the POTS. It had a button that let you forward all incoming calls on the landline phone to the mobile (using a feature offered by the POTS network operator). Finally, it kept sure that your phone was charged :-) I doubt that Siemens still makes them, but you might find one on ebay -- search for 2phone.

    --
    where's all that Karma?
  110. Great for large houses by bpdski · · Score: 1

    I bought one of these a couple months ago and I love it. When I get home, I just drop my cell phone in the cradle and it will ring any phone in my house. The caller id info is also sent to all my land line phones. The downsides I have noted are:
    1) Sometimes people on the other end hear a faint echo
    2) You have to dial the # key after a number to place a call, so it won't work with any hardware device like a Satellite box that has to dial home. Although I don't know that a modem could work over a cell phone anyway.
    Upside: I save $40/month on a land line I rarely used.

  111. Re:I got one about a year ago. Here's my impressio by Ungrounded+Lightning · · Score: 1

    Data? If you live in one of the 4 UMTS markets you can receive faster data transmitions through your Cingular service then through your cable modem.

    I'd love to do that. But I don't.

    The cell site is just TDMA. No data (other than digitized voice), period. And as of the last time I checked (a couple weeks ago) there were NO plans at Cingular to EVER upgrade it - even to voice-only GSM - just as AT&T had no such plans before the merger.

    (I'll try again from time to time as the merger shakes out and gets organized.)

    It's right on the edge of their TDMA coverage, far off the edge of their GSM coverage, and they're not planning to expand either - even to convert it to GSM as they retire TDMA. Verizon has no plans to extend coverage to that area, either. (With the AT&T/Cingular cell and a roaming agreement, they apparently consider it adequately covered.)

    Since there's only a handfull of retirement homes and the intersection of two not-heavily-traveled highways, it's probably too sparse for 'em. (If the area zoned for a new subdivision ever develops they might change their mind. But in that case I'd be losing much of the view I built there to get, selling the house at an inflated price, and moving further out.)

    --
    Bantam Dominique roosters crow a four-note song. Once you've heard it as "Happy BIRTHday" you can't NOT hear it that way
  112. Also: UMTS is metered by Ungrounded+Lightning · · Score: 1

    Data? If you live in one of the 4 UMTS markets you can receive faster data transmitions through your Cingular service then through your cable modem.

    Also: UMTS is metered at a penny a megabyte if you use it for anything other than browsing on your cellphone's screen.

    Bluetooth, cable-from-the-phone, or plugging the authorization card into a different phone or device all start the meter.

    --
    Bantam Dominique roosters crow a four-note song. Once you've heard it as "Happy BIRTHday" you can't NOT hear it that way
  113. Cidco MERGE Dock by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    They mentioned this product on Gizmodo back in November.

    http://www.gizmodo.com/gadgets/cellphones/motoro la /cidco-merge-dock-026503.php

    You can choose what line you dial out on using a calling code.