Slashdot Mirror


Cooling Down Hot Processors

DonnaMai writes "Face it: the only scorching hot thing you want with a chip is salsa. Any other overheating is potentially counterproductive, and can be downright damaging to the microprocessor -- or other components. This article uncovers potential ways to chill the chips."

57 of 293 comments (clear)

  1. Eh? by American+AC+in+Paris · · Score: 3, Funny
    Face it: the only scorching hot thing you want with a chip is salsa.

    Because nothing says "fiesta!" quite like third-degree burns on the roof of your mouth...

    --

    Obliteracy: Words with explosions

    1. Re:Eh? by karnal · · Score: 4, Funny

      "Fieththa".

      Nope, didn't work. Roof is still tender.

      --
      Karnal
  2. You Insensitive Clod by big-giant-head · · Score: 2, Funny

    To maximize my ROI i use my p4 as a hotplate/Pizza Warmer when I'm not surfing the web.

    --

    So Long and Thanks for all the Fish.
    1. Re:You Insensitive Clod by jovlinger · · Score: 2, Interesting

      well,

      the linux kernel (and presumbaly the windows kernels as well) issue the hlt instruction when idle, which allows parts of the chip to power down, significantly reducing power and heat.

      (some/all?) desktop P4s can also scale down clock cycles under software control, but that is significantly coarser grain than the hlt instruction. When it works, the hlt instruction should be sufficient to keep the cpu cool when not doing anything.

      Of course, these recourses don't always work. My P4's fan is currently running very loud: I'm unsure whether the fan is on its last legs, or the CPU is erroneously not doing the hlt thing. Some suggestions are that SMP architectures hate hlt, and that hyperthreaded p4s are treated like SMPs. I'm still actively researching this. Anyone want to chime in?

  3. Bah by ikkonoishi · · Score: 4, Funny

    When I was a kid we had to cool our chips by using our little brothers as a heatsink.

    1. Re:Bah by ciscoeng · · Score: 2

      Damn you ikkonoishi!

      love,
      your fried brother

      p.s. Sister's pregnant again.

  4. cool chips by Luxifer · · Score: 5, Interesting

    What we really need is a spare, low-power, mimimal processor without all the fancy extensions that you can switch to when you're just, say, reading a webpage or email, or such.. you could integrate this right into the motherboard and completely shut down your processor when you're not using it for real stuff. IMHO... maybe an engineer will give me a reason this is unreasonable.

    1. Re:cool chips by MC68000 · · Score: 5, Informative

      We already have that. It's called Speedstep and it's on Pentium M processors.

      --
      E = m c^3 Don't drink and derive E = m c^3
    2. Re:cool chips by Ironsides · · Score: 2, Informative

      It's called the Crusoe Processor by Transmeta. And yes, it is an x86 processor.

      --
      Fly me to the moon Let me sing among those stars Let me see what spring is like On jupiter and mars
    3. Re:cool chips by detritus` · · Score: 4, Interesting

      Because configuring a MB for 2 processors is going to be a lot more complicated than the switching frequency model they use now (ie. Athlon XP-M and Pentium M chips). This method is a lot less complex than attempting to use 2 processors, one for high load and one for low load. (imagine trying to determine what's considered high load? after all web browsing actually takes a fairly high CPU while rendering some pages, especially with the more complex XML and (ick) flash pages that are out there). I'm typing this on a Athlon XP-M laptop right now and it actually stays quite cool until the CPU load goes above a certain point and it jumps fromm 533Mhz to 1.74GHz, at which point if its sustained it almost gets uncomfortable for laptop use.

    4. Re:cool chips by doublem · · Score: 4, Insightful

      The problem is software bloat.

      If applications were coded as if there were actual restrictions, if speed and efficency were a consideration, then this would be a valid option. 90% of the processing power in a computer would only be used when playing a game.

      Sadly, we live in a world where the OPERATING SYSTEM will soon require a 3D card to even function. (Windows Longhorn)

      The bottom line is, despite significant advances in hardware, the "User Experience" still feels as sluggish and slow as it did in the days of Windows 3.1 on a 386. How much does XP do that the average user needs that Windows 3.1 and Word 2.0 couldn't? Can you IMAGINE how fast Windows 3.1 would be on modern hardware if the drivers existed?

      --
      "Live Free or Die." Don't like it? Then keep out of the USA
    5. Re:cool chips by gl4ss · · Score: 2, Insightful

      if you want a low powered machine.
      buy one.

      but you'll still need to cool the high powered beast when you need the power, unless you would like to get some nitrous shitter that only could run full blast for 20 secs and then explode.

      --
      world was created 5 seconds before this post as it is.
    6. Re:cool chips by AShuvalov · · Score: 3, Informative

      I guess that is available, you have nothing to wait.

      The AMD Athlon64 3500 consumes 20W of power on low load and 69W when you stress it. Most of the time it will be pretty cool.

      --
      Andrew
    7. Re:cool chips by CausticPuppy · · Score: 2, Informative

      Sadly, we live in a world where the OPERATING SYSTEM will soon require a 3D card to even function. (Windows Longhorn)

      And that's not even an original idea from Microsoft.

      OSX 10.3 (Panther) already utilizes 3D acceleration on video cards and treats all windows as textures. That's how the nifty "expose" feature works. The first time I saw that feature it was one of those "why didn't anybody think of this before" moments. I don't even own a mac, yet... but my mini is on its way. :-)

      10.4 (Tiger) will take it to the next level with Core Image, which requires a video card with programmable pixel shaders (DirectX 9 equivalent from the Windows world). This will allow, among other things, realtime filters applied to videos, images, and of course some new OS eye candy. But it's mainly there to speed up image and video processing, which is what macs are supposed to be good at.

      However, a 3D card is still not "required" as the OS will automatically scale back the features that aren't supported (you will still be able to run Tiger on a 400MHz G3 iMac).
      I don't know whether Longhorn will actually require 3D cards, but saying "soon" in reference to Longhorn is a tad bit optimistic, don't you think?

      --
      -CausticPuppy "Of all the people I know, you're certainly one of them." -Somebody I don't know
    8. Re:cool chips by skubeedooo · · Score: 2, Informative
      I'm not totally sure of all this, but from memory win 3.1 couldn't:
      • Interface with USB peripherals, and hence the majority of devices which people want/use.
      • Have long filenames
      • Access large HDs
      • Have limited access users without some novell type extension
      And with word 2.0 you couldn't
      • Save docs as html
      • Do a decent grammar check
      • Write for more than an hour without it crashing.
      • Document templates?
      • Write scripts in a decent language where the object model is compatible with other 'office' applications, ie vb

      The bottom line is, despite significant advances in hardware, the "User Experience" still feels as sluggish and slow as it did in the days of Windows 3.1 on a 386.

      Why is this the bottom line? The UI needs to be acceptably fast, not 1ms fast.

      Can you IMAGINE how fast Windows 3.1 would be on modern hardware if the drivers existed?

      And who do you think would actually care?

    9. Re:cool chips by Dracolytch · · Score: 3, Interesting

      Dude, 90% of the processor power IS only used when playing a game. I have my system monitor open, and as I type this on my development computer, I'm at a steady 8 to 11 percent. 5% of that (half my CPU load) is running the flash animation on the top of this page.

      CPUs today are bored 90% of the time. Doing word processing and stuff, your CPU use is probably below 10%. The sluggishness has almost NOTHING to do with CPU speed. The big thing is load times, which is correlated to disk usage. RAM really is virtually unlimited, and the only time I've hit the limitations of my CPU are when I'm doing things like writing programs to breed multimedia files.

      If you're talking about lack of responsiveness, you sound like you don't need a faster processor... it sounds like you need a 1Ghz machine with 256 MB of decent RAM and a 10,000 RPM SATA drive. 512 MB of RAM if you surf with multiple windows and work with spreadsheets at the same time. Swear to god, that'll knock most of your lack of response time to near nothing.

      ~D

      --
      This sig has been enciphered with a one-time pad. It could say almost anything.
    10. Re:cool chips by The+Salamander · · Score: 2, Informative

      My Pentium-M (733) has 5 clock-speed steps.

  5. Cool it down by BooRolla · · Score: 2, Insightful

    The easiest way to keep it cool to not run Intel.

    1. Re:Cool it down by gnuman99 · · Score: 2, Interesting
      AMD Athlon XP 2200 - Best AMD to date. Runs very hot (55-60c)...A few times I've approached 80c

      Something is broken with either your installation, motherboard, fan or air circulation in the case. My Athlong *never* goes above 50. Most of the time, it runs under 40. Stock heatsink/fan.

      Your setup is messed up.

  6. In my day.... by vought · · Score: 3, Funny

    We used to build a little dam around the processor with putty, fill up the reservoir with freeze-spray, and drink margaritas while the whole shebang evaporated noisily.

    No fancy metal heat sinks for us...andd we liked it!

  7. Move! by turboflux · · Score: 5, Funny

    Best way to cool your processor is to move to Canada. Hands down.

  8. Tsssss! by geomon · · Score: 4, Funny

    Ice cubes work well.

    They don't last very long, though.

    Perhaps we should be working on a better ice cube!

    --
    "Rocky Rococo, at your cervix!"
    1. Re:Tsssss! by athakur999 · · Score: 2, Funny

      That's still thinking small. The biggest obstacle to cooling CPUs is that air is a very poor conductor of heat. Since almost all cooling systems used for PCs at some point have to radiate heat into air to cool down, air is the obvious weakness in the system.

      Solution: We all need to grow gills and move under the sea.

      --
      "People that quote themselves in their signatures bother me" - athakur999
  9. Razored processor architecture by Raul654 · · Score: 4, Interesting

    Dr. Trevor Mudge (U. Michigan) came to give a lecture at my University last year. He had an interesting proposal which I suspect is probably going to end up being used in nearly every architecture. The energy usage of a procesor is proportion to the square of the voltage - so dropping it as much as possible is desirable. The only problem is that once you get too close, you start getting bit level errors. He proposes to use a shadow register to keep track of values as they pass through and detect bit errors automatically, and route around them. If run at the optimal voltage (1.4 volts) a razored process will see a dramatic drop in energy consumption with a virtually-nonexistant hit to processing power.

    --


    To make laws that man cannot, and will not obey, serves to bring all law into contempt.
    --E.C. Stanton
    1. Re:Razored processor architecture by jumpingfred · · Score: 3, Informative

      That sounds like a bunch of extra logic at each flipflop. Which will reduce speed and increase the size of the chips.

    2. Re:Razored processor architecture by harrkev · · Score: 4, Informative

      But, as the voltage levels drop, the leakage current through the transistors increases. At some point, dropping the voltage does not reduce the power. I think that we are pretty close to this point already.

      --
      "-1 Troll" is the apparently the same as "-1 I disagree with you."
    3. Re:Razored processor architecture by loose+electron · · Score: 2, Insightful

      hm......

      Double the number of registers?
      I dont think so.
      How about parity (one extra bit) and ECC? Its been in the communication world forever.

      The "optimal voltage" is dependent on the foundry process and the threshold voltage associated therewith. Latest and smallest (90nm) sits at a power supply of 1.1V and has gate oxide leakage problems like you would not believe. After all the gate oxide thickness is about 6 atoms right now.

      Running at reduced power supply voltage does reduce power, but the penalty is paid for in several areas: reduced driver capability, not able towork at the fastest clock rate, susceptible to environemnt noise, much more sensitive to analog issues.

      What you are describing now becomes an analog design issue.

      --
      www.effectiveelectrons.com "chips that work" Analog, RF, Mixed Signal
    4. Re:Razored processor architecture by sam_da_mann · · Score: 2, Informative

      Bzzt, actully you're both wrong.

      I'm also an EE. True, as technology improves the voltage is lowed. The Vt must also be lowered, thus increasing leakage. But for A GIVEN PROCESS is in the method described by GP, drain-source voltage has minimal effect on subthreshold leakage. The standard equation is, assuming Vds > 100mV

      Id_sub=Id0*W/L*exp[q(Vgs-Vt)/(N0*KT)]

      Id0 begin the current at Vgs-Vt and N0 being the subthreshold slope

    5. Re:Razored processor architecture by harrkev · · Score: 2, Informative

      As it turns out, Anandtech mentioned this today.

      ANANDTECH ARTICLE

      --
      "-1 Troll" is the apparently the same as "-1 I disagree with you."
  10. Liquid Nitrogen, of course by tajmorton · · Score: 3, Interesting

    As reported on /. a while back. "Record Attempt: The 5 GHz Project"

    --
    Tell the truth and you won't have so much to remember.
  11. I like hot by SpongeBobLinuxPants · · Score: 4, Funny

    I don't know what the problem is, I like hot chi... oh wait, you're talking about chips, nevermind...

  12. Overheating vs. High Operating Temps by BenBenBen · · Score: 3, Interesting
    The original poster makes the very common mistake of confusing hot chips with overheating chips - just because 90degC is hot to us meatbags, doesn't mean that it's dangerous to have ICs who run at this temp.

    There are many, many ICs that run happily for years at high operating temperatures (Blaupunkt's Digiceiver digital RF processor being one I'm familiar with).

    Saying this, I do run a 12" G4 PowerBook and can appreciate the delights of a 20degC chip...

    --
    The Slashdot Paradox: "100% Overrated"
  13. What about by LukaFox · · Score: 3, Interesting

    a liquid cooling system that is also a conversation piece http://nobispro.com/aquatank/?

  14. Cool Processors by Pan+T.+Hose · · Score: 4, Insightful

    How do I cool processors? Simple: I underclock them. Even a 10-20% less MHzs is usually enough to get rid of a noisy fan, i.e. the most stupid idea in the history of personal computers. Most of today's computers are I/O-bound anyway (Moore's law) so there is no performance loss whatsoever. Seems like an obvious solution.

    --
    Sincerely,
    Pan Tarhei Hosé, PhD.
    "Homo sum et cogito ergo odi profanum vulgus et libido."
  15. Re:Salsa by eno2001 · · Score: 2, Funny
    Since when is salsa ever "scorching hot" even in reference to spiciness?

    Since the [tt]ime that salsa is made with Habaneros (which aren't really peppers) that will burn a hole straight from your mouth to your ass. Considering that most people here on Slashdot don't have any real distance between those two sections of the body, I guess it doesn't mean much tho... ;P

    --
    -"...bad old ideas look confusingly fresh when they are packaged as technology" - Jaron Lanier (Digital Maoism on Edge.o
  16. And why was this article accepted?! by William_Lee · · Score: 5, Insightful

    There was nothing new or innovative in the article, and it had the depth of Paris Hilton as far as actual real world cooling suggestions.

    There are a ton of different solutions out there both onchip and off including aircooling via different heatsink designs, watercooling, peltier cooling, and self contained refrigeration units.

    This article barely scraped the surface of anything useful or interesting related to cooling.

    Oh wait, this is /. I forgot for a moment...

    1. Re:And why was this article accepted?! by JaffaKREE · · Score: 2, Funny

      If you'd seen the videos, you'd know Paris Hilton can actually go pretty deep...

  17. Ducting by kavachameleon · · Score: 4, Interesting

    When I first got my Prescott chip, it ran *way* too hot. Realized that the stock thermal pad was just acting as insulation, so I scraped it off and replaced it with Ceramique. It still ran warm, so I superglued a piece of 3" PVC pipe to my case fan. Now air blows right onto the processor area, and the CPU temps are great. I highly recommend the ducting. Cheap, easy, and oh-so-geeky.

    1. Re:Ducting by ctr2sprt · · Score: 2, Interesting
      This is the way most rackmount servers work. Because of space concerns they can't easily fit a regular heatsink/fan combo in the case, especially with 2U (3.5" tall) or 1U (1.75" tall) cases. So they put a bunch of fans on the front or rear (or both) of the chassis and use a plastic duct to route the air over the processors and vent it out of the case. It also seems to be a common tactic among the low-end home desktop systems: the power supply fan is ducted over the CPU and out the back of the case. The motivation there isn't space or cooling efficiency, it's cost (fewer fans) and noise level (again, fewer fans).

      I think this is increasingly the way we are going to have to go as we try to squeeze a little more life out of air-cooling. But I really think we are going to have to move to water cooling soon. I'm a little surprised it isn't already happening with servers: due to the space constraints, they would be the biggest beneficiaries. And due to the efficiency benefits, you could cool several servers - maybe even an entire rack - with one radiator (assuming of course that the radiator is designed for that). Smaller installations, with only a few racks, might even be able to eliminate expensive dedicated AC units.

      Even in the home market, you could cool a radiator pretty well with a small number of large, low-RPM fans. It should result in a cooler system. My understanding is that at present water cooling is not much quieter than air cooling, if it's quieter at all, but I think that's more a limitation of currently implementations (which target the insane overclocker crowd, who don't care as much about noise).

  18. More efficient software by G4from128k · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Call me a curmudgeon, but it seems like most of the heat is created by wasted cpu cycles. Eye candy is nice, but at 200 million computers in the U.S. alone, each Watt saved represents about $31 million in annual energy costs (assuming 40 hrs/wk, @ $0.074/kWHr. Reducing power consumption by 10 W would pay for a lot of good beer to fuel software development for more efficient software.

    --
    Two wrongs don't make a right, but three lefts do.
  19. Excuse my Ignorance.... by devphaeton · · Score: 2, Interesting

    ...but would increasing the size of the actual chip help any? Like a vented, flow-through design. The actual chip is about the size of a fingernail, i know, but if we increased it to the size of the whole plastic skirt around it (that which has all the pins) wouldn't that help heat dissipation?

    I haven't taken any measurements, but i'm willing to bet that the skirting around that wouldn't be much bigger- we've got more length on all sides, so we don't have to go as deep.

    However, i don't design microprocessors, and don't know anything about electronics, so i'm betting there's something i'm missing out- i.e. the impedance or capacitance effects of increasing the microscopic traces. I would assume someone has thought of this once before, but with all the rush to make stuff smaller and smaller, can it be overlooked?

    It's not like we don't have any spare room in a PC case, y'know...

    --


    do() || do_not(); // try();
    1. Re:Excuse my Ignorance.... by david.given · · Score: 4, Informative
      would increasing the size of the actual chip help any?

      It would --- but there would be other problems.

      The first one is the most simple: silicon's expensive. Really expensive. The more units you can slice off that wafer the cheaper the units are. Making the die bigger simply for thermal reasons isn't going to wash with the chip manufacturers. They already glue the die to a metal backing plate, which gives you much the same effect anyway.

      The second one, however, is the most crucial one. Electricity is slow. Electrical impulses travel at about 2/3 c through copper and a touch less through silicon (IIRC, I can't find the figures to check). This means that the bigger your die is, the longer it takes the impulses to travel from one side of it to the other.

      A 1GHz clock fires every 10^-9 seconds; since the speed of light is 3x10^8 m/s, this means that the impulses are going to travel about twenty centimetres between clock pulses. For a 4GHz clock, it'll be about 5cm. There's a lot more wiring than that folded up inside the die; and it gets worse --- particular things happen at particular times throughout the clock cycle, and where you are in the clock cycle now depends on how long the wire is that connects you to the clock. Making sure everything happens in sync is a nightmare.

      There are solutions to all of this; asynchronous designs which don't use clocks, offloading functionality to special-purpose processors like GPUs so you don't need as fast a main processor, radically different approaches like Cell, optical transports so you can route signals through each other, etc, but basically there are loads of good reasons why you need the die to be as small as humanly possible.

  20. Re:Better than water cooling by Blue-Footed+Boobie · · Score: 5, Interesting
    I built one of those a while back...

    Here it is in the "mostly finished" stage:

    Picture 1

    Picture 2

    --
    DAMN YOU OCTODOG! DAMN YOU TO HELL!
  21. What a disappointment by Noose+For+A+Neck · · Score: 5, Insightful
    Here I was, all set to read an interesting article about technical solutions to the problem of heat transfer on microelectronic chips, and instead all I get is a bunch of fluffy gibberish that looks like it was written by a sophomore communications major in college.

    Color this mechanical engineer disappointed.

    --

    Software piracy is victimless theft.

  22. Insert Witty Title Here by LewsTherinKinslayer · · Score: 2, Funny

    This is so lame, I think I should post it AC...

    ... but...

    The roof, the roof, the roof is on fire!

    (Or, for the Futurama fan in you, and me, Nixon: "The loot, the loot, the loot is on fire!")

  23. Obligatory link by Spy+der+Mann · · Score: 2, Interesting
  24. Re:Before the /. effect... by object88 · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Does anyone else care that the submitter, DonnaMai, ripped off the article for his/her "submission"? How is it that on a website for nerds, we can't think of a way to at least paraphrase or summarize an article?

    Crap, I say!

  25. Re:Better than water cooling by Ingolfke · · Score: 3, Funny

    I can one up you. I built one of these, but instead of using mineral oil, I used vegetable oil. I run Gentoo, so I'd download a copy of Gnome, recompile from scratch, and then toss a bag for fries into the oil. They'd cook up really nicely in about 7 minutes. A friend of my brother, built one of these contraptions, and installed Gentoo from stage 1. He managed to deep fry and entire turkey. It was delicious.

  26. Re:Why do we need hot processors? by kannibal_klown · · Score: 2, Informative

    Their problem is the megahertz myth...

    They've been pushing this for so long, that they can't look back now. Yes, the Pentium M's perform great, but they're still only around 1.7 GHz.

    While that out-performs P4's with MUCH higher clock-speeds, what are they going to say? Buy this CPU, it's 1.7GHz! Joe Sixpack would say "But I can buy this here Penteeyum Four with 4 GHz... 4 is better than 1.7."

    AMD has been rating their CPUs on performance to keep competitive with Intel's. If anything, Intel will have to follow their lead and do the same if they really want to push the Pentium M's to the masses.

  27. Re:Laptops by LurkerXXX · · Score: 5, Interesting

    Someone needs to figure out an efficient way of makeing use of the huge surface area on the lid of a laptop for cooling. When in operation, it's facing away from you, so you wouldn't feel all the heat from it. The problem is tranferring the heat to a part that has to hinge away from the area that's making the heat. Plus there might be problems if it transfers too much heat to the LCD screen rather than to the air on the surface away from the user. It just seems a shame not to be able to take advantage of all that surface area.

  28. Plagiarised again? by Osty · · Score: 3, Insightful

    From the Slashdot summary

    Face it: the only scorching hot thing you want with a chip is salsa. Any other overheating is potentially counterproductive, and can be downright damaging to the microprocessor -- or other components. This article uncovers potential ways to chill the chips."
    and from the first paragraph of the article itself
    Face it: the only scorching hot thing you want with a chip is salsa. Any other overheating is potentially counterproductive, and can be downright damaging to the microprocessor -- or other components. In this Power Architecture challenge, developers warm up to the idea of how to cool down the hotter processors. From the weird to the wonderful, readers uncover potential ways to chill the chips.

    Aside from the removal of one sentence and a slight re-wording of the last, this is word for word the introduction to the article. If you were to submit this in a paper for a college (or even high school!) class, you'd be a good candidate for a plagiarism investigation.

    Once again, Slashdot editors, there's a very simple way to deal with this -- change the author attribution. Rather than saying, "DonnaMai writes ...", use "DonnaMai quotes ..." or "DonnaMai poorly paraphrases ...". By properly citing the summary as a quotation or paraphrasing* of the article, you would avoid the impression of plagiarism.

    * Yes, paraphrasing is allowed by fair use. In fact, if you're going to summarize an article, you want to paraphrase. However, paraphrasing is not, "Copy a sentence with a changed word here, drop a sentence there." You need to write a summarization in your own words, not take the article's words and (poorly) "massage" them so that they're not 100% identical (90% identical is still a problem).

  29. Re:Water cooling is inevitable by A.+Rimmer · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Water cooling is the WORST for of cooling if have encountered.

    When a water filled radiator is used on a cpu instead of a fan the heat that leaves does not get dealt with. Small components overheating aren't any better than the cpu. Sure, you can put in a powerfull (loud) set of case fans to deal with the extra heat, but what's the water system there for then?

    I worked in a small "geeks for hire" computer support team. ALL THREE of the water cooled systems I worked inside of had HEAT problems. And one was leaking!

    The problem with computers heating up is caused by tower cases. If you lay the components out on a sheet of plywood and use regular fans you get superb cooling. Submerged in mineral oil works great too. Don't be an idiot though, you need depth, a few millimeters over the cpu won't cut it (this guy is going to use a pump and copper radiator for what would have cost $2 in mineral oil!).

  30. Underclocking and undervolting primer by rhizome · · Score: 2, Informative

    Primer at www.silentpcreview.com

    std. disclaimer: i am just a fan. ba dum bum.

    --
    When I was a kid, we only had one Darth.
  31. Re:Intelligent case design by Zemplar · · Score: 2, Funny

    "Not to get into a clock-waving contest (excuse my pun), I'm running a Prescott 2.4GHz chip on a microATX board inside a gutted Mac Classic with one 8mm fan in the side, one 12mm fan out the back, and it runs at an average 96F. Just my two cents."

    VERY IMPRESSIVE. Hell, I don't even know where I can find an 8mm or 12mm fan, let alone ones that would actually cool anything.

  32. Intel Branding by Junior+J.+Junior+III · · Score: 2, Funny

    Hotness is all about Intel's branding....

    Did you hear about the new hotness? Intel Pentium, SCORCHING PERFORMANCE! ssssssssss!

    Stick a Prescott on a long stick and apply that scortching brand on the rear end of any Longhorn cattle, and you've got yourself a stampede of sales, yeeeee-haw!

    --
    You see? You see? Your stupid minds! Stupid! Stupid!
  33. Re:Better than water cooling by deacon · · Score: 2, Insightful
    Mineral oils are generally non-conductive.

    Yes, but they are solvents for the plastic parts used on the MB. Over time, the plastic parts (such as slot connectors) will swell, and eventually they might break the solder joints.

    The pcb itself might swell, and if it does, it will break the plated thru holes and vias between the layers in the board.

  34. #1: Make sure your fans are facing correctly. by Behrooz · · Score: 2, Insightful

    I can't believe nobody has said this yet, but the absolute FIRST thing you should do if your system is running over-hot is check the airflow and direction of all of your fans.

    Most ATX cases like to have a fan blowing in the front, and other fans blowing out the back, check your case documentation. If one of your fans isn't working well, or is actually facing the wrong way, the entire airflow scheme goes straight to hell. I've seen this happen several times, but now that cooling is so critical incorrect fan placement is often a show-stopper.

    Today's story? My buddy builds a new system with a new P4 3.4HT. It exhibits classic signs of overheating-- the fan sounds like a 747 taking off all the time, odd beeping, memory errors, and when his brother who actually built it for him runs 3DMark, it scores something like 40% of what it should have on CPU. Everest says it's running at >80C. Much freaking out is done, and they order a hardcore Thermaltake fan to replace the standard/weak one that came bundled with the processor. That comes, and it helps somewhat, so the processor isn't stepping itself down to non-melting temperatures, hanging at 65-70C full-performance. Memory errors still a bit of an issue.

    So I come over to look at it. Dumbass neighbor (Best Buy Geek Squad employee/Frat Boy) had put the front fan on facing backward while assisting with the assembly, so the front 80mm case fan was blowing OUT of the case.

    I unscrewed the fan, flipped it around, and two minutes later the computer was playing Far Cry and humming along at 40C, by far the quietest computer in the room.

    Moral of the story? If you have a misplaced or broken fan, your cooling power drops massively. It pays to actually look at your case documentation now. Oh, and buy Antec.

    --
    "We have to go forth and crush every world view that doesn't believe in tolerance and free speech." - David Brin