Slashdot Mirror


Was the Mac mini Intended to Have an iPod dock?

RMH101 writes "Was the Mac mini originally designed to have an integrated iPod dock? The Register has an article that appears to suggest it was. This opens up the option of homebrewing your own dock into a mini for yourself..."

96 of 404 comments (clear)

  1. Re:Hmmm.... by Goodl · · Score: 3, Insightful

    I doubt anyone would, I mean what does a doc cost versus the cost of replacing your Mac if you fsck it up

    --
    I've got some photographs, I'd like to show them to you. Though you don't know the girls You'll recognise the view..
  2. Re:Hmmm.... by troon · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Or in other words:

    This opens up the option of homebrewing your own dock into a mini for yourself...

    --
    Ydco co ,df C erb-y go. a Ekrpat t.fxrapev
  3. Re:Hmmm.... by slimak · · Score: 3, Insightful

    the real difficulty would be maintaining the smooth look of the mini... nothing like a jagged hole to keep the minimalists happy. A dock could be cool for all the ipoders out there.

  4. Makes sense by ceeam · · Score: 3, Insightful

    I want Mac Mini. I do not want iPod. As far as I am concerned Apple made a right decision.

    1. Re:Makes sense by slimak · · Score: 4, Interesting

      Making it an option would be nice for people that want it. Add the integrated dock for $50 or something.

    2. Re:Makes sense by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Insightful

      Of course, if Apple did it the other way, they still would have made a right decision.

    3. Re:Makes sense by Leo+McGarry · · Score: 4, Funny

      It's $40, and we're translating "integrated" as "it plugs in."

    4. Re:Makes sense by jayratch · · Score: 2, Funny

      And if you give a mouse a cookie, he's going to want a glass of milk...

    5. Re:Makes sense by notthe9 · · Score: 2, Interesting

      But those multi-button mice are so confusing!

  5. already been done... by me.. by l4m3z0r · · Score: 4, Funny
    See, I took my dock, firewire cable and plugged it in to the Mini.

    Pretty leet huh, I'm about to submit it as a full fledged story to /.

    Look for me in the dupe.

  6. Homebrew Cases by BlueThunderArmy · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Given some of the homemade cases I've seen, I suspect tinkering with the Mac Mini to give it an iPod dock would make it a bit less "mini" and considerably less stylish.

  7. Re:Hmmm.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 4, Funny

    Slashdotters don't care about screwing perfectly good things up. Look at all the dissection topics!

  8. I may be easily asmused... by Digital+Warfare · · Score: 5, Funny

    But did anyone else notice the convientley placed R2 and D2 ?
    It would a good to have this dock as optional, but that will be in the next flurry of updates?

    --
    "Sweet llamas of the Bahamas !"
    1. Re:I may be easily asmused... by Ironsides · · Score: 4, Funny

      But did anyone else notice the convientley placed R2 and D2 ?

      Hmm.. They are planning on having an option where you can order repair droid with your Mac Mini!

      --
      Fly me to the moon Let me sing among those stars Let me see what spring is like On jupiter and mars
    2. Re:I may be easily asmused... by Ian+Peon · · Score: 4, Funny

      When I soldered a diode onto D2, it started playing out some old data about a princess.

      Damned refurbs!

  9. Flexibility is good by Tibor+the+Hun · · Score: 2, Interesting

    While I think it's a good idea to add a "simple" feature like that, it might not be useful if the mini is just sitting on the middle shelf of a home theater system.

    --
    If you don't know what AltaVista is (was), get off my lawn.
    1. Re:Flexibility is good by DenDave · · Score: 4, Insightful

      If it it is to be a "shove-in" dock then it would be a bit nonsensical and un-aesthetic, imagine a mini with a white ipod dangling out of its left side..

      Nah..

      An extra connector is always a charm but a slot for your pod? hrmm.. considering future changes to the form of the ipod I wouldn't go there. The 60gb is thicker than the 40 and the pod mini... ugh just forget about ok? fugeddabaatit ok?

      --
      -if at first you don't succeed, stay the heck away from paragliding.
  10. Good thing Apple changed their mind by hcdejong · · Score: 2, Insightful

    or we would have had YA device with a non-flat top surface (ie nonstackable).

    1. Re:Good thing Apple changed their mind by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Informative

      You're not supposed to stack them anyway, because it interferes with the optical drive on top and the cooling system on the bottom.

    2. Re:Good thing Apple changed their mind by darkwhite · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Why? The dock could be a hole on top of the device that would hold the player vertically. Of course you couldn't stack them/put stuff on top of the unit with the player in the dock, but I don't see how that's an inconvenience.

      --

      [an error occurred while processing this directive]
    3. Re:Good thing Apple changed their mind by Golias · · Score: 2, Funny

      You're not supposed to stack them anyway, because it interferes with the optical drive on top and the cooling system on the bottom.

      You stack the top one upside-down, and the one after that right-side up, and so on. That way, you never put pressure on the drive (the weight is supported by the metal sides of the case and the rubber "foot" at the base) and you never interfere with air intake flow. Judging by the way these puppies are put together, I bet you could almost go floor-to-ceiling with them like that without any problems.

      --

      Information wants to be anthropomorphized.

  11. Not an iPod doc by Fished · · Score: 5, Insightful
    I don't think this was for an iPod dock. This guys is basing that conclusion on the fact that it's got firewire connectivity. But we should recally that Firewire was originally mostly used for video connectivity, not iPods, and Firewire is still more-or-less the standard for connecting video cameras and tuners digitally. The logical conclusion is that this bus is not here to support an iPod, but some sort of video hardware ... like, say an HDTV tuner card?

    This ties in nicely to the way that the mini seems tailor-made to be a media-center PC. If some sort of tuner card were plugged into this slot (say in a "Mac Mini Media-Center Edition" or something) you could plug a mini into your TV and be basically set with the ultimate convergence box.

    That's my opinion, anyway. Be looking for a Media Center version of the Mini soon.

    --
    "He who would learn astronomy, and other recondite arts, let him go elsewhere. " -- John Calvin, commenting on Genesis 1
    1. Re:Not an iPod doc by cybercyph · · Score: 3, Informative

      not lacking firewire support-- the ipod end of the connection is agnostic, a proprietary dock connector. Ipods are now coming with only the USB 2.0 cable-- no doubt to increase profit margins. All new macs come with USB 2.0 support, as do the majority of PCs, whereas many PCs do not come with firewire support.

    2. Re:Not an iPod doc by Ironsides · · Score: 3, Interesting

      You made me thing of something with this. Linksys made an amplifier for their 802.11b system called the BSB24. It was made to stack on top of the wireless hub. Here's a link. It stacks neatly on top of it and maintains the stackability of the hub. Is it possible this is what they had in mind?

      --
      Fly me to the moon Let me sing among those stars Let me see what spring is like On jupiter and mars
    3. Re:Not an iPod doc by troc · · Score: 2, Informative

      Erm, wrong. The new iPods are lacking a Firewire cable. That's all. The functionality is still there. It's a cost-cutting measure, USB 2.0 is ubiquitous and therefore they include that cable. You want to connect with Firewire, no problem, just get the FW cable (and/or dock)

      Troc :)

      --
      Troc's dubious podcast and blog: http://www.trocnet.net
    4. Re:Not an iPod doc by LWATCDR · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Seems like a possibility. The extra control lines could be used to do things like change channels or even interface an IR Transmitter or receiver. What the MacMini is missing is an display on the front and IR controls.

      --
      See my blog http://ilovecookes.blogspot.com/ for light hearted technical information.
    5. Re:Not an iPod doc by harrkev · · Score: 4, Interesting

      Neat idea, but I recently read a review stating that the Mini (at least the base version) lacked the processing testicular fortitude to be a full-blown media center. Plus, it does not have the storage to be a server (unless you upgrade the HD) Anandtech Review It still has some potential, but it does not seem to be designed for this role (at least without some serious upgrading)

      --
      "-1 Troll" is the apparently the same as "-1 I disagree with you."
    6. Re:Not an iPod doc by Fahrvergnuugen · · Score: 5, Informative
      Apple has already reaffirmed that they have no intentions of making a media center:

      from MacWorld

      Media Centers and digital video players

      Oppenheimer articulated Apple's current philosophy when it comes to "media center" computers -- PCs designed to work in the living room as a component of a home entertainment system, recording video, playing back music and more. While Oppenheimer admitted some consumers may be interested in media center PCs and that a Mac mini might be suitable, he said that "most customers" would prefer to have a more powerful computer in their office or den and leverage wireless networking to stream content to their home entertainment system.

      As a practical example, Oppenheimer pointed to AirTunes -- a feature of iTunes that works in conjunction with Apple's AirPort Express wireless networking hub. The AirPort Express features an audio jack that can connect to the home entertainment system using a mini jack or a digital optical cable. Music can then be streamed from the computer playing iTunes to the stereo.

      The iPod won't be getting video capabilities any time soon if current players are any indication, said Oppenheimer. Today's crop of portable media viewers are too bulky to carry as comfortably as the iPod, yet have screens he said are too small to enjoy a movie the same way you would on a TV or laptop. "Our view is that they've failed in the marketplace," said Oppenheimer.

      --
      Kiteboarding Gear Mention slashdot and get 10% off!
    7. Re:Not an iPod doc by swillden · · Score: 2, Informative

      you could plug a mini into your TV and be basically set with the ultimate convergence box.

      The mini would also need better sound outputs. The single 1/8" stereo jack doesn't cut it in most home theatres. You need SP/DIF or TOSLINK output for 5.1 and 6.1.

      --
      Note to ACs: I usually delete AC replies without reading them. If you want to talk to me, log in.
    8. Re:Not an iPod doc by sharkey · · Score: 2, Funny

      Cool! A 32x for the Apple crowd.

      "Stick it in your Mini!"

      --

      --
      "Outlook not so good." That magic 8-ball knows everything! I'll ask about Exchange Server next.
    9. Re:Not an iPod doc by SteeldrivingJon · · Score: 2, Interesting


      Could be firewire to an expansion box which would sit on top of the mini.

      The expansion box could hold additional hard drive storage, along with video and audio hardware and connectors appropriate for a media box. The hard drive could be bigger and faster, because it would be in a separate box from the CPU.

      The expansion box would match the Mini's size and shape, except with a UI on the front for controlling things, and maybe a remote control sensor.

      Stacked, the two would still be only about 5" high.

      --
      September 2011: Looking for Cocoa/iOS work in Boston area Cocoa Programmer Quincy, MA
    10. Re:Not an iPod doc by Golias · · Score: 5, Informative

      Neat idea, but I recently read a review stating that the Mini (at least the base version) lacked the processing testicular fortitude to be a full-blown media center.

      That's funny.

      My Mac mini (the 1.42 version) is currently providing HDTV PVR functions (via the EyeTV 500), DVD movies, Other MPEG movies via VLC, music via iTunes, and wide-screen World of Warcraft, all while hosting my personal web page in the background.

      In spite of EyeTV's box specs claiming that full-frame HD requires a dual-G5 tower, the mini seems to be handling it without a hitch. I even recorded some prime-time HDTV wide-screen broadcasts onto the mini's internal drive, and was able to watch them in full-screen mode with no trouble at all.

      Not bad for a $600 computer with no mods other than a single 1GB stick of after-market RAM in it.

      --

      Information wants to be anthropomorphized.

    11. Re:Not an iPod doc by Jeremy+Erwin · · Score: 2, Informative

      Nah. An atsc stream is already digital. Storing it takes very little horsepower, although it does take a "fast" hard drive-- the stream is 19.39 Mbs. Decompression could be a problem, but semimodern video cards have partial MPEG-2 decoding hardware built in, which substantially lightens the load. IIRC, wintel PCs only need a 800 MHz PIII to decode, assuming that video card acceleration is available.

      Apple hasn't exposed the necessary APIs, but if they wanted too, they could. But personally, I wouldn't expect any movement in this area until CoreVideo and CoreImage are finished.

    12. Re:Not an iPod doc by PatJensen · · Score: 3, Interesting

      I just got a Mac Mini BTO 1.42 with 512Mb of RAM and it runs WOW terrible. It is very choppy and barely playable, especially in Ironforge or around any water/fire effects. Does this improve by moving to 1G of RAM? Running top I see a lot of paging activity, but I want to see wht you think.

    13. Re:Not an iPod doc by karmatic · · Score: 2, Informative

      I can't speak for the Mac version, but on a stock 1.5GHz P4 pc (XP, Radeon 9800) with 512mb of RAM, it's practically unplayable.

      Throw in another 512MB, it's only choppy when a lot of people (20+) are in the same spot.

    14. Re:Not an iPod doc by AJWM · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Running top I see a lot of paging activity,

      As a general rule, if you're seeing any paging, adding RAM will speed things up. The exception would be something that is really CPU bound. Are you seeing high load factors? (Ie, several times the number of processors you have.)

      --
      -- Alastair
    15. Re:Not an iPod doc by Golias · · Score: 3, Informative

      Yes, more RAM helps. No need to BTO. The "putty knife" trick works like a champ (although I find it works better if you use the knife to bend back all the tines, instead of just bending the first couple and popping the rest out) and then you will have a spare stick of memory left over which you can drop into another system.

      Crowded cities still get a little laggy, but with 1GB, it plays smoothly enough that I became willing to sell off my game PC (as WoW was the only remaining non-console game I find myself playing.)

      Does it do as well as an Athlon tower or a G5 with a beefy bleeding-edge card? Of course not... but if you have enough memory, take the reccomended graphics settings the game selects, and then turn off the floating player-character names (which makes a huge difference in town), you will probably be fairly happy with it.

      --

      Information wants to be anthropomorphized.

    16. Re:Not an iPod doc by ansleybean · · Score: 2, Informative

      my mac mini 1.42 with 1GB RAM runs WoW beautifully. Unless there's something odd afoot, my guess is that 1GB is WoW's sweet spot.

  12. Coralized link by panum · · Score: 5, Informative

    Use Coral proxy to avoid slashdotting the poor site.

    -P

    --
    I hate people who quote .sigs
  13. iPod Docks by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Don't the different iPod models have different docks? So you could have a one-size-fits-all dock, but when you put a mini in it, there would be a gap around the edges, and Apple just wouldn't let that happen.

    1. Re:iPod Docks by badasscat · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Don't the different iPod models have different docks? So you could have a one-size-fits-all dock, but when you put a mini in it, there would be a gap around the edges, and Apple just wouldn't let that happen.

      I'm not saying this was definitely a dock connector in the making here, but people are missing the obvious:

      Replaceable plastic covers. Seriously. This thing has 'em, why not the Mac Mini? They can't cost more than about 3 cents each to make, and Apple could make 'em look better than these do. For those who don't want a dock port, just have the standard cover that the Mini's got right now. The only difference is you sell these snap-on dock port covers separately.

      Maybe Apple considered something like this (it's the only way to make an integrated dock work) and then decided it was too unelegant, or that they didn't want users replacing the whole top of the Mac mini, or that having only the dock port itself be replaceable would leave an ugly hole in the system top normally (or a split off extra bit that would detract from the cosmetic appearance even if a dock connector was not attached by the user).

      Personally, I'd probably rather just buy a separate dock anyway...

    2. Re:iPod Docks by macintaz · · Score: 2, Informative
      Look at the Bose SoundDock Digital Music System Supports iPod models with Dock Connector. (iPod and iPod Mini)

      Does not support iPod photo (this may get revised soon) or iPod shuffle (May Never be Supported) My two cents

  14. Old news by white1827 · · Score: 4, Informative

    The remnants of a possible iPod dock were found by the initial people ripping them open.

  15. Sorry it was the price... by garcia · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Whether the Firewire feature was dropped from the first incarnation, or was put in place ready for the Mac's next revision isn't clear. However, early rumours surrounding the so-called "headless iMac" that was to become the Mac Mini, did indeed mention an integrated iPod Dock, fitted to help encourage Windows-using iPod owners to switch to the Mac platform...

    I'm sorry but what made ME (as a "PC" user) to switch to the Mac platform was the price. $499 for the base model is 100% perfect. I have said it here before (and I am saying it again)... Once Apple created a computer that was reasonably priced I would purchase one and I did.

    It's nice that it runs cool, near silent, and that it is snappy for what I use it for (with 512MB) but it's super nice that it was priced right.

    I don't own an iPod and I likely will never own an iPod so the iPod dock wouldn't make me switch. I highly doubt that PC users would switch just because of an iPod docking feature.

    YMMV.

    1. Re:Sorry it was the price... by nsxdavid · · Score: 2, Interesting

      I did the same thing... when that mac mini came out, I ran... not walked... to the Apple store to buy it. I got the ugpraded version, plus some software: iWork and Motion.

      Oops!

      I suppose had I looked at the specs closer I could have known, but Motion doesn't work with a Mac Mini. It won't even install. Somewhat depressing, but the graphics card isn't up to the task. And the installer won't let you even try with pokey response, it just doesn't let you install.

      I admire Apple a lot. And to finally buy a Mac was a big step. But the mistake with Motion was compounded by the fact that the Apple Store would not allow me to return the software. The reason, of course, was because I had opened it. Nevermind that I didn't even know it wasn't compatible until the install informed me as such. Their web store sure didn't.

      No appealing to reason worked with these guys. They were as cold, unhelpful and indifferent to my situation as the most arrogant companies I've ever dealt with.

      Somehow I expected more from Apple. It's been so annoying that I just pusehd the Mini off to the side and haven't booted it up since. Having gotten nowhere with the "Apple Store Team" (as they don't respond to emails with their actual name) I just went and eBay'd the software off at a loss, in a bit of a protest auction. For what it's worth.

      I still admire Apple for its cutting edge design talent, and astute strategy to capture the market. I think the mac mini was a dramatic step for them. But their customer service at the Apple Store is, in my opinion, completely out of step with what it takes to make Apple competitive.

      And it's sad too... because I was telling everyone who'd listen about my jump to Machood. And later, when they came to ask me how my experience went.... that was a lot of sales lost for those guys because they wouldn't do the right thing. Ultimately this may not make a bit of difference in the scheme of things, but it certainly isn't optimal for them.

      --
      David Whatley
    2. Re:Sorry it was the price... by Arcady13 · · Score: 5, Informative
      You blame Apple because you are unable to read the system requirements or try out the free 30-day trial of the software? The trial page even has a compatibility checker application you can download.

      Next time, try blaming the real source of the problem: yourself.

    3. Re:Sorry it was the price... by The+Eagle+Maint · · Score: 2, Insightful

      No offense, but let's say you were a Mac user and decided (for whatever reason) to jump to the PC. If you go to any retail store that sells PC software and pick up something that isn't compatible with your PC, they aren't going to let you return it either. It's a common practice. Too many people have installed software to use and then returned it for their money back, copied it to resell or otherwise abused the return policies of these stores. As I work in retail I have seen it before. They're just following policy to protect themselves. It just seems like a bit of an overreaction to give up on the mini because you didn't check the system specs on the box before you purchased the software.

      BTW, I am a PC user.

    4. Re:Sorry it was the price... by nsxdavid · · Score: 5, Interesting

      You are right, I could have known. But if you follow the path through their web as I did, you don't see any of that. I knew I wanted Motion from seeing it demo'd in person (at SIGGRAPH), so I didn't go to the marketing part of the web site on it.

      In many ways, I acted more like a typical customer... the kinda Apple tries to appeal too: the nontechnical user. I read the hype pages on the Mac mini (that talk about how they have great graphics power) and then just started filling my shopping cart with the Mac mini, keyboard, mouse and upgrades.

      Then it encouraged me to buy some software and so I added iWorks and Motion to the cart. The shopping cart software COULD have seen that there was a potential problem since I was buying a mini and software that does not work on a mini at the same time. A warning would have surficed.

      I understand why some companies do not let you return software. My company makes software (though piracy is not much of an issue for us). But fully understand the issues.

      The problem is that Apple didn't deal with this in what, I would argue, is a customer-centric fashion. Their correspondence were cold and indifferent. They showed no flexibility, much less concern. Heck, they didn't even try to upsell me... what a perfect opportunity to say.. "Hey, how about upgrading to a G5... that'll do what you want!" I was not going to do that, but at least a well trained Apple Store Team (as they call themselves) should have made that play.

      So, yes, I did make a mistake. But not an unreasonable mistake. And not one that should have been undoable. This is the sort of nonsense that really turns people off. And makes them complain loudly about how they were treated.

      Given how much I like Apple, admire Apple, I wish this just wasn't how things went down. The cost of the software, frankly, is a non-issue for me. It was the principle of the thing.

      --
      David Whatley
    5. Re:Sorry it was the price... by Ohreally_factor · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Sorry to hear about your bad experience. Are you in the US? The reason I ask is two fold. One is that I've heard anecdotes that Apple customer service leaves a little something to be desired in Europe. The other is that if you had tried to return the software with the claim that you were unwilling to accept the click thru EULA instead of the claim that your system didn't meet the requirements, they would be required by law to accept the return.

      --
      It's not offtopic, dumbass. It's orthogonal.
    6. Re:Sorry it was the price... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Funny

      Congratulations. you are a Real Man, and capable of seeing the issue clearly. You are Enlightened. Apple gives the customer these expectations, and the customers are allowed to be indignant when it doesn't Just Work(tm).

      Bullshit. Apple publishes specs because they want you to read them. If you can't be bothered to read spec, that is your lookout. So what if it's fine print, it's there, and due diligence wasn't performed when the product was purchased.

      And they didn't do something that you wouldn't have fallen for, like the upsell argument. Maybe they knew by the stark ravingness of you that there was no way in hell that you'd be upgrading to a better box. They just don't want you using a mac. You've been excluded from the cult by the smallest of speedbumps... clue. And they've done it in a way as to make you think it was your decision.

  16. That's where you plug... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny

    ...the reality distortion field generator, duh!

  17. I think... by eobanb · · Score: 4, Funny

    ...more importantly, I noticed that Safari was using much more memory than Firefox when I had both open. Therefore, certainly we must ask ourselves, "is the Mac mini preferring certain programs over others?"

    --

    Take off every sig. For great justice.

    1. Re:I think... by REBloomfield · · Score: 4, Funny

      you mean like the way Firefox uses more memory than Internet Explorer on my Windows box? :|

  18. Firewire drive? by mackman · · Score: 2, Insightful

    If you read the description, the firewire connection pins are directly next to the connection to the ATA optical disc drive. Maybe Apple wanted to have the option of shipping firewire based disc drives should they become cheaper.

    1. Re:Firewire drive? by Jozer99 · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Never going to happen, because Firewire drives are simply ATA drives with a firewire adapter attached. Firewire is not a suitable protocol to drive a disk alone. Since it is always more expesive to ADD something, that will never happen.

  19. Probably a little internal fight over it by caryw · · Score: 4, Informative

    A great deal of people are buying iPod's these days. If more of them would buy mac's too Apple's market share for personal computers would greatly increase. I'm sure they originally put the dock idea in the low-cost model to attract these windows iPod buyers but the purists at Apple fought to keep the box cheap, simple, and clean.
    Also, since I have karma to spare, with I googled for mac mini ipod dock I got a picture of this crazy contraption. Just thought I'd share.
    - Cary
    --Fairfax Underground: Where Fairfax County comes out to play

  20. In other news... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny

    "Microsoft intended to fix bugs in Windows?" All the signs are there, the half done architecture and comment code stating "To be enabled in Longhorn."

  21. Uh oh! Does this mean Apple... by saddino · · Score: 3, Funny

    ...is backing away from the iPod? Quick! Someone call CNet!

  22. Re:Redundant? by brienc · · Score: 2, Interesting

    I think in this case it was redundant with the article description. From what I can see.

  23. Yes, But Killed Early On by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Informative

    I had the opportunity not too long ago to speak with someone at Apple that worked on the Mac Mini project and I asked the same question as it had been speculated on a lot by the rumor sites. The answer was yes, it was considered early on in the project but killed because they didn't think that it would work aesthetically along with the possibility that it could interfere with the wireless performance of the Bluetooth and Airport antennas that are located on the top of the case.

  24. Re:Redundant? by Otter · · Score: 5, Funny
    I'm the first post, and my post is 'redundant'?

    In fact, the moderator was correct -- you managed the rare feat of an entirely redundant first post. Particularly impressive given that the blurb is only three sentences long!

  25. You're mixing up your 'pods. by argent · · Score: 2, Informative

    The only iPod-branded device lacking firewire is the iPod Shuffle. The new Minis have firewire, they just aren't bundled with a firewire cable.

  26. Comment removed by account_deleted · · Score: 5, Funny

    Comment removed based on user account deletion

  27. iPod dock for next gen of Sawtooth G4 by Lev13than · · Score: 4, Insightful

    or perhaps... the mac mini 2 is intended to have an ipod dock.

    This got me thinking - my Sawtooth G4/400 has an internal Firewire port. Clearly, the designers intended the next generation of G4s to have integrated iPod docks.

    It's not uncommon for features to get added early in the mobo manufacturing process because it's cheap and relatively simple. This is probably an example of Apple doing a CYA 12 months ago and then abandoning the idea (whatever it was - dock or something else).

    --
    When you have nothing left to burn you must set yourself on fire
    1. Re:iPod dock for next gen of Sawtooth G4 by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Insightful

      OK, people, the fact that there are headers on the motherboard do not mean that things were going to be inside the case!

      My motherboard has somewhere around 5 USB headers all over it, and they're there to plug in to case-mounted usb ports, not to some internal USB keyboard!

    2. Re:iPod dock for next gen of Sawtooth G4 by Golias · · Score: 2, Insightful

      OK, people, the fact that there are headers on the motherboard do not mean that things were going to be inside the case!

      My motherboard has somewhere around 5 USB headers all over it, and they're there to plug in to case-mounted usb ports, not to some internal USB keyboard!


      Post like this from AC's are the reason why I still read at 0.

      "Was the Mac mini Intended to Have an iPod Dock?"

      No. The empty slot just a redundant part on a re-purposed motherboard. Does nobody remember the notorious "mezzanine" mystery header on the original iMac?

      --

      Information wants to be anthropomorphized.

    3. Re:iPod dock for next gen of Sawtooth G4 by Jeremy+Erwin · · Score: 2, Informative

      No. The empty slot just a redundant part on a re-purposed motherboard. Does nobody remember the notorious "mezzanine" mystery header on the original iMac?

      Sure. You could plug a Voodoo 2 card or a SCSI card into it. It was sweet-- at least until big bad Apple removed the slot from the Rev C's.

  28. Re:hasnt the ipod line abandoned firewire? by shadowsurfr1 · · Score: 2, Informative

    From what I heard, they haven't abandoned firewire, the cable is still available but they only ship ipods with the USB cable now.

  29. Re:Ha! That's still too expensive... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny
    When it drops to around $349 then I will jump. I know a few others that want a $299 price point.

    I won't get one until they're free inside a box of specially marked cereal.... but only if the cereal is on sale and I have a dollar-off coupon.

    Beat that cheapo.

  30. It will be in the 2nd version of the mini by hsmith · · Score: 5, Interesting

    Apple has the best selling philosophy:

    Sell version 1 w/ minimal features
    get everyone hooked
    release version two with extensive features
    profit

    look at the shuffle, the chip has the ability to recieve FM, they will add a screen and FM tuner in 1-2 versions to bump sales up. brilliant.

    1. Re:It will be in the 2nd version of the mini by yivi · · Score: 2, Interesting

      If you are going to "back-up" your claim with an example, it would be better if that example was real, and not yet another hypothesis.

      You know that the shuffle thing you mention hasn't happened yet, right?

      I.-

  31. What about a "driveless" Mac Mini? by Indiana+Joe · · Score: 4, Interesting

    Replace the hard drive with a docking station for the iPod. The higher-end iPods already come with a bigger standard drive than the Mini, why make customers pay for two drives?

    --
    I can't decide if this post is interesting, funny, insightful, or flamebait.
    1. Re:What about a "driveless" Mac Mini? by nottsp1 · · Score: 3, Funny

      One possible reason is that the micro drives in iPods are not designed for use as a desktop hard disk. Some poeple have learned this the hard way: installing an alternate OS on the iPod, booting into target/firewire mode, etc. In some cases, the constant use actually generated enough heat to fuse the small platters together. Oops.

  32. Looks of the mini w/ a dock on it.. by hydroxy · · Score: 2, Interesting

    If you're worried about design and looks, you need to think about laptops and their docking stations. Look at the bottom of the laptop and there are little flaps over the docking connector that gets opened up when you plop the laptop on the dock. Given this basic design + Apple's ingenuity, I'm sure adding an iPod docking station will not detract from the looks of the mini.

  33. Re:Y'know, its still about $150 too much... by Richard_at_work · · Score: 3, Insightful

    And if it drops to $10, you have a price point some people would STILL bitch about. Seriously, people will always want a price point below that which its currently selling for. Oh, and Ive kept my Mini with 256mb ram, and Ive not had any issues with it regarding speed or memory issues - dont take the 'must have 512mb ram minimum' crowd too seriously.

  34. wrong pinout by morcheeba · · Score: 5, Informative

    That looks interesting but the mac mini connecctor has 20 pins, while the ipod dock connector has 30 pins. The placement of the firewire pins are also different - the mini has the data on pins 1,2,11, and 12, while the ipod has them on 3,5,7, and 9.

  35. Re:Y'know, its still about $150 too much... by claussenvenable · · Score: 2, Informative

    mod parent up:
    This is more about players than the Mini, but...

    I'm an embedded/firmware developer doing audio players.

    The solutions used by virtually *everyone*, Apple included, for their music players are built around overloaded (in a good way) platforms from PortalPlayer and Sigmatel. Typically they're designed so that the platform can do anything from simple flash player to full-fledged multicodec recording and video playback.

    The cost of the silicon is basically the same in all of these cases, and makes it possible for the platform developers to support customers in the entire product range (from Shuffle to Portable Media Player) with very little overhead.

    The savings come in reducing the peripheral devices that have to go in, as well as the mechanical construction and battery. Flash players, for example, don't have a 20 dollar (in high volume!) LCD, and typically only use a few MB of SDRAM cache since they don't have to worry about HDD duty cycle to conserve power.

  36. Re:Only suitable mod by Caeda · · Score: 2, Insightful

    " Because slashdot still does not have a "-1, RTF summary you insolent clod"" Should be a -5 RTFM with a 2 week ban from posting on slashdot.

    --
    ~~ Please keep your arms, legs, and outright stupidity inside the ride at all times. Thank You ~~
  37. Firewire does not = integration by ProppaT · · Score: 2, Interesting

    The fact that the mount has firewire integrated makes absolutely no difference. If you've been keeping up with the news, you'd know that Apple is now marketing the iPod as a USB2 device. It's no longer shipping with a firewire cable. Why would that make steps towards integrating the iPod with the mini via firewire when they're abandoning their whole stance on firewire to begin with?

    --
    Wise men say, "Forgiveness is divine, but never pay full price for late pizza."
  38. It's a Macintosh, not a throwaway Dell by ashpool7 · · Score: 5, Insightful

    One of the things about buying a Mac is that you can still use it after 7 years. I've got a 400Mhz G4 that I've been using as my main macintosh until a year ago when I got a PowerBook. It runs the latest version of OS X and it usually benefits from the OS upgrades.

    I don't understand how whiners like you get modded up. Here we have the finest combination of a UNIX machine, a excellent UI, and decent market support, and you want it for the price of the crappiest computer you can whip up on Newegg?

    Please. Apple did a great job of trying to meet the demands of the cheapskates. One of my friends who bitched about the price forever finally admitted he had to have a Mini when they were announced.

    If you can't afford it, that's ok. However, nobody owes anything to you, the least of which, a cheaper Macintosh.

    1. Re:It's a Macintosh, not a throwaway Dell by CarrionBird · · Score: 2, Insightful
      What you're saying is true. But it can also be said of most PCs if their owners were willing to do incremental upgrades rather than just buy another disposable PC.

      I've had the same case/mobo etc since 2001. There are sometimes issues with the cheapest brand name PCs. (I've seen recent lowest end Dells that had the AGP port redacted, dude WTF?) But ususally any desktop, mac or pc, is quite upgradeable.

      Aside: Actually I've thought about getting the old G4 cube, it's quite upgradeable for a SFF system. But the ebay price stays pretty high for used.
      --
      Free Mac Mini Yeah, it's
  39. Re:Y'know, its still about $150 too much... by drinkypoo · · Score: 2, Insightful

    You're apparently just not too choosy about speed, or don't run a lot of apps at once. 256MB is exhausted rapidly under OSX. The OS itself consumes more than 128MB, not counting caching.

    --
    "You're right," Fisheye says. "I should have set it on 'whip' or 'chop.'"
  40. Re:Y'know, its still about $150 too much... by hackstraw · · Score: 2, Insightful

    When it drops to around $349 then I will jump. I know a few others that want a $299 price point. As it stands now its not truly a $499 machine either as you need a minimum of 512mb of ram to have a good system.

    Mmmkay. The Mini comes with about $200 in software which makes the hardware about $300. Even in the PC world, you can get a minimal piece of crap PC for like $200. A copy of XP will run you about $150. So for your target price of $350^H^H49 you will get a bottom of the line PC with no real end user software. If that floats your boat, then a Mac is not targeted for someone like you. Go talk to someone at a computer retailer like CompUSA. Ask them the difference between PC buyers and Macs. PC buyers come in buy their cheap computer, and are forever coming back buying more crap for it. Typically, a Mac buyer comes in, buys their mac, and they never see them again.

    Oh, and go look on ebay sometime for used computers. Compare the Macs to PCs, and then tell me if the initial purchase price was worth the extra couple of bucks.

  41. Re:or perhaps.... by Ford+Prefect · · Score: 4, Funny

    the mac mini 2 is intended to have an ipod dock.

    Actually, what with the relative sizes and all, it's believed that the next iPod will have a Mac Mini dock.

    --
    Tedious Bloggy Stuff - hooray?
  42. why have a sales rep at the store? by sum.zero · · Score: 2, Informative

    it sounds like he bought the software at the same time as he bought the hardware. if so, the sales rep should have pointed out that the software wouldn't run on the machine he was buying. likely, the rep was more focused on earning the commission and not on servicing the customer.

    sum.zero

  43. Re:Only suitable mod by WhatAmIDoingHere · · Score: 2, Insightful

    If people get banned for not R'ing TFA, who will be left to post on /.?

    --
    Not a Twitter sockpuppet... but I wish I was.
  44. The ipod is always thought of as a music player by goldcd · · Score: 5, Interesting

    but it's a nice little hard drive with a nice fast connection on it you can carry about with you. Feel free to shoot my down if I'm spouting gibberish, but maybe you could carry your desktop around on your iPod? Imagine a world with tiny Mac minis dotted about the place. Don't lug your laptop into Starbucks, just drop in your ipod the slot and whoosh, it's your PC. Maybe you're strolling through town and fancy some music, just pop your ipod into a public mac mini and stick a couple of iTunes albums on. You've got an ipod. You've built a desktop on it when you stumbled in for a coffee one day, why not buy a mac for your house as well? Basically, the ipod's pretty dumb by itself, but can hold a lot of your personal data. Drop it into any mac mini and suddenly it could be your machine.

  45. Re:Where's the USB dock? by damiam · · Score: 4, Insightful
    If this were a USB connector, I might be convinced it was intended as an iPod dock. As of now, all iPods support USB, though only mini's and larger even have Firewire (the iPod Shuffle does not). Maybe I am totally wrong because the dock interface on the bottom might support firewire - I just don't know.

    Every dockable iPod ever made supports both Firewire and USB through the dock connection. There's no reason for Apple to use a USB connection for an internal dock.

    My reasoning is that they left it off to save money and because an integrated dock would taint people's perception of the Mac mini. Instead of "Wow, this is a great computer for $499", people would think "This is a $499 iPod toy".

    --
    It's hard to be religious when certain people are never incinerated by bolts of lightning.
  46. Market Forces by nurb432 · · Score: 2, Insightful

    But what you want personally doesnt matter, its what the apple people belive the MARKET wants..

    Currently they belive the market does not.

    --
    ---- Booth was a patriot ----
  47. Re:Where's the USB dock? by amichalo · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Instead of "Wow, this is a great computer for $499", people would think "This is a $499 iPod toy".

    Great point!

    Apple is already seen as "the iPod company" - they need to help people realize they make great computers too.

    --
    I only came here to do two things; kick some ass, and drink some beer...looks like we're almost out of beer.
  48. Re:Y'know, its still about $150 too much... by claussenvenable · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Shouldn't say publicly, but it's a small product design consulting firm in San Francisco. We help bridge the gap between good UI design/ID and economically viable mass production in China/Taiwan.

    There's really quite a bit of subtlety in translating a high-design product idea into a high-build-quality consumer device that will actually be cheap enough to turn a profit. Takes a lot of experience dealing with ODMs, who in China are VERY good technically, but have little experience making decisions that relate to what Western consumers actually *want*. We help close that gap.

    On the other hand, companies that design AND build in Asia are somewhat less beholden to the notion that one must cater to the absolute imbecile, and hence are more likely to implement cool peripheral features that American market-testing would cast aside as too complicated for the target audience. Hence the Japanese cellphones and iRiver music players.

    As an example, a number of iRiver players and the iPods are both based the PortalPlayer platform -- start with an iPod and you get the slick out-of-box experience, but drill down into the iRiver firmware and you find a lot of random, cool little features that each might only interest 1% of the user base. Recording, special modes for language-learning materials, sleep-in-N-minutes, etc. Personally, I'm of the opinion that in firmware, more is better as long as it doesn't get in the way of usability. In any case, though, they're based on nearly identical core hardware.

    Companies are finally starting to recover from the shock of the iPod's simplicity, and I think we'll start seeing more and more neat useful features and well-designed interfaces as time goes on. That's my main gripe about the iPod versus the Mac -- the Mac has a slick, simple interface with secondary access to good features. The iPod just has the slick simple interface, although the features are starting to show up, generation by generation. Just as it took a few years for cellphones to get to the point where people wanted to download ringtones and wallpaper, it will take a few more for people to figure out other neat ways that their music players can be useful to them.

  49. Another docking station by owlstead · · Score: 4, Insightful

    I've never understood what the point is of a docking station. Yes, it puts the iPod (or PDA) in a possition that I can read the information on the screen. But I would get that *and* the possibility of using the keys if it was lying flat on my desk. Difficult to knock over as well. I possitively hate the docking station that came with my Palm(s).

    The only reason I see for including a docking station is for them to sell us a "special travel cable", which is basically a wire with their own proprietary connector. That and maybe supplying power, but a powered USB hub could handle that as well.

  50. Not an iPod Dock by commodoresloat · · Score: 4, Funny

    Don't be silly. This is not for the iPod. It's the controller for the Reality Distortion Field.

    1. Re:Not an iPod dock by theginjaninja · · Score: 2, Interesting

      c'mon - apple aren't moving away from Firewire they're just appealing to Windoze users who all have USB on their machines. You can still buy a Firewire cable - don't beleive the CNET FUD! Firewire is still superior for many data intensive tasks - HD DV, Hardrives etc

  51. Re:Plug and don't play by kilfarsnar · · Score: 2, Interesting
    "Now, the keyboard doesn't map well, there is several important characters that I am unable to type"

    There is a little program called Keycaps that should let you know the default mappings of the keys and their modifier keys on the keyboard. There are also language packs that can be installed from the OS X CD.

    Your wireless card definitely has drivers. Nothing ships with a Mac that has no drivers; they're part of the OS install. If the wireless card isn't working, it may be a hardware issue. Check with Apple for a warranty repair.

    --
    "What the American public doesn't know is what makes them the American public." -Ray Zalinsky (Tommy Boy)
  52. Re:Doesn't it figure? by cosmic_0x526179 · · Score: 2, Informative
    A review of Apple hardware reveals that there are often pieces of architecture that go into the product that are not used (iMac's mezzanine slot anyone?).

    Locate a 128K or early 512K Mac (1984-vintage). Get out the torx-drivers and open the case. Look back under the monitor where the 3.5 floppy drive is located. The metal frame has a cutout for the 5.25-in Twiggy drive that was supposed to be used early in the design. I guess Apple was covering their ass in case they changed their mind at the last minute.

    --
    This msg is brought to you by the letter 'W'.. for Worthless Wuss