Slashdot Mirror
Unix servers up 2.7%, Linux servers up 35.6%
cfelde writes "Linux servers up 35.6% and other Unix servers are up 2.7%. Also worldwide server revenue increased 6.2 percent to US$49 billion in 2004. The blade server market nearly doubled in size to over $1.1 billion in 2004 and 7 percent of x86 shipments in the U.S. were blade servers."
We know it's not SCO
There is not nearly enough love in the world, but there is far too much trust.
Didn't MS claim their server was up in the market as well?
Are these numbers the same (due to more servers being shipped) or are they actually due to increased market share?
up 500%.
$7.95/mo, 200 GB disk, 2TBxfer, MySQL, PHP, RoR.
When it comes to operating systems, Unix and Windows servers continued to grow. Unix server revenue was $5.2 billion in the fourth quarter of 2004 while the corresponding figure for Windows was $4.6 billion.
Linux servers represented 9 percent of worldwide server revenue in 2004, which is 35.6 percent growth compared to the year before.
Have you read my blog lately?
none other than IBM I would presume. Sun and SGI are dead so I don't see unix jumping ahead in the near future. Apple doesn't come off as a server company. BSD isn't as widely supported (I don't think) as Linux, and certainly doesn't have the momentum. Continue to see Linux Rise !
If the dollar is an "I owe you nothing", then the Euro is a "Who owes you nothing." - Doug Casey
What about *BSD? I think the absence of any mention here is a clear indicator that it's dying. Anyone have some Netcraft stats?
"Nokia is not a country, it's the capital of Finland!" -Moderated "Informative". Yeesh.
35.6% seems a pretty poor record for uptime to me.
My next sig will be ready soon, but subscribers can beat the rush
Linux is NOT dying!
Linux servers up 35.6% and other Unix servers are up 2.7%.
Need a new sysadmin? My Linux and Unix servers are up over 99%.
Growth in Linux is good, but overall growth in IT means more jobs, and that's even better.
See what I've been reading.
HP (HP-UX) Sun (Solaris) IBM (AIX) One could also claim that the BSD versions (like Apple OS/X) fall in the category.
These figures are based on revenue, what's the market share in terms of numbers?
That is, in terms of the number of Unix servers vs. Linux servers vs. Windows servers?
I don't think revenue gives one an accurate picture of the market share of these servers, especially for Linux since I'd expect the software for Linux machines ( and probably hardware too, since it's off the shelf stuff versus a lot of the stuff from Sun/IBM ) to be a lot cheaper.
but they're too small to be counted.
... oh, wait, it's under my coffee cup!
i know i had a MiniMac server somewhere on my desk
-- Tigger warning: This post may contain tiggers! --
Looks like Linux is catching up on M$-Windows.
Missing from the summary was mention of Windows growth--"When it comes to operating systems, Unix and Windows servers continued to grow. Unix server revenue was $5.2 billion in the fourth quarter of 2004 while the corresponding figure for Windows was $4.6 billion."
That's really good for a non-UNIX server.
and 99% of the time I don't care.
Well kinda-sorta. I have devoted last 13 years of my 40+ years life to be a full time computer systems admin, after getting my bachelors and masters degrees in EE and working 7 years in the electronics assembly and manufacturing trenches. I knew that there was an ulterior motive to go in the UNIX direction rather than windoze path subconciously but did not know exactly why and how I ended up being a UNIX guy. :)
During the last few years, certificate mills creating an army of windows admin drones, who can only click a predefined sequence of location on the screen with their mouse and passing as "system administrators", I tend to think that, certificate watching management types are going to hire more and more of these admin lookalikes and increase the share of windows in the server room which would make a demise of my careerpath. When I see articles like UNIX/Linux gaining ground on the server room, it makes me breathe a little easier. I do not want another career change, even though, after a week of skiing in Colorado, doing something like that for living is tempting
__________
The more I know people, the more I love animals
This is not an increase in market share! This is an increase in revanue. Microsoft was reporting similar gains for their server division as well.
When you're not talking about market share, everybody can be a winner!
Online Starcraft RPG? At
Dietary fiber is like asynchronous IO-- Non-blocking!
P.S. I don't own any Activant stock (if they are even public). Also, I do have a gripe with their lack easy to find web integration information for their seemingly home-rolled database, "Eagle."
I don't keep a lid on my coffee so when I walk around I look busy -me
At first I assumed it was market share. Then I stopped and thought it must be something much less dramatic. Then I RTFA. Jeez..... Basically, in a growing server market, Linux is producing more money than it did before.
can you imagine how embarrasing that was for me... My stupidity documented. Guess I will go back to managing my win2k boxes and shut up.
A blade server is essentially a computer on a motherboard, including: one or more processors, memory, storage, and network connections. The idea behind blade servers is that many such blades can be added in space-saving racks, thus providing compact and powerful computing solutions that are less expensive than traditional solutions (such as mainframes). Blade servers are ideal for specific purposes such as web hosting and cluster computing. Individual blades are typically hot-swappable. Although blade server technology allows for open, cross-vendor solutions, for the time being, users experience fewer problems when keeping with blades, racks and blade management tools from the same vendor. Eventual standardisation of the technology will hopefully result in more choices for consumers; increasing numbers of third-party software vendors are now entering this growing field.
So somebody who takes a disk, knows what they are doing, and makes three servers is not represented in the stats.
A Linux box which does two tasks and a Windows box which is devoted to only one will also skew the stats.
While this stat is helpful on a year-to-year basis to see how the industry is trending, it does not give a complete picture.
Except for ending slavery, the Nazis, communism, & securing American independence, war has never solved anything.
Way to FUD yourself!
First off, Linux isn't Unix, and the article clearly distinguishes between the two.
It does not say that Linux servers are 9% of Unix servers. It says that Linux servers are 9% of the worldwide server revenue.
Secondly, the article clearly states that the total worldwide server revenue is $49 billion.
internet pr0n is a 5-7 billion dollar industry
You're not kidding. I didn't get any real respect around here until I started spending money on server class hardware, "enterprise" distributions, etc.
Funny how that works. You would think that I'd get more respect for NOT spending money.
Hot Damn! It's the Soggy Bottom Boys!
Linux is the future. And it always will be.
Understand these misleading stats: Linux server sales revenues grew 36% over the previous year. But the grand total is still only 9% of the total server market.
Otherwise there's not much there for my pattern-seeking synapses to grab ahold of. Am I missing where in TFA the "Unix servers up 2.7%" stat is? I even fired up a graphical browser to see if it was in a sidebar! I suspect the 2.7% for Unix may be directly comparable to Linux's 2.4%, and not to the percent-of-percent 35%.
Ah, bitter dregs.
They are running UNIX on the back end with familiar Windows machines for the POS machines.
I always choose windows when i need a POS machine.
Snowden and Manning are heroes.
Too bad the story submitter and the slashdot editors have worked together to give us a dollar amount an label it a server unit number, but still.... when looking at server deployments, I'm going to guess that if you're just looking for percent increases in units shipped, nobody this past year is going to beat XServe numbers.
These statistics are always hard to digest, though... what segment of the server market are we talking about, what constitutes a server, is that UnixTM or does BSD/Darwin count, etc... I always have more questions than such articles are prepared to answer.
Still, any increase in Linux sales is good news.
Sun is notorious for producing some of the most stable software in the world. It's not fast, or pretty; it just never, ever fails. You can see this in the SUN JVM; it's about as stable as you could ever hope for. It's ugly and sluggish, but it's abhorrently resilient.
That's not necessarily true in all cases. In that (or a similar report based on the idc study), it mentioned that Sun's shippments where up higher than their revenues. Not sure about the other unix vendors but Sun has been dropping it's prices.
Open Source Java DAO Generator
No and yes. From http://www.itjungle.com/breaking/bn022405-story01. html
Also interesting...
" What I would like to know, is are they counted as Unix or Linux servers?"My guess would be Linux as reports claim that the majority of Sun's x86 servers are ordered with linux preloaded. Compared to 4.something billion in linux server sales overall, it wouldn't make that much difference in the numbers. Sun's still a small player in x86 but they're growing fast. They're more in the 64 bit x86 space. I read somewhere that they're the largest buyer of AMD Opteron chips.
Open Source Java DAO Generator
...The correct attribution is:
"UNIX is a registered trademark of The Open Group"
(http://www.unix.org/trademark.html)
I am NaN
Here's the original IDC report which has a somewhat more organized picture as well as more data.
"Unix server revenues were $5.2 billion in the quarter, increasing 2.7% year over year against a difficult compare for 4Q03."
"Additionally, on a sequential basis, Unix servers grew dramatically in 4Q04, add ing more than $1 billion in quarterly revenue."
"Linux servers generated $1.3 billion in quarterly revenue, representing 9.0% of worldwide server revenue."
"Overall, Linux server revenue grew 35.6% year over year"
"factory revenue in the worldwide server market grew 5.1% to $14.4 billion in the fourth quarter of 2004"
"For the full year 2004, worldwide server revenue grew 6.2% to $49.0 billion"
So...
Unix in 4Q03 was 5059.6 million.
Linux in 4Q03 was 837.2 million.
Total market in 4Q03 was 13717 million.
Unix/Linux marketshare was 42%
Unix in 4Q04 was 5200 million.
Linux in 4Q04 was 1300 million.
Total market in 4Q04 was 14420 million.
Unix/Linux marketshare was 45%
An interesting fact, as I noted in another thread, is that combined Unix+Linux marketshare seems to be increasing.
Unixware on an old old 486 machine. It has a very proprietary software, that takes in autodesk DWG files, and through the serial port controls a large plotter with plasma, cutting inches of steel. The manufacturers, and resellers who provided support are both out of business. We do not have the root password.
Before embarking on a cracking project, I tried installing the unixware on a different machine, it failed because the machine was too advanced I suppose. Gotta find a 486. Its also risky since the machine should not go down for a day... but looking away is risky too, we should take a partition image while the system is running good... its binaries could prob run on linux or bsd's sco unix binary compatibility... and we could provide a nice KDE interface remotely via terminal services, and have the files loaded via network shares... while removing SCO.
Do remember they were once admirable. Imagine this happening to Linux in 2020.
"Give orange me give eat orange me eat orange give me eat orange give me you." -Nim Chimpsky