Slashdot Mirror


MiniMo(zilla) Running on Windows Mobile

webgrappa writes "If you (yes, yes, you that like OpenSource but use Win all the time) own a Windows Mobile Device, in a near future you'll trash Pocket IE and NetFront. MozillaZine has photos of MiniMo running on Windows Mobile Device."

212 comments

  1. actual pictures by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Informative

    http://rebron.org/blogarchives/2005/03/minimozilla _com.html

    1. Re:actual pictures by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I like how they show about 20 pictures of the phone on a table, phone next to a golf ball, phone next to a dollar bill (bling!) but they cant manage to load a webpage other than google :(

      I'm interested in how it renders stuff for the small screen.

    2. Re:actual pictures by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      When I saw Minimo I mistakenly thought that they were talking about these surupy sweet Japanese idol girls.

      http://www.helloproject.com/minimoni/

  2. handhelds with browsers by fludlight · · Score: 5, Funny

    Yes! No more "cheap viagra now!" popups on my palm pilot!

    1. Re:handhelds with browsers by Shachaf · · Score: 1

      MiniMo hasn't been ported to the Palm. Only to Windows CE at the moment.

    2. Re:handhelds with browsers by passion · · Score: 3, Funny

      You mean you won't get messages anymore telling you that "you need to enlarge your tool"?

      --
      - passion
    3. Re:handhelds with browsers by nmarus · · Score: 2, Funny

      Cheap pop up viagra? No PUN intended?

      --
      Nicholas Marus
  3. Palm, sometime? by Justin205 · · Score: 5, Interesting

    Come on, when will this be ported to Palm OS? I'm currently using NetFront on my Clie, and while it renders pages pretty great, it's slow. Very slow.

    So, when? Because Minimo on a Palm would be very nice.

    --
    "Your effort to remain what you are is what limits you."
    1. Re:Palm, sometime? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Informative

      Clies are slow. You won't get very fast results.

      Try a recent Palm, but if you really want something powerful, Pocket PC is the only way to go.

      Here's an analogy: Palm OS 4 and below are like the original Mac OS or even DOS on the PC (simple, not very powerful, no multitasking), Palm OS 5 is like System 7 on Mac or Windows 3.1 (a bit more powerful, limited multitasking, a bit less simple), and Windows Mobile is like Windows NT/2000/XP (stable, powerful, and multitasking).

      PalmOS didn't even get devices that used *true* filesystems until very recently (instead of the antiquated and outgrown database format, which didn't really support advanced applications).

    2. Re:Palm, sometime? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      when? Never.

      Palm OS 5 and below would be very very difficult to be work with. Palm OS 6 may be a bit easier, but who wants a new Palm these days...

      At any rate, Palm OS is more or less obsolete. Windows Mobile does more, way more, with better and more hardware (although most people will look at Microsoft and immediately hate it. It's not a bad product at all.) Unless a large corporate sponsor would pay for or do the porting themselves, most people will be using something other than Palm OS. The obstinate anti-Microsoft freaks that choose not to get Linux-based handhelds will continue to use Palm OS.

      Windows CE is a Compact Edition of Windows, so a port of Gecko is fairly easy.

    3. Re:Palm, sometime? by prezninja · · Score: 1

      Exactly what I was thinking, but according to the comments on this earlier Mozillazine article, there is no planned Palm OS 5 port.

    4. Re:Palm, sometime? by Dan+East · · Score: 4, Informative

      http://www.mozillazine.org/talkback.html?article=6 097

      No, and from responses to previous times this question has been asked (it gets asked at least once every time someone mentions Minimo...), porting to Palm OS 5.x or below would be very hard. There was speculation that Palm OS 6 would make it a bit easier (but it'd still require someone to invest a bunch of time...)

      Dan East

      --
      Better known as 318230.
    5. Re:Palm, sometime? by Vombatus · · Score: 1, Offtopic
      PalmOS didn't even get devices that used *true* filesystems until very recently (instead of the antiquated and outgrown database format, which didn't really support advanced applications).

      And I thought that the Windows Future Storage (WinFS) filesystem that was supposed to be included in FogHorn LegHorn LONGHorn was database driven.

      Doesn't sound too antiquated to me (assuming that MS can ever get it to work properly).

      --
      This sig is intentionally blank
    6. Re:Palm, sometime? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Informative

      Troll.

      The older Palm OS devices did not have "files". Instead, they had "databases" and "programs". There were no directories - everything was stored in the same level. Databases had types and attributes, like other filesystems, but they were transparent to the user -- they would appear as files in programs. They had a file type field stored with them; it wasn't an extension in the filename, instead it was actually stored as an attribute (like Mac OS.) There was no separation between storage memory and RAM - programs ran right from where they were stored. (Windows Mobile divides storage and program memory into two separate areas. Palm OS 5 may do this, but I'm not sure.)

      You could not just store files on a Palm or access it from a PC like a filesystem; nor could programmers access it like a filesystem. If I wanted to put some JPEGs on a Palm, I'd either need special software to convert it, or a brand new Palm that does use a filesystem, or a Palm with a SD/MMC card. Windows Mobile has a hierarchial file system... much cleaner and easier to work with. You can just copy/add/remove files as you normally would.

      WinFS isn't a filesystem in the traditional sense. It still uses NTFS as its underlying filesystem, but uses SQL (and MS SQL Server 2005)
      http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/WinFS

    7. Re:Palm, sometime? by Vombatus · · Score: 1
      Thank you for filling a void in my knowledge.

      That will teach me to post something without doing at least some minor research in the future.

      --
      This sig is intentionally blank
    8. Re:Palm, sometime? by MyIS · · Score: 1
      I don't understand why the database approach of old Palms is "antiquated" all of a sudden. If anything, I thought it was a gutsy and advanced way to look at data. Database approach fits the mobile environment perfectly - syncing the device with desktop is very elegant and consistent; data handling is unified from the program side.

      I think dealing with data as uniform entries in one "flat" database is the way of the future - just look at Gmail and its lack of folders. Rather than organize everything into rigid hierarchy, just search for your data!

      --
      http://zero-to-enterprise.blogspot.com/
    9. Re:Palm, sometime? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Well... Pocket PC is really cool... especially when you remove the piece of shit called Windows... it freezes all the time...
      ...and replace it with Linux...

    10. Re:Palm, sometime? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      > I don't understand why the database approach of old Palms is "antiquated" all of a sudden.

      Did you program with it ? Was a pain to do anything advanced (limitation on records sizes, different API to access the data in RAM versus SD card, etc).

      Very shitty, from the start.

    11. Re:Palm, sometime? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Windows Mobile is like Windows NT/2000/XP (stable, powerful, and multitasking)

      I suggest not using it, if it is as "stable" and "powerful" as Windoze NT/2000/XP/whatever

  4. Nice to have a choice. by Sheetrock · · Score: 3, Interesting
    Apparently though if you're on a page with a word larger than seven characters, apparently you get the famous screen-widening effect.

    I just wish they'd distribute Firefox instead of Mozilla -- it makes a noticable difference on the desktop, and I'd imagine an even more sizeable one on a cellphone. Although I just recently saw a DivX movie on a friend's system, so maybe they're powerful enough to tolerate a little bloat.

    --

    Try not. Do or do not, there is no try.
    -- Dr. Spock, stardate 2822-3.




    1. Re:Nice to have a choice. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I think you'll find that MiniMo is a separate application based on Gecko. Not just Mozilla with some compile options.

    2. Re:Nice to have a choice. by commodoresloat · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Firefox shares the same code base as Mozilla, but is rewritten without the non-browser stuff to make it faster. Likely Minimo is also written without the extra junk (who needs Composer on their cell phone?) already, so basing it on Firefox would probably not make any of the kind of differences you're talking about.

    3. Re:Nice to have a choice. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The difference between Firefox and Mozilla is the user interface (chrome, code lives in xpfe and toolkit&browser) - minimo is a whole new user interface. It's probably more different from Mozilla than Firefox is.

    4. Re:Nice to have a choice. by arivanov · · Score: 1

      The most interesting screenshot as far as potential users are concerned is missing. I do not see the screenshot of the mail client. While I am not a particular fan of IE, it works to some extent so the users of Win CE have a working browser.

      What they do not have is a working mail client.

      The built in portable outlook only fetches recent messages and only from Inbox. You cannot access IMAP folders other then INBOX and have no means of accessing your old mail. To add to that, Pocket PC Outlook on the Smartphone Edition does not have client side SSL certificate support for IMAP or POP3 so you cannot provide secure remote access. This is essential, because it does not support any (even lame) encrypted VPNs and there are no third party clients for it.

      There are plenty of people out there who will _pay_ for a working thunderbird on Windoze Smartphones. And very few who actually care about a working third party browser to replace IE.

      --
      Baker's Law: Misery no longer loves company. Nowadays it insists on it
      http://www.sigsegv.cx/
    5. Re:Nice to have a choice. by glesga_kiss · · Score: 1
      The built in portable outlook only fetches recent messages and only from Inbox. You cannot access IMAP folders other then INBOX and have no means of accessing your old mail.

      Perhaps the 2003 edition is different, but mine does IMAP folders just fine. In fact, it's the only client I've seen that gives reliable unread counts next to the folder, without having to go into the folder to refresh the cache.

      To add to that, Pocket PC Outlook on the Smartphone Edition does not have client side SSL certificate support for IMAP or POP3 so you cannot provide secure remote access.

      Again, I'm using IMAPS with mine, no problems at all. Never tried it without SSL to be honest.

      This is essential, because it does not support any (even lame) encrypted VPNs and there are no third party clients for it.

      SecureRemote has a VPN client for the PPC.

      And very few who actually care about a working third party browser to replace IE.

      I've been watching this MiniMo for a couple of weeks now, since it was first announced. I'll be trying it out as soon as I can. For the moment, I'm using the ftxPBrowser, which does use the IE renderer, but has tabbed browsing etc.

  5. Fantastic! by MBCook · · Score: 3, Informative
    I got a Dell Axim x50v right before Christmas and I love the little thing to death. It's screen is amazing. Some parts of WM2003se aren't perfect, but overall it is a nice little device.

    That said I am often frustrated by PocketIE. While it works (and rather well) the fact that you can't have more than one window open (no tabs) SERIOUSLY hampers me. I can't tell you how many times I'd like to open a link in a second window/tab to look at in a minute or load while I continue reading, or open a collection of 2/3 links to look at. But instead I have to choose one or the other and read that now. Then I have to remember how to get back to where I was to find the other links, and remember which links those were. I haven't browsed using a single window on any platform in at least 5 years, probably more. So this feels like a HUGE limitation to me and really cramps my browsing style.

    Having not only a second option from Pockete IE, but one that might allow me tabs/windows would be fantastic. I will download it the second it's released.

    Horray for MiniMo!

    --
    Comment forecast: Bits of genius surrounded by a sea of mediocrity.
    1. Re:Fantastic! by johansalk · · Score: 1

      Hey there are third-party apps that allow you to open multiple IE windows and I imagine some of them might even be freeware. Go to the pocketpc usenet newsgroup and ask there. I forgot what they were but I remember coming across them a while ago. I just mainly use my PocketPC to take notes and never for net.

    2. Re:Fantastic! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      There's also better browsers like NetFront

    3. Re:Fantastic! by Dan+East · · Score: 4, Informative

      If all you want is tabbed browsing, then try ftxPBrowser. It is a freeware "wrapper" for IE that supports tabbed browsing, full-screen browsing, and a few other enhancements.
      http://park15.wakwak.com/~ftx/ftxp3e/

      Dan East

      --
      Better known as 318230.
    4. Re:Fantastic! by shoolz · · Score: 1

      Try the FTX Browser from http://park15.wakwak.com/~ftx/. It's been around for a long while and supports tabbed browsing, and has what it calls 'simply view' mode which eliminates useless formatting and side-scrolling.

    5. Re:Fantastic! by oliverthered · · Score: 1

      if you want anything that resembles a working browser try somewhere else mind you WinCe isn't exactly the best thought out OS in the world.
      doh, just lost all my work again, must remember to set saved directory to static ram every time battery goes flat.

      --
      thank God the internet isn't a human right.
  6. Minimo on desktops? by Shachaf · · Score: 5, Interesting

    Since Minimo seems to require a relatively small amount of memory (compared to Mozilla or Firefox), has anyone ever considered porting it back to the desktop so it can be used as a very lightweight browser on desktop?

    1. Re:Minimo on desktops? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Interesting

      "...used as a very lightweight browser on desktop?"

      Uhm, sure. Except it has already been done.

      I suggest you check out K-Meleon.

    2. Re:Minimo on desktops? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      It sounds like a great idea, I myself find the XUL frontend for the PC heavy... Is that in use on these phones? I'm sure SOMEONE has thought of back-porting this tiny browser...

      Courtesy Bash.org:
      (Amakusa) ALF and Catwoman snuff porn crossover (Amakusa) I'm afraid that when I make stuff up like
      that, it really exists out there somewhere ;(
    3. Re:Minimo on desktops? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      right so where's the linux version

    4. Re:Minimo on desktops? by natrius · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Galeon and Epiphany.

    5. Re:Minimo on desktops? by MonMotha · · Score: 1

      There's no reason it shouldn't run on an X based desktop. I know it runs on ipaqs running Linux (which generally run X) and Zaurii, so there's no reason it shouldn't compile for x86 (or whatever floats your boat) and run on your Linux/BSD/Solaris/HP-UX/AIX/ desktop. Now, if you're running Windows, you're on your own (though that may work fine too).

    6. Re:Minimo on desktops? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Informative

      both require gnome and mozilla and are worthless on, say, a system running fluxbox with no other browser. the only dependency I'd be willing to put up with is -- maybe -- gtk. even that is pushing it.

    7. Re:Minimo on desktops? by petecarlson · · Score: 1

      I tried to compile it for the IA1 running midori linux but couldn't get it to0 work. That's not to say it couldn't be done, just that I lacked the skils to do it. Has anyone pulled this off yet?

    8. Re:Minimo on desktops? by natrius · · Score: 1

      If you're that crazy about about a lightweight desktop, you should probably be aiming for Encompass.

    9. Re:Minimo on desktops? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      K-Meleon? Lightweight? We'll have to disagree on that.
      • 5 megabyte download
      • 13 megabytes installed (1 meg of files in a directory called "chrome")
      • 321 files (66 in a directory called "skins")
      The Off-By-One browser is only 1 meg installed, but it doesn't do JavaScript or CSS.

      ::sigh::

    10. Re:Minimo on desktops? by jaavaaguru · · Score: 1

      IPaqs and Zauruses running Linux use a framebuffer instead of an X Windowing system. Applications don't tend to run in a window - they usually run full-screen, so having X on the device would be overkill. ...and there's no such thing as "Zaurii".

    11. Re:Minimo on desktops? by ptlis · · Score: 1

      I've been playing with dillo recently, and although it's still in relatively early stages of development when compared to Gecko & KHTML what it does now is already impressive, but moreso the speed that it does what it does blows my mind - i'm on a T3 connection so transfer speed is not an issue, as such page rendering is near-instantaneous. I'll certainly be keeping my eye on it in the future, in a few years it could very well be competing with Firefox to dethrone IE once and for all.

      --
      There's mischief and malarkies but no queers or yids or darkies within this bastard's carnival, this vicious cabaret.
    12. Re:Minimo on desktops? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      yeah, very impressive. no scripting, no css. it is not going to be competing with anything any time soon.

    13. Re:Minimo on desktops? by ArsonSmith · · Score: 1

      Ipaqs do run X check out their project page Here. You can read why they use X from Jim Gettys. He has a very small less than 600k foot print X server that runs on the ipaq. a minimal full screen optimized window manager. And applications are just built for the screen size currently.

      --
      Paying taxes to buy civilization is like paying a hooker to buy love.
    14. Re:Minimo on desktops? by MonMotha · · Score: 1

      Depends on your operating environment. Stock Zaurii running Qtopia and things running OPIE will draw directly on the framebuffer as Qt/E sort of expects to. You most certainly can run X on an ipaq (and I believe a Zaurus too). My ipaq in fact runs X. I've done some crazy X forwards to it in the past (including Starcraft, running in Wine on my desktop).

    15. Re:Minimo on desktops? by smittyoneeach · · Score: 1


      Verily, wondered I: what could be done, foreasmuch as to render the King James Version less legible?
      Foresooth, thy sig hath shown me the way. :)
      </offtopic>

      --
      Get thee glass eyes, and, like a scurvy politician, seem to see things thou dost not.--King Lear
  7. this is part relevant by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Interesting

    On the topic of those who profess to love OSS and free software but do not use it, who has a link to the slashdot usage statistics?

    I remember seeing only about 20% mozilla and 80% IE on windows or something for a slashdotting. Pretty disgraceful (not all of that can be "we have to use it at work").

    Links would be nice for a little sub-discussion of the issue (issue which was brought up in the topic for those "off topic" happy mods).

    cheers.

    1. Re:this is part relevant by aussie_a · · Score: 1

      I remember seeing only about 20% mozilla and 80% IE on windows or something for a slashdotting. Pretty disgraceful (not all of that can be "we have to use it at work").

      Luckily this is a "News for Nerds" website and not a "News for OSS-zealots" so that yes, we can have people who are computer nerds and do like Microsoft. Minorities are often very vocal, I'm not surprised if the vocal people here are in the minority. I imagine there are plenty of people who don't even read the comments.

    2. Re:this is part relevant by R.Mo_Robert · · Score: 1

      No nerd could possibly love Internet Explorer. At the VERY least, they'd need a decent shell (with, say, tabbed browsing), but with that amount of effort hopefully they'd realize there are better choices.

      --
      R.Mo
    3. Re:this is part relevant by aussie_a · · Score: 2, Insightful

      No rational man could consider the world to be round.

    4. Re:this is part relevant by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Its not round... its an oblate spheroid !

    5. Re:this is part relevant by Spy+Handler · · Score: 1
      I remember seeing only about 20% mozilla and 80% IE on windows or something for a slashdotting. Pretty disgraceful (not all of that can be "we have to use it at work").

      Well if Slashdot actually got its own site to render properly in FireFox, that percentage might go up. :o

    6. Re:this is part relevant by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It's official : non Microsoft customers = Zealot.
      that's what i like about Microsoft-customers-centric website, its customers don't even realize how extremists they are.. Frightening

    7. Re:this is part relevant by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      how the hell is that insightful? how is it relevant? don't just reply with some generic saying, say "a nerd could like IE because...". lol

    8. Re:this is part relevant by bigman2003 · · Score: 1

      Okay, I guess I am not a nerd. I like IE...

      Tabbed browsing is an over-rated feature for me. All I have to do is look down at my start bar to see the 5 different pages I have open right now. I can click between them any way I want.

      Now that may be horrible compared to the love that some people show towards tabs. But there just wasn't any difference to me.

      But what I *hate* is the fact that Firefox drops the vertical scroll bar on a page that is too short to need it.

      What happens is that those pixels are now part of the page. So when a site has some pages that are long, and some that are short, the vertical scroll bar appears/disappears. If the page is formatted to be centered, this moves the entire page 6 pixels or so. So instead of a header remaining in the same exact spot, it shifts slightly.

      THAT is annoying.

      --
      No reason to lie.
  8. Honestly... by koreaman · · Score: 4, Insightful

    That's what Opera is for. Mini devices. Fork over the $30 or however much it costs, it's worth it if you use your device to surf the web.

    1. Re:Honestly... by StarManta.Mini · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Or... you know.... download Mozilla, and not pay $30 for what is free everywhere else in the world. (The ability to browse pages on a less crappy browser)

    2. Re:Honestly... by Rits · · Score: 3, Informative

      Difference is, you can browse the web now with Opera on millions of mobile devices powered by Symbian and Linux. There is even a test version of Opera for Windows Mobile Smartphone Edition.

      That Minimo Google-on-phone screenshot didn't look exactly inviting. Getting small-screen rendering right is not the trivial effort some people think it is. Opera has spend a lot of time and resources on getting it right.

      --
      If you don't like having choices made for you, you should start making your own. - Neal Stephenson
    3. Re:Honestly... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Insightful

      I'm sorry, but no it isn't. The Internet is free, and a browser is the most basic componant to access the net, so it too, should be free.

    4. Re:Honestly... by winkydink · · Score: 1

      The Internet is free? Really? You mean I've been writing these checks to my ISP all these years for nothing?

      --

      "I'd rather be a lightning rod than a seismometer." -Ken Kesey

    5. Re:Honestly... by koreaman · · Score: 1

      WTF kind of RMS nonsense is this. "Roads are free, therefore cars should be free."

    6. Re:Honestly... by aussie_a · · Score: 1

      Also, it looked like it wasn't taking advantage of the mini-google-page that google has provided for mobile devices.

    7. Re:Honestly... by koreaman · · Score: 1

      Not to mention your Slashdot subscribership

    8. Re:Honestly... by LoverOfJoy · · Score: 1

      So should my computer be free, too, because I use it to access the net?

    9. Re:Honestly... by Duckman5 · · Score: 3, Informative

      In all truth, that was the first thing I went to do as soon as I saw how crippled Pocket IE was on my Dell Axim, but upon reviewing Opera's download page I realized that they do not have a solution for my platform. You can see in the right where it clearly states that the Windows Mobile version of Opera does not run on Pocket PC devices. Total bummer.
      Now, with Minimo, I have another choice in browsers. Hopefully this will support the features that I want, not the least of which is the ability to have more than one window open.

    10. Re:Honestly... by rsborg · · Score: 1
      That's what Opera is for. Mini devices.

      A-frickin-men. I mean, why does Mozilla Foundation have such a push to PDA devices when Firefox/Thunderbird isn't exactly "perfect" yet for the desktop? There's lots of stuff that they can devote and focus on without worrying about devices that 95% of the populace dont use at all... as a personal anecdote: of the 100 people who were at our wedding reception, I'd say maybe 10 or so might own a PDA, and I'd bet only 2 or 3 of them actually use it even monthly... and this is in Silicon Valley! Seriously, MoFo struck gold with Firefox, and now they're going off into irrellevence with their quest for cutting edge again... why?

      Personally, I feel that development of XUL into a premiere cross-platform development environment would be much more worthwhile (esp. since Firefox has so much recognition now) effort... the tools exist now, but the documentation and development environment just don't cut it yet.

      Leave Opera alone to battle PocketIE in the PDA browser market... even Sony agrees that the PDA market is not worth their time. I'd honestly donate more knowing that my funds in Mozilla Foundation were going towards the right goal (maybe they could focus their donation efforts a la MandrakeClub?)

      --
      Make sure everyone's vote counts: Verified Voting
    11. Re:Honestly... by Kris_J · · Score: 1

      Yah. I've been hanging out for a PPC2002 (or whatever an Asus 716 runs) version of Opera for ages. I've already bought it for the S60 and I'd buy it for my PocketPC the moment it's available.

    12. Re:Honestly... by boris_the_hacker · · Score: 1

      My 7610 came with a browser from nokia.

      After trying to use it for various sites I grabbed the Opera bowser and life became sweet.

      It is worth the $30 several times over!

      --
      chris at darkrock dot co dot uk
      http colon slash slash www dot darkrock dot co dot uk
    13. Re:Honestly... by hkmwbz · · Score: 1
      "Leave Opera alone to battle PocketIE in the PDA browser market"
      Actually, Opera runs comfortably on normal mobile phones. It doesn't need to battle any PDA browsers at all, since it seems to be very popular on mobiles.
      --
      Clever signature text goes here.
    14. Re:Honestly... by hkmwbz · · Score: 1
      "Or... you know.... download Mozilla, and not pay $30 for what is free everywhere else in the world. (The ability to browse pages on a less crappy browser)"
      Oh my. Not everyone thinks Mozilla is better than Opera. Opera is certainly smaller and faster than Mozilla, and runs comfortably on normal mobile phones today with all these features like proper zooming, small screen rendering, and so on. As opposed to Mozilla's struggle to get things right that Opera has done right for years.
      --
      Clever signature text goes here.
    15. Re:Honestly... by hkmwbz · · Score: 1
      "The Internet is free, and a browser is the most basic componant to access the net, so it too, should be free."
      Nothing is free. Not even Mozilla. Someone pays for Mozilla, you know. Huge companies like Nokia and IBM. Opera is an independent browser which doesn't rely on donations from huge corporations to survive. That's a plus in my book.
      --
      Clever signature text goes here.
    16. Re:Honestly... by sffubs · · Score: 1

      I would if I could. I even sent an email to Opera begging them to release a Pocket PC 2003 version. Sadly nothing has yet been released, but I live in hope.

      --
      ݼ)s$æúßðíÊ'öX'îò5^àûßQç£
    17. Re:Honestly... by FireFury03 · · Score: 1

      Firefox/Thunderbird isn't exactly "perfect" yet for the desktop?

      Not sure where Thunderbird comes into any of this (I thought we were talking about a web browser, not a mail client). Anyway, admittedly FireFox has some bugs, what software doesn't, but it has a darn site less rendering bugs than Opera I'm afraid (ask anyone who's tried to write a XHTML 1.1 Strict + CSS2 website - Opera gets a lot of stuff wrong unfortunately).

      In any case, why are you complaining about a project to give people mroe choice? isn't that a good thing? (Yes, I run Opera on my P900 but I wouldn't mind some alternatives, it's got some annoying rendering bugs in it).

    18. Re:Honestly... by Tony+Hoyle · · Score: 1

      My old P800 came with Opera for free.

      I'm surprised that mozilla haven't ported to symbian as that's got the mindshare outside the US (plus it's a darned sight easier to use... had one CE device... ditched it after a week).

    19. Re:Honestly... by bhtooefr · · Score: 1

      Opera's got competition.

      On J2ME devices, they've not even gotten their browser small enough (although, they now have the necessary proxy technology) - ReqWireless WebViewer and TLogic PocketWeb. (Could someone PLEASE write an open source browser and proxy app so we can get a FREE J2ME browser?)

      On BREW devices, they HAVE (finally) gotten small enough. Their only competition is from the traditional J2ME browser market, and they cost more, and have less features, IIRC.

      On Symbian, Opera kicks Psion/Nokia Web's ass. Opera rules Symbian.

      On Linux, Opera is one of the most popular, but Dillo, Konqueror (!), and MiniMo are gunning for it (especially MiniMo, but so could Konq).

      On PocketPC, Pocket IE, and some others have the market cornered. MiniMo, of course, just got ported.

      On Windows Smartphone, PIE still rules the roost, but MiniMo just got ported, and Opera has betas out for Smartphone.

      On Palm, Blazer seems to have the market. Opera and Mozilla aren't even CONSIDERING it.

    20. Re:Honestly... by hkmwbz · · Score: 1
      "On J2ME devices, they've not even gotten their browser small enough"
      Not sure what this is all about, but why is J2ME relevant to Opera? And why wouldn't Opera be small enough?
      "On BREW devices, they HAVE (finally) gotten small enough."
      What do you mean? Opera has gotten small enough? It has always been small enough. It's been a matter of porting the program.
      "On Linux, Opera is one of the most popular, but Dillo, Konqueror (!), and MiniMo are gunning for it (especially MiniMo, but so could Konq)."
      Minimo is too bloated, and Konqueror is rarely seen anywhere. Opera has real sales people doing things to get Opera out there. I don't think Konq has that.
      "On PocketPC, Pocket IE, and some others have the market cornered."
      Opera isn't even available for Pocket PC, and Pocket IE is a terrible browser anyway. It is no competition to Opera.
      "On Windows Smartphone, PIE still rules the roost"
      See above. Saying that "PIE rules the roost" is a bit odd, since it insinuates that there is any competition for it. Again, Opera will devastate it when available.

      Minimo is trying to hype itself as the best mobile browser, but it's bloated and slow, and lacks things that Opera has been doing for years. Opera is way ahead of Minimo, both in performance and features.

      I don't think it's accurate to say that "Opera's got competition". Opera is just getting started.

      --
      Clever signature text goes here.
    21. Re:Honestly... by bhtooefr · · Score: 1

      Opera's close to being small enough on J2ME, but many devices don't have enough memory, even for Opera.

      BREW is simply a framework on top of J2ME, so everything that applies to J2ME applies here, but apparently most BREW devices have enough memory, and Opera got paid enough.

      MiniMo is TRYING to shrink. That said, Opera is by FAR the best.

      On Pocket PC, there ARE some PIE alternatives (some of which embed PIE).

      You are totally correct on Smartphone, I was just saying that RIGHT NOW, PIE is the only real option (Opera previews aren't always the greatest thing to run - betas, on the other hand, are OK).

      I was trying to say that Opera should watch out, and make sure they keep ahead of MiniMo (PIE is so hopelessly behind, all they need to do is port to Pocket PC, in addition to Smartphone, and they'll have at LEAST PIE, if not MiniMo killed). Not hard for Opera to keep innovating - try Opera 8 Beta 2 ;-)

    22. Re:Honestly... by StarManta.Mini · · Score: 1

      I meant to say that Mozilla was "less crappy" than IE, not so much Opera. Sorry about the misunderstanding

    23. Re:Honestly... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      WTF does RMS has to do with this? All he want is the ability to change the program he's running on his computer.

    24. Re:Honestly... by koreaman · · Score: 1

      RMS is the main source of all this "Software should be free!!111!1!!oneone" BS.

  9. Dust by electronerdz · · Score: 1

    I'll have to pull out my old HP Jornada and test it out. If only my ex hadn't kept the charger, and I won't have to make a new one with wires stretched over a jumper.

    --
    Kernel Krunch - Part of a Complete OS
    1. Re:Dust by Shachaf · · Score: 1

      As far as I know, the HP Jornada has an SH3 processor, and doesn't run Windows Mobile 2003. Also, getting an SH3 binary of this might not be easy.

    2. Re:Dust by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Not the 500 series. That one had an arm prossesor; it should work. The other ones have either sh3 or sh4 prossesors.

    3. Re:Dust by electronerdz · · Score: 1

      The article mentions that they are supposedly working on a Windows CE version... whether that includes the version of Windows CE on the my Jornada is another story. Really, I just want OpenZaurus to work on my SL-6000... I check the site 2 to 3 times a day to see if 3.5.3 has come out yet. Then I can put it on there since I wasn't too fond of Opera, and even less fond of Konquerer. Is there a Minimo for Opie/Zaurus?

      --
      Kernel Krunch - Part of a Complete OS
  10. thank you! by caryw · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Thank god. The crappy html browser in the windows smartphone platform (bastardized internet explorer) was the only thing holding me back from getting one of the smartphones out there today. Symbian is still a hot contender but most symbian phones are way too bulky for my use. For some reason the windows smartphones seem to be much slimmer. Sendo has a nice proprietary smartphone setup with their Sendo X but they still haven't worked all the bugs out. The ability to use a "real" browser with a smartphone just tipped the scales, goodbye Ericsson P910!
    Link to minimo project
    --Fairfax Underground: Where Fairfax County comes out to play

    1. Re:thank you! by caryw · · Score: 1

      ugh hate to respond to my own thread but the sendo-x link is broken. something about reffered links from slashdot.
      anyway, this should work for the sendo x forum and a review can be found here

    2. Re:thank you! by Rits · · Score: 0

      So you'd rather use Mozilla on Windows mobile than Opera on Symbian? There already is a "real" browser for the P910 after all.

      --
      If you don't like having choices made for you, you should start making your own. - Neal Stephenson
    3. Re:thank you! by dn15 · · Score: 1

      Maybe it's just me, but the phrase "bastardized internet explorer" seems rather redundant.

  11. Download Minimo by Shachaf · · Score: 5, Informative

    I just noticed that Minimo for WinCE can already be downloaded at http://www.mozillazine.org/talkback.html?article=6 097.

    1. Re:Download Minimo by j14ast · · Score: 1

      Wheres the Zaurus love?

      --
      Damn the man!
  12. Name Game by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Funny

    MiniMo? Some other suggestions:

    BrushFire
    DamnSmallMozilla
    MoWin
    Fox Trot (it's a mobile device, isn't it?)
    Fox-CE (pronounced Foxy)
    Small Fox (it can be a catchy epidemic)
    LilMo

    1. Re:Name Game by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "Fox Trot (it's a mobile device, isn't it?)"

      Genius

  13. Reference by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    You.. yes yes you.. stand still laddie!

    1. Re:Reference by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The schoolmaster from The Wall.

      but what does that have to do with MiniMo?

  14. A browser by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    again. Woo. Sorry let me work up some more enthusiasm: wooooooooooooo. (-42 can't give a shit)

  15. YES! UNSTABLE SOFTWARE FOR MY MOBILE DEVICE!! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    As if Mozilla wasn't any more unstable on the desktop already! Man oh man, why are we bringing more unstable software to mobile devices? Everyone knows nothing beats propritory software. IE is comptable with all webpages, unlike Mozilla which is full of security holes and incompatibilites. What a bunch of masochists!

  16. Obligatory quote... by game+kid · · Score: 1

    I shall call him, MIN--oh wait, its a browser? *scrambles to check TFA*

    It does look awesome (assuming it works on other pages besides Google). Hopefully that means I can get local news, my professors' homework and the answer to life the universe and everything at the same time, in case I forget one or all of them. (Which would be bad.)

    --
    You can hold down the "B" button for continuous firing.
  17. There are already better browsers by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Informative

    Well, there's NetFront which supports tabs and is a lot better than Pocket IE. Didn't you research at all?

    1. Re:There are already better browsers by nxtw · · Score: 1

      I agree with that. NetFront is very nice (compared to PIE).

  18. Interesting... by jonklem · · Score: 0

    however, I found nothing about the features MiniMo will have. Are we to expect pop-up blocking, tabbed browsing, and the whole shebang?

    1. Re:Interesting... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Pocket IE has always had pop-up blocking. Only one browser window can be open at a time, therefore no pop-ups. Tabbed browsing for the IPaq would be nice, though.

    2. Re:Interesting... by SmurfButcher+Bob · · Score: 1

      You can get... uh, sort-of tabs with PEI+ (pay), or real tabs with FTXBrowser (free). Both just wrap PIE, but they work.

      --

      help me i've cloned myself and can't remember which one I am

    3. Re:Interesting... by peawee03 · · Score: 1

      I used MiniMo back when I was using the gpe environment for my iPaq that I installed Linux on. MiniMo is *very* minimalist. I found no tabs, but I didn't get any popups. Don't expect mozilla from MiniMo, expect an extremist-level stripped down Gecko browser. I mean, it's *really* stripped down- there was no menu other than the tap-and-hold, and that was just stuff to replace the removed buttonbar. Of course, I haven't used MiniMo in a few months, so it may have changed by now (and with the port as well)

      --
      I wish I could write clever and witty sigs.
  19. Windows Mobile? Yawn. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Wake me up when a version for Symbian OS/UIQ appears...

  20. links to more photos by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    after cutting through all those middlemen bloggers incestuous links

    http://www.flickr.com/photos/91116329@N00/sets/153 327/

  21. Hmmm. by bigwillystylie · · Score: 0, Redundant

    I have produced a browser one eighth the size. I will call it Minimo!

  22. Re:MiniMo? by flithm · · Score: 5, Funny

    how does minimo sound homosexual? (not that there's anything wrong with it if it does). If it bothers you just deepen your voice and say it like you're sharpening an axe or something.

    It's totally in how you say it. For example, right now I'm prancing around saying "Mantorp!" in a really high pitched girly voice. How do you like that?

    Which sounds "gay" now huh? [Deep Axe Murderer Voice] MiniMo@$*&! or [Prancy Girl Voice] Mantorp!

    Yeah I thought so.

    And just so you know. Homosexuals everywhere are offended by your use of the word gay. I could see if they named it "HomoMo" or "AnalMo" or maybe even "SuperFlamingMo" but MiniMo? No way...

    And while we're on the topic, are you really so insecure about a simple word like "MiniMo" that you might think twice about using a superior browser to one that's total crap yet has a name like "SteakKnife Gun Browser?"

    Maybe we should all join hands and prance around saying Mantorp, because you know what... I BET IT'S MORE FITTING!

  23. Meh. by oGMo · · Score: 4, Informative

    On my Zaurus SL-C860, I can run the real Firefox (or Mozilla) with pdaXrom, not to mention a whole load of other apps, including abiword, gnumeric, and other apps that, while not exactly full-blown on the PC side, completely blow away anything on the PDA side.

    With the latest betas, things are working with very minimal headache. If you're looking for PDA apps, this is a dream come true; if you're looking for a unix workstation in your pocket, this is also a dream come true. Or if you want gvim and gcc in your pocket. Or if you want snes9x in your pocket. Etc. You get the picture.

    It's really awesome to have a Linux workstation in your pocket that can dial via bluetooth through your cellphone anywhere you can get reception. Take photos with your camera, edit them right there with the latest GIMP, upload them to your server.

    It may seem obscenely expensive for a PDA, but it's also obscenely functional. You can't find a laptop this size, and it does just about everything you'd want a laptop to, except play the latest 3D games.

    --

    Don't think of it as a flame---it's more like an argument that does 3d6 fire damage

    1. Re:Meh. by glesga_kiss · · Score: 1
      It's really awesome to have a Linux workstation in your pocket that can dial via bluetooth through your cellphone anywhere you can get reception. Take photos with your camera, edit them right there with the latest GIMP, upload them to your server.

      I've pretty much got that with my WinCE 2003 device as well. Granted, the terminal is an ssh session to my home box, but that's more powerful than a local session as all my resources are on that network. WiFi is a must, mine has it built in.

      I've considered looking into putting *nix on it, but decided against it. It's also my phone, and I doubt that I'd be able to get drivers for the obscure hardware that makes up the device. Then trying to get a useful GUI that lets me jump from a missed call to a contact, to an email to that contact. It's an interesting area, but I don't think mobile *nix is anywhere near ready for prime time yet.

  24. Google for PDAs by Cocteaustin · · Score: 1

    It looks like those photos are showing the full version of Google. They've provided a version of the search page that's optimized for PDA form factors for a while now.

    1. Re:Google for PDAs by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      This one is prettier though. :)

      http://www.google.com/ie

  25. MiniMo seems lonly by DarkMantle · · Score: 4, Funny

    I think Minimo needs some companions.

    Like MiniLarry, and MiniCurly.

    --
    DarkMantle I been bored, so I started a blog.
    1. Re:MiniMo seems lonly by glesga_kiss · · Score: 1
      I think Minimo needs some companions. Like MiniLarry, and MiniCurly.

      Simpsons, right? Who's Curly? You mean Karl?

    2. Re:MiniMo seems lonly by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
  26. Will it work with Wifi? by imemyself · · Score: 1

    It talks about the Phone and Smart Phone Edition, so will it run on the regular version(accessing the internet via wifi?) If so, then I'd love to use it on my Axim. It can do so much more than my old Palm. If only Palm could get their act together and introduce native wifi(like, not through a $100 card you also have to buy from them), and could have a RAD IDE(flame away but using VS.NET to develop Compact .NET Framework apps is rather nice), their stuff wouldn't be that bad.

    --
    Every time you post an article on Slashdot, I kill a server. Think of the servers!
    1. Re:Will it work with Wifi? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      of course it will.

  27. THIS IS NOT OFFTOPIC by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    AS THE OTHER POSTER SAID READ THE SLASHDOT SUMMARY:

    ""If you (yes, yes, you that like OpenSource but use Win all the time) "

    It's a perfectly reasonable discussion to have, because how are you going to COMPARE the mobile usage if you don't have the desktop usage to even look at?!?!?

    OMG MODERATION HAS GONE TO HELL HERE. It's a perfectly reasonable and relevant discussion to be having.

  28. Form Factor by Dan+East · · Score: 1

    It's critical that a PDA browser be intelligent enough to fit content to a PDA's display. The bulk of Pocket PCs are 240x320, and only the newest models support 480x640. Anyone who attempts to browse "normal" webpages in their native format on a screen 240 pixels wide will quickly realize that it is completely unusable for most sites.

    It sounds like this project is at the "Hey, we got it to render something!" stage. Hopefully it will quickly mature and supplant PIE, just as Firefox is taking away IE's share on desktops.

    Dan East

    --
    Better known as 318230.
    1. Re:Form Factor by Kris_J · · Score: 1

      Opera's Series 60 web browser manages to do well on 176x208, so I can't imagine they'd have much problem with 240x320.

    2. Re:Form Factor by glesga_kiss · · Score: 1
      Anyone who attempts to browse "normal" webpages in their native format on a screen 240 pixels wide will quickly realize that it is completely unusable for most sites.

      I disagree. Granted; it's not as simple as desktop browsing, but must mobile clients have a few different layout options and usually at least one looks good. I surf on my 240x320 device all the time, hitting BBC News, /., and a few other sites that weren't designed for mobiles.

      So long as you have tabbed browsing and can load new pages in the background, it's pretty useful.

  29. Symbian 60 by a.koepke · · Score: 1

    Any news when something like this would be available for Symbian 60 series devices.

    Would be great to use something like Mozilla on my mobile phone, especially if it includes something like FTP client and maybe a decent IMAP client.

    --


    (\(\
    (^.^)
    (")")
    *This is the cute bunny virus, please copy this into your sig so it can spread
  30. opera by minus_273 · · Score: 2, Insightful

    nothing really compares to the size and quality of opera. It even supports common Linux handhelds (minimo is not Qtopia based so it only runs under X). But more than that opera has the BEST small screen rendering.

    --
    The war with islam is a war on the beast
    The war on terror is a war for peace
    1. Re:opera by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Who / why was this rated Flamebait? I could maybe see Off Topic. But Flamebait?

  31. It Works! by Bionic_Baboon · · Score: 2, Interesting

    It just doesn't render very good. I wrote this post using it on my Axim x50v.

    1. Re:It Works! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Try rendering some words besides "very good", and let us know how well it does.

  32. Re:Really though! by ChatHuant · · Score: 2, Informative

    Who uses the internet on there Pocket PC? It takes way to long just to type in a web address!

    You don't have to type the URL every time you go to a site, you know? That's what favorites/bookmarks and links are for. I mostly use the PocketPC to check my favorite sites and not for general browsing. And for this type of usage it's great.

  33. Re:MiniMo? by r.jimenezz · · Score: 5, Informative

    "Mínimo" is Spanish for minimal.

    --
    The revolution will not be televised.
  34. Re:MiniMo? by carpe_noctem · · Score: 1

    Ditto. =) Very rarely do I read posts on /. that make me laugh aloud like this.

    --
    "Quoting famous computer scientists out of context is the root of all evil (or at least most of it) in programming." - K
  35. Re:MiniMo? by lee7guy · · Score: 1

    Mantorp?

    Mantorp is the largest racing track in Sweden, does the word have any significance in english too?

    --
    Ceterum censeo Microsoftem esse delendam
  36. Playstation 2 port? by Mongoose · · Score: 2, Interesting

    I haven't looked into this, but does it have a Playstation 2 port? Running netfront is ok, but it would be nice to have mozilla on a PS2.

    Hell, I might be willing to help with the port -- you never know when I'll need it for PSP too. hah

    1. Re:Playstation 2 port? by Kris_J · · Score: 2, Informative

      Mozilla has been available for the PS2 for ages. Just get the Linux kit. I think it was the third thing I installed. (Distributed.Net client, Moria, Mozilla...)

  37. Any reason to move over? by jleq · · Score: 1

    It looks nice, and I'm certainly glad that it's being developed, as competition is always good for that sort of industry. Anyhow, are there any compelling reasons to move over from Pocket IE (please omit OMG MICROSOFT SUXORZ flames, please)? I'm perfectly happy with it at the moment.

    1. Re:Any reason to move over? by Kris_J · · Score: 1
      Pocket IE is *awful*. For a start, it crashes all the damn time. And it doesn't know how to cope with pages that have a large boarder defined in their css. I've seen pages with one word per line down the middle (more or less) of the screen.

      I really want Opera for the Pocket PC (their S60 version is stunning), but I'll take what I can get.

  38. Windows bleh.. by MrPerfekt · · Score: 1

    Since I do not use Windows really any of the time, I would love to see this ported to a MIDP (Java) app for my Sony V800 (and the multitude of other phones that run Java apps).

    I'm not doubtful this will happen since Moz seems to love interoperability but I certainly would like to see this immediately instead of the long wait because I'm impatient.

    --
    I just wasted your mod points! HA!
    1. Re:Windows bleh.. by nxtw · · Score: 2, Informative

      No way. Nearly impossible. Not only would it require an extremely long time to do this, such an application would be both enormously complex and so different than the original that'd it be much easier to write a brand new browser. Symbian platform would be a bit easier, as would Palm OS, but as you see here, Windows Mobile handheld platforms aren't too much trouble, and Linux is hardly any work at all. Java MIDP has many constraints, such as the lack of a true filesystem and memory/filesize constraints, that would make this very difficult. The one MIDP Java web browser (ReqWireless, I think) I've seen uses a special proxy to pre-render pages into an easy-to-digest format. An older version of Handspring Blazer did the same thing.

    2. Re:Windows bleh.. by SenseiLeNoir · · Score: 1

      There are some JAVA MIDP web browsers avaialable, that work ok on the SonyEricsson. You may have to google around for it (or look at the Esato Forum which is a good starting point for all things SonyEricsson http://esato.com/board/

      The thing is MIDP ver 1.0 is not very capable, the SE V800 is a MIDP 2.0 compatible phone, which is far more capable, but I dont know if any web browsers are available for MIDP 2.0.

      I was going to suggest using the inbuilt browser (I have a SE S700i), which is usually quite good at rendering most web pages, but looking at the fact that you own a V800, it woudl be a Vodafone "bastardised" phone, right? which means its probably been restricted in what it can/cant do.

      --
      Have a nice day!
    3. Re:Windows bleh.. by MrPerfekt · · Score: 1

      It's a V802SE flashed to V800 EU firmware.. so no, it's not bastardized at all.

      But the search for a decent HTML browser rages on, the one from ReqWireless is still the best one I've come across. The built-in browser on the phone as with most phones out there is just WAP. Which needless to say isn't very helpful in alot of situations.

      --
      I just wasted your mod points! HA!
  39. .003 is interesting but in its infancy by unuselessj · · Score: 2, Interesting

    I'm surprised at how quickly a port was done from Familar Linux to WinCE/WM2003. I have a Dell Axim X5 from a few years back. When extracted, the current version is about 15MB, 9MB going for winembed.exe. From what I've heard, users running WM2003SE have more problems than those you have slightly older devices. It seems like Minimo isn't using any windows mobile or ce.net specific APIs. The top bar is forced to the bottom of the screen, the bottom bar doesn't exist and the input toggle is forced onto the top bar. This caused a conflict with ICBar and will probably cause conflicts with similar ICBar based UI customization programs.

    Forms and links don't work yet, but it is almost akward seeing a website rendered just as it would be on a full browser, especially after suffering through Pocket IE.

    It looks good on the ipaq linux conversions.

    1. Re:.003 is interesting but in its infancy by glesga_kiss · · Score: 1

      Yeah, I'd say it was more proof-of-concept right now. Their test process is "can it render the google homepage". Watching with interest though...

  40. Mod parent down by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful

    This is a troll. WinFS and the old Palm filesystem are two completely different filesystem. WinFS's "database" functionality is an SQL-based system to store metadata about files on a traditional NTFS filesystem. Palm's old filesystem was non-hierarchial (there were no subdirectories, folders) and didn't even use/support files in the traditional sense. It was very altrusitic and difficult to work with for advanced applications. It worked fine back when handhelds didn't run advanced software, but does not work very well in today's world.

  41. actual link (for us lazy ones) by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Informative
  42. So, how about for the Zaurus 5x00/6000? by Money+for+Nothin' · · Score: 2

    How long until MiniMo is ported to the Zaurus 5x00/6000L on the default Sharp ROM or OPIE ROM? I'm going to venture a wild guess of "never", seeing as I'm fairly sure this would likely require a rewrite of practically all the GUI code (to use QTopia libs)...

    1. Re:So, how about for the Zaurus 5x00/6000? by m50d · · Score: 1

      Nah, should be easy because Qt is so nice to program for. The kde devs ported normal mozilla to kde in 48 hours at a conference as a demo, and that includes things like making gecko available as a kpart. Want to try and start doing it?

      --
      I am trolling
  43. "Laser" by TimeTraveler1884 · · Score: 1

    But will it allow me to control the access port to my tank of sharks with friggin lasers mounted on thier heads?

  44. I'm just waiting for by terpri · · Score: 0

    Lesszilla and Sparkrat

  45. PalmOS DBs vs. filesystems by Andy+Dodd · · Score: 4, Interesting

    And the change to filesystem methodology for Palms is a good thing WHY?

    The old database-style techniques were far more efficient. When PalmOne moved to a filesystem-based architecture with the Treo 650, users found that N megs of RAM in the new device was equivalent to N/2 megs of RAM in the old device.

    PalmOS has always been more efficient and far better than Windows Mobile for any embedded device. PalmOS devices have historically been more usable despite 1/10 the processing power of a WinCE device thanks to the fact that PalmOS was designed from the ground up for mobile devices, while WinCE and its bastard brethren are a horrendous hack.

    Unfortunately, PalmOS 5.x is a step backwards. POS 5.x runs on significantly faster hardware than OS4, with practically no benefits in 95% of situations. It's still a hell of a lot better than any mobile version of Windows.

    --
    retrorocket.o not found, launch anyway?
    1. Re:PalmOS DBs vs. filesystems by nxtw · · Score: 5, Informative
      And the change to filesystem methodology for Palms is a good thing WHY?

      New applications. Multimedia. More demanding games. Because the competition is both more advanced *and* has taken over market share.

      The old database-style techniques were far more efficient. When PalmOne moved to a filesystem-based architecture with the Treo 650, users found that N megs of RAM in the new device was equivalent to N/2 megs of RAM in the old device.

      It was never "equivalent". First, PalmOne should have included more RAM in the Treo 650. Second, a sacrifice in efficency is necesarry. However, the way in which they mapped old databases to files was not very efficent. The old system was hindering the platform greatly.

      PalmOS has always been more efficient and far better than Windows Mobile for any embedded device.

      PalmOS was very kludgy, not 32-bit, etc. If by "embedded device" you mean "plain-jane simple organizer", I agree completely.

      PalmOS devices have historically been more usable despite 1/10 the processing power of a WinCE device

      WinCE has had the same basic architecture from the beginning. While it didn't work out as well to begin with (the OS wasn't very mature and hardware wasn't too great,) it has evolved and is now a very decent platform. PalmOS devices have always been usable, and rather simple to use, but you can't use it for much.

      As for processing power - clearly they needed more. The old Dragonball CPUs took a few seconds to decode JPEGs and had no hope at playing mp3s.

      thanks to the fact that PalmOS was designed from the ground up for mobile devices

      It was designed for simple organizers.

      while WinCE and its bastard brethren are a horrendous hack.

      That's an unsubstantiated anti-Microsoft troll.

      PalmOS still does not have anything close to the mutlimedia support present on Windows Mobile (yes, people *do* like to put music on their PDAs and watch movies too), nor does it have the advanced gaming or emulation support (yes, people like to play games too.) For those that like to multitask... they can. I can run IRC, AIM, browse the web, and play music (streaming radio if I want it to be), all at the same time. And you can do so much from the device itself - you don't need to have a computer with the right software to be able to install software, mess around, etc.

      Unfortunately, PalmOS 5.x is a step backwards. POS 5.x runs on significantly faster hardware than OS4, with practically no benefits in 95% of situations. It's still a hell of a lot better than any mobile version of Windows.

      Step backwards? Do you think they switched to ARM because it was a step backwards? No. They needed to move forward. Windows Mobile does so much more, and people see that. PalmOne is really struggling to catch up now. People enjoy using their PDAs to go online and play mp3s. "95% of situations" of what Palm OS did originally won't benefit from a faster CPU, but what people want to do now requires a faster CPU.

    2. Re:PalmOS DBs vs. filesystems by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      and that is why there's no MiniMo on Palm OS yet.

      you got nice performance, you got nice system resources for the application, but you lose some developers who has great idea but prefer having an easier life in programming.

    3. Re:PalmOS DBs vs. filesystems by hey! · · Score: 1

      And the change to filesystem methodology for Palms is a good thing WHY?

      Well, it depends on what you think a PDA is for, doesn't it?

      If you think of the PDA as a general computing platform that fits in your palm, a conventional file systems is a good thing. It's flexible. Why should a particular piece of informaiton in the file systembelong to a particular application? Why should I bundle all of my like data in a common database? Oh, these aren't real limitations, but there's definitely an impedence mismatch between the PDB approach and the view of the PDA as a general computing platform.

      If you think of the PDA as a specialized information appliance that exists to support a limited number of tasks conveniently and efficiently, then the PDB approach makes sense for efficiency reasons.

      Speaking as a developer who targets PDA platforms as general purpose computing devices, I have to say the kind of peple I support are a tiny niche in the (shrinking) PDA market. The brilliance of the Palm was all the things they left out, the things they chose not to do in order to what they needed to do well. Microsoft's marketing position, though,is enviable compared to Palm. The Palm message traditionally has been "less is more". The Microsoft message has always been, "more is more.' That's why it isn't "Windows CE" any more, its "PocketPC".

      My own opinion is that the traditional Palm way is better for most people. I still carry a palm PDA. However, for my kind of applications, it's better to target the pocketpc platform.

      --
      Post may contain irony: discontinue use if experiencing mood swings, nausea or elevated blood pressure.
    4. Re:PalmOS DBs vs. filesystems by LWATCDR · · Score: 1

      "PalmOS still does not have anything close to the multimedia support present on Windows Mobile (yes, people *do* like to put music on their PDAs and watch movies too),"
      People like to watch movies on the tiny PDA screen? Who? I mean the scree really sucks and even a single movie will take up a huge amount of space on the average PDA. I know the cost of memory cards has come way down but I doubt that many people use there PDA for that.

      "nor does it have the advanced gaming or emulation support (yes, people like to play games too.)"
      Yes they do but wouldn't a GBA, PSP, or the new Gamboy DS cost less and be a better system to play games on? What really great games can you get for a Pocket PC?

      "For those that like to multitask... they can. I can run IRC, AIM, browse the web, and play music (streaming radio if I want it to be), all at the same time."
      Again you need to have a wireless Internet connection. I also doubt that most Pocket PC users use IRC. If you must have IRC for your PDA http://members.tripod.com/~hokamoto/PalmIRC.html
      AIM for the Palm is available here. http://mymobile.aol.com/portal/pda/index.html
      Whi le I agree that some of these new functions are nice For the core business user they are just not all that important. I do think Palm is playing a big of catchup. Frankly they have blown what was fantastic lead. Palm should have taken a not from Apple and jumped to a Palm OS layer running on a Unix core sooner. They should have jumped from the DragonBall to the ARM sooner as well.
      What they should really do is... Include wifi, put in a hard drive like the iPod, and a hardware chip for Theodora or Divx decoding. Then the Palm would become a media player/ Mass storage device/PDA. The trick would be to keep the size and cost down and the battery life up.

      --
      See my blog http://ilovecookes.blogspot.com/ for light hearted technical information.
    5. Re:PalmOS DBs vs. filesystems by tommyth · · Score: 0

      Grandparent:
      while WinCE and its bastard brethren are a horrendous hack.

      WinCE is soooo 2001.

      Personally I like both Palm and PocketPC's, but I chose the PocketPC simply because at the time (a year and half ago) the PocketPC was better hardware for the price. Program X for Palm being better than Program Y for Windows Mobile is personal opinion, but for all intents and purposes, each platform has the same kind of software. And all the crud that makes Windows behave badly isn't really present on the mobile edition (at least in what I've seen), so the whole "XP sucks, so PockePCs must too" kind of talk is groundless and only serves to show everyone that you don't know what you (the grandparent) are talking about.

    6. Re:PalmOS DBs vs. filesystems by nxtw · · Score: 1
      People like to watch movies on the tiny PDA screen? Who? I mean the scree really sucks and even a single movie will take up a huge amount of space on the average PDA. I know the cost of memory cards has come way down but I doubt that many people use there PDA for that.

      It's not that much space. People do like to watch movies on small screens. You can fit a few movies or a lot of episodes of a TV show on a 512mb memory card. People also use smartphones for this purpose too.

      There are a lot of people interested in this.

      Yes they do but wouldn't a GBA, PSP, or the new Gamboy DS cost less and be a better system to play games on? What really great games can you get for a Pocket PC?

      Emulators. I can play NES/SNES/Genesis games. PDAs are allowed in many schools, where gaming devices aren't. As for great games, there are some that look pretty good.

      Again you need to have a wireless Internet connection. I also doubt that most Pocket PC users use IRC. If you must have IRC for your PDA

      Most Pocket PC users use their Pocket PC as a PDA. Anyway, my original point wasn't that you can use AIM or IRC, but that you can do all at once. Pasting those links just shows that you can use Google. Congratulations.

      Also, wireless internet connections are not uncommon on Pocket PCs. Many Pocket PCs have wifi built in, something Palm is not doing well with. There are many wifi SD and CF adapters. Otherwise, there's Bluetooth for cellular access.

      While I agree that some of these new functions are nice For the core business user they are just not all that important.

      For a business user, multitasking can be very useful.

      I do think Palm is playing a big of catchup.

      Catching up to what? the features capabilities you just called "useless"?

      Frankly they have blown what was fantastic lead. Palm should have taken a not from Apple and jumped to a Palm OS layer running on a Unix core sooner. They should have jumped from the DragonBall to the ARM sooner as well.

      Yeah, they're way behind and will probably remain that way.

    7. Re:PalmOS DBs vs. filesystems by LWATCDR · · Score: 1

      "Catching up to what? the features capabilities you just called "useless"?"

      I never once said that any of them where usless. Just not all that important.

      "Emulators. I can play NES/SNES/Genesis games. PDAs are allowed in many schools, where gaming devices aren't. As for great games, there are some that look pretty good."

      How many high school or younger kids can afford a $300+ PDA?

      --
      See my blog http://ilovecookes.blogspot.com/ for light hearted technical information.
    8. Re:PalmOS DBs vs. filesystems by nxtw · · Score: 1
      I never once said that any of them where usless. Just not all that important.

      Important enough to design the devices to be able to use them.

      How many high school or younger kids can afford a $300+ PDA?

      More than you'd think. With more and more schools getting WiFi networks, PDAs are only becoming more useful.

    9. Re:PalmOS DBs vs. filesystems by Andy+Dodd · · Score: 1

      Yup. I had an old Kyocera 6035. The only reason I upgraded to a Treo 600 recently is because the 6035's buttons and hinge were getting worn after 3+ years.

      The new media features of the 600 (PalmOS 5) are kind of nice, but overall I consider the system to be a step back in all of the areas I consider most important in a phone and PDA:

      Battery life
      Reliability
      Usability - Palm has obsoleted the old PQA system claiming that "web browsers are the future" - Well, for looking up small things quickly (such as what movies are playing nearby, the weather, and whether your flight is on time or not), PQAs on the old Verizon QNC CDMA data scheme (14.4 kbits/sec with high latency) were far, far faster than Blazer over even a direct serial PPP connection with broadband as its next hop. (115200 bps minimum, dedicated to the Palm device).

      PalmOS was the undisputed king in those areas, and is still a long way ahead of any MS platform, but not nearly as far ahead as they used to be. It's sad that it's not because MS has progressed much, but it's because Palm has taken a step backward in areas that matter.

      I miss my PQAs... I've hardly used any data features of any of my phones at all since Palm killed the gateway servers. Verizon would likely have managed to sell me their $25/month 5MB data plan if PQAs still worked, but Blazer and any other web browser are far less bandwidth efficient and far more difficult to use than PQAs were.

      --
      retrorocket.o not found, launch anyway?
  46. Beware Long Load Times! by Doomstalk · · Score: 1

    I just loaded up the precompiled build they offered on my MPx200 upgraded to Smartphone 2003. Actually, I lied. It's STILL loading after a solid two or three minutes... Make that five minutes. Or maybe si... oh it's loaded now. Jesus Christ guys I know it's an alpha build, but is this what you call compact?

  47. Re:Really though! by shoolz · · Score: 1

    I use the interweb on my PPC. When I travel on vacation it's great to be able check and reply to mission critical emails without having to carry around a cumbersome laptop. I hook it to my belt, and with either ministumbler or PocketWinC running while I shop or visit friends, I can jump on an open AP while walking down the street, log into my web exchange server and fire away.

  48. Re:Look! by maroonhat · · Score: 0

    This is exactly why i read with a 'Troll +2" mod on

    that was funny not troll-ish!

    --
    The more I learn about Windows the more I am surprised it runs at all
  49. "We've created a clone of Mozilla... by d_54321 · · Score: 5, Funny

    ...one eighth your size"

    "I shall call him... mini-mo"

  50. Re:Really though! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

    If you love it so much, why don't you pound it in the ass.

    Fag.

  51. I want a decent Java VM for WinCe NOW!!! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Who cares about a browser when fundamental development for this platform remains closed and commercialized (i.e.e no free tools nor APIs). Sun has made their VM for WinCE end-of-life. That scraping sound you hear is the door closing on WinCE as a viable platform for those of us who don't want the M$ meter running on everything we do and use it for. Too bad...how sad.

    1. Re:I want a decent Java VM for WinCe NOW!!! by Helvick · · Score: 1

      Not true at all - the Embedded Visual C++ V4 IDE is completely free to use, both it and the Windows Mobile\Smartphone SDK are downloadable from MS. You can quibble about the license but it is very much free "as in beer" at least, if not completely free "as in speech"

      From the links in the Article:
      eMbedded Visual C++ 4.0 [This is the full GUI IDE + API and language reference]
      eMbedded Visual C++ 4.0 SP4 [Brings platform support up to WM2003 SE and Smartphone 2003]
      SDK for Windows Mobile 2003-based Pocket PCs [Full API, documentation, dev environment and sample code]

      The base CE 4.x & 5.0 platform dev environments themselves are available if you choose to subscribe and they give you far more visibility to the underlying implimentation of the various API's if you need more than is explicitly exposed by MSDN.

      Everything that's needed for this particular project (porting Minimo to CE) is publicly available.

      Remain convinced about the imminent death or otherwise of Windows CE if you like but it's completely false to say that there is a lack of free and open access to development tools and API's.

    2. Re:I want a decent Java VM for WinCe NOW!!! by Skuto · · Score: 1

      The lack of current Java for PocketPC is a political decision from Sun (and a stellarly stupid one). MS can't really do much about that as they lost the right to make Java versions theirselves.

  52. Windows Mobile Device by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Funny

    Ah Ha! Now we know where those pesky WMDs are!

  53. Re:Really though! by eobanb · · Score: 1

    I use the interweb on my PPC

    Yeah, I like browsing on my Mac, too.

    --

    Take off every sig. For great justice.

  54. Good advice by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Don't use a flashlight to take pictures of a display. Take a stand instead.

  55. Re:MiniMo? by Mantorp · · Score: 1
    If I have to explain it, then it's not funny.
    But, here goes; mini = small or little, mo = short for homo, hence a little gay.

    I did apologize already, sheesh.

    prancing around saying "Mantorp!" in a really high pitched girly voice
    There's something pythonesque about that.

  56. Zaurus port? by samdu · · Score: 3, Interesting

    When will there be a Zaurus port of this? I'm aware of only one such project, but thus far I've been unable to get Firefox to run on the standard Sharp ROM. I tried OpenZaurus but it was buggy. It certainly would be nice to be able to run Firefox on the many Linux-based handhelds.

  57. Ran Minimo on GPE, wasn't all that by rwa2 · · Score: 2, Interesting

    So I went to the extra trouble of installing recent builds of GPE and OPIE (based on Familiar 0.8) on an iPaq h5450 I got from work. I ran Minimo under GPE, but didn't find it all that useful. It didn't even have bookmarks, so I'd have to type in my sites by hand each time. The konqueror-based browser under opie was much nicer.

    I got my greatest kick from installing a 1GB CF card in it and running debian-ARM off of it using chroot. I could run mozilla on a 640x480 vnc virtual framebuffer, displayed using OPIE's nice VNC client keypebble in 1/2 scale full screen mode. It was readable, fully functional (albeit a bit slow) and the scrollbars were a nice small size (I don't know why all of the programs in GPE and OPIE need such large scrollbars that take up, like, 5-10% of the meager screen real estate). Unfortunately, keypebble would consume all of the CPU time on screen refreshes, so this wasn't very good for battery life.

    Anyway, the touchscreen crapped out soon thereafter, which means I can't get past the calibration screen under WinCE or OPIE, so now I'm pretty much stuck with GPE (which uses xstroke and isn't as picky as the iPaq digitizer calibration hardware, I guess). But it's still kinda painful to try to push buttons since all my strokes are skewed a bit, no matter how I calibrate the screen now.

    So I'm pretty much back to reading pages with Plucker and occasionally Avantgo on my aging Visor Pro, even though it's starting to lose lines on its greyscale screen and the button don't register half the time unless I stroke them a certain way. For my part, I'm planning on holding out until someone offers a cameraless GSM Treo 650 (so I can use it at work - does anyone know if it's straightforward enough to just open it up and remove it yourself?). From there, I'd hope I could move straight to a Zaurus-phone in a few years, if I could afford to have one knocking around in my pockets.

    It's nice that Minimo is progressing, but I'd much rather see a full firefox with a slimmed UI, especially since the devices are powerful enough to support this already.

  58. WinCE MiniMo completely incomplete by __aaitqo8496 · · Score: 1

    The current version of MiniMo isn't even usable. I stuck it on my Dell Axim X30 and it pulls my task bar to the bottom (it should be on top) and lays over the bottom bar. The interface is absolutely horrible thus far. It renders pages at full size, but has no ability to shrink them to fit a QVGA screen. Also, it doesn't seem to support landscape mode (as in, it seems to have 240x320 set as a constant instead of changing with size of screen). It looks extremely promising, and I can't wait to use it, but it's got a LONG way to go before it's usable by the general masses. Until then, it's simple Gecko rendering on a WinCE device.

    1. Re:WinCE MiniMo completely incomplete by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yes on my c500 smartphone you cant enter any text and it is horrendously slow. still its a good sign of whats to come.

      Opera works quite nicely on it though especially since it tries to adapt the page to mobile format.

    2. Re:WinCE MiniMo completely incomplete by hey! · · Score: 1

      Well, according to a description linked of TFA, the prebuilt binary is only the second build capable of rendering anything.

      Personally, my interest in this project is not as a browser, but as a UI platform.

      Think of what Google has done with javascript. Now imagine applications designed for the PDA using those kinds of capabilities. The business logic could be remote, or running on a tiny application server running on the PDA.

      --
      Post may contain irony: discontinue use if experiencing mood swings, nausea or elevated blood pressure.
  59. Better browsers for PocketPC have been around... by shoolz · · Score: 3, Interesting

    Try: http://park15.wakwak.com/~ftx/

    I've been using it for about 2 years... tabbed browsing, text sizing, 'simply view' mode (no side scrolling or useless formatting), and the app is a mere 73K. Nice.

  60. Lightweight browsers by r3jjs · · Score: 2, Informative

    If you really need a lightweight web browser for an older machine, I would recommend

    Dillo - a nice lightweight browser, but no CSS or Javascript. Requiress GTK something.

    Links 2 - Runs in X, frame buffer, SVGA. Some CSS and Javascript support.

    Both are very lightweight and I've used both on ancient machines that needed "something." I'll usually include Firefox as a backup for sites that really need it.
  61. Also The Name of A Populour Trojan by Agret · · Score: 0

    www.mosucker.net - Minimo, a populour trojan.

    I wonder if Mozilla stole the name ;)

    Prior art flaming patent office ninja time!

    --
    Have you metaroderated recently?
  62. I'll stick with NetFront for now... by utexaspunk · · Score: 2, Informative

    I've got NetFront 3 on my h6315, and it works fairly well. It definitely does a better (albeit still quite imperfect) job at rendering pages for easy hand-readability than Pocket IE. As anyone with a Pocket PC knows, the worst thing in the world is a page that renders in such a way that requires you to scroll left and right and back again over and over to read a column of text. It doesn't look like MiniMo does anything to address that (yet, anyway).

    Anyone here had the misery of trying to read /. on Pocket IE? /. seriously needs to get with the program and create alternate layouts for this stuff. Google's smart enough to detect that you're using a handheld and arrange itself accordingly, why shouldn't /.? Has anyone else noticed that GMail has a non-DHTML version now that works with old/non-standard browsers such as Pocket IE? Of course, I just use the POP mail, but it's nice anyway.

    Other features of Netfront are some Javascript capability, and tabs, fullscreen browsing, and scroll mode (where your stylus moves the page, which helps a lot with the ones that don't render well). MiniMo will need all of these features before I consider switching.

    1. Re:I'll stick with NetFront for now... by norkakn · · Score: 1

      Have you tried /. light?

      there is slashback too, but /.light works with lynx pretty well, so i'd imagine that it'll work for a pocketPC too. (its in the homepage preferences)

    2. Re:I'll stick with NetFront for now... by utexaspunk · · Score: 1

      what if I want to view /. light when I'm on the road, but want the normal version when I'm at home, but don't want to have to change my prefs constantly? shouldn't that be storable in the cookie or something?

    3. Re:I'll stick with NetFront for now... by utexaspunk · · Score: 1

      oh yeah- you know what would REALLY sell me on MiniMo? Adblock. Ads aren't just a nuisance when you're downloading over GPRS, they're debilitating!

    4. Re:I'll stick with NetFront for now... by hughk · · Score: 1

      Good point, just create two profiles. The only problem is that the message centre is per profile. To create the second profile, you will need an alternate eMail address.

      --
      See my journal, I write things there
  63. New version out... by tcdk · · Score: 1

    I posted about this on PocketPC Thought about three weeks ago. You can see screen captures there and there's a link to the new version 0.003 (which I can't get to work on my axim v50x) as well...

    --
    TC - My Photos..
  64. Can Gecko run on a 486? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Can a gecko-based browser run on a 486 computer? One of my little projects is to make a 486-based Linux distribution; I'm wondering what browser such a distribution can use.

  65. No real zoom though (unlike opera) by Ezza · · Score: 3, Interesting

    If you look you'll see that the Google logo is at 1:1 resolution.
    That's because the gecko renderer doesn't support "true" zoom of text + images (yet), so until that's fixed it'll only be useful if you've got a nice big screen (and/or you like to scroll). Of course the Opera engine has been able to do this for years..
    The relevant mozilla bug is https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=4821
    (copy & paste to your browser)

    --
    I'm a perfectionist but I'm trying to cut back.
  66. Handheld Stylesheets by Nurgled · · Score: 1

    I'd be cool if they would make it default to using 'handheld' media stylesheets rather than 'screen' as in the desktop version. That way sites can provide a simpler version of their design for small-screened devices. Of course, it'd be even better if someone would implement something like Opera's "Small Screen Rendering", which actually transforms the HTML a little to make sites which do not provide a special handheld stylesheet more usable.

    As to the speed thing, the PocketPC systems I've seen have had reasonable processors, but doing intensive things like playing back highly-compressed video obviously uses up more battery than browsing your calendar.

  67. Obligatory by Creamsickle · · Score: 3, Funny

    That's an unsubstantiated anti-Microsoft troll.

    You must be new here.

    --
    On the 0th day, God created C
  68. Re:Look! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    No. It was a utterly clueless remark made by a notorious Fark troll-wannabe.

    Go Photoshop some Brittany Spaers pictures, please.

  69. Re:MiniMo? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Except that mo stands for Mozilla here.

  70. Just get Opera - Re:Symbian 60 by Werrismys · · Score: 1

    Opera has years worth of headstart and is really usable on series 60 phones... haven't tried if it has FTP. All series 60 phones I've seen already have IMAP client. Not decent, but usable ;-)

    --
    'Once scientists, even the dim-witted social scientists, get muzzled, the Western Civilization is finished.' - oldhack
  71. Cool by wiredog · · Score: 1

    Now if only they'd get it running on an sl-c3000. None of the embedded distros I've seen run on that yet.

  72. OpenZaurus by wiredog · · Score: 1

    Won't even install on the sl-c3000 dammit. Apparently the ROM in that model is smaller than in previous ones and some of the os (/usr for example) has to be installed to the hard drive. Naturally, the developers have ensured that the documentation for compiling OpenZaurus/OpenEmbedded for sl-c3000 is at best opaque.

  73. Mod grandparent up by m50d · · Score: 1

    I don't think it's a troll, just a misunderstanding of the concepts. I had exactly the same thought when reading the great-grandparent.

    --
    I am trolling
  74. Re:MiniMo? by Mantorp · · Score: 1

    Oh really? Gee thanks for that.

  75. Re:MiniMo? by Mantorp · · Score: 1

    lee7guy, it's where I grew up.

  76. Re:MiniMo? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Not according:

    Babel Fish Translation Help

    In English:
    minimo

    Translate again - Enter up to 150 words

    minimo

    Minimo is minimo.

  77. Windows Media Device? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Oh, NO, the WMDs are coming, the WMDs are coming!!

  78. Re:MiniMo? by Spunk · · Score: 1

    Hold the phone! No need to change your worldview! Thanks to Firesomething, you can run SteakKnife Gun Browser and no one need know you're running that gay pansy homeosekshul Minimo.

    ...assuming Firesomething works in Minimo

  79. Re:MiniMo? by chachob · · Score: 1
    And just so you know. Homosexuals everywhere are offended by your use of the word gay.
    And just so you know, Heterosexuals everywhere don't give a shit.
  80. Re:MiniMo? by lee7guy · · Score: 1

    Hehe, tänkte inte på ditt nick i din inledande kommentar. Tänkte väl att "Mantorp" var ett för bisarrt ord i sammanhanget, för att vara ett rent sammanträffande. :)

    --
    Ceterum censeo Microsoftem esse delendam
  81. Re:MiniMo? by Mantorp · · Score: 1

    Mitt dåliga skämt blev inte så uppskattat heller, nåväl.

  82. Jornada 7xx is cheaper by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I bought an old HP Jornada 710 and a 512Mb CF and now I have a full ARM Linux distributition (NetBSD runs too) running in my pocket that can play mp3 or ogg (with integer-only players) :-)