Slashdot Mirror


William Shatner Pitches 'Starfleet Academy' Show

Tycoon Guy writes "TrekToday reports that William Shatner recently pitched an 'Academy' show to Paramount. The series would feature teen versions of the Classic Star Trek characters Kirk, Spock and McCoy, and be set at Starfleet Academy. The studio turned Shatner down, but he's not letting go of the idea: Pocket Books has asked him to write a two-novel series based on the 'Starfleet Academy' concept. Also, Shatner apparently went over the head of Trek head honcho Rick Berman to pitch his idea straight to the head of Paramount - maybe after Enterprise ends and Berman leaves the franchise, the studio will be more inclined to listen to Shatner?"

107 of 564 comments (clear)

  1. I can just imagine by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny

    Beer me up Scotty!

    1. Re:I can just imagine by frankenbox · · Score: 2, Funny

      C'mon, "In search of" was the X files of the 70's! You have to figure, if anyone ever was great for a role, it was Nimoy. Starting with the cage... Screaming at the top of his lungs to Jeff Hunter. "Firing laser beams Captain!!!" Took a few episodes to chill him out. Don't think they can work spock into the "Ridgmont High - Starfleet Acadamy" scenerio. I could see him cooking up some Vulcan Methamphetamine in the Dorm. Big Explosions, end of show. Ooops....

  2. Tekwars by Neon+Spiral+Injector · · Score: 5, Funny

    I wonder if Shatner will use the same ghost writer this time?

    1. Re:Tekwars by thundercatslair · · Score: 2

      Latest .rpms for gentoo? We are talking about star trek here, how can one get more nerdy?

    2. Re:Tekwars by nametaken · · Score: 4, Insightful

      I wonder if Shatner will use the same ghost writer this time?

      So long as he doesn't sing the theme song.

      Seriously though, I'm glad he went over that douchebag's head.

    3. Re:Tekwars by Random+Chaos · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Why would Pocket Books need another academy novel? They already have Kobyoshi Maru (or however you spell that) - and it was written by a good author!

    4. Re:Tekwars by teromajusa · · Score: 2, Informative

      Slashdot can change its content just for you ...or... you could create an account and disable topics you are not interested in. For me not clicking on stories I don't care about works just as well ;)

    5. Re:Tekwars by Winkhorst · · Score: 5, Insightful

      There's apparently so little writing ability and creativity in Hollywood that they can't get beyond Star Trek as the only possible metaphor for space-based Sci Fi. There is an incredibly large universe out there, yet it doesn't appear to have enough room for anything other than ONE plot structure based on ONE metaphor? Here's an exercise: Create a program with the dynamism of the original Star Trek with NONE of the structural baggage. Tell me, is this really an impossible challenge?

      --
      "Is this Winkhorst a nova criminal?" "No just a technical sergeant wanted for interrogation."
    6. Re:Tekwars by mmkkbb · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Tell me, is this really an impossible challenge?

      Making the show is not the challenge. It's getting people to watch it that's hard. Branding power and all that. It's like Nintendo and Tetris.

      --
      -mkb
    7. Re:Tekwars by starsong · · Score: 3, Insightful

      It was called Firefly. They cancelled it.

      Seriously, the problem seems to be with the perceived risk. Star Trek has an established fan base, so even a very sucky new series is guaranteed at least SOME measure of support. People spending several tens of millions on a new show don't want to take risks on something unproven. It's the same reason Miss Congeniality 2 is playing down the street from me. Sequels are (perceived as) safer than originality.

    8. Re:Tekwars by ajs · · Score: 2, Insightful

      "There's apparently so little writing ability and creativity in Hollywood that they can't get beyond Star Trek as the only possible metaphor for space-based Sci Fi"

      Stargate (both shows), Battlestar Galactica, Star Wars: Clone Wars... these are just the good shows that I know something about.

      Just how many space-based shows do there have to be to convince you?

    9. Re:Tekwars by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Stargate based on the mild success of the film and novelised version of the film; Battlestar galactica based on the 1979 series that itself had an earlier sequel in 1980 (banish the thought though as it was poorly done), Star Wars (mention of that is enough, no?) all demonstrate the same repetition. For those popular here: Farscape was an exaggerated space drama that still shied away from the epic scope of a space opera for some reason so ended with the extension of only a sequel mini-series; Firefly had promise but used overly of the same character types as the Enterprise derivative of Star Trek, so it failed from lack of popular franchise, and Enterprise failed due to overt similarity to Andromeda, that itself failed due to poor character design. Over saturation is the problem, and lack of hard sci-fi amidst the drama that will not plunge into epic space opera.

    10. Re:Tekwars by Winkhorst · · Score: 3, Interesting

      The one difference I think you're all missing is that all these films and series take place in a universe with a mature interstellar civilization, whereas in the Original Star Trek, space was still a relatively unknown quantity ("going where no man has gone before"). That is what created the sense of awe and wonder and that is what Sci Fi (and SF) are all about--the UNKNOWN--not some spaceship tied to Starfleet Command by a subspace umbilical cord. That was why Janeway was flung halfway across the galaxy, and still they continued to act like a Washington bureaucracy when determining how to proceed.

      And along the way Star Trek became more and more about the characters, whereas in the original series, the crew were basically an ensemble cast that acted out new stories every episode. I.e., they were short stories, not parts of a novel. The great thing about this kind of ensemble acting is you don't have to get to know the characters over again. You can cut right to the chase and tell a story. This is why the idea of a Star Fleet Academy series is such a horrendously bad idea. It gets even farther away from the short story format and turns the franchise into even more of a soap opera. And I, for one, cannot abide soap operas pretending to science fiction.

      --
      "Is this Winkhorst a nova criminal?" "No just a technical sergeant wanted for interrogation."
    11. Re:Tekwars by ajs · · Score: 2, Interesting

      "The one difference I think you're all missing is that all these films and series take place in a universe with a mature interstellar civilization"

      I'd have to say that Battlestar Galactica definitely does not fit into that category, and while in Stargate, there are races that have been out there building civilizations since before humans were on the scene, this compares favorbably to ST:ToS where humans were just starting to explore the galaxy which many older races called home for millenia or even MUCH more (Organians).

      Nope, I fail to see the lack of a sense of exploration in Battlestar Galactica or Stargate.

      However exploration is NOT the only useful theme in SF, and ST:ToS is not the only valid recipie for good story-telling. For example, a series based on the Foundation trilogy or Dune would have almost no exploration component at all. Same goes for most of the Culture books and a fair chunk of Nivin's universe (though some of it WAS clearly exploritory... especially the earlier books).

    12. Re:Tekwars by Saxerman · · Score: 4, Insightful
      >>It was called Firefly. They cancelled it. >Because it sucked. This is honest opinion, not a troll or flamebait. >Every episode looked like a Mad TV or SNL spoof. It wasn't so bad that it was fit for an MST3K treatment, but it was close.

      Wow. We must not have been watching the same show. At first blush I disliked Firefly due to the "Space Western" theme as I thought it sounded rather contrived. Why would we unlock tech in space flight and colonization and yet regress technologically?

      Fortunately my friends convinced me to watch the show, and I was hooked. After I understood the story, it made perfect sense. I enjoyed how they accepted the advanced technologies of space travel but did not let them dominate the story. I enjoyed how the story stayed focused on the characters, and I especially enjoyed watching the characters and their relationships develop.

      I'm not sure why you felt Firefly seemed like a space comedy. There were certainly some very funny moments but the thrust of the series seemed to focus on the serious morale issues of working within the grey areas of the law and surviving between those groups that considered the laws absolute and the criminal elements that would rather ignore the laws completely. If anything I would think you would take exception of the melodrama, considering how you cite that grievance against the Star Trek franchise. I also agree that Star Trek was too melodramatic for my tastes, which is why I considered Firefly a welcome change. I didn't feel like the script was talking down to me and appreciate how they directly tackled hard issues like religion ("You don't 'fix' the Bible, River.") and didn't make me feel like I was being preached too.

      --

      A steaming cup of soykaf would be real wiz right now.

    13. Re:Tekwars by CodeBuster · · Score: 2, Insightful

      There have been many other space based sci-fi shows over the years, mostly on the sci-fi channel, including both original series such as Farscape and remakes of classic franchises including DUNE and BattleStar Galactica. However, the problem with sci-fi in general and quality sci-fi in particular is that it is very expensive to create on a weekly serialized television production schedule. This problem is compounded by the fact that sci-fi programming mostly appeals to a small, relative to the mainstream, and very demanding audience which is not very tolerant of any faults or perceived lack of quality in the programming. A smaller audience means that advertisers are not willing to pay as much for commercial slots and high production costs mean that a greater percentage of revenue is simply covering costs and not generating profit. Finally, because science fiction is a niche market there are fewer good writers with television production and script writing experience who also understand the special needs of the science fiction genre, particularly with regard to integration of technical details in their scripts. This killer combination has been the bane of even popular sci-fi franchises such as Star Trek and Stargate SG-1. For example, the original BattleStar Galactica was the number one show in 1978 with the highest ratings, but even then the advertisers were only willing to pay so much and the show was so expensive, because of the high expectations that people had after Star Wars that the show was costing one million dollars per episode to produce. Universal and ABC were making a profit, but not nearly as much as they could by producing several less popular shows for the same budget so the show was cancelled even though it was the highest rated show for that year. These factors have changed somewhat with the advent of cheaper and more powerful computer hardware, effects/editing software, and dedicated networks such as the Sci-Fi Channel which serve to concentrate the audience and maximize the advertising revenue. However, there is still quite some distance to go before this type of programming begins to approach the profitability of more mainstream television fare. So the long answer to your question is no, it is not impossible, but merely difficult to squeeze good science fiction programming into a weekly television production schedule and budget.

    14. Re:Tekwars by TheWormThatFlies · · Score: 2, Insightful

      The point is that the Firefly universe is built on a model in which the average tech level decreases the further away from the core civilised planets you go. And I think this is a perfectly sensible model.

      Complex technology needs to be maintained. It requires a support structure of factories, spare parts and qualified technicians. When you colonise a primitive planet, there's nothing there to begin with. It would be silly to try to start with city dwellers and a complex tech level system when you can start with farmers and seeds.

      I'm not saying that it would be impossible to maintain a high tech level on colonised worlds, but it would certainly be more expensive, whereas dumping farmers, cows and seeds out of a spaceship is about as cheap as you can get.

  3. Academy.. by ackthpt · · Score: 4, Funny
    William Shatner recently pitched an 'Academy' show to Paramount.

    Um.. I read this and immediately had a disturbing vision

    The series would feature teen versions of the Classic Star Trek characters Kirk, Spock and McCoy, and be set at Starfleet Academy.

    Ah, not what I thought, but not exactly a thrilling concept.

    The studio turned Shatner down, but he's not letting go of the idea: Pocket Books has asked him to write a two-novel series based on the 'Starfleet Academy' concept. Also, Shatner apparently went over the head of Trek head honcho Rick Berman to pitch his idea straight to the head of Paramount - maybe after Enterprise ends and Berman leaves the franchise, the studio will be more inclined to listen to Shatner?"

    Maybe if he pitched it as a reality show, a la The Apprentice. That might be entertaining...

    --

    A feeling of having made the same mistake before: Deja Foobar
    1. Re:Academy.. by jeremy111 · · Score: 2, Insightful
      The series would feature teen versions of the Classic Star Trek characters Kirk, Spock and McCoy, and be set at Starfleet Academy.


      But isn't Spock like x00 years old? So when the humans are teens, say 30 years younger then Mr. Spock would still be x00 - 30 and still not a teen. But this is crazy. As much as I like the StarTrek universe I think the series should be put on hold (remember in the 80's) to allow our minds to become interested in the shows again.
    2. Re:Academy.. by Reignking · · Score: 3, Informative

      Shatner has a reality show starting Tuesday night, called Invasion Iowa, where he convinces an entire town that he's filming a movie there. It is on Spike TV and is from the creators of the Jow Schmoe Show.

      The Iowa town is the town the Captain Kirk is supposedly from...

      --
      One man's Funny is another man's Offtopic.
    3. Re:Academy.. by wankledot · · Score: 5, Funny
      "Maybe if he pitched it as a reality show, a la The Apprentice. That might be entertaining..."

      Nowthat qualifies as a disturbing vision. What would a bunch of trekkies be fighting for the chance to be? Captain of an imaginary starship? Chance to date a woman? A shower? Associate producer of the next doomed Trek series?

      --
      My sig is blank, I typed this by hand.
    4. Re:Academy.. by ackthpt · · Score: 2, Interesting
      But isn't Spock like x00 years old? So when the humans are teens, say 30 years younger then Mr. Spock would still be x00 - 30 and still not a teen. But this is crazy. As much as I like the StarTrek universe I think the series should be put on hold (remember in the 80's) to allow our minds to become interested in the shows again.

      I think there was some problem with ST Canon. Apparently Spock was about the same age as Kirk when they went through academy together. The was mentioned somewhere that at the time of the series both were around 100 years old. That's what future science had done for aging.

      It smells like one of those things that has half a chance of working if you chuck canon and is doomed to failure if you don't. Kirk would unfortunately be a very cocky fellow and I think we've seen enough of that stereotype on TV already.

      Effective cast:

      Spock: Brainy, yet unassuming
      McCoy: Face planted in medical books all the time
      Kirk: Natural leader, is brash, adventurous and gets them into trouble and somehow they always get back out of it, maybe with only a scar or two. After all, they need to learn.

      --

      A feeling of having made the same mistake before: Deja Foobar
    5. Re:Academy.. by hawk · · Score: 3, Funny

      > What would a bunch of trekkies be fighting for the chance to be?

      Transporter test subjects, of course . . .

      think of it as evolution in action . . .

      hawk

    6. Re:Academy.. by Gilmoure · · Score: 2, Funny

      Wil Wheaton

      --
      I drank what? -- Socrates
    7. Re:Academy.. by AKAImBatman · · Score: 2, Interesting

      No offsense to Wheaton (I know you're probably reading this), but wouldn't he come across as a bit too dopey for the role? Gary was supposed to be a hotshot competitor to Kirk that kept the both of them pushing their limits. In many ways, we can probably thank Gary for Kirk being the youngest captain.

      Whoever plays Gary Mitchell *needs* to come across as a TopGun pilot.

  4. yea!!! by ArsonSmith · · Score: 2, Insightful

    That has to be the worst idea I've ever heard.

    --
    Paying taxes to buy civilization is like paying a hooker to buy love.
    1. Re:yea!!! by MrLint · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Berman = bad producer
      Shatner = bad ideas

      sounds like we should keep these guys together not separate. mebbe trek can be killed once and for all.

    2. Re:yea!!! by Rei · · Score: 5, Funny

      Come.. now......... It has long been.. recognized.. that William Shatner is an actor, of amazing... talent, a talent that simply dwarfs... all of the rest of his contemporaries. Who.. else.. could have figured out that the way to display.. ultimate.. pain, is to half kneel, and thrust your elbows as far forward as... physically.. possible.. ?

      --
      I once listened to a Philip Glass record for an hour and a half before I realized it was skipping.
  5. Hey Bill? by AKAImBatman · · Score: 3, Funny

    Just let Kirk die already!

    1. Re:Hey Bill? by AKAImBatman · · Score: 4, Informative

      Just to add to my own post:

      The series would feature teen versions of the Classic Star Trek characters Kirk, Spock and McCoy, and be set at Starfleet Academy.

      This doesn't make much sense. From the series,we have a very strong impression that Spock and Kirk met for the first time on the Enterprise. (Note the use of "the". That "other show" sounds stupid without it.) The episode that firmly established Pike's command before Kirk's only bolsters the feeling that Kirk inherited Spock instead of hand picking him as he probably did with Bones.

      In short, this sounds like a very fanboyish concept. Let JMZ take the helm and we'll see if the old girl still has any antimatter left in the ol' warp engines.

    2. Re:Hey Bill? by AKAImBatman · · Score: 3, Interesting

      And another thing, Bones was WAY older than Kirk (by 15-20 years, I believe)! Especially when you consider that Kirk was the youngest Starfleet captain ever! (canon, I believe) The only way Bones would have been at the Academy during Kirk's tenure is if he was the Doctor on staff!

    3. Re:Hey Bill? by bill_mcgonigle · · Score: 3, Funny

      The episode that firmly established Pike's command before Kirk's only bolsters the feeling that Kirk inherited Spock instead of hand picking him as he probably did with Bones.

      Bones is ~20 years older than Kirk. Maybe he got held back alot at SF academy?

      --
      My God, it's Full of Source!
      OUTSIDE_IP=$(dig +short my.ip @outsideip.net)
    4. Re:Hey Bill? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Funny

      Dammit Jim, I'm a doctor, not a StarFleet Academy student!

  6. Love his style by NormalVisual · · Score: 4, Insightful

    You gotta give Shatner credit for totally dissing Berman like that. :-)

    --
    Please stand clear of the doors, por favor mantenganse alejado de las puertas
    1. Re:Love his style by AKAImBatman · · Score: 2, Interesting

      No offsense, but noone takes Berman seriously anymore. Even Paramount has been less than cooperative with him as of late. Honestly, the guy must have a lifetime contract or something, because he should have been fired YEARS ago.

  7. first thing that came to mind by kin_korn_karn · · Score: 3, Funny

    "They're tiny, they're toony,
    they're all a little loony"

  8. God love that manwhore! by Nijika · · Score: 4, Insightful

    I think Shatner is by far, by far, my favorite Trekker. He's got a sense of humor about himself and his work, yet he's not even remotely afraid to take chances.

    --
    Luck favors the prepared, darling.
    1. Re:God love that manwhore! by Timesprout · · Score: 5, Funny

      yet he's not even remotely afraid to take chances

      Based on some of the things he's done I think thats more complete lack of an embarassment gene rather than lack of fear.

      --
      Do not try to read the dupe, thats impossible. Instead, only try to realize the truth
      What truth?
      There is no dupe
    2. Re:God love that manwhore! by hawk · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Sure, but how else do you get someone to take an ongoing role which is *designed* as a parody of himself? (Boston Legal)

      hawk

    3. Re:God love that manwhore! by Intrinsic · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Good for him, we dont need embarassment anyway, its a quick way to limit your life.

    4. Re:God love that manwhore! by Locke2005 · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Sorry, but I think Leonard Nimoy has always had a better since of humor about himself (and always been a better actor). Also, Nimoy directed the only StarTrek movie that didn't suck...

      --
      I've abandoned my search for truth; now I'm just looking for some useful delusions.
    5. Re:God love that manwhore! by Politburo · · Score: 4, Insightful

      See: Adam West, Family Guy.

  9. Oh God.. by doormat · · Score: 4, Funny

    The OC meets Star Trek. May God save us from such garbage.

    (Its not like the women's starfleet uniforms are all that revealing anyways)

    --
    The Doormat

    If you're not outraged, then you're not paying attention.
    1. Re:Oh God.. by mmkkbb · · Score: 2, Funny

      That can be changed. Ever heard the word "retcon"?

      --
      -mkb
    2. Re:Oh God.. by Guppy06 · · Score: 5, Informative

      "(Its not like the women's starfleet uniforms are all that revealing anyways)"

      You forget: If we're going back to the early days of Jim & Co, we're going back to the days of miniskirts and green slave women. :)

    3. Re:Oh God.. by Erbo · · Score: 2, Funny
      Well my first thought was, "Oh, spiffing! Now it's Star Trek: 90210! Could they possibly run the franchise any farther into the ground?"

      Fortunately, WFS got turned down...someone at Paramount must have had a sudden onset of senile sanity.

      --
      Be who you are...and be it in style!
  10. So by aftk2 · · Score: 5, Funny

    Which one of them will be doing all of the crazy sound effects? And what about the crazy gun nut? "Tackleberry!"

    On a more sobering note, I find it deeply disturbing that I was able to remember this much about Police Academy, at a moment's notice.

    --
    concrete5: a cms made for marketing, but strong enough for geeks.
  11. Let it die. by nberardi · · Score: 5, Insightful

    I think, as sad as it might be, that StarTrek has really come to an end. It has had a good 50 some odd years of episodes. Let it die with at least some dignity.

  12. I like the idea...not the setting.... by haplo21112 · · Score: 5, Insightful

    ...the idea would be better served in the pre/post TNG/DS9 time frame and with new characters....perhaps with camio here or there from the established charaters.

    --
    Power Corrupts,Absolute Power Corrupts Absolutely, leaving one person(group)in charge is absolutely corrupt.
  13. Star Trek 90210 by snuf23 · · Score: 4, Insightful

    This is a horrible idea. Just what would be needed to completely kill off the franchise. How about a whole show full of Wesley Crusher teen angst in a Federation uniform.
    Visually it would be hard to jive with the old series, and having actors who are trying to potray the old characters might lead to pure campiness.
    Ok so now everyone can tell how it would be great if they did it right - but come on people, you KNOW they wouldn't do it right.
    I'm just hoping whatever new series comes out has Shatner singing the theme song. Hell, just have him sing the lyrics to the orignal theme from the '60s series.

    --
    Sometimes my arms bend back.
    1. Re:Star Trek 90210 by 0123456 · · Score: 2, Insightful

      "How about a whole show full of Wesley Crusher teen angst in a Federation uniform."

      Bah. Just think about all those hot teenage girls in those tiny little skirts...

    2. Re:Star Trek 90210 by snuf23 · · Score: 2, Funny

      Why do you think Kirk left Earth? All the REALLY hot women are out in space!
      They don't let Orion slave girls into the Federation.

      --
      Sometimes my arms bend back.
    3. Re:Star Trek 90210 by jfengel · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Yeah, they'd botch it. Not gonna argue with you on that one.

      I agree that trying to make the old characters synch up would be hard. Star Trek is never about the 22nd/23rd/24th centuries; it's always about today. So having "young" Kirk have more mature attitudes (by our standards) than "old" Kirk would be disconcerting.

      Besides, they'd have the same problem that they did on Enterprise: you can't place a character in real jeopardy if you already know that they survive. That's supposedly why they renamed T'Pau to T'Pol. Personally, I'd have loved to have seen the great leader of Vulcan as a young woman, to see what made her great, and screw the suspense factor, but they saw it otherwise. And then wrote absolutely nothing interesting for her to do.

      Still, I like the idea of setting a series at Star Fleet Academy. There are a billion ways to do it wrong, and only a few to do it right, but there are some good opportunities there. Just like both Voyager and Enterprise had good opportunities that rotted behind unimaginative plotting, ratings-grabbing, and a failure to understand what Trek really is.

      So, sadly, as a Trek fan from before the proliferation, I gotta agree: let it rest.

  14. A Train Wreck, but... by Snap+E+Tom · · Score: 2, Funny

    I'm surprised Paramount turned this down. Sure, it'll be 90210 set in space, and it will be crap to Trekkies. However this is the exact type of teenage soap opera drama they run on UPN all the time.

  15. I'd like to see a "Star Trek" reality show by erroneus · · Score: 2, Funny

    I think it'd be hilarious. Let's get a bunch of Star Trek addicted weirdos together in a trailer home or something like that and watch them interact and stuff. I think it'd be utterly memorable and hilarious. And when they start speaking in Klingon, there could always be subtitles right?

  16. Romulan Ale. by MrJerryNormandinSir · · Score: 4, Funny

    Frat parties with green slave girls and rumulan ale.

  17. Shatner is copying Smallville by zymano · · Score: 3, Interesting

    All these new teen shows on the alternative networks are the big ratings getters because of 'teen girls'. Purely a niche play.

    I think he is putting money before the vision of Rodenberry.

    Maybe he will have a ton of models be the crew. Should get good ratings for a while until teen girls viewers get bored by scifi which takes about a year for these demographic shows.

    1. Re:Shatner is copying Smallville by jmcwork · · Score: 2, Funny

      Are you insinuating that someone would actually get tired of looking at teen girls? That is like saying "Logic is a wreath of pretty flowers which smell bad"

  18. Not a bad idea by PCM2 · · Score: 3, Interesting
    Why is everybody so quick to knock this idea? I'd say the main problem is that it doesn't make much sense to have Kirk, Spock, etc. all hanging out at Starfleet together. For one thing, presumably the universe was a much smaller place before the Enterprise's original five-year mission. For another, we all know Spock served with Christopher Pike before Kirk came on board, so what's to suggest that he and Kirk were old school buddies?

    Instead, why not do it with new characters? The only problem there is getting all the horrible "Next Generation" style moralizing out of it and keeping every character from being a different version of Wesley Crusher (jock Wesley, flirt Wesley, misunderstood loner Wesley, etc.) Hell, if you did it right, you could even bring back Wesley as an Academy instructor... why not?

    Not sure I'd actually watch such a show, mind you, but it certainly doesn't sound any worse than the crap that's been passing for Star Trek in recent years.

    --
    Breakfast served all day!
  19. SpaceBalls? by Emperor+Foo · · Score: 2, Funny

    Also, Shatner apparently went over the head of Trek head honcho Rick Berman to pitch his idea straight to the head of Paramount

    Dark Helmet: You went over my helmet!!!!!

  20. Official Statements by Ducati_749S · · Score: 3, Funny

    While top officials at Paramount were unavailable for comment at press time, William Shatner has released this official statement in regards to Paramount's dismissal of his show concept:
    "KHAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAN"

    --
    What about the twinkie? - Dr. Peter Venkman, PHD
  21. Pitch Man by scottennis · · Score: 2, Funny

    I heard that one of the futuristic features of the Starfleet Academy was that you could name your own price for tuition.

  22. Shatner wants MORE Trek? by Nastard · · Score: 5, Funny

    I can't get behind that.

  23. Academy good; Kirk, Spock bad by bsandersen · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Skip the Kirk/Spock tie-in and stick with the major premise:
    There are a number of coming-of-age shows on TV right now that are well accepted (if not well done). Hospital shows about young doctors in training, for example. So long as it is more like a military academy drama setting sans the militaristic feel, and not like "Police Academy", I think it could fly.

    -- Scott

  24. It's like Muppet Babies. by EarwigTC · · Score: 5, Funny

    It's like Muppet Babies. Only preachy and more farfetched.

    --
    Promote civility: mod down any post starting with 'ummm'.
  25. No no no no no!!!! by MagicDude · · Score: 5, Interesting

    Do NOT do a prequel to the TOS cast. If enterprise has taught us anything, it's that trying to write history to canon is full of pitfalls, and the nerds will never forgive even the smallest of errors. You'll also run into the problem that people had with enterprise in that the technology looked more advanced than TOS, simple because computer graphics were more advanced.

    Also, it's a bit of a stretch to presume that all the TOS cast would be at the academy together. Kirk and Spock maybe, but all the junior officers are much younger than Kirk, Spock, and Bones (McCoy would have been at starfleet medical anyway).

    An awesome show would be an academy show during the dominion war of an unknown group of cadets. So rather than being a futuristic "Saved by the Bell", you can follow these cadets in some of the extended duties they would have had to undertake during the war. We could even see how the attack on Starfleet Headquarters happened, since we only saw the aftermath in DS9.

  26. Getting Old... by fourlugas · · Score: 2, Interesting

    The only idea I would be at least interested to see is maybe a Romulan based show. As far as major races, they are one of the few that have not actually been explored extensively. You could still have the flavor of ST with meetings with Starfleet and all that but the other side of the story. Of course it doesn't have to be Romulan. Just any other storyline. How many ways can we depict how wonderfully perfect the Human race is (/sarcasm off)

  27. teen versions? by LordNimon · · Score: 2, Insightful
    The series would feature teen versions of the Classic Star Trek characters Kirk, Spock and McCoy, and be set at Starfleet Academy.

    Considering the vast age differences and career paths (before joining on the Enterprise) between Kirk, Spock, and McCoy, I seriously doubt they were in Starfleet Academy at the same time.

    Also, I would think that Starfleet Academy would be like other military academies, which means most of the student population would not be teenagers, but that's just a nit.

    I do believe, however, that this would make a great replacement show for Smallville, once that gets cancelled.

    --
    And the men who hold high places must be the ones who start
    To mold a new reality... closer to the heart
  28. I can see it now by The_Whole_Fn_Show · · Score: 2, Funny

    Must......study for.......midterm.

    KHAAAAAAAAAN!!!!!!

  29. Re:Tekwars - Read the article!!! by Lord+Haha · · Score: 2, Informative

    quote "Presumably, the Reeves-Stevenses are again co-writing these novels with Shatner."

    hum... interesting ain't it :)

  30. Cancelled Out! the ultimate reality show... by tyroneking · · Score: 2, Funny

    ...would see the casts of cancelled shows (both past and present) battling it out to win a new show with Paramount.
    Enterprise vs. TOS vs. B5 vs. etc; with a special bye for Futurama - naturally the whole thing would be rigged in favour of Futurama because we all know cartoons are so much better than real-actors.
    The end of each show would see a team eliminated and sent to a community theatre for a year to act out classic plays such as Death of a Salesman or classic TV series such as Magnum and Tour of Duty ... in some foreign US-hating country like Iraq or N Korea (US-hating Europe would be exempt but UK's Manchester would not because they have guns). The show would then spawn multiple spin-offs following the fortunes and hilarious misfortunes of the various expelled casts as they struggle with the lack lustre material, lazy stage hands, and random assasination squads. Yes, I did say random.
    As an added bonus each cast memeber who ever tried to resurrect their original TV show will be required to accompany the local US ambassador where ever s/he goes but without a bullet proof vest.
    It would be very funny and allow us to let go of cancelled TV shows that should be treated like sleeping dogs and stop old actors from trying to resurrect old TV shows.
    I say this having just recovered from the first Ep. of the new Dr Who (I knew Billy Piper liked older men but this is getting ricockulous).

  31. Re:Who is William Shatner? by JHromadka · · Score: 2, Informative

    Go watch Boston Legal sometime. Shatner rocks in it.

    --
    "The objective of securing the safety of Americans from crime and terror has been achieved." -- John Ashcroft
  32. I want to see it by goreking · · Score: 2, Funny

    O.K. I suck...but I want to see this show. Uhura in tight, booty-showing capri-pants. Nurse Chambers when she was just plain old Betty. Yum..

    --
    No...it's okay...I wasn't using my Civil Liberties anyway
  33. Let J. Michael Straczynski (B5) have a go by metoc · · Score: 4, Informative

    I personally think that J. Michael Straczynski should have a go, he pulled off B5 on a shoestring. See his comments here http://www.joeuser.com/Forums.aspx?ForumID=10&AID= 65211. Imagine what he could do with Paramounts financing and marketing muscle.

    Like wise I would like to see Jose Whedon thoughts and Quentin Tarantino's ideas. Even Jonathan Frakes has demonstrated enough talent as a director and producer with Roswell to put together a good team.

    1. Re:Let J. Michael Straczynski (B5) have a go by Hakubi_Washu · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Please don't let JMS have his way with Star Trek, B5 might have had an extremely loyal fan-base as well (I never belonged to it, for me the acting was bad and the story felt like it had been ripped from D&D's Manual of the Planes (Shadows vs. Old Ones, er, Grey Council), but that's not the point), but B5, simply put, is way more gritty, dirty and "Real Life" + "New Age" than ST ever was. JMS can obviously do quite successfull shows, with a lot of appeal for a large group of viewers, but his "style" doesn't fit into the ST-universe at all! Should he gain command of ST, then I'd know the franchise dead for good, at least for me. (And I think it's pretty much stinking by now, Voyager was utter crap and Enterprise had a nice pilot episode, which even includes the explanation of why all those time-line inconsistencies are ok to show up, if you use your brains once in while, but ultimately, it was plain boring and having T'Pol be the Sexbomb-of-the-series sure did its fair share towards that end...)

    2. Re:Let J. Michael Straczynski (B5) have a go by Nick+of+NSTime · · Score: 2, Funny

      Like wise I would like to see Jose Whedon thoughts

      Is that the Mexican non-union equivalent of Joss Whedon?

    3. Re:Let J. Michael Straczynski (B5) have a go by DunbarTheInept · · Score: 2, Insightful


      There was a reason B5 was cancelled... Ugh

      Yeah, and that reason was that it finished it's plotline. Now I realize that plotline was an alien concept in US sci-fi series until B5, and is again an alien concept afterward, but really, it can be a good thing, trust me.

      --

      Don't label something "offtopic" unless you know the topic well enough to tell what's on topic.

    4. Re:Let J. Michael Straczynski (B5) have a go by salesgeek · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Yeah, and that reason was that it finished it's plotline.

      Agreed. The plotline was the reason that you could watch B5 week after week. It made up for the occasional bad episode or cringe inducing incident. It also led to rabid fans who kept the show going an extra two years. The reason year 5 wasn't the best is that it was uncertain that there was to be a year 5 so JMS sped up the plotline in year 4 leading to... the last season being kind of weak.

      --
      -- $G
  34. Age differences by cfalcon · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Teen versions of McCoy and Kirk? Aren't their characters like, 20 years apart in age?

    Now, I don't know the details, but isn't Spock like, older than all of those (using the "every race is longer lived and better than humans" rule that applied to all sci-fi fantasy since forever, especially those with pointy ears)?

    Get around that crap, and the idea is actually pretty cool. Well, I think so. More tech gadgets, little to no combat, all people stories...

    Or maybe we'd just watch as the group bravely runs around to bars after school hours, attempting to bravely go where no man has gone before...

  35. You're thinking "New Shatner" by GuyMannDude · · Score: 5, Insightful

    I think Shatner is by far, by far, my favorite Trekker. He's got a sense of humor about himself and his work, yet he's not even remotely afraid to take chances.

    Really, I think that's a bit shortsighted. Shatner has only become that way in the last decade or so. Prior to that, he's tried to distance himself from the Trek fans as much as possible. Compared to how much he has benefited from Trek fandom, Shatner has given very little back. Contrast this with George Takei, Deforest Kelly, or Jimmy Doohan who have always been big supporters of Trek fandom. In a previous message, I talked about how Jimmy Doohan took it upon himself to use his fame to help a single fan back to health. Shatner would never do anything like this -- then or now. I'll admit that Shatner is likeable but that's been a recent thing. Read Takei's book sometime and listen to the shit that Shatner used to do. Shatner didn't even show up at Roddenberry's funeral, for chrissake!

    You're entitled to your opinion but I'm baffled how you can consider him a Trekker at all, let alone your favorite.

    GMD

    1. Re:You're thinking "New Shatner" by Monkelectric · · Score: 3, Insightful
      has given very little back

      Seriously, star trek actors dont owe anyone anything. Being famous is not that great, trust me. Everyone wants to tell you what they love you, that you suck, or bask in your reflected glory. It gets OLD. You just wanna be a normal person who can goto pizza hut without a love fest from pimply teenagers.

      About ~20 years ago I was (a kid) at the San Diego wild animal park. And Richard Pryor happened to be there. Everyone was nuts over him. He was in the gift shop looking at some mugs or something and everyone was running outside telling their friends to come gawk at richard pryor buying gifts. I felt so sorry for him and I was 8 at the time.

      --

      Religion is a gateway psychosis. -- Dave Foley

    2. Re:You're thinking "New Shatner" by Dachannien · · Score: 3, Informative

      Contrast this with George Takei, Deforest Kelly, or Jimmy Doohan who have always been big supporters of Trek fandom.

      Doohan refused to appear on Futurama reprising his role as Scotty, which is why he got replaced by the fake character Welshie.*

      On the other hand, Shatner was willing to poke fun at his own hubris:

      Nimoy: Melllvar, you have to respect your actors. When I was directing Star Trek IV, I got a magnificent performance out of Bill because I respected him so much.
      Shatner: And when I directed Star Trek V, I got a magnificent performance out of me, because I respected me so much!

      (* Site has anti-deep-linking measures in place - copy and paste link)

    3. Re:You're thinking "New Shatner" by DunbarTheInept · · Score: 2, Informative

      That's not a fair jibe because Doohan was in poor health.

      --

      Don't label something "offtopic" unless you know the topic well enough to tell what's on topic.

    4. Re:You're thinking "New Shatner" by MitchlBuckeye · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Except for: De Kelley was fairly successful at character work prior to Trek-- I believe I heard him say that he wasn't sure if he was typecast or not because he had not intended to go on working after Trek ended anyway.

  36. Re:Prequels are just plain HORRIBLE by Guppy06 · · Score: 3, Interesting

    "I could care less about what happened BEFORE"

    Who cares what you want, I wanna see the Earth-Romulus War already! I wanna see the humans take all their anti-Vulcan aggression out on the other green-blooded, pointy-ear bastards!

    In the episode where the Romulans were first introduced in TOS, they show a map of the Neutral Zone and it has Romulus on it, and yet Earth is nowhere on the map, as if the Neutral Zone is a whole lot closer to Romulus than it is to Earth. I wanna see that happen. :)

    "give me BORG again."

    God... why not ask for more Janeway while you're at it? The Borg were introduced as a whim to make a particular Q episode a little more interesting, and now the dead horse has been beaten for the better part of a decade. They can't even stay consistent for three seconds. How do you resolve the whole lustful Borg Queen with the way the Borg were originally portrayed, for example? They're supposed to be Daleks on legs, not the latest pin-up of the month!

  37. Tiny Toon Adventures! by Tackhead · · Score: 5, Funny
    > "They're tiny, they're toony,
    they're all a little loony"
    And Sunday afternoony,
    We're invading UPN!
    Rick Berman's adventures,
    Complying with the censors,
    With schedule misadventures,
    It's Starfleet Academy!

    So here's UPN, where crappy bling bling makes for art,
    Black sitcoms and reality shows - it's like FOX, but dark!
    We're spitting invective, the phasers are defective,
    The franchise isn't dead, Jim, but it's lost. it's. heart.

    (Kirk's toupee's from Wal-mart.)

    1. Re:Tiny Toon Adventures! by ColGraff · · Score: 2, Funny

      Thank you, man. That made my day.

      Incidentally - was it Animaniacs or Tiny Toons that introduced Pinky and the Brain? I'd think the Brain would make an acceptable Trek villain. Hell, look at "Nemesis" and "Insurrection" - compared to that tripe, he'd make a *superb* villain.

      --
      I'm the stranger...posting to /.
  38. Let It Go... by JohnPerkins · · Score: 2, Funny

    It's dead, Jim.

  39. Bah, just do a klingon ship and be done with it. by Telastyn · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Really. It'd be interesting to see a non-federation ship as the primary vessel. Better yet, make it a klingon mercenary ship to give them more plot oppertunities. Less goodie goodie prime directive, more honor.

  40. I like trek but... by Doverite · · Score: 3, Interesting

    Lets just let the whole thing be done and do something new. The problem with the trek universe is the TREK UNIVERSE every time someone tries to do something new it conflicts with the history or the prime directive or what someone thinks aught to be done. I say start fresh and different.

    --
    You can legislate morally you can't legislate morality
  41. "Kobayashi Maru" book did this very well. by sampson7 · · Score: 4, Interesting

    One of my favorite Star Trek books, called The Kobayashi Maru, involved several of the main characters re-telling stories of their academy days. It is really a compelling little book and extremely well written.

    Several of the stories focus on the Kobayashi Maru doomsday scenario that's referenced in one of the Star Trek movies, but several deal with other aspects of a Star Fleet Academy education.

    If Shatner had this type of material in in mind then the project might actually be worth while. Anyway, it's a great read for any Star Trek fan -- the author really captures each character's own nuances.

    Just remember, it can't be any worse than the first (and for me, last) episode of Enterprise.

  42. Denny Crane! by Grendel+Drago · · Score: 2, Funny

    "Now that, my friend, is a rabbit. Denny Crane."

    If I weren't already a human being, that show would make me want to go out and sign up for lawyering school.

    --grendel drago

    --
    Laws do not persuade just because they threaten. --Seneca
  43. Smallville better than Superman IMHO by N8F8 · · Score: 4, Interesting

    I used to hate Superman. I liked Batman and human superheros better. What kind of a turtured soul can you have when you can't even be hurt? How about being uncorrupted by ultimate power? No, Smallville gets it right. Internal conflict between a evil destiny and being raised with a apple pie morality. Good stuff. It also helps explain his relationship with Lex Luthor.

    --
    "God fights on the side with the best artillery." - Napoleon, Marshal of France - speaking truth to power
  44. Finally by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Funny

    maybe the show will finally explain how he got that speech im[sleep(3)][2x fast]pediment

  45. But wait, there's more by fm6 · · Score: 2, Insightful
    I share your lack of enthusiasm -- but then, I'm burned out by all things Trek. The concept is totally worn out, and deserves to be retired.

    That said, I can't rule out the possibility that Shatner's concept might result in something worth watching. I'm not a fan of teen angst shows, which is another genre that's been done to death. But all genres you see on TV -- cop shows, medical shows, workplace comedies, household comedies -- have been done to death. TV doesn't have the courage to try anything really new. But if you get the right combination of good writing and good acting, you can actually do something good with even the most cliched material. As every Buffy fan knows.

    Much as I'd like to see Star Trek just disappear and be replaced by something really original, I know that's not going to happen. Next best is to have Berman and his hack stories retired, replaced by somebody with some actual creativity. Which person is certainly not Joseph Michael Straczynski; aside from having too many names, he's even more of a cliche-monger than Berman.

    William Shatner might not seem any better, since his occasional attempts at writing have been truely pathetic. But at least he knows that he's a bad writer, and knows how to hire good ones. And he seems to have some sense where the Trek franchise has gone wrong -- more so than anybody else connected with it.

  46. Who's this "Kirk" guy people talk about? by sgant · · Score: 4, Funny

    Did Shatner play him or something in an obscure show and it's an "in" thing to bring it up? Kind of like bringing up Cat from Zero Wing?

    I mean, come on! Shatner will always be known for one character and one character only: Denny Crane!

    --

    "Leo Fender was in a 'state of grace' when he designed the Stratocaster." -- Paul Reed Smith
    1. Re:Who's this "Kirk" guy people talk about? by Gilmoure · · Score: 2, Funny

      "There was a monster on the wing!"

      "The same thing happened to me!"

      Dick Soloman (John Lithgow) and the Big Giant Head (Bill Shatner) comparing flights into Ohio.

      --
      I drank what? -- Socrates
  47. Not impossible, very very simple. by khasim · · Score: 3, Insightful

    The only issue is that it has to be story with a clear beginning and a clear end. Just like a novel.

    The problem is that Hollywood isn't interested in that format for TV. They want it episodic so there's always room to wiggle and try to squeeze more money out of it.

    Think of it as filming a movie, in 26 blocks.

    1. Re:Not impossible, very very simple. by NanoGator · · Score: 2, Funny

      "The problem is that Hollywood isn't interested in that format for TV. They want it episodic so there's always room to wiggle and try to squeeze more money out of it."

      Actually, no. The reason that Hollywood doesn't do that is that they want TV show audiences to grow. If episode 5 requires watching Episode 2 to understand, they've alienated new people to their audience. A novel-like beginning and end forces that scenario. Who'd want to catch it in the middle?

      --
      "Derp de derp."
  48. Off topic by Get+Behind+the+Mule · · Score: 3, Funny

    Just found this: An endless loop of Shatner shouting you-know-what.

    Just open it up in a separate window and let it play in the background all day long.

  49. Anyone seen Star Trek V lately? by MrMagooAZ · · Score: 3, Funny

    If Shatner's efforts at Star Trek V are any indication, he should stay far, far away from the creative process of any show.

    1. Re:Anyone seen Star Trek V lately? by NormAtHome · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Exactly, I sometimes wonder if he's ever actually seen the whole original series. Some of the things that happened in that movie were so out of character (for the characters) that at the point where Kirk orders Spock to shoot / kill Sybok that I wished I had walked out. He doesn't seem to have any real feel for the characters, not even his own.

      Star Trek as a TV series has just about exhaused all possibilites and just needs to take a break. I've actually been afraid of where Star Trek has been going, since I believe that had Enterprise run it's full course with halfway decent ratings that next we would have had a recast Star Trek The Original Series... which would have bombed since as Paramount and Berman have learned you just can't rewrite history and expect the fans to support you.

  50. I am not a Starfleet Commander... by sbowles · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Here is Shatner's monologue from the Just for Laughs festival in 2000. It is a parody of a famous Canadian beer commercial.

    --
    You sly dog: you got me monologuing! - Syndrome
  51. Re:Prequels are just plain HORRIBLE by AKAImBatman · · Score: 2, Informative

    The Borg were introduced as a whim to make a particular Q episode a little more interesting

    Actually, no. The Borg were supposed to be the end-of-season villian for ST:TNG season 2. If you remember the (second to last?) episode of that season, the Enterprise and the Romulan were investigating planets along the Neutral Zone that had been destroyed. The last episode was supposed to be Best of Both Worlds, but the show ran out of money. As a result, we got that stupid flashback episode instead and BoBW waited until the end of Season 3.

    What I really want to know is, what happened to the little bugs-in-the-ear from the Season 1 finale?

  52. Branding doesn't mean anything to story by Gondola · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Star Trek is a very large body of work encompassing many years, many cultures, and many interesting locales. Like Stargate, it's a framework that allows a writer to do whatever he wants.

    Personally, I think the Star Trek still has a lot of potential left in it, but it's the writers, the actors, the directors, and the producers of any given project who will determine whether a new franchise is worth anything.

    Sometimes that mixture has to age a bit before it matures enough for all of those ingredients to start working together. Star Trek TNG was embarrasingly overacted and rough in its first few episodes, perhaps even the first season or two -- but it eventually grew to be a favorite of mine. Enterprise was decent entertainment, and was getting better. I didn't like Kate Mulgrew, so I couldn't enjoy V-ger. DS9 was too political for me, but from all accounts it also matured with age and became something worth watching. However, the Trek movies are an exercise in nostalgia and CGI, and I despise them for their cheap tricks and bland plots. Although I really didn't care for the TOS-cast movies when they came out, they at least had character and substantial plot. The TNG-cast movies just seem to be blah excuses for a lot of CGI and routine plots.

    I think a Starfleet Academy could be a great series if done well. It all depends on how the casting, writing, directing, etc work out. I don't think it's a good idea to feature the big characters from ST:TOS, however. Perhaps their younger selves, maybe even via CGI, can be featured in cameos or whatnot. If they went back and tried to put Kirk and Spock as major characters in a new series, it would be an exercise in nostalgic masturbation.

  53. You forgot Walter Koenig as Bester on B5 by Thag · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Walter Koenig did a bangup job as Bester on Babylon 5. Completely convincing, completely unlike Chekov.

    Jon Acheson

    --
    All opinions expressed herein are my own, and not those of my employers, who are appalled.
  54. What ever happened to... by werewolf1031 · · Score: 2, Interesting

    ...anthalogy series? In spite of the bastardization that Berman has made out of the Trek universe in recent years, I've always thought that the vast number of races and cultures touched upon during the TNG and DS9 years was enough "canon" fodder to last a lifetime of story-telling. So... Why not an anthology series, where the characters are never the same twice. (Think Twilight Zone or Outer Limits, only in Trek-space.) Each episode would tell a small story set somewhere -- hell, ANYwhere -- in the Trek universe, even at different time periods. The four-years war with the Romulans; the humanoid-possessing insectoids from the "Conspiracy" TNG episode (unfinished story!); what *really* happened to Guinen's race when the Borg attacked, and how'd she escape death/assimilation; hell, the potential war stories that could be told about the Cardassian occupation of Bajor are in themselves limitless -- think WWII mini-epics (Bajoran Dirty Dozen?? :) I've always believed that there are far too many rich ideas in Trek to focus on just one ship or crew. Time to let the idea floodgates open...