Slashdot Mirror


Microsoft Drops Blaster Author's Fine

bevo noted that Microsoft has dropped their fine against the author of the Blaster worm that DDoS'd Microsoft's web sites and hijaacked 50,000 computers. 225 hours instead of a 500k fine. $2200/hour seems like a good deal to me ;)

312 comments

  1. Could've been worse by fembots · · Score: 5, Funny

    Luckily the community service cannot involve computers, otherwise this guy will get away lightly by cleaning up roughly 50 spyware/virus-infected Windows machines to clock up 225 hours.

    1. Re:Could've been worse by ZephyrXero · · Score: 3, Funny

      In Bill Gate's eyes, 225 hours of service worth alot more than $500,000...that's pocket change ;)

      --
      "A truly wise man realizes he knows nothing."
    2. Re:Could've been worse by mankey+wanker · · Score: 2, Informative

      Try cleaning a 7 year old Win98 machine.

      A windows machine that is also a weak hardware performer can take hours to clean. A lot of the processes can be automated, but it depends on how you bill your hours. So hours and hours of constant attention to clean a machine, not probably - but automated processes can still take a lot of time. And some system infections are really a pain in the ass and do require hours and hours. Just count yourself luck if you don't deal with those kinds of machines with any regularity.

      Now, a properly administrated machine should take mere minutes to recover from a good backup and backup protocol. That I agree with.

    3. Re:Could've been worse by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      OT, but I never understood why people with these slow ass computer pay someone $60 an hour to fix their computer when they can buy a new Dell computer for $300. It might be a crap-of-the-line system, but it's a hell of a lot better than a 5 year old spyware infected zombie.

    4. Re:Could've been worse by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Informative

      It's been said Bill Gates makes over $1,000 every ten seconds. So it's more like $81 million for 225 hours.

    5. Re:Could've been worse by Ced_Ex · · Score: 3, Interesting

      Not all new computers are "fully backwards compatible" with the POS that they currently use.

      For instance, they have a network of computers here that are still using FoxPro for DOS and some other old old DOS programs. Replacing the slow ass computer with a fast one presents a whole wack of problems that include the fast computer not being able to slow down to stay in sync with the other POSs.

      So if you count all the support and maintenance to tie the new with the old, it's actually cheaper to spend the dough to rebuild the old crap.

      I only wish life was that simple.

      --
      Live forever, or die trying.
    6. Re:Could've been worse by spagetti_code · · Score: 4, Insightful
      MS would never have seen a bean of that money. First there's the jail time. Then you've got an unemployed teenager with a criminal record and no tertiary education who will, if he finds someone to employ him, probably make minimum wage.

      It certainly is a PR move. Remember, almost everything MS does is a PR move because they are now first and foremost a great marketing company.

      So its a good move on their behalf - chase some loser for 500K and never see a bean, or offer 'foregiveness' out of the bottom of their hearts.

    7. Re:Could've been worse by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It's easy, overwrite the HDD with Debian

    8. Re:Could've been worse by aichpvee · · Score: 1
      --
      The Farewell Tour II
    9. Re:Could've been worse by kuzb · · Score: 1

      What all of you are so elegantly missing is that you don't work on one at a time. I don't know what shop you all worked for, but at ours, we'd do them 10 or 20 at a time, and you use switchboxes so you can have one keyboard, one mouse and one monitor.

      So yes, if it takes you 225 hours to do 50 machines, you're pretty useless, because it means you're thinking linearly instead of multitasking like any real professional would.

      --
      BeauHD. Worst editor since kdawson.
    10. Re:Could've been worse by Frumious+Wombat · · Score: 1

      As a Unix admin at the time this attack happened, but with Windows users who came to me rather than trust the computer center I can say:

      I'd rather they reduced his punishment to writing a personal letter of apology to each and every user who was infected, and then submit to three swift kicks by steel-toed boot wearing sysadmins (* per admin *) who had to deal with their friends/family/users being infected. Heck, for that, i'd even let him leave prison after the 50,000 letters were done.

      --
      the more accurate the calculations became, the more the concepts tended to vanish into thin air. R. S. Mulliken
    11. Re:Could've been worse by drsmithy · · Score: 1
      Now, a properly administrated machine should take mere minutes to recover from a good backup and backup protocol. That I agree with.

      A "properly administrated" machine should never get "infected" in the first place.

    12. Re:Could've been worse by mankey+wanker · · Score: 1

      Nothing stops the ignorant user from doing all kinds of mischief. All it takes is one bozo that breaks with safe computer use protocols and you have crap running 24/7.

      Hell, I know one place where they let kids operate business machines as a temporary babysitter. Yeah, like some idiot kid isn't going to do all kinds of nasty stuff to a smooth running computer.

    13. Re:Could've been worse by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It certainly is a PR move. Remember, almost everything MS does is a PR move because they are now first and foremost a great marketing company.

      But they could go the "Dark Side" PR way and mercilessly screw him over for the rest of his life. That'd be equally strong "don't f**k with us script kiddies" PR.

    14. Re:Could've been worse by dangitman · · Score: 1
      otherwise this guy will get away lightly by cleaning up roughly 50 spyware/virus-infected Windows machines to clock up 225 hours.

      You call that light work?

      --
      ... and then they built the supercollider.
  2. A "Get Out of Jail Free" card! by plover · · Score: 5, Funny
    From the article:

    U.S. District Judge Marsha Pechman said the sentence reflected that although he was 18 at the time of the attack, his maturity level was much younger than that. She also said his home life contributed to the problem.

    Damn, that precedent means virtually everyone here on /. is immune from prosecution. For anything. Especially since "mom's basement" probably qualifies as a "home life".

    --
    John
    1. Re:A "Get Out of Jail Free" card! by poopdeville · · Score: 1, Insightful

      Uh, not really. TFA said that he was sentenced to 18 months in prison and 10 hours of community service.

      --
      After all, I am strangely colored.
    2. Re:A "Get Out of Jail Free" card! by plover · · Score: 4, Funny
      Shit, do I actually have to type the damn smileys in here for you people?

      Here: :-)

      That means "it was a JOKE."

      --
      John
    3. Re:A "Get Out of Jail Free" card! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 4, Funny
      Here: :-)

      That means "it was a JOKE."

      Here: ^$/

      That means "no it wasn't!"

    4. Re:A "Get Out of Jail Free" card! by northcat · · Score: 4, Informative

      This was "Tee kid". This guy didn't write the original Blaster worm that "wreaked havoc". He took the original one, modified it and spreaded it. IIRC, he got caught by leaving references to his nick of various sites "Tee kid" and leaving the URL to his website in the worm (I can't remember well). This guy was really stupid.

    5. Re:A "Get Out of Jail Free" card! by plover · · Score: 1, Informative

      Oh, to have mod points! That was funny!

      --
      John
    6. Re:A "Get Out of Jail Free" card! by Locke2005 · · Score: 1

      Speak for yourself. I moved out of my mom's basement when I was 17... 27 years ago.

      --
      I've abandoned my search for truth; now I'm just looking for some useful delusions.
    7. Re:A "Get Out of Jail Free" card! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      Aah, progress.

      his maturity level was much younger than that

      So now in the US, being an immature idiot is a valid defence? Damn my education is just getting in the way...

    8. Re:A "Get Out of Jail Free" card! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      His home life?

      Such BS - here we go again with the liberal 'his childhood was bad'.

      So what - he still is responsible for his actions. I am SOOOOO sick and tired of people coming up with excuses for things they've done. People act like right and wrong is some massive gray area. I call 'bullshit' - 99% of the time you KNOW what's right and what's wrong - these people just figure out some way to make it 'ok' in their head to do the wrong thing - and you little whiners making excuses for him are just enabling more people to do the same thing. Are we suppose to belive the thought it'd be ok to fool around and send out a new virus variant? Sort of like starting a new version of a fire in a building? What's the differece? Zero in the mind.

      Period. End of Story. 18 months isn't long enough. People don't seem to understand just how much these a-holes are costing us in time & bandwidth.

    9. Re:A "Get Out of Jail Free" card! by Sj0 · · Score: 1

      ...here we go again with the liberal...

      Do you feel it's wrong to use this opportunity to attack on of two viewpoints? I'd say that it's immoral to once again dilute the meaning of a word -- "his childhood was bad" has probably been an excuse longer than you or I been alive. It may be a cop-out, but it's hardly a liberal one.

      --
      It's been a long time.
    10. Re:A "Get Out of Jail Free" card! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      That's why he should'nt be jailed or sentenced. He showed in na apropriate way that M$ has an issue with IE/Outlook and M$ is the one that should pay!

      someone realy evil could done much more dammage, not only to M$!

  3. $2200/Hr a good deal? by AddressException · · Score: 1

    Depends on what the community service involves!

    1. Re:$2200/Hr a good deal? by oddsends · · Score: 2, Funny

      Thats not such a great TCO

    2. Re:$2200/Hr a good deal? by Gr33nNight · · Score: 1

      From personal experience, probably working at a YMCA. Its good service, teaching little kids how to play baseball, football, and other sports. It is also alot of fun.

      /offtopic

    3. Re:$2200/Hr a good deal? by soft_guy · · Score: 0

      Unless it actually kills you or physically poisons you to the point where you life is shortened a lot, it is a good deal.

      I could hire an actress for a snuff film for less than $2200/hr.

      --
      Avoid Missing Ball for High Score
    4. Re:$2200/Hr a good deal? by saintp · · Score: 4, Funny

      Um, I don't think you have to pay them. At all.

    5. Re:$2200/Hr a good deal? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Yeah, the community service I got stuck with was sticking towels in a dryer at the YMCA. The people there were pretty cool - the guy who ran their whole community service program at this YMCA started working there after he did community service there. It wasn't quite as fun as the thing that got me there in the first place, but it wasn't a horrible way to spend my evenings for few weeks either.

    6. Re:$2200/Hr a good deal? by The+Ultimate+Fartkno · · Score: 2, Funny

      Oh, you still have to pay them. It's just that after it's all over you can easily get your money back.

      Uh oh... I just described GTA.

      RUN! IT'S THE GOVERNMENT!!

    7. Re:$2200/Hr a good deal? by AceCaseOR · · Score: 1

      Just make sure they're not positive for HIV and the blood spray doesn't get in your eyes.

      --
      Zagreus sits inside your head, Zagreus lives among the dead, Zagreus sees you in your bed and eats you in your sleep.
    8. Re:$2200/Hr a good deal? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Speak for yourself. That sounds like my idea of living hell.

    9. Re:$2200/Hr a good deal? by Paleomacus · · Score: 3, Funny

      I could hire an actress for a snuff film for less than $2200/hr.

      Ok...I've admittedly led a somewhat sheltered suburban life but, how in God's name do you know this?

    10. Re:$2200/Hr a good deal? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

      I saw that episode of CSI too

    11. Re:$2200/Hr a good deal? by nsasch · · Score: 1

      This is slashdot what girl would settle for less than $2200/hr to undress for a /.er?

      --
      Make your computer faster: rm -rf /mnt/windows/
    12. Re:$2200/Hr a good deal? by cornjchob · · Score: 1

      Uh oh... I just described GTA.

      RUN! IT'S THE GOVERNMENT!!


      Government? You mean Hilary? Why should we run, what's she gonna do? Let us cheat on her to death?

      --
      We now have confirmed reports from an informed Orange County minister that Ethel is still an active communist.
    13. Re:$2200/Hr a good deal? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      CEO of Microsoft?

  4. Clemency by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    So MS has been given judicial powers to grant clemency now? What is this world coing to?

    1. Re:Clemency by Shalda · · Score: 4, Informative

      RTFA. Parsons was to have paid the $500,000 as restitution to Microsoft because the worm launched a rather feeble DDOS attack on Microsoft's websites. As such, Microsoft has the authority to waive that, or to make arrangements. Also, with no job, assets, or future, Parsons would have had no means to make the restitution payment, and would likely have had it dismissed in bankruptcy proceedings. Microsoft would never have seen a dime. Instead, Microsoft gets to look charitable and magnanimous while the kid gets to avoid bankruptcy. Sounds like a win-win deal to me.

    2. Re:Clemency by ad0gg · · Score: 1

      Not to mention community service will help out the community instead of putting money into Microsoft's wallet.

      --

      Have you ever been to a turkish prison?

  5. Overlords by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

    I, for one welcome our new $2200/h overlords...

    1. Re:Overlords by ZSpade · · Score: 1

      *Streeeetch

      --
      Go ahead and call me unreliable; reliable is just a synonym for predictable.
    2. Re:Overlords by ZSpade · · Score: 1

      Gads! The parent comment has disappeared! This must be the work the the Slashdot overlords, whom I gladly welcome.

      --
      Go ahead and call me unreliable; reliable is just a synonym for predictable.
  6. If only... by Enjoi · · Score: 0

    .. that had been me. I'd damage microsoft like that for only 225 hours. 225 hours is nothing, I'd do it all at once and get it over with in a few weeks.

  7. Drops the fine? by nolife · · Score: 4, Interesting

    How can MS "fine" someone? Are they really that close to the government now that they can hand out their own judgement and punishment?

    --
    Bad boys rape our young girls but Violet gives willingly.
    1. Re:Drops the fine? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      Are they really that close to the government
      You mean Microsoft ISN'T the government? What ever happened to that MSUSA merger?
    2. Re:Drops the fine? by Uptown+Joe · · Score: 1

      It's called a software license.

    3. Re:Drops the fine? by Eradicator2k3 · · Score: 5, Insightful

      That was *probably* a poor word choice. I would imagine that the $500K "fine" actually was damages awarded to MS. MS does have the option to recommend that the court replace the awarded damages (of which they would only see a fraction) with community service. IANAL, however and this is mere speculation on my part.

      --
      Mr. T pitied this fool on 27 July 1992.
    4. Re:Drops the fine? by Hollins · · Score: 2, Insightful

      If you look at the power wielded by the BSA, of which Microsoft seems the biggest beneficiary, it's clear that for all practical purposes, Microsoft is the government.

    5. Re:Drops the fine? by Fjornir · · Score: 5, Informative

      MS didn't fine the kid, the court ordered him to pay 500k in restition. MS offered to let the kid sweat it off instead of paying cash. This is just a typical shitty slashdot writeup.

      --
      I want a new world. I think this one is broken.
    6. Re:Drops the fine? by pilgrim23 · · Score: 1

      You mean...the Dancing Monkey Boy...ISN'T President???

      --
      - Minutus cantorum, minutus balorum, minutus carborata descendum pantorum.
    7. Re:Drops the fine? by That's+Unpossible! · · Score: 1

      Ummm, what power does the BSA wield? I'm talking about real power, not just what is in their own heads and PR?

      --
      Ironically, the word ironically is often used incorrectly.
    8. Re:Drops the fine? by OECD · · Score: 1

      This is just a typical shitty slashdot writeup.

      Worse than typical: "225 hours instead of a 500k fine." Subject? Verb? Anyone? Bueller?

      --
      One man's -1 Flamebait is another man's +5 Funny.
    9. Re:Drops the fine? by tomhudson · · Score: 4, Insightful
      Ok stupid, if you had a brain you'd realize this was damaged awarded to MS due to downtime and such.
      So the kid should have included an MS-style EULA with his worm variant, and his liability would have been limited to the lesser of $5 or the price paid for the software ($0).

      What's good for the goose is good for the gander - when is Microsoft going to pay for all the downtime their crap causes?

    10. Re:Drops the fine? by Hollins · · Score: 4, Interesting

      Based on anonymous tips, typically from disgruntled employees, the BSA can force a company to allow the BSA to perform an on-site software audit on behalf of its members. Audits usually result in the BSA demanding large payments for unlicensed software, plus penalties. Companies have found that losing receipts, packaging, etc. is no defense.

      These tactics are firmly established in a number of court precedents, to such an extent that fighting the BSA in court is usually futile and only adds expense.

      Even if a company is diligent in paying for software licenses, the cost of compiling documentation and escorting auditors can be expensive.

      About once a year here in Chicago, the BSA runs radio ads against software piracy, along with encouragements to employees to call their anonymous tip line.

      Now it may be completely ethical and legitimate for the BSA to act in this way, but it basically affords them governmental enforcement authority.

    11. Re:Drops the fine? by fm6 · · Score: 1

      Slashdot only copied a shitty headline.

    12. Re:Drops the fine? by vwjeff · · Score: 1

      "...when is Microsoft going to pay for all the downtime their crap causes?"

      Does my job count? I don't work for Microsoft but must support Windows as well as OSX.

      All I can say is that if Windows was as stable as OSX, I may not have a job.

    13. Re:Drops the fine? by serutan · · Score: 1

      How can MS "fine" someone ... blah blah ... hand out their own judgement and punishment?

      The article clearly explains what's going on. If you moderate, please ask yourself if you really believe the poster RTFA.

    14. Re:Drops the fine? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      What's good for the goose is good for the gander - when is Microsoft going to pay for all the downtime their crap causes?

      When are administrators going to patch their machines?

    15. Re:Drops the fine? by ShinmaWa · · Score: 1

      Wasn't just slashdot. The article itself was worded pretty shitty:

      Microsoft has granted clemency to the 19 year-old author of the Blaster worm. Rather than pay $500,000 in restitution, the youth will be sentenced to 225 hours of community service, which may not involve computers.

      That gives the strong impression that Microsoft has the power of clemency and sentencing authority.

      --
      The /. Effect: Thousands of users simultaneously accessing a site to not read its content.
    16. Re:Drops the fine? by nolife · · Score: 1

      The headline was clearly misleading and quite honestly, the whole article is garbage.

      Here is the first paragraph:

      Microsoft has granted clemency to the 19 year-old author of the Blaster worm. Rather than pay $500,000 in restitution, the youth will be sentenced to 225 hours of community service, which may not involve computers.

      Nothing in that article implies anything but MS made this decision themselves. You see anything about a judge, a court? Anything from the judicial branch of our government at all in there? See the big Microsoft granted, I see nothing of a judge or court at all. Is this the clearly part you are refering too?

      Then the last two paragraphs that are not related to this specific "fine" dropping and only references something that already happened last year.

      Jeffrey Lee Parson, of Minnesota, was sentenced this year to 18 months in prison and 10 hours of community service. The defense argued that Parson suffered from mental-health problems.

      U.S. District Judge Marsha Pechman said the sentence reflected that although he was 18 at the time of the attack, his maturity level was much younger than that. She also said his home life contributed to the problem.


      Judge and court are involved in there. The article is garbage and it is not clear at all.

      --
      Bad boys rape our young girls but Violet gives willingly.
    17. Re:Drops the fine? by tomhudson · · Score: 1
      All I can say is that if Windows was as stable as OSX, I may not have a job.
      ... or you could be working on more interesting stuff that would have a better pay-back, so the company would make more money and the bosses would realize your true value and pay you more ... :-)
    18. Re:Drops the fine? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Your rebuttal makes no sense at all. Who had the downtime that MS was awarded for because of the Blaster worm? MS or the people using their software. So MS software has a hole, someone expliots it and millions of users and business using the software are SOL, the court awards MS $500K in damages? I think there is much more to it then that.

    19. Re:Drops the fine? by tomhudson · · Score: 2, Funny
      When are administrators going to patch their machines?
      - probably whenever a new distro comes out that looks interesting. Oh, you meant Windows "administrators". Sorry. Here's your 10-step plan.

      Instructions for "Windows Administrators"

      If you really MUST continue to administer Windows boxen, why not make your life a little easier with these simple steps:
      1. AutoPatcher is your friend. (autopatcher.com)
      2. Remove outlook, outlook express, and the whole Microsoft Office suite.
      3. Hide the Internet Exploder icon.
      4. Install Firefox, OpenOffice.
      5. Replace the Firefox icon with the Exploder icon
      6. Get everyone to use a centrally-administered web-mail client.
      7. Remove all floppies, cd-rom and dvd drives, etc.
      8. Force everyone to save their data to a central location, backed up every night. Re-image their drives automatically overnight so any spyware, adware, viruses, etc., that they installed yesterday are simply gone, baby, gone.
      9. For really recalcitrant cases, re-install the cd-rom INSIDE the case (so they can't open the drive door) and set their machine to boot from cd-rom, then leave a bootable linux distro in the drive
      10. Use your new-found free spare time for constructive tasks, like surfing slashdot.
    20. Re:Drops the fine? by Tongo · · Score: 1

      Okay, this is just crap I've read on the internet, but I thought that if these guys came to your door you could just tell them to go get a search warrant and come back. The only people you have to let accross your doorstep is a cop with a warrant, isn't it?

    21. Re:Drops the fine? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      They'll return. Not with a search warrant, but with a subpoena. Either way, the burden of proof is on you to show that all the software being used is licensed.

    22. Re:Drops the fine? by Tongo · · Score: 1

      Well, again, this is just stuff I've heard and read, but doesn't a DA have to show some level of proof that a crime has been commited in order to get a judgeto sign off on a subpoena?

      Basically they have to have some sort of proof, wether circumstantial or not, that you are using pirated/non-licensed software.

    23. Re:Drops the fine? by alba7 · · Score: 1
      7. Remove all floppies, cd-rom and dvd drives, etc.
      In the age of USB memory sticks this point is futile.
      --
      Post tenebras lux. Post fenestras tux.
    24. Re:Drops the fine? by serutan · · Score: 1

      Re-reading the article I see that you are absolutely right. Apologies for dissing you. It was a crappily written article.

    25. Re:Drops the fine? by techfury90 · · Score: 0

      Disable the USB ports from the BIOS like some machines let you do. Or remove the drivers for the USB controllers. Of course there's the "what if they use a USB keyboard and/or mouse" problem. Maybe you could remove just the usb mass storage driver or something. Though a friend said in the group policy you CAN disable the ability to use usb flash drives. Could be wrong though.

      --
      I'm friends with the youngest daughter of the former head of the PowerPC division of IBM you insensitive clod!
    26. Re:Drops the fine? by tomhudson · · Score: 1

      Remove usb drivers, insert scrfew drive in rear usb ports and twist around, remove wires from usb usb connectors to front panel (you can reconnect them if/when needed, but the end user won't have a clue - that's why they're called end-users)...

    27. Re:Drops the fine? by Math,+The+Ancient · · Score: 1

      "Windows boxen"

      You realize this makes your grammar at my 5 year old's level?

      "6. Get everyone..."
      "8. Force everyone... "

      Tell your CEO/President this and see how long you're employed as they see you as the expert and expect you to be competent enough to handle the job. Obviously, you are not.

      --
      If I really am talking out of my ass...explain it to me with respect so I'll at least pull my ears out to listen.
    28. Re:Drops the fine? by Darkangael · · Score: 0

      Which brings to mind the questions "How come Microsoft are the ones receiving damages when the rest of the world gets diddly squat?" and "Why was he not fined?"

    29. Re:Drops the fine? by tomhudson · · Score: 1
      Tell your CEO/President this and see how long you're employed as they see you as the expert and expect you to be competent enough to handle the job. Obviously, you are not.
      He's a former Apple convert ... he absolutely HATES Windows. We use mostly linux, and he's a BIG fan of the os, and open source in general.
      You realize this makes your grammar at my 5 year old's level?
      ... well, my advice *was* aimed at "Windows ... Administrators".
    30. Re:Drops the fine? by Math,+The+Ancient · · Score: 1

      "He's a former Apple convert ... he absolutely HATES Windows"

      Hmmm, you're right. If my CEO went to Apple, I would lose faith in the company's competence level and look for another job. :)

      ".. well, my advice *was* aimed at "Windows ... Administrators"."

      And so that would put you at age 1 then? You used the word, not me.

      --
      If I really am talking out of my ass...explain it to me with respect so I'll at least pull my ears out to listen.
    31. Re:Drops the fine? by tomhudson · · Score: 1
      Hmmm, you're right. If my CEO went to Apple, I would lose faith in the company's competence level and look for another job. :)
      ... gawd ... just the thought of a technically knowledgeable/competent CEO is scary ... :-)
      And so that would put you at age 1 then? You used the word, not me.
      ... man, there are some days I wish I were. To get a second round, knowing what I know now ... then again, it would all be obsolete by the time I was ready to use it. And having to go through puberty again (and having to wait for it to even hit, knowing what I'd be missing out on ...) ... damn, there's always a catch.
  8. Microsoft, the good guy by bonch · · Score: 0, Troll

    Microsoft comes out looking like a good guy who brought this person to justice. Most of the media ignores that a large part of the fault lies with Microsoft Windows...and Microsoft appreciates that very much.

    1. Re:Microsoft, the good guy by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Baloney. You currently can't stop worms, no matter what the OS is. You can DDOS Linux with a worm too. Worms are just programs.

      Now maybe if Microsoft gets the trusted computing platform up and running you will be able to stop them by not allowing unsigned code to run - but I'll bet you don't like TPM so I guess M$ is screwed in your eyes anyway.

    2. Re:Microsoft, the good guy by bonch · · Score: 1, Troll

      You can't stop worms and trojans. But why should your operating system take those extra steps to be helpful to script kiddies by having insecure ports open and a vulnerable RPC protocol? Hackers love Microsoft Windows.

    3. Re:Microsoft, the good guy by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      My operating system doesn't need a "Trusted Computing Platform" grafted onto it where I have to permit what runs and what doesn't. My OS is already secure enough to not need it.

      Congratulations on falling for Microsoft's bogus marketing. Trusted Computing will be hacked. Just wait and see.

    4. Re:Microsoft, the good guy by InfiniteWisdom · · Score: 4, Insightful

      I'm glad you think that way. Tell me where you live and break in to your home. Its your fault for have breakable glass windows or whatever other vulnerability I exploit to get in, so I shouldn't be punished if I get caught.

    5. Re:Microsoft, the good guy by Eberlin · · Score: 1

      There's something to this -- if MS were to receive some form of compensation, wouldn't there be some backlash from those that were hit by this guy's Blaster variant? Perhaps even some sort of implied responsibility on Microsoft's part (EULA be damned)?

      Then again, I'm sure this was something that was already fixed and the truly vulnerable ones were those that hadn't patched (some with valid reasons nonetheless).

      Just saying that it's possible that if MS took money for this, others may start looking to MS to pay for THEIR damages.

    6. Re:Microsoft, the good guy by stlhawkeye · · Score: 1
      Most of the media ignores that a large part of the fault lies with Microsoft Windows...and Microsoft appreciates that very much.

      YM
      Most of the media doesn't realize that a large part of the fault lies with Microsoft Windows...and Microsoft does nothing to disabuse them of that ignorance.
      HTH!

      --
      "I have never won a debate with an ignorant person." -Ali ibn Abi Talib
    7. Re:Microsoft, the good guy by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Not the same thing at all.

      Suppose I sell Door XP, which is an Entryway Operating System designed to allow easy access in and out of your house. I sell it and claim that is will automatically identify you and only allow you and people you explicitly allow access through the Door XP.

      Well, due to a slight design flaw, it turns out that anyone who waves a red flag at the door can get it to open. There's a fix available, somewhere, that you can install to correct this, but it's on Page 48 of the Updated Manual that you need to go to my store to read.

      So, someone comes to your house, waves the red flag, and steals all your stuff. Should you be punished for using the faulty Door XP? No, of course not.

      However, as the salesperson who gave you Door XP and told you that it was secure, I should be in trouble. In fact, in the real world, I would be in a lot of trouble for selling a security product that just doesn't work.

      But Microsoft and other software manufactorers get off without anything for creating broken products. C'est la vie.

    8. Re:Microsoft, the good guy by InfiniteWisdom · · Score: 1

      Why do people keep making this ridiculous argument? If I leave the door to my home unlocked, it may be stupid of me, but that doesn't make anyone who comes in and steals stuff any less of a criminal. If walk around a bad neighborhood with a wad of cash in my hand and get mugged, that makes me an idiot, but anyone who mugs me is still a criminal.

      You might be able to protect yourself better by using non-MS software, but that does not mitigate the actions of the criminals who create destructive worms and viruses in any way.

    9. Re:Microsoft, the good guy by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I'm being modbombed by pro-Microsoft trolls.

      For once you're right. They had no reason to mod you down here. Your IP politics, however...well, that's another story.

    10. Re:Microsoft, the good guy by Smidge204 · · Score: 4, Interesting

      A better analogy would be if I made locks which, because of poor design choices, could all be easily opened with a screwdriver.

      Then somebody breaks into 50,000 houses because they all used my inadequate locks.

      The only fault of the homeowner would be trusting my product too much... but you can't really blame them for that either, since a lock manufacturer should know a thing to two about security!
      =Smidge=

    11. Re:Microsoft, the good guy by InfiniteWisdom · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Show me where Microsoft makes the claim that their software is impregnable

    12. Re:Microsoft, the good guy by Lehk228 · · Score: 1

      but if door95, door98, doorME were all well known as pieces of shit then there is some fault with the person buying doorXP

      --
      Snowden and Manning are heroes.
    13. Re:Microsoft, the good guy by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

      Install it and watch it say "More Secure!"

      Come to think about it, every version of Windows since Windows 98 has said that during the install.

    14. Re:Microsoft, the good guy by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      In other words, if you disagree with the majority, your voice will be silenced.

      Begone, heretic bonch.

    15. Re:Microsoft, the good guy by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yes, but Door XP is based on the Door NT line of doors, and claims to be much more secure and robust than Door ME was.

    16. Re:Microsoft, the good guy by InfiniteWisdom · · Score: 1

      You're stupider than I thought. If you're wearing a bulletproof vest and kevlar helmet on a battle field you're more secure than if you're not. That doesn't mean you're invulnerable and should go stand in front of the main gun of a tank.

    17. Re:Microsoft, the good guy by stlhawkeye · · Score: 1
      Oh I agree you completely.

      My point was more that the media's error here isn't an act of malicious omission so much as technical ignorance. In my opinion, anyway.

      That's one topic. It has nothing to do with whether or not people are responsible for the security of their own machines.

      --
      "I have never won a debate with an ignorant person." -Ali ibn Abi Talib
    18. Re:Microsoft, the good guy by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Mmmm hmmm. Good argument there. You lost me for a sec though. Are you saying running Windows on the Internet is the same as standing in front of the main gun of a tank?

      Though possibly true, should it really be that way?

    19. Re:Microsoft, the good guy by InfiniteWisdom · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Quite possibly. I'm not defending Microsoft. I'm arguing that just because Microsoft's software is buggy doesn't make mean that people who explot those bugs are any less culpable.

    20. Re:Microsoft, the good guy by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful

      ...which is totally irrelevant to the original point. You're trying to force use to accept a false dichotomy.

      People who exploit bugs: at fault.
      People who make bugs to exploit: also at fault.

      That simple enough? It can be both.

    21. Re:Microsoft, the good guy by vertinox · · Score: 1

      I'm glad you think that way. Tell me where you live and break in to your home.

      Well I don't know where you live, but most houses in Center City Philadelphia (USA) have bars on their windows. Not having them is foolish.

      If someone yanked those bars off or the dead bolt on our door failed to work properly I would blame the contractor who installed them for crappy workmanship. (Unless of course I left the door unlocked or someone used a blow torch. If someon wanted in that bad... Well...)

      The chances of catching a perp around here are slim to none. Think of the internet as the ghetto only everyone is banging on your doors 24/7.

      --
      "I am the king of the Romans, and am superior to rules of grammar!"
      -Sigismund, Holy Roman Emperor (1368-1437)
    22. Re:Microsoft, the good guy by kernel_dan · · Score: 1

      Not many people know how to use DoorOSX or LinDoors, nor do they want to learn.

      --

      Illegal? Samir, This is America.
    23. Re:Microsoft, the good guy by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Baloney again. I can write a worm for Linux that any user can run and DDOS. WORMS ARE JUST PROGRAMS. If you cannot stop programs from being run, you cannot stop worms.

    24. Re:Microsoft, the good guy by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Dude! fix you sig. The link doesn't work. You duped the slashdot.org part.

    25. Re:Microsoft, the good guy by StikyPad · · Score: 1

      A better analogy would be a leaving all your windows and doors open with a sign on the lawn saying, "I'm not paying attention to what's going on, but I'm trusting nobody will come in my house while I'm gone."

    26. Re:Microsoft, the good guy by InfiniteWisdom · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Firstly that's not true, because nobody advertises their open ports... blaster and the other worms probe addresses, look through address books etc. and run scans and probes to find vulnerable computers. Secondly, even if you did that, nobody who stals stuff from your home can use that as a defense. Its unlikely that the cops would spend any effort to find the thief, since you acted so stupidly, but if the person were caught somehow they're still culpable.

    27. Re:Microsoft, the good guy by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Please tell me how physically breaking into a house is the same as writing a pattern of 0's and 1's.

      Writing a pattern of 0's and 1's shouldn't even be legally punishable in the first place.

      If you connect a computer to the internet you should expect to receive every possible arrangment of data possible.

      If your computer crashs, is "infected" from it or anything else happens it is YOUR fault for having faultly equipiment.

      Don't think because you can talk about something in abstract terms "Operating System, Ports, Tcp" etc that you can forget what it really is.

      If you are going to say that people depend on it etc....
      Maybe they should of not connected that computer to the internet at all. It is there risk doing so entirely and they should take all the responibility for doing so.

      Thanks, That's My Anon Coward Rant For Today

    28. Re:Microsoft, the good guy by InfiniteWisdom · · Score: 1

      Firstly, look up the term "analogy" sometime.

      Secondly, let me see you put your money where your mouth is. Give me your checking account number and routing transit number and let me do some so rewriting of 0's and 1's of my own.

    29. Re:Microsoft, the good guy by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Interesting

      I fail to see how that analogy is better. Windows isn't a lock, it's a platform for work, entertainment, and sadly the deployment of business infrastructure. It has things roughly equivalent to locks, safes, and other such mechanisms of securing resources but then so does your house.

      Your house also has windows, which more often than not are quite capable of being used to gain entrance regardless of what sort of lock you happen to insert into your door.

      Now your windows are there intentionally, whereas the flaws in Microsoft software that permit others to take use of your computer's resources are unintentional, but both the windows and those bugs are a natural consequence of practical human endeavor.

      People don't typically buy security-grade windows, the building materials that their homes are constructed with are typically not very sturdy to persistent attack, and few people opt to not have windows because as it turns out fresh air and exposure to natural light are both highly-sought. Microsoft, too, chooses to make tradeoffs of practicality when offering their software for sale, and like someone buying a house, the consumer willingly purchases the product despite that it is not impregnable for practical reasons.

      If some douchebag breaks into your house, regardless of how you choose to secure, even though you and the builder of your home are slightly responsible in that you chose cost over security, the real culpability lies with the intruder. They shouldn't be there, and pointing out that they're only there because your house isn't impregnable is no more insightful than saying that you can die because you're mortal.

    30. Re:Microsoft, the good guy by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      YOU ARE AN IDIOT WHO DOESN'T KNOW WHAT HE'S TALKING ABOUT.

      Which is probably why you use Microsoft Windows. Other operating systems do not allow others to completely control your computer with one wrong click on an email client, or have several unsecure ports open to the world.

    31. Re:Microsoft, the good guy by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      That's how they do it in real life also, with much harsher results. Please try to understand that your disagreements aren't the issue. It was the way you did it. I, for one, will welcome you back with open arms. I agree with you on this. You shouldn't silenced. For now, make a new account to hold you over. Dynamic IP addresses can be your friend in case they go after your addy. Good luck to you.

    32. Re:Microsoft, the good guy by Nefarious+Wheel · · Score: 1
      Were we talking about a stupid criminal, or the criminally stupid?

      Both are losers. Darwin will win.

      --
      Do not mock my vision of impractical footwear
    33. Re:Microsoft, the good guy by jericho4.0 · · Score: 1
      I agree with the poster above, you are an idiot. How do you expect your Linux worm to install itself on thousands of boxes? Go and learn what a worm actually is before replying.

      --
      "A language that doesn't affect the way you think about programming, is not worth knowing" - Alan Perlis
    34. Re:Microsoft, the good guy by Math,+The+Ancient · · Score: 1

      Beacause the pattern of 0's and 1's are probing (peeping into windows) and designed to unlawfually gain information such as credit card information (burgularly) or destroy the system (arson).

      Even if I do leave my door unlocked and my windows don't have doors, you don't have the right to come in and take anything you want. You or viruses have no more right to my box.

      --
      If I really am talking out of my ass...explain it to me with respect so I'll at least pull my ears out to listen.
    35. Re:Microsoft, the good guy by Math,+The+Ancient · · Score: 1

      And let's suppose a burgular went under the house and up through the floor, perhaps through the stink pipe and up through your toilet, perhaps when coming thru the floor they were able to use a crowbar and hammer yet bypasses the security alarm on the DoorXP (btw, this tactic works on DoorLinux, too). Should you still responsible for selling them the product "that doesn't work" because they didn't anticipate the creativity of the criminal?

      --
      If I really am talking out of my ass...explain it to me with respect so I'll at least pull my ears out to listen.
    36. Re:Microsoft, the good guy by Math,+The+Ancient · · Score: 1

      "... or someone used a blow torch. If someon wanted in that bad..."

      That's just it, you have a lock on your door (authentication), but somebody broke a window or used a blow torch (brute force). You blame the lock manufacturer? What a waste of police time to go after your locksmith instead of the real perpetrator (the writer of the virus/worm/trojan/whatever).

      --
      If I really am talking out of my ass...explain it to me with respect so I'll at least pull my ears out to listen.
    37. Re:Microsoft, the good guy by vertinox · · Score: 1

      Um... One wouldn't have the locksmith thrown in jail, but rather taken to local court for losses.

      I think the anology would be better like this (this is a fictional story):

      A locksmith in the town sold these new fancy locks to all sorts of people through out the town claiming that they were secure and you would be safe. However a local theif found that if you just pushed on the door and jiggle the handle the door would come right open.

      This ingenious theif tells his friends about the exploit and through the town they rob everyone blind. Later they are caught but have no money for the people since they spent it all on crack and heorin, but they faced ample jail time.

      However the lock manufacture who claimed that their locks was secure was brought into civil court by the towns citizens on the fact that the locks themselves were not secure and were supposed to be such as that.

      I think the point is that if you have a lock on your door you are not supposed to giggle it and it just fall apart. Yes it would be reasonable to say it's not the locksmiths fault if someone dig bring a large drill or a blowtorch, but if the locks were insecure to begin with then the locksmith is to blame as well as the perp. And the perp goes to jail and the locksmith is sued in civil court for monetary loss.

      --
      "I am the king of the Romans, and am superior to rules of grammar!"
      -Sigismund, Holy Roman Emperor (1368-1437)
    38. Re:Microsoft, the good guy by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      He statements were incorrect. When called on it, he refuses to respond. He simply repeats inaccurate statements, and accuses others of hypocrisy. That's insulting to any reasonable person. Normally I would ignore it, but he gets modded up for it, and others might believe what he says. Somebody has to respond logically. He doesn't do it. Notice how the mods hammer you, also?

  9. Can he reduce the worktime ... by Tribbin · · Score: 5, Funny

    ... by replacing himself by a shell script?

    --
    If you mod this up, your slashdot background will turn into a beautiful sunset!
    1. Re:Can he reduce the worktime ... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Only if he uses someone else's scipt

    2. Re:Can he reduce the worktime ... by bonch · · Score: 5, Funny

      He's a script kiddie, so don't you mean "replacing himself with someone else's modified Visual Basic 6 project file he got from IRC?"

    3. Re:Can he reduce the worktime ... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      ECHO Community Service 0.1 Beta
      ECHO Register now for just $2200 per hour of use
      ECHO Currently in shareware mode

      trashcollect.exe
      ERRORLEVEL 0
      ECHO Trash picked up. Done for the day.
      Oh wait, bet the kid couldn't even code that.
  10. No Respect by alecks · · Score: 0

    Script kidding just don't get you that kind of respect anymore, do it?

  11. So MS determines sentencing now? by afstanton · · Score: 0

    How does that work? It can ignore governmental orders, pressure countries into software patents, and now alter someone's sentence in a criminal trial? What happens when they decide to increase someone's sentence instead of decrease?

    --
    Reject Fear - Embrace Hope
    1. Re:So MS determines sentencing now? by cornjchob · · Score: 1

      Seriously douche, the AC has it right--even all of these IANAL's got it and you didn't. Perhaps R-ingTFA or even half the posts above you would've explained it so even you could understand it.

      --
      We now have confirmed reports from an informed Orange County minister that Ethel is still an active communist.
  12. This wasn't the Blaster author by r_glen · · Score: 5, Informative

    This was the guy who modified the Blaster worm. The original author never got caught.

    1. Re:This wasn't the Blaster author by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      This is annoying the hell out of me, most of the articles on news.google also report this guy as the original author. I can forgive /., it's just a blog, but a lot of "reputable" news sources have this simple fact wrong...

    2. Re:This wasn't the Blaster author by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      Yeah but W32.Blaster.B added (well changed actually) this little embedded message:
      Microsoft can suck my left testi!
      Bill Gates can suck my right testi!
      And All Antivirus Makers Can Suck My Big Fat Cock
      So I imagine Bill was pretty pissed.
    3. Re:This wasn't the Blaster author by tehwebguy · · Score: 0

      if i were the original author i would be pissed that this script kiddie got so much fame.

      --
      -- lol pwned
    4. Re:This wasn't the Blaster author by jez9999 · · Score: 0

      Enough! Lies, lies, lies! I did it! I did it all! There. Only _I_ could have executed such a masterpiece of leet coding. And I have the records to prove it! Here, just look at these -- [pulls out binders and floppy disks] each one a work of Machiavellian art. Now, ...

      Oh.. heh heh heh... I nearly walked straight into that one! Just passing, nothing to see.

    5. Re:This wasn't the Blaster author by gardyloo · · Score: 0

      I can forgive /.

      You're new here, aren't you?

    6. Re:This wasn't the Blaster author by HiThere · · Score: 1

      Were I the original perp, I'd be quite pleased that someone else was taking the heat for my ... errors of judgement.

      OTOH, I've never understood why anyone would paint a bulls eye on their chest and go looking for a rifle range.

      --

      I think we've pushed this "anyone can grow up to be president" thing too far.
    7. Re:This wasn't the Blaster author by ampmouse · · Score: 1
      if i were the original author i would be pissed that this script kiddie got so much fame.
      They were pissed. The "Anti-Virus Reward Program" was started to punish the script kiddie for pirating their code!
    8. Re:This wasn't the Blaster author by Surye · · Score: 1

      No, he's obviously not. To be mad at /. is nieve

    9. Re:This wasn't the Blaster author by satans_advocate · · Score: 0

      To be mad at /. is nieve

      Is that Neve as in Campbell, Niet as in No,or Naive as in faith in the public education system?

  13. Is this just punishment :) by gmknobl · · Score: 1

    Great! I bet his community service will be fixing Windows computers. Talk about irony!

    1. Re:Is this just punishment :) by alatesystems · · Score: 1
      You should really RTFA in the future. Jesus Christ, is it that hard. The very first sentence is:
      Microsoft has granted clemency to the 19 year-old author of the Blaster worm. Rather than pay $500,000 in restitution, the youth will be sentenced to 225 hours of community service, which may not involve computers.
    2. Re:Is this just punishment :) by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      225 hours to fix ONE windows computer

    3. Re:Is this just punishment :) by Radical+Rad · · Score: 1
      I bet his community service will be fixing Windows computers.

      Could have been worse. Bill could have made the kid proofread his latest manuscript.

    4. Re:Is this just punishment :) by gmknobl · · Score: 1

      And you should watch your F mouth! Geesh, apparently you can't see a joke even when a smiley is on it! No, this post is not a joke.

  14. And in the meantime... by The+Ultimate+Fartkno · · Score: 3, Insightful

    ...50,000 people with pwn3d boxes get absolutely nothing. I can't decide if that's complete injustice or exactly what they deserve.

    1. Re:And in the meantime... by Fjornir · · Score: 5, Insightful

      If you had a box that caught blaster there is nothing preventing you from taking this kid to civil court for damages.

      --
      I want a new world. I think this one is broken.
    2. Re:And in the meantime... by plover · · Score: 1
      I didn't get MSblaster, I just have XP. It's like having nothing, but I still had to pay for it.

      I sure am getting what I deserve, though, either way you look at it.

      --
      John
    3. Re:And in the meantime... by stlhawkeye · · Score: 1
      ...50,000 people with pwn3d boxes get absolutely nothing. I can't decide if that's complete injustice or exactly what they deserve.

      What exactly would those injured parties have received under the $500,000 fine that Microsoft would otherwise have collected? Another $500,000 worth of security updates to Windows? Nah...

      If there are 50,000 injuried parties as a result of this kid's activities, they might have legal grounds for a class-action lawsuit. But I don't really know jack about law.

      Yet! I'm going to get a law degree just so I can take about legal matters on Slashdot and instead of saying "IANAL" I can respond to YOU people who post that and say, "IALSTFUPLZKTHXOMGWTF."

      --
      "I have never won a debate with an ignorant person." -Ali ibn Abi Talib
    4. Re:And in the meantime... by itistoday · · Score: 2, Insightful

      If you had a box that caught blaster there is nothing preventing you from taking this kid to civil court for damages.

      Other than any sense of empathy for the kid.

    5. Re:And in the meantime... by Fjornir · · Score: 1
      Sorry. None at all. Going easy on first offenses encourages first offenders to offend. Going easy on youth offenders encourages youths to offend.

      If I had been infected I'd take him to small claims for $25 and $25 in filing fees.

      --
      I want a new world. I think this one is broken.
    6. Re:And in the meantime... by itistoday · · Score: 1

      Ok, so after this kid has spend over a year in prison, you're going to ask him to pay you $25 that don't mean shit to you. Then, a bunch of other insensitive clods will also ask for their $25 that they don't need, and very soon thereafter you'll find him hanging himself from a rope because the only greeting he finds after spending 18 months in pound-me-in-the-ass prison is a $200,000 debt.

    7. Re:And in the meantime... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      >Ok, so after this kid has spend over a year in prison, you're going to ask him to pay you $25 that don't mean shit to you. Then, a bunch of other insensitive clods will also ask for their $25 that they don't need, and very soon thereafter you'll find him hanging himself from a rope because the only greeting he finds after spending 18 months in pound-me-in-the-ass prison is a $200,000 debt

      I fail to see the problem in this scenario.

    8. Re:And in the meantime... by Fjornir · · Score: 0, Troll
      Damn right. If I'd been infected by his worm it would cost me time cleaning my system, verifying the integrity of my data, and so on. Time I could have spent making money or enjoying myself. Giving a free pass to someone who willfully takes action to damage my property does not sit well with me.

      As to his newfound $200,000 in debt he should have fucking thought about that before he let a worm out into the wild, hey? I don't want to send the message to the next script kiddie that this short of sit is acceptable.

      And 18 months? That's a fucking joke. He deserves a lot more.

      --
      I want a new world. I think this one is broken.
    9. Re:And in the meantime... by itistoday · · Score: 1

      Damn right. If I'd been infected by his worm it would cost me time cleaning my system, verifying the integrity of my data, and so on. Time I could have spent making money or enjoying myself. Giving a free pass to someone who willfully takes action to damage my property does not sit well with me. Oh please, you are so full of it. Do you even know what the blaster worm does? The only thing it does is create a DOS against windowsupdate.com. Oh no! This guy needs to be flogged with a very pointy stick, and while we're at it, why don't we just ruin his life for it. You simply just have trouble understaning the situation, and putting yourself in his shoes. No one's giving him a "free pass", and he didn't "damage [your] property". 18 months in prison is more than enough punishment for such a prank. If you think ruining his life for it is an "OK" thing to do, then you've got your head up your ass.

    10. Re:And in the meantime... by Fjornir · · Score: 1
      Oh please, you are so full of it.

      A cunning riposte. I don't know what to say.

      Do you even know what the blaster worm does? The only thing it does is create a DOS against windowsupdate.com.

      It also spreads, saturating network connections. If you think the bandwidth used by blaster was free you might want to reconsider and think of the actual damages caused by this bug. But that wasn't even the important part of the havoc Blaster played: the perpetual reboot cycle on machines where it crashed RPC was much more troublesome.

      You simply just have trouble understaning the situation, and putting yourself in his shoes. No one's giving him a "free pass", and he didn't "damage [your] property". 18 months in prison is more than enough punishment for such a prank.

      I don't think you understand the situation, actually. A company I used to work for lost a quarter of a million dollars over this 'prank'. The shit hit the fan overnight at the company and the IT department elected to emergency-push the patch onto all systems in the domain. As per SOP lab managers and their assistants were sent the emergency page two hours before the push went out. The company's upstream bandwidth was saturated with blaster traffic so the email got stuck at the server and was not delivered to the pagers. So a lab manager didn't know to come in and physically isolate his (already patched) lab. Thus the servers were rebooted by the force-deploy scripts. A 500 hour stress test was interrupted in progress, causing a certification deadline to be missed and penalty clauses in the contract were invoked.

      Blaster took out 911 service in some areas, distrupted air-traffic-control, ... ... Virus and worm writers deserve a lot more than an 18month slap on the wrist.

      --
      I want a new world. I think this one is broken.
    11. Re:And in the meantime... by MassacrE · · Score: 1

      Tell ya what, you go spend 18 months in prison, then refer to it as a 'slap on the wrist'. Even better, while inside, refer to it as a 'slap on the wrist' to the other inmates. Good luck.

    12. Re:And in the meantime... by itistoday · · Score: 1

      ooo wow. A pain in the ass. But tell me this: Was anybody's life ruined? I think a year and a half in prison is more than enough punishment for a few hours or days of unpleasantness. But I guess that's where we disagree.

    13. Re:And in the meantime... by satans_advocate · · Score: 0

      Damn right. If I'd been infected by his worm it would cost me time cleaning my system, verifying the integrity of my data, and so on. Time I could have spent making money or enjoying myself. Giving a free pass to someone who willfully takes action to damage my property does not sit well with me.

      Yeah! Well you should be liable for choosing such a shitty operating system and placing it on a public network.

      In fact, I think every lazy fucker that puts the shitty MS OS on a public network should pay $50 in damages to a fund for the W3C, IETF and GNU foundation.

      I don't want to send the message to the next script kiddie that this short of sit is acceptable.

      Riiiight. The message we want to send is that it's acceptable for Microsoft to put people's bank accounts, personal information and network performance at risk without any cost to them.

      You know what? Fuck you for decreasing the value of the network and fuck Microsoft too.

    14. Re:And in the meantime... by Math,+The+Ancient · · Score: 1

      "But tell me this: Was anybody's life ruined? "

      911 service was knocked out in some areas...did you not read?

      --
      If I really am talking out of my ass...explain it to me with respect so I'll at least pull my ears out to listen.
  15. The real reason... by Sebilrazen · · Score: 3, Insightful

    Billy boy dropped the fine was that he saw some of himself in the boy, totally ripping off someone elses work, rebranding it and sending out the door. It was just a variant, wasn't it?

    --
    "There are no facts, only interpretations." --Friedrich Nietzsche.
    1. Re:The real reason... by maukdaddy · · Score: 0

      +4 Insightful? You have to be fucking KIDDING me! Only on Slashdot would a comment like this be modded as insightful!

    2. Re:The real reason... by Sebilrazen · · Score: 1

      I agree, and I'm the poster. Funny? maybe. Wry observation? okay. Insightful? come on.

      --
      "There are no facts, only interpretations." --Friedrich Nietzsche.
    3. Re:The real reason... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Troll? Flamebait? Jesus, seems that conservatives aren't the only ones who rampantly abuse the moderating system...and then complain at being unfairly modded down.

  16. Guilt by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Why doesn't Microsoft get punished for its faulty software which allowed this to happen?

    1. Re:Guilt by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Four words: EULA.

  17. But will he get respect from the other criminals? by CitznFish · · Score: 2, Funny

    Life just ins't fair....

    --
    'mmmmmmmmm.... forbidden donut'
  18. Microsoft is soft. by dei3oe · · Score: 0

    What happened to the bully Microsoft of the past? I can't believe he did not get any jail time for fines. Granted community service sucks, 225 hours REALLY sucks.

    Note: If he does 8 hours a week (assuming he has some other sort of job), it will take a little over 28 weeks to complete!

    1. Re:Microsoft is soft. by cornjchob · · Score: 0, Flamebait

      You can DTFM (do the fucking math), but you can't RTFA (read the fucking article)? The 500k was restitution, not fines--a previous post explained the difference. He was sentenced to 18 months as well.

      --
      We now have confirmed reports from an informed Orange County minister that Ethel is still an active communist.
  19. 225 hours of ... by Tribbin · · Score: 1

    ... system administration for MS clients?

    Please shoot me instead.

    --
    If you mod this up, your slashdot background will turn into a beautiful sunset!
    1. Re:225 hours of ... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      What's the problem? Just stare at the screen for hours genuinely dumbfounded and utter "gee, I've never seen *this* happen before" every once in a while. Click on things. It isn't going to help anyway. At the end of the day, declare it beyond your ability and backup, format and reinstall.

      Everyone can admin MS clients for fun and profit! Well, not really *fun*, but profit!

  20. Community Service by datafr0g · · Score: 3, Interesting

    The article also contained this:
    Jeffrey Lee Parson, of Minnesota, was sentenced this year to 18 months in prison and 10 hours of community service.

    What the hell is the point of a day's worth of community service when you are also serving 18 months in prison!?

    --
    "Who says nothing is impossible? Some people do it every day!" - Alfred E. Neuman
  21. 225 hours of... by Nevtje(hr · · Score: 4, Funny

    ...gardening! getting to know the REAL bugs out there!

    --
    Three rings for the Elven-kings in the sky
    1. Re:225 hours of... by halivar · · Score: 1

      I thought he was being sentenced to work at Electronic Arts. Hell, give me the $500K fine.

  22. I'm really confused here. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    First off. I thought the oringial writer was never caught, they only caught some chump that made his own version.

    Secondly, what the fuck does this have to do with microsoft? Yeah it ddos'd there website, but how does that grant them the power to control his punisment. They are not the law.

    Thirdly, 50,000 infected computers? Try more like 10 times that.

  23. Strange by bad_outlook · · Score: 1

    Why wouldn't they want to punish this person? At the very least they should hold him accountable for loss business (although how much could they loose, really?) All in all a more understanding MS than we've seen in the past. bo

    1. Re:Strange by InfiniteWisdom · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Trying to extract $500k from a 19yo kid would probably fetch them more bad press than any actual compensation they would receive. Instead they come across as being compassionate and understanding. Nothing strange about it... just a good PR move (which we all know has always been their primary strength)

    2. Re:Strange by Locke2005 · · Score: 1

      Maybe they realized that getting a half million dollar judgement against someone who HAS NO MONEY is about as useless as getting a date to the prom with your sister...

      --
      I've abandoned my search for truth; now I'm just looking for some useful delusions.
  24. Excuse me?? by FreeLinux · · Score: 0

    Jeffrey Lee Parson, of Minnesota, was sentenced this year to 18 months in prison and 10 hours of community service.

    So what is the significance of all these other numbers?

    Also, since when did Microsoft have the authority to impose sentences and fines on individuals?

    1. Re:Excuse me?? by dauthur · · Score: 1

      There was this wonderful game in the 30's that came out, and Milton Bradley ended up buying the game. I think it was like "monopole" or something.

    2. Re:Excuse me?? by Ayaress · · Score: 1

      Microsoft did not impose those sentences. RTFA. A judge did. The "fine" was not a fine, it was restitution he was ordered to pay Microsoft. Microsoft has the right to suggest that the judge replace the damages with a community service sentence.

  25. These were damages owed MS by the_rev_matt · · Score: 4, Informative

    To all the people screaming "What, MS is part of the government now?":

    The judge determined that the convicted owed MS damages of about $500,000. MS at their own discretion opted to allow him to to do community service in lieu of cash. As long as the agreement is acceptable to both parties, the judge will generally go with it.

    --
    this is getting old and so are you

    blog

  26. If he was convicted of paying the fine.... by thelastguardian · · Score: 0

    half of us here would eventually be bankrupt (seeing how everyone here are involve in the "dark" side).

  27. Wow, that's nice of Microsoft. by ColMustard · · Score: 1, Funny

    What a great company Microsoft is!

    --
    Moof.
    1. Re:Wow, that's nice of Microsoft. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      maybe Apple Computer, INC. will take a LEAF from the M$ Books

  28. Microsofts Judicial Powers by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 4, Funny

    So MS has been given judicial powers to grant clemency now?

    Yes. They first used it for this case.

    1. Re:Microsofts Judicial Powers by ZephyrXero · · Score: 1
      --
      "A truly wise man realizes he knows nothing."
    2. Re:Microsofts Judicial Powers by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      These days, "the corporation" is the root of the government, not the 4th branch.

  29. he wouldn't have been able to pay by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
    I expect the reality is that the Blaster-kid wouldn't have had the money to pay the fine, so microsoft would not have been able to collect it.

    So in fact the 225 community service is a more severe punishment perhaps. (Than declaring bankruptcy or paying the massive fine off at a token amount per week until retirement and still not paying close to the whole fine).

    What happens anyway in the US legal system if someone is fined a $500,000 when they have a few hundred bucks to their name, and no or low income?

    1. Re:he wouldn't have been able to pay by InfiniteWisdom · · Score: 2, Informative

      What happens anyway in the US legal system if someone is fined a $500,000 when they have a few hundred bucks to their name, and no or low income?
      An oversimplified answer is they file for bankruptcy protection, lose virtually all their posessions besides their primary residence, means of transport to work and other essentials and personal effects of no monetary value, need to have all significant expenses in the future approved by a judge and so on till they emerge from bankruptcy. Then they spend about 10 years unable to get a credit card or bank loan because their credit rating is so low.

    2. Re:he wouldn't have been able to pay by The+Bungi · · Score: 2, Informative
      besides their primary residence

      Only in some states like Florida, I think. In others they can still repo your house and auction it.

      I was hearing something on the OJ Simpson trial the other day which was being rehashed now that the lawyer died. AFAICT OJ "Magic Gloves" Simpson moved to Florida after the $30M civil suit he lost to avoid having his NFL pension garnished to pay for the judgement, and I think that Florida law also forbids your "primary residence" from being r00ted.

      I might be wrong though.

    3. Re:he wouldn't have been able to pay by a3217055 · · Score: 1

      He can move to another country, this country is not the crux of civilization. Also he can get out of Mn, which is a nice state, but there are better places to be.

    4. Re:he wouldn't have been able to pay by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      IANAL, but I don't believe this is entirely correct. Punitive damages are exempt from bankruptcy relief under the provisions of chapter 5, section 523

      "(a) A discharge under section 727, 1141, 1228 (a), 1228 (b), or 1328 (b) of this title does not discharge an individual debtor from any debt-- ...

      (6) for willful and malicious injury by the debtor to another entity or to the property of another entity;"

      And before you say it'll be a ch 7 or 11, ch 5 is the chapter that regulates general provisions for all bankruptcies.

    5. Re:he wouldn't have been able to pay by Math,+The+Ancient · · Score: 1

      Nice tag. Very fair sounding.

      --
      If I really am talking out of my ass...explain it to me with respect so I'll at least pull my ears out to listen.
  30. I'm really pissed!!! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I can't believe that this fucktard is getting all my props. He doesn't even have the skillz to hide his IP address and they are giving him credit for one of my best pieces of work?

    That's it. I can't take it any more. All you "news" agencies, prepare to be pwned!

  31. At least... by d2_m_viant · · Score: 3, Interesting

    Well, at least this kid didn't get a JOB offer from Microsoft. Seems he wasn't quite as lucky as the kid who hacked into T-Mobile and monitored Secret Service messages, only to get a job offer from them once he was caught...

    ...maybe when he matures and is looking towards real work, he'll consider a lucrative career in hacking government agencies, seems like breaking the law is rewarded nowadays.

    1. Re:At least... by pbaer · · Score: 1

      Deals like that have always been allowed. Besides who is better at showing others how to prevent crimes than a criminal who has commited them? Now it's not quite the same thing but plea bargains are close to get out of jail free. If you can and are willing to turn in some gang members/accomplices that otherwise wouldn't be caught your penalty will be severly lessened.

      --
      There are 11 types of people, those who know unary and those who don't.
    2. Re:At least... by Math,+The+Ancient · · Score: 1

      Even the FBI has invoked this concept. A semi-recent movie, "Catch Me If You Can" depicts the story of a fake-check writer now working for them and responsible for most of the security procedures in place today with banks.

      --
      If I really am talking out of my ass...explain it to me with respect so I'll at least pull my ears out to listen.
  32. Microsoft can do this... by dteichman2 · · Score: 2, Informative

    It's not time for the tinfoil hats- yet. Microsoft isn't so close to the government that they can choose his sentence, but they could, if they wanted, ask the judge to reduce the sentence to certain terms that they think are fair.

    Remember though, IANAL

    I think it'd be great for this guy to get out in the sun and clean up graffiti! Maybe it'll build his character enough that he'll realize that making worms to smash Microsoft PCs isn't a cool thing to do- or is it?

    --


    Silence is golden... and duct tape is silver.
  33. What Bill wants, Bill gets... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Why? Bill's owns a bunch of Microsoft and they're getting into the antivirus market.

  34. No way by oGMo · · Score: 2, Funny
    Are you kidding? This is perfect. 225 hours of migrating boxes to Linux sounds like a perfect solution for both Microsoft and their customers.

    :-)

    --

    Don't think of it as a flame---it's more like an argument that does 3d6 fire damage

  35. Were they? by FreeLinux · · Score: 1

    It's too bad that TFA completely fails to even provide a hint that this is what it is about. In fact, it is impossible to determine what you state from TFA or any of the links within it.

    1. Re:Were they? by the_rev_matt · · Score: 1

      Yea, I had to go find the original sentencing news reports to verify. It was a fairly content free article, but that's par for the course for links on /. ;)

      --
      this is getting old and so are you

      blog

  36. Yet they can get $20 million in tax breaks by WillAffleckUW · · Score: 1

    I think it'd be great for this guy to get out in the sun and clean up graffiti! Maybe it'll build his character enough that he'll realize that making worms to smash Microsoft PCs isn't a cool thing to do- or is it?

    Well, Paul Allen just got $20 million in tax breaks according to The Stranger (local weekly paper) and The Weekly (other local weekly paper), so ...

    However, if they want to clean up graffiti, we have an underpass at Bridgeway N that can be repainted to remove the graffiti over here in Seattle.

    --
    -- Tigger warning: This post may contain tiggers! --
  37. no surprise on Microsoft by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    If put a heavy fine on these guys, who's going write these virus, then who's going to pay them to upgrade and mantainance?

    Eitherway, they're in big trouble. With virus, people will move to Linux faster, without virus, they have little income. They just choose to be the bad guy.

  38. Purely Profit-Motivated by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    M$ just did their homework and discovered that they would gain more finanacially by playing the benevolent dictator than by taking this guy's payments for his $500,000 debt.

  39. Nice move, nice PR. by kosmosik · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Really. They just got some good press. And it is better to have good press worldwide that to have some teen own you $0,5M which he probably would never pay to them at all...

  40. Make him spend the 225 hours by Anonymous+Luddite · · Score: 4, Funny


    Helping Bill Gates with his first Gentoo install..

    1. Re:Make him spend the 225 hours by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Ok, well that MIGHT cover the kernel and a few other things...so after the 225Hrs are up, who's gonna help Bill start the whole emerge KDE process?

  41. Glass windows are necessary by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Glass windows are a necessary element of a house.

    What necessity is there for a bunch of open ports and RPC in an Internet-connected operating system? That's like using door locks that anyone can open with a common twig.

    1. Re:Glass windows are necessary by Ayaress · · Score: 1

      Windows are a neccessary element of a house, but INSECURE windows are not.

      They make windows that can survive getting a rock or brick thrown at them with minimal visual distortion.

      Even if you don't do that, all home security systems have dirt cheap break sensors that go on all windows. Ours came standard with ten of them, and additional ones were a whole $1.50 each. You break a window, and you trigger the alarm, which not only sends in an emergency call, but also makes a lot of noise and attracts unwanted attention from the neighbors.

  42. The headline is missing a comma by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

    The story was really about an MS demo at an author's convention of a new consumer laser cannon that barely missed hitting Stephen King when the targeting system bluescreened.

  43. Not to mention tons of money by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Four words: "Education", Un-open (source), Lobbying, Attorneys

  44. IANAL, but: by RM6f9 · · Score: 1

    In cases involving damages, the victim (in the case referenced, Microsoft) is allowed to request leniency or harsher penalties: The judge ruling on the case is *NOT* required to accede to such requests.

    --
    Take the 90-Day Challenge! http://rwmurker.bodybyvi.com/
    1. Re:IANAL, but: by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I don't think it would be hard for MS to just eat the cost. That's cheap for good publicity.

      I see so many comments about how this kid needs to pay and be made an example of, but the reality is he didn't do that much damage. The original blaster did, but not this kid's hacked version of it. Be nice people! A $500,000 will ruin your life! Does he deserve his life ruined?

      At my salary, 4 years of jail time for committing neglegent man slaughter and a $50,000 fine on top is still less money than this kid got slapped with, all just for cutting and pasting some lines of code in this email he got and re-sending it.

  45. Re:MICROSOFT MAKES SUPERIOR SOFTWARE by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Not superior software, superior service plans formerly but now only the market presence created by its history and effective monopoly status in the US keep the firm gaining income with any advantage over other PC software firms.

  46. Get away lightly? by caryw · · Score: 5, Informative

    This kid still has to do 18 months in prison! 18 months! 13,128 hours! (linked from the same site)
    18 months is almost 10% of the time this kid has even been on the planet!
    Microsoft just helped him out by letting him live his life once he gets out of prison instead of being in debt for the next 40 years.
    I bet it's extremely hard for a convicted felon to work off a $500,000 debt.
    --
    Fairfax Underground: For residents of Fairfax County and Northern Virginia

    1. Re:Get away lightly? by aztektum · · Score: 2, Funny

      he could write a book about it

      --
      :: aztek ::
      No sig for you!!
    2. Re:Get away lightly? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      son of sam laws.

      he could write one, then not get any money from it.

    3. Re:Get away lightly? by aichpvee · · Score: 1

      What if his mother sold her story to an author and then licensed the made-for-tv movie rights?

      --
      The Farewell Tour II
    4. Re:Get away lightly? by norfolkboy · · Score: 5, Interesting

      "I bet it's extremely hard for a convicted felon to work off a $500,000 debt."

      Since the fine is a civil issue, and not a criminal issue, if the criminal has any sense, he'll petition for his own bankruptcy before he goes into jail, and be debt-free by the time he leaves. ... or is that not how it works in USA?

    5. Re:Get away lightly? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I don't think it's fair that he's been let off.

      How is this oxygen waster ever going to learn ??

    6. Re:Get away lightly? by Tongo · · Score: 1

      Then he would still have to perform his 225 hours of community service.

    7. Re:Get away lightly? by Math,+The+Ancient · · Score: 1

      He didn't get let off. He went to prison!

      As for the fine...it is meaningless unless you actually can pay it off. Currently, 500,000 is not workable, 50,000 is. MS obviously thinks this guy will get one after he pays debt to society (prison, remember?) and either is thinking "let's put it at a level he actually can pay off" or "let's be sensible for now and maybe he'll come work for us"

      --
      If I really am talking out of my ass...explain it to me with respect so I'll at least pull my ears out to listen.
    8. Re:Get away lightly? by EvilJoker · · Score: 1

      http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Son_of_Sam_laws
      Notice the last piece:
      "Though the New York law was struck down, many such laws still exist in other states, mostly because they are so rarely invoked. The Supreme Court ruling actually stated that Son of Sam laws could conceivably be constitutional, but only if written very carefully with regard to First Amendment concerns; most of the remaining Son of Sam laws are not."

  47. It was surely not a fine by EmbeddedJanitor · · Score: 4, Insightful
    My understanding of "fine" is that of a penalty imposed by the state in a criminal case. In the case of a civil action I think the term "damages" is used.

    Microsoft is getting pretty big and powerful and can push the DOJ around, but I don't think they're yet in the position to fine people.

    --
    Engineering is the art of compromise.
    1. Re:It was surely not a fine by freakmn · · Score: 1

      I don't think Microsoft are fine people, either...

      --
      warning: This post is likely to contain gobs of dripping sarcasm. Consume at your own risk.
  48. Hmm by ad0gg · · Score: 1

    Looking at their webpage I noticed both IBM and Apple are members. Where did you find out that Microsoft is the biggest beneficiary, do you have any links? Or are you just pulling it out of your ass? And what power does the BSA hold?

    --

    Have you ever been to a turkish prison?

    1. Re:Hmm by Hollins · · Score: 1

      If you'd bother to use google, you might make a fool of yourself less often as a juvenile troll.

      Ed Foster at InfoWorld has written quite a bit on the BSA and Microsoft. Here's one example. The rest you can find yourself, or just continue trolling. I really don't care.

  49. Not a good deal -- to me. by Nom+du+Keyboard · · Score: 2
    seems like a good deal to me

    It may be a good deal to the criminal in this case, but not to the rest of us computer users who have to put up with this type of worthless scum on a daily basis. If all the worm/virus/adware/spyware/hijack/root kit etc. writers and those who use their products to infect the rest of us were to disappear tomorrow, I, for one, wouldn't miss them for a moment. Life is tough enough already without humans preying on other humans.

    --
    "It's the height of ridiculousness to say for those 9 lines you get hundreds of millions."
    1. Re:Not a good deal -- to me. by javajawa · · Score: 2, Insightful

      If all the worm/virus/adware/hijack/root kit etc. writers and those others were to disappear tomorrow, then we'd still be left with all the shoddy programming that was initially left in the programs. These exploits point out the tip of an iceberg which, unchecked, would allow unscrupulous people in power to abuse the users.

      --

      Meh

    2. Re:Not a good deal -- to me. by HiThere · · Score: 1

      You act like that's an accident.

      Well, some of it probably is...but I remember jokes from long enough ago to suspect that someone took them seriously, and that it's not an accident at all. No proof, of course. I don't think that ANYONE would be stupid enough to comit something like that to writing, or at least not anyone who would be likely to succeed.

      But do you really think it's an accident that various foreign countries are among those most interested in Linux, BSD, etc. It's not *ALL* economics. A lot of it's concern over security, and over who might secretly pwn them.

      Personally, I consider myself to unimportant to be targeted by the govt...but various commercial and criminal entities would be quite happy to own access to my finances. (Some legally, and some wouldn't care how.)

      Would you sell your PIN number for a certificate for a free ice cream code redeemable at a nearby store? Some people would.

      --

      I think we've pushed this "anyone can grow up to be president" thing too far.
  50. The Real Significance... by jd · · Score: 1

    Is that NONE of the numbers are powers of 2. That is probably the most sick and twisted thing you can do to a geek. At the very least, the judge should have presented them in hexadecimal.

    --
    It's a small world and it smells funny; I'd buy another if it wasn't for the money; Take back what I paid (SoM)
  51. Instead of community service... by SmokeHalo · · Score: 3, Funny

    ...they should make him apologize, in person, to everyone affected by the worm.

    --
    I'm not good in groups. It's difficult to work in a group when you're omnipotent. - Q
    1. Re:Instead of community service... by rokzy · · Score: 1

      in alphabetical order

    2. Re:Instead of community service... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      the appology would go like this in the majority of cases...

      Kid: Im sorry that the virus i hex edited infected your computer
      Person: Your what infected my what?

      Kid spends rest of community service trying to explain what he is appologising for.... talk about hell!!

    3. Re:Instead of community service... by Math,+The+Ancient · · Score: 1

      That was funny! I'm sorry I already posted in this article. :)

      --
      If I really am talking out of my ass...explain it to me with respect so I'll at least pull my ears out to listen.
  52. mental health by micromuncher · · Score: 1, Insightful
    The defense argued that Parson suffered from mental-health problems.


    Writing a virus takes a fair bit of know-how... the article states he was immature and had a bad family life.

    Maybe its just an example of a bored kid doing something with bragging rights.

    Immature or not, there was intent and dedication, and if he's smart enough to write and deploy, he was smart enough to know it was wrong.

    --
    /\/\icro/\/\uncher
  53. Re:But will he get respect from the other criminal by KingEomer · · Score: 1

    Well, this is the IT world, so he obviously won't be getting Any Respect

  54. The news always gets it wrong by dtfinch · · Score: 1

    They've gotten it wrong from the beginning. He's not the author. He grabbed a copy of the virus, modified some text, and let it loose again, infecting computers that were probably already going to be infected by the original. For that he gets 18 months.

  55. $2200/hour is a steal to many companies by Douglas+Simmons · · Score: 2, Insightful
    The blaster virus must have been the single best thing to happen to the antivirus software industry. And not just the companies in that particular subsector either. Security from viruses, spyware, popups and hacking in general has become a fear around which many companies have started marketing themselves. Take AOL's latest ads, or even non Internet operations like credit card companies and their new gimmick innovations against identity theft.

    Just like how Bush has been accurately criticized for capitalizing on fear to push his agenda, many companies are now benefiting from fear in this context. Hell yes it was a bitch to deal with Blaster and friends, but I got paid cash money to remove it from a lot of people's computers. One time got some ass from it. So to those of us who are fans of capitalism and consumerism, or ass maybe, this is a Good Thing, and the economy has been helped more than it has been hurt by crap like this.

    1. Re:$2200/hour is a steal to many companies by reverius · · Score: 1

      Let me introduce you to the broken window fallacy. Long story short, the hidden costs outweigh the obvious benefits of a destructive act.

      Just trust the economists on this (or read that article!)--things would have been even -better- had the kid not broken the window / created the SuperVirus. Can such a destructive act really leave us all better off than we started? Your instincts (as mine once did) say yes, because it appears more potential work has been created, but that is not the case.

    2. Re:$2200/hour is a steal to many companies by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      but d00d, he really did score some nice ass ... just check out his website!

      First I read your wiki link and i was like Yeah I feel this argument but then i peeped the link in his .sig and hot damn, i completely reversed my economic outlook

    3. Re:$2200/hour is a steal to many companies by theguywhosaid · · Score: 1

      Hold on a second there, you got ass for removing a worm or virus from a computer? Thats a sweet deal. How did that work?

    4. Re:$2200/hour is a steal to many companies by ltbarcly · · Score: 1

      I agree, but this only applies to the entire system taken as a whole. Obviously some people will benefit from destructive acts. Braking a window doesn't boost the economy because of increased demand for glass, etc. It sure as hell benefits the glass manufacturers though.

      So while Blaster might have caused damage, it certainly was good for virus scanner makers.

      Plus, even this is a simplification.

      When you look at the "Broken Window Fallacy" it is not a general case. When a window breaks, that is taken as the worst thing that can happen to a window owner.

      A better analogy is that of a business which has a window. They consider the window to be adequate protection against theft, since it is strong glass. One day a kid throws a brick at it and breaks it. Now, if that is the end of the story the fallacy applies here.

      However, the rest of the story might be that the store owner realizes the window wasn't strong, and installs a security system which saves him $50,000 later, when his store gets robbed. So now the breaking of the window actually has benefited the economy as a whole as long as the cost of the window + security system was much lower than the potential loss (whether insurance would pay for it or not).

      Of course, it would be better if the owner just figured this out and didn't have the window broken, but that is not what is in question.

      This story is much closer to that of virii than the one to which the "Broken Window Fallacy" applies.

    5. Re:$2200/hour is a steal to many companies by Drakonian · · Score: 1

      Hah, indeed. That was my first thought too. Please elaborate my friend.

      --
      Random is the New Order.
    6. Re:$2200/hour is a steal to many companies by CMRichar · · Score: 0
      One time got some ass from it.

      Nice. But what did you need a donkey for?

      --
      "Good night, good work, sleep well, I'll most likely kill you in the morning." - Dread Pirate Roberts
    7. Re:$2200/hour is a steal to many companies by satans_advocate · · Score: 0

      The problem with the broken-window-fallacy in this context is that when a window is broken, it replaced by more or less the same window.

      However .... when this windows(tm) was broken, it was theoretically replaced by a much better windows(tm)

      So there was a direct economic benefit to all who use the public network known as the Internet. ie. it improved.

  56. TEN MONTHS by dapyx · · Score: 1

    Apparently it's 10 months, but there was an error that got perpetuated.

    --
    I'm sorry, the number you have dialed is an imaginary number. Please rotate your phone 90 degrees and dial again.
  57. Re:Could've been worse- elephant poo by modernbob · · Score: 3, Funny

    I always thought that a good community service activity was shoveling elephant poop at the zoo. 225 hours of poo shoveling would give this person some perspective as to the aguish they have caused! :-)

  58. "Clemency"? by xbytor · · Score: 1

    From TFA: Microsoft has granted clemency to the 19 year-old author

    Normally, I would complain about slash-editors munging up a story, but this story is so farked its ridulous. The article makes it appear as if MS was ajudicating the proceedings in addition to the US District Judge.

    The confusion is in the original article.

    1. Re:"Clemency"? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Not only that, but it makes it seem as if the 19 year old, WAS the author, which, as I recall, is not true. Rather, he spraypainted his name on the side of the blaster worm as it was going by, which hardly makes him the enginer.

  59. What a shock! by TiggertheMad · · Score: 2, Interesting

    So, MS isn't going to try to extract several hundred thousand dollars from someone with no money or prospect of getting that sort of money, because it would cost more to hire a thug to shake down the punk than they would get. Hmmm.

    See, MS can make a good decision on occasion...

    --

    HA! I just wasted some of your bandwidth with a frivolous sig!
    1. Re:What a shock! by Dhalka226 · · Score: 1

      because it would cost more to hire a thug to shake down the punk than they would get.

      A company as big as Microsoft almost certainly has a team of highly paid lawyers on staff. They wouldn't need to hire anybody, just get them to add one more threatening letter to their batch queue.

  60. Only 50000 machines? by iamlucky13 · · Score: 1

    I understand that we're actually talking about MSblast here, not Blaster or Nachi, but was the circulation really that low? I daresay that Blaster itself infected nearly 1/4 of student's PC's on our college campus alone. We never actually took data on it, but once it got on the network, the whole thing was down in a couple of hours.

  61. Judge Microsoft? by Doc+Ruby · · Score: 1

    "Microsoft has granted clemency"

    What power does Microsoft have to grant clemency? The court decideds guilt and sentences, including fines and remedies. I could see Microsoft declining restitution, but who gives Microsoft the power to decide whether a guilty party is punished by labor, rather than a fine?

    --

    --
    make install -not war

    1. Re:Judge Microsoft? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Another great post by the ol' fake Doc Ruby. Maybe people think you are trying to do them a service by not stretching their minds. Well, you are not helping anyone.

    2. Re:Judge Microsoft? by One+Childish+N00b · · Score: 1

      This is how these things work sometimes - in a case such as this, if an agreement/settlement is reached between the two parties, the judge will usually go along with it.

      Both sides made a good decision here. MS knew they weren't going to get that sheer amount of money from this kid, and he probably didn't want to have every paycheck for the rest of his life have a percentage of 'Microsoft Tax' trimmed off to go towards paying it off, so they sat down and reached an agreement - the side that was wronged get what they feel is an appropriate punishment and the side being punished agreed to take it. This is how justice should be done, people - don't slam MS solely because TFA was poorly-written and suggested they were acting like some sort of judge, jury and executioner - this is perfectly normal practice.

      --
      Dealing with lawyers would be a lot less tedious if they all looked like Casey Novak.
    3. Re:Judge Microsoft? by Doc+Ruby · · Score: 1

      Maybe you're right, that this was a negotiated settlement. But remedy decisions by judges include the damaged party's estimates only to the extent of the damage, for restitution/remedy, not the amount of any "fines". Otherwise, it's little different from "revenge", not justice.

      I can't tell from the article, which is all I have to go on - it says Microsoft granted clemency, Microsoft specified the fines. In fact, it seems to me that you're speculating about some hypothetical way that this could all make sense, though there's no actual evidence to believe it. I would prefer to believe that your scenario, which retains legal authority to the legal authorities, is true. But I need more than hope to go on.

      --

      --
      make install -not war

  62. Screw him, cut off his hands! by meburke · · Score: 1

    Back in the days when worms were an AI experiment and Core Wars were respectful contests, I would never have anticipated the morons who have made so many administrators' lives more hectic. I say he should be blinded and his hands cut off.

    --
    "The mind works quicker than you think!"
  63. I may not like Microsoft by DaFitzMan · · Score: 0, Insightful

    but kudos to them for being human on this.

  64. Linux has homes for people by FerretFrottage · · Score: 1

    just check under /home
    I think MS is the one that has ownership problems...who computer/documents is it really? "My Computer|Documents|whatever"...means "theirs" to MS....double so for anything under My Music that has DRM :)

    --
    "Look Lois, the two symbols of the Republican Party: an elephant, and a fat white guy who is threatened by change."
  65. In other news.... by Trelane · · Score: 2, Funny

    a new worm has emerged which targets Linux exclusively. Reverse-engineering has thus far only revealed the string "!seineew era sreenigne xunil zes rekcah retsalB".

    --

    --
    Given enough personal experience, all stereotypes are shallow.
  66. who by suezz · · Score: 1

    "U.S. District Judge Marsha Pechman said the sentence reflected that although he was 18 at the time of the attack, his maturity level was much younger than that."

    was she talking about Billy?

    1. Re:who by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      No, actually "Billy's" maturity level at 18 was more like 38.

      That's what got him where he is.

      So where are you?

    2. Re:who by suezz · · Score: 1

      I have a conscious which I know Billy doesn't he will stomp on anybody that gets in his way - you know that is the american business way.

      how about you anonymous coward - do you have one?
      or do you like to make you co-workers look bad and try to show how smart you think you are just so you can move up in the world.

  67. Re:I bet... by symbolic · · Score: 1


    I wonder if the community service IS the job offer...he'll get to be M$' bitch for 7 months. If his job were to locate security holes in M$ software, that would certainly qualify as a community service.

  68. bonch, the hypocrite by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Hmm. I remember not too long ago you being a rabid supporter of all things Microsoft, up to and including jumping all over anyone who would dare to make a joke about Clippy or MS Bob.

    I smell a karma whore/troll/hypocrite. Take your pick. They're all applicable.

  69. That really depends... by WebCowboy · · Score: 4, Insightful

    So are you some kind of hotshot that can get any computer up and going in a vew minutes to an hour? Well, any monkey can format and re-install or restore-from-ghost in very short order, but in my experience it is those technicians that people call "useless" when they get their "fixed" computers back without properly configured drivers and all their email and data since their last weekly backup wiped out (if the said user is swift enough to even do a weekly backup).

    In the corporate world competent techies have made it easy for themselves. They probably deal with a fleet of identical Dells, each issues with a standard ghost image, scripts up the wazoo, something like Altris or other big brother software do roll out updates/config changes, etc etc etc.

    OTOH, 4.5 hours to clean up a machine is actually a realistic high-range estimate when you are talking about some of the personal computers or PCs at mom-and-pop operations out there like "nerds on site" and the like must see. I imagine they see everything from PIIs to the latest screaming PIV from any number of builders out there, and some of them are probably slapped together with leftover components too. These users don't have an image to restore to--unless you count the "rescue CD" if they haven't managed to lose it...they might not have any OS install CD at all! And backups? HAH! I've found you're lucky to even have weekly backups. And no matter how trivial their files look, all these users want to save as much as possible. These users are also rather undisciplined in their own maintenance. The worms and viruses are one thing--prepare to spend some time getting rid of adware attached to weather bugs, comet cursors, chat smileys and "free" P2P programs.

    In any case, if you average it out you might spend 2 hours per machine. I'd say that for how much damage Blaster-variants caused this guy got off lightly--even including the hours he will spend in jail. I suppose, though, that suing someone who is broke for a half-million is pretty pointless. I DO like the idea of making the guy shovel elephant poo for a month as a substitute.

    I do try to be optimistic though--one good thing is that this whole Blaster debacle brought to light the security crisis in Microsoft products. To this day, an unpatched win2k or pre-sp2 winxp machine will become infected within minutes when hooked up directly to a typical high-speed internet connection. It seems unfortunate that some jackass had to pull a stunt like Blaster before anything serious was done about security at MS.

    1. Re:That really depends... by 192.168.0.1 · · Score: 1
      To this day, an unpatched win2k or pre-sp2 winxp machine will become infected within minutes when hooked up directly to a typical high-speed internet connection.
      "High-speed" is assuming no one on dial-up got infected with the blaster worm, isn't it?
  70. Yawn by ad0gg · · Score: 2, Interesting
    Apple works closely with the Business Software Alliance (BSA) and the Software Information Industry Association (SIIA) to combat software piracy worldwide.

    Or you can take it straight from the horses mouth [search for apple]. Sure looks like they do a lot of work for Apple. If we compared Apples 622 documents to Microsofts 670 documents, they are pretty equal. And thats not a fair since Apple only has 3% market share.

    --

    Have you ever been to a turkish prison?

  71. what a job by Lucidborg · · Score: 1

    now he makes almost as much as gates does

    --
    Just because you stole my car doesn't mean you have to gloat about it.
    1. Re:what a job by WillAffleckUW · · Score: 1

      now he makes almost as much as gates does

      No, he's making $2200 an hour.

      Gates makes that much every millisecond.

      --
      -- Tigger warning: This post may contain tiggers! --
  72. Good analogy. Wrong conclusion. by mangu · · Score: 2, Interesting
    Try this: leave the keys in your car parked during the night in a downtown street. Tell it to your insurance company and try to make them pay you.


    To use the normal /. terminology, this is "orthogonal" to the punishment applied to the thief. He was wrong in stealing your car, yes, but you are also wrong in being so careless. By being careless, you are creating an incentive to crime and should also be punished. You are an accessory to the crime, an accomplice.


    Remember this, "property rights" exist only because of our social conventions. Have you ever seen two dogs sharing a bone? Among animals, property always goes to the stronger one that wants it. So, to have any rights to your property, you should follow social conventions. One of these conventions is that you should take reasonable steps to protect your property when the circumstances make it necessary.


    You may sleep with open doors if you live in a farm somewhere, but not in a poor inner city neighborhood. Likewise, you must be sure to lock your system if you ever connect to the internet. If you don't do it, then you are guilty of the crime of creating an environment where cybercrime propagates.

    1. Re:Good analogy. Wrong conclusion. by amliebsch · · Score: 1
      You are an accessory to the crime, an accomplice.

      Ah, no. These words have specific legal meanings, especially in criminal contexts. If this were true, then that means that YOU could be prosecuted for somebody else stealing YOUR CAR, because you made it too easy or something. Wrong answer. Generally speaking, it is not a crime to be careless, even extremely careless, with your own property.

      --
      If you don't know where you are going, you will wind up somewhere else.
    2. Re:Good analogy. Wrong conclusion. by satans_advocate · · Score: 0

      Generally speaking, it is not a crime to be careless, even extremely careless, with your own property.

      Except under execeptional circumstances where you can be charged with 'gross negligence occaisoning death', or similar.

    3. Re:Good analogy. Wrong conclusion. by DarkVader · · Score: 1

      Actually, in some places, it is illegal to leave your keys in an unattended vehicle.

    4. Re:Good analogy. Wrong conclusion. by Math,+The+Ancient · · Score: 1

      "Try this: leave the keys in your car parked during the night in a downtown street. Tell it to your insurance company and try to make them pay you."

      I don't leave my keys in my car, I use authentication to access it. It is circumventing that authentication (car-jacking vs trojans) that we're placing the wrong blame here.

      --
      If I really am talking out of my ass...explain it to me with respect so I'll at least pull my ears out to listen.
  73. ... but Microsoft Windows aren't by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    MS-windows aren't a necessary element of any computer

    1. Re:... but Microsoft Windows aren't by Math,+The+Ancient · · Score: 1

      umm...boy, you sure missed the point on this thread.

      --
      If I really am talking out of my ass...explain it to me with respect so I'll at least pull my ears out to listen.
  74. Only 225 hours? by threephaseboy · · Score: 1

    Must be a machine spec'd out for Longhorn.

    --
    .
  75. Re:Could've been worse- elephant poo by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    ...shoveling elephant poop at the zoo...

    I think it'd be best if such a sentence is carried out by not allowing the use of a shovel. Or gloves. : )

  76. Uhh... Re:Drops the fine? by templest · · Score: 2
    IANAL, but for an EULA to work, doesn't the user have to agree to it and run the program voluntarily?
    Would you like to run this worm and agree with the Terms of Service? (Y/n): _"

    Again, dunno. Maybe I'm wrong. Comments?
    --
    I'm a signature virus. Please copy me to your signature so I can replicate.
    1. Re:Uhh... Re:Drops the fine? by HiThere · · Score: 1

      FWIW, there have been viruses distributed that included an install dialog that essentially amounted to just this. I haven't heard whether anyone has ever been prosecuted for writing them.

      Might be an interesting case. If they did the EULA correctly, they might get MS paying for their defense.

      --

      I think we've pushed this "anyone can grow up to be president" thing too far.
  77. Mod Parent Up! by cornjchob · · Score: 1

    That's the first post in a while I haven't replied specifically to bitch. In fact, I'm not replying to say anything except well put, and we need a helluva lot more people like you on /.

    --
    We now have confirmed reports from an informed Orange County minister that Ethel is still an active communist.
  78. Wrong! by Luke+Psywalker · · Score: 0, Redundant

    This kid did not write the blaster virus! He just made a varient that involved small changes and his varient infected 50,000 computers.

    The real blaster virus infected nearly 10 million computers.

  79. OT... by niteice · · Score: 1

    but nice UID.

    --
    ROMANES EUNT DOMUS
  80. Feasibility by Trejkaz · · Score: 1

    Microsoft might have noticed that hardly any 18 year olds are going to have $500,000 to actually pay the fines.

    --
    Karma: It's all a bunch of tree-huggin' hippy crap!
  81. Under what terms? by Vthornheart · · Score: 1

    How is Microsoft allowed to impose a fine on someone, or is the wording of this article simply incorrect? Last I looked, Microsoft was a business: and only government entities held any jurisdiction in the realm of legally imposable fines.

    --
    -Vendal Thornheart
    1. Re:Under what terms? by Math,+The+Ancient · · Score: 1

      Last I looked, it's called restitution and lawyers representing both sides come to a common agreement. The alternative was the kid declares a Chapter 13 Bankruptcy (pay agreement up to 5 years) and MS gets alot less.

      --
      If I really am talking out of my ass...explain it to me with respect so I'll at least pull my ears out to listen.
  82. Too bad... by XeRo_X4i · · Score: 0

    Too bad the orignial writer of the blaster worm never bothered to copyright his work, or else he could have sued this kid's ass for all of his $20 dollars.

    --
    XeRo
  83. Microsoft = innovation by uigrad_2000 · · Score: 1

    1. Create a sloppy piece of software with bugs and security holes
    2. Wait until a 19-year kid figures out how to do damage with it
    3. ...
    4. Profit!

    --
    Free unix account: freeshell.org
  84. You don't know shit! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Herbavore poo is not very unpleasant. At least as far as poo goes. For nasty, you really need to go with some sort of carnivore.

  85. How to end computer viruses, forever... by rice_burners_suck · · Score: 0, Troll
    There should be a law that states this: If you write a virus that infects any system running non-Microsoft software, you go to prison forever. If you write a virus that infects systems running Microsoft software, Microsoft is required to pay you a licensing fee of not less than $2,200 for each copy of the virus that propogates. Of course, your virus would be required to send identifying information to a central server, which would keep track of its propogation, so that you would get paid what you are owed.

    Yes, this sounds like a good way to get rid of viruses. (Because everyone will switch away from Microsoft software, and then the virus writers will find another profession.)

  86. Go find the original sentencing news reports by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    It was a fairly content free article, but that's par for the course for links on /.

    Partial credit. The links didn't require a login to the largely content fee article.

  87. Re:But will he get respect from the other criminal by DarkMantle · · Score: 1

    Well, Billy-Boy Gates seems to have some respect for him. Even though he's not clasified a criminal yet.

    --
    DarkMantle I been bored, so I started a blog.
  88. The State Always Gets Theirs... by Saeed+al-Sahaf · · Score: 1

    I don't think that's the way it works here, but IANAL. In general, The Government exempts them selves from allowing people to relieve debts to them in bankruptcies for example defaulted student loans and such. Since The Government makes the laws, they get their $$$ one way or another.

    --
    "Who are in control, they are not in control of anything - they don't even control themselves!" - Glen Beck
    1. Re:The State Always Gets Theirs... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Actually, I think you can do that. Recall the recent uproar over proposed legislation that would prohibit people from declaring bankruptcy to get out of paying fines related to protesting at abortion clinics. This would seem to imply that currently you are able to declare bankruptcy to get out of paying civil and/or criminal penalties.

    2. Re:The State Always Gets Theirs... by Saeed+al-Sahaf · · Score: 1

      Thanks for your political comments about abortion. But that is not relevent in this discussion. Go away.

      --
      "Who are in control, they are not in control of anything - they don't even control themselves!" - Glen Beck
  89. This guy will not be employed by your local 7-11. by CTB0y · · Score: 1

    People like this are not left out in the cold for long. An individual who has done what this person has is very employable by large firms with lots of money, and no problems with paying someone who has been able to undermine most of the technical world with a simple mickey mouse virus. This guy isn't going to go hungry. he will seem to disappear but I promise you he will be in demand.

  90. MAJOR TYPO by saleenS281 · · Score: 1

    someone needs to fix that "author" of MSBlast, this kid didn't author anything. He downloaded a copy of it off the internet and changed two lines so that it would grab the worm from his server of choice.

  91. Dropping the fine by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
    M$ and the teenager were jointly responsible for the Blaster. (Take either one out of the picture, and it would not have happened). What was M$'s fine and jail time, and has the teenager dropped that ?

    Liberty and Justice for all, I seem to remember.

  92. what? by cg0def · · Score: 1

    MS should have offered him a job rather than going after him (like they usually do). Can't wait until some guy from China or some other country thet does not follow US legislation gets pissed of at MS. That would be one great day. Instead of keeping 50 layers on staff they can kick some of them out an pay for developers to FINALLY fix the problems with windows or rewrite the damn thing. Windows is the longest going industry joke by far.

  93. What do you think they hired him for? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    OK. So MS is taking 225 hours of a successful virus writer's development... er.. i mean "community service not involving ... heh heh ... computers... pbbbt!" instead of a $500,000 fine. Sure, they don't really need the money, and he surely can't pay it.

    But they DO need a virus to hit some other OS so they can finally not be the security laughing stock of the world.

    I bet they target OSX, since its about to release a new version, which (at least as far as Windows has shown us) should have hundreds of critical bugs waiting to be exploited...

    I wonder who will win...

    (go Steve!)

  94. Proper Community Service by chucks86 · · Score: 0

    I think a better use of all of those zombie boxes would have been remote distcc clients. You know what kinds of computers people buy for their grandmothers/other stereotypical Windows users-- stats to put a lot of our computers to shame.

    --
    Help a poor college student. Send a couple cents via paypal to chucks86@gmail.com
  95. I feel sorry for the kid, by brammo · · Score: 1

    but why didn't he just use an internet cafe? I think they would be great for spreading viruses etc., or do you need a passport to use them?

    --
    Tha-tha-tha-tha-that's all folks!
  96. You, RTFA! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    It doesn't say that anywhere in the article or in any of the articles links. So, why don't you RTFA and STFU? Ass Cheese!

  97. Do the math? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Um, 10% of 18 years is 21.6 months. And sure 3.6 months is much of a difference....Unless you're in prison!!