Slashdot Mirror


Hibernation on Demand

Mr. Christmas Lights writes "Dr. Mark Roth at the Fred Hutchinson Cancer Research Center has successfully induced a state of reversible metabolic hibernation in mice which (no surprise) is getting quite a bit of publicity. Attempts in the past have used cooling techniques, but Dr. Roth uses hydrogen sulfide (80 parts/million) to basically put the warm-blooded mice into an advanced hibernated state, with a drop from the normal 120 breaths/minute to less than 10. Core body temperature also drops as low as 11C (50F) to match the ambient room temperature. The mice recover in about two hours once normal air/temperatures are applied, with no apparent ill effects - apparently there is a mice IQ/motor-skills test. In addition to the obligatory reference to Woody Allen's Sleeper movie, this has applicability for emergency rooms as it would be beneficial to in ER medicine as a way of "buying time" while diagnosis is performed."

108 of 185 comments (clear)

  1. Hibernating by DarkHelmet · · Score: 4, Funny

    If only we could put those dupes on ice...

    --
    /^[A-Z0-9._%+-]+@[A-Z0-9.-]+\.[A-Z]{2,4}$/i
    1. Re:Hibernating by Jack+Taylor · · Score: 1

      I'm beginning to think more and more that what the editors need is some sort of automatic dupe checker. Something that takes the less common words in each submission and compares them to the common words in all /. stories for the last few weeks. With a system like that, the words "hibernating" and "mice" would have marked this story out as a likely dupe straight away. In fact, a well-crafted Google query could bring most of this functionality...

      --
      One good turn - gets all the covers.
    2. Re:Hibernating by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful

      I have something that can check dupes, its called "you-get-payed-stop-being-lazy-asses-and-fucking-r ead." However, it is very hard to master, and still in beta stages. Still, I think this product could be the solution.

    3. Re:Hibernating by JoshRoss · · Score: 2, Funny

      I was going to sell my RTFA3000 software, but then I realized that Tridge was going to reverse engineer it. Therefore, I decided to preemptively revoke slashdot's license.

    4. Re:Hibernating by R.Mo_Robert · · Score: 1

      What can you expect? E-mail is worse than marijuana, after all.

      --
      R.Mo
    5. Re:Hibernating by 1u3hr · · Score: 1
      Slashdot: search "hibernation finds both.

      They just don't give a fuck. How hard is it to spellcheck -- they can't be bothered to do that; let alone check if a story is a dupe or a hoax or a year old.

    6. Re:Hibernating by Dwonis · · Score: 1
      Why would the editors care to eliminate dupes when a bunch of slashdotters will still post comments (view advertisements) complaining about it.

      Dupes won't go away until they start adversely affecting /.'s bottom line.

    7. Re:Hibernating by DeXtroMe · · Score: 1

      After considering this I've come to the conclusion that /.ers are a bunch of whiney biotches (and no, I'm not new here). As you've so astutely pointed out, the situation won't change until the 'dupes' start affecting OSDN's bottom line, which is to say never. Mark my words, dupes will not ever effect the bottom line because, put quite simply, no one gives a fuck. The most vocal dupe-avengers are the ones who are so obsessed with Slashdot that they'll continue coming here no matter what. The rest of us see a story we've seen before and go 'Hmmm, guess I won't click on that link'. Oh NO! My day is now ruined, I didn't click, read, and reply and each and every story posted on Slashdot!

  2. Dupe by qewl · · Score: 1, Redundant

    Thanks for another dupe (Front page news 36 hours ago).. Well, if nothing else, this one has a few more details.

    --

    (\_/)
    (O.o) This is Bunny. (> <)
    1. Re:Dupe by FidelCatsro · · Score: 1

      it is'nt a dupe , its an evolutionary step .

      --
      The only things certain in war are Propaganda and Death. You can never be sure which is which though
    2. Re:DUPE by FidelCatsro · · Score: 1, Interesting
      --
      The only things certain in war are Propaganda and Death. You can never be sure which is which though
    3. Re:DUPE by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Interesting? Are you people completely insane?

  3. First Human Tests... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny

    ...are apparently with Slashdot editors.

  4. There is a drawback he reports ... by Nice2Cats · · Score: 4, Funny

    ... you spend the rest of your life smelling like rotten eggs because of the sulfide...

    1. Re:There is a drawback he reports ... by OrangeSpyderMan · · Score: 3, Funny

      ... you spend the rest of your life smelling like rotten eggs because of the sulfide...

      This is actually a feature - "Hey geeks, hibernate and retain that unwashed smell you spent your life creating" :-)

      --
      Try NetBSD... safe,straightforward,useful.
    2. Re:There is a drawback he reports ... by William+Robinson · · Score: 1

      Hmmm...Now I know where my colleague is coming from

    3. Re:There is a drawback he reports ... by mrjb · · Score: 1

      H2S is also the main smelly component in farts. Somehow nobody has volunteered for a human hibernation experiment yet. Now why would that be?

      --
      Visit http://ringbreak.dnd.utwente.nl/~mrjb/growingbettersoftware to download your free copy of the book
    4. Re:There is a drawback he reports ... by Solder+Fumes · · Score: 1

      H2S is also the main smelly component in farts.

      No kidding? I guess this explains why some of those vile, concentrated elevator farts seem to last an eternity.

  5. Wow! It works! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny

    This hibernation thing really works. Seems like only yesterday that I went to bed after reading about this.

    1. Re:Wow! It works! by William+Robinson · · Score: 1

      Yeah....You were found hibernated while discussing with colleague eating beans.

  6. oh shut up, honestly by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Insightful

    In further news, READ YOUR OWN FUCKING SITE once a day you stupid fuck.

    1. Re:oh shut up, honestly by duncangough · · Score: 1

      what he said
      or write a perl script to do it for you ffs

    2. Re:oh shut up, honestly by MoogMan · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Calm down dear, its only a slashdot article.

    3. Re:oh shut up, honestly by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny
      "READ YOUR OWN FUCKING SITE"

      Woah, /. has pr0n now? Finally, /. decided to get what geeks really want in a site. How might I find the new section, btw?

  7. Worst Dupe Ever by chronos82 · · Score: 2, Funny

    Oh MY FUCKING GOD HOW DID THIS GET THROUGH? The previous story couldnt have been more than 2 days ago. Ive had enough of this shit, Im handing in my slashdot ID, from now on I shall post anonymously as a Coward, and get modded up more. Christ, you people have turned this place into a fucking joke.

    1. Re:Worst Dupe Ever by Legion303 · · Score: 1, Insightful

      You could use your +2 account almost exclusively for trolling, like I've done for the past 2 years.

    2. Re:Worst Dupe Ever by martingunnarsson · · Score: 3, Informative

      If you're a suscriber there's a link to report "problems" with an article. I reported this one and many before it as dupes. Sometimes it helps (perhaps if enough people complain about a story), sometimes it doesn't.

      --
      Martin
    3. Re:Worst Dupe Ever by brainstyle · · Score: 1

      Personally, I'd rather not have to pay for the privilege of improving the editing on this site. I mean, if anything, if you're paying you should have to put up with this stuff even less - rather than be expected to let the editors know when they aren't doing their jobs.

      --
      "Why can't everyone just be straight with me?"
      "Because we live in a bendy world, dear."
    4. Re:Worst Dupe Ever by Inverse+Icarus · · Score: 1

      So, you pay to do work that benefits the non-subscribers? Brilliant!

    5. Re:Worst Dupe Ever by mrogers · · Score: 1

      Maybe they've realised they can get more page impressions by posting a dupe than a new story, thanks to all the people bitching about it.

    6. Re:Worst Dupe Ever by Stephen+H-B · · Score: 1
      Reminds me of a Dilbert strip I saw the other day.

      Dilbert (to his Mom): "As usual, I worked until midnight last night Mom."

      Mom: "Well, at least you got paid for the extra time."

      "No. I'm on a salary. I don't get overtime."

      "Well, at least you improved your presentation."

      "Not really, my boss made me change my powerpoint slides, but the changes made them worse."

      "Then you can point that out at the meeting tomorrow"

      "The meeting was cancelled. It's all right though, because the project isn't funded anyway."

      "So, you worked for free to worsen a presentation for a meeting that won't happen for a project that doesn't exist?"

      "Yep."

      --
      Sick of WoW? Try the thinking man's MMORPG: EVE Online
  8. In other news... by nacturation · · Score: 4, Funny

    Microsoft initiates legal action against the researchers for numerous violations of patents covering the Windows Hiberation feature.

    --
    Want to improve your Karma? Instead of "Post Anonymously", try the "Post Humously" option.
    1. Re:In other news... by druske · · Score: 1

      The machines I've had trouble with have been a Compaq Aero with Windows 95, an HP OmniBook 4150A running Windows 2000, and, most recently, a Dell Latitude running Windows XP SP1. I have a Dell D600 due in within a few days with XP SP2 on it, and I'm hoping that fares better.

      I've heard nice things about the Thinkpads, but my corporate masters make such choices for me.

      However that might sound, I'm sure they do this out of love.

  9. I wish... by CaptainPuff · · Score: 4, Funny

    I was on hibernation long enough to get some fresh stories...

  10. I regularly hibernate... by Zemran · · Score: 4, Funny

    each day at work ... I normally recover in time to go home without any ill effects and do not require the smell of rotting eggs.

    --
    I love stacking my barbecues in the shed at the end of summer - you can't beat a bit of grill on grill action.
  11. Travelling to the year 3000 by Goalie_Ca · · Score: 3, Funny

    So now i'll be able to bite his shiny metal ass!?

    --

    ----
    Go canucks, habs, and sens!
  12. I mod this -20 DUPE by tekrat · · Score: 1

    THIS STORY IS A DUPE.....
    Why do you people waste our time?

    Do you slashdot editors really get PAID to be this stupid!!!!? WHY CAN'T I GET A JOB LIKE THAT?

    --
    If telephones are outlawed, then only outlaws will have telephones.
  13. My first application for this would be by Travoltus · · Score: 1

    to put millions of humans into hibernation in underground vaults while the people on the surface pollute themselves into extinction.

    If nothing went wrong then they'd awaken x thousand years later and be repatriated. Or start a revolution. Or take down the Matrix. Or something...

    --
    --- Grow a pair, liberals... stop letting the Republicans bully you!
  14. Copy this story NOW and resubmit it by tekrat · · Score: 1, Troll

    I dare every slashdotter who reads this to copy the story VERBATIM and resubmit it as a new story! That'll teach those editors (well, not really, who are we kidding, they are too stupid to know!)...

    --
    If telephones are outlawed, then only outlaws will have telephones.
  15. If you thought this is a dupe then... by A+beautiful+mind · · Score: 4, Funny

    Just wait until Zonk dupes CmdrTaco's "Update For for the dupe. Not going well. Appreciate all the hate mail. Really encourages improvement.".

    --
    It takes a man to suffer ignorance and smile
    Be yourself no matter what they say
  16. Let's improve on that by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny
    I doubt they'll fall for it now that you've made the plan public. However, let's agree to resubmit a verbatim copy of every dupe article from now on.

    For chrissake, I mailed them about the story being dupe and the guys still post it...

    1. Re:Let's improve on that by wdd1040 · · Score: 1

      But, it's obvious they don't read the site. So, why would posting it publicly here make a difference?

      --
      wdd
  17. Why Dupes really get posted by Stripsurge · · Score: 2, Insightful

    They are very popular articles. Just look how many replies they get. Sometimes they even more than the original article. Not only that but there is an outpouring of emotion. So much anger is spawned from just a few clicks of the keyboard (ok maybe they just copy paste from the original post. I really dunno) Most importantly though it is the one subject that ALL Slashdotters can agree upon. Dupes are TEH Suck.

    Just a thought. How about the next obvious dupe that comes along nobody reply. See if we can it to get off the front page without a single reply. It'll never happen but a man can dream.

    1. Re:Why Dupes really get posted by nounderscores · · Score: 1

      That is the most insightful thing I have ever heard on slashdot. Since this is about a story that was reposted just 36 hours after it was initally posted (which must be a world record) it's definitely ontopic.

      Unfortunately, it also opens up the possiblity that the editors have gotten so sick of the slashdot crowd that they are actively trolling us by reposting popular articles, rather than using slashback.

      If I was caught napping and missed the Hybernation story (sorry) I would really want to hear about it again On Slashback. I'm a biochemistry honours student and i'm really interested in what kind of changes at the cellular and molecular level would go on in a non-hybernating mammal when exposed to H2S. I'd be overjoyed if I got told about an article as important as this one had been overlooked by me... so long as they told me through the proper channels like slashback.

    2. Re:Why Dupes really get posted by 1u3hr · · Score: 1
      . Since this is about a story that was reposted just 36 hours after it was initally posted (which must be a world record)

      Nothing like a record. I've often seen dupes both live on the front page, posted two or three hours apart. Not by the same editor, though Taco has reposted some "funny website" filler he'd already done months ago.

    3. Re:Why Dupes really get posted by jericho4.0 · · Score: 1
      There was a dupe a year or so ago with one story between the two.

      --
      "A language that doesn't affect the way you think about programming, is not worth knowing" - Alan Perlis
  18. i for one... by distantbody · · Score: 1

    ...welcome our new dupe overlords, note their dupliciousness.

    1. Re:i for one... by Punboy · · Score: 1

      Now that we've welcomed them, and even honored their arrival with the invention of a new word, lets celebrate by creating a sentence to go with said word.

      The Slashdot Editors have a predilection to exceeding dupliciousness.

      --
      If you like what I've said here, and want to read more, go to http://www.krillrblog.com
  19. Make use of this space by OBeardedOne · · Score: 4, Funny

    Since this is a dupe (and a very recent one at that) and all we're going to hear is whinging about it being a dupe I figure why not make use of the space. I submit that we change the subject to something worthwhile discussing: Category: ASK SLASHDOT Subject: DUPE ARTICLES "With all of the fancy software and technology at their disposal, how is it possible for Slashdot to not have a "technological" system in place to ensure that dupe articles are not submitted to the front page? Are their systems too complicated to enable the development and use of a simple dupe article checker that would automatically search and warn of similar, perhaps identical, articles that have recently been posted? Is it that the cost of such software is prohibitive, or that they believe submission of dupe articles are considered "funny" to readers and therefore help the bottom line? Or is it pure laziness? Discuss.

  20. I don't mind the occasional dupes but by FidelCatsro · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Im sick fed up of the constant row of "OMG DUPE yo idiotz" posts that follow.
    a constant dupe of "this is a dupe" posts ....
    People take your own advice and stop duping previous comments

    --
    The only things certain in war are Propaganda and Death. You can never be sure which is which though
    1. Re:I don't mind the occasional dupes but by Punboy · · Score: 1

      I second that. You think the editors are being duplicious? Look at yourselves. You're dupliciating yourselves by commenting on their dupliciousness.

      If you're confused about the strange words, click here.

      --
      If you like what I've said here, and want to read more, go to http://www.krillrblog.com
  21. Re:Fountain of Youth? by Kippesoep · · Score: 1

    Freezing stops many if not all of the biological processes in the body, including aging. Hibernation is just a (deep and prolonged) form of sleep. You do get older while sleeping. Comatose people also age normally. I doubt very much hibernation will be anything like the fountain of youth.

  22. Moderators by mincognito · · Score: 1

    Parent should receive +1 for redundancy.

  23. Dupes and subscribers by theolein · · Score: 4, Insightful

    I think it's time that there was an open discussion of dupes (This article is a dupe of one poasted last night).

    There have been pro and against arguments. The pro argument have been that some people miss the original articles and have a second chance to post. The neutral argument has been that if one doesn't like the dupe, one should simpy ignore it. Both of these arguments make good sense.

    However, slashdot is in some sense a commercial enterprise. The majority are, of course, not subscribers, but there must be quite a few all the same. Slashdot also gets paid by advertisers to get many hits. Advertisers could argue that they get less hits on dupe articles.

    In these last two cases, it isn't exactly a shiny example of quality in a product (if one can look upin slashdot as a product) to see so many dupes. I know that the sheer number of dupes in slashdot would prevent me from subscribing as I see it as a problem of editors being disinterested in checking what they post.

    1. Re:Dupes and subscribers by martyb · · Score: 1
      I think it's time that there was an open discussion of dupes (This article is a dupe of one poasted last night).

      There have been pro and against arguments. The pro argument have been that some people miss the original articles and have a second chance to post. The neutral argument has been that if one doesn't like the dupe, one should simpy ignore it. Both of these arguments make good sense.

      However, slashdot is in some sense a commercial enterprise. The majority are, of course, not subscribers, but there must be quite a few all the same. Slashdot also gets paid by advertisers to get many hits. Advertisers could argue that they get less hits on dupe articles.

      In these last two cases, it isn't exactly a shiny example of quality in a product (if one can look upin slashdot as a product) to see so many dupes. I know that the sheer number of dupes in slashdot would prevent me from subscribing as I see it as a problem of editors being disinterested in checking what they post.

      I agree with your sentiment. I also understand that it can be difficult to detect a dupe when such a large number of articles come streaming through. It's a non-trivial task.

      What I would recommend is some kind of tool which discerns "similarity" between a current article under consideration, and articles posted within, say, the last week. What comes to mind is a technique used to detect spam - Bayesian (sp?) Filters. It just seems to me that these are similar problem spaces and that it may be able to apply the same techniques. Even if, just prior to an article being posted, the top 5 [or so] most similar articles were presented for comparison, it could help to knock a few off the site.

      Now maybe that's not the right technology to use, but it seems like there should be some way we can leverage anti-spam tools to assist in this.

    2. Re:Dupes and subscribers by theolein · · Score: 1

      I think that if they simply fixed the search tool, they'd be part of the way there. That way, they'd be able to do a quick search before they posted an article. Alternativley, they could just use google.

    3. Re:Dupes and subscribers by nounderscores · · Score: 1

      They have a way to let people see an article they missed. It's called "Slashback."

      Not using slashback and just reposting it is a form of trolling. Before I sound too much like a hypocrite, I'll refer you to my previous post

    4. Re:Dupes and subscribers by Cougar_ · · Score: 2, Insightful

      How hard is it to just read all the articles. I read them all, and I have only a few minutes a day to spend viewing Slashdot. Surely those being paid to contribute to Slashdot could spend a bit of time each day reading everything that's been posted since their last visit?

    5. Re:Dupes and subscribers by Pedrito · · Score: 4, Insightful

      I also understand that it can be difficult to detect a dupe when such a large number of articles

      Why is it so difficult? They post what, 20 articles a day? How hard is it to look over the past 100 topics to see if it was previously posted? I agree, though that a simple tool could provide them with the ability to detect these. I don't even think you'd need Bayesian techniques. A simple comparison of the less common words would probably bring 90% of them out pretty quickly.

      But as I posted a while ago: Where's their incentive to improve their quality? What, are we all going to go somewhere else and stop reading Slashdot? I don't suspect that will happen anytime soon.

      The fact is, Slashdot is an amateur operation that happens to make a little money. I doubt they make that much. When was the last time they updated the web site in any significant way? Let's face it, these guys aren't working for a living. That's cool. I'm sure a lot of people would in their situation. But they clearly don't follow their own site and they clearly could care less about what people think about it. If they did, the site would improve.

    6. Re:Dupes and subscribers by Andrewkov · · Score: 4, Insightful

      That's my thought exactly .. These dupes send a clear message that the Slashdot staff, who are *paid* to work for a for-profit company, spend less time reading the site than the casual readers. I'm not a /. addict by any means, but I do login a few times a day from work to see what's happening. If a casual reader like myself can spot these dupes, why can't the editors? Do they actually read their own site less than I do?

    7. Re:Dupes and subscribers by studog-slashdot · · Score: 2, Interesting
      In these last two cases, it isn't exactly a shiny example of quality in a product (if one can look upin slashdot as a product) to see so many dupes. I know that the sheer number of dupes in slashdot would prevent me from subscribing as I see it as a problem of editors being disinterested in checking what they post.

      What Slashdot really needs is the ability to mod articles as well as comments. Then dupes would get (-1, Redundant) and disappear.

      ....Stu

    8. Re:Dupes and subscribers by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful

      Frequently when you take an activity a person enjoys, start paying them for it (or make it a responsibility they are required to engage in), it will become far less enjoyable.

      You almost always get far better quality from volunteer mods, ironically enough.

    9. Re:Dupes and subscribers by Maxwell'sSilverLART · · Score: 2, Informative

      These dupes send a clear message that the Slashdot staff, who are *paid* to work for a for-profit company....

      That's because you're doing it all wrong. The staff doesn't care. But there is a solution; you mention that they work for a for-profit company. Gentlemen, I give you the contact information for the Open Source Technology Group, Slashdot's parent company:

      46939 Bayside Parkway
      Fremont, CA 94538

      Toll free: (877) 825-4689
      Phone: (510) 687-7000
      Fax: (510) 687-7155

      E-mail: info@ostg.com [not linkified for spam reasons]
      (Source: http://www.ostg.com/contact/index.htm) You want the editors to, erm, edit? Complain to their bosses.
      --
      Moderate drunk! It's more fun that way!
    10. Re:Dupes and subscribers by 1u3hr · · Score: 1
      They have a way to let people see an article they missed. It's called "Slashback."

      There is a better way: just look at the "older stuff" panel on the right.

      There you find Older Articles and Yesterday's news. You can just edit the URL for any given day, the date format (issue=20050423) is obvious.

    11. Re:Dupes and subscribers by Donny+Smith · · Score: 1

      I proposed that about a year ago and I'm sure others have done the same.

      Aparently the editorial scum doesn't like the idea as the next natural step is asking for the ability to mod editors (whereby the lame ones would get fired). Stupid fucks.

    12. Re:Dupes and subscribers by Rauser · · Score: 1

      I've started to check out another alternative, presented by the folks at Digg.

      The novel concept at Digg is the use of audience-based article promotion, so dupes get low ratings and are demoted. You can report dupes and have them removed. High audience interest in an article promotes it so it has a higher ranking. The audience has much more of a say, rather than the arbitrary whims of a select pool of editors.

      The entire process is spelled out nicely in their faq.

      --
      The white zone is for loading and unloading only. If you need to load or unload go to the white zone. It's a way of life
  24. Aha - that explains it ! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

    I have occasionally noticed the smell of rotten-eggs out in userland.

    I alwasy thought these people were just stupid - now I know they are hibernating at work.

  25. Re:Daddypants is sleeping by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

    The "editor-on-duty" must have been busy - like getting drunk, stoned or getting a blow job.

  26. Re:Im gonna get frozen by Rosco+P.+Coltrane · · Score: 1

    You may as well commit suicide right away, cuz you won't ever be woken up upon such conditions...

    --
    "A door is what a dog is perpetually on the wrong side of" - Ogden Nash
  27. Surviving hibernation by theufo · · Score: 5, Informative

    Why aren't hibernating mammals eaten alive by microorganisms? (yes there was a discussion before) Well, apparantly their immune system is actually disabled. However, they wake up periodically, specifically to fight off any infections.

    http://www.sciencedaily.com/releases/2002/04/02040 2074547.htm

    Humans can't do this if their cytochrome C is inhibited by hydrogen sulfide, so if you ever do this with humans, you'd have to make sure they wake up periodically to prevent all kinds of nastyness.

    Bats seem to have a different strategy. They stay in deep hibernation for prolonged periods up to 90 days, but their biochemistry changes quite drastically in order to do this. It's unlikely that human cells are able to change themselves so drastically.

    http://physrev.physiology.org/cgi/content/full/83/ 4/1153

    I really wonder what would happen to a mouse if you induce hibernation for more than a month.

    Buying hours and preventing damage would be a good purpose for artificial human hibernation, but I think space travel is a little far fetched.

    1. Re:Surviving hibernation by Aimak · · Score: 2, Interesting

      AFIK, hydrogen sulfide would also inhibit the cytochrome C of all aerobic bacteria in the body. Hence, the infection risk may be decreased during the hibernation because these bacteria would be "hibernating" too.

      About the anaerobic bacteria found within our body, I'm not sure. Perhaps a combined effect with low temperature could also prevent these anaerobic bacteria of growing.

      Low temperature (not freezing) and a mixture of gases may be the way to go about long-term hibernation.

    2. Re:Surviving hibernation by mbrod · · Score: 2, Interesting

      I would think the hydrogen sulfide in the body would also induce hibernation in the microorganisms in the body. Slowing them down.

    3. Re:Surviving hibernation by randall_burns · · Score: 1

      What is the problem with just waking folks up say once a month just long enough for their immune system to kick in? Also would they necessarily "wake" or just go from hibernation to regular sleep?

      I understand that this would remove some of the advantage you get in areas like oxygen consumptino from hybernation-but it would seem like there would still be a big advantage.

  28. Re:Daddypants is sleeping by Loconut1389 · · Score: 1

    And yet a couple of truly decent articles I had got rejected. Go figure.

  29. I'm a nerd... by Beolach · · Score: 1

    You can tell I'm a nerd when my first thought when reading this isn't the Woody Allen movie, but instead is all of the many sci-fi stories that use chemically induced hibernation to aid in long-distance space travel.

    --
    Join moola.com, play games to earn money.
  30. Re:Why is everybody complaining? by Loconut1389 · · Score: 1

    Well, lots of us do read every article.. and reading the same thread again is like reading pride and prejudice again for another english class... and for everyone else there's the 'Older Stuff' section.

  31. Re:Fountain of Youth? by Punboy · · Score: 1

    There is a different between hibernation and a coma or deep sleep. In a deep sleep or coma, your metabolism continues at its normal pace. In hibernation, the metabolism slows down drastically, causing lower energy consumption, lower cell death, and ultimately, slower aging.

    --
    If you like what I've said here, and want to read more, go to http://www.krillrblog.com
  32. Re:Good Job, Slashdot by Chris+Kamel · · Score: 2, Funny

    And I've never seen such a worse grammar in my whole life :p

    --
    The following statement is true
    The preceding statement is false
  33. Freezerville by nounderscores · · Score: 1

    Good point about the low temp.

    How about doing what no animal can do, and clean ourselves externally and internally before hybernating under aseptic conditions?

    1. Re:Freezerville by Boronx · · Score: 1

      And take a boatload of antibiotics.

  34. Software solution for dupes? by rdurell · · Score: 3, Interesting

    So I have a software based suggestion for how to ameliorate the dupe problem. My suggestion would add a step to both the initial submit of the story as well as to the post of the story. Additionally, the responsibility for preventing dupes is shared between the submitter and the editor.

    1) User completes submission form
    2) The user's write-up is compared to the last year or so worth of posts. (You could pull keywords from the submission, pattern match or use any number of other techniques.)
    3) The user is presented with a list of similar articles
    4) The user then reviews the list of articles
    5) The user either abandons the submit as a dupe or continues/certifies the submit as not a dupe to the best of his/her knowledge

    The editor would encounter a similar process (following steps 3-5). It is important that the editors follow this process as well to help them find and reject dupes that a submitter may not have (or chose not to) noticed.

    This would probably not eliminate all dupes, but should help mitigate the issue.

    Thoughts?

    1. Re:Software solution for dupes? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful

      They just should moderate the submissions...

      This would also prevent hoaxes and stories that are just ads.

    2. Re:Software solution for dupes? by Johan+Veenstra · · Score: 1

      A.L.I.C.E.: Do you think this would probably not eliminate all dupes, but should help mitigate the issue?

    3. Re:Software solution for dupes? by aardvarkjoe · · Score: 1
      Thoughts?
      My thoughts? If the editors can't be bothered to glance at the last dozen stories posted on the front page before posting a new story, they won't review a computer-generated list of potential dupes either.

      How's this for a solution: if an editor posts a dupe, he doesn't get paid that day. Maybe that would actually get them to pay attention.

      --

      How can we continue to believe in a just universe and freedom to eat crackers if we have no ale?
  35. Re:this all hibernation is a dupe by Boronx · · Score: 1

    Therefore in Soviet Russia the Bear hibernates you?

  36. Re: or maybe by BitterAndDrunk · · Score: 1
    you just have good taste in movies.

    On the bright side, we could round up all our phone sanitizers and send them off to a new planet with this technology. . . we just have to do it before the third HHG2TG movie comes out and spills the beans on our nefarious plan.

    --
    You better watch out, there may be dogs about . . .
  37. Sorry 'bout the dupe submission ... by xmas2003 · · Score: 3, Funny
    I hadn't seen the earlier hibernation article, so I'll share the blame for this dupe since I was the one who submitted it.

    Oh well, maybe we can all go back to sleep now ... ;-)

    --
    Hulk SMASH Celiac Disease
  38. Actually, no. by Grendel+Drago · · Score: 1

    The primary components in farts are nitrogen, oxygen, and other odorless gases. The smelly bits, if it smells like "rancid butter", is butyric acid, along with hydrogen sulfide and carbon disulfide.

    --grendel drago

    --
    Laws do not persuade just because they threaten. --Seneca
  39. Re:this all hibernation is a dupe by mooingyak · · Score: 1

    Umm..... as opposed to you hibernating the bear????

    --
    William of Ockham had no beard. The most likely explanation is that it was chewed off by squirrels every morning.
  40. embarrassment by Tedium+Unleased · · Score: 1

    if the dumb fucks don't read their own site, they care even less to read the comments and therefore don't give a shit enough about the readers of the site to be embarrassed by anything they say. slashdot's been coasting for the last few years.. it was never all that great, just better than most out there. it's produced by people who have no clue as to what diligence means and no concept of trying to be the best at what you do. maybe that's why so many IT/"coding" drones like it so much.

  41. Re:this all hibernation is a dupe by Boronx · · Score: 1

    Of course. Would *you* want to hibernate the bear?

  42. Next step by dutchd00d · · Score: 1

    Can't wait till someone submits a slashdot story to slashdot and it gets accepted. Recursive dupe!

  43. Yes it may be a dupe but... by whitetiger0990 · · Score: 1

    it has more details and I don't really care anyways. You say it "wastes yoru time" but it's your fault you are replying.


    Anyways back on topic; this is great. Just think about it. If you got some horrible deseise with no cure and you were frozen until a cure was found, would it matter if you smelt like rotten eggs?

    --
    You have been warned.
  44. Silly, misdirected scientists by nystagman · · Score: 1
    In addition to the obligatory reference to Woody Allen's Sleeper movie

    To hell with hibernation: if scientists feel the need to invent stuff in Woody Allen movies, how about starting with the Orb, or the Orgasmotron?

    Oh, wait, too late: http://forums.applenova.com/archive/index.php/t-25 84.html

    --
    Theory and practice are the same in theory, but different in practice.
  45. Re:space travel by Tlosk · · Score: 1

    Lol, it would be like going into a bacholor's frig and seeing several boxes of chinese. Open each one up and you never know quite what you will find, something tasty, or some unbelievable funk.

    I can imagine waking up after a 10 year space flight and as the pods whish open to have to see who among them "went bad", not a pleasant thought.

  46. Embrace dupes! by TrueKonrads · · Score: 1

    we need only some improvements. 1) moderators vote articel as dupe, all +5 comments are then automaticlly linked here aswell. 2) A dupecounter goes up by 1. Once it reaches a certain threshold (say, 1337), CmdrTaco gets a beating in front of TV by a bunch of fat chicks.

    --
    Lone Gunmen crew.
  47. Obligatory link by TeknoHog · · Score: 1
    --
    Escher was the first MC and Giger invented the HR department.
  48. You think you're a nerd? by farquharsoncraig · · Score: 1

    My first thought was, "who is Woody Allen? Did he make movies?" (-:

  49. What's the use of handing your /. id? by fmobus · · Score: 1

    I mean, if you continue as an AC you will still be jerking off their ad-servers (which gives them money). Want to make a rebellion? Give up visiting /. at all.

  50. If you hate dupes... by Giggle+Stick · · Score: 1
    Most of the "stories" on slashdot are already a few days old anyway. If you read newscientist, you will get their science/technology stories a few days early. If you read Drudge, you will find the political/privacy articles a few days early too. I'm sure there are other sites as well that are more cutting edge for other types of stories.

    Furthermore, all you people complaining about the dupes, what's the point. I think it's kind of stupid too, but if they don't even glance at the front page, will they bother reading the comments? Maybe each individual editor looks at the comments for their own stories, but I kinda doubt it.

    I think the reason it makes people mad, is cause they feel like they're relying on this site for technical foresight, and if they don't seem to care enough to prevent this kind of simple oversight, then what are the chances their putting in the effort for any of the site's content. I guess they're just phoning it in. Does the New York Times ever due the same story twice, and act like it's brand new each time?

  51. Pete and repeat were sitting in a boat by TyrelHaveman · · Score: 1

    How is this different than Yesterday's Story?

  52. Lots and lots of publicity!! by NFJ25 · · Score: 1
    (..)which (no surprise) is getting quite a bit of publicity.
    Yeap!
  53. Guantanamo Bay, here we come by vaporland · · Score: 1

    interesting the military funded this

    imagine the "correctional" aspects - you would be sentenced to ten years in prison, put into a drawer in the wall, and withdrawn like a safe deposit box at the end of your time

    and the prison staff could molest you at will, and you'd never be any wiser

    or, just put all political opposition on ice until the war is over . . .

    --
    Ask Me About... The 80's!
  54. Re:this all hibernation is a dupe by mooingyak · · Score: 1

    Oh. I hadn't realized you were volunteering :)

    --
    William of Ockham had no beard. The most likely explanation is that it was chewed off by squirrels every morning.
  55. emergency room, my ass by slazar · · Score: 1
    The last thing you want to do in an emergency room is slow the breathing down and body temperature of a patient. Often they are in shock and I imagine putting them in hibernation could have some bad effects. Sedation and pain relief are worthwhile, but we have drugs for that...

    Not that I am a medial doctor or anything but emergency room use just seems flawed. Hibernation really seems applicable to long term space travel (Mars anyone?). Cause hey, if the astronaut dosen't have to eat, weight can be saved.

  56. Re:Daddypants is sleeping by jericho4.0 · · Score: 1

    Did you mean 'giving a blowjob"?

    --
    "A language that doesn't affect the way you think about programming, is not worth knowing" - Alan Perlis
  57. Re:Why is everybody complaining? by jericho4.0 · · Score: 1
    It's a symptom of the general anger directed at /.'s editors for being lazy. It's evident that they don't actually read the site. They ignore patches to slashcode, they will not implement CSS, and in IRC chats they respond to all complaints with 'whatever, next'. They also arbitrarily permanently revoke moderator privileges from people who criticize them, like they were in junior high.

    /. is, IMO, the same thing as Microsoft, top of the market by virtue of being there first.

    --
    "A language that doesn't affect the way you think about programming, is not worth knowing" - Alan Perlis
  58. Higher functions by h8macs · · Score: 1

    I would assume that it is hard to predict the possible brain death in a mouse/rat. Moving that forward to humans.... you go first... ;-)

    --
    :-( --- argh. Despair, I owe again. :-b