Slashdot Mirror


NASA's Mars Polar Lander Found at Last?

Ant wrote in to mention that the Sky and Telescope is running a story (with photographs and other images) that NASA's Mars Polar Lander (MPL) may have been found. From the article: "On December 9, 1999, it was supposed to touch down near the red planet's south pole but disappeared after entering the Martian atmosphere without a trace. 5.5 years later, scientists think they may have finally located the lander's wreckage and confirmed what went wrong with the mission...The search for Mars Polar Lander was hampered by inexperience: the team didn't know what a parachute should look like or how the ground would be disturbed by the landing rockets. Lessons learned from observations of the Mars Exploration Rover landing sites helped team members identify what they think are the parachute, the rocket-blast zone, and ultimately the lander itself."

152 comments

  1. Late Breaking News: by TripMaster+Monkey · · Score: 5, Funny

    Today the Council disclosed the news that the repulsive beings inhabiting the blue planet third from our star have located the wreckage of one of their invading spacecraft near our planet's southern pole.

    Strangely enough, their newscasts mentioned nothing of the warning plaque errected alongside the downed invader.
    Some scientists theorize that the translation of our warning into their bestial language was imperfect, while others maintain that the plaque is simply too small to be imaged properly with their feeble, childish astronomical instruments.

    K'Breel, speaker for the Council, voiced another, more pesimistic theory:



    "Certainly, beings who are capable of constructing and sending such fiendishly clever little devices to spy on our world are more than capable of receiving and understanding our warning. They have simply chosen to disregard it. Clearly we can no longer ignore the predaceous advances of the evil blue planet. The Council has given the final authorization to divert our asteroid into a collision course. We now need only wait."

    --
    ____

    ~ |rip/\/\aster /\/\onkey

    1. Re:Late Breaking News: by Androk · · Score: 3, Funny

      K'Breel's opponent A'Ting says in typical liberal form, K'Breel is being to soft on the invaders. Nothing short of the devastation to the 5th planet will be acceptable, after all some could survive the asteroid collision. His quote "enviromental worries about a new asteroid belt blocking 5 to 10% of the sun are vastly over blown". More news as it comes...

    2. Re:Late Breaking News: by lseltzer · · Score: 1

      Let's just hope Ming the Merciless doesn't get involved.

    3. Re:Late Breaking News: by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0



      The fifth planet?

      What do the Martians have against the Jovians?

    4. Re:Late Breaking News: by Androk · · Score: 0

      The fifth planet? What do the Martians have against the Jovians? THat used to be the 6th planet, the fifth is a nice asteroid belt. Androk

    5. Re:Late Breaking News: by david.given · · Score: 2, Funny
      "...such fiendishly clever little devices..."

      Fiendishly clever? Obviously, those Martians aren't nearly as smart as they think they are...

    6. Re:Late Breaking News: by Mr_Huber · · Score: 1

      Today Aal Phylari Enallii of the Jovian Defense Center issued a statement indicating the pathetic meatbags of the third and fourth planets have allowed their feeble war to spread to the glorious Jovian system. Director Phylari is calling for cometary bombardment of both rocks until "rock four is as wet as rock three used to be."

    7. Re:Late Breaking News: by vsprintf · · Score: 1

      What mockery is this? Captain Carter knows full well that the probe was whacked by a banth

    8. Re:Late Breaking News: by Kosi · · Score: 1

      It's Colonel Carter, we're in season 8 already!

    9. Re:Late Breaking News: by vsprintf · · Score: 1

      :) Dude, what're you doing in the archives? It's dank and moldy. Get out of there before you catch something.

  2. A proposal by JPelorat · · Score: 5, Funny

    Change the project name to

    Mars Polar Plummeter

    and call it a "smashing success"!

    --
    Hokey statistics and ancient misconceptions are no match for a good thought in your head, kid!
    1. Re:A proposal by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      *whoosh*

      (if the project name is changed, then by definition it becomes successful - look how well it plummeted!)

      (yes, that's silly and comical and not exactly logical or true.. it wasn't a serious recommendation in the first place, lighten up)

    2. Re:A proposal by vandon · · Score: 4, Funny

      Who knew parachutes don't work as well in a thin atmosphere?

    3. Re:A proposal by deglr6328 · · Score: 5, Informative

      The parachutes worked fine. The crash was caused by a tiny microswitch on one of the landing feet that was supposed to switch the engines off when it was clicked shut by touching rocks/dirt. It bounced shut 40M up because that's when the feet unfolded causing a slight jolt to the craft. No one anticipated that and the software was designed ONLY to say: switch closed=shut down engines now!

      --
      - "Hear that?! The percolations are imminent! Cease your ingress!"
    4. Re:A proposal by Chrispy1000000+the+2 · · Score: 1

      I read that, and had the funny idea of what it would look like too see the lander/base, from the view of the rover, have its engines ignite.

      --
      Sig
    5. Re:A proposal by Infinite+Entropy · · Score: 1

      Sounds like ecsessive cost reduction replaced a very robust radar-based system with a very crappy and stupid switch. Ended up costing them a lot more in the long run!

    6. Re:A proposal by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The real problem is that while each of its legs had a sensor, only ONE intermittant contact indication constituted a touchdown.

      Clearly anyone with half a brain would have figured out that no less than two steady indications would have been far more reliable.

      Whoever came up with the first plan should have [his,her,their] kneecaps shot off.

  3. Before it gets Slashdotted... by TripMaster+Monkey · · Score: 5, Informative

    Here's the text of the article:


    In December 1999 NASA's Mars Polar Lander (MPL) was supposed to touch down near the red planet's south pole. But shortly after it entered the Martian atmosphere, the spacecraft disappeared without a trace. Only now, 5½ years later, do scientists think they may have finally located the lander's wreckage and confirmed what went wrong with the mission. The full report, by planetary scientist Michael C. Malin (Malin Space Science Systems), appears in the July 2005 issue of Sky & Telescope, now in press.

    Malin used his company's Mars Orbiter Camera (MOC) aboard NASA's Mars Global Surveyor to search for the missing spacecraft in late 1999 and early 2000, but apparently came up empty. Shortly thereafter, a review board looking into the craft's disappearance reported what might have caused Mars Polar Lander's demise. The board suggested that MPL's landing rockets fired at the right time and altitude but cut off prematurely. They were suppose to continue firing until one of the craft's landing legs touched the surface. Apparently the onboard software mistook the jolt of landing-leg deployment for ground contact and shut down the engines, causing MPL to fall from a presumed height of 40 meters (130 feet).

    Using information gained from observing the two Mars Exploration Rover landers last year, Malin reexamined the 1999 and 2000 images looking for similar features. This time he identified what looks to be a parachute located several hundred meters away from a disturbed bit of ground with a large mark in its center. The parachute-like feature closely matches the Mars Exploration Rover parachutes (which were made of the same materials), and Malin believes the disturbed ground matches what one would see if a rocket had blasted the surface from a height of tens of meters.

    "It seems that the MPL investigation board may have been correct," writes Malin in Sky & Telescope. "MPL's descent proceeded more or less successfully through atmospheric entry and parachute jettison. It was only a few short moments before touchdown that disaster struck."

    Later this year NASA will direct Mars Global Surveyor to reexamine the MPL crash site using a special technique to improve the camera's resolution to 0.5 meter per pixel. Malin hopes the new observations will provide the conclusive evidence needed to officially close the case of the missing Mars Polar Lander.

    --
    ____

    ~ |rip/\/\aster /\/\onkey

    1. Re:Before it gets Slashdotted... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Interesting

      Michael Malin is an expert planetary scientist. A incredible number of discoveries in the geological history of Mars have been made by Malin and colleagues. It is unsuprising that his team was able to make this discovery. They rarely miss anything (making it hard for other planetary scientists studying Mars to find anything new--seriously!).

    2. Re:Before it gets Slashdotted... by david.given · · Score: 0

      Does anyone have a link to the images?

    3. Re:Before it gets Slashdotted... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0, Funny



      Hey Michael...quit bogartting Mars!

    4. Re:Before it gets Slashdotted... by AndroidCat · · Score: 1

      Ball-hogs on a grand scale eh? However I doubt that they're sitting on the data and not allowing anyone else to look at it. The other teams will just have to speed up their game, and soon they too will get the fame and endorsement contracts that go with being tops in the planetary science leagues.

      --
      One line blog. I hear that they're called Twitters now.
    5. Re:Before it gets Slashdotted... by Detritus · · Score: 2, Informative

      Your answer implies the presence of significant digits that don't exist in the original measurement.

      --
      Mea navis aericumbens anguillis abundat
    6. Re:Before it gets Slashdotted... by DeadChobi · · Score: 1

      Shazam. You're right. It goes from 131.xxxxx feet, to 130 feet because you have to round anything that isnt significant in an inter-system conversion. And actually, the article probably didnt do sig-figs, otherwise they would've landed a value of ~100, because trailing zeroes are insiginificant unless there is a decimal *somewhere* in the answer.

      --
      SRSLY.
    7. Re:Before it gets Slashdotted... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      RTFA!!!, oh wait, you just PTFA because we /.TFA.

      Way to karma whore...

    8. Re:Before it gets Slashdotted... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      karma whore

    9. Re:Before it gets Slashdotted... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Mostly its due to the fact that Malin Space Science Systems invented the camera used. The data comes to MSSS and then gets distributed. No matter what, Malin's team will be the first to see the data. Being that they are an exceptionally good team, they rarely miss important discoveries.

    10. Re:Before it gets Slashdotted... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      whiny bitch

  4. Here's the photo in case of Slashdotting by WormholeFiend · · Score: 5, Funny

    Photo: .

    Enlarged: o

    1. Re:Here's the photo in case of Slashdotting by shawn(at)fsu · · Score: 3, Funny

      Had they been able to read martian, they would have found it a lot sooner by just following the signs to "Jimbo's junk yand and space salvage, any part you want. You pull it $15"

      --
      500 dollar reward for tip(s) leading to the arrest of the person(s) who stole my sig.
    2. Re:Here's the photo in case of Slashdotting by KiloByte · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Beh. To me, both items look just like random rocks, similar to those you can find right in the neighbourhood. The rock on photo 2 is simply a bit bigger.

      Perhaps my eyesight is just bad, but I wouldn't dare to call this data conclusive. Try again with a better resolution.

      --
      The creatures outside looked from Alt-Right to Antifa; but already it was impossible to say which was which.
    3. Re:Here's the photo in case of Slashdotting by Danathar · · Score: 1

      IN case of slashdotting use Google Web Accelerator...

    4. Re:Here's the photo in case of Slashdotting by Liquid+Len · · Score: 1

      Ewww buddy, not the goatse guy...

    5. Re:Here's the photo in case of Slashdotting by eclectro · · Score: 1


      High-Def picture: .*'

      --
      Take the cheese to sickbay, the doctor should see it as soon as possible - B'Elanna Torres, "Learning Curve"
  5. Re: A Modest Proposal by richie2000 · · Score: 3, Funny

    Mars Deep Impact.

    --
    Money for nothing, pix for free
  6. Can't Wait by mattmentecky · · Score: 4, Funny

    With businesses like http://www.marsshop.com/ selling acre tracts of Martian land, how long before we have someone claiming that the Mars Polar Lander wreckage belongs to them?

    We have [usually sunken] treasure laws, accidentally-delivered-merchandise laws but we'll need an inter-planetary-law expert to sort this out, anyone knows a good one?

    1. Re:Can't Wait by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Thanks for pointing that place out. I need to sue them for trying to sell my land on mars. I laid claim to the whole planet years before they did.

      and in fact my claim to ownership is just as valid as theirs.

      which means that anyone that buy's anything from them is one of the biggest RETARDS and MORONS ever born.

      they have ZERO claim to anything on mars, and they also are nothing but a scam. you CAN NOT own any part of mars. no country will recognize it in any way shape or form.

    2. Re:Can't Wait by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Interesting

      Isnt that illegal under UN law to OWN places in space? Isnt it protected just like the Antartic, nobody OWNs it?

    3. Re:Can't Wait by 0123456 · · Score: 1, Flamebait

      "Isnt that illegal under UN law to OWN places in space?"

      So's invading countries that haven't attacked you. No government really gives a damn about what the UN thinks, unless it's acting in their favor.

    4. Re:Can't Wait by Vague+but+True · · Score: 2, Funny
      Dear NASA,

      Your probe is on my land. You have 30 days to retrieve before I claim it has my personal property.

      This notice has been made public through the New Mars Post newspaper.

      Sincerely,
      Marvin the Martian

      --

      I'm not a doctor, but I play one in bed.

    5. Re:Can't Wait by nizo · · Score: 1

      I am guessing whoever gets there first gets to keep it. I am also predicting that the Mars rovers will make cool coffetables/footrests for someone someday.

    6. Re:Can't Wait by AndroidCat · · Score: 1

      If they're selling chunks of Mars, they're eventually going to have to deal with the Martian Embassy , and that's not healthy! (A classic radio show chopped to 11m24s RealAudio and Trainspotting music added. Nice.)

      --
      One line blog. I hear that they're called Twitters now.
    7. Re:Can't Wait by TGK · · Score: 4, Interesting

      Some countries have signed treaties saying they won't claim/weaponize space. Of course, some of those same countries signed treaties saying they wouldn't try to develop anti-ballistic missiles.

      Under international law (specificly the treaty of London, 1600) a settlement, colony, or claim is only valid if the country in question has the means in palce to defend it.

      In other words, should China (which didn't sign that whole "won't claim space" treaty) land on the Moon and claim it for China, it won't be recognised as Chinese property unless they bring along some effective means of keeping other people off of it.

      Functionaly this leads to an anarchical environment. Wasn't such a bad idea in the 1600s, but when you're talking about the idea of carpet nuking someone's moon base into smoking oblivion to invalidate their claim to the place... well... things are different.

      --
      Killfile(TGK)
      No trees were killed in the creation of this post. However, many electrons were inconvenienced.
    8. Re:Can't Wait by HomerJayS · · Score: 4, Informative

      To clarify a bit. Under the (admittedly impotent)1967 UN treaty. No NATION can claim ownership of space real-estate. Private entities are free to claim ownership, getting some legal entity to affirm said ownwership and enforcement are other issues altogether.

      In reality, it means that whoever gets there first (be it a nation-state sponsored colony or private entity) can do pretty much do whatever they see fit once they are there.

    9. Re:Can't Wait by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Law stops at atmosphere.

    10. Re:Can't Wait by Bullfish · · Score: 1

      This is the same as the guy who was selling acreage on the moon. It was ruled illegal and he got fined. Ultimately, you cannot sell what you do not own.

    11. Re:Can't Wait by Acy+James+Stapp · · Score: 1

      It's illegal for *governments* to own places in space.

      --
      -- Too lazy to get a lower UID.
    12. Re:Can't Wait by scottvdp · · Score: 1

      Yes, but we own the sun. http://www.weownthesun.com

    13. Re:Can't Wait by MSZ · · Score: 1

      But that's the point - unless you put in stakes to mark your claim, fence to keep people off and hire some security (or sit with that laser rifle in hand), your claim there isn't worth shit anyway.

      Really, it's not much different from how things are on Earth...

      So... the best way to own a piece of martian scenery is to organize an expedition, land there and then proclaim Republic of Mars (or kingdom, or whatever) and get your land granted by the new govt.

      --
      The moon is not fully subjugated. I demand a second assault wave preceded by a massive nuclear bombardment.
    14. Re:Can't Wait by gstoddart · · Score: 1
      Under international law (specificly the treaty of London, 1600) a settlement, colony, or claim is only valid if the country in question has the means in palce to defend it.

      Did the Chinese sing that one too? Because, quite frankly, following it up with ...
      In other words, should China (which didn't sign that whole "won't claim space" treaty) land on the Moon and claim it for China, it won't be recognised as Chinese property unless they bring along some effective means of keeping other people off of it.

      Makes me think "since you didn't sign this treaty, we'll hold you to the rules of this other treaty you didn't sign.".

      What I wanna know is, which of the treaties you're not a signatory to are you bound by? Surely they're no more bound my the treaty of London than the "won't claim space" treaty. Which means the treaty of London as as useless as can be wrt China.

      --
      Lost at C:>. Found at C.
    15. Re:Can't Wait by sjames · · Score: 1

      won't be recognised as Chinese property unless they bring along some effective means of keeping other people off of it.

      Of course since the resources that we can put on the moon are limited, a pistol might just qualify. When everyone is in a spacesuit, a gunshot anywhere might be fatal. I'm discounting missile defense since no country has the ability (beyond experimental/theoretical) to defend against anything that is delivered by an ICBM.

  7. Reason Found by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

    It was also reported that NASA had to pay the local martian towing company an exorbiant amount to get their vehicle back. "The towing company just ripped us off", said the mission control head. It is learnt that the local martian city council has awarded the monopoly in towing unclaimed spaceships to 'Tow-ards a Better Future Inc'.

  8. Obligatory Link to the Lobbing Scorecard by Old+VMS+Junkie · · Score: 5, Funny

    For those of you keeping score in the grand game... http://www.bio.aps.anl.gov/~dgore/fun/PSL/index.ht ml

    1. Re:Obligatory Link to the Lobbing Scorecard by stlhawkeye · · Score: 1

      They don't have Beagle II on their site anywhere. Somebody needs to have a talk with the scorekeeper.

      --
      "I have never won a debate with an ignorant person." -Ali ibn Abi Talib
    2. Re:Obligatory Link to the Lobbing Scorecard by Raphael · · Score: 1
      They don't have Beagle II on their site anywhere.

      They do. 20:15 | 2003 Jun 02 17:45:00 | Mars Express. This was rated as a success although Beagle 2 failed, just like several other missions that sent data or images back even if they sent less than planned due to a malfunction in one of the instruments or probes.

      --
      -Raphaël
    3. Re:Obligatory Link to the Lobbing Scorecard by Mad_Rain · · Score: 1

      Anyone else read that tag at the end of the link as "anal.gov" ? (Perhaps some truth in government agency naming? ;) )

      --
      "What do you think?" "I think 'What, do you think?!'"
    4. Re:Obligatory Link to the Lobbing Scorecard by ZenSoda · · Score: 1

      And what makes you think we don't say the same thing here? ;)

      And, thanks, Raphaël, for actually reading the entries in the card.

      Scorecard's been updated.

      -Dave
      "At, but not paid by, ANaL"

  9. parachuting problems?!! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

    the team didn't know what a parachute should look like?!! It is a soft fabric device made up of Cowboy Neal's worn out underwears (if he wears any...)

    1. Re:parachuting problems?!! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      the team didn't know what a parachute should look like?!!

      I mean, come on NASA, it's not rocket science...

  10. Blast zone? by Alcimedes · · Score: 1, Funny

    If they didn't know what a blast zone looked like they could always walk down to their server room.

    Under 50 replies and the story is down. Sheesh.

    There should be a cache link requirement for a story to be accepted from now on.

  11. Oblig. by Dachannien · · Score: 2, Funny

    Leo Wong: We own entire western hemisphere. That the best hemisphere.
    Professor Farnsworth: It's the same way on Earth.

  12. Inadequate labelling system by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    It was as close to "-1, Retarded" as they could get.

  13. Such sloppy facts.... by YodaToo · · Score: 2, Informative

    A quick calc shows its more like 5.408219178 years based on a 365 day year and counting today.

    1. Re:Such sloppy facts.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      As I always say, if you can't take your time calculation out to 42 decimal places, you never really knew the time. After 42 you both know and don't know it simultaneously.

    2. Re:Such sloppy facts.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      And better yet, every time someone asks you for the time, you'll bore them into buying their own damn watch.

    3. Re:Such sloppy facts.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      There's 365.25 days in a year anyways.

    4. Re:Such sloppy facts.... by MonkeyCat46 · · Score: 1

      there are 365.242199 days in a earth year.

  14. wait a minute ... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Does my memory fail me, or wasn't there a news article back then that showed how some defense dep't. spy satellites were trained on Mars and found the thing? It was pretty much where NASA said it would be. And my memory says the pictures we're now seeing (again...) look a LOT like those that the spy cameras saw.

    This happened not long after the mishap.

    But within a VERY short while, all the news postings and pictures taken by the spy satellites VANISHED from the 'net.

    Am I the only one who remembers this?

    1. Re:wait a minute ... by TripMaster+Monkey · · Score: 1, Funny


      Unfortunately, you are not the only one. A significant percentage of the population were unaffected by the memory-erasing ray broadcast during the popular sitcom 'Friends'.

      Please report to your nearest government office for reeducation.

      --
      ____

      ~ |rip/\/\aster /\/\onkey

    2. Re:wait a minute ... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0, Funny

      Am I the only one who remembers this?

      yes..... yes you are.

      BTW, you missed you last electro-shock therapy treatment this morning. And what have we told you about hogging the internet pc in the common's area. do we need to send you to Doctor Proctor in Rectology again?

      now take your pills and have someone wheel you down here.

    3. Re:wait a minute ... by v1 · · Score: 2, Funny

      Agents will be arriving in a few minutes to correct this. Just remain seated in front of your computer.

      --
      I work for the Department of Redundancy Department.
    4. Re:wait a minute ... by Fr33z0r · · Score: 1

      I think I know what you're talking about, but it wasn't spy satellites that took the images, rather a spy agency doing supersampling with multiple MGS images of the region.

      I remember reading about it on space.com, the article is probably in their archives somewhere.

    5. Re:wait a minute ... by Sirch · · Score: 4, Informative

      Is this what you are referring to?

    6. Re:wait a minute ... by aug24 · · Score: 1
      Am I the only one who remembers this?

      Only till the agents get to your place with the blue pill..

      Hope that helps!
      J.

      --
      You're only jealous cos the little penguins are talking to me.
  15. Not missing, just misplaced by $RANDOMLUSER · · Score: 2, Funny

    They found it in a props warehouse at Paramount studios, right next to the Apollo 11 LEM.

    --
    No folly is more costly than the folly of intolerant idealism. - Winston Churchill
  16. I found it months ago on Google Maps by GatesGhost · · Score: 0, Funny

    google has become all powerful, all knowing.

  17. Innovation at its finest by fistfullast33l · · Score: 1, Funny

    The search for Mars Polar Lander was hampered by inexperience: the team didn't know what a parachute should look like or how the ground would be disturbed by the landing rockets.

    NASA Janitor 1: ...and my favorite Calvin and Hobbes of all time was the strip when the went to Mars.
    NASA Janitor 2: You mean when they see Voyager and take their wagon to meet a new alien?
    NASA Janitor 1: Yeah they just launch into outer space by riding their wagon down a hill and projecting into space!
    NASA Intern passing by: Why didn't I think of that! How did they land?

  18. dibs by Senor_Programmer · · Score: 2, Interesting

    i don't know.

    abandoned at sea, if you recover, it's yours

    abandoned on land, on your property, it's yours

    abandoned on the side of the road on trash day, it's yours. this how where I get all my lawn equipment. mower, weedwhacker, seed spreader, wheel barrow. other stuff too, radio, tv, computer, coffee pot, couch, lawn chairs, hammock, pots and pans, dishes, building materials, ... it's about the only way to live anymore what with the damn taxes.

    abandoned on public property? I don't know.around here, abandoned cars and motorbikes are removed by a towing company that has a contract. if no one claims, they get sold for storage. not so easy for the amateur dumpster diver

    1. Re:dibs by lcsjk · · Score: 2, Interesting
      The main difference between a yard sale and yard trash is the distance from the curb.(unknown)

      When you obtained your abandoned lawn mower from the roadside, was it by some coincidence still running and a lawn only partially cut?

    2. Re:dibs by Vulch · · Score: 3, Informative

      abandoned at sea, if you recover, it's yours

      Not true. Under international maritime law, abandoned at sea, if you recover, the original owner (who may now be an insurance company) must be given the opportunity to reclaim it on payment of reasonable (set by an admiralty court) expenses to you.

      In any case government property remains government property, and you must have that governments permission before attempting salvage operations. See the fun Curt Newport had recovering a sunk Mercury capsule recently.

    3. Re:dibs by MSZ · · Score: 1

      IANAL... but there's a difference betwen abandoned and lost. Lost must be returned to owner (there may be compensation), abandoned is free for taking.

      --
      The moon is not fully subjugated. I demand a second assault wave preceded by a massive nuclear bombardment.
    4. Re:dibs by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      yes, you're right, reasonable factors in recovery expense & risk.

      i was thinking more in terms of square grouper, outboard motors, sonobuoys, ...

      is that nuclear bomb still lost of SC coast?

    5. Re:dibs by Senor_Programmer · · Score: 1

      "abandoned on the side of the road on trash day"

      any further from the curb would be a traffic hazard...

      if you can't tell the difference, ask!

      BTW I got a very nice ceiling fan today. It was on the grass side of the curb but without a cord I figured they weren't using it to cut grass.

  19. moo3 by mfh · · Score: 1

    Damn it TMM... now I have to go play moo3.

    --
    The dangers of knowledge trigger emotional distress in human beings.
    1. Re:moo3 by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Damn it TMM... now I have to go play moo3.

      Considering how bad that game was, you have good reason to damn him.

    2. Re:moo3 by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Considering how bad that game was, you have good reason to damn him.

      Exactly. But it's fun to play once in a while. I mean nobody wants to buy my copy of the stupid game... right?

      I wish someone would create something similar but make it far superior. There just aren't any good good God games anymore.

    3. Re:moo3 by BGA · · Score: 1

      How about Galactic Civilizations?

      http://www.galciv.com/

      There is even a sequel being produced:

      http://www.galciv2.com/

    4. Re:moo3 by Jupiter9 · · Score: 1

      Good game, needs Multiplayer.

      --

      --
      Does anyone remember /\/\/\?
    5. Re:moo3 by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      MOO3? *shudder* I'd rather play MOO2. By like, a thousandfold. In fact, maybe I will...

  20. mirrordot link. by leuk_he · · Score: 1

    That cache link can be found at mirrordot.org:

    the article including some pictures.

  21. Direct link to data and photos at Malin Space by CuriousKangaroo · · Score: 5, Informative

    Here is the direct link to the Malin Space Science Systems page with the data and images.

    In addition to MPL, they have found Viking 2.

    http://www.msss.com/mars_images/moc/2005/05/05/ind ex.html

    Cool stuff.

    1. Re:Direct link to data and photos at Malin Space by jdoeii · · Score: 1

      Here is another one with the same pictures:
      http://www.chron.com/cs/CDA/ssistory.mpl/nation/31 69765

  22. Better Photo by Maddog+Batty · · Score: 2, Funny

    Better Photo: X

    (it did crash after all!)

    --
    wot no sig
  23. Still missing by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Ok, MPL has finally been found. But where ist Beagle?

    1. Re:Still missing by jacksonj04 · · Score: 1

      Under the landing pad for Opportunity. Where else?

      --
      How many people can read hex if only you and dead people can read hex?
  24. some scientists by yodaj007 · · Score: 4, Funny
    "the team didn't know what a parachute should look like"

    This might help.

    --
    These aren't the sigs you're looking for.
  25. Don't stop there by LordSnooty · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Can they can start looking for Beagle 2, so we might have a chance of understanding what went wrong with that one?

    1. Re:Don't stop there by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      ...what went wrong with that one?

      Uhhh... It was planned designed by th ESA?

  26. Testing! by Timberwolf0122 · · Score: 2, Insightful

    If only they had a sensor that measured constant force exterted on a landing leg insted of the short impulse of landing.

    Why is there not a standard design mars landing vehicle, one that can be used to deploy any payload upto say 8^3m meters in volume, it would solve a lot of issues and reduce the overall mission costs, if designed well it could be used to land on other bodies (moon/IO/Europa) with only a slight modification to fuel levels/Paracute size/airbag preasure.

    --
    In the not too distant future, next Sunday A.D.
    1. Re:Testing! by TrippTDF · · Score: 4, Informative

      If only they had a sensor that measured constant force exterted on a landing leg insted of the short impulse of landing.

      I'm willing to bet the team wanted to disrupt the surrounding area around the craft as little as poissible. If you wait for a an extended force, that's time that the craft is on the group firing it's rockets into the ground doing nothing but churning up the landscape.

      Why is there not a standard design mars landing vehicle, one that can be used to deploy any payload upto say 8^3m meters in volume, it would solve a lot of issues and reduce the overall mission costs, if designed well it could be used to land on other bodies (moon/IO/Europa) with only a slight modification to fuel levels/Paracute size/airbag preasure.

      There's no standard design because we're still looking for the best solution! We've only landed a handful of times. Don't forget it's not just the landing to consider, but how we get the thing there. The systems used for the Rovers did pretty well for themselves, and I bet we see more of the Bouncy-Ball design in the future. However, landing location has a lot to do with landing type. The ice caps might in general have too delicate of a surface to ensure the bouncy-ball design work well there.

      I'm sure that with continued missions, a more standard solution will come into effect.

    2. Re:Testing! by Banner · · Score: 1

      Sorry, but that would make SENSE.

      With all those PhD's over there, you'd think they would have figured that one out already.

    3. Re:Testing! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      The systems used for the Rovers did pretty well for themselves, and I bet we see more of the Bouncy-Ball design in the future.


      Incorrect, the Mars Pathfinder mission had that
    4. Re:Testing! by Phisbut · · Score: 1
      I'm willing to bet the team wanted to disrupt the surrounding area around the craft as little as poissible. If you wait for a an extended force, that's time that the craft is on the group firing it's rockets into the ground doing nothing but churning up the landscape.

      From the images and the scale shown, the lander's rockets already burned a surface of approx. 450 square meters (30m x 15m) and they stopped while still 40 meters above ground. If you have your rockets burning the ground all the way down, it's not a couple extra seconds that will make a difference, the ground will already be churned as much as it possibly can...

      --
      After 3 days without programming, life becomes meaningless
      - The Tao of Programming
    5. Re:Testing! by lysergic.acid · · Score: 1

      what about using infared, or sonar to detect the distance between the spacecraft and the ground? i'm sure there are much more accurate ways of detecting ground contact than measuring the force exerted on the landing leg.

    6. Re:Testing! by TrippTDF · · Score: 1

      -or a combination. NASA loves (as they should) redundant systems.

  27. Send in the rover by lobsterGun · · Score: 1

    How far is the crash site from the mars rover? If it's close, why not send it over to investigate?

    1. Re:Send in the rover by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Sure, why not? It will just take a few centuries, given the current speed of the rovers (i.e., longer than their expected lifetime). That is, assuming that they can cross some craters and deep valleys or go around other minor obstacles such as mountains that are much taller than what we have on our planet. But if they can do all that then sure, let's try...

    2. Re:Send in the rover by lobsterGun · · Score: 1

      This sounds better and better!

      Christopher Columbus, Ferdinand Magellan, Louis and Clarke, Francis Burton, and the Mars Rover: The great explorers of the Human Age.

    3. Re:Send in the rover by fmayhar · · Score: 3, Informative

      Sigh. Had you been paying attention for the last eighteen months, you would know that, one, the rovers are quite close to the equator, albeit on opposite sides of Mars. Mars Polar Lander, right? Sure, compared to the distance between here and there, they're right next to each other, but that doesn't make your idea any less inane.

    4. Re:Send in the rover by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      That's not such a good idea, it will get lost in the traffic jam (we'll have cities on mars by the time the rover gets close to the lander).

  28. Didn't know what a parachute looks like... by IdJit · · Score: 0

    But I'll bet most of the geeks at NASA know Goatse looks like. (nah...i'm not gonna link to it.)

  29. Prime NASA cadidates here... by Thud457 · · Score: 1

    Why do you idiots insist on discussing this in Earth years?!!! The probe's on Mars.

    --

    the preceding comment is my own and in no way reflects the opinion of the Joint Chiefs of Staff

    1. Re:Prime NASA cadidates here... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Why do you idiots insist on discussing this in Earth years?!!! The probe's on Mars.

      Although the probe is on Mars, not only are the people interested in talking about it on Earth, they also are more accustomed to relating large amounts of time in Earth-years. Next question.

  30. Inexperiences by chrisnewbie · · Score: 1, Funny

    "The search for Mars Polar Lander was hampered by inexperience: the team didn't know what a parachute should look like" In another news! a team of nasa specialist all died while jumping from a plane, seems like they didnt know the difference between a pillow and a parachute. Man what a bad excuses!!

    1. Re:Inexperiences by arkane1234 · · Score: 1

      I believe they were talking about in regards to the atmospheric pressure. It's not the same as earth obviously.

      --
      -- This space for lease, low setup fee, inquire within!
    2. Re:Inexperiences by iamlucky13 · · Score: 1

      I'm sure you're joking, but I've been around long enough to know there's plenty of readers out there who don't get it:

      They didn't know what a parachute would look like layed randomly upon the Martian surface, photographed from 100 km up, with a resolution of about 2 meters/pixel.

    3. Re:Inexperiences by chrisnewbie · · Score: 1

      O.K put it that way sure! it would be like trying to find a needle in a haystack. Next time i write a joke i'll put smileys and some hahahah and lol's + add the fact that i'm a french speaking canadian (true) and that what i was thinking at the time might have been lost in translation.

  31. You have got to be kidding ! by OneSmartFellow · · Score: 1
    Is this just a case of wishful thinking ?

    Are we really seeing the best quality photos available ?

    From what I can tell, they have extrapolated the final image to the point where it almost looks like Abe Lincolns face here: http://www.balloonhq.com/highlights/hats/lincoln.J PG

    I hope I haven't violated any rules with that link, I just did a quick internet search for itm it's not meant as a troll or a advertisment

  32. We welcome you by CyBlue · · Score: 1

    We, the beings of Mars, welcome our lander overlords.

  33. Present Usage by JJ · · Score: 1

    Right now that probe is as useful as the rusting 76 Chevy Impala out back of my future father in law's trailer.

    --
    So long and thanks for all the fish . . . !!!
  34. Why the MPL crashed by photonic · · Score: 5, Interesting

    I did read the failure investigation report (can be found here, search for polar) some time ago and IIRC the most probable failure scenario was a software error involving a single boolean:

    MPL was to land under active control (with rocket power, not the air-bag trick). To kill the moter once it had touched down the legs contained contact sensors which were constructed of a pin with a spring, a magnet and a Hall-sensor. The legs were to be extended some time before touchdown.

    The problem was the sensors would trigger some intermediate false readings during the leg extension. These false readings toggled a flag, which, once the control system first started looking for contact, immediately killed the engine, having the lander free-fall to death. Clearing the flag after the leg-extension would have saved the mission. The bug was not found because of errors in the software design documents and lack of a system level test. The intermediate false readings were found in a component level test, but its consequences somehow didn't made it in the final design.

    --
    karma police: arrest this man, he talks in maths; he buzzes like a fridge, he's like a detuned radio. [radiohead]
  35. Do I have this right? Parachute still white? by djupedal · · Score: 2, Insightful

    The two rovers now in operation are risking issues due to dust covering their solar panels. And we've been reminded over and over how dust and wind have helped shape the surface of Mars for eons, etc.

    But the parachute that has been laying around for the last 5+ years is still in one piece, just as it fell, and is as white as can be...

    ...is that what we're supposed to believe? How convenient that the raging elements didn't disturb it so NASA wonks could find it later.

    1. Re:Do I have this right? Parachute still white? by east+coast · · Score: 4, Informative

      But the parachute that has been laying around for the last 5+ years is still in one piece, just as it fell, and is as white as can be...

      From msss.com (where some images of the "wreck" can be seen):

      "Shortly after the loss of Mars Polar Lander (MPL), the Mars Global Surveyor MOC was employed to acquire dozens of 1.5 m/pixel images of the landing uncertainty ellipses, looking for any evidence of the lander and its fate..."

      These are not new images, just new finds on old images.

      --
      Dedicated Cthulhu Cultist since 4523 BC.
    2. Re:Do I have this right? Parachute still white? by djupedal · · Score: 1

      ...ahhh...that makes sense, thanks :)

    3. Re:Do I have this right? Parachute still white? by pedroloco · · Score: 1

      Many of these images have been processed. In press release images, the brightnesses of pixels are frequently stretched so that the lightest shade pixels are white and the darkest shade pixels are dark (sort of like changing the brightness/contrast of an image in your favorite image viewer). This allows for details in shading and brightnesses to be more apparent to the viewer. The parachute is probably covered by dust (and probably started accumulating dust as soon as it touched down). However, it's still likely to be a lighter shade of red than the surroundings and one of the brighter objects in the vicinity.

    4. Re:Do I have this right? Parachute still white? by Tablizer · · Score: 1

      These are not new images, just new finds on old images.

      Maybe if they got new images and the items had less contrast than they did then, it can be considered a sign that the features are newly made (craft), and have since been dusted over.

      Then again, with all the wirlwinds, things may be re-cleaned and re-soiled over and over. The top of mars rocks tend to be "clean" of dust, so things that stick out may be less subject to permanent dusting.

  36. Game over man! by spankey51 · · Score: 1, Funny

    I say we takeoff and nuke the site from orbit... It's the only way to be sure.

    --
    -ubuntu others as you would have others ubuntu you.
  37. Comb the desert! by TheStupidOne · · Score: 3, Funny

    Somehow when they said they couldn't find it, I was reminded of the desert scene from Spaceballs. I guess they finally switched to a better comb...

    --
    unable to resolve function slashdot.sig(), aborting...
  38. Ummm... this isn't the optimal design by blueZ3 · · Score: 2, Insightful

    I don't think we've been doing this long enough to have enough data to say what the "best" design is on which to base such a "standard" lander. There have only been four or five successful landings on Mars. When that number reaches 20 or 30, perhaps we'll have enough information that your idea will be possible.

    --
    Interested in a Flash-based MAME front end? Visit mame.danzbb.com
  39. Case not closed by WarpGiGA · · Score: 1

    "Malin hopes the new observations will provide the conclusive evidence needed to officially close the case of the missing Mars Polar Lander."

    I'd say the case is closed when it's back on earth. It belongs in a museum! ;)

    1. Re:Case not closed by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It belongs in a museum!

      Which one?
      The Museum for Failed Extraterrestrial Missions?
      The Museum for Failed Mars Landings?
      The Museum for Things that Landed with a Bang?
      The Museum for Things that Almost Got Done Right?
      or The Museum of Manmade Craters?

  40. Why not ask the pros.. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Maybe they should call in The Squad with their infinite magnifiers!

    With that power on hands they could check the expiration date on those retro-rockets..

  41. things that make you go hmm by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    i wonder if ford and microsoft had a part in this.

  42. I looked at the pictures... by dethlejd · · Score: 1

    taken from the orbiting observation platform and am unimpressed. All I can see is the outline of a vaguely humanoid face.

    - Jim

  43. Lost & Found by jwsd · · Score: 1

    Any space traveller who has lost a package with parachute attached please come to Mars Lost & Found.

  44. Not too sure about the validity of this one by Mr.+BS · · Score: 1, Redundant

    Are you going to tell me, unlike Opportunity's or Sprit's landing sites, that at the Martian poles there's no wind? I find it hard to beleive that the parachute and blast zones are still visible.

    If the Martian poles are anything like Earth's, there should've been gale force winds there at one point in time within the last 5 years to blow this away. I mean it's a parachute!!! How could it not have moved?

    How about the blast zones? It's dust! (possibly melted to glass) Why aren't there dust devil's here like at the other LZ's? Any kind or wind?!?!

    To me it still doesn't look like NASA knows what it's looking for!

  45. Bad part of Mars by jemenake · · Score: 1
    scientists think they may have finally located the lander's wreckage and confirmed what went wrong with the mission...
    and concluded that "what went wrong" is most likely that they chose to set down in a "bad part" of Mars. Their evidence for this seems to be that photos show that the lander was up on blocks and the wheels and hubcaps were missing.
  46. That report contradicts this one by bluGill · · Score: 1

    Expect the investigation to be re-opened. This report suggests that there are makes like you would expect from a rocket firing on the ground. Suggesting that the rockets were operating at touchdown time.