Slashdot Mirror


Cassini Confirms New Moon of Saturn

pipcorona writes ""In a spectacular kick-off to its first season of prime ring viewing, which began last month, the Cassini spacecraft has confirmed earlier suspicions of an unseen moon hidden in a gap in Saturn's outer A ring. A new image and movie show the new moon and the waves it raises in the surrounding ring material."

207 comments

  1. "Name That Moon" Contest by TripMaster+Monkey · · Score: 4, Funny


    From TFA:



    The new body has been provisionally named S/2005 S1.



    Well, that just rolls off the tongue, doesn't it?

    Looks like it's up to us...please post your suggestions for the new moon's name below.

    --
    ____

    ~ |rip/\/\aster /\/\onkey

    1. Re:"Name That Moon" Contest by Dan+Up+Baby · · Score: 5, Funny

      S/2005 S1, as you know, was the Roman god of awkward names.

    2. Re:"Name That Moon" Contest by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny

      That's no moon...

    3. Re:"Name That Moon" Contest by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      So is it going to hit the Earth? And how many megatons would that be?

    4. Re:"Name That Moon" Contest by pv2b · · Score: 3, Funny

      Britannia.

      Why, after all, it rules the waves in Saturn's belt. Britannia rule the waves. Get it?

      Besides, what more fitting tribute to the decline of the British Empire than naming an insignificant 7 kilometer wide hunk of rock(or whatever it's made of) after it. :-)

    5. Re:"Name That Moon" Contest by Meetch · · Score: 5, Funny

      Ok so consensus would have us leaning toward a really cool name like "Deathstar". Sorry for stating the obvious!

    6. Re:"Name That Moon" Contest by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      goatse
      lollercaust
      omg ror
      cmdrtaco
      stallman2

    7. Re:"Name That Moon" Contest by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Is it time to destroy the Shadowlords again? Will the moongate be red or blue this time?

    8. Re:"Name That Moon" Contest by pv2b · · Score: 5, Funny
      goatse
      I'm sorry. We can't name it Goatse. I think that award should be reserved for the Goatse Stellar Nursery (A.K.A. NGC 604).

      You can't tell me that doesn't look like goatse. I swear! It does!
    9. Re:"Name That Moon" Contest by sik0fewl · · Score: 3, Funny

      I don't know, it's all Greek to me.

      --
      I remember when legal used to mean lawful, now it means some kind of loophole. - Leo Kessler
    10. Re:"Name That Moon" Contest by qurk · · Score: 1

      That is extraordinarily appropriate.

    11. Re:"Name That Moon" Contest by DoraLives · · Score: 1
      The new body has been provisionally named S/2005 S1.

      It's in the Keeler gap. So name it Keeler. Duh.

      --
      Is it fascism yet?
    12. Re:"Name That Moon" Contest by mbrewthx · · Score: 2, Funny

      With a name like s/2005 S1 I wonder if there is a Stargate on it? Probably not wrong type of naming convention.

      Let's call her Sheila.

      --
      __________ Leave me alone I'm compiling a RPG II program on my S/36...Thanks to metamucil I'm a Regular Meta Moderator
    13. Re:"Name That Moon" Contest by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Eslashzusi

    14. Re:"Name That Moon" Contest by grasshoppa · · Score: 1

      Oh my god, that DOES look like it.

      God, you wacky bastard, you've been reading too much slashdot.

      Seriously.

      --
      Mod me down with all of your hatred and your journey towards the dark side will be complete!
    15. Re:"Name That Moon" Contest by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Holy shit, God's fucking with us.

    16. Re:"Name That Moon" Contest by Brett+Buck · · Score: 2, Funny

      Another day, another proof of goatse's transcendent relevance to the physical world. Brett

    17. Re:"Name That Moon" Contest by pv2b · · Score: 1

      Can I quote you on that?

    18. Re:"Name That Moon" Contest by Wizarth · · Score: 2, Funny

      Oh My... $DIETY really does have a sense of humour!

    19. Re:"Name That Moon" Contest by MerlynEmrys67 · · Score: 1
      You made me click on it...

      Thank god I am running firefox and don't have to worry about not having a status bar at the bottom to display where the link REALLY goes to - was afraid you were going to sneak it in

      --
      I have mod points and I am not afraid to use them
    20. Re:"Name That Moon" Contest by krymsin01 · · Score: 1

      $DIETY - Geek political correctness hits a new low (high?)

      --
      stuff
    21. Re:"Name That Moon" Contest by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      that's no moon... it's a space station.

    22. Re:"Name That Moon" Contest by Yokaze · · Score: 1

      I vote for Danae.

      --
      "Between strong and weak, between rich and poor [...], it is freedom which oppresses and the law which sets free"
    23. Re:"Name That Moon" Contest by uhlume · · Score: 1

      s/political correctness/spelling

      --
      SIERRA TANGO FOXTROT UNIFORM
    24. Re:"Name That Moon" Contest by cofaboy · · Score: 1

      LMAO, Now it looks like that! Absolutely brill

      --
      In the end, It's all bovine dung you know
    25. Re:"Name That Moon" Contest by aussie_a · · Score: 1

      You are now banned from naming any moons.

    26. Re:"Name That Moon" Contest by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      BEAT ME TO IT!

    27. Re:"Name That Moon" Contest by kaellinn18 · · Score: 1

      That's no moon...

      It's Uranus

      *rimshot*

      --

      --------
      This isn't the sig you're looking for. Move along.
    28. Re:"Name That Moon" Contest by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Breast.

    29. Re:"Name That Moon" Contest by fredrik70 · · Score: 1

      already taken! Mind you, they call it Mimas nowadays.

      --
      if (!signature) { throw std::runtime_error("No sig!"); }
    30. Re:"Name That Moon" Contest by AndroidCat · · Score: 1

      I think you mean S/MMV SI. (He had a brother who was god of awkward Roman numerals.)

      --
      One line blog. I hear that they're called Twitters now.
    31. Re:"Name That Moon" Contest by lolocaust · · Score: 1

      lollercaust

      You misspelled it.

      --
      Why does my post history abruptly stop? I want to laugh at the stupid things I posted as a kid.
    32. Re:"Name That Moon" Contest by CheshireCatCO · · Score: 3, Informative

      No good. That name would be for a moon of Jupiter (as they're usually named for his various lovers). Saturnian moons are named for Titans or Titan-like gods from other pantheons.

    33. Re:"Name That Moon" Contest by CheshireCatCO · · Score: 1

      Bear in mind that Saturnian moons are named for Titans or Titan-like gods from other mythologies. So while I'm sure people can generate a lot of sweet names, if you really want to play the game by the rules, that's a key one.

    34. Re:"Name That Moon" Contest by ggremlin · · Score: 1

      I just had to reply to this. How about the the Ring Barer?

    35. Re:"Name That Moon" Contest by killawatt5k · · Score: 1

      I vot for Pythagoras, we might as well start nameing them after real people. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Pythagoras

    36. Re:"Name That Moon" Contest by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      My God, it's full of stars!

    37. Re:"Name That Moon" Contest by hikerhat · · Score: 1

      The empire must be hard up. This "moon" is only 7 km wide or so while The Death Star was 120km in diameter until destroyed by terrorists, and the Death Star II was 160km in diameter.

    38. Re:"Name That Moon" Contest by AndroidCat · · Score: 1
      It seems pointless to waste a good god or goddess name on a chunk of rock/ice. It's not like we're making new gods all the time (a debatable philosophical point perhaps), so except for worthy objects, we should tap other sources.

      I think characters from 1950s/60s TV shows would be good, and suggest Ranger Bob (from Lassie). However, it might be an idea to reserve certain shows for whole moon/planetary systems, such as an entire Leave it to Beaver-themed solar system.

      --
      One line blog. I hear that they're called Twitters now.
    39. Re:"Name That Moon" Contest by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Hey, somebody mod God down, okay?

    40. Re:"Name That Moon" Contest by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Nah, that was the big black monocoprolith.

    41. Re:"Name That Moon" Contest by gstoddart · · Score: 1
      I'm sorry. We can't name it Goatse. I think that award should be reserved for the Goatse Stellar Nursery (A.K.A. NGC 604).

      Man, you can rest assured I checked the text of that link several times before clicking on it lest it be another of those unexpected ones that turns out to be the image that shall not be seen.
      --
      Lost at C:>. Found at C.
    42. Re:"Name That Moon" Contest by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I vote for 'Kahuna' cause it's master of the waves, dude.

  2. Not a movie! by CypherXero · · Score: 1, Informative

    It's not a movie! Geez! It's an animated GIF image!

    1. Re:Not a movie! by degraeve · · Score: 1

      A more accurate description would be that old-timey term "motion picture".

    2. Re:Not a movie! by Gabrill · · Score: 0, Flamebait

      Enlighten us with your refined definition of "Movie"?

      --
      Always going forward, 'cause we can't find reverse.
    3. Re:Not a movie! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Nasa stopped making movies after appolo mission was criticized as hoax, and costliest sci-fi movie :P

    4. Re:Not a movie! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      So you're saying that instead of a rapidly changing series of still pictures it's actually a rapidly changing series of still pictures? Dammit!

    5. Re:Not a movie! by HAKdragon · · Score: 1

      I don't have any music CDs. I have a bunch of a uncompressed PCM waves on disc.

      --
      "Our opponent is an alien starship packed with atomic bombs. We have a protractor."
    6. Re:Not a movie! by nacturation · · Score: 1

      Why the parent comment isn't +5 Funny is beyond me.

      --
      Want to improve your Karma? Instead of "Post Anonymously", try the "Post Humously" option.
    7. Re:Not a movie! by NanoGator · · Score: 2, Funny

      "It's not a movie! Geez! It's an animated GIF image! (Score:2, Informative)"

      *Sigh*

      Remember when these debates were fun? Now I worry a chick will see me.

      --
      "Derp de derp."
    8. Re:Not a movie! by sik0fewl · · Score: 1, Informative

      http://dictionary.reference.com/search?q=movie

      Just because something doesn't use a video codec doesn't make it not a movie.

      --
      I remember when legal used to mean lawful, now it means some kind of loophole. - Leo Kessler
    9. Re:Not a movie! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It's not a movie! Geez! It's an animated GIF image!

      And there was me looking forward to George Lucas's latest film. I won't bother now. :(

    10. Re:Not a movie! by Captain+Irreverence · · Score: 2, Funny

      *Sigh* Remember when these debates were fun? Now I worry a chick will see me.

      This is Slashdot. No danger of that.

  3. What's so special about a new moon? by psetzer · · Score: 4, Interesting

    I mean, really? Every time they find a new one, the things just keep getting smaller. What's next, a piece of ejecta from another moon the size and shape of a '74 Chevy Impala? Might as well start naming the debris in the rings.

    --
    "Anyone who attempts to generate random numbers by deterministic means is living in a state of sin." -- John von Neumann
    1. Re:What's so special about a new moon? by forkazoo · · Score: 5, Funny

      The impala is not recognised as a unit of measure. Please use Volkswagons, or ISO Standard Bathtubs.

      I'm not sure where the exact cutoff is. I'd assume anything in the decivolkswagon range would simply be considered as flotsam unworthy of a name, unless somebody wants to try to catalogue everything in the rings! You'd need a lot of mountain dew.

    2. Re:What's so special about a new moon? by psetzer · · Score: 1
      You'd need a lot of grad students.

      Changed for clarity.

      --
      "Anyone who attempts to generate random numbers by deterministic means is living in a state of sin." -- John von Neumann
    3. Re:What's so special about a new moon? by dickeya · · Score: 1

      They would be bigger but that damn Rebel fleet keeps blowing them up. They've been reduced to building on the Spaceballs "Winnebago" scale.

    4. Re:What's so special about a new moon? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Well, it seems you didn't RTFA, which is expected, but you didn't even look at the Fing picture!

      The new moon is in the middle of the rings. In a section with no ring in fact. This means that:
      -The pause in the ring might be caused by the moon plowing through it.
      -(see above) this moon would have a lot of crater impacts from ring material. Say, water?
      -The gravity from the moon might have had something to do with riing formation to begin with, so if you want to know about rings you have to study this moon (at least in terms of mass, composition and orbit)
      -There are some weird effects you can get from moons in debri rings (ever read the integral trees?)

      So, normally I'd agree with you, but this one moon seems pretty special.

    5. Re:What's so special about a new moon? by core+plexus · · Score: 1
      It may be a way to fund science.

      Think about all the people that 'buy' a name for a star for their loved ones, or purchase a claim for land or minerals rights on the moon, Mars, or elsewhere? Yes, I have read the international conventions stating no one can own this or that, but is naming something a claim to ownership? Alfred Brooks (the late geologist and explorer for the U.S.G.S.), nor his decendants, lay any claim to ownership of the Brooks Range in Arctic Alaska.

      I might be inclined to give $100 to have a chunk of rock named after someone or something, especially if I knew the money was going to further scientific research.

      -cp-

      Alaska bear-mauling victim survives rare second attack

    6. Re:What's so special about a new moon? by flyingsquid · · Score: 1
      I mean, really? Every time they find a new one, the things just keep getting smaller. What's next, a piece of ejecta from another moon the size and shape of a '74 Chevy Impala? Might as well start naming the debris in the rings.

      Well, everybody could get something named after them that way.

      You know what would be a good business model? Selling people small moons, made to order. You could get them made out of whatever you wanted- say, silver, or gold or steel or marble, although something you could polish would be good because then you might actually be able to see it whiz overhead like you can with satellites. You could carve the name on it... name it after yourself, or name it after your significant other (hey baby, I bought you a moon, happy anniversary). They'd be inconspicuous unless you knew when and where to look.

      If expendible rockets cost 3,000-6,000 dollars to get a pound into orbit, you could sell people moons for 10,000 dollars per pound, plus cost of materials and work, and make a damn nice profit. Of course, NASA has enough junk in orbit to track already so maybe they wouldn't take kindly to this idea.

    7. Re:What's so special about a new moon? by mccrew · · Score: 1
      The impala is not recognised as a unit of measure. Please use Volkswagons, or ISO Standard Bathtubs.

      Here in the U.S., the standard unit of measure is number of football fields.

      --
      Hey, Windows users, there is no such thing as "forward" slash, there is only slash and backslash.
    8. Re:What's so special about a new moon? by PMuse · · Score: 1

      Every time they find a new one, the things just keep getting smaller.

      That'd be because the big ones, them being summat easier to spot as they are, have been found already. ;-)

      --
      "We reject as false the choice between our safety and our ideals." --The American President (20.1.2009)
  4. So everythings a moon now? by mnmn · · Score: 4, Funny

    7km across? Compared to Saturn thats tiny. Thats like saying the ISS is a moon.

    So how do you draw a distinction between a moon, a natural satellite, asteroids and space junk? You can either say the moon Earth has an asteroid orbiting it... or that Earth has many moons orbiting it, only one of which is large enough to see.

    So if I pay the Russian space program to launch my 1kg rock in lower orbit, do I get to name my moon, or will they just name it
    S/2005 SR26GC3.14159265357?

    Which makes me wonder, have we named or numbered our own moon yet? Can I call shotgun and call it 'fp!'?

    --
    "Give orange me give eat orange me eat orange give me eat orange give me you." -Nim Chimpsky
    1. Re:So everythings a moon now? by Daedalus-Ubergeek · · Score: 5, Informative

      I do believe our own moon is named Luna, which would be where you get the word "Lunar", although you rarely ever hear anybody call the moon by its actual name.

    2. Re:So everythings a moon now? by helioquake · · Score: 4, Interesting

      I'd usually agree with your sentiment. But this finding is rather important and scientifically useful (for some, not really for me).

      The significant thing is this: this moon, how small it is, may regulate the way a gap in the A-ring evolves (or stay clear of smaller rocks),

      The effect of the moon's gravity is small, but not small enough to be ignored by the material nearby. Some smart guys can run some numerical analysis to study what the rings are made of, and how a single massive (relatively) body can perturb its surrounding smaller particles.

    3. Re:So everythings a moon now? by ag0ny · · Score: 2, Informative

      Well, at least in Spanish-speaking countries we always call it Luna.

    4. Re:So everythings a moon now? by xlv · · Score: 1

      Luna is the goddess of the moon according to the Romans (see http://dictionary.reference.com/search?q=luna for reference). So that gives you Lune in French and Luna in Spanish/Italian.

    5. Re:So everythings a moon now? by Greyfox · · Score: 5, Funny
      Thats like saying the ISS is a moon.

      That's not a moon. It's a space station.

      --

      I'm trying to teach myself to set people on fire with my mind... Is it hot in here?

    6. Re:So everythings a moon now? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Informative

      Earth actually has multiple moons apart from just 'The Moon', our second largest moon is Cruithne (5km across). Doesn't really mean anything though.

    7. Re:So everythings a moon now? by never_cry · · Score: 1

      I think you'v made a mistake!

    8. Re:So everythings a moon now? by frakir · · Score: 2, Informative

      Cruithne is not a moon; it is not bound by Earth gravitation. It is an asteroid (number 3753).

    9. Re:So everythings a moon now? by digitalchinky · · Score: 1

      The 'bear in the big blue house' calls it 'Luna' - ok ok, so you probably don't watch early morning childrens television....

    10. Re:So everythings a moon now? by Jugalator · · Score: 2, Interesting

      "actual name"?

      Hmm, I thought the actual name was "the Moon", and Luna a term rarely used to distinguish it from other moons whenever necessary. Why would people rarely use an actual name?

      That it's the actual name is as debatable as Sol is the actual name for the Sun, something I also can't really say, even if we have "solar".

      I guess both these names can be said to be occasionaly used to personify these celestial bodies though.

      --
      Beware: In C++, your friends can see your privates!
    11. Re:So everythings a moon now? by metroplex · · Score: 5, Informative
      Actually, in all Romance Languages (those derived by latin), the Earth's moon is called something like "Luna".
      • Italian: Luna
      • French: Lune
      • Spanish: Luna
      • Portuguese: Lua
      • Romanian: Luna
      --
      "Words of wisdom: drop that zero and get with the hero" -- Vanilla Ice
    12. Re:So everythings a moon now? by PakProtector · · Score: 1

      Why is that post funny?! It should be informative!

      This post should be funny!

      --

      Edward@Tomato - /home/Edward/ man woman
      man: no entry for woman in the manual.
      "Qua!?"

    13. Re:So everythings a moon now? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

      I do believe our own moon is named Luna, which would be where you get the word "Lunar"

      Thanks this explains a lot. Here in the UK many people refer to Tony Blair as a Lunatic, so I guess that must mean he's a blood sucking parasite from outer space :)

    14. Re:So everythings a moon now? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0, Funny

      You actually used a bulleted list. Holy crap, that's amazing!

    15. Re:So everythings a moon now? by m50d · · Score: 2, Informative

      It's an old joke, it's been posted 3 times in the thread already, and yet you still can't get the line right? That's *no* moon.

      --
      I am trolling
    16. Re:So everythings a moon now? by fo0bar · · Score: 2, Funny

      I do believe our own moon is named Luna, which would be where you get the word "Lunar", although you rarely ever hear anybody call the moon by its actual name.

      What's next? Calling the sun something stupid like "Sol"?

    17. Re:So everythings a moon now? by PakProtector · · Score: 1

      The parent being modded informative is an example of irony.

      --

      Edward@Tomato - /home/Edward/ man woman
      man: no entry for woman in the manual.
      "Qua!?"

    18. Re:So everythings a moon now? by metroplex · · Score: 1

      You never thought someone dared actually do that, huh! You just found the man

      --
      "Words of wisdom: drop that zero and get with the hero" -- Vanilla Ice
    19. Re:So everythings a moon now? by cbv · · Score: 2, Informative

      What's next? Calling the sun something stupid like "Sol"?

      Just in case you're not being sarcastic, as our Solar System's planets are actually named after Roman gods, the name for our Sun would be Sol just as Earth is actually called Terra.

      For a list of names, see this compilation.

    20. Re:So everythings a moon now? by antipod · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Actually I have always been tought that the actual name of our planet is Tellus. Though that is what we were tought in swedish schools 20 years ago and I know it is the latin name for the Earth and also the roman goddess of Earth so who knows who is right...?

      And as www.susning.nu says about Terra (sorry, swedish site) 'Terra is a latin noun that means land. On old maps you can see the words like terra ingocnita, which means unknown land'.

    21. Re:So everythings a moon now? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Wow! That's so original! I've never heard anything quite like that before!

    22. Re:So everythings a moon now? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Still in portuguese (aswell in other languages, I believe), the Sun is actually called Sol

    23. Re:So everythings a moon now? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I thought it was Terra Incognita

    24. Re:So everythings a moon now? by antipod · · Score: 1

      It is... that typo is just an effect of Murphy's law.

    25. Re:So everythings a moon now? by Seehund · · Score: 1

      I don't know who compiled the list you linked to, but Earth's Latin name is Tellus.

      --
      Help savingAmigaOS and a free PowerPC market
    26. Re:So everythings a moon now? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Actually our moon is called Cruithne or at least one of them is.

    27. Re:So everythings a moon now? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      For a list of names, see this compilation.\

      Clicking the list you'll find that the languages are seemingly arbitarily ordered. However, I did find it interesting that Esperanto(!!) was tenth on the list. It's all well and good that you include an artificially developed language (as opposed to "natural" languages that evolved through centuries of use), but it I find it a bit of a slight to list it above 40+ other languages, many that are still spoken today. Are they trying to imply Esperanto is more widely spoken than the Mandarin, Cantonese, Arabic, Russian, Polish, or Greek languages?

      Maybe I'm making much adue about nothing, but I've always considered Esperanto to be more on par with fictional languages, in terms of relevance to the real world. I'd bet that there are more people studying and using Queyna, Sindarian, or even Klingon than Esperanto.

    28. Re:So everythings a moon now? by trongey · · Score: 2, Informative

      I do believe our own moon is named Luna...

      Actually, our moon doesn't technically seem to be named anything. The International Astronomical Union (IAU), which many people consider to be the authority on such matters, doesn't seem to have any documents that specify what our moon's name is. Some of their documents use the name Moon with a capital M (eg. "Report of the IAU/IAG Working Group on Cartographic Cordinates and Rotational Elements of the Planets and Satellites: 2000" http://astrogeology.usgs.gov/Projects/ISPRS/PREPRI NTS/index_preprints.html), and I've read that they recommend the use of the name Moon.

      --
      You never really know how close to the edge you can go until you fall off.
    29. Re:So everythings a moon now? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      M-O-O-N ... that spells moon!

    30. Re:So everythings a moon now? by JCholewa · · Score: 1

      > I've never heard anything quite like that before!

      Yeah, but in this particular context, the statement is correct. OP was talking about the ISS, which *is* a space station. :p

    31. Re:So everythings a moon now? by krunchyfrog · · Score: 0
      So if I pay the Russian space program to launch my 1kg rock in lower orbit, do I get to name my moon, or will they just name it S/2005 SR26GC3.14159265357?

      I regret to tell you, but only pies can have that name.

      --
      printf($randomline(sigs.txt) \n "-- "$randomline(authors.txt));
      -- myself
    32. Re:So everythings a moon now? by Kiryat+Malachi · · Score: 1

      Actually, lunatic is derived from the root word luna, from the belief that crazy people were being driven to their behavior by the supernatural effects of the full moon - hence, luna-tic.

      --

      ---
      Mod me down, you fucking twits. Go ahead. I dare you.
      (I read with sigs off.)
    33. Re:So everythings a moon now? by Hmmzis · · Score: 1

      Also Russians, Ukrainians, Belorussians, Kazachs and almost all slavish people call the Moon Luna.

    34. Re:So everythings a moon now? by corblix · · Score: 1
      Earth has many moons orbiting it, only one of which is large enough to see.

      Haven't done much stargazing away from city lights, have you?

  5. Roche limit? by Gangis · · Score: 4, Interesting

    I'm no astronomer, but I remember hearing in Astronomy class about the Roche Limit, the absolute minimum distance that an orbiting body can be from a planet before it'd be disintegrated by the gravity. I also remember hearing that Saturn's rings could have been developed as a result of objects falling within the Roche Limit and disintegrating, thus adding to the ring. This object seems much larger than most of the ones in the ring structure, though. I find that really odd. But then again, IANAA. :P

    --
    "Black holes are where God divided by zero." - Steve Wright
    1. Re:Roche limit? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Informative

      The Rings are inside the Roche limit, which is the point where tidal forces will destroy a satellite. However, the Roche limit assumes a liquid body. A small solid body has enough physical strength to hold itself together even inside the Roche limit.

    2. Re:Roche limit? by imsabbel · · Score: 4, Informative

      The Roche limit only works for large bodies, when you assume that the moon is only held together by its own gravity.

      For very small, rocky moons, the tensile strenght of the rock itselv enabls them to exist nearer than the roche limit. Its nothing extremely longtime-stable, but otoh, the tidal forces on a small moon arent very large.

      Also, the roche limit is only a contant (2.xxx*R_bigplanet or so) if the bodies have the same density. If the objects is, for example, a captured iron asteroid, its roche limit can be VERY close to a not very dense saturn.

      --
      HI O WISE PRINCE. WHT TOOK U SO DAM LONG?
    3. Re:Roche limit? by Any+Web+Loco · · Score: 1

      In other words... "i'm no astronomer.... and that's no moon"?

  6. Missing Option . . . by Gabrill · · Score: 1

    Saturnian Moon "Cowboy Neil", the Slashdot god of "None of the Above"!

    --
    Always going forward, 'cause we can't find reverse.
  7. Uhhh by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
    The moon is named... Moon! Duh!!!

    man, where do they get these guys...

    1. Re:Uhhh by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Our moon isn't even a moon, this is a binary system...

  8. Images! by Roland+Piguepaille · · Score: 2, Informative
    Cool images and data:
    Map and Images of Titan from Hubble Space Telescope
    Nasa Titan Photojournal
    Saturnian Satellite Fact Sheet
    Phoebe best image so far, from Voyager2 in 1981!

    --
    To confirm you're not a script, please piss in my ear.
    1. Re:Images! by darenw · · Score: 2, Interesting

      A post about non-S/2005 S1 objects seems a bit off-topic, and so probably deserves no response, but i must point out that the Phoebe image referred to is hardly the "best image so far"! We have 10000000000 times better resolution (it's too late at night to count digits... ;-) from Cassini in June 2004. Just crawl out from under fuzzy little rock where you've been living, and have a look at, for example: http://ciclops.lpl.arizona.edu/view.php?id=198 or http://ciclops.lpl.arizona.edu/view.php?id=203 - the smallest craters you see are about the same order of size as football stadiums.

    2. Re:Images! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      there were some great phoebe images just a little while back:

      http://antwrp.gsfc.nasa.gov/apod/image/0406/phoebe 3_cassini_big.jpg

    3. Re:Images! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      'Interesting book' links to a shock site. Looks like amazon.com links are no longer safe to click either...

  9. Easy definition to determine when it's a moon by spineboy · · Score: 1
    To distinguish when a moon is a moon and not, say, a large orbiting asteroid is easy. It occurs at the same time when bread becomes toast.

    Ask that question (Bread -> toast) to some people who's IQ lies on the wrong side of the bell curve - you'll be amazed at the looks you'll get.

    --
    ..........FULL STOP.
    1. Re:Easy definition to determine when it's a moon by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Maybe you are on the wrong side of the sense of humor bell curve.

    2. Re:Easy definition to determine when it's a moon by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Ask that question (Bread -> toast) to some people who's IQ lies on the wrong side of the bell curve - you'll be amazed at the looks you'll get.

      Ask them about apostophe placement, on the other hand, and that's a whole 'nother matter.

  10. Good use of science money by qurk · · Score: 3, Insightful

    At least this money is going to find new and useful things. Unlike my state (Kansas) which seems to think that the board of education needs to make us all a laughingstock and put their damn religion in our schools in every science textbook. Why not just require a class, like "Majority religion/philosophy-science indocrination". Look, I learned a LOT from reading Isaac Asimov essays, is there a reason I had to go the the library and check out books of essays from a science fiction author to learn about science? Ya! My state board of education is really badass, getting the job done, and is really cool!

  11. Interesting that... by vikstar · · Score: 4, Interesting

    the waves caused are asymetric, as if the moon is moving faster than the immediately surrounding debris. But thats impossible, because it would move the moon to a higher orbit, or the debris to a lower one, right? Can anyone explain this seemingly wierd phenomenon? Also notice the waves caused on the inner darker ring, what is the cause of that?

    --
    The question of whether a computer can think is no more interesting than the question of whether a submarine can swim.
    1. Re:Interesting that... by DigiShaman · · Score: 1

      How about some form of static charge?

      --
      Life is not for the lazy.
    2. Re:Interesting that... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I would assume that those 'waves' are bits of rock which have been moved by the gravity of the moon, and have stayed in position in the same approximate orbit as the moon in this altered configuration...

      In other words, it's not really a wave, it's bits of rock in orbit in formation. The appearance of a wave is an optical illusion.

    3. Re:Interesting that... by duggy_92127 · · Score: 1

      Footfall!

      They first appear as a series of dots on astronomical plates, heading from Saturn directly toward Earth...

      Doug

  12. Keeler Gap by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I figure since the moon was found in the center of the Keeler Gap of Saturn's rings, it might as well be formally named "Keeler." Heck, it probably made the gap in the first place.

  13. prime ring viewing? by weighn · · Score: 0, Offtopic

    and no goatse reference in the 1st 30 posts!?

    What is going on with you people...

    --
    Mongrel News all the news that fits and froths
  14. Re:Apologies in advance... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I knew it was coming. I laughed anyway.

  15. Test for grav. pertubation by helioquake · · Score: 2, Interesting

    I'm repeating myself here (see my post below)...

    This satellite is actually interesting since it may hold a key on how to retain a gap in the A-ring. It has to do with this small body of a satellite perturbing the neighboring, smaller dusts and removing them from the region effectively.

    Somelike that can be studied numerically (n-body problems) to prove the ring's composition, etc. A nice test case for n-body problem.

    [I really should be moderating today but...oh well.]

  16. Re:Apologies in advance... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Yes, It's not moon.... It is MORON... I clearly heard the scientist say "I found moron somewhere in the king station".

  17. Does anyone else find that the slightest bit odd? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    There is a large particle moving through the gap, disturbing the rings and raising waves, yet the whole thing is stable??? Wouldn't the perturbations from the other particles in the ring eventually knock that particle out of its orbit???????? I'd swear it looks just like there is some kind of active feedback maintaining the system, ;-)

  18. Re:Apologies in advance... by daemonenwind · · Score: 1

    Damn straight.

    Bush keeps the Major League Baseball mind control operations there. You think he got that last win only because his opponent was made by Dr. Frankenstein?

  19. Re:3 Simple Suggestions for Slashdot by Fizzl · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Oh please god no!
    What are you on? That would make /. look like a gay christmas tree. All of your suggestions are horrible.
    1. If you need images, post a link. If you don't have your own webserver or atleast host space to put images on, please hand back your /. UID.
    2. Emoticons are plaque of messageboards. I want to strangle someone each time I use MSN after fresh install and haven't turned them off. What ever happened to the good old smileys?
    3. Ok, you just have to be trolling...

  20. yeah but by fux0r · · Score: 1

    does the moon run linux?

    1. Re:yeah but by DrMrLordX · · Score: 1

      No, but Iapetus might.

    2. Re:yeah but by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

      does the moon run linux?

      No, it runs Lunix!

    3. Re:yeah but by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Imagine a Beowulf cluster of these, spread out in a ring!

  21. Wonderful Whitebox Enterprise Linux News by wbel_pimp2 · · Score: 0, Offtopic
    this is good news.

    Seems the egotistical owner of the whiteboxlinux.net and whiteboxlinux.com domains has decided to offer them on ebay as a peace offering between wbel and himself.

    This is really great news so lets hope someone with WBEL enthusiasm steps up to build a respectable community site.

  22. That's not a moon! That's a... by Jugalator · · Score: 2, Insightful

    ... unsually large particle in Saturn's ring system??

    --
    Beware: In C++, your friends can see your privates!
    1. Re:That's not a moon! That's a... by Kredal · · Score: 1

      It's the perfect place to build a Death Star... plenty of raw materials around. That gap wasn't there before we started building. The only problem is getting all the general contractors out there. But that's ok, we offer them a lot of money, and unless they have "ethics", they'll work on it for us.

      Besides, what's the chance of some pipsqueak finding the critical flaw in the station and killing everyone involved?

      --
      Whoever stated that signature sizes should be limited to one hundred and twenty characters can just go ahead and kiss my
  23. In space no one can see your color? by cnschulz · · Score: 2, Insightful

    umm... can anyone explain why they dont send color cameras into space? every picture seems to be either black and white or post-processed into some wierd infra-something false color. give us real color! the truth is out there!

    1. Re:In space no one can see your color? by Mikey-San · · Score: 5, Interesting

      Imagine being in England for a moment. It's 3 a.m., and you're sitting on one side of the Thames River.

      Your friend Bob is perched in his chair on the other side.

      Your camera's all set up and ready to snap a picture. Just when you're about to snap, you realize that the nearest streetlight is three miles to Bob's left. Seeing that the Thames isn't a sneeze's distance across, you know that the dinky flash on your camera is pretty useless.

      You whip out your trusty imaging spectrometer camera lens and line up the shot with Bob again. Bob's giving off some good x-ray emissions, and those come across just fine.

      You could've used a really, really awesome lens and captured a bad photo of Bob--he still reflects some light, though it's a ridiculously small amount--but the IR lens gave you a more descriptive picture of Bob. Why? Mr Bob the Planet Man doesn't give off his own visible light, but he certainly emits x-rays on his own.

      This scales higher:

      In this new-but-similar scenario, you're flying over England. You're trying to take a picture of Bob and his lazy ass, but all you can see, no matter how much light you shine down onto the city below, are the lights from the buildings, bridges, and streetlamps. There's just too much noise to find ol' Bob in that galaxy of lumens.

      You've got all these lights shining on Bob, but unlike the first scenario, there's /too much/ light to see Bob; all you see are stars, so to speak, drowning out the nearby planets. Well, in x-ray mode, your camera can see that while those stars are emitting x-rays, so is Bob, just like before. You're not seeing a faint image of Bob drowned out by the only light illuminating him, you see Bob's x-ray signature approximately ten feet to the right of that cluster of streetligts.

      The universe is a dark place, but sometimes it can be TOO bright! It's a good thing I remembered a towel!

      --
      Mikey-San
      Karma: +Eleventy billion (mostly affected by watching Celebrity Jeopardy)
    2. Re:In space no one can see your color? by bcwright · · Score: 4, Informative

      Resolution. Most space cameras work by detecting light falling on a CCD (Charge-Coupled Device); if the camera was full color, then the resolution would be cut by at least 2/3 because you'd have to devote 1/3 of the CCD to each of the primary colors. (It might be even worse than that if your imaging system wasn't 100% efficient at directing the color components to the proper pels on the CCD). You can obtain the effect of a color camera by using different lens filters and taking multiple pictures and then composing them into a single image - this is what's usually done when a color photograph is desired. By doing that you can produce an image that's exactly what you could obtain with a color camera, but at a higher resolution and without having to use a higher resolution CCD. Also, that way your pictures aren't limited to using a selection of color components that are compatible with those the human eye sees - you can use the filters to "see" parts of the spectrum outside the range that's visible to the human eye.

    3. Re:In space no one can see your color? by ccozan · · Score: 1

      Color CCDs need lots of light, and that's exactly why in space, you can only use normal CCDs ( or CMOS , not an expert here ) , and apply different filters for different wavelenghts. Might be also a question of data size and processing power. Please correct me if i am wrong.

    4. Re:In space no one can see your color? by Jack_the_Tripper · · Score: 1

      Yeah...Bob still owes me 20 bucks too.

    5. Re:In space no one can see your color? by CheshireCatCO · · Score: 2, Informative

      People have already more or less addressed this, but I'll speak up anyway.

      They DO send color cameras into space. After a fashion. You have surely seen the color images taken by Cassini's ISS instrument already, so you know that it is possible. To do this, they put various filters in place and expose the CCD to take the image. The colors are then combined (with extreme love and care to get accurate color, in many cases) to make a color image. However, this clearly takes at least three times the exposure time that a single black and white image through a clear filter does. (Actually, more than that. Each filter blocks a lot of the light, so you tend to expose for longer than you would for a simple clear filter in order to get your signal to noise down.) So for a lot of science, when color isn't expected to be very important anyway (like for discovering a moon), you just use the clear filter.

    6. Re:In space no one can see your color? by petermgreen · · Score: 1

      basically a "color ccd" works by having tiny filters over the pixels

      this means you effectively waste a lot of resoloution AND you limit yourself to a human-like impression of color

      with a monochrome ccd and a color wheel you can have a much wider choice of filters and then decide what combinations you wan't to use to make the final image later. The downside is ofc that it takes longer to make an image.

      if nasa decides an infa-red channel will better capture the information they want than a red channel then thats what they will use to make an image

      --
      note: i'm known as plugwash most places but i screwd up registering that here somehow in the past and now can't register
  24. Re:3 Simple Suggestions for Slashdot by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    This is an obvious troll, but god damn....

    I'm not even gonna touch on the idiocy of the HTML tags or in post images, just the fact that you want emoticons is fucking retarded. It already has emoticons you goon. :) :( :\ >:]

  25. Re:"Name That Moon" Contest... and in other news.. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    In other news Cassini has spotted more previously unseen dark redish brown rings around uranus!

    And in further news Michael Jackson denies reports that he misunderstood the term "star gazing at minor moons" in relation to McCauley Culkin.

  26. Re:Apologies in advance... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Stay in India. Don't get on the Internet. Immediately cease all attempts at creating jokes.

  27. Re:Wonderful Whitebox Enterprise Linux-off topic by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    mod parent down. despite being accurate post is off topic.

  28. Drag that moon back to Earth by DigiShaman · · Score: 1

    With nuclear rocket technology, I wonder how hard it would be to attach such a rocket using a grapple-hook to the moon and drag it back to Earth. It would be nice to have a second moon ;)

    Earth only has one. Adding a second moon would be like the modern day version of building the pyramids

    --
    Life is not for the lazy.
    1. Re:Drag that moon back to Earth by jacksonj04 · · Score: 1

      Except for the bits you've already thought of, such as having to put it in an orbit avoiding everything else, the fact it would play hell with tides, confuse countless creatures who use the moon for guidance (Think turtles)...

      --
      How many people can read hex if only you and dead people can read hex?
    2. Re:Drag that moon back to Earth by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      make that moon orbit around our moon
      that would be... weird

  29. The Fithp are coming by rossdee · · Score: 1

    Thuktun Flishithy

    (or Message Bearer)

    From Niven & Pournelle's Footfall)

  30. Why asymetric? by Herve5 · · Score: 1

    I find nothing shocking here. I'd say, the innermost ring is *closer* to Saturn, so it turns *faster* (thus the moon's gravity waves on it are going *ahead* of the moon's movement), while the outer ring is farther, so it turns slower, so the moon's waves on it are going rearwards compared to the moon's movement.

    Just consider the rings themselves are turning, like the moon, even if you can't detect it (indeed the waves are a means of visualizing the ring's movement, maybe the only one at that scale)

    Hervé

    --
    Herve S.
    1. Re:Why asymetric? by CheshireCatCO · · Score: 3, Informative

      You nailed it. The ring material inside the S/2005 S1's position is moving faster than the moon, so the waves that the moon excites appear ahead of the moon's present position. (That material just had a close encounter.) The other edge of the gap is orbiting more slowly, so the moon PASSES it, so the waves appear behind the moon.

      I'd avoid the word "turning" because it suggests a solid object. The rings are anything but solid.

      There are other ways to make asymmetries in these wakes. If the moon isn't well-centered in the gap (although it isn't clear why it wouldn't be) or has a significant orbital eccentricity, you'll get asymmetry as well.

  31. Re:Does anyone else find that the slightest bit od by slashnik · · Score: 1

    What I find even more odd is that the ripples are to the left of the moon on the inside of it's orbit and to the right on the outside.

    Would you not expect the ripples to be behind the moon's direction of motion?

    slashnik

  32. the rocks of the rings by VanillaCoke420 · · Score: 1

    It would be excellent if it was possible to somehow photograph individual rocks in the rings.

  33. Re:3 Simple Suggestions for Slashdot by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Hahahahahahahahaha.... He admitted being a windows loser!! Hahahahahahahahaha....

  34. Jeezus Krist!! Scary!! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Bob's giving off some good x-ray emissions

    Remember me to never come close to your friend!
    (Are you sure you don't mean IR-radiation? X-Rays are rather unhealthy, and he would have to be *very* hot to emit a significant amount of X-Rays)

    1. Re:Jeezus Krist!! Scary!! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I'm pretty sure he meant Bob as just an example of a planet, not a person giving off lots of x-rays.

  35. The name by jlebrech · · Score: 2, Funny

    Hey they even called the planet after the Sega Saturn, why not called this new moon Dreamcast.

    1. Re:The name by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Hey they even called the planet after the Sega Saturn, why not called this new moon Dreamcast.

      Why are is these new objects also about to self destruct and die never to be seen again? :)

  36. Re:Does anyone else find that the slightest bit od by mr_snarf · · Score: 1
    What I find even more odd is that the ripples are to the left of the moon on the inside of it's orbit and to the right on the outside.
    *sigh* Why did I just read that as nipples?
    --
    printf("Goodbye cruel world!\b\b\b\b\b\b\b\b\b\b\b\b\b\b\b\b\b\b\b\b");
  37. Sphere of Fear by Shivetya · · Score: 4, Funny

    Planet Death?
    The Killing Ball?
    Death Moon?
    Giant Hurt Ball?
    The Deathdicle?

    --
    * Winners compare their achievements to their goals, losers compare theirs to that of others.
    1. Re:Sphere of Fear by Strontium-90 · · Score: 1

      Happy Fun Ball?

  38. ZOMG by Yurithedragon · · Score: 1

    i name this moon 4chan!!!!!!!!

    1. Re:ZOMG by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Why would you name a moon after a webforum dedicated to gay sex with AIDS?

    2. Re:ZOMG by Yurithedragon · · Score: 1

      because

    3. Re:ZOMG by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      gb2/l

      B&

  39. Re:Apologies in advance... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

    "that's no moon, that's a spa--...oh, my mistake, actually it is. shoot him han."

  40. Re:Boycott Microsoft! Fight liberal garbage! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Yeah a new moon of saturn IS pretty sweet.

  41. Right after I name something by ebvwfbw · · Score: 1

    Ok, go ahead and make standards like that after I get to name something. I think the next moon should be named Sat-uranus, in honor of saturn and the planet uranus.... In one of the rings.

  42. I for one... by GreasyBloater · · Score: 1

    I for one welcome our new Saturn moon-like rock speck.

  43. Clearly you're mistaken by argStyopa · · Score: 1

    I can see a number of people from my desk, all of whom are a decivolkswagen or smaller in size (ok a couple are probably bigger) and AFAIK all of them have names?

    It's taken careful observation to recognize them, since their average albedo (i.e. brightness) is pretty low. But through a thorough analysis of donut-crumb tracks and the oscillation of the water in the cooler, I can pretty certainly infer their locations making direct visual identification a mere formality.

    --
    -Styopa
  44. uh by jridley · · Score: 1

    I think you mean newly discovered moon. I don't think moons are currently being manufactured.

    1. Re:uh by perdu · · Score: 1

      A new moon could be captured, but your point's well taken!

      --
      You only use 2% of your DNA
  45. thanks by subtropolis · · Score: 1

    I was just going to post the same question. Image here, for the curious.

    --
    "Our interests are to see if we can't scale it up to something more exciting," he said.
  46. You're off topic, and stupid. too by lheal · · Score: 1, Troll

    How is naming an object orbiting Saturn a moon a good use of your tax dollars?

    On the other hand, your State Board of Education wants you to really THINK about where you came from, and not simply accept the implausible idea that God did it in six days nor the unlikely explanation that it just happened, and kept on just happening, for billions of years. They want you to question your assumptions, and to know what you're taking on faith.

    You choose to put your faith in Isaac Asimov. Fine - you get the answer to the basic questions of life from a science fiction writer. You might be interested in the writings of that sage, L. Ron Hubbard, who took the next step and invented his own religion (Scientology).

    --
    Raise your children as if you were teaching them to raise your grandchildren, because you are.
    1. Re:You're off topic, and stupid. too by meadowsp · · Score: 2, Insightful

      How about making you really THINK about the implausable idea that the earth is flat or the unlikely explanation that its round.

    2. Re:You're off topic, and stupid. too by Kiryat+Malachi · · Score: 1

      Naming an object orbiting Saturn, not such a good use.

      Finding a new one, and studying the effects of it on solar and planetary dynamics? Using it to test solutions of n-body problems? Exploring our world, just because? *Great* use of my tax dollars. More, please.

      --

      ---
      Mod me down, you fucking twits. Go ahead. I dare you.
      (I read with sigs off.)
  47. Artist/Photographer's perspective by cryptocom · · Score: 1

    Can you imagine what the view would look like from one of these tiny moons? This newly discovered one, along with several others, are tucked in between gaps in Saturn's rings. Imagine sitting on one of these moons, looking up toward this massive planet that fills the sky and a field of debris rings spreading out in both directions. Blows the mind!

    --
    It takes just a moment and an action to destroy. It takes some time and thought to create.
    1. Re:Artist/Photographer's perspective by Zareste · · Score: 1

      I think the view would be of a bunch of meteors about to slam into you..

      --
      I am NOT a number! I am a - oh wait, I'm number 761710. Look! 761710!
  48. The reference. by dmaxwell · · Score: 1

    Four or five of you probably haven't seen this yet. The parent is referencing the parody here:

    http://www.sequentialpictures.com/moviestarwarsepi sode3.html

  49. Boring news! by chrisnewbie · · Score: 1

    On another matter with the same impact as the dicovery of this new rock in space! A farmer in an undisclosed location has dicovered a new cow in his herd! neighbors were suspecting it, but confirmation of the extra bovine was made publice today! "less grass was discovered in an area of the field, and that got citizen concerned" thus an inquiry exposed the new cow! it's name is *%%#%?( or what the f$??%* in farmer translation.

  50. Wrong Saturnian moon. by FooAtWFU · · Score: 1

    No, no, no, you've got the wrong moon: you're thinking of Mimas, another moon of Saturn. (cool picture included)

    --
    The World Wide Web is dying. Soon, we shall have only the Internet.
    1. Re:Wrong Saturnian moon. by Tongo · · Score: 1

      Does that look like the Death Star to anyone else??

    2. Re:Wrong Saturnian moon. by JCholewa · · Score: 1

      > Does that look like the Death Star to anyone else??

      *sigh*

      That's the POINT. It looks like the Death Star to EVERYONE.

      That's why Mimas is cool. That and the fact that if the asteroid that created that crater was a tad larger, it would've destroyed the moon, which is pretty neat to think about.

      --
      -JC

    3. Re:Wrong Saturnian moon. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yes, the side-by-side comparison of Mimas and the Death Star really lead me to believe that both Mimas and the Death Star really look like the Death Star. Moron.

    4. Re:Wrong Saturnian moon. by Tongo · · Score: 1

      Sorry, I've never seen a photo of Mimas before.

  51. There's already a Death Star moon: Mimas by FooAtWFU · · Score: 1

    Mimas, another moon of Saturn, is the one that looks just like the Death Star. If anything, rename it instead.

    --
    The World Wide Web is dying. Soon, we shall have only the Internet.
  52. Still "moon". by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    In English, that is. It was called that before there were known to be any others. Now we use the term more generically.

    With Luna, you do get lunar, but you also get "lunatic" from the affects that the moon has on people, and all romance versions of the first workday, Monday or Moonday, with Lunas, Lundi, etc.

  53. Re:3 Simple Suggestions for Slashdot by karnal · · Score: 1

    You've got me curious.

    What in the hell does a gay christmas tree look like?

    --
    Karnal
  54. Re:Does anyone else find that the slightest bit od by CheshireCatCO · · Score: 1

    That's easily explained. The ripples appear for material that has just passed near the moon. Material inward of the moon's position orbits faster than the moon, so the ripples there appear ahead of the moon's orbit. Material outside moves slower, so the ripples appear behind the moon.

    It's all about Kepler's third law.

  55. Re:Does anyone else find that the slightest bit od by CheshireCatCO · · Score: 1

    There will be angular momentum exchange: the inner edge is tugging on the moon making the moon's orbit expand, while the outer material is tugging the opposite way making the orbit contract. It's possible for the whole thing to be in steady state, actually. Or the moon (and the gap) could be slowly migrating.

    However, the ripples don't build up in time because they have a lot of time to go before they re-encounter the moon. In that time, the particles suffer copious collisions and the ripples tend to damp down again. (This isn't 100% true, at least in all cases. Recent work by my graduate advisor and a former student showed that the ring doesn't necessarily lose memory of the last encounter, although I don't think that that applies here.)

  56. Shepherd moon by Caractacus+Potts · · Score: 1

    This object already has a name. It's called a shepherd moon. There's probably at least one in every ring gap.

  57. Re:Does anyone else find that the slightest bit od by slashnik · · Score: 1

    Doh, "Smacks Head"

    Thanks for the whack with the clue stick.

    Let's see if I gan get my brian out of neutral before my next post.

    krrrrunnnnch

  58. good post, mod parent up (nt) by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    nt

  59. Re:Boycott Microsoft! Fight liberal garbage! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Too bad they can't delete spamming zealots. The internet has far too many Nazis as it is

  60. Luna = moon in spanish by ggambett · · Score: 1

    In spanish, "luna" is literally "moon". We call it "la luna", which means "the moon". The title of this article would be "...nueva luna de Saturno", because there's no difference between luna the type of celestial body ("moon") and luna our moon ("luna").

  61. What about the thing that goes vertical on screen? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    No one mentioned the little white ball thing that goes down the screen and then suddenly changes direction, WTF is that?

    Are there bugs in space?

    Stupid flies always getting in the picture.

  62. Re:Does anyone else find that the slightest bit od by CheshireCatCO · · Score: 1

    To be fair, this is what I do for my research. It's not necessarily obvious, I just see this kind of thing every day.

  63. oh freakin great! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    with comercial space travel comming about and discovering of 7km moon, i can just see the future some rich hollywood star buys a private get away moon instead of an island

  64. My Favorite Stargate by susano_otter · · Score: 1

    My favorite Stargate address:

    P575309

    (And yes, that is the correct naming convention for Stargate addresses.)

    --

    Any sufficiently well-organized community is indistinguishable from Government.

  65. There are those who call me... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Tim!

    Greatings Tim...

    Greatings Arthur...

    There is much you know, Tim...

    Quite...