Slashdot Mirror


Nokia Develops a New Browser on Apple WebKit

Althazzar writes "Nokia has built a new browser for their Symbian system based on the WebKit open source project from Apple, released last week. "Apple is pleased to assist Nokia in creating their new Series 60 browser based on the same KHTML open source technology that powers Apple's Safari"."

211 comments

  1. Let me know when its free to use by CrazyJim1 · · Score: 4, Insightful

    I have a built in web browser in my phone, but I never fired it up because it has fees that go along with its use.

    1. Re:Let me know when its free to use by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      He never said he didn't want to pay for the phone, just not pay for the webserver ( which happened to come with it )

      Are you just argumentative ?

    2. Re:Let me know when its free to use by Eric+Giguere · · Score: 1

      I assume his carrier doesn't offer flat-rate pricing for data, which can lead to some pretty stiff charges if you don't browse carefully, especially if you're downloading Slashdot pages that probably don't even format correctly for the small screen anyhow...

      Eric
      See your HTTP headers here
    3. Re:Let me know when its free to use by Kaamoss · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Sorry, but I gotta side with CrazyJim here on this one. I never use the browser on any of my phones just because the data service charge is so high. I'm sure it makes sense for some people but deffinitly not for most. it's not the same as asking an isp for a reuter and not exspecting to pay for bandwidth because the primary reason for use of a phone is to make phone calls. I think a lot of people have lost site of this and confuse their phones for instant messaging, camera, web browsing toys and not a device to place a call. But that's just my 2 cents.

    4. Re:Let me know when its free to use by Matje · · Score: 1

      reread his post. he doesn't use the browser due to the fees for browsing. presumably he does use his phone for make phone calls.

    5. Re:Let me know when its free to use by kmmatthews · · Score: 0, Troll

      This from a guy who admittedly hears voices?

      --
      feh. stuff.
    6. Re:Let me know when its free to use by croddy · · Score: 0, Flamebait

      My phone IS a call-placing, instant messaging, picture-taking, SSH-client'ing, toy. That's the reason I bought the damn thing, and I certainly don't need your sour attitude telling me to stop using it!

    7. Re:Let me know when its free to use by LiquidCoooled · · Score: 1

      Its cheaper to get a phone with everything on than it is to purchase a phone with a large format readable screen but no additional crap.

      --
      liqbase :: faster than paper
    8. Re:Let me know when its free to use by faedle · · Score: 4, Insightful

      On my carrier, I get unlimited data usage and only 300 minutes of "anytime minutes". My PalmOne Treo is an IMing, SMSing, SSHing computer that just happens to have an expensive-to-use phone attached to it.

      It's all a matter of perspective.

    9. Re:Let me know when its free to use by Okonomiyaki · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Actually, the primary use of a phone is to send and receive text messages. Now that flat rate internet access is getting reasonable, that will soon be the secondary use and since it will be moving into the #2 position from dead last, I guess everything else will be moving down. That should put "making phone calls" around 5 or 6.

      Of course it could just be me. I really hate talking on the fucking phone. And it costs too much in Japan anyway.

    10. Re:Let me know when its free to use by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Bahahah.... James is officially nuts.

    11. Re:Let me know when its free to use by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Huh? You need to pay if you want to use your browser to browse a local filesystem?

    12. Re:Let me know when its free to use by squiggleslash · · Score: 2, Informative

      If you're an American, you might want to switch over to T-Mobile. Basic web access is free over GPRS, though they offer additional plans (T-Zones, which is exclusive content, and non-port blocked GPRS access for things like laptops) for an additional fee.

      --
      You are not alone. This is not normal. None of this is normal.
    13. Re:Let me know when its free to use by f0rtytw0 · · Score: 1

      Who is your carrier?

      --
      this is the most important sig ever! In your face 446154!
    14. Re:Let me know when its free to use by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You are assuming your phone usage is the same as everyone elses. I use my web browser all the time, I watch television on my phone, I use it for messaging, I use it to send and receive pictures, and I use the email address I setup on my carriers website as well (which I can check ans send using the web broser on the phone or any IMAP client from a PC). Unlimited internet access was included with my phone plan and on the three additional phones that share my plan. The newer plans do not include it for free but it is only an additional $15 for the first phone and $5 for each additional phone. This includes $5-$10 a month allowance for download content per month per phone (My phone television service referenced above costs me nothing extra per month).

      My suggestion? When comparing cellular plans, make sure to compare EVERYTHING you plan on using. Anytime minutes are a small portion of what is available by the carriers and only used to get you in the door.

    15. Re:Let me know when its free to use by eWarz · · Score: 2, Informative

      his carrier is probably sprint. $15/mo for unlimited data.

    16. Re:Let me know when its free to use by Xshare · · Score: 2, Informative

      I pay only 3.99 a month for unlimited data use on my phone. T-mobile. :)

    17. Re:Let me know when its free to use by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It's also possible to have a similar plan with Cingular Orange/ Cingular Blue provided you got grandfathered into it.

    18. Re:Let me know when its free to use by ronnieroller · · Score: 1

      I pay $20 for unlimited internet on my cingular http://www.mobile-review.com/articles/2004/se-s710 -pict-en.shtml Sony s710 and use http://slashdot.org/palm to read slashdot. If i did not have an unlimited plan, i would never use it.

    19. Re:Let me know when its free to use by jalefkowit · · Score: 2, Informative

      ... unlimited data use through the apps provided by T-Mobile, that is (i.e. their cruddy web browser and e-mail client).

      Try to load up your own apps like Opera Mobile, Agile Messenger, etc. and you find that the dirt-cheap all you can eat plan blocks your service. You have to shell out $20/month to be able to bring your own apps.

      Not that they document this anywhere you might see it before you buy a plan -- it's just "unlimited data!!! unlimited Mobile Web!!! " with the caveats buried deep in the fine print.

      (Yes, I'm a bitter T-Mobile customer :-) )

    20. Re:Let me know when its free to use by bahwi · · Score: 1

      $20/mo in the US for T-Mobile Unlimited. Kinda pricey, but invaluable when on the go.

      Not to mention Putty for Symbian works great. =) SSH'd in fixing a prob without leaving the bar!

    21. Re:Let me know when its free to use by someonehasmyname · · Score: 1

      What?! My unlimited data plan with T-Mobile is $20/month!!

      --
      Common sense is not so common.
    22. Re:Let me know when its free to use by geekychic · · Score: 2, Interesting

      T-Mobile changed its data pricing in the past year or so. If you subscribed to unlimited data before they changed the price, you got to keep the 3.99 per month rate. It came in very handy this past March, when I was checking NCAA basketball scores every few minutes...

    23. Re:Let me know when its free to use by Pathwalker · · Score: 1
      They have several different plans, including:
      • proxied web access only
      • NAT with most ports blocked
      • NAT with all ports open ( internet2.voicestream.com as the GPRS gateway)
      • A real IP with no ports blocked, or firewalling; incoming connections allowed ( internet3.voicestream.com as the GPRS gateway)
      Right now I use the internet2 level. Being able to VPN out via my cell phone, as well as using Agile Messenger to keep in touch with people are well worth $20/month to me.

      I tend to use about a gig a month of data transfer.
    24. Re:Let me know when its free to use by RzUpAnmsCwrds · · Score: 1

      Or T-Mobile USA. They offer unlimited data for $20 a month.

    25. Re:Let me know when its free to use by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Dude, if you want to see some real prophecies come true, read the Qur'an.

  2. I wonder... by techathead · · Score: 2, Interesting

    If apple was actually working with them on this, or if they just are using the recently released webkit code from apple.

    1. Re:I wonder... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Informative
      Uhhh ... I won't say RTFA, but RTFS (read the effing summary)!
      I wonder if apple was actually working with them on this
      "Apple is pleased to assist Nokia in creating their new Series 60 browser"
      if they just are using the recently released webkit code from apple
      "Nokia has built a new browser for their Symbian system based on the WebKit open source project from Apple"
    2. Re:I wonder... by larkost · · Score: 1

      Hmm... you think that information might actually be in the article? Well, this is slashdot so that certainly doesn't matter....

  3. Wither KHTML? by squiggleslash · · Score: 5, Interesting
    I wonder if it'd be worth the Konqueror people taking WebKit/etc and porting it back to KDE, rather than trying to keep up with WebKit in KHTML when the latter is obviously having problems because of slight architectural differences.

    This way the three groups, Nokia, KDE, and Apple, will be working on making one browser engine perfect, rather than working on two very similar systems that, really, have no major advantages over one-another.

    Symbian has little relationship with OS X/OpenStep. It strikes me if this was easy for Nokia to do, it should be architecturally reasonable to port it to a KDE environment.

    --
    You are not alone. This is not normal. None of this is normal.
    1. Re:Wither KHTML? by m50d · · Score: 4, Insightful

      WebKit doesn't meet KDE's coding standards. They're quite strict, in order to keep a clean codebase, wheras Apple has rushed features in to a certain extent. Also, KHTML is integrated into KDE, and a large part of the difference between it and WebKit is that Apple have done a lot of work to remove that integration (and add their own). I suspect the reason Nokia are using WebKit is it is mostly de-integrated. Porting to KDE would just mean adding all the integration back in. (kparts, kwallet, etc.). Not too much work, but pretty pointless because the result would be very similar to KHTML.

      --
      I am trolling
    2. Re:Wither KHTML? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      wheras Apple has rushed features in to a certain extent.

      I think also a big bit of the problem is that Apple actually optimizes their code...

    3. Re:Wither KHTML? by jellomizer · · Score: 2, Interesting

      So you saying the KDE people are producing a lesser project because they rather sacrifice features, correct behavior, and speed for clean code? perhaps they should reevaluate their levels.

      I agree code should be clean when possible. But it is not always possible to produce clean code. Sometimes you need to put an ugly fix in it to get it to work right.

      --
      If something is so important that you feel the need to post it on the internet... It probably isn't that important.
    4. Re:Wither KHTML? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I agree code should be clean when possible. But it is not always possible to produce clean code. Sometimes you need to put an ugly fix in it to get it to work right.

      This is a very interesting claim. Would you be kind enough to provide an example of a problem which is possible to solve with ugly code but not with clean code? I, not to mention millions of computer scientists, would be fascinated to see such a thing for the first time.

    5. Re:Wither KHTML? by Gregg+Alan · · Score: 1, Flamebait

      Has it occurred to you that Apple may not have chosen KHTML if it hadn't been clean code?

      Maybe instead of bashing KHTML you should bash Gecko (or whatever they call it, not sure) for not being quality enough code for Apple to want to use it.

      (as an aside, IME, KHTML is fast, has the features I use/need, and it's behavior is good for the sites I visit though I realize this may not apply to everyone.)

      --
      Here before all but 8486 of you.
    6. Re:Wither KHTML? by jellomizer · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Problem. You have to fix a program. You have 2 hours to fix it, if you are over 2 hours you are fired. The clean version of making a function more adaptible will take 3 hours to do. Vs. Copying and pasting the fuction and altering the bits and pieces and give it a simular name dostuff2(int x,int y, float z).

      Time it takes to code in reallife is actually an issue. If you spend to much time then you go over budget, when you are over budget then your job quality is in question, when your job quality is in question there is a hire chance of getting fired. These are real factors that are not taught in Computer Science, because in the virtual world people have endless time to write their code and make it optimised, and clean. In real life, If it takes you twice as long to write a program that is 25% faster. It is usually cheaper to buy a computer that is twice as fast then pay for optimised code. Also with the cost of repairing bad code vs. writting clean code from the start If the tradeoff of fixing code will simular amount of time as it does writting clean code you get the advantage of spreading the money over a longer period of time alling more time to invest money and make more.

      Real life sucks doesn't it.

      --
      If something is so important that you feel the need to post it on the internet... It probably isn't that important.
    7. Re:Wither KHTML? by beelsebob · · Score: 1

      Neither. Neatly generalize dostuff2 then replace it and the other code with a specialization call to it. Bob

    8. Re:Wither KHTML? by bluGill · · Score: 1

      KDE does not operate on the model. KDE doesn't have management breathing down our necks. We have programmers breaking down each others neck. We know that one day I want to make a change to the code, and I don't want to change every instance. So we insist on clean code. If support for some gimmick (ACID2) takes a little longer, so what, at least is easy to developer. In the long run this is better, because ACID3 won't require fixing a bug in two places.

      That is one of the advantages of open source - we are able to say to the management demanding something now "Go away, I'm going to do it right, no matter how long it takes."

      That is why Mozilla took years between netscape 4.x and mozilla 1.0 - they were able to take those years to get it right. Mozilla is now advancing fairly quick because the code is well written.

      Of course if you just want feature foo now, this is a downside. If you are thinking long term, it is an advantage.

    9. Re:Wither KHTML? by XMyth · · Score: 1

      What features are they sacrificing? All the crap about not being able to merge the webkit changes into Konqueror are over....they already did it.

    10. Re:Wither KHTML? by Klivian · · Score: 1

      That's pure nonsens, since the KDE coders have been busy and not sitting around waiting for Apple. They have been creating lots of code in khtml/kjs in the two years since Apple forked the code. If you bother to look over the WebCore source tree you will see lots of patches pulled from the KDE tree incorporated into WebCore. In lots of areas it's the Apple coders who have been trying to keep up with the KDE coders, not the other way. But they have had access to the KDE cvs/svn, having had a much easier job. Since Apple finally has started giving similar access, making it easier for the KDE developers they can now spend more time to writing new code and less time reworking the Apple changes.

    11. Re:Wither KHTML? by Just+Some+Guy · · Score: 1
      Sometimes you need to put an ugly fix in it to get it to work right.

      That is never true. Sometimes you might be tempted to add an ugly fix to alter some behavior to how you think it should be today, but that doesn't make it right or good.

      If the answer is "ad-hoc patch", then you're asking the wrong question.

      --
      Dewey, what part of this looks like authorities should be involved?
    12. Re:Wither KHTML? by juhaz · · Score: 1

      Problem. You have to fix a program. You have 2 hours to fix it, if you are over 2 hours you are fired.

      If you spend to much time then you go over budget, when you are over budget then your job quality is in question, when your job quality is in question there is a hire chance of getting fired.


      See, that why KDE people don't need to do that.
      They can't get fired no matter how long it takes, because they never got paid in the first place.

    13. Re:Wither KHTML? by stilborne · · Score: 1

      > This way the three groups, Nokia, KDE, and
      > Apple, will be working on making one browser
      > engine perfect

      this would be purpose and point of http://khtml.info/ =)

    14. Re:Wither KHTML? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      WebKit doesn't meet KDE's coding standards. They're quite strict, in order to keep a clean codebase, wheras Apple has rushed features in to a certain extent.

      How do you know? Have you done any kind of code review of either project? Both have their messy and their clean parts, and a lot of WebKit changes are actually code cleanup of KHTML code. It would be unseemly to get in a "whose code is better" pissing match in public; but it's totally wrong to claim WebKit is some kind of hacked-up mess compared to KHTML.

      Have you considered that maybe Nokia picked WebKit over KHTML due to the superior performance and web compatibility rather than just to make their port easier? Sometimes, the code to get something 100% right is a bit more complicated than the code to get it 90% right.

  4. That's quite strange by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Interesting

    I had thought WebKit had some nontrivial tyings into Cocoa. Is WebKit that neatly separable from Cocoa? Does it use qt internally still?

    1. Re:That's quite strange by geniusj · · Score: 2, Interesting

      They probably mistyped and meant to say WebCore. That would be my guess.

    2. Re:That's quite strange by Elwood+P+Dowd · · Score: 3, Interesting
      1. Yes, they meant WebCore not WebKit
      2. There's a bit of mailing list activity from people working on porting WebKit (and the internal qt-alike), and the Apple folks have been encouraging.
      Dunno who's doing the work, because I'm not watching CVS or bugzilla or nothing. It sounds like they'll merge the existing GTK Webkit port first. Some dude says he's going to pound on it 'till it compiles in Windows and swears he'll keep it up for a year. Dunno who these people are, so I don't know how much salt to take anything with.

      But the notable thing is that the Apple employees are down with WebKit getting ported to Windows, and that would imply that they will try to keep that port maintained.

      Mildly offtopic, but interesting, right?
      --

      There are no trails. There are no trees out here.
    3. Re:That's quite strange by minus_273 · · Score: 1

      nah that was a load of BS, you can run webkit on gnome (thanks to nokia). gtk-webcore
      that is much more of a story than this is. Heck i'm sure someone could just compile gtk-webcore for windows too if they tried.

      --
      The war with islam is a war on the beast
      The war on terror is a war for peace
  5. There is a GTK+ Webcore based Web browser by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Informative

    Which is based upon the Webcore released by NOKIA not long ago. Here is a Screenshot

    And further Information can be found here.

    1. Re:There is a GTK+ Webcore based Web browser by Coryoth · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Gosh, so it's sort of the bastard offspring of KDE, GNOME, and Apple. How very odd. I wonder if this will mean GNOME will get a webkit based browser in the near future.

      I wonder how many people would have predicted that GNOME would gain the most from Apple taking up KHTML? Sure, we aren't there yet, but it begins to look possible. How very very odd.

      Jedidiah.

    2. Re:There is a GTK+ Webcore based Web browser by quinto2000 · · Score: 2, Informative

      actually, gtkhtml was originally a fork of the khtml codebase, just like webkit. It has since mostly withered and died, but there are a few projects using it.

      --
      Ceci n'est pas un post
    3. Re:There is a GTK+ Webcore based Web browser by Klivian · · Score: 1

      The Gnome WebKit browser has already existed for some time.
      One is called Atlantis http://www.akcaagac.com/index_atlantis.html/
      Or you may build Galeon with WebCore http://sourceforge.net/mailarchive/forum.php?threa d_id=5818624&forum_id=42686/.
      In addition it seems that WebCore has been imported into the Gnome CVS for some reason (http://cvs.gnome.org/viewcvs/gnome-webcore/)

    4. Re:There is a GTK+ Webcore based Web browser by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Atlantis will never see large scale use, simply because the author is a infamous anti-gnome troll, and he's never made the source code available for atlantis.

    5. Re:There is a GTK+ Webcore based Web browser by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yeah, said by an anonymous asshole like you....

  6. hmmmm. by Kaamoss · · Score: 3, Interesting

    So dosn't that mean that the Nokia 60 browser is opensource too? Wonder where I can get the source code or if they'll bother to provide it. If anyone finds a link to it let me know.

    1. Re:hmmmm. by CdBee · · Score: 2, Informative

      KDE - upon which WebKit is based - is LGPL, meaning full source-code disclosure isn't required

      --
      I have been a user for about 10 years. This ends Feb 2014. The site's been ruined. I'm off. Dice, FU
    2. Re:hmmmm. by oever · · Score: 5, Informative

      It is required! The code for the _library_ must be provided. The code linking to it may stay undisclosed.

      --
      DNA is the ultimate spaghetti code.
    3. Re:hmmmm. by Kaamoss · · Score: 1

      True, but at least partial disclosure is right? I'm not an expert on liscenses so let me know if I'm mistaken. I would think that they would need to give back to the community in some way...

    4. Re:hmmmm. by XbainX · · Score: 2, Informative

      The LGPL requires any distributed modifications of LGPL'd source code must be made available.

      Nokia using a LGPL'd web library for their browser does not mean they have to release the source code for the browser.

    5. Re:hmmmm. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Can someone please explain to me how KDE is LGPL if it depends on a GPL library (QT)?

      I am totally confused by the licensing details.

    6. Re:hmmmm. by Coryoth · · Score: 5, Informative

      Of course Nokia has apparently taken webkit and built the GUI for it using GTK+. The result is GTK-WebKit, which has indeed been open sourced - you can find it here. I have no idea how much of their browser that contains, but at the least it is an HTML renderer and basic GUI, which should get you the better part of the browser whole.

      Does a GTK+/KHTML browser count as cross desktop cooperation, or a mutant bastard offspring created by third party mad scientists?

      Jedidiah.

    7. Re:hmmmm. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      First, let me say I am not a lawyer, nor I'm an expert in KHTML or it is licensing details.

      That said, my view is that it is feasible by double-licensing the source code under both the GPL and LGPL (here I asume all code in KHTML is original or received under LGPL). Provided that you don't link it with Qt, you can choose witch license you do prefer. If you link with Qt, then only the GPL can apply.

    8. Re:hmmmm. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Well, it's gtk-webcore, webkit is the higher Objective-C api which nobody but GNUstep would want to use it.

    9. Re:hmmmm. by arose · · Score: 1

      The same way something can be BSD licensed while depending on a GPL library: the combined product is GPLed, but if you can use the code without linking to the GPL library you are free to use it under it's own license.

      --
      Analogies don't equal equalities, they are merely somewhat analogous.
    10. Re:hmmmm. by m50d · · Score: 1

      Seems a bit silly to me considering the mature Qt/Embedded exists, while afaik there's nothing like that for GTK, and certainly not at the same level of maturity.

      --
      I am trolling
    11. Re:hmmmm. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Trolltech can have strange and unpredictable attitudes to licensing though, at times they give the impression that "commercial" projects need to be licensed whether GPLd or not or even that projects developed and used entirely behind closed doors need to be separatelt licensed. I don't see how they could win in court on that basis but it's a mess best avoided.

    12. Re:hmmmm. by juhaz · · Score: 1

      Well, they were probably already working on Maemo / Nokia 770 back then, and did it primarily for it.

      "Silly"? I really, really doubt Nokia just spinned a dice that decided to take one, and then build not just one product but entire platform on top of that. In addition to the whole GPL/LGPL/Commercial mess, they probably wanted flexibility, and then again, why not? The ARM monsters mobiles tend to have these days should be more than capable of running X.

    13. Re:hmmmm. by shutdown+-p+now · · Score: 1

      Obviously, it's both.

  7. Hmm by Payalnik · · Score: 3, Informative

    I do suppose Opera has more experience in fitting web pages to small screens. Have they made it better?

    1. Re:Hmm by SpyPlane · · Score: 1, Interesting

      Opera is available on the competitor's phone (Qualcomm) on the Brew platform. So, I don't suppose Nokia made it better, they just didn't have Opera available to them.

      --
      "We need a fourth law of Robotics: Stop Fingering My Wife"
    2. Re:Hmm by Payalnik · · Score: 1

      Opera is available on s60 for ages. I didn't have a chance to test it, but I've seen a beta version for Pocket PC and it renders just fine.

    3. Re:Hmm by kaarlov · · Score: 4, Informative

      Nokia ships lots of phones with Opera as a web browser. See http://www.opera.com/products/mobile/products/

      If Nokia is serious with their own KHTML-based browser for their phones, it could be major financial blow for Opera Software.

    4. Re:Hmm by Payalnik · · Score: 1

      Does Nokia pay Opera software for using the browser?

    5. Re:Hmm by jhagman · · Score: 1
      I do suppose Opera has more experience in fitting web pages to small screens. Have they made it better?

      I read the announcement quite fast, but in my understanding Nokia is going to do the browser, they are not done it yet. I might have misread it though.

      About Operas quality, atleast the S60 version of Opera is quite useless given the terrible (read big and unaliased) fonts and bad layout. Hopefully Nokia makes it right, smaller, better, hopefully subpixel antialiased fonts are needed for a good browsing experience.

      ThunderHawk has the font issues right. Unfortunately I haven't been able to play with it so I can't say whether it is any good otherwise.

    6. Re:Hmm by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      No, Nokia are ripping of Opera. Opera know about it but just hope Nokia will stop their massive and blatent copyright infringment.

      Oh no, wait, that would be really fucking stupid. Perhaps you're just dumb? Yeah, that's probably it.

    7. Re:Hmm by kaarlov · · Score: 3, Interesting

      Yes they do. According to Opera Software's first quarter earnings, they get three times more revenue from licensing their browser for various pocket devices, than from selling the desktop version for Windows and Linux.

    8. Re:Hmm by WzDD · · Score: 1

      Not only has Opera been available for Series 60 phones for ages, as other commenters have pointed out, it really sucks. I've got a Nokia 6600 (bad, bad phone), it runs Opera, and the browser is terrible for anything other than basic text rendering.

      Opera used to be great, but it's way behind the curve nowadays.

      The only reason they get away with it is because I hardly ever use the Web browser on the phone, since traffic is so expensive here.

    9. Re:Hmm by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Interesting

      As a recently former Symbian developer. When I say this, after 3 years, it's very much worth celebrating, Symbian development is the worst experience of my life, including having to have my dog put to sleep in the comparison.

      In any case, the Series 60 platform includes mostly bitmapped fonts and for "Performance Reasoning" do not bother even trying to make a decent font system. They have a painfully slow glyph renderer and their support for path rendering in general is pathetic. Most Symbian (specifically nokia) phones are using extremely underpowered processors and antialiasing is just not an option.

      Some asian Series 60 phones ship with a commercial font renderer, but the font they include is of a proprietary format and is missing a large amount of characters.

      Nokia and Symbian try to take the route of reinventing every wheel they can. They typically try to rewrite everything from the ground up using average developers.

      So, I wouldn't blame Opera for these problems. The fact that a browser like Opera can run on such an incredibly bad operating system is a huge thing in the first place.

      I really wish Nokia the best with the KHTML stuff, but I've seen many attempts, even serious ones, to implement an embedded KHTML. The thing about KHTML is that it performs as well as it does due to their large memory usage. They have an internal DOM tree which is frigging beautiful and clean, but it is also LARGE!!!! I love Safari and use it all the time, I don't mind having a gig of RAM in a machine to make the browser fly, but KHTML just doesn't perform on lower memory systems. The other point of interest is that the rendering engine of KHTML might not be suitable for the non-CSS alterations to page layout that makes the difference between Opera and other small screen systems.

    10. Re:Hmm by hkmwbz · · Score: 1
      "Not only has Opera been available for Series 60 phones for ages, as other commenters have pointed out, it really sucks."
      Well, it's not like anything else is any good. Maybe it's just S60 that sucks? Anyway, my phone with Opera shows pages just fine. No side scrolling either, actually. What's so bad about Opera?
      "Opera used to be great, but it's way behind the curve nowadays."

      Compared to what, exactly? If Opera "used to be great", then how come it's actually getting better? (Smaller, faster, more stable.)

      Your comment doesn't make sense.

      --
      Clever signature text goes here.
    11. Re:Hmm by porneL · · Score: 0

      Nokia sponsored Minimo, now they're getting KHTML "mobilised", but still Opera with their SSR is unbeaten on small screens.
      I guess it's just Nokias game to get lower prices from Opera.

  8. In case by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0, Informative

    In case anyone is wondering... no this doesn't mean that Qt is part of Nokia's plans. Apple spent a huge amount of time and effort to remove the Qt dependency from KHTML to make this... like most KDE software, it was useable outside the KDE project unless you happen like being forced in using the GPL (thanks to TrollTech and its expensive licenses!).

    So.. Webkit is an HTML render forked from KHTML, and with the Qt tendrils chopped out of it, leaving a decent quality LGPL HTML renderer that makes for good competition for mozilla. Let's hope it eventually kills off KHTML... since it is both technically superior and has better licensing.

    1. Re:In case by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0, Flamebait

      WTF???

      KHTML has cleaner code then Webkit, it has the same license, and now (in trunk) has adblock support. Your your post is complete bs.

    2. Re:In case by SteamedPenguin · · Score: 2, Informative

      Better licensing? What kind of crack are you smoking? The license has not changed.

      If you are going to make some sort of comment about licensing then maybe you should see if it applies first.

      --

      Dixi et salvavi animam meam

    3. Re:In case by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You cretin... the GPL used by Qt infects upwards. You didn't read the bit about removing the Qt dependency in the FIRST FUCKING SENTENCE, DID YOU?

      If you are going to make some kind of comment about licensing, make sure you understand the situation first.

    4. Re:In case by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I wish people would stop going on about the mythical KHTML 'cleaner code'. I'm quite sure the webkit code isn't so unusable that the astonishing performance and compatibility gains it's made over KHTML aren't worth it.

    5. Re:In case by Capt.+Beyond · · Score: 1

      I think Nokia and Apple has enough money to purchase Qt licenses if it wants too. Qt licenses are not expensive.

      --
      -- "Perceptions create reality. By changing your perceptions you change your reality."
    6. Re:In case by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Another cretin... 1. QT license are expensive. You pay per developer, and annually. 2. Apple wouldn't have been the only ones paying. The Qt license would have infected everything touching Webcore. Developers targetting the Mac would be paying up too... which, of course, would please TrollTech no end.

      Now do you see why they removed the Qt dependency? Now do you see why hardly any KDE code gets re-used outside the KDE project? Probably not, you dumb-assed crazed zealot.

    7. Re:In case by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Damned right it's mythical. The Apple developers took KHTML and applied good software engineering principles by separating its dependencies into layers. The hysterical KDE super-fans who continuously post about how KHTML has "cleaner code" are either deluded or lying, or just stupid. Quite possibly all three considering their past history.

      Webcore is a far better, cleaner piece of software than KHTML was and is. The fact that it is also now free of TrollTech's odious toll-taking is a bonus. If the KDE project really had any clue they'd learn from webcore, not slag it off like they do anything not 'K'osher.

    8. Re:In case by stilborne · · Score: 1

      i'm sure (s)he did read the "first fucking sentence". equally sure, you seem to be unable to understand how licensing works. and fair enough, it's a complex and tricky topic that legal professionals spend stupid amounts of time on. hm. maybe that's WHY it's complex and tricky; but anyways....

      if webkit were to "kill off" khtml, which doesn't actually make any sense since they are all collaborating on this thing together, that wouldn't change khtml's license or webkit's license. no license change would happen for those using khtml, either in webkit or "straight from KDE's svn repository" versions. it's the LGPL either way. what matters is the rendering toolkit used beneath it, but that isn't a unique privilege of webkit over "vanilla" khtml.

    9. Re:In case by stilborne · · Score: 1

      > Now do you see why hardly any KDE code gets
      > re-used outside the KDE project

      it's due at least in part to people such as yourself who go around playing the Anonymous Ignoramus spreading lies, half truths and other misinformation.

      it'd be nice to discuss the real issues like grown ups so that things like the Qt license can be put into proper perspective, as opposed to the overly simplistic and vitriolic position you have taken here. but that would require an informed, mature, non-anonymous person on the other side of that discussion. when you find one willing to play that part let me know and we can find an appropriate venue.

    10. Re:In case by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      i'm sure (s)he did read the "first fucking sentence". equally sure, you seem to be unable to understand how licensing works.

      Ummm... do tell... what exactly is untrue about the message.

      it's the LGPL either way.

      You really are a moron, aren't you? Why do you think Apple removed the Qt dependency if it was LGPL you fucking buffoon? The KHTML code was LGPL, BUT IT DEPENDED ON QT WHICH MADE THE WHOLE FUCKING THING GPL. Removing the Qt dependency removed the GPL, and KHTML reverted back to it own license... the LGPL.

      Christ, instead of stating the obvious: "it's a complex and tricky topic that legal professionals spend stupid amounts of time on." You might trying spending five minutes reading up on the subject before posting.

    11. Re:In case by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      it's due at least in part to people such as yourself who go around playing the Anonymous Ignoramus spreading lies, half truths and other misinformation.

      What's untrue about the message? The Qt dependency brings the full strength GPL into effect... nothing you can say will change that, it's a fact.

      Your message is bluster and bullshit about "putting the Qt License into perspective" -- meaning you know damned well that I'm telling the truth, and badly want to make it seem like you are replying... when in reality all you are doing is posting a stream of meaningless verbiage.

    12. Re:In case by stilborne · · Score: 1

      what is untrue about your message is the assertion that there isn't a lot of code shared between KDE and other projects, including code that originated within KDE itself.

      what is also untrue is that more widespread sharing of KDE code has a lot less to do with Qt licensing than it does with other issues, such as language preferences, integration issues, NIH, industry politics and us not having promoted the platform as much as we probably could have in the past.

      that's what i meant by "simplistic". you try and paint it as a one dimensional issue, but it's not. often times, Qt licensing costs never really come into the play.

    13. Re:In case by stilborne · · Score: 1

      > You really are a moron, aren't you?

      my, what fine social skills you have.

      > BUT IT DEPENDED ON QT WHICH MADE THE WHOLE
      > FUCKING THING GPL

      screaming doesn't make you less wrong. the original assertion was that webcore "killing" khtml would result in a better licensing situation. and what i was pointing out was that it wouldn't. see, khtml is, was and likely always will be LGPL. popping webcore in there instead and using it against Qt results in the same licensing scenario. IOW, no change. it isn't the webcore/khtml code that is of interest in regards to licensing, it's the toolkit you compile it against.

      if the original poster had said, "if KDE devs would stop linking KHTML to Qt then it would result in a cheaper licensing situation for closed source devel" i would've agreed. because, well, they would've been right. =)

    14. Re:In case by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Perhaps, if you had any clue, you would take a business class in your Jr High School.

    15. Re:In case by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      my, what fine social skills you have.

      My, what fine reading skills you have.

      screaming doesn't make you less wrong. the original assertion was that webcore "killing" khtml would result in a better licensing situation.

      No, it said: "Let's hope it eventually kills off KHTML... since it is both technically superior and has better licensing."

      Describing the situation perfectly.

      IOW, no change. it isn't the webcore/khtml code that is of interest in regards to licensing, it's the toolkit you compile it against.

      That is exactly what the original message said, and exactly what the follow up message said. The license on KHTML is LGPL... but the full GPL applies, regardless of how you slice it. Using webcore means that the LGPL applies instead... in other words (sigh!) "removing the Qt dependency ha changed the licensing situation"

      if the original poster had said, "if KDE devs would stop linking KHTML to Qt then it would result in a cheaper licensing situation for closed source devel" i would've agreed. because, well, they would've been right. =)

      That's what it fucking said, you mong. Would it have helped to stick to using words of one syllable? Yet again we see a KDE advocate getting snippy about "closed source" -- if that's the case, and the GPL is *so* wonderful for locking out evil closed-source developers... perhaps you could explain why the code for KHTML is LGPL, rather than GPL itself?

    16. Re:In case by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      what is untrue about your message is the assertion that there isn't a lot of code shared between KDE and other projects, including code that originated within KDE itself.

      Do tell? Perhaps you could list the many and varied projects that benefit from KDE code? Don't bother listing KDE apps and KDE libraries... it's outside the KDE world, remember...

      what is also untrue is that more widespread sharing of KDE code has a lot less to do with Qt licensing than it does with other issues, such as language preferences, integration issues, NIH, industry politics and us not having promoted the platform as much as we probably could have in the past.

      Bwhaha. Industry politics indeed. Oh, btw, it doesn't seem to have occurred to you that you've just badly contradicted yourself in this message. "It's untrue that there isn't a lot of code shared between KDE and other projects" and "what is also untrue is that more widespread sharing of KDE code has a lot less to do with Qt licensing than it does with other issues..." (followed by endless fantasist justifications). No doubt you'll try to weasel out of it by claiming to be talking about "more" widespread use, but it doesn't change the fact that you recognise that KDE code usually left on the shelf.

      I hate to break it to you pal, but a GPLed cuckoo like Qt *is* the main issue. As has been stated before, using the full GPL for a library like Qt infects everything that links to it. KDE code is intimately tied to Qt (no doubt influenced by the TrollTech developers who are also core KDE) and this cripples it as far as external use goes. Now I'm actually a supporter of the GPL, in the right circumstances (such as for apps themselves). I think it's a fine license, but not when it is used to hold other developer's code to ransom just because they want to write apps on your platform... which is what TrollTech do.

      The GPL nature of a library like Qt kills KDE adoption stone-dead. It doesn't matter a damned about your bullshit list of "industy issues, nih, language preferences(!)". KHTML is a special case because it is one of only a capable HTML renderers (and actually does a pretty good job)... but far from supporting your case, the work done by Apple to remove the Qt infection and rearchitect KHTML just highlights what a huge problem Qt is.

      that's what i meant by "simplistic". you try and paint it as a one dimensional issue, but it's not. often times, Qt licensing costs never really come into the play.

      Ummmm... yes... they do. Are you really this deluded?

    17. Re:In case by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      And this "business class" would teach me how to avoid the crappy software engineering that's in KDE, would it?

    18. Re:In case by Capt.+Beyond · · Score: 1

      In case you havent noticed, Qt is dual licensed, it's not just GPL'd. So, anyone that wanted to could use the non GPL Qt license and KDE lgpl would be ok.

      One project that does use KDE code, is Opie.

      --
      -- "Perceptions create reality. By changing your perceptions you change your reality."
  9. How long... by Fermatprime · · Score: 5, Funny

    How long until Cringely announces the details of the upcoming Apple/Intel/Nokia merger?

    --
    I hate the one hundred and twenty character limit for signatures with an all-enveloping, all-destroying, incredible pass
    1. Re:How long... by jwegy · · Score: 1

      Too funny :-) A better prediction would be an "iPod" cell phone, as previously rumoured - complete with the nokia web browser.

    2. Re:How long... by ezavada · · Score: 1

      How long until Cringely announces the details of the upcoming Apple/Intel/Nokia merger?

      Actually that would be Dvorak who announces that, to one-up on Cringely for one-upping on him. Then Cringely will predict the Sony/IBM/Nintendo merger.

    3. Re:How long... by cosmic_0x526179 · · Score: 1

      hmmm.. Nokia + Apple + Intel = iPad ??

      --
      This msg is brought to you by the letter 'W'.. for Worthless Wuss
    4. Re:How long... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I would have modded this insightful not funny.

  10. Return the favor? by DeepFried · · Score: 4, Interesting

    Maybe they can return the favor by being more Mac friendly in their desktop and sync software rollouts.

    I have recently "discovered" the series 60 platform and I am really pleased with it. I was so happy with it that I was able to dump my Treo for a 6620. Finally, a real multitaksting smartphone alternative (non-msft). It's the best thing since sliced bread. Now if they could just give OS X some love.

    --


    Who is General Failure, and why is he reading my hard disk?
    1. Re:Return the favor? by krakelohm · · Score: 1

      Deepfried what problems are you having with your 6620 and iSync? I know that the 6620 was not supported till 10.4. But yes the 6620 is a killer phone, that is for sure.

      --
      You are all a bunch of idots.
    2. Re:Return the favor? by DeepFried · · Score: 1

      I upgraded to Tiger so iSync isn't the issue anymore. The Nokia software allows you to convert MP3s to "true tones" and also allows you to use the Nokia LifeBlog software. I am using the PicoBlogger as a moblog solution but have not found a way to convert MP3s. These may seem like silly needs but it would be nice to have the option. Its part of my overall experience with my phone.

      Overall, I am thrilled. I dumped Verizon Wireless because of their phone crippling tendencies and dumped my Treo for my 6620. I am very happy with my choice.

      --


      Who is General Failure, and why is he reading my hard disk?
    3. Re:Return the favor? by Draoi · · Score: 1
      Maybe they can return the favor by being more Mac friendly in their desktop and sync software rollouts

      They're notorious for this - my series-40 phone is in the same boat. No iSync support and no sign of it coming, either. I'd high hopes for decent series-40 support being added to Tiger but ... nope! AFAIK, series-60 is there now ...

      In the meantime, may I recommend BluePhoneElite?

      --
      Alison

      "It is a miracle that curiosity survives formal education." - Albert Einstein

  11. Minimo by brolewis · · Score: 5, Interesting

    What happened to the minimo project? I thought that Nokia was supposedly funding this project for use on its phones. Is this an apparant shift or just a bad memory on my part?

    --
    A little learning never hurt anyone.
    1. Re:Minimo by jp10558 · · Score: 3, Informative

      I think Nokia just want's lots of choice for browser on their phones, as they also tend to include Opera on the series 60 IIRC.

      --
      Opera, Proxomitron-Grypen,GPG 0x0A1C6EE3
    2. Re:Minimo by BasilBrush · · Score: 1

      Minimo is intended for wireless PDAs. They never said or implied it was going to replace Symbian OS on the phones. Symbian is built from the ground up for low memory and disk space devices.

    3. Re:Minimo by eggz128 · · Score: 1

      And on other phones (like my 6670) the Netfront web browser.

  12. Any particular reason the G5 picture is used by antifoidulus · · Score: 0

    considering this has NOTHING to do with the G5 or Apple hardware in general really.....

    1. Re:Any particular reason the G5 picture is used by Sirdar+Bey · · Score: 0
      ...and does this mean that new Nokia swag will be x86 based? With no OpenFirmware? Or will they run that adapter card mentioned elsewhere?

    2. Re:Any particular reason the G5 picture is used by R.Mo_Robert · · Score: 1

      The G5 image is one used for Apple technology in general (hence the "Technology (Apple)" alternate text and title text), not just hardware.

      Of course, for some reason, they might have to change this soon...

      --
      R.Mo
  13. Opera by Eric+Giguere · · Score: 2, Informative

    This is a blow for the Opera for Mobile product, it seems to me. I wonder how usable this new browser is without a proxying component like the one used by the Reqwireless WebViewer or even the BlackBerry's built-in browser?

    Eric
    J2ME acronyms defined
    1. Re:Opera by bhtooefr · · Score: 1

      The problem is, ReqWireless WebViewer (and TLogic PocketWeb) is in a whole different class from Opera for Mobile, MiniMo, and this.

      The first two run on J2ME, whereas the others are native S60 apps (note: Opera is available in a BREW version. Does that count, though? I mean, you have to have a BREW phone...)

    2. Re:Opera by Eric+Giguere · · Score: 1

      Yes, I know the Reqwireless browser is J2ME (I know the guys who built it) but it seems to me that you still need proxying to reduce the wireless network traffic so that pages don't load so quickly by stripping and transforming (and compressing) the pages that get sent back down...

    3. Re:Opera by bhtooefr · · Score: 1

      Well, Opera CAN be run in such a mode.

      However, the reason they do this has little to do with network access (except on Opera) - they've hit dial-up speeds (and beyond), after all. It has to do with the fact that the J2ME devices have limited RAM, and can't hold a large page.

    4. Re:Opera by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      This is a blow for the Opera for Mobile product, it seems to me.

      Yeah, Apple will kill Opera if they can, just like they've been targetting linux for a few years, knowing that many linux users are just dissatisfied Windows users and are thus open to switching again. Apple is one of the oldest computer companies, and they've always had the vicious proprietary Microsoft attitude but much better PR -- they've only been held back by their insistence on owning the hardware and the software. Now that they're loosening control a little bit and have dropped their prices to a reasonable level, it's only a matter of time before they grow into the next full-fledged Microsoft. Whether that's good or bad depends on your fanboy level, but one thing's for sure: if they can kill the little third-party vendors who stand in their way, they'll kill them outright, or bankrupt them like they did Konfabulator and many others.

    5. Re:Opera by Eric+Giguere · · Score: 1

      It has to do with the fact that the J2ME devices have limited RAM, and can't hold a large page.

      Luckily, the memory limitations that once seriously constrained J2ME platforms are becoming a thing of the past with the newer devices, though it's still not an excuse to go and download megabytes of data. I still find it really slow, in Canada at least, to surf the web via cellphone/BlackBerry. Reminds me of WAP browsing, and we all know how people loved that.

      Eric
      Read my Google AdSense Tips
    6. Re:Opera by toddestan · · Score: 1

      have dropped their prices to a reasonable level

      We'll have to see about this. The current PPC based Macs are just as expensive as ever.

    7. Re:Opera by hkmwbz · · Score: 1
      "This is a blow for the Opera for Mobile product, it seems to me."
      Not necessarily. It could indicate that Nokia's quest for a decent alternative to Opera has been a failure, and this is yet another desperate attempt (which will probably fail too - KHTML is apparently a bitch to embed, and then they have to emulate Opera's Small Screen Rendering?!). Or it could be that they are just keeping all alternatives available, including Opera (with whom they recently renewed their contract). In either case, Opera comes out on top.
      --
      Clever signature text goes here.
  14. webkit/webcore/safari on windows? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    With the open-sourcing of web/kit/webcore/whatever, will (can?) someone make a version for XP?

    1. Re:webkit/webcore/safari on windows? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      wait until apple releases cocoa for windows next year, then it'll be a piece of cake

    2. Re:webkit/webcore/safari on windows? by GweeDo · · Score: 1

      Why not port the GTK version? There is already GTK for windows.

    3. Re:webkit/webcore/safari on windows? by Klivian · · Score: 2, Informative

      Why not port the Qt version? There is already Qt for windows.

      Jokes aside, if you use the nox version of Konqueror, you will already have a functional browser. And not simply a html widget and a javascript interpreter which is what webkit/webcore are.

  15. It's very spiffy by Kyro · · Score: 4, Informative

    This has been out for a while, i've been using gtk-webcore for the last two months on my Slackware box.
    you can get it from here and there's lots of other interesting tidbits of information on that site.

    --
    save the GNUs!
    1. Re:It's very spiffy by palndron · · Score: 1

      irc without the idiots?

      If you wanted it to stay that way, you should put it in your sig posting to /. ;)

      --
      a man, a plan, a canal, panama
    2. Re:It's very spiffy by juhaz · · Score: 1

      This has been out for a while

      Well, not really. While they've probably collaborated with their gtk-webcore project to a large extent, Symbian doesn't have gtk+, so it's not quite the same and this is yet another and new port.

  16. Gtk+ WebCore by mukund · · Score: 4, Informative

    Gtk+ WebCore seems to be made at Nokia.

    --
    Banu
  17. That's exciting by J.+T.+MacLeod · · Score: 2, Insightful

    But not nearly as exciting as it would be if Nokia would make a Series 60 phone that didn't have gnome-sized buttons or have them arranged in strange, unnatural ways.

    Why can't Nokia make a decent Series 60 phone?! To boot, they're all ugly as sin.

    I want Series 60, especially if it has a decent browser on it. But all the Series 60 phones are wonderful pieces of technology with garbage physical interfaces. It's so sad, considering how usable some of their lower-end models are.

    Ironically, Nokia is the only phone manufacturer with a sane software interface.

    1. Re:That's exciting by BenjyD · · Score: 1

      You think that's bad: take a look at the Series 80 'phones'. My 9500 is ugly with a capital Ug.

    2. Re:That's exciting by SpamJunkie · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Ironically, Nokia is the only phone manufacturer with a sane software interface.

      I thought this too until I started to do some serious research. My aging nokia needed to be replaced and the new nokias turned me off for the same reason: horribly deformed keypads and general ugliness. Even though I was afraid of giving up the familiar interface I checked out some alternatives.

      To my surprise Sony Ericsson has really usable phones. I had discounted them because their phones lack dedicated answer/hang up keys, but they're actually quite good. Add on the fact that they don't make you do gymnastics to dial a number and I was sold.

    3. Re:That's exciting by biglig2 · · Score: 1

      Did you know Nokia license Series 60 to other manufacturers? Info is at http://www.series60.com/products

      The Sendo is a lovely device - I have a small issue with it, otherwise I'd be using it right now - and the Panasonics look quite good too.

      --
      ~~~~~ BigLig2? You mean there's another one of me?
  18. Wrong...WebCore, not WebKit by xeno314 · · Score: 5, Informative

    How hard is it for the submitter/editor to catch this one? WebKit doesn't even appear in the press release...

    1. Re:Wrong...WebCore, not WebKit by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Can someone explain exactly what the difference is?

      Is WebCore the rendering engine itself, while WebKit is the API used by applications? Or something?

    2. Re:Wrong...WebCore, not WebKit by venicebeach · · Score: 1

      According to Wikipedia,

      Webcore is half of Webkit, the other half being JavascriptCore.

    3. Re:Wrong...WebCore, not WebKit by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      From the article (emphasis added):

      "Apple is pleased to assist Nokia in creating their new Series 60 browser based on the same KHTML open source technology that powers Apple's Safari," said Philip Schiller, Apple's senior vice president of Worldwide Product Marketing. "The Safari Web Kit's blazing performance, efficient code base and support for open standards make it an ideal open source technology for projects like Nokia's new Series 60 browser."

  19. Good by pherthyl · · Score: 3, Interesting

    This is great news. The more people using KHTML based browsers the better for website compatibility. I think having 3 browser engines around with non-insignificant market share would be great.

  20. Nokia + Apple = iTunes Phone by Been+on+TV · · Score: 1

    Availabiliy of WebKit + other core Apple technologies probably makes it easier for Nokia to build an iTunes Phone, yeah?

    --
    The future is in beta
    1. Re:Nokia + Apple = iTunes Phone by EddWo · · Score: 1

      Nokia have already licensed Microsoft's "Plays4Sure" Janus DRM and Media Transfer Protocol. Don't think they are going to be making anything compatible with iTunes. I don't think Apple wants them to either.

      --
      "Taligent is still pure vapor. Maybe they'll be the last who jumps up on Openstep... "
  21. What does that have to do with phone charges by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    exactly?

    1. Re:What does that have to do with phone charges by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The fact that anything he says must be taken with a large pinch of salt, because he's obviously a total loony.

  22. Huh? by ionicplasma · · Score: 1, Interesting

    PuTTY+Lynx is my web browser.

    Pictures only take more time to view, and most of our WAP/GPRS providers charge per kB.

    --
    The easy part was getting the brain out, but the hard part was getting the brain out.
    1. Re:Huh? by vidarh · · Score: 1
      I recently finally deserted to links for all my textmode browsing needs... Lynx gets too annoying because it insist on being a standards nazi and slows down to show me all kinds of useless status messages and ask if I want to accept cookies that aren't to it's liking etc. The only reason I stuck to Lynx as long as I did was Yahoo Mail, because Lynx will happily ignore their obnoxious redirect for non-javascript enabled browsers. However since they at some point made the annoying switch to their old (non broken) interface happen only on a per session basis, it's tolerable (the old interface is ok for text browsers, but it's hellish with a graphical browser).

      Love the fact tht Links supports colours, and that I can happily control it with the mouse.

      (And for people who wonders why I do insane stuff like accessing the web over ssh to my home machine, it's a very useful way of downloading stuff straight to my home computer rather than via whatever machine I happen to be on.)

  23. Please take your closed source browser by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    and stick it Ali!

    1. Re:Please take your closed source browser by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Hey, the browser really kicks ass using it as we speak. So shut the fuck up you fucking idiot and go write your own.

  24. It is nice... by ratta · · Score: 1

    to have 2 major browser opensource with Firefox (and hopefully KHTML and WebCore will soon merge together, now that WebCore CVS is avalable for KDE developers)

    --
    Wondering why i am doing so strange posts? I am trying to get a "+5,Flamebait" or "-1,Insightful" rating.
  25. porting to S60 by phoenixlpr · · Score: 1

    I think they can't use that code directly. If they want quality they have to rewrite it using S60 libs instead of libc....

    1. Re:porting to S60 by BenjyD · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Symbian libc support isn't that bad: there are bugs (in sprintf printing 64 bit integers, for example), but in general it works pretty well. Good enough that you'd probably only have to use S60 libs for directly UI related code.

  26. Tabs? by tivoKlr · · Score: 3, Funny

    Does it support tiny little tabs across the top of the browser screen? Then it'll be the total "killer app" ;-P

    --
    Ocean is land, covered with water.
  27. Ugh, no by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful

    So you saying the KDE people are producing a lesser project because they rather sacrifice features, correct behavior, and speed for clean code? perhaps they should reevaluate their levels.

    No no no.

    The KDE people are producing a project which is not as absolutely maximal as it could be today in order to prevent maintainance problems later.

    Or rather, APPLE is sacrificing potentially the future quality of their project to improve the quality of their project today.

    Yeah maybe you sometimes need to put in an ugly fix to get it to work right. But you are not a large multinational software project with many contributors.

    Apple can maybe get away with what they're doing because they do not rely to any degree on volunteers and so can do things like just throw a bunch of engineers at webkit someday in the future and say "refactor this to code standards, lackeys!". KDE does not have that luxury.

    1. Re:Ugh, no by earthbound+kid · · Score: 1

      But don't they have that option now? If they would just join forces with Apple, they could devote their resources to making KDE better, and just leave all the refactoring work on Konqueror to Apple's paid lackeys. Then, if in the future Apple starts slacking off, then they can come back in and try to rework it from what's left over. The point is though, there's no need for the KDE team to make a redundant copy of Apple's work, if Apple is determined to stay in the browser game for the foreseeable future...

    2. Re:Ugh, no by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      If they would just join forces with Apple

      KDE and Apple do not have convergent goals. This idea would be no more appealing for Apple than it has been for KDE.

    3. Re:Ugh, no by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      kde is more than khtml/kjs. Coding standards and integratin and whatnot have to be maintained across the desktop. Apple couldn't care less about KDE as a whole.

    4. Re:Ugh, no by mp3phish · · Score: 1

      If they would just join forces with KDE, they could devote their resources to making Apple better, and just leave all the refactoring work on WebCore to KDE contributers. Then, if in the future KDE starts slacking off, then they can come back in and try to rework it from what's left over. The point is though, there's no need for the Apple team to make a redundant copy of KDE's work, if KDE is determined to stay in the browser game for the foreseeable future...

      You see, your whole post makes one big wrong assumption: "KHTML is apple's pet project." It isn't. It is KDE's. Trying to tell KDE to drop a project THEY STARTED and maintain in replacement for a lower quality but more functional FORK of their project is like telling them to just drop the project altogether. Why should they just drop the project altogether? They are doing a fine job already.

      I am sick and tired of hearing all this BS about how KDE needs to do this and KDE needs to do that. If you don't like how it is run then go work on it. But don't sit around all day talking about how KDE needs to go and contribute to WebCore. They don't. It isn't their project. Even if they did try to contribute to WebCore, they don't have a say in the steering of that project. They have no power to make a core decision in its architecture to look out for THEIR project. That is why it is APPLE's project. Not KDE's.

      Apple has put almost no energy or effort into this technology when you compare the amount of effort put into it by the KDE team. 90% of the code is from KDE. Most of Apple's code is for hacks to get specific web pages to load and to integrate the software into MacOS X. What do you think the ACID2 test is all about? You think they made major architectural changes to get that? No, they hacked the code up to make it work with ACID2.

      So quit saying that KDE needs to join them. Apple needs to join KDE. If they don't want to, nothing is forcing them to, then that is your problem and their problem. It does not hurt KDE in any way (except maybe the bad publicity and FUD people like you are spreading over slashdot)So Quit saying KDE needs to join Apple.

      --
      Your ignorance is infinitely greater than you realize.
    5. Re:Ugh, no by earthbound+kid · · Score: 1

      The KDE project has goals other than making a yet another open source web browser, but unlike Apple it doesn't have a butt load of cash in the bank. Apple is offering to pay for the continued development of the web browser, so that KDE can focus its efforts on the rest of the project. I say, it would be best for the KDE project to accept free labor when it's given to them, and use the freed up resources to do other things. You make it sound like the ideal would be for the KDE team to do everything and for Apple to do nothing, but in fact, that's just the opposite of the ideal. The KDE team needs to be lazier, so that they can spend more time on more important projects (like making Linux on the Desktop better than OS X on the Desktop) and less time on tedious stuff that they can trick Big Corporations into doing for them.

    6. Re:Ugh, no by mp3phish · · Score: 1

      Ever thought that maybe the particular people who work on KHTML on a daily/weekly basis aren't the same people who are in charge of KDE as a whole? It is not like the KDE project can just bundle up all their developers, and start making assignments on who should work on what with whom.

      It isn't a business. Everyone who works on KDE is working on a particular part of KDE because that is what they are interested in. You got it backwards.

      As far as "letting apple" do the grunt work. That is not how you should look at it. You should instead look at KHTML as a project that a small group of developers decided to work on. It just so happens to be part of the KDE project but in reality it does not take away from the KDE project. And apple's Fork of KHTML does not slow KHTML development. It also does not improve it much. There is no "ideal" in this case. The "ideal" case would be for every KHTML developer to keep workin on the project they want to work on. And if that means working on KHTML (their pet project) then so be it. If that means that they don't want to give their baby to Apple then why is that such a bad thing?

      Again, No help from apple, tons of help from apple, smal help from apple. It doesn't matter which you pick, none will hurt the KHTML project. It's only limit is itself.

      --
      Your ignorance is infinitely greater than you realize.
  28. Internet tablet? by minkwe · · Score: 1

    Is this the same version which they ported to GTK and used on their very cool 770 internet tablet?

    --
    "Fighting terrorists with millitary might is like killing a mosquitor on your Dad's forehead with a rifle."
    1. Re:Internet tablet? by BigSven · · Score: 1

      The 770 uses Opera as its web browser but I guess the plan is to replace it with a GtkWebCore based browser as soon as it is ready.

    2. Re:Internet tablet? by hkmwbz · · Score: 1
      "The 770 uses Opera as its web browser but I guess the plan is to replace it with a GtkWebCore based browser as soon as it is ready."
      I can't imagine why, seeing as Nokia has already paid Opera for putting it on the device.
      --
      Clever signature text goes here.
  29. WebCore port could be more... by mr-mafoo · · Score: 0

    From a technological standpoint the iTunes Music store is basically a web page using Apple's JSCore and WebCore to render it.

    This does propose the interesting question that with the imminet release of itunes for the various phone platforms (im guessing they didnt just do it for motorola) and the stament in Nokia's press release that they intend to allow other manufacturers access to the port - Is Apple going after the mobile-downloadable music market?

    All it needs is a secure link and a mobile freindly layout and shazam, Apple is selling the crazy frog ringtone at a third of the price of anyone else and the world descends into anarchy!!! ahem, I mean apple gets a slice of the youth dominated mobile music market.

    1. Re:WebCore port could be more... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Actually, the iTMS is rendered internally by iTunes through WebObjects. It doesn't use WebKit.

    2. Re:WebCore port could be more... by iluvcapra · · Score: 3, Informative

      I seem to remember Dave Hyatt setting us straight on that one. The iTunes Music Store does not use WebCore or WebKit to render its pages.

      Just why, I couldn't guess. It seems like a natural application for it.

      --
      Don't blame me, I voted for Baltar.
    3. Re:WebCore port could be more... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The itunes application uses Quicktime to render the itunes music store, not WebCore, JSCore, or Webkit.

  30. Think Widgets by 605dave · · Score: 2, Insightful

    The first thing that came to my mind was the new dashboard widgets in Tiger. Remember, Dashboard widgets are written in Javascript, CSS, XML, and HTML. Each Widget is actual a webcore instance if my understanding is correct (or it's one big web core window). Couldn't be that difficult to make it work on this browser. And if you have seen the number of widgets out there (I was just @ WWDC), it is pretty amazing. And a lot of them would be perfect for cell phones. Just something to chew on...

    --
    Be kind, for everyone you meet is fighting a difficult battle. - Plato
    1. Re:Think Widgets by saddino · · Score: 1

      In fact, leveraging WebCore is the strategy used by Amnesty for running Dashboard widgets on the desktop under Panther (10.3.9) and Tiger.

      But doing the same on a cell phone OS is problematic because many widgets use BSD system calls, embedded AppleScripts and Cocoa plugins to do their work.

      So, CSS, JavaScript and HTML support is only adequate to support the very simplest of widgets.

    2. Re:Think Widgets by aristotle-dude · · Score: 1

      Ah but the simplest widgets is what you would want on your cell phone. Imagine Weather widgets, RSS news widgets or a webcam widget.

      --
      Jesus was a compassionate social conservative who called individuals to sin no more.
  31. how free? how about your minutes? by johnpaul191 · · Score: 1

    i don't have a super plan and it just counts as minutes on my phone. free nights and weekends means free web browsing. that being said the browser in my phone is not so good.

    i do have the USB cable to connect to my laptop and that counts as minutes even though it is on their data network (i don't actually dial into an ISP... it's faster than that). same deal, free nights and weekends on data use too.

  32. "Nokia taps Apple for open-source smarts" by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Informative
    Nokia taps Apple for open-source smarts.

    Good article, showing that Apple's role as a leader of the open source movement is finally paying off. Apple's groundbreaking work on KHTML is to become the foundation of many of Nokia's future lines.

    From the article (and there's even a linux quote for those of you who are into that kind of thing!):
    Nokia also said it will be working with Apple on open source in the future and will be actively involved in the open-source community.

    "Open-source software and Linux is an interesting phenomenon--it is not new for Nokia," said Tero Ojanpera, Nokia's chief strategy officer. "We are more and more using open source in our developments."
    Looks like Apple and their open-source efforts have done it again!
  33. But why? by Gilesx · · Score: 3, Insightful

    Am I going senile here, or is this the same Nokia that gave a large handout to the Mozilla corporation?

    This move just doesn't seem to make any sense whatsoever to me, as if you believe the rumours, they had some kind of gecko based browser already up and running. All I can assume is that it just didn't cut the mustard.

    Anyone know any more about this?

    --
    Sunday you're Thinking Different, Monday you're a huge tool, paying too much and waiting to think like everyone else.
    1. Re:But why? by Iloinen+Lohikrme · · Score: 3, Interesting

      They did gave a large handout to Mozilla. And they do use, and will be using Opera as a browser in their phones. The reason why they are spreading their money and resources is to increase competition. By having three camps developing browsers for phones you get more competition, more innovation and more choices. In other words Opera can't rest or it will soon find itself phased off. The other reason I think is that they want to speed the development of phone browsers in case MS would come up with better phone browser. And we all know that they won't be selling their browser with out their OS. And finally, we are talking about Nokia research here. They are wonderfull in spending and investing money in start-ups and new technologies. It really is pennies to them. Actually they get much more back, because of publicity and maybe more positive view in the minds of developers. Just my 10 cents.

    2. Re:But why? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Doesn't it seem strange that this same press release was made by Nokia for Minimo a while back... the best part is, they said "Will be availabe to developers..." in about a year on that too.

      It didn't pan out. It won't pan out. At least with KHTML they have a little more hope to get the browser small. Too bad they still have to try and make content fit on the screen too, only took Opera 3-4 years with a staff about 50-100 times the size of the KHTML for team at Nokia and Apple. Should be easy for them to do it in 6 - 8 months

  34. Irrelevant in the U.S. by Toe,+The · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Has anyone noticed that no matter how cool a phone is, it is usually unavailable in the U.S.?

    Nokia, Sony Ericsson, Samsung, and so on all keep coming out with killer phones, and they are completely unavailable from regular American channels. The only way to get most of them is to give hundreds and hundreds of dollars plus your credit card information to some fly-by-night, grey-market operation based in who-knows-where. Much of the time (judging by what I've read in reviews), the result is that you get some Chinese-language phone and no response from customer service.

    Why the lack of cool phones in the U.S. when Europe and Asia have such a great selection of the latest and greatest?

    Sure, we don't have third generation networks here... but we still appreciate cool phones. WTF is up here?

    P.S. And no, the Sony-Ericsson S710a is not a cool phone. It *looks* cool, but has such horrendous design flaws as to be mostly unusable.

    1. Re:Irrelevant in the U.S. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Blame US's weird GSM implementation. PLUS the fact that in the US people dont spend money on Phones they wait for the to become free. even in INDia it is common for people to plunk down $500+ for a new phone like every 6 months. Even more so in rest of richer Asia where spending major cash on a new cellphone every few months is not uncommon IN the US the makers have to sell at a price decided by the Operators. Neat and simple Its all economics Watson

      And I resent the state ment about the S710a You forget that thats basically a Camera tat can make calls not a Phone with a camera(atleast in its design philosophy) And what flaw are you talking about?

    2. Re:Irrelevant in the U.S. by Toe,+The · · Score: 2, Insightful

      After using a S710a for a little while, I found these little glitches...

      1. Use it closed. Open the switchblade. Notice that it's upside down now? WTF?

      2. Microphone is in the front of the phone. Hold it against your face. Nobody can hear a word you say. You MUST either hold it away from your face or use a BT headset. Genius move there, when they easily could have put it on the bottom.

      3. Volume controls are lacking for many functions. There is no way to turn down the deafening camera sound, or to adjust many other sound volumes.

      4. Up and down arrows on side don't control volume when not on a call. That's just retarded.

      5. Buttons are on the part of the switchblade that moves. So if you use it sometimes-open, sometimes-closed, half the time a button is in one place, half the time it is in another. This makes is very difficult to learn where a button is.

      6. Data usage is enormous. I looked through the Cingular online menus and... used up my entire (paltry) 500 KB data allotment. I never actually got any data; just looked at the options.

      7. Menus are clumsy. For example, you have to cruise for ever to try to find a picture you recently took. It is easier to open the camera, go to View, then close the camera. Stupidly, that is much easier than following the menus.

      8. General comment on switchblade form factor... DUMB! You get all the disadvantages of a wand and a flip. The screen is always exposed, so likely to scratch; yet you have to open it to use the buttons. Extra fun when you are using it closed and need to press a button... slide it open, and the friggin' button is upside down above the screen.

      Those are the only flaws I can recall, but I only used it briefly.

      Still think it's a good phone?

      But your point about Americans buying habits is well taken. We'd rather get a free phone and get stuck into an enormous monthly contract for crappy service than actually pay dollars for a phone. We'll fall for any gimmick except a genuine good deal.

      But that said, it is still almost impossible to get a really good phone in the U.S. without going through a very shady reseller.

    3. Re:Irrelevant in the U.S. by Toe,+The · · Score: 1

      Oh, and WTF "it's a camera that happens to have a phone in it?"

      If I want a digital camera, I would think I could do better than 1.3 Megapixels with zero optical zoom!!! For less money, I could get an absolutely tiny Canon with 4 or MP, and still have room in my pocket left over for a small phone. Collectively, they'd probably take up less space than that monster S710a.

    4. Re:Irrelevant in the U.S. by Hitchcock_Blonde · · Score: 0

      You know what's retarded? Spending that kind of cash for a freakin' phone, that's what.

      --
      Karma Schmarma
  35. Aikon? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    TikBew Elppa no Resworb Wen a Spoleved Aikon.

    1. Re:Aikon? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      TikBew Elppa no Resworb Wen a Spoleved Aikon.

      No, look in the mirror.

  36. Animated .GIF bug? by Jay+Maynard · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Wonder if Nokia will fix the animated .GIF display bugs that Safari on Tiger has? I can reliably crash Safari looking at one, and there's another that doesn't display on the web page it's part of, but will display if loaded by itself.

    --
    Disinfect the GNU General Public Virus!
    1. Re:Animated .GIF bug? by wubboy · · Score: 3, Funny

      Who the hell wants animated Gif's anyway? I'd Call that a feature.

      --
      Sit... Speak.... Shake.... Good Dog!
    2. Re:Animated .GIF bug? by cavac · · Score: 1

      Who the hell wants animated Gif's anyway? I'd Call that a feature.

      That entirely depends. NASA also has some quite nice animated gif's.

      A real feature would be to automatically logon to the remote server and crashing it every time it serves a PopUnder :-)

      --
      Look, this thing is totally safe! Built it myself, you know. You just press that button like this and then turn that lev
  37. acid2 test by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Ok, but does it pass the Acid 2 test like Safari?

  38. Ummm... T-Mobile is Unlimmited by Toe,+The · · Score: 1

    That's why I just switched to T-Mobile.

    Their net service is FAR from perfect, but I can surf to my heart's delight for $5 a month.

  39. Won't Happen -- Not In Trolltech's Best Interest by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful

    You have to remember that many of the KDE developers are paid by Trolltech. And part of their job is to keep KDE locked into Qt

    Trolltech uses KDE as a showcase, in order to sell proprietary Qt lock-in licenses. While KDE may use Qt under a GPL license, for proprietary software developers, allowing themselves to become locked in to proprietary Qt is the only way to create software that is fully integrated with the KDE desktop environment.

    When Apple adopted KHTML for Safari, the first thing Apple did was to reorganize the KHTML code into logical layers, in order to separate out the Qt interface code. That way, Apple was able to replace the Qt interface layer with their own Aqua interface layer for OS/X.

    Nokia then took Apple's layered KHTML code, known as Webcore, and created a GTK interface layer.

    As any good software developer can tell you, that sort of code layering is useful, because of the flexibility it provides. If used throughout KDE, for example, it would allow KDE to be easily ported, beyond Qt, to multiple other GUI environments, such as GTK, Aqua, Windows, Mozilla's XUL, QNX's Photon, and so on. KDE could become the most open, most cross-platform, and most widely used desktop environment outside of Windows.

    But, as I said, it wouldn't be in Trolltech's best interest, so it's probably not going to happen. I expect KDE will continue to be held back by Qt's licensing restrictions, which is a shame.

  40. Your prayers have been answered by DeepFried · · Score: 1

    Ok so maybe you are not praying about it but it seems that Nokia has decided to change their ways. The 668* series Nokia phone is a step in the right direction.

    --


    Who is General Failure, and why is he reading my hard disk?
  41. Re:Won't Happen -- Not In Trolltech's Best Interes by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful

    Wow... one wonders how you've remained unmodded down by the KDE zealots. Anyone pointing out the fatal flaws in that desktop and strategy are usually "-1, Don't want to listen" in seconds.

    No matter how many times you tell them this, they still won't listen. They still continue to make ridiculous claims that KDE is technically superior, or has a better architecture than other desktops... all of which is complete fantasy. KDE is a dependency nightmare. It's poorly engineered, and most of its code is shockingly badly written. tha idiot m50d can be found on every KDE story (and most GNOME ones too) making ridiculous claims and idiotic statements about how KDE r00lz. It never occurs to him that thw work done on webkit made it *better* than KHTML -- not only at passing ACID tests, but from a pure software engineering standpoint.

    Far from being a healthy project, KDE is totally dependent on TrollTech, it's health as a company and goodwill (don't bother mentioning the FreeQt agreements, they aren't worth the bandwidth used to email them). And these days, KDE is being badly left behind by GNOME.

  42. And now a PC suite version for non-Windows by Rogue+Pat · · Score: 1

    Sure, that's nice and all. But in the mean time, Nokia only provides its software for MS Windows http://www.nokia.com/nokia/0,,72014,00.html

    Simalarly, drivers for their connectivity cables are Windows only :(
    Can't sync my current Nokia phone on my Powerbook. The same goes for the next Nokia model i was eyeing. In fact, for that very reason I haven't bought it yet. Sorry Nokia.

    1. Re:And now a PC suite version for non-Windows by yet+another+coward · · Score: 1

      Check the supported devices list for iSync if you buy a phone for use with OS X. Nokia's site is probably no help.

    2. Re:And now a PC suite version for non-Windows by Rogue+Pat · · Score: 1

      I know, the one i'm eyeing is not listed: 5410[i].

      For what it's worth the "standard" company phone around here is the 6230[i], which is not supported either.

  43. Nokia Email on WebKit mailing list by cuijian · · Score: 2, Informative

    Here is an email from Roland Geisler at Nokia that was posted on the Safari Web Kit mailing list (more info at http://webkit.opendarwin.org/contact.html)

    From: roland geisler
    Subject: [webkit-dev] Greetings from the Series 60 mobile browser team at Nokia
    Date: June 13, 2005 2:52:33 PM PDT

    RE: Recent press release: http://press.nokia.com/PR/200506/998214_5.html

    Hi,

    I'm heading marketing and strategy at Nokia for Series 60's new mobile browser that will be built upon WebCore/KHTML and JavaScriptCore/KJS. I am writing you this email to thank you for having built the Konqueror and Safari browser with the two components WebCore/KHTML and JavaScriptCore/KJS. I would like to introduce myself and some members from our core development team, and explain why we at Nokia have selected your code base for our future Series 60 mobile browser. I also hope that this will start a mutual dialogue among us that will support all of our projects in the future.

    Not all of you might be familiar with Series 60. Series 60 is a smart phone software platform developed by Nokia, which enables feature rich applications on mobile devices. Series 60 is based on the Symbian OS and is written in C++. More information can be found from http://www.forum.nokia.com/
    and http://www.series60.com/.

    I copied some of our core development team members on this email so you have their names and contact information. Antti Koivisto, whom you might know already, is one of the co-authors of KHTML and has been working for Nokia Research Center for the past few years and recently joined our mobile browser development team in Boston. David Carson and Deepika Chauhan are two of the original developers of the Nokia mobile browser. Zalan Bujtas, Prabhakar Marnadi, Yongjun Zhang and Sachin Padma have been working with mobile browsers for some years at Nokia in Helsinki and Boston. Keith Hollis has several years experience working with mobile browsers and has recently joined our team in Boston, earlier he was the principal person leading the port of the Opera web browser to the Symbian OS at Opera Software. Guido Grassel, Kimmo Kinnunen and Andrei Popescu are working at our Nokia Research Center in Helsinki (http://www.nokia.com/research/) where we have built the GTK port of Apple's WebCore that we released last year - http://gtk-webcore.sourceforge.net/.

    The high performance, low memory consumption and small code footprint of KHTML and KJS make these components ideal for resource-constrained mobile devices. Clean architecture and good design create a good base for future development of mobile features. In addition, Web compliance was another important criteria for us. Congratulations to the KDE Konqueror developer team for building such a great browser.

    Big thanks at this point also go to the Apple Safari team that has tremendously improved KHTML and KJS in many areas, in particular in Web compliance and performance. WebCore and JavaScriptCore also offer a cleaner separation to the underlying operating system. For these reasons we at Nokia chose WebCore and JavaScriptCore as the code base for our Series 60 mobile browser.

    Our plan is that the new Series 60 mobile browser will be available as a standard Series 60 application during the first half of 2006.

    We at Nokia are excited to use WebCore/KHTML and JavaScriptCore/KJS for our future Series 60 mobile browser. I hope that we can start a dialogue with your community and the Apple Safari team on how to "mobilize" WebCore/KHTML and JavaScriptCore/KJS to create the best Web browser based on open-source components for mobile devices.

    Best regards,

    Roland Geisler
    Head of Marketing & Strategy, Series 60 Browser
    Nok

  44. Re:Won't Happen -- Not In Trolltech's Best Interes by stilborne · · Score: 0, Troll

    > It's poorly engineered, and most of its code is
    > shockingly badly written

    which is exactly the opposite of what Nokia just said about KDE code in this article. good job!

    > KDE is totally dependent on TrollTech, it's
    > health as a company and goodwill

    we benefit from the health and goodwill of Trolltech. GNOME benefits from the health and goodwill of Red Hat. we could add a number of such entities to each project's roster, and that's a good thing.

    but KDE is not dependant on Trolltech. at least not in the way the dictionary defines "dependant". in fact, KDE isn't dependant on any single entity though we benefit from the involvement of many, and that's one of our strengths as a project.

    > one wonders how you've remained unmodded down
    > by the KDE zealots

    likely because it's more amusing to watch what new sillyness you people can come up with than to mod you down. you may expect those who care about KDE to try and supress alternative viewpoints, but that's not generally how we try and do things.

    > don't bother mentioning the FreeQt agreements,
    > they aren't worth the bandwidth used to email
    > them

    i suppose you should let the lawyers who worked on the most recent version of the agreement know then. unless, of course, they might just understand it a lot better than you.

    > KDE is being badly left behind by GNOME.

    ah, the bias emerges. =) you are entitled to your opinion, of course. i feel you're completely out to lunch on this one, in part due to my own research into both platforms and in part due to listening to people evaluating Open Source desktops for real world deployments.

    all the same, regardless of whether i'm right or you're right or we're both right, don't you think there are more productive ways of approaching this issue? you know, ones that don't make Microsoft chuckle in glee.

  45. Re:Won't Happen -- Not In Trolltech's Best Interes by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful

    which is exactly the opposite of what Nokia just said about KDE code in this article. good job!

    You mean, in the PUBLIC RELATIONS release? Oh my... they said nice things in a P.R. article. Oh, and thanks for snipping that out of context: KDE is a dependency nightmare... ask Apple how many man-months it took them to sort out KHTML.

    The rest of your message is well upto your usual standards: Vague nonsensical assertions about Red Hat's position with GNOME being the same as TrollTech and a, frankly, bizarre mention of Microsoft.

  46. Re:Won't Happen -- Not In Trolltech's Best Interes by stilborne · · Score: 1

    > in the PUBLIC RELATIONS release

    not just there, but also in their project lead's email to kfm-devel.

    > ask Apple how many man-months it took them to
    > sort out KHTML

    few enough that it was worth passing up every other option in front of them.

    > your usual standards

    oh, you're one of those people who follow me around, reading what i write only to get all pissy about it afterwards? now i'm doubly curious as to who the (wo)man behind the mask is.

    > nonsensical assertions about Red Hat's position
    > with GNOME being the same as TrollTech

    analogous, which is what i was implying, isn't equivalent to "the same". i was offering a familiar frame of reference for comparison.

    > and a, frankly, bizarre mention of Microsoft.

    the mention of MS was to remind you who the competition on the desktop truly is, and who benefits from people such as yourself sowing baseless dissent.

    apologies for showing you up in public.

  47. Re:Won't Happen -- Not In Trolltech's Best Interes by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    not just there, but also in their project lead's email to kfm-devel.

    And? What were you expecting him to say?

    oh, you're one of those people who follow me around, reading what i write only to get all pissy about it afterwards? now i'm doubly curious as to who the (wo)man behind the mask is.

    Ummm... you see that little link at the top of the message? I took a look at your previous postings. It's really easy to do, and when I saw you splattering your idiocy here, I had a look at your history... but hey, if you prefer to indulge yourself in a creepy stalkee fantasy, fine. Whatever floats your boat.

    analogous, which is what i was implying, isn't equivalent to "the same". i was offering a familiar frame of reference for comparison.

    In other words: misinformation and lies... two things KDE posters on slashdot are intimately familiar with.

    the mention of MS was to remind you who the competition on the desktop truly is, and who benefits from people such as yourself sowing baseless dissent.

    I think you mean: Throwing around the bogey man in order to change the subject. Microsoft has nothing to do with this.

    apologies for showing you up in public.

    The only person you've managed to embrass is yourself. I can't even claim credit for that (damn!)... you did it by yourself with no help for me.

  48. Konqueror's JavaScript support sucks... by leonbrooks · · Score: 1

    ...up to version 3.4.1, which is what I'm using to post this.

    Since 3.4.2 includes lots of merges from WebKit, I'd expect the JS support to be startlingly better, but I'd also expect to see that a few bugs have crept in. 3.4.3 should be pretty much all shiny and good.

    Then the KDE team will release KDE4, which will practically clean your teeth for you and think happy thoughts in addition to being a file-manager-over-SSH (fish://user@host), man-page reader (man:bash), CD ripper (audiocd:/)and practically everything else (mostly the kinds of features MSIE lies awake at night wishing for). Huge? yes; bloated? yes; complicated? well, only under the hood - but still remarkably quick and flexible.

    --
    Got time? Spend some of it coding or testing
  49. The correct question is... by leonbrooks · · Score: 1

    ..."how can I get this working in the next minute and thirty?"

    --
    Got time? Spend some of it coding or testing