Slashdot Mirror


Windows Longhorn and Internet Explorer 7

An anonymous reader writes "At Gnomedex this year, Microsoft is excited about the new RSS integration into Windows Longhorn and Internet Explorer 7. Screenshots of Internet Explorer 7 reveal how Microsoft has added a search tool to the top right of the browsing window similar to the one found in Safari/Firefox. Also, Microsoft revealed that RSS will be integrated into the heart of Longhorn."

82 of 554 comments (clear)

  1. Say no to Windows by bigwavejas · · Score: 4, Insightful
    I think I'll stick with Firefox and run http://www.bloglines.com/myblogs for my RSS feeds.

    Stop the machine.

    --
    "Simplify, simplify, simplify!" Thoreau
    1. Re:Say no to Windows by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Funny

      Oh my god, They're developing at an incredible rate!!!

    2. Re:Say no to Windows by TGTilde · · Score: 3, Funny

      at least when you get to a site that is only IE compatible you won't lose all your standard features...oh wait, we have to wait for Longhorn first. See: DN Forever

      --
      --- Bah, who needs a sig?
    3. Re:Say no to Windows by RoadkillBunny · · Score: 5, Funny

      Why though? IE7 looks exactly like Firefox.

      --
      Cheers,
      RoadkillBunny
    4. Re:Say no to Windows by FuzzzyLogik · · Score: 2, Interesting

      The only RSS viewer I know of for FireFox is the LiveBookmarks and the Extension Sage. Sage acts nothing like Safari. LiveBookmarks are nice (only for del.icio.us for me however) but aren't really what I would consider an RSS reader. Thunderbird has an RSS reader, but Firefox does not. If it does, feel free to point me to it.

  2. Looks like FireFox by ryg0r · · Score: 5, Informative

    Maybe its just me. But it looks like FireFox with some Longhorn UI added. :P

    --
    Karma whoring .sigs don't work
    1. Re:Looks like FireFox by pdbaby · · Score: 5, Funny

      Yay Microsoft! King of innovation. They have the menu bar below the tablist. Truely innovation I'm sure people will pay for (in more ways than one).

      Any word on how many bugs they'll have introduced, their png and css standards compliance support?

      Good to see that RSS is integrated into the OS. That's something every kernel lacks these days ;-)

      --
      Global symbol "$deity" requires explicit package name at line 2. - If only $scripture started "use strict;"
    2. Re:Looks like FireFox by QuaZar666 · · Score: 2, Funny

      more like Safari than Firefox I would say, the real question is does it pass Acid2? (my guess is no)

    3. Re:Looks like FireFox by pdbaby · · Score: 2, Informative

      It would be fair enough if they had an IE-only alternative for common web problems like rounded corners on things; it strikes me that the IE team are incredibly lazy - all they've managed to do is write an RSS reader and add tabs in how many years?

      It's really odd, especially because they have stiff competition from Firefox. In Visual Studio, the competition from Eclipse and other free IDEs is showing: Visual Studio 2005 is a really smart, really well designed development environment.

      --
      Global symbol "$deity" requires explicit package name at line 2. - If only $scripture started "use strict;"
    4. Re:Looks like FireFox by XNormal · · Score: 5, Insightful

      They have the menu bar below the tablist.

      It's not just below - it means that the menu bar is part of the tab and can change when you switch tabs. It's actually a pretty clever design. I think they will use it for plugins and web pages that add items to the menus (PDF, Office, etc.)

      --
      Stop worrying about the risks of nuclear power and start worrying about the risks of not using nuclear power.
    5. Re:Looks like FireFox by remahl · · Score: 5, Insightful

      Menus that change isn't good design.

    6. Re:Looks like FireFox by suttree.com · · Score: 3, Funny

      Clever in that you run one instance of every toolbar per tab?

      Now that's innovation!

      When Apple said 'Redmond, start your photocopiers' I thought they were joking....

      Playaholics: Play Wolf N Swine

    7. Re:Looks like FireFox by lxs · · Score: 2, Funny

      it means that the menu bar is part of the tab and can change when you switch tabs. It's actually a pretty clever design. I think they will use it for plugins and web pages that add items to the menus

      ...and for spyware installers and for phishing sites, the possibilities are truly endless.

    8. Re:Looks like FireFox by justforaday · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Please elaborate. I don't believe I've ever come across a Mac app in 10+ years where the menu items change depending on which window you have selected. Sure, some items are greyed out depending on context, but the actual menus don't change...As I said, please elaborate on your statement.

      --
      I'll turn into a supernova and burn up everything. Well I'll turn into a black little hole and you'll turn into string.
    9. Re:Looks like FireFox by cortana · · Score: 2, Informative

      Clarisworks/Appleworks changes menus and menuitems according to the type of the document that was focused. If no documents were open then the menu bar just had File/Edit/Help IIRC.

    10. Re:Looks like FireFox by hunterx11 · · Score: 3, Funny

      If the menu changes, maybe with the extra space there will be enough room to fit the entire "Shut Do..." item.

      --
      English is easier said than done.
  3. What about WEB DEVELOPERS? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Insightful

    This is a good move by MSFT, but their lack of respect for web developers is ridiculous.

    Markus Mielke, quite possibly the most braindead member of humanity ever to use a computer, seems to think that separating content from presentation is wrong. See here for details. Even worse, the article he links says the reason is that CSS3 is not ready. This is despite the fact that the IE team won't even support CSS 2.1 fully in IE7! Yes, they might have fixed Peekaboo and Guillotine, but how about :hover for all elements? Or any semblance of support for floating elements? And they simply seem incapable of giving a straight answer!

    Dave Massy, senior program manager and all round idiot, in comments to this article, says that support for MathML and SVG should be left to 'experts', never answering the very pertinent query about why Microsoft isn't an expert in web technologies.

    Why not go over to the IEBlog and let them have a piece of your mind?

    1. Re:What about WEB DEVELOPERS? by MrDomino · · Score: 5, Insightful

      You're assuming, in calling these people idiots, that what they're doing is unintentional.

      If web coding were easily doable by hand with a text editor, would they get much in the way of sales for FrontPage? If web applications were ubiquitous thanks to a fully functional browser, do you think people would continue to fork over such obscene amounts of cash for MS Office?

      Is this crazy? Over-the-top? Probably. But for a company that has so many brilliant researchers among its ranks, isn't it odd that their web browser is so shoddy, yet they still continue to pour money and development time into it rather than let someone else take over?

    2. Re:What about WEB DEVELOPERS? by NutscrapeSucks · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Except that 5 years ago, Internet Explorer was a light-year ahead of the competition in client-side functionality. Despite Andreessen's hype, Microsoft did far more to legitimize web-based applications than Nutscrape ever did.

      Don't forget that Microsoft is (at heart) a development tool vendor, and I'm sure they're fully aware that web application development is where the coding market is. And they've finally seemed to re-understand that browser features are critical to that market. Things like XHTML and CSS2 allow Microsoft to sell much effective web development tools (Visual Studio/ASP.NET), and that's a real revenue stream for them.

      People romanticize the "Browser Wars", but it's really a big battle over nothing -- a bunch of almost zero-revenue eyeballs using a free product. The strategic value is what people build on top of the browser technologies.

      As great of a browser as Firefox is, I don't believe that Mozilla.org still got the lessons of the last war. They spent a lot of time and money to build an enormous amount of developer technology, but have never seriously packaged and marketed it. You have to assume that Microsoft is not just trying to build a browser, but looking at this "holistically" (client/tools/server); while Mozilla isn't.

      --
      Whenever I hear the word 'Innovation', I reach for my pistol.
    3. Re:What about WEB DEVELOPERS? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Insightful

      "I don't believe that Mozilla.org still got the lessons of the last war. They spent a lot of time and money to build an enormous amount of developer technology, but have never seriously packaged and marketed it."

      Hmm. Do you not understand what Open Source Software is? You see, there's no need to package and market it. It's not really a "product". However it does present a choice to users of IE, which happens to be a free, and rather good choice at that. It's also not tied to one Operating System. It's also constantly upgraded and very configurable. Mozilla is simply trying to build a great, free, secure browser. They have nothing to gain from strategically declining support for web standards, and I'd say Microsofts decision not to support standards will only make their browser less attractive compared to browsers that do "care" about standards implementations.

    4. Re:What about WEB DEVELOPERS? by BoneOfconTroll · · Score: 2, Insightful
      Don't forget that Microsoft is (at heart) a development tool vendor

      Lion's share of Microsoft's revenue is from consumers buying Windows and Office. They began with developer tools (Basic, way before MSDOS), and they still make some, but it's not what they are about.

      --
      I don't want to sell you death sticks.
    5. Re:What about WEB DEVELOPERS? by NutscrapeSucks · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Do you not understand what Open Source Software is? You see, there's no need to package and market it.

      Firefox is one big packaging and marketing exercise, and a pretty good one at that. Mozilla tried the "base" thing for years and it never caught on, even with AOL/Netscape marketing.

      Also, I'm not talking about declining web standards, my point is that you can actually do much more with web standards than "just a brower" lets you do.

      --
      Whenever I hear the word 'Innovation', I reach for my pistol.
    6. Re:What about WEB DEVELOPERS? by NutscrapeSucks · · Score: 2, Insightful

      How soon we forget the lessons imparted unto us by MonkeyBoy. The cornerstone of MS's business has always been strong developer support and integration points. In the case of a free web browser, that's even more important. (Netscape used to understand this.)

      --
      Whenever I hear the word 'Innovation', I reach for my pistol.
    7. Re:What about WEB DEVELOPERS? by wheany · · Score: 2, Insightful

      I see User Friendly is still painfully unfunny.

  4. What's better than screen shots? by HyperChicken · · Score: 5, Informative
    --
    Free of Flash! Free of Flash!
    1. Re:What's better than screen shots? by kneeless · · Score: 3, Interesting

      Funny, there are actually IE-fanboys there at that thread. Didn't know those existed.

      What really amazes me is the fact that they're saying that "RSS is going to be so much broader because MS is putting the work they are doing into the platform." RSS has been around for years, and now RSS is amazing because IE integrates it? IE is so far behind that technologies aren't realized until years later. Ridiculous.

    2. Re:What's better than screen shots? by XO · · Score: 2, Interesting

      But, for now, the actual usefulness of RSS is completely and totally questionable. So far, I've found absolutely no use whatsoever for it, and I've been doing this stuff as long as it's been around.

      --
      "Champagne for my real friends - and real pain for my sham friends!" http://ericblade.postalboard.com/
  5. its sad by ericdano · · Score: 3, Insightful
    It's sad how Microsoft is so far behind the curve, yet they get excited cause THEY have figured something out. They are their own Hype machine.

    It's sad.

    --
    It's either on the beat or off the beat, it's that easy.
    I moderate therefore I rule!
    --
  6. Possible Google lawsuit? by RootsLINUX · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Well now I'm almost positive that the search engine integrated into IE is MSN's own. And since IE is embedded into Windows, this has a good chance of reducing traffic for Google, Yahoo, and other search engines. So can we expect to see a possible lawsuit for these unfair business practices, which Microsoft is infamous for?

    --
    Hero of Allacrost, a FOSS RPG for *NIX/*BSD/OS X/Win
  7. I'm Shocked... Get Me The Booze... by __aaclcg7560 · · Score: 5, Funny

    Microsoft is adding technology into Longhorn? For a moment, I thought it was another announcement of yet another technology being pulled from the house of cards called Longhorn. The next thing that they will be announcing is a Mactel version.

    1. Re:I'm Shocked... Get Me The Booze... by JudgeFurious · · Score: 5, Funny

      The only reason they're adding this to Longhorn is that the PURE EVIL that's also fully integrated into the OS turned out to be smaller than expected. It seems obvious now but at the time nobody at Microsoft knew that pure evil is concentrated and takes up less space than the "mostly evil" they'd been using. The end result being that there was room for this.

      Otherwise they'd have left it out.

      --
      Appended to the end of comments you post. 120 chars.
  8. Golly Gee... by Rekrapt · · Score: 3, Funny

    Can't we just all get along? ---

  9. How will this effect Google? by entrigant · · Score: 2, Insightful

    I'm fairly certain that search bar uses msn search :). Do you think IE users will start using that instead of going to google first?

  10. Re:Wow by PoitNarf · · Score: 2, Informative

    Perhaps if you only have 3 or 4 IE windows open at the same time I would agree with you. But when I do online shopping or something where I'm going to be looking at multiple pages on the same site, or perhaps I always want a tab with Slashdot open in it, tabs become much more convenient. Once you get used to them they are far easier to manage. I prefer a single instance in my taskbar with 10+ tabs open rather than 10+ instances in my taskar.

    --

    "0101100101? It's just jibberish. *looks in mirror, gasps* 1010011010@!? AHHHHHH!!"
  11. Re:Speaking of sad... by ericdano · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Seriously. It sounds like they are saying that this is a FIRST or something. Isn't Internet Explorer the LAST browser to support RSS feeds?

    --
    It's either on the beat or off the beat, it's that easy.
    I moderate therefore I rule!
    --
  12. integrated into the heart by Frank+Grimes · · Score: 5, Funny

    "RSS will be integrated into the heart of Longhorn." Oh my god! Someone get on the phone to Linus Torvalds and tell him to integrate RSS into the Linux kernel as fast as possible!

    --
    CfkRAp1041vYQVbFY1aIwA== RV/hBCLKKcSTP5UFK3kqsg==
  13. Say "NO" to Bloatware by reporter · · Score: 3, Insightful
    I am sitting here, pondering the future of Windows, as I watch the operating system slowly boot up and struggle along. I suspect that operating systems and web clients have now reached the point where they offer much more features than I need and actually use.

    Has anyone suggested that Microsoft create 2 parallel operating systems: slimware version and bloatware version? I want a slimmed down version of Windows that includes just a little more than a true pre-emptively multi-tasked kernel I also want a slimmed down web client that lacks support for ActiveX and anything else that is not strictly necessary for accessing the secure website run by my bank.

    I need little more. I suspect that this barebones configuration meets the need of most Americans, who are not tech savy.

    1. Re:Say "NO" to Bloatware by pdbaby · · Score: 5, Interesting

      But that's not in microsoft's best interests. They're a company, after all. They're in a perfect position: they can make their operating system require a faster processor and more memory. Do you think Intel, AMD and the various memory makers aren't "very grateful" of the extra business they get from the dizzyingly high requirements of Windows nowadays?

      --
      Global symbol "$deity" requires explicit package name at line 2. - If only $scripture started "use strict;"
    2. Re:Say "NO" to Bloatware by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Look up xplite. It's what I used, trimmed the windows partition down to 700mb (you can go lower, but I kept in stuff like media player and IE)

    3. Re:Say "NO" to Bloatware by Anti_Climax · · Score: 5, Informative

      Well, they'll probably never give it to you, but you can definitely have it.

      http://www.nliteos.com/nlite.html allows you to pull unwanted components from your windows install cd's, including media player, messenger and internet explorer. If you're so inclined I highly recommend making your own personalized install.

      It also comes in particularly handy when you want to keep people from using IE after their machine gets hosed by malware.

      As an aside, I find it much easier to just write the new install files into my CD image rather than burn a new one from folders on the disk and as a bonus the CD is typically smaller that way as well.

      --
      Even people that believe in pre-destiny look both ways before crossing the street.
    4. Re:Say "NO" to Bloatware by Rolken · · Score: 2, Insightful

      "I suspect that this barebones configuration meets the need of most Americans, who are not tech savy."

      Are you serious? Did you not see the article on Windows 'N' being a remarkable failure? People want their computers to be able to, shock of shocks, do things out of the box, especially those who aren't tech savvy.

      But hey, who needs facts and reality when you have Slashdot dogma.

    5. Re:Say "NO" to Bloatware by RzUpAnmsCwrds · · Score: 4, Insightful

      "Do you think Intel, AMD and the various memory makers aren't "very grateful" of the extra business they get from the dizzyingly high requirements of Windows nowadays?"

      Because, as we all know, GNOME runs *great* with 128MB of memory. And of course, Mac OS X is absolutely smooth on 128MB as well.

      With 256M of memory, Windows is as nippy as any other fully-featured desktop environment.

    6. Re:Say "NO" to Bloatware by quarkscat · · Score: 5, Informative

      "Has anyone suggested that Microsoft create 2 parallel operating systems: slimware version and bloatware version?"

      Well, yes actually. Microsoft now offers the following "flavors" of Windows:

      (1) Windows XP Home
      (2) Windows XP Pro
      (3) Windows XP Embedded
      (4) Windows XP "Lite"
      (5) Windows XP "Thin"
      (6) Windows XP Home Theatre Edition
      (7) Windows XP 64-bit Edition
      (8) Windows XP N
      (9) Windows CE

      Pray tell, just which other version of Windows were you actually looking for, that MSFT doesn't already offer (except "Windows XP Secure")?
      There are already more versions than you can shake a proverbial stick at, and all with varying levels of bloatware and also vulnerabilities. Pick your poison, and prepare to be "owned".

    7. Re:Say "NO" to Bloatware by Cross-Threaded · · Score: 2, Interesting
      .

      Nlite looks pretty cool. I would have used it if I had found it 2 months ago. Instead, I spent 3+/- days learning how to do it all the hard way, and I burned a lot of coasters in the process.

      When I finally got done, I had a pretty, slick up-to-date*, restoration cd that I could insert in the box, walk away for about an hour, come back and login. My normal apps (including virus scanner) install automatically, too. And yes, the very first thing the box does when it connects to the internet is go get the latest virus defs.

      * Obsolete the following Tuesday.

      I am currently working on one that XP will be as stripped down as I can make it, and will use F/OSS applications only. I am continually amazed at the darn decent F/OSS software that is available, (Thank you sourceforge folks!).

      I admit it, I make my living supporting Windows. However, I have done several Gentoo systems, and did go through the pain of LFS 5 (twice*). I want to make the switch to Linux, but I haven't found the setup/apps/configs I would like, so I keep switching distro's, never spending enough time to get used to them. (Typical Windows User, Don't know what I want...)

      * FYI - Shell scripting LFS is a bugger! Compiled and Installed by hand the first time, then wanted to try for a Gentoo-style install.

      --
      They call us sheeple, I wonder why?
    8. Re:Say "NO" to Bloatware by TruckerTom · · Score: 2, Interesting

      If you want a slimmed-down, security conscious version of Windows I'd suggest Windows 2003 Server.

      Otherwise, be careful about what you install. Turn off Active X if you don't like it or want it on. Avoid downloading and installing everything you find for "free" on the Internet. "Free" software is not free, because it's usually poorly-written and leaves digital droppings all over your hard drive.

    9. Re:Say "NO" to Bloatware by oddfox · · Score: 2, Informative

      A gig of RAM but what are the other specs if your system is -that- slow? From the sounds of things it's a sub-500MHz box, maybe even worse. This goes for whether you're talking about Windows XP or any Linux distribution worth beans.

      --
      "We invented personal computing." - Bill Gates
    10. Re:Say "NO" to Bloatware by Magic5Ball · · Score: 2, Interesting

      "[T]hat is a blatent lie,"

      Yes, because without knowing exactly what hardware the both of you are using, your datapoints ABOUT OSX and experience are somehow more correct than his ABOUT WINDOWS AND LINUX, always.

      But instead of pointing out that with almost all Linux distributions, most components can be stripped out by the end user with relative ease to save memory and CPU cycles, or that the Windows and Linux memory managers might show different performance optima depending on the amount of installed memory, you've resorted to a failed attempt at feigning zealotism.

      hector_uk, I invite you do show me, with any arbitrary computing task of your choice, how trained monkeys might perform better than you using a computer running XP and 128 MB of RAM. If your the duties of your vocation can be performed with trained monkeys, you might also consider a more meaningful line of work.

      --
      There are 1.1... kinds of people.
    11. Re:Say "NO" to Bloatware by fwarren · · Score: 3, Interesting

      Have you ever read the "leaked" Whitepaper Microsoft did on the conversion of HotMail from FreeBDS/Apache to Win2000/IIS?

      One of the things they specifically mention is the fact you can build a VERY SMALL minimal *nix system because you can cut all of the cruft. It is humanly possible to figure out the mininum dependancies, libraries, etc.

      Whereas with Microsoft, who was doing this as a matter of pride, would not create a striped down version of Windows for themselves. And even stated that you could not strip down a build of windows because there are to many unknown interactions.

      It would take a lot of work to figure out what you can remove. More work than Microsoft was even willing to do as a matter of pride on a project they were throwing millions of dollars at and took several years to complete.

      I don't think we will see a striped down "core" version of Windows anytime soon.

      --
      vi + /etc over regedit any day of the week.
  14. TARGET=_TAB by klaasb · · Score: 2, Insightful

    That is all I need

    --
    if your pants fit well, it's not only because of the pants ...
    1. Re:TARGET=_TAB by Cynshard · · Score: 2, Insightful

      I'd much rather stick with TARGET=_NEW and let the browser handle where to open the link.

    2. Re:TARGET=_TAB by rebug · · Score: 3, Insightful

      I'd much rather stick with not specifying a target and letting the user handle where to open the link

      --

      there's more than one way to do me.
    3. Re:TARGET=_TAB by HG2 · · Score: 2, Funny

      I much rather jump off a cliff than hear you guys argue.

    4. Re:TARGET=_TAB by sgt-at-arms · · Score: 2, Insightful

      I'd much rather - as a user - be able to CTRL+Click a button and have the form submit to a new tab (or window).

      --
      I can see how dictators do it, it's so easy. - Easy2RememberNick
  15. Re:Wow by FatBobSmith · · Score: 2, Insightful

    The beauty of tabbed browsing becomes apparent when you have a bookmarks folder full of your favorite sites in firefox and you right click and select 'open in tabs' and 20+ of your favorite sites open in a single window for you to peruse while you drink your morning coffee.

  16. Re:Shameless Copying by HyperChicken · · Score: 2, Insightful

    And "us" keeps shamelessly copying them. GAIM, OpenOffice, XMMS, and even Linux itself.

    Don't hold Microsoft to a double-standard.

    --
    Free of Flash! Free of Flash!
  17. Gnomedex!? by Recovering+Hater · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Am I the only one confused as to why M$ would call the gathering Gnomedex? I though it was going to have something to do with the Gnome desktop and M$ for second. Wierd.

    --
    My humor is probably your flamebait
  18. What's sad about this is.... by WMD_88 · · Score: 5, Insightful

    When IE 7 comes out and all the Joe Average people start using it (via auto updating, or the new computer they bought, or whatever), they're gonna see the finally-added features and think, "Wow, look at these new things Microsoft created! They're amazing!" because they've never used anything but IE. Microsoft thus gains mindshare for nothing.

    1. Re:What's sad about this is.... by St.+Arbirix · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Why do you think Mac people are always showing off our computers? We're not pugnacious pricks, we're trying to help the *nix community so that when MS finally pushes what OSX and Linux have been doing for years people will actually believe us when we offhandedly say it's been done before and they're being held back by Windows.

      We take so much ridicule for you guys. :)

      --
      Direct away from face when opening.
    2. Re:What's sad about this is.... by bad-badtz-maru · · Score: 2, Insightful


      I don't think that Joe Average is going to give a shit about the new features, personally... I think Joe Average views the computer as an irritating device that unreliably provides interesting functionality.

  19. Can it get any bigger or uglier? by Jackie_Chan_Fan · · Score: 3, Insightful

    Microsoft really needs to hire some real UI artists one of these days.

    Personally, i dont need the windows title bar, address bar, etc taking of a chunk of the screen like that. It must be a low res shot but still...

    MS likes to make these big screen eating UI's with things that most people never use.

  20. still two years behind by fermion · · Score: 2, Informative
    It would seem that after 10 years the richest software developer in the world would have caught up with the state of the art. I mean a search box? Is that the best they can do. I mean for those of us that have been browsing the internet for all that time, and a bit more, IE has always been the laughing stock. It is a very good application front end, a terminal really, but a horrible browser.

    Which is realy not the fault fo the devolopers. I am sure they are very good. But when the goal is get and keep clients, and force is an option, one has a hard time justifing a customer centered approach to development. I mean it is kind of a waste of time to sweet talk a victim if you are just going to knock him out and take his money.

    --
    "She's a scientist and a lesbian. She's not going to let it slide." Orphan Black
  21. Cool! by sammyo · · Score: 2, Interesting

    >RSS will be integrated into the heart of Longhorn

    Maybe there will be a scripting extension so I can add some dynamic content to my blog.
    Hey how about automatic forwarding?

  22. Staring at the embers by LS · · Score: 3, Insightful

    Seeing this news item really awakened me to the lack of innovation with Internet software these days. Embedding RSS into IE is mundane to the extreme. This pales in comparison to the rate at which ideas were pouring out 5-7 years ago. I suppose the browser is a mature market, but is it really? Perhaps we need to go back and look at some of the older ideas that were ahead of their time now that the Internet infrastructure is more mature. It just feels like we are still staring at the embers of a long-dead bonfire.

    LS

    --
    There is a fine line between being a cultivated citizen and being someone else's crop. - A. J. Patrick Liszkie
  23. Looks pretty good by melted · · Score: 3, Insightful

    Gotta admit, they have some smart people there. Yes, firefox is a superior browser, technologically. Yes, it's open source. Yes, it supports CSS2 a little better and yes, it supports alpha channel in PNGs. Does any of this matter as far as Joe Sixpack is concerned? Not a bit!

    What does matter then? The stuff they're emphasizing - tabbed browsing, design, and integration. You can spend hours explaining what's better to a layman, and in the end they'll use the browser that looks better and is more comfortable. Plus, if they approach security of IE7 with the same rigor we've seen in IIS6 (which I doubt highly, considering such a short product cycle), security will not be a problem.

    It is time for Firefox/Mozilla devs to pile on the goodies. Get us some SVG and CSS3, get web devs (at least some of them) to use these cool technologies, and make Microsoft play catch-up again.

    Ain't competition grand?

  24. Future History by Nova+Express · · Score: 2, Funny
    April 29, 2007: Microsoft Releases Longhorn with Integrated RSS

    April 30, 2007: First RSS-Related Security Hole Exploit Announced

    --
    Lawrence Person (lawrencepersonh@gmailh.com (remove all "h"s to mail)

    http://www.lawrenceperson.com/

  25. Comment removed by account_deleted · · Score: 5, Informative

    Comment removed based on user account deletion

  26. alittle slow? by tymellon · · Score: 2, Funny

    slashdot = osnews + 5 hour delay.

  27. Web-apps platform: Windows killer by BoneOfconTroll · · Score: 2, Insightful
    Of course MrDomino is right - the long-time fear of the web as an OS/app platform, so Windows wouldn't matter, and Office wouldn't matter.

    Your explanation is simple and explains a lot -it's almost certainly right.

    What better way to sabotage the web as OS and web-apps, than to control the browser? Make it *just* good enough for enough people to accept; but not good enough to make web-apps great - which they definitely could be.

    Evil. Brilliant. Very Microsoft.

    --
    I don't want to sell you death sticks.
  28. Microsoft's motto should be... by Stormwatch · · Score: 5, Funny

    ..."The technologies of today --- TOMORROW!"

  29. How far have they fallen by codemachine · · Score: 3, Insightful

    Longhorn loses its next generation shell and filesystems, both of which are pretty core OS functionality.

    Now they make up for it by adding RSS to their browser? At this rate Longhorn isn't going to be much more than Windows XP plus IE 7 (and yet still delivered late?). And IE hardly counts as OS functionality.

    Maybe if they spent their time building an operating system, and let application developers build the applications for it, they'd be able to build an OS that has some really innovative technologies in it. Instead they spend all this time trying to "own the web", as well as compete with 3rd party software vendors like Adobe.

    From a technology perspective, I think this strategy sucks. Time will tell whether this is a good business strategy or not.

  30. Re:Speaking of sad... by NutscrapeSucks · · Score: 2, Insightful

    It is staggering to see how much more efficient loosely-knit community is than mammoth-like corporation.

    I think you missed my point. Products like Mozilla Firefox and OpenOffice exist because of big one-time-only investments from large coporations. They were not developed by a loose-knit community. The question is whether Firefox can remain competitive without that backing.

    --
    Whenever I hear the word 'Innovation', I reach for my pistol.
  31. Re:Is it too much to ask... by omry_y · · Score: 5, Funny

    why, its very useful to have RSS in the heart of the system.
    imagine the possiblities:

    * RSS system log:
    whenever a line is added to the log, you will be able to see it in your IE 7 Browser!

    * RSS memory monitor:
    you will have an RSS feed of your memory status in the last 24 hours! you will be able to tell how much memory your computer used, all from your IE 7 Browser!

    * RSS file system:
    Saving files is too boring?
    now you can save them as RSS entries, and watch them from your IE 7 Browser!

    * RSS buttons, checkboxes and tabs:
    instead of the silly outdated over-rated gui widgets we have today, we will have RSS widgets, which will allow you to know which buttons of an application was pressed, when, and why - all from your IE 7 Browser!

    now, tell me you are not excited!
    Microsoft, inovates the future

    --
    Omry.
  32. it's called "Gnomedex"... by jhcarnelian · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Those screenshots looks increasingly like Gnome and Firefox. So, I guess it's called "Gnomedex" because Microsoft is cloning the Gnome desktop for their next release of Windows?

  33. RSS feeds for SPYWARE! by Festering+Leper · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Now your spyware and Browser Helper Objects can automatically keep themselves up to date based on RSS feeds!

    --
    if you want people to think you know what you are talking about, just put ".com" at the end of everything you say.com
  34. Blatant rip-off by Mwongozi · · Score: 2, Insightful

    So IE7's RSS support looks virtually identical to Safari's RSS support

    Why am I not surprised?

  35. Re:oh yeah firefox invented top right search uh hu by oSand · · Score: 2, Informative

    Actually, tabbed browsing was first appeared in Booklink's InternetWorks.

  36. Why wait for Longhorn? by hermank · · Score: 2, Informative

    I am not talking to the release date of Longhorn. I am talking on the performance of applications on Longhorn.

    I am working on a computational intensive problem. With linux I can install ONLY the functions I need. I can even stop and uninstall all server to free memory and diskspace and make my program run faster.

    I really dont want to wait for my program fighting for getting more resources against some funny kernel extension like web access and RSS, which cannot be stopped.

    Maybe Microsoft have no interest on scientific arena, but, as the OS getting
    more bulky and inflexable, I serious doubt if Windows platform can survive apart from desktop and gamming.

  37. Re:Shameless Copying by NanoGator · · Score: 2, Insightful

    "Don't hold Microsoft to a double-standard."

    I find it funny that everybody talks about switching to Mozilla/Firefox because of things IE doesn't support, but when MS finally gets around to updating IE it's bitch bitch bitch.

    The Slashdot group-think has a grudge against Microsoft. That, in and of itself, I don't have a problem with. We're all human. We all have our opinions. (I certainly shouldn't be casting any stones.) But what really irks me is that nobody is willing to admit it. All these "It's stupid because it comes from Microsoft" rants are paraded around with a flag of 'Insightful', 'Informative', and 'Intesting'. Microsoft's proud of its work, that's twisted into false hype citing other browsers that have that functionality. (Never mind that only about 10 million or so people on the net are using browsers with that functionality and that MS is introducing it into a much broader market.) Microsoft adds new features with a few additions of their own, that's twisted into predictions of insecurity and buggery. (Possible, but I'm talking elaborate works of fiction here.) Microsoft doesn't announce a particular feature or adherence to a standard (not to be confused announcing that it WON'T do either), it's twisted into more Microsoft arrogance and some Dr. Evil'ish plot to monopolize the internet.

    It's very difficult to take any story about Microsoft here seriously. They're not 'news for nerds', they're pitchfork-waving parties. Hardly more respectable than an epic Babylon 5 vs. Star Trek debate.

    I expect this comment to be modded down. Fine, no prob. Please, at least do me the courtesy of reflecting on some of the behaviour around here and attempt to see where I'm coming from. I'm not pro-Microsoft, I'm anti-hypocrite.

    --
    "Derp de derp."
  38. RSS will be integrated into the heart of Longhorn by binkzz · · Score: 2, Insightful
    Is anyone else scared by this?

    How do you integrate RSS into the heart of your OS?

    Or more importantly, why?

    --
    'For we walk by faith, not by sight.' II Corinthians 5:7
  39. Longhorn is just a code name... by Junior+J.+Junior+III · · Score: 2, Funny

    When it is officially released, they're going to call it Windows Me 2... which will of course be pronounced "Windows, Me too!"

    --
    You see? You see? Your stupid minds! Stupid! Stupid!
  40. Great news for Firefox! by salesgeek · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Microsoft didn't get it: the reason Firefox is so damn good is that it's a better browser than IE. I think MS marketing looked at the eyecandy (search box, tabs, Live Bookmarks) and thought that this FireFox was more like some of the customized versions of IE that are out there. They totally missed out the power that Gecko, XUL and the amazingly simple extension system bring.

    Firefox renders correctly, it's simple to use and extensions are just plain fun and useful. The user has more control and is literally safer than with IE. Sure there are exploits found, but they are generally fixed quickly and users are alerted to upgrade.

    Then there's that whole extensible user interface...

    --
    -- $G