Slashdot Mirror


Linux-Based Phone Lasts 200 Hours on Standby

An anonymous reader writes "Motorola is showing off a Linux/Java phone with a claimed battery life of 200 hours on standby, or 200-250 minutes when talking. If those figures prove true, Linux sure is improving quickly on the power management front. That kind of battery life also suggests that the E895 might be the first single-chipset phone ever to run a complex OS, whether Symbian, Windows Mobile, or Linux. Other features are user-upgradable memory, 1.3MP camera, video capture, multimedia slideshows, and more. Hopefully a more U.S.-friendly version will follow, as happened when Mot's Linux-based quad-band A780 came out a year or so after it's tri-band forebear, the A768, shipped in China."

187 comments

  1. By definition... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0, Interesting

    ... wont' something non-Linux, something smaller and more efficient, give longer talk time?

    1. Re:By definition... by Ithika · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Probably, but it may well be worthwhile paying off the loss in performance for greater ease and speed of development. They didn't have to write the kernel from scratch; though no doubt there have been some significant modifications.

    2. Re:By definition... by moz25 · · Score: 4, Insightful

      I would imagine something without as many features to consume less power. I'd say it's not power-saving features of Linux, but rather a better battery and/or more power-efficient electronics as a whole.

  2. Too less of user memory? by snkmoorthy · · Score: 0

    The maximum capacity of the E895 is listed as 10MB. Is this an error, 10MB of 3gp file is like 20 mins of video. what about other standard expansions SD,MMC?

    1. Re:Too less of user memory? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Apparently SD and MMC are physically too big for the phone. Most of the Motorola phones use Trans Flash with it's much smaller size and unfortunately much smaller capacity. :-(

    2. Re:Too less of user memory? by freitasm · · Score: 3, Informative

      The memory is 10MB, but TransFlash cards can be used - with cards up to 512MB available and compatible with the phone.

      The OP says user-upgradable memory, which is quite not correct - the memory card is in addition to the 10MB but it's not a on-board upgrade. It's just an expansion - like in any other current smartphone or even featured phone in the market.

  3. No cynicism by Kinky+Bass+Junk · · Score: 2, Funny

    Oooh, that's nice, and I accept a plethora of comments to stream past about how we don't need this in a phone, and that a phone is a phone... But don't you just look at this and think "wow... we've come a long way". I know I do.

    A great phone by itself, with the addition of lotsa power, i'm liking it :)

    --
    Anonymous Coward
    1. Re:No cynicism by darksider415 · · Score: 1, Interesting

      I remember thinking that my Nokia 5165 was really great at the time, but this is really revolutionary. I mean, just 5 years ago, monochromatic displays and bulky designs were the norm. Even my baseline Sony Ericsson T237 is a massive leap forward. With Linux on the Motorola phones, it really makes you think about where the industry is headed. Now, if you can access X-terminal and run OpenOffice, then I'd see about getting one. How many phones can you go rm-r on? Not many.

      --
      And they wonder why I left Windows.....
    2. Re:No cynicism by LordNokia · · Score: 0, Interesting

      (I know this will never get seen but...) I remember back in the day there was an article on here (slashdot) about how Apollo-Era scientists would kill to have our cell phones- not because of the communications, but because of the processors in them. Think about it- There's PocketPC's out there that rival the speed of the iMac i'm posting from.

      --
      Tim says: "please mod me up so my karma won't be terrible. Please?"
    3. Re:No cynicism by shokk · · Score: 2, Interesting

      A long way from what? I don't see this phone curing cancer, getting us to Mars, solving world hunger, balancing budgets, or preventing wars. It's a neat gizmo, but it's no milestone of human achievement. Oh, waiter, one order of perspective please!

      --
      "Beware of he who would deny you access to information, for in his heart, he dreams himself your master."
    4. Re:No cynicism by Mind+Booster+Noori · · Score: 1

      Yes, you can access X-terminal or run OpenOffice. This mobile (and the new generation of Motorola Linux-based phones) use Qtopia: Phone Edition...

  4. Impressive? by Morgahastu · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Those figures aren't impressive for a phone as all my phones in the past 3 years have lasted twice that long.

    1. Re:Impressive? by Shisha · · Score: 5, Insightful

      The point is it only needs 1000mAh battery. Sure, if I have four batteries, I have standby time _four_ times as long as you.

      Iff you checked the capacity of your battery and decided that your phone indeed must have lower consumption then the new phone then you have to check whether your phone runs an OS that's in the same category as Linux and _only then_ can you claim it's not impressive.

      (I'm not saying you must be wrong. I'm just saying that you may be comparing apples to PCs, ooops, sorry apples to oranges)

    2. Re:Impressive? by Dtyst · · Score: 1

      Agree, those figures are quite average on a mobile phone today, but still an impressive feat by motorolaby showing this is possible with Linux OS on handheld aswell.

    3. Re:Impressive? by imsabbel · · Score: 3, Insightful

      My 2 year old siemens s55 gets 10days-2weeks standby with a 740mAh battery.
      Like the greatparent said: the phone is absolutly NOTHING to write about (except LINUX LINUX LINUX LINUX... its slashdot, alright...)

      --
      HI O WISE PRINCE. WHT TOOK U SO DAM LONG?
    4. Re:Impressive? by Shisha · · Score: 1, Insightful

      No, the point is exactly tha you get Linux there. If you got the same performance with Symbian or Windows then it would be equally impressive. s55 might be a nice phone and all, but you probably can't add any extra software (except Java stuff). Could you make s55 play Ogg files? Probably not. Can you get programs for Windows, Symbian, Linux phones, that play Oggs. Probably yes.

      That's the whole point you get a more flexible OS, not so huge phone and a still a decent battery life.

      Yes, I still get nearly a week of standby on my four years old Sony phone (640mAh battery). I don't get GPRS, Bluetooth, camera, colours, IMAP email client, etc. etc. that's the whole point. The new phone has a lot of nice features _and_ a decent standby time.

      And why yes, on the top of all this, I'm interested to hear that it runs Linux. Linux on mobiles, on a single chipset, is "news for nerds, stuff that matters." If you don't like what Slashdot is reporting on, don't read the main section but just things that you find interesting. And if you reply to a post, please read the whole post you're replying to first, before complaining about Slashdot. Not RTFA, not reading the comments properly, posting offtopic is what makes Slashdot occasionally suck. Posting news about Linux does not.

    5. Re:Impressive? by WARM3CH · · Score: 0
      The point is it only needs 1000mAh battery. Sure, if I have four batteries, I have standby time _four_ times as long as you.
      My old Nokia 6310i has a 1050mAh battery and lasts 400 hours in standby. 200 hours for the new Motorola? Not impressed at all.
    6. Re:Impressive? by Jeff+DeMaagd · · Score: 1

      My Sanyo SCP-4900 is rated for 384 hours on standby with a 1350mAh battery and it actually gets it on a two year old battery. It has a web browser, photo viewer, PDA functionality, color screen and such.

      Your statement about Linux is irrelevant, about as irrelevant as saying Tivo has Linux whereas competitors might not. For most people, if it works well, it doesn't matter what is inside or how simple or complex, how well-fit or ill-fit those internals are.

    7. Re:Impressive? by Shisha · · Score: 1

      Can it read IMAP mail? And deal with x.509 certificates? The point is that if the OS is Linux, Windows or Symbian, then I can probably get an email program that can do those things and copy it to the phone and run it on the phone. So the fact that it runs a proper OS does matter to some. Yes, I agree the fact that it's Linux is not that important.

      I'm sure you have a good phone and if the PDA functionality includes the above, then let me know, I'm looking for such a phone. Cheers.

    8. Re:Impressive? by Morgahastu · · Score: 1

      Who compares cell phones based on operating system? It's not oven a PDA+Phone, just a regular phone (by today's standards). My phone has a 750mAh battery and still lasts twice as long.

    9. Re:Impressive? by log2.0 · · Score: 1

      I have one of those too. It was the first phone I could buy that had Java support.

      One thing is, the Nokia has a monochrome screen and a lot less features. So you would naturally expect the Motorolla to use more Juice anyway.

      I think the point of the post was to say "hey, a linux phone that doesnt suck"

      I may get one of these if they come out in Oz...my Nokia is getting a little old.

      --
      Can your karma go above being Excellent?
    10. Re:Impressive? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I think the point others are trying to make is... it's just a damn phone! One that happens to use a raped version of Linux, which is largely irrelevant as you already admitted. None of the features are really new (or really relevant for actual using a phone as it's meant to be--talking)

      The story headline could be simply changed to "Technology Progresses" ...gee who would have thought that? This story would not even be on slashdot if the phone used any other OS (unless that OS happens to be Mac OS X, BeOS, or Amiga)

    11. Re:Impressive? by Deathlizard · · Score: 1

      I remember during the last holiday season I wanted to see how long standby lasted on my Kyocera 6035 smartphone, so I charged it and left it on standby for two weeks. When I looked at it before I returned to work it had over half a charge left.

      Now I set the phone to shut off at midnight and turn on at 8AM, so from my calculations thats 225 hours from a 1500Ah battery. It could have easily gone longer and probably break 400-500 hours on standby, and this is from a phone that is about three generations behind today's phones.

    12. Re:Impressive? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      ummm I do, my imate sp3i (windows) gets 10 days standby. This may be amazing figures for linux but every other phone OS has significantly outdone those numbers already.

    13. Re:Impressive? by Leroy_Brown242 · · Score: 1

      "Linux-Based Phone Lasts 200 Hours on Standby"

      In other news, car drives 500 miles on a tank of gas, and plane 20 hours!

      Agreed. Although impressive, not unheard of.

    14. Re:Impressive? by MattWhitworth · · Score: 1

      But does it run Li...wait, darnit, it does! (explodes)

    15. Re:Impressive? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      A step in the right direction, but the screen is too small. This phone is useless as a PDA.

    16. Re:Impressive? by qazwsxqazwsx90 · · Score: 1

      Yes, but could you just imagine a beowulf cluster of these.

    17. Re:Impressive? by badasscat · · Score: 1

      No, the point is exactly tha you get Linux there. If you got the same performance with Symbian or Windows then it would be equally impressive. s55 might be a nice phone and all, but you probably can't add any extra software (except Java stuff). Could you make s55 play Ogg files? Probably not. Can you get programs for Windows, Symbian, Linux phones, that play Oggs. Probably yes.

      Look at the phone and read the article. It's Linux-based, yes, but you're not going to be running SUSE 9.3 on that thing. It's running embedded Linux, it's likely got a fixed interface, and it will run a limited set of OS-based and java apps - just like every other phone.

      My Z500a - which apparently uses a proprietary OS from Sony/Ericsson (I don't know what it is) - lets me play mp3's, record and view video files, take pictures (and view pictures that I've uploaded to it), browse the web, download and play games, and download and use various apps that allow me to do things like watch TV or get weather alerts, on two color screens. This Linux phone is not going to do much more, if anything, than that.

      My phone gets 10 days of standby time, and 360 minutes of talk time. This is better than this Motorola phone, and it's on a 670mah battery.

      So I think people are right to question what's so special about this phone. It almost seems like the article submitter hasn't even looked at phones in years, and like the editors accepted the submission simply because it mentions Linux.

    18. Re:Impressive? by Hal_Porter · · Score: 1

      So I think people are right to question what's so special about this phone. It almost seems like the article submitter hasn't even looked at phones in years, and like the editors accepted the submission simply because it mentions Linux.


      Yeah, right. Next you'll be saying that Michael Moore quotes people he doesn't like selectively to make them look bad.

      OSE for ever BTW.
      --
      echo -e 'global _start\n _start:\n mov eax, 2\n int 80h\n jmp _start' > a.asm; nasm a.asm -f elf; ld a.o -o a;
    19. Re:Impressive? by graphicsguy · · Score: 1

      Who compares cell phones based on operating system?

      Umm.... nerds?

    20. Re:Impressive? by EnigmaticSource · · Score: 1

      Can it read IMAP mail? And deal with x.509 certificates?


      Yes, In fact it can (X509 native, IMAP is a BREW addon), The SCP-4900 has nice firmware, and in fact it sold me on just using Sanyo phones... (flip phones of course, the 4900's fatal flaw is that it likes to dial random numbers in your pocket)

      --
      The Geek in Black
      I know my BCD's (when I'm Sober)
  5. I dunno... by Mac+Degger · · Score: 2, Informative

    ...this sounds like typical phone talk/standby times. And that's including the many Symbian phones out there, as well as the Treo's. Dunno what Hiptops do, but I wouldn't be surprised if it's in the same order.

    --
    -- Waht? Tehr's a preveiw buottn?
    1. Re:I dunno... by boogy+nightmare · · Score: 1

      This is true, i have a nokia 6630 phone and that runs on Symbian (the greatest of all phone OS's) and this has a standby time of up to 11 days...

      Nothing special and this only made it on to /. because its linux.

      --
      Kingdom of Loathing (www.kingdomofloathing.com) Addicted is me
    2. Re:I dunno... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Don't be a dumb ass and do us all a favor, RTFA. It is talking about how a battery THAT SMALL can still run as long as the larger batteries due to battery innovations and the low load of Linux.

      No one gives a fuck if your common-sized battery can do the same as this micro battery.

    3. Re:I dunno... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Don't be a dumb ass and do us all a favor, RTFA. It is talking about how a battery THAT SMALL can still run as long as the larger batteries due to battery innovations and the low load of Linux. THAT is why it is on slashdot.

  6. Linux Improving Battery Life? by Morinaka · · Score: 3, Insightful

    Nowhere in the article does it say that linux is the reason behind the batteries long standby time. You might want to read it again.

    --
    Rock is Dead! Long live Paper and Scissors!!
    1. Re:Linux Improving Battery Life? by Shisha · · Score: 1, Informative

      No it does. It says that Linux is the first os in it's category to run on a single chipset phone, _hence_ improving the battery usage.

    2. Re:Linux Improving Battery Life? by William+Robinson · · Score: 3, Informative
      Nowhere in the article does it say that linux is the reason behind the batteries long standby time

      It does....See this from TFA.

      If true, these figures suggest Linux has made great progress in consumer electronics power management, possibly through the efforts of MontaVista, which has supplied the Linux used in all of Motorola's previous Linux phones.

      Read this too.

    3. Re:Linux Improving Battery Life? by Morgahastu · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Unfortunately that's just speculation, so I agree with the grand parent. I love submissions based on a 1 sentence speculation of an article.

      And the battery life is still not impressive, which makes the one sentence irrelevant.

    4. Re:Linux Improving Battery Life? by reflective+recursion · · Score: 1
      No, it says:
      Such stellar battery life suggests the E895 might be based on a single-chipset architecture
      As well as:
      If true, these figures suggest Linux [...]
      We need to take our bias-blinders off and realize this article is at linuxdevices.com. Whole lotta "suggesting", little factual data.
      --
      Dijkstra Considered Dead
    5. Re:Linux Improving Battery Life? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Funny

      So the article is about how "now linux can do what others have been doing for sometime"?

      Meh.

    6. Re:Linux Improving Battery Life? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      That's not the point, you loser. The GP was pointing that the article DOES tallk about linux.

  7. Again, it's only in Asia by ziggamon2.0 · · Score: 4, Insightful
    This isn't the first linux phone Motorola has released, and I've previously tried to get a hold of one of those babies, but it seems they are only available in Asia.

    Again, TFA says:
    The E895 is expected to be initially introduced in the Asia-Pacific region in Q4 of 2005.

    Does anyone know why Motorola keeps doing this? Isn't there a viable market for linux-based mobile phone in Europe or the US for example?
    1. Re:Again, it's only in Asia by WindBourne · · Score: 1, Interesting

      At this time, The American market is slowing down. All the tech toys go to the far east as they have a much better economy. Sadly, our economy has been in stall for 5 years and not looking better due to the oil price instabilities.

      --
      I prefer the "u" in honour as it seems to be missing these days.
    2. Re:Again, it's only in Asia by delire · · Score: 1

      The 'Asian market', taken with just China or all together is many many times larger than the US. the US is comparitively tiny. Second largest is the EU, which is also larger than the US. There will be distribution branching, but likely they want to collect revenue and analyse market performance before exploring smaller additional markets and (most of all) language ports.

    3. Re:Again, it's only in Asia by delire · · Score: 1

      /me notes conspicuous redundancy in parent "which is also larger than the US". s/also larger/also larger in population

    4. Re:Again, it's only in Asia by pafrusurewa · · Score: 1

      And your constitution is ignored by your parliament. Is that better?

    5. Re:Again, it's only in Asia by donscarletti · · Score: 1

      I'd imagine that it would be because of the mobile phone standard. IIRC Asia-pacific mainly uses GSM and to a lesser extent CDMA. Probably Motorola has itself geared towards GSM production or something. But really, I'm just speculating. These things probably arn't as much of issues as they used to be.

      --
      When Argumentum ad Hominem falls short, try Argumentum ad Matrem
    6. Re:Again, it's only in Asia by 110010001000 · · Score: 1

      Bullshit - take a look at Japans economy vs the US over the last 5 years. The reason why is that Asian markets are used as a test bed for new technologies. If a company isn't sure of a new platform they will release it in Asia first.

      Its much easier to introduce new phones in those areas (no FCC-like requirements) and less chance of product lawsuits if the product doesn't work well, and expensive recalls are unheard of.

    7. Re:Again, it's only in Asia by 110010001000 · · Score: 1

      The US has a parliament? Another ignorant EUsian!

    8. Re:Again, it's only in Asia by pafrusurewa · · Score: 1

      Yes, indeed they (it's plural, ignorant American) do. Only American sources try to redefine the word 'parliament.' Everywhere else that's what the legislative body is called.

    9. Re:Again, it's only in Asia by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      Only American sources try to redefine the word 'parliament.' Everywhere else that's what the legislative body is called.

      So what? It's not what we call it. So when referring to our legislative body wouldn't it make sense to call it by its name? Europe... what a bunch of followers.

    10. Re:Again, it's only in Asia by Mant · · Score: 1

      Its simply that new phones are better received in Asia, and Europe, then the US. Americans are more reluctant to adopt the new technologies, and more likely to stick with an existing phone.

      In the past Motorola has had trouble shifting phones when the took new tech to the state. Having learnt the lesson they now sell them first in more responsive markets like the other phone companies.

    11. Re:Again, it's only in Asia by egghat · · Score: 1

      It's a combination of market size and mobile phone standard. The Asian and European markets for GSM phones are much bigger than the US market (which still is mainly CDMA based). But this still doesn't explain why most Linux based phones aren't available in europe neither. (I'm from Germany and Motorola Germany doesn't list any of the Linux based phones on its web site).

      Bye egghat.

      --
      -- "As a human being I claim the right to be widely inconsistent", John Peel
    12. Re:Again, it's only in Asia by WindBourne · · Score: 1

      Bullshit is right, but on your part.

      A market test is done for 2 reasons.

      1. To test how a product will be received.
      2. To get the word out to others - basically a marketing effort that is counted on spreading.


      Electronics are normally introduced into selected markets to test what type of ppl will buy a product. Historically, Electronics have been tested in America (dominately in NYC|LA|Chicago|Dallas, Clevand|Cinninati, somewhere in midwest (like lincoln NE), and somewhere like Pheonix|Seattle|Denver). That changed about 4 years ago. At the time, the markets were not reflecting what was going on. Basically the economy (caused by 9/11) prevented a clear picture of what was happening . Since that time, they have remained in the far east, as their economy is much better than ours. At times, it is Japan, at other times, it is India or even Australia. But no matter, they have shifted the initial marketing to the other side. Once our economy is back, then market tests will most likely come back.

      Now, as to no FCC-like requirements, that is also bullshit. When I worked at Bell Labs, All of our products had to jump through all sorts of hoops when dealing with any other country. Every country has some form of FCC. And all of them were pains about it. In fact, the USA was actually easier and cheaper to deal with. We knew exactly what was required to pass any tests. In many other countries, the government works closely with the local companies, so they will come up with weird tests if you have something interesting.

      --
      I prefer the "u" in honour as it seems to be missing these days.
    13. Re:Again, it's only in Asia by Tschepsit · · Score: 2, Insightful

      You also have to consider that most phones in the U.S. are bought through one of the service providers, and U.S. service providers require extensive testing to work out any problems a phone might cause with their networks.

    14. Re:Again, it's only in Asia by tushar · · Score: 1
      Does anyone know why Motorola keeps doing this? Isn't there a viable market for linux-based mobile phone in Europe or the US for example?
      Along with the jobs, they are planning to outsource the market to Asia :-)
    15. Re:Again, it's only in Asia by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Americans don't call it parliament because it doesn't *work* like a parliament. In parliament it's one person, one vote directly elects an official with the most votes who in parliament again has one vote on *any* issue which is again, directly voted in by majority vote.

      In the USA it is always vote by proxy. Your vote elects an official who decides who will be your representative in government (it does NOT directly elect someone into power). The system is geared to prevent the easy enacting of legislation (in parliament, if the government is a minority, laws like "the present prime minister will be removed from power today and an election held immediately" can pass easily -- laws like that are next to impossible to pass in the US). This is done through several steps, such as requiring multiple voting passes on a bill by different members (ie: chambers), and generally requring the president to sign the bill to finalize it (unless 2/3 of the people in government disagree with the president).

      Unlike parliamentary senate, which, by choice, may veto a bill, congressionary senate may not only veto but may amend a bill in any way, period.

      Complicated, eh?

      That's why it isn't called "parliament". Because it isn't running with any form of parliamentary process by any measure of the word. It isn't one man one vote. It's one man votes to allow someone to vote.

      Now, all that being said, that doesn't mean it's a better or worse system, it just means it is different. Each system has its plusses and minuses. With a system that makes intoducing legislation to vote a minimal process (parliament), you can ensure an even opportunity for everyone to have their say. At the same time, you can easily stomp all over the basic rights of a minority, since parliament doesn't give anyone a final say.

  8. 200-250 hours is not impressive by myspys · · Score: 2, Interesting

    as an example of a phone that can do up to 300 hours on stand-by

    Nokia 5140i

    1. Re:200-250 hours is not impressive by Inda · · Score: 1

      My 2 year old low-cost, bargin-basement phone lasts nearly 200 hours on standby. And it does Java, photos, internet, makes the tea...

      200 hours is not impressive.

      --
      This post contains benzene, nitrosamines, formaldehyde and hydrogen cyanide.
    2. Re:200-250 hours is not impressive by CuriosityKilledWHAT · · Score: 1

      But does it run Linux?

    3. Re:200-250 hours is not impressive by TG1 · · Score: 0

      I, for one, welcome our new Slashdot overlords
      And I, for one, welcome our new insect overlords
      And I, for one, welcome our new mollusk overlords
      And I, for one, welcome our new posting overlords!
      And I, for one, welcome our new tile overlords.
      And I, for one, welcome our oil producing algea overlords
      I, for one, welcome our new stag-headed lizard overlords!
      As someone who runs a few SMP systems, I, for one, welcome our dual-core overlords.
      I, for one, welcome our new Go'auld overlords.
      Either you write something in the form "I, for one, welcome our XXX overlords" or you do nothing at all.
      I, for one, welcome our new Punch The Monkey and Win 10000 Banana Points overlords
      I was going to make a "I, for one, welcome our new Cockroach overlords" joke as is obligatory in every /. thread.
      I, for one, WELCOME our cliched joke overlords!
      I, for one, Welcome our New Swedish Overlords!
      I, for one, Welcome our new unstable likely to crash and overated tablet overlords.
      I, for one, welcome David Hasselhof as our new Overlord
      I, for one, welcome back our American overloardI, for one, welcome our malicious code inserting overlords
      I, for one, welcome my new beerbrewing overlord.
      I, for one, welcome my new conspiratorial corporate overlords, whoever they are.
      I, for one, welcome my new library RFID overlords.
      I, for one, welcome my new patent overlords.
      I, for one, welcome my old NSA overlords.
      I, for one, welcome no overlords. (heh, think i'll change my sig)
      I, for one, welcome our "I, for one,"-posts-that-don't-mention-overlords overlords.
      I, for one, welcome our "we're not evil, but we are a publicly owned corporation, just like all the other fuckers; give it a few years before we turn into another bunch of wankers" overlords
      I, for one, welcome our 17 year old female overlords
      I, for one, welcome our 18+-wheel Devry-trained highway juggernaut overlords.
      I, for one, welcome our 2.2 inch LCD Display featuring VGA Resolution toting overlords
      I, for one, welcome our 8-armed robot overlords!
      I, for one, welcome our AOL loving Microsoft Rendering Butt Licking Netscrap overlords
      I, for one, welcome our Judeocratic overlords
      I, for one, welcome our PPTP-password-cracking-slammer-leaving overlords.
      I, for one, welcome our Skynet overlords, and their lieutenants, the T1000s.
      I, for one, welcome our U-Bot overlords
      I, for one, welcome our Wikipedian overlords (I only hope that they continue to get along with our GPL and Google overlords)
      I, for one, welcome our agitating overlords..."
      I, for one, welcome our astroturfing overlords from Utah
      I, for one, welcome our biologically active martian overlords
      I, for one, welcome our bird-like flocking-flying parallel-processing bluetooth-connected linux-cluster overlords!
      I, for one, welcome our bright magenta overlords of haberdashery.
      I, for one, welcome our combo-cellphone-do-everything overlords.
      I, for one, welcome our crazy GPU vector coprocessor finite difference code matrix guy overlords
      I, for one, welcome our dirt removing, washing machine overlords.
      I, for one, welcome our emergent overlords
      I, for one, welcome our encrypted overlords
      I, for one, welcome our enslaved, robot-controlling females
      I, for one, welcome our fellow super secret nerd overlords.
      I, for one, welcome our giant robot wasp overlords
      I, for one, welcome our head-sized nipple overlords
      I, for one, welcome our helium filled stationary communication overlords.
      I, for one, welcome our herring-fed overlords!
      I, for one, welcome our high-rez photo printing overlords... Uh, wait... In Corea...
      I, for one, welcome our hydrogen peroxide and kerosene swilling SkyNet Overlords.
      I, for one, welcome our iPippen overlords
      I, for one, welcome our incompetent moderator overlords
      I, for one, welcome our jeffery overlord.
      I, for one, welcome our keyboard playing overlords ... except for that Yanni guy.
      I, for one, welcome our massive b

  9. Something smaller, more efficient; yes. but... by WindBourne · · Score: 3, Insightful

    Linux is not competing against a simple kernel that simply goes to sleep. It is competing against Win CE, Symbian, etc. that ARE real oses as well. They have their own share of issues that are apparently much slower and/or more overhead.

    --
    I prefer the "u" in honour as it seems to be missing these days.
    1. Re:Something smaller, more efficient; yes. but... by mikolas · · Score: 3, Informative

      As someone who has been forced to do some Symbian programming in the past, I can tell you that Symbian is not the right platform for efficient software development. From that perspective, going with Linux or Windows CE is a wise decision. And even more important, Windows and Linux have fairly large software base that can be easily ported to mobile devices' limited API functionality. Well, more easily than to Symbian at least.

    2. Re:Something smaller, more efficient; yes. but... by Cat_Byte · · Score: 1

      I have never programmed Symbian but have been amazed at how small the installers are for some apps. Mario Kart was 45K I think. Putty.exe for my Symbian is awesome ;)

      --
      Two roads diverged in a wood, and I - I took the one the bus load of girls just went down.
  10. Sure, it lasts 200 hours on standby, but by gonerill · · Score: 5, Funny

    When you try to use it, it texts you with the message "Can't find lib.so.8"

    1. Re:Sure, it lasts 200 hours on standby, but by arodland · · Score: 1

      Yeah, I prefer "Rundll32.exe has experienced a serious error and was forced to exit" myself.

  11. that's nothing by PerlDudeXL · · Score: 2, Interesting

    My Philips Xenium 9@9++ has a standby time of about a month. No useless toy features (camera, color display, ...).

    Granted, I don't phone that much, but it's nice to have a device that doesn't need be be recharged every other day/week.

  12. linux, linux, linux by pedantic+bore · · Score: 4, Insightful
    It seems like every tenth word in TFA is "linux". OK, so the phone uses linux internally. Why should I care; what does this get me? It's not like I'm going to ssh into my phone, fire up emacs, and start hacking on my latest C++ app.

    Does it really matter what OS your phone is running? It's a closed system; you can't get at the internals.

    --
    Am I part of the core demographic for Swedish Fish?
    1. Re:linux, linux, linux by ImaLamer · · Score: 1

      It's a closed system; you can't get at the internals.

      I've always wondered, does this mean we can expect to see some source code from Motorola? (It may already be published, if so forgive me).

      That question is more rhetorical, but the real question I have is: Isn't that binary distribution? If device makers start using GPL code for their devices, and ship them, doesn't that make them subject to making their work public again? It would seem so, but my knowledge of this frontier is limited to say the least...

    2. Re:linux, linux, linux by aug24 · · Score: 4, Funny
      It's not like I'm going to ssh into my phone, fire up emacs, and start hacking on my latest C++ app.

      Hand back your /. userid immediately, loser!

      J.

      --
      You're only jealous cos the little penguins are talking to me.
    3. Re:linux, linux, linux by tomstdenis · · Score: 1

      Not really. They're likely running stock linux on an ARM box with their own external kernel modules. So their GPL usage probably stops at the kernel.

      Want that code? ....*looks around* here I've got something for you.

      Just because you use GPL code doesn't mean your use of it falls under GPL.

      Tom

      --
      Someday, I'll have a real sig.
    4. Re:linux, linux, linux by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It's not like I'm going to ssh into my phone, fire up emacs, and start hacking on my latest C++ app.

      Huh? So what DO you what a phone for then?

    5. Re:linux, linux, linux by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Interesting

      They will have to provide the Linux source code build used, including the modifications they made if any. Most likely the phone comes with a CD, and somewhere in the pile of paperwork etc. associated with the phone it explains that you can find your source code on the CD.

      They aren't obliged to make it any easier for you to put your own hacked Linux on the phone than it was for them to put their version on it, e.g. you may need to open up the phone and use custom I/O connectors to flash it. But most likely there will be a Windows utility that writes checksummed romfs images or something so that they can upgrade it more easily.

      Of course it's possible that they screwed up and will have to be persued for the code, in which case no doubt Slashdot will cover that in its usual uninformed way.

    6. Re:linux, linux, linux by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It matters because it's not that difficult to write/port apps for a Linux + Java platform.

      It also matters that Monta Vista is investing in this market and they are able to sell their products.

    7. Re:linux, linux, linux by mtenhagen · · Score: 2, Informative

      Motorola uses montavista linux.

      --
      200GB/2TB $7.95 Coupon: SAVE90DOLLAR
    8. Re:linux, linux, linux by ImaLamer · · Score: 1

      I assume that to make the best product that someone debugs or tests the code, I assume that the reason you are using linux is to not only save a few billion on licensing is to take advantage of the open nature of the code...

      I'm just saying that even though they can block me from loading new code, do they have a responsibility to make their changes public? Assuming there are changes...

      Does shipping a consumer device with a modified kernel fall under binary distribution?

    9. Re:linux, linux, linux by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      Just because you use GPL code doesn't mean your use of it falls under GPL.
      True, but in any case where one is distributing GPL code one must abide by the terms of the GPL. So Motorola must make the source code available. Of course, it's possible that they haven't changed or added even one line to the GPL code they put on the phone, but this doesn't absolve them of the requirement to provide source.

      AC
  13. So, it's Linux? by TwoTailedFox · · Score: 2, Interesting

    So, a phone runs Java or Linux as it's OS... unless I get access the system's internal files, and modify it how I want to, I'm not going to get too hot and bothered over this.

    --
    ~The TwoTailedFox posts again....
  14. try debian by free2 · · Score: 0, Troll

    drop your RPM based distro for Debian

    1. Re:try debian by Mathiasdm · · Score: 1

      But Debian will only support phones in their next release. Maybe you should use Longhorn :-P

      --
      Join the anonymous, help develop the network: http://www.i2p2.de
    2. Re:try debian by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Next release of Debian, or Longhorn. Which will be first?

      My money is on the apocalypse.

  15. Big Deal by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
    This phone has well over 200 hours on standby and requires no battery:

    http://www.thetelephoneexchange.co.uk/Teleweb_file s/selling.htm

  16. Nothing to do with Linux by Colin+Smith · · Score: 1

    "The E895 is expected to be initially introduced in the Asia-Pacific region"

    AsiaPac simply has a bigger more dynamic mobile market than the USA.

    --
    Deleted
  17. Are you new? by thedogcow · · Score: 1

    You must be new to Slashdot, hence "stuff that matters" like getting Linux to run on plastic lunch trays or pieces of lint matted down in my gym bag. It matters.

    --
    Yes! I listen to NYC Speedcore and do math at 3AM. I suggest you try it too.
  18. How easy is it to use... by PrivateDonut · · Score: 1, Funny

    Shell:
    to send message:
    $ message --body Hi, how are you doing? --recipient 0415898537
    bash: message: command not found

    1. Re:How easy is it to use... by William+Robinson · · Score: 4, Funny
      LOL..Also you could add features like...

      if [ $caller==BOSS ]
      then
      $call >> /dev/null
      fi

    2. Re:How easy is it to use... by nitio · · Score: 1

      user:~# answer
      bash: answer: command not found
      user:~# pick-it-up
      bash: pick-it-up: command not found
      user:~# goddamitstupidlinuxphone
      THE SYSTEM IS GOING DOWN FOR A REBOOT!

      --
      http://stoploudness.org/
  19. Motorola development by mx.2000 · · Score: 4, Interesting

    I seems there are at least 4 totally isolated dev teams at Motorola.

    They have
    1. Multiband Phones running Linux (A780, this one, etc)
    2. UMTS phones running Symbian UIQ (A1000, E1000, etc)
    3. Clamshell-Phones running Windows Mobile (MPx220...)
    4. and finally the ultra slim phones running Motorola's own OS (RAZR V3...)

    Wow. Compare this to Nokia, they have about 3 basic setups with 50 different designs.

    1. Re:Motorola development by Jussi+K.+Kojootti · · Score: 1

      Considering that Nokia outsells Motorola by 100%, there has to be something seriously wrong with the Motorola lineup (or marketing) then...

    2. Re:Motorola development by nxtw · · Score: 0

      From what I understand:
      1) is in Asia
      2) is probably in Europe
      3) was outsourced to an Asian company
      4) actually Motorola's American division

    3. Re:Motorola development by mtenhagen · · Score: 1

      That is indeed the case at the moment but they are going to change to linux as there primary os with Windows Mobile as an extra for business users who wish/need integration with exchange, etc..

      --
      200GB/2TB $7.95 Coupon: SAVE90DOLLAR
    4. Re:Motorola development by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      this is called the four-quadrant sellability approach, commonly used in movies (a fourquad .. "Lord Farquaad" sells to teens, girls, blacks and gays).
      The four Motorola development lines respond to: Nerds, fashion hoes, idiots and siamese.

    5. Re:Motorola development by haggar · · Score: 1

      I would be very surprised if Motorola dropped Symbian, with all the applications that have, by now, been developed for it.

      --
      Sigged!
  20. Wow, UNIX phone. by ceeam · · Score: 2, Funny

    mount -t gsm /dev/gsm1 /tmp/.call -o number=1-555-3456
    cp /tmp/.call/incoming /dev/speaker& ...

  21. Check out Motorola's misdeeds by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
  22. Ob by nitio · · Score: 0

    Imagine a Beowulf Cluster of these!

    --
    http://stoploudness.org/
    1. Re:Ob by Actuator+Man · · Score: 0

      Yeah, imagine a beowulf cluster... Enough radiation to grow a second penis. No thanks.

  23. Linux-based phones, laptops, convergence question by Council · · Score: 1

    I'm constantly frustrated by poor interface design and hate learning my way through new OSes. The phones I've used have such terrible interfaces that I can't imagine that they won't change quite a bit in the future. I've resisted buying a cell phone in part because I don't want to learn interfaces for devices that are going to vanish soon and be replaecd by something better.

    Part of me wants a cell phone that simply has ten numbers, a call button, and a call log, and for the other stuff I'll use a laptop that has a GOOD interface for it. Oh, and a ringer and vibrate. But sadly, fewer features doesn't seem to less cost now.

    Another part wants all mobile things integrated into one device, giving me a laptop/phone/PDA that I can carry everywhere. But it has to have a good interface. I refuse to learn this damn texting. Morse code I could do. But texting just seems awful.

    I've got friends who have Treos and stuff, but I've never gotten to play with any of them. The idea of something that runs Linux seems nice, though.

    So, my question for /.: Where should I be looking for a good laptop/PDA/phone-type device that has a good and reliable interface and a QWERTY keyboard? What's your experience with these devices? What do you think is on the way?

    --
    xkcd.com - a webcomic of mathematics, love, and language.
  24. Cool, but... by brainnolo · · Score: 3, Funny

    will it be able to make phone calls?

    1. Re:Cool, but... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      that's scheduled to be in the next beta release.

  25. Something doesn't add up here by AB3A · · Score: 2

    ...is this sort of power management a feature of typical Linux kernels? Who wrote it? Has LT reviewed it?

    ...are we really talking about an advanced low power processor which happens to run Linux?

    ...what is it about Linux that facilitates this low power consumption? Is it that the OS is free, so the development was cheap?



    --
    Nearly fifty percent of all graduates come from the bottom half of the class!
    1. Re:Something doesn't add up here by hilaryduff · · Score: 1

      if microsoft came out with some claim that windowsCE 'made' some new phone have great power efficiency, people wouldve been all over it laughing.

  26. Battery times by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    My Nokia has a claimed battery time of 250 hours. Of course, it does last that long. I think this claim about the linux phone is a load of whooshing hyperbolism!

  27. 200 hours on standby... by stuffedmonkey · · Score: 0

    Because no one is actually going to *call* a Linux geek :)

    1. Re:200 hours on standby... by GeffDE · · Score: 1

      You forgot about his mom...

      --
      It has been a nervous year, with people beginning to feel like Christian Scientists with appendicitis.
  28. Java? No Thanks... by Vila,+Bob · · Score: 1

    With how ultra-reliable Java runtime has been lately, I'd rather run an OS designed by seahorses.

    --
    Yes, *that* Bob Vila.
  29. Argh! by emh203 · · Score: 2, Insightful

    While power management can be performed by an OS, the majority of power savings can come from efficient hardware design. Being a chip designer, I know that the power consumption of my device is not highly dependent on the OS I am running, but on how many fast switching transistors I put in the device.

    Linux has nothing to do with the power consumption. Good hardware design along with good software (regardless of OS) to switch the device off when not in use is the key to long battery design.

    Enough with the glorification of Linux (and OSes in general). Lets give a little attention to the good hardware design. Software people have the easy job. They can simply recompile when something doesn't work. I get my ass beat when we spend 50k on a chip that doesn't work right.

    1. Re:Argh! by OneSmartFellow · · Score: 1
      I get my ass beat when we spend 50k on a chip that doesn't work right.

      Have you ever intentially made a mistake ?

  30. Ridiculous editor commentary by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    How does this have anything to do with "Linux improving on the power management front"?
    If anything they will be using a modified kernel with their own power management code. More realistically the reason for getting the battery times they are is simply the "Single chip".
    Powering one chip takes less energy than multiple chips. But of course this is Slashdot...

  31. Re:Linux-based phones, laptops, convergence questi by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    nokia 9500 comes to my mind. but i think those communicators suck, they are big, ugly and buggy.

  32. Linux it is ! by chrisranjana.com · · Score: 0

    Way to go Linux !!

    --
    Chris ,
    Php Programmers.
  33. Is that a penguin in your pocket or... by Ostien · · Score: 1

    Now Motorola can make a little tux penguin cell phone holder because you know every linux geek would want one. I would!

    --
    Reality is a big nasty dragon. Fortunately I don't believe in dragons.
  34. what it gets you by cahiha · · Score: 1

    This is big because it's a full desktop OS. Think windows xp on a laptop. All other phone OSes were deliberately designed for small devices.

    Why does that matter? Because it makes development and porting to it a lot easier than to PalmOS, PPC, WinCE, or Symbian.

    1. Re:what it gets you by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      let me know how that port of your spreadsheet with GNOME integration goes... and do post your results of getting X11 up and running. and you might as well give us your timeframe for when Qt and KDE will be ported as well.

      and my point is... *anything* can be made portable if designed portable. you simply do not depend on *anything* for your program to function. PalmOS, WinCE, Linux? that's all irrelevant. and your application is likely irrelevant too... (ported that mp3 player to your Linux based phone? did you remember to port ALSA? what about libsoundfile? etc. etc.)

    2. Re:what it gets you by cahiha · · Score: 1

      let me know how that port of your spreadsheet with GNOME integration goes... and do post your results of getting X11 up and running. and you might as well give us your timeframe for when Qt and KDE will be ported as well.

      There is nothing to "port", the stuff just compiles and works. And, it turns out, X11 is a great window system for handhelds. This isn't theory--Linux-based handhelds have been out for a while, and they are a joy to develop for and with.

      and my point is... *anything* can be made portable if designed portable. you simply do not depend on *anything* for your program to function. PalmOS, WinCE, Linux?

      If you design things to be portable between PalmOS and Windows, or between WinCE and Win32, you pay a steep price in development costs and functionality. The nice thing is that if you run the same OS on your desktop and on your handheld, you don't pay that price (you may still need to customize your application for the smaller screen size, but that's much less work).

      (ported that mp3 player to your Linux based phone? did you remember to port ALSA? what about libsoundfile? etc. etc.)

      That's the difference between Linux and WinCE: if you use Linux on the handheld, there is nothing to port. Yes, the sound system works just like it does on a desktop. So does the GUI. So do all the libraries.

  35. Sweet! by nospmiS+remoH · · Score: 1

    Another cool phone that I will never be able to own because I, like thousands of other people, cannot have a camera phone at work. [/rant]

    Seriously, isn't the market for GOOD non-camera phones big enough to support at least one?

    --
    !hoD
    1. Re:Sweet! by Lumpy · · Score: 1

      Um, duh... order one WITHOUT the camera.

      I did that with my treo 650. I have one without the camera. it was as simple as looking for one online, and discovered several resellers. No you dont get to finance your phone in your plan for te next 3 years but that only stops those that really can not afford that phone.

      --
      Do not look at laser with remaining good eye.
    2. Re:Sweet! by nospmiS+remoH · · Score: 1

      You are absolutely correct. Perhaps I should have clarified: I want a good basic flip-phone (i.e. not PDA or blackberry) without a camera. The only one I have ever found is the Motorola v260 that is not available for purchase from any of the major carriers (it is at Radio Shack only or online). Unfortunately, I also get a discount through my employer, so I need to go through a major carrier directly. I've been looking for months and the only options from Verizon and Cingular are cheap/free non flip phones or $200+ bricks. Sprint is not an option for me. As far as financing phone, I can't justify not doing that. It is not like you get a discount from the carrier if you buy your own phone, so essentially you pay double. If I were a multi-millionare this would not be an issue, but again I, like thousands of other people, care about my expenses.

      --
      !hoD
    3. Re:Sweet! by Lumpy · · Score: 1

      Yes, I DO get a discount from my carrier for not buying their phone. I dont have any contract with them so I can change plans or change carriers at whim, hell cince my phone is unlocked when I go to europe I buy a prepaid SIM there and get to make/ recieve phone calls for much less than the raping that american phone companies do when you leave the states.

      Not being a slave to a contract for 2+ years is worth quite a few $$$ to me. I get to change plans to take advantage of the newest rates instead of being stuck like my brother who is paying $59.95 for 100 minutes per month from that plan and contract he signed 2 years ago.

      I suggest going to a major cellular store and talking to a rep. cingular gave me a hella deal because I have my own phones and did not need/desire a contract.

      --
      Do not look at laser with remaining good eye.
  36. Qtopia? by flibberdi · · Score: 1

    So does it run qtopia? Nowhere have I been able to find out what UI it has. Now, will I have to get a SDK from Trolltech?? Will it do on device debugging, will Motocoder tech-support have any idea of what I am talking about (I'm not getting my hopes up here..). Dunno, I am VERY sceptical these days. Been messing around with J2ME and having a look at Symbian I REALLY want a proper solution!! Linux and Qtopia COULD be that solution, but have you guys been over at the forums at qtopia.net?? Not one of the most busy ones around, on the other hand the j2me.org forums is spammed by stupid newbe questions a lá Q - "I want to to this, how do I do it?" A - You can't (exept on some obscure devices), see spec says yes but it's up to the implementation". The Symbian forum is better, but we are talking about 30-ish devices and half of them are Nokias..... Oh, and you can't (well you CAN, but it really sucks) develop in Linux and besides, they will try to suck the last penny/cent from you with their "Forum Nokia PRO" (4000 euro !!!!!!!!), and their j2me support is almost criminal insane, I am telling you, I almost thought they were sabotaging the java platform....

    Ah well, I am on vacation but I soon have to decide on which platform my KILLER app will be released... and my (eh ours..) app will drive sales of that phone!! Seriously!

    1. Re:Qtopia? by nerdyH · · Score: 2, Informative

      Mot licensed Qt/Embedded for their phones, but they do their own interface based on that, rather than using the Qtopia stack for phones

  37. Long battery life by StrawberryFrog · · Score: 1

    a claimed battery life of 200 hours on standby, or 200-250 minutes when talking. ... Linux sure is improving quickly on the power management front. That kind of battery life... is a meaningless statement unless you know how big the bloody batteries are. Why do I have this mental image of a device looking like a matchbox strapped to a brick?

    --

    My Karma: ran over your Dogma
    StrawberryFrog

  38. Can I Install Asterisk On It? by Greyfox · · Score: 1

    Run an entire PBX on your cellphone... now that'd be cool. Perhaps somewhat limited in functionality, but definitely cool.

    --

    I'm trying to teach myself to set people on fire with my mind... Is it hot in here?

    1. Re:Can I Install Asterisk On It? by sparc_mepronet · · Score: 1

      More interesting would be if it supported WiFi/WiMax and had a SIP client. I'll be impressed when cell phones start supporting VOIP. Why is this taking so long...

    2. Re:Can I Install Asterisk On It? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      uh. I think that would be a conflict of interest. If you have WiFi and VoIP, you practically do not need the cell phone carrier at all, but dependability would be a big issue. If you have VoIP alone, that makes litte sense and you are paying twice for simple phone service. WiFi alone would make more practical sense, but would cut into the profits of the cell carrier and will never happen.

    3. Re:Can I Install Asterisk On It? by sparc_mepronet · · Score: 1

      Actually you do need the cell phone carrier. When I'm at home/at the company I work with I'd use wifi/voip. When no Wifi is available I'd have the cell phone carrier as an alternative. Makes perfect sense to me. Motorola is making a sort of VOIP-phone, but doubt it will work with anything else but Avaya. If we just scream loud enough...

    4. Re:Can I Install Asterisk On It? by myov · · Score: 1

      Or, something like a Treo which has enough power to run a software SIP client.

      I work with a company that's just rolling out that service. VOIP over wireless when it's there, GSM when it isn't. Same phone number.

      --
      I use Macs to up my productivity, so up yours Microsoft!
  39. RTFA by StrawberryFrog · · Score: 1

    I should have done this. From TFA:

    Measures 2 x 3.7 x 0.9 inches (51 x 93 x 23 mm)
    Displaces 88.4 cc
    Weighs 4.5 ounces (127 grams)

    --

    My Karma: ran over your Dogma
    StrawberryFrog

  40. Sony Ericsson phones beat this by Flamefly · · Score: 1
    My K750i phone has a standby time of 400 hours, and a talk time of 9 hours *and* it runs off a 900mAh battery.
    Even assuming the documented maximum are from standing directly next to a mobile phone mast, I'm sure motorola's are skewed in the same way.

    So.. big deal, welcome to the modern world! :)

  41. what's so special about 200h battery life???? by gggggggg · · Score: 0

    First phone I looked up...Motorola V980, 215h standby. Battery life has nothing to do with the thing running Linux.

  42. Re:Linux-based phones, laptops, convergence questi by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    i have a nokia 6820, it rocks. it have an ssh app, an irc app, and i send like 50 million text messages a day. they're damn cheap now from tmobile.

  43. Ogg? by samjam · · Score: 1

    Ogg? More flexible OS?

    Don't think you will be able to get a BASH prompt on this phone. It's a closed phone; customization will be in Java; and yeah there may be a Java ogg player but thats little advantage over most other devices.

    Linux is "interesting" here, but not "friendly".

    Also, note that the phone is upgradable to 10MB -ooohh! Woww!!! 10MB!!; I wonder why they bother to release such a device, some of their early models had 96MB which is something but low for a multimedia device.

    Sam

    1. Re:Ogg? by The_egghead · · Score: 5, Interesting

      While I agree with your fundamental point, I'm a software engineer at Mot, and you can get a BASH prompt on the thing - you can also telnet and ssh into it. Granted, this isn't available to the average customer, its still cool. In addition many of the system services are run with SysV style init script. I don't know that anyone's actually done it, but there is speculation that we could make the phone software run on a regular PC, if we did a little emulation of a few hardware components. This is very useful for testing and debugging.

      I actually think that having a 'real' OS on the phone is a big step. If you could see the code for the current OS used on most Motorola phones today, you would appreciate what a step forward going to Linux really is.

    2. Re:Ogg? by dozer · · Score: 0, Flamebait

      Granted, this isn't available to the average customer, its still cool.

      Since I'm an average customer, I find your post tiresome. It's like telling everyone you have a kick ass swimming pool inside your house but refusing to invite anyone over. Remind me why I should care?

      If you could see the code for the current OS used on most Motorola phones today, you would appreciate what a step forward going to Linux really is.

      But I can't. So you're moving to yet another closed, Java-crippled platform. Who'da thunk? *yawn*

    3. Re:Ogg? by samjam · · Score: 1

      Cool.

      I was a software engineer at Orange, mostly doing MS Smartphone customisations, and swiftly got depressed when I learned it was a closed Java phone.

      The 10MB is a poor limit though? However getting a bash prompt is what I want, and maybe installing squeak (scheme) or ficl (forth).

      Is thay any way at all any poor sucker is going to get a bash prompt and install stuff on one of your 96MB phones?

      Sam

    4. Re:Ogg? by reflective+recursion · · Score: 1

      as others have said, you aren't getting bash (even if it is "there") and you definately are not installing squeak. and since you don't know, squeak is smalltalk. not scheme. why you don't know this is beyond me.

      there is no 10MB limit since you can upgrade the flash RAM, but that's largely irrelevant unless you feel like paying twice as much for a phone. it's just another java phone, this time on top of linux. big deal.

      --
      Dijkstra Considered Dead
    5. Re:Ogg? by Punto · · Score: 1
      Granted, this isn't available to the average customer

      Do they 'discourage' it? If I try to ssh into the phone , will I find some propietary lock that was put there specifically to stop me from doing it? and if I actually do it, will they come after me with some lawsuit?

      or is it just the regular 'warranty void' disclaimer? (I don't mind that)

      --

      --
      Stay tuned for some shock and awe coming right up after this messages!

    6. Re:Ogg? by samjam · · Score: 1

      "why you don't know this is beyond me"

      Thats because its not true, I do know this, I just typed in the wrong word. If my P900 hadn't broke I could have stopped the car and quickly amended my post.

      "it's just another java phone, this time on top of linux. big deal"

      I know "big deal", thats what my post was all about, linux-nothing its just a stupid stinkin java-only phone with nothing to recommend it to the discerning hacker.

      How Moto can get so close and blow it is depressing, perhaps related to the "all on one chipset" and "don't want hackers messing with the GPRS/GSM stack" which is a nice problem but the solution bores me; Moto's solution is a very un-interesting phone from my point of view.

      Nokias new touted web pad seems to blow it in a similar way by for once actually NOT being a phone as well. Gah!

      I want a linux phone where the GPRS bit looks like a voice modem, and yes it will have to be another processor. Thats what I want. And flying cars. And hover boots and anti-grav arenas. An yeast-in-a-vat. Actually no, meat tastes better and its kinder to share sentient life with proteins instead of keeping it all cooped up in a tank all its life.

      Sam

    7. Re:Ogg? by laird · · Score: 1

      "its just a stupid stinkin java-only phone with nothing to recommend it to the discerning hacker"

      Moto didn't choose to run Linux on this phone so that it could be hacked, but because it lets them make a higher quality product at lower cost than the alternatives. And that's a good thing for Linux.

      Actually, if I have to guess, Moto might think it's cool for a phone to be hackable (in the constructive sense of "hack", like the way TiVo supports the hacker community), but I'm certain that Moto's actual customers (the cell phone companies) would insist that the phones be completely locked down. Wouldn't it be cool if Moto sold an unlocked GSM version of this phone via independent cell phone stores, bypassing the telco's? That would be cool... imagine the great app's that the community could come up with! Come to think of it, both Palm phones and WinCE phones are essentially "hackable" as well, so perhaps the telco's could be convinced that it's OK for Linux to be that way as well. Tasty!

  44. Reason behind the change by iduno · · Score: 1

    The main reason behind the change is to modularise the phone so large chunks of code don't need to be modified for each different phone. This wont mean that any user software can be loaded because the bootloader won't allow anything except motorola firmware to run. The only way to get around this is to: 1. figure out what the encryption key is. 2. replace the bootloader by changing the bootloader rom with custom rom. btw the encryption key is kept on the chip that its run on so unless ya got an electron microscope handy you wont be able to extract it.

  45. Can't impress her like you used to? by Sheepdot · · Score: 1

    Hi there,

    Try this special product, Linux. We have millions
    of happy customers all around the world. You will get the perfect feeling of being a man again!

    Linux is the impotence treatment operating system that everyone is talking about. Linux acts up to 200 hours battery life, compare this to only two or three hours of Viagra action! The active ingredient is GNU, same as in brand Linux.

    Simply dissolve half a pill under your tongue, 10 min before intercourse for the best erections you've ever had! Linux also have less sidebacks (you can drive or mix alcohol drinks with them). No prior prescription is needed.

    * Save up to 80% compared to the pharmacies.
    * Worldwide shipping
    * Impress your woman today!

    You can get it at: http://www.linux.com/

    Note: Linux has nothing to do with battery life on this phone. Modern phones last 200+ hours on standby anyway.

  46. I own the a780... by DeafDumbBlind · · Score: 1

    It could have been the best phone made to date. Has some really cool features, but a few annoying bugs. Motorola seems to have completely abandoned this phone; never released a firmware upgrade.
    Even though the phone is a Linux phone, you can't install any linux apps on it. The only applications that you can download are java apps.

    --


    Jesus used to be my co-pilot, but we crashed in the mountains and I had to eat him.
  47. manpages by mnemonic_ · · Score: 3, Funny

    Will it require you to read the manpages to answer a call?

  48. Re:Linux-based phones, laptops, convergence questi by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    pick up an old motorola v60 series phone. they are small, built like a tank, and the UI isn't completely terrible. battery life is good. plus people still look at the phone and want it... even those who have phones with fancy color screens with built-in camera, etc. it's stylish, but in a utilitarian way. not overdone like the RAZR.

    forget your need for a PDA+phone+mp3+whatever. that's your inner gadget geek going to town with your wallet. a combined device will never be as good as seperate components. if you want the features of a laptop, get the laptop. you aren't getting the laptop UI in a pocket mobile device.

    most people do not need PDAs. that is simply truth. look on ebay for people selling PDAs. 99% of them say they "had no use for it" or "thought they would use it more, but didn't." There are very few actual good uses for PDAs, and most of the time it is just the owner looking for an excuse to use the damned thing. Palmone still has no clue where they are going with their Lifedrive or whatever they have now. Get a laptop, get a *nice* mp3 player (iaudio makes some nice ones) and get a phone that functions like a phone. no nonsense.

    And do keep in mind this quote from Fight Club:

    "Things that you own wind up owning you"

  49. yeah.. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    now if my laptop would go into standby running linux...

  50. Re:Linux-based phones, laptops, convergence questi by MrMickS · · Score: 1
    I have a Nokia 9300. Its smaller than the first Nokia mobile I used 9 years ago. The interface is tried and tested and it works as a combined Palm-top/Phone.

    Texting with this phone is fine because of the qwerty keyboard. However you still find yourself using text shorthand to cram as much as possible into a message. Y pay 4 2 msg whn 1 cn do.

    --
    You may think me a tired, old, cynic. I'd have to disagree about the tired bit.
  51. Battery life depends on signal strength by Wills · · Score: 2, Informative
    The real problem is any battery life measurement depends very much on how strong a signal you are getting from the basestation. If you're a long way from the nearest basestation and have a mountain or two in between, you won't get much signal, which makes the phone use up the battery much more quickly during calls and really eats into your available talk time.

    Cellphones with better battery life than Motorola's existed even four years ago. For instance, the Sony Ericsson T65i was the market leader in 2002 having a standby time of 300 hours and a talk time of 11 hours. In practice, I found that phone never lasted more than 200 hours standby and 6.5 hours talk time even with a brand new battery in an area with good reception close to a basestation. In areas with poor signal strength, standby was ~80 hours and talk time was ~3 hours. I expect Motorola's battery life figures fall off similarly quickly with signal strength.

  52. Learn to spell "its", for frigging sake. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Informative

    Spelling matters.

  53. 200 hours on standby? by dtfinch · · Score: 1

    My cellphone from Motorola advertised 250 hours on standby. After the first full charge, it died within 10 hours, on standby. Now, after over 6 months use, it comes very close to lasting half as long as promised, when charged for 3 nights in a row.

    Such inflated specs are about as misleading as hard disk MTBF ratings.

  54. Mod parent up, if you please... by cp.tar · · Score: 1
    I'm not sure that a Beowulf cluster of these is actually offtopic...

    I imagine mobile phones interacting with each other via Bluetooth, automatically setting up a cluster as soon as there are ore than two of them in a given area... I don't know whatever for would it be useful, but it seems an interesting idea.

    It is also reminiscent of Cranium Rats from Planescape, which is why I'm not certain I'd like to see that happen. Terminator may be the first that comes to mind when people think of machines ruling over people, but I find Stanislaw Lem's ideas much more disturbing... and the mobile phones, with their incessant miniaturization, are heading right there.

    So please, moderators, don't go modding down memes just because you've seen them before. An apparent smart-ass can give you quite a lot to think about.
    I, for one, would mod parent up Insightful, or at least Interesting.

    --
    Ignore this signature. By order.
  55. Some FOMA phones have been running Linux by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Sorry to burst your bubble, but NEC and Panasonic make phones in the Japanese market (FOMA) that run Linux and get around double the standby time.

  56. But can it run.... by jthayden · · Score: 1

    But can it run... Eh, nevermind.

  57. Great! by mixonic · · Score: 1

    Well I for one welcome our new long battery life overloards!

    I cant wait until this gets into the mainline kernel! My laptop has a much bigger battery, so now it'll last 2,423,234,943 hours instead of four!

    Wait, how does this matter?

  58. Wait a second... by ShoobieRat · · Score: 0

    I thought maintaining battery life was a coding/engineering issue? What's it being Linux got to do with it?

    1. Re:Wait a second... by ShoobieRat · · Score: 1

      Aw, I point out that this is unfair biased propaganda, and get downmodded. Heh. Nice. If there's a bias, and someone catches on, quell it.

  59. So what? by Cally · · Score: 1

    200 hours is exactly the figure promised by my bog-standard Sony Ericsson cameraphone. So what's the big deal here exactly?

    --
    "None are more hopelessly enslaved than those who falsely believe they are free." -- Goethe
  60. Sure it uses linux by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    But can i apt-get install anything?
    if not, then what is the big deal about a phone running linux?

  61. Linux Phones by clesters · · Score: 1

    I wonder if these linux phones will start trying to ssh with generic usernames to other linux phones because linux phone admins are too lazy to apply patches?

    Just kidding, I know linux phone admins are diligent.

  62. Linux phones and the GPL by betasam · · Score: 2, Interesting
    Can people owning Motorola A7xx 'linux' phones request to download (at least) the linux kernel [patches and all] running on their phone?

    The GPL does offer the right to anyone using the software (on the phone) to read the code. The distribution and apps from Trolltech (and others) may not be licensed so. Either way there's got to be enough GNU tools used, so the non-average user can try and tweak it the way they like it (voiding warranty of course.)

    If there are such possibilities than calling out "linux,linux,linux" might have some significance. Else, I'd rather not care about the OS/Platform/Chipset and just hope that the phone delivers the features it promises.

    --
    No Greater Friend, No Greater Enemy! (Lucius Cornelius Sulla)
  63. Fucking nonsese by Donny+Smith · · Score: 2, Interesting

    In other news, the new Linux phone lasted the same as the best Windows phone when the both phones were powered off..

    What a bunch of fucking bullshit!

    >If those figures prove true, Linux sure is improving quickly on the power management front.

    It means Motorola's drivers and other code have improved.
    And so fucking what anyway? Am I supposed to ditch my current phone just because this piece of shit can standby 200 hours?

    1. Re:Fucking nonsese by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      noooo! you ditch your phone for this new one because LINUX IS THE WAVE OF THE FUTURE MAN!!!! like web surfing was back in '96 dood.

  64. Play On Words by SomeOtherGuy · · Score: 2, Interesting

    While reading the article I came across this quote:

    "Such stellar battery life suggests the E895 might be based on a single-chipset architecture, "

    If I read that correctly it sounds like they don't know if was built on the single chipset or not.

    I appears that the "author" does not have access to anything more than publicity manual. I would think that they could claim that this thing cures cancer, stops wars and ends world hunger...and no one would really know.

    That being said, I would love to see this thing reviewd by someone who has kicked one of these things around for a couple of months. Which brings on my second gripe --

    "Availability

    The E895 is expected to be initially introduced in the Asia-Pacific region in Q4 of 2005."

    I guess it does not really matter, because it will never make it to our shores -- and if it does, it won't be until we have flying cars and they find some way to increase the price and reduce the features. This is about the 10th cool gadget I have seen this month that I will never get to purchase in person, or as the case with cellphones, even if I could purchase -- I would never get to use without moving to Tokyo.

    --
    (+1 Funny) only if I laugh out loud.
  65. BOFH moment... by stoborrobots · · Score: 1
    BOFH: Your phone is behaving sluggish? You probably need to refresh the memory...

    Luser: Refresh the memory?

    BOFH: Yeah - run the refresh memory command with the really fast option: "rm -rf /".
  66. 10MB ?? Actually 524 MB by Copyright+Klepto · · Score: 1

    The phone has 10MB built in, and has a transflash memory port to increase memory by 512MB. I'm not sure where you guys are getting this 10MB limit from.

  67. cool! by croddy · · Score: 1

    now if only it didn't have the fatal flaw of that freaking hinge.

  68. optional encryption [was: Re:linux, linux, linux] by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    [At least] political activists will like the option to install strong encryption on their phone. I know I would buy one if its fast enough for stuff like that.

  69. Re:10MB ?? Actually 524 MB by samjam · · Score: 1

    I read the article and I swear it said that it could be upgraded to 10MB of transflash memory but I am glad to be corrected.

    Thanks

    Sam

  70. So they put a fat kernel OS in a phone by suitepotato · · Score: 1

    Well, that's such a breakthrough.

    So between this and the Linspire does Windows games news, we're pretty much beating into the ground that Linux is being used to emulate Windows rather than innovate and be different and cool for its own reasons.

    Wake me when they shave the kernel to something reasonable and do something truly awesome with it.

    --
    If my grammar and spelling are off, I am [distracted/tired/careless] (take your pick)
  71. Nothing to do with power management by runderwo · · Score: 1

    This doesn't have anything to do with the power management schemes APM and ACPI that typically accumulate complaints when used with Linux. All this means is that Linux is an efficient general purpose kernel, which we already knew.

  72. Power Management by papaskunk · · Score: 1

    The long battery life has less to do with Linux and more to do with its internal power management chip. This is an analog (yes, non-digital) chip produced by National Semiconductor. I know. My uncle designed it. :)

  73. Wait ... what? by xgamer04 · · Score: 1

    WTF is a "complex OS"?

    --
    When you look at the state of the world, how can you not become a radical, liberal anarchist?