Slashdot Mirror


Intel On A Building Spree

Anonymous Cowherd writes "Intel will build two new facilities - a new chip plant and a new wafer plant. The new chip plant will be built in Kiryat Gat, Israel, continuing Intel's 30 years operation in the country. Intel already owns several facilities in Israel, both for R&D and for manufacturing. Previous developments of Intel Israel are the 8088 processor, MMX and the Centrino mobile platform. The new wafer plant will be built in an existing facility at Chandler, Arizona, and will feature 45nm technology - 1/1,333th the width of a human hair. The technology is two generations ahead of the current 90nm. Intel's Arizona operation includes production of the Pentium processor family and related chipsets."

298 comments

  1. Frugality by bigwavejas · · Score: 1, Funny

    Why don't they just takeover IBM's facilities?

    --
    "Simplify, simplify, simplify!" Thoreau
    1. Re:Frugality by TERdON · · Score: 3, Interesting
      1. IBM is going to churn out console processors from their own fabs?

      2. It isn't very easy to "upgrade" a semiconductor fab to latest tech, building a new one might actually be easier as you can make the buildings fit the purpose perfectly...

      --
      I have a really elegant proof for Fermat's last theorem. If this sig was only a bit longer...
    2. Re:Frugality by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Because some idiot pooped in the urinal a few weeks ago. The smell is still vivid in the fab. Who wants to buy that?

    3. Re:Frugality by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      omg aol so tru!

  2. 1/1,333th by Dayze!Confused · · Score: 5, Funny

    Thirth? I believe this should be 1/1,333rd.

    --
    "All tyranny needs to gain a foothold is for people of good conscience to remain silent." [Thomas Jefferson]
    1. Re:1/1,333th by jrockway · · Score: 5, Funny

      Actually, they obviouly meant to write "1/1,337th".

      --
      My other car is first.
    2. Re:1/1,333th by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

      Not "thirth", but "thith"... as in the Star Wars epic "Revenge of the Thith"

    3. Re:1/1,333th by weierstrass · · Score: 1

      Surely either "1/1,333", or "one 1,333rd"?

      --
      my password really is 'stinkypants'
    4. Re:1/1,333th by jjares · · Score: 1

      Actually, I think he means 3/4

    5. Re:1/1,333th by Aaron+England · · Score: 1

      You mean they meant, one one leet-eth.

    6. Re:1/1,333th by kesuki · · Score: 1

      Actually it translates to I teh leet-eth ;)

    7. Re:1/1,333th by jrockway · · Score: 2, Funny

      > You mean they meant, one one leet-eth.

      Or maybe even one mili-leet-er.

      --
      My other car is first.
    8. Re:1/1,333th by protohiro1 · · Score: 1

      mili-leet-er. Ha ha. That made me laugh.

      --
      Sig removed because it was obnoxious
    9. Re:1/1,333th by jackofallbrandnames · · Score: 1

      Thirth?

      Threeth.

      --
      The geek shall inherit the earth.
    10. Re:1/1,333th by mnmn · · Score: 1

      Please do not WOW slashdot users by using 'width of human hair'. Just give us the plain metric or scientific units like 1.3E-4 Something like .45nm fabrication plant will WOW me no matter what the fraction of ape hair it is.

      --
      "Give orange me give eat orange me eat orange give me eat orange give me you." -Nim Chimpsky
  3. Outsourcing.... by cayenne8 · · Score: 1
    'Oy'....we're outsourcing again...

    :-)

    --
    Light travels faster than sound. This is why some people appear bright until you hear them speak.........
    1. Re:Outsourcing.... by Marxist+Hacker+42 · · Score: 1

      And given Intel's recent hiring practices, Chandler, Arizona locals better get used to curry and kebabs.

      --
      SJW: a person who perceives an injustice, and while correcting it, commits a greater injustice.
    2. Re:Outsourcing.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      " And given Intel's recent hiring practices, Chandler, Arizona locals better get used to curry and kebabs." -- Marxist Hacker 42

      Well, when your dream of a socialist paradise is realized, you can keep out all of the foreign capitalist scum that you want.

    3. Re:Outsourcing.... by Marxist+Hacker+42 · · Score: 1

      Well, when your dream of a socialist paradise is realized, you can keep out all of the foreign capitalist scum that you want.

      It's not the foreign capitalist scum that is doing this- it's the home grown capitalist scum that has turned traitor against us.

      --
      SJW: a person who perceives an injustice, and while correcting it, commits a greater injustice.
    4. Re:Outsourcing.... by BuddyJesus · · Score: 1

      'Oy'....we're outsourcing again...
      How are they outsourcing if they are actually BUILDING additional facilities in the US?

    5. Re:Outsourcing.... by cayenne8 · · Score: 1
      "How are they outsourcing if they are actually BUILDING additional facilities in the US?"

      With reference to the part about doing it in israel.

      --
      Light travels faster than sound. This is why some people appear bright until you hear them speak.........
  4. How do the saudi's feel...? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

    Seriously...

    If you buy a laptop in Saudi Arabia, do they pop it open to make sure that CPU/centrino chipset wasn't made in Israel?

    Conversely, do the Israelis install tags in their chips to make them easier to find? Maybe that way they can sink the next USS Liberty just a little faster.

    1. Re:How do the saudi's feel...? by mnemonic_ · · Score: 1

      Holy fucking flamebait... but yes, the Liberty incident is infuriating to say the least...

    2. Re:How do the saudi's feel...? by Fareq · · Score: 1

      Oh, come on... it's not flamebait, it's funny

      Alas, I have no modpoints today...

      -- Andrew

    3. Re:How do the saudi's feel...? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      This should have been moded offensive.

  5. Ah, Science Journalism! by Lord+Marlborough · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Don't you just love it when a number as incomprehensible as 45nm is finally put in a graspable framework such as 1/1,333 the width of a human hair? It's like the insight given by the statement that a mole of marshmellows would cover the US 512 miles deep.

    1. Re:Ah, Science Journalism! by gardyloo · · Score: 3, Funny

      Gosh. It would really smell like mole-asses then.

    2. Re:Ah, Science Journalism! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      the little ones or the big ones?

    3. Re:Ah, Science Journalism! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Where would you get enough egg-white and sugar to make those marshmallows?

    4. Re:Ah, Science Journalism! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful

      How else do you propose to give the reader a sense of scale? A number like 1,333 is fairly comprehensible. Now imagine chopping up a hair that many times along its length. It's more interesting than trying to visualize 45e-9 meters which tells you nothing more than "45 meters divided by ten 9 times."

    5. Re:Ah, Science Journalism! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Sorry, I don't follow.

      Please explain it to me in terms of number of library of congresses or football fields.

    6. Re:Ah, Science Journalism! by Phurd+Phlegm · · Score: 5, Funny
      It's like the insight given by the statement that a mole of marshmellows would cover the US 512 miles deep.
      Nice going. Now that someone's thought of a 512-mile deep mole made of marshmallows, that's what Gozer will return as.
    7. Re:Ah, Science Journalism! by LionKimbro · · Score: 1

      I think the best way to understand it would be to draw a map of scale next to the article. "Here's the type of things that live at this part of the scale."

    8. Re:Ah, Science Journalism! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

      You do have a day job right?

    9. Re:Ah, Science Journalism! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful

      Just because you understand 45nm doesn't mean that everyone does. Adding in information to give a sense of scale that people can relate to doesn't take away from the article in this case, so why hate on it?

      Most people can't comprehend 45nm, so providing the scale imparts understanding to some people that they wouldn't otherwise have.

    10. Re:Ah, Science Journalism! by D4MO · · Score: 1

      > 1/1,333 the width of a human hair

      Would that be pubic or cranial?

      --

      Rocket science is easy. Neurosurgery, now *that's* difficult.
    11. Re:Ah, Science Journalism! by kesuki · · Score: 2, Interesting

      someone just re/watched ghost busters ;)

      hopefully they were thinking of this kinda mole

      although googling for 'mole' on image search (have safe search Off) brought up a really disgusting picture that i'll leave to the reader to find on their own... it's sure to bring nightmares to just about anyone *shudders*

    12. Re:Ah, Science Journalism! by gardyloo · · Score: 3, Funny

      although googling for 'mole' on image search (have safe search Off) brought up a really disgusting picture that i'll leave to the reader to find on their own...

            godda mn you prev poister -- thankfully I found a shar penedd pencill by touch with which to sta bout mine own eyes. and goddamn curioisity.

    13. Re:Ah, Science Journalism! by Deviant+Q · · Score: 1

      I saw a similar statement in my Chemistry book (high school), about marbles covering the earth, and decided to prove it. Interestingly enough, I found the book was off by several orders of magnitude! The marbles covered the earth much less than was predicted.

      --
      "May the days be aimless. Let the seasons drift. Do not advance the action according to a plan."
    14. Re:Ah, Science Journalism! by kjots · · Score: 1

      I would be more interested to know how many transistors they will be packing into the area of the cross-section of a human hair. That kind of information might actually be useful.

    15. Re:Ah, Science Journalism! by Bob-o-Matic! · · Score: 1
      Nice going. Now that someone's thought of a 512-mile deep mole made of marshmallows, that's what Gozer will return as.


      Oh, God I am glad I finished my Guinness before I read that. That should be modded like +26, Funny!

      Thanks for the laugh!

      Bob
    16. Re:Ah, Science Journalism! by kesuki · · Score: 1

      what were you expecting when I warned you 'search safe off' and 'disgusting picture' ;)

      I guess curiosity not only kills cats, but also causes severe pencil impact trauma on innocent cornea.

    17. Re:Ah, Science Journalism! by yellowalienbaby · · Score: 1

      Indeed, a mole of marshmallows would be massive, and fairly dangerous considering the power of their front paws. I wouldnt like to be responsible for maintaining the grounds after that fella has been rooting about. ..Mol Shurely Shome Mishtake

      --
      Darwin Hawking Blackmore
    18. Re:Ah, Science Journalism! by sunbane · · Score: 1

      " The new wafer plant will be built in an existing facility at Chandler, Arizona, and will feature 45nm technology - 1/1,333th the width of a human hair"
       
      It's wafer thin!

  6. Now that's small.... by pyst-off · · Score: 1, Funny

    "1/1,333th the width of a human hair" Will the newly hired employees be able to find the plant?

    1. Re:Now that's small.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      How can they build the chips if they can't fit in the building? It needs to be at least three times bigger.

  7. Uh huh by hobotron · · Score: 5, Funny


    "The technology is two generations ahead of the current 90nm."

    And it will take 2 generations to build.

    --
    There is truth in humor.
    1. Re:Uh huh by Iriel · · Score: 1

      And another 2 to afford!

      --
      Perfecting Discordia
      www.stevenvansickle.com
    2. Re:Uh huh by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I think the parent was trying to be insightful, not funny.

    3. Re:Uh huh by pakog · · Score: 1

      I've found that waiting for something is often much, much better than actually having it. Like computer games, half of the time the ones you've been waiting for dont live up to their hype and the other half they suck up your whole life and leave you friendless and malnourished for about the same amount of time it took to get bored of it. So lets hope our grandkids have a good time with their 1/1333rdofahumanhairtechonlogy.

    4. Re:Uh huh by Surt · · Score: 1

      By definition!

      --
      "Who is the Journal of Quantum Physics going to believe?" --Stephen Hawking
  8. Oh, bloody great use of numbers by gardyloo · · Score: 5, Informative

    The new wafer plant will be built in an existing facility at Chandler, Arizona, and will feature 45nm technology - 1/1,333th the width of a human hair.

          Yay for science writers using numbers in dumb ways. So glad that all humans have all the same hair thicknesses, and they're all about 59.99 microns. According to various sources (and I've measured hair diameters myself), they range from 200microns down to about 50 microns. So the article should have stated that the 45 nm technology is somewhere between 9/10000th and 9/40000th the width of a human hair. Wouldn't that be much more impressive? /sarcasm

    1. Re:Oh, bloody great use of numbers by TERdON · · Score: 2, Funny

      Actually, the variance in at least the summmary is far greater than that. In several countries, 1,333 is understood as 1.333 and NOT 1333. Which makes for a huge variance (although only two actual values). (And BTW, why wasn't that 1.337???).

      --
      I have a really elegant proof for Fermat's last theorem. If this sig was only a bit longer...
    2. Re:Oh, bloody great use of numbers by javamann · · Score: 1

      When I was a machinist our standard of measurement was a RCH. All discussion were based off that.

      PS

      (Red Cunt Hair)

    3. Re:Oh, bloody great use of numbers by iabervon · · Score: 1

      If they did that, they'd have to update their figures more often. This way, they can say that 45nm is 1/1333rd the size of a human hair, while 90nm is 1/1333rd the size of a different human hair.

    4. Re:Oh, bloody great use of numbers by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Stop posting this crap to Slashdot.

    5. Re:Oh, bloody great use of numbers by makomk · · Score: 1

      In several countries, 1,333 is understood as 1.333 and NOT 1333.

      Some of the newer Casio calculators have an option to switch between the two. In one of the modes, 1333 would actually *be* shown as 1.333...
      (evil grin)

  9. Globization... by __aaclcg7560 · · Score: 1, Insightful

    So much for the Made In The USA sticker.

    1. Re:Globization... by Adult+film+producer · · Score: 0, Flamebait

      Face it, Isreal is just another u.s. state... annual subsidies that run into the billions, financing "their" military with billions of dollars worth of our hi-tech equipment... it calls itself an independent nation but that's just a joke.. I wouldn't be surprised if Israel recieved more federal funding than many of the poor states in the u.s... and their habit of selling u.s. military technology & secrets to the chinese... at least they're making a profit.

    2. Re:Globization... by Marxist+Hacker+42 · · Score: 0

      Won't matter one bit. Israelis and Americans are far too expensive to staff these plants with- Intel supports IITians in their rush to bring Hinduism to America and Israel.

      --
      SJW: a person who perceives an injustice, and while correcting it, commits a greater injustice.
    3. Re:Globization... by BTWR · · Score: 0
      what a surprise: an article mentions a factory in Israel (the land mass, not the government/politics/controversies), and some asshole tries to rant his anti-Israel (and likely anti-semetic) politics.

      "Anti-Zionism is Anti-Semitism" - Martin Luther King, Jr.

      Leave the talk here to nerdy stuff. Take your Israel-bigotry to the craigslist forums. They're so out there, they think basically think Clinton was a radical right winger. Such idiots we have on these Internets...

    4. Re:Globization... by jericho4.0 · · Score: 1
      Facts; Israel gets more US military gear than anyone else. Israel regularly wins the US "Top Gun" air force meet. Israel replaces the avionics in their US jets with custom hardware. Israel refuses to sell that tech to the US. Israel fields spies in the US, etc....

      Hmmmm, they look pretty independent to me. Maybe you have it backwards....

      --
      "A language that doesn't affect the way you think about programming, is not worth knowing" - Alan Perlis
    5. Re:Globization... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      This is dead wrong, and I don't care if it was Dr. King that said it. There are many reasons to oppose the Israeli state, and anti-Semitism is only one such reason. Furthermore, those who criticize Israel in any way are often branded as anti-Semitic, which shuts down a healthy discussion about the conduct of the Israeli government. Furthermore, what if I say that the settlers are immoral nutjobs? I suppose it's anti-Zionist to say that, even though in fact many of those settlers oppose the Israeli state themselves. Your X=Y reasoning simply dumbs down the debate to an "am not-are too" type of argument.

    6. Re:Globization... by Adult+film+producer · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Give the "anti-semitic kneejerk retort" a rest would ya.

      "what a surprise: an article mentions a factory in Israel (the land mass, not the government/politics/controversies), and some asshole tries to rant his anti-Israel (and likely anti-semetic) politics" In case you didn't notice I was responding to someone lamenting the loss of a vibrant manufacturing base here in our country. My point that Israel is just another state in the union is valid, you're free to challenge that. But you haven't. Instead you resort to character assassination, nice job kid.

      You need to chill out and just quit with the knee-jerk accusations of anti-semitism, it has no place in this discussion.

    7. Re:Globization... by JanneM · · Score: 4, Insightful

      I agree it's off-topic.

      However, you imply that any critizism of Israeli politics or policy, or politics or policy connected to Israel, would be anti-semitic. That is BS. Israel is another sovereign state, and one that is democratic no less, and should be subject the same amount of scrutiny as, say, French, American, Russian or Japanese politics and policies. There is no perfect country and no perfect state anywhere in the world, and none that comes even close. But screaming "anti-semitism!" whenever shortcomings are pointed out certainly doesn't encourage discussion and doesn't help anyone redress them.

      --
      Trust the Computer. The Computer is your friend.
    8. Re:Globization... by blincoln · · Score: 1

      However, you imply that any critizism of Israeli politics or policy, or politics or policy connected to Israel, would be anti-semitic. That is BS.

      Mod parent up.

      I like Judaism. I am very good friends with a Jewish family. I'm nonreligious, but for an organized religion it has a lot of really great ideas and their ceremonies are beautiful.

      I understand why many Jews wanted a country of their own after the holocaust.

      This does not mean I must logically or ethically support the idea of Israel in particular, or Zionism in general.

      Israel is located in literally the worst possible place for Jews to pick in the entire world. Every country on every side of them is full of people from cultures that not only haven't been able to get along with the Jews for millennia, but often can't get along with each other. Violently.

      So now, because the founders of Israel wanted to be able to fulfill the prophecy of rebuilding the Temple that was destroyed on its original site, the US has to pour billions of dollars every year into that country to make sure it's impractical for the other Middle Eastern countries to invade.

      Meanwhile, the Israeli government is so grateful for that assistance that it spies on the US.

      Finally, the attempts to "settle" Israelis inside the occupied territories are just ludicrous. Imagine the reaction if the US had built heavily armed concrete fortresses for Americans to live in permanently in Japan, Germany, or Iraq.

      offtopic, no karma bonus.

      --
      "...always new atoms but always doing the same dance, remembering what the dance was yesterday." -Richard Feynman
    9. Re:Globization... by klasikahl · · Score: 1

      Israel is located in literally the worst possible place for Jews to pick in the entire world. Every country on every side of them is full of people from cultures that not only haven't been able to get along with the Jews for millennia, but often can't get along with each other. Violently.

      I suggest you do more research. Jews lived in peace with Arabs in Persia for centuries up until the collapse of the Ottoman Empire. (Persia is modern day Iran.) Jews also lived in what is now Saudi Arabia, Jordan, Afghanistan, and many other Arab countries extremely peacefully - often in beneficial symbiotic relationships - up until about 1910. In the 1910s, the Jews began mass immigration to Israel from mostly Eastern Europe. The Jews and Arabs (Jordanians) living in modern day Israel got along very well and there are countless stories of the Arabs actually teaching the immigrant Jews to farm their new land. In 1917 (I believe), a jihad was declared by a radical cleric against the Jews living in Israel after a couple of clashes between a large Jewish family and a large Arab family. The clashes are believed to be over a land dispute of 100 or so acres. Basically, after that Arab-Jewish relations went to shit.

    10. Re:Globization... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "Israel is located in literally the worst possible place for Jews to pick in the entire world. "

      Unfortunately it is the one place that Jews have a right to establish a state. There was a self-governing Jewish population there until Imperial Rome used its armed forces to put an end to it. This is a historical, not a theological, claim.

    11. Re:Globization... by killjoe · · Score: 0, Flamebait

      That's overly simplistic. The fact is that TODAY the state of Israel is acting in an uncivilized manner towards people it is occupying illegally. If any other country in the world tortured people, took over private property, built walls, killed thousands of innocents, destroyed houses of people whose only crime was to be related to a criminal then they would be invaded by the US and the leaders jailed.

      Notice that I am in no way, shape or form defending what the palestenians do, I am simply pointing out that Israel acts as an uncivilized nation. As the grandparent said, imagine if Mexico formed armed and walled cities in texas by displacing texans from their homes and then lauchned missiles into Huston every time an American shot at a mexican occupying force.

      --
      evil is as evil does
    12. Re:Globization... by killjoe · · Score: 1

      If anti zionism is anti semitism then zionism MUST be racism. I don't see how you get past that.

      --
      evil is as evil does
    13. Re:Globization... by droopycom · · Score: 1


      > Imagine the reaction if the US had built heavily
      > armed concrete fortresses for Americans to live
      > in permanently in Japan, Germany, or Iraq.

      You mean, they should rotate the colons every now and then like the US does in Ramstein, Okinawa and Bagdad ?

    14. Re:Globization... by Kamsky · · Score: 1

      Perhaps you've never heard of Intel's Global Virtual Factory? It's been in operation for over a decade. Engineers in countries across the globe work on identical manufacturing lines, solving the same problems and then, as the sun sets, handing them off westward to the next cohort. Besides, how could you begrudge Israel with all of it's intellectual talent and its status as a US territory?

    15. Re:Globization... by renoX · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Bah, this is a very weak historical claim.

      You and I are probably from Africa originally, so should we be able to go to Africa and establish a state here?

      Who care what occured milleniums ago? Only recent history matter.

    16. Re:Globization... by __aaclcg7560 · · Score: 1

      I'm quite familar with working across the globe. I once led a software testing project where I had to coordinate work from California with people in the Eastern U.S., Great Britain, and Australia. Pain in the butt since I had to be up at Midnight and 6AM Pacific Time to answer any questions in real time but it was probably the most rewarding project that I worked on.

      My comment was not specifically about Israel (although I should've put in a disclaimer to that effect). If the story was about how Toyota picked Canada for a new auto plant because Canada offers better health insurance (which means a better workforce) despite generous offers from politicians in Southern U.S. (which doesn't have a better workforce), the comment would still apply. (I would link directly to the San Jose Mercury News article but the link is fubar; try Google instead.) Manufacturing capability is disappearing in the U.S. but nothing is being done to reverse this trend except wave it goodbye.

    17. Re:Globization... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      There is no perfect country and no perfect state anywhere in the world, and none that comes even close. But screaming "anti-semitism!" whenever shortcomings are pointed out certainly doesn't encourage discussion and doesn't help anyone redress them.

      Then it's just a coincidence that Israel is the one country most often singled out for criticism for broadly shared faults? Of course not all criticism of Israel is anti-semitism, but when only Israel is criticised, it makes one wonder if the criticism is valid.

    18. Re:Globization... by identity0 · · Score: 1

      What the hell? Although calling Israel a US state is insulting, every point the guy said is true. And he didn't even start on the Palestinian conflict.

      From the American Forces Press Service:
      The increased competition brought about by EU arms sales to China could also lead Russia and Israel -- currently the largest suppliers of arms and military technology to China -- to relax their existing limits on such sales.

      From the International Herald Tribune:
      For many years, Israel has received the largest sum of U.S. aid. Washington provided $2.3 billion in military aid and more than $500 million in economic assistance last year, according to the U.S. Embassy in Israel.

      And in case you're wondering if he was being too anti-Israeli: 51st state on Wikipedia:
      While sometimes used in a serious political context, it is often used colloquially or humorously to refer to associates which act based on American influences, such as Australia, Canada or the United Kingdom.

    19. Re:Globization... by Marxist+Hacker+42 · · Score: 1

      The problem is that in this day and age, Zionism has also become Anti-Semitism; because the Palestinians and Arabs are racially Semites as well.

      --
      SJW: a person who perceives an injustice, and while correcting it, commits a greater injustice.
    20. Re:Globization... by Marxist+Hacker+42 · · Score: 1

      It's a correct claim- and it has lessons for us today. The REASON Imperial Rome used it's armed forces to put an end to it was Jewish Zionist Terrorism. The only answer was to kill 50 Jews for every Centurion killed, destroy Jerusalem itself, and sow the land with salt so that it would be over a thousand years before the land would produce food again.

      Today, we face a group of Semite terrorists- and that answer is one possible solution still today.

      --
      SJW: a person who perceives an injustice, and while correcting it, commits a greater injustice.
    21. Re:Globization... by Marxist+Hacker+42 · · Score: 1

      Finally, the attempts to "settle" Israelis inside the occupied territories are just ludicrous. Imagine the reaction if the US had built heavily armed concrete fortresses for Americans to live in permanently in Japan, Germany, or Iraq.

      They weren't concrete- but this is basically what happened in Cascadia to the Kwakiutal nation. Some of us still consider the lands from the Pacific Ocean to the Great Divide, from the California border to Alaska, to be occupied territory from foreign invaders.

      --
      SJW: a person who perceives an injustice, and while correcting it, commits a greater injustice.
  10. What about their plant in Colorado? by dptalia · · Score: 3, Interesting

    They built a huge plan in Colorado right before the Tech Crash. The the crash came they abandoned the plant (the most expensive building ever in the state). Is this building unusable? It was supposed to be a "nest generation" chip plant after all!

    --
    Genius is one percent inspiration and 99 percent perspiration, which is why engineers sometimes smell really bad.
    1. Re:What about their plant in Colorado? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful

      Do you mean this plant?

    2. Re:What about their plant in Colorado? by OSSRocks · · Score: 1

      Actually "THEY" didnt build that.. they bought it and tried to retro-fit it. And yes the tech crash... and recently accounements take the lifespan of that site out to 2010+ (without getting anything added to their workload)

    3. Re:What about their plant in Colorado? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Insightful

      I really, really wish people would get their facts straight. I used to work at the plant in Colorado about 5 months ago. I left, the plant is still there. in fact, they are currently expanding that facility right now.

    4. Re:What about their plant in Colorado? by OSSRocks · · Score: 1

      yes as i was pointing out to the poster, as well as it was purchased and not built by Intel. but when you read the story and it talks about two seperate things.. a CHIP and WAFER plant it sets the tone for the posts i suppose

    5. Re:What about their plant in Colorado? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Actually no, there were two "facilities" in Colorado Springs. They built the fab that is still up and makes memory by the Garden of the Gods(my college room mate worked there when it opened). The other facility (north of town and visible from the interstate) they bought from Rockwell and is now for sale.

    6. Re:What about their plant in Colorado? by kesuki · · Score: 1

      Ah typical of slashdot ^_- the ggggp knew that intel had scrapped a plant in colorado but didn't know they had another plant there, and the people who worked at the plant there didn't know they had bought and scrapped plans to use a different plant there...

      those of you wondering, yes, if you work at fab 23 it's still there... unless of course someone did something like... this!

    7. Re:What about their plant in Colorado? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It was supposed to be a "nest generation" chip plant after all!

      It was a nest generation plant. Intel just decided to leave that nest.

  11. Austin by boristdog · · Score: 5, Interesting

    Maybe they'll actually finish these buildings, unlike the big development center they started in Austin and then left unfinished. A big, half-constructed building sitting in the middle of downtown for the last 5 years.

    And the city council gave them millions in tax breaks to leave an eyesore downtown...

    1. Re:Austin by Mes · · Score: 1

      amen. it is pretty damn ugly. Although maybe we dont need any more construction downtown right now.. We've got enuf as it is. But Intel getting a break on their property taxes pisses me off when I look at what I have to pay to make up the difference.

    2. Re:Austin by OSSRocks · · Score: 1

      That old place was slated to be Fab16.. its nickname is now SLAB16 .. its been sold in case your interested and the Gov. there (county i believe) basically but a screetching halt by pulling the BOND out from underneath Intel's feet after the slab was laid down.. so blame that on local government or there would have probably been a new factory announcement there in Austin as well.. seeing how there were at one point great plans to develope in that area.

    3. Re:Austin by JpMaxMan · · Score: 1

      i'm not sure where you get your intel, but you should share it with the local Austin media. I'm sure they'd be interested to know that local government doomed this builidng to more years in purgatory!

    4. Re:Austin by woo2the2 · · Score: 1

      I'm pretty sure the city you are referring to was Fort Worth and not Austin. Maybe I'm wrong and there was another incident in Austin.

      Intel essentially got caught with its pants down with the downturn/implosion in 2000. The whole fiasco was pretty much a lose-lose for BOTH Fort Worth and Intel - stopping everything at that stage in the game was a lot of money poured down the drain - I'm actually surprised they were honest with themselves enough to make the decision to stop given the momentum things like that have - although I'm sure lots of people lost their job over it!

    5. Re:Austin by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The whole point of the Austin plant was a stick in the eye of AMD. It's just like having Wal-Mart with a store near the Costco HQ. Just something to remind them that they are there.

    6. Re:Austin by DavidSJ · · Score: 1

      At least it's not the Ryugyong Hotel.

    7. Re:Austin by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      > I'm pretty sure the city you are referring to was Fort Worth and not Austin.

      You may be pretty sure, but you are also wrong.

      It's Austin and it's an eyesore.

  12. Human Hairs by TonyMillion · · Score: 2, Interesting

    What I'd like to know is whos hair they use as this baseline, or is all human hair the same thickness?

    1. Re:Human Hairs by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I have realy thick hair. It's like, twice as thick as normal hair. Does this make 45nm equal 1/666 the thickness of my hair, cause that'd be cooler.

    2. Re:Human Hairs by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      In engineering an RPH (Red Pubic Hair) is the traditional standard. IIRC you can get them calibrated with NIST traceability.

    3. Re:Human Hairs by tOaOMiB · · Score: 1

      "...is all human hair the same thickness?"

      Somewhat on topic: NO, human hair isn't all the same thickness, and this problem is even leading to lawsuits!
      Standardize hair thickness now!

    4. Re:Human Hairs by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I would like to propose we use Robin William's hairs as the standard.

    5. Re:Human Hairs by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Thomas, is that you?

  13. Chips, wafers by gunpowda · · Score: 5, Funny

    Where's the waffle factory? We need to know!

    1. Re:Chips, wafers by ehiris · · Score: 1

      This reminds me of a story on how Micron got started.
      J.R. Simplot (Idaho potatoes magnate) who was one of the initial investors in Micron thought that he is investing in building a plant that makes potato chips.

    2. Re:Chips, wafers by PsiPsiStar · · Score: 1

      I don't think the story is true (or if so can you post a link?) More of a running joke. Though a potato chip magnate did invest heavily in Micron.

      Just so noone gets confused.

      --

      ___
      It's the end of my comment as I know it and I feel fine.
    3. Re:Chips, wafers by Dun+Malg · · Score: 2, Interesting
      This reminds me of a story on how Micron got started. J.R. Simplot (Idaho potatoes magnate) who was one of the initial investors in Micron thought that he is investing in building a plant that makes potato chips.

      Yeah, that's such a hilarious joke. Every exasperatingly possible permutation of it was used for years by would-be humorists in the trade rags. Further proof that business journal writers should stick to business and stay away from comedy.

      In reality, JR Simplot invested in Micron at the urging of his youngest son Scott who, as Director of Planning and Information Technology for Simplot (the corporation), knew full well the difference between microchips and potato chips.

      --
      If a job's not worth doing, it's not worth doing right.
    4. Re:Chips, wafers by bruthasj · · Score: 1

      We all know that Massachusetts produces the most waffles.

  14. ob. google troll: by Thud457 · · Score: 1

    According to google satellite, there is no fab plant in Chandler, Az!!

    --

    the preceding comment is my own and in no way reflects the opinion of the Joint Chiefs of Staff

    1. Re:ob. google troll: by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Informative

      Actually the two existing wafer fabs are south of that location (near Queen Creek Blvd). That site is offices and R&D

    2. Re:ob. google troll: by Combuchan · · Score: 1

      Anyone want to wager a guess as to what the GIANT SPRAWLING FACTORY on the lot to the direct northwest of the google marker is?

      I'll give you a hint.

      --
      "[T]he single essential element on which all discoveries will be dependent is human freedom." -- Barry Goldwater
    3. Re:ob. google troll: by aklix · · Score: 1

      The roofs of some of the buildings even looks like the bottom of a processor!

    4. Re:ob. google troll: by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Packaging Development Site... not a wafer fab.

  15. Water by said_captain_said_wo · · Score: 4, Informative

    What is the estimate of how much water these plants will consume? Do the communities in which these plants are being put understand what the impact will be? Chip fabs usually consume lots of water.

    Links from google:
    1 2 3

    1. Re:Water by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Informative

      Actually we dump the water back into the community. The loss is trivial.

      And, due to regulations, the water is cleaner when we dump it than when we input it into the factory. Now, the question is "why not just recycle the water?" If the fabrication process wasn't black magic this would make sense. But, we really don't understand what affects yeild. So, once yeild is high you are not allowed to change anything. When it is low, change whatever you want.

      Intel after all is not an engineering company. It is a manufacturing company.

    2. Re:Water by Surt · · Score: 1

      The key is to remember not to give away water for free. Then no matter how much a plant like this uses, you can always go buy more from another source.

      --
      "Who is the Journal of Quantum Physics going to believe?" --Stephen Hawking
    3. Re:Water by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      > What is the estimate of how much water these
      > plants will consume?

      That's a darn good question (or at least, a
      concern). Phoenix has been in a long drought
      cycle and it isn't clear that it is going to
      end anytime soon. The Colorado River is at
      record lows, and Lake Roosevelt (to the east
      of Phoenix) has been very low for a long time
      now. However, Phoenix is still growing like mad
      and no one seems that concerened about it. They
      will be kicking themselves though if this turns
      out to be one of those 40-50 year drought cycles.
      Of course I haven't lived in Phoenix for couple
      of years now, but I don't think the situation
      has changed any. Anybody got the latest and
      greatest news?

    4. Re:Water by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Your post just indicated chip fabs:

      1) don't know what's in the water when they get it, that effects chip yields.

      2) hence, don't know specifically what's changed about the water and it's chemical effects when they sell it back to the commuity, and how those changes effect thier yeilds.

      3) You seem to assume they know enough about public health to assume it won't have an effect... hence the rationalization that the water must be good enough for public consumption but not good enough for chip fabrication....

      Seems pretty dubious. Why don't they just recycle water for chip fab? The voodoo argument doesn't "carry much water" so to speak.

      Considering cellular mechanics are far more complex and less well understood than chip design, and it's not chip designer's field of expertise, the reassurance isn't terribly reassuring.

      Again, why don't they just recycle the water if it's so clean? Certainly they purify it upon taking it in, and you claim they purify it prior to sale to be even cleaner than when they bought it....

      Something doesn't add up there.

    5. Re:Water by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You seem to know what you're talking about, but I strongly disagree with the assertion that Intel is not in the business of engineering - at Intel manufacturing and engineering go hand in hand.

    6. Re:Water by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yeah, it's called a profit, and in many ways what they are doing makes sense.

      The water going in will more than likely be and remain the same, when they rotate the filters, they will do so according to a strict schedule. The water is no longer a variable.

      When they release the water back, it more than likely has all heavy metals and known problem chemicals removed, it is then more than likely sent into the sewer to be treated with everything else, including the loads of stupid shit people dump down the drain anyhow, so I'd bet what intel is releasing when they're done is fairly clean stuff. Probably cleaner than the drinking water in many communities to begin with, take the anti-corporate bullshit elsewhere and move out of mom's basement

    7. Re:Water by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "Considering cellular mechanics are far more complex and less well understood than chip design, and it's not chip designer's field of expertise, the reassurance isn't terribly reassuring."

      uhhh yes because only chip designers work in a factory... NOT

    8. Re:Water by Jamie+Lokier · · Score: 1

      Yeah, it's called a profit, and in many ways what they are doing makes sense.

      The water going in will more than likely be and remain the same, when they rotate the filters, they will do so according to a strict schedule. The water is no longer a variable.

      When they release the water back, it more than likely has all heavy metals and known problem chemicals removed, it is then more than likely sent into the sewer to be treated with everything else, including the loads of stupid shit people dump down the drain anyhow, so I'd bet what intel is releasing when they're done is fairly clean stuff. Probably cleaner than the drinking water in many communities to begin with,

      Sure, that makes sense. The water had better be cleaner than when it went in because some of the chemicals it's in contact with in the factory are quite toxic.

      What doesn't make sense is why it's not recycled. You haven't given a good explanation for that.

      You said it's ok to tamper with the factory design while yields are low, and not to tamper with anything including the water process while yields are high.

      But that explanation does not make sense: 1. Why isn't the water recycled at the low yield stage? 2. If altering the water process makes any observable difference to the yields, that logically implies that you either don't know what's in the water you're putting out of the factory, or you don't know what's in the water coming in.

      Evidently you do measure both of those things in great detail otherwise you couldn't legitimately say what goes out is safe for the public water supply... So where's the problem with recycling?

      take the anti-corporate bullshit elsewhere and move out of mom's basement

      So quick to switch from logic to name-calling? There's nothing anti-corporate about pointing out that your explanation, in the absence of further context, makes no logical sense.

    9. Re:Water by JollyFinn · · Score: 1

      I think what he tried to tell you that the fabs are doing things EXACLY like other Intel fabs.
      Now if first fab of certain kind do not recycle then no-other fab either. The yield is the reason for such mentality. Not recycling water might be excessive on that mentality but the mentality makes difference in yield. Or lack of difference in yield between intel fabs ;)

      --
      Emacs is good operating system, but it has one flaw: Its text editor could be better.
    10. Re:Water by Jamie+Lokier · · Score: 1

      That would make sense if the new fabs were doing things exactly like other fabs. But they're not: this is the new 45nm process, supposedly 2 generations ahead of the ones currently used for mass production. There's more to that than just changing the optics... And frankly, they've had 40 years to get around to recycling the water - considering how much complexity goes into purifying it and measuring it, and the number of times every part of the fabbing process have changed, recycling would seem to be a no-brainer if they're really not polluting downstream as they'd claim...

      My (uneducated) guess is that they need to emit plenty of water to ensure the trace substances which are difficult to dispose of any other way are sufficiently diluted that the outgoing water is considered safe. And that's probably ok, but difficult to confirm.

      -- Jamie
    11. Re:Water by justins · · Score: 1
      Now, the question is "why not just recycle the water?"

      I would think the answer involves waste heat...
      --
      Now before I get modded down, I be to remind whoever might read this that what I am saying is FACT. - bogaboga
  16. A global corporation by roman_mir · · Score: 0, Flamebait

    Isn't Intel based in the USA? Interesting to see that in light of the latest tensions between Israel and the USA Intel is going forward with the new factory deal and that the US government is not preventing them from doing that. Then again, the US government wouldn't bite a feeding hand, would it?

    1. Re:A global corporation by pickyouupatnine · · Score: 1

      Israel and US are BIG allies. There wouldn't be a modern Israel if it weren't for the US... or a modern US if it weren't for Israeli innovation (they be some smart folks over there). Any tentions between the two are minor compared to their relationship. Intel knows this. To them its just like opening a plant in the USA - but making use of a pretty smart scientific base.

      --
      _Vishal www.squad9.com
    2. Re:A global corporation by roman_mir · · Score: 1

      but making use of a pretty smart scientific base. - are you implying that the scientific base in the USA is not smart enough to open another Intel plant? (I live in Canada, I am just asking.)

      I don't believe that. I think this has to do more with that half a billion dollar grant Intel will be getting from the government of Israel and possible tax breaks.

    3. Re:A global corporation by The+Lynxpro · · Score: 3, Insightful

      "I don't believe that. I think this has to do more with that half a billion dollar grant Intel will be getting from the government of Israel and possible tax breaks."

      Tax breaks which would not be possible if the U.S. stopped financially (and militarily)supporting the State of Israel. So technically, the U.S. government through its foreign policy is supporting this outsourcing. However, considering the power of the pro-Israel political action committee(s), I doubt this will be mentioned the next time Democrats raise the issue of outsourcing against the President and his economic policies. Instead, they'll bash India and China (and score approval points while doing so in the polls) while approving the continuation of such aid that leads to virtual job losses amongst the tech community here in the States. And consequently, more American college students will elect for a major in physical education over computer sciences.

      --
      "Right now, somewhere in this world, Scott Baio is plowing a woman he doesn't love," - Peter Griffin, *Family Guy*
    4. Re:A global corporation by chill · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Sorry, no.

      There are several U.S. military contractors, and even sectors of our gov't that are prohibited from using Checkpoint firewalls because Checkpoint is Israeli and closed source. Too much potential for abuse.

      This is just one example of many.

        -Charles

      --
      Learning HOW to think is more important than learning WHAT to think.
    5. Re:A global corporation by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      tentions..... Wow, I'm speechless. That's amazing.

  17. Oy, Israel and Intel CPU chips by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Alright... I'm just waiting for someone to post a comment here involving both Moore's law and Godwin's Law simultaneously.

    1. Re:Oy, Israel and Intel CPU chips by cayenne8 · · Score: 1
      " Alright... I'm just waiting for someone to post a comment here involving both Moore's law and Godwin's Law simultaneously.

      Why...no one here mentioned the nazis...

      Oops....

      :-)

      --
      Light travels faster than sound. This is why some people appear bright until you hear them speak.........
  18. Another plant in the arid Southwest? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Why does Intel always seem to locate it's new fab plants in deserts where water is scarce (they have a fab in Albuquerque as well), when fabs guzzle jillions of gallons of water a day? Israel isn't exactly a rainforest either...

    I guess economic development trumps common sense. Personally I'd rather have the water.

    1. Re:Another plant in the arid Southwest? by iggymanz · · Score: 1

      rivers, lakes and high water tables make for incriminating telltales when highly toxic industrial waste is covertly buried.

    2. Re:Another plant in the arid Southwest? by The+Lynxpro · · Score: 1

      "Why does Intel always seem to locate it's new fab plants in deserts where water is scarce (they have a fab in Albuquerque as well), when fabs guzzle jillions of gallons of water a day? Israel isn't exactly a rainforest either..."

      Using your post's logic, perhaps Intel should locate a plant at Antartica and consequently prevent the worldwide sea level rise caused by the melting away of Antartica's ice. That would be good corporate citizenship in practice... :)

      --
      "Right now, somewhere in this world, Scott Baio is plowing a woman he doesn't love," - Peter Griffin, *Family Guy*
    3. Re:Another plant in the arid Southwest? by Octorian · · Score: 1

      Well, it sounded like their main Israel facility is in Haifa. That's in the north of the country, along the coast, and not as desert-like as the southern parts we always think of.

      Also, the location would put them near Technion University, so they'd have the academic research base to support their operation as well.

    4. Re:Another plant in the arid Southwest? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Using your post's logic, perhaps Intel should locate a plant at Antartica and consequently prevent the worldwide sea level rise caused by the melting away of Antartica's ice. That would be good corporate citizenship in practice... :)

      Actually, it'd probably accelerate the process of melting glaciers, especially if they're making (and testing) P4's there. :)
    5. Re:Another plant in the arid Southwest? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Moisture is not preferable for fabs and increases chances for contamination.

    6. Re:Another plant in the arid Southwest? by Zachary+Kessin · · Score: 1

      Well Intel has places all over Israel, they have a very large building in Petach Tikvah, as does IBM (i have no idea what they do in them, I just take the bus past them every morning as I go into Tel Aviv).

      Kirat Gat is just outside of Ashlalon, about half way between there and Hebron. No idea why they chose to put it there and not any of a dozen other places, but they probably have good reasons. There is no university anywhere near there (the closest is probably in Bear Sheva).

      I personally live farther north near Ariel

      --
      Erlang Developer and podcaster
  19. Intel's Clover and Blackberry Facility by StefanJ · · Score: 3, Interesting

    I live down the street from a giant Intel plant in Hillsboro, Oregon. When the weather is cool and I feel like I need the extra exercise, I walk the dog around the perimeter. It is a touch under four miles round trip and has its own wetlands area where beaver, ospreys, and coyotes live.

    Immediately across the street is some more Intel land. It has Intel no trespassing signs, but is . . . well, not vacant. It is a clover field. Sometimes you can see tractors plowing it up or harvesting the stuff. I guess Intel leases the land to a farmer.

    Around two of the sides are great big walls of blackberry bushes. These are considered weeds out there, but produce great whopping crops of blackberries. I picked about three gallons last year, enough to make three pies and twelve jars of jam. Technically, one of the white SUV security vans could bust me for picking the berries, but it seems a shame just to leave them for the birds.

    1. Re:Intel's Clover and Blackberry Facility by mnemonic_ · · Score: 1

      What does that have to do with anything? Slashdot story comments aren't meant for blogging.

    2. Re:Intel's Clover and Blackberry Facility by Hungus · · Score: 1
      where beaver, ospreys, and coyotes live.
      Sure they are not really wallabys?
      --
      Bad Panda! No Bamboo for you! In matters of importance ACs will not be responded to. Want to say something critical,OK
    3. Re:Intel's Clover and Blackberry Facility by youta · · Score: 2, Interesting

      These agricultural/livestock/preserve buffers represent yet another tier of Intel's tax-break strategy (as many big companies do)

    4. Re:Intel's Clover and Blackberry Facility by blincoln · · Score: 2

      Slashdot story comments aren't meant for blogging.

      Yes my brother! We must use any means necessary to prevent the sacred Slashdot comments section from having its pristine state polluted by interesting anecdotes related in some way to the story!

      Down with blackberry-picking drivel! Up with "In Soviet Russia" jokes and mandatory references to flatulence if there is even a tenuous connection to methane!

      =P

      --
      "...always new atoms but always doing the same dance, remembering what the dance was yesterday." -Richard Feynman
    5. Re:Intel's Clover and Blackberry Facility by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Rocko's Modern Life reference?

    6. Re:Intel's Clover and Blackberry Facility by Hungus · · Score: 1

      Of course...
      I am glad someone got it even if it was an AC

      --
      Bad Panda! No Bamboo for you! In matters of importance ACs will not be responded to. Want to say something critical,OK
    7. Re:Intel's Clover and Blackberry Facility by SB5 · · Score: 1

      Since when have wallabies started migrating 9000 miles to Oregon?

      --
      If what you are reading sounds funny, or sarcastic, lame, or stupid
      it is because it is supposed to be. just laugh
    8. Re:Intel's Clover and Blackberry Facility by chud67 · · Score: 1

      ...produce great whopping crops of blackberries. I picked about three gallons last year, enough to make three pies and twelve jars of jam.

      Sweet!


    9. Re:Intel's Clover and Blackberry Facility by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I believe the grandparent comment represents something called "discussion" by normal people, but I am as perplexed as you are about how one is supposed to respond to that.

    10. Re:Intel's Clover and Blackberry Facility by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Actually not beaver but something called Nutria. You'l notice they don't have the big flat tails.

      Tony

  20. First Simpost! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Mmmmmm.... wafers!

  21. New Intel business plan by Locke2005 · · Score: 3, Funny

    1) Build billion dollar fabs in places most likely to be bombed (e.g. Israel, Dublin, London)
    2) Wait for attack
    3) Collect billion dollar insurance settlements
    4) Profit!

    --
    I've abandoned my search for truth; now I'm just looking for some useful delusions.
    1. Re:New Intel business plan by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      yep, that's the business model

      fyi, assembly plants don't cost anything close to a billion dollars

    2. Re:New Intel business plan by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Except for the fact that Intel is self-insured....

    3. Re:New Intel business plan by sean23007 · · Score: 1

      2.5) Meanwhile, produce most of the world's general purpose processors and sell them to manufacturers by the boatload.
      4.5) (See 2.5) Profit a lot more!

      I don't think it's a scheme to collect insurance, considering how much more money they'd make if the plants don't get blown up.

      --

      Lack of eloquence does not denote lack of intelligence, though they often coincide.
  22. Intel Israel by joe_bruin · · Score: 4, Interesting

    If you look at the Intel code names on their road maps, you'll see that they usually name their chips after rivers. Most of these rivers are in the western United States, but occasionally you'll see Israeli river names (Banias, for example). Grouping these names together, you can tell that Intel Israel usually works on low-power chips and integrated chipset features (SSE, Centrino, ...). That is, the heart of Intel cores is done in the U.S. They send their first generation designs to Israel for improvement and integration.

    Intel, as well as numerous other chip makers, have had a long tradition of development in Israel. IBM, DEC (back when they existed), Freescale all have research centers in Israel. This is due to the large amount of English-speaking skilled engineers and their relatively low cost compared to US engineers. This is the first I've heard of actually making the chips there. Germany is usually the preferred site for fabbing in the European region.

    1. Re:Intel Israel by great+om · · Score: 2, Informative

      motorola does a significant amount of fabing in israel. Particularly CPU's and small electronics for other corporations. Don't know why... must be all the sand

      --
      ------- Oh damn.... the Sigfile escaped... -Great OM
    2. Re:Intel Israel by KillShill · · Score: 1

      it's probably cause virtually all israeli business is subsidized by the american taxpayer so everything ends up being cheaper to do over there.

      --
      Science : Proprietary , Knowledge : Open Source
    3. Re:Intel Israel by OSSRocks · · Score: 1

      Intel has had Fabs making chips in Isreal since 6inch technology (Fab8 flash only now) there is also Fab18 (200mm factory flash factory only as well) IF Fab28 is built (if its officially announced) then it will be a Logic/Flash site as well but even some 486 machines were made in isreal :P

    4. Re:Intel Israel by The+Lynxpro · · Score: 1

      "Grouping these names together, you can tell that Intel Israel usually works on low-power chips and integrated chipset features (SSE, Centrino, ...). That is, the heart of Intel cores is done in the U.S. They send their first generation designs to Israel for improvement and integration. Intel, as well as numerous other chip makers, have had a long tradition of development in Israel. IBM, DEC (back when they existed), Freescale all have research centers in Israel."

      That's actually pretty funny. Intel Israel successfully works on low power chip solutions. Yet despite having developmental teams in Israel, IBM nor Freescale could offer similar technical feats for the G4 or G5 for Apple to use in the iBooks and PowerBooks. Consequently, a lot of Intel Israel's offerings will be in Apple Macs starting next year.

      --
      "Right now, somewhere in this world, Scott Baio is plowing a woman he doesn't love," - Peter Griffin, *Family Guy*
    5. Re:Intel Israel by whorush · · Score: 1

      israel gets our foregin aide. about 2.8 billion a year. egypt gets more than 2 billion. besides, don't think that this foregin aide is just chairty. its done beacuse enough people think its in our best interests. i'd hardly say that all of their biz is subsidized by the us tax payer.

    6. Re:Intel Israel by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Repeat after me: "Israel is not a part of Europe"
      Do that about 1000 times.
      After this exercise say to yourself a few dozen times: "Israel is a part of Asia".

      OK?

      It might be closer to Europe than the US, but it is most cases politically and economically (through subsidies and arms sales) closer to the US than it is to Europe.

    7. Re:Intel Israel by corblix · · Score: 1
      If you look at the Intel code names on their road maps, you'll see that they usually name their chips after rivers.

      Yes, I've spent many a fine day floating down the Pentium ....

    8. Re:Intel Israel by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      nah, there are just very good engineers over there. better than the mass produced asians who know all the interview questions but can't solve a problem to save their lives.

    9. Re:Intel Israel by woo2the2 · · Score: 1

      Yes, I've spent many a fine day floating down the Pentium .... Code names not product names/brands. Willamette, Coppermine, Banias, etc. versus Pentium, Centrino, et al

  23. Perhaps not... by crt · · Score: 4, Informative

    Actually it's not clear if they are building anything new in Israel, as the Updated article mentions.

    1. Re:Perhaps not... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Another article about the deal:http://www.ynetnews.com/articles/0,7340,L-311 7591,00.html

      Intel spokesman in Israel, Koby Bahar, said the company has not made a decision to build a new plant in Israel, the AP said. U.S.-based Intel spokesman Chuck Mulloy declined to comment Sunday, CBS Marketwatch reported.

      Sharon said Intel chief executive Craig Barrett told him over the phone Saturday night that his company had chosen Kiryat Gat, where Intel already has a major factory.

      Seems to me like the decision was made, to build the factory in Israel, but the Israeli adiministration blabbed to the press about it too early. They are prone to that. It happened before IIRC in one of the peace talks, and the US administration where pissed. (can't find a link though).

  24. It is all about the money. by DaedalusHKX · · Score: 1

    Same reason the republikrats left microsoft alone and didn't bitchslap them into oblivion after they lost that fine lawsuit vs the antitrust laws that this same gov't set forth years and years ago. I guess signatures and justice aren't as important as corporate campaign funding and bribes. Long live Amerika. Boy are we fucked!!

    --
    " What luck for rulers that men do not think" - Adolf Hitler
  25. Need to learn USA! by quark007 · · Score: 1

    As reported Israel won over Intel after agreeing to pony up a $ 525 million grant, about 15 per cent of the $ 3.5 billion initial project cost.

    In return ofcourse, Israel would get hi-tech jobs, supporting industries, and expertize.

    I wish our politicians would look into future and invest wisely as Israel did.

    --
    - Sh!t
    1. Re:Need to learn USA! by Mr.Sharpy · · Score: 1

      As reported Israel won over Intel after agreeing to pony up a $ 525 million grant, about 15 per cent of the $ 3.5 billion initial project cost.

      In return ofcourse, Israel would get hi-tech jobs, supporting industries, and expertize.

      I wish our politicians would look into future and invest wisely as Israel did.


      Interestingly, Isreal received an estimated 2.7 billion dollars in foreign aid from the United States. With another proposed 2.7billion for 2005.

      Israel just gave 20% of the aid it will receive from the United States this year to get an American company to build a plant there that could have supplied thousands of high-tech jobs here at home. Am I the only one that is bothered by what amounts to the United States paying for its companies to send yet more jobs overseas?

    2. Re:Need to learn USA! by I'm+Spartacus! · · Score: 1

      Yeah, I love it when the government fleeces the taxpayer in order to subsidize big business!

      Please. You act like this isn't happening enough as it is.

      --
      "War is God's way of teaching Americans geography." -- Ambrose Bierce
    3. Re:Need to learn USA! by geekee · · Score: 1

      " Yeah, I love it when the government fleeces the taxpayer in order to subsidize big business!

      Please. You act like this isn't happening enough as it is."

      Right, because the tax money they collect on the profit from the plant isn't going to more than make up for the initial investment. This sounds more like a business deal than govt. charity.

      --
      Vote for Pedro
    4. Re:Need to learn USA! by The+Lynxpro · · Score: 2, Interesting

      "In return ofcourse, Israel would get hi-tech jobs, supporting industries, and expertize. I wish our politicians would look into future and invest wisely as Israel did."

      But our politicians did. Their financial aid to Israel indirectly allowed this *investment* to happen in the first place. So don't thank Israeli politicians for being saavy, thank the politician action committees allied to them that successfully lobby our Congress each year for monies.

      Having stated that though, I'm sure there was some financial incentive that was indirectly bankrolled by the American taxpayer that led to Atari setting up shop in the Republic of Ireland back in the day. Dell now occupies said property to my knowledge.

      --
      "Right now, somewhere in this world, Scott Baio is plowing a woman he doesn't love," - Peter Griffin, *Family Guy*
    5. Re:Need to learn USA! by phsdv · · Score: 1

      yeah, great investment, about $500K per job.... Same size investment in Arizona generates about 1000 new direct jobs.

  26. Hmmm by UncleScrooge · · Score: 0

    I don't know if it is wise to build a 4 billion dollar plant in such a politically unstable region. Call me paranoid but I just do not think it's such a great idea.

    --
    Slashdot 1|0 Productivity
    1. Re:Hmmm by mnemonic_ · · Score: 1

      Considering the Banias and Dothan cores (Pentium M? you know, the reason Apple switched to Intel?) were designed by Intel Israel, I think it will work out pretty well. Intel's Israeli division is also working on Yonah, a CPU architecture designed from the ground up to be dual-core, with the power consumption of the Dothan.

  27. AMD Ads by Bryansix · · Score: 2, Insightful

    I like how there are AMD ads on the page about Intel.

    Also, I think the investment in Israel is a great idea. They are a strong ally and more investment will only help the cooperation.

    1. Re:AMD Ads by Rosco+P.+Coltrane · · Score: 1

      I like how there are AMD ads on the page about Intel.

      So what? I've seen numerous Microsoft ads on Slashdot. Money is money, wherever it comes from, to whom wants/needs it badly enough...

      --
      "A door is what a dog is perpetually on the wrong side of" - Ogden Nash
    2. Re:AMD Ads by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Strong Ally? What has Israel contributed to the US exactly, in terms of national security benefits?

      The only thing I can pinpoint is the hate of the muslim world all concentrated on us becuase of our billions of dollars being spent to fund their military & govt that commits acts of atrocities against muslim people.

    3. Re:AMD Ads by BTWR · · Score: 1, Insightful
      acts of atrocities against muslim people.

      I agree. How dare israel:

      -Blow up buses of innocent kindergardeners

      -Blow up a religious dinner, killing 57 people during a holiday

      -Blow up sbarros where non-soldiers live

      -Murder Olympic Atheletes, who have abolutely no policy-making credentials

      -Openly support terrorist organizations who openly say they want the other side "destroyed"

      Oops... my bad. That's the palestinians!

      (PS - extra credit! since isreal is such an evil country that won't let the "poor, poor" palectinians have a land, explain why there was no palestine between 1948 and 1967, when egypt and jordan owned the gaza strip and west bank, respectively?)

    4. Re:AMD Ads by Bryansix · · Score: 1

      So what? I've seen numerous Microsoft ads on Slashdot. Money is money

      You misunderstood me. I like the AMD ads.

    5. Re:AMD Ads by The+Lynxpro · · Score: 1

      "Also, I think the investment in Israel is a great idea. They are a strong ally and more investment will only help the cooperation."

      Israel is not a strong ally of the United States. Britain is a strong ally of the United States. At the risk of sounding like a troll, Israel is an ally of the *wag the dog* variety. If you need further proof, compare the long historical cooperative relationship between the CIA and MI6 in the 20th Century (to today) with Israel's constant spying and theft of American nuclear technology. That doesn't sound like an alliance to me. Opportunism, yes.

      --
      "Right now, somewhere in this world, Scott Baio is plowing a woman he doesn't love," - Peter Griffin, *Family Guy*
    6. Re:AMD Ads by whorush · · Score: 1

      think the US doesnt spy on israel? its mutual.

    7. Re:AMD Ads by whorush · · Score: 1

      israel has contributed tons in the way of nat security to the US. militiary technology, tactics, etc. especailly now that we're fighting terrorists, there's no one better at this than israel, and they are actively helping us. in this regard they are one of our closest allies. atrocities? such as?

    8. Re:AMD Ads by FlameboyC11 · · Score: 1

      Jesus, MOD PARRENT DOWN. What does this have to do with Intel at ALL?

    9. Re:AMD Ads by le_defaut_tragique · · Score: 1

      Holy crap! The Palestineans blew up a Sbarros!? I support Israel now that I know ALL the facts.

    10. Re:AMD Ads by BTWR · · Score: 1
      Holy crap! The Palestineans blew up a Sbarros!? I support Israel now that I know ALL the facts.

      you freakin idiot. Did i forget to mention, or are you too stupid to realize that they killed civilians, too?. 15 to be exact.

    11. Re:AMD Ads by Bryansix · · Score: 1

      Accidental civilian deaths from Israeli response to terrorism are not the same as suicide bomb attacks targeted at civilians by Palestinian terrorist organizations.

    12. Re:AMD Ads by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Aren't they? Are you actually impliying that a life has different value based on who takes it and why?

    13. Re:AMD Ads by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      israel has contributed tons in the way of nat security to the US. militiary technology, tactics, etc. especailly now that we're fighting terrorists, there's no one better at this than israel, and they are actively helping us. in this regard they are one of our closest allies. atrocities? such as?

      Ah yes, tactics. You know that innocent Brazilian electrician who was shot on the London underground? There's definite suggestions that the UK police borrowed that from Israel. In general, their tactics seem to be very good at stopping attacks in the short term, but also at causing dangerous levels of resentment in the long term...

  28. target (of) opportunity... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Hmmm... Qiyrat Gat seems to be about 10 miles from the West Bank, and 15 miles from the Gaza border. Should be just within range of the new Nassar rockets Hamas is fielding. Sprawling semi plant filled with expensive machinery should make for a nice, fat target. And the economic damage to both Israel and an American company might make it worth the effort.

    Let's see how long it takes them....

    1. Re:target (of) opportunity... by jericho4.0 · · Score: 1
      One of the lessons learnt in WWII was that targeting factories is almost totally useless. The Allies focused on ball bearing production as a weak point, dropped a gazillion bombs on ball bearing plants, and found out after the war that plants they thought were totally destroyed were up and running a week later.

      A fab, or other super high tech factories, would appear to be much more vulnerable. I wonder how this will play out in the wars of the future.

      --
      "A language that doesn't affect the way you think about programming, is not worth knowing" - Alan Perlis
    2. Re:target (of) opportunity... by otis+wildflower · · Score: 5, Informative

      Qiyrat Gat seems to be about 10 miles from the West Bank, and 15 miles from the Gaza border.

      Dude, there's no spot in Israel that isn't at most 25 miles from some pissed off Arab. It's a pretty small country, about 80% the size of Maryland, give or take a settlement.

    3. Re:target (of) opportunity... by stimpleton · · Score: 1, Funny

      ...usually that would be *take* a settlement.

      Thank you, thank you, I'll be here all week, at 7.00pm.

      --

      In post Patriot Act America, the library books scan you.
    4. Re:target (of) opportunity... by Clod9 · · Score: 1

      As I've looked at how geopolitics have changed over the last three decades, it looks less and less likely that we'll ever have another all-out conflict between large nation states where production capacity is an issue. Conflicts of the future will be between people groups and ideologies that cut across geographical and political boundaries, and technology and military hardware will not decide them. Many military writers have been working this out, calling it 4th-Generation Warfare. You'll notice that politicians and upper-level military leaders still put their faith in industrial might and technology, but that's because that's where the power centers are, not because those things will keep a nation safe.

  29. i8087 from Israel by mzs · · Score: 2, Interesting

    The i8088 was developed in the US, the i8087 (the fp math coprocessor) was developed in Israel.

  30. MOD PARENT UP by WilliamSChips · · Score: 1

    Mod Parent Up, just to annoy that annoying 2*2*3*75011 guy. :P

    --
    Please, for the good of Humanity, vote Obama.
  31. the same thing by phsdv · · Score: 2, Informative
    Intel will build two new facilities - a new chip plant and a new wafer plant

    This anouncement makes it sound that the two fabs are making different things, chips and wafers. However all chips or made on wafers so in this context a wafer fab is also a chip fab and visa versa.

    Why do people write about things without knowing what they talk about? Or at least try to find out, before writing something down.

    1. Re:the same thing by javamann · · Score: 1

      I was going to post the same comment. The only thing that MIGHT make it valid is if the Chip plant is really an assembly plant (wafers -> finished devices). Other than that every Wafer Fab I have worked at we said we were making chips (people understand chips).

    2. Re:the same thing by OSSRocks · · Score: 1

      The article is pretty much what you said.. somebody writing about something they dont know about.. and on an OFFICIAL note Intel hasn't officially announced the Isreal Plant ONLY Fab32 (the AZ plant) has been officially announced as on the roadmap.

    3. Re:the same thing by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Actually they are two different things.

      First the circuits are grown on the wafers, which are then typically shipped halfway around the world. Next, the wafers are cut up, individual dies are tested, and the good ones are packaged into chips.

    4. Re:the same thing by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      > This anouncement makes it sound that the two fabs are making different things, chips and wafers.

      Sounds good - one plant makes blank wafers, the other scribbles on the wafers and cuts the dies (i.e. makes the chips).

      > However all chips or made on wafers so in this context a wafer fab is also a chip fab and visa versa.
      > Why do people write about things without knowing what they talk about?

      Good question. Some people can't even spell 'vice-versa'. Very sad ...

  32. an artist's impression of their wafer plant by capicu · · Score: 0

    here it is:
    Artist's Impression

  33. Historical Note on microprocessors by chud67 · · Score: 1

    Previous developments of Intel Israel are the 8088 processor...

    For historical purposes it is worth noting here that the microprocessor was actually invented in San Antonio, Texas by a company called Datapoint (formerly Computer Terminal Corporation).
    The architecture of Intel's 8080 processor was virtually identical to Datapoint's 8008 which preceded it by a couple of years.

    1. Re:Historical Note on microprocessors by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      The architecture of Intel's 8080 processor was virtually identical to Datapoint's 8008 which preceded it by a couple of years.

      According to Wikipedia, the 8008 was designed and manufactured by Intel for CTC/Datapoint.

    2. Re:Historical Note on microprocessors by phsdv · · Score: 1

      No, Intel started with the 4004 and later Intel designed the 8008, followed by 8080

    3. Re:Historical Note on microprocessors by chud67 · · Score: 1

      No, Intel started with the 4004 and later Intel designed the 8008, followed by 8080.

      Yes, but Datapoint's 8008 preceded BOTH Intel's 4004 and their 8080, and therefore was the first general purpose eight-bit microprocessor on a single chip. As I stated previously, Datapoint invented the microprocessor, NOT Intel.

  34. not india or china by javiercr · · Score: 0, Flamebait

    It's not India or China for once, so this is original, it's good these things spread everywhere. A chip 'Made in the USA' doesn't seem all that impressive to me, may be for pick up truck 'Made in the USA' for for a chip... a Cell processor made in Japan sounds just as good. Or you can do like Apple, 'Designed in California by Apple' appears very big in the box and hidden somewhere you have the 'made in Malaysia' Israel has a lot of talent and impressive scientific achivements. I studied there for a while in the Israeli Institute of Technology and it is an MIT kind of institution. If they didn't go there they would still hire lots of people from there and take them to California. Jews have always been good scientists, Einstein, Oppenheimer and many many others.

  35. It was the 8086 by Prof.+Pi · · Score: 1

    It was the 8086 that was designed in Israel. The 8086 was a cheaper version of the 8088. For instance, it used an 8-bit data bus rather than a 16-bit bus (but internally it was the same). It was chosen for the IBM PC, due to these cost advantages.

    1. Re:It was the 8086 by Wonko · · Score: 1

      It was the 8086 that was designed in Israel. The 8086 was a cheaper version of the 8088. For instance, it used an 8-bit data bus rather than a 16-bit bus (but internally it was the same). It was chosen for the IBM PC, due to these cost advantages.

      I believe you meant to say that the 8088 was the cheaper version of the 8086.

      The 8088 had the 8 bit bus. 8088 is to 80886 as 386sx is to 386dx :).

  36. Maynooth? by notjim · · Score: 1

    Is the Israeli plant the one that would have gone to Ireland if the EU hadn't kickup about Irish government subsidies?

    1. Re:Maynooth? by OSSRocks · · Score: 1

      Ireland already has a new 300mm Factory called F24, and its ramping up on some of intels (current) latest technology as we speak.. its on the same site as the old fab (200mm)

    2. Re:Maynooth? by notjim · · Score: 1

      okay, but there was some talk about future investiment beyond the new factory and whether it would go to Ireland, Israel or Colarado.

  37. As weird as it sounds by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Informative

    The official Intel page states otherwise
    http://www.intel.com/jobs/israel/sites/haifa.htm

    The pioneering 8088 processor, Intel® math coprocessors, the i860® XP processor, Ethernet communication chips, and cache and memory controllers are a few of the more than 50 products designed in IDC (Israel Development Center)

    So it sounds like both of them were developed there

  38. Re-opening Testing in Albuquerque by snookerdoodle · · Score: 1

    They're temporarily adding 300 employees in Albuquerque for testing... Place called "Fab 7 Test".

    Like our Third World State needs 300 temp jobs to get folks' hopes up. :(

    Mark

    1. Re:Re-opening Testing in Albuquerque by OSSRocks · · Score: 1

      your THIRD world state happens to produce over 80% of all P4's that the world uses... its got the largest continuous cleanroom space in the world and the only HIGH volume 300mm factory for intel (Ireland is ramping up quickly though .. F24)... Fab7 which was the original fab in New Mexico was shutdown (on 6 inch wafer technology the only one now left for Intel is currently in Isreal Fab8) and is being refitting as a temporary capacity its NOT testing like what you think.. its Assemply/Test (basically testing the chips and seeing which ones to actually make into a full fledges processor...) this is to relieve constraint on the current A/T sites until the new one is announces and built... and after that it will become a DataCenter (probably 2-3 yrs) .. oh and Intel employees over 6000 people in New Mexico as well incase your interested.

    2. Re:Re-opening Testing in Albuquerque by woo2the2 · · Score: 1


      They're temporarily adding 300 employees in Albuquerque for testing... Place called "Fab 7 Test". Like our Third World State needs 300 temp jobs to get folks' hopes up. :(

      You do realize that "Test" in the semiconductor world is an actual step in the manufacturing process, not a designation indicating that its a temporary "test" fab....maybe I'm wrong and they are explicitly temp employees, but my money is that those 300 employees will be around for more than a few years.

    3. Re:Re-opening Testing in Albuquerque by snookerdoodle · · Score: 1

      The article in the ABQ Journal sez, "The temporary component test facility, which is to be in operation for the next two years, is expected to result in 300 more jobs to the New Mexico site during that period."

      So, well, that's what they say...

      Mark

    4. Re:Re-opening Testing in Albuquerque by woo2the2 · · Score: 1

      Look like I was wrong! I read the article after posting this....doh!

    5. Re:Re-opening Testing in Albuquerque by snookerdoodle · · Score: 1

      Anyone who lives here is aware that Intel employs 6000 people, "incase your interested." The employees *are* to be temporary (see the ABQ Journal article). Friends who work at Intel tell me the data centers are all moved to California.

      If you gathered that I was somehow ungrateful that they have those 6000 jobs, well, you misunderstand. I even understand why they might want to locate their stuff where the local gov't can give them incentives. 300 temporary jobs is still a joke and NM is still a poor state.

      Have you been here? Do you know what the poverty and unemployment levels are? Why are you SHOUTING the word "third", as if you think you know some secret that NM is somehow some secretly wealthy place and our poverty, unemployment, and associated per capita crime is all a lie to keep you people from coming here and taking our money?

      Mark

  39. Link About Albuquerque Facility by snookerdoodle · · Score: 1

    Here's the article in our local paper:

    http://www.abqjournal.com/news/apintel07-25-05.htm

    Mark

  40. Way to clarify the mud! by Em+Adespoton · · Score: 1

    So, in several countries, 1,333 is understood as 1.333 -- Would the US be one of those countries, or would France be one of those countries? Now I'm really confused. I guess I should find out by measuring my hair.

    1. Re:Way to clarify the mud! by TERdON · · Score: 1
      The US IS NOT one of those countries.

      Sweden IS one of those countries. Not sure about France, but there are also several others - AFAIK it's quite common in non-english-speaking countries.

      Of course, some one that has done locale settings work should know more than me...

      --
      I have a really elegant proof for Fermat's last theorem. If this sig was only a bit longer...
    2. Re:Way to clarify the mud! by Em+Adespoton · · Score: 1

      Slow down, and re-read what I wrote ;)

    3. Re:Way to clarify the mud! by jackofallbrandnames · · Score: 1

      So, in several countries, 1,333 is understood as 1.333 -- Would the US be one of those countries,...

      When moving the decimal point in an equation, such as a fraction, you also have to move the other portion. I.e, if 1,333 is to be 1.333, then 1 is .001 to reflect .001/1.333 (doesn't look as nice.

      For the record, 1/1,333 = .00075018754688672168042010502625656... "of the size of a human hair".

      --
      The geek shall inherit the earth.
  41. Metric makes my head hurt by inertialmatrix · · Score: 0

    Im just happy when people put numbers like 12km into a graspable framework.

  42. I propose... by hackwrench · · Score: 1

    not even trying...that is, of course, unless you enjoy failing mierably, and sounding rediculous 1,333 is no more or less comprehensible than 45*10^-9 except only in certain frames of reference that are optimized for the comprehensibility of said number. The size of a hair is not one of them.

    1. Re:I propose... by ArsonSmith · · Score: 1

      Would that be Imperial or Metric Hair?

      --
      Paying taxes to buy civilization is like paying a hooker to buy love.
  43. Quite a large facility! by riflemann · · Score: 1

    Looks like they have quite a massive plant in Arizona. See Google map.

    Plenty of housing nearby for the workers too. It's almost like a whole town for them.

    1. Re:Quite a large facility! by Flummox · · Score: 1

      Which is funny because you linked to the old Fab 6 facility (which isn't running anymore). Perhaps you really wanted to link to here.

      Note, I believe this is the site where they are building the new fab as well.

    2. Re:Quite a large facility! by Flummox · · Score: 1

      Oops. Make that here.

  44. Actually this one has been resolved already by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
  45. That's the problem by hackwrench · · Score: 1

    I don't think people do relate to it. In other news, the question was brought up as to whether people might want a fire that can be fitted nasally.

  46. And what's next for Intel? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Why, a "building riot!" And then they'll be "In the building zone!" ... And then they'll be accused of modding by the 12 year-old company in their game.

  47. Want to see an Intel town? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Go look up Hillsboro, Oregon. 15000 employees over many campuses.

  48. red flag to a bull... by stimpleton · · Score: 1


    I'm not a military strategist, hell I couldn't even get up before 8.am(for a bugle call), but "wafer" and "chip" fabs will be, to the next big conflict, what ball-bearing factories were in WWII.

    --

    In post Patriot Act America, the library books scan you.
  49. Intel - Planning Ahead by Bellum+Aeternus · · Score: 1
    Is the new plant in Arazon Intel's attempt to plan ahead for 2 generations of future outsourcing?

    1. Hire Americans in Arazona
    2. Layoff everybody and outsource their positions
    3. PROFIT!

    --
    - I voted for Nintendo and against Bush
    1. Re:Intel - Planning Ahead by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I've been living in Phoenix, AZ since 1979, the same year that Intel came here. They are one of the largest employers in the state, along with Motorola, Honeywell, General Dynamics, Boeing, Lockheed, and others. We make cruise missiles, Apache helicopters, mobile phones, little security devices for your house, radar systems, etc....

      None of these companies are going to lay off their workforce simply to make a profit. I'm not saying that type of thing doesn't happen, but your feeble attempt at humor is not indicative of anything that might take place.

  50. You're right by Prof.+Pi · · Score: 1
    I believe you meant to say that the 8088 was the cheaper version of the 8086.

    The 8088 had the 8 bit bus. 8088 is to 80886 as 386sx is to 386dx :).

    Whoops -- you're right!

    And I believe you meant to say "8088 is to 8086" -- but then, who actually checks their posts these days? :-)

    1. Re:You're right by Wonko · · Score: 1

      And I believe you meant to say "8088 is to 8086"

      I can't believe I missed that! Even with brand new glasses :p.

      but then, who actually checks their posts these days? :-)

      Nobody is perfect :).

  51. I'm confused. by Michael+Woodhams · · Score: 1

    Are they building two fabs? Or are they building a single fab in the overlap between Arizona and Israel? Will the Arizona fab produce chips, or just wafers of silicon?

    The /. post says two plants, wafers in Arizona, chips in Israel. One Reuters article says that Israel says Intel will build a plant there, making goodness knows what. The other article says that Intel will make chips in Arizona, and are "no comment"ing on the Israel plant.

    --
    Quattuor res in hoc mundo sanctae sunt: libri, liberi, libertas et liberalitas.
  52. News to me by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I hope they didn't abandon it because I need to go to work tomorrow.

  53. RFC: Negro or human hair width? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    If you wanna call that kinky black shit hair more like a brillo pad.

  54. MOD DOWN TROLL by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Israelis do not vote in U.S. elections nor pay taxes into the U.S. Treasury's coffers. You sir, are a troll.

  55. 1133th (sic) the width of human hair by veriti · · Score: 1

    How can you tell that precisely an average human hair width? 45nm*1133=50895 nm, or 50.895 micrometers? Damn, the 5 nm of that 50895 is a single molecule size!

    Or you just sampled one from your scalp and measured it?

    nanotech.republika.pl

    1. Re:1133th (sic) the width of human hair by scholzie · · Score: 1

      5 nm is not the size of a molecule, unless you're talking about entire DNA chains or amino acids. A typical atom is 0.5 to 3 Ang, or 0.05 to 0.3, and a single water molecule is about 0.958 Ang. molecules of 5nm could concievably change the performance of a silicon device by shortening effective channel widths (considering channel widths are targeted for the 45nm range, +/- a mere 0.3 nm).

  56. 1/1337 == NEAT! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    coined...how'd ya like that!?

  57. Check up on your sources people. by Khyber · · Score: 1

    I found an article on About.com That says somethign totally different about who invented what.. And several other articles say even more different things. Seeing as most of these sites are "accurate" it seems we're all getting the wrong kind of information.

    --
    Still waiting on Serviscope_minor to wake up to fucking reality and realize that Jessica Price isn't going to fuck him.
  58. Let's put an end to this myth: by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Look here:
    http://www.jewishvirtuallibrary.org/jsource/myths/ mf21.html#h
    http://www.jewishvirtuallibrary.org/jsource/myths/ mf21.html#i
    http://www.jewishvirtuallibrary.org/jsource/myths/ mf21.html#j
    http://www.jewishvirtuallibrary.org/jsource/myths/ mf21.html#k


    MYTH

    "The U.S. has always given Israel billions of dollars without expecting repayment."

    FACT

    U.S. economic grants to Israel ended in 1959. U.S. aid to Israel from then until 1985 consisted largely of loans, which Israel repaid, and surplus commodities, which Israel bought. Israel began buying arms from the United States in 1962, but did not receive any grant military assistance until after the 1973 Yom Kippur War. As a result, Israel had to go deeply into debt to finance its economic development and arms procurement. The decision to convert military aid to grants that year was based on the prevailing view in Congress that without a strong Israel, war in the Middle East was more likely, and that the U.S. would face higher direct expenditures in such an eventuality.

    For several years, most of Israel's economic aid went to pay off old debts. In 1984, foreign aid legislation included the Cranston Amendment (named after its Senate sponsor), which said the U.S. would provide Israel with economic assistance "not less than" the amount Israel owes the United States in annual debt service payments.

    MYTH

    "Israel continues to demand large amounts of economic aid even though it is now a rich country that no longer needs help."

    FACT

    Starting with fiscal year 1987, Israel annually received $1.2 billion in all grant economic aid and $1.8 billion in all grant military assistance. In 1998, Israel offered to voluntarily reduce its dependence on U.S. economic aid. According to an agreement reached with the Clinton Administration and Congress, the $1.2 billion economic aid package will be reduced by $120 million each year so that it will be phased out over 10 years.
    (...)
    Israel made the offer because it does not have the same need for assistance it once did. The foundation of Israel's economy today is strong; still, Israel remains saddled with past debts to the U.S., which, unlike those of Jordan and Egypt, were not forgiven.

    MYTH

    "U.S. military aid subsidizes Israeli defense contractors at the expense of American industry."

    FACT

    Contrary to popular wisdom, the United States does not simply write billion dollar checks and hand them over to Israel to spend as they like. Only about 26 percent ($555 million of $2.1 billion in 2003) of what Israel receives in Foreign Military Financing (FMF) can be spent in Israel for military procurement. The remaining 74 percent is spent in the United States to generate profits and jobs. More than 1,000 companies in 47 states, the District of Columbia and Puerto Rico have signed contracts worth billions of dollars through this program over the last several years. The figures for 2001 are below: (There is a table in the last link)


    Furthermore, from the CIA World Factbook entry on Israel:

    Budget:
    revenues: $48.09 billion
    expenditures: $52.11 billion, including capital expenditures of NA (2004 est.)

    The US Aid is about 3 billion dollars.
    thats less than 1.5% of the israeli budget! (revenues-wise)
    So next time you are saying stuff like "Tax breaks which would not be possible if the U.S. stopped financially supporting the State of Israel" know the numbers.

    1. Re:Let's put an end to this myth: by The+Lynxpro · · Score: 1

      "The US Aid is about 3 billion dollars.
      thats less than 1.5% of the israeli budget! (revenues-wise) So next time you are saying stuff like "Tax breaks which would not be possible if the U.S. stopped financially supporting the State of Israel" know the numbers."

      You proved nothing, AC. That's $3 billion that could be spent on things here in the U.S. Like, for instance, reimbursing California for the full cost of providing healthcare and emergency services for illegal immigrants that the Feds require us to offer yet they don't reimburse our State for. The money should be spent here, not in Israel.

      Furthermore, if the U.S. didn't give Israel that $3 billion you cite, do you really think they could afford to give Intel a $500 + million grant? Nope.

      --
      "Right now, somewhere in this world, Scott Baio is plowing a woman he doesn't love," - Peter Griffin, *Family Guy*
    2. Re:Let's put an end to this myth: by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      3 Billion is not that much money country-wise, neither in the US nor Israel.

      It's like all of those people criticizing the NASA funding, though it really is only a insignificant amount in the budget.

      Israel could easily scrape those 500mil from somewhere anyway.

    3. Re:Let's put an end to this myth: by The+Lynxpro · · Score: 1

      "3 Billion is not that much money country-wise, neither in the US nor Israel. It's like all of those people criticizing the NASA funding, though it really is only a insignificant amount in the budget."

      I'm not criticizing NASA funding. NASA is an American agency. The $3 billion given to Israel would still be better spent in America.

      I object to spending $3 billion on a nation in the Middle East that only serves as a lightning rod for hostility on the part of Muslims/Arabs/Persians against the United States and does nothing to secure a national strategic interest such as oil.

      --
      "Right now, somewhere in this world, Scott Baio is plowing a woman he doesn't love," - Peter Griffin, *Family Guy*
  59. banias by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Is Gwen Stefani going to do the marketing campain for that one?

    The chip is Banias!
    B-A-N-Aaaa-I-S
    Oh yeah the chip is Banias...

    ok i give up

  60. Not In California by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    You'll notice that these plants are *not* being
    built in California. Intel made a statement
    several years ago that it would not be building
    new facilities in California. The reason, the
    state is just to heavy handed with it's
    regulation and burdensome bureaucracy. I guess
    they are sticking to their word.

    I use to have a house that was just down the road
    from the Intel plant in Chandler, on Chandler
    Boulevard. You would never guess that it is a
    plant which builds microprocessors and other
    electronic devices. That place is HUGE. It looks
    big enough that it could be a car munfacturing
    facility. Intel also has several other facilities
    in the Phoenix East Valley. Looks like Intel's
    future home probably lies in Arizona.

  61. Anyone remember Austin? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Intel doesn't build in Texas.
    They would rather take millions of dollars of the states money, build a shell of a building and leave it to rot.

    It's the skeleton building just west of the park:
    http://maps.google.com/maps?q=austin,+tx&ll=30.267 444,-97.748666&spn=0.006822,0.010070&t=k&hl=en

  62. Better Israel than India by Agarax · · Score: 1

    At least we know they arn't doing just it to save a quick buck.

    --
    Remember folks, slashdot doesn't have a -1 "disagree" moderation!
    1. Re:Better Israel than India by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      No, better India than Israel. The reasons for going to India are not just because its cheaper. Indian tech (hardware and software) are world-class. Which is why IBM has a research lab there, google has a presence in Bangalore, Microsoft has a strong prescence in the country. Furthermore, take a look at the demographics of any graduate program in the US in science/engineering. They are dominated by South Asians and Orientals. Get over yourself. If you cannot compete intellectually, don't use the "it's cheaper" argument. Because you sound like a fool.

  63. New processing technology by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    It'll be hell to keep the new intel chips cool

  64. Uh Intel is not building in Israel by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    This is alittle out of date. Intel is building a new Fab in Arizona and adding onto it's fab in New Mexico. There are no plans to build more in Israel.

  65. Two articles that show Israel is a good light? by jack_n_jill · · Score: 0
    There are two articles on today's Slashdot that seem to imply that Israel is a country just like any other in the rest of the civilized world. It is not! It is a country that discriminates on the basis of religion and ethnic origin. It is a country where ethnic cleansing is the norm. America and the rest of the world should have nothing to do with these thugs.

    1. Re:Two articles that show Israel is a good light? by lebow · · Score: 1

      So you like to post off topic every where. You constantly call Israel racist, but how are you not a racist when every thing that has to do with Israel you attack. Do you see the israeli's posting off topic any time there is a mention of Grmanay? Remember the whole holocoust thing ? or are you one of those who say it didn't happen? All these articles are about technology none are about politics. Why do you have to drag in your anti-semetic feelings? If you really want to voice your opionion, go hop on ElAl and go protest infront of the Israeli Parlament building. And while your at it be sure to take a trip to the all the other neighboring countries as well, and just for fun speak out about their govenments. Here is a fun thing travel around the middle east and make a T-shirt for each country you visit that says "I hate NAME OF CURRENT COUNTRY'S LEADER ." Let us know your expected results and then see if they are true. Any way, have a nice day and please keep your off topic post... off.

    2. Re:Two articles that show Israel is a good light? by jack_n_jill · · Score: 0
      The Germans acknowledge their responsibility for the Holocaust. They condemn the Nazis and Fascist ideology. The Israelis still do not accept responsibility for the horrors that they committed during the Zionist invasion. Israel does not condemn Zionism.

      Off topic post? When any subject relating to the old South Africa was discussed apartheid was always mentioned. When gold mining was discussed you would mention their treatment of their Africans. If the South African economy was discussed, apartheid was discussed. Why is it not natural to discuss Israeli racism and oppression when the subject of Israel is brought up.

      I am not a racist. The solution to the problem in Palestine is for Israel to give the Palestinians equal rights. Turn Israel into a civil society. The Israelis believe that oppression will bring them peace, it will not. Almost 60 years of experience should tell them that.

    3. Re:Two articles that show Israel is a good light? by lebow · · Score: 1
      When gold mining was discussed you would mention their treatment of their Africans

      First off, when did I every do that ?

      Would you have called for equal rights for jews in arab countries ?

      Also if you think that the arabs have it so bad, maybe you should take a drive around and see all of the mantions they have in The state of Isael. The arabs opress them selves, they are the ones who send their children to die. They are the ones who do not rescue their brothers from "opression." Why don't the arab contries follow Israel's lead and when their brothers are being "opressed" send planes to save them, and accept them with open arms.

      Again, take my advice, go and witness this "Racisim" for your self. I think you will be surprized. Arabs can walk around fine in J'lem without fear of being attacked. Can you say the same for a jew that makes a wrong turn in Ramallah ?

      Your solution I'm afraid is not what the arabs want. The want to remove the jews, that is their offical position.

      Also why should Israel condem Zionism ? To condem zionism is to deny Israel's right to exsist. Are you saying that jews don't have a right to live in their own country ? Take a look at history and see how warmly they were treated by the other nations. Even today it is apparent ( from your posts ) that anti-semitisim is still as strong as ever. For some one to belive such illogical things there must be a base of hatred. Hate manipulates logic acording to his will.

      Go visit the state of Israel. and see for your self before you make any more acusations.

      Is this the solution that you are propsing ?

      "We say to the entire world: Today Gaza, tomorrow Jerusalem. Today Gaza, and tomorrow the independent Palestinian state with Jerusalem as its capital."
      -- Ahmed Qurei, known as Abu Ala
  66. Built in Israel? by homebrewmike · · Score: 1

    Great! Kosher Chips!

  67. Do you know what a Semite is? by donscarletti · · Score: 1
    Semite is a fairly broad term. It refers to anyone descended from Shem, one of the sons of Noah. That refers to quite a few people, most notably the Jews (sons of Jacob) and the Arabs (sons of Jacob's uncle Ishmael) but also to a wide number of other races in the middle east, including the Palestinians.

    Thus, since Zionism is a belief that advocates the oppression of other semitic people in "Israel" based on racial and religious grounds it would be a difficult task to be both Zionist and not anti-semitic in some shape or form. Zionism is what is racist, it is the belief that Jews, based on their race and religious beliefs have a divine right to Israel whereas the other residents have less of a right to it because the Jewish holy text says so. Palestinians have darker skin, their lifestyle is slightly less clean and Western and chances are, you probably didn't go to school with a few Palestinians. Most non-jewish Zionists like Jews because they look and act far more white and they understand a lot of Jewish culture from the western media. The other problem is a gross misinterpretation of the bible, thinking that somewhere, in-between all of that salvation by grace, love and compassion there is a bit where God still wants us to kick some arse and support carving out an Israeli state right in the middle of the middle east and getting ourself rightly hated (and wrongly attacked) because of it.

    I think a good model for this for non-Jews is set by Darius who gave Ezra permission to repopulate Jerusalem and Artaxerxes who gave Nehemiah permission to rebuild it while never getting involved themselves or renouncing sovereignty over the land (and thus causing trouble with bordering countries, many being anti-jewish for real). Both of these kings avoided the politic quagmire that exists today because they both knew that returning a nation to their homeland is a very nice thing to do, giving control of your territory and giving full support to ultra-nationalists is just downright bad for business. Persia never had to worry about the Suez Crisis or the Six day war, Persia never had to worry about diplomatic relationships with Arab countries being difficult or terrorist bombings because they helped out Nehemiah because they knew what to help them with and what not to. Back then the people got their temple, they got their own law enforced and they got their freedom and Persia got peace of mind knowing that it wouldn't have caused any problems (Persia owning Egypt and Syria at the stage didn't hurt either to be honest).

    Anyway, I find if offensive to hear someone say that if one is sick of the trouble Israel is causing with its racial and religious discrimination, its multi-decade annexation of Palestine without giving the population of this territory rights and its hypocrisy in claiming the right to return after 1900 years in exile while forbidding Palestinians to return after 30 is a racist. I don't hate Jews, I don't even hate Israelis but I am getting mighty pissed off at the ones who want to sweep away the last two millennia worth of residents of Israel for the sake of religious and racial purity. Unfortunately, those types of Israelis make up a regrettably large segment of Israel's Jewish population. Thus, I see no reason why I should approve of someone building a plant in Israel any more than I would have approved of someone building a plant in South Africa twenty years ago.

    --
    When Argumentum ad Hominem falls short, try Argumentum ad Matrem
    1. Re:Do you know what a Semite is? by sita · · Score: 1

      No, there is no such thing as a "semite". As you may look up elsewhere, the word antisemitism was invented by Wilhelm Marr in 1879 as a euphemism for the age-old Judenhass (jew-hatred in German), to lend it a more scientific air. Of course, the science of the day, racial biology has long been tossed on the scrap heap of history, and noone would any longer seriously suggest that there exists such things a "semite" race. At the superficial level, jews come in all colors, and on a DNA level, you can see traces of the migration over the millenia.

      Not even in the connotation "speaker of semitic languages" semite is meaningful. It would not include the larger part of the worlds jews (who speak English, Russian, French and other non-semitic languages), on the other hand it would include the people of Ethiopia and Eritrea.

      Hence, antisemite means hatred of jews, not of arabs, or any other people. Suggesting otherwise is suggestive of a quite sinister agenda.

      Thus, since Zionism is a belief that advocates the oppression of other semitic people in "Israel" based on racial and religious grounds

      Your premise is wrong. Zionism is advocates the establishment and, now that it exists, the continued existence of a sovereign jewish state. In that it is not different from other national liberation movements of its generation.

      I think a good model for this for non-Jews is set by Darius who gave Ezra permission to repopulate Jerusalem and Artaxerxes who gave Nehemiah permission to rebuild it while never getting involved themselves or renouncing sovereignty over the land (and thus causing trouble with bordering countries, many being anti-jewish for real). Both of these kings avoided the politic quagmire that exists today because they both knew that returning a nation to their homeland is a very nice thing to do, giving control of your territory and giving full support to ultra-nationalists is just downright bad for business.

      So, pray tell us, why do you want to deny the Jewish people sovereignty, when your main complaint with Israel is that they are denying the palestinian people theirs?

    2. Re:Do you know what a Semite is? by Triskele · · Score: 1
      Your premise is wrong. Zionism is advocates the establishment and, now that it exists, the continued existence of a sovereign jewish state. In that it is not different from other national liberation movements of its generation.

      Sorry but it is your premise that is wrong. Zionism is not a national liberation movement - it is a religious liberation movement. Zionism is in fact brother to the whole notion of the Islamic Caliphate...

      --

      --
      USA: home of the world's largest terrorist training camp.

    3. Re:Do you know what a Semite is? by donscarletti · · Score: 1
      So, pray tell us, why do you want to deny the Jewish people sovereignty, when your main complaint with Israel is that they are denying the palestinian people theirs?

      For the same reason that you might endevour to deny someone of their life when your main complaint with them is that they are trying to deny another person of theirs. Sometimes you've just got to tell whoever is trampling on peoples rights that if they keep doing that, they probably don't deserve the right to keep it up.

      --
      When Argumentum ad Hominem falls short, try Argumentum ad Matrem
  68. Trust me, I've lived there, it IS a 3rd world stat by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    The natives detest everyone non-hispanic. i was threatened multiple times for being white. What a great place. Hopefully all of America will be like it in 20 years....

  69. Wrong.... by MikeSty · · Score: 0

    .... neet :P

    Just a quick FYI, 1 / 1337 ~=~ 7.479e-4 ..... or .0007479 ... or Oootatg!

  70. Arizona? That explains why... by MikeSty · · Score: 0

    ... my P4 is so hot!

  71. Das Juden by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Fucking jews are at it again. If there's money to be made, the jes are all over it like flies on shit. I say it's time that the U.S. bomb Isreal and wipe the scourge of those cockroaches from the face of the earth. Then the wealth can be freed up to go to it's proper owners: the black nationals of the African continent.

    1. Re:Das Juden by cwns · · Score: 1

      That's just slander, heh But anyway point aside! You don't read New Scientist do you, we'll about four years ago there was an article about how Israel would become the next so-called Silicon Valley! and if you we're that unhappy with that report you should have gone to AMD just at that time! But no.. you whine now! And while I'm on the case have you not noticed that we in the UK again voted for Blair, we're hoping he can get all the Africans over here within the next 100 years or so before our island floods! Looks like my kids, kids > kids we will be finishing off the boar wars were my great great great grandad started them! aww! always wanted to love there, SO much water and land! Didge!

  72. 45nm by cwns · · Score: 1

    Oh goodie 45nm could mean an easy Quadcore from Intel wonder if they will use HT in it?

  73. 2 generations ahead? by Kiyooka · · Score: 1

    "The technology is two generations ahead of the current 90nm."

    If it's the technology that comes after this one, doesn't that make it by definition next-generation technology? Is there some scientific basis for this, or is this just more marketing? As if "next-generation" is just not hyped-up enough...

    1. Re:2 generations ahead? by Cross-Threaded · · Score: 1
      As I understand it, "current-generation" is 90nm. The "next-generation" is about to go into production at 70nm, which Intel, and other companies, have been gearing up for for the last couple of years.

      This plant is gearing up for the 45nm "next-next-generation" which is still heavily in development, and will not be ready for about 2 more years.

      They are building this facility so they can hit the ground running when the 45nm machinery is ready.

      It takes a couple of years to build a facility of this size, and you really have to plan ahead to be ready to manufacture when the technology is ready. It is a very competitive business, and they need to start planning and building for the "next-next-generation" now.

      --
      They call us sheeple, I wonder why?
    2. Re:2 generations ahead? by scholzie · · Score: 1

      Lithography "generations" are determined by an international consortium of semiconductor companies. Long ago Intel, IBM, et al. realized they would not be able to afford the research necessary to advance the the industry (this was all before we were able to go sub-micron). As a result, the ITRS (http://public.itrs.net/) was developed to lay out the necessary groundwork for research and lithography landmarks for the industry. Current generation 90nm, next is 65nm, and 45nm after that. Eventually there's supposed to be a 32nm node, then 11nm with a potential stop over in the 25nm range.

      Past that it's anyone's guess. 0.3nm is about the size of a silicon atom, so considering we need to be able to pattern polysilicon and copper at these sizes it doesnt make me too convinced that we'll make it to 11nm reliably...

      Then again, they said we'd never make it below 1000nm ...

  74. woo hoo more work in AZ by crashelite · · Score: 1

    and arizona is the surface of the sun so they dont have to spend money on their heating bill... AC on the other hand will be high... that and dust is a problem :) todays high was 108 and that was with it raining yesterday and cloud cover in the afternoon :) but then the other facility in Israel thats not really outsourcing cause they have most their operations there...

    --
    (yes i know i suck at spelling fell free to correct my grammar and/or spellin i dont care, im still not going to change
  75. Intel CPU fab is hallmark of zionist occupation by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    It is said the Intel factory in the Holy Land is built on occupied Palestinian territory. Because of this Intel CPUs marked "made in Israel" cannot be legally sold in some european conutries, to help the palestinian cause.

    Will this new Intel location also stand on occupied palestinian territory?

  76. Thats ok folks! by Halvy · · Score: 0

    But I think I'll stay outa this one..

    My karma is already trying to punch a hole in the floor :(

    --
    I will gladly loose all of life's battles.. in order to win the war..
  77. Was it supposed to be in Oregon? by CatGrep · · Score: 1

    A few months back Washington County (the county where most all of Intel's Oregon facilities are located) announced a deal whereby Intel was given huge tax breaks by the county. In return Intel pledged to spend something like $20 Billion in Oregon over the next 10 years or so. That spending was supposed to create something like 3000 to 5000 more jobs here so the county went along with it thinking they would make up the revenue in property taxes from all those new residents (a questionable assumption anyway, since they would have to build all sorts of new infrastructure like schools and roads to support the increase in population - but I digress)

    So now Intel announces that the next big new shiny fab will be located in Arizona. So what gives? Was Washington County taken for a ride?

    Besides, doesn't Oregon have a lot more water than Arizona and don't fabs need huge amounts of water?

    1. Re:Was it supposed to be in Oregon? by Cross-Threaded · · Score: 1
      Having spent the majority of my life in Washington county, Oregon, I can tell you that this is most likely a problem with state and local government, not Intel being flaky. My experience tells me that local bureaucrats are more than likely the cause, making Oregon a very expensive, problematic, and flat-out unattractive place to build facilities, compared to what it once was.

      That being said, it may be that the knuckle-headed local government may be pulling their head out of their tail and actually doing something right, and the new Arizona plant was just on the road map before the Washington County deal was struck. Perhaps Intel still has plans to build more facilities in Oregon.

      Yes, Oregon has much more water than Arizona, both running and airborne(humidity). However, Intel must not see this as a problem, otherwise they wouldn't be building in AZ.

      --
      They call us sheeple, I wonder why?
  78. Israeli Overclocking by acb · · Score: 1

    And then there's the possibility that a significant proportion of the Israeli labour force have a genetic mutation that makes them think faster, a sort of neurological overclocking. Or so some scientists at the University of Utah have claimed.

  79. WTF by jesusfingchrist · · Score: 1

    Why the fuck is Intel making shit in Israel ??

    It's not like they are right around the fucking corner.

    --
    "Freedom and Justice for All" is a registered trademark of The United States Govt Inc. Not available in all areas.
  80. Finish what you started by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I am so happy to hear that Intel is on a building spree. Now maybe they will finish construction on the five-story building in downtown Austin that they halted four and a half years ago.

    This thing is a frigging eye-sore:
    http://www.pinkdome.com/archives/2005/06/brother_c an_you_1.html

    Just imagine, Intel comes to your town and tears down some cool old stuff, starts construction on a large building and then stops, leaving a hulking mass of concrete and rebar in the middle of downtown. It has sat there unfinished for YEARS.

    Now your (US) tax dollars might end up paying for the demonlition of Intel's unfinished building.

    Nice, very nice.

    --
    Matt

  81. Stock inintel by amiami · · Score: 1

    Just bought two dell pentium 4 3.0 GHz for $600 by getting a refurbished system. Back two years ago these systems would have cost $2500 each.Compaines like these decide there net worth by simply intorducing a next generation product.And by that everytime microsft is about to launch an xbox or new windows version or intel is about to unleash a new chip or sony with another playstation buy stock in the company and watch your profits soar. Dont belive look at the past if you would have done this when the earlier systems were released.

  82. Flamebait? by killjoe · · Score: 1

    Wow, critize israel and it's flamebait huh?

    --
    evil is as evil does