Slashdot Mirror


PS3 Details Slowly Emerging

The Playstation Magazine (PSM) has a feature coming up in the next issue which discusses Sony's new console with a few new details. Both Maxconsole and Ferrago have a look at the piece. From the Maxconsole article: "We've received a lot of letters asking about how PS2 will be backwards compatible with PS2 and the original Playstation if it doesn't have memory card slot. Well, we have an answer, and it's both good and bad. First, the bad news: All of those old memory cards you have won't be usable with PS3. Okay then, wha's the solution? Sony has actually decided to only use Memory Stick Duo cards(the same format PSP uses) for PS3 save data. However, if you play a PS1 or PS2 game on PS3, the system will treat the Memory Stick like it's a normal memory card."

169 comments

  1. Oh come on people... by Godeke · · Score: 3, Insightful

    OK, so there I am on the prior story saying how much I look forward to the PS3 because of the backwards compatibility and here comes an article telling me that my save files are junk. Good grief, they couldn't put a *single* reader slot for the old cards? I wouldn't care if they made me copy the data over prior to use, except for those few games with "protected" save files that you can't move are still in trouble. I wouldn't even care if it was on the back or something silly, since I would only copy the files once.

    Please tell me that they aren't this stupid? I have games from the PS1 that I haven't finished (turn based strategy games may look bad, but still play great) and a lot of games on the PS2 in progress.

    --
    Sig under construction since 1998.
    1. Re:Oh come on people... by GoodbyeBlueSky1 · · Score: 1

      Please tell me that they aren't this stupid? I have games from the PS1 that I haven't finished (turn based strategy games may look bad, but still play great) and a lot of games on the PS2 in progress.

      Sony is, by a very large margin, the absolute worst company when it comes to memory storage. They sell the most expensive flash memory around, and you're lucky if it doesn't go obsolete within two years. I'm sorry, but they really are this stupid.

      --
      why? forty-two.
    2. Re:Oh come on people... by WaterBreath · · Score: 4, Insightful
      Please tell me that they aren't this stupid?

      They aren't "this stupid". "This stupid" would be to guarantee full backward compatility at every step, tying themselves indefinitely to ancient, obsolete hardware and software.

      We should be thanking Sony for even bothering to support the PS1 at all. It's two generations back now. Heaven forbid you should have to start a game over. We're lucky we'll even be able to play them at all. I certainly was surprised.

      I have games from the PS1 that I haven't finished...

      PS1 machines aren't going to magically stop working once the PS3 comes out. Keep your PS1.

      ...and a lot of games on the PS2 in progress

      PS2 machines aren't going to magically stop working once the PS3 comes out. Keep your PS2.

      Sorry to sound snide. I just don't understand where you're coming from with this complaint. Are you really outraged, or just disappointed? Either way, I don't think it's fair, or correct, to call it a stupid move.

    3. Re:Oh come on people... by LoverOfJoy · · Score: 1

      Don't worry. By the time PS3 comes out you'll have beaten even the longest of your PS2 games.

    4. Re:Oh come on people... by torpor · · Score: 1

      Re:Oh come on people...

      Come on yourself .. Whats the big deal with re-playing your game again?

      or, are game-saves some sort of trophy/reward/win/pose thing?

      you can still save stuff on the new slots .. so i applaud sony, actually, for taking that risk. its the 3rd revision of their game system, they know how many game-saves there are in the world, they're sorta saying .. why don't you play the games .. again .. on your new system ..

      game-saves. should it be forever, or just when you're playing?

      --
      ; -- the corruption of government starts with its secrets. a truly free people keep no secrets. --
    5. Re:Oh come on people... by Chosen+Reject · · Score: 1
      are game-saves some sort of trophy/reward/win/pose thing?

      What is really happening is he never played them to begin with. He just copied some friends game saves so he could beat the game real fast and then brag about it.

      --
      Stop Global Warming!
      Just say no to irreversible processes!
    6. Re:Oh come on people... by Meagermanx · · Score: 1

      Nothing's stopping him from keeping his save games. If he wants to play his PS1 games, he should use his PS1 or PS2. Same with the PS2 games. I mean, god forbid he should have to switch like, one cable from one machine to the other.

    7. Re:Oh come on people... by Godeke · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Yes, I can keep the PS2, but when I got the PS2 I gave the PS1 to relatives. I already have four consoles under this roof and making it so I can't just swap it out means I probably will just wait that much longer to buy, since I already have a library of games that I play. A lot of the games have unlockable content and when you are on the next to last mission of Ring of Red you don't want to start over. It isn't the new memory architecture, it is the inability to migrate to the new memory architecture while at the very same time you can use the games. If I have to wait until I finish all my old games before I buy, I won't buy soon.

      Maybe this doesn't matter to the "look shiny" crowd who doesn't play 100+ hour strategy games and rarely finishes anything, but it is an inconvience for me. the article questions whether a DEX drive might migrate the files... here is hoping it will, because I will be right there.

      --
      Sig under construction since 1998.
    8. Re:Oh come on people... by bleaknik · · Score: 3, Funny

      After reading your comment, I ran some numbers. I've got enough games that I still want to complete that I figure I should be done just in time for the next Duke Nukem title.

      Wait a minute.................

      --
      Deja Vu
      n. 1. The sensation that you've read this very article before.
    9. Re:Oh come on people... by MasterOfMagic · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Given people's obsession with finding out the secrets of the PS2 and the PS3 and given the lucrative market, I'm sure that GameShark or ActionReplay will come out with a device or software to do this migration for you. For example, a version of the SharkPort that works on the PS2 to take the games from it and move them to the PS3.

      Just because Sony won't support this in the console doesn't mean that it won't be supported by third parties.

    10. Re:Oh come on people... by WaterBreath · · Score: 1
      Maybe this doesn't matter to the "look shiny" crowd who doesn't play 100+ hour strategy games...

      In the interest of clarification, I'm not in the "look shiny" crowd. I got my first PlayStation for free from a friend who was done with his. That was just 4 years ago. I recently picked up a used PSOne (for $30) at Gamestop because that old one broke. I bought my first (and only) PS2 just 1 year ago.

      And the reason I even bought the systems at all was so that I could play through all the great SquareSoft RPGs, including the re-released NES and SNES games. Although these are arguably not usually 100+ hour games, it can approach that amount of time investment in order to "get everything" in the newer ones.

      Anyway, I understand where you're coming from. My solution has always been to be satisfied with being a late adopter. Yeah, it means I don't get to play the exciting new stuff. But it also means I never have to buy a game wondering whether it will be worth the money or not.

    11. Re:Oh come on people... by supabeast! · · Score: 1

      "Please tell me that they aren't this stupid? I have games from the PS1 that I haven't finished (turn based strategy games may look bad, but still play great) and a lot of games on the PS2 in progress."

      They aren't that stupid. They'll be selling PS1 and PS2 memory card readers at some obscene markup to make up some of the losses they take on the PS3.

      And if Sony doesn't make it, Interact will.

    12. Re:Oh come on people... by superpulpsicle · · Score: 1

      Backward compatibility is never 100%. There were PS1 games that never worked for PS2. I know first hand.... my PS1 Mortal Kombat Trilogy was one example. I was so angry, I threatened to piss on my shiny new PS2.

    13. Re:Oh come on people... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      Yes, I can keep the PS2, but when I got the PS2 I gave the PS1 to relatives

      I was going to get rid of the PS1 when I got the PS2, but it's a good thing I didn't. PS2 has huge problems playing PS1 games, at least for me. It has trouble spinning the discs (you can hear it trying. It's like there's no friction), it glitches out on a few games, and it wont read my third party memory card. Often when I wanna play PS1 games I actually have to bust out the PS1. Good thing the cables are the same for both systems, so its only a matter of swapping two cables.

    14. Re:Oh come on people... by Kaenneth · · Score: 1

      My playstations have frequently magically stopped working.

      I've had 3 Playstation 1's and 2 Playstation 2's die on me so far, while an origional NES still chuggs merrily along (with an occaisional cleaning)

      Sony VCR? dead. Samsung VCR that was used even more? Still working.

      Sony TV? dead. RCA TV I bought before it needed a repair once, but still works.

      add to that how badly Sony screwed up Everquest (Raising prices AND reducing customer support, on a product that should have gotten cheaper to provide with decreasing hardware/bandwidth costs AND higher customer volume...)

      and add to that the whole Betamax/Minidisk/Memory Stick incompatibilities...

      at this point I'm avoiding Sony products as much as I can.

    15. Re:Oh come on people... by Mostly+Monkey · · Score: 1

      Another advantage in staying "behind the curve" is being able to buy the games dirt cheap. There are very few I pay full price for, (Mostly Atlus stuff which usually doesn't come down in price) since most triple-A titles drop down to $20 eventually. Most of my purchases have been buy 2 get one free (POed)meaning 3 for around $15-$20 bucks. 6 or 7 games for the price of one new one means there are more then enough titles to keep me occupied until the new releases drop in price. Honestly I can't even keep up!

      About the PS3 memory card slot... I really wouldn't be surprised if a 3rd party or Sony brings out a memory card->USB adapter or some other way to transfer the saves eventually.

      --
      Chika Chik-ah... do-e ow ow.
    16. Re:Oh come on people... by rlbond86 · · Score: 1

      get a gameshark or something when that comes out. you'll be able to transfer saves like that with ps2 save builder eventually. Till then... EPSXE!!!!

    17. Re:Oh come on people... by qurk · · Score: 1

      I have the exact same problem. I have many ps1 games that won't even boot in the ps2. It is easy to just swap the a/v cable though.

    18. Re:Oh come on people... by Mostly+Monkey · · Score: 1

      I wonder if part of the problem lies in the fact that newer consoles have moving parts? I would say overall the last 2 generations of systems won't last as long as the earlier solid state machines. For this I am grateful for backwards compatibility. It means I'll be more likely to find a working machine 20 years in the future.

      --
      Chika Chik-ah... do-e ow ow.
    19. Re:Oh come on people... by supabeast! · · Score: 1

      Wait... you got angry because you COULDN'T play the Mortal Kombat Trilogy? Is that a joke?

    20. Re:Oh come on people... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I'm a big Nintendo fan but I'd say that's not an entirely fair comparison due to the fact that even a well manufactured disc drive is vastly more likely to fail than any of the parts in a cartridge based system.

      To make a valid comparison you need to compare it to another disc based console. As far as that goes, I'd say that there is in fact a great deal of anecdotal evidence that the PS2 is more prone to failure than the Gamecube or Xbox. Given the number of people who have had multiple PS2s fail I would guess that the problem must be due to a sensitivity to dust.

    21. Re:Oh come on people... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I'm sure that GameShark or ActionReplay will come out with a device or software to do this migration for you. For example, a version of the SharkPort that works on the PS2 to take the games from it and move them to the PS3.

      Why not use the SharkPort or an Action Replay Max Drive, copy your PS2 saves to your PC, then write THOSE files to the Memory Stick Pro Duo for the PS3? Other than the PS3, the hardware to do this is already available.

    22. Re:Oh come on people... by mink · · Score: 1

      I have Sega-CD, Turbo Duo, and Sega Saturn. All three are "old" consoles with moving parts and they work like a charm (once the volume knob on the Duo broke off (I suspect cold solder joint) and I had to open it up to fix that.

      I have 3 PS2 units that have stopped reading most media (will be trying to use my O-scope to adjust lasers next week) and a PSX that only seems to work at a >45 degree angle. I had replaced the worn rail in the PSX that made it only work when upside down, now I fear it's having read issues as well.

      I like the games I have for these consoles but the hardware is total shit in part quality.

      --
      Well I've wrestled with reality for thirty five years doctor, and I'm happy to say I finally won out over it.
    23. Re:Oh come on people... by Kaenneth · · Score: 1

      I have dust allergies, and try to keep the air in my home well filtered, and not with an ionic cleaner, as I read that those can be damaging to hardware.

  2. I predict 100% backwards compatibility... by It+doesn't+come+easy · · Score: 3, Funny

    We've received a lot of letters asking about how PS2 will be backwards compatible with PS2 and the original Playstation [...]

    --
    The NSA: The only part of the US government that actually listens.
  3. A Hack by niskel · · Score: 1

    How long would it take to make a hack that gets saves from the old memory cards onto the new memory cards. Not long by my guess seeing as there are already ways to get PS1 and PS2 saves to a computer. All it would really take is a PSP hack to get the saves on the new sticks.

  4. All of Sony's electronic products exist just to... by rokzy · · Score: 4, Insightful

    ...sell Memory Sticks.

    it wouldn't be so bad if they didn't keep updating the specs so you can't use new high-capacity sticks in previous-generation electronics.

  5. Compatibility by BigZaphod · · Score: 3, Funny

    "about how PS2 will be backwards compatible with PS2"

    Boy, I hope they are compatible! I'd hate to buy a PS2 and find myself with a suddenly obsolete PS2 when the PS2 comes out a week later or something. That'd suck.

    1. Re:Compatibility by AvitarX · · Score: 1

      MS doesn't seem to care with the XBOX360.

      --
      Wow, sent an e-mail as suggested when clicking on "use classic" banner, and got a fast response that addressed my msg
  6. What about Compact Flash and SD by gabebear · · Score: 1

    The article was a bit scarce on details, but they made it sound like the Compact Flash and SD slots announced at E3 will not be used. I hate these stupid "leaked stories"....

  7. What doesn't it do? by alvinrod · · Score: 4, Insightful
    A TiVo style peripheral will enable TV programmes to be saved on to the optional mini hard-disk.

    So it plays PS, PS2, and PS3 games, can play Blu-ray movies if they ever come into frutation, can display 2 HD outputs, used to serve as a router (functionality removed), supposedly it will run Linux out of the box, and other impressive features.

    Unfortunately, it doesn't take old PS and PS2 memory cards (I found it annoying that you could save PS data onto a PS2 card, but this just really sucks). Dance pads and other old PS2 periphels won't work on it (I guess I can laugh at my brother for buying a $300 DDR dance mat that won't work with a PS3). Next thing we know, it won't even play games.

    Is anyone else disappointed that the PS3 is becoming less and less of a game machine and turning more and more in to an all-in-wonder-box? I recall when Sony talked about how MS was basically releasing a PC with the Xbox, and now it seems the tables have turned. Some part of me honestly hopes that Nintendo and MS kick the crap out of Sony this round.

    1. Re:What doesn't it do? by Winterblink · · Score: 1

      Is anyone else disappointed that the PS3 is becoming less and less of a game machine and turning more and more in to an all-in-wonder-box? I recall when Sony talked about how MS was basically releasing a PC with the Xbox, and now it seems the tables have turned. Some part of me honestly hopes that Nintendo and MS kick the crap out of Sony this round.

      You're dreaming if you think Microsoft won't go all batshit dreaming up non-gaming things for their console to do. It's the way things are going to be going.

      --
      "I'm a leaf on the wind. Watch how I soar."
      -Hoban Washburn
    2. Re:What doesn't it do? by cerelib · · Score: 1

      first of all I think you might be looking for the word fruition, maybe. also I hope Nintendo kicks the crap out of Sony and MS. Nintendo has shown that they are really the only one of the three that cares about gaming and innovation. Sony and MS seem to just follow the trend of high power. I think they are going the way of the Pentium 4, which I would no longer touch with a 10 ft pole once they moved passed 2 GHz. Give it as many "features" as you want, you still have a steaming (literaly), inefficient mess.

    3. Re:What doesn't it do? by oGMo · · Score: 4, Insightful
      Unfortunately, it doesn't take old PS and PS2 memory cards (I found it annoying that you could save PS data onto a PS2 card, but this just really sucks).

      Yes, because it's so hard to transfer files to a Memory Stick Duo. I might even be able to do that with a $10 USB interface. (And you've been able to transfer PS1/PS2 savegames for ages.)

      Dance pads and other old PS2 periphels won't work on it (I guess I can laugh at my brother for buying a $300 DDR dance mat that won't work with a PS3).

      Sure, because even though they already build a PS2->USB box for $13, building either a bluetooth-based box or just connecting your dance pad to the PS3 USB port will be impossible. After all, it's clearly in the best interests of Sony and Konami/Bemani to alienate all those users. That's why they're ensuring backward compatibility in the first place.

      Next thing we know, it won't even play games.

      Sure, dumbass.

      --

      Don't think of it as a flame---it's more like an argument that does 3d6 fire damage

    4. Re:What doesn't it do? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny
      Sure, dumbass.

      Ha! Who's the bigger dumbass, me or the people that modded me as insightful?!

    5. Re:What doesn't it do? by NanoGator · · Score: 3, Insightful

      "Is anyone else disappointed that the PS3 is becoming less and less of a game machine and turning more and more in to an all-in-wonder-box?"

      It didn't really bother me until the rumored $465 price tag. Then I start thinking about things like "You know, I never got around to playing Metroid Prime..."

      Then again, I think launch is a terrible time to buy a system. That's when it's at it's most expensive, most likely to break, and when the fewest games are launched.

      --
      "Derp de derp."
    6. Re:What doesn't it do? by |/|/||| · · Score: 1
      You missed out on Metroid Prime? It's definitely worth picking up, as is the sequel, Echoes. I actually enjoyed the second one even more than the first.

      One tip though - the first thing you want to do on starting a new game is turn off the "hints." They're on by default, and nothing ruins a good metroid game like knowing where to go next. 8P

      --
      [javac] 100 errors
    7. Re:What doesn't it do? by bynary · · Score: 1

      I guess I can laugh at my brother for buying a $300 DDR dance mat that won't work with a PS3

      Did he buy the mat specifically for the PS3 or did he buy it for the PS2? Goodness. I just don't follow your logic.

      --
      http://www.bynarystudio.com
    8. Re:What doesn't it do? by nunchux · · Score: 4, Funny

      I guess I can laugh at my brother for buying a $300 DDR dance mat that won't work with a PS3

      Let me get this straight... Your brother is dancing like an idiot in front of the TV set, and the reason you're laughing at him is because his dance mat won't work with the next generation consoles?

    9. Re:What doesn't it do? by cornface · · Score: 0

      So it plays PS, PS2, and PS3 games, can play Blu-ray movies if they ever come into frutation, can display 2 HD outputs, used to serve as a router (functionality removed), supposedly it will run Linux out of the box, and other impressive features.

      Sounds good to me. However, I have the feeling that you're about to start complaining.

      Unfortunately, it doesn't take old PS and PS2 memory cards (I found it annoying that you could save PS data onto a PS2 card, but this just really sucks). Dance pads and other old PS2 periphels won't work on it

      I knew it!

      It's interesting to note that my old SMS light gun won't work with the Dreamcast and my SNES controllers won't work on the GameCube. Well maybe not interesting, just common sense. Why would you be upset that a peripheral you bought for an existing piece of hardware won't work with another piece of hardware that hasn't even come out yet?

      (I guess I can laugh at my brother for buying a $300 DDR dance mat).

      I fixed that sentence for you.

      Is anyone else disappointed that the PS3 is becoming less and less of a game machine and turning more and more in to an all-in-wonder-box?

      If you don't like it, don't buy it. Don't let it bother you.

      I recall when Sony talked about how MS was basically releasing a PC with the Xbox, and now it seems the tables have turned. Some part of me honestly hopes that Nintendo and MS kick the crap out of Sony this round.

      It's amazing to think that Sony would talk down their competitor's features that were not part of their own console. I'd post more but I need to take a break and let that sink in.

    10. Re:What doesn't it do? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Honestly, you Nintendo fans need to die off already along with your favorite has been company. Having the slowest, wimpiest specs and mostly games for 10 years and younger does not make them innovative or creative. 20 different Mario games don't make them a prime gaming company. They need to step aside already and leave gaming to companies which actually have the power.

      You hope Nitendo kicks the crap out of them? You better start hoping they stop kicking the crap out of themselves with their Fisher Price console.

    11. Re:What doesn't it do? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Let me get this straight...

      What an unfortunately ironic choice of words.

    12. Re:What doesn't it do? by NanoGator · · Score: 1

      Appreciated, thank you! :)

      --
      "Derp de derp."
    13. Re:What doesn't it do? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Wow, that was weak attempt at trolling.

      100% factual, but weak, none-the-less.

    14. Re:What doesn't it do? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I know you were trying to be funny, but seriously, dont knock it until you've tried it. After 10 minutes playing on my little brother's mat, I was hooked.

    15. Re:What doesn't it do? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I can't believe anyone cares about this nonsense.

    16. Re:What doesn't it do? by Weirdofreak · · Score: 2, Funny

      I could be mistaken, but I thought Sony had been saying for a while that the PS3 was a supercomputer*. Here we go, although the link's been eaten:
      http://games.slashdot.org/article.pl?sid=05/05/25/ 1758219&tid=233&tid=212

      *for values of supercomputer made up on the spot

    17. Re:What doesn't it do? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      Nintendo has shown that they are really the only one of the three that cares about gaming and innovation

      Bullshit. They have been against the evolution of technology for fears of rising costs. Sony and MS give gamers what they want, Nintendo tells gamers what they want

    18. Re:What doesn't it do? by j.bellone · · Score: 1

      Why does it matter? If you own a PSP then you could simply transfer the files to the PSP's Memory Duo slot from your PC. I'm sure they'll be some sort of adapter for the USB that'll allow it, but is it worth the $30?

      --
      I'm f#$king magic!
    19. Re:What doesn't it do? by patternjuggler · · Score: 1

      Is anyone else disappointed that the PS3 is becoming less and less of a game machine and turning more and more in to an all-in-wonder-box?

      Xbox 360 seems headed the same way. If anyone remembers the set-top box non-events (I'm sure MS was involved with one of them) or the '3D0 is the next VCR like appliance' type marketing from the early-to-mid-90s, it seems like MS and Sony are trying to revive the concept. The reason for the resurrection? HD tvs will make the web more readable than they were on standard definition.

      General purpose machines are boring.

      The death touch is if they promote the educational potential for their machines, but I haven't heard that one yet.

    20. Re:What doesn't it do? by rohlfinator · · Score: 1

      "They have been against the evolution of technology for fears of rising costs."

      In what way? The GameCube was far more powerful than the PS2, and almost on par with the Xbox. The only reasonable argument I could understand is the N64 cart vs. CD's debate, but that's ancient history in an industry this young. All three console manufacturers are cutting corners to save money. Sony has already removed several features from the PS3, and has rumored at an inflated price point to make up for the PS3's expensive hardware. Microsoft will need to be especially thrifty in the upcoming generation, unless they plan to bleed millions of dollars again like they did on the Xbox.

      The goal is to design a console that's financially reasonable for both the consumer and the manufacturer. Microsoft missed that mark with the Xbox, and Sony appears to be doing the opposite with the PS3, raising the price to offset costs. So far Nintendo has been the only company to consistently provide an affordable yet powerful console without coughing up a mint to pay for it.

    21. Re:What doesn't it do? by Murasaki+Skies · · Score: 1

      "You can't win, oGMo. If you strike me down, I shall become more of a dumbass than you could possibly imagine."

      --
      Waiiii!!!!!! I have bad karma!
    22. Re:What doesn't it do? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      rofl! pwnt.

    23. Re:What doesn't it do? by elrous0 · · Score: 1
      Sony had been saying for a while that the PS3 was a supercomputer

      But will it render Toy Story real-time? And shouldn't we be concerned that terrorists could use such an incredibly powerful supercomputer to guide missles?

      -Eric

      --
      SJW: Someone who has run out of real oppression, and has to fake it.
  8. hmm by jessecurry · · Score: 1
    All of those old memory cards you have won't be usable with PS3

    I hope that someone will create a piece of hardware that copies information from the old memory cards to the memorystick.

    --
    Those who know, do not speak. Those who speak, do not know. ~Lao Tzu
    1. Re:hmm by StonedRat · · Score: 1

      i think you can backup ps2 memory cards to your pc with an action replay, and write to the duo easily enough using a psp or a card reader.

      --
      "Religion is the most malevolent of all mind viruses." - Arthur C. Clarke.
    2. Re:hmm by forkazoo · · Score: 1

      http://www.lik-sang.com/info.php?category=25&produ cts_id=202&

      This is the first thing I saw. Plug it into your PC, and backup your saves. If you have a Memory stick reader on the PC, it should be easy to copy over.

      I also wouldn't be surprised if there us a USB card reader available for the PS3 itself to work with the old cards directly.

    3. Re:hmm by Harlockjds · · Score: 1

      I'm sure they will go on sale by someone when the ps3 lauches

  9. On the bright side... by sagekoala06 · · Score: 1

    at least I'll have a use for the otherwise useless 32meg memory stick that came with my psp.

    1. Re:On the bright side... by Guppy06 · · Score: 1

      I don't know what you're talkin gabout, I get lots of use out of the 32 MB memory stick! It's the UMD slot that has no porpose! :)

  10. Great. by bk_veggie · · Score: 3, Insightful

    So I get to buy some kooky, expensive third party device in order to transfer my final fantasy, xenosaga and street fighter data to this expensive memory stick?

  11. Possibility? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I wonder if it would be possible for those who are lucky enough to have PS2 Linux kit's to trasnfer the game saves over a network onto a PC and then from there to a memory stick?

    The solution of course would be for someone to make an adaptor that allows memory card data to be transferred to PC - from whence the information can be moved around willy nilly

    1. Re:Possibility? by CronoCloud · · Score: 1

      Yes, it can be done with a kernel patch (the BWLINUX patch) that lets you access the full contents of a card.

      One wouldn't even need to transfer the files to a PC over the network. The PS2 Linux kit can use USB storage devices so just hook up a PSP or cheap card reader.

  12. DexDrive by antifood · · Score: 2, Interesting

    The article mentioned that the DexDrive would be a possible solution to transfer game files. It's the first thing that came to my mind as well.

    1. Re:DexDrive by DreadPiratePizz · · Score: 2, Insightful

      That solution is unacceptable to many of us who do not own a Windows PC. The DexDrive does not have macintosh support, so I am out of luck.

      It's also terribly inconvinient to force your customers to jump through hoops like that just to play old saved games. This is exactly what I didn;t want to see, and that's partial support for backward compatability. It's all or nothing, and if you don;t have it all, it's not worth doing.

    2. Re:DexDrive by antifood · · Score: 2, Informative

      Well apparently you can use a DexDrive on your Mac. I don't think that Sony executives thought that using a relatively unknown peripheral would be a suitable substitute. I do think some Slashdot reader's may find the original link I supplied to be of use.

    3. Re:DexDrive by nick_davison · · Score: 0, Troll

      That solution is unacceptable to many of us who do not own a Windows PC. The DexDrive does not have macintosh support, so I am out of luck.

      Oh, come now. Do you seriously expect us to believe any Mac users use PlayStations? There's no way a Mac user's brain could handle all the buttons on a Dual Shock, it'd explode (very creatively) or something.

      Of course this does open up a massive niche for third party developers - the crossover device: A controller with no buttons, no D-pads, no analog sticks. It's just a reassuring white blob that you can hug to your chest and stroke/squeeze as if it did have buttons while not having to admit to them.

    4. Re:DexDrive by oGMo · · Score: 2, Insightful
      Oh pfft. So someone comes out with a USB addon for the PS3 that let you plug in your PS2/PS1 memory cards. $10-15 tops. Then you don't need a PC or Mac at all.

      Sony's not "forcing" customers to "jump through hoops"; as someone else said if you've got old save games, your old console doesn't stop working when you get a PS3.

      Sony gives you 2 consoles of backward compatibility, a ton of new features, upgrades to a more standard form of memory storage with far greater capacity and a lower price, and all everyone does is whine whine whine because they can't plug in their 12-year-old memory card. Typical.

      --

      Don't think of it as a flame---it's more like an argument that does 3d6 fire damage

    5. Re:DexDrive by Babbster · · Score: 1
      Sony gives you 2 consoles of backward compatibility, a ton of new features, upgrades to a more standard form of memory storage with far greater capacity and a lower price, and all everyone does is whine whine whine because they can't plug in their 12-year-old memory card. Typical.

      How about a one-month-old memory card? As for the "more standard" memory card with "a lower price," had Sony gone with SD I might buy that argument. Had Sony gone with the Memory Stick when they designed the PS2, I think folks might be more forgiving.

      If you want to be an apologist, that's certainly your prerogative, but the truth is that Sony is trying to suck a lot more money out of people's pockets - not less. They're counting on people saying "what the heck" and spending $40 for 128MB instead of $20 for 32MB (Sony Memory Stick Duo prices at a major retailer; also worth noting that at this same retailer a 32MB SD card goes for $10 - Sony must really use advanced tech to be twice the price).

      The bottom line in my eyes is that Sony could have easily included a slot for the old cards, perhaps with the option to move them over to a Memory Stick. By not doing so, they're forcing an unnecessary kludge/expense on people who want to take advantage of what is supposedly (at least when Sony fans are raving about the PS2 and PS3) one of Sony's best features.

    6. Re:DexDrive by defy+god · · Score: 1
      well, an 8MB PS2 Memory Card retails at $24.99 , while the 128MB Memory Stick is at $39.99. Per MB, that's $3.12 vs. $0.31. They've placed the memory stick in everything Sony(tm) for several years now. It's just common sense for them to place it in a practically guarunteed multi-million selling product that can hopefully finally bring the acceptance of the Memory Stick to the forefront. I'd like to believe that the Memory Stick will go down in price, though i doubt it, but I do find it a lot more useful than having the 8MB PS2 memory card specifically just for playstations. Mind you, I hate memory sticks and Sony's constant forced product tie-ins, but from their perspective it makes good business sense.

      Bob buys a PS3 and uses a memory stick to save his game data. He decides to buy a digital camera and lo and behold, he sees that the sony digital cameras use the same memory format his PS3 uses. no need for him to buy that extra memory card or at least if he does, he can use it along with his ps3. imagine if he brings his camera over to a friend's house. friend has a PS3 as well. Want to see the pictures? Plug it into the PS3. Want to play that party game with everything unlocked? Wait a minute, it's in his memory card that he uses for both PS3 and digital camera so he has it with him because he has his digital camera. What? He didn't save it onto his camera's memory stick? Why, just download it from some gaming website, copy it to the memory stick through your sony vaio, and play the party game with all games unlocked that way.

      sure, they could have used an SD, CF, xD, smart media, or even iPod but they didn't. they don't control those formats, nor do they make money directly (memory stick sales) or indirectly (other products using the memory sticks).
      --
      hackers of the world unite!
    7. Re:DexDrive by Babbster · · Score: 1
      That's a great idea, using one Memory Stick for multiple devices. It might work, too, as long as a) you buy all Sony, a company that makes average products and sells them for a premium because once upon a time Sony had a quality line-up (my grandma, rest her soul, had an awesome little Trinitron that kept going and going), and b) you don't do "too much" with any one device ("Darn, I'd love to take some more pictures but this Memory Stick is full because of my Final Fantasy XII game saves.").

      And your explanation still doesn't offer anything as to why they can't put a legacy PS1/PS2 card port in the PS3 (assuming the info here constitutes the "straight dope"). They could still have made Memory Sticks a requirement for PS3 saves - like they did with the new-format PS2 cards - while making things easier for those who, as I said earlier, want to use one of the PS3's big features.

      Hey, I think Memory Sticks are better than the one-device PS1 and PS2 game cards. I was one of those hoping early on that the PS2 would use them, if only because I like it when devices I buy conform to somebody's standard. That doesn't change the fact that, out of the box, it seems the PS3 is going to be backwards compatible only in theory...or only if you play just one pre-PS3 game and leave the console on between play sessions.

    8. Re:DexDrive by Babbster · · Score: 1
      That last sentence was mistaken, probably due to my brain being muddled by my current irritation with Sony (I say "current" because I've enjoyed my Playstation and PS2, and I'll probably enjoy a PS3). It should say: "...or only if you want to start a pre-PS3 from scratch." After all, if you want to play a "new" old game on the PS3 a Memory Stick will work out just fine.

      Oh, and I should also note an extra source of irritation towards Sony with this Memory Stick debacle. Specifically, I'm a little pissed that they couldn't find a way to include a hard drive in the console from jump. I know that it was one of the causes of the Xbox losses, but damn if it isn't one of the most convenient, consumer-friendly aspects of that console.

    9. Re:DexDrive by blackicye · · Score: 1

      Lol if I had mod points I would have modded parent post funny.

  13. Re:All of Sony's electronic products exist just to by PhilHibbs · · Score: 1

    Stupid memory stick. Stupid Sony. USB storage is the way to go, you stupid, stupid people.

  14. WTF by czarangelus · · Score: 1

    I'm gonna be hella pissed off if my old saves won't work on the PS3, or if I have to buy some crappy $30 gizmo to do it. I've invested well over 100 hours into some of my RPGs (slow summer, give me a break!) and if Sony's gonna throw all those hours out the window... I'm gonna be one unhappy camper.

    --
    When a true genius appears, you can know him by this sign: that all the dunces are in a confederacy against him.
    1. Re:WTF by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Um, you don't HAVE to get rid of your old console just because you get a new one.

    2. Re:WTF by czarangelus · · Score: 1

      That's true, but a) I can probably still sell the PS2 for ~$20, enough for a decent discount off the next console. b) I'd rather not have my space cluttered with obselete consoles - the dorm room is small enough as it is.

      --
      When a true genius appears, you can know him by this sign: that all the dunces are in a confederacy against him.
    3. Re:WTF by IpalindromeI · · Score: 1

      Yeah, but then he can't get hella pissed. Remember, this is Slashdot. The (unwritten) motto is: Getting pissed for no reason since 1997.

      --

      --
      Promoting critical thinking since 1994.
    4. Re:WTF by ElleyKitten · · Score: 1

      I can probably still sell the PS2 for ~$20, enough for a decent discount off the next console.

      Wait, you think $20 is a decent discount off a system that will cost at least $300? At that price, why even sell it?

      --
      "What is Internet Explorer 7? Are you saying we can't access the normal internet?" - I love tech support. Really.
    5. Re:WTF by Crumplecorn · · Score: 1

      If it plays PS2 games better than the PS3 (due to memory cards or other issues), and you wish to play PS2 games, it is not obselete.

    6. Re:WTF by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Wait, you think $20 is a decent discount off a system that will cost at least $300? At that price, why even sell it?

      He said he was a college student. He's used to the campus bookstore buying $300 books for $20.

  15. The Rub, 10 years down the road.... by telstar · · Score: 3, Insightful

    I've got a great 36" Sony TV. Picture is beautiful. Nice HD display. Takes Sony memory sticks as the memory stick of choice ... but NOT the duo. Now, I don't really expect a TV to take ANY type of memory card, so it doesn't bother me that much ... but it was a brand new TV 2 years ago and it didn't support the Duo. The manual was even new enough to know that the Duo existed, but that it wasn't supported by my TV. Like I said, it doesn't bother me since I don't use memory sticks.

    Now Sony has billed the Playstation3 as a 10-year device. It makes me wonder if they truly intend to stop the evolution of their memory stick line at the form factor of the Memory Stick Duo. What happens if 4 years down the road, they come up with a new format with a new form factor that's incompatible with the interface of the PS3? Is everyone that's 4 years into a 10 year PS3 investment screwed?

    The ONLY reason Sony is obligating users to use the Memory Stick Duo as the storage media is that it allows them to recoup some of the loss they're taking on each machine sold. And while it may seem okay today ... "hey, it's their product ... they can do what they want ... right?" ... talk to me in 10 years, when a new storage medium has come out ... and your PS3 is still using a storage format you can only find used on eBay.

    1. Re:The Rub, 10 years down the road.... by Gerad · · Score: 1

      No offense meant, but I would imagine that the market for PS3 memory sticks would be significantly larger than memory sticks for a specific brand of TV. I mean, you even admit that you don't bother with a memory stick in your TV, because you don't really expect a TV to use one. As long as there's a significant demand and a significant ability to make a profit, I seriously doubt that any company, that's able, will stop manfacturing a product that's bringing them in a profit.

      --
      Be the Ultimate Ninja! Play Billy Vs. SNAKEMAN today!
    2. Re:The Rub, 10 years down the road.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I think Sony advertizes these adapters that allows you to plug in a duo inside a larger old-style memory stick that you connect to your device instead -- they advertize this in their PSP manuals and I've seen them at compUSA at least.

    3. Re:The Rub, 10 years down the road.... by alvinrod · · Score: 3, Informative
      Now Sony has billed the Playstation3 as a 10-year device.

      They've also said things about how the PS2/PS3 would be 200 times more powerful than their last console.

      If you believe them when they say it will have a 10 year life cycle, you should probably get your head examined. If anything, it seems that the lifespan of consoles is decreasing: (based on information from GameFAQs.

      Nintendo: 7/83 - 11/90

      Super Nintendo: 11/90 - 6/96

      Nintendo 64: 6/96 - 9/01

      GameCube: 9/01 - 8/06 (guess based on current information)

      As you can see, the lifespan of consoles is decreasing as they become more advanced. The Xbox has only existed for roughly 4 years and it's already being replaced. People will still makes games for a system after a new one comes out, but most of the killer apps will be for the new platform.

      I think what Sony meant to say when they threw out the 10 year figure is that it has technology in it that will finally come into wide acceptance and be standard in 10 years. 1080p TVs, good luck finding those today, but in 10 years I think a lot of people will have HD TVs capable of making full use of the PS3's graphical output abilities. Blu-ray discs won't be heavily used now since most people are satisfied with DVDs, but in 10 years it's possible that they will have replaced the DVD as the standard. There is no way, however, that the PS3 will last for 10 years. That's like saying if you purchased a top of the line computer right now that it would still be competitive 10 years down the road. It might handle Doom 3 just fine now, but what about Doom 5?

      Essentially what we get is another bullshit figure pulled from the ass of Sony to get people to buy what they're selling. 10 is a nice round number and sounds impressive and somewhat believable after all the hype about the PS3 we've had thrown at us, but in 10 years I think we'll be looking at getting a nice new shiny PS5, which will replace our PS4, which 5 years before replaced the then almost pathetic PS3. Moore's law just won't allow something like the PS3 a 10 year life span.

    4. Re:The Rub, 10 years down the road.... by kisielk · · Score: 1

      "talk to me in 10 years, when a new storage medium has come out ... and your PS3 is still using a storage format you can only find used on eBay."

      Yeah, just like I have to go to eBay to find memory cards for the PSX used...

      I know it's not 10 years old yet, but I can still find memory cards for it in plentiful supply and they don't appear to be about to disappear any time soon.

    5. Re:The Rub, 10 years down the road.... by oGMo · · Score: 1
      Now Sony has billed the Playstation3 as a 10-year device

      The thing to realize about this is that it's nothing unusual for Sony. The PS1 was already 10 years (first shipped in 1994, still shipping millions in 2004). The PS2 was first shipped in 2000, and as they're pumping out games for it today with no end in sight, it'll probably be 2008-2010 before we see the last PSTwo out the door. Backward compatibility of the PS3 helps to encourage this, since even if someone doesn't have a PS1 or PS2, if they get a PS3, then they can still play those new PS2 games.

      If the PS3 ships in 2006, I wouldn't be suprised still seeing it in 2016, but the PS4 will probably ship around 2011.

      --

      Don't think of it as a flame---it's more like an argument that does 3d6 fire damage

    6. Re:The Rub, 10 years down the road.... by oGMo · · Score: 2, Informative
      If you believe them when they say it will have a 10 year life cycle, you should probably get your head examined.

      I believe if you weren't a Nintendo fanboy and looked at the lifespan on the PS1, you'd see it survived a decade. The PS2 has an easy 3 years left in it, which puts it close, and I wouldn't be suprised to see more.

      Nintendo: 7/83 - 11/90
      Super Nintendo: 11/90 - 6/96
      Nintendo 64: 6/96 - 9/01
      GameCube: 9/01 - 8/06 (guess based on current information)

      As you can see, the lifespan of consoles is decreasing as they become more advanced.

      Because clearly, there are no consoles besides Nintendo consoles. Don't get me wrong: I grew up on Nintendo and love them like anyone else. But this decline could also easily be attributed to Nintendo's production of fewer and fewer games, their focus on the Gameboy, or any number of factors. Look beyond Nintendo and we don't see a decline at all.

      --

      Don't think of it as a flame---it's more like an argument that does 3d6 fire damage

    7. Re:The Rub, 10 years down the road.... by badasscat · · Score: 1

      Nintendo: 7/83 - 11/90

      Super Nintendo: 11/90 - 6/96

      Nintendo 64: 6/96 - 9/01

      GameCube: 9/01 - 8/06 (guess based on current information)

      As you can see, the lifespan of consoles is decreasing as they become more advanced.


      Well, your dates are a bit off, first of all.

      The Nintendo Famicom was produced from 1983-2003. Yes, 20 years. The NES (which I guess is what you mean by "Nintendo") was produced from 1985-1995. So either way, your dates for it are completely wrong.

      Your basic premise could still be true, but for the fact that Sony produced the original PlayStation from 1995-2004. So, nearly as long as Nintendo produced the NES, as long as Atari produced the 2600, longer than Sega produced the Genesis or Nintendo produced the SNES.

      Many older consoles have also had extremely short life cycles. The Atari 5200 and Coleco Vision, successful in their day (yes, the 5200 actually outsold the CV), both were produced from 1982-1984. The 5200 was scheduled to be replaced by 1985 even if the crash of 1984 had never happened - the Atari 7800 was completed in 1983. (The crash delayed the 7800's launch by two more years.)

      I'd say the length of a console's production life depends more on its success and its production costs than its position in the timeline of game console history. A lot of old consoles lasted a good long time (the Intellivision, for example, was produced from 1979-1991 despite limited marketplace success - it was cheap to make and market), but a lot of others only lasted a couple years. The same is true of today's machines.

    8. Re:The Rub, 10 years down the road.... by alvinrod · · Score: 1
      I won't dispute that you can still buy a new PlayStation and that people still make games for it (usually sports games like Madden and such are all that I can recall), but once the PS2 launched, most people slowly stopped making games for the PS. Games were still released for it (like Madden which has seen a 2005 release for the system) but nothing really great that I know of has come out for the PS since the PS2 launched, which is why we don't see GTA, GT, FF, or other big franchises being released for it.

      The dates I listed where from when the console launched to when the next generation version launched. This doesn't mean that everything stops for that particular system, merely that it's pretty close to it.

      PlayStation: 12/94 - 3/00 (japanese dates)

      PlayStation 2: 3/00 - 3/06 (guess based on current information)

      Sony's machines really haven't declined much, but I used Nintendo as an example because they stretch back farther and give a wider example. Maybe the phenomina is unique to Nintendo, but I think it's somewhat applicable.

      You can argue that the Sony PS is still a viable system with games being produced for it and I won't argue too much with you because there is some truth in such a statement, but for all intents and purposes, it's life is over. Perhaps it would have been more accurate for me to say that the amount of time before a new console generation is released is shortening.

      Using that reformulated hypothesis, the amount of time between the PS and PS2 falls right into line with the numbers from Nintendo consoles. Taking into your account your argument for a decreasing number of Nintendo games and an increasing number of games for the PS and PS2, their life spans are a little bit longer than average. The Xbox from MS is a special case because they entered the current generation playing field late and want to start the next one early.

      The projected span for the PS2 is slightly shorter than the PS2 however. Will we still see Madden 2009 for the PS2 thought? I'd bet money on it.

    9. Re:The Rub, 10 years down the road.... by Niobium-41 · · Score: 0, Offtopic

      Essentially what we get is another bullshit figure pulled from the ass of Sony to get people to buy what they're selling

      Speaking of Sony Bullshit.. that "Realtime Killzone Demo" apparently not so realtime..

      Quoted from the same article (pulled from http://www.shacknews.com/)
      "None of the game footage was taken from software running on systems using the final PS3 graphics chip, the Reality Synthesizer (RSX). ... The most stunning demo, Killzone PS3, was from an actual game engine running on an alpha kit--at less than five frames per second. The footage was sped up to 60fps in post-production."

    10. Re:The Rub, 10 years down the road.... by TheSneak · · Score: 1

      5fps? That's ok, i get that much on doom3.

      --
      Nasa spent billions making a pen capable of writing in space. The Russians just use a pencil.
    11. Re:The Rub, 10 years down the road.... by oGMo · · Score: 1
      The thing is, this is part of the cycle. The console isn't suddenly dead when the next generation gets released. Past its prime, yes, but it's still got a ways to go. Most people were still playing NES games when the SNES was out, same with the N64, etc.

      What I'm saying is that regardless of manufacturer, these things already have close to an 8-10-year lifecycle. Basically, Sony is playing up something that is fairly typical. Hype, yes, true, probably, big deal? Not quite as big as they'd like to make it---but a signficant advantage over the XBOX, which seems to have been in its death throes for awhile already.

      (Nintendo has been doing worse for entirely Nintendo-related reasons, IMO. They need to start producing the same level of games they did in the SNES days. I think they realize this, too, and that's what they're aiming for with the Revolution. I'm not entirely sure they know how to do it yet, though.)

      --

      Don't think of it as a flame---it's more like an argument that does 3d6 fire damage

    12. Re:The Rub, 10 years down the road.... by Hadlock · · Score: 1

      The Nintendo Famicom was produced from 1983-2003. Yes, 20 years.
       
      As I understand it, the Sega Master system is still in production and still very popular in Brazil (As the Sega Master System III, but it's still the same basic hardware) - from 1987-2005 (and beyond).
       
        Wikipedia Sega MS article.

      --
      moox. for a new generation.
    13. Re:The Rub, 10 years down the road.... by Psiven · · Score: 0

      Well since Revolution is backwards compatible I think we can expect to see GCN games getting released for 8 years after the format was introduced. Miyamoto was quoted saying precisely this.

    14. Re:The Rub, 10 years down the road.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Oh, you meant console FAILURE.. yeah, lets hope its 10 years..

      *Tries to hold back laughter after replacing both my PS1 and PS2..*

      I won't even bother with the PSP.

      What you meant that when the PS3 is released, people will still care about the PS2? How about no.

      Nintendo has been doing worse for entirely Nintendo-related reasons, IMO. They need to start producing the same level of games they did in the SNES days. I think they realize this, too, and that's what they're aiming for with the Revolution. I'm not entirely sure they know how to do it yet, though.)

      Its sad that the cheapest console is also the least supported. I see commercial after commerical with Sony/Microsoft logos, and wonder what in the hell Nintendo could have done to lose so many good games for itself.

    15. Re:The Rub, 10 years down the road.... by Hellsbells · · Score: 1

      It usually comes free when you buy a duo memory stick.

    16. Re:The Rub, 10 years down the road.... by markimusk · · Score: 1

      I think what it comes down to is what do you still play? Going by my own experience (which honestly matters to me more than others), the Atari 2600 now has a 28 year lifespan.

      I have a PS2 and still play PS1 games on it, so arbitrary "market statistics" don't really mean anything. I might get a PS3, but only when there is actually a reason to do so.

      Bottom line, play what you like and enjoy!

    17. Re:The Rub, 10 years down the road.... by mink · · Score: 1

      The reason there are still millions of PSX units being made and sold is because PS2 backwards computability isn't all that great (some popular ones have issues on PS2) and that the components are made so cheaply (I bet they used caps with the bogus electrolyte) that they break regularly from normal use. Since they now only cost $50 you can look at the cost of buying new ones kind of like a maintenance fee every quarter.

      Yes I am exaggerating, but sometimes it feels that bad.

      --
      Well I've wrestled with reality for thirty five years doctor, and I'm happy to say I finally won out over it.
  16. Maybe he meant... by game+kid · · Score: 1

    ...the PS2 will now be backwards-compatible with PS/2, which means I can use my 3-button mouse to play SOCOM II--YAY!!1

    --
    You can hold down the "B" button for continuous firing.
  17. I agree. by game+kid · · Score: 1

    Your sig ("Be incomprehensible. If they can't understand, they can't disagree"), oddly enough, applies perfectly well in this case.

    --
    You can hold down the "B" button for continuous firing.
  18. Re:All of Sony's electronic products exist just to by bleaknik · · Score: 1

    You know, Sony updates the specs for a reason. Sure I'm pissed I can't use my old 1.3 MP Digital Camera with a brand new 4 GB Memory Stick Pro... but if I remember right... they needed to update the specs in order to breach the 128 MB gap... something about file system instability. I guess there are those users who wouldn't mind flipping a toggle switch 37 times so they could access a few more megabytes of data..........

    --
    Deja Vu
    n. 1. The sensation that you've read this very article before.
  19. This won't be a problem at all. by Firehawke · · Score: 1

    Eh, it's irritating, but it's not a HUGE problem. I'll just run MGS3 or something on the PS3 to get an idea what the save format looks like, then I'll use execftps to yank all my PS2 saves, then lastly hand-reformat them to the memory stick filr structure. Shouldn't be too hard-- chances are it'll use the same directory/file structure, so I probably won't have to do anything more than just move the files as-is.

    1. Re:This won't be a problem at all. by Gr33nNight · · Score: 2, Funny

      Tell that to my mother who enjoys playing Harvest Moon.

    2. Re:This won't be a problem at all. by IpalindromeI · · Score: 1

      Tell your mother not to get rid of her PS2. Problem solved.

      --

      --
      Promoting critical thinking since 1994.
  20. How hard would it be... by wuie · · Score: 1

    for Sony to make a slot for the old Memory cards (doesn't need to be in the front, it could be hidden), and make a small function that reads the old saves and writes them on the new disk?

    They have the code.. they have the tech.. now all they need to do is implement this into the PS3 and save themselves a marketing nightmare.

    1. Re:How hard would it be... by geshtu · · Score: 1

      Yeah, they could replace two of the three freakishly pointless gigabit ports and just slap a card reader on the back. Oh wait, sony doesnt care what you think. They just want to see what they can fit into one box.

  21. Suicide by SewersOfRivendell · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Seems like Sony and MS are both playing "Let's see who can screw up the next console generation more!" This game may backfire if Nintendo's hardware beats expectations.

    1. Re:Suicide by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      " Seems like Sony and MS are both playing "Let's see who can screw up the next console generation more!""

      Well you seem to have managed to find the one area MS actually is beating Sony...

      I would love to hear someone list some area that MS isn't screwing up with the 360. So far it is turning out to be the biggest console fiasco ever. Makes the Dreamcast marketplace failure look not so bad.

    2. Re:Suicide by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA. *wipes tears from eyes*

      It's funny because its true!

    3. Re:Suicide by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I think that in many ways Nintendo may regain a lot of ground this generation because they're simply not trying to compete in the same way as Sony and Microsoft.

      The Backwards compatibility of the Revolution should be a big selling feature to a lot of old-school gamers; if they could only work out a deal with Sega to support their old platforms they would sell a ton of units for that reason alone (could you imagine NES, Sega Master System, SNES, GENESIS/Sega CD/32X, N64, Saturn, Dreamcast and Gamecube games all playable on a single platform). If they produce some sort of low cost (possibly free) development kit for either these systems, or some sort of virtual system, they could offer a new revinue source to both indipendant and large development houses.

      Although the Revolution should be pretty similar in graphics to both the PS3 and 360, Nintendo hasn't been spending too much time hyping this. After having a conversation with a couple of people from small (former GBA) development houses, this is what they want from these console manufacturers. Most developers have come to the conclusion that they will not be able to compete against the larger developers in a technology war anymore; this is not because their programmers are not good enough, but the cost of developing 1 level of content for a game is approaching the entire budget of an old N64 game. These developers would rather support a platform that wasn't being produced by a company that was saying "if it doesn't look dramatically better than what was available on the XBox there is no reason to play it".

      I'm not saying that Nintendo will dominate; but if the rumors are true and the revolution will launch at a reasonable price ($150-$200) with more moderately priced games compared to their competitors then they could capture a lot of the market.

    4. Re:Suicide by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      This game may backfire if Nintendo's hardware beats expectations.

      Nope.This game may backfire if Nintendo's software beats expectations.

      It is about the launch games. And the price.

  22. Useless reading. by TheSneak · · Score: 1

    That was a pretty useless article if you ask me. Nothing new there and it was all speculation, speculation and more speculation.

    Call me when you get some concrete info from sony themselves, instead of this "a freind of a freind said at e3 that they said that..."

    --
    Nasa spent billions making a pen capable of writing in space. The Russians just use a pencil.
    1. Re:Useless reading. by SeekerDarksteel · · Score: 1

      I almost wonder if rumors like this are not leaked by the company behind the game on purpose, but diffused through several layers. This way Sony can judge people's reactions to the rumor while maintaining deniability. If people seem to not care they can go ahead, but if there's a lot of negative reaction they can always add the slot on there and save face by denying that they ever intended the PS3 to lack a PS2/PS1 memory card slot.

      --
      The laws of probability forbid it!
  23. Flash drives by CelticWhisper · · Score: 1

    Am I the only one who thinks it would be great if even just one of these manufacturers built a system that could save games to a USB flash drive? More and more people are buying them, they're based on a decade-old standard that's been, for all intents and purposes, perfected, and they could potentially open up new worlds of fan-modding for console games (trading maps, custom characters, saves, etc.) If they're that concerned about piracy, all I can say is that I've yet to see a 50GB USB drive.

    I know it can be done since the Codebreaker allows the updating of codes via the PS2's USB ports. So how's 'bout game saves? Hmm? Anyone? Bueller?

    --
    Help protect civil rights from abuse by the TSA - visit TSA News Blog.
    http://www.tsanewsblog.com
    1. Re:Flash drives by pthor1231 · · Score: 1

      You haven't seen 50 GB USB drives?? Really, thats strange, because I have seen 50 GB USB drives, even sizes up to 250 GB. Granted they are external hard drives, but its still the same format as a USB Flash drive.

    2. Re:Flash drives by Psiven · · Score: 0

      I love this idea but then the console manufaturer loses income on memory cards. I think they must turn a large profit on those cheap flash cards.

      But to give a ray of hope, Revolution and Microsoft both have USB ports. Dunno about PS3 off hand.

    3. Re:Flash drives by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I have a 500GB Lacie USB drive right here. And I loves it.

  24. Backwards campatability vs Not by 834r9394557r011 · · Score: 1

    Man you people b@$ch about some stupid stuff. I mean seriously, people. At least the old games will still work at all. Look at the 360, you are going to have to buy the game again if you want to play it on the new system. I think having to play the game again > is not such a huge deal. I think having to spend another $20-$40?!? for the same game again would call for the "wah" sound, and maybe a little bitching. Microsoft has the code for those games and could easily make it somewhat backwards compatible. I mean if they have to rewrite the games to play on the 360 in the first place, wouldn't it be easier to write one bunch of code in the OS rather than rewriting 20 games? Just be happy we will still get to enjoy FFIV on two HD screens :-)

    --
    w00t
    1. Re:Backwards campatability vs Not by Babbster · · Score: 1
      What you say about buying Xbox games again for the Xbox 360 is just an old rumor - a lie, if I was less kind. According to the latest information available, the Xbox emulation in the 360 is planned to use the same discs already available, it will be optimized first for compatibility with the most popular games and will continue to be updated over time through Xbox Live as difficulties are worked out.

      X360 backward compatibility is not going to be ideal but it's certainly not the mess you claim it to be.

    2. Re:Backwards campatability vs Not by Suddenly_Dead · · Score: 1

      Definition of fanboy: See parent

      Honestly. No one has even said that you have to buy the 360 games anew, just that not all games will work. I'm sure that all the ones I give a crap about will work, it's been said that the low sellers will be those that they won't focus on. Makes sense, no?

      (At that, I don't have enough money for one HD screen at the moment, let alone two. AFAIK, it hasn't been said that FFIV will work with two anyways.)

  25. Memory sticks!? by thejez · · Score: 1

    Anyone wonder why Sony even bothers with using memory sticks at all? Havent we evolved enough in the console market to expect a built in means for saving game data? Sony gets to continue to bilk you for the price of buying these little one generation piles of junk. Why?

    1. Re:Memory sticks!? by bleaknik · · Score: 1

      To be honest, I don't like being forced to rely on internal storage for a console. You can't transfer anything off an X-Box without a memory card. Those run $30. You can't FTP in (Without modding). And even if you do own a memory card, certain games are too large to fit on the Wimpy 8 Megs.

      My cousin's got an X-box that the DVD drive is making alarming clicking noises... he found a resale X-box for cheap, so he's been using that, but one of his gamesaves (Jade Empire?) is too large to be copied to his Memory Card, and once he gets it to his new system, there's no guarantee that the new system won't somehow fail.

      I'm actually glad that Sony (Memory Stick) and Nintendo (SD) are using standard flash memory for their next gen systems...

      --
      Deja Vu
      n. 1. The sensation that you've read this very article before.
    2. Re:Memory sticks!? by thejez · · Score: 1

      with wifi in the next gen consoles they should know when they are sitting next to another console and share data if you want. Also, I wouldnt be surprised if the gold xbox live allowed you to transfer via the net to another xbox... maybe even friends...

      dont lock yourself into thinking the way its always been... console should be advancing well beyond memory sticks.

    3. Re:Memory sticks!? by rohlfinator · · Score: 1

      "dont lock yourself into thinking the way its always been... console should be advancing well beyond memory sticks."

      What? Consoles are just now advancing to standard memory sticks. I'm thrilled that Sony and Nintendo are using conventional flash memory over that expensive junk they try to pawn onto us right now. Microsoft is no better, and they're not even offering the option in the next generation. You can speculate about wireless data transfer, but Microsoft required the purchase of memory cards for the Xbox, so unless they announce otherwise, there's no reason to believe they won't do it again. The 360's WiFi isn't even standard, so it would be lunacy to require that as the only way of transferring files.

      Maybe stuff like that will be implemented in the future or on other consoles; I think it's more likely to happen on the Revolution due to the built-in WiFi. Even still, there will always be a place for solid, portable memory. It's convenient, relatively cheap, and it'll always work. Sony and Nintendo seemed to have figured that out, but I guess Microsoft is still trying to recoup their losses.

  26. Re:All of Sony's electronic products exist just to by ZakuSage · · Score: 1

    Uh, PS3 also has slots for Compact Flash and SD, so your point is now moot.

  27. Re:All of Sony's electronic products exist just to by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    And if you think the PS3 will allow games to save or load from them, then you need to get a MRI.
     
    The PS2 had USB slots, and didn't acknowledge USB thumbdrives at all. Only a literal handful of games in Japan would save/load from the HDD.

  28. Memory Sticks - not that bad by Master+Of+Ninja · · Score: 2, Insightful

    I have to disagree with people here. The Memory Sticks are not that bad. OK its a different standard to SD, but SD is equally proprietory. The MS and MSD actually work fairly well if you buy Sony equipment so it is quite interchangeable. In response to another poster the Duos should work with normal MS ports with the adaptor that comes with them.

    The SD standard in itself if maybe a bit better as it does come slightly cheaper and is supported by more manufacturers. But the deriviatives are a joke - the miniSD and the b*stardised offsrpring the TransFlash. Especially for mobile phones it makes buying this haphazard as there is no guarantee that a standard will be in operation in the near future, especially with added 'convenience' of Nokia's reduced MMC.

    In this way Sony's MS and MSD (with the increasing concentration on the Duo) seem more sane. It just works across the product lines esp with the PSP and the PS3 coming out. I'm sure someone will make an adaptor to convert the old cards anyway (the PS2 one being essentially a different form factor memory stick).

    1. Re:Memory Sticks - not that bad by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      dude, you got to pay 20-40% more!!! whytf would you choose to do that??!! and u say they work well w/sony devices? fuck them and fuck u! sony: compare aapl to sne the last couple of years and 86 the lame -as-shit format that noone in the entire world wants to fucking use. when i don't give a fuck about company bullshit i'll buy an xbox so quit pushing your bad luck

  29. Re:All of Sony's electronic products exist just to by andrewski · · Score: 0

    Yeah, because heaven forbid that Sony should have designed their Memory Sticks with an eye towards the future.

    They designed the Memory Stick format to obsolete itself.

  30. Nintendo by ScaryFroMan · · Score: 1

    Why does it seem like every announcement regarding the 360 or PS3 makes Nintendo look like they're doing the right thing?

    --
    In Soviet Russia, backwards is everything.
    1. Re:Nintendo by cornface · · Score: 0

      Probably because most of the posts about Nintendo are about how they're doing the wrong thing.

      There must be balance.

    2. Re:Nintendo by H0D_G · · Score: 1

      what, you mean telling us nothing, still bringing out mario sequels, not supporting DVDs and still pushing a handheld which has a touch screen as the main interface? Those right things? this isn't a competition where you can't even respond to a competitior's claims. Unless we get some serious Revolution details it will become a footnote in the console wars.

      --
      Kids! Bringing about Armageddon can be dangerous. Do not attempt it in your home!
  31. Oh yes. by Adapt+or+Die · · Score: 1
    God forbid he's not "fair" to poor wittle Sony.

    We're lucky we'll be able to play those older games?! You've got that backwards, man. They're lucky if we buy their console, and having backwards compatibility is one of the ways they'll use to entice us to do so.

    Now excuse me while I go "thank" Sony for selling me something I don't even need.

    1. Re:Oh yes. by WaterBreath · · Score: 1
      having backwards compatibility is one of the ways they'll use to entice us to do so

      Yes, it might entice you, or I, to do so. But what about everyone else? It's just as arrogant to think that Sony owes it to you to meet your obscure demands as it is for a company to put out a product without doing market research. Don't like it? Don't buy it. But in this particular case, I doubt it will be any skin off Sony's nose if vintage game geeks like you and I don't buy, or buy late. And therefore, it's not stupid of them.

      I'd like to find out what percentage of the people who own PS2's actually use its PS1 compatibility. I can guarantee that the guys who are running out annually to buy the latest version of EA's sports games don't care, by and large. They and those like them are the big boon of the games industry right now.

      As for me? I'm not buying the system until I know there are good PS3 games out for it already. Why should backwards compatibility change that? It's not like they're going to stop selling PS2's the day the PS3 hits the shelves. And it's not like you can't still find used PS1's in good shape. I'm not dropping $300 (or $400) on a brand spanking new system just to play old games, that I could play on a still available $30 or $75 machine (or better yet, which I already own). Especially when I don't know if the games that actually use the new technology will be good or not. No, that would make me the stupid one, helping line Sony's pockets for no guaranteed ROI.

    2. Re:Oh yes. by Drachasor · · Score: 1

      How many people that own SUVs actually use their off-road capabilities? Now compare that to how many people buy SUVs because of the off-road capability they will probably never use.

      A feature can entice people to buy a product even if that feature is never used.

    3. Re:Oh yes. by Hadlock · · Score: 1

      There are a lot of young (mid-late 30's) parents with 12-15 year olds who are purchasing a new (not hand me down) console for their kids for the first time. It's a big selling point to them that the youngest or middle kid (johnny) can have the PS2 in his room, while all the kids can share the PS3 in the living room, and when Johnny's big brother's out of the house, Johnny can play gran turismo 4 on the big screen downstairs on the PS3, or that Johnny's big brother can play all his old hand me down PS1 and 2 games on his PS3 without having to borrow Johnny's PS2. Also PS2 games will all fall in to the $15-30 range by the time the PS3 comes out, meaning Johnny's parents can buy both Johnny and his big brother(s) a new game each for christmas, rather than making them split the PS3 in to a time share so they can play gran turismo 5 or whatever the favorite game is on the PS3 at the time.

      --
      moox. for a new generation.
    4. Re:Oh yes. by Chemical · · Score: 1
      I'd like to find out what percentage of the people who own PS2's actually use its PS1 compatibility.

      I'd say the percentage would be about equal to the number of people who owned a PS1 before owning a PS2.

    5. Re:Oh yes. by WaterBreath · · Score: 1

      I bet it's not. A lot of people toss out or sell their old games/systems when they get old.

  32. Re:All of Sony's electronic products exist just to by bleaknik · · Score: 1

    You're right. It kind of reminds me of how great the IDE specification is. That whole 137 GB barrier... We'll never see hard drives bigger than that. I mean never. Absolutely never.

    (of course I'm being completely facetious. the point i am making is that in 1998 when the MS first rolled out, flash memory was still a new technology. no one was absolutely certain it would take off as well as it did. give sony some slack for what they accomplished with the medium. we could still be using FD Mavicas... Need I remind you a decent picture with one of those could take up to 30 seconds to write...)

    --
    Deja Vu
    n. 1. The sensation that you've read this very article before.
  33. One of the ways. by Adapt+or+Die · · Score: 1
    One of them. Not the only one. Sony wants to have as many features as they can, especially since they are not going to be first out of the gate this time. Sure, the fanboys will stick around, but what about everyone else?

    Either way, the golden rule here is to give more options.

    I personally couldn't care less about backwards compatibility. (Honestly, I don't care much about the PS3 either.) But, Sony bothered to tell us about dual video out for crying out loud, and there's a much smaller audience there than there are people who might wanna play older games on their new system.

    After all, people can't keep their old systems connected forever, as they're going to need to make extra room for the second HD screen, right?

    1. Re:One of the ways. by LuckyPossum · · Score: 1

      They are able to find space for two HD outputs, but don't put in even one memory card slot. This is the same logic that made there be only two controller ports for PS2 when it's competition had four. Hell even the dreamcast and the N64 had four ports.

  34. Plan to sell more... PSPs? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Blatant attempt to sell more PSPs, as a device you can use to transfer your old saves onto the new files (with the help of your existing PS2 and it's USB port)... Even a DexDrive solution is less than useful, as how many people have a computer capable of reading MemoryStickDuo without a PSP (or other external reader), so you still can't get your saves to the PS3 without one of those. Scary.

  35. Re:All of Sony's electronic products exist just to by Suddenly_Dead · · Score: 1

    Sony has actually decided to only use Memory Stick Duo cards(the same format PSP uses) for PS3 save data.

    No doubt CF/SD cards will be readable for photo viewing or whatnot, but according to the article, not for save games.

  36. Solution for psp owners by Virtualtaco · · Score: 0

    Make a utility available to get the saves off of the PS2 with a USB cable. Or if you were cool enough to purchase a Dexdrive you should have no problem to begin with. Either way... I can't imagine all of your savegames are going to get you into replaying your old games since you're posting about it complaining instead of playing them in the first place. I'm more likely to replay a game that I don't have every item or every level completed in before the ones i do.

  37. Re:All of Sony's electronic products exist just to by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Flash memory was hardly new in '98. In '98, CompactFlash, SmartMedia, MMC, SD, and ATA flash were all available. MemoryStick was *not* an improvement on any of the existing formats. The only reason it existed was simply to line the pockets of Sony and to continue to drive vertical integration at the cost of functionality.

    Further, MS has been through four iterations now. The MemoryStick Pro broke the 128 MB barrier, but the Duo and Duo Pro offer no improvements upon their original designs aside from form factor. It should be noted that Duo sockets cannot accept non-Duo media.

    So, basically, I think a lot of us are gun-shy about the idea of ever backing the MemoryStick format, since CF and SD are both doing quite well in the market, and Sony has a very bad history with proprietary media formats (Beta, MD, MS, MagicGate, UMD...).

  38. Re:All of Sony's electronic products exist just to by gabebear · · Score: 1

    The anonymous source said it was true, so it must be!!!

  39. Gonna hurt them at launch... by Guppy06 · · Score: 1

    Aside from the issues of having to find some sort of dongle to transfer saves, this is goin to hurt them at launch when their comptetitors are a little more backwards compatible. If the PS3 launch is anything like the PSP launch, there will be maybe 3 games total available at launch (and maybe 1 of them will be worth playing), so without the ability to also play the older library with older saves, there is no game-related reason to actually shell out money for the box at launch.

  40. You could just by sloose · · Score: 1

    go here and just download new saves. Extract them and copy to your ps3 over your home network.

  41. Re:All of Sony's electronic products exist just to by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
    MemoryStick was *not* an improvement on any of the existing formats

    False, memory stick was faster

    but the Duo and Duo Pro offer no improvements upon their original designs aside from form factor

    And speed

    It should be noted that Duo sockets cannot accept non-Duo media

    There are adapters.

    Sony has a very bad history with proprietary media formats (Beta, MD, MS, MagicGate, UMD...).

    At present, there are over 600 supporting companies* from a diverse range of fields MS seems to be doing fine, UMD is selling fine and has been declared a standard, Beta is being used for just about all News stations, and MD was rather popular. So you were only right on magicgate

  42. Re:All of Sony's electronic products exist just to by Suddenly_Dead · · Score: 1

    I wouldn't be surprised if the article is correct, though it definately isn't a sure thing.

    (See what the grand parent said about Sony and its memory cards.)

  43. I just hope it idles quietly.... by r_jensen11 · · Score: 1
    when watching dvd's with the PS2, it's like trying to watch a movie with a wind tunnel between you and the speakers. I just hope that the PS3 is much quieter when doing regular multimedia tasks, (id est, playing videos and music).

    But, the most important question: Will it support FLAC out-of-the-box?

  44. Nintendo is smart by Taulin · · Score: 1

    Nintendo was smart. They never even bothered with backward compatibility. No mem stick problems, no complaining. As that Korean guy said to me at the Korean market when I tried to return some bad frozen fish I bought there, "You no complain!" (true story)

    1. Re:Nintendo is smart by rohlfinator · · Score: 1

      You mean for the GameCube, right? The Revolution is fully backward compatible with the Cube, down to the same controller and memory card ports. The Game Boy line has always been backward compatible. And the biggest reason for avoiding the feature on previous systems was the expense of having multiple cartridge slots.

    2. Re:Nintendo is smart by Taulin · · Score: 1

      Worry about multiple cartridge slots?! Don't make me laugh. Nintendo did produce the GBA adabptor for the Cube, and GB adabptor for the SNES. They can make what the they want, and what will benifit them. Can full size auto feed disk systems, like the revolution will have, even handle mini-disks?! If the revolution handles cube games, it will be a first for nintendo. Just because they say it now, does not mean it will be true. Even PS2 does not fully support PS1 mem cards. I have many games, like Symphony of the Night, that have to be saved on PS1 cards. If it happens, I will be happy, of course. One less console on my switch. Don't forget that Nintendo has not even made an official launch statement. As 'till now, it is all hype to keep you from buying the competition..which is SALES.

    3. Re:Nintendo is smart by rohlfinator · · Score: 1

      "Nintendo did produce the GBA adabptor for the Cube, and GB adabptor for the SNES. They can make what the they want, and what will benifit them."

      Yeah, but those were peripherals, each costing over $50. It's a lot more feasible when you're getting reimbursed that much for the hardware. An NES slot on the SNES would have required a lot of hardware changes and probably would have increased the cost of the console considerably.

      "If the revolution handles cube games, it will be a first for nintendo. Just because they say it now, does not mean it will be true."

      First of all, backward compatibility is one of the few confirmed details about the Revolution. It would be suicide for Nintendo to draw so much attention to a feature that isn't already finalized. Secondly, what is the purpose of this if it doesn't support GameCube games? The Revolution will support wireless controllers and SD Flash memory by default, so there's no purpose for all that extra hardware, other than backward compatibility.

      Nintendo has repeatedly emphasized backward compatibility. There is no way that any company would announce a feature more than six separate times, build it into a prototype, wave it around in front of thousands of people, and then drop it. It would be sheer lunacy.

  45. SPI by tepples · · Score: 1

    The Memory Sticks are not that bad. OK its a different standard to SD, but SD is equally proprietory.

    In practice, SD card readers are not proprietary. All SD cards and 99% of MMC cards can be read and written through the SPI interface.

  46. Re:All of Sony's electronic products exist just to by Linus+Torvaalds · · Score: 1

    Agreed. The thing that annoys me is that my PS2 has a perfectly good USB port that you can plug flash disks into, and yet it won't let me save anything on them.

  47. My take on this: by __aailob1448 · · Score: 1

    To sum it up: Can't use your old ps1/ps2 saves without hokey pokey. Nobody cares. Almost nobody uses backward compatibility as it is. No old peripherals supported. Nobody cares. there'll be adapters for the few who need them. Specs aren't set in stone. Ok, that's nice. Let's hope what they add is more than what they will inevitably cut (router functionality anyone?) HDD won't be for games. Duh! else it'd be bundled with the console. HDD mp3 bla bla hub bla bla photos bla bla movies bla bla share bla bla tivo bla bla psp bla bla. This is just a bunch of marketspeak bullshit. None of those functions will be used by anyone. The alternatives available to us will far surpass what the ps3 can offer. 80 gb HD? don't make me laugh... 720p to be the resolution of choice. Again: Duh! 720p offers 60 fps instead of the 1080i's 30 fps. Games are definitely 720p territory. As far as 1080p, that's just too hard to push for the nextgen consoles. Maybe for the generation after next. Doesn't mean a couple games won't support it though. Afterall, Gran Turismo 4 supports 1080i and it's just a PS2 game. And OF COURSE 480i/p will be supported. Sheesh, next thing you know, they'll start announcing that games will still have loading times... In conclusion: PS3 games are going to look real pretty and we'll be able to watch bluray movies on it. If you expect more than that, you're in for a disappointment.

    1. Re:My take on this: by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The router functionality was never there in the first place, so it was not 'cut'

  48. Re:All of Sony's electronic products exist just to by bleaknik · · Score: 1

    I'd like to point out that there are no less than 90 million MagicGate devices out there, and I imagine a larger number of MagicGate media. Last I looked the logo was stamped on the PS2 Memory Cards.

    Sure, I don't necessarily like MagicGate, but I wouldn't call it unsuccessful.

    --
    Deja Vu
    n. 1. The sensation that you've read this very article before.
  49. Re:All of Sony's electronic products exist just to by rohlfinator · · Score: 1

    "UMD is selling fine and has been declared a standard"

    Being "declared a standard" has no relevance to any practical discussion. UMD is supported by a grand total of one piece of hardware. The NES cart was a more successful storage medium than the UMD appears to be. Sony execs can call the UMD whatever they want, but for all intents and purposes, it's a proprietary medium.

    I can't really comment on the current standings of Beta, but the MiniDisc was only marginally successful. It was a redundant format, just like the MemoryStick is.

  50. Re:All of Sony's electronic products exist just to by mwvdlee · · Score: 2, Interesting

    When Sony released the first MS format, we already had CompactFlash and Secure Digital, both of which were, and still are, supperior to the MS format, never have had any specs changed and even this day come in faster packages with larger storage. They didn't need to breach the 128MB limit, because they didn't have that limit.

    The reason you give for Sony updating the specs, to break the 128MB limit, is exactly the reason MS is a crappy standard; if they designed the thing in a decent way to begin with, they would never have needed to update the specs.

    Seems like all things abreviated to "MS" suck ;)

    --
    Slashdot social media options: AIM, ICQ, Yahoo, Jabber and Mobile Text. Why no MySpace?
  51. True users of backward compatibility.... by Crumplecorn · · Score: 1

    The few people out there who will play PSX, PS2 and PS3 games on their PS3 will have to restart (probably*) PSX and PS2 games. However, they will not need a minimum of three memory cards; they'll only need the one (until it runs out of space).
    One of the problems with playing both PS2 and PSX games on a PS2 is the need for two types of memory card. A minor problem, but for anyone willing to start their games anew, this problem is gone with the PS3.

    Of course, the possible return of fan noise (which neither of the previous consoles have now), the inability (probably*) to use the Glorious Dual Shock 2**, and the imperfect nature of emulation, will still all be problems.

    *Third-party hardware unaccounted-for.
    **Assuming the new controller isn't better. A safe assumtion methinks.

  52. Re:All of Sony's electronic products exist just to by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Seems like all things abreviated to "MS" suck ;)

    LOL omg u made teh FUNNY!!!

  53. If your worried about Memory Cards... by wickedj · · Score: 1

    Just wait till Sony releases another Holiday Demo Disk that erases all your PS2 memory cards. That should take care of all your worries of getting PS2 saves onto the PS3.

  54. Re:All of Sony's electronic products exist just to by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Only the Pro was faster. Duo changed the form factor but didn't change the performance at all. Read what I write please.

    And they only needed to offer the Pro before the original wasn't terribly fast. I had no problems with the speed of CF at the time.

    There are Duo-to-MS adapters, but not MS-to-Duo adapters. Currently, the only workaround is to use *two* adapters to adapt Duo to CF, and then CF to MS. So, if you don't mind all the extra hardware, then sure, I'll give you that.

    Beta may have been superior, but it still required you to pay sizeable licensing charges to Sony to use, as opposed to VHS. And as one of the other posters responding to your troll said, MD is hardly popular. Especially considering it was originally intended to be a CD replacement.

    Oh, and hey - let's also remember the SA-CD format. That one definitely has reached critical mass.

    Show me a consumer product *NOT* made by Sony that uses MS. I don't give two shits about how many companies claim to support MS. I haven't seen anything supporting the format except for Sony products.

    See the above, and substitute MagicGate. There was no reason for it to exist on the PS2 - it only inhibited the manufacture of 3rd party memory cards and interface peripherals.

  55. Maybe not such a bad thing by Pranadevil2k · · Score: 1

    You know, I own a lot of games that I haven't played in a long time. My PS1 memory cards are full of games that are complete or damn-near it. My PS2 memory cards are in the same predicament.
    I own a peripheral that would let me get my saves onto my PC harddrive, and from there I can probably work out some way to get them onto a memory stick. But I don't think I'm going to do that. Those games just sitting around in my room are classics, and it would be a CRIME not to want to play them again.

  56. Re:All of Sony's electronic products exist just to by andrewski · · Score: 0

    Yes, the AC who responded earlier about said it all.

    Are you a pro Sony apologist?