Slashdot Mirror


Google And NASA To Collaborate On Technology

Mike Peel writes "The BBC reports that Google will be assisting NASA with new technology from a campus facility in the NASA Research Park at Moffett Field." From the article: "As part of the venture, Google will develop one million square feet of real estate at the Nasa Ames research centre. The centre, built in 1939, has been at the heart of the US space program for many years, conducting research into the Apollo moon missions between 1963 and 1972. Nasa recently unveiled plans to make another moon landing by 2020. Examples of areas of potential collaboration include the development of new types of remote sensors and improving analysis of engineering problems." More details available from the official press release and MSNBC.

151 comments

  1. One small step for man by LiquidCoooled · · Score: 5, Funny

    A giant leap for google kind towards the Copernicus Center

    --
    liqbase :: faster than paper
    1. Re:One small step for man by linumax · · Score: 4, Funny

      Now, by the help of NASA they can definitely do this

    2. Re:One small step for man by pilgrim23 · · Score: 1

      Are they sure they have concrete plans? From what I have heard, everything at NASA is up in the air...

      --
      - Minutus cantorum, minutus balorum, minutus carborata descendum pantorum.
    3. Re:One small step for man by Stripe7 · · Score: 1

      I think this Google trying to buy some of NASA's launch facilites and technology for the Google Moonbase. Did everyone here forget that Google was hiring for positions on their Moonbase a while ago? :)

    4. Re:One small step for man by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Our new goal is to "organize all the useful information in the universe and serve it to you on a lightly salted cracker."

    5. Re:One small step for man by GodGell · · Score: 1

      hey, this is a pretty cool idea, if there's enough beer^H^H^H^Hresources to build it. though making a giant hard drive out of the Moon will be just a small addition to Google's overall storage capacity, but let's put hard drives C: (Earth) and F: (Moon) into a RAID config instead. has Google developed interplanetary IDE cables yet?
      Google Cache can be renamed to Lunar Cache or CheeseChache then. it'd certainly sound better. not sure whether it'll get them more chicks though...
      we've been fed by, orally pleasured by, tortured by and deamortised by human females for a couple thousand years now, so i say let's keep up with the tradition and leave lunar bacteria out of the party. we can bring some women with the regular pizza and beer supply ship. having a drinking party on the Moon will be great, too. now you can get out in the "garden", play dodge-the-asteroid while trying to breath from the beer bubbles and then wonder why doesn't the alcohol "heat you up" this time. you must be homesick.
      still, it'd be a pretty cool ending: freezing to death full of beer totally drunk next to a tit-shaped research center called Cheese, with a beer-based athmosphere, in an impact crater full of drunken geniuses watching the puny little humans "over there" looking at the sky wondering which next technological breakthrough you're working on up here. *burp*^H^H^H^H^H^H*sigh*
      they'll have a next big hit over there on the Earth with someone singing "the Cheese is made out on the Moon". the next greatest pickup line will be "let me take you to heaven, but let's stop at the Cheese first". sounds stupid, but then you show her the source code of the interplanetary RAID controller you designed... no wait... that wouldn't actually work well with girls... but no, she'll be astonished when you tell her you work in an impact crater full of beer! yeah... sign me up!

      getting back on the subject... i sent a mail to Google, applying for the Cheese Center, and i just got this automated response:

      -------------
      Thank you for contacting Google about our Copernicus Research Center.

      We've received an overwhelming response to this opportunity and are not
      currently accepting additional resumes. We will, however, keep your
      information on file should we have an opening in the future. At the
      current staffing levels, we anticipate that we may need additional
      applicants on or around April Fool's Day in 2104. Until then, we
      appreciate your interest in Google and your taking the time to write us.

      Sincerely,

      The Googlunar Recruiting Team
      -------------

      rock on, Google.

      --
      [SHOW SOME LENIENCY TOWARDS ... I mean, FUCK BETA] Eat. Survive. Reproduce. GOTO 10
  2. Old News. by HugePedlar · · Score: 5, Funny
    --
    Argh.
    1. Re:Old News. by The+Original+Yama · · Score: 1

      Zoom right into the moon. Wallace was right, the moon really is made out of cheese!

  3. Chair upgrade! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Funny

    They're going to replace all of NASA's chairs with inflatable exercise balls.

    1. Re:Chair upgrade! by hplasm · · Score: 1, Funny

      That will stop the inflated Ball-mer from throwing them around, shouting "I'll Kill NASA!!"

      --
      ...and he grinned, like a fox eating shit out of a wire brush.
  4. Google Moon by Crixus · · Score: 1

    Google has secretly been launching recon satellites into orbit around the moon, and will soon be unveliling their Google Moon satellite maps.

    --
    Ignore Alien Orders
    1. Re:Google Moon by SimilarityEngine · · Score: 1

      Erm... you mean this? Or did I miss your point? Anyway, I'm looking forward to GoogleMilkyWay.

      --
      Those who can make you believe absurdities can make you commit atrocities. - Voltaire
    2. Re:Google Moon by Anonymous+Writer · · Score: 1

      Check out what happens when you go all the way to maximum zoom in that thing... the moon is made of cheese!

    3. Re:Google Moon by SimilarityEngine · · Score: 1

      that is #*&king brilliant!! cheers :-)

      --
      Those who can make you believe absurdities can make you commit atrocities. - Voltaire
  5. Moffett by BWJones · · Score: 4, Insightful

    One million square feet! is certainly a lots of real estate space (no pun intended) that in the South Bay Area has to be worth a not insignificant chunk of change. Granted, Moffett field sits on an amazing amount of land and although I have not been back to the base for years, I imagine it is still some pretty choice real estate that just so happens to be right up the road from Google.

    It also might be of interest to note that Moffett is right next door to a former NIMA (NRO) facility and given Google's interest in mapping the surface of the Earth and other remote sensing activities, might be pretty convenient.

    --
    Visit Jonesblog and say hello.
    1. Re:Moffett by josephtd · · Score: 5, Informative

      Yea, well there is now a surplus of of office space around the Moffett Field area. My office is over on Shoreline and there are For Lease signs everywhere.

    2. Re:Moffett by BWJones · · Score: 1

      Interesting. Do you think it is because of all the former defense dept. space that has been opened up for development after base closures creating a local market glut in the S. Bay or do you think that it might be the real estate bubble beginning to burst for the Bay Area?

      Perhaps its good that I turned down that job offer at Stanford last year? :-)

      --
      Visit Jonesblog and say hello.
    3. Re:Moffett by DingerX · · Score: 4, Funny

      Big-ass airships man. They got a hangar for one. The Navy's abandoned airships for 65 years -- probably as a result of a horrendous Ronald Reagan movie -- it's time for Google to bring it back and show us how it's done. I mean, how cool is that? A Zeppelin dude, to travel in style. Stick inside a wet bar, lounge area, and sell tickets via invite only (n.b., boarding verification requires a celphone). Paint it up with a google logo on the side. Will it make money? Will it crash in a horrific fireball? Who cares! Just slap a big "BETA" logo on the side.

    4. Re:Moffett by josephtd · · Score: 1

      RE Bubble caused by .bom, outsourcing and C-Level greed.

    5. Re:Moffett by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yeah, I can't quite figure this out. There's still lots of vacant land on the facility, but there are some restrictions to building on the site (like they'd have to build housing for their employees as well). Plus, why build something new, when there's plenty of commercial space available in the area? If they were to occupy existing buildings on the site, they would need lots of renovation, because most of the buildings are pretty old (old Navy buildings).

    6. Re:Moffett by 3x3eyes · · Score: 1

      Well, from where I am sitting, I don't think they are going to using existing buildings. You could see trucks hauling dirt off 101 entrance, and it's not just for the freeway renovation. I wonder if they are going to open-up their cafeteria to the rest of Ames or are they going to fenced the others out?

    7. Re:Moffett by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Keep in mind that Lockheed Martin Space Systems Company is also literally right next door to Moffett - they actually have an entrance to get to LM's property from Moffett.

  6. New Tech by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    At the forefront of the new technology, sharks with frikkin' laser beams, in space...

  7. Reasoning by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 4, Funny
    Nasa recently unveiled plans to make another moon landing by 2020
    And why not, they've looked for Osama every other place that he isn't.
    1. Re:Reasoning by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      What, are you hiding him?

  8. Just a real-estate leasing deal... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 4, Interesting

    It's just a glorified real-estate leasing deal, which will use up some of the office space created by the latest layoffs at NASA-Ames:

    http://www.siliconvalley.com/mld/siliconvalley/127 63469.htm

    1. Re:Just a real-estate leasing deal... by brian.glanz · · Score: 1
      Larger parts of this are public relations, cool factor, and the real, hard science potential. Even if office space made it this deal with these terms on this day, this is not about real estate.

      Where did Velma go to work after Scooby Doo? NASA.

      Where will Dib go to work after Invader Zim? Google.

      <sigh> and what ever happened to Penny (Inspector Gadget) ...

    2. Re:Just a real-estate leasing deal... by sloths · · Score: 1

      The only place it says "Google" on that page is in the Google Ad on the bottom.

      --
      really 867993
      Karma schkarma
    3. Re:Just a real-estate leasing deal... by LinuxTek · · Score: 1

      My thoughts exactly. Besides the supercomputing stuff, I can hardly see any relation between Google's and NASA's mission.

      There's a very important piece of information in the article:

      "The agreement would allow the company to design and develop a campus for whatever needs it envisions.

      Google has been hoping to expand for at least a year, combing the Bay Area for suitable sites, including downtown San Francisco and San Jose."


      I guess they took the hint from George Lucas

      --
      Signatures are supposed to be funny?
  9. Congratulations Google by Work+Account · · Score: 1

    The bigger Google gets the closer this world gets to becoming a better place.

    3 cheers for Sergey and Larry!

    "Do no evil!"
    "Do no evil!"
    "Do no evil!"

    --

    If you "get" pointers add me as a friend (116)!
    1. Re: Congratulations Google by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

      Are they blackmailing you with your Google cache or something?

  10. Google Universe? by TarrySingh · · Score: 1

    "Google and NASA share a common desire--to bring a universe of information to people around the world," said Eric Schmidt, Google chief executive officer. "Imagine having a wide selection of images from the Apollo space mission at your fingertips whenever you want it. That's just one small example of how this collaboration could help broaden technology's role in making the world a better place." So I guess that's the next Google venture. Good thing is that they're supporting the ailing yet very crucial organisation like NASA. good job fellas!

    --
    Scott McNealy to Michael: "Suck my Sun!" Michael Dell to Scott : "Lick my Dell!"
    1. Re:Google Universe? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The Department of Awayregolith Security have instructed Google to blur the Moon. We wouldn't want terrorists to blow up the Moon because they had easy access to highly detailed maps of their target.

  11. Google to assist NASA .... by Karma_fucker_sucker · · Score: 3, Funny
    I can see it now. We need to find more planets. I know, we'll just Google for them!

    All right, I'm done. Warn your children! This is what happens when your out of work!

    --
    Evil people don't think they're evil. - George Lucas, Making of Ep III
  12. GMOONGLE by roman_mir · · Score: 2, Funny

    Small step for a huge firm to help NASA with some real estate.

    Huge freaking text ad on the MOON!

    1. Re:GMOONGLE by pureseth · · Score: 1

      Google is on an intense rise in business. They went from a search engine, to EVERYTHING ELSE!!

      --
      Add me as a friend!
    2. Re:GMOONGLE by melandy · · Score: 1

      That would be great, except updating the text can be a pain.

      It's still stuck on "CHA"

  13. Re:creators collaborate: demise of unprecedented e by SimilarityEngine · · Score: 1

    Jeez, did you use this to compose that post?

    --
    Those who can make you believe absurdities can make you commit atrocities. - Voltaire
  14. Google takes their mission seriously! by Weaselmancer · · Score: 4, Funny

    They really are trying to search everything, aren't they?

    --
    Weaselmancer
    rediculous.
    1. Re:Google takes their mission seriously! by ciroknight · · Score: 1

      Are they helping NASA search for ET, ala SETI?

      --
      "Victory means exit strategy, and it's important for the President to explain to us what the exit strategy is." G.W.Bush
    2. Re:Google takes their mission seriously! by garcia · · Score: 2, Funny

      They play too much Katamari Damacy. They're trying to roll up the universe!

  15. Google and Nasa.... by cheezemonkhai · · Score: 3, Funny

    This brings a whole new meaning to Google Earth.

    I mean we all know their main business is adverts ;)

    1. Re:Google and Nasa.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You mean were going to have to start calling the earth "google earth" like 3com park or GNU/Linux?

  16. Makes me wonder... by Pichu0102 · · Score: 1

    ...What's Google getting out of this deal? Money? Land? Connections to the government?

    And on that note, I for one, welcome our new space-searching overlords.

    1. Re:Makes me wonder... by epaton · · Score: 1

      access to some really smart people, think how good a motivation this could be for staff as well.

    2. Re:Makes me wonder... by Quince+alPillan · · Score: 1

      Not to mention the good PR for helping out NASA.

    3. Re:Makes me wonder... by kurbchekt · · Score: 0

      Damn, ya beat me to it...

  17. Had to say it... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    NASA, for one, welcomes their new Google overlords.

    (On a side note, how would you like to be the research leader at NASA? Just walk over to the Google labs financial office and be like 'uhh...hi....I'm kinda working on this new project and...um, it will cost $400,000,000 to get it in space by 2012...can you spot me and I'll pay you back later?)

    1. Re:Had to say it... by LifesABeach · · Score: 1

      It gets me to thinking, "what would the increase be to do a "Deep Radar" analysis of the Moon?" With this knowledge, it would be possible to evaluate secondary landing sites for colonizing...

  18. I'm sure the kids at Google are bright but by mister_jpeg · · Score: 1

    they're no rocket scientists. How in the heck can a search engine help NASA? What could Google possibly offer?

    --
    -jpeg
    1. Re:I'm sure the kids at Google are bright but by ZachPruckowski · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Well, to make that big search engine, they needed a big supercomputer, which they built themselves by networking a lot of computers together, didn't they? I mean, they might beat NSA at raw computing power. And a supercomputer, programmed differently, could run all sorts of high-power simulations and could correlate all sorts of sensory data.

      Then there is the fact that Google is so adaptable that simply having them on the team gives NASA a boost. Google has done pretty much everything Internet related in the last few years, and that requires organizational flexibility. Maybe NASA wants to get an idea of how they work?

    2. Re:I'm sure the kids at Google are bright but by Mr.+Underbridge · · Score: 1, Insightful
      And a supercomputer, programmed differently, could run all sorts of high-power simulations and could correlate all sorts of sensory data.

      "Could" is irrelevant. The processing power is a lot cheaper and easier to come by than the people necessary to do the science. I'm really not feeling this one.

      Then there is the fact that Google is so adaptable that simply having them on the team gives NASA a boost.

      In PR, maybe, which seems to be what they need most. It's almost like the NASA PHB's were sitting around, and one said "What can we do to be cool again like 1969?" and one thought for a while before the light bulb illuminated, and said "You know who's cool? Google! Let's have them run the place!" Hmmmm....maybe not.

      Google has done pretty much everything Internet related in the last few years, and that requires organizational flexibility

      That's the kind of PHB thinking that takes you down the crapper. So why not let them build a new medical institute, since they've done so well with the internet? Why not let them solve the problem of global warming, they've done so well with the internet? I'll tell you - because they're not qualified, and success in one field doesn't imply success in another.

      Maybe NASA wants to get an idea of how they work?

      Then they should hire Page as a consultant, not let them take half the place over.

    3. Re:I'm sure the kids at Google are bright but by asky · · Score: 1

      Yes, they are extremely bright. I went to a seminar at Stanford
      about a year ago, where Burt Rutan spoke. He mentioned being in some forum of famous people with the Google founders and others. After the meeting, one of the Google founders approached him and asked some very insightful questions about the commercial space technology. Rutan's reaction was: these guys have really done their homework, they know what they're talking about, don't be surprised if some portion of their billions is invested in that direction.
          Perhaps these guys have a focus on space as do Elon Musk (PayPal, but a physicist by training) and John Carmack (Doom, Armadillo Aerospace, brilliant computer scientist), both of whom have been building launch hardware.

    4. Re:I'm sure the kids at Google are bright but by hplasm · · Score: 0
      How in the heck can a search engine help NASA? What could Google possibly offer?

      http://www.worldwidemetric.com/metcal.htm

      --
      ...and he grinned, like a fox eating shit out of a wire brush.
    5. Re:I'm sure the kids at Google are bright but by asky · · Score: 1

      The NASA Advance Supercomputing (NAS) Division is, in fact, located at Ames. One of its principal assets is the Columbia supercomputer, a 10,240-node SGI Altix supercluster of Itanium 2 processors. In fact, it does do amazing simulations which would make the Google folks salivate. Google has the computing power and computer science background; NASA has massive finite element physics simulation background and an intelligent systems group at Ames. This is one of those rare amazing cases where one could actually complement the other.

    6. Re:I'm sure the kids at Google are bright but by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      last time i checked john carmack and the elon musk were doing the rocketry thing on their own dime, not connected to their respective software companies. google is planning on doing it with shareholder money.

      face facts, google sycophants. google has shown it can make money doing exactly ONE THING- selling little text ads on websites. that is 99% of their revenue and 100% of their profit.

      and now they think they can start building spaceships? larry page actually said in an interview that he'd like google to invest in a space elevator. and the latest announcement said they're going to be getting into nanotechnology and life sciences?

      are you kidding me?

    7. Re:I'm sure the kids at Google are bright but by lemoncheesecake · · Score: 1

      I think read in an interview with Vint Cerf (who also works for nasa)when he was hired by google, that he would like to work on systems and protocals to allow differnt space ships to talk to each other and exchange information. I think this might be the start of that.

    8. Re:I'm sure the kids at Google are bright but by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "they're no rocket scientists. How in the heck can a search engine help NASA? What could Google possibly offer?"

      Money. NASA Ames has been searching for somebody...anybody...to step up with a big pot o' cash to help defray the costs of operating the facility and the airstrip (NASA also now owns the former Naval Air Station there, too).

  19. I can see it all now... by Linker3000 · · Score: 5, Funny

    "Mission Control, this is Mars Pathfinder 1, we are experiencing minor power fluctuations on bus C and require some diagnostic advice, over..."

    "Pathfinder 1, roger that, wait one..."

    "Pathfinder, this is Mission Control, please surf to history.nasa.gov/ap13rb/ch4pt.2.pdf. If you need a copy of Acrobat Reader please advise and I will supply the URL, over..."

    --
    AT&ROFLMAO
    1. Re:I can see it all now... by LiquidCoooled · · Score: 5, Funny

      Thats still sounds a like a hell of a lot better future than if they chose Microsoft for the on board diagnosis:

      "Mission Control, this is Mars Pathfinder 1, we are experiencing minor power fluctuations on bus C and require some diagnostic advice, over..."

      Clippy: It looks like your all going to die. Would you like to.....

      *silent scream*

      --
      liqbase :: faster than paper
    2. Re:I can see it all now... by Schnapple · · Score: 1
      More like

      ASTRONAUT: "Mission Control: Please find me Sea of Tranquility"

      MISSION CONTROL: "Cannot find Sea of Tranquility - did you mean Sea of Tranquility Drive ?"

    3. Re:I can see it all now... by foniksonik · · Score: 1

      more like

      *blue scream of death*

      duh-dunk, tch... ;-p

      --
      A fool throws a stone into a well and a thousand sages can not remove it.
    4. Re:I can see it all now... by JJC · · Score: 1

      I was watching a lot of NASA TV during the recent shuttle mission and you could hear some of the minutiae of the astronauts' daily lives in the communications between the shuttle and the ground. In the morning, the capcom reported that they'd finished syncing the astronauts' e-mail and they actually used the phrase, "You are go for Outlook".

    5. Re:I can see it all now... by game+kid · · Score: 1

      Ah, Clippy, a.k.a Microsoft Office's evil reincarnation of Iago. (hint: download the archived episodes...)

      --
      You can hold down the "B" button for continuous firing.
  20. Ob Simpson's Quote... by hplasm · · Score: 0
    Whaaaa????

    /Moe

    --
    ...and he grinned, like a fox eating shit out of a wire brush.
  21. Google never should have went public by Anita+Coney · · Score: 3, Insightful

    Google wants to do so many cool things, from scanning the world's books to helping us in space. But now that it's public it's only a matter of time before the stock holders start pulling back the reins. In the narrow view of the stock market it doesn't matter if you help people. It doesn't even matter if you make a profit. The sole thing that matters to the stock market is whether you're growing. That's it. If you're not focusing on that, you're out.

    --
    If someone says he and his monkey have nothing to hide, they almost certainly do.
    1. Re:Google never should have went public by khann80 · · Score: 1

      I believe the founders are still in control due to the way they structured their IPO. The shares that the public bought were a lower "tier" on the voting scale so they can be out voted by Larry and Sergey.

    2. Re:Google never should have went public by bheer · · Score: 5, Informative

      Google's stock offering has been very carefully structured to give Larry and Sergei a lot more control[1] than the ordinary shareholding public (and besides, Google is still relatively closely held - the main shareholders of Google are its investors and they trust the founders+Eric Schmidt implicitly). In fact, the non-founding shareholders (mostly Kleiner Perkins and Sequoia) likely know that Google's 'goofiness' makes for good press and share price, and as long as the party continues they're unlikely to rock the boat.

      [1] WaPo: After IPO, Google Founders Plan to Remain in Control

    3. Re:Google never should have went public by cowscows · · Score: 1

      I think that sooner or later everyone's going to realize how entirely ridiculous Google's share price is, and it'll quickly come tumbling down to something that actually makes sense. So before that happens, Google should probably try and spend as much money as is possible, because once reality sets in, people will be a lot more scrutinizing of them.

      --

      One time I threw a brick at a duck.

  22. Proof of Google's long term viability? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Some people have been questioning the longevity of Google due to all the stock sales and other factors. These people are saying that Google is looking like a .com boom and will have a similar fate.

    I wonder whether this venture is proof that Google stocks aren't going to crash any time soon and that Google won't blow up and leave behind a bunch of rich employees.

  23. Google Earth vs. NASA World Wind by KeiserSoze · · Score: 3, Interesting

    For a second there when I saw "Google and NASA collaborating on technology" I had a vain hope that it would be a reference to NASA World Wind. For those unsure (any Google Earth users), NASA World Wind is basically the same thing, only that it was around much earlier and (more importantly) it's open source software. On the down side, no expensive up-to-date imagery.

    1. Re:Google Earth vs. NASA World Wind by Nuffsaid · · Score: 1

      I had the same first impression. Who knows, maybe after all they will merge both their code base and their datasets. The result would be impressive: easy navigation of detailed global maps (with elevation!) and extensible data overlays! I'm sure Google would have few objections in making Earth opensource. Google Earth, I mean, the application, not the planet...

      --
      Nuffsaid
      ________

      Don't know about his cat, but Schroedinger is definitely dead.
    2. Re:Google Earth vs. NASA World Wind by bobbo69 · · Score: 1

      I have to say I find WorldWind a lot more attractive graphically - the bitmap scaling in Google Earth just reminds me of Mode 7 on the SNES...

  24. SETI to GETI by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny


    The Search for Extra Terrestrial Intelligence will be replaced by Google for Extra Terrestrial Intelligence.

    1. Re:SETI to GETI by ciroknight · · Score: 1

      GOTTI - Google OuterTerrestrial Terraforming Industry

      --
      "Victory means exit strategy, and it's important for the President to explain to us what the exit strategy is." G.W.Bush
  25. NASA to announce gShuttle by binaryDigit · · Score: 4, Funny

    One of the first fruits of the Google/NASA pairing will be the gShuttle. The existing space shuttle will be modified to store 10x the amount the previous shuttle could (though no details yet from NASA as to why they need that much space and if they'd actually use it). The new shuttle would also bring up paid advertisments based on various criteria, the formula for which Google has not made public. Another gShuttle innovation would be a radically simplier control and navigation system. The pilots will not simply type in their commands to the shuttle (e.g. "rearThrusters:fire burntime:10"). One particularly interesting feature is the "I feel lucky" button on the navigation console, no specifics as to the exact function of this button was put forth by the Google spokesdrone.

    1. Re:NASA to announce gShuttle by pmike_bauer · · Score: 1

      it will never get out of beta

      --
      I read /. for the (Score:-1, Conservative) comments.
    2. Re:NASA to announce gShuttle by digidave · · Score: 1

      "One particularly interesting feature is the "I feel lucky" button on the navigation console, no specifics as to the exact function of this button was put forth by the Google spokesdrone."

      It's simple: you just type your destination and click the "I'm Feeling Lucky" button, then you end up there, or at least you end up somewhere.

      --
      The global economy is a great thing until you feel it locally.
    3. Re:NASA to announce gShuttle by TGK · · Score: 1

      It's important that you don't confuse it with the "I'm getting lucky" button, which draws shutters over all the windows, dims the lights, and plays Berry Manalo music. While romantic, this has severe drawbacks during a landing sequence.

      --
      Killfile(TGK)
      No trees were killed in the creation of this post. However, many electrons were inconvenienced.
  26. gMoon by jgionet · · Score: 2, Funny

    right on! now I'll be able to to search the moon and it'll be powered by google! next it'll be the gRocket!

  27. At last by Ranger · · Score: 1

    With NASA's satellite mapping capability and Googles search engine. They can help Jimmy Buffet find that lost shaker of salt.

    --
    "You'll get nothing, and you'll like it!"
    1. Re:At last by MaskedSlacker · · Score: 1

      I feel sad that I may be the only /.-er that got that. Very sad.

    2. Re:At last by FooGoo · · Score: 1

      Don't worry I got it too.

      --
      People who bite the hand that feeds them usually lick the boot that kicks them
    3. Re:At last by Reducer2001 · · Score: 1

      Me three. Last I heard, that shaker was somewhere near Margaritaville.

      --
      When you get to hell -- tell 'em Itchy sent ya!
  28. The Google Braindrain by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    >>I'm sure the kids at Google are bright but they're no rocket scientists.

    Actually, this is a big problem.

    Google has cornered the market in big-brains, and has convinced dozens of top minds to leave their corporate overlords for the google brain collective.

    Google is the largest collection of Highly Intelligent people focused in a single group since, well, NASA.

    Its no wonder they are helping each other out. Its going to be a very mutually benificial relationship.

    This is one of the reasons so many other companies are so pissed off at google. Theyve shuttled away all their biggest and best minds. Of course, thats google for you. Its still one of the best places to work in the world. And thats why people leave their current jobs for it.

  29. Coming soon!... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Coming soon...
    Google and Jesus team together to make gmessiah,
    Google make a search engine to find your lost keys,
    Google helps old lady across street,
    Google buys slashdot and renames it gdot and uses it to post glowing reviews of itself

    1. Re:Coming soon!... by dextroz · · Score: 1

      oh wait... there are enough google zealots already doing that last bit...

      --
      Where's my free iPod!? Until then, I'll settle for a kiss...
  30. Is Google the New Bell Labs? by rlp · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Bell Labs was heavily involved in the Apollo moon landing program. In both a technical capacity and a project management capacity. I remember early on, going to a meeting for new employees where all the senior managers introduced themselves and talked about their background. Years earlier, most of them had worked together on the Apollo moon landing.

    Google has formed Google Labs including a lot of folks formerly from Bell Labs. It's interesting that NASA is working with them on the Moon Landing 2.0. Hopefully, without the bureaucracy of an AT&T, Google Labs will be more successful at translating R&D into marketable product. So far, their early track record looks very promising.

    --
    [Insert pithy quote here]
    1. Re:Is Google the New Bell Labs? by Flying+Purple+Wombat · · Score: 1

      It seems to me that the ex-Bell Labs folks that Google hired would be Computer Science types. The Bell Labs folks involved in space missions would have included physicists, electrical, chemical and mechanical engineers as well as computer geeks, and probably others as well. Has Google hired experts in those other fields?

      [disclosure: formerly worked at Bell Labs, speculate in Google stock]

      --
      If God had meant for man to see the sunrise, He would have scheduled it later in the day.
  31. Collaboration by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    NASA are gonna use google convert

  32. It is a merger... by insignificant1 · · Score: 3, Insightful
    "...bio-info-nano convergence..." -Google Press Release

    A merger of the buzzwords that drive the investors of today.

    1. Re:It is a merger... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Sadly, it seems 99% of Slashdotters think this is a real story.

  33. Nothing new for NASA by FJ · · Score: 1

    NASA has called in private companies before. IBM got to keep a good deal of technology they developed in the 1960s & 1970s for NASA. One of the most famous program in particular for the mainframe is JES and a version of JES is still used by every IBM mainframe system. Banks, insurance companies, and other large manufacturers still depend heavily on software initially developed to put someone on the moon. It's pretty cool when you think about it and I hope Google will get the same type of benefit from working with NASA.

  34. www.fuckedgoogle.com, we need you! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
    http://www.fuckedgoogle.com/


    Ah, finally a take on the NASA deal that doesn't involve slashdot users falling over themselves to praise Google. But seriously, how do you go from selling text ads on websites to saying you are going to build nanotechnology for NASA? Did Eric/Larry/Sergey eat the brown acid at burning man this year or something? I was there and heard from several folks that they were too, although I didn't see them personally.


  35. Advanced Search by Knx · · Score: 1

    Results 1 - 10 of about 337,000,000 for hotel. (0.11 seconds)

    Your search was limited to: Solar System / Earth.
    Would you like to extend your search to other locations?

    Please note that it may take up to a couple trillions years for our Googled-Nasa Probes (tm) (beta) to scan the most distant, not yet explored galaxies. Thank you for your patience.

    --
    The problem with Slashdot memes is that YOU INSENSITIVE CLOD!
  36. The Perfect /. Story by Viper+Daimao · · Score: 2, Funny

    Google and NASA in the same /. story! Will they be using linux or some other open source software? If so, then we may have the Perfect /. Story!!

    --
    "In the game of life, someone always has to lose. To me, if life were fair, that someone would always be Oklahoma." -DKR
    1. Re:The Perfect /. Story by chrisd · · Score: 1
      Did we mention that we run a great deal of linux machines in our data centers?

      Seriously, we do.

      --
      Co-Editor, Open Sources
      Open Source Program Manager, Google, Inc.
  37. Censorship by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Interesting

    Google has already demonstrated its ability to censor searches for governments. Given the current political climate I wonder if Google will be compelled to censor searches in a way that will insure NASA's version of science remains the "official science" of America.

    If people can't find what you published to read it, you perish.

  38. Channel for money by jfig · · Score: 1

    Is it me or this is just a way for the US Government to channel money into Googles accounts??

    Wonder want they're really paying?

    --
    - JFig http://jfig.net - http://del.icio.us/jfig/
  39. Searching martians by geo_2677 · · Score: 1

    Next news.. Google builds engine to search the elusive green martians :) Way to go Google...

  40. Google Moon, Google Mars (, Google Galactic?) by asky · · Score: 3, Insightful

    As you head out into the solar system and attempt to settle elsewhere, one of the problems is that you won't be able to google a query back to Earth and get a lightning fast response. (Well, uh, perhaps as fast as lightning, but that could be seconds, minutes, or hours....) You no longer can present every problem to Mission Control and wait for an answer. And you probably will not have trained for every scenario.

    Survival of a small colony of smart people on the Moon or Mars could partly depend on taking large portions of your planetary knowledge base with you and looking for solutions that others have figured out but you haven't. (It also is a form of taking your culture with you.) The trick is to do it without rooms of massive power-hungry clusters, but for a smaller group of users. I can imagine Google working with NASA to pull some of these technologies together. Things like nanotechnology, one of the focal points of work at Ames, will be key to making it happen.

  41. Google's probably getting international leeway by jerryodom · · Score: 1

    For all their mucking about in China and such they'll help Nasa use technology built in the 21st century.

    --
    For some reason I refuse to use either spell check or the spacebar properly.
  42. Google-bubble by anubis__ · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Does anyone else think that maybe we're just in a Google-bubble, much like the internet bubble of the late 90s? I mean c'mon! Yeah, they wrote a search engine and they've made enough money to create a developer utopia where their programmers can be paid to work on thier own personal projects. Yeah, they have several other products out which utilize the internet in various ways. So now NASA, a government agency, is looking to spend taxpayer dollars to team up with Google... so they can bring the Apollo mission search results when we ask for them? And perform research into fields that Google only has money to due to an excessive amount of over speculation? Give me a break.

    --

    "After three days without programming, life becomes meaningless." - Tao of Programming
    1. Re:Google-bubble by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yes, I think it's only a matter of time before their strange corporate behavior comes back an bites them (and maybe yahoo too) in the rear. You
      can't play this game forever, the valley has proven that time and time
      again. In the end it all comes down to money and when the goofyness
      gets to out of control Wall Street and the Press will eat them alive.

      If you've ever been on either Google or Yahoo's campuses, you will be
      shocked by the feeling that the .Com buble bursting was nothing more
      than a bad dream. neither company or it's employees act as if anything
      ever happend, add in there cockyness and you have a formula for a
      looming disaster.

      Just as in life, death catches up with companies, it's not a question
      of "if", more a question of "when"?

      Enjoy the ride Google.. while it last.. Dark times are ahead.

  43. Google expandig out of it's domain...why? by Bitsy+Boffin · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Ok, Google is a company based around providing Search services, and they do that well. All thier services are in some way related to information mining (searching), from web search, to geographical search, it's all search in the end.

    But what incredible need does NASA have for a partner to provide search? Sure, data mining is a useful tool for NASA I'm sure, but why do they need Google to actually set up shop there with them to do this?

    Seems to me like Google is expanding out of it's domain. And that's not usually a good thing. Pick one thing and do it well, don't try to be Jack of all trades.

    --
    NZ Electronics Enthusiasts: Check out my Trade Me Listings
    1. Re:Google expandig out of it's domain...why? by FooGoo · · Score: 1

      Googles domain is not search it's turning ideas into reality. Search/ads will just fund the initial efforts. Google is a think tank/reasearch lab at heart.

      --
      People who bite the hand that feeds them usually lick the boot that kicks them
  44. Marketing Talk by lsetia · · Score: 0

    From the article:

    "Google and Nasa share a common desire, to bring a universe of information to people around the world," said Eric Schmidt, Google's chairman and chief executive.

    Whereas what he actually believed was this:

    "Google wants to bring a universe of information to the people, whereas NASA wants to bring information about the universe to the people".

    Steve Ballmar would be impressed.

  45. NASA has needed Google technology for a long time by alispguru · · Score: 4, Informative

    NASA has big archives of space data, and they're only going to get bigger - the next generation of earth observing satellites are expected to generate 4 petabytes/year. That's 4 * 10**15, folks - think 8,000 500 GB drives. Per year. For at least the next ten years. One year is on the order of the size of Google's web cache.

    Current archives are merely huge, and off-the-shelf databases are having trouble indexing it all - I've heard of a database holding just metadata (date/time, geographic extent, data type, resolution, format, etc.) for millions of observations where queries were taking tens of seconds, and this was with top-of-the-line commercial database software with all the spatial search bells and whistles.

    If anybody can come up with a better way to store and index this stuff, it's Google.

    --

    To a Lisp hacker, XML is S-expressions in drag.
  46. of course by brenddie · · Score: 0

    thats where http://moon.google.com/ comes from

    --
    The best test environment is production. - Me
    chrome://browser/content/browser.xul
  47. You mean... by uberchicken · · Score: 2, Funny

    we can just google for aliens now? Seti must be pissed.

  48. Google Space Search by gilesjuk · · Score: 1

    Google Space Search

    |Aliens___________| Search :)

  49. it is NASA, not Nasa by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Geez....get it right, NASA is not a word it is an acronym, so stop writing Nasa and write NASA. Have a little respect you hippie freaks.

  50. Beta by fremar · · Score: 3, Funny

    Will this mean all future NASA projects will be in a near-permanent Beta release? Oh wait, nothing new there...

  51. I'm feeling lucky's detailes has been announced! by linumax · · Score: 1
    A NASA spokesperson has already mentioned that
    The new "I'm feeling lucky" navigation button will get you to a random planet.

    Just a few minutes ago CNN reported some UFO crashing somewhere around Redmond, could you guess where?

  52. Re:mod u4 by EvilMole · · Score: 0, Offtopic

    Best. Post. Evah.

  53. Next: Google and SETI by fahrbot-bot · · Score: 2, Funny
    In related news, Google will team up with SETI by updating its search engines to find extraterrestrial intelligence. When asked about the upcoming collaboration, the head of SETI remarked, "I can't believe we didn't think of this sooner! This will be much easier than mucking about with signal analysis and Fourier Transforms".

    Testing is slated to begin in Q4 2005 by searching for intelligent life here on Earth.

    --
    It must have been something you assimilated. . . .
  54. Google Moon by Ruphuz · · Score: 2, Funny

    Well, I hope the collaboration does not imply NASA is going to land their ships with the aid of Google's close-range moon maps. Last I heard, they had some 'holes' in their technology.

    --
    My other post is a First.
  55. From NASA ARC Contractor... by vhawke · · Score: 2, Funny

    I for one, welcome our Google overlords...
    PS when's lunch?

  56. $2.5-3 million per-year in property tax savings by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    http://www.sanluisobispo.com/mld/sanluisobispo/bus iness/technology/12772386.htm

    When you're on federal land, the local and state governments can't tax the property or your buildings and you get to ignore their pesky building codes, etc.

    Whatever happened to "do no evil"?

  57. Essentially... free rent by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
    From an article at SFGate.com yesterday, "Google's deal with NASA Ames will be a long-term lease of at least 60 years that would allow the company's rent payments to be plowed back into the campus for improvements, real estate sources said."

    It seems odd at least for a company whose motto is "do no evil" to negotiate a deal in which the rent paid on public property is turned around to their 100% benefit rather than being used for something like offsetting other tax payer funded costs at NASA Ames.

    Perhaps their motto should be "do no evil that any of our competitors wouldn't do in the same situation."

  58. Welcome to nasa.google.com! by ReaveT · · Score: 2, Funny

    Search query: a l i e n s -> I'm Feeling Lucky

    *****searching

    404 Not Found -> Back -> Search

    *****searching

    10 of 1000000000000000000 results found

    Froogle results: Would you like to buy a new shuttle? Only $17,000,000.00!

    Search results ranked in order:

    Aliens found on Mars! -> *CLICK!*

    404 Not Found -> Back -> Google Cache

    http://images.google.com/imgres?imgurl=http://www. csicop.org/si/8512/face-on-mars.jpg&imgrefurl=http ://www.csicop.org/si/8512/face-on-mars.html&h=200& w=200&sz=9&tbnid=wV2pf_vxAMoJ:&tbnh=99&tbnw=99&pre v=/images%3Fq%3Dface%2Bon%2Bmars%26hl%3Den%26lr%3D &oi=imagesr&start=2

    -> Back

    New Search: Space Porn

    *****searching

    10 of 10000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000 results found

    Froogle: Would you like to buy a new space condom? $2!

    -----------

    Let's face it... Google would make SETI a lot more interesting.

  59. Larry and Sergei just got a new driveway by sprior · · Score: 1

    The real motivation for this partnership is that Larry and Sergei get a big runway so they can take their shiny new plane to work...

  60. i hope not by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    bell labs came about as a result of a monopoly that legally gouged consumers on long distance service for decades. i hope google never has that power.

    1. Re:i hope not by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I would hardly call free local calls as " gouging". We need a central TelCo especially in these times. Are you forgetting that there are half a dozen cell phone protocols? Imagine if we had "competition" from Sprint and ITT back in the 30's.

    2. Re:i hope not by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      We need a central TelCo especially in these times.

      yes, look at the wonders a monopoly did for pc software.

      you = moron.

  61. Better than YETI.... by anaesthetica · · Score: 1

    Yahoo! for Extra Terrestrial Intelligence.

  62. Marriage of the year? by dysonlu · · Score: 1

    The Famed Google and the Almighty NASA!

    Slashdotters, er, I mean Google Zealot must be ejaculating with joy right now.

  63. The Norvig connection by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Do you all realize that Peter Norvig (Director of Search Quality at Google) used to head the Computational Sciences Division at NASA (which is based out of Ames)?

    My understanding of this story is that it is just a means for getting office space. However, should Google want to collaborate with NASA on anything, they definitely have strong connections and a good idea of what kinds of stuff NASA is doing.

  64. This is real estate, not technological cooperation by tji · · Score: 1

    Google and NASA are both very close to each other, in Mountain View, CA (which is where I live, less than 2 miles from both of them). Google is currently in the offices built by Silicon Graphics, which is a pretty nice place by Silicon Valley standards. Most companies around here are in nondescript office parks. The Google/SGI building is large, uniquely designed, and colorful.

    Google is North of Shoreline Blvd, South of Shoreline Blvd is Moffet Field. It used to be a Navy facility, and its most prominent feature is the huge blimp hangar that you've probably seen if you've ever flown into the Bay Area during the day. (Microsoft's facility is actually between the two, just across the Stevens Creek trail from Moffet. This used to be their WebTV facility).

    Moffett has been scaling down operations for quite a while. They already have a lot of space that is leased out to private companies. Also, they just shut down the nation's (world's?) largest wind tunnel a year or two ago.. There has been a lot of talk in the local papers about re-using that land for something more productive (that, and about cleaning up the toxic chemicals on the site and lead paint on the huge blimp hangar).

    Although there is a ton of open commercial real estate in silicon valley, most of it consists of those small non-descript office parks I mentioned before. So, apparently Google has been looking for a huge space to expand the business. Since there is practically no large space available (and thus the ridiculously high housing prices), the Moffett facility was one of few options.

    So, I think this is a whole lot more about precious real estate than it is about any technology cooperation, as the articles claimed.

  65. Dont Panic - We Do No Evil by KaushalParekh · · Score: 1

    That could be the cover to the "Google's Guide to the Galaxy" ;-)

  66. Looking for life on other planets? by Alpha_Traveller · · Score: 1

    Just enter the part of the universe you'd like to search and click "I Feel Lucky!"

    --
    "Love is like pi - natural, irrational, and very important." (Lisa Hoffman)
  67. the moon by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    has anyone ever taken a bong hit ont he moon? i want to!

  68. This is why we love Google (and hate Microsoft) by FreshFunk510 · · Score: 1

    With all the Google stories lately, there's always the inevitable comment: "Why do we LOVE Google and HATE Microsoft?" This is an example why. They do cool things, work on ideas beneficial to the public and they're collaborating with an agency that's respected by the American public.

    With that said, I'm trying to understand Google's roll in this. I don't think it's completely selfless. Considering how much data NASA has to process, I think Google's tools fit right in (since they, too, have so much data they have to process). One tool that I read about long ago that aids them is the GoogleFS.

    Other ways that this could potentially be beneficial is the other tools that may need to be built that are parallel with Google's goals (more data management). And I'm guessing that they also see this as a way of contributing towards a dying space program.

    --


    "Injustice anywhere is a threat to justice everywhere." - Martin Luther King, Jr.
    1. Re:This is why we love Google (and hate Microsoft) by Barryke · · Score: 1

      in my view, a huge advantage is that google gets the chance to extend search BEYOND metatext.

      Things like searching on visual features and in things like wave patterns will make their knowledge grow significantly!

      Of course, things like visual search have been done, but everyone knows that google could introduce very interesting concepts using its vast company knowledgebase.

      --
      Hivemind harvest in progress..
    2. Re:This is why we love Google (and hate Microsoft) by Brendor · · Score: 1

      "Considering how much data NASA has to process, I think Google's tools fit right in . . ."

      I remember a TV news piece about NASA not having the capability to process the data in it s collection due to the bandwidth of the tape backup system at the time and the shelf life and quantity of the tapes. This is the sort of data set that Google seems to look for in any market they can conceive of.

      Since this data is work of the federal government it should be Public domain as well. The Public would benefit form having such information available. Anything from videos of all previous shuttle missions (NASA TV presented by Google Video) to Galactic Maps, Transcripts and scientific data from unmanned and manned missions going back to the 1950s.

  69. Hopefully... by frank378 · · Score: 1

    Google will be able to help NASA get the overwhelming amount of information they have on their web sites and collaborative sites in order to make it easier to find things. There is a lot of great information out there but it's so hard to what's there unless you already have something specific in mind.

  70. Google and NASA by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    3 big reasons Google partners with NASA. 1: real estate Google wants to build its own corporate offices + help provide its employees with affordable discounted housing. Anoter way to retain employess. Google wants to be a college campus - putting lots of brilliant people close to each other creates a better chance of great ideas or complimentary ideas finding each other Work, Play and Live in the same square mile and you likely to spark a great idea. Eventually they should rename the area from Moffet Field to Geek City 2: Content, Content, Content What does Google want more than anything!? From scanning books to spidering the web faster everyday. Who else can organize NASA's trillions of Terrabytes of data other than Google? 3: Distributed computing Google has it, NASA needs it.

  71. That was a misprint by BandwidthHog · · Score: 1

    It’s supposed to read “Google and NSA to Collaborate on Technology.”

    --

    Quantum materiae materietur marmota monax si marmota monax materiam possit materiari?
  72. Google - The FBI's New Carnivore? by Longhair2020 · · Score: 1

    Think of what Google is making possible that the FBI could not. Google Mail (unlimited storage on THIER servers of personal/private/business emails), Google Earth + NASA Satellite mapping technology, Satellites and othere data, Project Gizmo (VOIP - Storable Voice Conversatons with later ability to search and parse spoken language) and a Search Engine thats capable of correlating all of this information together into a single VAST Intellectual Property/trending/analysis/etc/etc.

    Big Brother is not watching you, Google is. And it may be to the highest bidder.

  73. Let me just say ... by bastardknight · · Score: 1

    All your base are belong to Google.

  74. Re:NASA has needed Google technology for a long ti by copdk4 · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Well, you have gotta understand that Google and NASA work on entirely different types of data:

    Google = Web pages/multi-media content that is hyperlinked
    NASA = Large relational tables storing petabytes of data from sensors and telescopic readings...

    The techniques for mining are different in both cases.. when they talk about "Bio/Nano" it refers to entirely new domain.. Its not as easy as plug-n-play with different domains. Agreed, Google has mastered the algorithms for ranking and extracting data from Web-pages but mining data out of relational streams of data is entirely a different ball game.

  75. Russian's use Google Mini by copdk4 · · Score: 1

    The Google Mini - New lower price, search more documents

    How many vital documents are buried and forgotten somewhere on your website or corporate intranet?

    How much faster could your business grow if your employees and prospective customers could find product, support or sales information, instantly and on demand?

    Meet the Google Mini. Designed to help small and medium-sized businesses make the most of their digital assets, the Mini is a hardware and software search appliance that delivers the power and productivity of Google search across your organization's documents and websites.

    The Google Mini:

            * Now indexes and searches up to 100,000 documents -- 2X its previous capacity.
            * Works with over 220 different file formats, including HTML, PDF and Microsoft Office.
            * Can be set up in under an hour and requires minimal ongoing administration.
            * Now costs just $2,995 for all hardware and software, including a year of support and hardware replacement coverage.

    Just point the Google Mini at your content, add a search box to your site and you're set. It's that simple to make your public website or intranet as easy to search as Google.com. View an online product tour.

  76. Re:Chair upgrade! (bwahahaha) by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    omfg.

    I work for google, and you just caused me to fall off of ... you guessed it, an inflatable exercise ball. Pardon me while I regain my composure and stop laughing :)

  77. Here's what they'll do by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Let's google for "+houston +problem" ...

  78. Re:NASA has needed Google technology for a long ti by zopf · · Score: 1

    I think what Google has to offer is not necessarily its current search technologies, but rather a wealth of experience dealing with large amounts of data and, most importantly, a group of brilliant, creative engineers who have been working well with each other for years. The blurb from the article doesn't say that Nasa needs AdWords or PageRank. It says that Nasa wants to sell some space and outsource some large-scale, high-data flow engineering. I'd say Google is pretty damn good at that.

    --
    Did you see the pool? They flipped the bitch!