Slashdot Mirror


Insect Substance Synthesized For Science

An anonymous reader wrote to mention an article discussing the successful synthesis of resilin, a super-elastic material used by insects to perform amazing feats. From the article: "Dr. Elvin predicted the substance would lead to everything from artificial arteries to spinal parts that would not wear out despite being flexed 100 million times. 'That's how many times you move your back in 50 or 60 years,' he said. It could also be used in micro electronics. 'We even imagine putting it in running shoes.'"

224 comments

  1. I like where this is going... by feagle814 · · Score: 5, Funny
    Dragonflies and bees use resilin to beat their wings all day long

    I like where this is going...

    1. Re:I like where this is going... by Associate · · Score: 1

      Been there, done that.

      --
      Someone hates these cans.
    2. Re:I like where this is going... by revery · · Score: 1

      Dragonflies and bees use resilin to beat their wings all day long
      I like where this is going...


      Yeah, Ornithopter, babeee!!!

  2. Go Australian Scientists .... by kotku · · Score: 0, Troll


    Now lets see another invention go overseas while our anti science government sits on its's hands ...

    --
    The bikini - security through obscurity since 1943
    1. Re:Go Australian Scientists .... by my+ky+is+brokn · · Score: 3, Interesting

      Now lets see another invention go overseas while our anti science government sits on its's hands ...

      Anothr invntion go ovrsas? Invntions don't gt outsourcd...thy gt invntd. Nxt tim, try a littl hardr with the anti-govrnmnt rhtoric.

    2. Re:Go Australian Scientists .... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I'd like to buy an "E", Pat.

    3. Re:Go Australian Scientists .... by kotku · · Score: 1

      Move along. No dealing here please .... many young children frequent this site.

      --
      The bikini - security through obscurity since 1943
    4. Re:Go Australian Scientists .... by aaza · · Score: 1
      look at the username, AC, then read the message again.

      It's either very clever, or true.

      --
      In theory there is no difference between theory and practice.
      In practice, however, there is.
    5. Re:Go Australian Scientists .... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Your username is almost perfect, but you'd need two space between "my" and "key" in order for it to be perfect. After all, if your E key really is broken, you'd hit it, and then hit space again, leaving a pair of spaces between the two words.

    6. Re:Go Australian Scientists .... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Got nouns?

    7. Re:Go Australian Scientists .... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It truncates multiple spaces to a single space, just like html. Try it.

    8. Re:Go Australian Scientists .... by shokk · · Score: 1

      Riddle me this... why does invention need to come from the government? We live in a free society where you and others, including corporations, can engage in research and then development of the results. Me think you like to rail against the "gummint" any chance you get.

      --
      "Beware of he who would deny you access to information, for in his heart, he dreams himself your master."
    9. Re:Go Australian Scientists .... by awol · · Score: 2, Insightful

      The issue is not that the Government should be doing the invention but that Australia has a history of breaking ground, passing off the "value add" to other countries and then buying back the value added product. In particular with respect to some pretty fundamental science. I am not sure I am in the same boat as the poster with respect to their feelings about that situation, but the point is certainly arguable that a little more government investment in those inventions would benefit the whole country greatly and continue to do so in the future. Such investments, according to the poster, are probably good investments from a socal perspective.

      --
      "The first thing to do when you find yourself in a hole is stop digging."
    10. Re:Go Australian Scientists .... by Gwyn_232 · · Score: 1

      Anothr invntion go ovrsas? Invntions don't gt outsourcd...thy gt invntd. Nxt tim, try a littl hardr with the anti-govrnmnt rhtoric.

      Next time, try a little harder with your spllng.

  3. Price by GenKreton · · Score: 3, Interesting

    This all sounds very good but how cost efficient will large, industry scale production of resin be? Just because they can successfully reproduce its chemical structure does not mean that they can do it in a cost efficient enough manner to break into any of the mentioned markets.

    1. Re:Price by bzeichick · · Score: 2, Funny

      This all sounds very good but how cost efficient will large, industry scale production of resin be?

      Because resilin production is such a ground-breaking undertaking, a revolutionary manufacturing process will need to be created. A process that involves many busy-bees to make the resilin, which could be called "workers". These workers would go to a "hive" to create the resilin, and would work furiously in the hopes that some day all of their labors might give them a chance to rub elbows with someone important, and let's call this entity a "queen". Sound good?

    2. Re:Price by Stripsurge · · Score: 3, Informative

      Once they've got the gene(s?) into bacteria making more of the substance becomes very easy. Grow a whole bunch of the transgenic bacteria and extract product. Cost will vary with application. For everyday uses (running shoes) it'd be cheap but for implants into humans it needs to be a lot purer as to not trigger an immune response. Even small bits of leftover bacteria is a very bad thing. Pure typically = $$.

    3. Re:Price by stunt_penguin · · Score: 2, Interesting

      "The scientists initially cloned the fruit fly gene that naturally produces the material. It was then put into bacteria, creating a biological "factory" to reproduce it as a liquid. The liquid was then cured under projector bulbs to form a workable solid."
      As far as i'm aware, insulin is made by a similar process using bacteria that have been genetically altered to produce the substance in large quntities. It isn't a particularly new technique past the point of getting the initial bacteria to produce the substance, so here's hoping (hopping!!) that we can make use of what sounds like a great material as cheap as possible.

      --
      When the posters fear their moderators, there is tyranny; when the moderators fears the posters, there is liberty.
    4. Re:Price by ebh · · Score: 1

      I can see the finger quotes, but can't tell if you're wearing a monocle...

    5. Re:Price by Reducer2001 · · Score: 1

      Well, I for one welcome our new... Hey wait, that actually might be an appropriate response!!!!

      --
      When you get to hell -- tell 'em Itchy sent ya!
    6. Re:Price by Itchy+Rich · · Score: 2, Interesting

      This all sounds very good but how cost efficient will large, industry scale production of resin be?

      Pretty efficient I expect. Having substances made by bacteria isn't a new idea, and since this will primarily be proccesed in liquid form is should be fairly easy to produce. The major question for me would be how long the bacteria take to synthesise the material.

      The question as to whether it's economically viable is misleading, because you can't answer it accurately without knowing the application for which you're determining viability. I would guess that there will be so many possible applications for this that it wont be hard to find some that can afford the probably high initial cost.

    7. Re:Price by TheSync · · Score: 1

      The brewing of pro-resilin sounds very similar to a wide range of pharma products created from genetically engineered E. Coli, and the final assembly using the metal catalyst is pretty standard chemistry. No worse than beer and ammonia production.

    8. Re:Price by ArsonSmith · · Score: 1

      Don't belive the hype, pro-resllin is all fake.

      --
      Paying taxes to buy civilization is like paying a hooker to buy love.
    9. Re:Price by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Hell, *I* laughed.

    10. Re:Price by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Informative

      I read the article, and all I can say is:

      "God Bless those Aussies"

      Because they're using what nature & the almighty already provided for us, & we as human beings just had to study it and stumble upon it.

      (This is living WITH nature, imo, not against it... & it sounds like it has NO serious chemical waste products either, as petroleum based products such as plastics possibly have, or possibly the rubber industry as it stands now).

      LOL, it sounded like somekind of "physical energy capacitor" to me, from the part about how fleas utilize resilin to store jumping energy & releasing it in a nanosecond (etc./et all)... the railgun of leaping!

      (Imagine Micheal Jordan with THIS STUFF in his shoes!)

      * :)

      APK

      P.S.=> Between this resilin compound & also stem cell research? It may be a breakthru for spinal damage cases as well... amazing, & again - God Bless the Aussies for this one! apk

    11. Re:Price by shotfeel · · Score: 2, Informative

      Then there's the possibility that resilin itself might trigger an immune response. Not to mention the fact that degradation of the material over time hasn't been determined. Who cares if it can withstand being flexed 100 million times, if it can't withstand proteases and other reactive compounds in the human body?

    12. Re:Price by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      What about disposal? Are we just creating another material to polute the world with? Or will it break down naturally? etc etc

    13. Re:Price by mOdQuArK! · · Score: 2, Insightful
      Because they're using what nature & the almighty already provided for us, & we as human beings just had to study it and stumble upon it.

      And I'm pretty sure this "natural discovery" has or will be patented so that nobody else will be able to use it without paying through the nose.

      Three cheers for having exclusive control over something that nature provided for free!

  4. Registration only, lots more here by Markus+Registrada · · Score: 4, Informative

    Lots of better (non-registration-required) links here:

    http://news.google.com/news?q=resilin&btnG=Search+ News

    1. Re:Registration only, lots more here by Seehund · · Score: 5, Informative

      Or why not go to the original source instead of trying to understand what the hell the dumbed-down popular press versions are trying to say (which can be difficult when the journalists don't know squat about the topic they're covering)?

      Nature's news story, which summarizes the original article by Elvin et al. (You need to be sitting at a Nature subscriber institution to read the latter.)

      --
      Help savingAmigaOS and a free PowerPC market
    2. Re:Registration only, lots more here by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Or CSIRO, who actually invented the stuff.

  5. I wish Fred MacMurray were still with us by glomph · · Score: 2, Funny

    This sounds wayy too much like Son of Flubber!

  6. RTFA by kotku · · Score: 5, Informative

    "We currently make sufficient material for research purposes, but this could be scaled up for commercial use," Dr Elvin said. "It looks a bit spaghetti [but] we can cast it in any shape."

    --
    The bikini - security through obscurity since 1943
    1. Re:RTFA by deltalimasierralima · · Score: 2, Funny

      Now we have the first observable effects of the Great Flying Spaghetti Monster...Hurrah Intelligent Design!

    2. Re:RTFA by poot_rootbeer · · Score: 3, Funny

      "It looks a bit spaghetti [but] we can cast it in any shape."

      They would just need to swap out the die on their Play-Doh Fun Factory.

  7. Less information by KeiserSoze · · Score: 5, Funny

    Learn less about Resilin at Wikipedia.

  8. Condoms by Bad+Labrador · · Score: 5, Funny

    Resilin condoms. One size really does fit all.

    1. Re:Condoms by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      And that for 720000 times per minute ... Jeeee

    2. Re:Condoms by fmwap · · Score: 5, Funny

      Resilin condoms. One size really does fit all.

      Good for 100 million uses!

    3. Re:Condoms by cbrocious · · Score: 1

      This is Slashdot, where even a one-use condom is unnecessary.

      --
      Disconnect and self-destruct, one bullet at a time.
    4. Re:Condoms by urmensch · · Score: 2, Funny

      Stop projecting

    5. Re:Condoms by 6th+time+lucky · · Score: 1

      Good for 100 million uses!

      Actually that would be good for 100 million individual beats...

      Still, a rather resilient prophylactic.

    6. Re:Condoms by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Sweet, but if you want to pass it on as a family heirloom you'll have to NOT use it!

    7. Re:Condoms by cerberusss · · Score: 2, Funny
      Resilin condoms. One size really does fit all.

      Female slashdotters are thinking about this amazingly flexible *ahem* replacement for men's genitalia.

      --
      8 of 13 people found this answer helpful. Did you?
    8. Re:Condoms by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Flies in the trumpet?

    9. Re:Condoms by gstoddart · · Score: 2, Funny
      Resilin condoms. One size really does fit all.

      Good for 100 million uses!

      Eeeew!

      I am so not washing out my rubbers.
      --
      Lost at C:>. Found at C.
    10. Re:Condoms by chrisnewbie · · Score: 0

      Now , if a girl sees you with your re-usable condom, i'm pretty sure it will have the same effect as re-usable handkerchief in your pocket.

      She aint gonna go there.

    11. Re:Condoms by higgenbottom · · Score: 1

      Have the baby...

    12. Re:Condoms by ArsonSmith · · Score: 1

      "I am so not washing out my rubbers."

      Eeeeeeew!!!!!

      man if you don't wash them out the get crusty.

      --
      Paying taxes to buy civilization is like paying a hooker to buy love.
    13. Re:Condoms by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Intergalactic prophylactic!
      @C

    14. Re:Condoms by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Dont need to. Just turn em inside out.

    15. Re:Condoms by fbartho · · Score: 1

      a million use condom though could have made slashdot unneccessary if it was time-shared!

      --
      Gravity Sucks
    16. Re:Condoms by gstoddart · · Score: 1
      "I am so not washing out my rubbers."

      Eeeeeeew!!!!!

      man if you don't wash them out the get crusty.

      I'll stick with the traditional methods:

      1) flush 'em
      2) throw it into her wicker waste-paper basket
      3) fling them with reckless abandon if we're not at my place
      --
      Lost at C:>. Found at C.
    17. Re:Condoms by idontgno · · Score: 2, Funny
      Good for 100 million uses!

      Actually that would be good for 100 million individual beats...

      This is Slashdot. Same thing.

      --
      Welcome to the Panopticon. Used to be a prison, now it's your home.
    18. Re:Condoms by cwelch · · Score: 1

      The fact that someone knows that they get crusty is semi-intruiging, yet makes me want to hurl about as much as watching a couple of 2000lb people do it.. or watching a bull get his nuts cut off. I can't understand how people eat calf fries.. *hurl*

  9. bringing down the price by Andreas+Schaefer · · Score: 5, Funny

    this will only become affordable on an commercial scale once the porn industry starts using resilin - i won't go into details, but there are interesting applications for a high durabality super-elastic material... ..or maybe just new alien case-mods?

    - Andreas

    1. Re:bringing down the price by Jedi1USA · · Score: 1

      Or maybe both at the same time?

      --
      My old sig was REALLY stoopid.
  10. You know its getting late when... by Toxicgonzo · · Score: 5, Funny

    You know its getting late when you read the article as "Incest Substance Synthesized For Science" ..." An anonymous reader wrote to mention a article discussing the successful synthesis of resilin, a super-elastic material used incest to perform amazing feats" and I'm like WTF

    1. Re:You know its getting late when... by Stripsurge · · Score: 1

      And written by Dr. Evil?

    2. Re:You know its getting late when... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I never used to believe that stuff about self abuse leading to blindness, but with all these posts from Slashdotters misreading the screen, I'm starting to wonder...

  11. Webshooters! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 4, Funny

    Admit it, you guys are all thinking that too. Boo organic web spinnerets.

  12. conductive? by BlueJay465 · · Score: 0

    yeah, but does it run Linux?

    1. Re:conductive? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Both linux users want to know I guess..

    2. Re:conductive? by mikiN · · Score: 1

      Imagine a Beowulf cluster of this...yuck, imagine having to untangle it.

      --
      The Hacker's Guide To The Kernel: Don't panic()!
    3. Re:conductive? by AndyChrist · · Score: 1

      Imagine a beowulf cluster of MY FISTS IN YOUR FACE. Imagine a beowulf cluster of SHUT THE FUCK UP.

    4. Re:conductive? by mikiN · · Score: 1

      Imagine a beowulf cluster of MY FISTS IN YOUR FACE.

      I'm sorry, but that configuration is not supported.

      --
      The Hacker's Guide To The Kernel: Don't panic()!
    5. Re:conductive? by mink · · Score: 1

      I think he must be running the Hokuto No Ken distro.

      --
      Well I've wrestled with reality for thirty five years doctor, and I'm happy to say I finally won out over it.
  13. Yeah it's flexible by 3.5+stripes · · Score: 2, Interesting

    But will your body accept it?

    It doesn't do any good if your body rejects your new arteries..

    --


    He tried to kill me with a forklift!
    1. Re:Yeah it's flexible by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Pathetic.

    2. Re:Yeah it's flexible by Wwolmack · · Score: 5, Informative

      It's a non-volatile protein, not living cells like a kidney or liver. So theres a very low chance of rejection.

    3. Re:Yeah it's flexible by 3.5+stripes · · Score: 1

      Lord knows why your reply wasn't modded up.

      Good to know though, thanks.

      --


      He tried to kill me with a forklift!
    4. Re:Yeah it's flexible by the_humeister · · Score: 1

      True, but there's still a chance of having an immune response because it's a foreign protein.

    5. Re:Yeah it's flexible by efatapo · · Score: 2, Informative

      Non-volatile protein? What does that mean? Does it not trigger the immune system or is it not prone to explosion? Seriously, I'm a biochemist PhD student (I work with nucleic acids mostly...but still) and I've never heard that term.

    6. Re:Yeah it's flexible by sdpuppy · · Score: 1
      Volatile has a few meanings, besides the popular "explosive", it also means to evaporate easily - the usual use in science.

      Here is an example of a paper with the term "Non-volatile protein"

      http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/entrez/query.fcgi?cmd= Retrieve&db=PubMed&list_uids=14561310&dopt=Abstrac t

      I'm not in this field, but I would assume that in the context in this thread it is not evaporating but used sort of incorrectly (IANABC) and probably what is meant is that the protein stays put and doesn't send out little pieces to alert the immune system that a foreigner is present, but then again, I am not a BioChemist.

    7. Re:Yeah it's flexible by Linux_ho · · Score: 1

      Brundlefly says no problem, flexy flexy.

      --
      include $sig;
      1;
    8. Re:Yeah it's flexible by subtillus · · Score: 1

      ALL proteins are immunogenic unless there is tolerization. This is the whole concept behind generating antibodies to make western blots...

      Inject just about anything and you'll get some reaction to it, moreover even completely inert materials still build up films of our own proteins which can eventually become hazardous in their own way. The above statement is completely false, and should be patently obvious to anyone who took first year microbiology and immunology, or even physiology...

    9. Re:Yeah it's flexible by shotfeel · · Score: 1

      I agree. Ask anyone in the biomaterials field. They'll tell you finding materials with the right mechanical properties is easy. Finding one that has the right mechanical properties and won't react in some negative way with the body is a real chore.

      For example, you find resilin has the right mechanical properties and is non-immunogenic (highly unlikely IMO), so you make an artificial artery. Oops! What's with all those platelets aggregating on the super-artery? They're clogging the thing up!

      Or who'd have guessed something made of protein gets broken down over time when placed in a live body?

      Or, gee, you dry a liquid under a bright light to get a solid, put it inside a body made mostly of water, and it regains its liquid state! Science is fun

      Or...,

    10. Re:Yeah it's flexible by sharky611aol.com · · Score: 2, Informative

      Actually, proteins are the most antigenic molecule type. Any foreign protein rapidly has antibodies created against it. Thus why most immunizations these days attempt to use proteins from the organism to which you want immunity (or a carbohydrate-protein hapten setup).

    11. Re:Yeah it's flexible by StillNeedMoreCoffee · · Score: 1

      No but you start to get very stiff hairs on your legs and you look longingly at dogs fur.

  14. Why do insects produce such amazing substances? by Vellmont · · Score: 4, Interesting

    Spiders produce super-strong silk, other insects produce this perfect rubber substance. What is it about insects that they produce such desireable materials? Are there more insect substances equally amazing?

    --
    AccountKiller
    1. Re:Why do insects produce such amazing substances? by duffahtolla · · Score: 5, Insightful
      What is it about insects that they produce such desireable materials?

      Short life span, and extreme numbers give them accelerated evolution compared to other animals.

    2. Re:Why do insects produce such amazing substances? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      Are there more insect substances equally amazing?
      yes.
    3. Re:Why do insects produce such amazing substances? by Vellmont · · Score: 1

      I could see it, but what is it about insects that the thing to go for, the thing that gives them the best bang/buck is substances with excellent physical properties?

      --
      AccountKiller
    4. Re:Why do insects produce such amazing substances? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Insects have evolved for far longer than species like mammals etc?

    5. Re:Why do insects produce such amazing substances? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Excusme, sir, but you shoud add a disclaimer stating that evolutive theories and Darwinism in particular are just theories and are not proven, so the other option is that insects were created with those supercapabilities directly by the Lord.

    6. Re:Why do insects produce such amazing substances? by archeopterix · · Score: 1, Informative
      I could see it, but what is it about insects that the thing to go for, the thing that gives them the best bang/buck is substances with excellent physical properties?
      Maybe it is their size. I suspect that spider net would not scale up to mammal sizes. Basic geometry/physics - volume/weight goes cubic, while surface goes only quadratic with size.

      Btw, spiders are not insects.

    7. Re:Why do insects produce such amazing substances? by SB5 · · Score: 2, Interesting

      You have heard of evolution right? You don't live in Kansas do you?

      Natural selection gets rid of competitors that can't compete. The best way to compete is to have the best of the best, because then you don't have to compete to survive as much.

      Lets have two people swim in a race, one guy will wear a wetsuit and flippers and one will wear a regular speedo bathing suit. The guy in the suit probably has a better chance of winning because of the wetsuit and flippers.

      Now take two people with wetsuit and flippers. each person has different flippers and wetsuits....

      Now repeat those trials 100 billion times. You will have found after repeated trials someone with probably the most efficient flippers and wetsuit combination.

      --
      If what you are reading sounds funny, or sarcastic, lame, or stupid
      it is because it is supposed to be. just laugh
    8. Re:Why do insects produce such amazing substances? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Interesting

      Now that's a perfect explanation for why we don't fart silk or rubber...yet.

      Then again, keeping on that frame of mind, bacteria should be building spaceships now.

      Note: 1) desirability of a organically produced material derives strictly from our criteria

                  2) steel-like silk and such are really far from being the only desireable substances produced by living organisms that we have exploited. Plants and fungi are probably the most popular sources of interesting compounds (think wood and peniciline)

    9. Re:Why do insects produce such amazing substances? by nwbvt · · Score: 1

      Spiders are not insects. And I'm sure you can find some amazing structure or protein in virtually any highly evolved organism.

      --
      Mathematics is made of 50 percent formulas, 50 percent proofs, and 50 percent imagination.
    10. Re:Why do insects produce such amazing substances? by AGMW · · Score: 1
      One assumes you mean the Lord GSM http://www.venganza.org/ ?

      --
      Eclectic beats from Leeds, UK
      handmadehands.co.uk
    11. Re:Why do insects produce such amazing substances? by Triskele · · Score: 2, Funny
      Then again, keeping on that frame of mind, bacteria should be building spaceships now.

      <friday> They are - they just took a billion years to evolve into us to do it! </friday>

      --

      --
      USA: home of the world's largest terrorist training camp.

    12. Re:Why do insects produce such amazing substances? by anotherzeb · · Score: 1

      The silk and this resilin stuff both sound good. I'm also wondering about the stuff that makes some insects glow / emit light at night (and possibly during the day, but the sun would prevent that being very noticeable). Getting some of that to use instead of light bulbs might be fun and might save energy (don't know how much energy it would take to synthesise, though, so might not)

      --
      Good luck sometimes arrives disguised as bad
    13. Re:Why do insects produce such amazing substances? by TheDauthi · · Score: 1

      Bah! Evolution! Actually, His Noodleyness is unhappy with us for denying Him and is working on our replacements. These are the future of 'Big Business'.

    14. Re:Why do insects produce such amazing substances? by greg_barton · · Score: 1

      What is it about insects that they produce such desireable materials?

      It's obvious, isn't it? Jesus wanted it that way.

    15. Re:Why do insects produce such amazing substances? by P3NIS_CLEAVER · · Score: 0

      Our specialization is our brains. That is why we build spaceships. Other creatures have other specializations, such as gooey proteins.

      --
      Please sign petition to restore sanity to our banking system!!!

      http://financialpetition.org/
    16. Re:Why do insects produce such amazing substances? by ILKO_deresolution · · Score: 0

      Dude your fricking god! Are you into macross?
      bacteria building ships... I've been thinking along those lines for years
      just programming them for structures shape, thats the trick.
      Well when we learn enough we'll have programs to make dragons.
      p34c3
      keep thinking this...like how to get a bacteria to create a convex or somthing

      --
      I tip toe like rats on vouge runnways.
    17. Re:Why do insects produce such amazing substances? by clem · · Score: 1, Funny

      Maybe it is their size. I suspect that spider net would not scale up to mammal sizes.

      What part of, "Does whatever a spider can," did you not understand?

      --
      Your courageous and selfless spelling corrections have made me a better person.
    18. Re:Why do insects produce such amazing substances? by kurtu5 · · Score: 2, Insightful

      "... bacteria should be building spaceships now."

      Why bother buidling spaceships when they are space ships?

      Panspermia <- All about extremophiles... well some about extremeophiles.

      Although, considering the recent slashdot article relating to the use of plastics for spaceships, chiton may be a great hull due to the low chance of becoming a hull of heavy unstable isotopes after being exposed to cosmic radiation.

      I suppose you could coax bacteria to deposit chiton onto the interior of an inflated space baloon, strap on some propulsion, avionics and life support and voila - spaceship! You could even engineer something that likes to build vigorously near high pressure gradients - micrometerite damage control.

      Too bad there are no examples of biological space propulsion to copy. I guess that life support made out of life wouldn't be to far around the corner. Avionics would be another matter, space travel seems to require really, really precise navigation and control.

      Gotta love biomimetics, and the great Wiki.

    19. Re:Why do insects produce such amazing substances? by flyonthewall · · Score: 1
      They are - they just took a billion years to evolve into us to do it!
      42! mmm... What was the question again?
      --
      "The avalanche has already started. It's too late for the pebbles to vote." - Kosh
    20. Re:Why do insects produce such amazing substances? by shotfeel · · Score: 2, Funny

      Are there more insect substances equally amazing?

      Yeah, that stuff they leave on the windshield when you hit them. Resistant to almost every cleaning substance known to man that doesn't dissolve the glass too.

    21. Re:Why do insects produce such amazing substances? by shotfeel · · Score: 1

      You mean luciferin? Still burns chemical energy in the way of ATP hydrolysis to create light. I don't know that it would be any more efficient at providing light.

    22. Re:Why do insects produce such amazing substances? by Vellmont · · Score: 1

      Gee, thanks for the high school explanation of evolution, I didn't know what it was.

      If you knew a little more about evolution you'd also know that species don't just get any-old advantage, they get the one that requires the least amount of changes but also provides them with the most advantage (bang for buck). The question is obviously why extrodinary physical substances fit that bill so often for insects.

      --
      AccountKiller
    23. Re:Why do insects produce such amazing substances? by RedCard · · Score: 2, Funny
      Bah! Evolution! Actually, His Noodleyness is unhappy with us for denying Him and is working on our replacements. These are the future of 'Big Business'.

      You, Sir, are on the right track! From the article:
      Dr Elvin said. "It looks a bit [like] spaghetti [but] we can cast it in any shape."

      I do believe that this is in fact a sign!
      I mean... Arrrrr.....

    24. Re:Why do insects produce such amazing substances? by Arcane_Rhino · · Score: 1

      I can't believe you have not been moderated to +5 for sardonic hilarity. I actually burst-out laughing.

    25. Re:Why do insects produce such amazing substances? by moz25 · · Score: 1

      I'm assuming that you're making a joke, but... if a core element of biology has to be accompanied by a baseless disclaimer, then it would only be fair that churches prominently display such disclaimers as well since their assertions are not only unproven, but usually also heavily disputed by members of the same religion (but other demonination).

      Why is there no push for such disclaimers?

  15. From the horse's mouth... by scdeimos · · Score: 3, Informative

    ... so to speak. No soul-eating registration required:

    Harnessing flea power to create near-perfect rubber

  16. secret identity by nielkosh · · Score: 3, Insightful

    It looks a bit spaghetti [but] we can cast it in any shape. Dr. Elvin, I presume? Or is it .... Peter Parker...

    1. Re:secret identity by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

      Peter Parker? Not really. Rearrange the letters in Dr. Elvin and you will get...

      EVIL NRD.

  17. I, for one ... by threaded · · Score: 5, Funny

    I, for one, welcome our super bouncy overlords.

    1. Re:I, for one ... by Nimloth · · Score: 2, Funny

      The instructions specifically said "do not taunt happy fun resilin ball"!

  18. Comic Book Guy sais by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Worst. Troll. Evar.

  19. The new WMD? by nz_mincemeat · · Score: 2, Funny

    I just can't wait for those terrorists lugging slingshots powered by resilin bands ;-)

    1. Re:The new WMD? by zev1983 · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Using resilin balls as ammunition it would be like that scene in Men in Black where the bouncy ball tore up half the office. I can think of a few places I could use that....

    2. Re:The new WMD? by shotfeel · · Score: 1

      And here I was thinking flubber...

    3. Re:The new WMD? by zev1983 · · Score: 1

      I thought of that first, but I couldn't remember the name of it, and I couldn't remember the name of the movie it was from, so I went with MIB.

  20. Re:What does by sound+vision · · Score: 0, Offtopic

    You never know, they might start making Resilin Personal Lubricant. I don't know how it feels though, and how it would compare to more popular brands like KY or Remmington. But this product does have a lot of, as you would say "tallywhacker" potential. I prefer to use the word "pecker" though. It makes you sound more distinguished.

  21. Phew! by 10Ghz · · Score: 3, Funny

    "Dr Elvin predicted..."

    For a moment I read that as "Dr Evil"...

    --
    Lesbian Nazi Hookers Abducted by UFOs and Forced Into Weight Loss Programs - -all next week on Town Talk.
    1. Re:Phew! by halleluja · · Score: 1
      For a moment I read that as "Dr Evil"
      Your suspicions are correct.

      "Elvin" is an anagram of "Evil N" commonly pronounced as "Evil One".

      Fire up the Jeff "BrundleFly" Goldblum jokes!

    2. Re:Phew! by ArsonSmith · · Score: 1

      I think it is an anagram for "Evil n" where n = your rank in the evil organization.

      --
      Paying taxes to buy civilization is like paying a hooker to buy love.
  22. Hey! by Frodo+Crockett · · Score: 1

    I spent a full two minutes researching that article, you insensitive clod!

    --
    "The newly born animals are then whisked off for a quick run through a giant baking oven." --heard on Food Network
  23. Super... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Love to get some of that stuff into my knee joints. It'll be great to not have to worry about wearing them out. Too bad he said it'll take at least a decade to make human joint replacements. Hope other researchers jump in to speed it up.

    1. Re:Super... by Skye16 · · Score: 1

      Yeah, and I'd like to get a replacement disk at L4/L5, too. Most days it feels fine, but every so often, things go awry. (I had a microdisectomy at L4/L5 my freshman year of college, so there isn't much left in the disk to keep it...juicy. And whatnot.)

    2. Re:Super... by bleckywelcky · · Score: 1

      Hopefully it doesn't get bogged down by patent issues as well. If this is the kind of breakthrough development in materials that they make it out to be, it should be accessible to anyone and everyone to come up with great new ideas on how to use it. Just sitting here I've already thought of half-a-dozen different uses to reduce complexity, cost, risk, and increase accessibility in existing systems. I'm concerned about the "patent" and "commercial partners" wording in the article. They need to have flexible licensing and just set a fair price for access to the technology to allow small guys a chance to get in on the business ... but then set a royalty rate or something so if an invention does hit it big, they can take their appropriate share (which would hopefully fund additional CSIRO research).

  24. mansuper by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

    note substance will not work under the red sun of krypton

  25. doubtful by Loconut1389 · · Score: 3, Insightful

    While resilin sounds interesting, the article seems a bit hyped up...

    "If humans had such pads they could leap 100-storey buildings"

    That sounds like unsubstantiated exxageration- eg no reality behind it. Now it may be true, but seems highly improbable to me?

    I hope resilin does neat things, but I'd rather read about it in Science magazine or Scientific American.

    1. Re:doubtful by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I believe they are only making the point that relatively speaking that's how high fleas jump....

    2. Re:doubtful by Smauler · · Score: 1

      The notion we would be able to leap 100 storey buildings is plain wrong. If a flea were the size of a human, it would collapse and die under it's own body weight. I don't understand why more people don't know this.

    3. Re:doubtful by Capt+James+McCarthy · · Score: 2

      I just hope they can make drive belts out of the stuff so I never have to pay the auto mechanic again for that rubber crap thats on there now.

      --
      There are no loopholes. It's either legal or it's not.
    4. Re:doubtful by Analogy+Man · · Score: 2, Informative
      A simple length scale conversion...you are right.

      The interesting thing is the g-forces involved. Impulsively (1 ms) give yourself a sufficient boost to be rocketed 1000 feet into the air. I think more likely your shoes would cause your legs to explode from the knee down.

      --
      When the people fear their government, there is tyranny; when the government fears the people, there is liberty.
    5. Re:doubtful by mysticgoat · · Score: 2, Funny

      I have no problem envisioning the up side of leaping over a 100 storey building.

      However there is a down side to this that I'd rather not visualize...

    6. Re:doubtful by bleckywelcky · · Score: 1

      They just forgot to mention that we would not survive the landing.

    7. Re:doubtful by shotfeel · · Score: 1

      "If humans had such pads they could leap 100-storey buildings"

      That sounds like unsubstantiated exxageration- eg no reality behind it.


      I believe that's supposed to be "could leap a 100 story flea condo".

  26. uh? by tuxette · · Score: 2

    What exactly can this stuff make you do that 50 espresso shots can't?

    --
    People say I'm crazy, I got diamonds on the soles of my shoes...
    1. Re:uh? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Bounce.

    2. Re:uh? by shotfeel · · Score: 2, Funny

      What exactly can this stuff make you do that 50 espresso shots can't?

      Walk past a rest room without stopping?

    3. Re:uh? by tuxette · · Score: 1

      HAHAHAHA, true enough! :-D

      --
      People say I'm crazy, I got diamonds on the soles of my shoes...
  27. Kind of sad by WindBourne · · Score: 1

    When we finally have the ability to find out, we may end up losing the interesting species that we will not find out.

    --
    I prefer the "u" in honour as it seems to be missing these days.
    1. Re:Kind of sad by Chris+Burke · · Score: 1

      I know. I think of all the species we have lost and are losing in the rain forests and other places, all those innovations from millions of years of evolution that are now gone, and its our own stupid fault.

      I don't understand how any rational person could not be at least in principle an environmentalist.

      --

      The enemies of Democracy are
    2. Re:Kind of sad by ArsonSmith · · Score: 2, Funny

      Actually according to evolution it is their own stupid fault. If they couldn't adapt then they were not adequate to survive. That's just how evolution works.

      --
      Paying taxes to buy civilization is like paying a hooker to buy love.
    3. Re:Kind of sad by Chris+Burke · · Score: 1

      That's not what I'm talking about. I'm talking about us losing the benefit of being able to discover all the different things these species used to adequately survive before we came along. Things like Resilin. Things we don't know about, and never will because the species that developed them are gone now.

      "Fault" is irrelevent. The cost of our own actions is, and it is costing us.

      --

      The enemies of Democracy are
    4. Re:Kind of sad by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      They couldn't have been all that great because they are all dead now.

    5. Re:Kind of sad by Chris+Burke · · Score: 1

      That only makes any sense if what you care about is what caused the animal to go extinct. There's tons of useful chemicals and materials found in nature that don't help at all against, say, slash and burn farming, or a metor strike.

      Is that your metric? "This could only be useful if it would let me survive a meteor strike."

      --

      The enemies of Democracy are
  28. More info by Maikel_NAI · · Score: 4, Informative

    You can read more about it in BBC News (English) and in Astroseti (Spanish).

    --
    Faith does not move mountains, but drills can go through it.
  29. sure, it all sounds cool now by martin-boundary · · Score: 1

    but once we all wear our super strong resilin shoes and belts with Insect Power(TM), I just hope nobody then also invents a cheap, mass market universal teleporter.

  30. We could implant a network in the spinal cord. by Associate · · Score: 0, Offtopic

    Imagine a beowolf cluster of those!

    --
    Someone hates these cans.
  31. Remain alive by RidiculousPie · · Score: 2

    "a gallon and a half (5 liters) of espresso" contains so much caffiene that it can kill you. source: wikipedia .

    --
    ah, mod points ... now where is my crack?
    1. Re:Remain alive by thorgil · · Score: 2

      correctly made espresso contain less caffiene than normal coffe per volume due to fast extraction (20-30 sec depending on coffe bean and roasting)
      One cup of espresso is 3 cl (a REAL espresso, 1-2 cl if restritto, 4 cl if lungo)
      50 cups of espresso would be aboutish 1.5 liters not counting crema (foam)

      still a lot...

      --
      Warning: This sig contains a small bug. ==> *
  32. Why synthesize? by LS · · Score: 0

    If this stuff is so valuable, why couldn't it have been harvested from insects before synthesis was posssible?

    LS

    --
    There is a fine line between being a cultivated citizen and being someone else's crop. - A. J. Patrick Liszkie
    1. Re:Why synthesize? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      spider silk would be fantasticly helpful in a number of applications that would save lives (such as bullet proof vests), as well as many other, but somehow they have not been able to harvest it from the spiders appropriately, that is probably the reason they cant harvest resilin

    2. Re:Why synthesize? by Pollardito · · Score: 1

      the damned things wouldn't stand still long enough to be milked!

    3. Re:Why synthesize? by F_Scentura · · Score: 1

      It's an issue of scale and purity, I imagine. With synthesis possible we finally have the amount of unadulterated material that we need to carry on larger experiements.

    4. Re:Why synthesize? by Just+Some+Guy · · Score: 1
      why couldn't it have been harvested from insects before synthesis was posssible?

      Look at a grasshopper. Any grasshopper. Try to spot one of its tendons. Now, imagine how many of those you'd need to somehow glue together to make a pair of sweatshop tennis shoes.

      That is why you can't just harvest the stuff.

      --
      Dewey, what part of this looks like authorities should be involved?
    5. Re:Why synthesize? by bleckywelcky · · Score: 2, Funny

      Have you tried milking a flea? It's not a pretty sight. Half the time you end up crushing it with the tweezers.

    6. Re:Why synthesize? by LS · · Score: 1

      Come on now, I don't think that they would use surgery to remove these tendons. We're not living in prehistoric times anymore - we have machine harvesters, factories, refineries, whatnot. I was just wondering why some process wasn't invented where you could dump a bunch of grasshoppers in a vat, and out of the otherside of some set of devices comes this substance, perhaps through some chemical or steam or whatever form of separation. Jeez people

      --
      There is a fine line between being a cultivated citizen and being someone else's crop. - A. J. Patrick Liszkie
  33. Re: *Sniff* Whats that smell? by EddyPearson · · Score: 2, Insightful

    If humans had such pads they could leap 100-storey buildings.

    I dont beleive it for a second. Take scale into account! The force needed and the required energy could not be stored in a bit of rubber between you're legs.

    --
    You feel sleepy. Close your eyes. The opinions stated above are yours. You cannot imagine why you ever felt otherwise.
  34. Dr Elvin? or Dr Elvin Atombender??? by Goodl · · Score: 1

    If he starts saying 'Stay a while, Staaaaay forever!!' I'm out of here I always wondered what happened to that guy after I finished 'Impossible mission' on the C64'

    --
    I've got some photographs, I'd like to show them to you. Though you don't know the girls You'll recognise the view..
    1. Re:Dr Elvin? or Dr Elvin Atombender??? by Zunni · · Score: 1

      Thank you for allowing that pleasant memory to be brought back from the deep recesses of my mind...

      'Another visit-ar... Stay awhile.. Stay Forevar!'

      That and 'AHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHH HHHhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhh' as you fell down a pit will never be forgotten..

    2. Re:Dr Elvin? or Dr Elvin Atombender??? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You can play the game too even now. Get yourself a Commodore C64 emulator software and the game. Google them up, one good one is Frodo. Or buy that joystick which plugs directly to your TV and contains Impossible Mission (I think it was part 2).

  35. Re: *Sniff* Whats that smell? by klmth · · Score: 3, Informative

    That hyperbole was invented by the reporter. The summary in Nature has no such claims.

    I really hate it when scientific discoveries get FUBARed by the press. What is it with journalists? Why don't they have any common sense?

  36. Re:You know its getting REALLY late when... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Funny

    And you know it's getting REALLY late when you don't even go "WTF".

  37. That's what they always say by mosb1000 · · Score: 1, Insightful

    Sure, anything that can be done in the lab can be done on a larger scale. But they don't know whether or not this kind of thing would be economically feasible when done on a larger scale. That's why it's called research, because we don't already know. It might be feasible, but the truth is we won't really know until it's happened.

    Furthermore, these kind of things usually don't pan out. Even it it does, it won't be practically available to the general public for decades because of the secondary technology that needs to be developed first to make it feasible. Scientists like to make grandiose claims about what their research will lead to because it helps bring in funding for continued research. That doesn't mean they will pan out, only that the scientist thinks they might.

    1. Re:That's what they always say by P3NIS_CLEAVER · · Score: 2, Informative

      proteins and amino acid production via fermentation has proved to be a viable commercial approach in the past. This isn't as far fetched as say creating a space elevator with buckytubes.

      --
      Please sign petition to restore sanity to our banking system!!!

      http://financialpetition.org/
    2. Re:That's what they always say by mosb1000 · · Score: 1

      I don't know, the scientist in the article himself said that commercial products are at least a decade off. The problem is that just producing the amino acid is only part of the problem of making a useful product. There are unresolved questions about whether or not this will be be a good material for making shoes, or prosthetics, and if it does have good properties (like wear resistance as they have postulated) they will still need to find a way to form it and make it hold its form, and keep the water from leaking out. Of course, if it does have good properties, they have to be enough better to justify the added expense of producing this stuff instead of just rubber or whatever cheap-ass polymer they'll be using by then.

      I'll admit, it has a much better chance than carbon nano-tubes and the space elevator, it is by no means a done deal.

  38. Nothing changes... by charlie763 · · Score: 1

    ...gee whiz, future technology always seems so promising. Too bad it never seems to change from being only promising.

    --
    Welcome to the land of the free...pay toll ahead...no photography...please open your bag...
  39. 100 million times? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Hell, I should move my back more often..

  40. Elvin is correct by Belial6 · · Score: 1

    No, Elvin is right. So, stay a while...

  41. Re: *Sniff* Whats that smell? by MalHavoc · · Score: 2, Funny

    Hey, now! You'd be amazed at the amount of force and energy that's stored in the rubber between my legs!

  42. Always beware... by carldot67 · · Score: 1

    ...Scientists trying to score their next round of funding by claiming "breakthroughs".
    I am sure the material is very good but I am cautious. Biomechanically, insects operate in a very different world to us and proteins (even structural ones) have a tendency to need care and feeding from surrounding tissues.

    --
    I wish at was Friday, but I dont want to wish my life away. So I wish it was last Friday.
  43. A good argument for Environmental Conservation by digitaldc · · Score: 0, Offtopic

    A good argument for environmental conservation is the benefit to all mankind from the undiscovered riches (such as beneficial chemical compounds) of insects and plants. Instead of putting all of our faith and effort into man-made items and products, people should realize that environmental protection and economic growth/development are not mutually-exclusive.

    If you care about the environment, you are smarter than you think.
    See: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Beneficial_insects

    --
    He who knows best knows how little he knows. - Thomas Jefferson
  44. Shocks by N8F8 · · Score: 1

    Another use could be shock absorbers for vehicles.

    --
    "God fights on the side with the best artillery." - Napoleon, Marshal of France - speaking truth to power
    1. Re:Shocks by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      if you throw a resilin base ball at the ceiling hard, it would bounce against every wall of your apartment, knock out your coffee, smash your keyboard ... just like a super bouncing ball in the cartoon. Now consider your car on the highway hitting the back of 40' container at 30mph.

    2. Re:Shocks by sn0wcrash · · Score: 1

      Shocks are designed to dampen the movement of the springs. Without shocks your car would be very hard to control at speed, and the ride would suck. So this would be the opposite of what you want from a shock absorber.

  45. Obscure Star Trek Reference by SomeoneGotMyNick · · Score: 1

    "Return To Tommorrow"

    Scotty commenting about an alien synthetic muscle compound in front of him:
    "It's a fancy name, but how will something that looks like a drop of jelly
    make this thing work?"


    Henoch (The evil alien):
    It will have twice the strength and agility of your body. It will last 1,000 years.

  46. The perfect use for resilin by Woogiemonger · · Score: 1

    The ultimate superball! Throw it against a wall and watch it bounce all over for hours!

  47. Re:Remain alive futurama style by Blurredplacebo · · Score: 3, Funny

    and after 300 cups do you break the coffee barrier?

  48. I dare you... by NotFamous · · Score: 1

    ...to repeat the title 10 times as fast as you can. Extra points if you have dentures.

    --
    Some settling may occur during posting.
  49. late! by assnoodles · · Score: 0

    Nice to see slashdot is light years behind biologue: http://wmbr.org/shows/biologue/

  50. Dr. Elvin or... by Wannabe+Code+Monkey · · Score: 1

    "Dr Elvin predicted the substance would lead to everything from artificial arteries to spinal parts" While his research partner Dr. Evil predicted the substance would lead to everything from miniture clones to sharks with frickin' laser beams attached to their heads.

    --
    We always knew Comcast was corrupt, here's the proof: http://tech.slashdot.org/comments.pl?sid=1909890&cid=34545432
  51. I hate quote like this. by manno · · Score: 1

    "If humans had such pads they could leap 100-storey buildings."

    Statements like this make me cringe.

    1. Re:I hate quote like this. by Dread_ed · · Score: 1

      Makes me cringe too...

      Think of the LANDING!

      --
      When the only tool you have is a claw hammer every problem starts to look like the back of someone's skull.
    2. Re:I hate quote like this. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Why? It's obviously used to give an idea of scale, e.g. the ratio of jump to height that fleas are capable of. They don't mean it literally, which I think would be obvious.

    3. Re:I hate quote like this. by manno · · Score: 1

      It is? I know it's false, but that wasn't the impression I got.

  52. Mistakes of scale are so common by ianscot · · Score: 2, Informative
    "If humans had such pads they could leap 100-storey buildings"

    That sounds like unsubstantiated exxageration- eg no reality behind it. Now it may be true, but seems highly improbable to me?

    One does tend to suspect any popular press story that makes mistakes of scaling like unto the ones in 1950s science fiction movies that have giant ants running around. For a basic primer on the goofiness of this claim, Insultingly Stupid Movie Physics would be one source.

    --
    "Fundamentalism" isn't about divine morality. It's about human authority.
    1. Re:Mistakes of scale are so common by mink · · Score: 1

      You can thank either TLC or Discovery for this. They had a whole week series of "contests" with supposed results of scaled up creatures competing.

      --
      Well I've wrestled with reality for thirty five years doctor, and I'm happy to say I finally won out over it.
  53. Take a look around you right now. by ianscot · · Score: 1
    Too bad it never seems to change from being only promising.

    Yeah, that whole microwave oven thing is vastly overrated. And the dweebs at college carrying around backpack computers, they're completely losing their nerdy minds over the idea that someday we'll all be using computers embedded in the simplest daily things.

    Take a look around you at all the lasers you encounter. Played a CD lately?

    Almost nothing's ever the panacea that real true believers think it might be, but if anything the pace of change is accelerating, "Connections"-style.

    --
    "Fundamentalism" isn't about divine morality. It's about human authority.
  54. Nature's neat. by rnelsonee · · Score: 1

    Although I'm a huge fan of the scientific achievements we've made over the centuries, as well as the ones we're sure to make in the future, I find it humbling that the 'new hotness' material is something that mother nature's had for plain old insects for millions of years. And this certainly isn't the first time that nature has shown to be superior to our synthetic devices. I guess millions of years of evolution can produce some amazing things.

  55. Until someone pulls the drain plug by brokeninside · · Score: 2, Interesting

    After the water all runs out, those without flippers, or with minimal flippers suddenly start to outcompete those with the uberflippers.

    Not to mention, your view of competition is a bit skewed. Natural selection favors survival of the adequate, not survival of the fittest. Only in extreme situations does being the best help individuals survive to a significantly greater extent than being adequate. Certainly, there are some situations in nature where resources are so scarce that only the `best' survive, but throughout most of the natural world, being adequate is good enough.

    And not to mention that adequateness in natural selection is defined entirely by propagating one's genes. It doesn't matter if a swimmer has the best fins in the world if the guys in speedos mate more frequently and have enough progeny to ensure that some survive the attacks of their quicker swimming brethren.

    1. Re:Until someone pulls the drain plug by sdpuppy · · Score: 1
      It doesn't matter if a swimmer has the best fins in the world if the guys in speedos mate more frequently and have enough progeny to ensure that some survive the attacks of their quicker swimming brethren.

      Are you implying something about slashdotters here?

      dang I better get rid of that wet suit now - should have know that wasn't getting the girls...

      Know a good Speedo store in the area?

      :-)

    2. Re:Until someone pulls the drain plug by TGK · · Score: 2, Insightful

      It doesn't matter if a swimmer has the best fins in the world if the guys in speedos mate more frequently and have enough progeny to ensure that some survive the attacks of their quicker swimming brethren.

      That IS fitness. If that's the case then the speedos are fitter (is that a word?) than the flippers. Fitness in the evolutionary sense of the term doesn't mean the strongest, the most powerfull, or the most impressive -- it means the most capable to pass on genetic material.

      Sometimes that means avoiding starving to death. Sometimes that means getting a lot of action. The only evolutionary measure of the "fittest" is (s)he who has the most kids. Promiscuity, then, is the quintessential evolutionary trait.

      Now that I stop to think about it, maybe THAT'S the problem the I.Ders have with evolution.

      --
      Killfile(TGK)
      No trees were killed in the creation of this post. However, many electrons were inconvenienced.
  56. Mattress by aktiveradio · · Score: 1

    I hope this stuff is ready soon I need a new Mattress and this one better last 1000 years.

  57. did anyone else think... by mikers · · Score: 2, Funny

    of Mithril, yes from... JRR Tolkiens now (in)famous EPIC (Lord of the rings... for those who haven't had coffee this morning yet).

    From the pedia... "...It is a precious silvery metal, stronger than steel but much lighter in weight..."

    And brought to us by none other than Dr. Elvin.

    What will the elves think of next!

    1. Re:did anyone else think... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      *Now* famous? Idiot.

  58. Don't Worry by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Don't worry - as you grow old, the area around L5 tends to stiffen up anyway. But getting some elasticity back wouldn't hurt.

    That said, I'd also like a few new components, such as something to hold TH5 in place! Bugger got squashed a few years ago.

  59. Flubber by barfomar · · Score: 1
    Nike will love this.

    or aka: Grandson of Flubber

  60. ``If humans had these [resilin] pads ... by Kaz+Kylheku · · Score: 1

    they could leap 100 story buildings.''

    Oh the amusing stupidity of some science journalists. :)

    1. Re:``If humans had these [resilin] pads ... by gnn_geeknotnerd · · Score: 1

      The version I've heard of this is that if fleas were scaled up to human size they'd be able to leap 100ft buildings. I'm bad at maths, so I'm not going to try and work it out, but as I understood it it was all about weight and energy storage and transfer from the superelastic proteins in their legs...

      --
      That is not dead which can eternal lie, And with strange aeons even death may die.
    2. Re:``If humans had these [resilin] pads ... by mOdQuArK! · · Score: 1

      Oh, it's perfectly technically feasible to launch a human body over a 100 story building. It's keeping them healthy & alive during the launch & during the stop which is the hard bit.

    3. Re:``If humans had these [resilin] pads ... by Retric · · Score: 2, Insightful

      If you where 100th your height you would be ~1/100^2 as strong but ~ 1/100^3 as light thus if you could jump 1 foot in the air now you could still jump ~1 foot into the air even though you where only ~2cm tall. (Ignoring things like wind resistance ect.) It's funny but if the "Honey I shrunk the kids" thing really happened they would have been a lot stronger than any of the insects they came into contact with. When you start scaling the human body down you find that it's incredibly strong for it's size (~2m tall) which is why insects don't get more than about 1 foot in size.

      PS: However the basic strictures of the human body don't scale down to that size, in the real world, which is why mammals tend to be at least 2inches long when full grown.

    4. Re:``If humans had these [resilin] pads ... by F34nor · · Score: 1

      Your comment makes me think og the gasoline powered stils that russians had, ~40 feet or something in height but landing was a BITCH.

      Powerskip.de would benefit from these protiens.

  61. Dolly the "spider silk protien" goat by ILKO_deresolution · · Score: 0

    Yeah gene splicing is way cool, remember that goat that's mammograms now produce spider silk,
    the strongest silk in the world for bullet proof vests (could you use carbon nanotubes for a vest?)

    http://www.howstuffworks.com/news-item38.htm

    Why the hell aren't you guys talking about incorperating this into a mech or exoskeleton?
    all those elestic leg projects...just ignored.

    What about the suction cup gloves? for spiderman manuvers?
    I mean christmas is so close and ... and

    --
    I tip toe like rats on vouge runnways.
  62. I can see the Intellectual Property suits coming.. by markana · · Score: 1

    How long until some group of insects files suit against these scientists for using their IP without paying royalties?

    Remember - the insects outnumber and outmass humans, and certain of their subspecies ahve already established themselves in the legal profession...

  63. Re:Remain alive futurama style by kurtu5 · · Score: 1

    That scene of Fry moving in quicktime was the bestest. I wish slashdot would allow image posting.

  64. Re:doubtful(do these amazing capabilites scale?) by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    My entomology teacher taught us that when we consider the ants "amazing" power to lift 10 times it's body weight, that it is partly the scale of the ant that lends to it's ability to do that. ie an ant that was the size of a human would not be able to lift 10 times it body weight.
    Does anyone know if this type of chemistry an application will scale successfuly?

  65. Re: *Sniff* Whats that smell? by blazer1024 · · Score: 1
    What is it with journalists? Why don't they have any common sense?

    I don't think it's lack of common sense. It's lack of any sort of scientific education. Communications majors don't take physics, chemistry or biology. They're going to take the easiest course they can (since most 4 year universities require SOME sort of physical/lab science), and barely pay attention. After all, they aren't science majors, they're communication majors.

    I'm sure there are exceptions, but humans (especially we Americans) like taking the path of least resistance to get what we want.
  66. Ok - there are a few products I want... by cr0sh · · Score: 1
    First off, a slingshot made with this stuff...

    Second, a resilin high-bounce ball...

    Seriously, though - I wonder if this stuff, if made right (perhaps combined with other substances - isn't there a polymer which shrinks in response to electrical stimulus?), could create an advanced artificial "muscle"? Could such a device be more useful (perhaps more efficient) in robotic and other mechanical applications where currently hydraulic, pneumatic, or electro-mechanical systems are used?

    --
    Reason is the Path to God - Anon
  67. Last we'll hear of it by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    "...parts that would not wear out despite being flexed 100 million times..."

    Something that durable would never make it into general use. Companies sell us products which wear out on purpose to keep us coming back for more product. Consider the $30 DVD player which wears out after less than a year of use, or shoes whose soles wear down rapidly. Ours is a consumer culture, and if the products we buy don't wear out regularly then we'll consume less and less.

    If resilin makes it into consumer products you can bet it'll be in a degraded form which wears out eventually. These modifications will be touted as "enhancements" designed to make it a better product.

    Am I crazy because I think the things I buy should last longer than they do?

  68. Re:I can see the Intellectual Property suits comin by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I have long suspected that my attorney is an insect. I'd be willing to bet cash money that he's going to represent them.

  69. Uncultured Swine by iamlucky13 · · Score: 1

    In the future, when making jokes that refer to old movie plots, please avoid using sequals that nobody cared to watch. The movie you are looking for is The Absent Minded Professor.

    As a bit of fun though, in the trivia section down at the bottom of the IMDB entry is the "recipe" for this amazing substance. I guess these resilin scientists are getting a little extravagent with their protein synthesis and genetically modified bacteria.

  70. My science class teaches intellegent design. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    and my teacher says this is is against god. Man was made in GODs image so you can't use insect parts. You're all going to hell for worshiping devil science. Look to GODs teachings of intellegent design and George Bush. Substitute science for faith and you'll make it to heavin!

  71. OK, vulture breath! by glomph · · Score: 1

    I knew damn well about the first Flubber movie. What a dweeb.

  72. That's exactly the point I was trying to make! by brokeninside · · Score: 1

    ``Fitness in the evolutionary sense of the term doesn't mean the strongest, the most powerfull, or the most impressive -- it means the most capable to pass on genetic material.''

    The question posed was ``why do so many insects make such great substances?'' and the reply was that ``evolution makes great things.'' But the only thing that evolution selects for, long term, is gene propagation. Saying that evolution produces `the best' or `the fittest' implies a value judgment that is not there in nature. Hence, my recasting of the theory of evolution as survival of the adequate.

    1. Re:That's exactly the point I was trying to make! by TGK · · Score: 1

      This is why slashdot needs a javascript enabled method of expanding threads....

      Guess that got lost in the jumble.

      --
      Killfile(TGK)
      No trees were killed in the creation of this post. However, many electrons were inconvenienced.
  73. Re: *Sniff* Whats that smell? by djbckr · · Score: 1
    Why don't they have any common sense?

    That's why they are journalists! :P

  74. How about a membrane keyboard that lasts by Big+Hairy+Goofy+Guy · · Score: 1

    I can't wait for this stuff to get used in a keyboard that lasts for 100 million keystrokes At one keystroke per second, that means over 3 years of continuous use. I'm especially imagining this on those awful membrane keyboards that have been so (un)popular on cheap electronics. I think quality improvements there might be nice.

  75. Re: Rejection by mhollis · · Score: 1

    I have had this explained by a very good orthopedist who replaced my right knee in 1997 with one that certainly is not something my body manufactured (one that works extremely well, too).

    Dr. Scott told me that the only way my body could reject the knee is for me to have a runaway infection in my body that so energizes my immune system that it thinks it needs to attack anything and everything foreign.

    That is kind of rare, as we tend to put bandages over cuts and wash deep wounds and treat them promptly where I live. Were I involved in some kind of natural disaster and could not do so I might suffer more from the effects of gangrene first before I lost my knee.

    To put it plainly, these types of substance, when inserted in the body, tend to not attract the body's defenses, save just after their insertion. Think of how many pins help mend broken bones and how many other prosthetic devices we use to make our lives better and ask yourself how many people suffer from rejection syndrome with these. I think you'd find the number is very low.

    Knee replacement surgery is very painful and difficult for the body and patients tend to run a low-grade fever for a few days. That fever is an indication of the body's defenses trying to find foreign organic material (or dead tissue generated by the surgery itself). I don't have a fever now and everything's fine. That would be the most probable result of using this substance within the human body.

    --
    Gods don't kill people, people with gods kill people.