Slashdot Mirror


More on Sony's "DRM Rootkit"

A couple of days ago we posted a story about Sony DRM installing a rootkit. Since then we have seen many more stories on the subject that I thought were worth sharing. manno gave us a link to the inquirer and salemnic sent us a page from the washington post. smallfries gave us one from PC Pro. It's nice to see this story not getting lost in the cracks since the implications are gigantic.

125 of 608 comments (clear)

  1. Regardless of where this goes... by Donniedarkness · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Even if this doesn't go to court, at least this is getting some attention... and ANY bad attention for DRM makes me happy.

    --
    Earn a % of cash back from Newegg, Tiger Direct, Walmart.com, and more: http://www.mrrebates.com?refid=458505
    1. Re:Regardless of where this goes... by Scoria · · Score: 2, Interesting

      People seem amazed when they learn what DRM technology is capable of. Interestingly, I'm afraid that most casual readers wouldn't understand the implications of DRM, even if it actually received a substantial amount of press. I know that "rootkit" isn't the most commonly used term.

      In fact, to a casual reader, it would almost seem as though anything with an acronym such as "Digital Rights Management" would be designed to protect your digital rights. It's entirely misleading.

      If all else fails, Sony can always use a scapegoat and proclaim that the managers had no idea any of this was happening. An unknown malicious programmer must have done it all!

      --
      Do you like German cars?
    2. Re:Regardless of where this goes... by xtracto · · Score: 4, Informative

      You may be interested in my signature... and my XCP affected Album list.

      Hope this helps!

      --
      Ubuntu is an African word meaning 'I can't configure Debian'
    3. Re:Regardless of where this goes... by Scrameustache · · Score: 2, Insightful

      it would almost seem as though anything with an acronym such as "Digital Rights Management" would be designed to protect your digital rights. It's entirely misleading.

      Yes it is.
      That's the point, it's got a double plus good word in it's title, so it must be good!
      For other examples of this: PATRIOT act and "operation [adjective] freedom"... how could ANYONE oppose them without appearing anti-freedom to the uninformed?

      --

      You can't take the sky from me...

  2. Maybe Sony Should Print This On Their CD's.... by 8127972 · · Score: 5, Funny

    We Got Root

    --
    This is my opinion. To make sure you don't steal it, it's covered by the DMCA.
    1. Re:Maybe Sony Should Print This On Their CD's.... by Jussi+K.+Kojootti · · Score: 4, Interesting
      They do... This is their Minimum system requirements for content protected discs:
      To listen to the music on this disc, you need a PC with the following minimum system requirements:
      • One of the following operating systems: Windows 98SE, ME, 2000 SP4, XP Home or XP Pro
      • Pentium II or higher with Windows 98SE, Windows ME
      • Pentium III or higher with Windows 2000 SP4, Windows XP Home, Windows XP Pro
      • at least 64MB RAM above recommended OS memory level
      • CD-ROM/DVD-ROM disc drive
      • Internet Explorer 5.0 or higher
      • Microsoft DirectX 9.0 or higher with non-Windows XP systems (download)
      • Logged in with Administrator rights
      .. you need to be root to listen to music. Just amazing.
    2. Re:Maybe Sony Should Print This On Their CD's.... by acoustix · · Score: 2, Funny

      "Logged in with Administrator rights"

      I guess that means that no one from my company will be listening to DRM'd CDs. I don't even let my users have "power user" rights.

      -Nick

      --
      "A plan fiendishly clever in its intricacies"- Homer Simpson
  3. Hope it catches on by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Interesting

    "infected with DRM"

    Love it. Great phrase. Maybe it'll catch on.

    1. Re:Hope it catches on by mc900ftjesus · · Score: 5, Insightful

      For god's sake, yes. ./ we are all now responsible for spreading a new term "infected with DRM." A bad publicity spin is a better way to combat DRM than actaully explaing it to Joe Sixpack. The word infected implies that it's bad, christ I've met people who think viruses are like human viruses (no one makes them they just happen). Leave the tech speak at home, just dumb it down to three words: infected with DRM.

    2. Re:Hope it catches on by fireweaver · · Score: 3, Interesting

      mc900ftjesus (671151) wrote: "DRM." A bad publicity spin is a better way to combat DRM than actaully explaing it to Joe Sixpack. The word infected implies that it's bad, christ I've met people who think viruses are like human viruses (no one makes them they just happen). Leave the tech speak at home, just dumb it down to three words: infected with DRM."

      I would tell Joe Sixpack something like this: "Joe, if you try to play one of these CD's that's got that copy-protection or something else called 'Dee-Are-Emm' on it, it will put viruses into your machine that will not only fuck it up completely, but cannot be gotton rid of. That is because the record companies are in cahoots with the hackers and spammers to rip you off. Do you want to take that chance?" You might also want to add a little punch to this by telling somebody's sad tale of woe.

      I think he would get that, and I don't think it is misleading.

    3. Re:Hope it catches on by gerf · · Score: 4, Interesting

      "Infected with DRM"


      Again, I must state that whenever I clean a computer with Adaware/Spybot/AVG/Panda Activescan/CWShredder/ect, I'm now going to have to ask one more thing:


      "Have you bought and played any music CDs lately?"


      How sad is it that doing something so legal can become associated with other computer slow-downs as spyware/malware/adware. This is what is going to irk the general public, and hopefully get people to look at DRM a bit more closely.

    4. Re:Hope it catches on by laughing_badger · · Score: 2, Insightful
      Fantastic term!

      Me: That CD's infected with DRM

      Friend: What's DRM?

      Me: Digital Restrictions Management. SONY has infected that CD so that it will alter the way Windows works so that you can't put that CD onto your iPod or make a copy to use in your car player that eats CD's occasionally.

      That might finally get through.

      --
      Help children born unable to swallow - www.tofs.org.uk
    5. Re:Hope it catches on by MilenCent · · Score: 3, Interesting

      Hmm... maybe we should get stickers made and pay a little visit to the local Walmart....

  4. Re:Sue by garcia · · Score: 2, Interesting

    So is it or isn't it enough for a lawsuit? Anyone know of any developments in this area?

    A lawsuit on what grounds? That you agreed to something and then they installed their software based on your agreement? I have a feeling that the "oh, no one reads those things" isn't really going to work all that well against Sony's legal team.

    Hereis a link to F-secure's "detailed" writeup about what the DRM installer puts on your machine.

    Don't buy DRM'd CDs as they don't allow you to exercise fair-use. Sadly, most people don't care anymore.

  5. Hrm... by LilGuy · · Score: 3, Funny

    So they're gonna root all my cds? Yet another reason to switch to KaZaa/Grokster/Mule/DC++

    *sigh* Silly executives, rape is for kids.

    --

    You're nothing; like me.
  6. Never fear, Slashdot is here! by NerdBuster · · Score: 5, Funny
    "It's nice to see this story not getting lost in the cracks since the implications are gigantic."

    With Slashdot reporting this 10 times a day I doubt it will get lost :)

    1. Re:Never fear, Slashdot is here! by harrkev · · Score: 2, Insightful
      With Slashdot reporting this 10 times a day I doubt it will get lost :)
      This story on /. is preaching to the choir. We all know about this. What IS newsworthy is that this is starting to hit mainstream press (well, at least getting closer to mainstream). If this makes it to Newsweek, it will give Sony a big black eye.
      --
      "-1 Troll" is the apparently the same as "-1 I disagree with you."
  7. Simple Solution: Boycott Sony to Death by snotclot · · Score: 5, Interesting

    Ok sure, so boycotting Sony is not realistic. Or is it...? We can really do without them. Screw their stupid DRM'ed Memorysticks, we have our SD and CompactFlash. Screw their VAIO's, we have Dell and Taiwanese laptops.. Screw their TV's, we have better ones from other brands. Screw PS3, we have XBOX2 and Nintendo Revolution. Screw PSP, we have Nintendo DS. Once they get the collective shaft, well, other companies will think twice before pulling shit like this.

    1. Re:Simple Solution: Boycott Sony to Death by Donniedarkness · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Honestly, I wish we COULD start a mass boycot against Sony... not even for this, really, but more because of the RIAA. The problem is, most people don't think that it's worth not having the latest crap music, if that's what it takes to send these guys a message :(

      --
      Earn a % of cash back from Newegg, Tiger Direct, Walmart.com, and more: http://www.mrrebates.com?refid=458505
    2. Re:Simple Solution: Boycott Sony to Death by LilGuy · · Score: 2, Interesting

      What really sucks though, is boycotting a company you don't buy anything from anyway. Honestly I haven't purchased shit of theirs since my last pair of headphones. I'm not really brand conscious though, more of an impulse buyer. I suppose they somewhat rely on the impulse buyer as well, so maybe I'll make a dent if I keep their underhanded tactics in mind before I make it to the register with anything with their logo on it in hand.

      --

      You're nothing; like me.
    3. Re:Simple Solution: Boycott Sony to Death by God'sDuck · · Score: 2, Insightful
      i dont think anyone considers memorysticks to be anything but a useless dead format....


      there's nothing wrong with memory sticks! sure they're proprietary - but sony's consumer-grade cameras are currently the best on the market,* simply because their AF system has made several advances in the past three years which make their cameras solidly faster in-use than the competition. canon's following closely; hopefully the situation will reverse in the next year or so (the market was even 3 years ago, such leads rarely last).....but all to say, memory stick, while a dead end, perhaps, is certainly not dead, as most of the best and most popular cameras still demand it. furthermore, with moore's law, EVERY format you buy is dead in two years. my first digicam (kodak) was given a 64 meg card (compact flash), my second (sony - memory stick) a 128, then later a 256, my third (canon - compact flash) a 512, and my fourth (canon) 1 gig. i anticipate a 4 gig card for my next camera.

      all to say - people that waste time whining about proprietary memory that-they-can't-take-with-them need to realize that they can't take it with them *anyway*, at least until the megapixel war subsides. storage for serious photographers is more analogous to RAM than floppies - it's just part of the camera system. even if the format is compliant with subsequent models, they'll likely consider it prohibitively small, and they're better off selling it off to pay for half a new one.


      ps: and before you say "b4t m1n3z d4 b0mbz!" realize i'm not dissing your camera, i'm just saying that, at this point in time, when you take a consumer down the line in a camera store that carries all brands of cameras, and make them play with each camera uninfluenced by sales rhetoric or concerns for proprietary formats or brand preference, a significant majority gravitate to the Sony's...not all, but most (like 5/6, among people that consult with me). doesn't mean the others aren't good, or don't have specific features that make them more desireable to other people, just means their user interface and general operation speed is slightly less eye-catching. natch?

      pps: OT? sorry. just a pet peeve of mine. you can say it's proprietary and we should resist proprietary formats on principle, but don't mix "proprietary" with "technically bad," or underestimate Sony's ability to keep its CompactBetamax in very active use for years to come.
    4. Re:Simple Solution: Boycott Sony to Death by rolfwind · · Score: 2, Informative

      The problem with simply boycotting (on a small scale, as I assume most non-geeks don't care) is that companies won't understand why sales for product X or for their company as a whole are down and it is human nature to look everywhere but within.

      Look at the RIAA/MPAA and their correlation of sales/piracy. They'll never link sales could be down because the current music sucks or whatever - it's always the market's fault somehow - piracy, recession, depression, etcetera.

      So next time you are tempted to buy a Sony product and instead decide to boycott it, write them a nice (I mean it) letter (not email) to their headquarters, preferable to a manager (find it on their site):

      http://www.sony.com/SCA/senior_mgmnt.shtml (sorry, this is the best I can find, you'll have to go from there)

      Explaining why you didn't buy their product. Specifically link it with their DRM practices. Include a copy of the reciept for the product you did buy - this way the impact on the bottom line is tangible and credible.

      A small boycott without communication your frustration is nearly worthless.

    5. Re:Simple Solution: Boycott Sony to Death by Keith+Russell · · Score: 2, Funny
      Screw their stupid DRM'ed Memorysticks, we have our SD...

      SD is an abbreviation for Secure Digital. The remaining irony is left as an excercise to the reader.

      --
      This sig intentionally left blank.
  8. Let us hope: by Winckle · · Score: 4, Interesting

    That this sets a precedent, and that Sony don't wriggle out of this, at the very best it could point out some of the absurdities of the DMCA.

    1. Re:Let us hope: by n0dalus · · Score: 5, Informative

      Unfortunately Sony may be able to claim that they offer an uninstaller.

      From TFA:
      Hypponen said the only way to uninstall the program in the conventional sense (without running the risk of hosing your system or CD-ROM drive) is to contact Sony BMG directly via a Web form and request removal.

      At that point, a real, live person will call you back and ask for all kinds of information about your system, and your reason for wanting to remove the software. You're then directed to a Web page that downloads an ActiveX program (yes, you must be using Microsoft's Internet Explorer to do this), which determines what version is installed and reports that back to First4Internet. Then you get an e-mail containing a link to another site that downloads something that finally uninstalls the Sony program.


      So, although they make you sell your firstborn to get it, they apparently do offer an uninstaller. IANAL, but maybe someone can still argue that the uninstaller needs to be bundled with the CD. Sony might also be liable if the installation damages your computer.

  9. Re:DUPE? by kyouteki · · Score: 2, Informative

    Not a dupe, an update. Surely additional viewpoints on an issue as large as this warrants additional coverage.

    --
    A slashdotter who didn't build his own computer is like a Jedi who didn't build his own lightsaber.
  10. The Solution is Simple Folks! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Just never buy a cd again.

    Me, I think I'll just pirate all my music from now on. That way I don't have to worry about any of this DRM nonsense!

  11. Re:Sue by voice_of_all_reason · · Score: 5, Interesting

    Based on the grounds that it re-routes the windows instructions on how to play *all* audio CDs. If you remove the DRM by force, you lose the ability to play other music as well.

  12. Re:Sue by Celt · · Score: 5, Informative

    Nice that you've read up on the matter,
    It is not stated in the EULA that this rootkit will be installed, plus there's no way to uninstall it through add.remove programs

    --
    "WebTV: bringing the Internet into the shallow end of the gene pool since 1995" - Martin Bishop
  13. First4Internet by WarwickRyan · · Score: 5, Informative

    The malware installed is created by a company called First4Internet.

    They're based in Banbury, Oxford and their CEO is Mathew Gilliant-Smith DBC.

    6 South Bar Street
    Banbury
    Oxfordshire
    OX16 9AA
    United Kingdom

    All info (and more) available on their website here http://www.first4internet.com/contact.aspx/

    That's about 20 minutes in the car for me, should I go pay them a visit - taking the best wishes of the /. community with me? ;)

    1. Re:First4Internet by TrueKonrads · · Score: 5, Funny

      I suggest you put blank keys together with some epoxytde in their locks, break of the keys and slap DRM sticker :)

      --
      Lone Gunmen crew.
    2. Re:First4Internet by God'sDuck · · Score: 4, Funny

      that would actually be Analog Rights Management.

      lovely idea, though.

    3. Re:First4Internet by Turn-X+Alphonse · · Score: 3, Interesting

      I perfer my idea but sure, or you could take in an old box and drop it on the front desk and go "Excuse me, you've installed a virus on my PC via a Sony CD. Will you be removing it or should I charge by the hour at £X00(add as many 0s as you likee, but 2 sounds about right) for having to remove it via a repair guy (don't say you, it seems supicious).

      Demand compensation (for petrol to get there), the money to fix it and if they refuse tell them you'll take them to court for the damages (claim the box was used for something important like hosting websites and the rootkit has not passed some safety tests that all servers must pass at your company).

      Aww the fun of being a sick little geek :D

      --
      I like muppets.
    4. Re:First4Internet by Ender+Ryan · · Score: 4, Funny
      No no, it's Door Rights Management.

      --
      Sticking feathers up your butt does not make you a chicken - Tyler Durden
  14. Re:I don't understand the fuss. by klubar · · Score: 4, Informative

    It's software like Sony's that makes windows unstable. A clean install of Windows with only "certfied for windows XP" software is rock solid. It's once you start added badly written drivers and other code the mucks into the OS that it becomes unstable. As the systeminternals article indicated, the driver doesn't follow the rules for unloading itself and other violations that can lead to the blue screen of death. Perhaps MS should increase the level of warnings about non-certified code, but users would still click-thru and blame the OS when it crashes.

    It's not a Windows-specific problem, it's just that Sony has only implemented it for windows.

  15. Contains LAME code? by Sulka · · Score: 5, Interesting

    Interesting.. Some reports Finnish reader of this news in Sektori.com (in Finnish) reports Contents\GO.EXE file seems to contain parts of the LAME player. Can anyone verify this? Is Sony distributing LGPL software on the CDs?

    --
    "Although it is not true that all conservatives are stupid, it is true that most stupid people are conservative."
    1. Re:Contains LAME code? by idontgno · · Score: 4, Insightful
      Oh, I hope it's so. The delicious, tasty, non-fattening irony. Using an embedded copyright violation to enforce copyrights. I shudder in ecstacy at the thought.

      Who'll follow up on this thread? I'm sure we can find enough free-as-in-freedom warriors to do a tech analysis on the software and confirm the report in parent comment? C'mon, hoisting retards on their own petards is just too much fun!

      --
      Welcome to the Panopticon. Used to be a prison, now it's your home.
    2. Re:Contains LAME code? by Ender+Ryan · · Score: 2, Informative
      No, LAME does include a decoder. I use it to decode my MP3s when making audio CDs for my car. MP3s, which, just for the record, I have encoded from CDs which I own.

      Offtopic: Ya know, I don't have an actual CD player suitable for playing the CDs I buy. I absolutely cannot keep the original discs in my car, as they only last a few months getting shuffled around. Hell, they take a beating just being in my car, in a CD carrying case. Other than while driving, I listen to music while working, in several different locations, on my laptop.

      --
      Sticking feathers up your butt does not make you a chicken - Tyler Durden
  16. Re:Russinovich's Take by jurt1235 · · Score: 2, Informative

    how to get rid of it...

    Except that he put a link to a form, and not to a way to get rid of it. Looking further into the sony website the code used seems to originate from http://www.xcp-aurora.com/ . Maybe that is the root of all problems.
    Sue Sony -> Sony sue Aurora -> Lawyers will get rich and happy.

    --

    My wife's sketchblog Blob[p]: Gastrono-me
  17. Yes, this is bad by Sheepdot · · Score: 5, Informative

    Sony could be held liable in a class-action lawsuit. Anyone can design a virus and name it "$sys$" now, and AV software won't be able to detect it if this rootkit is installed. An IM worm could use this naming scheme, only infect a few thousand people, and the news would report, "SONY's DRM software used to hide latest virus". It'd be a horrible blow, and they'd totally deserve it. I still think we'll see a virus/worm that does this before the end of this month.

    On a related note: World of Warcraft hackers are now using Sony's DRM rootkit to hide from "the Warden". I tried to submit this as a standalone story, but since I saw this DRM news update, I figured I'd post it here.

    Is Sony aiding and abetting cheaters?

    1. Re:Yes, this is bad by Donniedarkness · · Score: 3, Funny
      "Is Sony aiding and abetting cheaters?"

      Doesn't Sony Entertainment develope (and produce) Everquest? Heh... I wonder what the media could do with THIS...

      "Sony using rootkit to ruin WoW"

      --
      Earn a % of cash back from Newegg, Tiger Direct, Walmart.com, and more: http://www.mrrebates.com?refid=458505
    2. Re:Yes, this is bad by Renraku · · Score: 4, Interesting

      People are using Sony's software to violate the ToS of World of Warcraft.

      Something that they tried to HIDE on people's computers to RESTRICT them. People are now abusing it against Blizzard. Blizzard has 'just cause' to start a lawsuit.

      --
      Job? I don't have time to get a job! Who will sit around and bitch about being broke and unemployed then?
    3. Re:Yes, this is bad by PhilHibbs · · Score: 2, Interesting
      Blizzard has 'just cause' to start a lawsuit.
      Against Sony? No way, that's stretching the point too far. It's as daft as suing P2P software authors because people are using their software to violate copyright. Oh, wait...
  18. Re:I don't understand the fuss. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Insightful

    On the off chance that you're not a troll:

    Sony has the key to your computer.
    The key is digital, thus an infinite number of copys can be made of the key.
    The key is digital, so anyone with enough time can make a copy even if they aren't from sony.

    Once someone besides Sony has the key, they can distribute it on the internet, and now EVERYONE will have the key to your computer.

    Is it scary now? Do you think your bank plays music from sony CDs? Do you want everyone in the world having keys to your bank?

  19. Re:I don't understand the fuss. by 10Ghz · · Score: 5, Funny
    I don't understand the fuss.


    That's because you are an idiot. No, really.
    --
    Lesbian Nazi Hookers Abducted by UFOs and Forced Into Weight Loss Programs - -all next week on Town Talk.
  20. Re:Sue by Donniedarkness · · Score: 4, Insightful
    "A lawsuit on what grounds? That you agreed to something and then they installed their software based on your agreement? "

    I think the issue here is that Sony does not tell you that they are installing the software ANYWHERE. In addition to them adding the software without your permission, its software that can create a "safe haven for viruses" (the software makes everything that has "$SYS$" in the filename turn invisible), according to the PcPro writeup.

    --
    Earn a % of cash back from Newegg, Tiger Direct, Walmart.com, and more: http://www.mrrebates.com?refid=458505
  21. Not in Europe? by Alphix · · Score: 3, Informative

    It might be interesting to note that in this newspaper article (sorry, only in Swedish), the Swedish CEO of Sony states that the copy protection is not used for CD:s sold in Europe and that "no copy protection will be introduced before it works well both for consumers and copyright owners" (which can of course be interpreted in many ways).

    1. Re:Not in Europe? by axolotl_farmer · · Score: 2, Informative

      The situation with Copy-Control CD is much worse in Sweden (and in the rest of Europe) than in the USA. Most major label CDs by scandinavian artists, as well as many international releases are protected/crippled.

      I only have a few old crippled CDs, and I don't buy any new ones, so I can't tell if the rootkit is on anyone of them.

      However, the Swedish Sony exec is blatantly lying in the article when he claims that Sony won't release any copy-controlled CDs until the protection works well for both the customers and the record labels.

  22. Re:I don't understand the fuss. by vegardh · · Score: 2, Informative

    It burned 1-2% CPU _when the player was not running_, for starters... Read the article.

  23. Re:Dupe(s): with a purpose. by idontgno · · Score: 4, Insightful
    Me too!

    No seriously, I agree. Sony's inconceivably bad behavior has to be dragged, squealing and flailing, into the sunlight where it can be properly stomped to gory death with hobnailed boots. No mercy, no PR coverup, no plausible deniability. Corps have to understand, with visceral fear-of-agonizing-death understanding, that this kind of crap will not ever be tolerated. This is a trend which must be stopped cold dead. These shenanigans have to be punished with such finality that any observer centuries from now will intuitively know the immediate and unalterable consequences of this kind of crap.

    --
    Welcome to the Panopticon. Used to be a prison, now it's your home.
  24. Re:Sue by OverlordQ · · Score: 4, Informative
    As soon as you have agreed to be bound by the terms and conditions of the EULA, this CD will automatically install a small proprietary software program (the "SOFTWARE") onto YOUR COMPUTER. The SOFTWARE is intended to protect the audio files embodied on the CD, and it may also facilitate your use of the DIGITAL CONTENT. Once installed, the SOFTWARE will reside on YOUR COMPUTER until removed or deleted. However, the SOFTWARE will not be used at any time to collect any personal information from you, whether stored on YOUR COMPUTER or otherwise.


    Umm, nice to see that you didn't read the EULA either.
    --
    Your hair look like poop, Bob! - Wanker.
  25. Grounds for suit by Engineer-Poet · · Score: 3, Insightful
    I believe the doctrine of trespass to chattels would apply here.

    Of course, IANAL, IAAEE.

    1. Re:Grounds for suit by jenkin+sear · · Score: 2, Funny

      I was thinking letters of marque and reprisal myself- if they break my machine, and I have no other recourse, I want to go loot their freighters.

      Actually, I wonder if the RICO act applies, particularly if this was done in collusion with the RIAA- it sure seems like collusion, and the uninstall process described above seems like extortion.

      --
      What a strange bird is the pelican, his beak can hold more than his belly can.
  26. Deal with the devil... by Kjella · · Score: 4, Insightful

    ...I did the responsible thing *cough*. I e-mailed Microsoft and expressed my concern about how this mucking about with the kernel stood in the relation to the EULA, support (who the hell wants to support a kernel patched with unknown code supplied by a third party) and future patches and upgrades. This could cause it to fail to validate like a warez'd install, cause breakage because a patch half-overwrites the hack and any other number of wierd things. I also expressed my concern of how this would reflect on the security and userfriendlyness of Windows (read: Windows has enough issues without Sony messing around). I really hope Microsoft comes out and tell Sony what they think.

    --
    Live today, because you never know what tomorrow brings
    1. Re:Deal with the devil... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Insightful

      The Microsoft solution would be to install such a thing as part of Vista, and then sell Sony a license to use it.

    2. Re:Deal with the devil... by Arcys · · Score: 3, Interesting

      I wonder how ms, mac and winamp feel about this anti-competitive behaviour against music players?

  27. Re:Sue by garcia · · Score: 4, Informative

    It is not stated in the EULA that this rootkit will be installed, plus there's no way to uninstall it through add.remove programs

    I assume that you were trying to somehow infer that I didn't read the EULA? Well, I did, but I'll post the important part of it here because it's fairly apparent that you did not, or at least didn't fully comprehend what it said:

    As soon as you have agreed to be bound by the terms and conditions of the EULA, this CD will automatically install a small proprietary software program (the "SOFTWARE") onto YOUR COMPUTER. The SOFTWARE is intended to protect the audio files embodied on the CD, and it may also facilitate your use of the DIGITAL CONTENT. Once installed, the SOFTWARE will reside on YOUR COMPUTER until removed or deleted. However, the SOFTWARE will not be used at any time to collect any personal information from you, whether stored on YOUR COMPUTER or otherwise.

    See that part about "the SOFTWARE will reside on YOUR COMPUTER until removed or deleted"? That's what people agree to when they click "I agree" on the EULA screen.

    As far as being able to uninstall it via "add/remove programs", I wasn't aware that this made software dismissable via legal grounds. I thought it just meant that you could proudly wear the "Made for Microsoft Windows" on your retail box.

  28. Sony is losing it by shanen · · Score: 4, Interesting
    I still stand by my earlier comments on this topic, but at this point it's pretty clear it isn't just a /. rumor. I used to have a lot of respect for Sony, but it's been pretty well dissipated over the years. Their decision to dump PDAs greatly saddened and annoyed me, but I've also had too many problems with their hardware to buy any more... They just couldn't handle the pressure of needing to have ever higher profits and being squeezed between their one low-margin hardware-oriented parts of the company and the high-greed software-oriented parts. Now they've completely trashed their own reputation, and I do feel morally constrained to sell my stock, too.

    I guess I'll send them a sharply worded letter first, but I really don't see any way that I can do any business with a company like this. Not even as a shareholder.

    --
    Freedom = (Meaningful - Coerced) Choice != (Speech | Beer^2), and sad sock puppets' bad mods avail them naught.
  29. Re:Russinovich's Take by calbanese · · Score: 3, Funny

    Or maybe they get their money because they know how to spell.

  30. yes, but is it Mac compatible? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny

    Apparently this rootkit does not run on Mac OSX. Yet another example of the vast library of software available only to Windows users. :-(

    Look at Sony's FAQ,
    http://cp.sonybmg.com/xcp/english/faq.html#listeni ng

    The protected CD looses all features and appears as a normal CD on a Macintosh. This really sucks!

    Im switching to Windows!

    1. Re:yes, but is it Mac compatible? by TheUnknownCoder · · Score: 2, Interesting
      I read the FAQ's yesterday and the just added the following overnight:
      • 6. I have heard that the protection software is really malware/spyware. Could this be true?
      • How do I uninstall the software?
      The uninstalling the doesn't say much, it just points us to a form that asks: Where you purchase the disc, Artist Name, Album Title, Store Name, Email Address. That's it. Now, let's say I want to uninstall this rootkit and I fill out the form. What will they do? Send me the instructions on the e-mail? From what Russinovich wrote, it's not a simple and easy task that the average user could do. So they have to send someone over to my house to uninstall this beast from my computer?

      Couldn't Sony foresee the reaction on actual consumers: "I wanna buy this CD, but it has DRM (rootkit or not). Maybe it'll play on my car stereo maybe not. Maybe I'll be able to listen to it on my Discman (made by the same Sony), maybe not. Forget it, I'll get it online."

      David Berlind has some interesting takes on the whole DRM issue.
      --
      Uncopyrightable: The longest word you can write without repeating a letter.
  31. Re:Sue by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Insightful

    "Sadly, most people don't care anymore. "

    You have got that backwards. Those who know what DRM is cares.
    The problem is that not many people know about it.

  32. Re:Sue by Lonewolf666 · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Some lawyers seem to think so.
    On Mark Russinovich's Blog, at least one guy claimed to be a lawyer and he asked California residents who were affected to contact him about a lawsuit.

    --
    C - the footgun of programming languages
  33. Is this necessarily legal? by hunterx11 · · Score: 4, Interesting

    Even if you do agree to give Sony the rights to your first-born child in the EULA, wouldn't this violate laws in some states, such as the Consumer Protection Against Computer Spyware Act in California?

    --
    English is easier said than done.
  34. Re:Sue by LurkerXXX · · Score: 5, Interesting
    There is no way for a normal user to remove the software. It comes with no uninstall program, nor is it listed in the windows add-remove programs.

    If you can manage to find the hidden software files and do delete tehm as suggested in the EULA, you will no longer be able to access your CD drive.

    Funny how no mention of those points are made in the agreement.

  35. Re:Sue by ZachPruckowski · · Score: 3, Insightful

    Yes, it says "software", but it doesn't say "I agree to allow Sony to install software commonly associated with hackers that may infringe upon my computer's security". And I think that'll make a bit of a difference.

  36. The security industry by Anita+Coney · · Score: 3, Insightful

    Any news on how Symantec, Mcafee, and the other so called security firms are treating this? I'd certainly expect an up-to-date anti-virus software to stop this from installing.

    --
    If someone says he and his monkey have nothing to hide, they almost certainly do.
  37. Great new band name by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Funny

    Sony and the Rootkits...

  38. Re:I don't understand the fuss. by CoderBob · · Score: 2, Insightful

    You don't perchance work for Sony, do you?

    That aside, anything that hooks into the internals of an OS without my clear and informed authorization is a problem.

    you've got a piece of code in your computer that only gives Sony access. nobody else.

    Please tell me you don't really believe that. Considering how many of MS's products have opened backdoors for people, you're going to trust Sony to "do it better" and leave this software completely secure? It might not suddenly allow crackers "on some IRC network" to get in, but it sure opens up a lucrative bit of research for them- finding the security holes in a DRM rootkit that people don't even know is installed.

    Imagine the trouble in fixing that with a patch.

  39. A wild conspiracy theory: by merc · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Could be that Sony and the major music labels are using this to create intentional fear, uncertainty and doubt. Who ever said the record labels want you to play music CD's on your computer, in fact wasn't there a genuine effort by the RIAA cartel to create CD's that wouldn't work at all on a PC? If they can't get the end user to cease this undesired activity they can always frighten the luser into submission.

    Stick that music CD into my computer? No you don't, I'll become infected with malware.

    Yes, perhaps it's as the subject suggests, a wild conspiracy theory. It's not as though this industry wanted to create laws to legalize hacking P2P users or anything.

    --
    It's true no man is an island, but if you take a bunch of dead guys and tie 'em together, they make a good raft.
    1. Re:A wild conspiracy theory: by Lonewolf666 · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Looks more like a fuckup by careless management to me. Because the price in lost reputation will outweigh any benefits from reduced copying.
      I'd bet they simply did not understand the implications of their "copy protection".
      Or maybe they knew and did not expect it to make much waves.

      But I don't think Sony management wanted the kind of publicity they have now.

      --
      C - the footgun of programming languages
  40. Sony should immediately recall all XCP'd CDs by yeremein · · Score: 2, Informative

    Any malware whose filename/registry keys start with $sys$ will be shielded from antivirus and antispyware software by XCP. This gaping security hole represents a great opportunity for script kiddies. Sony should do the responsible thing and immediately recall all rootkit-infested CDs.

  41. Re:Sue by _bug_ · · Score: 4, Informative

    It is not stated in the EULA that this rootkit will be installed, plus there's no way to uninstall it through add.remove programs.

    You can contact Sony directly and they will send you tools to remove the DRM software.

    The F-Secure blog talks a little about this. It appears their removal software installs ActiveX controls.. just really messed up.

  42. Re:Russinovich's Take by interiot · · Score: 5, Funny
    Hahaha.
    1. complain to editors about posting dupes
    2. editors start to link to their previous stories
    3. posters visit those previous stories, and copy links FROM THE previous FREAKING ARTICLE itself
    4. ???
    5. profit!!
    How does this stuff get modded up?
  43. How to beat this... by ZachPruckowski · · Score: 3, Interesting

    As soon as you have agreed to be bound by the terms and conditions of the EULA, this CD will automatically install a small proprietary software program (the "SOFTWARE") onto YOUR COMPUTER. The SOFTWARE is intended to protect the audio files embodied on the CD, and it may also facilitate your use of the DIGITAL CONTENT. Once installed, the SOFTWARE will reside on YOUR COMPUTER until removed or deleted. However, the SOFTWARE will not be used at any time to collect any personal information from you, whether stored on YOUR COMPUTER or otherwise.

    Emphasis is mine. Anyways, nothing is the EULA says that I can't just go and delete it. Sure, it may reinstall, but can't we delete it the minute we eject the CD? Can we write a script to do that?

    1. Re:How to beat this... by mopslik · · Score: 4, Informative

      Anyways, nothing is the EULA says that I can't just go and delete it.

      Except that, if you read through Mark Russinovich's blog, you'll see that it cripples your system when you do this.

      When I logged in again I discovered that the CD drive was missing from Explorer. Deleting the drivers had disabled the CD [drive]. Now I was really mad... I know from my past work with device driver filter drivers that if you delete a filter driver's image, Windows fails to start the target driver.

      He goes on to detail the steps that were necessary to bring his computer back to fully-functional condition. It's not for Joe Q. Public.

  44. Solution? by Wessler · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Get a Mac? According to the FAQ, the disc appears as a normal CD on a Mac. Anyone know if the content is the same, or are there extras that you get for enabling viruses on your PC?

    1. Re:Solution? by Sgt_Peppers · · Score: 2, Insightful

      It does seem a bit of a flaw in their copy protection that you can stick the disk in a mac (doesn't say about linux) and rip it to MP3/ogg. Most file sharing networks don't tend to be platform specific so windows users can just download it from there. +1 to the list of copy protection systems that annoy legit customers and don't stop piracy.

  45. Anti-PC by vandenh · · Score: 3, Interesting

    Well Sony has all the reasons to mess with PCs stuff. They don't *really* want people to use their PC for any media stuff... Sony wants everybody to use custom hardware solutions made by Sony. PS3, PSP, Memory Stick,.....

    So messing with your PC looks like a good thing to do for Sony (especially since it also f*cks with MS).

  46. H.R. 2929 by spurtle15 · · Score: 5, Interesting

    Has this passed? Is it applicable?

    (4) inducing the user to install a computer software component onto the computer or preventing efforts to block installation of a software component;

    http://thomas.loc.gov/cgi-bin/bdquery/z?d108:h.r.0 2929:

    If they used racketeering laws to go after the RIAA, why not antispyware legislation against this?

  47. Re:Sue by dangerz · · Score: 4, Interesting

    Sadly, most people don't care anymore.

    The other day, I was driving with my fiance when we got on the topic of cd's. She proceeded to tell me that there's this great cd that I need to get because the band is really good. I proceeded to tell her that I haven't purchased a cd for almost 4 years now because of my dislike for the RIAA. After explaining everything to her, she just got all flustered and said that she didn't care about all that crap. She didn't care that even though she paid for the cd, she didn't fully own. She didn't care about all the bully tactics the RIAA uses. She didn't care about any of that, she just wanted the music.

    I agree with you that the majority of the people just dont care. As much as I try and inform people of all the crap the RIAA pulls, it just goes in one ear and out the other.

    For now, I suppose I'll just continue on with my silent protest.

    --
    The greatest experience we can have is the mysterious.
    - Albert Einstein
  48. Re:Sue by OldeTimeGeek · · Score: 2, Insightful
    Go ahead. Sue. Make some lawyers happy. After years of litigation and after millions of dollars are spent, Sony says 'nolo contendere', settles out of court and you get a free CD for your trouble.

    Or, better yet, don't buy a Sony music CD. Sony gets sued all of the time for various reasons - it's part of the cost of doing business. Their stockholders are used to it. A significant drop in sales will be far more likely to get attention.

  49. Fix for the problem by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Informative

    Posted by: Dickrichard | Nov 1, 2005 11:03:07 PM

    I'm posting this via a proxy just in case Sony doesn't like what I post...
    After reading this news story I decided to go after this software and defeat it, and I did.

    The following is how you kill this hidden install. I did this in Windows XP Pro, so attempt on another OS at your discretion. This will require Administrator rights. Please read through the entire instruction set, and if you don't feel comfortable attempting this, then don't. The rest of you, follow me ;)
    1. hit windowsKey+R to open the RUN command. Type services.msc to run the services dialog. Find 'Plug and Play Device Manager' in the list, right click and choose Properties. Under the General tab of the box that comes up, in the middle there should be the "startup type" of the service. Set this value to "disabled" and click OK. Next find the service named 'XCP CD Proxy' and set its startup type to disabled as well. You won't be able to stop these services, only disable them from starting next time Windows starts.
    2. Download and run the latest Blacklight beta from http://www.f-secure.com/blacklight/ This program will find the 'super hidden' CD proxy files we're trying to get rid of. When it finishes searching click next until you reach the screen that shows you all the hidden files it found. Select all these files and click the "rename" button to the right. Windows will restart once you click OK, and the files will be renamed.
    3. Once Windows restarts you will have lost any and all CD/DVD drives. DON'T PANIC! Hit windowsKey+Pause/Break to open up your System dialog. Click on the Hardware tab, then on the "Device Manager" button. Your system will not list any CD/DVD drives, but you should see IDE slot(s) that have little yellow circles with exclamation points over them indicating a device with a problem. In order to restore the drivers to their un-sony-altered state you must right click on the affected device and choose "uninstall driver". Do this for each device with a problem.
    4. Now that you have uninstalled the affected drivers, simply navigate to your Control Panel via the Start Menu and choose "Add Hardware". The add hardware wizard will run and find your previously disabled devices. Your drives are now restored and functional, and this potentially dangerous menace vanquished.
    5. Advanced users may now go and clean up the mess, but this step is not necessary. Delete renamed files, and dare I say it, registry keys that pertain to Sony's program. Use this list for reference: http://www.europe.f-secure.com/v-descs/xcp_drm.sht ml but nothing really beats searching.

    As an added note, once I got my drives back up and running, I popped in the CD that put this program on my computer. I was able to use a multi-session aware program (Roxio) to access the audio portion of the disk and rip MP3s to my hard drive where they will now be listened to in my preferred player the way God intended it to be. Oh, and the only illegal thing that went on here was what Sony did!

    CONSUMER 1 - SONY 0

    P.S. Once you rip MP3s from your Sony disc, burn it the old fashioned way, with gasoline and a match!

  50. ... until removed or deleted. by ArsenneLupin · · Score: 5, Insightful
    See that part about "the SOFTWARE will reside on YOUR COMPUTER until removed or deleted"?

    ... but they conveniently forget to point out that their software can't be removed or deleted by the common user...

    So, technically they are in the clear (in the same way that they would be in the clear if they said "the SOFTWARE will reside on YOUR COMPUTER until pigs grow wings"), but what they are doing is still morally very wrong...

    As far as being able to uninstall it via "add/remove programs", I wasn't aware that this made software dismissable via legal grounds.

    It's just not a matter of failing to supply some user-friendly functionality to make it extra easy to uninstall.

    Such functionality might take time to develop, and so a case could be made that the developper just didn't feal it worthwhile to spend the effort...

    But in this case, the developers went out of their way to make it extra difficult to detect, let alone remove, their software. Even without Add/remove functionality, you could still remove the files and registry keys manually, if the software was just sloppy, rather than malicious. But in the present case, the software's files and reg keys are hidden, so you can't just remove them. And if you do find the trick how to de-activate the rootkit, removing the resources will break the OS if not done properly (disabled CD driver), meaning that for a normal user the only alternative is to reinstall the OS. Not nice!

    1. Re:... until removed or deleted. by garcia · · Score: 2, Funny

      ... but they conveniently forget to point out that their software can't be removed or deleted by the common user...

      You can have a Sony rep contact you and they will help you remove it. Sounds like good service to them.

      but what they are doing is still morally very wrong...

      I don't see what this has to do with the discussion at hand. Yes, we all know that corporations have little or negative morals. The beginning point of this thread was whether or not Sony could be chased down legally for this install. I proposed that they could not. My hypothesis still stands unchallenged.

    2. Re:... until removed or deleted. by Ender+Ryan · · Score: 5, Insightful
      I challenge your hypothesis.

      The SOFTWARE is designed to hide itself, alters the functionality of the machine to the detriment of its performance and can cause it to malfunction(prevent CD/DVD readers/writers from working properly), opens up the machine to further attack, and finally reduces the stability of the machine. The EULA, which you cited, is intentionally vague and misleading, and certainly does not absolve Sony of responsibility for the above problems caused by their SOFTWARE. Also, just because it's in the EULA, sorta(!), does not make it legal. Sony is clearly being deceptive with these products and their EULA, and there are laws on the books to protect consumers from such action.

      Furthermore, it is not a safe bet to assume an EULA is a binding contract, there is precedent both ways on this, it depends on the EULA and the judge's opinion, and there are all kinds of laws regarding contract validity.

      --
      Sticking feathers up your butt does not make you a chicken - Tyler Durden
    3. Re:... until removed or deleted. by garcia · · Score: 2, Interesting

      The EULA, which you cited, is intentionally vague and misleading, and certainly does not absolve Sony of responsibility for the above problems caused by their SOFTWARE. Also, just because it's in the EULA, sorta(!), does not make it legal. Sony is clearly being deceptive with these products and their EULA, and there are laws on the books to protect consumers from such action.

      The DMCA is deceptive and vague but yet it still stands. Welcome to law.

      Furthermore, it is not a safe bet to assume an EULA is a binding contract, there is precedent both ways on this, it depends on the EULA and the judge's opinion, and there are all kinds of laws regarding contract validity.

      There is yes, but the EULA hasn't been truly tested, thus why it still stands. You know why? Because no one has the time and financial ability to go up against Microsoft, Sony, etc. So, regardless of YOUR opinion on the subject, you can certainly guarantee that this particular EULA will stand until another fails.

    4. Re:... until removed or deleted. by rhetoric · · Score: 2, Insightful
      >The EULA, which you cited, is intentionally vague and misleading, and certainly does not absolve Sony of responsibility for the above problems caused by their SOFTWARE. Also, just because it's in the EULA, sorta(!), does not make it >legal. Sony is clearly being deceptive with these products and their EULA, and >there are laws on the books to protect consumers from such action.

      The DMCA is deceptive and vague but yet it still stands. Welcome to law.

      >Furthermore, it is not a safe bet to assume an EULA is a binding contract, there is precedent both ways on this, it depends on the EULA and the judge's opinion, and there are all kinds of laws regarding contract validity.

      There is yes, but the EULA hasn't been truly tested, thus why it still stands. You know why? Because no one has the time and financial ability to go up against Microsoft, Sony, etc. So, regardless of YOUR opinion on the subject, you can certainly guarantee that this particular EULA will stand until another fails.


      Why are you so vehemently opposed to the very IDEA that people could sue Sony? From reading your posts here, I'd guess you are insecure and you want everyone to just give up and feel as weak as you in the face of teh uber Sony...

      The post I've quoted essentially says: "you dont have a case because legislation can be vague, and because you can't afford it." Neither of these two "points," has ANY bearing in the arguement over whether or not there is LEGAL justification for a suit. Please stop posting flamebait.
      --

      "where words meet intent, lies rhetoric's lament"
    5. Re:... until removed or deleted. by Curunir_wolf · · Score: 2, Informative
      There is yes, but the EULA hasn't been truly tested, thus why it still stands.

      I think the bnetd case pretty much gives software publishers carte-blanche in restricting what you can do. They held that (1) the EULA was enforceable (2) it removes the consumers rights granted by copyright and DMCA laws (3) The UCC covers the transaction because the software is goods sold (4) the software is licensed, not sold, because the EULA says so.

      In short - EULAs are enforceable, even when they are wordy, vague, and contradictory. And, they are contracts since they say "if you don't agree, return this for a refund" - even though there is no realistic way to actually get your money back for opened software.

      --
      "Somebody has to do something. It's just incredibly pathetic it has to be us."
      --- Jerry Garcia
    6. Re:... until removed or deleted. by rhetoric · · Score: 2, Informative

      to clarify: DMCA != EULA. Not enough money to sue != no legal basis to sue.

      --

      "where words meet intent, lies rhetoric's lament"
    7. Re:... until removed or deleted. by KDR_11k · · Score: 2, Informative

      If they don't take it back, you have legal grounds because then you're practically forced into agreeing. The courts said an EULA is to be expected and a no-reverse-engineering clause is to be expected. If there's some additional stuff that you cannot be reasonably expected to know about beforehand AND they refuse to undo your sales contract (which you can be reasonably expected to think they'd do) then it's either being forced into accepting the contract (not sure about the legal term but I think it's not extortion when it involves contracts) or being sold a good that's not what they told you it was (fraud, you are expected to know that there's some form of EULA but you're also expected to assume the standard terms, these days more and more crap is being thrown in).

      --
      Justice is the sheep getting arrested while an impartial judge declares the vote void.
    8. Re:... until removed or deleted. by KDR_11k · · Score: 2

      But the rootkit DRM isn't actually malicious, in that it is not intended to cause harm to the user or computer.

      Even with good intentions hackers go to jail. There was a virus that patched your computer against the vulnerability it exploited, while that was not malicious the thing didn't work and caused big damage, the writer went to jail. Since this thing looks like a virus and acts like a virus it IS a virus.

      The EULA talks about some DRM mechanism, it does not make clear that the mechanism involves a virus that replaces drivers from other manufacturers (anticompetitive behaviour?). If the courts said it was covered by the EULA and Sony is clear that's a dangerous precedent. Anyone care to send the judge responsible a CD that autoruns and infects his PC with a latent virus that overwrites all files commonly edited by users (.doc, .pdf, .txt, etc) with garbage the day after they've been edited or when some backup program is run while showing an innocuous looking EULA that pretends to install some thank-you greeting card program?

      --
      Justice is the sheep getting arrested while an impartial judge declares the vote void.
    9. Re:... until removed or deleted. by griffjon · · Score: 2, Informative

      Actually they now link to the kind folks who made this software for 'em and will provide an uninstall feature... ...but the damned thing requires ActiveX.

      http://updates.xcp-aurora.com/unsupported.aspx

      Sigh.

      --
      Returned Peace Corps IT Volunteer
  51. Not just "Sony" by uqbar · · Score: 4, Informative

    Boycott all of Sony Music - this includes labels like:
    Arista Records
    BMG
    Columbia Records
    Epic Records
    J Records
    Jive Records
    LaFace Records
    Legacy Recordings
    Provident Music Group
    RCA Records
    RCA Victor Group
    RLG - Nashville
    Sony
    So So Def Records
    Verity Records

    As a recording engineer / producer I'm against piracy - but I also hate DRM screwing with my machine and making it hard to enjoy the music I purchased in the way I want.

    Support indy labels, and write letters to artists you like that are on majors - tell them to move on to an indy label or start their own.

    And if you're really mad (as I am) boycott all of Sony. While Sony music walks to its own drummer, the parent company can't be loving the bad publicity.

    I stopped buying all Sony products (including the pro gear I use as an audio engineer) when they initially started their annoying DRM. It is easy to break, but makes normal use of the CD harder.

  52. There's more than one law here. by argent · · Score: 2, Informative

    This is part of what you need if you want to listen to Sony's music legally.

    On the one hand, it's perfectly legal for me to play that CD on my laptop without running that software. Even assuming a clickthrough license is valid, I can simply refuse to accept that license, refuse to install the software, and treat it as an ordinary audio CD. If I'm not running Windows on my laptop, in fact, I don't even have an opportunity to use their spyware-enhancer.

    On the other hand, even if it WAS a legal requirement, any contract that involves on or the other of the parties performing an illegal act as a requirement for fulfilling that contract is void. There's a reasonable case that this software violates the DMCA and thus the license is invalid.

    Which takes you back to the first hand.

  53. Other affected CDs by vmxeo · · Score: 4, Interesting

    I showed the last to one of my coworkers, who immediately started worried about a recent Switchfoot CD he played on his machine. Sure enough, not only did the CD have DRM on it, but it seems to have installed the same rootkit as the example given in the Sysinternals website. Which of course makes me wonder, how many CDs did Sony put this into?

    I'm starting to think it'd be worthwhile to create a domain policy to prevent this malware from running on any of our network machines....

  54. Re:Russinovich's Take by slavemowgli · · Score: 4, Informative

    Easy. Slashdot punishes you for moderating stuff down, and moderators know this, so pretty much everything that's even remotely interesting gets modded up.

    --
    quidquid latine dictum sit altum videtur.
  55. Re:Sue by i_am_not_a_bomba · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Don't buy DRM'd CDs as they don't allow you to exercise fair-use.

    If 'fair use' is a natural right then any entity that attempts to crush that is criminal.

    Your attitude is lazy, here's some fun with it; don't like not being able to sit up the front of the bus, then dont ride on the bus.

    Don't like the cancer from the toxic waste dump in your town, then leave.

    Don't like to have the police perform secret searches on your home, don't buy a home, dont move into that town, state, country, etc.

    Facile examples but they are along the same line of thinking. If an entity is actively stamping on peoples natural rights then that entities behaviour can be forcefully stopped by society, through the power of government, one of the things that government is supposed to exist for.

    There seems to be some strange thought pattern here that nobody must let the idea even cross their mind that a corporations' behaviour may be wrong and that it is ok to put a stop to it through Government. Somehow a fairly large group of people have decided that corporations should have less responsibility to a country than the citizens that it is supposed to benefit do. That the only thing that lowly citizens should be 'allowed' to do is *absolutely nothing* (which is exactly what a 'boycott' is, total and utter inaction).

    Undoubtably this thought process is a mutation of various anti-communist, anti-socialist and pro facist (in the true sense) ideologies coming to their logical end..

    Your argument is also objectively pro virus/spyware and malware. Using your argument any virus or malware author, to be safe from prosecution simply has to show some form of EULA, something that has been joked about here often but dismissed as absurd. (You probably didn't make that connection in your rush to promote your ideology).

    --Awaiting the flurry of half thought out responses misinterpreting my words.

  56. My Letter to Sony by macklin01 · · Score: 5, Interesting

    Hello.

    I have just learned about the malware that Sony has started to add to "compact disks" (in quotes, because Sony breaks the CD standard) via poorly-written DRM software from First4Internet. It is simply unconscionable that Sony would resort to such unethical lengths to prevent the pirating of a software. In fact, criminal trespass comes to mind, given that the software differs from what is described in the EULA and non-removable.

    I'm outraged at this behavior demonstrated by Sony, and I can assure you that I am no longer a Sony customer. In short, although I am a computer enthusiast/technologist who builds his own systems and enjoys gaming, and although I am a scientist who uses high-end computing resources on a daily basis, I won't be purchasing any of the following from Sony in the next few years:

    1) Stereos and portable audio equipment
    2) Flat screen televisions, plasma TV's, etc
    3) High-end computer LCD monitors
    4) Laptop computers
    5) Computer CD and DVD drives
    6) Sony-branded CD, DVD, and floppy disk media
    7) PlayStation 2 or 3
    8) PlayStation Games
    9) PlayStation Portable

    and needless to say,

    10) Sony and BMG music.

    If you break standards on DVD equipment, add Sony and Columbia TriStar movies to that list.

    Thank you for making my future purchase decisions so much easier.

    Sincerely,

    ****

    --
    OpenSource.MathCancer.org: open source comp bio
  57. CMT.com removing posts about Van Zant rootkit by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Interesting
    There have been at least 2 posts removed from the Van Zant message board on CMT.com about the insideous DRM rootkit their CD installs. One of these post was mine. http://it.slashdot.org/comments.pl?sid=166915&cid= 13929028 I am emailing CMT.com to determine why my post was removed.

    Make no mistake, the mebers of Van Zant are just as culpable in this as Sony Music. please let them know at

    Vector Management

    Ken Levitan and Ross Schilling

    P.O. Box 120479

    Nashville, TN 37212

    Phone: 615-269-6600

    Fax: 615-269-6002

    Thank you Tapeworm

  58. List of affected CDs? by Timo_UK · · Score: 4, Interesting

    Is there a list of CDs that are affected, except the one Mark Russinovich used.

    --
    Timo's Audio Software http://www.esseraudio.com
  59. Re:Sue by Alphabet+Pal · · Score: 5, Funny

    Additional items from the EULA:

    • On DAYS when we can't get our cars started, you agree to COME BY our houses in your CAR and pick us up. You will fully compensate US for any time lost DUE to being late to work.
    • On every third FRIDAY, you will report to our company CAFETERIA and cook and serve FOOD to us.
    • When we are low on MONEY, we will stand outside your house with a BLACKJACK, hit you over the HEAD with it, and take your WALLET.
    • We reserve full pillaging RIGHTS to your wife and ATTRACTIVE children.
    • You agree that you will not LISTEN to purchased CD.
    --
    Because you can't spell "slaughter" without "laughter"
  60. Let them know how you feel.... by Hachey · · Score: 2, Informative

    Follow this link to send a comment to Sony. I know I won't be buying their products anymore, and I sure as hell let them know.

    --
    Please allow me to hate the creator of the 120-character limit: *HATES*. Thank you.
  61. Boycotts are worthless... by FellowConspirator · · Score: 5, Insightful

    ... for stuff like this. If you care enough to REALLY do something about it, there are really only two things to do:

    1. File a tip with the US Department of Homeland Security

      Intentionally or otherwise, what the program is exploiting a flaw in a popular operating system in a way that not only enables them to control access to the data on the CD -- which itself is illegal, but fat chance the government will help you with that -- but it in so doing opens up the machine to facile infection with illicit software which it will then actively cover up and make detectable only to very knowledgable users. If DHS is serious about cyber terrorism, they shouldn't be letting companies subvert the already weak security of the predominant operating system and prime them for becoming unwitting pawns in terrorist activity.
    2. Develop a SafeDupe campaign.

      Make a simple flyer explaining what's happened and the implications and see if local record stores would be amenable to helping out. This could be as little as having them stuff an info packet in their bags, to leaving a stack of Live Linux CDs that do nothing but permit a user to duplicate a CD to CD-R without the offending software, or even have a "SafeDupe" day where a few people setup a table where purchasers can show proof of purchase and bring a blank CD to have it "SafeDuped" for them. Obviously, most record stores won't want to rock the boat, but a well-spoken and sincere person (armed with copies of coverage from the mainstream media talking about the problem) ought to be able to find at least one or two store managers with an ethical streak.

      It's perfectly legal to make such copies, and if you don't believe me, ask a lawyer or download the Bern Convention on Copyright and read it yourself.

    And remember kids, calm, cool, and collected. No name calling, no vitriole. Attribute not malice where stupidty is explanation enough, etc. And do make sure that whatever you do is entirely on the up-and-up, transparent to everyone involved, and that the press and SonyMusic are well informed on the subject.

  62. Never forget... by Kamiza+Ikioi · · Score: 3, Interesting

    "So, technically they are in the clear..."

    In the good ol' USofA, there is no technically clear in civil litigation. All you have to prove is something as simple as your reasonable expectations. Doesn't matter what the EULA says or if they did anything illegal.

    IANAL, but it is my impression that in the eyes of the US courts, you not only have to follow the letter of the law, but you have to ensure that you are conveying a reasonable perception about what your product does. That fine print means nothing if the court finds it too difficult to read, or makes unfair claims (ie - By installing this, you transfer ownership of your computer to us... which is what a rootkit comes closest to without physical possession.)

    Civil cases aren't really about the law. They're about damages, and a propoderance of evidence (more than 50% in your favor... a lot less than the reasonable doubt standard of a criminal trial). It may not be against the law for you to spraypaint your trees pink. But if I'm your neighbor and plan on selling my home, I have every right to sue you for damaging the property value of my home. Getting a few other neighbors to testify, and it'll win just on proponderance of evidence.

    IMHO, I'd sue the hell out of Sony in a class action lawsuit. Look at it this way: you may not win a lot of money each, but it'll probably be enough to repurchase that CD and a few others with no DRM.

    --
    I8-D
  63. Technical Issue Feedback form... by pfrCalif · · Score: 2, Informative

    should be filled out by all angry individuals... http://cp.sonybmg.com/xcp/english/form8.html

  64. Lnux version? by frinkacheese · · Score: 5, Funny

    Does anybody know if there is a Linux port of this RK? Or will it run on WINE? I would really love to have this RK on my Linux box. I think it's the only thing stopping me from using Linux on the desktop at the moment.

  65. Re:Sue by trentblase · · Score: 4, Funny

    Not to sound trollish, but perhaps you should reconsider this marriage?

  66. Re:Sue by rishistar · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Can't you sue for the product not technically being an audio CD in the first place? Maybe I'm mistaken (and if I am I'd like to know) but an audio CD meets certain standards detailed in the Red Book that anything with DRM in fails to meet. So some shop is bound to advertise Sony CDs as audio CD's ergo that retailer can be sued perhaps?

    --
    Professor Karmadillo Songs of Science
  67. Sony in violation of DMCA? by softcoder · · Score: 5, Interesting

    If SONY circumvents the security I have installed on MY machine with their rootkit are THEY in violation of the DMCA?

  68. Re:Sue by ajs318 · · Score: 2, Informative

    You only need to sue if there has been a violation of civil law. What Sony have done violates criminal law on several counts -- it is deception, misuse of a computer, criminal damage and aiding and abetting the misuse of a computer. Don't call a lawyer, call the police!

    --
    Je fume. Tu fumes. Nous fûmes!
  69. Re:Sue by Alcilbiades · · Score: 2, Insightful

    You clearly haven't been reading the articles. Others have stated what the EULA was and it wasn't changed to include information about the hidden malware until after these articles started getting out. Furthermore, just because it is in a EULA does not make the EULA valid or legal. A company can put lots of stuff in the EULA it doesn't mean they hold up in court. Most cases in the US regarding EULA's have come down to judges dictating that they are far to restrictive and illegal.

  70. One nasty idea by jonr · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Buy and return.
    Buy something from Sony, like PS2 or a camera, and then return it the day after. AFAIK, return items go pretty high up in the supply chain. Tell why you are returning it.
    Any problems with this?

  71. Re:Sue by Pakaran2 · · Score: 2, Insightful

    In an ideal world, that would be the case. In this one, the police aren't going to go after a corporation which employs tens of thousands of Americans because they did something to individual users' computers. And if they did, Sony can afford to drag it out in court forever (the same way Exxon is still dragging out the Exxon Valdeze fine - they don't need to pay it until the case is closed).

  72. Functions as normal audio CD on Macs by Cadre · · Score: 2, Interesting
    What happens if a Mac user puts one of these crap Sony disks into their computer?

    Nothing. It looks and functions as a normal audio CD on a Mac.

    Does the Sony DRM prevent Windows users who legally buy their CDs from playing the songs in their iPod?

    Under Windows, yes it will prevent iTunes from ripping it and putting the music on your iPod. Several bands (and I believe even Sony) have instructions for copying music onto the iPod using Windows and they generally involve burning the included WMA files of the music on a regular CD and then reripping it (yes you will lose quality), but the much better solution (that they don't tell you about) is to just hold down the shift key while inserting the CD which will disable the autorun.bat script.

    It's actually rather funny looking at their instructions because they'll have several pages of instructions for Windows machines to copy the music onto iPods and for the Mac, they just say "The audio CD will function normally and without restrictions on a Mac.".

    --
    All editorial writers ever do is come down from the hill after the battle is over and shoot the wounded.
  73. Here's the address of the guy to write to at Sony: by trudyscousin · · Score: 2, Informative

    Mr. Thomas Hesse
    President, Global Digital Business
    Sony BMG Music Entertainment Company
    550 Madison Ave.
    New York, NY 10022-3211

    I wrote this guy last summer after reading a piece in the New York Times featuring him discussing Sony's oh-so-wunnerful SunnComm copy protection. I can't locate the original NYT article, but this one says almost exactly the same thing.

    I didn't receive a reply. I thought I stood a good chance of receiving one since I couched my language in civil terms and didn't call him a pig fucker. So, see what works for you.

    --
    Those who can, do. Those who can't, write technology blogs.
  74. Call to anti-virus makers by elfguygmail.com · · Score: 2, Interesting

    This is reported everywhere as a rootkit, something that can't be uninstalled, and that may compromise your system. It is, in fact, a virus. Personally I hope anti-virus software will start detecting it, reporting it as virus to the user ("Sony DRM virus found!") and remove it.

  75. Re:Here's the address of the guy to write to at So by mihalis · · Score: 3, Funny

    Hey, I mentioned this article to my wife who actually works for Sony-BMG right there at HQ on 550 Madison, and even she didn't reply to me. no kidding!

  76. but Sony says it's not malware by cab15625 · · Score: 3, Insightful
    To quote the faq from Sony

    6. I have heard that the protection software is really malware/spyware. Could this be true?

    Of course not. The protection software simply acts to prevent unlimited copying and ripping from discs featuring this protection solution. It is otherwise inactive. The software does not collect any personal information nor is it designed to be intrusive to your computer system.

    Also, the protection components are never installed without the consumer first accepting the End User License Agreement.

    If at some point you wish to remove the software from your machine simply contact customer service through this link. You will, though, be unable to use the disc on your computer once you uninstall the components.

    I call shenanigans. They say it's not designed to be intrusive, yet it hides itself by creating a security hole and it messes with your drivers. They say it's not installed without the consent of the user to the EULA yet the EULA doesn't appear to give sufficient details to make an informed choice as to whether or not you want this on your system. They offer a removal tool; however, once applied, you will not be able to use the CD in your system at all. This last implies that the tool either does an incomplete removal or adds further software to your system (does the removal tool come with an EULA?)

  77. Re:Sue by KDR_11k · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Moreover, it says when you terminate the agreement you have to remove ALL parts of the software. Sony hides part of the software and makes it hard to impossible for you to fulfill your obligations under the contract. They didn't tell you beforehand and there's most likely a law against that (putting a clause into a contract while actively hindering the signee from fulfilling it, forcing him to commit a breach of contract). Entrapment? Otherwise it'd be too easy to put some impossible (but on first glance harmless) clause into a contract that triggers upon termination and causes the signee to unknowingly violate the contract and be liable under the damages clause. Imagine AOL implemented that into their service contract.

    --
    Justice is the sheep getting arrested while an impartial judge declares the vote void.
  78. Re:Sue by CastrTroy · · Score: 2, Informative

    The really crappy part is, is that this only hurts the legitimate users. People who wish to pirate the CD will just pop it in a Linux computer and rip it. Or they will just disable autorun on their CD drive. I'm not sure about this method specifically, but this seems to bypass every copy protection mechanism i've seen on music CDs. The rest of the users, are stuck out in the cold, using crappy players that come on the disc to play the CDs, as well as not being able to copy the CD onto their hard drive. Which kind of violates your fair use rights, depending on how you interpret them. Not to mention the fact that they have software on their computer that may be hard to uninstall, and may be doing things the user doesn't want it to do.

    --

    Anthropic principle: We see the universe the way it is because if it were different we would not be here to see it.
  79. Re:Let us /. Sony by blincoln · · Score: 2, Insightful

    The copy protection on the Velvet Revolver album was a lot less insidious than their new system.

    --
    "...always new atoms but always doing the same dance, remembering what the dance was yesterday." -Richard Feynman
  80. Take action to stop Sony from cont this outrage by Rasta_the_far_Ian · · Score: 2, Informative

    Express your outrage in a letter to Sony Investor Services contact. State that you will no longer purchase Sony products, and will be very leery of Sony as an investment in your retirement plans due to this clear demonstration of Sony's lack of ethics in its business practices. Physical letters work best. The address, from Sony's 2005 Annual Report, is:

    Sony Corporation of America
    Investor Relations
    550 Madison Ave, 27th Floor
    New York, NY 10022-3211

    If you want a laugh, check out Sony's views on Corporate Social Responsibility site at http://www.sony.net/SonyInfo/Environment/about/ind ex.html

    From that site: "The Sony Group recognizes that ... Sound business practices require that business decisions give due consideration to the interests of Sony stakeholders,including shareholders, customers, employees, suppliers, business partners, local communities and other organizations."

    I wonder how they think installing rootkits on customer computers promotes the interests of Sony's customers!!!

  81. Re:Sue by m0rph3us0 · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Yeah, he just wrote the book on how to detect rootkits, and play with the internals of Windows. Maybe Warner Von Braun isn't the rocket scientist slashdot makes him out to be. I'm sure that cutting and pasting text from a EULA would be beyond him.

  82. Unfortunatly, you made the problem worse. by Belial6 · · Score: 2, Insightful

    By, saying that all audio CDs should not be played, you took the heat off of Sony. You basically told them that audio CDs are inherently a problem. This would lead to the belief that the problem is not Sony's. You also punished the employee. If companies follow your advice, employees that want a little music through the day will now be denied the use of any CDs. You should make sure that you highlight that SONY is the problem, and that they have software on their CDs that infect computers with DRM.