Slashdot Mirror


Podcasting Officially a Word

goldseries writes "The BBC is reporting that the New Oxford American Dictionary is adding podcasting to the dictionary. A year ago it was rejected because not enough people were reading it, but, in a ode to the speed of technology's growth, it is being declared the word of the year. Podcasting has been in the Oxford Dictionary of English since last summer. Podcast beat out words such as lifehack and rootkit for inclusion in the dictionaries. I guess no one needs to know what a rootkit is."

281 comments

  1. What!? by BlacKat · · Score: 1, Funny

    I can't believe podcasting got into the dictionary before rootkit did!

    Hmm, is this also a first post... if so, it's my first one ever! :D

    1. Re:What!? by meringuoid · · Score: 0, Troll
      I can't believe podcasting got into the dictionary before rootkit did!

      The reason for this was that I pwnz3d their systems with a trojaned podcast and installed a rootkit, then began spearphishing the researchers to obtain the necessary details to forge submissions. The result of this lifehack was that I was able to unfairly influence the dictionary - not only could they not detect the rootkit, they couldn't even list the word in their lexicon ;-)

      --
      Real Daleks don't climb stairs - they level the building.
    2. Re:What!? by 1u3hr · · Score: 4, Insightful
      I can't believe podcasting got into the dictionary before rootkit did!


      Results 1 - 10 of about 74,600,000 for podcast.

      Results 1 - 10 of about 8,480,000 for rootkit. So obviously podcast has more currency, and I think in the non-tech media the ratio would be much higher.

    3. Re:What!? by Big+Nothing · · Score: 4, Interesting

      True, but if you wanna play the numbers-game:

      Only approximately 4.5 million users will be using podcasts by the end of 2005.

      Up to 24 million users may be infected by the SONY rootkits. In addition, there ARE other rootkits out there...

      Ah, well - I just felt like being a smart-ass.

      --
      SIG: TAKE OFF EVERY 'CAPTAIN'!!
    4. Re:What!? by geoffspear · · Score: 3, Funny

      6 billion people this year will be affected by flurgamistophon, and none of them know what it means.

      --
      Don't blame me; I'm never given mod points.
    5. Re:What!? by NitsujTPU · · Score: 1

      What does it mean?

      I Googled it and got nothing.

    6. Re:What!? by Phattypants · · Score: 1

      While it may not have terribly wide circulation, rootkit should be added as a scientific and technical term because it is indeed a scientific and technical word frequently used by scientific and technical people.

    7. Re:What!? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      whoosh!

    8. Re:What!? by juletre · · Score: 1

      Now if only we could get "nonesevent" as an official word too, that 76-year old british word-puzzle guy would be immortal for the rest of his life!

      --
      "he, who has quotes in his signature, is a douche" - unknown.
    9. Re:What!? by Ipeunipig · · Score: 1

      They must have submitted it as $sys$rootkit, thus it was unseen by Oxford. /sorry, bad joke.

    10. Re:What!? by john83 · · Score: 0

      It's in there alright. It's under $sys$.

      --
      Strange women lying in ponds distributing swords is no basis for a system of government.
    11. Re:What!? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I wonder how many people are using the /. rootkit and don't even know it?...

    12. Re:What!? by wyohman · · Score: 1

      I can't believe someone would rename an .mp3 and call it podcasting. It's a frickin' mp3 file. All bow at the Apple altar and pay homage to renaming an mp3.

  2. Food for thought... by Antony-Kyre · · Score: 4, Insightful

    It may be a word now, but will anyone still be using it 50 years from now?

    1. Re:Food for thought... by Ziviyr · · Score: 2, Funny

      I'm sure the durable plastic casing will make good fishing bait for years to come.

      --

      Someone set us up the bomb, so shine we are!
    2. Re:Food for thought... by cjb-nc · · Score: 4, Insightful
      "I got your memo, would you go Xerox 10 copies for me for my next meeting?"

      There's a word that was ubiquitous some number of years ago. Can't say I've heard anyone use Xerox as a verb in quite a while. Now it's copy or photocopy. Podcasting will go the same way, eventually. I seriously doubt it will take more than 10 years, much less 50.

    3. Re:Food for thought... by GroeFaZ · · Score: 1

      Yeah, especially as opposed to rootkit *shudder*

      --
      The grass is always greener on the other side of the light cone.
    4. Re:Food for thought... by meringuoid · · Score: 4, Insightful
      It may be a word now, but will anyone still be using it 50 years from now?

      Quite possibly. Remember how 'Hoover' became a generic term for a vacuum cleaner? How 'walkman' became a generic term for a portable personal cassette player?

      I would not be surprised to see 'iPod' becoming a generic term for digital audio players - or, if Apple defends its trademark as well as it probably will, the obvious corruption to just plain 'pod'. The increasingly widespread currency of the word 'podcast' might well cause this to happen more quickly. If you can listen to podcasts on it, it's a pod, right? Not an iPod, because that's only the Apple ones, but a pod nonetheless...

      --
      Real Daleks don't climb stairs - they level the building.
    5. Re:Food for thought... by ObsessiveMathsFreak · · Score: 4, Insightful

      It may be a word now, but will anyone still be using it 50 years from now?

      Marry N'uncle, a swivven'd comely wench shall tell thee by the nonce.

      --
      May the Maths Be with you!
    6. Re:Food for thought... by trollable · · Score: 1

      Blame the mongers. They are the ones that came first with 'pod'.

    7. Re:Food for thought... by Walkiry · · Score: 1

      >I would not be surprised to see 'iPod' becoming a generic term for digital audio players

      I would, simply because there is one already that everyone uses: "MP3 player". Wherever it plays MP3s or not (the Sony ones that played only their craptastic format were still generally called MP3 players). Surprising maybe, since it's two words and MP3 isn't exactly a wizbang-cute sounding word, but there you go.

      --
      ---- Take the Space Quiz!
    8. Re:Food for thought... by ciroknight · · Score: 1

      Translation please?

      --
      "Victory means exit strategy, and it's important for the President to explain to us what the exit strategy is." G.W.Bush
    9. Re:Food for thought... by osu-neko · · Score: 1

      Is "podcast" trademarked? If not, then your analogy is rather poor, since that's the main reason for the push not to call photocopies "Xeroxes", inline skates "Rollorblades", etc.

      --
      "Convictions are more dangerous enemies of truth than lies."
    10. Re:Food for thought... by Eightyford · · Score: 1

      Who calls their vacuum a Hoover? That's almost as bad as some Southerners calling Mountain Dew "Coke".

      Hi can I get a coke?
      What kind?
      Mountain Dew, please.

    11. Re:Food for thought... by osu-neko · · Score: 1

      I would be very surprised if the term "MP3 player" remains in use if they become terribly popular. It's only a term "everyone uses" as long as "everyone" is a small subset of the population. If a substantial majority of ordinary people start using them, the first shorter, easier, catchier alternative to come along will become the de facto standard name for them.

      --
      "Convictions are more dangerous enemies of truth than lies."
    12. Re:Food for thought... by Golias · · Score: 1

      I would be very surprised if the term "MP3 player" remains in use if they become terribly popular. It's only a term "everyone uses" as long as "everyone" is a small subset of the population.

      Wow. You mean you actually know somebody who doesn't own one?

      When is he going to start bragging about it on the Internet, like those nutty crackpots who choose not to own TV sets and can't shut up about it?

      --

      Information wants to be anthropomorphized.

    13. Re:Food for thought... by Walkiry · · Score: 2, Interesting

      >It's only a term "everyone uses" as long as "everyone" is a small subset of the population.

      Here's where we disagree I suppose. I've heard this term used by a wide range of people, in billboard advertisements, TV adverts... Heck, check the MediaMarkt audio and video page and see where the iPod is (hint: click on "Die beliebtesten MP3"). Saturn has the iPods in their "MP3 section." The term "MP3 Player" is very widely extended, where "everyone" stands for a large portion of the general population (sure, all they'll tell you is that it's one of them things that lets you hear the music off your computer, but that's how they're referred to).

      --
      ---- Take the Space Quiz!
    14. Re:Food for thought... by erroneous · · Score: 3, Funny

      "maybe"

      --
      erroneous: look me up in a dictionary
    15. Re:Food for thought... by c_forq · · Score: 1

      That bugged the crap out of me too, last time I visisted the South I had that same thing happen to me, except I ordered a Pepsi. That blew my mind, how Pepsi was apperantly a type of Coke.

      --
      Computers allow humans to make mistakes at the fastest speeds known, with the possible exception of tequila and handguns
    16. Re:Food for thought... by gordo3000 · · Score: 1

      I don't........
      I guess to be part of hte in crowd I better go burn a good 250$ right now, eh?

    17. Re:Food for thought... by mrcolj · · Score: 1

      I think you're stretching to make a point... "Xerox" is still probably the second most popular verb for "copy." "Rollerblades" still is the main term for "inline skates." Like products are still called "band-aids" and "kleenex." I've even heard iPods described as "a type of walkman." I know the guy who is "the father of the Walkman," and he can still influence his way into any mp3 corporation position. These words may be synechdochal, metonymic, or downright zeugmatic, but they're not one hit wonders. And "rootkit" is a technical word, and overt technical words aren't in even the largest dictionaries. The OED, as mentioned above, has close to 700,000 words, and is always considered the definitive source for what words "exist," and yet doesn't have "phyrritic granulonum" or "rootkit."

      --
      --Colin Jensen
      colinandbethany.com
    18. Re:Food for thought... by Tim+C · · Score: 1

      Cute, but he said 50 years, not 500.

    19. Re:Food for thought... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I guess to be part of hte in crowd I better go burn a good 250$ right now, eh?

      Did parent post say anything about $250 iPods?

      You can get MP3 players for a lot less than that, and they are very handy. Not only are they great for working out and taking your music to work with you, but they are the ultimate car system, as one little gadget replaces stacks and stacks of CD's.

      I love my MP3 player, and I'm not tech junkie. Why, I don't even own a TV set!

    20. Re:Food for thought... by imsabbel · · Score: 1

      only if you want an APPLE IPOD.
      You can get a mp3 player for 20$ if you want...

      --
      HI O WISE PRINCE. WHT TOOK U SO DAM LONG?
    21. Re:Food for thought... by jmelloy · · Score: 1

      My sister is in high school and refers to MP3 players collectively as "iPods" and "knockoff iPods". I don't think I've ever heard her use the term "MP3", and she downloads music all the time.

      My other sister once asked me the difference between and iPod and an MP3 player.

    22. Re:Food for thought... by gordo3000 · · Score: 1

      I was just commenting on how everyone seems to now need an MP3 player to be part of the in crowd and the biggest symbol of conformity is the iPod in my mind. it reminds me of old 1984 commercial.

    23. Re:Food for thought... by Golias · · Score: 1

      I was just commenting on how everyone seems to now need an MP3 player to be part of the in crowd...

      Yes. It's all about status and conformity. The amazing convenience of having your whole music collection handy at all times for your personal entertainment can't possibly have anything to do with why MP3 players are so popular with people. We are all cattle, and you are soooooo special for not moving with the herd.

      You go right on being the only person waiting in line at the DMV who's bored out of his skull. I'll be with the other cattle, listening to whatever music strikes my fancy at the moment, blissfully unaware of how much less cool I am than you.

      --

      Information wants to be anthropomorphized.

    24. Re:Food for thought... by Vinnie_333 · · Score: 1
      will anyone still be using it 50 years from now?

      Doesn't really matter. Words come, words go. A dictionary is not an official document that tells people what are and are not words (though it's often used as such). Rather, a dictionary is a catalog of the words that people commonly use. Any word that gets widely used should be added to the dictionary. Dictionaries change with time (new words are added). Ideally, words would be deleted from dictionaries as they fall out of use, but they are usually kept it. Sometimes the tag "archaic" or "older use" is added behind them to signify that the words are no longer in common use or if their definition has changed over time. e.g., the wordgay.

      --

      "We shall party like the Greeks of old! You know the ones I mean." - HedonismBot
    25. Re:Food for thought... by ncc74656 · · Score: 1
      Who calls their vacuum a Hoover?

      The Brits do. They made a verb of it, too: to "hoover" the carpet is to vacuum it.

      --
      20 January 2017: the End of an Error.
    26. Re:Food for thought... by gordo3000 · · Score: 1

      I was also commenting on your amazing ignorance about the vast numbers of people who don't give a damn about MP3 players and probably won't for a long time, or ever. If you didn't know, here is a clue: some people don't care to be lost in some fanciful world and would rather be engaged with other people in some form of itneraction. but then again, that usually keeps me from being bored no matter what I'm doing. I do have several friends with MP3 players and it fits them just fine. They prefer to listen to music rather than talk to people. maybe you should open your mind to the possibility that there are a lot of people that buy things because it is a status symbol and lots of people that don't buy things you find useful, because both those groups exist.

      my main comment was about when people buy the iPod (a great symbol of moving with the crowd) and don't use it to anywhere near its capacity, sometimes never. its funny simply because it was bought expecting it to magically have some value and suddenly, those people reaized it didn't have any and they are stuck with a 250 dollar 20 gig hard drive.

    27. Re:Food for thought... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The following music company has had a "pod" out since around 1998/99, so I've been "pod"casting each time I plug my guitar in for over 6 years.
      http://www.line6.com/products/pods/

      I still don't understand why people call it podcasting at all.. it's not broadcasting anything. You're just downloading a file from a website. It also has nothing to do with the ipods anymore (like podcast.net.. you just click a link and download a soundclip in mp3 or wma). Nothing is actually being broadcast to your ipod.

    28. Re:Food for thought... by burndive · · Score: 1

      Or you could just go buy a digital music player.

      --
      ...because "hacker" sounds way sexier than "code drone."
    29. Re:Food for thought... by burndive · · Score: 1

      Well I for one thank God that highschoolers and their ignorance don't necessarily define the American language. If they did that would be like totally bogus. Not rad at all, dude.

      --
      ...because "hacker" sounds way sexier than "code drone."
    30. Re:Food for thought... by ndansmith · · Score: 1
      Podcasting will go the same way, eventually.

      You are only addressing half of the name (Pod). The "casting" part is what will make this word endure. Let's face it: It's darn clever. Rhymes with "broadcasting," and you can guess the meaning based on the form. For that reason it will stick around.

    31. Re:Food for thought... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Dude...the 80's ended 15 years ago.

    32. Re:Food for thought... by Charcharodon · · Score: 1

      Dude.....is very much an 80's word. Proof positive that the tubularness will be back very soon. It's only a matter of time, resistence is futile.

    33. Re:Food for thought... by tbone1 · · Score: 1
      It may be a word now, but will anyone still be using it 50 years from now?

      English has abandoned a lot of words that would seem to be useful. While someone may be ruthless, how many are ruthful? "Ugsome" used to be the opposite of handsome, but it just disappeared. One great loss is "velleity", which meant a desire that isn't strong enough for you to act upon. What a great word, yet it's gone. Not only that, but American colonists preserved many words that disappeared in England later, the classic example being "fall" for the season after summer and before winter. The language would be even further impoverished if not for us damn yankees.

      I'm sure that "podcast", like others, will disappear one day; English is too dynamic a language to not shed words. That doesn't make it invalid right now, though.

      --

      The Independent: Reverend Spooner Arrested in Friar Tuck Incident - ISIHAC, Historical Headlines
    34. Re:Food for thought... by Golias · · Score: 2, Insightful

      If you didn't know, here is a clue: some people don't care to be lost in some fanciful world and would rather be engaged with other people in some form of itneraction.

      The way everybody was so close and friendly with each other on New York subways before the invention of the Sony Walkman? The world you live in sounds like it must be really nice. I wouldn't know, as I've never seen it.

      Seriously, you sound like a total ass when you assume that you KNOW the reason why other people bought their iPods. I can only speak for myself and those close to me: We buy them to listen to music on, and don't care what the fuck people think about them. When they are not in use for the stated purpose of listening to music, they are hidden away in pockets, glove boxes, handbags, etc.

      Why would anybody think of a small hunk of personal electronics as a "status symbol" anyway? It's barely visible, cheaper than jewelry, and usually tucked out of sight. You might as well try to convince me that women who buy expensive vibrators are only getting them because they want to be part of the "in crowd." My first guess is that they are getting them for their own personal satisfaction, and don't really care whether they impress anybody or not.

      --

      Information wants to be anthropomorphized.

    35. Re:Food for thought... by saskboy · · Score: 1

      "I would be very surprised if the term "MP3 player" remains in use if they become terribly popular."

      I call my portable digital audio player an OGG player you insensitive clod!

      -/Wonders why other Slashdot readers don't too...

      --
      Saskboy's blog is good. 9 out of 10 dentists agree.
    36. Re:Food for thought... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I dont know about your world, but in my world, people buy other music players (read better) and not iPod when they want to listen to music. People buy iPod because thats the in thing.

    37. Re:Food for thought... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Oooooooh!

      Here I thought you actually believed that. Now I understand. You're bitter because you're the only kid on the block with a cheap-assed iPod knock-off, and rather than acknowledget that you are insanely jealous of the iPod's remarkable ease of use, handy click wheel, compact size, wide array of accessories and add-on features, etc. You see those people having oodles of fun with their MP3 players, to the point that they are unable to contain their elation about finally getting one, and it hurts that you are not having that kind of fun owning yours... so you redirect your bitterness into convincing yourself and others that yours is actually better because it's something different than the iPod.

      It's not possible that their player is more popular because it's actually better in some ways. It must be because it's "in." How it got to be "in" to start with, when it's so obviously not as wonderful as yours, is a mystery which will endure for the ages, but now that it's "in" the reason why everybody wants one is that it's "in." Yeah. That must be it.

    38. Re:Food for thought... by gordo3000 · · Score: 1

      you know, you can find out exactly why someone bought something if you ask them nicely. its pretty damn easy to find out. its especially obvious when you ask why they chose the iPod as compared to brand x. If you haven't ever talked to people and lose yourself in your music, you obviously wouldn't have seen the rest of the world. of course, formally, businesses call them surveys and its why they try so damn hard to protect the individuality of their product.

      and why would anyone think the iPod is a status symbol? that might be the dumbest question(even rhetorical) I've ever heard. I mean, why would anyone consider the latest Jordan's a status symbol in middle school? when you aren't using them for the proscribed purpose of protecting your feet while walking around outside, they are tucked away in some closet. oh wait, people do buy every day things and use them as status symbols. And those shoes are probably less noticable than those white earbuds. The same goes for that little tommy hilfiger symbol or polo symbol on their collared shirts. they are status symbols even though they are small. Its common.

      be careful, you can call me an ass all you want but your ignorance of the retail sector is showing.

      of course, trying to draw some completely unrealistic analogy to what the other 6.2 billion people live in with the New york subway system of the 70's and 80's is pretty damn foolish. try something a little more canonical of everyday life for at least the other 250 million americans.

    39. Re:Food for thought... by rickbrodie · · Score: 1
      The language would be even further impoverished if not for us damn yankees
      Erm, that is a pretty amusing statement. I don't mean to be offensive, but round these parts it is pretty much "common knowledge" that the english language is dying a slow and horribly painful death at the hands of the Americans. Now, whether or not this is a justified view, I shall leave as a subject for discussion.

      As for the rest of your post, I heartily agree with everything you said. I mourn the loss of some fantastic words too, and also believe that words are not sacred and bloody well should be fluid.

      Personally, it is the brutal and sustained attack on the fundamental rules of grammar (commonly attributed, but not unique, to America) that gets my goat.

    40. Re:Food for thought... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      And when was the last time you heard anyone refer to a walkman? Seen a tape player recently?

    41. Re:Food for thought... by Golias · · Score: 1

      So, where are all these surveys you are talking about in which people proclaim that they bought their iPods for "status" rather than listening to music? Links, please?

      I realize that people I know is not a statistically valid data set, but as a case sample, every last one of them who bought an iPod did so because they wanted to listen to their music on it.

      And those who chose an iPod did so because they went to Best Buy, saw it next to the iRiver and others, and noticed how much those other players look and feel like exactly what they are: knock-offs. Those looking to save a few bucks bought the iRiver or something like it.

      (In my parent's case, they bought a player that had a built-in FM player, partly because it was cheaper, and partly because they were willing to gamble on a more dodgy player for the sake of that feature... a decision they came to deeply regret, as the Windows set-up program for it was sufficiently byzantine that they can hardly operate it. Worse yet, they discovered the damn thing only had enough storage space for a couple albums.)

      Those who payed attention to the overwhelming consumer satisfaction among iPod owners they know spent the extra couple bucks for the real thing. You call it "status", I call it "word of mouth."

      Jordan sneakers are not analogous. Middle school kids in the late 80s thought of them as status symbols because: 1) They were endorsed by the most popular athelete in the world, who kids that age worshipped, and 2) $100 for a pair of kid's shoes at that time was considered shockingly expensive. The kid might as well have shown up to school wearing a Rolex watch.

      By the mid-90s, most other brands of well-made athletic shoes were just about as expensive as the Air Jordans, and once MJ went from being a superstar with the Bulls to being a bench player with the Wizzards, the prestige value of those shoes kind of faded.

      --

      Information wants to be anthropomorphized.

    42. Re:Food for thought... by atomic_toaster · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Well, Kleenex started up in 1924, and you have to admit that the term "Kleenex" as opposed to "facial tissue" is still in use... Band-Aid first came on the market in 1920; these days, it's rare to hear someone ask where they can find the "adhesive bandages".

      So yes, anything that was the first of its kind to become popular often will stand the test of time. "Walkman" and "rollerblades" have also become popularly used to replace "portable cassette deck" and "in-line skates," but they haven't been around long enough to pass the 50-year test. Although, from what I have observed, it really depends on the level of technology with regards to how long a name sticks around. With the invention of CD's, and now mp3 players, nobody really uses the traditional Walkman anymore (although Sony has also labelled their mp3 players "Walkmans", the term still seems to apply to portable cassette players in popular jargon). Rollerblades, too, while less techy than a walkman, aren't nearly as popular as at their first inception. However, terms like Kleenex and Band-Aids stick around for a long time because they have evolved very little since the product was first marketed.

      As an aside, I would personally hope that the term blogosphere does not stand the test of time. It's possibly one of the silliest terms I have ever heard. But with my luck, it will stick around forever, or perhaps be replaced by something much worse...

    43. Re:Food for thought... by G-funk · · Score: 1

      Hell no, it's a load of crap. "Podcasting" is what's wrong with the "Web 2.0"... It's the most insidious buzzword we have. "Oh no, it's not an mp3 of nerds talking... It's PODCASTING! It's the new big thing! I'm the AJAX Web 2.0 folksonomy buzzword mastah!"

      Kids these days... I remember when we had b2b, push technology, and we liked it!

      --
      Send lawyers, guns, and money!
    44. Re:Food for thought... by onkelonkel · · Score: 1

      The 80's are coming back! They have to. I have a whole pile of skinny leather ties just waiting for the day.

      --
      None of them can see the clouds; The polished wings don't care.
    45. Re:Food for thought... by gordo3000 · · Score: 1

      again, learn to read. I never once said I had or referenced a study. I said that asking people nicely why they bought something is called a survey by businesses. you really need to work on that whole taking things out of reference.

      you also have no idea about the Jordan shoes, do you? by the mid 90's(ie. 94 to 96 I assume would qualify), only other superstars had shoes as expensive as the Jordans. They were 160$ at that point. Don't even try to bullshit that all the other sneakers were that expensive, they were half that price or less(I'm talking about new, a year after they came out, the price would drop on those sneakers). but as the price goes, the iPod means you have upwards of 500 dollars to spend on something to play your music(and generally 100 to 200 dollars more than similarly spec'ed competition).

      of course, I will admit because those sneakers had a big name behind them, so they are different to a degree. But you didn't even try to address the mention of polo or hilfiger clothing, specifically the popularity of the collared shirts which only have one small symbol to tell you who made them. At is at most as obvious as the iPod ear pieces (and actually has more competition in the way of other companies).

      but again, my original point was simply a response to your comment about not knowing someone who doesn't own an MP3 player. there are a whole bunch of us. I neither feel the need to buy one simply because everyone else has one nor see much purpose in my owning one. And of course, I tread litely as I know several people that bought them and ended up dissatisfied because they realized that don't care to listen to music 24/7(hyperbole).

  3. Pah by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 4, Insightful

    I'll stick with audio download.

    1. Re:Pah by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Interesting

      > I'll stick with audio download.

      Right. can someone explain to me the difference between new trendy "podcast" and the old "ftp" or "scp" or "http" that we use for everything else? It's the same old technology just dressed up and marketed by Apple under another name. Hell, you don't even need Apple or an iPod to be involved in listening to these audio broadcasts.

      It's a marketing gimmick.

    2. Re:Pah by baryon351 · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Right. can someone explain to me the difference between new trendy "podcast" and the old "ftp" or "scp" or "http" that we use for everything else? It's the same old technology just dressed up

      Convenience. Back in the early 90s, I remember many remarks like yours about the new WWW. "Can someone explain to me the difference between this new trendy "world wide web" and just downloading files by ftp? It's only text and gifs anyway". Yes podcasts are all just mp3s and xml. They're also one hell of a lot more convenient, in the same way that anyone sane would rather go to www.site.com/index.html instead of manually downloading some text with references to half a dozen images and then go hunting down the images it referred to.

      Podcast = find a show you like, subscribe. listen.
      Audio Download = find a show you like, find how to download it from that particular site, find how often it's updated to know when to check again, download it, move it to your player/audio device, listen.

      Admittedly neither is much different to the other for one single download of one episode. or two. perhaps three, but when you find ten separate podcasts you quite like listening to each episode of, you're bound to just throw it in the too-annoying-to-continue-with basket. This kind of automation benefits the listeners who keep getting their shows easily, and the casters themselves who don't have to continually get their audience to go through a rigmarole of steps just to hear the show. Radio doesn't make you do that.

    3. Re:Pah by hesiod · · Score: 0

      > Podcast = find a show you like, subscribe. listen.
      > Audio Download = find a show you like, find how to download it from that particular site

      Oh wow, I thought it was just a low-bitrate audio file, but apparently it will magically appear on my iPod without my knowledge! Oh, what's that? You still have to figure out how to find it the first time, (evidently some people have never heard of bookmarks) download it, you still have to check back periodically, barring an RSS feed (which AFAIK still wouldn't get the file for you, just give you notification and/or a link), and copy it to my iPod...

      It's exactly the same thing with a distribution method tacked on. One that is not novel in any way. As AC said, a gimmick to smear Apple's marketing feces all over the landscape.

    4. Re:Pah by Jearil · · Score: 4, Informative

      it's kind of funny listening to your rant... You've never used iTunes to get podcasts before. This is an obvious statement, else you wouldn't have made such a silly comment.

      Apple really did do something good when they added podcasts into iTunes. Since iTunes is basically the only "official" way to get music onto an iPod anyway (and the one used by most people who own one), the whole podcast thing is made completely simple. You find a podcast in iTunes.. anyone can get their podcast in there, it doesn't take a license agreement or anything with apple, just an available feed that you tell them about. Every time you load up iTunes to resync your iPod, it automatically goes and downloads any new episodes of all of your podcast subscriptions. No bookmarks, no checking back on each one at different web sites for each one (imagine checking 20 websites a day, all for a different podcast, just to see if one updated). Just load up iTunes, update all of your podcasts, update your iPod, and you're good to go. I know on a mac anyway just plugging in the iPod will do all of those steps for you, as usually the default action to an iPod being plugged in is to run iTunes and update it.

      Now granted, the end result of automatic podcast updates through iTunes will get you the same as if you went to those 20 different sites and downloaded sperate mp3 files from each and manually put them all onto your iPod (or other mp3 player I suppose), but it's not as easy. And this is where you sound the most silly.

      It's exactly the same thing with a distribution method tacked on.

      Well DUH! That's the key! Distribution methods are super important, that's what the grandparent was pointing out! Who wants to go and download each element of all web pages you travel to as all of their seperate components and put them together themselves when you can just use a web browser that does all of that for you? An easy distribution method will make a technology go from something that's "neat" that a bunch of geeks will toy with, to something that the general population will jump on.

    5. Re:Pah by pebs · · Score: 1

      Convenience. Back in the early 90s, I remember many remarks like yours about the new WWW. "Can someone explain to me the difference between this new trendy "world wide web" and just downloading files by ftp? It's only text and gifs anyway". Yes podcasts are all just mp3s and xml. They're also one hell of a lot more convenient, in the same way that anyone sane would rather go to www.site.com/index.html instead of manually downloading some text with references to half a dozen images and then go hunting down the images it referred to.

      Podcast = find a show you like, subscribe. listen.


      That's all fine and well, but why the fuck would they add it to the dictionary? If it was a word like "audiocast" I could understand (which actually means what it is), but "podcast" is too much an advertisement for "iPod". People will (and do) think you need an iPod to be able to listen to a podcast, when the reality is people are calling any kind of audio streaming or download a "podcast". It's a marketting gimmick that shouldn't be part of language.

      --
      #!/
    6. Re:Pah by baryon351 · · Score: 4, Informative

      Oh wow, I thought it was just a low-bitrate audio file, but apparently it will magically appear on my iPod without my knowledge! Oh, what's that? You still have to figure out how to find it the first time, (evidently some people have never heard of bookmarks) download it, you still have to check back periodically, barring an RSS feed (which AFAIK still wouldn't get the file for you, just give you notification and/or a link), and copy it to my iPod...

      No. You don't get it. You don't have to go find it and download it, You don't have to check back periodically, you don't have to copy it to your iPod, you don't have to bookmark anything, yes it does magically appear on your iPod. You do have to figure out how to find it the first time, but hey. if you can't find something by typing in a search term on the iTunes Music Store and clicking "subscribe" you've probably already been institutionalized.

      As you hinted at by saying "barring an RSS feed" that's just what the xml side of a podcast is. an RSS feed that podcasting software (like iTunes) takes, and then does everything you need automagically.

      Plugging the iPod in to charge it kickstarts all the syncing behind your back. Yes, magic, once you've done that first step of finding a podcast you like and going "ooh. I like that" and clicking subscribe. Done. Nothing else to be bothered about except listening to it.

    7. Re:Pah by TimTheFoolMan · · Score: 1
      You still have to figure out how to find it the first time, (evidently some people have never heard of bookmarks) download it, you still have to check back periodically, barring an RSS feed (which AFAIK still wouldn't get the file for you, just give you notification and/or a link), and copy it to my iPod...
      For the geeks, that might be the path, but if you're using an iPod anyway, it probably makes more sense to look the podcast up on iTMS via iTunes. That mechanism is no harder than buying music, which several non-techie types seem to have figured out.

      Then again, you can add an RSS feed manually for something not in their directory, and it's still pretty hard to screw it up, but YMMV.

      Tim

    8. Re:Pah by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Informative

      audio download? how lame. why not call it what it has been called for over 7 years now...

      internet radio or webradio.

      podcasting is kind of funny to me. 2600 and other have been doing it for much longer than podcasting has even been thought of.

      what kills me is the lamer Adam Curry still tries to claim ownership of it. Yay a washed up hasbenn VJ that is trying to hijack something that has existed for a long time now.

    9. Re:Pah by Rude+Turnip · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Apple didn't invent the word "podcast." As to what "should" or "should not" be part of a language, that wreaks of the same elitism that leads the French government to have a ministry of language. Language is what the people speak, period. Language is descriptive, not proscriptive.

    10. Re:Pah by jbn-o · · Score: 1, Troll

      I see no reason to litter my language with advertisements for what I maintain is a poor product (runs on proprietary software, lacks important features, remarkably expensive, Apple's terms of service with iTunes—what is commonly used with an iPod—change after the purchase).

    11. Re:Pah by anothy · · Score: 1

      i'm not going to defend "podcast" - i very much wish the term which became dominant for this thing wasn't a walking (er, whatever) advertisement. however...

      a "podcast" is not an "audio download". or rather, that's only part of it. it's also important that it be potentially time-shifted, (at least sorta) subscription based, and automated downloads.

      now my real questions is: what do we do when they get it wrong? they've defined it as explicitly being music; i'm subscribed to several podcasts, and only one has anything to do with music.

      --

      i speak for myself and those who like what i say.
    12. Re:Pah by pboulang · · Score: 1
      Nothing else to be bothered about except listening to it.

      ..and sometimes I skip that step, too.. talk about your convenience!

      --

      This comment is guaranteed*

      *not guaranteed

    13. Re:Pah by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      People will (and do) think you need an iPod to be able to listen to a podcast, when the reality is people are calling any kind of audio streaming or download a "podcast".

      It sounds like you do have to have an iPod (or at least iTunes) to be able to listen to a "podcast." Otherwise it's just an audio download without all the automation.

    14. Re:Pah by Yahweh+Doesn't+Exist · · Score: 1

      >...lacks important features...

      if you're refering to Microsoft's advice on "how to buy an mp3 player" then I'm pleased to tell you that the new iPod does have a stopwatch.

      as for your zealotry and poverty, nothing I can do about that, and they're your problems not the iPod's. the iPod seems to be doing fine without you.

    15. Re:Pah by marhar · · Score: 1

      Right. can someone explain to me the difference between new trendy "podcast" and the old "ftp" or "scp" or "http" that we use for everything else?

      The user experience. I get in the car and push the play button, and listen to
      my podcast subscriptions which have automatically been downloaded and
      transferred to my player. It's just like radio by subscription!

    16. Re:Pah by Deus+Acerbus · · Score: 1

      That's a bit ironic, considering the elitist air about the OED being the "definitive source" on the English language. Not specifically targeting you, but it just makes me chuckle a bit at mentioning the linguistic descriptivism/proscriptivism debate on an article about the OED admitting a word.

    17. Re:Pah by pebs · · Score: 1

      Apple didn't invent the word "podcast." As to what "should" or "should not" be part of a language, that wreaks of the same elitism that leads the French government to have a ministry of language.

      Unintentional marketing gimmick. The fact of the matter is you don't need an iPod to listen to a podcast. Sure, you can say POD stands for "Personal, On-Demand" but the word came from "iPod" and implies "iPod" regardless of how you want to reinterpret it. It's misleading, and it's free advertising for Apple, regardless of whether they created it or not. Seems more elitist to use the word than to question its validity.

      --
      #!/
    18. Re:Pah by pebs · · Score: 1

      It sounds like you do have to have an iPod (or at least iTunes) to be able to listen to a "podcast." Otherwise it's just an audio download without all the automation.

      Sounds like you do, but that's certainly not the case. You just need a program capable of reading RSS, and downloading sound files based on the downloaded RSS. There are plenty of programs out there that let you subscribe, download, and listen to "podcasts" without iTunes or an iPod. It's a misleading word, and WILL mislead people into thinking they need an iPod, when all they need is a computer, some software, and maybe a portable music player (but not necessarilly).

      --
      #!/
    19. Re:Pah by Rude+Turnip · · Score: 1

      From what I understand by listening to the Word Nerds podcast, the OED is more of a "record" than a "source" on the English language. Now that may seem like splitting hairs, but the way it's put together is by delving into English-speaking cultures (there are several versions of the OED by region) and seeing how the people are using the language. In other words, it doesn't say, "this is how the English language is," but rather "this is how the English language is being used at this point in time and here are some examples of how it has been used at other points in time."

    20. Re:Pah by Teknoguy · · Score: 1

      Right. can someone explain to me the difference between new trendy "podcast" and the old "ftp" or "scp" or "http" that we use for everything else?

      If you really want to know, why don't you just....LOOK IT UP IN THE DICTIONARY!

      --
      -Nik
    21. Re:Pah by hesiod · · Score: 1

      > by saying "barring an RSS feed"

      I should have said besides the RSS feed, I understand that.

      So what you are saying is that with iTunes, I just import the initial XML RSS document and as soon as there is a new file available it will download it and copy it to my iPod (as soon as it's plugged in of course) without ANY user intervention? If so, that must be a feature of a newer version of iTunes than I have.

    22. Re:Pah by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Informative

      Then you have a pretty old version of iTunes. Podcasting support was included with Version 4.9, and it's now up to version 6. It's also simpler than "importing the XML RSS document", as every podcast I've ever had an interest in was already listed in their directory, and getting it was simply a matter of clicking subscribe. After that, yes, it's as automatic as you suggest. To be fair, I don't know if there's any convenient method for subscribing to a podcast that's not listed by Apple.

    23. Re:Pah by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "the new iPod does have a stopwatch"...

      Ever heard of iRiver? Stop Apple whoring.

    24. Re:Pah by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      After pointing to an article that shows what Apple does to their iTunes customers, the best you can come up with is to make cracks about being poor and making fun of a user's freedom to share and modify the software they use?

    25. Re:Pah by Yjerkle · · Score: 1

      you still have to check back periodically, barring an RSS feed

      I don't understand what the attraction of these new-fangled "automobiles" is! It's just a fancy looking carriage. Barring some sort of engine, you still have to have your horse pull it.

    26. Re:Pah by hesiod · · Score: 1

      You obviously have no knowledge of the workings of an automobile, it's a lot more than a carriage with an engine. RSS, however, is an extremely simple and obvious: it's two unimpressive things slapped together.

  4. Including rootkit would be more consistent by dascandy · · Score: 5, Funny

    > ... but we found that not enough people were using it, or were even familiar with the concept ...

    Thanks to Sony and the like, there are more than enough people running a rootkit, so include the word already...

  5. New Oxford Japanese Dictionary by Alain+Williams · · Score: 2, Funny
    I guess no one needs to know what a rootkit is.

    Needed in the Japanese version for the Sony employees (music/CD division).

  6. Why does podcasting need its own word? by tpgp · · Score: 2, Interesting

    It's just a webcast you can save.

    There's nothing particularly special about it.

    --
    My pics.
    1. Re:Why does podcasting need its own word? by NevDull · · Score: 4, Informative

      What the fuck is a webcast?

      If you're going to be cynical, be properly cynical and stop using words that sound like buzzwords but mean absolutely nothing.

      A podcast is an RSS feed with the URL of an audio file in each entry.

    2. Re:Why does podcasting need its own word? by spot35 · · Score: 5, Interesting

      Probably just feeding the troll but here goes anyway...

      It's less words. It's entered the public consciousness as Podcast. Apparently, "birthplace", "bump", "torture", "olympian", and "mountaineer" weren't discrete words till Shakespeare coined them and they entered the public consciousness.

      Remember, language is a forever mutating beast and will continue to do so, whether you like it or not.

    3. Re:Why does podcasting need its own word? by Iron_Yuppie · · Score: 1, Insightful
      "Saveable webcast" doesn't have quite the same ring to it.

      It's unfortunate that podcast implies you need an iPod to use it, but you don't. Most audio podcasts can be played on any mp3 capeable device. I'm not too familiar with video podcasts but I assume you can watch them on most PSPs, Archos hardware, or other portable video players.

    4. Re:Why does podcasting need its own word? by toleraen · · Score: 4, Funny

      Yes, indeed, why create more words? There are already too many words out there! Less words would be doubleplusgood!

    5. Re:Why does podcasting need its own word? by Tony+Hoyle · · Score: 1

      If you don't know what a webcast is that's your problem.

      The mainstream media have been using the term for years. Well known pop groups have done entire concerts as webcasts.

    6. Re:Why does podcasting need its own word? by Jugalator · · Score: 1

      webcast...

      --
      Beware: In C++, your friends can see your privates!
    7. Re:Why does podcasting need its own word? by NevDull · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Podcasting isn't a "webcast" that you can save. It's not streamed, it's downloaded. ...and webcast is an emptier word than podcast.

    8. Re:Why does podcasting need its own word? by AndersOSU · · Score: 2, Funny

      Mod parent up that is a interesting link...

      I was dismayed to learn that Shakespeare coined the odious terms marketable and gossip, but all is well because he also apparently gave us addiction, aroused, zany and puking - four words I couldn't have made it through college without.

    9. Re:Why does podcasting need its own word? by tpgp · · Score: 1

      Hmmmn,

      I'm a little surprised you haven't heard of webcasts - the word has been been around for a long time.

      I'm mildly amused that you accuse me of using buzzwords whilst defending 'podcast' - a word clearly designed for the call-all-mp3-players-ipods crowd.

      an RSS feed with the URL of an audio file in each entry

      You don't think that is not more accurately described by the existing word webcast? The RSS feed is going to be delivered via http, server by a web server.

      At no point is an iPOD neccessary - so Why TF call it a podcast?

      --
      My pics.
    10. Re:Why does podcasting need its own word? by XxtraLarGe · · Score: 1
      At no point is an iPOD neccessary - so Why TF call it a podcast?

      There's a few good reason to call it a podcast.

      1. Rhymes with broadcast. The idea behind most podcasts was that it was a way for people to distribute their audio content (music, opinions and other ramblings) without having access to a radio station.
      2. Many people download podcasts so they can listen to them on their portable music player.
      3. The most popular portable music player today is the iPod
      4. iTunes is one of the most popular delivery methods for distributing podcasts
      5. Finally, it is easier to say "podcast" than it is "audio webcast you can save".

      So seriously, what's your problem with the term podcast? If it was a marketing ploy, they would have called it an iPodcast.

      --
      Taking guns away from the 99% gives the 1% 100% of the power.
    11. Re:Why does podcasting need its own word? by tpgp · · Score: 2, Informative

      1. Rhymes with broadcast. The idea behind most podcasts was that it was a way for people to distribute their audio content (music, opinions and other ramblings) without having access to a radio station.

      Broadcast, podcast, webcast all rhyme, they all end with cast.

      2. Many people download podcasts so they can listen to them on their portable music player.

      I agree - but so what?

      3. The most popular portable music player today is the iPod

      Riiiiiiight. But again, so what?

      4. iTunes is one of the most popular delivery methods for distributing podcasts

      Raises eyebrows in astonishment!

      Are you sure about that? I thought iTunes was a client?

      5. Finally, it is easier to say "podcast" than it is "audio webcast you can save".

      Erm, my point was why not just call it a webcast?

      --
      My pics.
    12. Re:Why does podcasting need its own word? by cortana · · Score: 1

      I don't see the difference between 'streamed' and 'downloaded'... ;)

    13. Re:Why does podcasting need its own word? by russellh · · Score: 1

      I don't see the difference between 'streamed' and 'downloaded'... ;)

      well for audio you'd certainly hear the difference.

      --
      must... stay... awake...
    14. Re:Why does podcasting need its own word? by SnowZero · · Score: 1

      How about "downloadable audio"?

      Here is one of the earliest "podcasts" I can find. When will the iPod have aiff and au support?

    15. Re:Why does podcasting need its own word? by djupedal · · Score: 1

      Does this help? 'streaming' is push, and you don't have to wait for a given file, as a single element, to be completely copied over to your side your side before you can use it. The audio is part of a continous stream that your computer can utlize for (nearly) instant playback.'download' is pull, where your computer tells the remote computer it is authorized to commence a file transfer. You can't listen to an audio file until it is finished being downloaded.

      podcasting is actually time-shifting, where you decide when you'll listen, much like TiVo.

      If I had known this was going to be such a big thing, I'd have made more noise about it back in 2001, when I used to have my B&W G3 'speak' my email so it could be recorded onto a mini-disc (VOX). I'd simply disconnect and pocket the portable MD player/recorder as I was going out the door, and 'listen' to my email on my way to work...oh well.

    16. Re:Why does podcasting need its own word? by cortana · · Score: 1

      Hmm... so if I wget an mp3 file I am downloading it, but if I run mpg123 on the half-completed file, it is magically converted to a 'streaming' operation?

      Nice hack with the spoken email BTW. I'm still wating for festival, or even Microsoft's TTS software to sound half as good as Apple's PlainTalk voices did back on System 7 in 1994. :)

    17. Re:Why does podcasting need its own word? by djupedal · · Score: 1

      >...it is magically converted to a 'streaming' operation?

      1/2 completed doesn't count :) - There are several variations whereby some apps, will begin to read (play) some files, of course. But in the strict sense of definitions, to qualify as 'streaming', audio/video is specifically encoded and served solely for that purpose, and can't normally be 'saved' in the same sense as a downloaded (CRC'd) file.

      I also built a PVR that combined a Linux box w/the G3 - I fed my satellite TV signal to the Linux box, where it was captured and encoded...the G3 was set up to run Apple's 'QuickTime Streaming Server', using the rendered files sitting on the Linux box as the feed. QTTS was merged into a web server on the Linux box.

      I could sit at work and have my choice of watching TV via the live feed off the satellite box, or schedule shows for 'recording' and viewing later, or que up any archived video content, all at will, using only a browser on the client end. The VDSL pipe at home made it all workable, of course...without that, the feeds would have been near useless. I also had the G3 set up to pipe audio and video wireless to my living room, as another source for my home theater. I could pick from iTunes, QTSS, spoken email, etc., without having to go anywhere near the computer room.

      Funny you should mention Plain Talk - that sure seems like it was eons ago :)

    18. Re:Why does podcasting need its own word? by Yahweh+Doesn't+Exist · · Score: 1

      aiff - now

    19. Re:Why does podcasting need its own word? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Webcest is a word referring to all of the perversions that the internet has made possible.

      Oh... you said webcast. Well I don't know what that means.

    20. Re:Why does podcasting need its own word? by burndive · · Score: 1
      --
      ...because "hacker" sounds way sexier than "code drone."
    21. Re:Why does podcasting need its own word? by elrous0 · · Score: 1

      > At no point is an iPOD neccessary - so Why TF call it a podcast? The same reason my propane tank is both flammable and inflammable and the plural is moose isn't meece: because English makes NO GODDAMN SENSE! -Eric

      --
      SJW: Someone who has run out of real oppression, and has to fake it.
    22. Re:Why does podcasting need its own word? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The difference between podcast and webcast is like the difference between blog and IM.

    23. Re:Why does podcasting need its own word? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      No offense, but podcasting is just people talking. There is a reason that radio is a gatekeeper that keeps people like this off of the airwaves because, frankly, most of them suck!

  7. Product word? by 4D6963 · · Score: 1

    I'm not really sure to know what Podcasting means, but it's a word only related to iTunes/iPod right? I mean, sounds weird, why would the name of a function of some product be added to the dictionnary?

    --
    You just got troll'd!
    1. Re:Product word? by spot35 · · Score: 1

      Hoover

    2. Re:Product word? by Duckz · · Score: 2, Insightful

      It's no different than Google being in the dictionary.

    3. Re:Product word? by giel · · Score: 1, Funny
      podcasting

      Ehr... To me it sounds dirty. Like something one would do on a toilet...

      --
      giel.y contains 2 shift/reduce conflicts
    4. Re:Product word? by xoip · · Score: 1

      Xerox...Now there is a Product word!

    5. Re:Product word? by nycguy · · Score: 2, Informative

      Aspirin, escalator, elevator and zipper were all trademarked words originally, but are now considered generic names. Kleenex is another good example, though "facial tissue" is their way of trying to keep their name from becoming genericized.

    6. Re:Product word? by 4D6963 · · Score: 1

      oh well, I didn't think about all that (someone said Hoover too), indeed I didn't know all that, so i guess it's alright, but still sounds weird to me (without anymore real reason now)

      --
      You just got troll'd!
    7. Re:Product word? by 4D6963 · · Score: 1

      It's in the dictionnary? If so what does it mean?

      --
      You just got troll'd!
    8. Re:Product word? by toleraen · · Score: 1

      Open a dictionary and find out? According to Wiki it's in the Oxford English dictionary...

    9. Re:Product word? by 4D6963 · · Score: 0

      I'm french, I have no english dictionnary... and I don't expect it to be in a french dictionnary

      --
      You just got troll'd!
    10. Re:Product word? by toleraen · · Score: 1

      I don't own an English dictionary either, but rumor has it there are a few floating around on the Internet for those willing to dig deep enough.

    11. Re:Product word? by Red+Alastor · · Score: 1

      Xeros means photocopy. And it's barely used anymore. We have products / company names that became dictionary words in french too (kleenex, ski-doo, klaxon, etc.) but we don't verb nouns. This is why still say "search on Google" and not "google it".

      Anyway, anyone and Calvin knows that verbing weirds language.

      --
      Slashdot anagrams to "Sad Sloth"
    12. Re:Product word? by 4D6963 · · Score: 1

      Idk what ski-doo means, and I didn't know that klaxon was a brand in the first place (you forgot Frigidère) but personnaly, even in french i say "google it", i say something like "google-le". Didn't pay attention whether other people where sayin it or only me..

      --
      You just got troll'd!
    13. Re:Product word? by Red+Alastor · · Score: 1

      I indeed forgot the most famous exemple (Frigidère).

      Klaxon was a brand name at the begining of the previous century (the 20th). I guess the company is long dead. People used the name because "avertisseur sonore" was too long. Ski-doo means snowmobile.

      I never heard anyone saying "Google-le". By the way, do you live in France or Québec ? I live in Québec, it often explain differences in language.

      --
      Slashdot anagrams to "Sad Sloth"
    14. Re:Product word? by 4D6963 · · Score: 1

      I live in France. Now I remember about ski-doo, but yeah, it's only a Québec thing. Correct me if i'm wrong, people in Québec tend to over-frenchify, I heard you guys have "ARRET" signs instead of STOP signs

      --
      You just got troll'd!
    15. Re:Product word? by Red+Alastor · · Score: 1

      What's wrong with it ? I remind you that Quebec is where signs with pictures instead of words were invented and it became a worldwide standard afterward. If anything on signs is different, it's someone else who changed it because we were first.

      And no, we don't over frenchify, we just didn't traded a truckload of word for english versions like France did. We do use english word but nowhere near as often as France does and we still have french versions of those words. Do you still have a french version of "shopping" ?

      And we can pronounce english words without completely mutilate them :)

      --
      Slashdot anagrams to "Sad Sloth"
    16. Re:Product word? by 4D6963 · · Score: 1
      Nothings wrong with it, it's just quite particular from a french POV.

      "we don't over frenchify, we just didn't traded a truckload of word for english versions like France did"

      hehe, sounds like two ways of talking about the same thing.

      "Do you still have a french version of "shopping" ?"

      um... if you're talking about "faire les courses" then yes.

      "And we can pronounce english words without completely mutilate them :)"

      hahaha, true, but you can't blame us for using english words and then blame us for not adopting the english accent when pronouncing them :). And we got a nicer sounding accent anyways, and we got rid of such words as "présentement" lol, damn that word is annoying! ;-)

      --
      You just got troll'd!
    17. Re:Product word? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      you claim to not "mutilate" the pronounciation of english words and that may be true, but you sure can't change verb tenses for shit.

    18. Re:Product word? by Red+Alastor · · Score: 1

      Maybe. I don't claim to speak or write perfect english but what I was talking about is pronouncing english word like if they were written in french. The worse word I heard so far is damned with the "ed" pronounced in full at the end. Sounds very strange as a swear word.

      --
      Slashdot anagrams to "Sad Sloth"
    19. Re:Product word? by C4BL3 · · Score: 1

      I'm not really sure to know what Podcasting means

      GOOGLE IT!

  8. Bollocks by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0, Flamebait

    Radio shows on a portable audio players deserves to be a word in the dictionary? Absolutely useless.

    Perhaps they're trying to be trendy and get more people to purchase their books but this is a silly word to add just to satiate the hipsters. If you want to listen to your radio shows go pick up an MP3 player with a built-in FM tuner and drop the style accessory called "iPod"

    1. Re:Bollocks by Tony+Hoyle · · Score: 1

      It's quite telling that the most popular podcasts on itunes are all 'mainstream' broadcasts just repackaged as MP3. Postcasting is becoming just timeshifted radio...

      We have some excellent radio stations in the UK, that are better quality than 99% of podcasts, so I can't see podcasting getting popular here. In the US it's different - from what I hear they basically have no good radio at all.

    2. Re:Bollocks by NaruVonWilkins · · Score: 1

      Actually, the OED and its ilk are about tracking what words are actually used in English. The words in them are directly based not on what "should" or "should not" be in a dictionary, but what words are used in everything from everyday speech to literature. The OED got started with individuals sending in notecards with a word and a pointer to an example of its use.

    3. Re:Bollocks by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Timeshifted radio is so hugely useful that podcasting appears to be initiating a rennaisance for quality radio programming with regards to numbers of listeners. I would say that this is especially true for accessing radio content from the UK, where the BBC has some great radio shows (factual shows, documentaries, plays, etc.) that are often at inconvenient times. BBC Radio 3 and 4 are treasure troves of niche programming with much smaller radio audiences than they deserve. The fact that you can download a show and play it in your car, on your computer or on your MP3 player whenever you feel like it is so useful for many people that it hardly qualifies as a "just".
      Following your line of reasoning, video recorders were "just" timeshifted TV.
      MP3 players and podcasts are helping a lot of people all over the world to rediscover quality radio.

  9. $sys$ROOTKIT by digitaldc · · Score: 4, Interesting

    Now noone will ever know what a rootkit is.

    FYI, if you anagram Podcast, you can come up with 'Stop a CD'

    --
    He who knows best knows how little he knows. - Thomas Jefferson
    1. Re:$sys$ROOTKIT by Monstard · · Score: 1

      FYI, if you anagram Podcast, you can come up with 'Stop a CD'

      Brilliant! This is exactly the kind of unexpected approach to a topic that makes slashdot so enjoyable.

  10. Other Technical Words.. by Digital+Warfare · · Score: 4, Funny

    I always wondered why other technical words such as "bollocks" never made it in..

    --
    "Sweet llamas of the Bahamas !"
    1. Re:Other Technical Words.. by richy+freeway · · Score: 1
    2. Re:Other Technical Words.. by peterpi · · Score: 1

      No American I've ever encountered has the slightest idea what 'bollocks' means (are you the first?). I think it's just not in their vocabulary.

    3. Re:Other Technical Words.. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0


      Arew you saying Americans don't have "bollocks". Moderate down as flamebait immediately! ;-)

    4. Re:Other Technical Words.. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Bollocks are either of two blocks fastened to the topsail-yard, for the topsail-ties to reeve through. We don't get many Brits aboard.

    5. Re:Other Technical Words.. by ixache · · Score: 1
      I always wondered why other technical words such as "bollocks" never made it in...

      Never Mind the Bollocks

      --
      Do I make sense? Please report if not.
  11. Rootkit is in the New Oxford American Dictionary.. by Afecks · · Score: 5, Funny

    ..you just can't see it ;)

  12. Excuse me? by springbox · · Score: 5, Insightful

    It's just a fad word for downloading audio from the Internet. This pretty much summarizes it. How did it get added to the dictionary so fast? It's not even generic - it was created in part based on a modern day product. If anything, it should be going into a slang reference guide not a dictionary.

    1. Re:Excuse me? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      just like hoovering...

    2. Re:Excuse me? by gowen · · Score: 0, Troll

      Because being cautious and circumspect about not including faddish new words doesn't get you free puff pieces masquerading as news articles.

      --
      Athletic Scholarships to universities make as much sense as academic scholarships to sports teams.
    3. Re:Excuse me? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It's only going into the Online version, they're far stricter about the paper version.

    4. Re:Excuse me? by TK2216UKG · · Score: 0

      Probably in the same way that 'hoover' is what any vacuum cleaner is often called.

      http://www.askoxford.com/results/?view=dict&freese arch=hoover&branch=13842570&textsearchtype=exact

      --

      - Jonathan :)

      No tuna is safe.

    5. Re:Excuse me? by SandSpider · · Score: 4, Insightful
      Specifically, it's a word for downloading binary content (generally large binary content, usually audio, video) from the internet in a way that doesn't require active user intervention after subscribing, using a pull model rather than a push model. So emailing an MP3 would not be a podcast, because it's a push technology, but if you use a pull technology such as RSS, Atom, or some manner of SOAP application to direct the download, then it would be a podcast. (Of course, people misuse the word, so it may become more generic than that, but properly, it's as I've written above).

      The point is that it's such an easier interface for the end user that it has become popular in its own rights. Technically, television is movies, just in your home and not in a movie theatre, but that doesn't mean that there shouldn't be another word describing it because the interface is different.

      And what's with the attitude that a dictionary is some sort of sacred document that should only include words that you think means something special? Is it the third-grade teacher mentality, which says that "ain't" isn't a word, despite its common usage? The great thing about dictionaries is that they can include all forms of words, and give you the proper instances for use. In the example above, the Oxford English Dictionary says:
      ain't - informal contraction of
        am not; are not; is not : if it ain't broke, don't fix it. [ORIGIN: originally representing London dialect.]
        has not; have not : they ain't got nothing to say. [ORIGIN: from dialect hain't.]

      USAGE The use of ain't was widespread in the 18th century and is still perfectly normal in many dialects and informal contexts in both North America and Britain. Today, however, it does not form part of standard English and should not be used in formal contexts.


      A proper dictionary should include words that people want to understand the definition of. If everyone is using the word podcast, and you don't know what it is, a dictionary might be a good place to look it up, especially nowadays when dictionary information is available online so can be distributed faster.

      =Brian
      --
      There is nothing so good that someone, somewhere, will not hate it.
    6. Re:Excuse me? by BodhiCat · · Score: 2, Insightful

      It's not even generic - it was created in part based on a modern day product. If anything, it should be going into a slang reference guide not a dictionary.

      There are many words in the English language that started out as brand names. Common examples are kleenex and band-aid. Its not surprising that words based on brand names for computer hardware, software, or processes have made it into the Oxford dictionary.

    7. Re:Excuse me? by brunes69 · · Score: 1

      I was taught by my english teacher in high school that ain't was a perfectly valid word as long as you are using it in the "am not" sense, where it originated. He said that this was because there is no other way to form a contraction based on these words ( amn't? ).

      I dunno if he is full of crap or not, but at least he wasn't anal about it. It makes sense too, there is no reason to use ain't for 'is not' when isn't is just as short and is more proper.

    8. Re:Excuse me? by Myself · · Score: 1

      I take a similar stance on "Y'all", because English doesn't otherwise have a third-person plural pronoun.

      "Youse", on the other hand, drives me nuts. It's y'all or nothing.

    9. Re:Excuse me? by Karma+Farmer · · Score: 1

      I take a similar stance on "Y'all", because English doesn't otherwise have a third-person plural pronoun.

      English has a perfectly good third-person plural pronoun: they.

      Y'all is second person.

  13. OpenDictionary is by TarrySingh · · Score: 0

    what they meant!

    --
    Scott McNealy to Michael: "Suck my Sun!" Michael Dell to Scott : "Lick my Dell!"
  14. You are oh so right.... by spectrokid · · Score: 3, Insightful

    I guess no one needs to know what a rootkit is."
    No, no non-techies should have to know about this. They ought to live in a world where it is ok to listen to a CD you bought legally in a normal shop.

    --

    10 ?"Hello World" life was simple then

  15. podcast or blogcast? by hutteman · · Score: 5, Funny

    I guess Microsoft employees can now stop calling them blogcasts

    1. Re:podcast or blogcast? by BarryNorton · · Score: 1

      I wish there were a better (non Apple-specific) word, but blogcast isn't it - the implied semantics are all wrong. 'Syndicated audio' is more like it, but it's not catchy...

    2. Re:podcast or blogcast? by ch-chuck · · Score: 1

      I wonder how long before New Oxford American Dictionary becomes part of Encarta.

      --
      try { do() || do_not(); } catch (JediException err) { yoda(err); }
  16. Please kill me now... by jonr · · Score: 1, Insightful

    Podcasting... Can I throw up now?

    1. Re:Please kill me now... by 2nd+Post! · · Score: 1

      Go for it; the world will just continue on without you.

      What's the big deal anyway? The ubiquity of MP3 players, the invention of RSS, and the ease with which a person can record audio/video makes the invention of an online audio feed inevitable; it has to be called SOMETHING, and podcast is as good as any.

      A podcast is the online equivalent to an independent newspaper, except that the delivery mechanism, the medium, and the subscription are all online.

  17. Personal On Demand Casting is now official word! by raynet · · Score: 1

    It is about time that podcasting aka Personal On Demand Casting is added to the dictionary. Though I haven't yet managed to find any podcasts. Everytime I try to find one, I end up with MP3 files, sometimes a video file. Well, perhaps someday I'll manage to download a podcast file.

    --
    - Raynet --> .
  18. awwww by toQDuj · · Score: 1

    "I guess no one needs to know what a rootkit is."

    aww, that's cute, do I see a little bit of envy in there? :)

    B.

    --
    Every experiment which ends in a big bang is a good experiment.
  19. And in other news.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Rob Glaser is whining about the New Oxford American Dictionary did not add the word "RealNetworking" as a word that describes .... buffering...

  20. english has no "official" anything by Lord+Bitman · · Score: 1, Interesting

    Dictionaries never were and never will be a source of information about the english language, expecially not about what words /don't/ exist.

    if you think to yourself "He can't possibly have an argument to support that statement!" You probably misread the statement.

    --
    -- 'The' Lord and Master Bitman On High, Master Of All
    1. Re:english has no "official" anything by spot35 · · Score: 1


      Oh, I'm sorry, sir. I'm anaspeptic, frasmotic, even compunctuous to have caused you such pericombobulation.

    2. Re:english has no "official" anything by Jeff+DeMaagd · · Score: 1

      Dictionaries never were and never will be a source of information about the english language, expecially not about what words /don't/ exist.

      "never" is an absolute that isn't true about your statement.

      Why? It works fine for Scrabble(TM).

    3. Re:english has no "official" anything by jiawen · · Score: 1
      What? Dictionaries are great sources of information about the English language. They're usually pretty correct about the words that they list. The OED is pretty helpful in finding word origins or first printed uses, for example.

      You're right, though, that dictionaries are not a good source of information about what words don't exist. Too many people make the mistake of thinking that dictionaries are the only authoritative source of information about English. Saying "It's not in the dictionary, so it's not a word" or "here's what the OED says it means, so that's the only thing it can mean" is the real mistake.

      Remember, a dictionary is a mirror of reality, not the reality itself. "A map is not the territory."

    4. Re:english has no "official" anything by rpdillon · · Score: 1

      Wow, if that's true, it should have it's own Slashdot headline, and we should probably notify the entire population of the planet:

      "Dictionaries never were and never will be a source of information about the english language!"

      Good thing they're useful as firestarter!

      By the way, it should be "English" language...look it up if you don't believe me. =)

    5. Re:english has no "official" anything by Lord+Bitman · · Score: 1

      Do you speak Scrabble, or do you speak English?

      In order for the game to be played, there is only one baseball. Does this mean footballs do not exist?

      "Never" is factual. The exaggeration comes from not having placed limits on what constitutes "information" (though from the context of the article, it can be derived by anyone). The purpose of the second sentence seems to have been lost on you.

      --
      -- 'The' Lord and Master Bitman On High, Master Of All
    6. Re:english has no "official" anything by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      No, I didn't misread that statement. You wrote "expecially," and it's still not a word.

  21. Different Strokes by scottennis · · Score: 4, Funny

    I always thought "podcasting" sounded like a euphemism for masturbation.

    1. Re:Different Strokes by hesiod · · Score: 1

      No, more like a bunch of losers with nothing to do listening to someone else masturbate, while thinking it's hip/edgy/political/whatever.

    2. Re:Different Strokes by spot35 · · Score: 0

      Thought that was "left handed surfing"...

    3. Re:Different Strokes by imageek · · Score: 1

      No, that would be wadcasting. At least for males.

  22. Lifehack? by Caspian · · Score: 1

    What is a lifehack? Lifehack is a doubleplus ungood word. The person who invented it must have ownlife. Lifehack wordmaker not bellyfeel ingsoc.

    --
    With spending like this, exactly what are "conservatives" conserving?
    1. Re:Lifehack? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Google also does not know what a Lifehack its. However, it knows rootkit and podcast

    2. Re:Lifehack? by egomaniac · · Score: 1

      I had to go look it up. According to urbandictionary, a lifehack is "A tool or technique that makes some aspect of one's life easier or more efficient."

      Stupid, stupid word, and I'm glad it's not in the dictionary.

      --
      ZFS: because love is never having to say fsck
    3. Re:Lifehack? by Da_Biz · · Score: 1

      "This article brought to you by the manufacturers of Camsnuffling(TM)"

      I've been an avid hobbiest for over 20 years (and a tech professional since), and have not heard "lifehack" once. Granted, it's been about 10 years since I rolled with the 3l33t hax0rz but, sheesh.

      As noted by a previous poster, I also question whether or not "podcast" will be around in 50 years. In terms of everyday items connected to brand name, I think Kleenex would be a better inclusion.

  23. News (at least for me) by trollable · · Score: 2, Funny

    In the USA, words are created by companies.

    1. Re:News (at least for me) by trollable · · Score: 1

      Forget the parent, Oxford is of course UK. The comment was about the use of 'officialy' in the OP. Sorry

    2. Re:News (at least for me) by Chester+SnapdragonMc · · Score: 1

      in soviet russia companies are created by words

    3. Re:News (at least for me) by atomic_toaster · · Score: 1

      In the Unites States, companies create __________!

      Okay, it's not quite as good as "In the Soviet Union...", but it's about as relevant.

      (And don't bother starting an argument about how relevant these comments are in relation to the other ones on Slashdot. For every article posted here, there is at least one "In the Soviet Union..." or "In Korea, only old people..." that gets ridiculously modded up.)

  24. Re:Rootkit is in the New Oxford American Dictionar by ChristW · · Score: 0

    You mean it's listed as fnordtrootkitfnord?

    --
    09 F9 11 02 9D 74 E3 5B D8 41 56 C5 63 56 88 C0
  25. Give me a break by beavis88 · · Score: 1

    Podcasting has to be the most useless word ever. Last year we were "downloading audio", this year we're "listening to podcasts" - right.

    1. Re:Give me a break by fastgood · · Score: 1
      Last year we were "downloading audio", this year we're "listening to podcasts" - right.

      It's just a word. For at least a hundred years, the phrase 'Pod casting' has been 2 words to East Coast fishermen.

      --
      "Baby spoke his first word today.
      I distinctly heard him say mother.
      No that isn't just half of a word."

    2. Re:Give me a break by Indiana+Joe · · Score: 1

      Podcasting has to be the most useless word ever.

      Actually, the most useless words are, "Microsoft", "government", and "Slashdot".

      --
      I can't decide if this post is interesting, funny, insightful, or flamebait.
    3. Re:Give me a break by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Actually, in the interest of efficiency, we're just "podcasting" not "listening to podcasts".

  26. Podcast all you want...Is anyone listening? by xoip · · Score: 1

    Podcast...Blogcast whatever...there is no distinction between the information provided and what it is delivered on. Hence no need to ad it to the dictionary. Just an example of great marketing at Apple. Personally I cringe every time I hear the term podcast because it is generally being made by a comentator on mainstream media referring to an archive of his show.

    1. Re:Podcast all you want...Is anyone listening? by Tony+Hoyle · · Score: 1

      That is just what most podcasts are.

      Top two on itunes at the moment:

      1. The Ricky Gervais Show (Guardian)
      2. The Best of Moyles (BBC)

      It's nice to know that you colonials can get our british radio shows now and seem to like them...

  27. Not in the Oxford Compact by Potor · · Score: 1

    Well, it has not made it into the Oxford Compact Dictionary, nor anywhere else on their AskOxford site.

  28. Is it good or bad? by Arthur+B. · · Score: 0, Flamebait

    On the one hand I hate this cause it sounds like apple invented the mp3 player and this makes me completly crazy... you know those kind of assumptions:
    I've got a PC => Oh you have windows
    I have an MP3 player => Ah, an IPOD
    NO YOU FUCKING MORONIC FUCK, I DON'T NEED A FUCKING MARKETTING HYPE MACHINE TO LEARN, WITH A FIVE YEAR LAG, THAT SOMETHING CALLED AN MP3 PLAYER EXISTS.
    So now it sounds like they invented the "podcasting"... great, cause it's for ipods right... I mean it's a music file, they play on ipods no?

    On the other hand, the word going official is generally bad for trademarks... I wish "ipod" would make it in the dictionnary as "MP3 player" so anyone can start selling ipods... mouwahahahah

    --
    \u262D = \u5350
  29. Ekk by ASUSanator · · Score: 1

    It is such a useless buzz word that nobody will use in a year or so. Whats next ? slashdot ?

    1. Re:Ekk by ArwynH · · Score: 1
      It is such a useless buzz word that nobody will use in a year or so. Whats next ? slashdot ?

      Well to a certain extent slashdot has already entered our language. Most people in the IT profession know what a 'slashdot effect' is for instance. It's just not officialy in a dictionary yet. Most modern scientific terms aren't.

    2. Re:Ekk by ASUSanator · · Score: 1

      Well yes, Any IT techie worth his salt knows what slashdot is or what being slashdotted means. IMHO SlashDot related words and phrases will be remembered long after podcasting. I am surprised they didnt just put ipod in there for some real commercialism, Everyone seems to refer to the word "ipod" when they really mean to say mp3 player these days. Very very annoying for me and i am sure the rest of the geek community.

  30. low power radio by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I thought was podcast was when you connected your mp3 player to one of those low power radio transmitters that transmit to those rarely used 88.x radio stations.

    Hey! How come my spell checker has podcast highlighted as misspelled?

  31. Nonesevent? by LizzyDragon · · Score: 1

    Come on, surely everyone knows what a nonesevent is! That word deserves to be in the dictionary!

  32. Lifehack? by mikeage · · Score: 1

    Am I the only one who's never heard of this term?

    --
    -- Is "Sig" copyrighted by www.sig.com?
  33. New possible solutions for 10 letter acrostic? by randm.ca · · Score: 0

    With the addition of Podcasting to the dictionary, I wonder if that opens up the possibility of a universally accepted 10 letter acrostic puzzle solution? I'll bet Ted Clarke peed his pants when he read this, that single additional word must give him thousands/millions/billions of new combinations to try. (Any math genius know the exact significance of this?)

  34. All I have to say is... by TobyWong · · Score: 1

    ...thank god podcasting is "officially a word". Now I can utter it in speech without fear of spontaneously combusting because I hate it when that happens.

    --
    - Toby
  35. MOD PARENT UP by httpamphibio.us · · Score: 1

    This is the first time I've posted a MOD PARENT UP post... but this one certainly needs to be done. I'm absolutely sick of terms made up by marketing people, especially one so product specific as this.

    --
    sig.
    1. Re:MOD PARENT UP by geoffspear · · Score: 1

      Of course, if you or the parent poster realized that Apple had absolutely nothing to do with creating the term (and that the people who did were a bunch of geeks who almost certainly have no background in marketing, and completely certainly weren't marketing iPods), maybe you'd be less sickened.

      --
      Don't blame me; I'm never given mod points.
    2. Re:MOD PARENT UP by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Of course, if you or the parent poster realized that Apple had absolutely nothing [wikipedia.org] to do with creating the term (and that the people who did were a bunch of geeks who almost certainly have no background in marketing, and completely certainly weren't marketing iPods), maybe you'd be less sickened.

      Yeah. right. And if you believe that you're too naive to be posting on slashdot. Apple had everything to do with the creation of the term, despite the urban legends about it coming from a journalist who just conveniently used it in an article right before Apple introduced this new 'podcast' service.

      Coincidence? Definnately not. MS has paid shills in the media too you know.

    3. Re:MOD PARENT UP by httpamphibio.us · · Score: 1

      When I said "marketing people" I didn't say whose marketing people. Your, incorrect, assumption is that I meant Apple when in fact I just meant that somebody had a vested interest in using the word "Pod," maybe not the person that coined the term, but certainly everyone that proliferated it. If they didn't we'd be using the far more descriptive and broad term of "audio download."

      --
      sig.
    4. Re:MOD PARENT UP by geoffspear · · Score: 1
      It was 9 months between the first use of the term "podcasting" and Apple's release of a version of iTunes that supported the feature.

      Of course, I must be too stupid to be posting on Slashdot if I bother to argue with a trolling Anonymous Coward whose tinfoil hat is a bit too tight.

      --
      Don't blame me; I'm never given mod points.
  36. Re:One slight error in article: by 0kComputer · · Score: 1

    The caption "Chris Moyles is the BBC's most popular podcast" should read "Chris Moyles is a fat cunt with no discernable talent".

    I dunno if I would mod that flame bait, judging from the pic in the article, OP seems pretty informative to me. Really gives meaning to the phrase "has a face for the radio."

    --
    Top 10 Reasons To Procrastinate
    10.
  37. Depends which country by nighty5 · · Score: 4, Funny

    Not so the US, but the word 'root' in Australia is slang to have sex.

    Rootkit - sounds like some sort of fuckfest preparation guide!

    1. Re:Depends which country by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      If you've got it, Sony has fucked you. The word still works, Australian connotation and all.

    2. Re:Depends which country by waferhead · · Score: 1

      The Aussie definition of "root" still works in this context.

      root==have sex

      "rootkit"--- The author rooted you.

      Almost exactly the same meaning.

    3. Re:Depends which country by atomic_toaster · · Score: 1

      Not so the US, but the word 'root' in Australia is slang to have sex.

      Which is exactly why the Aussies were laughing their heads off at us Canadians at the last Olympics, when all of our nation's competitors were dressed in Roots brand clothing...

  38. Dictionaries don't OFFICIALLY make things words. by httpamphibio.us · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Dictionaries just report on current usage of groups of letters that have meaning. They don't officiate anything. That's one of the problems with things like acrostics and Scrabble, they don't care if things are actually words or not, just that they are in the dictionary. There is a vast portion of language that manifests itself in words that has never and will never be in the dictionary.

    --
    sig.
  39. Podcasting a word by racecarj · · Score: 1

    Yeah, but so is buttfuck. Also: cocksucker, cumslut, jizm. For that matter Tom Arnold is considered an actor and George Bush is the president. You can call yourself anything you want!

    1. Re:Podcasting a word by pintomp3 · · Score: 1

      i guess u'll be labeled a troll by someone who calls himself a moderator.

  40. Will "podcast" be used 10 years from now? by Ayanami+Rei · · Score: 1

    I doubt it.
    Surely there will be more sophisticated audio distribution methods in the future...
    But a vacuum cleaner is an entirely different thing... a product that started as a service industry and was revolutionized by turning it into a portable appliance for home use.
    Vacuums for the removal of particulate matter from air are a revolution in fluid dynamics and basic application of scientific principles.
    Podcasts are... FUCKING AUDIO FILES ON A WEBLOG.
    Durrrrrr....

    --
    THIS THING CAN TURN ON A DIME, MACROSSZERO STYLE ALSO FUCK BETA, ~NYORON
    1. Re:Will "podcast" be used 10 years from now? by drinkypoo · · Score: 1

      Surely there will be more sophisticated audio distribution methods in the future... But a vacuum cleaner is an entirely different thing... a product that started as a service industry and was revolutionized by turning it into a portable appliance for home use.

      Interestingly, music combos started out as entertainment in public settings, and music was revolutionized when you could play music on a portable appliance for home use.

      --
      "You're right," Fisheye says. "I should have set it on 'whip' or 'chop.'"
  41. Ten letters... hmmm... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Will it help with this?

    http://ask.slashdot.org/article.pl?sid=05/12/03/23 7224&tid=99&tid=186&tid=208&tid=4

    It's the correct length anyway.

  42. What's a Rootkit? by fairthorne · · Score: 1

    The people who need to know what a rootkit is will find out quickly enough, in the dictionary or not.

  43. The author could have told us this by AviLazar · · Score: 1

    Because, really, I didn't know until I looked it up:

    Dictionary.com Main Entry: podcasting
    Part of Speech: noun
    Definition: the Web-based broadcast of music which works with software that automatically detects new files and is accessed by subscription
    Etymology: 2004; iPod + broadcasting

    --

    I mod down so you can mod up. Your welcome.
  44. Podcasting is a temporary solution by GauteL · · Score: 2, Insightful

    .. to the iPod and most other mp3-players not having any radio tuner or internet access when you are on the road.

    When iPods and other mp3-players have constant Internet access, "podcasting" will be about as common as people taping radio feeds on their cassette deck to play later. Hardly something requiring a new word.

    1. Re:Podcasting is a temporary solution by theurge14 · · Score: 1

      Temporary solution to a radio tuner? I seriously doubt my radio is going to play just the stuff I want, have a backlock of saved episodes, and be ad-free anytime soon.

      And besides, isn't the whole idea of an iPod to be "on the road"? If I wasn't, I'd save the cash and stick to listening to everything in the free iTunes.

    2. Re:Podcasting is a temporary solution by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      When portable digital audio players have constant internet access, as you're pointing out... podcasting will be even more common, since the definition is web-based broadcast of audio (accessed by subscription.)

    3. Re:Podcasting is a temporary solution by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You just said "casette deck" and that we don't use them any more... Hmm, maybe cassette shouldn't be in the dictionary because we use MP3 players now.

  45. Am I the only one... by pebs · · Score: 1

    who asks what the fuck is a lifehack?!???

    --
    #!/
    1. Re:Am I the only one... by burndive · · Score: 1

      You most certainly are not! I too demand to know why this abomination of a 'word' has been added to the OAD. Oh, wait, a simple search for the term reveals the answer: lifehack.org obvously paid to get their trendy domain name codified into our language in hopes that it would boost traffic.

      --
      ...because "hacker" sounds way sexier than "code drone."
  46. how much did Sony pay... by dantheman82 · · Score: 1

    to keep 'rootkit' out of the dictionary this year?

    --
    This sig donated to Pater. Long live /.
    1. Re:how much did Sony pay... by ObiWonKanblomi · · Score: 1

      I guess they could only choose one as the iPod is the walkman killer.

  47. Re:One slight error in article: by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    That's pretty much undeniable

  48. in an ode? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    They wrote a poem about it?

  49. Will this lead to immortality? by sugapablo · · Score: 1

    Yet another 10-letter word! Kick@$$! Now maybe we can get that 10 Letter Acrostic Puzzle solved without controversy!

    http://ask.slashdot.org/article.pl?sid=05/12/03/23 7224&tid=99&tid=186&tid=208&tid=4

  50. do that google search 5 years ago by eean · · Score: 1

    The point of the grandparent is that "rootkit" is a fairly old term.

    1. Re:do that google search 5 years ago by 1u3hr · · Score: 1
      The point of the grandparent is that "rootkit" is a fairly old term.

      Lots of words are used in various subcultures for years before they are picked up by the mass culture. Basically if it's a word you might come across in a newspaper, it very likely will be in a standard dictionary; if only in a usenet FAQ then probably not. Age doesn't count for much either way.

  51. i am not a ... language...tician ... but: by supersocialist · · Score: 1

    "Streamed" goes to a program/plugin and isn't saved, "downloaded" goes to disk.

  52. Flogcasts by PikeyX · · Score: 1

    The world will rue the day I get that word put into the dictionary. Now if only the iFlog was the hot item this christmas.

    1. Re:Flogcasts by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Rue the day? who talks like that?

    2. Re:Flogcasts by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Wouldn't a blog powered by FLog be a FLogcast?

  53. likewise, how did podcast beat rootkit? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    First of all, it's a name derived from a product.. secondly, in 5 years when ipods will be obselete, podcasting won't be used much at all (but I bet rootkit will!)

  54. Yay! by kuzb · · Score: 1

    Congratulations Slashdot, yet again you've fallen victim to the Apple marketing machine. Podcasting wasn't invented by Apple, they just want you to think it was. Even Oxford terms it "a digital recording of a radio broadcast or similar program, made available on the Internet for downloading to a personal audio player". The word itself is stupid; you don't need an iPod to podcast (even though many are going to think the 'pod' part is refering to an iPod, it means any portable media player) and you don't have to do it with a live broadcast (it can be prerecorded, and stored on the device). It's amazing how gullable people are. In a few years, everyone is probably going to be talking about how Apple innovated this, when really, they did no such thing. All they did was pull together a bunch of technologies invented by other people who won't get credit for it, and called it their own.

    If Microsoft had done this, everyone would be screaming about it.

    --
    BeauHD. Worst editor since kdawson.
  55. Reminds me of... by theantipop · · Score: 1

    Smurf #1: Hey, did you have a good time last night? Smurf #2: Smurf-tacular! Smurf #1: Yeah, I saw you leave with Smurfette. Smurf #2: Oh man, as soon as we got out of the bar, she started smurfing me. Smurf #1: Shut the Smurf up! Smurf #2: Yeah! Smurf #1: Right in the Smurfing parking lot? Smurf #2: Smurf-Yeah! Smurf #1: Oh! That is freaking Smurf!

    1. Re:Reminds me of... by theantipop · · Score: 1

      *sigh* Line breaks > me.

  56. ob simpsons by uberjoe · · Score: 1

    Well, it is a perfectly cromulent word after all.

    --

    The days of the digital watch are numbered.

  57. I feel ill... by AndyG314 · · Score: 1

    I feel like throwing up!

    --
    If it's dead, you killed it.
  58. nufortunate by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I actually think it is unfortunate that "podcast" has become an official word. I like the concept. I subscribe to about a dozen or so podcasts myself, some daily, some weekly, some that are only periodically updated. I think the concept is fantastic. I dislike the term podcast because
    a.) I think it gives people the impression that you must use an iPod
    b.) A lot of folks think that they can not receive
            podcasts unless they have a Mac or use iTunes
    c.) Adam Curry is such a self congratulatory, masturbatory twit, and
            even though the distribution method was genious, using his word just
            makes his overgrown ego even more so.

    1. Re:nufortunate by ^_^x · · Score: 1

      It's not official, it's Oxford. Even then, they consider it to be an addition to the American language. Growing more distant from English, American includes words like labor, favor, behavior, and now, if you take Oxford as the ultimate authority, "podcast."

      It's commonly accepted, but it's no more a word than Asprin, Kleenex, Band-aid, etc... It's a commercial catchphrase.

      Finally, I refuse to recognise its legitimacy becase I'd been downloading non-XML webcasts for at least three years before the first iPod was announced. I fail to see how webcast + XML = podcast, especially when it took a while to be supported by anything Apple.

  59. Re: What? by daddymac · · Score: 1

    Don't misunderestimate the power of podcasting! It clearly embetters the english language.

    --
    If something I said can be interpreted two ways, and one of the ways makes you sad or angry, I meant the other one.
  60. What's in a name. . . a lot. . . by JSBiff · · Score: 1

    You are quite correct. Podcasting is a slightly misleading term, that seems to give undue credit to Appple. But, from a marketting standpoint, it's a great word (which is why it is used so much). It's short, it's catchy, it's fairly understandable (although it tends to lead people to think iPods are the only audio player the technology works with), and most importantly, it relates to ideas people already are familiar with and use on a daily basis.

    Most people listen to broadcasts, so listening to 'podcasts' is an easy conceptual jump - it seems like a natural extension of what people already do. Proposed alternatives like 'blogcast' or 'audio blog' are unfamiliar to most people, because most people aren't used to reading blogs (a lot of people have no idea what the term even means), and view blogs as different than broadcast programming.

    I might be intersted in listening to 'digital broadcasts', but not to listening to 'audioblogs'. It's a difference in perception of what a blog is (someones personal 'web-diary', or professional opinion page), and what a broadcast is.

    Unfortunately, for awhile, I think we are going to be stuck with this term. If someone can come up with an alternative word, that is just as catchy, and wants to start popularizing it, by all means, be my guest. I prefer terms that are vendor-neutral, when talking about a technology.

    1. Re:What's in a name. . . a lot. . . by kuzb · · Score: 1

      I have no idea what can replace the term 'podcast', but it should be replaced with something less ambiguous, which is not tied to Apple. Jobs does deserve some credit though, it was a brilliant stroke of marketing genius to get a term which was tied (albiet wrongly) to an Apple product accepted as an English word - but I think this contributes to the thought that Apple is not the white knight many people think it is. I mean, English as a language is amazingly ambiguous as it is, we shouldn't further contribute to watering it down with terms that don't accurately describe what people say they mean.

      I agree with you that it is something of a viral term (like so many others these days) which people will use. I think I'm just going to have to throw it on the stack along with others which are also silly. AJAX comes to mind, as does DHTML. Surprisingly, many see these as independant 'technologies' when really they shouldn't be seen as such. I hope 'podcasting' is not viewed in the same light.

      --
      BeauHD. Worst editor since kdawson.
  61. Meh by tfinniga · · Score: 1

    Meh.

    I'm still waiting for stuponfucious to make it in.

    --
    Powered by Web3.5 RC 2
  62. Could you please clarify? by maillemaker · · Score: 1

    Could you please clarify the difference between clicking on a link to an MP3 file and a Podcast? I'm serious, this piece of technology has slipped by me and I really don't know what a "podcast" is.

    For example, SciFi has some Battelstar Galactica "podcasts" here:

    http://www.scifi.com/battlestar/downloads/podcast/

    But they are just MP3 files. They do have a nice link about "learn more about podcasts" that I just read, and I guess what it amounts to is to turn an MP3 file into a "podcast" you need a special piece of software that goes and checks for updated MP3 files from time to time? They mention an "RSS" feed? This is something else I've never used.

    Could someone tell me more about Podcasts? Thanks.

    Steve

    --
    A work that expires before its copyright never enters the public domain and thus enjoys eternal copyright protection.
    1. Re:Could you please clarify? by arose · · Score: 2, Informative

      It's an RSS feed that links to audio files instead of articles, if you subscribe to it with a compatible client it automaticly downloads the audio files.

      --
      Analogies don't equal equalities, they are merely somewhat analogous.
  63. Xerox is a common word by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I have worked with many people who say 'I'll make Xerox of this.'

    The new word podcast might outlast the technology!

  64. "MP3 Player" by Foerstner · · Score: 1

    ...is that like some kind of iPod?

    Except for the "Slashdot crowd," portable music devices are iPods. People who don't have computers know what iPods are. To most people, "MP3 player" sounds like a genericism, like "correction fluid" or "polystyrene foam."

    --
    The US free market: two halves of a government-granted duopoly are free to set the market price.
  65. Interesting..!! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    >>an MP3 player to be part of the in crowd
    >>the biggest symbol of conformity is the iPod

    And I bought iRiver H10 just recently. One reason was that it is much superior to any iPod, and second reason is to LMAO at the iPod whores.

    So, am I being part of the in crowd or am I going against the flow?

  66. Re:Dictionaries don't OFFICIALLY make things words by praxis · · Score: 1

    Thank you for posting this, I was going to do it but decided to check if someone else beat me to it. Of course, you are only partially correct. When speaking of dictionaries, there are two types: descriptive and prescriptive. The OED is descriptive, it only describes the current state of the language as observed by readers. The other type, prescriptive, tries to dictate correct usage, although I'm not aware of any examples off hand. Not all dictionaries report on current usage, but the ones scholars use most do.

  67. Word of the Year vs. Inclusion by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Question: is the submitter completely incapable of RTFA, or does he/she/it truly believe that the OED only lets one new word in each year?

    Yes, podcast beat out rootkit for 2005's Word of the Year. But that doesn't mean rootkit isn't in the dictionary. No doubt they both are along with many other new words.

  68. Pro is the opposite of con... by yotto · · Score: 1

    What I don't get is, if Podcasting is "Casting to your pod" then what is Broadcasting?

    1. Re:Pro is the opposite of con... by 2nd+Post! · · Score: 1

      You broadcast to your TV
      You podcast to your MP3 player

      Where did you get the definition "Casting to your pod"? The article itself says, "a digital recording of a radio broadcast or similar program, made available on the internet for downloading to a personal audio player".

    2. Re:Pro is the opposite of con... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Fishing for a woman.

    3. Re:Pro is the opposite of con... by GrassyNoel · · Score: 0

      The definition is too restrictive. I can download podcasts to my desktop machine too. Does that mean they're not podcasts but ordinary old audio files?

      --
      Plus ça change, plus c'est la même chose.
  69. What are you saying???11?9!! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    But but but.... It has the word "pod" in there, and we know that only Apple(TM) can make protable media players that can play music, movie, photos, etc!

    What an awful dirty thing to make a rabid Apple fanboy think about, it makes me want to cry and I need a kleenex tissue!

  70. $sys$fnord by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Google probably cannot index them all properly due to all the places it's listed as $sys$rootkit :)

  71. Re:Rootkit is in the New Oxford American Dictionar by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Actually it is in, just look it up under $sys$rootkit

  72. Every year... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Every year (usually just before Xmas) the marketing squad at Oxford, and all the other dictionary writers, publicize a list of X-TREME new words they're gonna add to their dictionary.

    Most of these are not put in because the word will be in our lexicon for a while: they're funny, cheesy, often controversial words, that are used get the dictionary into the news.

    I do agree that dictionaries should be kept up-to-date, but adding ridiculous words as a marketing ploy makes me feel a bit disgusted. It's also the fault of the media, having too short a memory to remember the exact same story the year before, except with different new words.

    Message to Nana's: Don't buy your grandkids a new dictionary for Xmas. Not just because it's a ploy, also because it's a shit gift to get.

  73. Advertisers outnumber geeks. by Nymz · · Score: 1

    I thought your post was more insightful, than the flamebait tag it got, because I often feel that geeks are unable to successfully portray their "turf" against mass media advertising.

    All hackers are considered crackers.
    All computers are considered windows/apples.
    All mp3 players are considered ipods.

    All the dictionary entry really proves is that mass media advertisers can create more hype than geeks can. *shrug*

    1. Re:Advertisers outnumber geeks. by Arthur+B. · · Score: 1

      Thanks for the support! It really makes me sad to see that ipod has become defacto == "mp3 player" just because people were to affraid to buy one for years, and suddenly it's ok because it's not nerdy, it's cool, look at those shadows dancing over a flashy background. Podcast is another illustration... how many people are going to buy an ipod thinking they need one to hear those famous "podcasts" they keep hearing about... I feel like they just put "IEjournal" instead of "blog" in the dictionnary...

      --
      \u262D = \u5350
  74. OED not your standard dictionary by eean · · Score: 1

    The OED hardly counts as a standard dictionary with the vocab from your local English newspaper. It attempts to encompass /all/ English spoken and written anywhere. This is the dictionary with "d'oh" in it.

    "It embraces not only the standard language of literature and conversation, whether current at the moment, or obsolete, or archaic, but also the main technical vocabulary, and a large measure of dialectal usage and slang."

  75. Good thing the New Oxford American is read-only... by tommasz · · Score: 1

    ...so that Adam Curry's name doesn't mysteriously appear in the definition.

  76. If People Use It, It's A Word by cbnmedia · · Score: 1

    The English language doesn't care if a word is "worthy" or not fools! If people use a word, and obviously they use 'podcast' or nobody would even understand this story, then it's part of the language, end of story!

    --
    Haven't you got anything better to do than read my stupid signature?
  77. Thanks (n/t) by maillemaker · · Score: 1

    Steve

    --
    A work that expires before its copyright never enters the public domain and thus enjoys eternal copyright protection.
  78. Not Officially by teece · · Score: 1

    There is no way for an English word to "officially" become a word.

    Languages like French and Spanish which have an official language academy that supposedly dictates what is or is not in the language could make a (very dubious) claim to officiating words.

    No such thing exists for the English language. It's a stupid idea, anyway. 'podcast' was a word the minute Apple coined it. If you and I both know what it means, and communicate with it, it's a word. Period. When your grade school teacher told you "ain't wasn't a word" she/he was full of shit. Which is why the retort was "ain't ain't a word and I ain't s'posed to say it." Funny, considering 3/11 of that sentence is composed of a non-word, it's still completely clear what it means...

    --
    -- Hello_World.c: 17 Errors, 31 Warnings
  79. Re:Good thing the New Oxford American is read-only by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    or a similar note... will he start taking credit for the New Oxford American dictionary now? ;)

  80. So.... by D14BL0 · · Score: 0

    So now they have two phrases now for hosting an audio file on the internet and making it available for download.

    1) Podcasting

    2) File hosting

    Because "Podcasting" is such a novel idea that it needs it's own term in a dictionary.

  81. Woids by Annerson · · Score: 1

    "rootkit"? Who cares? It's a wondrous technical term that means, well, it means something. I might even care if I needed to know.

    What I did (and sorta still) need to know is what a "foreign SMTP server" is. It shows up in fuck-knows how many reject slips from you-name-it email servers. Like a complete idiot I googled the term (complete with "meaning" and/or "definition" or whatever) and never did find out what the son of a bitch means.

    OK, I pretty much know that "foreign" means "not domestic", and that "domestic" refers to "here" (read: "local, under my immediate control"); but, my point is that I wanted to know what it means and I still have no idea. So much for having a common term show up in a glossary or a lexicon that is searchable (or findable) by the ubiquitous Google.

    Hey, I now know what a "rootkit" is: kit=undersized fur-bearing animal + root=underground portion of a plant. (AHD3) I'm not really certain what all this has to do with computers but I see the term tossed about all the time these days, so I'm sure it belongs in the dictionary.