Slashdot Mirror


Technology Predictions for 2006?

OffTheLip writes "As 2006 fast approaches it's time for some to gaze into the crystal ball of technology and predict what will be hot, what will make a difference in our lives or make someone rich and famous. The Mercury News takes a shot at predicting the coming year of technology. No great revelations but it nice to see clean technologies make the list. The list is light on pure technology and big on trends. Perhaps killer apps are not as important as they once were thought to be." What would Slashdot users put in their top 10?

344 comments

  1. finally! by nuttzy · · Score: 5, Funny

    this is the year we all get flying cars!

    1. Re:finally! by ackthpt · · Score: 5, Funny
      2006 will be the year Duke Nukem Forever comes out!

      Nope, it's the year we find out that the Pentagon has been secretly breeding sharks with lasers and the CIA has overthrown the government of Atlantis, to be replaced by a demoracy, while we drill for oil offshore of .. Hold on a second, someone at the door

      [NO CARRIER]

      --

      A feeling of having made the same mistake before: Deja Foobar
    2. Re:finally! by HardCase · · Score: 4, Funny

      Ahem. I predict that most predictions will be wrong. Thank you.

    3. Re:finally! by Tablizer · · Score: 1

      this is the year we all get flying cars!

      Yeah, Ford Pintos with signs reading, "Hit my gas tank, Dare ya"

    4. Re:finally! by c_forq · · Score: 1

      to be replaced by a demoracy

      It all makes sense now, if you eliminate the c you can get rid of all the red tape...

      --
      Computers allow humans to make mistakes at the fastest speeds known, with the possible exception of tequila and handguns
    5. Re:finally! by moro_666 · · Score: 1

      2006 ? ah --> steve jobs and objective-c will take the world over with cocoa...

      --

      I'd tell you the chances of this story being a dupe, but you wouldn't like it.
    6. Re:finally! by PHPfanboy · · Score: 1

      Java + Cocoa = Mocha?

      --
      29 mpg. YMMV.
    7. Re:finally! by jo42 · · Score: 1
      > Pinto

      Too bad many of the kids here will not get that at all (without the help of Google)...

    8. Re:finally! by Zwack · · Score: 1

      Marshmallows!!! I want Marshmallows in my Cocoa!

      Z.

      --
      -- Under/Overrated is meta-moderation, and therefore is Redundant.
    9. Re:finally! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I prefer a Gremlin with an 8-track.

    10. Re:finally! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Muther.. can I have more mini mashmallows in my instant cocoa? Aw nooooo, the man just missed a bible question because he did not know what deuterotomy was!

    11. Re:finally! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Unfair! Many of us kids have seen Top Secret, ya know...

    12. Re:finally! by ignavus · · Score: 1

      But what if no other predictions are made?

      Would your prediction be classed as right or wrong?

      If your prediction were classed as wrong, and there are no other predictions, then 100% of all predictions made would be wrong, in which case your prediction would actually be right!

      But if your prediction were classed as right, and there are no other predictions, then 100% of all predictions made are right. In which case your prediction would be wrong!

      A paradox, a paradox, a most ingenious paradox. (Oh be quiet, Bertrand Russell!)

      --
      I am anarch of all I survey.
  2. I Want My Personalized Entertainment by moresheth · · Score: 5, Interesting

    I'm anxious to see dynamic (digital) paper, like with newspapers and junk, but I doubt we'll be seeing them this year.

    Most likely the number one spot will be a-la-carte television and music downloading. Not just to compete with piracy, but just because that's what people want.

    1. Re:I Want My Personalized Entertainment by tomstdenis · · Score: 5, Insightful

      Problem with e-paper ...

      1. Monthly service for radio link servetude: $30
      2. Airtime charges to download the news: $10
      3. 911 access fee ... on a piece of paper ... : $1
      4. License fee: $7
      5. Newspaper subscriptions: $15
      6. Knowing you'll be leached to death by yet another inadequate technology: Priceless. :-)

      [yes this is a rant about how cell phones cost too much and do so little]

      Tom

      --
      Someday, I'll have a real sig.
    2. Re:I Want My Personalized Entertainment by Nethead · · Score: 1

      Hell, they already have this at Hogwarts!

      --
      -- I have a private email server in my basement.
    3. Re:I Want My Personalized Entertainment by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      you are confusing some future potential e-newspaper with e-paper.

      e-paper could be in anything from a gift card to a cereal box to an e-book.
      that's why e-paper will make an emergence soon. I'm guessing late 2007 though as the earliest it appears some of the manufacturing challenges were just addressed this year based on prototypes shown.

    4. Re:I Want My Personalized Entertainment by DarthGregor · · Score: 1

      Somehow all new technology starts at outrageous prices, and eventually settles at a more acceptable level later on. First industry makes a buck out of few users, because they don't have the capacity to serve a lot of them, so they limit their numbers through high prices. There will always be rich people or total technology freaks who'll buy the newest stuff for what you and I take as outrageous prices (not to say a rip-off), but what are you gping to do about it? Wait for the prices to drop ;-)

    5. Re:I Want My Personalized Entertainment by Nadsat · · Score: 1

      Peace on earth is here today... through a few small reforms. I have seen the strategy. I'm not joking. I predict.

  3. Oblig Simpsons quote by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny

    The domestication of the dog continues unabated.

  4. easy by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Funny

    microsoft makes a boatload of cash while their demise is predicted on slashdot,

    linux is _almost_ ready for the desktop,

    and duke nukem forever will briefly reach beta, only to be pulled

    1. Re:easy by AoT · · Score: 1

      And yet the amount of cash MSFT makes only effects the share price if it is more than last quarter.

      Odd how that works.

    2. Re:easy by h4rm0ny · · Score: 1


      If it was static, then buying in would cost the same amount as buying out (well, okay - there are many other factors, but pretend). Money is made in the change of value in Microsoft's worth. I'll break out the analogies and as this is a techy community... think of it like Geothermal energy, substituting a span of time for the length of the shaft. It's the difference in temperature at each end that your capitalising on.

      Yes - you could invest in Microsoft and depend on steady dividends, but that's thinking long-term, and the market wants everything now!

      --

      Aide-toi, le Ciel t'aidera - Jeanne D'Arc.
  5. I predict by TubeSteak · · Score: 4, Funny

    That we will have _____ wonderful technology in 20 years.

    Because for some reason, everything wonderful always seems to be 20 years away.

    --
    [Fuck Beta]
    o0t!
    1. Re:I predict by saltydogdesign · · Score: 1

      Dude, you're on the Internet. It's not that hard to get your Simpson quotes correct:

      Frink: Well, sure, the Frinkiac-7 looks impressive, don't touch it, but I predict that within 100 years, computers will be twice as powerful, 10,000 times larger, and so expensive that only the five richest kings of Europe will own them.

      --
      // This is not a sig.
    2. Re:I predict by maxume · · Score: 1

      The grass is greener in the future.

      --
      Nerd rage is the funniest rage.
  6. Duke Nukem by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

    2006 will be the year Duke Nukem Forever comes out!

    1. Re:Duke Nukem by ackthpt · · Score: 0
      2006 will be the year Duke Nukem Forever comes out!

      I predict it will be the year after the year after the year after the year after the year after next year.

      Maybe.

      Definitely possibly.

      Beyond a speculative doubt.

      --

      A feeling of having made the same mistake before: Deja Foobar
    2. Re:Duke Nukem by jasonditz · · Score: 1, Funny

      AD 2101... War was beginning

      What Happen?

      Somebody release Duke Nukem Forever.

      What!

  7. Re:Prediction: Slashdot Will Have Even More Dupes! by tomstdenis · · Score: 0

    This just in: 2006 will be the year of the dupe!

    --
    Someday, I'll have a real sig.
  8. time machine by Quick+Sick+Nick · · Score: 0, Troll

    time machine. go back in time, before i read this useless headline....

  9. Trusted people, of course by TheNoxx · · Score: 5, Funny

    Although Microsoft didn't do so hot with their "trusted computing" initiative, they'll do much better with "trusted people". Check out a future issue of Playboy: "Hottest Places to Have Your RFID Chip Inserted! Please Your Woman and Keep Your Nation Safe at the Same Time!"

    --
    Ex nihilo nihil fit.
    1. Re:Trusted people, of course by physman_wiu · · Score: 1

      I know this is off topic..but wasn't it in Revelations that it predicts the mark of the beast.....hmm....I bet the Intelligent Designers are going to point to RFID chips inserted into humans as the mark of the beast, commercialize humanity, get targeted ads when you walk into a store after it reads your personal information from a chip in you ****! Oh yeah, and let Uncle Sam know your a red blooded American, that way he doesn't wiretap your ass to see if you're a terrorist.

      --
      Physics is imagination in a straight jacket. ~John Moffat
    2. Re:Trusted people, of course by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Well, the mark is supposed to be "in their right hand, or in their forehead". One step closer

  10. Video and all-in-ones by Diordna · · Score: 5, Insightful

    I think that most innovations will come in video and handheld form. Things will get more consolidated very quickly, and the handheld will become even more central than it is now. I hope to see something like an iPod Video that can store movies at screen sizes creater than 320x240 just so they can be hooked up to TVs and played back anywhere. Also, the outcome of Apple Intel machines should be interesting - one place for OS X, Windows, and Linux to all run at the same time.

    1. Re:Video and all-in-ones by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Actually, the video iPod can do 300x400 video which is generally considered to be standard TV resolution.

    2. Re:Video and all-in-ones by IntlHarvester · · Score: 1

      Personal digital video players have been around for a few years now, you know.

      I've made this point before, but with Apple's control over the market, it makes sense for them to slow "innovation" rather than accelerate it. Recall the gigantic flame wars here back in 2004 when the Apple crowd was parroting Steve Jobs and vehemently insisted that Apple would never, ever, *ever* introduce a Video iPod? Well, of course, Jobs was just stalling on video to maximize the upgrade revenue. So, something like a wide-screen video iPod is an obvious prediction, but only when the existing market becomes saturated.

      --
      Business. Numbers. Money. People. Computer World.
    3. Re:Video and all-in-ones by Lord_Dweomer · · Score: 1
      I actually think that it is this latest leap to handheld video that will push forward adoption of a wireless (or wired) video eyepiece, similar to a Blutooth earset. People are fast becoming accustomed to having technology with them at all times, and being able to access it more freely at all times...with things like portable media players I see a wearable video screen eyepiece being the only real way to get around the small screen issue in the immediate future (aside from rollable LCD screens).

      I truly think that a wearable display piece will only be popular if Apple were to release it.

      --
      Buy Steampunk Clothing Online!
    4. Re:Video and all-in-ones by ozmanjusri · · Score: 1

      the video iPod can do 300x400 video which is generally considered to be standard TV resolution.

      I don't know which planet you're on Sparky, but where I come from PAL has a resolution of 720x576, while our neighbors in NTSC land can see 720x480 glorious pixels of soap opera every day on their standard TV sets.

      --
      "I've got more toys than Teruhisa Kitahara."
    5. Re:Video and all-in-ones by Solosoft · · Score: 1

      yeah ... but isn't TV interlaced ?

    6. Re:Video and all-in-ones by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      On this planet, both NTSC and PAL are analog and don't have any 'pixels'.

    7. Re:Video and all-in-ones by fyngyrz · · Score: 4, Informative

      where I come from PAL has a resolution of 720x576, while our neighbors in NTSC land can see 720x480

      If only it were that clean.

      Horizontally speaking, NTSC encodes various components as signal brightness and two color information streams of differing bandwidth. The brightness can change at a rate that is approximately equivalant of 700-ish brightness changes per scan line, with the other 20 or so appearing in the overscan area which is typically hidden by the way television tubes are mounted; your milage may vary a little if you have an LCD, but then again, it may not. Color changes are a function of combining the brightness change with the two color components. These components can change at an average rate of 100 color changes per complete line, however, because one component is slower than the other, not all color changes can be reproduced at that rate. Notice that I described this as a rate; that's because television, real television, is a pure analog signal and although the rate that the brightness and the colors colors can change is limited, the position that a brightnes or color change can occur at is only limied by how recently one already did... if colors haven't changed within 1/100th of a line, then you can have a color change fairly precisely located... at the cost of not having another for a 1/100th. Similarly, a brightness change (or a green amplitude change... some of you will see why when I describe the math, for the rest, it's magic, trust me) can occur at a rate of about 700, but they can start anywhere and so the precision with which either a brightness change or a color change can be located on a scan line is in effect infinite with an analog system. When displayed on a typical color television tube, most of this capability is lost because the display beam only has a finite number of RGB phospher triads it can illuminate, and the analog detail is re-sampled by the "jail-bars" of the phosphor dots or slots. However, this is still true of a black and white set, which has a continuous display surface. Again roughly, greens change the fastest, reds the next fastest, and blues the slowest of all. These color change ratios (to one another) were designed to mimic the ratios exhibited by your eye's sensitivity to similar changes. Unfortunately, while the idea is sound as far as it goes, your eye's ability to deal with those changes, ratios aside, is so much higher than the change rate video provides, that I would argue that the designers kind of screwed the pooch in this area, but that's a different discussion. :)

      The math is done like this, again more or less, using the R, G and B (red, green and blue) color components: Brightness = .59 times G plus .3 times R plus .11 times B. That gets you luma, a black and white signal that offers compatability with how the older BW television sets worked. This is also called "Y". The first color component is simply (R-Y), although as I mentioned above, it is bandwidth-limited so that the color changes are encoded in a broad, blurry way. The third component is (B-Y) and it is bandwidth-limited even further... slower and blurrier. The color image is re-created at the display this way: R = (R-Y) + Y, B = (B-Y) + Y, and G = Y - (R + B), keeping in mind the RGB .59, .3 and .11 scaling factors.

      As far as vertical resolution goes, this is a bit easier to understand. For both systems (PAL and NTSC) the display is created in two passes. One the first pass, half the lines are painted. On the second pass, the other lines are painted in between the originals. Next time, the others again and so forth. These are referred to as the odd and even fields of a frame. A frame is considered to be definitive of how many lines you see, and it adds up to 400+ (odd=200, even=200) for NTSC, PAL a little more, with the remaining scan lines again typically hidden as a consequ

      --
      I've fallen off your lawn, and I can't get up.
    8. Re:Video and all-in-ones by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It may be a little bit more than maximizing upgrade revenue. It's not like those iPod minis were having abysmal sales when Apple killed it off with a flash player to entice people to upgrade. I don't think you have a saturated market when nearly 6 months after the discontinuation of a product line, there are still many eBay bids on new/unopened iPod minis at prices that are above the MSRP.

      Personal digital video players have been around, but how many got a big network to back it with their hottest programs? Not to mention almost real time availability of the show. Yes, you may know how to record, rip, and encode video onto those devices, but the majority of people don't. They just want it easily and quickly available to them, so what would have been the point of having a video player for the masses that no one could use?

      Going back to the iPod mini to nano, flash memory wasn't actually cheap a year or two ago. Having enough supply of flash memory to deal with the iPod demand while having it at an affordable price for roughly the same amount of storage is no easy feat. Anyone that had half a brain would have been able to predict that "yes, eventually flash memory will be big enough to use as the iPod mini's main storage device", but that doesn't make it happen.

      Color screens were predicted forever, but other than battery drainers, there wasn't much point to them. Most iPods didn't get color screens until the battery life of an iPod had increased to the point where a color screen was negligible.

      You could easily say that "yes, eventually in the future true high definition movies will be downloaded to your 10th generation iPod and you could output it to a TV", but it's not like Apple is the one holding back the industry right now. Never mind the fact that no movie studio has made available that content in any portable form, but no one would stand waiting for that 8GB video download and only having 4 movies on a device that would cost a bundle to get a hardware decoder chip and a suitable battery for.

      Certainly Apple isn't being hurt by these "obvious" upgrades, but they're "innovating" at a pace that is very fast for a consumer electronics company (look at Tivo which can't even record OTA HD signals). Some of these obvious upgrades take resources that just aren't physically, easily, or legally available yet. I hope I don't come off as an Apple apologist or whatever, but I think it's a little bit more than just maximizing upgrade revenue every single time that is stalling them from putting out the latest and obvious features yesterday.

    9. Re:Video and all-in-ones by ozmanjusri · · Score: 1

      There'll be a quiz next period. Let's not all see the same hands.

      Question 1: So how d'ya get 300x400 as a standard resolution out of that?

      --
      "I've got more toys than Teruhisa Kitahara."
    10. Re:Video and all-in-ones by fyngyrz · · Score: 3, Informative
      Ok, the 400 vertical resolution fits into the 200x200 (400) vertical resolution of the full frame. Outside of the 400 lines, evenly distributed above and below the active lines, typically would be blanked lines -- so the 400 line vertical distribution is all on-screen, and you can't paint off the top and bottom (unless you fuss with the vertical size of the monitor or television and distort the displayable area.)

      A horizontal scan of 320 is (more or less) naturally derived by cutting a 640 clock in half, where 640 was conveniently available since early days of graphics cards because those engineers knew that the color information came at exactly that rate if video scan frequencies were used, and again when working with video, 320 double-width pixels fits onscreen sans overscan. Again, there are more clocks that don't "have pixels" that extend into the overscan areas at the left and right, and so you can't usually paint past the display edge in a 320 horizontal design.

      Now: If you actually meant 300, this can be done as well but would more typically be an RGB resolution, not a video resolution, meaning that it would not be expected to encode quite as easily into a video signal because it can't be presented exactly at the rate that the color information changes. If video is not a consideration, then no resolution is impossible, it more depends on the display having enough phosphor or display elements to reproduce the signal than it depends on the card hardware — it's a lot more difficult to make a display that can show some arbitrary resolution, especially if they're high resolution, than it is to make hardware that emits an appropriately encoded signal.

      Another thing that can skew all this is the question of rectangular pixels. Looking back at the Amiga, which was designed from the outset with video in mind, the pixels were not square, and that was done specifically so that the rate that the pixels changed folded perfectly into the rate at which color information can change when those changes are in phase with the color information... you can actually make an illegal NTSC image with a system like that by changing (for instance) from red to blue in one pixel; a video signal can't pull that off when the horizontal rate is 300+, so you get a smeary, nasty result if you actually try to encode it. Good video hardware would wipe the change out (filter it) before trying to encode it, but the net result is the same, it doesn't get to the screen.

      One of the things we have in our software is the ability to filter an RGB image or animation into NTSC-compliance by transforming it into video encoding space, filtering it timewise, and transforming it back to the image buffer; this is useful if the video hardware doesn't do the filtering, and also useful if you just want to see what you might get on screen (assuming the video hardware does in fact filter.) This will be less important as we move forward and NTSC video sees less and less use for commercial display. It works on any resolution, such as your 300 example, as long as the presumption that a whole scan line is in the buffer isn't wrong. These are the kind of backflips that are sometimes required to get a good image from production to the viewer; it is particularly a problem when the image is artificial, such as raytrace output, because those images contain ultimately sharp color transitions without any regard for video legality. Video cameras tend to never produce illegal images (though they certainly produce poor ones if fed scenes they can't encode.)

      As sort of an addendum to my first post, we sometimes see framebuffers with much higher horizontal resolutions than 700-ish; this is a nod to the idea that since you can only get a rate of change of 700, but if things aren't changing now, you can start to change anywhere. If the horizontal resolution is, for instance, up in the 1400 range, then the precision with which an edge can be placed doubles if no change preceeded the new one by more than 1 pixel. You can go higher, too. The framebuffer can be correctly loaded by software that ensures that the changes aren't illegally encoded.

      --
      I've fallen off your lawn, and I can't get up.
    11. Re:Video and all-in-ones by eples · · Score: 1

      Also, the outcome of Apple Intel machines should be interesting - one place for OS X, Windows, and Linux to all run at the same time.

      Why would anyone want to do that? It comes with OSX. If you want to hack it, hack at Darwin. ...And you'd want XP/Vista why? Games? My XBox 360 is on a huge LCD HDTV and a boomin' sound system.

      So, um, yeah - I'd just stick with the OSX.

      --
      I'm a 2000 man.
    12. Re:Video and all-in-ones by Library+Spoff · · Score: 1

      This is why i still come back to slashdot.
      (who am i kidding? how many times can you hit F5 at work...)

      Among all the tripe, hype and trolling you still get someone who REALLY knows their stuff!

      --
      Acid House saves Souls
    13. Re:Video and all-in-ones by Prophet+of+Nixon · · Score: 1

      The differences in color change rates... that's a bit over my head, but does it explain why certain colors shift sideways more than others when I watch them out of my peripheral vision? Real objects don't do it, but any projected-light image separates by color into slightly different offset images when I watch it from the side. Its sort of cool to rotate my head 180 degrees while watching something sometimes, just to watch the colors move around, but I've never understood why it happens.

    14. Re:Video and all-in-ones by Diordna · · Score: 1

      You have to ask why? Well, why do people dual-boot Windows and Linux? Simple - productivity and entertainment. OS X may be more pleasant to use (I won't start a flame war), but there are hundreds of useful Windows-only programs and no, that doesn't include games. You argue that you don't need Windows for games because you have an XBox 360, but I argue that the XBox not only costs hundreds of dollars extra, but also doesn't support super-spiffy games such as Half Life 2.

      Oh, and I'd put Linux on there too, because there might be something I need to run some time, and after all, why not?

    15. Re:Video and all-in-ones by fyngyrz · · Score: 1
      does it explain why certain colors shift sideways more than others when I watch them out of my peripheral vision?

      No. Color shifts that are introduced by encoding will be visible when you look right at them.

      One thing that can cause this is a plastic lens in glasses. The light weight plastics that replace glass lenses refract red and blue at significantly different rates, and this is quite noticable as they get thicker. Glasses lenses get thicker towards the edges, so if one turns away, then looks back to the side to see the original target, you're looking through much thicker plastic. If you look to one side, red is prominent, if you look to the other, blue is. So are you a glasses wearing person?

      You might see this kind of abberation from a (bad) projector lens, but if you did, it should be constant — it would be visible if you looked right at it.

      --
      I've fallen off your lawn, and I can't get up.
    16. Re:Video and all-in-ones by Prophet+of+Nixon · · Score: 1

      Yea, I've been wearing some sort of newer really thin plastic for about two years now, though I recall having some shifting even with the older, thicker plastics. I've never tried glass lenses, which is good since I'd be short a few eyes by now if I had. I didn't realize they refracted colors at different rates, though that does explain a lot. Thanks for the info!

    17. Re:Video and all-in-ones by poot_rootbeer · · Score: 1

      I hope to see something like an iPod Video that can store movies at screen sizes creater than 320x240 just so they can be hooked up to TVs and played back anywhere.

      I have one, and I've had it for more than a year now. Archos's Gmini 4xx product line is the same size as an iPod, and can playback and output DivX video at up to 640x400 resolution. (Their AVxxx product line can do even higher resolutions, but they are larger devices.)

      The drawbacks of this device compared to an Apple product are many -- smaller drive capacity, less elegant interface, far inferior customer service -- but it is proof that the technology exists. Apple's decision not to put it in the current generation of iPods is a purely business decision.

    18. Re:Video and all-in-ones by Catbeller · · Score: 1

      Does your boss know that you're typing all this?

    19. Re:Video and all-in-ones by fyngyrz · · Score: 1
      I am my boss. I own the company. :-)

      --
      I've fallen off your lawn, and I can't get up.
    20. Re:Video and all-in-ones by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It may be a little bit more than maximizing upgrade revenue. It's not like those iPod minis were having abysmal sales when Apple killed it off with a flash player to entice people to upgrade. I don't think you have a saturated market when nearly 6 months after the discontinuation of a product line, there are still many eBay bids on new/unopened iPod minis at prices that are above the MSRP.

      The reason to kill the Mini was obvious. It had a metal case, which was pretty durable and scratch resistant. It also has an easier to replace battery. The easy to scratch, hard to take apart, soldered in battery iPod Nano is a much better choice to make people have to repurchase their pricy Apple toys every couple of years.

  11. Nothing new under the sun (this year) by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Insightful
    What are the odds of a new technology coming out of nowhere and becoming popular? Look at 2005 -- just an expansion of existing tech. Torrents become more popular, more bandwidth means people exchange more videos, bird flu will continue to be overrated and containable and there will continue to be few deaths, wifi will be more popular, more telephony, and so on.

    It's evolution baby, not revolution, and that's the way I like it :)

    1. Re:Nothing new under the sun (this year) by Lehk228 · · Score: 2, Funny

      well duh revolution comes out in 2006

      --
      Snowden and Manning are heroes.
    2. Re:Nothing new under the sun (this year) by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Well duh, you're not going to get flying cars magically one day unless aliens drop by and donate their technology.

    3. Re:Nothing new under the sun (this year) by lowid+(24)+_________ · · Score: 1

      Good call. What was the most popular christmas gift last year? Probably the ipod. This year? Probably the ipod video. Evolution. Not too shabby though... baby steps are better than nothing. We'll be in flying cars before too long. :)

  12. My prediction by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I predict that by the third quarter of 2006 I will finally be able to drive to work in my flying car.

  13. the year of... by Garabito · · Score: 1

    Linux on the desktop?

    1. Re:the year of... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Where have you been?
      That happened in 2004 ummm... No wait, 2005... No wait, ummm...
      Hold on, I'm kinda confused, but I remember I read it on slashdot...

    2. Re:the year of... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The year of the network was declared year after year. Each year after the first people pointed out that it had not in fact been the year of the network. Each year however networking gained ground. Finally people stopped declaring the year of the network because the network had slipped in slowly never with the huge surge of adoption that was predicted and become ubiquitous. Linux may very well do the same thing, never have a year but year by year slide onto more desktops until it is just there.

  14. I predict by jbplou · · Score: 0, Flamebait

    Computers will become twice as powerful and so expensive only the 6 richest people in the world will be able to afford them.

  15. GoogleRate by zymurgy_cat · · Score: 5, Funny

    Google will come up with GoogleRate, a neat application that will automatically search for, record, archive, and then verify all these claims and predictions that everyone makes.

    People will then be able to quickly find out how accurate companies, newspapers, etc. have been in the past when they now say that X will be popular this year or that the nano-wireless-widget market will grow from $2M to $100 billion over the next 5 years.

    --
    -- Fugacity: Confusing chemists since 1908
    1. Re:GoogleRate by castoridae · · Score: 1

      Sounds a little like Tradesports.com. They broker bets on non-traditional items like political events. Doesn't seem like a stretch for them to set up a pool on when a particular technology will reach a particular rate of adoption. Turns out that the (dynamically determined) odds that come up do tend to be a pretty good indicator of the likelihood of events.

    2. Re:GoogleRate by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      funny...

      right. I consistantly wonder what the world would be like if companies were held accountable for the wild claims they make in advertisments. not so much about the 2 or 3 things they say but the 10 or so they never mention.

    3. Re:GoogleRate by FleaPlus · · Score: 1

      Google will come up with GoogleRate, a neat application that will automatically search for, record, archive, and then verify all these claims and predictions that everyone makes.

      You're probably joking, but back in September Google mentioned that they've set up a prediction market system to use within their company, for the purpose of forecasting things like product launch dates and "many other things of strategic importance". I wouldn't be surprised if this is a lead-in to creating a publically-open prediction market for more general events, sort of like the Foresight Exchange, Yahoo's Buzz Game, or TradeSports.

      Of course, they'd probably add some sort of Google-specific twist to it, such as forecasting the number of news reports or blog write-ups on a particular keyword (i.e. its "importance" or "impact"), or the future PageRank of a particular site. They probably couldn't legally use real money directly, so perhaps they'd raffle prizes based on earnings, sort of like Yahoo's done.

      I should probably add the disclaimer that I have a bit of an obsession with prediction markets. They're statistically the best way to predict the future, better than either opinion polls or individual experts.

    4. Re:GoogleRate by jcnnghm · · Score: 1

      I predict it will never make it out of beta.

      --
      You don't make the poor richer by making the rich poorer. - Winston Churchill
  16. flying cars? by Unknown_monkey · · Score: 2, Funny

    No, fuel cells! This is the year that they are only a year away! But maybe given all the stem cell research we could get monkeys flying from my butt. I predict digital ink will be big with lots of press releases and upcoming projects in future years. And this will be the year that a slashdot editor goes power crazy and tries to ransom sites with the threat of a slashdotting, and that he will fail miserably due to two other editors posting dupes of the story that editor #1 is threatening to post. The lack of faith in the negotiation will lead to long term hostility against the slashdot editors for posting duplicate stories on the same page causing multiple slashdotting. The end story will be that the submissions come from host servers with high per GB fees that had their customers intentionally slashdotted. This will cause mass user support for **Beatles. And in the Soviet New Year, technology puts out a list on you!

    1. Re:flying cars? by Lehk228 · · Score: 1

      Plug Power just sold 80 fuel cell units on december 15th so it's too late to be betting on them

      --
      Snowden and Manning are heroes.
  17. Re:Prediction: Slashdot Will Have Even More Dupes! by AoT · · Score: 1

    I only hope that there will be a wireless thumbdrive.

    And if it happens then I hope they will not try to patent it, 'cuz i thought of that shit first.

  18. Doesn't Matter by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    It doesnt matter because... we'll read about it several times over here on slashdot, thanks to all the dupes :-P

  19. thoughts on OfficeWeb & Human Proteome Folding by cwtrex · · Score: 1

    I don't see this happening until the internet proves to be a bit faster as well as reliable. Yes, some companies have already started doing this, but very few. I don't see this taking off (like e-commerce take off) until at least 2010.

    As for "Stem-cell research advances," I can only hope this is true. But I wish that they would also tie in the research which was in part taken up by grid.org for "Human Proteome Folding Project." Since that project is nearing completion, it would be great to hear that they have already started analyzing the data and will start rolling out some medical advanced due to that project. But I have a feeling both the stem-cell research advances and Human Proteome advances will be in research only and not in any beta medical trails.

  20. I Call BS on All These Predictions by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Everyone predicted social software and VoIP would dominate 2005, well guess what? They were wrong!

    Web 2.0 and AJAX are what defined 2005.

    1. Re:I Call BS on All These Predictions by dtfinch · · Score: 1

      Buzzwords for correctly using long existing browser features are what defined 2005?

  21. How about by BCW2 · · Score: 5, Interesting

    Flash drives get priced competitivly with hard drives of the same size?

    --
    Professional Politicians are not the solution, they ARE the problem.
    1. Re:How about by ShaneThePain · · Score: 0

      Last I saw, 4GB flashdrives cost LESS than 4GB hard drives. Atleast, I think i saw that.

      --
      Fascism is the greatest political ideology ever conceived. Sorry.
    2. Re:How about by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I bet 128MB flash drives cost a lot less than 128MB hard drives. It is called supply and demand. Now when I see 80GB flash drives that cost less than 80GB hard drives, I will be impressed.

    3. Re:How about by ottffssent · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Why?

      400GB of flash would be bigger, heavier, and probably slower than 400GB of magnetic storage. It would also be less reliable. You might be able to get decent performance in a lower-power, quieter device, but even with price parity, why would you want flash with all its drawbacks?

      The winchester hard drive really deserves some sort of award. Second only to the microchip, the hard drive has been the most successful technology product of the past 20 years, I would say. Consider that its evolution in terms of capacity has far outstripped that of the CPU, while its price has remained low. The same basic principles have scaled from the largest several-hundred-pound devices of old to the 19 gram Seagate ST1, and from the early 1MB drives to current half-terabyte drives. These devices can be found in all but the smallest of consumer electronics and in the largest of mainframes. Only the integrated circuit has shown similar technical improvements and wider applicability, yet the hard drive gets little respect, even within the computer industry. Sad.

    4. Re:How about by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      1) Where the fuck can you buy a 4GB drive nowadays? I don't think any store around here carries anything under 80GB as you only get less space (not enough, that is) for the basically same price - and often they don't even have something that small in stock. I don't think anything smaller is being manufactured anymore either.

      2) Comparing HD sizes of the mid-90's to flash? I don't see the point, really.

      3) Of course the small HDs cost an arm and a leg for what you get. No matter what capacity the HD has, it still needs an enclosure, motor to make it spin, heads, bearings, platters, controller (several chips - to control head placement, timing, A/D conversion, etc). Smaller drives may need less platters/heads, but tiny drives cost probably 90% as much to produce as the biggest ones (expensive for small units, cheap for large ones). Flash on the other hand... It's only a bunch of transistors - and their amount is directly proportionnal to the amount of memory (cheap in small quantities, but expensive in large quantities). Perhaps you should have compared price/GB in their normal available sizes instead? (HD prices are ~50$/GB or so; flash is MUCH more expensive!).

    5. Re:How about by EvanED · · Score: 3, Interesting

      It's also that hard drives have a high overhead cost. No matter what size the hard drive, you need some controlling stuff, a motor to drive the head, the head itself, and a hermetically sealed container. Compare that to what has to be a very small amount of electronics and a couple cents worth of plastic that goes with your typical flash drive.

      That said, I think it will be a LONG TIME before you see solid state parts be priced competitively with hard drives. Looking at Pricewatch, a 2 gig flash card is a little over $100. From Circuit City, there's a 2 gig one for $99.99 after $30 savings and $70 rebate. I paid only a bit more than that (maybe $120?) for a 250 gig Segate a couple weeks ago when my older hard drive decided to go meet the great head of light entertainment in the sky. That means that even if hard drives make no priceing improvements over the following year, flash would have to drop about 50 times in price. Given that about 14 months ago I got a 120 GB hard drive for about the same price (btw, this isn't the one that went kaput), that means that hard drives are a little less than doubling in size for any given price every year. If this trend continues, that means that flash must drop in price 100 times -- that's two orders of magnitude! Do you *really* think that's going to happen?

      Secondly, what would you do if flash DID? You couldn't replace your hard drive with it; flash has a much lower life span for writes. With a typical file system, you'd probably see failures much sooner than a typical hard drive failure. At the very least you'd have to find one that's meant for flash drives so you don't burn out frequently written-to areas. (E.g. inode blocks, journal areas. It seems a log-structured file system might be called for here.)

    6. Re:How about by EvanED · · Score: 1

      With a typical file system, you'd probably see failures much sooner than a typical hard drive failure. At the very least you'd have to find one that's meant for flash drives so you don't burn out frequently written-to areas. (E.g. inode blocks, journal areas. It seems a log-structured file system might be called for here.)

      I take this back, perhaps. Drives can do what's called wear leveling automagically under the file system's nose (and transparently) and even out where the writes fall, so you wouldn't necessarily need to use a special purpose file system.

      From what I'm reading it probably is theoretically possible to make a flash hard drive that will last plenty long enough.

      (I still hold that the cost will be more than a typical hard drive for a long time to come.)

    7. Re:How about by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      > Where the fuck can you buy a 4GB drive nowadays?

      Think iPods -- at around 4GB, Flash is cheaper than drives.

    8. Re:How about by matt21811 · · Score: 2, Informative

      Actually, this is predicted this to happen in 11 years from now, not in 2006.

      http://www.mattscomputertrends.com/flashvsharddisk .html

      They didn't just make up the 11 year figure either. The prediction is based on price trends from the last few years.

      The article also explains why performance and maximum write issues will not be an problem by then.

    9. Re:How about by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      flash memory prices won't be dropping any orders of magantude... however hard drives are not nearly as reliable as people give them credit for (i have a friend who buys about 100 HDs a week, just to replace failed drives in a data center) moving parts Will wear out, in an operating environment that uses ram to compensate for the deficiencies of flash memory, flash drives can actually have a few orders of magantute higher reliability, of course using RAM offeres the Highest order of reliability, as you can have virtually unlimited read/write cycles. albeit at the cost of none of that being permanent, however if your write cycles are limited etc, you can control the frequency of write cycles if everything fits in the system's RAM during runtime, and only write out to disc according to a backup schedule..

    10. Re:How about by matt21811 · · Score: 3, Insightful

      "400GB of flash would be bigger, heavier, and probably slower than 400GB of magnetic storage. It would also be less reliable. but even with price parity, why would you want flash with all its drawbacks?"

      Given that a 32 GB SD flash card is likely to be available very shortly, that it only takes 13 of these cards to reach past 400GB, and that a pile 13 SD cards is still a tiny fraction of the size and weight of 3.5 inch disk drive, I think your size and weight assumption needs rethinking.

      As to reliability, I have no idea what you are talking about. I can drop and SD card from shoulder height onto conrcete and it will almost certainly keep working. Hard disks rarely pass the same test. If you are talking about the write limit of flash memory. A simple comparison with a hard disk of today shows this misconception to be just that. Taking a the example of a flash drive of 200GB with a write speed of 40 Megabytes per second (similar to a modern hard disk) and doing some basic calculations shows that it could be written to continuously for just over 15 years before every block passed the 100 000 write mark. The equivalent of todays 200GB drive some 15 years ago was the 210MB disk. There are not many machines running today with 210MB hard drives, let alone dong the kind of work that requires continuous writing to the disk. And 100 000 writes is often considered a minimum. The secret is wear leveling algorithms.

      So to sum up, given that you might be able to get decent performance in a lower-power, quieter, lighter, smaller, tougher device, with price parity, why would you not want to use the flash drive?

    11. Re:How about by tzanger · · Score: 2, Informative

      It's also that hard drives have a high overhead cost. No matter what size the hard drive, you need some controlling stuff, a motor to drive the head, the head itself, and a hermetically sealed container.

      The rest of your post is great, but hard drive cases are not hermetically sealed. They are pretty dust-tight but air (and moisture) passes through them just fine.

    12. Re:How about by tidewaterblues · · Score: 1

      You're thinking about it wrong. Flash drives will probably never win out in situations where cost per GB or long term reliablilty is the chief factor, nor will it probably ever get a foothold in the server-side storage market. The considerations of this niche are already far removed from what the average user sees (consider, for instance, the universal prevalence of tape as a backup medium. Typical users haven't seriously used tape for years and years.)

      Where flash will win, without a doubt, are areas where performance and power are the main considerations. Think of these possiblities:

      1. Read and write speeds on par with conventional memory. That is tens of millions of times faster than the best disk. (I know flash isn't quite there yet, but I am convinced that the day will come soon.)

      2. No moving parts = perfectly silent and vibration free operations.

      3. No seek time (I think, not sure about this).

      4. Fantastically lower power consumption than a HD, due to lack of moving parts. This also means fantastically less heat than a HD. Also it can be cooled with a heatsink instead of a fan.

      Sounds like just what the laptop market needs, doesn't it?

      Also, and this really peaks my interest, consider the technical possibilites of a long term memory system almost as fast as main memory. It would be the end of memory buffers in a filesystem context. Though, the entire file handling API may need to be rewritten to take advantage of this. And indeed, if the speeds are that fast, why have the concept of a file API at all? Why not have each program view the entire filesystem as an extension of its own primary memory. Imagine, for instance, an image browser that had all of the images on your computer "preloaded" by the kernel when it was run.

      The possibilites of the convergence of primary and secondary memory are terrific, IMHO.

      --


      ...En að Besta Sem Guð Hefur Skapað Er Nýr Dagur
    13. Re:How about by JDSalinger · · Score: 0

      You remind me of the gum salesman from Clerks.

    14. Re:How about by matt21811 · · Score: 1

      "3. No seek time (I think, not sure about this)."

      You can be certain. This page:
      http://www.tomshardware.com/2005/08/10/two_fast_an d_functional_usb_flash_drives/page9.html shows that seeks times can come in at less than milisecond.

      I have seen another test that shows I/O operations per second, the type where SCSI drives usually trounce IDE drives. Flash blew away all types of hard disks in this type of tests purely because of the huge seek speed advantage that flash has.

    15. Re:How about by dwandy · · Score: 1

      Perhaps flash drives don't need to directly compete in the short term for them to gain significant traction in the desktop market:
      If (as a previous poster has suggested) 32gb flash drives are available shortly, that will make them of sufficient size to replace the hard disk. This introduces new portable computing possibilities.
      I can run my OS with my software on (compatable) hardware, regardless of what software they have: think $100 portable with $1500+hardware power...just limited by the existance of hardware. eg:kiosks, homeschool, or workhome without the laptop. Go to a friends house and have everything you need on one flash card.
      While the flash doesn't need to replace the hard-drive in the short-term, it can certainly replace the 3.5" floppy/ZIP disk/CDR(w) set of portable media if it hasn't already done so.
      AFAIK the flash disks can outperform HDDs, so this may not be a 2006 prediction, but I tend to agree that in the long term all moving parts will be eliminated from the desktop computer...

      --
      If you think imaginary property and real property are the same, when does your house become public domain?
    16. Re:How about by toddestan · · Score: 1

      1) Where the fuck can you buy a 4GB drive nowadays? I don't think any store around here carries anything under 80GB as you only get less space (not enough, that is) for the basically same price - and often they don't even have something that small in stock. I don't think anything smaller is being manufactured anymore either.

      Lots of places carry 4GB harddrives. What cave do you live in?

      Oh, and the original poster is wrong. a 4GB microdrive is about half the cost of a 4GB compact flash card.

    17. Re:How about by ottffssent · · Score: 1

      Who's going to be producing a 32GB SD card? You can barely buy 16GB CF cards these days.

      Let's assume 16GB cards versus a 500GB hard drive. That's 30 cards, for a total volume of 232 cm^3 according to the spec. A 500GB 3.5" hard drive has a volume of 386 cm^3. However, that hard drive includes interface hardware, which 30 CF cards don't. So you've got 160cm^3 to attach 30 CF interfaces and enough circuitry to convert that into some sort of reasonable attachment standard, SATA for example, as well as power, and a reasonably tough enclosure to put it in. Since I presume we're safely in the realm of fantasy now, I'll let you argue that you're not beholden to the CF form factor and therefore don't need that many big pin blocks to plug into. Fair enough. But you do need an awful lot of routing, and a nice beefy front-end chip to run all this, since you can't just pack 500GB of memory on one controller - you'd end up with 10MB/sec transfer rates if you're lucky. We're trying to beat modern disks now, which means you've got to hit at least 70MB/sec. So realistically that's 8 flash controllers with 60GB of flash behind each one, and a SATA power and data connection.

      Ok, I think you're right. It probably actually could be done, and since we're ignoring price for the moment I'll concede the point. Flash certainly doesn't win this one hands down, but it looks like you actually could make a device with roughly the same size and capacity as a modern disk drive.

      I'm drawing my data from a variety of places, but primarily Pretec's product line. It looks like a Flash-based disk would sport similar non-operating shock tolerance, but would handily beat magnetic storage when spinning. The read error rates are identical, though there's no mention of longevity. As you mention, wear leveling algorithms would help quite a bit, hopefully without sacrificing too much performance for the extra read/write cycles.

      Power's a hard one to get a handle on. Pretec's 8GB Flash drive consumes half a watt in use - the 60 of them required to reach about 500GB would draw double the power of a magnetic disk, though the power / GB ratio should improve quite a bit with larger devices as the power consumed by the flash controllers is amortized over a larger amount of storage. Pretec quotes 8MB/sec read/write speed, meaning you'd need 10 of the devices in some sort of array to reach the STR performance of a magnetic disk. The extra flash shouldn't actually consume any power - it's just a matter of the controller chips required. Since we'll need 10 of them to match a disk, plus a SATA controller and some sort of custom ASIC or FPGA or microcontroller or some such to handle wear leveling, striping, remapping of bad blocks, etc. I'd guess the power consumption would be about on par as well. At least for a flash device in operation. It should be able to idle down to less than 50% of full power, which is about what a disk can manage.

      Perhaps I spoke a bit too soon. You probably could get 500GB of flash storage with comparable size, power, and performance as a disk drive. So I suppose the question isn't so much "why would you want to put up with the drawbacks" as "why would you want to use new, unproven tech for no real gains". Also, coming back to reality for a moment, there's no way you're going to get 4 trillion and change transistors for anything like $300 in the visible future. Or even 1 trillion, assuming fancy MLC flash cells.

    18. Re:How about by matt21811 · · Score: 1

      Wow, what a well reasoned responce.

      Some points I'd like to add. I chose 32Gig SD as my example because they are expected in 2006, and the /. post is about predictions for 2006.
      http://www.pcworld.com/news/article/0,aid,122514,0 0.asp I chose SD because it is a lot smaller than CF. take these two factors into account and flash starts to get a serious size and weight advantage.
      The best sustained (read or write) hard disk performance of IDE drives is 60 MegaBytes per second according to a recent article on Toms Hardware. The best flash drive, as tested by Toms, had a sustained performance of 23 Megabytes per second write speed with 30MB per second read performance. That means you only need a 3 wide stripe to get the same through-put as a disk. The real advantage of flash is in seek times which are sub 1 milisecond.
      I think the power requirements of an idle flash drive would be significantly less than any hard disk no matter how many "cards" in the array. They dont use power when they are not reading or writing. The power usage when reading or writing might be significantly more, as you calculated.

      Obviously, we are discussing a theoretical product due to price considerations. I have pointed out in other posts that it could be 11 years before flash catches 3 1/2" IDE disk in the $ per meg area. I think there siginificant advantages to flash that will mean the transition will occur when the price is right.

      Thanks again for a well reasoned reply.

    19. Re:How about by booch · · Score: 1

      Both of you have conducted a good debate, even though I think you've both missed a few things. Just one major point I'd like to add.

      There are 4 considerations when looking at a storage medium (ignoring connectivity, reliability, and compatibility issues): capacity, speed (sustained and latency), size, and price. Look at how hard drives and flash RAM (and microchip memory in general) have progressed over the years. You've shown that flash RAM is already smaller in size than a comparable-capacity hard drive.

      Hard drives have probably increased in capacity faster over the long term, but haven't gotten all that much faster. It's to the point where CPUs have to wait 1000s of cycles to get data from a hard drive. (And even RAM access is up into the 10s of cycles.) I think this will soon (next 3 years) drive a move to an additional memory type in the memory access scheme (CPU -> L1 cache -> L2 cache -> RAM -> HD). I think we'll have systems with flash RAM between the RAM and hard drives. Or maybe I'm wrong, and we'll just continue with even larger hard disk caches, or system RAM will get replaced with flash RAM.

      Even capacity-wise, in recent years, typical flash RAM devices have moved from 64 MB to 1 GB in about 2 years, staying about the same price and size. That's a factor of 16, or a factor of 4 every year. (Maybe my memory [pun not intended] is off, and 64 MB was common 4 years ago -- that'd still be doubling every year.) Hard drives are doubling in capacity at a rate of probably more than 18 months. I think this will eventually lead to flash RAM surpassing hard disks in terms of capacity/price. At current trends, I'd predict this to happen in about 2013. That would put both technologies at about 6 TB for $200. (I should really get some real numbers and graph the trends to make a more accurate prediction.) However, I actually expect hard drive capacities to slow their rate of increase, so it could happen earlier.

      One minor point I'd like to get back to is the low number of writes allowed to flash RAM devices. You mentioned that you couldn't write to the whole disk in 15 years. But the real problem is that certain portions of a hard drive get written to a lot more often than others. For example, the FAT tables on FAT filesystems probably get written to 100K times in less than a year. (Granted, NTFS and UNIX file systems are better, but they still have to make frequent changes to common branching points in the directory tree.) I'm not sure if there are algorithms to rotate these writes through different memory cells (perhaps you were alluding to that -- I didn't quite follow what you meant). But even if there are, I doubt that they're good enough to reduce writes enough for it not to be an issue with some types of access patterns. Do you have any good pointers to info that would correct my mis-understanding? ;)

      --
      Software sucks. Open Source sucks less.
    20. Re:How about by booch · · Score: 1

      OK, I found that you've actually done all the trend analysis on your web site. I'd like to retract my 4th paragraph. ;)

      --
      Software sucks. Open Source sucks less.
    21. Re:How about by matt21811 · · Score: 1

      "There are 4 considerations when looking at a storage medium"
      I think power usage will also be a big consideration going foreward.

      "Hard drives have probably increased in capacity faster over the long term"
      I know that you have said found my site http://www.mattscomputertrends.com/ but I am not sure if you read the capacity trend info. The hard disk capacity trend is about 104% each year but flash comes in at 130%. Feel free to dispute the data, though.

      " I'd predict this to happen in about 2013."
      I know you retracted your paragraph 4 but I am pretty impressed that some one could come up with such a close guess to mine on what I assume is just off the top your head calculations.

      "One minor point I'd like to get back to is the low number of writes allowed to flash RAM devices."
      Wear leveling algorithms just move the high traffic data (like swap files) to lesser used areas of the flash as needed, evening out the wear across the whole flash storage device over time. These are yet to implemented in major operating systems but will probably be quickly implemented when flash as primary storage becomes viable. Wikipedia has good references about these file systems.

      "However, I actually expect hard drive capacities to slow their rate of increase, so it could happen earlier." AND "Hard drives are doubling in capacity at a rate of probably more than 18 months." I think these two statements show you have noticed something that I thought noone else had discovered. Kryder's law is dead. Kryders law is moores law for hard disk capacities. It says they should double every 13 months. The other way of saying this is a 1000 fold increase in capacity every 10.5 years. The second way evens out short term bumps and dips. In March when I am due to do the 2006 figures on my site, there will be solid evidence that the trends are way behind Kryders law. I'll do a story about it and submit it here (where it will be rejected, haha).

  22. VOIP by jonathan3003 · · Score: 1

    Since the article mentions internet telephony, I figured the killer app will be a dupe prediction detector :)

  23. Predictions... by Wyatt+Earp · · Score: 5, Interesting

    Advancements in artificial limb technology driven by the Iraqi Military Operations
    Advancements in stripping the psychotropic effects of drugs like Ketamine and X for use as pain killers, driven by the Iraqi Military Operations
    A video card that cracks the $1000 US price point
    More hybrid and bio diesel technology from the big Automakers
    F/A-22, Eurofighter Typhoon purchases get cut, F/A-22 or the F-35 programs might get totally eliminated by the US DoD
    Quad core AMD and Intel server chips
    US program to put GPS in all cars becomes a political hot issue
    UK program to track all cars does not become a political hot issue

    1. Re:Predictions... by Zantetsuken · · Score: 1

      F/A-22, Eurofighter Typhoon purchases get cut, F/A-22 or the F-35 programs might get totally eliminated by the US DoD

      the Raptor is supposedly crap compared to some of the nicer Russian jets, the only reason why the US would win in a fight against the 2 is US has more money to produce planes, and they only have, what, ONE squad of F/A22's. it's possible Congress just cuts the funding for the whole Raptor and F35 program anyway, along with the (X)M8 rifle, OCSW ABG (25mm airbursting grenade) machine gun, and a host of other programs of the sort, just for the dipshit reasoning that "We have something that works now, it's been proven for 30-40 years, why stop using this ancient pos technology and weapons when there is much better stuff available?"

    2. Re:Predictions... by DigiShaman · · Score: 3, Funny

      How about a Quad core CPU. Two cores of Intel, and two cores of AMD technology all packaged togeather. No matter how your program is written, it will take advantage of the best set of cores for its function.

      Ya... I can dream can't I?

      --
      Life is not for the lazy.
    3. Re:Predictions... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      (Score:-1, Dipshit)

    4. Re:Predictions... by NixLuver · · Score: 1

      You know, I can't really make factual observations about the relative crappiness of the Raptor vs. some Russian Jets; it might in fact be true. But I do know that I've heard all this before, about how superior the Russian Military Equipment was. We heard how the T70 would make mincemeat of the M1A1 Abrams, and how the Migs would cut our birds to pieces, and in the end it turned out that it was all hype. I hope we never have to find out outside of military excercises, frankly, but neither possibility would surprise me.

    5. Re:Predictions... by Wyatt+Earp · · Score: 1

      It wasn't all hype. In late 1990 and early 1991 some of the F-15C pilots did secret dogfights with the German MiG-29s from the East German Airforce and in some aspects of the envelope, the MiG-29 was superior to the F-15C and AIM-9 at that time. The MiG-29 is about equal to an F/A-18C in dogfighting, with the MiG-29 able to override the flight control computer's 9G limit to pull up to 9.3G if I remember correctly.

      Armor wise, the Russian gear was vastly overwhelmed by the M-1 and M-2/3, but they had alot of them. SAM wise, the Russian stuff is really, really good, while the US has Rapier, Avenger and Patriot now on the ground, the Russians have alot of systems for all sorts of threats. NATO has had alot of experiance with these systems since 1965 through 1999 and to 2003 and they get data from the Israelis.

      F-22 and F-35 aren't about matching threats today, but about matching threats out past 2020 and 2030. F-22 looks like it's going to be far superior to Eurofighter Typhoon and the Gripen, and the coming Chinese systems aren't up to F-16C quality from the looks of them. Not sure how many F-22s and 35s will actually be built.

    6. Re:Predictions... by im_thatoneguy · · Score: 1
      A video card that cracks the $1000 US price point


      I see you haven't been shopping for Quadro cards as of late...

      Just as an example let's look at the Quadro FX 4400:
      http://www.academicsuperstore.com/market/marketdis p.html?PartNo=742511
    7. Re:Predictions... by toddestan · · Score: 1

      How about a Quad core CPU. Two cores of Intel, and two cores of AMD technology all packaged togeather. No matter how your program is written, it will take advantage of the best set of cores for its function.

      My guess is that the Intel cores would end up spending most of their time idle.

    8. Re:Predictions... by bergeron76 · · Score: 1

      You clearly don't live in a capitalist society do you?

      --
      Don't think that a small group of dedicated individuals can't change the world. It's the only thing that ever has.
    9. Re:Predictions... by JoseAugusto · · Score: 1

      Very informed view on the future. Do you know ZapFuture.com? We need to register your predictions there! Regards.

    10. Re:Predictions... by Zantetsuken · · Score: 1

      As I understand cost effectivelly, the Raptor is about $187 million (per jet) (BTW: I got the info by searching Google with "f 22 raptor cost" and the .mil site only, so the return I pulled this quote off of was the dod.mil site = http://www.dod.mil/news/Jul1999/n07301999_9907302. html)

      BTW: the info for the Russian jets I would have gotten directly from the sukhoi.ru site, but my Firefox Google translater extension doesn't support Russian/Cyrillic.

      Compared even to the experimental MiG 1.42/1.44 "MFI" which is supposedly $70 million per unit, and that is the more expensive experimental MFI. A direct quote from http://www.aeronautics.ru/nws001/janes008.htm which cites their source as Janes Defense - "With a projected unit cost of $70 million, the MFI (mnogo-funktsonalnyy frontovoy-istrebityel) is now described as a 'flying laboratory', as it is unlikely to be ordered in any quantity. "It is not a commercial programme", says Korzhuyev, "it will be the basis for a new fighter that will be smaller and cheaper, but not worse, than the MFI"."

      And that's just the MiG MFI, not including Sukhoi's experimental Su-47 "Berkut" which is supposed to lead to the slightly dumbed down "PAK (something or other I think)" (they are leaving out the forward swept wings, which as I understand Russia discovered just as America did that "marginal manuervablility gained by the foreward swept wings was outweighed by the cost of the automatic computer stability controls"). The experimental Berkut is based on the Su-37, which in-turn is based on the Su-27 Flanker series.

  24. Check out e-ink by castoridae · · Score: 3, Interesting

    E-ink, an MIT Media Lab spinoff, has been working on this since ~1997. They have products to market, although you can't yet get your local paper on it... :-\

    http://www.e-ink.com/products/matrix/imaging_film. html

  25. Apple by Joey+Patterson · · Score: 0

    I predict that, on January 10, 2006, Apple Computer will release an Intel-based iBook.

    1. Re:Apple by wondercool · · Score: 1

      Agreed.

      And Apple will sell a service where you can buy pebbles for 1 dollar (though there is pressure from certain suppliers to increase the price for red hot ones and less for certain other colours).

      These pebbles are supposed to be used by your iCon only. Only allowed format is square, ogg shaped is forbidden and enforced by Apple's 'fair' use.

      Fair use, means you can suck the pebble and put it into 5 different iCon's

      Users will affectionaly be known as iSuckers...

  26. Fusion! by headkase · · Score: 4, Interesting

    2006 will be the year we finally achieve a sustained controlled fusion reaction! My 1970 copy of the new book of knowledge annual edition says it's just around the corner! Let's hope its not around the corner for another 35 years as we really do need it....

    --
    Shh.
    1. Re:Fusion! by ShaneThePain · · Score: 0

      I doubt it, fusion is only being pushed because of people's fantasy that some miracle technology is going to replace oil. nothing will replace oil, nothing at all. when oil becomes too expensive, there wont be anything to fall back on. not fusion, not fuel cells, not even fucking coal. in short: were fucked. http://www.peakoil.com/

      --
      Fascism is the greatest political ideology ever conceived. Sorry.
    2. Re:Fusion! by Frumious+Wombat · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Yes, but will that get us closer to Fusion-powered Ramjets?

      But seriously, I'd predict better photovoltaics, thermoelectrics, and fuel cells. None of this will power anything bigger than a lawn-mower, but it will look great in the lab.

      On the other hand, what won't look better will be designer bioweapons. Not that they'll be released, just the capability will give us one more thing to worry about.

      Someone will realize that with Google's increasing suite of information organizing technology, that they can become a privatized CIA/NSA. Watch for new bloggers who actually do data mining, rather than off-their-meds rants.

      And to stay on topic, controlled nuclear fusion will be right around the corner.

      --
      the more accurate the calculations became, the more the concepts tended to vanish into thin air. R. S. Mulliken
    3. Re:Fusion! by FooAtWFU · · Score: 3, Funny

      Actually, I believe that we already have "sustained controlled fusion" reactions. What we'd like are sustained controlled fusion reactions which produce more energy than they consume.

      --
      The World Wide Web is dying. Soon, we shall have only the Internet.
    4. Re:Fusion! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Impressive google-bombing, works in quotes...

    5. Re:Fusion! by Tablizer · · Score: 1

      My 1970 copy of the new book of knowledge annual edition says it's just around the corner! Let's hope its not around the corner for another 35 years as we really do need it....

      I predict they will invent a corner that actually stops.

    6. Re:Fusion! by DigiShaman · · Score: 3, Interesting

      You are correct in that nothing in regards to a single solution will replace the energy needs that we demand from crude oil. However, I suspect it will be a collection of alternative energies ranging from A to Z that will slowly displace our need for oil. This migration will take place naturally through market forces and mankind's lust to capitalize on such solutions.

      For 2006, I see a major national plan to diversify our energy grid so that future technologies can be seamlessly integrated for the cooperation of the entire alternative energy industry and to set into motion a set of standards for electrical grid plug-and-play. So far, it's not very accommodating to the private sector willing to sell unused generated energy such as that of solar and wind.

      --
      Life is not for the lazy.
    7. Re:Fusion! by Kjella · · Score: 1

      You are correct in that nothing in regards to a single solution will replace the energy needs that we demand from crude oil. However, I suspect it will be a collection of alternative energies ranging from A to Z that will slowly displace our need for oil. This migration will take place naturally through market forces and mankind's lust to capitalize on such solutions.

      We in Norway are the 3rd biggest oil exporter in the world. Our exports of oil will be plummeting to about half by 2020. Other countries are not far behind, and only the Middle East has any chance to increase production further. We're peaking right now with oil prices at $55/barrel. From here, supply will go down, down, down and prices up, up, up.

      Naturally, but it won't be pretty. Most of the other energy resources we have (gas, coal, uranium etc.) have fairly limited reserves that we'd burn through quite quickly if we replaced oil with them. Supply and demands works out really poorly when you have a fixed reservoir to take from.

      Renewable energy sources have one big (huge!) problem - they don't really produce a lot of energy. We here in Norway have tons of rain coming in from the atlantic on a very long coastline and a sparsely populated country of 4,5 million, and we can't sustain ourselves with hydroelectric power. If we can't do it, who can? Wind, waves, solar power - nothing produces any significant amount of energy.

      --
      Live today, because you never know what tomorrow brings
    8. Re:Fusion! by winwar · · Score: 1

      "What we'd like are sustained controlled fusion reactions which produce more energy than they consume."

      And are smaller than a star :)

  27. The better battery? by Presence2 · · Score: 1, Redundant

    My hope is that 2006 will be the year a cheap, easily manufactured portable power cell will become popular. Rechargeable.. disposable.. who cares, just make it better then what we've been using for the past 20 years. Limitations in power supply is really starting to be the limitation for all our fancy high tech gadgets. We can put 3000 songs on ipod.. but you can't play them all. We can put the latest movies on a psp or portable dvd player, but they will barely stay on long enough to play some of today's epics. I can't think of any laptop that can last longer then what.. 8-10 hours? Pathetic!

    1. Re:The better battery? by superpulpsicle · · Score: 3, Interesting

      Speaking of PSP, this is the year sony handheld division must deliver or die. I don't see it sticking around for the sake of playing DVDs if they can't make some great games. FF7 advent children might drive some sales, but ultimately this is where the road split.

  28. Mac OS X on 10% of PC's by 4D6963 · · Score: 1
    My prediction for 2006, Mac OS X 10.5 on 10% of PC's. http://www.osx86project.org/

    OK, more a wish than a prediction

    --
    You just got troll'd!
  29. Predictions by ackthpt · · Score: 5, Insightful
    • 1. Someone will challenge Moore's Law as not being true any longer.
    • 2. Cell phone batteries will need longer life as people listen to music and watch video on them.
    • 3. Nano physics will be all the rage, but nobody will still have made anything practical with them.
    • 4. RIAA will continue to hound people who really don't affect their bottom line, then blame the loss of music sales for the expense.
    • 5. Howard Stern will not have the new customer draw Sirius is betting on.
    • 6. Red Wine will be found not to actually have any real impact on reducing heart disease when they find a bunch of drunken italian doctors made it all up.
    • 7. Video Games will continue to be ballyhooed as more realistic than ever, but movement will still look terribly wooden.
    • 8. New processors, mother boards, video cards will all come out and amazingly the top of the line will cost what the top of the line has cost for the past ten years.
    • 9. Moore's Law will be reaffirmed.
    • 10. Cheezy Poofs and Coke will be declared heart-healthy by firms in Plano, TX and Atlanta, GA, and the media will not question it one bit.
    --

    A feeling of having made the same mistake before: Deja Foobar
    1. Re:Predictions by slashname3 · · Score: 4, Interesting

      2. Cell phone batteries will need longer life as people listen to music and watch video on them.

      Which will result in cell phones the size they were back in the 80's, satchels weighing about 8 pounds.

      This will also result in a record number of car wrecks as more people are found watching their cell phones while driving which leads to several states banning the use of cell phones in cars.

      There will be a large number of complaints by cell phone users that even with 200 channels available there is nothing worth watching.

      There will also be a project started to port mythtv to these new video capable cell phones.

    2. Re:Predictions by equallyunequal · · Score: 4, Informative

      Howard Stern is definitely drawing new customers to Sirius radio. I work at Radioshack and my entire district is sold out of all Sirius recievers and we have waiting lists. 75% of the customers say they are buying because they wanted Howard Stern.

    3. Re:Predictions by pfhlick · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Stern is being replaced with David Lee Roth, at least in Boston. I bet that would drive some people to Sirius.

      On second thought, though, maybe not.

      --
      So long, and thanks for all the fish
    4. Re:Predictions by thedletterman · · Score: 1

      Especially if they have Sirius in 1984 in some weird alternate universe.

      --
      Any fool can criticise, condemn, and complain, and most fools do. - Benjamin Franklin
    5. Re:Predictions by smoker2 · · Score: 1
      This will also result in a record number of car wrecks as more people are found watching their cell phones while driving which leads to several states banning the use of cell phones in cars.
      Aah, that gives me an idea.

      How about cell phones adopting gps tech. so that if the phone detects it is travelling any faster than walking pace (say 5 mph), it refuses to transmit or receive an end user accessible signal.

      There would be no real "downside" to this, as SMS messages would be queued on the server (as they are now) and voice calls would either go to voicemail or they call back later.

      That would just about sort out the misuse of these devices.

      Of course the FCC would have to mandate its inclusion in all new cellphones, but other than that ....

      What's the number for the Patent Office again ?

    6. Re:Predictions by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      How about cell phones adopting gps tech. so that if the phone detects it is travelling any faster than walking pace (say 5 mph), it refuses to transmit or receive an end user accessible signal.

      Busses, subways, trains...

      OTOH, your idea has merit in the fact that it would shut up the noisy yakkers.

    7. Re:Predictions by ackthpt · · Score: 1
      Howard Stern is definitely drawing new customers to Sirius radio. I work at Radioshack and my entire district is sold out of all Sirius recievers and we have waiting lists. 75% of the customers say they are buying because they wanted Howard Stern.

      Sirius is paying him $500 million over 5 years. I just don't see them bringing in enough to cover that.

      There will be 2 HS channels. One is Howard all the time, the other is some kind of Howard News Network.

      --

      A feeling of having made the same mistake before: Deja Foobar
    8. Re:Predictions by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Sirius is paying him $500 million over 5 years. I just don't see them bringing in enough to cover that.

      You're right, they won't be turning a profit anytime soon; but neither will their competitor. However, with the Howard Stern deal, they've already gotten their $s worth in advertising/promotion. Plus, he will draw subscribers that otherwise wouldn't bother with satellite "radio". All in all, the deal with Stern has already been worth the money for Sirius.

    9. Re:Predictions by mikael_j · · Score: 1
      This sounds like a horrible idea as it would mean that you could no longer use your cell phone while on the bus/train or in the subway, although I suppose it might work in the US where most people see public transport as "communism" anyway.. ;)

      /Mikael

      --
      Greylisting is to SMTP as NAT is to IPv4
    10. Re:Predictions by smoker2 · · Score: 1
      A good point there.

      Maybe if there was some way the phone could know its present location ?

      GPS perhaps ?

      Also, if any particular form of public transport had its own signal being broadcast which "complemented" the cell phones own signal in order to allow a connection.

    11. Re:Predictions by Chapter80 · · Score: 1
      I work at Radioshack and my entire district is sold out of all Sirius recievers and we have waiting lists. 75% of the customers say they are buying because they wanted Howard Stern.

      Are you sirius?

    12. Re:Predictions by ackthpt · · Score: 1
      All in all, the deal with Stern has already been worth the money for Sirius.

      I would be highly surprised by that. I have followed the fortunes of Sirius and XM so far and both have been cash burners to say the least. XM looked like they would be first to hit break even with Sirius far behind. Each needs something like 20 million subscribers to turn a profit. Not everyone who signs up stays, either. That was the old model based upon Sirius' old expenses, with the commitment of $100 million/yr to Mr. Stern I think they are going to need quite a few more subscribers.

      I don't care for Stern and have stayed a customer for 5 years for the other programming and news. Occasionally they trample one or more of my channels for NBA or NCAA games. So far they're better than the alternative, going back to KFOX and 5 minutes of annoying commercials.

      --

      A feeling of having made the same mistake before: Deja Foobar
    13. Re:Predictions by pfhlick · · Score: 1

      I meant Roth is the broadcast drivetime guy now. You know that's gonna suck.

      --
      So long, and thanks for all the fish
    14. Re:Predictions by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "10. Cheezy Poofs and Coke will be declared heart-healthy by firms in Plano, TX and Atlanta, GA, and the media will not question it one bit."

      I have offices in both of those cities, and have a couple of my boys on it now.

      To preserve the "I told you so" factor, we will wait to announce this news until 2006."

    15. Re:Predictions by ignavus · · Score: 1

      11. Someone will invent numbered points without bullets in front of them. Oh, wait ... I just did!

      --
      I am anarch of all I survey.
    16. Re:Predictions by bergeron76 · · Score: 1

      I'm actually moving to Sirius for Stern. I've been paying for XM (and it's ads) in a de-facto way, but in a few months I'm getting Sirius.

      --
      Don't think that a small group of dedicated individuals can't change the world. It's the only thing that ever has.
    17. Re:Predictions by JoseAugusto · · Score: 1

      Great Predictions! You HAVE to post them on ZapFuture.com. Regards.

  30. Re:Prediction: Slashdot Will Have Even More Dupes! by tomstdenis · · Score: 1

    um ... that wouldn't make a good load of sense. You'd have a wifi adapter in every flashdrive? You can't use BT as it's too slow and even Wifi maxes out at 54Mbps [all while using around 200mAh at 3V]. The cost would be an interesting figure.

    Tom

    --
    Someday, I'll have a real sig.
  31. It's been in the technology cooker for a while now by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Last year saw a new Debian Stable release... I think this year we'll finally see some sharks with frickin' laser beams attached to their heads!

    It could happen

  32. predicton for 2k6 by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    > Perhaps killer apps are not as important as they once were thought to be." What would Slashdot users put in their top 10?

    Perhaps in 2006 we can stop using the phrase killer app

  33. Show me a boy @ seven and I shall show you the Man by Leontes · · Score: 3, Interesting

    Wikipedia will continue to grow, and content will continue to become more refined and generally better. Facebook will grow, and options for adding non-school connected individuals will be introduced before the end of the year. Myspace, Friendster and Liverjournal usership will decline. The television shows available on itunes will increase ten fold, some regular free television program downloads will become available by march. Political Speeches will become regularly podcast. A c-span like service will become reasonable popular on itunes podcasting service. Macintosh computers will sell more computers in this year than in the last two, combined.

  34. Hot tub high-tech. by MikeFM · · Score: 1

    From an area of my recent interest (new job) I'd say that hot tubs will go really high tech this year. Already they do both hot and cold tempertures, have hi-fi stereo, flat screen tv, etc. I guess they'll have full Internet access and video games within the next year. Pretty cool.

    --
    At what price learning? At what cost wisdom? The price is a man's peace of mind, and the cost is his life.
  35. 3D iPod by yet+another+coward · · Score: 1

    3D iPod!!!

    1. Re:3D iPod by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      [insert joke about anything being in human space being 3d, then insult about OP only being able to afford a 2d (read:jpeg) IPOD]

    2. Re:3D iPod by steevc · · Score: 1

      I can just imagine people walking around with their VR iPods, superimposing their media on their view of the 'real' world.

      I fear for our future if we continue to cut our selves off from reality. We'll all end up in the Matrix or something weirder.

    3. Re:3D iPod by yet+another+coward · · Score: 1
      Superimposing? I was thinking "replacing." And what is this "walking around"?

      I fear for our future if we continue to cut our selves off from reality. We'll all end up in the Matrix or something weirder.


      We're already here. It's just far less than expected.
  36. Number 7 by rolfwind · · Score: 3, Interesting
    7. Even small start-ups go global

    Three major forces are driving the rise of the mini-multinational -- start-ups that are launched from the get-go as global operations.

    First, there's the promise of lucrative foreign markets, which are growing more quickly than in the United States. Some overseas opportunities are now even bigger than here, such as cell-phone sales in China.

    Second, U.S. companies can lower their costs and boost profits more quickly by outsourcing work to places like China and India, where labor is cheaper.

    Finally, the Silicon Valley model of nurturing start-ups has spread to other regions around the world. Venture capitalists are opening offices in those countries and are getting more comfortable with helping to nurture companies in those foreign markets.

    Many companies, seeded by Silicon Valley venture capital firms, set up headquarters in the valley, where they employ high-end engineers, marketing professionals and senior management.

    But they have major operations in Bangalore, India, or Shanghai, China, and increasingly elsewhere.


    I thought it was easier - the herds who wants to make a fast buck in the stock market now jump on any tech stock hoping it will be the next eBay or Google. In short, there's a lot of demand for investments, but good ones are in short supply That might explain why so many stocks are so overpriced now (according to Buffett). But it should also be pointed out that most newcomers have a poor business plan and eventually are going to fail.
    1. Re:Number 7 by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful

      >> Second, U.S. companies can lower their costs and boost profits more quickly by
      >> outsourcing work to places like China and India, where labor is cheaper.

      This item did not surprise me one bit. The MBA types are going to continue to hype this point for years to come.

      What surprises me is that they (the MBA types) are starting to be more aggressive with how they "fudge" the numbers. For example, one of the managers that I work with was touting (in a meeting with upper management) that in two years time companies will be able to cut development time by 50% by outsourcing the technical work to India. When I confronted him for some references or reasons to back up his claim he could provide nothing, not even a magazine article.

      >> Many companies, seeded by Silicon Valley venture capital firms, set up
      >> headquarters in the valley, where they employ high-end engineers, marketing
      >> professionals and senior management.

      Okay, this is going to sound like a troll (and probably get modded off-topic) but this is my honest observation from the field ... The "high-end engineers" in Silicon Valley will be needed to clean up after the "cheap labor" in India and China. More and more I find that the job of senior software engineers in the US is to clean up after the team(s) in India or explain how to do the work (over and over again) instead of just doing the work ourselves. We are no longer training the next generation of American engineers like we did in the past. The "senior software engineer" title in corporate america is becoming synonymous with middle manager. Perhaps this is why (as a previous post put it) that the year of 2005 saw no real new technologies.

  37. Blake Ross's ten predictions by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I vote for Blake Ross's "Ten predictions for the new year" as the most hilarious list of predictions for 2006.

    For example (I picked this one out for the Slashdot crowd): Due to a glitch in Windows Vista, Microsoft CEO Steve Ballmer will mix up his notes at PDC '06 and declare: "Developers, developers, developers....We're going to f*%ing bury those guys!" Nineteen will leave on stretchers with furniture-related injuries.

  38. 1996: HD DVD Player 1997: HD DVD Recorder by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    As a person who lives in 2 countries I had to buy the first DVD players on the market for both zones, then another two with recording capability. Then I found a recorder that can record and play my zones (multi-zone, thus illegal).

    I guess the next big thing will be to throw away again what I have and purchase the DVD player that can play in High Definition. Then later, buy one that can record too. (No doubt they could make a recorder right away, but there is no business in there.)

    I am awating the next HD DVD standard will force me to do. Will zones still be present? With 1920x1080 resolution for HDTV around the world, will I need to buy a different model just like now with the PAL and NTSC models?

    One thing is for sure: I can start selling my normal DVD movies on Ebay before they become obselete.

  39. Delayed Vista release... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    maybe 2007.

    Oh, and therefore, more flying chairs around the Redmond campus.

  40. 2006 Predictions Here Too by jg21 · · Score: 1

    There are multiple sets of technology predictions just publisheed here too, at the AJAX Developer's Journal site. Amazing how AJAX is a-booming!

  41. Computer Power by ackthpt · · Score: 1
    Computers will become twice as powerful and so expensive only the 6 richest people in the world will be able to afford them.

    By the last quarter of 2006 quad core 64 bit Athlons will be common place at Circuit City and be preinstalled with Windows Vista. ExtremeWhizzoHot Tech will review and find it 10% faster than an Athlon 64 3000 with XP.

    --

    A feeling of having made the same mistake before: Deja Foobar
  42. What I really wish by selil · · Score: 4, Funny

    1. The DMCA is overturned entirely when all the chief justices get threatening letters from RIAA for watching jib/jab videos. 2. The Patriot Act is declared dead in the water when it is found that undeclared wiretaps were actually against the FISA judges. 3. Video on demand systems requiring no physical media and available on multiple formats cause independent media moguls to become instant zillion-aires and they buy up studios by the dozens converting them to creative commons. 4. The really cool ultra slim portable gadgets found in Japan and Europe are actually released to North America versus gray market. 5. The hottest TV show involves high geek factor when a three guys, and a kid are marooned on a haunted island being bombed by the Pentagon, while a forgotten civilization forges forward trying to find a lost city in another galaxy with wierd looking zombie dudes who eat flesh play pool on the island with the guys and kid. 6. Video game ESPN sports takes on a new twist when they electrify the chairs with 100,000 volts. 7. Windows XP SP4 is released when nobody upgrades to the "late" Vista when no OEM produces a machine with a terabyte of disk space, and a 20Ghz processor required to do anything but load the OS. Bill Gates bursts into flames when demo-ing Vista from a microwave leaking processor. 8. Open Source Advocates actuall publish an agreed upon coding standard for all languages and it is ignored by all. 9. NASA launches a man to the moon sans rocket as it is determined that no rocket is safe therefore they get rid of the rocket and use a giant sling shot. 10. The Cubs win the world series.

    --
    --- Location Unknown
    1. Re:What I really wish by klept · · Score: 1

      roffl and mdr. Hey I already thought the cubs won the series a 100 years ago.

    2. Re:What I really wish by rsadelle · · Score: 1

      11. Paragraph breaks really start to catch on.

    3. Re:What I really wish by JoseAugusto · · Score: 1

      Very nice! You need to register your predictions on ZapFuture.com. Regards.

    4. Re:What I really wish by koreaman · · Score: 1

      There is one 'f' in 'rofl' you French dude.

    5. Re:What I really wish by klept · · Score: 1

      lol dude but would it escape the Slash filter?

    6. Re:What I really wish by koreaman · · Score: 1

      huh?

    7. Re:What I really wish by klept · · Score: 1

      Some of what I have wrote to Slashdot has been filtered, censored, in short not included. EG anything in parenthses doesnt get through. And they are normal words in the parentheses. I think I have seen them do the same with what they consider vulger words like f-. The way people get around that in MMORGs is by just adding one more letter like in omffg with 2 fs. And dude, lol, no offense, but if you dont know what a MMORG is, I think you aint no geek and / or whitehat hacker. Heavon forbid if you were a blackhat hacker. My gf has strictly forbid me to talk to people like that. She also has had me drink 3 glasses of milk a day, obey my mommy and daddy, and be kind to dumb animals, especially the 2 legged ones at the RIAA or whatever the fascists call themselves today lol. Enjoy the rest of the holiday. I know I will :).

    8. Re:What I really wish by koreaman · · Score: 1

      rofl omfg

      Je sais ce que c'est un MMORPG.

    9. Re:What I really wish by klept · · Score: 1

      Hey you only got one f. Ques que se vous dite?

  43. 100% accurate predictions by Darius+Jedburgh · · Score: 1

    Faster computers, hard drives with higher capacities and faster networks. Batteries that last (slightly) longer. New releases of Linux. New patches for Windows. Several new rounds of iPods. Google release more software. Security holes in Windows and Internet Explorer. And new web protocols will be announced.

    1. Re:100% accurate predictions by jo42 · · Score: 1
      > And new web protocols will be announced.

      Running over HTTP. Again.

  44. Painkillers by TubeSteak · · Score: 4, Interesting
    I agree with the need for more/better pain killers

    One of the main problems with the current meds is their massive potential for abuse.

    I predict this will take off in 2006
    To counter abuse, drug makers are developing ways to reformulate prescription painkillers. Purdue Pharma in Stamford, Conn., which makes OxyContin, is thinking of adding a second drug, called an opiate antagonist, that neutralizes the effects of the opiate.

    The antagonist would be walled off using polymers or some other sequestering technique, said Dr. David Haddox, the company's vice president of health policy.

    A patient who swallowed the drug would get full pain relief, as intended. But if someone tampered with the pills, the antagonist would be released.
    ...
    A second approach is to mix in a chemical irritant like capsaicin, the main ingredient of hot chili peppers, said Dr. Woolf, who has a patent on the idea.

    Because the esophagus and stomach do not have many receptors for hot peppers, patients could take the pills as prescribed and find relief, he said. But the lining of the nose and cheeks are loaded with pepper receptors, and anyone who ground up such a pill would get a burning feeling in the chest, face, rectum and extremities, as well as paroxysmal coughing.
    It doesn't really advance the effectiveness of painkillers, but it'll be a very very effective stopgap measure to basically kill the street trade in these meds.

    Doctors will also be able to perscribe powerful painkillers to the patients who need them w/out constantly worrying the DEA will investigate them for possibly overperscribing pain meds.

    BTW - the second method (with capsaicin) is really fucking evil. The Dr. describes the pain of snorting/injecting it here
    --
    [Fuck Beta]
    o0t!
    1. Re:Painkillers by Wyatt+Earp · · Score: 1

      I have alot of strong pain meds to deal with the migraines from a Stroke I had in April. My Doctor and I got a good laugh out of the capsaicin option. As someone that has to go through hoops for the meds that help me because of the asshats who abuse them, I say Ya Capsaicin!

    2. Re:Painkillers by wildsurf · · Score: 1

      A second approach is to mix in a chemical irritant like capsaicin, the main ingredient of hot chili peppers, said Dr. Woolf, who has a patent on the idea.

      What about people with involuntary acid reflux, or vomiting? If the capsaicin is released in the stomach, this could have horrible consequences even for those who take the pill as intended. I think the opiate antagonist is a MUCH better idea.

      --
      Weeks of coding saves hours of planning.
    3. Re:Painkillers by moof1138 · · Score: 1

      As I understqand it people grind the pill since it is time-released, so they can get the whole hit in one shot. While the antagonist thing might work, I expect some sort clever junkies would figure out how to cut the pills just so to get past it.

      As for adding capsicum, it would stop snorting/injection, but they could pulverize the pill and put it in a gelatin capsule to get it past the mouth, and they would still get a rush since it would still hit in one big shot instead of being time-released.

      --

      Hyperbole is the worst thing ever.
    4. Re:Painkillers by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Read the link he posted. That is mentioned.

    5. Re:Painkillers by NixLuver · · Score: 5, Insightful

      I can't believe that this thread is treating this stupidity as if it were a good thing. The piles of red tape and bullshit that people have to go through to buy scheduled drugs are not because of the abusers, it's because of the War On Drugs. How can someone consider themself free if they don't have basic sovereignty over their own body? Good god, people, the only difference between abuse and use is whether or not a Doctor wrote you a prescription. As long as you don't get stupid, there are a million doctors who will prescribe basically whatever you're smart enough to request and provide basic, rudimentary symptom support and insurance for.

      The real technological advance would be a free society, not newer and better ways to fuck up people's days.

    6. Re:Painkillers by TubeSteak · · Score: 1, Flamebait

      You Act Like You Know What You're Saying, But Your Ignorance Is Showing

      Since drugs like Marijuana have no medical purpose (according to the federal gov't) any use = abuse. Since opiates and various other meds do have medical uses, you're required to get a perscription because it assumes that the doctor writing you script has some clue wtf he's doing. Doc's who act like script mills, at best get their licenses revoked and at worst, they go to jail.

      I also take issue with your contention that "the only difference between abuse and use is whether or not a Doctor wrote you a prescription." That is such a load of crap. You assume that some idiot off the street can self diagnose and self medicate with the same results as a Dr. who meets minimal DEA standards to dispense scheduled drugs and went to school for 7 extra years.

      Oh and you know why everyone always says "get a second opinion"? Because some of these educated people we call doctors still make mistakes. And you seriously think "rudimentary symptom support" is all that doctors are good for?

      "How can someone consider themself free if they don't have basic sovereignty over their own body?" I guess the threat of going to jail for breaking laws like... i dunno... shooting heroin & smoking crack, means none of us are free?

      P.S. Drugs like Ketamine, Extacy, LSD, GHB and a variety of others were banned because they were abused by the party crowd. Not because they had no legitimate uses. They're just getting around to studying X as a psychiatric medication (which was the original use its creator had intended) because of the past and present abuse of MDMA.

      --
      [Fuck Beta]
      o0t!
    7. Re:Painkillers by lysergic.acid · · Score: 5, Insightful

      Adding an opioid antagonist like nalaxone doesn't do anything when you snort it, only when you inject it. If you add enough of it that it has any effect when you take it orally or when you snort it, then you're blocking off just as much of its analgesic effects. Same with trying to remove the psychotropic effects of ecstasy--its the psychotropic effects that also make ecstasy theraputic (it's not really a pain killer).

      Our drugs laws are just dumb. People are always going to take opiates and other drugs recreationally because it's fun. It's like trying to prohibit the recreational consumption of alcohol (a societally accepted recreational drug which we have a double standard for) just because there are alcoholics. The funny thing is, before opiate dependence was made a crime, it was seen by Americans as less of a nuisance to society than alcoholism--people could also support their opiate habit on pennies a day and still be functional members of society. In fact, you'd be suprised at how many well known people in history used opiates such as opium/heroin/morphine regularly.

      What we need to do is just reform our drug policies and most of the societal problems related to drug abuse will simply go away--like people ODing on "ecstasy" because it was cut with more dangerous substances, or the prohibition style crime-wave which has sweeped the nation, etc.

    8. Re:Painkillers by Arcanix · · Score: 1

      Yeah maybe this will prevent people from snorting it or grinding but most people take full pills anyways. First, the only people who snort it are people who have done a lot of blow and think it'll be better but due to the chemical composition of OC you actually lose much of the high using that method. Second, if you eat one on an empty stomach you don't really need to grind it to get a fast release. Most people who have used it more than a few times know it's best just to take it normally.

      Essentially, they're spending a lot of time and money and the end result will be that the illegal trade continues with no disruption... pretty much a microcosm of the War on Drugs in general.

    9. Re:Painkillers by 10101001+10101001 · · Score: 1

      >Since drugs like Marijuana have no medical purpose (according to the federal gov't) any use = abuse.

      Yes, well, we all know how well the federal gov't is admitting that it make a mistake about a drug and is willing to revoke its stance upon reading medical journals and seeing many proactive states, who have read said journals, make some medical use of marijuana available. Oh, wait, I forgot..the federal gov't dragged such laws to the Supreme Court which somehow distorted "interstate commerce" to activities that occur entirely within the state 'cause, you know, smoking marijuana might mean not buying other medicine, and that'll effect interstate commerce. <sarcasm>*Great* basis for why the federal gov't has any business in a state affair, btw...</sarcasm>

      >I also take issue with your contention that "the only difference between abuse and use is whether or not a Doctor wrote you a prescription." That is such a load of crap.

      Any use without a prescription is considered abuse. No matter how much you contend the likelihood that use without a prescription is abuse, from a legal perspective he's spot on.

      >>How can someone consider themself free if they don't have basic sovereignty over their own body?

      >I guess the threat of going to jail for breaking laws like... i dunno... shooting heroin & smoking crack, means none of us are free?

      Yep. The same sort of lack of freedom that comes with banning cursing in Russian. It's funny how arsenic and all sorts of poisons aren't banned for sale but heroin and crack are. I guess it's gov'ts way of saying they don't mind if you kill yourself straight out, but if end up abusing drugs and then commiting crimes to continue the habit, we should just ban all such drugs in general.

      >Drugs like Ketamine, Extacy, LSD, GHB and a variety of others were banned because they were abused by the party crowd. Not because they had no legitimate uses.

      Woopie. I guess we should also ban shouting "Fire" in a theater even when there's a fire because, you know, people might abuse their speech.

      --
      Eurohacker European paranoia, gun rights, and h
    10. Re:Painkillers by fyngyrz · · Score: 2, Interesting
      guess it's gov'ts way of saying they don't mind if you kill yourself straight out, but if end up abusing drugs and then commiting crimes to continue the habit, we should just ban all such drugs in general.

      Ah, no. The gov't will hammer you simply for using, having, or selling the drugs, no need to commit any further crime at all... and most people don't.

      Just so we're clear. It's a mommy law. It has no reasonable basis in ethics, legitimate protection of the citizen, or the citizen's economy at large (although it certainly keeps a lot of cops, politicians, and other gov't employees in funds and lodging, as well as serving to keep prices high on the street and drug dealers in a very profitiable business.)

      Mommy laws:

      "Don't use pot." Why? "Because I'll beat you with a strap. It's for your own good." But mommy, I have glaucoma! "You'll have glaucoma with strapmarks on your butt if you step out of line. Now get out of my way, I have to finish explaining to your brother what is going to happen to him if he says certain words on the radio or television."

      --
      I've fallen off your lawn, and I can't get up.
    11. Re:Painkillers by Red+Flayer · · Score: 1

      It's not crushed because of time-release; it's crushed because of the absorption rate of the drug through the nasal membranes vs through the GI tract.

      Also, drugs absorbed intranasally don't go through first-pass metabolism, where up to about 20% of the drug is metabolized by the liver as it passes through the GI tract.

      --
      "Trolls they were, but filled with the evil will of their master: a fell race..." -- J.R.R. Tolkien on Olog-hai
    12. Re:Painkillers by Red+Flayer · · Score: 1

      "What about people with involuntary acid reflux, or vomiting? If the capsaicin is released in the stomach, this could have horrible consequences even for those who take the pill as intended. I think the opiate antagonist is a MUCH better idea."

      Well, that's one thing doctors are for... to decide what drug is appropriate for the patient and their condition. For any patient with GERD or vomiting, capsaicin-laced painkillers would be contraindicated.

      --
      "Trolls they were, but filled with the evil will of their master: a fell race..." -- J.R.R. Tolkien on Olog-hai
    13. Re:Painkillers by Red+Flayer · · Score: 1

      "But the lining of the nose and cheeks are loaded with pepper receptors, and anyone who ground up such a pill would get a burning feeling in the chest, face, rectum and extremities, as well as paroxysmal coughing" (emphasis mine)

      Are you kidding me, pepper receptors!?!?

      Capsaicin works by approximating the effect of neurotransmitters at regular pain receptors. The human body doesn't have any 'pepper receptors.'

      One of the responses to capsaicin is mild euphoria, similar to a runner's high, induced by the body's reaction to pain. I'm not sure a lot of junkies wouldn't welcome the additive effects :)

      --
      "Trolls they were, but filled with the evil will of their master: a fell race..." -- J.R.R. Tolkien on Olog-hai
    14. Re:Painkillers by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful

      A "free society" is like a flying car. It does not work without competent, responsible users. I don't care how many drug users die or are damaged, but I do care about the rest of us.
      Drugs differ. Weed? Fine. PCP? Bad Sh1t. Some regulation is needed.
      Want a free society? Move to Somalia. You can do what thou wilt, but so can others.

    15. Re:Painkillers by Daengbo · · Score: 1

      This is why I love Thailand. Pretty much everything is available over the counter. I can self-prescribe as often as I like. This means that I don't have to schedule a doctor's appointment for a minor ear infection when I already know what the doctor will tell me to take and I just need his/her signature.

    16. Re:Painkillers by poot_rootbeer · · Score: 1


      So druggies will learn to simply swallow their illegal OxyContin to get to HappyLand instead of grinding them up first. It'll take a little longer for the effect to take, but it beats taking a hot pepper up the nose. How is this going to suppress abuse?

    17. Re:Painkillers by wildsurf · · Score: 1

      For any patient with GERD or vomiting, capsaicin-laced painkillers would be contraindicated.

      Sure, for the most part, but upchucking is not 100% predictable. Just wait until some not-so-bright individual takes one of these pills and then goes on a roller-coaster, then sues the pharmaceutical company for pain and suffering. (Or goes for a bumpy car ride, or eats tainted food, or listens to too much Barbra Streisand.) I haven't chundered in years, but I still don't relish the idea of filling up my insides with capsaicin. Unless there's a LOT of chips and guacamole to go with it.

      --
      Weeks of coding saves hours of planning.
    18. Re:Painkillers by Red+Flayer · · Score: 1

      The idea, though, is that the nerve endings wouldn't be exposed to the polymer-encased capsaicin; only busting the polymer mini-capsules open, by cutting etc, would cause a situation where it would do damage.

      --
      "Trolls they were, but filled with the evil will of their master: a fell race..." -- J.R.R. Tolkien on Olog-hai
    19. Re:Painkillers by wildsurf · · Score: 1
      The idea, though, is that the nerve endings wouldn't be exposed to the polymer-encased capsaicin; only busting the polymer mini-capsules open, by cutting etc, would cause a situation where it would do damage.

      From TFA:
      "If a formulation containing capsaicin is swallowed whole, release of the irritant in the stomach and small intestine would not cause discomfort," Woolf maintains.
      This seems to imply that some capsaicin does get released into the stomach, though he doesn't say how much. I still wouldn't want to be the guinea pig for this experiment.
      --
      Weeks of coding saves hours of planning.
    20. Re:Painkillers by Red+Flayer · · Score: 1

      I agree, I'd not want to be the guinea pig either. But I think the reason it wouldn't cause discomfort os because it would be sequestered/encapsulated...

      I know for sure that capsaicin released in the GI can cause discomfort if it's not sequestered, usually about 24-36 hours after ingestion...

      --
      "Trolls they were, but filled with the evil will of their master: a fell race..." -- J.R.R. Tolkien on Olog-hai
    21. Re:Painkillers by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Prohibition will end if these cops have anything to say about it. And they do. It's still going to take awhile, but in all honesty we are starting to win.

      http://www.leap.cc/ - Law Enforcement Against Prohibition. ;-)

    22. Re:Painkillers by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      BTW - the second method (with capsaicin) is really fucking evil.
      might be a good way to find those wmd.

      </scnr>
      .~.
  45. Prediction: economic colapse by argoff · · Score: 4, Insightful

    My prediction is that technology predictions will be cut short because the US economy is getting ready to fall off hyperinflationary debt cliff. A rare condition where costs and prices become orders of magnitude larger while at the same time pay and employment become orders of magnitude lower. With over leveraged housing debt on a housing market that is getting ready to fall, too much credit card debt, too much corporate debt, too much trade debt, too much municipal debt, too much state debt, too much federal debt - and 270 TRILLION with a T in derivatives contracts that must settle wether thru default or thru printing up money. It wouldn't take too much in the modern efficient US economy for things to snowball and between the FED and a potential panic out of foriegn dollar reserves - it could really be a very very ugly global colapse. IMHO, people should really consider gold in their portfolios this year, there is a reason why it has been going up for the last 5 years, and recently those reasons have become a lot more immenent.

    1. Re:Prediction: economic colapse by Mad+Marlin · · Score: 1, Insightful

      ... bla bla bla ... the sky is FALLING! ... bla bla bla ... so buy GOLD!

    2. Re:Prediction: economic colapse by argoff · · Score: 1

      ... bla bla bla ... the sky is FALLING! ... bla bla bla ... so buy GOLD!

      Well, laugh in my face all you want, but it won't change the fact that I made an absolute killing in gold stocks this last two quarters. Well, I guess google did pretty well too, but if you want to cling to a technology stock with that high of a P/E - then good luck, you'll need it.

      BTW, everyone already knows that the dollar is going to get trashed ... the only question nowdays is can the derivatives market withstand the shock? The current theory is that the FED can just print up money to smooth out defaults, but I'd like to see the fed print up the 12 trillion dollar spread on interest rate "bets" out there without causing mass inflation or messing up a lot of other stuff!

    3. Re:Prediction: economic colapse by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Your predictions may be correct, but you make this all sound like it will happen overnight. I predict that the U.S. economy decline will be slow but evident, but nothing as drastic and quick as you seem to think.

    4. Re:Prediction: economic colapse by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Ya, you are probably right. From a historical standpoint, economic collapse is usually a slow process allowing everyone plenty of time to adjust.

      Or not.

    5. Re:Prediction: economic colapse by thedletterman · · Score: 1

      Paranoid? Things are not as bad as MoveOn.org and the ACLU would like you to believe. Our housing market isn't teetering on a crash. We are at a high on home lending, as historically interest rates have never been so low, but that doesn't mean everyone or even a large percentage of people have completely overextended their incomes. The last few years have been a great time to buy property, and people have been doing just that. Is it going to slow? That's inevitable, I'm surprised it has lasted this long. Is it "spurring the economy"? Yes, because people are reinvesting in their own assests by mortaging instead of renting. Noone else seems to make the connection that this enormous cost savings is resulting in a more widely distributed wealth than the traditional "land lord" economics and people are having more assets to borrow money against. Banks aren't extending so much credit out there that everything is going to crash because they would lose the most, and they aren't that stupid.

      --
      Any fool can criticise, condemn, and complain, and most fools do. - Benjamin Franklin
    6. Re:Prediction: economic colapse by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Until social security is privatized, we're probably safe from a major economic collapse for at least a few months.

    7. Re:Prediction: economic colapse by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Good thing you got that big army and secret polis to keep order though huh?

    8. Re:Prediction: economic colapse by MarkWatson · · Score: 1

      While your predictions are likely to come at least partially true in the next 5 or 10 years, I can't agree with predicting a dollar collapse occuring exactly in the next year.

      My advice is to avoid debt at all costs and then sit back and watch the show. People with lots of consumer debt will turn into economic debt-serfs, and will likely never again have control over their own lives.

    9. Re:Prediction: economic colapse by marcosdumay · · Score: 2, Insightful

      " ... bla bla bla ... the sky is FALLING!"

      The must anoying thing about making predictions are those guys that come saying " ... bla bla bla ... the sky is FALLING!". So, the sky really falls, and they shut up. But a week later, you make another prediction, and they say the same thing again.

      You know... There are people out there who really know what they are talking about. Those persons are capable of making a real diagnosis of the situation, and you'd better folowing their advice.

      Specificaly for this thread, the only speculation the GP does is that the sky will fall in 2006, not 2007 or 2008. Everybody already knows that it will fall soon, and it isn't even a hard guess, because there are plenty of evidence pointing that the fall will happen next year.

      About the other discussion (abrupt or slow falling), My guess (based on a lot of evidences) is that the US (with the world toguether) will face several abrupt hits, with one of them being next year. Every hit, you'll have the chance of avoiding the next ones, but it will become harder and harder to do, since you will probably answer to them with increased protectionism and power concentration.

    10. Re:Prediction: economic colapse by Vitriol+Angst · · Score: 1

      I think you should keep quite about the "buy Gold" comment.

      Just tell your friends and Pro-Liberty Progressives.

      Keep it on the "down low" you know? I've decided my new years resolution was not to interfere with people who don't know their own best interest and are determined to self-destruct. When it "hits the fan" you at least get the satisfaction of hearing these folks say; "Wow, this financial collapse came as a complete surprise -- nobody could have foreseen that Trickle Down would have been such a dismal failure." Almost has humorous as Media Coverage of; "Rich people missing, somehow, all the American companies are now Bermuda companies -- amazing. Unfortunately, we don't have any experts around to explain this to you, because they are also, all missing."

      --
      >>"ad space available -- low rates!!!"
    11. Re:Prediction: economic colapse by utuk99 · · Score: 1

      If the end is truely nigh, then the best investment is lead or perferably copper on the end of a brass tube filled with explosive powder. I knew there was a reason I always keep a thousand rounds handy for each of my guns. I just got another thousand 9mm and .22 for christmas. :)

      So you keep your little pieces of paper that say you own gold somewhere. I will keep my investment in my trunk and closet. We will see which is more useful in a full economic collapse.

      PS I think a economic collapse is unlikely, but a correction is comming, so gold is probably not a bad investment, but there are a lot of other investments that are good in a bear market.

      PSS Firearms are great stress relief in any economic climate.

    12. Re:Prediction: economic colapse by bergeron76 · · Score: 1

      Interesting post, but precious metals aren't the end-all solution. Any investor should be hedged, and that would include previous metals (like Gold). The US Economy typically reflects high gold prices with a low US dollar in relation to foreign markets. It makes perfect sense in relation to the current US Economy. Which, is still recovering from the "stock market bubble". Recession is the economic way of ebbing from a tide (aka the bubble). The same thing happened in the 80's.

      Your mention of the global market is helpful, but it also means that demand for our vast exports will simultaneously grow (China is the greatest importer of US Cotton, so they aren't going to call in debt lest they hurt their own economy).

      Our country has certainly had better administrations/years; but it's nothing we haven't seen before.

      --
      Don't think that a small group of dedicated individuals can't change the world. It's the only thing that ever has.
    13. Re:Prediction: economic colapse by Mad+Marlin · · Score: 1

      Gold has been overhyped for the last 500 years. If you believe that the dollar is collapsing, then you should move to another currency, and gold hasn't been a real currency for at least that long. Oh, and move out of the United States too, assuming that you live there. Not that it would really help: if the American economy collapses, it will bring the rest of the world with it. I believe that the American economy is going to win in the long run though.

  46. My prediction by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I know without a doubt that the long awaited Duke Nukem will finally be released bundled with Longhorn.

  47. my two cents^H^H^H^H^Hpredictions by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    1. Early in December, a Sony EVP will say, "Honest, we are pumping out PS 3's out as fast as we can... we sure wish we could have more units out there on the shelves right now."

    2. Microsoft proclaims the September 2006 Vista launch to be a stunning success, despite yawns and considerable harping by the trade press. Just before year end, Jeff Raikes announces that a service pack will ship in summer 2007 with a number of enhancements and improvements in the areas of security, performance, and robustness.

  48. In Bizarro World by daemonenwind · · Score: 2, Interesting

    - PS3 sales exceed all expectations as Sony delivers sufficient consoles and games at launch, while the user base ignores the glaring fair-use issues inherent to the Sony product line.
    - PalmOne resurges as the owner of the cell/MP3/Palmtop space by incorporating WiMax and Sun microprocessors.
    - Apple's move to Intel chips causes the biggest brand loyalty seachange in modern history as disgurntled users throw their WinTel boxes off of buildings.
    - Lawsuits will be brought against cities offering WiMax by local users who are hacked over their unsecured connection.
    - AOL manages to rebirth itself as a dominant Internet player by selling residential access to Internet2.
    - Dell actually "gets off the pot" and begins to sell AMD desktop/laptop systems.
    - Elliot Spizer raids the home of Bill Gates, finds a Linux machine running the automated home features, along with the full archive of goatse images as framed art in a hallway.
    - Europe splits off from the Internet As We Know It, China joins in, and most left-wing American political websites go strangely quiet on what comes to be known as "Internet Classic".
    - The DMCA is overturned by a housewife in New York state appealing a fight with the RIAA all the way to the Supreme Court. Her arguments before the justices become required reading at most major law schools.
    - The "Third-World Laptop" will be widely used....to grind grain. See also, "The Gods Must Be Crazy".

  49. No way! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Don't hold your breath, it's not about to happen. Flash just can't be produced at 100$/200GB unlike HDs. They'd have to come down in price by over 100 times to be comparable - that's asking a bit much (a price reduction of over 99% that is). The drive is a few moving/metal parts (only cost so much) and some somewhat-inexpensive electronics, Flash would require billions and billions of NMOS transistors which cost a lot more to produce (and perhaps draw a lot of current and create heat at such quantities). Flash is coming down in price, perhaps by 2x to 4x per year, but nowhere near as much as it would take for that to happen (HDs are also increasing in size, although not as quickly).

  50. killer apps still needed by slashname3 · · Score: 1

    There are several killer apps still needed to make Linux a main stream system for the average user.

    1. visio replacement (dia is not quite there yet) 2. Income tax software (non-web based turbotax) 3. group calendar system 4. DVD/video editing packages 5. better wireless driver support

    1. Re:killer apps still needed by tomstdenis · · Score: 1

      More drivers is about the most important thing.

      Bring the hardware, software will follow.

      Of course this would require the hardware manufacturers to

      a) open up their interface with documentation

      or

      b) write a GPL driver and give it out.

      But they won't because they're stupid and they think knowing how to make a wifi device send a frame in memory is "leaking how th design was implemented". Like knowing the encoding for the MUL instruction tells you how an AMD64 processor works ... :-/

      SPEW!!!!

      Tom

      --
      Someday, I'll have a real sig.
    2. Re:killer apps still needed by slashname3 · · Score: 1

      I forgot another one:
      Project management software

      Drivers are needed as I indicated. But some of these basic apps are needed so people can get work done. Without such applications segments of the work force don't have an option of using linux. Things are improving. But getting a few more of these applications out would remove most of the objections to moving to linux. Or even solaris.

  51. mIRC might finally get upnp by ZenJabba1 · · Score: 1

    As has been requested from the writers of mIRC for nearly 3 years, mIRC will ship with upnp to deal with the nightmare of DCC ports.

    --
    `find / -name "*your_base*" -exec chown us:us {} \;`
    1. Re:mIRC might finally get upnp by Achromatic1978 · · Score: 1

      I doubt it. I seriously think mIRC is dead in the water, not even a minor bugfix release in 18 months.

  52. The Future is here by TheTopher · · Score: 2, Informative

    hope to see something like an iPod Video that can store movies at screen sizes greater than 320x240 just so they can be hooked up to TVs and played back anywhere. You already can. If you want TV quality output, you have to save it to the iPod as that quality and the iPod will convert to 320x240 in real time when you use its screen. If you use an AV adapter and set the iPod to "video out" it will play it in the quality that you saved it as. Seems Apple has some fortunetellers working in R&D. http://store.apple.com/1-800-MY-APPLE/WebObjects/A ppleStore.woa/72703/wo/Na399iwmd8cv2dV70ja18EmHd0d /2.SLID?mco=543CBB30&nplm=M9765G%2FA

  53. All I want is.. by earthstar · · Score: 1

    A total slashdot design makeover using techniques like CSS, so that its soft 'n' sweet on eyes.

  54. Apple by JanneM · · Score: 1, Funny

    Apple will encase a piece of rock in white, translucent plastic, name it iCon and immediately sell five million of them for $249 each to fans solemnly declaring that Apple has redefined the meaning of amorhpous silicates.

    --
    Trust the Computer. The Computer is your friend.
  55. Simple. by Tatarize · · Score: 4, Funny

    Wimax becomes huge.
    OpenOffice.org media campaign speeds adoption, achives 30% penetration.
    Britney Spears remarries.
    AJAX becomes even more popular making the internet kinda suck.
    UPnP applications become almost universal.
    Firefox penetration hits 25% before IE7 comes out and knocks it down to 15%, even though IE7 sucks.
    Pope Benedict XVI dies.
    Democrats take the house, gain in Senate.
    US troops remain in Iraq throughout the year.
    Bush's approval rating reaches 30%.
    2006 Hurricane Season exausts name list again.
    Somebody creates an effective non-website based bittorrent network.
    Pi proven to be normal.
    3 new higher prime numbers found.
    Bird Flu kills about a dozen people and is stopped completely.
    "The third man of the fire will empower the forces of the blue prince." - Deemed to be quite vague but fits several situations that occur.
    South fails to rise again.
    Majority of scientists backslide on existence of dark matter halos.
    RIAA/MPAA go even more apesh!t.

    --

    It is no longer uncommon to be uncommon.
    1. Re:Simple. by Lord+Omlette · · Score: 1

      Democrats take the house, gain in Senate.

      You mean the reverse, right? Dems are reasonably close in the Senate, but don't have a chance in hell of retaking the House for a decade at least. (gerrymandering)

      Somebody creates an effective non-website based bittorrent network.

      DHT? Someone has to make an initial torrent file, right?

      South fails to rise again.

      Have you been paying attention these last 5 years?

      The third man of the fire will empower the forces of the blue prince.

      Son of a bitch.
      --
      [o]_O
    2. Re:Simple. by JoseAugusto · · Score: 0, Flamebait

      Loved your predictions. Why don't you post them on the right place, on ZapFuture.com? Regards.

  56. The latest advance from Diebold by Belseth · · Score: 5, Funny

    Voterless voting machines. No longer will the average american be burdened with the inconvience or respnosibility of voting. Simply register and you're done. Diebold will even see that you get to have a say in elections after you're dead. Field tested last year in Ohio the system is now ready for widespread use just in time for congrssional elections next year. Sit at home in comfort and watch the results to see who you voted for election night.

    1. Re:The latest advance from Diebold by ylikone · · Score: 1

      Your vote will be mostly determined by which political invested more capital in diebold.

      --
      Meh.
    2. Re:The latest advance from Diebold by Tablizer · · Score: 1

      Voterless voting machines.

      They already have this. It is called "congressional campaign donations".

    3. Re:The latest advance from Diebold by BushCheney08 · · Score: 1

      Of all the predictions listed, the only true one is marked 'funny'. That's kind of sad...

      --
      Be a real patriot: Question authority. Think for yourself. Formulate your own conclusions.
    4. Re:The latest advance from Diebold by Vitriol+Angst · · Score: 1

      Funny and true.

      The only reason they make fun of people wearing "tin foil hats" is because THEY, don't want you wearing the tin foil hats.

      Everyone insightful these days is a "conspiracy theorist." What an effective conspiracy!

      --
      >>"ad space available -- low rates!!!"
  57. The Bad News by Lucas+Membrane · · Score: 3, Interesting
    1. Radar range beam weapons for crowd control. Not lethal but completely inhumane.

    2. Lethal drone aircraft the size of insects.

  58. Only one thing is certain by dangitman · · Score: 3, Funny
    Chairs will be thrown.

    OK, maybe two things. Thrones will also be chairs.

    --
    ... and then they built the supercollider.
  59. Some predictions by jd · · Score: 2, Funny
    • Wireless optical interconnects replace switches in clusters
    • Polarized light video displays (3D in color, and it's pretty damn good, even if you do need polarized glasses) in the home
    • DVD vendors finally concede defeat and make their products genuinely interchangeable, even when using a home recorder
    • SCO completes the transformation into a Ringwraith and adds Frodo to the lawsuit
    • Someone develops a completely functional computer that runs Linux and Fedora Core, using only chip specifications from Open Cores and programmable components. The computer then outsells at least one well-known PC manufacturer.
    • SGI reaches crisis point and can't continue. It is bought by OSDL, the Altix is moved to the Opteron and Linus Torvalds sets a new record for kernel build times.

    --
    It's a small world and it smells funny; I'd buy another if it wasn't for the money; Take back what I paid (SoM)
  60. GPS .... by ylikone · · Score: 1

    Why would having a GPS in your car be a political hot issue? GPS's just tell YOU where you are located on the planet, they do NOT transmit that information to anybody else.

    --
    Meh.
    1. Re:GPS .... by NixLuver · · Score: 1

      Actually, I think the GP was referring to the confluence between mobile telephony and various positioning systems that use GPS or tower triangulation to locate the handset/module/whatever (think OnStar and similar). My Handset can be tracked by tower triangulation - actually, much more accurately than a standard GPS system can provide.

    2. Re:GPS .... by Wyatt+Earp · · Score: 1

      I mean the units that'll track your movements, monitor your speed, ticket you, etc.

      The United States still has a serious streak of being independent, when the 24/7/365.25 monitoring of every vehicle in the country pops up, it's going to cause a serious political issue.

      I get Car and read about what the British government is going to do in regards to watching every meter of road and taxing you, in the UK the attitude seems to be, oh well, whatever. In the States it'll be ugly, folks shooting out cameras and worse ugly.

  61. Satellite radio will boom... by ylikone · · Score: 2, Funny

    Satellite raadio service will be all the rage... until people stop and figure out that they are paying monthly to *listen to the radio*.

    --
    Meh.
  62. Men will be replaced! by jeremycec · · Score: 0, Offtopic

    Guys, our worst fears are coming true. I always heard that if women could make babies without us and figured out a way to open jars, we were not long for this earth. Well, check out this and this. Doh!

    1. Re:Men will be replaced! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
    2. Re:Men will be replaced! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      They'd go extinct in four generations, tops. And I say this as a woman.

  63. 20 Years You Nimtard Mod by TubeSteak · · Score: 1
    For whatever idiot with mod points who modded me offtopic, I refer you to this current Wired article about developement of an AIDS vaccine
    The failure in the last couple years of one of the more promising vaccine candidates has bred some frustration. The United Nations' top HIV/AIDS official acknowledged earlier this year at a conference that it was no longer realistic to hope that the world will meet its goal of halting and reversing the spread of the pandemic by 2015. A British delegate to that conference predicted it might take 20 years before such a vaccine is created.
    I will now repeat my prediction:
    We will have _____ wonderful technology in 20 years.

    And if you think a vaccine isn't a 'technology' then you're woefully ignorant of the extensive computer modeling and testing that molecules and potential drugs go through before they even reach the beginning stages of trials.
    --
    [Fuck Beta]
    o0t!
    1. Re:20 Years You Nimtard Mod by vertinox · · Score: 1

      Actually, I would counter that most singularity-esque technologies are already in labs or on timetables to be released into mass productionvery shortly, but you never hear about them because the companies producing them don't need to make press releases that tout their technologies will be feasible in 20 years.

      Take for example instant boot computers via flash memory... Either 2006 or 2007 and will be one of the more revolutionary developments of the PC since maybe the 56K modem or 3d graphics card, but you don't see Intel press releases even mentioning a big hub bub about it because those companies don't need VC investors.

      So when someone does say "X technology will be ready in 20 years" they really mean is "we'd like enough venture capital to last us for 20 years".

      --
      "I am the king of the Romans, and am superior to rules of grammar!"
      -Sigismund, Holy Roman Emperor (1368-1437)
    2. Re:20 Years You Nimtard Mod by Gravis+Zero · · Score: 0

      i dont think the companies are interested in forcefully giving it to african and muslim nations where men rape women and spread the virus.

      In this issue we document again the horrendous brutality by men in Moslem countries -- for instance in Pakistan where rape and murder flourish, supported by Islamic laws. The stoning of women to death is ordered by Islamic judges after women are raped - while the rapists go free: and this is Islamic justice! the article

      but there is still more. this is africa specific.

      Among the young men questioned, 80% said women were responsible for causing sexual violence; 30% said they thought women who were raped 'asked for it'; 20% thought women enjoyed being raped; and 10% said they thought gang rapes were 'cool.' The survey, was conducted by Johannesburg's Southern Metropolitan Local Council and the nongovernmental organization CIETafrica, also found that about 60% of rapists knew their victim. . .South Africa's AIDS epidemic, which affects more than 4 million people, 'adds a frightening dimension to the country's rampant levels of rape,' Reuters reports. the article

      giving away medication to rapists and recieve no money does not sound enticing. again, im not trolling, this is factual information.

      --
      Anons need not reply. Questions end with a question mark.
    3. Re:20 Years You Nimtard Mod by Gravis+Zero · · Score: 0

      wtf? why did i get an automatic score of 0?

      --
      Anons need not reply. Questions end with a question mark.
  64. More hybrid and bio diesel technology... by cliveholloway · · Score: 1

    More hybrid and bio diesel technology from the big Automakers

    This is a scary one. The UK can produce enough biodiesel in an environmentally friendly manner (waste cooking oil) to supply 1/380 of its road transport fuel. After that, the most common form of biodiesel supply is oil palms. And this supply is an environmental disaster in itself - huge forests felled and burned to create space for the trees, peat bogs dried out.

    God knows what kind of destruction will take place if this "environmentally friendly" fuel supply takes off in the US.

    cLive ;-)

    --
    -- Trinity in high heels carrying a whip: The donimatrix - there is no spoonerism
    1. Re:More hybrid and bio diesel technology... by BrynM · · Score: 1
      After that, the most common form of biodiesel supply is oil palms.
      If you've ever seen the middle of the United States you would swear it was made completely of corn, a prime biodiesel source. In the US we grow so much of it due to subsidies that it's in most of what we eat. Here, that's pretty much what biodiesel equates to: Nebraska... er... Corn.

      Not that this makes it any better of solution for the UK, but it's been a huge part of the US energy debate since the 70s.

      --
      US Democracy:The best person for the job (among These pre-selected choices...)
    2. Re:More hybrid and bio diesel technology... by Wyatt+Earp · · Score: 2, Informative

      There are vast swaths of the United State's prime agricultural areas sitting unused, with more areas able to grow Soy, Safflower, Rice, Corn, Wheat, etc.

      In 2003, with alot of land unused, the US produced 256,904,992 metric tons of Corn for example.

      The United States has a vast range of products that can be economically produced.

      As of 2003 some tax credits are available in the U.S. for using biodiesel. In 2004 almost 30 million US gallons (110,000 m) of commercially produced biodiesel were sold in the U.S., up from less than 0.1 million US gallons (380 m) in 1998. Due to increasing pollution control requirements and tax relief, the U.S. market is expected to grow to 1 or 2 billion US gallons by 2010. The price of biodiesel in the United States has come down from an average $3.50 per US gallon ($0.92/l) in 1997 to $1.85 per US gallon in 2002. This appears economically viable with current petrodiesel prices, which as of 09/19/05 varied from 264.8 cents to 306 cents.

      A pilot project in Unalaska/Dutch Harbor, Alaska is producing fish oil biodiesel from the local fish processing industry in conjunction with the University of Alaska Fairbanks. It is rarely economic to ship the fish oil elsewhere and Alaskan communities are heavily dependent on diesel power generation. The local factories project 3.5 million tonnes of fish oil annually.

      Meanwhile, independent results have shown that a Cambridge, MA company, GreenFuel Technologies has been successful in producing biodiesel using flue gas emissions from power plant smokestacks. Using a patented algae bioreactor, GreenFuel utilizes algae, and a process of photomodulation, to reduce emissions while extracting oil rich biodiesel from the system. Currently, the company has a field site at the MIT cogeneration facility and at an undisclosed power facility in the U.S.

      The United States also has the ability and experance to ramp up and produce alot of a new technology when it's politically or economically viable to.

  65. REALLY! by ylikone · · Score: 0

    You'd think that Slashdot being the number 1 site for geeks, nerds and techies, that the site developers could put in a little bit of code to check for dupes or display similarity percentages to the previous years worth of articles. I mean, come on, it's NOT THAT HARD! There really is no excuse for dupes.

    --
    Meh.
  66. Predictions huh? by sane? · · Score: 2, Interesting
    OK, some random predictions to keep in with the theme.

    1) At least on major country or trading block will attempt large scale taxation of the Internet and Internet commerce. This will be used as a cover for the removal of the last vestiges of anonymity, with the sop of removing spam in the same breadth. The approach will spread worldwide as governments find it a no brainer.

    2) Parallelisation will continue as not only to all normal machines become SMP boxes, but the flexibility grows to combine and split apart all the computer power you possess. The PDA/mobile phone won't be a separate item, it will become only a part of the wider entity that you can carry with you. Increasingly accessing and synchronising with the whole entity will become as norm.

    3) Wireless will go long range as mobile phone companies attempt to get over the still birth of 3G with WiMAX like services.

    4) TV will go Internet, and very quickly both transmission and country borders will look quaint.

    5) DRM will be added to everything, and just as quickly broken. Lies will be told and individuals will be taken to court.

    and finally, but not least

    6) Bird flu will hit home, preceding by a dry run of the first wave of infection. All those that have been playing down its impact will point to the first wave and ignore the second. They will die and the world that emerges from 2006 will look very different than the one we have now. The double wammy of the shock of peak oil will send the world into an introspective spiral that will shatter certain expectations.

  67. This Will be the Year... by Greyfox · · Score: 1
    of the cybernetic dildo. Giving a whole new meaning to the term "pop up." A couple of startups have tried to get into this field earlier, but I guess the VCs were still too scared from the dot-com bubble burst.

    Heh heh OK, maybe not. What I'd REALLY like to see is for the Heliodisplay people ramp up production. Depending on how well it works, that technology has incredible potential and a lot of applications suggest themselves as soon as you look at it. I hope it pans out...

    --

    I'm trying to teach myself to set people on fire with my mind... Is it hot in here?

  68. Top ten predictions as Google URLs by Anonymous+Cowdog · · Score: 1

    http://universe.google.com/ [finally making Hubble images easy; follow-on to Earth]

    http://audio.google.com/ [logical extension of current offerings]

    http://calendar.google.com/ [a top productivity app]

    http://todo.google.com/ [productivity app, maybe 37signals purchase?]

    http://contacts.google.com/ [productivity app, maybe LinkedIn purchase?]

    http://teach.google.com/ [for teachers, organizing materials]

    http://learn.google.com/ [for students of all ages]

    http://bookmarks.google.com/ [del.icio.us type service]

    https://storage.google.com/ [personal storage space]

    http://welcometotheinterweb.google.com/ [something, I don't know what, for the next billion Internet users]

  69. best in the thread by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful

    The powers-that-be are fully aware of this situation and the "social ramifications" of what would occur. So I will add to your prediction (that I agree with), that a very large dual foreign/internal war will be promulgated. They have about failed to contain the information and even the most optimistic of stock market bull shills is having a hard time keeping up a happy face, so the herds are close behind. So, judging by historical parallels, they will need a diversionary tactic, and it's invariably always been a larger general war. It's always been the last gasp of failing empires....

    My best guess is that it will kick off with a phony WMD series of attacks on US soil, which will be blamed on the bad guy du juor overseas and unnamed domestic "terrorists".

    Gold and silver are OK as far as they go, but I would also recommend actual long term stored food and medical supplies, etc as sound "investments". That and being totally out of debt. There's a reason they passed that bankruptcy law this year, and it's because they know what is coming and they are planning to shift masses of wealth upstream quasi-legally. Also see the FED stopping the reporting of the hard data of the M3 supply. A very telling clue there.

    1. Re:best in the thread by argoff · · Score: 2, Interesting

      So, judging by historical parallels, they will need a diversionary tactic, and it's invariably always been a larger general war. It's always been the last gasp of failing empires....

      Yeah. I've been trying to figure out what that's going to be though. I don't think it will be the war on terrorisim, no, that reminds me of the war on indians that was fought - then paused while the US went thru a civil war - then resumed after the civil was was over. Also, this time all the conflicts seem to center arround controlling information ..... the fed manipulating money, the stock market, copyright, the internet, dupeing all our trade partners .... and you can't controll information with physical war. It would half to be some kind of information war? Perhaps DRM, price controlls, massive propaganda, idle threats???? Between that supreme court rullings on emminent domain and student loans, and the massive housing debt - it already seems like they're getting ready to do something with peoples property? Try to make a currency backed by land?? I dunno, it is very strange.

  70. Cold fusion is closer than you think by ylikone · · Score: 1

    There are retired ex-nuclear-physisists working on creating reproducable cold fusion reactions in their basement labs at this very moment. Read that in a magazine somewhere.

    --
    Meh.
    1. Re:Cold fusion is closer than you think by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Now, I'm not a thermodynamics professor or anything, but if fusion were cold, how would we get the energy out of it? I thought generators relied on a temperature difference.

  71. Blu-ray by edgr · · Score: 1

    Blu-ray will take off and HD-DVD will be left wondering what happened. The predicted 'format war' will never happen except in the minds of a few HD-DVD fans.

  72. Heres an invention by Man+in+Spandex · · Score: 1

    Some sort of machine that tells people that they just did what they hate.

    Slashdotter: DAMmit, This is a Dupe. Slashdot why do you always do this to me!
    Machine: Negative! That comment is a dupe of the following members' comments: #21345, #21346, #21347...... #755000,#755001. Detecting date..... December 26. Happy Festivus!

  73. Wrong! by ylikone · · Score: 1
    >Batter that last (slightly) longer

    I doubt it. I think we'll see more and more super-quick charging batteries though. Everybody doing the "15-minute" recharge now... next it is will "5-minute", then a few seconds.

    --
    Meh.
  74. A look at last year's predications by Swamii · · Score: 2, Interesting
    Chris Pirillos 2005 predictions:

    1. MSN Search will be renamed to MSN Grahams Number
    2. Robert Scoble will be fired and/or hired by another company at twice his current salary
    3. George Lucas announces three more Star Wars films (dubbed Suckquels), after Special Editions for the Prequels and Super-Duper Mega Deluxe Power Special XP Uber Plus Editions for the Original Trilogy are re-pre-pro-issued
    4. Adobe Reader 7.0.1 will be released, solidifying its place in the Guinness Book of Worlds Records as the Most Painfully Long Boot Process for an Application that Everybody Needs.
    5. eBay will eBay itself on eBay
    6. Microsoft will begin issuing patches as viruses and spyware, thus boosting update adoption by ten billion percent
    7. The RIAA will make writing on any kind of CD illegal
    8. Everybody and their grandmother will have a podcast thats just as boring and useless as their blogs
    9. To compete with Atom in the marketplace, Harvard will start calling RSS Eve
    10. It becomes legal to castrate / sterilize spammers under vigilante justice

    Robert X. Cringelys 2005 predictions:

    1) Microsofts entry into the anti-virus and anti-spyware businesses will be a disaster for users. This is based on everything I know about Microsoft, having watched the company for almost 28 years. They will make a big fanfare, spend a lot of marketing dollars, but in the end, the company simply wont be able to keep up with the demands of keeping virus signatures current, which isnt the real point of this gambit, anyway. There is so much to this story and so much that I could write that I think Ill do so next week, and just move on to the next prediction.
    2) Carrying over from last year, I predict that Burst.com will beat Microsoft in their current lawsuit. But to avoid having to eat crow again over timing, let me put this in greater context. IF a trial actually takes place, as it is now scheduled to do this summer, Burst will easily win. Microsoft is at a disadvantage already as a bully. Burst will probably get Judge Motz to tell the jury that Microsoft deliberately destroyed evidence, and it doesnt hurt, either, that Burst is just plain right on all counts Microsoft DID violate their patents, DID violate Bursts non-disclosure agreement, DID attempt to illegally put them out of business, and DID attempt to control the market.

    Of course, Microsoft might settle before trial, but at this point, I dont think that is likely out of simple arrogance on Microsofts part. Microsoft is furious with Burst for the little companys continued survival, plus Microsoft is listening to the wrong lawyers on this one. So Burst will win on some or all counts ,and I expect the damage award to be in the billions. Of course, Microsoft will appeal. But the key difference between this case and other Microsoft cases is that once Burst wins, Real Networks and Apple Computer, both of which are also infringing Bursts patents (along with TiVO and a bunch of other companies), will immediately buy Burst licenses, throwing $100+ million into Bursts coffers and leading to everyone else EXCEPT Microsoft taking a Burst license, too. At that point if it goes that far and Microsoft is that stupid Redmond wont be able to risk not having a Burst license and will settle, too. Only by waiting so long Microsoft will have blown any number of advantages it could have had. Typical.

    3) Apple will take a big risk in 2005. This could be in the form of a major acquisition. With almost $6 billion in cash, Steve Jobs hinted to a group of employees not long ago that he might want to buy something big, though I am at a loss right now for wh

    --
    Tech, life, family, faith: Give me a visit
  75. Vista won't by namekuseijin · · Score: 1

    "what will be hot"

    except for this one, Vista won't:

    "make a difference in our lives"

    hey, surely yet another Windows won't.

    "make someone rich and famous"

    Bill Gates is already very rich and famous.

    --
    I don't feel like it...
  76. Re:Prediction: Slashdot Will Have Even More Dupes! by c_forq · · Score: 1

    How fast do you need a thumbdrive to be? It would have great uses I would think, sure it would be horrible for live distros of linux, but it would be great for word documents, excel spreadsheets, and small to medium photoshop projects.

    --
    Computers allow humans to make mistakes at the fastest speeds known, with the possible exception of tequila and handguns
  77. Here's mine, posted in my blog: by Regnard · · Score: 1

    I have my set of predictions for 2006:

    http://webstandards.raquedan.com/

    --
    Need a color? Try 100 random colors
  78. Cross-platform the new buzz word ... by wysiwia · · Score: 1

    might not become a technology of 2006 but definitely one of the next years. It has the potential to change the future of the whole computer industry. Just imaging you go to the next store and buy a computer of your liking but never again have to ask "Does this application run on this system?" and neither "Is this game also available on this computer?". There will come a future were customers simply expect anything running on every system. 2006 might not be the right time but if you start asking for cross-platform solutions this future will come.

    O. Wyss

    --
    See http://wyoguide.sf.net/papers/Cross-platform.html
  79. O'Really by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Here are my .02 cents on their predictions;

    Cell phones do everything: Puke and vomit; I think this is on the money. Cell phones will do everything; half assed, that includes making phone calls.

    Internet phone calls zoom: Telcos have to much money and political clout; won't happen thanks to the FCC and political lobbying.

    The office moves to the Web: Nope; off on this one; people like their app's on their PC's. Might have some small uptake in the corp world; but nowhere else. Once a network connection dies; 100,000 employees have nothing to do except put their finger up their A$$.

    Stem-cell research advances: Ok, on the money.

    Biotechs target flu vaccines: Uhhh; this person is on crack.

    Even small start-ups go global: Yes, its called the web; been done already.

    Video comes to the blog: People are already doing it.

    On-demand video everywhere: Not till everyone gets faster broadband. Companies still pay by the packet; way too much cash. Other countries (home users) could do it; since their broadband is cheaper and faster. Please feel free to thank the FCC for our sorry assed state of broadband.

    Clean technologies: This has been in the pipe for years; until it is cheaper than polluting the environment; it isn't going to happen. Money talks..............

  80. Predictions for 2006 by Animats · · Score: 5, Insightful
    1. Saudi Arabia finally admits the Gawar field has peaked. Oil passes $70 per barrel.
    2. US interest rate spike. "Homeowners" with adjustable-rate interest-only loans default and are foreclosed.
    3. Housing prices crash as foreclosures glut market.
    4. Congress finally starts investigating some activities of the Bush administration.
    5. No real change in Iraq. Neither side can force a decision, so both sides keep bleeding.
    6. China announces major progress in their space program.
    7. Micropayments flop, again. Goodbye, Bitpass.
    8. A Cat 4 or 5 hurricane wipes out another southern US city, or New Orleans floods again.
    9. One of the big three US car manufacturers goes bankrupt.
    10. Total number of active blogs decreases.
    1. Re:Predictions for 2006 by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      No real change in Iraq... both sides keep bleeding

      Ha! That's great! As if US politicians are the ones "bleeding" from the loss of wives, husbands, sons, daughters, and life in general!

      Seriously, put on those glasses, son.

    2. Re:Predictions for 2006 by DNS-and-BIND · · Score: 1
      Dude. Katrina was a Cat 3. Iraq keeps having peaceful elections. Big Three? Chrysler was bought by Daimler two years ago. Get with the times and quit the wishful thinking of catastrophes.

      Number 10, I can get behind, though.

      --
      Shutting down free speech with violence isn't fighting fascism. It IS fascism!
    3. Re:Predictions for 2006 by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Seems like we lost more civilians on 9/11 than soldiers in 4 years since then.

    4. Re:Predictions for 2006 by jyx · · Score: 1

      Iraq keeps having peaceful elections.

      I just did a quick Google search on Iraq, election and violence.

      This is obviously a new meaning to the word 'peaceful' that has yet to make it to the dictionaries.

    5. Re:Predictions for 2006 by Lord+Omlette · · Score: 1

      No real change in Iraq. Neither side can force a decision, so both sides keep bleeding.

      If the Bush Administration doesn't begin withdrawing troops now, they won't be able to get most of them home in time for the upcoming elecions. Remember: it's never been about winning the war on terror, it's always been about *looking* like we're winning.

      Total number of active blogs decreases.

      Any reason you feel this way?
      --
      [o]_O
    6. Re:Predictions for 2006 by JoseAugusto · · Score: 0, Troll

      Very nice predictions. Why don't you post them on the right place, on ZapFuture.com? Regards.

  81. Re:Prediction: Slashdot Will Have Even More Dupes! by AoT · · Score: 1

    The Point: Open read access to 1G of WiFi music files.

    And after ThumbDrives are 10G with buikt-in WiFi, you will understand.

  82. Re:Prediction: Slashdot Will Have Even More Dupes! by AoT · · Score: 1

    You make no sense.

    Yes; speed, resistance and cost would play a minor cost, It would be nothing in even the short/medium range and everything in the long range.

  83. What The Simpsons didn't say is that... by jd · · Score: 1

    ...this will be achieved by extracting DNA from the bones of the Dire Wolf, the Bone-Crushing Dog and the Epicyon then genetically embedding the fragments into a poodle. Aside from the fact that it will then have three ears and meow on thursdays, it will be much placated with the therapy.

    --
    It's a small world and it smells funny; I'd buy another if it wasn't for the money; Take back what I paid (SoM)
    1. Re:What The Simpsons didn't say is that... by h4rm0ny · · Score: 3, Funny

      I think traditional breeding techniques have been woefully underused. Recent breeding experiments with foxes in Russia have shown that a noticeable difference can be produced in a much shorter time than expected. So my suggestions for controlled breeding are as follows:
      • Dogs should be bred for intelligence. Never mind making them big / small / whatever... selectively test and breed only those dogs that show exceptional intelligence. If we'd been doing that for as long we've been turning wolves into poodles and pugs, we'd have super-intelligent dogs by now.
      • Rabbits should be bred for size. Right now, rabbits are cute and make great housepets. But think how much cuter they would be if you bred them bigger! You could have a retriever-sized dutch lop hopping around your house. That would be so adorable and cuddly.
      • Bears should also be bred for both size and temperament. In addition to breeding really really big bears for security work and Japanese gameshows, you could breed really little friendly ones. They'd be even better than dogs because their body shape is squatter and more huggable. If they were bred without the claws, then you'd have great pets for young children. Very comforting for kids at night - I know I'd buy one for my children.

      And that's just off the top of my head right now. I'm sure I could think of much more when I'm sober.
      --

      Aide-toi, le Ciel t'aidera - Jeanne D'Arc.
    2. Re:What The Simpsons didn't say is that... by pnewhook · · Score: 1
      How about genetic engineering? Some benefits:
      • a talking dog. Talking cats wouldn't be nearly as interesting as all they'd say is "Piss off I'm trying to sleep"
      • talking cows, chickens and turkeys. After listening to them PETA will discover that they really are stupid and deserve to be eaten
      • flying pet dragons. With fuel getting so expensive, going to work on a flying dragon will be the environmentally friendly and 'in' thing to do
      --
      Tesla was a genius. Edison however was a overrated hack who liked to torture puppies.
    3. Re:What The Simpsons didn't say is that... by smooth+wombat · · Score: 1
      flying pet dragons. With fuel getting so expensive, going to work on a flying dragon will be the environmentally friendly and 'in' thing to do

      Ya know, there is that planet called Pern where they did this very thing. Came in very handy when Treadfall was about. A nice side benefit was that the dragons could teleport to almost any place on the planet in an instant.

      Would definitely make a dent in the fuel consumption and the waste generated by these beasts could be turned around and burned as fuel itself.

      Now if only we could figure out how to manage the mating ritual we'd be in good shape.

      --
      We will bankrupt ourselves in the vain search for absolute security. -- Dwight D. Eisenhower
    4. Re:What The Simpsons didn't say is that... by pnewhook · · Score: 1
      Ya know, there is that planet called Pern where they did this very thing. Came in very handy when Treadfall was about. A nice side benefit was that the dragons could teleport to almost any place on the planet in an instant.
      Here I am trying to come up with legitimate solutions to environmental problems and you start talking crazy talk with teleporting dragons on other planets. Sheesh! ;-)
      --
      Tesla was a genius. Edison however was a overrated hack who liked to torture puppies.
    5. Re:What The Simpsons didn't say is that... by zopf · · Score: 1

      I would be scared sh*tless if dogs suddenly got massively smarter. What with the sharp teeth and near-unstoppable jaws, we'd all be goners if they figured out they didn't all need to be obedient.

      --
      Did you see the pool? They flipped the bitch!
    6. Re:What The Simpsons didn't say is that... by h4rm0ny · · Score: 1


      We're fine so long as no idiot engineers one with an opposable thumb. You try and stage a revolution with your teeth. :)

      --

      Aide-toi, le Ciel t'aidera - Jeanne D'Arc.
  84. 4/1 by Whorebot · · Score: 2, Funny

    An end to Slashdot's April Fools tech coverage.

  85. gah by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    ajaxjacking

  86. FIRST: Let's see last year's predictions! by oldCoder · · Score: 1

    Let's see who was right and who was wrong. Otherwise, why try to be right?

    --

    I18N == Intergalacticization
  87. Video is coming by b0r1s · · Score: 1

    Hopefully more and more Video Blog services - which will lead to amateur TV over IP, begin integrating with amateur video to/from cell phones, and more video from more sources in more locations. More, better, everywhere.

    --
    Mooniacs for iOS and Android
    1. Re:Video is coming by CreatureComfort · · Score: 1


      You say that like it's a good thing.

      --
      "Unheard of means only it's undreamed of yet,
      Impossible means not yet done." ~~ Julia Ecklar
  88. My two cents by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    With the completion of phase I of the HapMap project, 2006 will see the rapid development of the roots of "personalized medicine" that the media have been ranting about.

    While Woo Suk Hwang stepped down from his position from Seoul National University in 2005 for falsifying research results, he still proves his method in creating patient-specific stem cell lines to be effective in 2006.

    Windows Vista fails to gain the ground Microsoft anticipates. Universities and many corporations continue to use Windows 2000, and DIY PC hobbyists continue to use Windows XP. OEM users, of course, are forced into Vista.

    "Social networking" internet sites like MySpace and Facebook begin to raise even more privacy concerns, but these concerns will only be limited to communities like Slashdot.

    CCTV surveillance cameras crop up in the streets of major US cities, by decree of the DHS. The public is wary about being watched, but gradually accepts them just as traffic speed cameras were. America's freedom to racially profile are secure.

  89. Nothing new under the geek (this year) by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    "It's evolution baby, not revolution, and that's the way I like it :)"

    It's intelligent design.

    I predict that a geek will get laid in 2006.

  90. My (decreasingly) reasonable predictions by Shazow · · Score: 4, Funny

    1. A dozen of new web-based RSS feed readers will be announced, all featuring tags and various intricate social features. Eventually one or two will be considered the "norm" (as Blogger, Livejournal, etc are considered the norm for blogging, despite all the imitators). My bookmarks folder rejoices.

    2. AMD motherboards with DDR2 will finally show up. I finally upgrade from an obsolete 32-bit system. My applications rejoice.

    3. Sony PlayStation 3 will be released. It will be sold out. Then more will be released. Then more will be sold out. Then more will be released. Then the price will drop a little. Then I'll buy one. Then it will be hacked by various groups for various purposes. Sony pouts. I rejoice.

    4. A new flavour of Cola: Chocolate! (Eww) Oops, not technological, sorry.

    5. Opera finally releases a stable, good, browser for PocketPCs. I rejoice.

    6. Enlightenment 17 is finally released. I try it, don't like it, go back to XFCE.

    7. XFCE 4.4 is finally released. I upgrade. I rejoice.

    8. Microsoft releases Vista. Only thing new from XP: Aero and 9 versions of the same thing with 9 different price tags. (The cheaper version users are stuck with an inferior plastic paperclip.)

    9. Apple releases their new line of Intel PowerBook laptops. No one notices -- attention diverted by the release of 4 and 8 gig iPod Nanos with FM radio. I consider buying one until I realize, again, that it's a waste of money. iPod lovers' collection of iPods grows to 9 units per person. Apple rejoices.

    10. I go to sleep. You rejoice.

    - shazow

    1. Re:My (decreasingly) reasonable predictions by JoseAugusto · · Score: 1

      Very very bright views of the future. You need to register at once your predictions on ZapFuture.com. Regards.

  91. Without reading their list by thedletterman · · Score: 0, Redundant

    I've got money on most of my predictions, but I'll have them out here.. 1. WiMax, Intel signed onto this technology in 2005, and companies like Alvarion has already deployed BreezeMAX solutions all around the world. I think this is going to be one of the biggest trends in wireless networks in 2006, but maybe to hit the US the latest. 2. Video on Demand, this one has been around and gradually picking up steam, but as higher bandwidth starts hitting the national infrastructure and portable devices capable of carrying it around with you increase in popularity, the demand for this is going to start gaining exponentially. Companies like Path One Networks develop video switches and such for this technology that is going to do very well in 2006. 3. High Definition TV, in 2006, Sony is going to be the first company that has an end-to-end solution for HDTV from hardware to content. HDTVs, players, games, and videos. Expect the PS3 to be bigger than just what "core" promises. The Blueray will challenge against HDTV will be monumentally strengthened by the Japanese demand for this console, and once again, we will see the United States slow to adopt the revolutionary technology foreign countrys are recognizing first. 4. Portable electronics, with chip manufacturing down to a 65nm process, look for continued improvements in minaturization and energy efficiency to make more capable, portable electronic devices. Look for Sony to make the thinnest, lightest most capale VAIO yet. Also look for competition erupting against the Blackberry with devices like the Treo and iPod to meet head-on challenge in the portable mp3 player market. 5. Digital Rights Management, everyone's skittish about this one as it threatens many of our very lifestyles. Today we have the flexibility to record and tranfer our files between our devices spurring the innovation of new products. With the RIAA lobbying heavily to Congress to put barriers in manufacturing and lawsuits against application, don't be surprised if digital right managements mandated by law are applied to consumer electronics devices, and don't be surprised if these applications of the law suck worse than the recent Sony-BMG fiasco. 6. Unlimited bandwidth, Sun's been talking about this for years it seems like. The infrastructure is dependant on the fattest pipes you can imagine, and I'm imagining a combination of several emerging technologies competing and combining to create the fastest, most robust architecture ever conceived to emerge in 2006. Utilizing powerlines, wireless, fiber to the home, as well as improvements to cable signaling will result in companies like SBC, Verizon, and Comcast to offer cost-effective internet capablities up to 100mbit, and allow home access upward of 35mbit. 7. This one is wishful thinking, but an application of techonlogy that is entirely feasible and useful in 2006. The first self-bootable chipset. I'm talking the first motherboard with an integrated C: for loading an operating system resulting from "on board" nvram. I've got my fingers crossed it will be a company like ABIT or ASUS that drop this, what I see as the inevitable evolution in chipsets. Companies like Saifun that used different signaling storage to double the capacity of NVRAM promises to see the emergance of a 4GB nvram chip in 2006, which would be sufficient space to load any operating system in existance at lightning fast speeds. We've already integrated the sound card, networking cards, and everything else into the chipset, with the tremendous performance increase of integrated storage, coupled with the demand for "locked configuration" workstations dependant on network file storage system, the ability to expand with SATA devices doesn't even seem necessary in many configurations leaving us a motherboard, usb ports, and a video port combined with new low heat cpus could result in the slimmest pc yet, and without an optional optical drive.. no moving parts. This is a corportate administrator's dream, but I still think this configuration is more likely for 2008 than 2006. 8. AMD, 2006 is

    --
    Any fool can criticise, condemn, and complain, and most fools do. - Benjamin Franklin
  92. If only I had remembered to HTML format! by thedletterman · · Score: 1

    Sorry about that last post, I didn't realize it wouldn't carry CRs
    I've got money on most of my predictions, but I'll have them out here..

    1. WiMax, Intel signed onto this technology in 2005, and companies like Alvarion has already deployed BreezeMAX solutions all around the world. I think this is going to be one of the biggest trends in wireless networks in 2006, but maybe to hit the US the latest.

    2. Video on Demand, this one has been around and gradually picking up steam, but as higher bandwidth starts hitting the national infrastructure and portable devices capable of carrying it around with you increase in popularity, the demand for this is going to start gaining exponentially. Companies like Path One Networks develop video switches and such for this technology that is going to do very well in 2006.

    3. High Definition TV, in 2006, Sony is going to be the first company that has an end-to-end solution for HDTV from hardware to content. HDTVs, players, games, and videos. Expect the PS3 to be bigger than just what "core" promises. The Blueray will challenge against HDTV will be monumentally strengthened by the Japanese demand for this console, and once again, we will see the United States slow to adopt the revolutionary technology foreign countrys are recognizing first.

    4. Portable electronics, with chip manufacturing down to a 65nm process, look for continued improvements in minaturization and energy efficiency to make more capable, portable electronic devices. Look for Sony to make the thinnest, lightest most capale VAIO yet. Also look for competition erupting against the Blackberry with devices like the Treo and iPod to meet head-on challenge in the portable mp3 player market.

    5. Digital Rights Management, everyone's skittish about this one as it threatens many of our very lifestyles. Today we have the flexibility to record and tranfer our files between our devices spurring the innovation of new products. With the RIAA lobbying heavily to Congress to put barriers in manufacturing and lawsuits against application, don't be surprised if digital right managements mandated by law are applied to consumer electronics devices, and don't be surprised if these applications of the law suck worse than the recent Sony-BMG fiasco.

    6. Unlimited bandwidth, Sun's been talking about this for years it seems like. The infrastructure is dependant on the fattest pipes you can imagine, and I'm imagining a combination of several emerging technologies competing and combining to create the fastest, most robust architecture ever conceived to emerge in 2006. Utilizing powerlines, wireless, fiber to the home, as well as improvements to cable signaling will result in companies like SBC, Verizon, and Comcast to offer cost-effective internet capablities up to 100mbit, and allow home access upward of 35mbit.

    7. This one is wishful thinking, but an application of techonlogy that is entirely feasible and useful in 2006. The first self-bootable chipset. I'm talking the first motherboard with an integrated C: for loading an operating system resulting from "on board" nvram. I've got my fingers crossed it will be a company like ABIT or ASUS that drop this, what I see as the inevitable evolution in chipsets. Companies like Saifun that used different signaling storage to double the capacity of NVRAM promises to see the emergance of a 4GB nvram chip in 2006, which would be sufficient space to load any operating system in existance at lightning fast speeds. We've already integrated the sound card, networking cards, and everything else into the chipset, with the tremendous performance increase of integrated storage, coupled with the demand for "locked configuration" workstations dependant on network file storage system, the ability to expand with SATA devices doesn't even seem necessary in many configurations leaving us a motherboard, usb ports, and a video port combined with new low heat cpus could result in the slimmest pc yet, and without an optional optical drive.. no moving p

    --
    Any fool can criticise, condemn, and complain, and most fools do. - Benjamin Franklin
  93. Actually : 2D iPod !!! by droopycom · · Score: 1

    A 2D ipod would be much better.

    Think thin as a sheet of paper.

  94. second the vote for 'best in thread' by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful

    Yeah. I've been trying to figure out what that's going to be though. I don't think it will be the war on terrorisim

    [from a different AC]

    watch what's happening in Iran. U.S. has them cornered, with bases in Afghanistan on one side, and Iraq on the other. They're working on building some nukes, because the U.S. has a policy of not invading nuclear-armed countries. Israel will attack Iran to take out their nuke sites, the U.S. being the enabler by removing military opposition in the in-between country of Iraq...

    China is also a powder-keg. If they see the U.S. too distracted with briar-patch entanglements elsewhere, they'll move to take Taiwan...

    Silver, Food, Guns and Gold are on my shopping list. Silver before Gold, because Silver is industrially useful, and it's easier to trade. 1oz silver liberty is currently ~$10, whereas a 1/10 oz Gold Eagle is ~$58. Also, most of the silver that's ever been mined has been used up over the last 20+ years (production deficit + price controls == big problem).

    Got a bag of rice, bag of beans, and a 50lb bag of wheat is in this week's natural food buying club order (they deliver to seven western states - four corners, Nevada, SoCal, W. Texas). I'm also stocking some seeds... Yes, economic troubles are certainly ahead, and all the world seems blind to it.

    fulfilledprophecy.com looks interesting (found link from the wikipedia), though I haven't really looked through it.

    also see Michael Mandeville's The Coming Economic
    Collapse Of 2006


    michaelmandeville.com/collapse2006/index.htm

  95. Hurry up and hide, the future is here. by Mathness · · Score: 2, Funny

    Apple will launch iEarpod which fits in your ears.
    Spam text obfuscation will evole into a new language.
    Steve Balmer will start a company to manufacture more durable chairs. /. will continue to get trolled and post dubs. And possibly see member number 1.000.000.
    Linux/BSD will finally become available on toast (but remain uneatable until 2010). /. will finally understand the difference between Bill Gates as a private person, and Microsoft the company.
    Mary Poppins will make a surprise return as an online VR guide on Google.
    India will outsource IT to Mars, after the martians makes official first contact on the first day of the 4th month of the year.
    People will flock en masse to the stores to exchange/replace crap gifts recieved during Kwanzaa/Yule/Xmas/...
    SCO will hire Uri Geller to represent SCO in the courts. Uri Geller will promptly get sued by the creators of the Chewbacca defense.

    And finally...

    I will probably continue to post serious and/or (un)funny posts on /. >_<

    --
    Carbon based humanoid in training.
    1. Re:Hurry up and hide, the future is here. by phaggood · · Score: 1

      All I want is those house-building robots fully developed. The subsequent crash in home prices around the country when attractive, well-constructed 2000sq homes can be built for
      Yeah, progress!

  96. Not quite 10, but... by ar32h · · Score: 2, Interesting
    1. Another technology bubble fueled by small startups with a focus on acquisition. Going public will not be a goal because of Sarbanes-Oxley.
    2. WiMax is a big flop. Implementations do not live up to the hype and "Channel sales" favoring established cell companies over municipalities, ISPs, and individuals will restrict the deployment of WiMax access points.
    3. Broadcast television decline in favor of video podcasts.
    4. Consumer backlash against RIAA due to their heavy-handed legal tactics.
    5. A general collapse of walled garden social networking sites.
  97. prediction by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    "There shall in that time be rumours of things going astray, erm, and there shall be a great confusion as to where things really are, and nobody will really know where lieth those little things wi-with the sort of raffia-work base, that has an attachment. At that time, a friend shall lose his friends hammer, and the young shall not know where lieth the things possessed by their fathers that their fathers put there only just the night before, about eight O'clock."

  98. What ? NO .. by shadowdata · · Score: 0

    cure for cancer ???

    --
    This is NOT a sig - billy
  99. Well I a most looking forward to the Cell processo by SmallFurryCreature · · Score: 1

    No I am not a Sony fanboy directly. Only consoles I own are handheld. The new Cell processor IF it lives up to its promisses could however be a intresting new approach. Some Intel exec said it was a stupid design and we all know what that means. (Oh you don't? Well that it will be insanely fast while not causing a china syndrome in your box).

    IF the PS3 will indeed have a linux-on-hd addon and it is properly open I am looking forward to see what it will do as a desktop machine.

    IF sony indeed will support linux on it may be the first time that modern graphics hardware has open drivers, okay this is a long jump, Sony could easily combine the GPL Kernel with a closed source driver BUT lets be positive here shall we?

    Linux already has a lot of support for multi-core machines and while the Cell is not a regular SMP machine it will nontheless be intresting to see how a desktop will behave with 8 cores inside.

    Of course there is a lot of IF's here but who knows. Sony in my opinion wants to take MS on for the PC in the living room market. They do not have the resources to write their own. They might just pull an IBM and decide to support linux fully in the hope of using it to bring MS down a notch.

    This I think will be the biggest story in 2006. The possible emergences of a desktop contented.

    --

    MMO Quests are like orgasms:

    You may solo them, I prefer them in a group.

  100. The year of Linux by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    2006 will be the year of linux in the desktop :-)

  101. Easy one by houghi · · Score: 3, Insightful

    2006 will be the year of the Linux Desktop.

    --
    Don't fight for your country, if your country does not fight for you.
  102. Re:Prediction: Slashdot Will Have Even More Dupes! by Ohreally_factor · · Score: 1

    I only hope that there will be a wireless thumbdrive.

    And the new pick up line amongst the cafe laptop crowd will be . . .

    "Is that your data in your pocket or are you just glad to see me?"

    --
    It's not offtopic, dumbass. It's orthogonal.
  103. Technologies that WONT make it in 2006 by jonwil · · Score: 3, Interesting

    Here are 4 technologies that are always seen as "just around the corner" but which I predict wont make much progress in 2006.
    1.Flying cars. Not because the technology isnt up to par but because of the difficulty of dealing with the huge regluatory hurdles.

    Right now, there are laws limiting where VTOL vehicles (which would include flying cars and also includes helicoptors) can take off and land. If flying cars were introduced, you would need to completly re-write the rulebook when it comes to aviation, flight paths, places you are allowed to take off and land from etc.

    2.Video downloading services offering content you can watch on your TV. (as opposed to content you can watch on a mobile phone or video ipod etc)
    Firstly, the TV operators (pay and Free-To-Air) do not want competition from "Internet Television" (be it true IPTV running as an actual stream you download or be it something you buy and watch later) and will pressure the content providers (a number of who have investments in cable/satelite/FTA TV) not to expand in this area (just look at what the TV networks did when ABC offered its shows on the iTunes store). Remember that several cable companies are starting to offer video-on-demand and would see internet downloading as a direct competitor to that.

    And secondly, the bandwidth required to download full-size movies and TV shows is huge (especially if compressed at a rate that doesnt sacrifice the quality too much and makes them worth spending the $$$ on vs buying the DVD) so many (normal) people (especially people on ISP plans that limit their monthly transfer allowance) are not going to want to download large files like that.

    The other problem is how to get the content from the PC where it was purchased and downloaded into something you can watch on your TV. Burning to DVD is not an option (not everyone has the time, skills or gear to burn a DVD and in any case, there is no copy protection method that can be applied to burnt DVDs AFAIK) and the other option (having your computer send the video to a box connected to your TV) is out too because the boxes just arent available (and there is no standards between boxes that do exist as far as what formats they accept or what, if any, copy protection they support)

    3.Stem Cells and related technology. (including such things as cloning body parts) There are too many people opposed to this sort of technology (including, I believe, George W Bush to some extent) and too many people worried about the negative effects (e.g. cloned babies) for this to advance out of the lab anytime soon.

    4.Online & home delivered groceries. There is some movement towards this idea but no-one has been able to make it work yet. In the vision of the future, you would just scan the barcode on something you want and it would record the item. Then, this combined with other items (items you dont have to scan or items that dont have barcodes like fruit etc) would be placed online and the items would be delivered directly to you.

    I am sure there is a big market out there from people wanting to be able to buy all their food etc online.
    Even better would be if the online supermarkets could combine with a store like K-Mart, Target or Big W (here in australia, Coles Myer owns K-Mart, Target and Coles Supermarkets and Woolworths owns Woolworths supermarkets and Big W) so you could have all sorts of variety goods delivered in the same order. Also, combine this with the alcohol sales too and you have a perfect item. (both Coles Myer and Woolworths own bottle shop chains)

    But even where you can buy online, the range and price dont compare favorably to the bricks & mortar stores and its only available to a limited area. (I have no idea if other parts of the world like europe and america are any better).

    As to why I dont think we will see any forward movement with this in 2006, I think it is because in order for this to really take off, the interface has to be dead simple to use.
    And it needs to be accessable where the food is

    1. Re:Technologies that WONT make it in 2006 by JoseAugusto · · Score: 1

      Very informed post about the future. You need to register your views with ZapFuture.com at once! Regards.

    2. Re:Technologies that WONT make it in 2006 by thedletterman · · Score: 1

      Online grocery delivery rocks! You obviously don't live in New York City, Freshdirect.com is all over the place here. Also, maybe you should read up more about intel's new Viiv if you're wondering about delivering video ip content to the tele...

      --
      Any fool can criticise, condemn, and complain, and most fools do. - Benjamin Franklin
  104. Emacs 22 by jeffbopp · · Score: 0

    Emacs 22 will kick much ass. On many platforms. Grown men will weep.

  105. Linux! Yes! by lsetia · · Score: 0

    2006 would be the year for Linux on the Desktop.

    --
    Psychiatric help: 10 cents

  106. Awkward prose by sacrilicious · · Score: 1
    The article contains an example of choosing data to support breathless phrasing:
    Wireless networks, already common, will spread so rapidly in 2006 that it will blanket entire cities like San Francisco and Philadelphia.
    It's been known for quite a while that these two cities, among others, have announced plans for city-wide wireless networks (which the article acknowledges in the ensuing paragraph). So the translation becomes "Wireless networks will spread so rapidly that various cities will follow through on their announced plans for large networks". If wireless networking is spreading on a grass roots level, then illustrating it with large-scale, localized infrasctructural investment by government would seem to be missing the point. If the evisioned spread will be on this infrastructural level, then pointing it out by mentioning the two big "sure bets" doesn't confer insight into a trend.
    --
    - First they ignore you, then they laugh at you, then ???, then profit.
  107. anti-bias chip ? by smoker2 · · Score: 1
    How about an add-on chip for tv transmitters that renders FOX news unbiased ?

    Or failing that, a user controlled system whereby the presenter gets "instant electrocution^H^H^H^Hfeedback" when they are spouting shite ?

  108. Slashdot upgrade? by Sierpinski · · Score: 2, Funny

    How about a dupe-free /.?

    Nevermind, I predict flying cars will come first.

  109. In terms of automotive technology for 2006... by MtViewGuy · · Score: 1

    ...The mandate of low-sulfur motor fuels (e.g., under 15 parts per million sulfur compounds) starting Summer 2006 in the USA will actually have a HUGE benefit for automakers in the USA.

    Why? Because by removing sulfur compounds (which can corrode engine components from the intake system to the exhaust piping system like sulfuric acid), we can finally see in the USA the application of these new technologies:

    1. Direct fuel injection of gasoline into combustion chamber combined with lean-burn (e.g., air to fuel ratio of 30:1 or higher) on a large scale. This allows extermely precise fuel delivery, and with the use of low sulfur gasoline we can apply a new generation of highly advanced catalytic converters that remove the increased NOx output from lean-burn operation very easily. The result is 10-15% improvement in fuel economy over current gasoline-fuelled engines.

    2. The arrival of homogeneous charged compression ignition (HCCI) for production applications in motor vehicles. Fuelled by gasoline, it promises diesel-like fuel economy without the exhaust emission issues that plague diesel engines; this means 30-38% better fuel economy compared to today's gasoline engines! :-)

    3. The arrival of truly clean-burning turbodiesel engines. With low-sulfur diesel fuel, we can apply common-rail pressurized direct fuel injection for extremely precise fuel delivery and apply a new generation of diesel exhaust catalytic converters that double at diesel particulate traps. Already, I've read that BMW has succeeded in getting their turbodiesel engines to meet the world's toughest auto diesel engine exhaust standard (the California Air Resources Board 2007 standard) using these new technologies and low-sulfur diesel fuel. Imagine switching every SUV, light pickup truck and minivan to clean turbodiesel power--it will improve the fuel economy of these classes of vehicles 30-35% or more compared to the gasoline engines used now.

  110. No mention of RFID? I thought RFID was the BFD? by walterbyrd · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Or was that last year?

    Isn't this supposed to the year that Linux *really* takes off?

  111. New tech. .. none. But here's my 2k6 predictions. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    DLP will be shoved down our throats.
    You will be nobody without HDTV.
    Electro-gas hybrid cars will still be too expensive for the average driver.
    DRAM prices will continue to drop to $25/GB (GByte).
    Solar power for the home will still be too expensive for the average home owner. ...
    eh... I'm still waking up. That's all you get.

  112. Massive Rodents by jd · · Score: 1
    The largest rodent that lived was the Phoberomys pattersoni, weighing in at 1500 lbs and was the size of a buffalo. Amblyrhiza Inundata was a good runner-up, the size of a black bear.


    All you need are the genes controlling size from these, and you could have a single rabbit for the entire block! Much more efficient and you could possibly train it to keep guard at nights.

    --
    It's a small world and it smells funny; I'd buy another if it wasn't for the money; Take back what I paid (SoM)
    1. Re:Massive Rodents by belmolis · · Score: 1

      Actually, you can't in general take an organism and scale it beyond a fairly limited range because structures that work at one size don't work at others. For example, the strength of legs is approximately proportional to the square of their diameter but body mass is proportional to the cube of body size, so ratios of leg diameter to body size that work just fine for small organisms lead to collapse when scaled up because weight increases disproportionately to leg strength. (This is why the legs of elephants are thicker even in proportion to body size than those of ants.)

  113. Paging Mr. Carlin... by PFI_Optix · · Score: 1

    Hippy Dippy Weatherman paraphrase: "Technology trends will change off and on for a long, long time."

    --
    120 characters for a sig? That's bloody useless.
  114. My hard drive size predictions by mrdisco99 · · Score: 1

    Terabyte ATA hard drives by year end. 1.2TB SCSI drives in 2007.

    I feel pretty confident about that. Seagate is already selling 160GB platters. Hitachi will be stuffing drives with five 200GB platters real soon now.

    --

    +++
    NO CARRIER

  115. But why are they illegal? by gorzek · · Score: 2, Interesting

    You made a lot of good points, but I think some additional information would be useful. Most people don't know why certain drugs are outlawed in the US.

    Opium was outlawed because Chinese immigrants in California were making a fortune selling it to Americans. Political elites were terrified by the idea of Chinese immigrants getting rich and having political clout, so it was outlawed. Keep in mind this was during the 1800s, and the very idea of white men and women hanging out with Chinamen just disturbed conservative elements to no end.

    The motivation for outlawing "marijuana" was pretty much the same: plain old racism. William Hearst had a lot to do with it. Loads of people smoked "cannabis" at the time. But Hearst's papers started publishing all sorts of propaganda about some evil substance called "marijuana" that Mexicans smoked. It made them lazy and unwilling to work. The prevailing, irrational fear was that black men would smoke it and somehow that would induce them to not only be lazy, but rape white women.

    I think if most Americans knew the utterly asinine and racist reasons we outlawed these drugs in the first place, they might be more willing to reconsider their legal status. But for whatever reason, the media won't examine the issue.

    Personally, I think the key to judging a law's justness and value lies in evaluating our motives for creating it in the first place. Bad motivations lead to bad laws.

    1. Re:But why are they illegal? by Wyatt+Earp · · Score: 1

      Well, at the same time there are some half way senseable reasons for not being able to buy Opium and Toothpaste at the same time down at the corner market. Just like not having Cocaine Wine at the liquor store is a good thing.

      Now the reason Opium was outlawed is not entirely a racist reason. Opium production in the 18th and 19th centuries was not controlled by the Chinese. The United States started importing Opium from the Ottoman Empire in 1805 and from India in 1834. Indian Opium production peaked in 1880, then cheaper Chinese production ramped up. Now even with Chinese production, the Chinese didn't have a transportation fleet to get it to North America in the 19th century. American consumption of opium rose over four-fold from the 1840s to the 1890s, and the number of addicts peaked at 313,000 in 1896.

      As early as the 1850s, Opium addiction was identified in the United States as a health issue, especially among women.

    2. Re:But why are they illegal? by lysergic.acid · · Score: 1

      I question the verity of that 1896 figure on the number of opium addicts in the United States. If you define an opium addict as anyone who consumes opium recreationally, then perhaps it could have been close to that figure, otherwise, it seems unlikely. Secondly, it should be noted that while opium as it was consumed by the Chinese in opium dens was outlawed, opium/morphine tinctures such as laudanum was still legal as it was a habit mostly taken up by the wealthy upper class.

      Though I think coke and opiates should be regulated much like alcohol and tobacco, the prohibitionist policies we have against recreational use of these substances are simply irrational and were formed by the wrong motivations.

    3. Re:But why are they illegal? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      http://www.leap.cc/ - Law Enforcement Against Prohibition

      Help is on the way.

  116. Prediction: George Lucas by Mechasheva · · Score: 2, Funny

    George Lucas will finally succumb to his past and re-release a digitally enhanced re-mastered version of "The Star Wars Holiday Special". Thus, truly completing his Star Wars odyssey. Again, Burger King produces accompanying merchandise...fans rejoice.

  117. No vaccine because private companies can't make $$ by Catbeller · · Score: 1

    http://www.seacoastonline.com/news/12262005/world/ 79889.htm

      No incentive for AIDS vaccine, researcher says

    WASHINGTON (AP) - In an unusually candid admission, the federal chief of AIDS research says he believes drug companies don't have an incentive to create a vaccine for the HIV and are likely to wait to profit from it after the government develops one. And that means the government has had to spend more time focusing on the processes that drug companies ordinarily follow in developing new medicines and bringing them to market.

    "We had to spend some time and energy paying attention to those aspects of development because the private side isn't picking it up," Dr. Edmund Tramont testified in a deposition in a recent employment lawsuit obtained by The Associated Press.

    Tramont is head of the AIDS research division of the National Institutes of Health, and he predicted in his testimony that the government will eventually create a vaccine. He testified in July in the whistleblower case of Dr. Jonathan Fishbein.

    "If we look at the vaccine, HIV vaccine, we're going to have an HIV vaccine. It's not going to be made by a company," Tramont said. "They're dropping out like flies because there's no real incentive for them to do it. We have to do it."

    "They will eventually - if it works, they won't have to make that big investment. And they can make it and sell it and make a profit," he said.

    An official of the group representing the country's major drug companies took sharp exception to Tramont's comments. "That is simply not true. America's pharmaceutical research companies are firmly committed to HIV/AIDS vaccine research and development with 15 potential vaccines in development today," said Ken Johnson, senior vice president of PhRMA, the Pharmaceutical Research and Manufacturers of America.

  118. Re:No vaccine because private companies can't make by h4rm0ny · · Score: 1


    I looked at your link, but it amounted to little more than someone saying there wasn't an incentive and a pharmceutical rep saying there was. I'm inclined to disbelieve pharmaceutical companies just out of habit by now, but why isn't there an incentive to develop an HIV vaccine?

    --

    Aide-toi, le Ciel t'aidera - Jeanne D'Arc.
  119. Predictions for the coming year by SqueakRu · · Score: 0

    All print media goes crazy - This will be the year where newspapers and magazines follow suit with the recording and movie industries by going completely insane. News programs will announce absurd declarations such as: "You will never see a Newspaper again!", "The DEATH of the Magazine" and such. I imagine cell phones will be involved, but somehow this doesn't seem quite right....

    The Empire Strikes Back (Re: Google vs. Microsoft) - I mean it is really just too perfect! The all powerful empire struck down by the upstart Google! What could be next? Microsoft will invade Google's winter stronghold....uhh figuratively

    PVR's will make everyone cry. Either with joy (You!) or in pain (Advertisers!) - Let's face it this is not some crazy over-priced monstrosity (like Laserdisc). For about a few hundred bucks any computer can be a PVR. TV companies will complain at first, but then they will rejoice that they can make money off of primetime shows 24/7.

  120. Re:No vaccine because private companies can't make by TubeSteak · · Score: 1

    because the people who need it most, are leasat able to pay for it.

    that and it's better (economically) for the company to churn out drugs that will suppress the virus and possibly beat it into submission, because they can charge big bucks every month.

    It doesn't really benefit the shareholders to produce a vaccine that will have to be sold cheaply to sub-saharan Africans.

    --
    [Fuck Beta]
    o0t!
  121. Direct X 9 forever! by Gravis+Zero · · Score: 0

    ok... so with the release of vista, Direct X 10 will come out. the problem that Direct X 10 will not be compatible on any cards that have come out in 2005 will hinder it from being used. so i predict Direct X 9 will used all next year and perhaps that more developers will switch to openGL considering the minimal overhead of the implimentation on top of Direct X 10. (DX 10 is quite similar to openGL)

    --
    Anons need not reply. Questions end with a question mark.
  122. You are correct by jd · · Score: 1
    The only difference, in this case, is that rodents actually scale very well (as the above two examples show) and are designed in very similar ways, so the scaling on one (the two listed are closest to gerbils and hamsters) should work reasonably well on another (such as rabbits).


    In general, though, you are absolutely correct about scaling. An insect doesn't scale well - partly because of limbs, but mostly because they don't have a scalable way to absorb oxygen. The 60s sci-fi horror of giant mutant insects is a physical impossibility. The proportions are all wrong and they'd die from a lack of oxygen.


    Likewise, elephants seem to be fairly limited in size. There are no fossil records of a pint-sized elephant - although there ARE fossil records of a pint-sized horse.


    Rhinos scale well - the largest in that family reaching 18' in height. It is not clear how small they can get, but I seem to recall that the Manatee is a fairly close relative that returned to the oceans.


    Humans seem to be about the upper limit on size - the largest of the Great Apes was only about 10' - but fossil finds seem to indicate that hominids have existed which were much smaller. I'd call hominids passably scalable, then.


    I'd love to see someone do some in-depth research on what forms ARE scalable and where this differs from what has actually occured in practice, why that potential might not be viable in practice.

    --
    It's a small world and it smells funny; I'd buy another if it wasn't for the money; Take back what I paid (SoM)
    1. Re:You are correct by belmolis · · Score: 1

      I don't have the book to hand and it is dated, but if I recall correctly there is a good discussion of this topic in D'arcy Thompson's classic On Growth and Form.

    2. Re:You are correct by jd · · Score: 1
      Phew! Ancient manuscripts! Thanks for the reference. On the one hand, we obviously have a lot more empirical data now, some of which may well conflict with earlier theories. On the other hand, the mechanics of organisms - for the most part - was certainly well within the science of the day and it's unlikely that there will be any significant discrepencies except for the more extreme structures.


      (It is unlikely that the dynamics of twenty tonne rhinos, or fourteen foot eagles, would have been within range of consideration. In 1917, flight was still too new for them to have been able to extrapolate accurately, and the scalability of power systems would have been uncertain. Everything else should hold up just fine.)

      --
      It's a small world and it smells funny; I'd buy another if it wasn't for the money; Take back what I paid (SoM)
  123. Agreed by argoff · · Score: 1

    I should have suggested gun ownership and food storage too, but I was really just focusing on the dollar fall.

  124. paranoid, perhaps, but wrong - unlikely by argoff · · Score: 1


    FYI, I hate moveon.org, hate the copyright/media industry that supports them, and am one of those minorities that support the war in Iraq, but that doesn't change the fact that the US has some suvere financial problems. And FYI, the banks are that stupid because it has paid bigtime to be that stupid - that's half the problem. When you have the power to create money and out of thin air and loan it out, you tend to do stupid things that wouldn't make sense with naturally limited money like gold.

  125. Yellow Goo by Medievalist · · Score: 1

    This year somebody will leave a semicolon out of the source code for their nanites, and everything will dissolve into a pulsating earth-sized blob of yellow goop.

    Later spacefaring civilizations will put up warning signs just inside the Oort cloud: "Danger! do not touch the yellow sticky stuff! It's evil!"

  126. Web 3.0 by slashmojo · · Score: 1
    VC's will finally realise that web2.0 is all hype and hotair and not really a good way to make money so they will pull all their money out and invest in web3.0 coz a bloke in a pub told them it was a sure thing..

    I'll stay one step ahead and start building my Web4.0 app now.

  127. Dragons, et al by jd · · Score: 1
    Whilst dragons (especially the Pernese kind) are probably a little beyond the engineering of the day, I see no reason why you couldn't have something that was a good substitute. The Haast Eagle had a wingspan of 14' and could certainly have carried a small person. As far as anyone can tell, it's about the upper limit of purely muscle-powered flight of that kind, so it could not be used to get adults to work. On the other hand, it might be a way to get kids to school.


    (It was also a bird of prey, so detention for more troublesome kids would not be necessary.)


    We already have talking turkeys, but I won't say which reality TV show they're on. Seriously, although you'd never be able to get a bird to talk, the avian brain is demonstrably capable of a respectable level of intelligence. African Grey parrots can understand grammar, adjectives and context, whilst crows have been filmed manufacturing tools (the only animal other than humans to demonstrate manufacture, not just exploitation of pre-existing resources).


    The problem with PETA has nothing to do with their arguments or beliefs. Their problems revolve around communication skills and a lack of hard data - both of which could be fixed. Slogans do not an argument make (did Yoda say). Do animals have intelligence? Do animals have feelings? We have fMRI, we could settle this beyond dispute. By making ethics an issue of faith alone, those with different faiths can - and do - feel free to ignore those ethics. Once ethics becomes a matter of verifiable fact, faith is irrelevent and can say what it likes.


    The communication aspect is just as important. Fine, let's say some things are wrong, but society (for whatever reason) feels they're important. Animal experimentation being a good (or bad) example. Can you communicate why the existing option really isn't as good as it seems -and- offer a better, cheaper, easier alternative? The alternatives do exist, but if you can't communicate that convincingly, why should anyone care? Society has inertia and unless you're willing to be convincing enough, inertia will always win out.

    --
    It's a small world and it smells funny; I'd buy another if it wasn't for the money; Take back what I paid (SoM)
    1. Re:Dragons, et al by wik · · Score: 1

      >On the other hand, it might be a way to get kids to school.

      You've heard about that childhood obesity problem, right? Not going to happen.

      --
      / \
      \ / ASCII ribbon campaign for peace
      x
      / \
  128. Overall decrease in quality will continue by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Next hot thing will be lossy, pixely, shitty DRM'd and overpriced digital video on tiny LCD screens. Hey - it worked with jpeg and mp3 after all, dinnit?

  129. A very singular 2006 by nektra · · Score: 3, Funny

    1. Steve Ballmer will have his own TV show.
    2. Google will contract Dalai Lama.
    3. Many people will see Argentina winning FIFA World Cup 2006 on Internet.
    4. Nicholas Negroponte will design an iPod clone for 20 dollars.
    5. GNU Hurd will run on more machines.
    6. Blogs will have recursive references.
    7. New AJAX interfaces on your watch.
    8. Linux penguin will be married.
    9. XBOX Patched.
    10. Amazon will read books to childrens while parents watch TV.

  130. The UK version by Anonymous+Brave+Guy · · Score: 1

    Well, funnily enough I saw a programme on TV about the UK's new alternative GPS satellite network this evening, since they're just launching the first trial box into orbit.

    It was quite scary that, while discussing the better resolution than the existing GPS network, the first example use quoted by a spokesman was that it was accurate enough to be used for automatic road tolls.

    If you think the UK doesn't care about these things, though, I suspect you're wrong. Word hasn't quite hit the mainstream about the new nationwide spy camera network that will track everywhere you drive on main roads and hold the information for 5 years yet, but when it does (along with the fact that it's all been done by the police without any parliamentary oversight, based on a technicality in their rules) then I predict there will be hell to pay, and it could even be the catalyst for a nationwide protest against the ever increasing government surveillance we're being put under. The whole ID card/register thing has gone very quiet since the terrorists actually attacked us and the government admitted that the ID card scheme wouldn't have helped, so now the civil liberties gang need a new target. As luck would have it, one has turned up right on time!

    And for the record, three GATSO speed cameras have been taken out (violently) within a mile or two of my house in recent months, and nationally even senior police figures have now admitted that the emphasis on those monstrosities was misguided and taken as a whole, the current road safety policies not really bringing the improvements that were claimed earlier.

    --
    If you disagree, post your argument. (-1, Overrated) isn't your personal censorship tool for views you don't like.
  131. Re:Show me a boy @ seven and I shall show you the by JoseAugusto · · Score: 1

    You must go register these predictions on ZapFuture.com at once.Loved them. Regards.

  132. I've already got one... by Run4yourlives · · Score: 1

    It's called the "power" button...shuts up fox real nice!