Slashdot Mirror


Coffin Hotels Opening Near You

An anonymous reader writes "Britain will soon see the launch of a chain of automated, short-term hotels for travelers and businesspeople." From the article: "Each soundproof cabin will contain a sofa that converts into a double bed, a pull down desk, closet space, adjustable mood lighting, a shower, wireless Internet, an iPod connection and a flat-screen TV. Check-in and check-out will be automated, but food and drinks will be available."

229 comments

  1. Makes sense by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny

    A lot of people in the business world are dead inside

    1. Re:Makes sense by Bazzalisk · · Score: 1

      Does that mean they get cool powers and have to do good deads to regrow their soul-stuff in the Spirit World?

      --
      James P. Barrett
  2. iPod? by Teun · · Score: 3, Funny
    an iPod connection

    You insensitive clod!
    What about my Creative Zen?

    --
    "The likes of Facebook and WhatsApp are free to those whose privacy is of zero value."
    1. Re:iPod? by User+956 · · Score: 4, Insightful

      "an iPod connection" - You insensitive clod! What about my Creative Zen?

      It's probably just a powered USB port. To most of the world, that is "an ipod connection."

      --
      The theory of relativity doesn't work right in Arkansas.
    2. Re:iPod? by Kijori · · Score: 1, Interesting

      Normally just seems to mean a mini jack. Sometimes with a cradle for the IPod itself. Obviously in a perfect world "3.5mm Stereo Speaker Connection Cable" is more accurate, but it doesn't quite roll off the tongue, does it?

    3. Re:iPod? by xenotrout · · Score: 1
      Normally just seems to mean a mini jack. Sometimes with a cradle for the IPod itself. Obviously in a perfect world "3.5mm Stereo Speaker Connection Cable" is more accurate, but it doesn't quite roll off the tongue, does it?
      "eighth inch phone jack" is a bit easier to say...or "stereo connection"--just as easy as "iPod connection"...or, as you said yourself "mini jack".
    4. Re:iPod? by Mercano · · Score: 1

      I thought USB didn't charge an iPod, only Firewire did.

      --
      #include <signature.h>
    5. Re:iPod? by slimak · · Score: 1

      As shipped, my Nano can only be charged via USB.

    6. Re:iPod? by ncc74656 · · Score: 1
      I thought USB didn't charge an iPod, only Firewire did.

      It depends on the iPod. Mine (a 60GB iPod photo) can charge on either USB or FireWire. The oldest iPods can only charge on FireWire because they use a FireWire jack instead of a dock connector. My understanding of some of the newer iPods, OTOH, is that they can only charge on USB.

      The weird bit, though, is that the cigarette-lighter-to-USB adapter I already had for some other devices won't work to power my iPod. I had to buy a different one made for iPod use (distinguishable from the others because it's white instead of black). I don't know what's different about this other adapter that it works when the other one doesn't, as I'd think both of them would just contain a 5V regulator and a USB jack.

      --
      20 January 2017: the End of an Error.
    7. Re:iPod? by foo12 · · Score: 1

      All iPods with a dock connector can charge via FireWire or USB2. The iPod Video and Nano will charge via Firewire, but can only be synched via USB.

    8. Re:iPod? by SPY_jmr1 · · Score: 1

      Not true: Third Gen iPods can only be charged via firewire, but sync via either FW or USB. But they sure have a dock connecter. Heck, it's the model that introduced it.

      You can ask my 40gb model in the other room if you don't believe me, heh.

    9. Re:iPod? by SmittyTheBold · · Score: 1

      It'll only sync over USB. It'll charge over either.

      --
      ± 29 dB
  3. coffins? by ebooborg · · Score: 0, Funny

    must be quite an experience

    1. Re:coffins? by PCeye · · Score: 1

      The room is also sound proofed, so I'm sure it is "dead quiet" in the room. I think staying at such a hotel will actually prepare you for the inevitable "dirt nap", but it is not such a catchy marketing campaign.

  4. that's huge! by User+956 · · Score: 5, Informative

    Each soundproof cabin will contain a sofa that converts into a double bed, a pull down desk, closet space, adjustable mood lighting, a shower, wireless Internet, an iPod connection and a flat-screen TV

    That's huge compared to what they have in Japan. In Japan, they have what are called capsule hotels", which is basically like the sleeping tubes in the movie the 5th element.

    --
    The theory of relativity doesn't work right in Arkansas.
    1. Re:that's huge! by JanneM · · Score: 5, Informative

      That's huge compared to what they have in Japan. In Japan, they have what are called capsule hotels", which is basically like the sleeping tubes in the movie the 5th element.

      Yep. This sounds more like a scaled-down normal room. The capsule hotels in Tokyo and Osaka, for those who don't know, are situated around the major train stations and cater to drunk salarymen who missed the last train and need someplace to crash before work the next morning. As such, they're actually quite expensive (set to be cheaper than taking a taxi home), and often prohibit women guests altogether. If you're looking for somewhere to go with that special someone, there's lots of clean, cheerful "love hotels" dotted around every entertainment district (which, often, are actually cheaper, cleaner and more comfortable than a normal hotel if you're looking for a place to stay overnight).

      --
      Trust the Computer. The Computer is your friend.
    2. Re:that's huge! by Bazman · · Score: 2, Informative

      Or if you are in Japan and want a nice traditional cheap hostel-style room, then find a 'ryokan' somewhere.

    3. Re:that's huge! by cybernezumi · · Score: 4, Informative

      I've stayed at a couple capsules, they're surprisingly comfortable so long as you're under about 6 foot or so. I'm even a little put off by tight spaces and it really didn't bother me. I could also kinda sit up if I wanted to. Prices of the ones I stayed at were about half the price of regular business hotels (which these "coffin" hotels come closer to: a bed, a bath, a desk/fridge/tv and enough room to walk between them). The capsules I stayed at were getting kinda old, so my impression is that they are a bit of a left-over of the popped Bubble Economy. I see far more new business hotels. On love hotels, there are a few catches (overnight pricing begins around 10-11PM & no reentry). You'll also probably need a bit of Japanese skill at checkout ("No, I didn't drink any of the sake in the fridge, please let me out."). They are usually about the same price as business hotels on the low end but usually a lot more room (queen bed, big tub, etc). More interesting stuff on the in-room TV too... >;)

    4. Re:that's huge! by JanneM · · Score: 3, Interesting

      Or if you are in Japan and want a nice traditional cheap hostel-style room, then find a 'ryokan' somewhere.

      I'd seriously like to know where you found an actual cheap ryokan.

      In my (limited) experience, a ryokan will be traditional and charming, but always somewhere from "quite a lot more expensive than the usual business hotel" to "you have got to be kidding, I could buy these square feet in Tokyo with that kind of money".

      That's not to say a ryokan isn't worth the stay; on the contrary. If you're vacationing in Japan, go for the ryokan over the boring hotel every time.

      But again, if you're adventurous, take one night or two at a love hotel; the experience really is worth it. My local favourite is "Chapel Christmas", where it's Christmas every day of the year: http://www.flickr.com/photos/jannem/75774506/

      --
      Trust the Computer. The Computer is your friend.
    5. Re:that's huge! by Tekzel · · Score: 1

      Completely off topic, but I read the page in your sig and I should sue you. I almost killed myself laughing.

    6. Re:that's huge! by Alcoholist · · Score: 2, Insightful

      These mini hotel rooms remind me a lot of the cabins on a cruise ship. They pack a lot of stuff into those.

      --
      Bibo Ergo Sum.
    7. Re:that's huge! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Interesting

      I've stayed at a couple of capsule hotels around Tokyo (one near Shimbashi, another in Ueno) and found them to be comfortable and even relaxing. As I understand it, a lot of the capsule hotels grew out of the sento (public bath-houses), so many have a bathing area, which includes not only a place to shower, but spa-style tubs of warm, hot, and/or cold water to relax or detox. When you check in, you also get cheap but functional Japanese robe to undress into. Between that, the baths, the, uh, interesting porn in the capsules (there's a TV in them), and the beer vending machines, spending 3500-5000 yen (about $30-45) for one night isn't all that bad, and depending on where you live, definitely better than $100 for a cabride home because you missed the train (which I've also done).

      These Western-style capsules seem to miss the point, a bit, but I guess these are about "luxury" and not necessarily function. Even so, I'd much rather enjoy (and spend money on) a nice bath in a capsule hotel than a glitzed up night in one of these.

    8. Re:that's huge! by MikeFM · · Score: 1

      When I was a kid I thought of capsule motels at the mall as a place where men could take a nap while women shopped. After I later found out that the Japanese already have such hotels I am even more inclined to think they're a good idea. My only suggestion is to have them accessible from a door on the side rather than from a door on the end. Fat Americans don't want to shimmy into a small space. Be more like a bed on a train.

      --
      At what price learning? At what cost wisdom? The price is a man's peace of mind, and the cost is his life.
    9. Re:that's huge! by metamatic · · Score: 1

      The article says 10 square meters. Maybe they modeled the size of their coffin on fat Americans.

      --
      GCHQ Quantum Insert installed. If only our tongues were made of glass, how much more careful we would be when we speak
    10. Re:that's huge! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful

      These Western-style capsules seem to miss the point, a bit, but I guess these are about "luxury" and not necessarily function.

      Well, the Japanese-style capsules assume you're under about 6-foot tall and not obese. That excludes a fair percentage of westeners.

      By the time you scale-up a Japanese-style capsule to fit the average westener, you probably don't lose too much by making it a quarter or half-size hotel room.

    11. Re:that's huge! by sean@thingsihate.org · · Score: 1

      as long as you don't mind the bed still being warm when you check in

      --

      One of the many things I hate. thingsihate.org
    12. Re:that's huge! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      This sounds a lot like what one already finds in the "budget" hotels in London (I've stayed in more than on broomcloset sized hotel room in London).

    13. Re:that's huge! by po8 · · Score: 1

      The reason, by the way, that all those salarymen have missed the last train (or so I'm told)...one never takes an earlier train than the last one, because it is important to appear to have been working as late as possible. The next-to-the-last train is usually pretty empty, whereas the last train is packed and some can't get on. I'm told it is not uncommon to sit in the Pachinko parlor until the last train is due.

      Different culture than the US, definitely.

    14. Re:that's huge! by bogie · · Score: 1
      --
      If you wanna get rich, you know that payback is a bitch
    15. Re:that's huge! by dimension6 · · Score: 1

      Stayed here...great spot, and only 4500 yen (about $40 a night) in Tokyo...

    16. Re:that's huge! by dimension6 · · Score: 1

      The Japanese workers go to izakaya after work! It's really common for them to go out and drink with their coworkers after work ends (though their hours are definitely longer than in the US, at about 48 hours a week).

    17. Re:that's huge! by CAIMLAS · · Score: 1

      I've always thought it would be a great idea to have such a sleeping arrangement available in airports here in the United States, particularly O'Hare in CHicago. Even if you charged $30/person, it would be cheaper and more preferable (in my opinion) to getting a shuttle to a $100+ hotel room at 2am after they've just fucked up the last flight of the day, forcing you to wait until the next flight at 6am.

      I'd think it would be pretty easy to do. Keep them inside the airport terminals so that people wouldn't have to entirely leave the airport and then go through the headache of security and check-in again in the "morning". Make them like "lego" blocks, stackable with fasteners to hold them together. Make them so that they can easily be put onto a custom trailer and brought up to the various concourses and set out with an attendant to man them.

      It wouldn't have to be much, just a simple 3x4x7 foot rectangular box with sound dampening materials, a door with a small latch on the inside, and a single light so you can see what you're doing inside: just big enough to rest your head in relative security and marginal comfort for 4 or 5 hours until your next flight.

      --
      ~/ssh slashdot.org ssh: connect to host slashdot.org port 22: too many beers
  5. I think I am going to have to change my name... by Mr.+Flibble · · Score: 5, Insightful

    To Case:

      The sky above the port was the color of television, tuned to a dead channel.

    "It's not like I'm using," Case heard someone say, as he shouldered his way through the crowd around the door of the Chat. "It's like my body's developed this massive drug deficiency." It was a Sprawl voice and a Sprawl joke. The Chatsubo was a bar for professional expatriates; you could drink there for a week and never hear two words in Japanese.

    --
    Try to hack my 31337 firewall!
    1. Re:I think I am going to have to change my name... by MichaelSmith · · Score: 4, Funny

      I don't get it. A quote about Cheap Hotel "Case never slept in Cheap Hotel, he slept in cheaper places" would have been more relevant.

    2. Re:I think I am going to have to change my name... by Mr.+Flibble · · Score: 0, Offtopic

      Meh, I did not feel like flipping through for that. It was easier to get the opening. :p

      --
      Try to hack my 31337 firewall!
    3. Re:I think I am going to have to change my name... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Just be glad that someone made a Neuromancer reference. Lot of the posters here probably never read it, never heard of it, never heard of William Gibson.

    4. Re:I think I am going to have to change my name... by DrSkwid · · Score: 1

      i tried but i kept falling asleep, the hype was supposed to keep me awake but failed.

      --
      There are places where the networks are not touching,and there are places where they are-Boeing's Lori Gunter
  6. Ipod connection? by broothal · · Score: 2, Interesting

    What's an Ipod connection? And what does it do? Say it's to enable people to fill up their mp3 player with new music, why isn't it just a USB port? If it's so you can hear your music, why isn't just a jack stick?

    This smells like some smart marketing suit yelling out requirements "we need this...and that!... and an Ipod connection!"

    1. Re:Ipod connection? by killeena · · Score: 1

      What is this 'mp3 player' you speak of? Don't you know there is only iPod?

      --
      Freedom would be not to choose between black and white but to abjure such prescribed choices. -Theodor Adorno
    2. Re:Ipod connection? by User+956 · · Score: 1

      This smells like some smart marketing suit yelling out requirements "we need this...and that!... and an Ipod connection!"

      LOL. Yeah, it's either total marketing BS, or some vice president, ultimately in charge of the project, was reviewing the plans and said "yeah, ok, looks great. throw in an ipod connection, and you're done."

      And lo, it happened.

      --
      The theory of relativity doesn't work right in Arkansas.
    3. Re:Ipod connection? by kfg · · Score: 5, Funny

      . . .why isn't just a jack stick?

      Do you want to advertise a hotel room bookable for four hour slots as coming complete with a "Jack Stick"?

      KFG

    4. Re:Ipod connection? by Shimbo · · Score: 1

      What's an Ipod connection?

      Something CNN made up that isn't in the companies PR

    5. Re:Ipod connection? by Brother+Dysk · · Score: 2, Informative

      It's not called a "jack stick" because that's Danish. In English, we call that an eighth inch audio connector.

      --
      - Frans.
    6. Re:Ipod connection? by rich_r · · Score: 2, Informative

      I think you'll find that it's a 3.5mm stero jack plug...

    7. Re:Ipod connection? by cioxx · · Score: 2, Informative
      Did you read the whole thing or just scanned it?

      Techno Wall with desk, universal port (for your i-pod or PDA) and plenty of storage
    8. Re:Ipod connection? by Kasis · · Score: 5, Informative

      From the link you posted:

              * Premium and Economy cabins
              * Techno Wall with desk, universal port (for your i-pod or PDA) and plenty of storage
              * Flat screen TV with surround sound speaker system
              * Free Internet - Wired and Wi-fi
              * Choice of hundreds of downloadable movies and CD's
              * Air conditioning
              * Double rotating beds
              * Ensuite bathrooms
              * Aircraft cabin mood lighting
              * Luxury bathroom fittings including monsoon rain shower
              * Luxury bedding
              * Bespoke Toiletries
              * Eat In grazing menu
              * Automated Check in / out
              * Web booking

      Sounds like a USB port.

    9. Re:Ipod connection? by HD+Webdev · · Score: 1

      I think you'll find that it's a 3.5mm stero jack plug...

      Around these parts it's a stereo phone jack plug.

      --
      This is not a dream, not a dream...we are transmitting from the year 1-9-9-9.
    10. Re:Ipod connection? by The+Great+Wazzoo · · Score: 2, Insightful

      "This smells like some smart marketing suit yelling out requirements "we need this...and that!... and an Ipod connection!""

      Congratulations, you've won the jackpot. Indeed, it's marketing. What else did you expect? Someone starting up a business with the intention of going bust? Those people are trying to sell a product, which, consequently, has to appeal to their market's tastes. iPods have proven to fit in that picture. So, indeed, it's smart marketing. Good work, I'd say.

      What do people have against business doing business? Sometimes people seem to forget that businesses are /required/ to have the intention of making a profit. That means marketing.

      Your remark was a bit naive.

    11. Re:Ipod connection? by CrazyTalk · · Score: 1

      I assume its a pair of speakers you can hook your iPod up to in order to listen to it while in the room and maybe even charge it as well - I can't imagine it has anything to do with actually downloading music. Kind of a nice feature, actually - like hotels that come with CD players in the room.

    12. Re:Ipod connection? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      sound wire thingy

    13. Re:Ipod connection? by Stiletto · · Score: 1

      Only in some back-woods country that hasn't caught up with the future--or in the USA. What's an "inch"?? Is it anything like a furlong? (snicker snicker)

    14. Re:Ipod connection? by Geoffreyerffoeg · · Score: 1

      universal port (for your i-pod or PDA) ... Sounds like a USB port.

      A USB port that connects to what? Either it's a USB power-only port, or it's just a regular AC outlet that's more conveniently positioned for devices than for appliances. I'm having trouble visualizing the hotel as a giant USB host.

    15. Re:Ipod connection? by toddestan · · Score: 1

      It could just be a headphone jack too, being that some people do put music on their PDAs.

    16. Re:Ipod connection? by Shimbo · · Score: 1

      Did you read the whole thing or just scanned it?

      I read it; several of the comments were asking why it was iPod specific. I was just pointing out that had morphed between the PR and the article.

    17. Re:Ipod connection? by onemorechip · · Score: 1

      An iPod doesn't have a headphone plug. It has a headphone jack. So if the room also has a headphone jack, what do you plug into it? Headphones? And what is connected to it behind the wall? An iPod?

      --
      But, I wanted socialized health insurance!
    18. Re:Ipod connection? by ncc74656 · · Score: 1
      In English, we call that an eighth inch audio connector.

      An 1/8" jack is what's on your old man's "HiFi" from the 60s or 70s. iPods, PDAs, portable CD players, and other portable audio devices typically use a 3.5mm jack for the headphones, which is much smaller.

      --
      20 January 2017: the End of an Error.
    19. Re:Ipod connection? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      An iPod doesn't have a headphone plug. It has a headphone jack. So if the room also has a headphone jack, what do you plug into it? Headphones? And what is connected to it behind the wall? An iPod?

      Yet again the fucking pedant squad pounces. Get a life-- I hope someone mods you troll.

    20. Re:Ipod connection? by alc6379 · · Score: 2, Informative
      An 1/8" jack is what's on your old man's "HiFi" from the 60s or 70s. iPods, PDAs, portable CD players, and other portable audio devices typically use a 3.5mm jack for the headphones, which is much smaller.

      No.

      You're thinking a 1/4" jack. 3.5mm is 1/8", roughly.

      --
      I don't moderate anymore. Karma penalty for 90% fair mods? Can I mod that unfair?
    21. Re:Ipod connection? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You are so freakin' stupid it's unbelievable. Pedantry has nothing to do with it, because GGP's comment doesn't make sense, even if he meant "plug" rather than "jack". Why would a hotel provide a headphone plug?

    22. Re:Ipod connection? by zulux · · Score: 1

      think you'll find that it's a 3.5mm stero jack plug...

      Nope. It's a 1/8 inch plug.

      It's design is based on imperial units and not metric.

      It's miniaturized version of the Ma Bell 1/4" tip and ring plug that was used all throughout the world for telephone switches.

      Kinda like how drywall is usually exactly 1/4" no matter where you go, even in most metric countries.

      --

      Moneyed corporations, non-working 'poor' and criminal prisoners are turning productive citizens into tax-slaves.

    23. Re:Ipod connection? by mrchaotica · · Score: 1

      "My car gets forty rods to the hogshead and that's the way I likes it!"</obligatory simpsons>

      --

      "[Regarding the 'cloud,'] ownership was what made America different than Russia." -- Woz

    24. Re:Ipod connection? by rich_r · · Score: 1

      Amazing what you can find out just by being a grumpy pedant! (I did stick a /facetious tag as the end, but it got stripped...

  7. Sound proof and bookable for 4 hour periods.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny

    "Sound proof and bookable for 4 hour periods...."

                Sounds like the perfect resource for hookers and hitmen!

    1. Re:Sound proof and bookable for 4 hour periods.... by kfg · · Score: 2, Funny

      . . .the perfect resource for hookers and hitmen!

      Or even worse. . .

      Street musicians.

      KFG

    2. Re:Sound proof and bookable for 4 hour periods.... by DigitalHammer · · Score: 1

      No, there's more worse:

      Micheal Jackson.

    3. Re:Sound proof and bookable for 4 hour periods.... by darkmeridian · · Score: 1

      Or prostitute hitmen. Make money from the guy you're about to kill!

      --
      A NYC lawyer blogs. http://www.chuangblog.com/
  8. Don't care. by RickPartin · · Score: 2, Funny

    Am I the only one who could care less how weird and uncomfortable these things are so long as it's cool and futuristic looking? I am such a slave to my geekness.

    1. Re:Don't care. by RickPartin · · Score: 1

      Yes I meant to say "couldn't care less". Please don't kill me grammar nazis.

    2. Re:Don't care. by JustOK · · Score: 3, Funny

      It should be "Please don't kill me, grammar nazis."

      --
      rewriting history since 2109
    3. Re:Don't care. by kfg · · Score: 1, Informative

      The phrase "I could care less" is the sardonic shorthand version of the phrase, "I could care less, but I'm not sure how."

      It's an idiom and assumes knowledge of the metadata to make sense of it.

      Grammar nazis only have dictionaries, not knowledge.

      KFG

    4. Re:Don't care. by Danse · · Score: 1

      It's an idiom and assumes knowledge of the metadata to make sense of it.

      Heh. I bet 90% of the people that use that phrase couldn't tell you the full version. So it apparently it assumes too much.

      --
      It's not enough to bash in heads, you've got to bash in minds. - Captain Hammer
    5. Re:Don't care. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Unless he was trying to say in an Irish accent, I have some grammar Nazis here and I would prefer that they were not killed.

    6. Re:Don't care. by kfg · · Score: 1

      Idioms are like that.

      KFG

    7. Re:Don't care. by JustOK · · Score: 1

      ...or "Please don't kill me grammar, nazis."

      --
      rewriting history since 2109
  9. Strange visitors by Dan!+Dan!+Dan! · · Score: 3, Funny

    I know a certain count from the Balkans that won't mind sleeping in this hotel.

    1. Re:Strange visitors by killeena · · Score: 1

      Unless they are numbered, then it may be a certain Count from Sesame Street.

      --
      Freedom would be not to choose between black and white but to abjure such prescribed choices. -Theodor Adorno
    2. Re:Strange visitors by Pesh+Hawksfire · · Score: 1

      Or a certain Count from Barrytown.

  10. What about a toilet? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Whould you really want to sleep in the same room you just took a dump in?

    1. Re:What about a toilet? by User+956 · · Score: 4, Funny

      Whould you really want to sleep in the same room you just took a dump in?

      After a night of partying, many college students are already quite comfortable with this idea.

      --
      The theory of relativity doesn't work right in Arkansas.
    2. Re:What about a toilet? by kfg · · Score: 1

      How many sorority girls does it take to screw in a lightbulb?

      Don't be silly. Sorority girls don't screw in lightbulbs. They screw in pools of their own vomit.

      KFG

    3. Re:What about a toilet? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Well it's certainly preferable to sleeping in one that someone else just took a dump in!

          Oh wait....

    4. Re:What about a toilet? by User+956 · · Score: 1

      Don't be silly. Sorority girls don't screw in lightbulbs. They screw in pools of their own vomit.

      That reminds me:
      What does a sorority girl put behind her ears to make her more attractive?

      Her ankles.


      --
      The theory of relativity doesn't work right in Arkansas.
    5. Re:What about a toilet? by sunspot42 · · Score: 1


      What's the first thing a sorority girl does in the morning?

      Walk home.

  11. Somethiing similar already exists by DrXym · · Score: 5, Informative
    EasyHotel runs a hotel in London where each room is essentially a box with a door. Windows, room service and the remote control which turns on the TV are extra. Prices vary from very cheap to much more than a conventional hotel room depending on when you book. It's a great idea assuming you don't plan to be in the room much and pick up a good rate, otherwise I'm not so sure. There are plenty of cheap chains like Travel Inn, TravelLodge, Ibis etc. who provide a full hotel service without the swingeing.

    The concept of a small room does appeal to me though. Assuming it was well designed and contains all the amenities, I'd have no problem with it. But the price must be substantially cheaper than a regular room to reflect the higher number of people they're cramming into the same space.

    1. Re:Somethiing similar already exists by mattjb0010 · · Score: 2, Funny

      EasyHotel runs a hotel in London where each room is essentially a box with a door.

      That's every hotel in London.

    2. Re:Somethiing similar already exists by DrXym · · Score: 2, Interesting
      That's every hotel in London.

      Not every hotel. There are some very decent chains and plenty of decent independents out a bit. Go at the right time of year and you'll even find decent offers in more upmarket places. I've never had to spend more than £100 a night and frequently spend a lot less for a decent place. but if you're foolish enough to rent a "tourist class" room around Picadilly Circus then you can expect to stay in a rathole. The same is true of Amsterdam, but even worse since the narrow building construction means you'll be hauling your bags up 3 flights of steep stairs.

      The smart thing to realise about London is that the Tube is your friend. It's easy enough to find somewhere lying out a bit which is only 15 minutes away from all of the attractions.

    3. Re:Somethiing similar already exists by Kijori · · Score: 1, Insightful

      If they intend mostly to build at airports and other high-throughput venues, they'll be able to charge an almost extortionate amount and the high demand will take care of the rest.

    4. Re:Somethiing similar already exists by newandyh-r · · Score: 1

      Accor - who run the moderately priced Ibis chain - also have some very low cost hotels of a similar, if lower-tech, nature.
      However travellers with a wider than normal waistband should beware of the very narrow toilets.

      See: www.hotelformule1.com

    5. Re:Somethiing similar already exists by kingturkey · · Score: 1

      EasyHotel are mentioned in the article but they are described as a cheaper, bare bones style room while these are supposed to be more luxurious while still keeping costs down.

    6. Re:Somethiing similar already exists by i.r.id10t · · Score: 1

      Strange, cruise ships are sorta like that too...

      --
      Don't blame me, I voted for Kodos
    7. Re:Somethiing similar already exists by Joey7F · · Score: 1

      Do you realize/realise that you said 100 GBP? That is a ridiculous price for a hotel in these here United States.

      Every Holiday Inn Express (that I have ever stayed at) is roughly 40GBP and they come with a decent breakfast! 100GBP are Disney World prices.

      I wish they would show the inside of one of these, or at least a mockup.

      --Joey

    8. Re:Somethiing similar already exists by mrchaotica · · Score: 1

      Not only that, but a Motel 6 or similar would be more on the order of 20GBP!

      --

      "[Regarding the 'cloud,'] ownership was what made America different than Russia." -- Woz

    9. Re:Somethiing similar already exists by DrXym · · Score: 1

      Oh please. First I said I've never had to pay more than £100 and frequently less for a decent hotel room. Secondly, visit New York at any time of the year and the rates are comparable - worse even. Besides which, £100 (or less) includes all taxes, the practice in the US is to slap the taxes on aftwards usually boosting your bill by a good 10-15%

  12. ... no thanks ! - Britain is a dirty island .. by bushboy · · Score: 5, Interesting

    Given the fact that in general, British public areas are usually filthy in terms of grime and litter, I don't think this is going to work.

    How do you know who slept in one of these "pods" before you, or what state you'll find one in ?

    Some of the B&B's I've stayed in here have been downright nasty, as well as some hotels and hostels.

    We can't even keep our hospitals clean.
    Also, everything gets vandalised here, even the windows on the trains have graffiti scratched onto them.

    I can imagine "parties" occuring in these pods, where 4 or 5 kids crowd into them, drink themselves into a coma and vomit all over the place - don't think it could happen ? - heh, try living here.

    --
    A slashdotting - you get the stick first and then the carrot !
    1. Re:... no thanks ! - Britain is a dirty island .. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Why is this modded troll?

      Im from the UK and i dont find this offensive. Infact its a correct image of the UK.
      Alot of people have lost respect for there enviroment.

    2. Re:... no thanks ! - Britain is a dirty island .. by mustafap · · Score: 1

      I agree. Although other cities, like Dublin in Ireland, make london look clean. I've lived in both and am glad to be out of both.

      I think the capsule idea is cool, and it's true that after a 12 hour flight it's nice to bed down for a few hours before heading into work. Having said that, most airport lounges that I have used had showers which did the trick for no cost. Great if you travel business class. If not, $70 would be worth it.

      --
      Open Source Drum Kit, LPLC deve board - mjhdesigns.com
    3. Re:... no thanks ! - Britain is a dirty island .. by iBod · · Score: 3, Informative

      Well, to be fair, what you say is true of London and other major cities in the UK, and any of the tourist 'honeypot' destinations. Poor service, poor standards, poor value because they don't have to make an effort.

      If you get off the beaten track a bit, market forces begin to operate and hotels and B&Bs need to compete, ergo standards are infinately better.

      I don't think it's right to say that Britain is a 'dirty island' - I have enjoyed some great times there. You just have to know where to avoid I guess - just like any other place.

    4. Re:... no thanks ! - Britain is a dirty island .. by Bazzalisk · · Score: 2, Informative
      Dublin? try Cork city.

      But, yeah, London is filthy. Manchester is Filthy, and Liverpool and Birmingham are only slightly better.

      Milton Keynes is quite clean ;)

      --
      James P. Barrett
    5. Re:... no thanks ! - Britain is a dirty island .. by jacksonj04 · · Score: 1

      It depends on the construction of the room. If it's designed well enough, all the flat surfaces are waterproof and there's a drain under the 'bed'. Take out soft bedding (which is gonna be washed anyway), hose the place down. Automatically charge the person who checked in (Since you already have credit card details tied to the room) extra for leaving it like a shithole.

      --
      How many people can read hex if only you and dead people can read hex?
    6. Re:... no thanks ! - Britain is a dirty island .. by ElephanTS · · Score: 1
      I can imagine "parties" occuring in these pods, where 4 or 5 kids crowd into them, drink themselves into a coma and vomit all over the place - don't think it could happen ? - heh, try living here.

      Why do you think it's called a coffin hotel? Probably more like a coughing hotel.

      --
      spoonerize "magic trackpad"
    7. Re:... no thanks ! - Britain is a dirty island .. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Informative

      Milton Keynes is a lifeless concrete desert.

    8. Re:... no thanks ! - Britain is a dirty island .. by bushboy · · Score: 3, Funny

      No, it's an opinion.

      This is flamebait, dickwad.

      --
      A slashdotting - you get the stick first and then the carrot !
    9. Re:... no thanks ! - Britain is a dirty island .. by dajak · · Score: 1

      Well, to be fair, what you say is true of London and other major cities in the UK, and any of the tourist 'honeypot' destinations. Poor service, poor standards, poor value because they don't have to make an effort.

      True. Paris, Brussels, and Amsterdam are the same. Poor service, small rooms, high prices. It is the combination of more demand than supply throughout the year (so that there is never an opportune moment for refurbishing the room) and high real estate prices (so that it is hard for competitors to enter the market in a good location).

      I do agree with TS that British hotels in inner cities are often exceptionally dirty, even by Parisian standards. Hotels in Germany, Norway, Austria, and Switzerland are the cleanest on average in my experience. I might try this coffin hotel some day, if only because it is new.

    10. Re:... no thanks ! - Britain is a dirty island .. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      you've clearly never been there then, and are going by the tired stereotypes. it's one of the most verdant, natural cities in the UK.

    11. Re:... no thanks ! - Britain is a dirty island .. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The area around the theatre is the largest car park I have ever seen in my life.
      It gave me agoraphobia.

  13. Makes sense. by Belseth · · Score: 4, Insightful

    There really isn't a downside. Anyone who has traveled much knows you rarely spend much time in the room other than sleeping so large rooms are mostly wasted. If you are staying for more than a few days you pick up a traditional room. They are being put in airports for a reason. People don't stay more than a day or two around an airport and traditionally airport hotels are extremely expense. I'd absolutely go that route if I got stuck with an overnight layover. Beats dropping a couple of hundred for a place to crash.

    1. Re:Makes sense. by phaggood · · Score: 1

      Anyone who has traveled much knows you rarely spend much time in the room other than sleeping

      Amen, brother! God, I have stayed in so many bloody expensive hotel rooms! First conference for the university I worked for in the 80's, room was bloody $250/nite. Conference ran 7am to 8p, plus BOF session until after midnight. The travel coordinator back at the U even said "I booked you next to the pool" like she was doing me a favor. We have pools in Mich, who GAF?

      There should be two types of hotels, the big fancy ones for travelling rock stars and divas who need that crap, and small, CHEAP and CLEAN (yeah, you can get cheap, but does it smell of urine?) rooms that are there for one purpose, somewhere to sleep when I'm not out in the bloody town to which I travelled spending my time enjoying the locale's local color, who cares about the stupid hotel room?

      Pool? Exercise room? Concierge? What is this, some Beaches-like all inclusive abomination?

      Give me a clean $70/night room with easy access to downtown Toronto,Paris, Montreal, Chennai, Tokyo, London, San Francisco, NYC, DC and probably 20 other cities around the planet, and you can keep your bloody pillow mint.

      rant=off

  14. Claustrophobic by leguirerj · · Score: 2, Insightful

    I don't like confined spaces.

    1. Re:Claustrophobic by Scruffeh · · Score: 1

      One man's claustrophobic is another man's cosy. It all looks pretty cosy to me, although I wouldn't want to stay there more than a night or so.

    2. Re:Claustrophobic by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

      WellIdon'tlikespacesatall,confinedornot.

  15. In time for the Olympics? by mustafap · · Score: 4, Interesting

    Expect to see a lot of these places springing up by 2012. And dont expect them to be cheap.

    I'm living near london now but very happy that I will be in another country by 2012. London will be hell on earth. Good luck to the locals!

    --
    Open Source Drum Kit, LPLC deve board - mjhdesigns.com
    1. Re:In time for the Olympics? by smoker2 · · Score: 1
      I think you only broke copyright 5 times there !

      Well done ;-)
      somebody has to do it...

  16. easyHotel by Jacco+de+Leeuw · · Score: 1, Funny

    easyHotel got these too. They've even shaped the rooms to Stelios' posture! :-)

    --
    -------
    Warning: Slashdot may contain traces of nuts.
  17. 10 square meters a capsule? I live in less by s0l3d4d · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Capsule - err, Coffin as its British translation seems to go - when the room is 10 square meters? Oh hey - I do live in an apartment of 1 living room, 2 bedrooms, and 3 capsules. Err, coffin sized bed rooms. And my room (shared) is a coffin size too? If that was a news of opening finally a real Japanese sized capsule hotel, it would score as geek news, but I don't see its geek newsworthness for the sake of it containing the word iPod.

    1. Re:10 square meters a capsule? I live in less by kfg · · Score: 1

      I don't see its geek newsworthness for the sake of it containing the word iPod.

      I can see by your user ID that you're new here.

      KFG

    2. Re:10 square meters a capsule? I live in less by s0l3d4d · · Score: 1

      My primary account here is far from new. Sometimes people need new starts, the history starts to be heavy.

  18. Cabin size is... application specific by joaobranco · · Score: 1

    I could use one of these for a short overnight stay... I wouldn't want it for longer stays... As this is intended to airport hotels, I would say it is a good fit.

  19. A good idea for tourists, too. by JakiChan · · Score: 2, Interesting

    I think that this would hit a great niche for me in terms of non-business travel if they had one of these in London proper (or any other city I'd like to visit, London being a personal favorite). I *don't* need a really fluffy hotel room, but the last "quaint" place I stayed in was not that nice. So somewhere between "super-budget" and "luxury" I could see people going for a small room but with the right features. Something $100/night in London that didn't suck would probably go over very well.

    --
    "Where quality is like a dead stinking rat - you just can't miss it."
    1. Re:A good idea for tourists, too. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You can get a hostel room for under £40 pppn. They are usually a bed, a wash-basin, and a sink, but quite decent if you only plan to sleep there. Breakfast is often included too...

  20. geek value by weierstrass · · Score: 1

    ..is that the hotels are automated

    --
    my password really is 'stinkypants'
    1. Re:geek value by Firethorn · · Score: 1

      How automated are they, really? I assume they still have an attendant come around to clean and change out the sheets/towels.

      Automated room rental could and have been done years ago. The only reason for not doing that is to have somebody watch over the place and fulfill odd jobs, like renting out rooms to people too drunk to handle a machine, make sure nobody's stealing or setting fire to the stuff in the lobby, helping with old people's luggage, etc...

      --
      I don't read AC A human right
  21. Sheesh, 10 square metres? by KozmoStevnNaut · · Score: 4, Insightful

    "...business travelers crammed into 10-square-meter cabins."

    They make it seem like 10 square metres is very little. I live in a 1-room, 15 square metre apartment, and I have plenty of space for all my furniture. There's even enough room for a small kitchen in the corner.

    Sheesh... Lousy pampered business-men...

    *Grumble, grumble*

    --
    Eat the rich.
    1. Re:Sheesh, 10 square metres? by lxs · · Score: 1

      If you look like him ten square meters is not a luxury, it's a necessity.

    2. Re:Sheesh, 10 square metres? by ncc74656 · · Score: 1
      "...business travelers crammed into 10-square-meter cabins."

      They make it seem like 10 square metres is very little.

      I did the math, and it came out to about 110 square feet. That's not just little, it's tiny. I currently have about 6x that space at home, and that's getting to be a bit small now. I suppose it'd be OK for its intended purpose, but even 3x the space would be too small to live in (been there, done that).

      --
      20 January 2017: the End of an Error.
    3. Re:Sheesh, 10 square metres? by michaelhood · · Score: 1

      15 (m^2) = 161.458656 sq ft The hotel room I'm sitting in as I write this is 4.5x larger than your apartment. My apartment is about 8x larger. Just because you're comfortable living in a closet, doesn't mean the rest of the world is. Get over yourself.

    4. Re:Sheesh, 10 square metres? by slappyjack · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Holy christ, that's quite possibly the most American thing I've seen written on /. to date, and it embarasses me to no end.

    5. Re:Sheesh, 10 square metres? by Kiryat+Malachi · · Score: 1

      Most likely they meant 10 m^2, not 10 meters square (100 m^2).

      The difference between the two is fairly large.

      (By the way, my *mattress* is around 2 m^2. If you genuinely live in 15 m^2, I pity you - humans should have more room to breathe than that.)

      --

      ---
      Mod me down, you fucking twits. Go ahead. I dare you.
      (I read with sigs off.)
    6. Re:Sheesh, 10 square metres? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I live in the SF Bay Area. My apt is 600 sq ft and costs > $2/sq ft.

      Just because you can't survive in a closet, doesn't mean the rest of the world can't. Get over yourself.

    7. Re:Sheesh, 10 square metres? by michaelhood · · Score: 1

      It embarasses you that I work hard to enjoy a larger living space? I was only responding to the GP judging people for needing a bigger room/apartment. Living in a 10m^2 here would be called poverty, for a reason. By our standards, it is.

    8. Re:Sheesh, 10 square metres? by slappyjack · · Score: 1

      Living in a 10m^2 here would be called poverty, for a reason. By our standards, it is.

      Exactly the point I was making. America consumes. Showing your level of consumption is important to many Americans and is somehow equates to self worth. I find it embarrassing.

      Some people choose to live with less than their means could provide - smaller house, smaller car, generally less stuff owned - and most americans think they're poor or not right in the head. Some people choose to live actually IN the city they tell people they're from, and deal with the cost/inconveniences associated with city living because they enjoy it, and most americans assume they can't "escape" to a big house in the suburbs.

      I find it embarrassing that this method of living has led people to think it's okay to live with an amount of debt that is typically equal to three months of their pay so they can drive 350 cubic inch sport trucks (used maybe twice a year to carry a load bigger than a dozen bags of groceries, and usually because someone has some big furniture) 30 miles from their gated neighborhood (actually not a neighborhood, because it contains zero support infrastructure, though you can build one of seven fabulously generic models of home in it) to their insulated and guarded workspace. "Yeah, I may not interact with another soul; but DAMN to I have some big stuff! Look at it!"

      I happen to be American, and the general direction of my country's attitudes embarasses me. This isn't the place I signed on the dotted line and swore to take a bullet for. Not anymore. ...and before you say it, I'm actively TRYING to get the fuck out.

    9. Re:Sheesh, 10 square metres? by michaelhood · · Score: 1

      I'm glad to see you're leaving, we don't want you. Persons capable of such rants are usually counterproductive to [American] society.

      Perhaps you should elect to learn to read. If that's not too consumer for you, of course. As I stated before, I was combatting the elitist GGP post about people needing/wanting such large living spaces. Just like you have the right to live below your means, I have the right to live at mine. If I can work a little harder than I need to in order to survive, and be able to have a house that makes me happier, shouldn't I?

      These are basic tenets of capitalism. If you don't like it, I suggest you head to China. But even they're starting to come around.

      Your socialist comments are unwanted on this side of the globe. Good luck finding a suitable home where YOU will be able to "have contact with another soul".

    10. Re:Sheesh, 10 square metres? by KozmoStevnNaut · · Score: 1

      Yes, I do live in 15m^2. It's roughly 4½ metres by 3½ metres, which comes to 15.75m^2, so yeah, closer to 16, but still. I have my own bathroom which is seperate (of course... it's not a jail!) and is roughly 2 metres by 2 metres. Also, there's a nice and big southward facing window, which is nice...

      So far, I've had no problem finding space for my furniture. I've got my sofa/bed, a nightstand, my TV, my stereo, a chest of drawers, two small sofa tables, my desk, some shelving, a nice comfy chair and some additional table space for my kitchen in the corner.

      Furnishing the whole thing was pretty cheap, thanks to IKEA :-)

      In addition to my laptop and my desktop (which admittedly is a small form factor Soltek Q-Bic), I also managed to cram an Alphaserver 1000A (double-width case, too) in there. But it was too noisy, so I sold it to an OpenVMS geek.

      Having less space just means that you have to be a bit more creative in furnishing, and that you only really have two or three usable arranging possibilities.

      And although I have had girls mention that it's a nice apartment (appearantly, size doesn't matter in this respect), I would definitely consider once that special someone comes along.

      --
      Eat the rich.
    11. Re:Sheesh, 10 square metres? by KozmoStevnNaut · · Score: 1

      (I had a pretty good reply typed up about how I don't mind people living in big houses, but then my browser found it neccesary to crash... Isn't technology great?)

      Please understand that I wasn't trying to be elitist. I was simply pointing out how silly the "crammed into..." comment in TFA was.

      And please, quit the ameri-dick waving, ok? We're trying to have a reasonable discussion here, and going "RAH, RAH, USA, USA!" isn't helping at all.

      --
      Eat the rich.
    12. Re:Sheesh, 10 square metres? by KozmoStevnNaut · · Score: 1

      I would definitely consider once that special someone comes along.

      What I meant to write, of course, was "I would definitely consider moving into something a bit bigger once that special someone comes along.".

      --
      Eat the rich.
    13. Re:Sheesh, 10 square metres? by Kiryat+Malachi · · Score: 1

      Having less space means that you can't do much inside your home. I silk-screen, I've done photo shoots, I can have a dinner party and invite over 6 or 8 friends. You can't do any of them; you simply don't have the space. Like I said - I pity you.

      --

      ---
      Mod me down, you fucking twits. Go ahead. I dare you.
      (I read with sigs off.)
    14. Re:Sheesh, 10 square metres? by KozmoStevnNaut · · Score: 1

      Keep it to yourself then, I don't need your pity. Really, I don't :-)

      As far as I'm concerned, I'm doing fine. I fiddle around with computers, fiddle around with electronics, play bass guitar, play console games, watch movies with friend (6 friends, no problem, as long as we've got a sofa and a few bean-bag chairs to go around.) and generally, not much of what I do needs a lot of space. Well... Driving around a car does, but I usually do that outside ;-)

      Never had a lack of space so far. Not that having more space for leaving stuff laying about wouldn't be nice, but I just keep my place reasonably tidy (ie. I can see my carpet... in spots... sometimes...)...

      --
      Eat the rich.
    15. Re:Sheesh, 10 square metres? by KozmoStevnNaut · · Score: 1

      Oh dear, what has happened to my spelling?

      It should have been "watch movies with friends", of course. I do have more than one friend, despite hanging out here :-P

      --
      Eat the rich.
    16. Re:Sheesh, 10 square metres? by slappyjack · · Score: 1

      I wasn't trying to be elitist. I was simply pointing out how silly the "crammed into..." comment in TFA was ... And please, quit the ameri-dick waving, ok?

      And those were the points I was trying to get across. I'd love to see that long reply if you can still pop it out.

      On the fun side however, the ameri-dick wavers are so easy to stick a thorn into. One comment about controling excess and they immediately go to the "SOAIALIST! GO TO ( China || Iraq || Cuba)!" argument. Best part of it all is, they don't know enough about worl dpolitics to konw socialist China from Socialist Sweden. Maube its because Fox News doesn't talk about the Swiss that much.

      Capitalism without education will eat itself.

      (FYI - I wasn't using "another soul" in the hippy-new-agey way. fool)

      Jeez, i guess its a good thing I didn't bring up the right to drive your SUV while packing.

      [ Please, mod-Troll away; I can use some bad Karma.]

    17. Re:Sheesh, 10 square metres? by michaelhood · · Score: 1

      I'm sure you've already got plenty of bad karma (and I don't mean in the Slashdot sense), achieved spouting your nonsense on the interweb. How do you suggest we control this "excess" you speak of? And who gets to decide what is excess? Take away the freedom to have whatever a person wants, and people stop striving to better themselves economically.

    18. Re:Sheesh, 10 square metres? by slappyjack · · Score: 1

      Cute.

      Once the economic non-argument fails, you guys always rally around the "liberals stealing your freedoms." I don't want your freedoms. In fact, I'd like you to have more of them.

      The decision of what is excess is mainly a personal one. Unfortunately restraint, for the most part, is no longer considered a virtue in American soceity. Neither is common sense or being educated (as it's own pursuit), both things fairly useful when making any decision, not just deciding what is excessive.

      Restraint from excess is sometimes, but not always, synonymous with sacrifice.

      Sacrifice is typically required for the betterment of others or soceity as a whole, not to mention often being just pain good for the individual doing the sacrificing.

      The population of this Country is rapidly sliding towards the attitude of "getting mine beause its mines right to have it" without an understanding of or care for where those rights and freedoms come from, much less having with any appreciation for those that exercised restraint and/or sacrifice in order to purchase those rights and freedoms in the first place. They don't, as a whole, give a damn what the cost is/was or who shoulders/shouldered the burden so long as it isn't them...

      And that's the problem.

      Think beyond your own experience. It doesn't hurt. Really.

    19. Re:Sheesh, 10 square metres? by Kiryat+Malachi · · Score: 1

      You get the pity for free, though. Everyone likes free things.

      Seriously. 160 square feet is not acceptable to most people - you've conditioned yourself to like it, which is fine for you, but people condition themselves to like all sorts of stupid things.

      --

      ---
      Mod me down, you fucking twits. Go ahead. I dare you.
      (I read with sigs off.)
    20. Re:Sheesh, 10 square metres? by KozmoStevnNaut · · Score: 1

      Oh yes indeed, I do like free things. Quite a lot actually.

      Yes, sometimes I do miss some extra space. I'm planning on construcing a pair of speakers for myself, and my apartment doesn't really lend itself to carpentry, and definitely not to painting.

      But that's where my parents enter the picture. Their house is plenty big for all those kinds of things. About half of their 800m^2 is my dad's company, and since he does a fair bit of installing radio communications equipment in cars, he's got a nice big garage where DIY stuff just seems to fit in very well. And of course, I absolutely don't mind him helping out, either ;-)

      Yes, you're right, you sorta condition yourself to a smaller living space. But I genuinely don't mind.

      --
      Eat the rich.
    21. Re:Sheesh, 10 square metres? by Kiryat+Malachi · · Score: 1

      See, if you have easy access to space like that, I'd define that as part of your living space. You can tolerate a smaller living space because you have a seperate work space. If I had a seperate work space for doing things, I could tolerate significantly less than the 120 m^2 I live in.

      --

      ---
      Mod me down, you fucking twits. Go ahead. I dare you.
      (I read with sigs off.)
    22. Re:Sheesh, 10 square metres? by KozmoStevnNaut · · Score: 1

      Yes, it would be defined as living space...

      That is, if they didn't live 250kms away from where I live. Which basically means it takes me more than three hours by train to get there, plus the hassle of bringing my things with me.

      So really, it doesn't count.

      --
      Eat the rich.
    23. Re:Sheesh, 10 square metres? by Kiryat+Malachi · · Score: 1

      Then it doesn't count, but you can't say "If I want to work on this, I just go over to my parents." 3 hours by train isn't a 'just'.

      --

      ---
      Mod me down, you fucking twits. Go ahead. I dare you.
      (I read with sigs off.)
    24. Re:Sheesh, 10 square metres? by KozmoStevnNaut · · Score: 1

      I never said I that I "just" went to their place. Like I wrote earlier, I go there during periods where I have some time off, and once in a while during a weekend, too.

      --
      Eat the rich.
  22. Hmmm by Raithmir · · Score: 1, Interesting

    "Costing roughly 70 dollars a night (but also bookable for four-hour periods), the rooms are aimed at passengers waiting for connections or those who want to sleep or work before a meeting." ...or lonely business men wanting somewhere to entertain the "ladies".

    1. Re:Hmmm by RobotRunAmok · · Score: 1

      or lonely business men wanting somewhere to entertain the "ladies".

      If the lonely businessman is the entertaining one, he's doing it wrong.

  23. YIC by dramenbejs · · Score: 1

    IMHO the term "You insensitive clod!" starts to deserve its own acronym.

    "YIC": Does anyone know about conflict with an existing one?

    1. Re:YIC by Transmogrify_UK · · Score: 1

      YIC! That is MY acronym!

      Jesus
  24. Missed Connections and Cancelled Flights by DaRat · · Score: 4, Interesting

    Having these hotels in hub airports would probably make them pretty popular with those who miss connections or have cancelled flights. This fall, I was going through Detroit, and they cancelled my connection with the next one in 8 hrs. Exhausted, and with a toddler in tow (who desperately needed a nap), I gladly plunked down $220 for 7 hrs in a Westin (most expensive nap ever). I would have loved to have had a $70 capsule hotel as an option.

    1. Re:Missed Connections and Cancelled Flights by deafgreatdane · · Score: 1

      Or, think of how the airlines will use this to their pocket book advantage: When flights get cancelled they comp you a room while waiting for the next flight. Now they can meet their obligation with these little boxes rather than putting you up in a real room. God forbid you actually want the larger room, now _you_ can foot the difference.

      Although I suppose it is in keeping with the below average real estate they give your butt and knees while you're flying...

    2. Re:Missed Connections and Cancelled Flights by llefler · · Score: 1

      Now they can meet their obligation with these little boxes rather than putting you up in a real room.

      If your flight gets canceled, you are probably more interested in catching the earliest flight rather than the size of your room. Like others have said, 10 square meters isn't that small anyway.

      The last time my flight got canceled, (Delta, mechanical problems on the first leg of the flight) I got to spend the night in Salt Lake City. It's 10pm, they've rebooked me on a 6am. So it's leave the gate, go to the ticket counter to get new tickets and various coupons for the night. Then wait for the hotel shuttle and get checked in. Make it to the room around 11:30. Next morning, up at 4am, get ready, check out, catch shuttle, and then wait for someone to show up at the gate. Do I really care about the room where I slept 4 hours and took a shower? As long as it's clean, quiet, and the alarm clock works. And if it had actually been in the terminal it would have given me another couple hours.

      If I'm going to be annoyed at the airline, it would be because of the cancelled connecting flight. Which, BTW, is why I don't fly United if there is an option. I've never missed a connecting flight with them, but it wasn't for lack of trying.

      --
      It is amazing what you can accomplish if you do not care who gets the credit. -- Harry Truman
    3. Re:Missed Connections and Cancelled Flights by aduzik · · Score: 2, Interesting
      Funny you should say that, because just last week (Tuesday, in fact) I was on my way back from my parents' house (Virginia to Iowa; leave a shitty state, arrive in a shittier state) and my connection in Detroit was cancelled due to weather. I found myself an "online-only" deal -- definitely worth the $6.95 for wireless access in the terminal. I wound up paying $89 at the Westin for a very nice room for the night. Plus, since I was travelling on Northwest (who doesn't in Detroit?) and my baggage was already en route to Cedar Rapids, I was able to check in at the automated stand at the hotel and take advantage of the no-line TSA checkpoint as well.

      I've stayed in some shitty hotels in my time and for $89, this was almost to good to be true. Everything at the Westin is "Heavenly" according to them, and for someone who's been stuck in an airport terminal all day, a "heavenly" shower, followed by a decent meal at the restaurant downstairs (featuring *real* silverware, even), a drink, some smokey treats and about six hours in the "heavenly" bed is worth any price they care to name. A couple of friends who just moved to Detroit even met me at the bar for a drink. After spending ten days with my parents, it was a welcome relief.

      The moral is, you can get a good deal at an airport hotel; you just need to wait until after check-in time and look around online. They're willing to take almost any price if they're afraid no one will be using the room for the night. And if you can make the reservation cheap for them by booking it online, they'll give you an even better deal. Or maybe I just got extremely lucky.

      --
      If it's not one thing it's your mother.
    4. Re:Missed Connections and Cancelled Flights by foo12 · · Score: 1

      Not that it matters now, but you should/could have probably flown standby to Minneapolis and then pick-up an easy connection to Cedar Rapids. FYI.

  25. Not a troll! by Teun · · Score: 1, Insightful

    Shit moderation, this is not a troll, these are sad facts of life on the Island of Britannia!

    --
    "The likes of Facebook and WhatsApp are free to those whose privacy is of zero value."
    1. Re:Not a troll! by Teun · · Score: 1

      Hmm, back to Meta Moderating!

      --
      "The likes of Facebook and WhatsApp are free to those whose privacy is of zero value."
  26. The lack of natural light by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Informative

    Tfa mentions that the lack of natural light is perceived as a problem. Most of the time when you are in a hotel room, it's dark outside. What you get is the light from surrounding buildings. Sometimes the view out the window is seriously ugly.

    Natural light could be provided by a light pipe; a quick google shows that those are commercially available. A decent sized lcd monitor covered with sheers would give you the same effect as a window.

    I've travelled a lot and 90% of the time, the view out my hotel room window hasn't been that great. Most of the time I'm in the room with the curtains closed and the window doesn't matter anyway.

    The lack of natural light shouldn't be a big deal.

    1. Re:The lack of natural light by tomjen · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Suppose you come in at an odd hour - say 3pm but are suffering from jetlag. Then it would be a good thing not to have any natural light, and a soundproff hotel room.

      --
      Freedom or George Bush
    2. Re:The lack of natural light by Firethorn · · Score: 1

      As a shiftworker and an international traveler, with it's attendant odd hours, I'll say that I value high-quality artificial lighting that I can turn off over a window which has light streaming in no matter what I do any day.

      There's a reason that I've foiled my bedroom window.

      And I'll agree with the sentiment that a cheap place, within negligable travel distance of the airport, without complicated and time consuming check-in procedure.

      Let's put it this way: I've been up for almost 48 hours straight, excepting not-very restfull snoozes on the plane, I've reached Boston and have a 6 hour layover until my connecting flight leaves at 8 or 10 am.

      The sooner I get a shower and into a bed, the happier I'll be. I'll even take a twin, and only need enough floor space for my luggage.

      Any other services are secondary at that point. Phone, TV, internet service are nice, but not necessary. They're cheap to provide though, so many places provide them as people are willing to pay $20 more a night to get them.

      --
      I don't read AC A human right
  27. Automated? Poor Norman by AHuxley · · Score: 1
    Won't Someone Think of the Norman Bates?

    "Norman Bates' Mother: And then what? After supper? Music? Whispers?"

    --
    Domestic spying is now "Benign Information Gathering"
    1. Re:Automated? Poor Norman by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Won't Someone Think of the Norman Bates?

      Strange, but with these "rent by the hour" hookerfest rooms, "Master Bates" was the last idea that came to my mind...

  28. Claustrophilic by DrSkwid · · Score: 5, Funny

    I do

    --
    There are places where the networks are not touching,and there are places where they are-Boeing's Lori Gunter
  29. offtopic by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    See how other companies are strengthening the dominance of ipods in the market by supporting these non-standard ports? Pretty soon, most people would give up their current player of choice and swing towards the ipod, because of it's exclusive support by other manufacturers.
    What some engineers need to do, is creat a standard port that companies can implement in their players. Sorta like Vesa, and that way the choice of portable players are back in the hands of the consumer.

  30. Price point for budget hotels is already $70 by cardpuncher · · Score: 3, Informative

    You can (usually) get a "normal" hotel in London from one of the budget chains for around the $70 mark (depending on area). The last time I checked "easyHotel" (http://www.easyhotel.com/), who pioneered the reduced-cost hotel concept, their prices were typically higher (up to $80 per night) than I could get in a number of conventional hotels that offered more space and a higher level of service. Accor (the French chain that operates Motel 6, Ibis, Novotel et al) already operates the Formule 1 brand (http://www.hotelformule1.com/) which provides automated checkin and basic rooms from around $50 in (the environs of) London and don't vary their prices according to demand the way easyHotel do.

    The only thing that seems to distinguish the Yotel is "designer" styling - and it will be interesting to see how this stands up to the wear and tear of a small space with high occupancy levels...

    Still, if they manage to deliver a hotel which meets the three basic requirements of a hotel - cleanliness, a working shower and a room quiet enough to sleep in - they'll be doing better than the majority of establishments out there!

  31. You just nailed it by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Abso-frickin-lutely. Had a layover in Honolulu and the next flight out to Guam was eight --eight!--hours away. I was worn out traveling from Miami - Houston - Hawaii and I was NOT keen to see more tropical weather, being from Miami, thankyouverymuch. Any place to lie in, not those plastic chairs waiting in the airport.

    The airport had a box like this, with a bed and shower, maybe not as luxurious but with short term rates, but GOD I just HAD TO HAVE IT. It was perfect, and I thought, well, why don't we have more of these?

    THey were thoroughly cleaned after use; I can imagine they could do the same in London.

  32. Fly Luggage Class! - Save! by SlashSquatch · · Score: 2, Interesting

    I would like to see flights with capsules.


    Since I'm over 2m tall, the seats are extremely uncomfortable.


    If I could opt for a coffin and an unfolded nap, I would almost certainly do so.


    Then weight distribution would be easy for the airlines.


    Of course there's safety issues, "someone please think of the children."

    --
    Autonomous Retard -- Is your camp safe? UnsafeCamp.com
    1. Re:Fly Luggage Class! - Save! by GlassUser · · Score: 1

      If I could opt for a coffin and an unfolded nap, I would almost certainly do so.

      Then weight distribution would be easy for the airlines.

      Of course there's safety issues, "someone please think of the children."


      There are possible safety issues with the fasten seatbelts sign too. Then again, these are mostly feelgood BS. There aren't many jetliner crashes that a seatbelt will save you from. And I like turbulence!

    2. Re:Fly Luggage Class! - Save! by croddy · · Score: 1

      Dude... the seats are extremely uncomfortable even for those of us *under* two meters :-)

    3. Re:Fly Luggage Class! - Save! by alnjmshntr · · Score: 1

      try this Not sure if you could stretch out much, but it's as about as comfortable as you can get on a plane.

      --
      If I had created the world I wouldn't have messed about with butterflies and daffodils. I would have started with lasers
  33. I see this as a positive thing... by Thumper_SVX · · Score: 2, Interesting

    ... though the price is a little high for what you get.

    I recently took a motorcycling vacation through the UK, and honestly finding places to stay was a little tougher than it is in the US. Here you can be sure of finding a budget hotel easily and quickly. Most of the time, to find somewhere to stay in the UK you've got to be either (a) near a big city or (b) near a tourist trap. That becomes a problem because typically the hotels are more expensive in these areas.

    Had this sort of thing been available, then the two nights I spent in London out of my two weeks I probably would have stayed there. It seems like just the sort of thing I needed; small, convenient and the price is not too high. My experience of hotels in England seems typically much higher than I'm used to. While traveling (not for business) I'm usually more than happy with a $40 per night Red Roof Inn.

    Having said that, I did end up staying at a hostel in Cardiff that was a lot cheaper than this (and almost stayed at a hostel in Brighton except for finding a great deal on a hotel room down the street). If you don't mind the "communal living" stuff and can live with the odor of weed in the lounge then this is a great option, especially if you're touring on a motorbike or just generally trying to keep the budget low.

    Back on topic, I would definitely use hotels like this when traveling. Usually all I need is a single night, and I don't intend on spending a huge amount of time in the room itself. I find the wireless Internet and stuff a little useless though... if this is really a room just to sleep and then go do stuff then why do you need a reason to stick around the little room?? When I was touring, if I wanted to use the Internet I normally didn't use the Hotel Internet connection and instead found a nearby Internet cafe. More sociable, and usually pretty cheap. Plus, I got some good (and bad) tea and coffee out of it :)

    1. Re:I see this as a positive thing... by 16K+Ram+Pack · · Score: 1

      If you ever come over again, I recommend rooms in pubs, which are all over the country. Pick the right ones, and you'll get a warm welcome, friendly locals, home cooked food and great ale.

  34. Renting by the hour? by PHanT0 · · Score: 1

    C'mon, doesn't this sound a little dodgy to anyone else?

    Do they warm-bunk them like in submarines?

    1. Re:Renting by the hour? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      C'mon, doesn't this sound a little dodgy to anyone else?

      Do they warm-bunk them like in submarines?


      "Is it just me or does this place smell like seamen?"

  35. The future of housing in general by nurb432 · · Score: 1

    As the cities become more and more crowded, dont be suprised if long term apartments start looking like this.

    --
    ---- Booth was a patriot ----
    1. Re:The future of housing in general by gronofer · · Score: 1
      At least in the UK, where there seems to be a general phobia about residential buildings with more than four floors, and perhaps a phobia about new buildings in general.

      About all you can expect is more efficient use of existing space for the growing population.

    2. Re:The future of housing in general by nurb432 · · Score: 1

      Wish i could say that is the case here in the US, where they are putting up skyscrapers at a frightening pace. ( along with the rapid destruction of farmland for single family homes..)

      --
      ---- Booth was a patriot ----
  36. Converts into what you say? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny
    Each soundproof cabin will contain a sofa that converts into a double bed, a pull down desk, closet space, adjustable mood lighting, a shower, wireless Internet, an iPod connection and a flat-screen TV.

    In my days, our Transformers only changed into one thing and back. And we liked it that way!

  37. Re:iPod? - Yo! Sushi! has iPod docks by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    At least on of the Yo! Sushi! outlets in London (off Oxford Circus) has an iPod dock on the table and a private speaker. Maybe this guy REALLY likes iPods (as do I!).

  38. Cruise ship cabins by Mal-2 · · Score: 3, Insightful

    Has anyone else noticed these look a lot like prefabricated cruise ship cabins? They too run about 3 meters on a side and contain a functional, if spartan, bathroom. I wouldn't be the least bit surprised if these are just a bunch of prefab cubes stuck in a building by crane, then plastered in. At least they don't automatically come with a roommate, like crew quarters...

    Mal-2

    --
    How is the Riemann zeta function like Trump rallies? Both have an endless number of trivial zeros.
  39. Why is this news? France has had them for 20 years by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Accor Hotels opened the budget Formule 1 chain with its mini rooms back in 1985. Now when they have these things in the obesity-laden, everything-has-to-be-supersized United States, get back to us.

  40. The Balkan? by chx1975 · · Score: 1

    If you think of Count Drakula, then you need a better world map. Romania is not on the Balkan peninsula. (And no, I am not Romanian either.)

  41. A shame so many are claustrophobic by CFD339 · · Score: 4, Interesting

    I'd love to see airports, train stations, and maybe a few other places have short term rentable units even smaller.

    Imagine a space 9 feet long, 3 feet high, and 3 feet deep. At one end, a 2 foot wide by 2 foot deep table on which could be placed a carry on bag. An electrical outlet could be available for charging laptops and such. The other 7 feet in length (2.13 meters) would be a padded, easily cleanable surface. Set in the wall at the back would be two one time use cleaning rags, a one time use pillow, and a cheap sheet & blanket. Well filtered airflow with a CO and CO2 alarm built in would be a requirement of course.

    You put in a credit card, it snaps a picture of the unit and then it opens. You are agreeing to a contract that says:

    1. If its not clean, you have 1 minute to decide that and reject the unit.
    2. You agree to use it for $x/hour.
    3. You agree to a $50 fee if you do not leave it clean.

    Assuming it opens, and is clean, you take the first of the two cleaning rags and wipe it down. Toss the rag, and pull out the sheet and blanket, the one time pillow and you've got a bed. Plug in the laptop to charge, pull the door closed behind you and sleep. Both you and the laptop get a couple of hours rest and recharging.

    On leaving, you toss the sheets and pillow away, wipe down the bed with the other rag, take your stuff and leave. When you close the door another picture is taken of the "finished" state of the unit in case you've left a mess. A short cleaning cycle runs using fresh air, UV light, and who knows what else. The unit is ready for the next person.

    Given most of these places have enough height to them, you could easily stack two.

    In an airport, having them in the secure part of the terminal combined with good strong wall makes the security threat pretty minimal.

    There are many times in airports I'd have been willing to pay $30 or more for a few hours that way.

    --
    The problem with quotes on the internet, is that nobody bothers to check their veracity. -- Abraham Lincoln
    1. Re:A shame so many are claustrophobic by evilviper · · Score: 1

      An interesting idea, but the devil is in the details.

      People have differing opinions of what is clean.
      The fee for an unclean room is MUCH too high.
      Requiring people to clean the rooms after they've used them is just a bad idea.

      I think you could just improve the automated cleaning system somewhat, and eliminate the need for manual cleaning entirely.
      Air filtering systems would be quite expensive, and pure outside air (possibly heated/cooled) would be fine.
      HEAVY noise insulation is a must.
      Some sort of simple, built-in alarm clock with radio and nature sounds could make things much more plesant.
      I wouldn't stack 2, I'd stack 10! A simple walkway and stairs for each 2-high row, of course.

      --
      Slashdot gets worse every day... Pipedot: News for nerds, without the corporate slant
    2. Re:A shame so many are claustrophobic by mrchaotica · · Score: 1

      Great idea, but I'd modify it slightly by making it completely waterproof, getting rid of the cleaning rags, and having an automatic system that just sprayed the whole thing down with soap and water, and then dried it using hot air from the ventilation system.

      --

      "[Regarding the 'cloud,'] ownership was what made America different than Russia." -- Woz

  42. What I want... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    ...is a sofa like that!

  43. Mod Parent Insightful by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful

    I believe that the promoters have this trade very much in mind, though don't expect them to admit it. Many escorts (upmarket) and street girls (downmarket) in the UK do not have a place to go and rely on using hotels. This adds about 50-100 GBP to the punter's cost, and the punter also has the embarassment of dealing with a hotel receptionist knows what's going on (probably seen the girl many times before). These things will be a Godsend to the trade.

  44. Copenhagen Airport has these by phatbuddy · · Score: 1

    I stayed in one of the tiny rooms in the Transfer Hotel in Copenhagen Airport--they rent in 2 hour blocks during the day. Soundproofing is the key that makes it work.

  45. Couldn't care less is British/Commonwealth English by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    ...while US English seems to use "could care less".

  46. Re:Couldn't care less is British/Commonwealth Engl by kfg · · Score: 1

    US English

    Is there such a thing?

    KFG

  47. Re:THe improved Haiku version by PFI_Optix · · Score: 3, Funny

    Your haiku skills need practice, grasshoppah. Fixt: iPod connection? I have a Creative Zen, Insensitive clod!

    --
    120 characters for a sig? That's bloody useless.
  48. Re:THe improved Haiku version by PFI_Optix · · Score: 1

    I really need to learn to use tags in my posts here.

    --
    120 characters for a sig? That's bloody useless.
  49. Re:No by symbolic · · Score: 1

    From the FAQ:

    Is there a laundrette or facilities for washing clothes? No
    Is there a telephone available in the room / hotel? No
    Can I store my bicycle within the hotel? No
    Can I buy alchohol at the hotel? No
    Is there a mini-bar in the room? No
    Is there a gym in the hotel? No
    Is there a swimming pool in the hotel? No

    This has David Spade written all over it.

  50. Hotel For Mule? by tepples · · Score: 2, Funny

    Accor [...] already operates the Formule 1 brand (http://www.hotelformule1.com/)

    Does it smell like a hotel for mules?

  51. This Friday, hostels will lose their business by tepples · · Score: 1

    did end up staying at a hostel in Cardiff that was a lot cheaper than this

    Will this film make people afraid to stay in hostels?

  52. Not that small by sansailes · · Score: 1

    I am an architect and i can easily say that these coffin rooms aren't out of the limits. Sure, ten square-meter rooms are definitely pushing the limits, but normally, (even though there's no limit on luxury rooms), hotel rooms don't usually measure more than 20-25 square meters. 12-16 square meters rooms are not uncommon. in Europe, people who live with their families or roommates live in apartments which are around 25-35 square meters per person. (in urban areas of course, rural areas are a whole different deal). There are also studios for one which can be as small as 30 square meters (for everything you need, bathroom, kitchen, a bedroom and a living room.) 10 square meters are a far stretch, but since you won't be "living" there, it'd be okay. Geometry of this 10 square meter room is probably 2.2 x 4.5 or something like 2.40 x 4.15. In many building codes, you can't build a bedroom narrower than 2.4 meters. A 3.3 x 3 room is also possible but not likely due to its square-like dimensions which is not really suitable for a hotel room. The more disturbing thing about these rooms are the fact that they don't have natural light. IMHO, that's a no-go. Lack of natural light (not to mention lack of natural air-flow) in bedrooms are almost always unacceptable barring extreme circumstances. And these circumstances here being squeezing more bucks out of a cheap concrete box, i'd say it's not cool at all. These rooms should be *really* cheap to match their "coffin factor". The real important deal in this article is that this hotel is totally automated, which nullifies A LOT of costs such as staff wages. After all, in the long run building costs are trivial next to cost of running a hotel.

  53. Now do this for Airplane Seating! by mkcmkc · · Score: 1

    Now, if they could just do this for airplane seating. Every time I cram into one of those godawfully uncomfortable things, I think, for the 50 (?) cubic feet I'm getting, why can't I lie down in it? (Sort of like in The Fifth Element.) That'd be way more comfortable.

    --
    "Not an actor, but he plays one on TV."
  54. Capsule flights--yes please! by metamatic · · Score: 1

    Yeah, I don't understand why nobody seems to sell capsule flights, particularly for long hauls. You could fit 6 capsules in the space of 8-9 seats on a 747, maybe even more. I'd pay 25% extra to get a capsule bed on a transatlantic flight.

    --
    GCHQ Quantum Insert installed. If only our tongues were made of glass, how much more careful we would be when we speak
    1. Re:Capsule flights--yes please! by fish+waffle · · Score: 2, Insightful
      I don't understand why nobody seems to sell capsule flights, particularly for long hauls.

      Lots of reasons it turns out:

      • Some people who lie down for a long time will have some difficulty standing up after. That would slow down deplaning, especially in an emergency.
      • For equivalent/maximal space usage, capsules would have to be stacked. Then you need a certain agility to access upper ones, which limits who can have which capsule.
      • Oh good, your capsule is the one previously occupied for 7 hours by someone with serious b.o., perfume, or even vertigo issues. Cleaning a capsule is a lot more work than cleaning a seat.
      • Capsules take up more space. Think about it---your average coach seat does not have room for you to stand up, and is fairly minimal in surroundings in other dimensions too. A capsule that wouldn't be obscenely claustrophobic would definitely require more space. Keep in mind that a few inches of extra space is the major difference between business and coach prices.
      • It's hard to eat/drink laying down. While the whole point might be to facilitate sleeping, not everyone sleeps well on planes, so inevitably they'd be consuming food/drink.
      • People wouldn't stay in their capsules. They'd keep coming out to stretch etc; you'd need to provide some kind of mingling, common space, which would require more space per person.
      • People would have sex in them. Messy.
    2. Re:Capsule flights--yes please! by Firethorn · · Score: 1

      1. Many people who sit for long periods of time have difficulty standing and moving afterwards.
      2. Figure it out on the plane. I'll take the top, the old woman can have the bottom(or next to the bottom). In the booking process have a checkbox for 'needs lower capsule'.
      3. Replace the pad during the servicing and wipe down the alcove. We're talking international flights here, refueling takes some time in those cases all by itself.
      4. If it reduces your capacity, charge first class, or other appropriate rates for them.
      5. If they're going to be eating, drinking, or not sleeping, have them get a traditional seat ticket.
      6. And how much space is available for people 'stretching their legs' on traditional flights? People sitting generally need to stand more than those laying down.
      7. How'll they fit two into there for sex? And yes, people will barf in them, etc. But then, people to that anyways and the airline manages.

      Here's a discussion about the idea of a 'coffin hotel' plane

      --
      I don't read AC A human right
  55. Re:Coffin? Bleh... by Trurl's+Machine · · Score: 1

    What's wrong with "Capsule hotel" name?

    It's not sarcastic so it's un-British.

  56. *snicker* by RoadWarriorX · · Score: 1

    Costing roughly 70 dollars a night (but also bookable for four-hour periods)

    Four-hours? How about 15 minutes and I promise to clean up after myself when I'm done!

    (rim-shot-here)

  57. sure there's a market by jilles · · Score: 1

    I've traveled quite a bit and slept in some pretty shitty places. In the end the only thing that's relevant about a hotel room is whether the bed and shower are clean enough (some nasty surprises I've had in expensive hotels: somebody else's pubic hair in the bed, small bloodstains on the towels, a 'used' toilet, 'dubious' stains on the sheets).

    I don't mind if the room is small, as long as my bag and I fit in to it and as long as it is clean. Hotels are mostly about providing a false sense of luxury at a low cost for people who don't get around very much. If you travel a lot, you're no longer impressed by it. Just like air travel had a reality check over the past few years, hotels will have a similar reality check. You can still fly business class if you want to but unless you are an overpaid executive, you'll probably fly economy class and pay for your drinks & meals nowadays (short flights anyway). Similarly, do you really need a minibar, a spacious lobby and an outrageous breakfast buffet? Sure it's nice to have but will you pay for it if the alternative is 50 dollars cheaper and gets you a good enough bed in a small but quiet room? Right now you don't have much choice.

    When traveling privately, I always seem to find these inexpensive nice places and when traveling for work the room price is two or three times as high.

    --

    Jilles
  58. Starship Titanic by ewy99 · · Score: 1

    For some reason, the 3rd class stateroom in Starship Titanic comes to mind.

  59. Re:The improved Haiku version by aconkling · · Score: 1

    HTML tags...?
    Or you could choose "Plain Old Text",
    you ignorant clod.

  60. Think of The Children... by Greyfox · · Score: 1

    And mandate that they be shipped luggage class? Sharing the last leg of a 28 hour flight from the company's newest outsourcing office in Derkderkistan with 3 screaming infants and 6 hyper children is not my idea of a good time. Especially if the company doesn't spring for business class for those flights due to the latest round of cost cutting. I'd take out my frustrations with a new TSA rule: If they can't do long division, they fly in cargo. Admittedly in the USA, that'd include a number of college age and older people as well...

    --

    I'm trying to teach myself to set people on fire with my mind... Is it hot in here?

  61. Apostrophe by gatzke · · Score: 0, Offtopic


    Hate to pick nits, but you only just add an apostrophe to plural nouns that end in s. Singular words that end in s you still add 's.

    From http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Apostrophe_(mark)

    Debate over the possessive form of words ending in s

            * While it is commonly perceived that words ending in s simply gain an apostrophe in their possessive form (Mr. Jones' sock garters), the University of Delaware provides these guidelines [2]:
                        o To form the possessive of a plural noun ending in "s" simply add an apostrophe.
                                    + dogs' bones
                                    + boys' bicycles
                        o To form the possessive of a singular noun that ends in an "s" sound, be guided by the way the word is pronounced. If a new syllable is formed in the pronunciation of the possessive, add an apostrophe plus "s."
                                    + boss's office
                                    + witness's memory
            * A more prescriptivist approach is to add an s to single syllable words (Mr. Jones's sock garters), and omit them from multi-syllable words (witness' memory).

    1. Re:Apostrophe by Jacco+de+Leeuw · · Score: 1

      My keyboard had a temporary failure. ee, there it happen again. I hate thi keyboard.

      --
      -------
      Warning: Slashdot may contain traces of nuts.
    2. Re:Apostrophe by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You hate to pick nits? You aren't picking nits.

      You've imagined some nits, consumed them greedily, savored their rich nit-like flavour and congratulated yourself on the speed and dexterity of your fanciful harvest.

  62. 10 square meters by Deadstick · · Score: 1
    If you'd like to live in 10 square meters for six months, you can do it by joining the Navy and going on a deployment in an aircraft carrier...and you'll have two roommates.

    Oh, and you'll have to be an officer.

    rj

  63. Capsule hotels by fbg111 · · Score: 1

    When I read the headline my first thought was that Britain had run out of room in their cemetaries and was solving the problem with large buildings in which to store occupied coffins. Obviously a bit misleading. The Japanese have a better, less morbid name: capsule hotels.

    --
    Flying is easy, just throw yourself at the ground and miss. -Douglas Adams
  64. Been there, done that by spamfiltre · · Score: 1

    Yotel CEO Gerard Greene described the new creations as "a wake-up call for the hotel industry." "We have been bold enough to take steps than no other has taken before, allowing us to offer luxury accommodation at an affordable price," he said.

    These have been tried in the States already, and failed miserably. Not quite the same concept - hourly rates only - but had the same target market. Maybe the previous entrepreneurs were a little ahead of their time.

  65. no digg by CrazyTalk · · Score: 1

    Already saw this on that rival web site - no digg!

  66. Re:Coffin? Bleh... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
    It's not sarcastic so it's un-British.


    It's attitudes like this that would make glad to have my British citizenship ripped up and see me thrown on the next plane out of the country. I'm not joking. In fact, I'm begging for it. Can't wait until I've got enough money together so I can get out before I grow old waiting.
  67. Re:Couldn't care less is British/Commonwealth Engl by Some+Bitch · · Score: 1

    US English

    Is there such a thing?

    No, I refuse to have my beloved language associated with 'color' and 'sox'. There does appear to be a North American language rooted in English but it has long since become seperated from the tongue of Her Brittanic Majesty.

  68. I already live in this... by schlumpf_louise · · Score: 1
    I'm a student, my room is smaller than these hotel rooms (ok we have a separate kitchen/bathroom). I live on the ground floor, my curtains are permanently closed so I have no natural light. I currently pay £55 a week and I can tell you my room ain't half as pretty as that room!

    Only thing I can think that would be a problem... ventilation. For me, I'm a girl on the ground floor so I never leave the window open at night cus I'm scared, but I tell you a small room with no decent ventilation for a few hours... you need some good air freshner :)

  69. Attitude in capsule hotels vs. mini rooms by atomic_toaster · · Score: 1

    I got stuck on the last train ride to Osaka from Tokyo on a recent stay in Japan. Bad planning on my part, but part of the problem is that I only speak very, very basic Japanese (e.g. "Where is the bathroom?"). It was about 1:00am and all the trains had stopped, and the next one left the station at 6:00am. I didn't have the money to take a cab to an expensive hotel and then cab back to the station in the morning, nor did I really speak enough Japanese to ask where the closest cheap hotel was (and ryokans, while they can be cheap, rarely have all-night entry), but I did have enough cash to pay for the capsule hotel located right there in the station. I can't read enough Japanese to be able to tell from the signage if a capsule hotel caters to only men, or to men and women both. Being a woman, I poked my head inside to ask if they accomodated women and if there was a capsule free, and I basically got yelled out of the establishment. I hadn't even cleared the front entrance! They yelled me out of the place despite the fact that I am obviously gaijin (blond-haired and blue-eyed), and equally as obviously didn't speak much of the language, so it was pretty darn likely that I'd just made a mistake. For a culture that is known worldwide for its politeness, these people were damned rude!

    Funny, though, it didn't seem to bother them that I had to camp out in the train station for the night, not twenty feet from the doorway of their establishment. That being said, a) I wasn't the only one to do it (there were a couple of obviously not homeless college-aged guys who did the same thing), and b) that train station was one of the safest places in a city where I have been late at night. (I'm comparing it to major Canadian cities, and one particular small town with a municipal campground fairly close to what passes for the downtown core, where I, as a young girl with the rest of my Girl Guide troupe, were terrorized by drunks who pissed on and sliced up our tents.)

    Back to the point, here, though... Basically, any room that is comfortable, affordable, and doesn't discriminate against female customers is good in my books. From personal experience, women won't enjoy the capsule hotel experience as much as they probably will the Yotel experience.

  70. Re:Couldn't care less is British/Commonwealth Engl by kfg · · Score: 1

    Ah, but your examples are about spelling. I'm questioning the language.

    KFG

  71. That's nothing... by Door+in+Cart · · Score: 1

    Each soundproof cabin will contain a sofa that converts into a double bed, a pull down desk, closet space, adjustable mood lighting, a shower, wireless Internet, an iPod connection and a flat-screen TV.

    My sofa converts into a state-of-the-art pirate fortress.

  72. Luxurious by Tokyo standards by mattr · · Score: 1

    A capsule hotel in Tokyo runs say 4000-5000 yen while a business hotel is say 6500-8500 and ordinary hotels then above 10,000 yen per night. The best capsule I've seen in Tokyo is VIVI in Roppongi's ROI building, for around 4000 yen, because it includes a common area with reclining chairs and large TVs, ion water, and relatively luxurious accomodations. For a little less you can sleep on shelves separated by curtains but that sucks. I've often used capsules when working past midnight when the trains stop since it costs 8000 yen to get home by cab. Another in Ebisu is 4400 yen I believe and is a standard clean capsule. (Think a quiet room with plastic molded bunk beds but when you go in your honeycomb cell and close the bamboo blinds over the end you scoot in horizontally, turn on the fan and light, and can watch a little tv. Minimal and expensive for what it is. The poster mentions a nice tiny hotel room that sounds more like a smallish Japanese "business hotel" size room without the window you normally get. This is probably like what women can rent in coed capsules (women are not allowed in the capsule side but get private rooms of their own), any women who has tried one please post.