Slashdot Mirror


Western Union Ends Telegram Services

Snap E Tom writes "As of this past Friday, Western Union has stopped sending telegrams. The article cites factors such as long distance telephone and faxes that contributed to its demise, but email was the final nail. My hunch is that modern USPS and overnight delivery services did the most damage, though."

223 comments

  1. Necrodendrology by (1+-sqrt(5))*(2**-1) · · Score: 4, Interesting
    Telegrams, interestingly enough, aren't the last way to wire dead trees; the USPS will also take PDFs and convert them into post.

    Just like voice and proximity have something over email, there's a kind of concretion in the physical missal.

    1. Re:Necrodendrology by (1+-sqrt(5))*(2**-1) · · Score: 1
      Did you set out to break the record for how many fancy words you could misuse in one post?
      Specifics, man; specifics.
  2. how long by spune · · Score: 0

    how long has this service been disgustingly obsolete?

    1. Re:how long by Alex+P+Keaton+in+da · · Score: 3, Interesting

      What is interesting however, is that telgraphs were able to send information long distances over wires... sort of reminds me of, um, the internet.
      Technology eveolves, and paying tribute to earlier tech that made our current tech possible is a worthwhile endeavor. Wasn't it Einstein who said of I have seen farther than others, it is because I stood on the shoulders of giants...
      Seriously- imagine what it must have been like to see a stock ticker for the first time in the late 1800s. I am not sure what it would compare to today, but it must have been amazing.

      --
      And All I Ask is a Tall Ship And a Star to Steer Her By
    2. Re:how long by psycho8me · · Score: 3, Informative

      It was Newton who first said that, and he meant it as a cruel joke against a short man.

    3. Re:how long by gruntled · · Score: 4, Interesting

      Two things: First, the telegraph was the first binary "digital" device. It communicated information using dots and dashes.

      Second, I last sent a telegram about six years ago when a friend of mine finished up her PhD. Western Union knocked on the door of her victory party and hand delivered it. She was flabbergasted, had never gotten one before, and none of her friends had ever seen one. She still has it in a frame. I don't know of anybody that's got any bit of email I've ever sent them in a frame.

    4. Re:how long by Fred+Or+Alive · · Score: 1

      What? I thought it was Oasis. :-)

      --
      10 PRINT "LOOK AROUND YOU ";
      20 GOTO 10
    5. Re:how long by Kadin2048 · · Score: 4, Interesting

      I don't know if this service is being discontinued as well, but Western Union used to offer the ability for a person to type in a message, and have it hand-delivered to his Congressperson. It was fairly expensive, but I'm told reasonably popular when you really wanted to make a statement.

      Given that I can't find any information about it on their site anymore, I'm going to guess it's been discontinued.

      Probably given that most politicians are less adverse to email now than they used to be (particularly with the new post-9/11 and post-anthrax security precautions), the demand for it didn't exist anymore. But until recently, it was widely believed -- and perhaps is still true -- that sending your opinion by email just didn't give it the impact that a piece of paper did; especially a piece of paper that everyone knew you spent quite a bit of money sending, like a telegram.

      --
      "Ladies and gentlemen, my killbot features Lotus Notes and a machine gun. It is the finest available."
    6. Re:how long by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Interesting

      Actually, you could actually type up the telegram message online, and have it delivered to the specified address.

      Perhaps if Western Union had done some more advertising about this service (particularly weddings, celebrations), they wouldn't have had to cancel it.

    7. Re:how long by ericspinder · · Score: 1
      Perhaps if Western Union had done some more advertising about this service (particularly weddings, celebrations), they wouldn't have had to cancel it.
      ...Only if they attached flowers,and ballons to those messages.
      --
      The grass is only greener, if you don't take care of your own lawn.
    8. Re:how long by utexaspunk · · Score: 4, Funny

      Don't worry- Western Union still handles the kind of transmissions that Congressmen pay attention to.

    9. Re:how long by jrockway · · Score: 2, Informative

      > First, the telegraph was the first binary "digital" device. It communicated information using dots and dashes.

      Wrong. It uses dots, dashes, and pauses. If you don't pause between letters, they blur together and the meaning becomes ambiguous. .... could be "eeee" or "h", for example.

      So it's not binary, it's tri-nary.

      --
      My other car is first.
    10. Re:how long by -kertrats- · · Score: 1

      It was clearly Odysseus in Troy that said it first.

      --
      The Braying and Neighing of Barnyard Animals Follows.
    11. Re:how long by jheath314 · · Score: 2, Interesting

      You are technically correct... most telegraphs were ternary devices. However, I should point out that this was only a function of the character mapping done in Morse code. It is possible to use a telegraph in binary mode (only dots and dashes, with no extra symbol denoting the end of a character) through Huffman coding.

      --
      Procrastination Man strikes again!
    12. Re:how long by ChadN · · Score: 1

      He said "digital", not "binary". Digital implies digits, or numbers, however they are encoded. Much like ASCII is a mapping of 7-bit numbers to a set of symbols, each unique set of dots, dashes, and pauses represent a unique codeword mapped to a symbol.

      That said, I think calling Morse code "digital" is a bit of a stretch; you could maybe also say it is a pulse-width-modulated analog signal that is temporally encoded, or some such thing. If it was truly digital, you could do checksums on it (directly); anyway, it may be open for debate, although I'd be happy to be convinced by someone.

      --
      "It's overkill, of course. But you can never have too much overkill." - Anonymous Slashdot Coward
    13. Re:how long by jheath314 · · Score: 2, Informative

      Actually, he said 'binary "digital" device', so it's unclear if he knew the difference between the terms. In common parlance binary and digital are used almost interchangeably.

      Let's review:

      Digital: Having only a finite set of symbols to choose from (as opposed to analog, which can have an infinite set of permissible values/signal levels/pulse shapes). By this definition, Morse code is clearly digital, even though the opportunities for doing fancy signal processing are limited.

      Binary: A subset of digital, in which only two symbols are permitted. These symbols can be almost anything, really: a dot versus a dash, a 1 versus a 0, a higher frequency versus a lower one, etc.

      --
      Procrastination Man strikes again!
    14. Re:how long by Erbo · · Score: 1
      What is interesting however, is that telgraphs were able to send information long distances over wires... sort of reminds me of, um, the internet.

      That's a better analogy than you might think...there's some good history of telegraphy in a book called The Victorian Internet , which I was inspired to dig out last night after reading about this story over on JWZ's blog. The parallels in the history of the telegraph network and the Internet are striking...they had many similar uses, including news delivery and commercial transactions; telegraph operators commonly used the wires for "chat" and even "online gaming" (playing chess); people devised, and broke, codes and ciphers for telegraph traffic; there were even some "telegraph romances." And, in its day, the telegraph network was referred to by some as "the highway of thought." (Compare with the overhyped phrase "the information superhighway.")

      --
      Be who you are...and be it in style!
    15. Re:how long by smittyoneeach · · Score: 1
      Never underestimate the value of a good, old-fashioned backup channel.
      HTTP is teh r0x0rz, until you really need to submit something, say, your income taxes, and your ISP does a face-plant.
      Suddenly, the capacity to fax, telegram, or at least get a post-mark on a letter to CYA goes from being
      disgustingly obsolete
      to being rather quaint, but occasionally useful.
      Or, as the writer of Ecclesiastes put it:
      9:14 There was a little city, and few men within it; and there came a great king against it, and besieged it, and built great bulwarks against it:
      9:15 Now there was found in it a poor wise man, and he by his wisdom delivered the city; yet no man remembered that same poor man.
      s/poor wise man/telegram/
      --
      Get thee glass eyes, and, like a scurvy politician, seem to see things thou dost not.--King Lear
    16. Re:how long by Guppy06 · · Score: 1

      "Wrong. It uses dots, dashes, and pauses."

      Dihs, dahs, short pauses between characters (silent "dih"), long pauses between words (silent "dah").

      Tetranary.

    17. Re:how long by SputnikPanic · · Score: 1

      It was only in the last ten years or so that the typical American received their first exposure to the internet, and since then we've seen the rise of even newer forms of communication -- cell-phone text-messaging, for instance. The communications revolution, then, is still clearly in full sway, and that revolution, it can be argued very strongly, all started with the invention of the telegraph. As mentioned in another comment, there's a short but fascinating book titled The Victorian Internet (the author is Tom Standage) whose thesis is exactly what you alluded to. The book is well worth a read, with many similarities between now and then, particularly in terms of how quickly the new communication medium mushroomed and created the need for new technologies.

    18. Re:how long by ChadN · · Score: 1

      Ah, you are correct, and I apologize.

      --
      "It's overkill, of course. But you can never have too much overkill." - Anonymous Slashdot Coward
    19. Re:how long by jheath314 · · Score: 1

      Apologize? What for? There's nothing wrong per se with being... um, wrong.

      --
      Procrastination Man strikes again!
    20. Re:how long by Kadin2048 · · Score: 2, Funny
      From the Western Union Money Transfer FAQ:
      5. How much money can I send from westernunion.com ?

      Initially, the maximum amount of money you can send online with a revolving 30-day period is $999.99. Once you have used the Western Union Money transfer service on the web, at least once over the course of 120 days, you may send up to a maximum of $2,000 within a revolving 30-day period. If Arizona is your state of residence, you may only send up to a maximum of $950 per transaction.

      With a limit like that, I think you're pretty much stuck with buying interns. :)
      --
      "Ladies and gentlemen, my killbot features Lotus Notes and a machine gun. It is the finest available."
    21. Re:how long by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Just for "correcting" you when being (blatently) incorrect myself.

    22. Re:how long by Deadstick · · Score: 1

      Telegrams were often referred to, years ago, as "yellow death" -- especially in 1941-45, but you would just as likely hear of Aunt Martha's passing that way. The sender could even specify that the telegram be delivered in a black-bordered envelope.

      rj

    23. Re:how long by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "Ah, you are correct, and I apologize."

      --passes out from shock at having never ever never ever expected this in any online discussion forum, let alone slashdot.

  3. Heh by Moby+Cock · · Score: 5, Funny

    Telegram Services STOP.

    1. Re:Heh by cogg · · Score: 1

      Bravo, sir!

      --
      "Never 'clear the air'. Instead, investigate all the subtle nuances of the word 'fester'." - R. Candappa
    2. Re:Heh by Morky · · Score: 1

      Bugger STOP I was going to make that joke STOP

    3. Re:Heh by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      quite cute! you got a giggle from me!

    4. Re:Heh by jargoone · · Score: 1

      Nice! Serious question: what if you wanted to use the word "STOP" in a telegram. Was there a way to "escape" it?

    5. Re:Heh by generic-man · · Score: 1

      yes

      --
      For more information, click here.
    6. Re:Heh by rubycodez · · Score: 1

      punctuation marks carried an extra charge, while the four character word STOP was free. So the best way to escape STOP would be to use punctuation characters to end sentences.

  4. 1/27/06 by The+MAZZTer · · Score: 2, Insightful

    ...is a very important date in Telecommunications.

    My Networking and Telecomm prof says it's about as important as the eventual day when the last car manufacturer will announce they have ceased production of gasoline-powered vehicles.

    1. Re:1/27/06 by nick-less · · Score: 2, Funny

      ..is a very important date in Telecommunications.

      Yep, now we`ll be surely doomed when SKYNET comes online...

    2. Re:1/27/06 by Alex+P+Keaton+in+da · · Score: 1

      SkyPager- I still remember the number- 1-800-759-7243. But you still don't know my PIN...
      There are many events that may be insignificant in the grand scheme of things, but are still interesting. To some car fans, the last Camaro in 2002 is significant, both sentimentaly and for trivia purposes.
      Maybe some of the young people here (I am assuming you are under 25 if you refer to your prof) have never seen a telegram. I have one framed at my house that my uncle sent my mom when I was born. Congratulations on the birth of your son STOP Hope all is well STOP etc... (Not to sound like an old fuddy duddy)

      --
      And All I Ask is a Tall Ship And a Star to Steer Her By
    3. Re:1/27/06 by TheRaven64 · · Score: 2, Interesting
      In the UK, BT stopped doing telegrams a few years back. I don't know the exact date. I read how to send them in the 1997 telephone book and was surprised that they still existed but when I went to check in the 2003 edition that page had gone and there was no mention on their web site.

      Do telegrams still exist in other countries? The only reason they carried on for so long in the UK was that you used to receive a telegram from the Queen on your 100th birthday (now you get a letter). Is the USA the last place to abandon them, or does your Networking and Telecomm professor (somewhat ironically) not realise that there is a world outside the USA?

      --
      I am TheRaven on Soylent News
    4. Re:1/27/06 by Imsdal · · Score: 2, Informative
      I was about to say that they disappeared in Sweden about five years ago as well, but some research showed that Telia, the state owned phone company, still (or, probably, again) offers them. They are now branded "Luxury Telegrams" and cost SEK 245 (USD$30).

      They are still widely used at weddings where it is customary to send a telegram if you can't make it to the reception. They are never used for business purposes anymore, as the motifs available are all roses, wedding couples etc.

    5. Re:1/27/06 by NeoBlazeSJX · · Score: 1

      Is the USA the last place to abandon them, or does your Networking and Telecomm professor (somewhat ironically) not realise that there is a world outside the USA? I think it's safe to say most people over here are unaware that there's another world outside of this country.

    6. Re:1/27/06 by 6*7 · · Score: 1

      Have you checked wheter someone else than BT is doing telegrams right now?

      Over here the dutch equiv. of BT stopped delivering telegrams in 2002 (apparently they delivered over 80k of them in 2001). But apparently some private company (http://www.unitel.nl/) thought they could still make some money with telegrams (http://www.telegram.nl/ and even tripled the number in their first year. Both sites are totally unresponsive for me right now.

    7. Re:1/27/06 by squiggleslash · · Score: 1
      Telegrams stopped being delivered by BT before it was even BT (or British Telecom) - they were still part of the Post Office when Telegrams were phased out.

      What you probably saw in the phonebook were "Telemessages." These were actual, normal, letters (ie delivered by the Post Office as regular first class mail) comprised of short messages transcribed over the phone. With the Post Office delivering first class letters overnight anyway, and so far as I'm aware having no international access method, it had limited use.

      --
      You are not alone. This is not normal. None of this is normal.
    8. Re:1/27/06 by Mostly+a+lurker · · Score: 1

      Actually, telegram service is not completely dead even in the US

  5. Good riddance to bad rubbish by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    What middleman is better known for facilitating the illegal acquisition of funds? If only they would stop their money transfer service also.

  6. I will miss the telegram. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Insightful

    I never, EVER received a spam/junk telegram. Ever. There's something kind of nice about a message transmission medium that has never been trashed.

    "FROM NIGERIA STOP OPPORTUNITY FOR MONEY STOP PLEASE HLP ME STOP..."

    1. Re:I will miss the telegram. by Stoopid-Guy0 · · Score: 0

      Have you ever received a spam/junk message-in-a-bottle?

    2. Re:I will miss the telegram. by Seraphnote · · Score: 1

      Spam telegrams would have cost money.
      On the other hand, junk-snail-mail costs money, and cost doesn't seem to prevent that.
      Hmm, what if email cost the sender money IF read, but the reader could easily and optionally refund the money back to the sender.
      Didn't someone mention that idea using micropayments?
      I guess we'd have regular SMTP servers, and pay-to-access SMTP (what would that be PMTP?) servers, and the PMTP servers could refuse to talk with the SMTP servers so as not to receive their spam.

      Oh I'll just wait until Microsoft kills off spam.
      (Which may or may not come before Duke Nukem Forever.)

    3. Re:I will miss the telegram. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Oh I'll just wait until Microsoft kills off spam. (Which may or may not come before Duke Nukem Forever.)
      Didn't you know? DNF is in production!

    4. Re:I will miss the telegram. by AndroidCat · · Score: 1

      That's only because they can't do it for free. Look at those services that provide relay operators for the deaf to make voice calls for them that scammers abuse the hell out of.

      --
      One line blog. I hear that they're called Twitters now.
    5. Re:I will miss the telegram. by roman_mir · · Score: 1

      yes, but when was the last time you received ANY telegram?

      I guess that is the point here.

    6. Re:I will miss the telegram. by NixieBunny · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Telegrams cost a LOT of money. I looked into sending one a few years back, and it was about the same cost as an Express Mail envelope - $10. You don't get much spam/junk sent via express mail either, I bet.

      --
      The determined Real Programmer can write Fortran programs in any language.
    7. Re:I will miss the telegram. by ab762 · · Score: 1

      I have never recieved a telegram. I'm only 46.

    8. Re:I will miss the telegram. by Deadstick · · Score: 1

      Matter of fact, WU used to have a poster in my local supermarket advertising a rate discount on money transfers to Nigeria. Now this was in the Denver area, no atypical concentration of Nigerian immigrants...and the discount was specifically for that country. If you wanted to send money to Burkina Faso or Liberia, or anywhere else in Africa, you paid full price.

      And the fine print said that you would not get the prevailing exchange rate, and they would keep the difference. Guess that's called knowing your customer base.

      rj

  7. Last telegram received... by marevan · · Score: 5, Funny

    Dear Western Union, stop. Would you please, please, stop.

    1. Re:Last telegram received... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      They should have marketed it instead of keeping quiet.

      "You can be the one to send the last telegram of humanity"

      Consider how many people never have sent or received a telegram, it could have bben a good business.

    2. Re:Last telegram received... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Mr C Chaplin, Sennett Studios, Hollywood, California.
      Congrats. Stop. Have discovered only person in world less funny that you. Stop. Name, Baldrick. Stop.
      Yours, E Blackadder. Stop.
      P.S. Please please please. Stop.

  8. Just great.. by erktrek · · Score: 5, Funny

    Now how are we supposed to coordinate the counter attack against the aliens?

    1. Re:Just great.. by leuk_he · · Score: 2

      That is done with morse, that is something different. Morse will still be used by radio amateurs.

  9. Ug by grub · · Score: 3, Funny


    I only hope [stop]
    that they do not [stop]
    end their exciting [stop]
    telegraph service [stop]

    --
    Trolling is a art,
    1. Re:Ug by Speare · · Score: 1

      Cute joke, but "stop" was the word used to indicate a period. Long before it became trendy to call it a "dot," the punctuation we call a period has also been called a stop or a full stop. You wouldn't use "stop" in the middle of a sentence.

      --
      [ .sig file not found ]
    2. Re:Ug by notthe9 · · Score: 1

      Yeah, man. That guy. is so retarded. Thanks for enlightening us. with your knowledge.

  10. Morning Coffee-Nose-Projectile-Monitor-Wipes by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Good one. I wonder how many people will get the joke.

  11. Oh No! by Kranfer · · Score: 0

    I didn't know you could still send a telegram through western Union. Whenever I think of Western Union I think of Money orders. But since there are no more Telegrams being sent over the wire... Does that mean the Pony Express is going to be taken out too?1 Say it ain't SO!

    --
    -- Josh
    "Whoopie! Man, that may have been a small one for Neil, but that's a long one for me!" - Pete Conrad
    1. Re:Oh No! by AndroidCat · · Score: 1
      Rider Qualifications:
      Ad in California newspaper read: "Wanted. Young, skinny, wiry fellows. Not over 18. Must be expert riders. Willing to risk death daily. Orphans preferred." Most riders were around 20. Youngest was 11. Oldest was mid-40s. Not many were orphans. Usually weighed around 120 pounds.
      Obviously all their potential riders became bicycle couriers instead and they had to close down.
      --
      One line blog. I hear that they're called Twitters now.
    2. Re:oh no! by uberdave · · Score: 1

      Telegrams were alive and well in 1955, the year Marty received the telegram from "Doc" Brown. Get your time lines straight.

    3. Re:oh no! by /dev/trash · · Score: 1

      The movie's gonna have to be reshot. Although wait. Doc sent the Telegram back in 1885. So 1985 Marty could get it in 1955.

  12. Re:OLD NEWS by Seraphnote · · Score: 3, Funny

    Well it takes CowboyNeal a while to type in all those telegrams we send him.

  13. Some laws may have to change by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Interesting

    For a long time, telegrams have actually been sent by teletype. The last time I saw a telegraph key in use commercially on a landline was in my grandfather's office (he was a railroad dispatcher) in the 1950s.

    When I got my first teaching job in the 1960s the law said that job offers for teachers had to be by telegram. Given the nature of the lawmaking process, I bet that law is still on the books.

  14. Keep the telegraph alive, though by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I do hope they keep the telegraph system alive for a few more years though. I'm in the middle of a download of a .mov file of Apple's "1984" Macintosh commercial through the telegraph system. I'm hoping to see the download complete sometime in late 2007.

  15. still a use by Balthisar · · Score: 4, Interesting

    I can see there being very reduced demand, but some demand still. Probably just not enough to justify the investment.

    I sent a telegram once. I was a kiddie in the Army, and I'd just left advanced training. I was on leave prior to going to Germany. Because I live in Michigan and a buddy going on the same plane lived in Ohio on the way to the airport in Pittsburg, we'd agreed to meet at his house so I could tag along. I broke my leg, though, and couldn't make the flight. I got everything straightened out with the Army, but not with my buddy, who didn't have a telephone (and wouldn't, I imagine, have internet access today). Of course I had his address, so the only way I could get a hold of him was via a Western Union telegram.

    I guess these days you could send flowers with "call me" just as fast as a telegram. Or hire one of the dancing monkey-suit people or a clown to sing a song about not being able to make the plane.

    I think there's still a demand today to be met, and possibly it can be done with a reduced infrastructure. Not everyone has internet access, and even so, as things are today you have to check the internet; it doesn't notify you. Heck, even *I* don't have a home telephone.

    --
    --Jim (me)
    1. Re:still a use by slashname3 · · Score: 2, Informative

      Today most people have cell phones. Text messaging directly to people would replace telegrams.

    2. Re:still a use by Kadin2048 · · Score: 1

      I think his point is that his Army buddy was not the sort of person who would have a cell phone.

      I can believe this -- although they're ubiquitous among most of the people who have internet access, there are a lot of people who for one reason or another don't have them. I can imagine a lot of people in the military might not bother, if they're on their way out of the country. (Because the majority of US cellphones don't work internationally anyway, or only do for a really exorbitant fee.)

      But not enough people exist, I guess, who both cannot afford a cellphone and would be willing to pay what Western Union would have to charge per telegram to keep the service operating at such a low demand.

      --
      "Ladies and gentlemen, my killbot features Lotus Notes and a machine gun. It is the finest available."
    3. Re:still a use by sean@thingsihate.org · · Score: 1

      Or hire one of the dancing monkey-suit people or a clown to sing a song about not being able to make the plane.

      So, essentially, we've given up traditional telegrams and they can now only be delivered by dancing people in monkey suits. And the world becomes just a little bit awesomer.

      --

      One of the many things I hate. thingsihate.org
    4. Re:still a use by TheRaven64 · · Score: 1
      In the UK, you can get a pre-pay SIM for free and a cheap 'phone for next to nothing (really - people tend to upgrade every year or two, so if you look for a 3-4 year old handset people are practically giving them away). You then just have to pay for your calls. Last time I looked at telegram prices (they discontinued them in the UK a few years back), they were more than a (cheap) phone and several hours of talk time are today.

      Basically, anyone can afford a mobile over here if they only use it to receive calls, and even most school children can afford to buy credit to make outgoing calls. Anyone who can't afford a mobile 'phone certainly couldn't afford a telegram. They priced themselves completely out of the market, particularly now SMS is ubiquitous (you can even send SMS to a land-line these days, and have it read out by a synthesised voice automatically).

      --
      I am TheRaven on Soylent News
    5. Re:still a use by Detritus · · Score: 1

      Are you going to SMS "UR MUM IS DED" to someone? I suppose it's better than sending a singing telegram.

      --
      Mea navis aericumbens anguillis abundat
    6. Re:still a use by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      > I can see there being very reduced demand, but some demand still. Probably just not enough to
      > justify the investment.

      Western Union obviously makes enough money from eBay scammers that it doesn't need to waste money actually doing anything!

      http://pages.ebay.com/help/confidence/isgw-fraud-s ending-payments.html#instantwire

    7. Re:still a use by Xiaran · · Score: 1

      You mean "UR MUM IS PWNED!!1!" surely.

    8. Re:still a use by brunes69 · · Score: 1

      I guess these days you could send flowers with "call me" just as fast as a telegram

      Actually, I have never been able to send flowers without the reciever's phone number. They usually want to call to make sure someone is home before they go to deliver.

  16. Radio telegrams by Lxy · · Score: 4, Informative

    Western union may have ended thier telegram service, but radio telegrams are still alive and well. Amateur radio service still uses RTs in emergency communications. The art of "traffic handling" as it's called is still encouraged by the ARRL. Here's a document that explains proper formatting of a radio telgram.

    --

    There is no reasonable defense against an idiot with an agenda
    :wq
    1. Re:Radio telegrams by AndroidCat · · Score: 1

      So how do I format a traceroute telegram?

      --
      One line blog. I hear that they're called Twitters now.
    2. Re:Radio telegrams by Lxy · · Score: 1

      Typically if you were going to send a message to another party, you would give the message to a ham operator. The ham operator would join one of the two daily national nets and send your encoded message. A ham near the intended recipYou're looking at 3 hops, on average, so a traceroute probably wouldn't look very interesting.

      You could set a handling instruction of HXB using short expiration times in hours (TTLs, essentially). Format multiple messages to the same source using varying TTLs, and you have yourself a traceroute. Considering that each message may take a different path, this may not give you the desired result. Now you've peaked my interest, this may be worth trying out.

      --

      There is no reasonable defense against an idiot with an agenda
      :wq
  17. Money Transfer experience by hey · · Score: 4, Interesting

    I had need to send somebody this month and they requested that I use Western Union. I was so surprised. Online it would have cost me a C$40 service fee and it appears that it would have done a cash advance on my credit card. I went to an office and it cost a flat rate of C$20 and I used by debit card. Still a ripoff if you ask me. But I looked around and could find and alternatives for non-Internet savvy people on the receiving end. The guy got the money.

    1. Re:Money Transfer experience by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      (international) postal money orders?

    2. Re:Money Transfer experience by slashname3 · · Score: 1

      Those guys over in Nigeria just love Western Union telegrams and money orders.

      Hope they get some help soon. Their ISP access costs for sending all those emails must be huge.

    3. Re:Money Transfer experience by hey · · Score: 1

      Yeah, this was international. I looked into that and the cost of mailing a letter quickly (4 business days) was more than Western Union. This is with Xpresspost. Also there is a service fee for the money order. If I didn't have to send it quickly I could have used regular air mail and a money order and that would be cheaper.

    4. Re:Money Transfer experience by ga53n · · Score: 1

      I had a similar problem to solve. How to receive some funds in Europe. Over here we got spoiled by legislation, so that banktransfers between accounts in the Euro-Zone have to be the same prive as domestic transfers, so I can send money to a lot of countrys, for no chare at all.

      The Options to/from the US & Canada I found where:

      paypay (I do not really like nor trust them)
      cheque ( my bank will charge about EUR 15 for caching the cheque and will take forever. 1st receiving the cheque via snailmail and then caching it)
      bank transfer (my bank charges me somewhere between 12-15 EUR plus the Sender has to pay an additionals 12-15 EUR)
      Western Union (pickup is free, iirc)
      cash via snailmail (did it a lot in the 80s, but not really safe)

      sadly there is no cheap and quick method to send small amounts of money other than paypal.

      --
      It is not possible to use technology to solve social problems
    5. Re:Money Transfer experience by trash+eighty · · Score: 2, Informative

      i find Xoom to be cheaper than WU for the transfers i have to do, and they seem pretty reliable though i don't think they have as big a network of agents as WU.

    6. Re:Money Transfer experience by stavromueller · · Score: 0

      *cough*paypal*cough*

      --
      I kill harmless processes for sport
    7. Re:Money Transfer experience by jackbird · · Score: 2, Insightful
      bank transfer (my bank charges me somewhere between 12-15 EUR plus the Sender has to pay an additionals 12-15 EUR)

      What REALLY pisses me off is that there's some additional middleman that takes a fairly decent chunk out of the transfer that can't be predicted - Overseas wire transfers always arrive $10-$25 short, even though my European client pays their bank's fee up front, and mine doesn't charge for receiving.

      Anyone solved this problem, or learned to predict the charges?

    8. Re:Money Transfer experience by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Interesting

      $20 isn't bad. I own a convenience store that has a Western Union office in it. Every day, and about 50 times per day on Fridays, illegals come in to send money back home using WU. Typically they send $100-$200USD. WU charges a minimum of $47 to do this. That means they're paying a fee that's between 23.5% and 47% just to send the money! WU is a rip-off. Even worse for us, WU is typically six months or more late with their rent check. It is a very profitable business and they cut corners in service and everywhere else they can to make it even more profitable.

      As an example of how profitable their business can be. They're open here six hours on Fridays. On one slow day, I know that they charged just over $2,300 in fees. Since they pay $7/hour to their girl, they spent $42 in labor. Now that's some profit!

      Another problem with WU is that they very often screw-up the paperwork so that the person can't pick-up the money. Usually the illegals will tell the WU girl to put a password on the wire so the person on the other end doesn't have to present an ID. Six different times I've sent money to friends stranded on vacation after their wallet was stolen, and since WU didn't check the password box before sending in the paperwork, my friends couldn't pick-up the money I sent. I always got most of the money back, but it took months of fighting with WU. With the illegals when WU screws-up, WU often gets to keep 100% of the money since they are often unwilling or unable to present an ID!

    9. Re:Money Transfer experience by generic-man · · Score: 1

      Holy crap, Xoom! I thought they were a competitor to Geocities in the free-home-page market.

      Remember when a bowl of soup was a nickel?

      --
      For more information, click here.
    10. Re:Money Transfer experience by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      That Xoom looks pretty good. Makes very good sense to have the search by tracking number on the home page. The idea of the ATM card you can remotely load is cool also. Too bad it is so US dollar-centric, however. Maybe they'll discover the Euro at least some day.

    11. Re:Money Transfer experience by jizmonkey · · Score: 1
      Six different times I've sent money to friends stranded on vacation after their wallet was stolen

      You've got to make smarter friends, muchacho.

      --
      With great power comes great fan noise.
  18. Writing on the Wall by lbmouse · · Score: 5, Funny

    "...factors such as long distance telephone..."

    Another example of how modern technology is undermining core business plans. You'd think they would've seen the writing on the wall... in, oh lets say, 1875?

  19. It's a pity by jetxee · · Score: 2, Insightful
    I belive, that there is still a lot of places in the world with neither e-mail nor fax. But one could send a telegram there. Is it easier now to communicate with those people?

    For WU it is business optimization, for most of us it does not matter much, but to tell the truth, there seems to be less opportunity now.

    1. Re:It's a pity by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Well, even if they don't have fax or email, surely they have mobile phones. Send them a text message.

  20. BT ended the UK Telegram service in 1982 by simong · · Score: 2, Informative

    and switched to Telemessages, which were Telex based with overnight delivery. Business telemessage services are still in the hands of BT Accurate but the personal service was sold off in 2003. What now for Telex though?

    1. Re:BT ended the UK Telegram service in 1982 by TheRaven64 · · Score: 1

      Are you completely sure about that? I read about telegrams in the 1997 telephone directory - I recall being surprised that they still existed then - and so they were definitely still in operation less than a decade ago, although very expensive and presumably not sent using traditional technology.

      --
      I am TheRaven on Soylent News
  21. Retro-Gram by boustrophedon · · Score: 4, Informative

    Retro-Gram provides the style and class of vintage telegrams with the speed and convenience of e-mail. Their free service will format your message as PDF in any of a half dozen vintage telegram formats and send it by email. For a fee, they will print your Retro-Gram and send it by snail mail.

    1. Re:Retro-Gram by Rob+T+Firefly · · Score: 1

      The printout option is not without its charm, but I personally would be really peeved if someone attempted to communicate with me in text by emailing a PDF file, no mater how cute it was.

    2. Re:Retro-Gram by tomjen · · Score: 1

      I wonder if you could get the format for the WWI/II death telegrams. I would make a different political message.

      --
      Freedom or George Bush
  22. They recently killed their "BidPay" service, by Ellis+D.+Tripp · · Score: 3, Informative

    as well, presumably due to competition by PayPal. Too bad, as it was a good way to accept international eBay auction payments without PayPal fees or having to go to a Western Union outlet to collect the money...

    --
    Remember "News for Nerds, Stuff that Matters"? Help make it a reality again! http://soylentnews.org
    1. Re:They recently killed their "BidPay" service, by Kadin2048 · · Score: 2, Insightful

      I wasn't aware of this -- thanks for the heads-up.

      I haven't sold anything in a while, but back when I was doing it more actively, I really liked BidPay. I've never been a fan of PayPal since they started requiring you to "upgrade" (big fat sarcasm quotes on that, in case you didn't notice) to a Premier account to accept Credit Card payments. In return for this "feature," they take a percentage of all your incoming transfers -- regardless of whether or not it comes from a credit card -- from then on. And the best part? You can only "down" grade from Premier back to the free service ONCE. If you accept another credit card payment after that, you're stuck with them taking a significant percentage of all payments, permanently. And eBay doesn't provide a convenient way of specifying that you accept PayPal, but not if it's funded by a Credit Card.

      I always liked BidPay because it gave me a way to let buyers use credit cards if they really wanted to, without shifting that expensive over to me, or requring me to jack up all my prices by several percent in order to cover PayPal's Premier service overhead.

      And as a buyer, it was a lot more convenient than going to the Post Office and buying a Money Order. It will be missed.

      --
      "Ladies and gentlemen, my killbot features Lotus Notes and a machine gun. It is the finest available."
    2. Re:They recently killed their "BidPay" service, by TheRaven64 · · Score: 1
      As a buyer I was always suspicious of BidPay due to the Western Union branding. I've seen a fair number of (obvious) scam auctions where Western Union was the only accepted way of paying.

      I'm not sure if it still exists, but NoChex used to be good. It cost a flat rate to put money into your account and take it out, so if you did a lot of business you could leave money with them for a while (they, of course, could invest it and get interest while you did this) and then transfer it all to your account in one lump, or use it to buy other stuff on eBay and not pay anything.

      --
      I am TheRaven on Soylent News
    3. Re:They recently killed their "BidPay" service, by SgtChaireBourne · · Score: 1
      Too bad, as it was a good way to accept international eBay auction payments without PayPal fees or having to go to a Western Union outlet to collect the money...
      What are the remaining alternatives to PayPal?
      --
      Beta is broken and the link to classic doesn't work. Stop wasting our time or there won't be anybody left here.
    4. Re:They recently killed their "BidPay" service, by The+Conductor · · Score: 2, Informative
      Well there are the electronic gold currencies. E-gold is the original and the most popular so far, but there is also pecunix which can issue cryptographically non-repudiable reciepts. There are also a couple others, e-bullion, (which claims more rigorous reserve auditing), and maybe one or two I can't remember offhand.

      The biggest weakness, IMO, of these services is that they are entirely dependent on the security of the user password, and therefore the client machine, to keep the stored value safe. So don't even think of accessing your account through a Windows machine. Transactions are non-repudiable.

      They are a working implementation of micro-payments. I can send 5 cents on e-gold and the fee is about a fifth of a cent. The fact that they haven't cought on as such seems to me to be an indication that nobody really wants micropayments.

  23. Blazing saddles :) by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

    "Telegram for Mongo"
    "Telegram for Mongo" :)

    1. Re:Blazing saddles :) by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Informative

      That would be "Candygram for Mongo"!

  24. Astronomers - What will they do? by AndroidCat · · Score: 3, Interesting
    It used to be that the telegram was the official stamp for announcing discoveries. It didn't matter if you'd been studing some speck and talking about it on the phone for years if someone else sent out the telegram first that he'd discovered comet Waldo.

    So how do they do it officially now? By email would seem to have the danger that some punk astro-spammers will take credit for everything by sending out email with slight variations "have discovered comet at .. ..", "have dis-c0vered comet at .. ..", "have d1scov3red komet at .. ..", "have d1scov3red komet V1agr4 at .. .."

    --
    One line blog. I hear that they're called Twitters now.
    1. Re:Astronomers - What will they do? by AndroidCat · · Score: 2, Informative

      Here's the page for the IAU: Central Bureau for Astronomical Telegrams which explains how to submit discoveries. (IAU = International Astronomical Union.) They seem to have gone to email mainly, and yes, spam is a problem. Text only messages please! (Submit CCD images seperately.) And you probably want to stick to the format developed for telegrams.

      --
      One line blog. I hear that they're called Twitters now.
  25. Telegram? by HermanAB · · Score: 0

    What is a telegram?

    --
    Oh well, what the hell...
    1. Re:Telegram? by Don_dumb · · Score: 3, Funny

      It must be the standard unit of measurement for weighing TV's

      --
      If this were really happening, what would you think?
    2. Re:Telegram? by tbone1 · · Score: 1
      What is a telegram?

      Bah, it's something these whippersnappers are using today, like hula hoops and fax machines. Why, give me a sweaty orphan on horseback being chased by p*ssed off Injuns any day of the week!

      --

      The Independent: Reverend Spooner Arrested in Friar Tuck Incident - ISIHAC, Historical Headlines
    3. Re:Telegram? by HermanAB · · Score: 1

      It is interesting that while the Telegraph dates back to 1830, the Fax machine (Pantograph) was invented shortly after in 1843. It took a long time for the Telephone to arrive in 1870.

      --
      Oh well, what the hell...
  26. Damn! by a_nonamiss · · Score: 1

    Slashdot's junk filter won't allow me to post a witty comment in morse code. (Not that I'd have a particularly witty comment anyways.)

    Reason: Please use fewer 'junk' characters.

    --
    -Arthur
    Cave ne ante ullas catapultas ambules
    1. Re:Damn! by jridley · · Score: 1

      Well, you could try posting in baudot; that's what they've been using for a lot of years anyway.
      Remember the shift-up and shift-down codes.

    2. Re:Damn! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Slashdot's junk filter won't allow me to post a witty comment in morse code.

      Turns out it filters out non-witty comments, not morse code.

  27. Funny that I see this today. by f0rtytw0 · · Score: 2, Interesting

    My roommate just sent a telegram last night. He needed to cancel something he ordered to avoid getting ripped off but he had to send the cancel order within 3 days of ordering. Well he just found out after the post office closed on the third day that what he ordered was crap so the fastest way to cancel the order that day was by telegram.

    --
    this is the most important sig ever! In your face 446154!
  28. Note to self... by digitaldc · · Score: 1

    STOP with all the telegramming!

    --
    He who knows best knows how little he knows. - Thomas Jefferson
  29. Revolution in comedy! by AndroidCat · · Score: 1

    Bad comedians will no longer be able to telegraph joke punchlines!

    --
    One line blog. I hear that they're called Twitters now.
    1. Re:Revolution in comedy! by RubberDogBone · · Score: 1

      In ten years, nobody will remember how to read anyway.

      Ironically, Slashdot wants me to type the word "Mailman" to prove I am not a script.

      --
      Sig for hire.
  30. Telegrams as a Novelty by Whafro · · Score: 4, Interesting

    I've sent several telegrams over the last few years... it's a great way to acknowledge a special event (birthday, anniversary, whatever) on short notice, it gets hand-delivered, it's not as corny as most greeting cards, it's relatively inexpensive, it shows some effort, and, most importantly, it's relatively unique these days.

    I'll miss having that option, as I always got responses like "wow, that's so cool-- I'd never gotten a telegram before!"

    Hopefully, someone else will pick it up, acknowledging its novelty value and marketing it effectively as such, but Western Union really had the old-school image that made it especially attractive for me.

    1. Re:Telegrams as a Novelty by LogicX · · Score: 1

      Agreed. My non-techie girlfriend randomly came up with the idea to send me a Western Union telegram a few months back, thanking me for such a fun weekend.

      Let me tell you -- that was the coolest thing I've ever gotten. I didn't even know they still did such things, and I'm even more thankful that she did it, now that they've discontinued the service.

      I was hoping to pull it on someone when the opportunity arose. Now I'll just have to stick to the $2 bills.

      --
      May this post be indexed by spiders, and archived for all to see as my Internet epitaph.
  31. BttF by fracai · · Score: 2, Funny

    Now how am I going to hear what Doc has been up to?!

    --
    -- i am jack's amusing sig file
    1. Re:BttF by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You didn't get the telegram on a Saturday night at approximately 9:52pm (not accurate) on a back road in a rain storm in 1955? Don't tell me you were still arguing with Biff back at the dance! Your first-trip 1985 self can cover that! You were supposed to redezvous by the future sight of your parents' current home in Hill Valley! Next you'll tell me you didn't get together with the 1955 Doc and go back to 1885 to save 1985 Doc's life!

    2. Re:BttF by The+Good+Reverend · · Score: 1

      Off-topic from a BttF fanboy: Doc didn't sent Marty a telegram, he left his hand-written note with the local Western Union office because he knew they'd still be around, and because they're in the delivery business.

      Your joke was still funny, though.

  32. Not just obsolescence by Bill_the_Engineer · · Score: 1

    I used telegrams a lot in my previous job (I was an operations representative for one of the largest ocean vessel transportation agency). We switched to MCI because Western Union was too expensive.

    Thankfully most ocean cargo vessels are switching to email and satellite telephone services, so telegraphs (that eventually become radiograms) are being replaced by cheaper services (BTW its still expensive, just not as expensive).

    I still remember my telegram callback...

    Brgds,
    Bill

    Opinions expressed in this posting are not of my current employer, nor should it be consider official communications.

    --
    These comments are my own and do not necessarily reflect the views or opinions of my employer or colleagues...
  33. Other alternatives, but are they legal? by Dcnjoe60 · · Score: 2, Interesting

    One thing that telegrams had in their favor is that most statutes recognized them as legal communications and based on the date they were sent. Many corporate bylaws include notice of meetings, etc. via mail and telegram. While the other alternatives mentioned, particularly email may be more convienent and faster, from a legal point of view, they may not stand the same ground (of course statutes and bylaws can be amended). However, one thing that a telegram would get you that an email won't is a dated receipt from a third party to prove the message was sent. With email, it is all to easy to spoof the headers to make them say whatever and their isn't any independent verification that it was received (even return receipts aren't universal and can still be spoofed).

    While I agree with other posters about other mediums being more efficient, there are still reasons to use less efficient means. Otherwise, the USPS would be out of business, too.

    1. Re:Other alternatives, but are they legal? by Teancum · · Score: 1

      Although like the original posting mentioned, if you sent a meeting notice or other legal matter via FedEx or priority mail, you get essentially the same result, including a signed notice of recept. Even better you can usually get a copy of the actual signature within minutes or hours of when it was signed.

      Still, before overnight delivery, I think you would have to be correct.

    2. Re:Other alternatives, but are they legal? by Dcnjoe60 · · Score: 1

      That is assuming that the bylaws for the corporation have been amended to allow for FedEx. Priority Mail through the USPS would qualify as almost all include mail. Prior to 10 years ago, most included telegrams. Technically speaking, FedEx would not qualify (unless the bylaws said so). As another example, the IRS recognizes mail, but not FedEx or UPS. If your return is postmarked by April 15, it is considered "filed" April 15. FedEx and UPS don't get that luxury.

    3. Re:Other alternatives, but are they legal? by Teancum · · Score: 1

      If you sent a tax return via FedEx rather than USPS on April 15th, the IRS would be very hard pressed to deny that you filed the tax return on the correct date. Of course when dealing with the federal government anything can happen. You would be "safer" through the USPS because it is still considered a federal agency and that you have given it to the federal government once your return physically enters a postal mailing box.

      As for ammeding the bylaws for corporations... that just takes a shareholder meeting and a little bit of legal paperwork... and something that should be done if they are thinking intelligently about it. I have used FedEx for critical memos of the nature you were talking about so much that I wouldn't have given it a second thought that it was even a problem, but yeah, I guess that looking in the bylaws to see if it is legal to do would be a smart thing.

    4. Re:Other alternatives, but are they legal? by Dcnjoe60 · · Score: 1

      I agree with what you say, however, the IRS requires taxes to be filed by April 15. The USPS is written into the statute that it constitutes filing based on the postmark date. A receipt from FedEx doesn't qualify. I agree that Corporations simply need to amend their bylaws, however, that's like having a constitutional amendment. Shareholders can add all kinds of things in the open forum, if they choose.

    5. Re:Other alternatives, but are they legal? by Teancum · · Score: 1

      And if you can get 50% + of the ownership shares in a corporation to agree to silly corporate charter ammendments like refusing to do business with Denmark (or pick your favorite "politically incorrect" country of the moment), this isn't going to happen anyway?

      Fortunately most shareholders don't agree with these silly charter ammendments, especially as most major corporations are actually owned by "institutional" investors, including mutual and retirement funds. Trying to get them to make a charter change to permit notification by FedEx, on the other hand, is going to be trivial to get passed and indeed is something I would expect to be suggested by one of these institutional investors, because it makes their job easier.

      BTW, I could split fine hairs on the IRS code, but you don't have to file before April 15th... you just have to make sure that your taxes have been paid before then. Even that has ugly fine points that are needless for this discussion as well, but it doesn't really matter. The point here is that documents have other alternative methods of delivery.

      I just can't wait until delivery to yesterday (due to the International Date Line issues... not time travel) becomes widespread due to sub-orbital cargo delivery flights. I've actually needed that a couple of times, and would have been willing to pay $500/lb or more to do it. I did charter a private pilot to be a personal courrier once to deliver a package that missed a FedEx shipping deadline.

  34. What did them in.... by will_die · · Score: 1

    My hunch is that modern USPS and overnight delivery services did the most damage, though."
    In an interview I heard yesterday the reason Western Telegram gave was cheap long distance calls, cheap and easy to get cell phones and cheap and easy to get to e-mail.

  35. Still doing well in Japan by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Well, not Western Union, but telegrams are still in wide use in Japan. No, not because people don't have phones (everyone seems to have a land line, a cell phone or two, and a high-speed internet connection these days) but because telegrams are used in a traditional way.

    In the old days people that couldn't make it to a wedding customarily sent a greeting telegram to wherever it was the wedding or wedding party was to take place. That custom alone has been kept alive, and people still send telegrams, even though there are better alternatives. It's become somewhat of a tradition. Usually a wedding ceremony will get anywhere between 10 to 50 telegrams. So on Saturdays and Sundays, the telegram deliverers are quite busy!

  36. Telexes by Kadin2048 · · Score: 2, Informative

    I don't know if the network still exists, but the last time I looked into it, there was still a lot of infrastructure set up to handle telexes, especially internationally.

    I just did a quick Google and it seems that International Telex (that's Telex with a capital T, as opposed to 'telex' as the generic term) has either changed its or been bought out by somebody else called Citycomm.

    They claim that "Telex is still the only legally recognized method of sending an electronic message. Facsimile (Fax) and electronic mail (E-mail), contrary to popular belief, do not constitute a legal document. Telex messages are used in the banking and brokerage industry to electronically confirm billions of dollars in financial transactions daily."

    So I guess the market is pretty safe, for now anyway.

    What I can't figure out is whether the telex networks that used to exist are still around anymore. It seems easy to believe that they just got absorbed into the Internet, but they were pretty interesting when they were operating. I don't pretend to understand it completely, but it was a separate system from regular voice phone lines, and Telex numbers (I think) had a different number of digits. I still have business cards of my father's that list a Telex number, although not with me to look at right now.

    It seems like the telex systems used now are just operating on the regular PSTN network, similar to fax machines.

    If anybody here uses telex services today and wants to comment on how they work, I'd be interested in what the situation is like.

    --
    "Ladies and gentlemen, my killbot features Lotus Notes and a machine gun. It is the finest available."
    1. Re:Telexes by Imsdal · · Score: 1
      Telex numbers (I think) had a different number of digits

      Welcome to the rest of the world, where already regular telephone numbers have a different number of digits.

      In Sweden, for instance, phone numbers are anywhere from five to eight digits, and area codes are two, three or four digits long.

      The most common combination is 2+7, 3+6 or 4+5 so that a phone number including area code is 9 digits, but other variations abound, such as 2+8, 2+6 and 3+5. Also, cell phones are always 4+6.

    2. Re:Telexes by Kadin2048 · · Score: 1

      Believe it or not, I'm aware of this.

      I believe the rather rigid standardization on 4-digit local numbers, 3-digit exchanges, and 3-digit area codes is due to the electromechanical routing systems that were deployed by the Bell System. I have seen one of these switches myself, they look like a rural mailbox, about 12"-14" long, with a rotating shaft down the center. As you dial each digit, a rotor turns and makes a connection, and there are seven rotors inside the box. (It reminded me of the mechanism of a combination lock.) I've never seen one in use (the one I saw was salvage), but it was obviously a product of mass production. Lots of stamped metal and spot welds. In other words, there was probably one standard design that everybody used, nationwide.

      Where you had countries all developing their own telephone systems, as in Europe, it makes sense that you'd have variations of switching systems and number lengths. But this never existed in the US under the Bell System monopoly.

      The fact that Telex numbers had a different number of digits than regular telephone numbers (if my memory of old business cards serves) is fairly unique -- or at least it's the only US service that I've ever seen which was like this, and it suggests that it's network was separate from the PSTN one.

      The fact that there is/was a separate, independent infrastructure for telegrams is what interested me most about it.

      --
      "Ladies and gentlemen, my killbot features Lotus Notes and a machine gun. It is the finest available."
    3. Re:Telexes by strat · · Score: 1
      In the U.S., there were parallel NPA's (numbering plan areas - you probably know them as "area codes") for the telex network and the telephone network, but the number assignment policies were not all that dissimilar, and were harmonized. The "area codes" for the telex network were originally of the form N10. You Marylanders in the 410 NPA are re-using a code that was originally used to call a TWX machine.

      Here's an excerpt from a particularly informative old post.

      There were NO area codes of the N10 nor N00 format in the 1940s/50s. The N10 format codes first were used for Telco Dial-TWX for new 4-Row Keyboard 7/8-level ASCII 100-speed TWX, starting in the early 1960s. 3-Row Kybd 5-level Baudot 60-speed TWX which had existed since 1931 was automated at the same time by adding modems and dials to the TTYs and integrating them into the DDD telephone network by giving them POTS-like telephone numbers using "POTS" area codes. 3-Row TWX began to disappear as 4-Row TWX devloped. Western Union took over the marketing of TWX by US Federal Government orders in the early 1970's but it wasn't until 1981 when TWX in the US was completely removed from the US-portion of the DDD telephone network and instead completely re-routed over Western Union's own Telex network. The N10 format codes no longer had *ANY* meaning on the US-part of the DDD telephone network (although WUTCO still had TWXes numbered with N10 format codes on the WUTCO Telex-I/II network), but it wasn't until the early 1990s when Bellcore first assigned real POTS telephone area codes of the N10 format.

  37. Some interesting quotes... by ockegheim · · Score: 1

    ...from the the Wikipedia page on telegraphy:

    [Semaphore] required operators and towers every 30 km (20 mi), and could only accommodate about two words per minute. This was useful to governments, but too expensive for most commercial uses other than commodity price information. Electric telegraphs were to reduce the cost of sending a message thirty-fold compared to semaphore.
    Is is also considered that Guglielmo Marconi sent and received his first radio signal in Italy in 1895. By 1899 he did it across the English Channel and in 1902 he radiotelegraphed the letter "S" across the Atlantic Ocean from England to Newfoundland.
    The first wide-coverage telex network was implemented in Germany during the 1930s. The network was used to communicate within the government. At the then-blinding rate of 45.5 bits per second, up to 25 telex channels could share a single long-distance telephone channel, making telex the least expensive method of performing reliable long-distance communication.
    In Germany alone, more than 400,000 telex lines remain in daily operation. Over most of the world, more than three million telex lines remain in use.
    Telegrams were often used to confirm business dealings and, unlike e-mail, telegrams were commonly used to create binding legal documents for business dealings.

    ...perhaps because of this:

    A major advantage of Telex was (is) that the receipt of the message by the recipient could be confirmed with a high degree of certainty by the "answerback". At the beginning of the message, the sender would transmit a WRU (who are you) code, and the recipient machine would automatically initiate a response which was usually encoded in a rotating drum with pegs, much like a music box. The position of the pegs sent an unambiguous identifying code to the sender, so the sender was sure that he was connected to to the correct recipient. The WRU code would also be sent at the end of the message, so a correct response would confirm that the connection had remained unbroken during the message transmission. This gave Telex a major advantage over other unreliable forms of communications such as telephone and fax.
    --
    I’m old enough to remember 16K of memory being described as “whopping”
    1. Re:Some interesting quotes... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      [Semaphore] required operators and towers every 30 km (20 mi), and could only accommodate about two words per minute.

      OH! CATHERINE
      OH! HEATHCLIFFE
      OH! OH! CATHERINE
      OH! OH! HEATHCLIFFE

  38. Information vs. proof. Re:Necrodendrology by Forge · · Score: 3, Interesting

    Information vs. proof.

    Email and Faxes killed the Telegram. That's because a telegram serves the simple purpose convey information to a person. That means if someone wants to know when your passport expires or the personal details in that document. A simple fax or emailed scan or telegram of that info is sufficient.

    If however you need to get a Visa put in by a country that doesn't have an embassy near your home you have to send the actual document by overnight mail or currier service.

    So yes. While Email will eventually kill of faxes too. It won't bother snail mail much more than it already has.

    In other news, has anyone on Slashdot EVER written a friendly letter (attempted seduction counts) and sent it by snail mail?

    --
    --= Isn't it surprising how badly I spell ?
    1. Re:Information vs. proof. Re:Necrodendrology by krgallagher · · Score: 1
      "In other news, has anyone on Slashdot EVER written a friendly letter (attempted seduction counts) and sent it by snail mail?"

      Yeah, sure. But then I am 41 years old. I pre-date email.

      --

      Insert Generic Sig Here:

    2. Re:Information vs. proof. Re:Necrodendrology by Viol8 · · Score: 2, Funny

      "In other news, has anyone on Slashdot EVER written a friendly letter (attempted seduction counts) and sent it by snail mail?"

      What do you think people did before email access was first available to
      Joe Geek in the early 90s? Shout really loud?

    3. Re:Information vs. proof. Re:Necrodendrology by generic-man · · Score: 2, Interesting

      National postal services can still provide a mark of integrity. In the U.K., although not the U.S., writing a letter to yourself can be used as an argument of prior authorship. Also, registered mail with a return receipt actually works in the US Postal Service: you can get hard proof that a user received a letter, whereas with e-mail who knows what happened to that letter you sent. No e-mail client is required to honor an electronic return receipt request.

      In the U.S. opening someone else's mail quickly escalates to the level of a federal crime. Opening someone else's e-mail has fewer legal ramifications, and those idiotic "For the intended recipients only" disclaimers do nothing to protect unencrypted messages. Everyone ought to be taught in E-mail 101 to never send important information through unencrypted e-mail, or at least not to get pissed off when you learn that someone in Eastern Europe just grabbed that "password protected" Excel file you sent yesterday.

      And to answer your question, yes, I have sent a friendly letter using the postal service. I wrote a letter to a local police department commending the officer who helped me when I got a flat tire a few years ago. I got an equally friendly response. A friendly letter warms the cockles of one's heart more than a friendly e-mail does.

      --
      For more information, click here.
    4. Re:Information vs. proof. Re:Necrodendrology by jc42 · · Score: 1

      What do you think people did before email access was first available to Joe Geek in the early 90s?

      Huh? If you didn't have email by 1980, you hardly qualify as a "geek".

      (OK; younger geeks can qualify, if they started using email as soon as they were permitted to put their little hands on a computer. ;-)

      --
      Those who do study history are doomed to stand helplessly by while everyone else repeats it.
    5. Re:Information vs. proof. Re:Necrodendrology by tomjen · · Score: 1

      I did so about a month ago. I dont think my cousin has internet - let alone email. And if he does it is properly a shared account. By sending a dead tree letter, I can be sure he opens it.

      I send letters to my maternal grandparents from time to time. They dont have a computer, so email is out of the question.

      --
      Freedom or George Bush
    6. Re:Information vs. proof. Re:Necrodendrology by Guppy06 · · Score: 3, Funny

      "In other news, has anyone on Slashdot EVER written a friendly letter (attempted seduction counts) and sent it by snail mail?"

      Well, now that you mention it, it was less "letter" and more "book"... but I did get a bona fide letter from her lawyer via certified mail!

    7. Re:Information vs. proof. Re:Necrodendrology by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      1980? Unless you were on a university system or Compuserve, you didn't either.

    8. Re:Information vs. proof. Re:Necrodendrology by Guppy06 · · Score: 1

      "Shout really loud?"

      I wouldn't reccomend that. You'd have everybody within earshot laughing in your face instead of just her.

      I'm just sayin'...

    9. Re:Information vs. proof. Re:Necrodendrology by Guppy06 · · Score: 1

      "In the U.K., although not the U.S., writing a letter to yourself can be used as an argument of prior authorship."

      I think that link is misleading. You get your copyright by simply writing that work as opposed to registering with the Copyright Office. The only thing registering really does for you is entitle you to sue for legal/collection fees if somebody violates it, while unregistered copyright holders are only entitled to the actual damages.

      So long as you're not attempting to recoup legal fees, I don't see why mailing it to yourself couldn't be used to establish original ownership.

    10. Re:Information vs. proof. Re:Necrodendrology by generic-man · · Score: 1

      Right, that's why I used the term "argument" instead of "proof." As Snopes points out, a postmark on an envelope only means the envelope went through the postal service on the date indicated. You could always unseal and reseal the envelope later. The postal service didn't inspect or register the contents of the envelope -- for 39 cents I wouldn't expect them to. It doesn't "establish original ownership" since there's no proof that I created or own the rights to the contents of the envelope. All you get with the "poor man's copyright" is a stamp on the front of an envelope.

      --
      For more information, click here.
    11. Re:Information vs. proof. Re:Necrodendrology by StalinsNotDead · · Score: 1

      Key Word: friendly.

      --
      Thanks to the internet, we can now all die alone together! -SomeWoman
    12. Re:Information vs. proof. Re:Necrodendrology by Guppy06 · · Score: 1

      "It doesn't "establish original ownership" since there's no proof that I created or own the rights to the contents of the envelope."

      It helps establish a preponderance of evidence. The fact that it is not 100% reliable is why we have a registration process to begin with, but if all you are doing is asserting ownership, whether or not it's probable that you went through the effort to forge it is something to be decided on a case-by-case basis.

    13. Re:Information vs. proof. Re:Necrodendrology by jc42 · · Score: 1

      Nah; you could be working for any of the zillion startup companies that were subcontracting a lot of the equipment and some of the software. Thus, BB&N existed before 1980. I didn't work for them, but after I left the university in 1978, I worked for a string of other small companies that had T1 links and ARPA/Internet. (The terminology was in transition and a bit confused at times).

      One of the things I found fun was the ongoing discussion of the legality of email. Lots of people were pointing out that this wasn't part of their funding contract, and really looked like a serious violation of the contract, since it was soaking up a lot of developer and admin time. But, of course, the DoD folks found it so useful that they didn't mention the topic. When someone brought the topic up in meetings, it tended to fade out after someone (often the ARPA rep) mentioned geese and golden eggs.

      1978 was also a historic year in one sense: I remember reading a report from AT&T saying that computer use of their circuits had passed human voice use. Not all of this was ARPA/Internet, of course; there were a dozen competing single-vendor, proprietary networks. But to the few of us who noticed, it was an interesting sign of where things were headed. And there was really only one general-purpose networking package that could be used by all developers without charge, so there were already predictions of who would win when the shake-out happened.

      --
      Those who do study history are doomed to stand helplessly by while everyone else repeats it.
    14. Re:Information vs. proof. Re:Necrodendrology by Forge · · Score: 1

      "... I have sent a friendly letter using the postal service. I wrote a letter to a local police department commending the officer who helped me when I got a flat tire..."

      Other people have admited to writing friendly letters. This letter dose not count as such. It's actualy a letter of comendation from a customer (seriusly) that will go on the cop's personel file along with any complaints.

      I should know. My boss has shown me some that came in from customers about me. I'm in tech support so most come via EMail thogh :)

      --
      --= Isn't it surprising how badly I spell ?
  39. 145 Years...The End of an Era by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Coming from the tele/datacommunications industry, I can safely state that I believe this to be of historical signifigance. After 145 years of service, Western Union has ended it's telegram services. Telegrams, staking their origins in telegraphy, the singing wire and morse code were truly fundamental catalysts in the industrial revoloution. It was the technology that led to the telephone, the semi-conductor, the facimile, the computer and high speed communications. We should collectively take our hats off and bow our heads. "What hath God wrought". Rest in peace, the telegram.

    Most of you insensitive clods should learn your history and be thankful to Western Union that you even have jobs. :-(

  40. Traffic Handling by Kadin2048 · · Score: 1

    I'm a ham also, and a few years ago I heard somebody talking about a project to send a bunch of test messages into the traffic handling system and analyze them to come up with ways to improve the way large batches of messages are handled and routed in an emergency. They were going to use the same sort of analysis methods that are used to optimize distributed-hub networks like retail distribution and UPS. (This was their area, not mine -- I don't remember any more technical details.)

    As a secondary goal it also would have created some metrics to use in discussing Amateur Radio emergency traffic handling with homeland security types. (e.g., "Most messages reach their destination in x hours," etc.)

    I thought it was a pretty neat idea -- of course I'm not sure whether the people that work the nets would really appreciate getting flooded with 10,000 essentially garbage messages, but I appreciated the concept anyway. I never heard if there was any attempt made to do anything with it.

    --
    "Ladies and gentlemen, my killbot features Lotus Notes and a machine gun. It is the finest available."
    1. Re:Traffic Handling by AndroidCat · · Score: 1
      Great, bring down the amateur radiogram network with a di-dah-dah-dit di-dit dah-dit dah-dah-dit of doom!

      Do they gateway any of the radiogram traffic into amateur packet? So long as everything was working properly, that would seem to be the best way to route and move them in bulk.

      --
      One line blog. I hear that they're called Twitters now.
    2. Re:Traffic Handling by zippthorne · · Score: 1

      Yes, but the long hops are usually HF, so you're back to keying code. A big problem with packet during emergencies though is that there mignt not be a path to a powered area, so you could get stuck in a bubble without HF. Satellite only marginally improves this, to the size of the footprint, but I'd hate to have to track a satellite manually using a pda and a handheld yagi for any length of time.

      Interestingly, some of the radiogram traffic gets routed through the internet as well. Hams have been linking repeaters over IP for a bit longer than the telephone VoIP has been around.

      --
      Can you be Even More Awesome?!
    3. Re:Traffic Handling by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      At one point, hams were on the cutting edge of communications technology. Today it seems like they're stuck using techniques from the 1930s and have fallen way behind all of the modern communications systems.

    4. Re:Traffic Handling by zippthorne · · Score: 1

      To be fair though, they were on the cutting edge because radio itself was cutting edge. There's still some work to be done, but mostly in various algorithms and band sharing techniques. Just talking on a radio isn't special anymore. But it's like camping. Just because the whole field isn't cutting edge doesn't mean that there aren't specialties to explore and lessons to be learned. And both skills come in quite handy when disaster strikes.

      --
      Can you be Even More Awesome?!
    5. Re:Traffic Handling by Kadin2048 · · Score: 1

      I don't work HF (didn't take the test when I knew the code, now I've forgotten it...the usual sob story), but aren't there quite a few HF digital modes that could be used? PACTOR and PSK31 come to mind.

      I agree though that the reliance of mains-powered equipment is a big Achilles' heel for any emergency communication system. I think Amateur Radio is actually at something of an advantage here versus other communications mediums, because so much equipment is built to run on 12VDC, it's not hard to build yourself a basic battery-backup system for when the lights go out.

      The FM repeater network near me also has done pretty well recently (post-9/11) in getting automatic-failover backup generators at its linked repeaters. I haven't been living here long enough to see how it works during a power outage or emergency, but I've heard one person say that there was a point where it was in better shape than the local public safety system, in terms of coverage during a blackout.

      --
      "Ladies and gentlemen, my killbot features Lotus Notes and a machine gun. It is the finest available."
    6. Re:Traffic Handling by zippthorne · · Score: 1

      AFAIK, there isn't an HF analogue to packet radio. PSK31 for instance is really more like CW than like TCP/IP in its design. Minimal error correction, and definately no routing information. The problem is bandwidth. To get anything like TCP requires a lot of overhead in routing information, packet description, checksums, and is generally 2-way as well. All of which requires bandwidth, which HF bands don't exactly have in abundance.

      That said, I'm also a bit non-current in HF, so there could be some new modes in the band plan I'm not aware of. It certainly stands to reason that even an inefficient digital packet system will be more thrifty with the available bandwidth than voice and that's certainly used. I would prefer a packet mode to voice for purposes of communicating with shelters too. The computers on each end can keep a record of all messages, and it wouldn't exactly be difficult to enter names into a comma-separated list in a PDA before transmission.

      --
      Can you be Even More Awesome?!
    7. Re:Traffic Handling by AndroidCat · · Score: 1

      Really? I thought that 300 bps AX.25 was being used on HF. I haven't had much to do with amateur radio and packet since university in Montreal, where I was fortunate enough to know a few of the packet innovators. It seems to me that a portable HF QRP setup and simple computer/PDA (maybe one of those $100 laptops for the third world) would be enough to handle a lot of health and welfare traffic to/from a disaster area.

      --
      One line blog. I hear that they're called Twitters now.
  41. oh my god by oPless · · Score: 1

    STOP WITH THE UNFUNNY JOKES STOP

    random garbage inserted here to pass the steaming pile that is the lame filter

  42. OMG! What of the Pony Express? by erroneus · · Score: 2, Funny

    First Telegrams, what next? I fear the Pony Express is targetted for elimination at the hands of "progress" and "technology." What is this world coming to!? When my grandfather died at the ripe old age of 46, he told me something that I'll never forget... ...if only I could remember what that was.

  43. Back to the Future by tourvil · · Score: 1

    Not only that, what if someone travels back in time and needs to send a message to the future? Huh? Doc needs you Western Union!

    1. Re:Back to the Future by zippthorne · · Score: 1

      Obviously, all time-travelers' messages have already been delivered. Otherwise they'd never have discontinued the service.

      --
      Can you be Even More Awesome?!
  44. sue by glsunder · · Score: 2, Funny

    If they were truely a modern company, they'd sue everyone who used the modern tech instead.

  45. It would have been nice.... by netruner · · Score: 1

    to have known about this in advance. I would like to have sent a telegram to a certain 12 year old that I know if nothing else so that someone of that generation would have known what a telegram was. It's already getting hard to find things like rotary dialed phones. It freaks kids out when they see my first cell phone (the brick), especially when most of them never knew of a time when cell phones were toys of the rich, much less a time when they didn't exist at all.

    Now, if only we could make dial-up modems a thing of the past - I wouldn't miss those one bit.

    --



    DISCLAIMER: This post was not checked for speling and grammar- if you complain- you're a whiner
  46. Thank God we still have by hey! · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Telex.

    By the way, anybody else hear the story about how Hemingway created his writing style by sending telegrams? He was a war correspondent, and his editor was continually bitching about the cost of telegrams.

    --
    Post may contain irony: discontinue use if experiencing mood swings, nausea or elevated blood pressure.
  47. There's always smoke signals... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    ...with which my computer used to communicate a message to me last night when I tried to overclock it a wee bit much.

  48. oh no! by Tighe_L · · Score: 1

    What will Doc do when he needs to send a message to the future to marty!!!!

  49. A Song for the Telegraph by Ralph+Spoilsport · · Score: 1
    By Orchestral Manoeuvres in the Dark, from their best record, Dazzle Ships. Oddly prophetic...

    Telegraph

    Ive got a telegraph in my hand.
    Words on paper, written in sand.

    Weve got telegraph, right across this land.
    It doesnt mean a damn thing.
    We dont understand.
    But who needs telegraph anyway?

    We've got telegraph, right across this land.
    It doesnt mean a damn thing. (damn thing)
    We dont understand, (we never understood!)

    Gods got a telegraph on his side.
    It makes Him powerful, gives Him pride.
    Even in America (God bless America!)
    They understand the value of the telegraph.

    Hand in hand, (hand in hand)

    RS

    --
    Shoes for Industry. Shoes for the Dead.
  50. Have you seen a telegram lately? by wandazulu · · Score: 3, Insightful

    I sent a telegram as a novelty to my girlfriend many years ago; what she got wasn't the yellowish paper adorned with logos and glued letters, but a dot matrix printout. It was about as unglamorous as you could get. Yes, it did say Western Union on it, but I wouldn't have been surprised if they hadn't already been using the internet to transmit it.

    All in all, it was truly a telegram in name only (had to pay, fill out a form, etc). It totally lacked any of the style or magic you may have expected.

    1. Re:Have you seen a telegram lately? by Teancum · · Score: 2, Interesting

      The last telegram that I recieved was when I lived in Brazil about 20 years ago. Where I was living there was a government bureaucracy from hell that governed the establishment of telephone service, and you had to get on a waiting list that was often as long as 10-15 years worth of waiting before you got your telephone connection. As a result, telegrams were a fairly standard method of communication for short messages... especially between other Americans when the exchange rate was quite favorable.

      You could send the messages from the local post office, and if you paid for priority courrier service there would be a messenger who would ride a motorcycle to your doorway and hand deliver the message, even in the evening. Like a previous poster mentioned, telegrams were very convienient to send messages when the reciever didn't have any sort of electronic decryption or reception equipment.

      I tried to send a telegram message to the USA as a Christmas message, but the cost of going through Western Union was so incredibly high (about $50 even with the exchange rate) that I said forget about it. That was close to a three weeks of living expenses including housing, clothing, and food for me at the time and while I was living there.

  51. I have nano-interest in micro-payments. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    "Hmm, what if email cost the sender money IF read, but the reader could easily and optionally refund the money back to the sender."

    I'm glad that none of these ideas has ever caught on at all. The idea that anyone who is not involved in spamming at all have to shell out any money like this (even if it is supposed to come back) is a very bad idea.

  52. Telegrams reborn by Merenth · · Score: 0

    A teenager in my area has setup an email service for older folks that works similar to telegraphs. He sets up email addresses for people too old/stubborn to use it, and then prints out and hand delivers all the non-spam messages they get. One retirement village pays him $800 a month for the service. Old tech dies hard.

  53. And Here We Thought We Were Being Clever And New. by Shadow+Of+The+Sun · · Score: 1
    At the beginning of the message, the sender would transmit a WRU (who are you) code

    It seems a bit strange to realize that that abbreviations that everyone thinks was invented with the advent of the internet ("R" = "are", etc) were actually used around seventy years ago.

  54. What I'd like to know, for the record by Catbeller · · Score: 1

    What I'd like to know, for the record, is the text of the very last telegram.

    The first was sent on May 24th, 1844 from Washington DC to Baltimore, and read:

    "What hath God wrought?".

    1. Re:What I'd like to know, for the record by uberdave · · Score: 1

      We will have to wait for telegraphy to die before that happens. There are many ways to send telegrams other than Western Union. Ask any ham radio operator.

  55. proto-internet by tverbeek · · Score: 1
    the telegraph was a precursor to the Internet in that it allowed rapid communication, for the first time, across great distances.

    To say nothing of the fact that it consisted of digital signalling (Morse code) on wires (and later over the air).

    --
    http://alternatives.rzero.com/
  56. Framed email. by uberdave · · Score: 3, Funny

    I had an email in a frame once, but then I closed the browser...

  57. No More Email by klaricmn · · Score: 1

    On a related note.....

    Effective February 3rd, 2006 there will be no more email. The companies that run the internet have decided that "email is simply no longer relevant in today's modern world." Due to this fact, it was recently decided that email communication is simply not a viable means of communication. Sorry for any inconvenience.

  58. It was Newton by Lucas+Membrane · · Score: 2, Informative

    He said it as a put-down to his rival Hooke, who was of little physical height and notable shortness.

  59. What did the last telegram say??? by Lucas+Membrane · · Score: 1
    It should go into the history books, too.

    Maybe "You've been running around with my wife and bringing her home late STOP"

  60. That reminds me... by Doctor+Memory · · Score: 1

    has anyone on Slashdot EVER written a friendly letter (attempted seduction counts) and sent it by snail mail

    Heh, I'm reminded of Dostoyevsky's (I think it was Dostoyevsky) comment:

    "I've written poetry
    In pusuit of seduction
    That is,
    For the sake of a worthy cause."

    --
    Just junk food for thought...
  61. Younger Genration IS not Completely Ignorant by wolff000 · · Score: 1

    I understand that the average mode of communication has changed from my generation and the last,(I'm 26). We still do know what telegrams and snail mail is like. When I got my first PC I didn't know but 3 other people that had one and only one of them was online. I still had to snail mail to everyone. I have even used a telegram, I have friends overseas and a telegram was a neat way to get in touch and was faster than snail mail. Just because you are in your twenties doesn't mean you don't what STOP means at the end of a sentence or have not mailed something with the post office. Just my 2 bits.

    --
    WTF?
  62. WILL MISS IT --STOP-- by Ranger · · Score: 1

    I WILL MISS WESTERN UNION TELEGRAM SERVICE --STOP-- NEVER USED IT --STOP-- ONLY SAW USED IN OLD MOVIES STOP LIKE BLAZING SADDLES --STOP-- CANDY GRAM FOR MONGO --STOP-- FUCKIN' HILARIOUS --STOP--







    damn. it won't let me post my lame-ass joke because i used too many caps. how retarded is that. who knew that slashdot had a lameness filter? it mustn't work very well because i see lame posts all the time. roland piquepaille comes to mind. anyway i'm typing as many lower case letters as possible to get past their lameness filter. ok. looks like I can post it now after previewing.

    --
    "You'll get nothing, and you'll like it!"
  63. The Final Western Union Telegram Read: by ibm1130 · · Score: 1

    Stop! Stop.

  64. Guilty as charged. by hummassa · · Score: 1

    Yes, I have written letters.
    Yes, I have shouted really loud.
    But my most-successfull strategy was to climb on the top of a 12-store building and howl all night long. Go figure.

    --
    It's better to be the foot on the boot than the face on the pavement. ~~ tkx Kadin2048
  65. Transport Independent by hey · · Score: 1

    ms is that they are Transport Independent.
    Maybe Western Union emails them or phones them to their local office then maybe they phone, fax, email, hand deliver or carrier pigeon the message the last few miles. It is (was) cool because a company is ensuring your message is delivered.
    If the guy doesn't answer the phone, then they hand deliver it or they could use FedEx even. Its like have a secretary. Too bad its gone.

  66. Western Union wasn't the only game in town. by Eric+Smith · · Score: 1

    You can also get telegrams delivered by Eastern Onion. Their service may be less suitable for urgent messages, but the Western Union's service level had gone down substantially since the 1960s too.

    1. Re:Western Union wasn't the only game in town. by javaxman · · Score: 1
      Google "Telegram". Ignore the references to Western Union. Guess what? There are other services that will deliver a telegram.

      The telegram is not gone... although, it's true that if I or anyone else I've ever known wanted to send a telegram ( uh, why? to make an impact? Then I'd send a stripper or flowers or a guy in a bunny suit as well... anyway... ) well, unless I wanted one of the special types of telegram I just mentioned, I'd think "Western Union". Now, I'd have to search for one of these alternate services.

      Obviously, someone looked at the business and noticed, hey! We're not making *any* money providing this service! Screw that!

      I'm frankly shocked it didn't happen 15 years ago. Sometimes people do let sentimentality get in the way of rational business decisions.

      Still, it's a bit silly for anyone to read this as "I can't send a telegram anymore"... although there is a question as to if it would make sense to do so... really, you need a courier service, not a telegram service per se.

  67. yeah, probably by PMuse · · Score: 1

    My hunch is that modern USPS and overnight delivery services did the most damage, though.

    At first, I thought the submitter was nuts. Telegrams are like email, right? Surely email, fax, and phone killed demand for telegrams. But no. Telegrams served a different market. A telegram is a message delivered in less than a day to a physical address where there is no receiving equipment.

    --
    "We reject as false the choice between our safety and our ideals." --The American President (20.1.2009)
  68. Can't believe I'm the first by Siberwulf · · Score: 1

    ..-. ..- -.-. -.- .. - .-.-.-

    Stupid "Lameness" filter.  been trying 15 minutes to get this crap to work.  The quippiness has since left me and now i'm bitter.  Add Morse code to the damn drop down already.

  69. "Digital" Telegrams by Kadin2048 · · Score: 1

    The vast majority of telegrams ever sent were never encoded in Morse. They were sent using a teletype, probably using 5-bit BAUDOT, or more rarely, ASCII or any of the other encoding schemes that have fallen by the wayside.

    I'm not sure if I would argue that they were the first digital communications medium or not, but I just thought it's just worth pointing out that most Western Union Telegrams had nothing to do with the CW electrical telegraph that they're so closely associated with.

    --
    "Ladies and gentlemen, my killbot features Lotus Notes and a machine gun. It is the finest available."
  70. I've sent one by bcoverston · · Score: 1

    When I was in Brazil, Ten years ago, my Syster in Law had her first baby. I couldn't use a phone, communications were poor, and the fastest way to send congratulations was an international telegram. Sure it was expensive, but it's in the little rug-rat's baby book to this day.

  71. laid off by mdmarkus · · Score: 1

    I was laid off by telegram in the early '90s. Glad to know that will never happen again...

  72. so much for tradition by WillAdams · · Score: 1

    When I got married, I had my best man do the traditional thing and send a congratulatory telegram to my father-in-law (at an exorbitant price). They phoned in the message, then mailed the telegram....

    He still has it though.

    William

    --
    Sphinx of black quartz, judge my vow.
  73. Western Union telegrams sucked, anyway. by GungaDan · · Score: 1

    The strippers couldn't dance or sing, and rarely took their clothes off.

    --
    Eloi are stupid, throw morlocks at them!
  74. Am i the only one? by Windows+Breaker+G4 · · Score: 1

    I thought these died out years ago!

    --
    brickspeed.net for your old Volvo performance addiction
  75. What? by settsu · · Score: 1

    No jokes about a post-apocalyptic Kevin Costner and a group of ragtag teenage revolutionaries?

    I feeling hungry for some ass... donkey! I meant DONKEY!

  76. It's a shame... by pclminion · · Score: 1

    If you rearrange the letters of "Western Union," you get "No Wire Unsent." Too bad that's no longer true.

  77. Last niche market for telegrams by Mostly+a+lurker · · Score: 1

    If you want to contact dead friends or relatives, your options are limited. It appears as though you can send them a telegram however.

  78. Western Union went out of business years ago by Animats · · Score: 1
    The Western Union Telegraph Company essentially went out of business in 1994. The entity that now uses the name "Western Union" is a money-transfer firm, Western Union Financial Services, that bought the rights to the name and some of tha assets. They kept on sending telegrams as a promotional item, but all they did was operate a call center that takes messages, prints them, and mails them.

    AT&T took over Telex service in 1991, which was the last real Western Union volume business. The WU international switching center in Paramus NJ lived on until at least 1996, but was phased out then.

  79. telegraph == Internet version 0.1 by peter303 · · Score: 1

    The telegraph had the same effect in its era as the Internet in ours. It could speed information around the world immediately. 31 years before telegraph colonel Andrew Jackson fought the battle of New Orleans against the British A WEEK AFTER the 1812 War peace treaty had been signed because it took that long for treaty news to get from Paris to Louisiana.

    The telegraph did have a doozy of a "last hundred yards" bottleneck. Perhaps tens of thousands of people would share the same terminus. So the system of telegrams was devised to multiplex messaging.

  80. grad school and job offers by peter303 · · Score: 1

    I received some telegrams in the 1980s as "extraodinary messages". At that time there grad schools and employers competing for my application. A few would send telegrams to get my attention.

  81. Snail Mail -- Not just for bills by cordelia · · Score: 0

    I write and receive "friendly letters" rather often. Email is fine and all, but there are some times when only a letter will do -- especially when the person you want to communicate with doesn't have email. For instance, my niece lives on the other side of the country. When her family moved out there, she was only three. So I sent her letters every week to keep in touch. And she dictated letters to her mother to send to me. Twelve years later, we still write each other a few times a month. She just got an email account right before Christmas, but we still take the time to write real letters. There is nothing better than going to the mail box and seeing a letter addressed to you that is not an ad or a bill!

    Plus, it allows me to indulge in my stationery habit. Half of the drawers in my roll top desk are full of different writing paper for all occasions! I even go inside the post office to buy cool stamps for my letters. There are much cooler ones out there than the standard flags that help to make the envelopes more interesting.

  82. you can still send telegrams, you know... by javaxman · · Score: 1
    Google "Telegram". Ignore the references to Western Union. Guess what? There are other services that will deliver a telegram.

    The telegram is not gone... although, it's true that if I or anyone else I've ever known wanted to send a telegram ( uh, why? to make an impact? Then I'd send a stripper or flowers or a guy in a bunny suit as well... anyway... ) well, unless I wanted one of the special types of telegram I just mentioned, I'd think "Western Union". Now, I'd have to search for one of these alternate services.

    Obviously, someone looked at the business and noticed, hey! We're not making *any* money providing this service! Screw that!

    I'm frankly shocked it didn't happen 15 years ago. Sometimes people do let sentimentality get in the way of rational business decisions.

  83. scam telegrams by JimBobJoe · · Score: 1

    I never, EVER received a spam/junk telegram. Ever.

    There's not a doubt in my mind that the telegram, at its height, was used for scamming (it likely was too expensive for extensive spam-use however.) A quick google search finds this article .

  84. I thought they went out in the 1950's ?? by keith134 · · Score: 1

    I thought they went out in the 1950's ??

  85. STOP by Jesus+2.0 · · Score: 1

    Why didn't they just convert the STOPs to periods when typing them up / printing them out / whatever?

  86. My first job - delivering Western Union Telegrams by Cliff+Stoll · · Score: 3, Interesting

    It was summer of 1967, when I applied to Western Union for a summer job. Since I knew Morse Code, I figured they'd have a telegraph position for me. Heck, I could send and receive 25 words a minute.

    Well, I wound up as bicycle telegram delivery boy. I covered downtown Buffalo five days a week.

    The office runs weren't hard ... a quick sprint into an office, hand a yellow envelope to the secretary, catch the elevator to the next floor, and do it again. Thick envelopes meant money-orders; night-letters were cheap, and high priority telegrams had red stamps on the front.

    Hey - I delivered candy-grams. Marriage proposals. And once delivered a notice that a man had won the New York Lottery (Federal laws prevented these from being sent by mail). The guy tipped me a quarter ... the only tip I collected that summer.

    The worst were the eviction notices, delivered to indigent individuals and sometimes families. I'd bike over to a tenement building where the Western Union delivery boy was a most unwelcome visitor. The slumlords dealt with their tenants through process servers, lawyers, and telegraph agents ... never face to face.

    Then there was the killed-in-action notice of the GI in Viet Nam. I'm seventeen and I'm supposed to deliver this telegram to his mom. My boss - a stogie smoker who played the ponies - took pity on me and delivered it himself. Poor guy returned a wreck: the woman completely broke down at the news. (This was common enough that Western Union had instructions on how to deliver death notices)

    Over the summer, I was immersed in Western-Union's electronics. Or should I say their electro-mechanics. Hundreds of Type 28 ASR teletypes, reperforators, and paper-tape systems ... 5 channel baudot code meant telegrams came out in uppercase only. The stuff ran at 60 words per minute (or about 25 baud, I think) No parity. They had a staff of guys that just repaired and oiled the clunkers. And clunk they did -- these were loud!

      At Christmas, teletype operators would pass along jingle bell messages to each other by sending teletype Control-G symbols at just the right intervals. Heck - they sent out time signals to local businesses who needed synchronized clocks.

    So good bye Western Union ... may those canary yellow telegrams age gracefully.

  87. What about Marty McFly!? by syousef · · Score: 1

    Now he'll never get the message that Doc is alive and well in the wild west!

    --
    These posts express my own personal views, not those of my employer
  88. Preserve History! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    So who was the last telegram from? To? What did it say!?!?

  89. Stupid Stupid Stupid by bigpicture · · Score: 1

    The internet took away this business model and made it irrelevant. So why did Western Union not do like the recording industry, and start suing everybody for using E-mail. Start up their own little RIAA, or do they really understand when something is dead of old age, it makes sense to take it off life support.

  90. Man I wish I had seen this when it hit... by lagerbottom · · Score: 1

    ...the front page

    Your sister Rose is dead!

    --
    "He was a wise man who invented beer." - Plato