Slashdot Mirror


Headphones in Corporate Culture?

TheGreatOrangePeel asks: "In an ever increasing sea of white-earbuds in my office, I broke from the mainstream and recently purchased the iAudio X5 to help pass the downtime I experience behind cube walls. I've got a decent set of headphones, but recently I've discovered that being able to hear the rap-tap on the cube frame is sometimes a problem even with the volume cranked way down and considering how my current headphones are about ready for retirement anyway, I thought I would start shopping around for a new set. The problem is that most of mid priced headphones out there are designed to block out real world noise. The Sennheiser PX100 look like they may fit what I'm looking for, but I question the durability of folding headphones and I thought I would see what my peers on Slashdot prefer. What I'm looking for is a set of headphones with (1) good sound in a wide variety of music (2) in the $30-$99 range that (3) will let me hear the warnings of imminent attack at work by co-workers, and the alerts at my monthly LAN parties from allied gamers."

206 comments

  1. Get the Sennheiser PXC 300 by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0, Informative

    They are AWESOME. I use them everyday for my subway commute and they filter out nearly all of the noise. I can play music at a much lower volume, so I can what I need to AND not damage my ears.

    Normally they retail for about $200, but PC Mall has them for the incredibly low price of $110 (after you add them to your cart). That's slightly above your range, but it's totally worth it.

    1. Re:Get the Sennheiser PXC 300 by Walpurgiss · · Score: 0

      I thought he was looking at something that didn't filter against outside noises? Personally I'd not try to mix your two needs together. Unfortunately I don't have any product suggestions for you, sorry. I've always just used whatever headphones or earphones came with my devices.

    2. Re:Get the Sennheiser PXC 300 by Jozer99 · · Score: 1

      Did you even read the parent? The guy wants headphones that WONT filter out noise.

    3. Re:Get the Sennheiser PXC 300 by Dumass · · Score: 2, Informative

      Parent's advice is good. I have a set of PX300s that I got in December. They filter outside noise, but only repetitive stuff (the vending machine outside my door, for example). A knock on the cube wall will probably not go unnoticed. As for the folding, my set are very well built and don't catch on my hair like my old Sony fold-ups did. If you can get them for less than $150, they're a great deal.

    4. Re:Get the Sennheiser PXC 300 by CaseyB · · Score: 1

      Noise cancelling earphones don't filter out voice very much. They kill off ambient white noise almost completely, but you can still hear "interesting" sounds.

    5. Re:Get the Sennheiser PXC 300 by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Are you sure? Etymonic earbuds cancel out everything, including voices and farts of others around.

    6. Re:Get the Sennheiser PXC 300 by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Sorry, that should read "PXC300s"

    7. Re:Get the Sennheiser PXC 300 by Frequency+Domain · · Score: 3, Informative

      Etymotics aren't noise cancelling, they are noise isolating - they physically seal your ear off from the ambient noise. Noise cancelling headphones, on the other hand, have a little pickup microphone for the outside noise, and circuitry to invert the waveform and inject it into the headphone signal. The inverted waveform and original noise waveform cancel each other inside the earpiece, leaving the music much more audible at lower volumes. Since the inverting circuitry works best against steady-state drones such as jet engines, refrigerators, computer hum, etc., the earlier post is correct that it may make it possible to hear things like raps on the cubicle or conversations.

    8. Re:Get the Sennheiser PXC 300 by kclittle · · Score: 2, Funny
      Cancel out farts of others? Then these would be signal-canceling nosebuds, yes?

      --
      Generally, bash is superior to python in those environments where python is not installed.
    9. Re:Get the Sennheiser PXC 300 by Aeiri · · Score: 1

      I think you are missing the point... the point is he DOESN'T want any ambient noise filtered...

      But $30-99? I'm going to have to go outside that range for a good set of headphones, and I don't mean more expensive. I picked up one of those head wrap headphone types at BestBuy for $10, and they are probably the best pair of headphones I've ever had (I've had headphones ranging from $1 to $50, even).

      I use them in my Starcraft... I mean Computer Networking class and I can listen to music and still be able to hear everyone else as we plan attacks... for routing networks... yeah...

    10. Re:Get the Sennheiser PXC 300 by AsbestosRush · · Score: 3, Informative

      Not to flame, but if the submitter is seriously considering Sennheiser cans, he subjectively won't like they reproduction of the $10 set from Best Buy. Sennheiser makes some of the best headphones in the business

      Of course, this begs the question, "If quality reproduction is what you want, why are you sourceing from an MP3 Player?"

      Now, to get back on topic, I have to wonder if submitter's little player really does have the juice to run a really good set of cans. I'd highly recommend that the submitter check out http://www.headphone.com/ and read up. Lots of great info there on headphones, a bit of the physics, and a *huge* selection of headphones and headphone amps.

      --
      EveryDNS. Use it. It works.
      AC's need not reply
    11. Re:Get the Sennheiser PXC 300 by engagebot · · Score: 1

      Just stop questioning them.

      They're the same people shopping in best buy that think acompletely slammed eq curve sounds good. 50hz range is rattling the upholstery of my car? check! 10k range sounds like its cutting lasers through my eyeballs? check!

      Sometimes you sat that same guy in front of some mackie hr824's, and he'll be speechless. But most of the time, they won't even notice a difference. And its that second group that scares me.

      --
      Han shot first.
    12. Re:Get the Sennheiser PXC 300 by Aeiri · · Score: 1

      They're the same people shopping in best buy that think acompletely slammed eq curve sounds good. 50hz range is rattling the upholstery of my car? check! 10k range sounds like its cutting lasers through my eyeballs? check!

      Yuck. I don't think like that! If anything besides the actual speaker (the part they WANT to vibrate, not the plastic around it), I nearly puke.

      As far as what we are talking about... I'm not quite sure it's possible to have a pair of headphones that you can hear outside noise with that would be considered "sounding perfect", the random ambient noises of the world around us can really screw up music. So any pair of headphones that you can hear stuff beyond the output of the headphones are all the same, essentially. Regardless, even in the most quiet conditions, the headphones I'm talking about are really good, considering the circumstances (being able to hear ambient noises and such).

  2. a mirror by file+cabinet · · Score: 4, Informative

    one of the people where I work has a mirror (similar to the one you would see on a bike) attached to her monitor..

    1. Re:a mirror by daeley · · Score: 2, Interesting

      ThinkGeek has its C.H.I.M.P., which is basically a convex cubicle mirror. Works well enough:

      http://www.thinkgeek.com/computing/accessories/294 0/

      --
      I watched C-beams glitter in the dark near the Tannhauser gate.
    2. Re:a mirror by Impeesa · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Better still, if you can manage it, is to arrange your cubicle/office so that your face is towards the entrance, rather than some combination of your back and your screen full of pr0n^H^H^H^H confidential work stuff.

    3. Re:a mirror by RabidMonkey · · Score: 1

      I've got one, and I do the headphone thing a lot - it works great. You get used to including it in your peripheral vision and soon you notice people before they knock and you can suprise them.

      Otherwise, do what I did for a while - I had a big set of sony studio monitor headphones - they're impossible to miss. people would come in to my cube and see them on and just make some noise. it removes the 'are they ignoring me' factor and lets them know they should be loud.

      easy. or you could just stick a post it note to the back of your head.

      --
      We emerge from our mother's womb an unformatted diskette; our culture formats us. - Douglas Coupland
    4. Re:a mirror by UnrefinedLayman · · Score: 3, Informative

      No, it really doesn't work well enough. The CHIMP mirror is made of cheap plastic and the resolution of the "mirror" (silver-painted plastic) is ridiculous. To boot, the wedge of the mirror makes it impossible to attach to any modern LCD without blocking a significant part of the screen.

      The quality is something I'd expect for a trinket from the back of a comic book. Very disappointing. I solidly do not recommend the product.

    5. Re:a mirror by ScrO · · Score: 5, Interesting

      Monitor mirrors are for HR and Marketing drones... I much prefer the strategically-placed CDs (data side out) pinned to my cube wall and aimed the appropriate direction with additional pushpins behind them. It amazes me that nobody catches on until I specifically point it out to them.

      Note that AOL CDs (while rarer these days) or any other free, pressed discs work best (as they are the shiniest); most CD-Rs don't work so well.

    6. Re:a mirror by dlelash · · Score: 0, Redundant
    7. Re:a mirror by rhandir · · Score: 2, Interesting

      A secondary advantage of a mirror, is that when you look into it, you shift the focal length in your eye compared to staring at the monitor, which helps reduce eyestrain.

      Altenatively, you could get a cheap webcam to point over your shoulder, and monitor the video in a window. But that seems like overkill. (But this is Slashdot, so who knows?)

    8. Re:a mirror by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "Tap here for attention"

    9. Re:a mirror by j-cloth · · Score: 1

      I had the webcam setup for a while. Be careful with that system... you'll find that a camera height appropriate for seeing people coming tends to ride tit level at people in your cube. Fine for women with whom you have a good rapport, not so fine with HR people.

    10. Re:a mirror by VolciMaster · · Score: 1
      one of the people where I work has a mirror

      ...as does my father where he works, though his is the kind you'd stick on a car for a blind spot view.

      When I used to where ear phones at work a lot, I liked the over-the-ear-but-still-ear-bid kind (mine were from Koss (similar to these on Amazon)). I had all the benefits of personal music, but could easily hear people coming up who needed to talk to me.

    11. Re:a mirror by sylvandb · · Score: 2, Insightful

      I much prefer the strategically-placed CDs (data side out) pinned to my cube wall and aimed the appropriate direction

      If you like CDs, you'd love hard disk platters.

      Probably getting too late to score anything bigger than a 3", but a 5" platter is a nice size for a cubicle mirror. Someday maybe I'll find an 8"... (I've seen platters larger than 8", but all of them were dull oxide, not the highly polished, bright mirror surface you want for a cubicle mirror.

      Oh, and any extra platters make much better wind chimes than CDs ever will.

      sdb

    12. Re:a mirror by object88 · · Score: 1

      Better still, if you can manage it, is to arrange your cubicle/office so that your face is towards the entrance...

      That worked amazingly well for me when I could do it. In my current situation, though, in addition to my cube not being set up to do so, I'd loose the ability to glance up and gaze out over the Alameda / Oakland estuary, which can be very relaxing.

    13. Re:a mirror by jZnat · · Score: 1

      Ah, but $50 for a base-level hard-drive is way more expensive than a stack of free AOL CDs from Blockbuster or even a spindle of CD-Rs from Walmart or something.

      --
      'Yes, firefox is indeed greater than women. Can women block pops up for you? No. Can Firefox show you naked women? Yes.'
    14. Re:a mirror by Anon.Pedant · · Score: 1

      You can get a better quality stick-on convex mirror at any decent auto parts store. Works for me.

    15. Re:a mirror by sylvandb · · Score: 1

      Ah, but $50 for a base-level hard-drive is way more expensive than a stack of free AOL CDs

      Who in their right mind would even consider buying a hard drive just to acquire a platter to use as a mirror???

      Surely someone you know has a hard drive that failed, or an obsolete drive.

      sdb

    16. Re:a mirror by Jake+Diamond · · Score: 1

      Better yet is a silicon wafer. I worked for a semiconductor manufacturer and we did something similar with polished wafers. Even better, those wafers are getting bigger, not smaller. Your typical wafer in a mass-production facility is at least 8", and many are moving (or have moved) to 12".

      They're very polished and shiny, and make excellent mirrors.

  3. Noise cancelling headset by javaDragon · · Score: 2, Informative

    I've been using the Bose QuietComfort II for nearly two years now (I'm working in a noisy environment) mainly for its noise cancelling ability, and I'm very satisfied with it. Of course, it's expensive, but in my opinion, it was well worth the price.

    --
    -- javaDragon is an instance of JavaDragon.
    1. Re:Noise cancelling headset by cosmotron · · Score: 1

      Those aren't exactly in the $30-99 range... Those go for about $300.

      --
      Ryan - http://www.thecosmotron.com/
    2. Re:Noise cancelling headset by dimension6 · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Not to mention, you won't be hearing any "warnings of imminent attack" with those.

    3. Re:Noise cancelling headset by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Have you actually used them before? The headphones only filter out steady, consistent noises (air conditioning, hum of a power supply, fans, general chatter). Everything else comes through slightly muted, but crystal clear. Assuming he would keep the music volume low, they would meet the OP's requirements on all but price.

    4. Re:Noise cancelling headset by dimension6 · · Score: 1

      I have used the QuietComfort 2 headphones (and use other Bose noise-cancelling headsets regularly when flying in small planes). It's the fact that they're "over-the-ear" type that makes them less practical for usage in a place where occasional conversation is required. Over-the-ear headphones may be what the OP is looking for, though.

    5. Re:Noise cancelling headset by SenorCitizen · · Score: 1

      "No highs, no lows - must be Bose"

    6. Re:Noise cancelling headset by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I have a pair of these and they only really cancel low frequencies so you can still hear people talking. It's quite weird turning the things on when you are wearing them because pretty much all of the computer noise and ventillation just fades away.

      A very big plus to me is that I can listen to music at very low levels with these puppies so they are probably better off for me in the long run.

    7. Re:Noise cancelling headset by jZnat · · Score: 1

      $300? Bose? Of course I'm not surprised. Bose usually makes high quality and thusly expensive audio gear.

      --
      'Yes, firefox is indeed greater than women. Can women block pops up for you? No. Can Firefox show you naked women? Yes.'
  4. You guys are missing the damn point. by rincebrain · · Score: 4, Insightful

    He explicitly said he wanted headphones that did NOT block out all ambient noise.

    --
    It's only an insult if it's not true.
    1. Re:You guys are missing the damn point. by default+luser · · Score: 1

      That's just what I was saying after reading this.

      Me, I don't use anything fancy at work, just a set of Sennheiser MX500 earbuds. Decent sound quality for the price, little noise leakage to piss off your cubemates, VERY light (a huge plus when you spend the whole day craning your neck, staring at a monitor), and a tiny inline volume control. Plus, you can actually hear those around you. About 15 bucks online.

      I love quality headphones, but unless you work alone, buying them for work is about as smart as buying audiophile-level speakers for your car. There's just too much background noise for you to notice the difference. At home, I like to break out my Allesandro MS1s, of if it's noisy, my HD 280 Pros, but at work I don't need anything special.

      --

      Man is the animal that laughs.
      And occasionally whores for Karma.

  5. $30-99? Grado SR-60s by trickykungfu · · Score: 5, Informative

    Grado SR-60s are the way to go for your requirements. They are, hands down, the best headphones available under $100. The only drawback is that they are open stage, so you can hear sounds around you, which is not so good for a metro or bus ride. But it sounds like that's an advantage rather than a drawback in your case. SR-60s will run you about $80 USD shipped. Oh, and don't succumb to the temptation to get the SR-80s just because they've got a higher model number. The 60s are far better for non-amp-driven listening.

    1. Re:$30-99? Grado SR-60s by Fraew · · Score: 1

      spot on for sound quality - grado's rule, though they might be a little bit uncomfortable after a few hours non-stop

    2. Re:$30-99? Grado SR-60s by name773 · · Score: 1

      you get used to it. i have a pair of sr80s and recommend them (are they really different from the 60s? good phones either way)

    3. Re:$30-99? Grado SR-60s by WMD_88 · · Score: 1

      I've got a pair of these myself. They block very little noise, and the open back actually lets other people know what you're playing - a "feature" I myself aren't very fond of. But for $76 shipped (www.headphone.com), you can't beat the sound quality, and the ear pads are very comfortable (the headband is what gets you). They are a little big overall, but that's only a problem because I have to fit them in a school backpack. Actual adults don't have to worry about that. ;)

    4. Re:$30-99? Grado SR-60s by rnelsonee · · Score: 1
      Yeah, I got the SR-60s after reading so many positive reviews. I must say though that it's uncomfortable after just 5-10 minutes (and only on one ear), so they don't get much use. That same side also seems to have a loose connection, and the wiring seems to be a little twisted...

      But they do sound great, so if you're the kind of guy who isn't afraid to return things, go ahead and try these. Chances are you'll like it anyway, I'm sure I'm in the minority here.

    5. Re:$30-99? Grado SR-60s by alienw · · Score: 1

      You might be able to get the SR60s slightly cheaper if you buy from a local dealer instead of a store. The prices are all the same, and you have to purchase from an authorized dealer if you want to keep the warranty. Your local hi-fi shop should stock them. I own a pair and have been very happy with them.

    6. Re:$30-99? Grado SR-60s by mpechner · · Score: 1

      At $95 the 80's do sound better. They don't need an amp.

      I was using my music from an IPOD with MP3's VBR hi rate to compare the two models. The 125's required an AMP. But they sound great if you want to spend as much on a headphone amp as you did on a Ipod.

      The 80's are worth the money.

    7. Re:$30-99? Grado SR-60s by TheGreatOrangePeel · · Score: 1

      I mentioned that I've got the X5 because they push out more power than an iPod. With that in mind, would you still recommend the SR-60 over the SR-80?

    8. Re:$30-99? Grado SR-60s by PeterBrett · · Score: 1

      My Grado SR-60s are absolutely fantastic; I've never used a pair of headphones that sounded better. One of my friends had a pair of extortionately priced Sennheiser 'phones, and had to concede the fact. As another poster mentioned, the downside is the open backs; it means that they get better frequency response, but at the cost of being pretty much unsuitable for work. If you're playing your music at any sort of volume above whisper quiet, everyone can hear it.

    9. Re:$30-99? Grado SR-60s by LordMyren · · Score: 1

      What is the differentce with the SR-80's? I wore my SR-80's well past the point of death, they were my alltime favorites. I vaguely understand what you're saying-- even at full volume some of my various playing devices were struggling (others were fine)-- but what is the actual difference that causes this?

      So, to the asker, keep in mind that the open stage nature of the Grado's is double edged. You can hear whats going on (I'd attend lectures with them on back in college), but other people around you sometimes hear what you're listening to as well sometimes. If you're in a relatively silent office, it might stick out.

    10. Re:$30-99? Grado SR-60s by krilli · · Score: 1

      My intuitive understanding is that with Grado headphones, they're rather "conductive". You can think of headphones (and other electronic devices) as water pipes. Grados are wide pipes.

      So whatever electronic device is driving them needs to be able to push a lot of current through them, in essence it needs to have many electrons on reserve and to be able to shunt them quickly through the headphones. The more energetic the sounds you're reproducing, the more current you need on hand. Drums, for instance.

      An iPod mini and an iPod shuffle are nice examples of similar devices that are built differently with regard to current handling. Both have a rather even frequency response, that is, the sound is neither muffled nor overly bright. Due to the electronics involved in pushing electricity into the headphones, the iPod shuffle is (perhaps surprisingly) far better at delivering PUNCHY bass and the WHAM (the attack) of drums.

      The result is that music sounds equally bright / muffled compared between Minis and Shuffles, but the Shuffle will deliver more "power" in the sound. More pop and bang. (This doesn't necessarily mean a louder volume.) Think of a fireworks explosion: there's the sound itself, recognizable even through a telephone receiver, and there's the BANG of it, which is much harder to reproduce.

      A special headphone amplifier can be used, and this makes devices like the iPod mini whose capacity current delivery capable of making sounds as "big" as more robust devices like the Shuffle. The approach is that the source device (a Mini, for instance) is made to drive the amplifier cirquit, which is "easier" for the source to drive than a pair of headphones, and the headphone amp then takes care of pushing current into the headphones with its beefier cirquit.

      Disclaimer: my understanding of this phenomenon may not be accurate, and may even be completely wrong. To get a feel for the idea, I suggest listening to a wimpy sound source connected to a pair of current-hungry headphones like Grados, and then comparing it to the same headphones connected to a headphone amp that has lots of current to throw around.

      Also, I've noticed that people are saying that different models in the Grado line have different requirements for amplification. This is incorrect, AFAIK, as the driver (the electronics) inside all of Grado headphones is essentially similar, the difference lies in the housing and the *quality* of the drivers, picked from different bins in the Grado factory.

      --
      Jag pratar lite svenska.
    11. Re:$30-99? Grado SR-60s by krilli · · Score: 1

      Self-replying is fun.

      I'd like to add this:

      I LIKE my Grado SR-325 headphones when they're connected to my Powerbook, but I LOVE them when they're connceted to a good amp.

      --
      Jag pratar lite svenska.
    12. Re:$30-99? Grado SR-60s by Kadin2048 · · Score: 2, Informative

      I'm not agreeing nor disagreeing with most of the points you made, I just thought I'd throw in my personal experience -- I've used a pair of SR80s with a 3G iPod, and think they sound great. I've tried them with an external amplifier (Headwise 'Cmoy', Google it), and frankly didn't think that the (slight) increase in the noise floor was worth it. I don't listen to music at a high enough volume to saturate the iPod's built-in amplifier, apparently. For someone with a different listening style, it might be critical though.

      The openness of the Grados is their biggest strength but also biggest weakness. In the OP's case, it would be nice because he'd be able to hear his surroundings; on the other hand if seriously listening to music is your goal, you need a very quiet place to do it in, with the Grados. Otherwise you'll still have outside sounds (HVAC, cooling fans, etc.) in the mix. Which is no different than you'd have with a regular speakered Hifi, but it's just something to consider. I guess it falls into the "audiophile nitpicking" category of complains, however.

      Anyway, I recommend the SR80s, but get them from a local shop (the Grado people will tell you where one is if you ask).

      --
      "Ladies and gentlemen, my killbot features Lotus Notes and a machine gun. It is the finest available."
    13. Re:$30-99? Grado SR-60s by Doctor+Faustus · · Score: 1

      you get used to it.
      I've had my SR125's for a year now, and while they sound great, I can only wear them for about four hours before they start to hurt.

    14. Re:$30-99? Grado SR-60s by Doctor+Faustus · · Score: 1

      I just plug my SR125's into my computer here at work. If my ears are getting sore, I'll just set them on the desk and use them as little speakers, and the sound is never more than halfway up.

    15. Re:$30-99? Grado SR-60s by John_Booty · · Score: 1

      I used SR-60s for about two years. Eventually I got sick of them and retired them to a desk drawer. I use Sennheiser PX100s now.

      The clarity on the SR60s is fantastic. If you listen to CDs or reaosnably high bitrate compressed audio, you'll be stunned at the details you'll hear in the music. I eventually got sick of the SR60s' drawbacks, though:

      * Not much bass to speak of, at least from the sources I use (computer sound card, various iPods)
      * Uncomfortable. Not something I want to wear for more than a few hours.
      * Completely open-air design. People near you can hear the music almost as well as you. I know the OP wanted headphones that let some ambient sound in. Well, the SR60s let plenty of sound in (good) but you're probably going to piss off people in adjacent cubicles unless you have your own office.

      The Sennheiser PX100s are great. Nice and light, very comfortable for 8-10 hours a day. Clarity is almost as good as the SR60s and bass is excellent.

      --

      OtakuBooty.com: Smart, funny, sexy nerds.
    16. Re:$30-99? Grado SR-60s by name773 · · Score: 1

      oh yeah maybe. i don't wear headphones for nearly that long anymore

      i used to though

  6. Tell me why I don't like Mondays. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0


    Based on what you've told us, we're playing this song because it features basic rock song structures, acoustic sonority, prominent rap-tap on the cube frame and extensive vamping.

    1. Re:Tell me why I don't like Mondays. by ogewo · · Score: 1

      A perfectly funny comment. No need to post as AC.

  7. Radhack by RomulusNR · · Score: 2, Insightful

    I have a pair of what are probably Radio Shack foam-padded old-school jobs that probably didn't even cost $20. They're sufficiently hearable and they don't block out outside noise.

    Jeez, why make it so damn complicated. Who needs to show off their headphones at work?

    --
    Terrorists can attack freedom, but only Congress can destroy it.
    1. Re:Radhack by Myself · · Score: 3, Interesting

      Amen. My pair of Pro-35s has served me well for many years. The sound is adequate for casual listening, and the open-air design is more appropriate than blocking out the world. They're fairly light, reasonably durable, and very comfortable. Find 'em on sale for $20 more often than not.

      If you want to make a statement, get a pair of bluetooth headphones. Pair them and a regular bt headset to your computer. Velcro the headset to the wall of your cubicle with a sign saying "intercom". Set the computer to pipe music to the headphones until the intercom button is pushed. :)

    2. Re:Radhack by Total_Wimp · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Jeez, why make it so damn complicated. Who needs to show off their headphones at work?

      I'm not too sure he's trying to show off. In fact, I suspect he's actually looking for good sound. My first clue was when he wrote "What I'm looking for is a set of headphones with (1) good sound in a wide variety of music..." My second clue was when he said he was looking for "headphones" which are typically used for personal listening as opposed to "giant speakers," which are often used to compare manhood.

      My final clue was his opening sentence "In a ever increasing sea of white-earbuds in my office, I broke from the mainstream and recently purchased the iAudio X5..." This suggested to me that he was not as interested in what his officemates thought as much as he was interested in what he liked. I really don't think this meets the definition of "showing off."

      TW

    3. Re:Radhack by canadiangoose · · Score: 1

      That 'intercom' idea is absolutely brilliant!

      --
      Never eat more than you can lift -- Miss Piggy
    4. Re:Radhack by Nataku564 · · Score: 1

      I agree. A good $30-$40 pair of Koss headphones will last you for life, and give you decent (if not excellent) sound quality.

      The UR40s have served me well for quite some time now, and I hear all immenant attack due to the open-ear design.

    5. Re:Radhack by bigman2003 · · Score: 1

      I've gone through a lot of headphones- including Koss, and I don't think that anything will last 'for life.'

      My problem is always the same, the stupid black foam starts to break down...then I'm stuck with black foam crap on my ears.

      My last set of Koss were the faux leather ones...so first the outside part had to breakdown, then the foam on the inside. Took about 2 years.

      Every Sony product I used has broken down earlier. Right now I am working on Sennheisens (sp) hopefully they work out a little better.

      But one other big factor for me- is always the length of the cord. I want something in the 9+ foot range, because I hate to be too closely tethered to my desk. These new headphones are great in that aspect too.

      --
      No reason to lie.
    6. Re:Radhack by st1d · · Score: 1

      Outstanding application of the ol' cluestick, TW. :)

      --
      Microsoft has just released their much anticipated hands-free cordless mouse. Warning, it may hurt a little at first.
    7. Re:Radhack by Moofie · · Score: 1

      Just a note: Doing the polar opposite of what the herd does is still lettting the herd run your life. Just sayin'.

      --
      Why yes, I AM a rocket scientist!
    8. Re:Radhack by Kadin2048 · · Score: 1

      I think the solution there is get headphones on which the foam surrounds are replacable, and get them from a manufacturer that's likely to still be in business when it's time to get a new set.

      Personally I'm a fan of Grado Labs, since I think they satisfy both these objectives, but I'm sure there are other companies that would fit the bill. The surrounds pop on and off fairly easily, and the cord is also replacable (although you'd need a soldering iron -- or send them back to the factory, which I'm sure is the legit method).

      Although they're not what the OP is looking for, I also have several products from the David Clark Company, which makes hearing protectors, headphones, and communication headsets (they apparently also make anti-G suits for pilots, which I was not aware of). I have a pair of hearing protectors from them that is close to 35 years old, and they're still making them. I just got a new set of foam surrounds for them, and they might as well be brand new. (It's the model 10A, if anyone's checking.)

      There's no reason why properly maintained, well-built analog gear ought not last you long enough to pass along to your kids.

      --
      "Ladies and gentlemen, my killbot features Lotus Notes and a machine gun. It is the finest available."
    9. Re:Radhack by VernonNemitz · · Score: 1

      So far as I know (can't say I looked farther due to being satisfied enough), these are the best-quality modest-price headphones Radio Shack sells. They also tend to be on sale fairly often at a reduced price.

    10. Re:Radhack by Doctor+Faustus · · Score: 1

      I've bought Radio Shack headphones before, but I try not to plan on them lasting more than about four months. They sound good, but they're very fragile.

      I used to buy the three year warranties, but then they started giving me crap about "abuse" when four consecutive pair of headphones broke in exactly the same way -- I call that a design flaw.

    11. Re:Radhack by RomulusNR · · Score: 1

      That as may well be, but he wants to shell $30-$40 or more for what are small speakers on a bent piece of metal. Frankly $20 is outrageous for such a device -- unless he really wants somewhat fancy ones.

      I guess I don't know what sort of sound quality he wants. I'd argue you can't get awesome sound quality if you don't block out external noise. Does he want the phones to vibrate his cartilage on the bass guitar, or something?

      I stand by my Walkman-style phones, which sound fine on my head, don't block out all external noise (some, but not all) but are just sufficiently open air enough that I can usually toss them down on the desk and then soon forget that something is still playing.

      --
      Terrorists can attack freedom, but only Congress can destroy it.
    12. Re:Radhack by RomulusNR · · Score: 1

      I try to avoid fancy RS branded items. The low-end items actually are more trustworthy and reliable IMO than the high-end items. The high-end items are universally covered in cheap decorative silver-painted plastic and end up being more fragile and more expensive for no actual gain in functional quality.

      Case in point: I asked for a variable DC car adapter at RS the other day, and was directed to this rack display featuring a $40 converter which is compatible with an assortment of connectors each as much as $10-$20. When I protested, the tech^H^H^H^H sales guy realized what kind of customer I was, and took me to the old, simple, black Adaptaplug converter which was roughly $20, comes with 4 plugs, and what I was looking for.

      Call me a loser geek, but I'm all about function > form.

      --
      Terrorists can attack freedom, but only Congress can destroy it.
    13. Re:Radhack by RomulusNR · · Score: 1

      That's one downside of the supra-aural (thanks, WP) foam-padded design, is that a lot of them have cheap foam, and will inevitably break down. But to be fair I can't recall many that have broken down within less than 4-5 years. And IMO it's worse when the plastic covering the foam on the circum-aural ones tears, because that foam is not designed to be exposed, and when it is, it soon becomes a crunchy mess.

      Anyway. RS sells a 6-foot 1/8'' stereo extension cord for about $5, I think. This is good for me because otherwise I'd have to keep my head next to the CD tray, which would not be comfortable. Also this gives me a plug near my hands that I can switch to plugging desk speakers into after-hours.

      --
      Terrorists can attack freedom, but only Congress can destroy it.
    14. Re:Radhack by ajlitt · · Score: 1

      You mean these? They're much cheaper here. If you want them a little less ugly and don't like the volume control, there's also these that use the same driver. This model (and the really ugly big brother PortaPros) is considered a 'sleeper' model by many.

      Goes a long way to explaining why they last longer than the standard cheap Rat Shack crap.

    15. Re:Radhack by Nataku564 · · Score: 1

      Koss headphones have lifetime warranties, dude. Just mail it in and get a new pair of whatever the current equivalent model is.

  8. What? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

    Oh, sorry, I had my noise cancelling glasses on. Anyway, most (all?) noise cancelling headphones have an off switch which puts them into normal headphone mode.

  9. Go Sennheizer by thegrassyknowl · · Score: 4, Informative

    I have a pair of senheizer HD-220s or somesuch (they're from the 200 series but I can't remember the specific number because they are at work where I am not).

    They are semi-open back. They block out most ambient noise just by putting them on - the general chatter fades out. Talking in the next cube, rap-tap-tapping and the phone doesn't go.

    Turn on some music and bam - nearly everything is gone. I play the music quietly all day and I don't have a problem. I can hear when people are talking to me or tapping on the cube, so it is cool.

    --
    I drink to make other people interesting!
    1. Re:Go Sennheizer by Fnord666 · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Definitely go Sennheiser. The sound reproduction is excellent. Personally I use and recommend the PXC250s. They are noise cancelling but they won't interfere with your ability to hear people talking to you. They just cancel out steady noise like the heating units or a power supply fan. The difference there will surprise you though. They work very well on airplanes and come with a several connectors for that purpose. They also come in a decent carrying case.

      --
      'The tyrant will always find pretext for his tyranny.' - Aesop's Fables
    2. Re:Go Sennheizer by rah1420 · · Score: 0

      I third the Sennheiser recommendation. I have a set of K141's that I just love to death. Loved them so much I had to get the elastic replaced for the headband and a new set of ear cushions.

      I wasn't a bit surprised to find out that (a) parts were available, and (b) it was rather easy to renovate them with a set of jeweler's tools. Voila, the K141's are back in business for another 20 years or so.

      --
      Mit der Dummheit kämpfen Götter selbst vergebens.
    3. Re:Go Sennheizer by rah1420 · · Score: 1

      Oh geez, just mod that post "retarded." Mixed up the sennheisers with the AKGs once again. Wish I could make up my freakin' mind.

      --
      Mit der Dummheit kämpfen Götter selbst vergebens.
    4. Re:Go Sennheizer by jZnat · · Score: 1

      Another agreement to go with Sennheiser. The iRiver comes with Sennheiser earbuds (not too sure on their exact model), and they are surprisingly good quality.

      --
      'Yes, firefox is indeed greater than women. Can women block pops up for you? No. Can Firefox show you naked women? Yes.'
  10. PX100/SR60 by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    The PX100's are a great choice for small, inexpensive, open cans. Also consider the Grado SR60s if you're willing to spend a bit more money.

    Try here for more choices.

  11. Original Sony Street-style phones? by EaTiN+cOfFeE+bEaNs · · Score: 2, Insightful

    They sound decent, are between $20-40, and they let in ambient noise at low levels. You're set!

    --
    No TiVo and no caffeine make me something something...
    1. Re:Original Sony Street-style phones? by neoprint · · Score: 1

      I have a pair of these, after a few hours they really start to hurt your ears, so I don't really think they're suitable for a corporate environment where they're likely to be work for ~8 hours a day

    2. Re:Original Sony Street-style phones? by mrchaotica · · Score: 1

      More generally, any sort of "sport"-style (as opposed to "studio"-style, with the big pads that completely enclose your ears) headphones ought to work pretty well, as long as they're comfortable.

      --

      "[Regarding the 'cloud,'] ownership was what made America different than Russia." -- Woz

  12. "Hearing Aid" by Frogbert · · Score: 3, Funny

    My tactic is to leave one ear bud out and hidden away under my shirt. I've managed to convince everyone in the office that it is a hearing aid. Now even in the odd chance that I don't hear someone they just chalk it up to my bad hearing.

    1. Re:"Hearing Aid" by Skater · · Score: 1

      I do have a hearing loss, you sensitive clod! :)

  13. I use Koss PortaPros... by hackerjoe · · Score: 1

    Not too expensive, they have good low-end, they're pretty comfortable, and you really can hear through them. The only real problem I have is the headband tends to collapse when I take them off, and sometimes my hair gets caught in there (ow). Also they're not the sturdiest headphones ever, but hey, they're made to be light and portable.

    1. Re:I use Koss PortaPros... by mattthomas · · Score: 1

      Personally, I think the PortaPros are the best headphones for the money, hands down. I tested them side-by-side with my friend's PX-100s before I bought my own pair, and they blow the PX-100s away, in my opinion.

    2. Re:I use Koss PortaPros... by tchae · · Score: 1

      Go with Porta-Pros.
      Great sound, reasonably compact, and they are open so you hear the boss creeping up!
      I also have Koss Spark Plugs for plane use, and Koss Pro4AAs for blocking the wife out (oh, hello dear!) - but these need an amp so I only use them at home at present.
      Driving all this is an iRiver H340 which knocks iPods flat!

    3. Re:I use Koss PortaPros... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      i have the same setup, and love it.

      Porta-Pros and an IRiver IHP-120

  14. PX 100's by spoop · · Score: 4, Informative

    I have a pair of Sennheiser PX 100's, and they are great. They are quite durable, although they might not look that way. Mine have been through a lot and are still in perfect condition. They come with a case which is a pain to use, but protects them very well. Most of the parts on them can be replaced if need be, and they come with a two year warranty. I say go for the PX 100's.

    --
    I blame geof's speakers.
    1. Re:PX 100's by googleaseerch · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Seconded. I recently went a step up from my old pair to the PSC 250's, which have a closed design and noise cancelling, for about $100-110. The increase per price isn't as dramatic as the 100's though, which are nearly impossible to beat for their size and price, and the submitter wanted to be able to hear people, anyways.

    2. Re:PX 100's by juventasone · · Score: 1

      Thirded. They're amazing for portables. They're open. Mine show no signs of physical weakness.

    3. Re:PX 100's by disappear · · Score: 1

      Fourthed. I love my Sennheisers.

  15. Grados by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Grado SR-60 ($69) or SR-80 ($99) models are right in your price range. They are open cans so you can hear pretty much everything around you. Realize that there is one very large downside to open headphones. This being, while you can hear everything around you, everyone around you can hear your music near perfectly and with great detail. But if that isn't an issue for you, just look for open backed headphones and you shouldn't have a problem hearing someone trying to get your attention. Usually these kinds of headphones are described as having "Poor Isolation." Good places to research are www.headphonereviews.org and www.head-fi.org.

    Good Luck
    -Anonymous Coward

  16. What I really want... by ElectricRook · · Score: 1
    To me a full-featured headset would be wireless head phones with a mic. When the phone rings, I can hit a keyboard sequence that cuts the music, and allows me to hold a phone conversation without changing head phones. When I'm on hold or listening to the meeting drones buzz-on, I can turn the music back up at a very low volume (just for me of course).

    ... AND when I'm in a noisy environment, my head phones double as hearing protection. I often venture into a data center that has a lot of fan noise at hearing damaging levels. Wearing head phones over the ear plugs can quickly become uncomfortable.

    --
    - High Tech workers, please say NO to Union Carpenters, their Union sees fit to control our compensation.
    1. Re:What I really want... by thegrassyknowl · · Score: 1

      I work in a similar environment. We have a custom wireless phone system that I don't believe can be integrated to the PC - so I am a bit pissed off about that.

      I don't know about wireless, but certainly a good quality padded, closed back set of phones with a decent retractable boom mic and some way to tie it to the phone as well.

      What I am after is an external sound card - USB or something. The two PCs on my desk have crappy sound cards (most sound cards are crappy) and with decent headphones you can hear all of the internal computer noise unless you bring up the output level to dangerous levels.

      --
      I drink to make other people interesting!
    2. Re:What I really want... by Kadin2048 · · Score: 1

      I think I know the perfect product for you ... get yourself a pair of these. Sure, you'll look like you just walked off the flight deck of the USS Enterprise (the real one), but you can order practically any combination of microphone element and speaker elements you want, with either XLR plugs or bare ends. They have the same amount of noise reduction as their industrial hearing protectors, too. (I use a set of the hearing protectors for handgun shooting, and they do work as advertised.)

      And it just looks so much more serious than those cheesy dictation headsets. When you're wearing one of those things, you mean some sort of business. They even have an accessory so that you can wear your tinted aviator shades at the same time, without carving divots in your head. Or if you feel like doing some desk-chair acrobatics, you can strap it to your face.

      Course, they will set you back about a deuce and a half.

      --
      "Ladies and gentlemen, my killbot features Lotus Notes and a machine gun. It is the finest available."
  17. Use a mic by t0qer · · Score: 5, Interesting

    Just plug a microphone in. Make sure it's sinsoid and not cartoid type, since sinsoid picks up sound in any direction.

    Put on your headphones, then adjust the mic mix till you hear the desired amount of background noise.

    1. Re:Use a mic by dpaton.net · · Score: 4, Informative

      You mean omnidirectional, not sinusoid. Cardoid describes the polar pattern of the mic, and will tend to reject sounds that are behind the mic, like the computer fans.

      -dave

      --
      This is not a sig. this is a duck. quack.
    2. Re:Use a mic by engagebot · · Score: 1

      By the way, its 'cardioid'.

      --
      Han shot first.
    3. Re:Use a mic by dpaton.net · · Score: 1

      Indeed it is. 15 years of studio work banged that into my brain something fierce. Late nights and sleep dep seem to have clobbered by ability to spell.

      Or maybe I've spent too much time reading the /. editor's posts.

      --
      This is not a sig. this is a duck. quack.
  18. Comfort by dimension6 · · Score: 1
    If you're looking into wearing headphones for a long period of time, I would suggest buying a comfortable pair. Perhaps my ears are more sensitive than most, but some headphones I've worn began to hurt after about 30-60 minutes. In light of this, I would suggest the Bang & Olufsen style of headphones (A8). The headphones can be purchased for under $100 on eBay (because they cost around $80 in China/HK, about half what they retail at in the US).

    However, I recently sold the B&O headphones because I found a similar style set with better sound (the A8s really lacked low-end response). If you can find them, I would highly recommend the Amadana PE-117 headphones (Amadana's a Japanese design company). I recently bought these in Japan (had to go to a few stores to find one that actually had them in stock. Bingo! Comfortable, and absolutely terrific sound! Dynamism has them in stock for $160 or so, but I paid about $110 for them in Japan.

    1. Re:Comfort by MooUK · · Score: 1

      Comfort over a long period is vital. I own a set of Sony MDR-V300 'phones (bought for me; I didn't choose them), and I find them uncomfortable fter a while. They squash my ears too much.

      In comparison, the Sennheiser phones we use at the gigs I help run are much more comfortable for long periods.

  19. my experience by jerrol · · Score: 2, Insightful

    I got a pair of Beyerdynamic DT231s from www.headphone.com
    Great service, great price, I reccomend them.

    They've lasted me 3 years of hard use and sound great. I can just make out the phone ringing with them on and music at reasonable levels.

    Office chatter is completely gone. I did have to get one of the monitor mirrors...but I tend to tune out everything when in deep hack mode so it is of limited use.

    --
    Never let your fears overcome your dreams.
    1. Re:my experience by jean-guy69 · · Score: 1

      I second this recommendation, these speakers have one of the best sound amongst the sub-100$ earphones with the grado.

      They are more neutral (so more hi-fidelity) with a frequency response a lot more linear than Koss Porta Pro or AKG 26 P which are bass oriented.

      And they're very comfortable.

      The downside is that with such a better fidelity, badly encoded mp3 will be unbearable.

    2. Re:my experience by dpaton.net · · Score: 1

      My DT770 Pros have the same effect. I get ~15dB of noise reduction, which lets me enjoy the music at a level compatible with a ringing phone or a speaking coworker. The velvet ear pads are removable and washable, and are extrememly comfortable.

      I also make extensive use of my C.H.I.M.P.

      -dave

      --
      This is not a sig. this is a duck. quack.
  20. In-ear headphones by Dr.+Sp0ng · · Score: 1

    If you can stand them, they sound phenomenal. They're basically earplugs with speakers built in, so they block out damn near all external sound by making an airtight seal, and you can keep the volume pretty low as a result. I used them for about a month, before I decided they were too much trouble than they were worth, though. They just wouldn't stay in my ears for extended periods of time.

    Some people swear by them, though, and I can see why - when they're in, they sound great. I think they just didn't fit me right or something.

    1. Re:In-ear headphones by aitikin · · Score: 1

      Really no. They sound like crap compared to a real set of headphones, a set like my HD 497s sound amazingly better than any pair of earbuds I've used. They were $40 or so when I got em. The only in-ears that I think might be better are those Etymotic Research ones, and those are too expensive for me.

      --
      "Don't meddle in the affairs of a patent dragon, for thou art tasty and good with ketchup." ~ohcrapitssteve
    2. Re:In-ear headphones by Baddas · · Score: 1

      The upside to the in-ear phones, as someone said above, is that you can leave one out and get some music while also hearing a knock on your door or the telephone.

  21. Koss Porta Pro by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    superb sound, lifetime waranty

  22. What you're looking for... by Timeburn · · Score: 1

    is a good pair of Open Ear headphones. Sennheiser makes some very good ones. (IMHO The Best)

    I've got an older pair of their higher-end open 'phones, and I can carry on a conversation while music is playing, as long as it isn't too loud. Sound quality is incredible, too. $120 and worth every penny.

    One thing to be careful of, though: Open phones are more prone to leakage the other way too. Turn it up too loud, and you might as well be running desktop speakers.

    --
    "Not one shred of evidence points to the notion that life is serious" -- Samuel Clemens, aka Mark Twain
    1. Re:What you're looking for... by masklinn · · Score: 1

      is a good pair of Open Ear headphones. Sennheiser makes some very good ones. (IMHO The Best)

      This is a very bold declaration here. Sennheiser are probably the most well known cans makers, and they're extremely renowned, but their cans go head to head with Beyerdynamic's and AKG's and they don't always come out at the lead.

      Sennheiser's cans are usually really good (and even then, they also have some crappy stuff), but The Best is quite stretching it.

      --
      "The way we can tell it's C# instead of Haskell is because it's nine lines instead of two." -- wadler
  23. get creative! by fanblade · · Score: 5, Funny

    You could also try some cube modding to find out when people are behind you!

    The low-tech solution is to set up a rear-view mirror. But this is slashdot, so...

    Write an app to lower your volume and/or play a sound when one of the following inputs are detected:

    - your doorbell is pressed
    - your touch-sensitive welcome mat is stood upon
    - your door-mounted IR/laser beam is broken
    - your cube-mounted microphone picks up an audio pattern that matches your "knock-knock" or "ahem" signature.
    - your directional light sensor detects a shadow between it and a certain ceiling light above and outside of your door.
    - your digital IR camera detects a body mass of close to 98.6 degrees fahrenheit standing in the doorway.

    OK, so maybe ALL of these is overkill. But I haven't been snuck up on in years!!!

    1. Re:get creative! by joNDoty · · Score: 3, Funny

      This still leaves us vulnerable to all floating, invisible, cold-blooded eavesdroppers.

      Unless they clear their throat!

    2. Re:get creative! by Detritus · · Score: 1

      Trip flares!

      --
      Mea navis aericumbens anguillis abundat
  24. Audio-Technica ATH-M40fs by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    The Audio-Technica ATH-M40fs are studio-quality headphones that should stand up well against any comparison to Sennheiser or Grado. They don't have that excessive Bass! quality that cheaper headphones tend to emphasize, which I think is a good thing. They should be well under $100, so great bang-for-the-buck. They are not noise-cancelling, but they are closed-back (which I prefer, but open-back may be more appropriate for you).

  25. Use the buds by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Interesting

    I find that wrapping the iPod bud headphone wire over the back of my ear and letting them dangle lets me hear the music fine and still hear my surroundings.

    1. Re:Use the buds by dave420 · · Score: 1

      Those headphones are bad enough when you're wearing them in your ears - the sound must be so tinny with them hovering an inch away it doesn't bear thinking about :-P

  26. DSPs by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Plantronic DSP-500s. I can't say enough about em. Great sound, deep bass if you want it, and perfect for online gaming.

  27. one more requirement you forgot by egburr · · Score: 4, Insightful
    You forgot the requirement that they direct the noise to your ears only and not disturb everyone around you.

    It's amazing how many people think that the cheap earbuds they wear can only be heard by the wearer. Sitting 3-4 feet away, I can often understand every word being sung, at least on those songs where the singer can be understood. With 2 or 3 such people around, I get a headache from the clash of noise.

    In an office setting, with open-top cubicles, sound carries an incredible distance. Try not to irritate your co-workers. Try out the headphones you like, adjust the volume to what you like, then get someone else to wear them while you sit a few feet away and listen while doing other relatively quiet tasks like reading a web page, typing a slashdot post, or playing solitaire. If you can still hear the music, maybe these aren't the right headphones for you after all.

    --

    Edward Burr
    Having a smoking section in a restaurant is like having a peeing section in a swimming pool.
    1. Re:one more requirement you forgot by pilot1 · · Score: 1

      I've never had a problem with earbuds being too loud. I always pay attention to the noise level, and my current ones (the cheap Sony ones that are frequently given out on airline flights) can't be heard 1m from my ear.

      As far as normal headphones go, what brand/model would you recommend for the best direction of noise (so you can hear it, but others can't)?

    2. Re:one more requirement you forgot by lachlan76 · · Score: 1

      I've never understood why people always have to have earphones loud enough that people can hear them from meters away. I can't hear mine (outside my ear, pointed towards the ear) until I'm within 10cm or usually even closer.

    3. Re:one more requirement you forgot by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      tghats because your point little ears are gummed up with ass-juice from whoever's arse your head is up

    4. Re:one more requirement you forgot by MooUK · · Score: 1

      That's the major problem with open-backed headphones - you can hear the environment around you, but the sound from the 'phones can also escape.

    5. Re:one more requirement you forgot by dave420 · · Score: 1

      Even better - insist on closed headphones in your office only. If someone has to hear the cubicle/office in the background, do as other posters have suggested - use a cheap microphone :)

  28. Stick with the earbuds. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Might I point out that the earbuds are pretty unobtrusive (not to mention so ubiquitous you don't even see them any more) and not nearly as anti-social as headphones?

    I obviously don't know what the mood is like where you work, so maybe it's not an issue-- but in my experience large over-the-ear headphones say "leave me alone" to your co-workers (and worse, managers.) Unless you're a sound engineer it's almost never appropriate to drown out the outside world, and even the most even-tempered boss will quickly get annoyed if they have to call your name twice to get your attention.

    If you don't like sticking those things in your ears, how about a decent pair of thin and lightweight external headphones that look like a phone earpiece? A casual observer wouldn't even know you were listening to music at all.

    Oh, and it's not always appropriate to buy one gadget to do everything. A good pair of $50 earbuds for work and a great pair of $50 headphones for gaming may suit your needs a lot more than a $100 pair that does both. You don't need the top of the line to listen to mp3's and game sound effects... If you need a place to start try Radio Shack, headphones are one of the few things they actually do right.

  29. I say go for the PX 100's by kevingolding2001 · · Score: 1
    I have a pair and they are great. Everyone I lend them to is amazed at the sound quality whilst still being able to clearly hear what is going on around.

    I have ended up buying about 4 pairs now just because my girlfriend, brother-in-law, girlfriends aunt, etc. all wanted a pair after they tried mine.

    The ability to fold does not seem to affect the durability as the hinge is metal and quite strong.

  30. Another solution by dbIII · · Score: 1

    Same headphones - just attach a cheap microphone to the audio socket as well, put it where your expect people to enter the cube and adjust your mixer settings appropriately.

  31. buds Vs muffs by RingDev · · Score: 2, Insightful

    When I got the green light to listen to music at work, my first choice was buds. I'm a application developer, and when we moved offices I went from a somewhat annoying (right next to the door) yet quiet (against 2 exterior walls), to a very loud (next to the network support bull pen) cubical. I used the ear buds for a while, but the ambient noise was still adiable unless I really cranked the music, which was just as distracting. I finally dug out an old set of Sony Switchback headphones. Those things are wonderful. Ambient noise gets cut way down, and they have some pretty decent sound quality. As for the cubical tapping, I figure if it's really important, they'll tap louder.

    -Rick

    --
    "Most people in the U.S. wouldn't know they live in a tyrannical state if it walked up and grabbed their junk." - MyFirs
    1. Re:buds Vs muffs by st1d · · Score: 1

      Same here. I did the earbud thing at first, but they had to be up louder, and some days (usually around the end of the week) they would bug me. After a while, I tried a couple different styles, eventually giving up and settling for a pair of back of the head jogging headphones. Not only do they work better as far as filtering out ambient noise while still letting me hear "important" things, I've found they have the added benefit of being a visual clue to others. I don't get bugged as much with petty "quick questions" that have no value, maybe because I look like I'm concentrating harder when I'm punching away at the keyboard or digging through a file, because the hardware is more visible, and the conversations I don't want tend to be shorter, because instead of removing them entirely, I just pop one ear up an inch. Kind of like the international sign for "You're not that important, I'm busy, go away".

      Doesn't always work, but then again, I'm not out $50 bucks for them, either. :)

      --
      Microsoft has just released their much anticipated hands-free cordless mouse. Warning, it may hurt a little at first.
  32. I feel sorry for you by idonthack · · Score: 1

    You must be surrounded by idiots.

    --
    Why is it that when you believe something it's an opinion, but when I believe something it's a manifesto?
  33. Extended Hearing is key by picklepuss · · Score: 2, Informative

    I tried those BOSE noise cancellation headphones on an airplane recently, and after about 2 hours, my ears were really killing me. Not the outside part of the ear (lobe) but my actual eardrums.

    If you're going to have the things on all day long, then think about professionals whose job requires they where headphones all day, every day - studio musicians, engineers, radio announcers, etc.

    When I was in Recording School, I bought a pair of the Ubiquitous AKG K240s. At that time, most recording studios had these in large supply. They are fairly durable, comfortable, and you can listen on them a very long time. I've been using mine over 10 years and they're still in great shape.

    They may look a bit dorky, and they don't fold, but they've survived my cluttered backback on many a trip. At just under $100, they fit in your price range.

    One other thing that's really nice about them... they have an 1/8" jack, and come with a threaded 1/4" adapter. The threaded adapter is priceless if you're contantly plugging your headphones in and out of studio gear.

    1. Re:Extended Hearing is key by farquharsoncraig · · Score: 2, Informative

      Same for the pair of Sony MDR-7506 I got. They are durable, have the threaded 1/4" adapter, are collapsible, and have a convient storage bag. When I went to Musician's Friend to get a pair I brought a recording of some Rimsky-Korsakov since it is generally demanding on the playback medium for audio range and fidelity. These were better quality than almost every other pair in the store for response, range, and clarity. They don't leak much even at moderate listening volume since they are over-the-ear rather than on-top-of-the-ear phones but also allow reasonable hearing of external events. A lot of earphones I've used will start to hurt your ears over extended listening from constant pressure on the pina. These are much more comfortable. So, in short, the parent commentor is wise to reccommend earphones designed for people who must wear them professionally everyday.

  34. Sony MDR Series by dlasley · · Score: 1

    I've had a pair of MDR (the MD5 series) headphones for years, and they do a fair job of filtering noise while still allowing you to hear things like the tap-tap or the shuffle-stop. I know Sony's on the fscker-company list right now because of DRM and DVD wars, but they make a nice affordable set of headphones. Heck, you can always take them back if they don't work for you - might as well try a variety.

    &laz;

    --
    when it rains, it gets real soggy. when it pours, i'm under the tap just _waiting_ for the joy
    1. Re:Sony MDR Series by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Some of the MDR phones are really good - even in the lower price range.

      Sony MDRG82LP + Mic = sweet, cheap setup.. and you won't piss off your cube neighbours (as people cant hear what you're listening to) - then with the mic, add as much background noise as you need from that.

    2. Re:Sony MDR Series by MooUK · · Score: 1

      My MDR-V100 headphones do a reasonable job. However, I find them uncomfortable after a while, and they always seem a bit too bassy. And there's the whole Sony=evil thing. (I didn't choose these; they were bought for me.)

      Even at very low volume levels, however, they block out almost all external sound. Which could be inappropriate in this setting.

  35. PX-100 Reliability by jafo · · Score: 1

    My wife and I have each have a pair of the PX-100s. We've had them for something around 2 years, and have had absolutely no problems with them. You question the robustness of the folding design. These units seem to be extremely solid. Plus, the case they fit in is also quite solid.

    We both carry them in our computer bags, just toss them in and go...

    They sound great, but don't require more power than a typical laptop or portable audio device. I haven't felt like I needed an amp.

    They let you hear a lot of the surrounding sound, particularly if you adjust them to cover more or less of your ears. The only problem I've had is that about once a month whem I'm putting them on, I'll brush the foam ear-pads, and them come off. That's absolutely the only complaint I have, if those stayed on a litter better, I'd be happy.

    I also have a pair of Grado SR-60s, which are not at all as portable and also not as comfortable. The ear cans press on the ears pretty hard, and the temples of my glasses get pressed into my head, so I can only wear them for a bit. They also really could use an amp.

    I'm just purchasing an Etymiotic, the less expensive ones. Found them for around $80. They would not at all be suitable for you, they are heavy isolation, something around 25dB. I'm largely getting them because I wanted something a little bit less bulky, particularly for when I'm walking around and traveling and the like.

    In short, the Sennheisers are great, I'm very happy with them. I don't think you will have any problems with the folding mechanism. They fold easily and are quite portable.

    Sean

  36. Sony MDR-V6 by EdwinBoyd · · Score: 1

    Before you all go apeshit I just want to let you know that these cans were produced in Sony's pre-evil stage. Sony first made them in 1985 and hasn't seen fit to make any changes since (even brand new models come with the same manual from '85).

    They're earmuff style, but they do allow enough ambient noise in that you won't miss much. Just be sure to avoid the MDR-V600s/700s/800s which look almost identical but are a classic example of how quality has slipped at Sony since the 80s.

    I had a bit of trouble finding them until I checked Froogle

    1. Re:Sony MDR-V6 by Chris+Pimlott · · Score: 2, Informative

      I second this. I used to use a pair as my office headphones at my last job. They fulfilled the chief objectives - good sound quality, don't leak sound to the surroundings, comfortable, and cheap enough that I can afford to leave them at the office and not worry too much if they disappear.

      As the poster said, look out for the look-alikes, particularly the V600. It's not the same thing at all. It's well known among enthusiasts that most Sony mass-marketed 'phones are crap, but the V6s are an exception and are well-regarded for their price. In the past, I've picked up good deals on some (gently) used 'phones at headphone forums like Head-Fi and HeadWize. You should be able to find a used pair at around $60, a bit more for new.

    2. Re:Sony MDR-V6 by adpowers · · Score: 1

      I third this. These are probably one of the best pairs you can get in this price range. Myself and a couple of my friends have them. Plus, you get the wonderful 80s aesthetic :).

      Andrew

      PS: I bought mine before the whole $sys$ thing was made public.

    3. Re:Sony MDR-V6 by Chris+Pimlott · · Score: 1

      PS: I bought mine before the whole $sys$ thing was made public.

      Er, what do you mean by this?

    4. Re:Sony MDR-V6 by adpowers · · Score: 1

      The Sony DRM rootkit. I should have just said rootkit, but I forgot what it was called because I'm not really following the story because I'm not on Windows.

    5. Re:Sony MDR-V6 by ajlitt · · Score: 1

      Good call. They allow just enough outside noise in to keep me from appearing deaf, but block out most of the annoying fan noise from machines around me. Sound is really good (studios still use them) and can be driven with most soundcard or MP3 player internal amps. Plus more recently manufactured models (mine are ~4 yrs old and still are in great condition) still come with the big blue-on-gold stickers on the side that say DIGITAL so you can relive the 80's "I don't buy tapes anymore" trend.

    6. Re:Sony MDR-V6 by Chris+Pimlott · · Score: 1

      Oh. Right. That.

      Hmm, I suppose I should be hating Sony for that. But I do need a new pair of V6s...

  37. Guerilla Marketing by SinGunner · · Score: 1

    Am I the only one here who finds this article terribly appropo given Penny-Arcade's recent rants about guerilla marketing? blah balh blah. tin foil hat. blah blha blah.

  38. RE: Grado SR 60 vs. Grado SR 80 by mac.convert · · Score: 2, Informative
    Oh, and don't succumb to the temptation to get the SR-80s just because they've got a higher model number. The 60s are far better for non-amp-driven listening.

    I would disagree with this. I also was looing for high quality headphones awhile ago, and Grado came up in many audiophile circles. The difference between the SR 60's and the SR 80's is that the SR 80's have a better bass response. Emphasise the word "response". This means that if the sound mix on a cd has a lot of low frequencies, it will reproduce them accurately, not "BASS BOOST" them a la Sony. Don't get me wrong, the SR 60's are a great set of phones, but there is a noticable difference in sound quality.

    --
    "Every time a bell rings, a Dell laptop bursts into flame."
  39. Sennheisser HD-515 by harpune · · Score: 1

    I just thought I'd throw in my $0.02. A month or so ago, I bought a pair of Sennheisser HD-515s. They sound to me like just what you are looking for. They are open-ear, so outside noises are audible. They are comfortable (the biggest selling point, for me). I can usually wear them for several hours, with glasses, and they are still bearable to wear. They also sound pretty good, and they were about $80 online (with shipping). If you are an audiophile, there is a higher quality model, the HD-555 that sound better, I guess. I think that's about 20 bucks more. They've served me well, so far.

    --
    Shriver

    And a thousand thousand slimy things
    Lived on; and so did I.
  40. Probably most people here have ADHD! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Seriously, how can people really miss this: "(3) will let me hear the warnings of imminent attack at work by co-workers, and the alerts at my monthly LAN parties from allied gamers.". Mostly everyone here recommends headset that will block out all ambient sounds!

  41. PX-100Ws by Thaelon · · Score: 1

    I have a pair of PX-100Ws (white) and they rock. Amazing bass for headphones. (White was what they had at Best Buy that day.)

    I use them on a daily basis for hours at a time.

    At reasonable volumes or quiet songs you can hear people around you fine.

    I don't know what that guy was complaining about the case being difficult was about. It takes me all of 15 seconds to put them in the case while being careful.

    Another thing I have to comment on is the cord. I don't know what the hell it's made of but it's very kink and twist resistant yet very supple. After being used a lot most headphone cords develop little near-permanent bends in them that cause them to tickle your face when wearing them and other annoying crap. These don't!

    I highly recommend them. I wear them 5 days a week for most of the day and at LAN parties. They're comfortable, sound amazing and aren't excessively overpriced.

    --

    Question everything

  42. Sennheiser HD-485 by chiph · · Score: 1

    I have a previous generation of this model (the HD-470), and it's excellent. I suspect the new one will fit your needs.

    1. It's open-air, so you can hear approaching bosses & coworkers.
    2. It's got surprisingly good bass response for an open-air design.
    3. It's got a long cord (3m), so it can reach the computer under the desk if need be.
    4. Lightweight and comfortable to wear for a couple of hours at a stretch.

    Suggestion: Buy a couple of pairs of replacement ear foams, as they will eventually wear out from use.

    Chip H.

  43. Wireless? by Alizarin+Erythrosin · · Score: 1

    I have the Sennheiser RS 110 model in my lab. Wireless, and open stage so I can still hear people. I have a mirror on the computer monitor, but can usually hear people walk up if I want to (read: volume isn't hella loud). Cost me $80 or so, and I can walk to the john and still hear my music, if I want to. Battery life is pretty good too. I use them almost every [work] day for a few hours and have to replace the batteries about every 2 months or so.

    Great sound, excellent bass response.

    --
    There are only 10 kinds of people in this world... those who understand binary and those who don't
  44. Sennheiser by qengho · · Score: 1

    Sennheiser HD433 that sounds great and is a bargain. Open back, so ambient noise intrudes with volume down. Around 30 bucks, I think.

  45. SR-60 defense by TheStonepedo · · Score: 1

    I can't speak for the other models, but the Grados are only uncomfortable in their shipped shape. You will not break the headband if you flex it to make it wider, and the headphones will be infinitely more comfortable with a normal-sized head after a little bending than before. Regarding portability, the Grado headphones are bulky but damn near bombproof. I have bicycled in the rain with them around my neck and listened to them as soon as I was back indoors. I have thrown them into my backpack between books, and after the foam on the earpieces relaxed back to its normal shape they were ready to go again. I have caught the cord on a door and ripped the earcups clean off of the headband and simply snapped it all back together. Comfort is not a concern if you take the appropriate measures, and if you have sufficient space to transport them they are plenty sturdy to travel.

    --
    I'll be your candy shop of infinite deliciousity if you'll be my discotheque of endless rump-shaking.
  46. ObKentBrockman by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Funny

    I, for one, welcome our floating, invisible, cold-blooded, eavesdropping overlords.

    1. Re:ObKentBrockman by kevingolding2001 · · Score: 1

      Damn! You beat me to it.

  47. Sennheisers are good by springbox · · Score: 1

    I got the PXC250 though. Compared to the Bose noise canceling headphones, they're pretty cheap, and they won't hurt your ears nearly as much. (Plus, they collapse in on themselves making it possible to carry them in your pocket.) I've had these for over a year and the active noise cancelling really does work. The unit will get rid of the low rumbling noises (air conditioners, motors, etc) but doesn't touch most other sounds (like keyboards.) You'll end up listening to your music at a lower volume with the noise cancelling on than off, and you can hear things around you in your environment. I'd recommend waiting a bit to get a pair of headphones with this feature.

  48. You can get noise-reducing white earbuds: by wideangle · · Score: 1

    Sony MDR-EX51LP
    http://www.amazon.com/gp/product/B000779RZU/

    Bought these around Christmas for $19. About the same quality as the original ipod buds, but with noiseproofing. Comes with 3 different size earbud attachments to fit different size ears.

    Mine just went through the laundry and after drying it out for 24 hours, still works.

    1. Re:You can get noise-reducing white earbuds: by loraksus · · Score: 2, Informative

      NO! No, No!
      These earbuds (along with the MDR-EX51LPs) suffer from a very serious defect - the cords turn gummy and then dissolve after a matter of months, exposing the bare wires (and then breaking shortly thereafter) - usually right after the 90 day warranty expires. Don't trust me, go on amazon and read the reviews. Virtually every one posted after March 2005 is negative (yet Amazon keeps the high rated reviews up, but that is a different story)

      Sony has known about this issue for quite some time (the problems started happening a year or so), but keeps selling this defective product. Shocking, given their terrific history, eh?

      This isn't to say that they sound really good and block a lot of sound, but they just don't last.
      AVOID and get a pair of some of the other ones in this thread (the shures seem to be popular)

      --
      1q2w3e4r5t6y7u8i9o0pqawsedrftgthyjukilo;p'azsxdcfv gbhnjmk,l.;/
    2. Re:You can get noise-reducing white earbuds: by Dahamma · · Score: 1

      What? This is a huge exaggeration.

      I have had my Sony earbuds for about 2 years and they are still in perfect shape. I have recommended them to 2 other co-workers, both of whom have owned them for almost a year and still love them. I bought some for my mom last year, she thinks they are a huge improvement in comfort and a decent improvement in sound over the stock iPod's.

      The nice thing about these compared to many other earbuds (at least 3 I have tried) is they are really comfortable over a relatively long listening session. You can wear them for hours at a time and they don't hurt your ears. Now, I'm not saying earbuds worn over several hours (especially with the volume way up) don't DAMAGE your EARDRUMS, they just don't hurt your ears...

      Like any product, I'm sure there are people who have bad experiences, but *my* experience is 4/4 in customer satisfaction... especially for the price!

    3. Re:You can get noise-reducing white earbuds: by frenchs · · Score: 1

      Yup, I've got a pair and mine took about 6 months to completely go to hell. I hadn't heard that this was a chronic problem, but I can't say I'm suprised.

      I called Sony and made sure to at least take a few minutes of their time to tell them how crappy they were and see if I could somehow get a new pair. They offered to replace them with a refurb copy for a fee, I can't recall exactly, but it was in the neighborhood of $30. I told them to suck it, cause there was no way I was paying $30 bucks for refurb in ear headphones.

      They were replaced with some black shure e2c headphones instead. The *only* thing I miss about the sony ones is the super short cord. It was handy when I wanted to wear my shuffle at the gym, and didn't want a ton of extra cord getting in the way.

      -s

    4. Re:You can get noise-reducing white earbuds: by loraksus · · Score: 1

      Had you actually read my post, you would of have seen "the problems started happening a year or so". Up to that point the cords had no problems (and I still have a pair of these from back then). Then Sony changed something (I recall hearing something about moving manufacturing from Korea to China) and turned a quality product into shit. If you can get an old set, they are great, but the news ones are crap.
      Like I said, read the reviews on amazon, etc.
      BTW, the 51s seem to have more of a problem than the 71s, but both exhibit the same problem. Only difference I can see is the cord is a bit longer.

      --
      1q2w3e4r5t6y7u8i9o0pqawsedrftgthyjukilo;p'azsxdcfv gbhnjmk,l.;/
    5. Re:You can get noise-reducing white earbuds: by wideangle · · Score: 1

      Read about that that cord problem before buying them. Apparently it doesn't happen to *everyone*. You'd think it might after going through the wash in hot water with extra-strength Tide but it didn't.

      Will post back here if it ever occurs.

  49. find some good open air cans by viperstyx · · Score: 1

    you basically want some open air cans. troll around head-fi.org for a while and you'll definitely find some. also, check out headroom (headphones.com or something, im not sure, google it). they have great, mostly unbiased reviews of all the headphones they sell. you're sure to find something for yourself.

  50. Koss Porta-Pro. by mbourgon · · Score: 1

    Koss Porta-Pro. $30. You can still hear everything around you, the foam pads are cushy and won't make your ears sweat, and the quality is better than anything shy of the Grado SR-60 or the $100 Sennheisers.

    --
    "Sometimes a woman is a kind of religion, she can save your soul & set you free from all your sins" - Bad Examples
    1. Re:Koss Porta-Pro. by ebbe11 · · Score: 1

      I second that. The only downside is that the foampads wear out. I'm on my second set of Portapros because I couldn't get a new set of foampads for the first set when they wore out.

      --

      My opinion? See above.
    2. Re:Koss Porta-Pro. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Aren't they still garanteed for life?

    3. Re:Koss Porta-Pro. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      No need to buy new headphones when the foampads crumble to dust, get them here or at your well-stocked hi-fi dealer's.

      I actually own three PortaPros (a question of convenience) and I think they're worth every penny. One of these even replaced an expensive set of Grados which I used with my home stereo. They're about the only headphones to which I can listen for several hours in a row without discomfort (I wear glasses and set the "Comfort Zone" sliders to "Light" on both sides).

    4. Re:Koss Porta-Pro. by ebbe11 · · Score: 1
      No need to buy new headphones when the foampads crumble to dust, get them here or at your well-stocked hi-fi dealer's

      I live in Denmark so the former option is unfortunately not viable. But yesterday I finally got around to going to the one dealer in Copenhagen that sells new foampads. For about a tenth of the price of a new set of PortaPros I now have a set that is as good as new. Joy! :-)

      --

      My opinion? See above.
  51. Cube doorbell. by serial_crusher · · Score: 1
    I spent a lot of time googling for single button USB device to use as a doorbell. It would be a great product. Configure it to play a sound, flash a message on the screen, hide your pr0n. Whatever you need.

    If only I weren't so lazy.

  52. Koss clip style earphones by Ezzelin · · Score: 1

    Get these--great audio quality, and open design. http://www.koss.com/koss/kossweb.nsf/p?openform&pc ^sc^KSC75

  53. Headphones by jkirby · · Score: 1

    I just got (like three days ago) the Plantronics 590A headphones. They are bluetooth and do not cancel ambient noise. They are spectacular! The kit comes with the base station charger (about 10 hours per charge), a bluetooth dongle, a USB charger, AC charger and an optional headphone cable for in-flight use; with this cable inserted, the bluetooth radio is disabled.

    You can pair it with your cell phone or PC and use the dongle at the same time. When an call comes in, the music is canceled and the headphones switch to the phone.

    The sound quality is amazing!

    --
    Jamey Kirby
  54. I second the Grados by John+Nowak · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Best headphones under $100, hands down. If you'd don't believe me, STOP ASKING FOR HEADPHONE ADVICE ON SLASHDOT and go listen to a pair.

    1. Re:I second the Grados by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Thirded on Grados (I have the SR-125s myself, which are IMHO very good). O'course, there are holy wars about headphones. This is the wrong place to get an opinion; try head-fi or something (and wade through the audiophiles with care). :)

      The comfort of Grados bothers some people, but they wear into you (bend it out a bit; and you either get used to bowlpads or you don't, but they sound way better), trust me on this.

      They look a tad M.A.S.H. Not the most stylish in the world. But they sound incredible.

      They're "open" too, so don't block any background noise; you should be able to hear perfectly well with them on, as long as your music's not too loud (wouldn't be a good idea with headphones that good, you might not realise how loud you have it, so take care), but they sound good enough that they don't have to be loud to make out the music.

      Slightly above your price range. Best advice is try some out, see how you get on with the quality. ...and yeah, this whole thread does seem a bit disappointingly astroturfy. Maybe P-A is just making me paranoid though... hmm...

    2. Re:I second the Grados by Toothpick · · Score: 1

      I fourth the Grados. I'm on my second pair of SR-60s. The first didn't wear out, a friend liked them so much I had to let him have them.

      They go in my laptop bag everywhere. Absolutely the best sound you can get under $100, comfort and style be damned.

  55. I HIGHLY recommend either KSC 75 or GRADO SR60 by uuhawky · · Score: 1

    The KSC75 are possibly the best 50$ (they cost like 20$) headphones you can get, followed by the Grado's which are just a bit over 50$ if I recall correctly. In fact, the KSC75 actually sound better than the Bose Triports. good luck!

  56. How about some other hack ... a "doorbell"? by Kaz+Kylheku · · Score: 1

    Suppose your cubicle had a push button which would mix an alert sound into your headphones.

    Shouldn't be hard to cob together. Read it through the parallel port, use the appropriate API to make a sound.

    Then get yourself some decent headphones that block the noise out, and keep the sounds in.

  57. Sony MDR-V6 by whereiseljefe · · Score: 1

    SUPER Durable (yaaah they fold but), excellent audio clarity...

    Froogle Results...

    --
    http://www.andrewsmcmeel.com/godsdebris/
  58. The Sennheiser gear is great! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I've had a pair of folding Sennheiser head phones for almost 2 years. I use them nearly every day, and keep them folded up in my jacket pocket when not using them. They are strong and high quality, not flimsy junk. The quality is amazing (even better with ALAC format). Great bass, beats the hell out of buds anyday.

  59. Re:smoking section by dibbs_online · · Score: 1

    Having a smoking section in a restaurant is like having a peeing section in a swimming pool.

    The peeing section is a lot warmer than the smoking section.

  60. A few recommendations by jumpfroggy · · Score: 1

    (Links at the bottom)

    I've been using a cheap pair of Sony behind-the-ear's at work for a while. Easy to put on, decent sound (little muddy), cheap, and doesn't look like my other phones. At home it's Sennheiser HD497's, incredible sound (good alternative to Grado SR-60's I hear). The 497's are about 60-70, and they're open design so you can basic hear everything around you not muffled at all. Same with the sony behind-the-ears, you can still hear around you and you can simply pause the music to hear people.

    I tried the Sennheiser PXC-250's, same physical design as the 100's but with active noise cancelling. Even with the noise canceling *off*, the phone physically blocked out a lot of noise (surprisingly). Good for music, bad for coworkers.

    Personally, I'd got with behind the ear Koss porta pro's (KSC55's probably). They're slightly less intrusive than over-the-head phones, that series of koss's are supposed to be the best bargain phones (ie. under $30), and they're really easy to pull down to your neck when a coworker wants to talk. That's important, as at my 1 year review one of my feedback from coworkers was "he's always wearing his headphones". Programming for 8-10 hours straight in the only office in the building without a window of any kind? Heck yes. I'm still going to wear phones, but I have to be careful not to appear "unapproachable" to the higher-ups. Aww, screw it. I'm doing important work, they don't need to disturb me.

    (I think it's outside the scope of the OP's requirements, but I can't say enough about the HD497's. Music sounds incredibly different listened with those compared to cheap phones, cars, computer speakers, etc. There's just a whole lot more there that you never realized. Love it, I want to listen to music all over again just in these phones.)

    Sony MDR-G52LP's, $20, ok but not as good as the Koss (so I've heard). Little muddy.

    Koss KSC55, ~$20, behind the ear, titanium diaphram, cheap and good

    Grado SR-60's, ~$70, bigger over the head, "best under $100"-kine (open design, can hear everything)

    Sennheiser HD497's, ~$70, more bigger over the head, "the other best under $100"-kine (open design, can hear everything)

    *Don't pay attention to frequency response numbers, 20-20000hz. Means nothing. Go try some phones, goto the Apple store and plug your personal ipod into the bose triports and listen to something you know well. If you're not rushed, you might notice a big difference.

    1. Re:A few recommendations by riker1384 · · Score: 0

      The HD-497 is very detailed and has good bass, but it's a bit distant and dry in the midrange. I haven't compared it to the competition. It does certainly have a LOT more detail than cheap headphones or speakers.

  61. Use a mic by bain_online · · Score: 1

    I do this regularly at work, i just keep a omnidirectional mic attached and unmuted while i have my headphones on...
    I can actually then select levels of alertness according to my mood, by changing mic gain.

    --
    BAIN http://www.devslashzero.com
  62. Instead of headphones by Cyberllama · · Score: 1

    Just buy a microphone and unmute it. Then you'll get all that lovely background noise while you listen . . .

  63. Get px100s! by v1z · · Score: 1

    I've had my px100s for close to 2 years now, and they're still fine. I use them both at home with a small head-amp, and when I'm out and about, with various portable audio sources. They've survived roadtrips, econnomy airtravel and generally rough treatment.

    I think you'd be hard pressed to find a more comfortable, well-sounding set in the same price-range. They're really light, and can be comfortably worn for 20 hours at a time (gaming anyone ? ;-).

    If you're *really* worried about durability, get a pair of Koss porta-pros. They don't sound as neutral (bit too much bass IMNHO), but they come with a lifetime warranty. I think you're more likely to develop hearing dammage with the Portapros, though, due to the slight bass emphasis. Still, listen to both at a hi-fi store, and decide for yourself.

    Both are reasonably priced, has decent sound and are open, so you can hear what's happening around you. I personally prefer my px100 over Koss, but listen to both. Depending on audio source, and amplifier I would have to change to head-phones 10 times the price to hear any real difference. They're miles ahead of regular cheap headphones though. I've also listened to the Grado SR 80, and I'd take my px100s over SR 80 any day.

    I recommend getting a headphone amplifier for use at work, especially if you're getting the px100s or a pair "hi-fi" headphones with similarily high impendance. You have to hear the difference to believe it.

    On a side note, I sadly had to give up using my px100s when I got my new mp3 playing phone; the cheap amplifier in the Sony Ericsson w800 is unable to drive them, resulting in the sound breaking up (I got similar noise every time the battery in my portable cd player was about to give out).

    Check out the buyers guide at http://headphone.com/ -- I think it's very good, especially considering it's a webshop. Also stop by the forums at http://head-fi.org/ for some good reviews.

    And, finally, if you've become a unlimited budget hi-fi maniac, stop by http://headamp.com/ and get a serious amp for your phones... I'd like one, but for now I'm stuck with a cheap amplifier. It's still *way* better than just plugging into line out in the back of your pc.

  64. The PX100 cord is absolutely phenomenal. by pelrun · · Score: 1

    Apparently the cable is reinforced with kevlar... whether that is true or not I couldn't say. But they're definitely the lightest, strongest, most flexible headphone cable I have ever seen.

    Mine has lasted well over a year now with no sign of wear.

    Practically all of my old (usually cheap) headphones developed serious problems with broken wires in the cables, but my PX100s look like they will last for freaking ever :)

  65. Why stop at a doorbell? by Kadin2048 · · Score: 1

    If you're going to do that, why not attach it to a large LED display, and let everyone who wants to talk to you "Please Take a Number?" :)

    Then when you feel like turning around, you just work your way down the queue. I know I'd be loads more productive if this were the case.

    --
    "Ladies and gentlemen, my killbot features Lotus Notes and a machine gun. It is the finest available."
  66. Grado SR-80s by Kadin2048 · · Score: 2, Informative

    I agree with you on the Grados in general, but I disagree about the SR80s not being worth it.

    I went down to my local hifi shop (you must buy Grados from an authorized distributer or else no warranty) to get the 60s and just on a lark did a 'blind test' of the 60s and 80s and I thought there was a very noticable difference in sound. I think the difference may be mostly due to the different ear ear surrounds and cushioning, although I suppose it could be the cable as well. The differences between the 60s and 80s are that the 80s have a 4-conductor cable and different foam pads, and are made in the Grado factory in Brooklyn; the 60s have a 2-conductor cable and are made on contract in either China or Taiwan, I forget which.

    I'm not quite sure what you mean about "non-amp-driven" listening ... I challenge you to find a source that will drive 32 ohm headphones that's not driven by an amplifier (a really big crystal radio?). I'm assuming you were referring to external amplifier, but as they're both 32-ohm/98-dB-SPL@1mv cans, I don't think that there's any reason why you'd want to use an amp on the 80s and not the 60s.

    At any rate, I've used the Grados with the Headwise 'cmoy' amp, and I didn't think the difference in sound quality was that dramatic at the volumes that you'd want to use in an office environment. I don't know how the amplification stages are in the OP's portable player, but the iPod gets my Grados uncomfortably loud without any distortion that I can hear.

    I think the real deciding factor between the 60s and 80s is whether a person thinks they can treat them well enough and not destroy them. If you're going to throw them in a bookbag or something, or run the cord over with your desk chair -- don't get either, go down to WalMart and get a pair of whatever trash Sony is making this week. If you're ready to put a little money into something that you'll probably be able to enjoy for a few years assuming you take care of them, I think the extra money for the 80s is justified.

    --
    "Ladies and gentlemen, my killbot features Lotus Notes and a machine gun. It is the finest available."
  67. Cord length is variable, and should be. by Stormbringer · · Score: 1

    You should know that you can buy or build an extension cable for the headphone cord. The extra length means that you can route the cable to fit your workspace, rather than having to deal with a cord which is stretched across the most annoying part of your keyboard. The extra length is also insurance against tugging the headphone cord leads loose within the plug, or (worse) within the headphone set itself. The thinner and more limply flexible the headphone cord is, the thinner and more fragile the individual copper strands within it are likely to be; minimizing wear and tear on them is common sense.

    Form a loose knot with the two cables around the junction of the plug and the inline jack, and they won't pull apart. Keep the headphone cord up off the floor, and it'll be the extension cable that takes the punishment from having the desk chair's rollers pass over it. When it breaks down, either shorten it to remove the damaged part (if you're handy with a soldering iron and your time is cheap), or buy a new one.
    If the longer run of the combined cables picks up buzz, look into getting a shielded extension cable (the cheap ones aren't).

    In my experience, cord problems start much earlier than ear-cushion problems, though I've had those too. YMMV; I might just be a more abusive user.

  68. Lower End Sony's by damnal · · Score: 1

    I'm currently using a pair of these (Sony MDR-V250V). Picked them up for $40CND and they work well both at work and at home. Loud enough that I can hear alerts and music, quiet enough that I can hear it when a coworker needs me. (For some reason I can't hear the wife with them on, or so she claims).

    These things are comfortable to wear compared to the mid-range ($60) earbuds I was using before, and they sound better.

  69. Bluetooth intercom (off-topic) by Myself · · Score: 1

    Even spookier, the Bluetooth spec already defines an Intercom Profile for cases like this. Some headsets already support pairing to each other for use as short-range walkie talkies, such as a motorcycle driver and rider communicating between their helmets.

    The trouble is, it doesn't seem widely implemented, because there's not much profit motive to do so. If there were a widely-publicized project that used these capabilities, it might spur manufacturers into supporting the odd little features...

  70. Nah. by Kadin2048 · · Score: 1

    Real Men use uncontrolled-mode claymore AP mines.

    You do go through a lot of interns this way, though.

    --
    "Ladies and gentlemen, my killbot features Lotus Notes and a machine gun. It is the finest available."
  71. PX100s are awesome, also PXC250 by metamatic · · Score: 1

    The PX100s are great, they come with a hard protective case but I don't use it and they haven't broken.

    The PXC250s are also good, basically PX100s with added active noise reduction. It'll filter out machine fan noise, but you'll still be able to hear people just fine.

    I was somewhat embarrassed to discover that I preferred the sound of my PX100s to my full-size Sennheisers...

    --
    GCHQ Quantum Insert installed. If only our tongues were made of glass, how much more careful we would be when we speak
  72. wearing grados and glasses by bodrell · · Score: 1
    I love mine, in general, but since they go over your ears, they can pinch your glasses between your ears and your head. The sound is great, and I like the design, as well. I like how they can lay flat in my desk drawer when I'm not using them. You won't be able to listen to 128 kbps mp3s with these, however, because you can hear every little artifact of the compression.

    I looked around web review sites extensively before purchasing mine; the criterion was the best headphones for under $100. Any audiophiles know why they call headphones "cans"? All the reviewers talked about how great these "cans" were for the price.

    --
    Si la vida me da palo, yo la voy a soportar Si la vida me da palo, yo la voy a espabilar
    1. Re:wearing grados and glasses by jZnat · · Score: 1

      Probably because they don't noise cancel and the sound coming from the headphones sounds hollow as if it were coming from a can. Nothing to worry about, but audiophiles tend to make a big deal about things like that regardless of the listening situation; I know I normally would, but I'm at least more sympathetic to the situation at hand.

      --
      'Yes, firefox is indeed greater than women. Can women block pops up for you? No. Can Firefox show you naked women? Yes.'
  73. Sennheiser Px100 by Java+Ape · · Score: 1
    I'm currently using the Sennheiser PX 100's the original poster inquired about, and I find them excellent for portable listening on my laptop. They're comfortable, surprisingly durable, and have excellent sound in a small package. However, these are my travel 'phones, and I have a couple of other suggestions for in-cube listening.

    I have a pair of Sennheiser HD580's that I use in the office. They're a bit pricey, but they are PERFECT for office use. Very comfortable, impeccable sound quality, and just enough ambient bleed to prevent me from ignoring my boss when she enters my cube. If you can spare the bucks, these are HIGHLY recommended.

    If you work in a noisy office, I would also consider a set of sound-canceling headphones. I used to work near a woman who spent all day on the phone and had the most raucous bray, er laugh, I've ever heard. I bought a set of Sony noise-canceling headphones (right about $100 if memory serves) and was amazed at what a good job they did of shutting her up so I could work. I used to leave the headphones on in "noise-canceling" mode even when I wasn't listening to music just to quiet her down. Well worth the investment, although they broke in about a year.

    One final suggestion, others have remarked on the use of cube-mirrors etc to see who's sneaking up on you. I found a more subtle solution is to frame a dark print (I use space art by Ziemanski) with a glass face, and hang it jut to the side of your monitor. It looks classy, and functions as a rather large and wide-angle rear-view mirror if your cube lights are down.

  74. Over the shoulder webcam by GreenSwirl · · Score: 1

    I got moved into a cubicle where there is contant traffic behind me. I tried a mirror, but the angle was too small. Now I have a webcam on top of one of my monitors and I keep a little rear-view window open in the corner of the screen. At first, I expanded the image to take up the whole 2nd screen, but people were too fascinated by it and would stare at themselves as they went by. Now I keep the window to about 3 inches wide so I can view it but it is not so obvious to passers-by. Works great, and I can videochat with the GF with it, too. Also, when I'm home sick or whatever, I can RDC to my desktop and see the office. ---- To stay on topic, I use noice-cancelling headphones plugged into my desktop PC. If hearing the office was a problem, I could just send my microphone signal to the headphones. Also, you could use the motion-detection feature of most webcam softwares to alert you when someone comes up behind you.

    1. Re:Over the shoulder webcam by rhandir · · Score: 1

      I saw a demo of someone who was using the webcam feed as their desktop. (Complete with a nifty photograph of their desktop blending into the background!) I think it may have been an experimental window interface hacked into OSX? Have you heard of this one, or can you think of some google search terms that might find it? My google-fu is weak today.

      -r.

  75. Just do what I did by Tweekster · · Score: 1

    and get moved downstairs...now I have speakers and can have tunes going all day long without a problem. I am at work so the volume doesnt need to be that loud to begin with, just something to get rid of background noise and to work to .

    --
    The phrase "more better" is acceptable English. suck it grammar Nazis
  76. SR-80s by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0


    If you do have a good quality, well-powered output, the SR-80's will be fine and probably a bit more comfortable. You might want to change the pads, you might not - you'll find out when you try them (there are a few different types available). Mine are plugged directly into an RME HDSP Multiface, no amp, and they sound excellent.

  77. oh, so easy ... by freaker_TuC · · Score: 1
    1. Get amp and pair of speakers; 250watt should do it
    2. Get Babble
    3. Connect to your amp & turn wide open (*)
    4. Profit

    (atleast the shop where you bought the amp/pair of speakers had profit)


    (*) The submitter is not responsible for any happening damages when not high enough in your business hierarchy system.

    --
    --- I am known for the ones who want to find me on the net. Is that a privacy risk or a privilege? One might wonder..
  78. Hack your headphones for comfort by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I have a pair of SR-60's, and they are indeed great.

    The only drawback (besides the open-ness, which the poster was specifically asking for) is that they're uncomfortable. Yeah, even hardcore Gradophiles have to admit this.

    But this is not a reason to buy something else! Buy the Grados, and then go buy some cheap replacement pads for some Sony headphones (or whatever floats your boat). You'll still be well under budget.

    I'm surprised that more people on slashdot (of all places) don't mention hacking their headphones. There's even a Grado hacking underground, for the tweaker in you.

  79. sourcing from an mp3 player != poor quality by koax · · Score: 1

    Admittedly, uber-high fidelity requires something along the lines of a high quality DAC or dedicated source components, but just below this is a very large range of very good sounding devices.

    The Cowon/iAudio X5 and longer-life-battery version, the X5L is widely accepted to have the highest audio quality output of any HD-based portable music player (search Hydrogen Audio). It's a true iPod killer. In addition to mp3, it supports ogg vorbis(up to -q 10) and FLAC and a bunch of other codecs. It's got audio recording and mpeg4 video playback too. (not that I'd ever watch videos on a screen an inch by an inch, but whatever.) Hot, hot stuff.

    Even the best ear buds sound ass-y compared to real headphones. I recommend kicking the earbud habit toot sweet. You just paid 300+ bucks for a sweet portable music player, don't skimp on the earphones man. I'm a big fan of AKG's line when it comes to headphones. The K240S would be a good semi-isolating design. They let enough sound in to detect approaching coworkers, and are designed to take a lot of abuse (taking them on and off, table knocks, etc.) The K501 sounds absolutely magical, but it leaks some sound out, it bothering your cube neighbors is a concern. The upside is that their fully open design allows a full natural conversation to be possible without taking them off. Whatever you do, don't get the closed K270 cans. They sound like crap and are way fatiguing due to the excessive bass, and they don't even isolate that well. For a completely isolating and highest-fidelity design, I recommend the Etypotic E4P. The E4P's are "canalphones" (as in you stick them in your ear), but their $200 audio quality is second to none short of spending $500. Then just like other people mentioned, get a mirror to see approaching coworkers. There will be no taps on the wall, as they leak no sound, and even if they did, you wouldn't hear them. ;-)

    I have owned all of these headphones, but I haven't bought the X5L yet. Soon though, soon. Good luck!