Slashdot Mirror


Fired for Solitare At Work

schlick writes "The Associated Press is carrying a story about a NYC employee fired after Mayor Michael Bloomberg noticed a game of solitare on the employee's desktop at work." From the article: "Greenwood, who earned $27,000 a year and had worked in the office for six years, said in a telephone interview that he limited his play time to his one-hour lunch or during quick breaks when he needed a moment of distraction. 'It wasn't like I spent hours and hours a day playing, because I had plenty to do,' Greenwood said. 'If I had been working at something exhaustively for two hours, I might get a cup of coffee and play for a minute but then go right back to my work.'"

60 of 680 comments (clear)

  1. If they enforced this by trickonion · · Score: 5, Funny

    If they enforced this I think about 99% of the slashdotters would be fire. I know I'd be 0wned

    --
    I got you an Andes mint, but it melted in my pocket
    1. Re:If they enforced this by slashbob22 · · Score: 5, Insightful

      I think you're right. There are a lot of people within the slashdot community which probably would loose their jobs if their Resource Use Agreement was enforced. I know I could end up in hot water one day for it. Thankfully I have an excuse, albeit weak, that I am monitoring IT trends - which loosely couples with my position.

      I would personally like to see a study on how many people are compliant with their agreements. From a survey of my cube-buddies; I know we would all fail. At the same time, I don't usually stop for lunch, so I don't see the harm in taking a thought-break - without which, I am sure my productivity would drop.

      --
      Proof by very large bribes. QED.
    2. Re:If they enforced this by Ucklak · · Score: 3, Funny

      1 word....

      soduko

      --
      if you steal from one source, that is plagiarism, if you steal from many, well, that's just research.
    3. Re:If they enforced this by hdparm · · Score: 5, Insightful

      If this is a policy at NYC, the whole desktop management team should have been fired too, for leaving the game available for users.

    4. Re:If they enforced this by Catbeller · · Score: 3, Insightful

      You have to love it, Canadian person. Look at the postings on this page; they are siding WITH THE MAYOR against one of their own. That's where our unions are.

      I've been immersed in this culture my whole life, and it takes a short shock of outside air to look at it anew. We've a country that hates "socialism" so much that they organize to keep inions OUT of their workplace. The salaries shrink, pensions disppear, healthcare is repeatedly slashed for current employees and denied to new, "temporary" employees who never will become permanent. And they will side with the employers every time.

      There's a book, "What's the Matter with Kansas?", which, altho not really being about Kansas, addresses this all-pervasive phenomenon here in the south. Wage slaves vote against their own interests, and those of the families, because of their distaste of "socialism" and "big government".

      It's a waterfall to the bottom of the gorge. The center ain't holding, and we're all being flushed, except for the very tippy top of the social scale, which is swimming in money and will pretty much own everything.

      Got any room up there for expats? I'm thinking WAY up north, given the warming to come. A place without cameras on every street, a scenario the Mayor of Chicago is bringing to fruition. Our new transit passes will track our movements, we're to be watched at all times, they're reading our email and listening to our phones down here. I didn't waste all that time growing up to live in a prison populated by cowards overseen by the paranoid and greedy.

    5. Re:If they enforced this by operagost · · Score: 3, Funny

      I just can't believe that this guy's been working at the same job in NEW YORK and only makes $27,000! A newly-hired custodian makes more than that! Bloomberg may have done him a favor.

      --

      Gamingmuseum.com: Give your 3D accelerator a rest.
    6. Re:If they enforced this by networkBoy · · Score: 3, Insightful

      ironically though, spending hours on /. is less likely to get you canned than 1 min of solitare. Why? because it's not a "game" so the PHB is less wise of it.
      -nB

      --
      whois gawk date unzip strip find touch finger mount join nice man top fsck grep eject more yes exit umount sleep dump
    7. Re:If they enforced this by StarKruzr · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Basically, the guy got really unlucky and got made an example of. I hope he finds some way to get compensation, but it isn't likely.

      --

      +++ATH0
    8. Re:If they enforced this by platypus · · Score: 5, Funny

      Heh, we are reading "stuff that matters".
      Nobody gets fired for that!

    9. Re:If they enforced this by Voltageaav · · Score: 3, Interesting

      Yeah, here where I work, Slashdot is one of the VERY few nongovernment sites not blocked. Even some sites relavant to my work are banned. Even my personal webpage is blocked after two visits to it for links.

      --
      Someone save me from this sanity.
    10. Re:If they enforced this by BigGerman · · Score: 3, Insightful

      yes I used to wonder why that was. Not-blocking Slashdot is very typical for all kinds of sensitive sites I worked at: defence contractors, three-letter agencies, etc. Then I realized: security folks and sysadmins have to read something too.

  2. Terms of use by Unknown_monkey · · Score: 5, Interesting

    What was his computer policy at work? If I do it, I'm fired if they want to enforce it.

    1. Re:Terms of use by Mrs.+Grundy · · Score: 5, Insightful

      I'm sure a lot of places of similar policies. To me, though, the disconcerting part of this story isn't that someone got fired for playing solitaire, it's that the mayor came in and fired somebody of whose work performance he was ignorant based on one impression. This guy could have been the most productive person in the building for all the mayor knew. If I was in charge of this employee I would have been seriously pissed if someone came in and decided to fire my employee. It's arrogance and micromanagement taken to an extreme height. On the other hand it appears this guy new the mayor was coming to shake his hand and have a photo taken and left the game up--that's really not so bright.

    2. Re:Terms of use by gswallow · · Score: 5, Insightful

      Oh come on.

      The frickin' MAYOR is coming to your office. Not of Paducah, KY, but of New York City. He probably hasn't been there for three years. Don't you think you'd better make yourself a little more presentable?

      --
      Diplomacy is the art of saying "nice doggy" until you can find a rock.
    3. Re:Terms of use by Billly+Gates · · Score: 4, Interesting

      I work in a different industry but its like this where I work.

      I do I.T. work at an amusement park but I also drive trams when its busy because its what I did before I got promoted. Anyway the CEO here has fire d people for sitting down at work and for even using a cell phone in a private break area away from guests. No cells allowed nor is looking like your not working in front of guests allowed. Cells outside of the public are allowed but its different when he is around. Even though I work in IT, I was asked by him why I was not picking cigarette butts where I was volunteering to work (clearing trams). I would have been termed onsite and to me its silly but that is just business as usual.

    4. Re:Terms of use by CustomDesigned · · Score: 4, Insightful
      Two of my clients had a no games policy. However, they had me remove all games from the computers. This way, there was no temptation. One went further, and had me install squid with a list of approved websites needed for business. Everything else was blocked.

      It really is unreasonable to have such policies without some kind of technical help to enforce them. It doesn't need to be bullet proof - it just makes things easier for the employees honestly trying to follow the policy.

      A related issue is the monthly limit on total bytes transferred with my cable company TOS. I wouldn't mind it, if only they provided a meter on their website somewhere where I could see how much I had left for the month. Without that, I am just guessing and hoping they don't get strict on me all of a sudden. I know I could build a system to track it myself using iptables - but haven't got around to it yet.

    5. Re:Terms of use by Bad+D.N.A. · · Score: 4, Insightful

      ...has fired people for sitting down at work and for even using a cell phone in a private break area away from guests.

      Sounds to me like it's time to get a new job.

      If you are good at what you do, then why are you putting up with these kind of working conditions?

      My recomendation is to quit NOW

      --
      "Truth is much too complicated to allow anything but approximations"
    6. Re:Terms of use by Midnight+Warrior · · Score: 5, Insightful

      If a big-time politician came wandering through my cube, (and a couple have) you have two obligations: clean up your desk, and greet the distinguished visitor with a smile. If your boss asked you to work during the tour, let's not be an idiot about it - find some work, or at least repeat some work you've already done. The VIP doesn't know the difference. "Sir, I'm working on an analysis of the workload levels of the T&M contractors the city hires to see if we're getting a good return on our contracts." Never mind it was something you did 3 months ago.

      Oh, and don't act like you aren't the BOFH that opens up old network statistics charts or network snoops, pouring over them when the big boss comes in. "Sir, I'm tracking through some anomalous network activity our SOA layer got during last night's advertising during the Olympics opening ceremony."

      Anybody caught doing something stupid when a VIP is in the room deserves what they get. It's like seeing a cop in the median a mile ahead and then getting the bright idea to shift four lanes of traffic and pass on the right. You're begging for it. "My cell phone rang and I was just trying to honor good road safety rules, officer." Yeesh.

    7. Re:Terms of use by PsiPsiStar · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Your eating fast food doesn't give me diabetes.

      I'm fine with laws that protect people from each other. I'm against laws that attempt to protect people from themselves. Seems simple enough to me.

      at least smoking tends to kill quickly.
      Emphysema and heart disease are slow enough.

      --

      ___
      It's the end of my comment as I know it and I feel fine.
    8. Re:Terms of use by Martz · · Score: 3, Funny

      Ob. Bill Hicks Quote:

      'Hicks, how come you're not working.'
      I'd go, 'There's nothing to do.'
      'Well, you pretend like you're working.'
      'Well, why don't you pretend I'm working? Yeah, you get paid more than me, you fantasise. Pretend I'm mopping. Knock yourself out. I'll pretend they're buying stuff; we can close up. I'm the boss now, you're fired. How's that? I'm on a fucking roll. We're all millionaires and you're dick. I'm pretending shit, I'm wacky, I can't be stopped.'

      I don't know if I have the right attitude for the workplace.

  3. strangely quiet by mgabrys_sf · · Score: 5, Funny

    Topic hitting close to home - or am I really first?

  4. Not something to worry about by Kohath · · Score: 4, Insightful

    If you can get fired for playing solitaire, then you can (and most likely will) get fired for anything. Some employers randomly fire people. It's unfortunate. Solitaire is just an excuse though. Excuses are easy to find.

    1. Re:Not something to worry about by rob_squared · · Score: 5, Interesting

      Most employers also try to fire someone because they aren't liked, or if they are perceved as a liability to the company. And let me explain what that means.

      There is a person at a company I work for, that gets the mandatory levels of productivity needed to keep the job. They are also very outspoken about company issues, which disagree with the current practices (union and so on). So every time he gets audited (monthly process) they purposefully find his worst interactions in the hopes that he'll be below standard and they can fire him. Some people didn't believe this so he purposefully made a small mistake in one interaction and wrote down the ID of that interaction. The next month, that was the one audited. This has been shown more than once, and they're just waiting for an "approved" reason to terminate employment.

      This kind of discrimination does exist, they just hide it behind protocol and procedure.

      --
      I don't get it.
    2. Re:Not something to worry about by Theatetus · · Score: 4, Insightful
      I'm sure its not in your job description that you have to clear your head once every two hours.

      No, Ayn Rand, it's not in your job description, but it's precisely in almost every state's labor laws.

      --
      All's true that is mistrusted
    3. Re:Not something to worry about by Idarubicin · · Score: 4, Insightful
      Working is NOT a right. It's a privilege. Employers should be able to fire you if they don't feel you are doing the job they hired you to do.

      The grandparent poster was talking about someone who was doing the job he was hired to do.

      Employees and employers both have extensive rights and responsibilities that are enshrined in job descriptions, employments contracts, and state and federal laws. Working isn't a right or a privilege--it's a mutually beneficial arrangement extensively regulated by contract and labour law.

      An employee who complains because the employer isn't holding up their end of the contractual or legal obligations shouldn't face sanctions (unfair evaluation practices as described by the grandparent poster, for instance).

      --
      ~Idarubicin
    4. Re:Not something to worry about by Ihlosi · · Score: 4, Insightful
      Working is NOT a right. It's a privilege.



      No, it is neither. It is merely the matter of a contract between two parties.

  5. Bloomberg thus joins the ranks by Perp+Atuitie · · Score: 3, Insightful

    of the rest of the undeserving rich who haven't the slightest clue about how work gets done.

    1. Re:Bloomberg thus joins the ranks by bluprint · · Score: 4, Insightful

      You don't understand. The term "rich" no longer has anything to do with wealth. It's simply a term people throw around that means "someone who I think for some misguided reason should be treated badly or differently".

      And to the GP, you will find if you pay attention, that most rich people who's names you know have worked very hard.

      --
      A modern day witchhunt.
    2. Re:Bloomberg thus joins the ranks by zorander · · Score: 4, Informative

      Bloomberg build one of the largest privately held companies from the world from the ground up. His coworkers, some of whom I know, testify whenever possible as to the sweat and intensity he put into the business and how wonderful he was to work for. The benefits offered at his company are among the best in the industry. It's hard to accuse him of not understanding how work gets done or how to/not to treat employees in light of what he's accomplished in his life, in particular from a management perspective.

      Also, if the employee were so indispensible, I assume his manager would have defended him and done whatever possible to give him another chance. Honestly, if the man got fired by a chance remark, even coming out of Bloomberg's mouth, he probably was on the line already for other reasons.

    3. Re:Bloomberg thus joins the ranks by ColaMan · · Score: 4, Insightful

      is puncuatian gonna be part of our final grade, ohh grate teachar of slashdot postars.

      It fucking well will be in real life. If you can't spell or put together a proper sentence, you will go nowhere fast.

      Any job application / report to a customer / business proposal instantly loses its authority in the eyes of the recipient if said recipient detects a spelling or grammatical error. Think about that before applying the sarcasm on with a trowel next time.

      --

      You are in a twisty maze of processor lines, all alike.
      There is a lot of hype here.
  6. Rules by BrookHarty · · Score: 4, Interesting

    If he was playing on a break or on his lunch time, i dont see an issue. If his job wasnt getting done fire him..

    That was a scumbag move of the mayor, firing him without even talking to him.

  7. Two paragraphs from TFA ... by Daniel+Dvorkin · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Office assistant Edward Greenwood IX was going over some papers at his desk as Bloomberg made the rounds with his photographer, greeting workers and posing for pictures. When the mayor reached him, Greenwood stood, they shook hands and the photographer snapped a photo.

    -- and --

    "I expect all city workers, including myself, to work hard," the mayor said. "There's nothing wrong with taking a break, but during the business day, at your desk, that's not appropriate behavior."

    Yep, workin' hard there, Mr. Mayor. Workin' hard.

    --
    The correlation between ignorance of statistics and using "correlation is not causation" as an argument is close to 1.
  8. Not nearly as bad as... by alyawn · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Smoking. Co-workers that smoke use up far more time than those that blow off steam with Solitare. When you see an employee playing Enemy Territory, *then* you need to worry.

    1. Re:Not nearly as bad as... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Funny

      Though I don't encourage anyone to take up smoking, it can make for a good bonding experience with upper management.

      Yeah, you might both end up in the same hospital ward coughing your lungs up. That's a fantastic bonding experience.

  9. not first but still - a question by mgabrys_sf · · Score: 3, Funny

    The only question I have about the story is what kind of crappy job is there in the Mayor's office - that pays less than 30k a year - IN FRIGGING MANHATTAN? I guess he'll have to change jobs - and get to STOP EATING TOP-RAMEN.

  10. Bloomberg... by LordSnooty · · Score: 5, Funny

    ... must be a Freecell fan.

    1. Re:Bloomberg... by prockcore · · Score: 4, Funny

      If only he was playing Minesweeper. He could've claimed to be looking for WMDs.

  11. Only a few minutes? by digidave · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Can we all agree that this guy is lying. Of course he played for more than a few minutes. We all have our necessary distractions. I browse Slashdot. My boss downloads hockey fights and forwards me Nigerian email scams (I kid you not!).

    Every good manager knows that employees need a bit of time to themselves. Just look at Google's policy for working on personal projects and what a great benefit that policy is to both Google and its employees.

    At my last job we had short Unreal Tournamet sessions one day a week and nakednews.com viewings in the morning, and everybody was really happy with their job. Everybody got a lot of great work done.

    --
    The global economy is a great thing until you feel it locally.
    1. Re:Only a few minutes? by Threni · · Score: 3, Funny

      > Can we all agree that this guy is lying.

      You mean "assume", right? Perhaps it's `creative dismissal`. If I'd been fired for playing a game at lunchtime you can bet I'd be hiring a solicitor right now. Well, as soon as I finish this level...

  12. Back in the day of Windows 3.1... by dcavanaugh · · Score: 5, Funny

    We were in the process of replacing our beloved VAXstations with high-end (60 MHz!) Pentium PCs running Windows 3.1. One of the big wigs was walking through the data center, and noticed a programmer playing Solotaire. He asks, "What is she doing?". A co-worker in the neighboring cube notices the situation and defuses the crisis by spewing a load of BS: "She's doing mouse calibration; they have you use this program, so the pointer on the screen can be aligned with the roller ball inside the mouse. It only takes a few minutes and it lines up the pointer for you."

    1. Re:Back in the day of Windows 3.1... by sparkz · · Score: 4, Interesting

      When I did PC support, there was a new-hire secretary who had no Windows experience. (This was in the days of Win3.1). I showed her how to find the games, as these would help her to use the mouse. Without that, she'd no idea about what the mouse did, or what it was for.

      --
      Author, Shell Scripting : Expert Re
  13. Another reason to smoke by RingDev · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Smokers take their 15 minute morning and afternoon breaks. And they will band together to ensure that no one imposes rules against them. Hell, unions have even been used to protect the glorious smoke break. But what about non-smokers? Ever since I quite smoking I have also quit taking 15 minute breaks. Now, when I need a break, I hit slash dot, check my email, and try to let my brain relax. So yeah, some hard ass could can me for "abusing web privledges", but I can point out to him how my web browsing is inplace of smoking, and by browsing the web I am saving him thousands of dollars in sick time and increased health insurance premiums.

    -Rick

    --
    "Most people in the U.S. wouldn't know they live in a tyrannical state if it walked up and grabbed their junk." - MyFirs
  14. Solitare used to be my wallpaper. by jzarling · · Score: 4, Funny

    I worked in a call center for more time than I would like to admit, and every month or so a new policy like this would come down the pipe.
    As an act of civil disobedience I made solitare my wall paper, and removed all my icons.

    --
    It is better to be the hammer than the anvil.
  15. Re:So? by lukewarmfusion · · Score: 5, Insightful

    The problem isn't that it's not within their rights (in my state, we have at-will employment and you can be fired for damn near anything). The problem is that some employers fail to recognize that eight full hours of productivity isn't a realistic goal. In this case, he claims to use solitaire for a "quick distraction." When I'm stuck on a problem, I take a walk, play a game of Sudoku, or check Slashdot. Sometimes it's a change of scenery that refreshes me. Other times its simply a change of perspective. In either case, it's important to realize that any employee who consistently claims to be productive for 100% of his time is lying.

    I've worked for employers that didn't understand this. Burnout and turnover rates were astonishingly high. Meanwhile, I've worked for employers that recognized the value of this kind of freedom/flexibility. They also realized the non-value of an employee that needs to get away.

    Solitaire/minesweeper/Sudoku or the occasional "why don't you go home early" often translates to a refreshed and more productive employee tomorrow.

  16. It wasn't in Manhattan by PCM2 · · Score: 4, Informative

    The guy didn't work in New York, he worked at the Albany city legislative office. The median income for a male living in Albany is ~$31,000.

    --
    Breakfast served all day!
  17. And the next story... by gold23 · · Score: 5, Funny

    Fired For Reading Slashdot Article About Worker Who Was Fired For Solitaire At Work

    --
    Trust not a man who's rich in flax / His morals may be sadly lax
  18. Not NYC - Albany by Joiseybill · · Score: 3, Insightful

    "...The Republican mayor stopped by the city's legislative office in Albany a few weeks ago ..." Cost of living in Albany is considerably lower than NYC. Original article also implies this guy had been reminded of the computer policies in 2004. Sounds like a repeat offender, and moreover he embarrassed the boss in front of company.

    1. Re:Not NYC - Albany by NormalVisual · · Score: 3, Informative

      Original article also implies this guy had been reminded of the computer policies in 2004. Sounds like a repeat offender, and moreover he embarrassed the boss in front of company.

      No, what it said was, "The mayor's office said its records show that in 2004 Greenwood reviewed the policy that prohibits "inappropriate" use of city computers." That means that they gave everyone a written copy of the AUP and had everyone sign something saying they received a copy of it and read it, something that practically everyone that works in an office of any size does in this day and age. It doesn't in any way imply that he'd broken the rules at any time.

      --
      Please stand clear of the doors, por favor mantenganse alejado de las puertas
  19. like a teenager and a car... by SuperBanana · · Score: 5, Interesting
    Really now, don't you know that what you do at work WITH COMPANY RESOURCES is up to the (shock) COMPANY?

    Yep. It's like my parents and I when I was in high school:

    Mom: "Okay, what car are you taking?"

    Me: "My car."

    Dad: *COUGHAHEM*

    Me: "The car which I am permitted to use."

    Dad: "Have fun!"

    I see it all the time- employees get very posessive about their computers. The word "my" is thrown around very casually, they get attached to them, etc. Hell, I worked at places where people (almost exclusively sales staff) would take laptops with them when let go, and they'd act REALLY pissed when we called them and asked for them back. Some we had to literally harass the CRAP out of, to get machines returned- and when they were, they'd invariably be damaged, usually the keyboard and mouse/trackpad buttons; it was clear they whacked the shit out of it with a shoe or something just to piss us off.*

    It's equipment. Capital. I don't see a machine shop operator getting pissed when he's fired and he can't take the mill home with him...


    *I've also had to lock sales people out of databases WHILE they were getting "The Talk", because in the past, every single one of their predecessors had immediately logged in to the customer database from home and dumped it... un frigging believeable. Never had more trouble with terminated/let go employees than with sales dweebs/bimbos. ZERO morals, which I'd like to think was part of the reason they were fired.

  20. Re:Paid for 8 hours work or to be present for 8? by Gyorg_Lavode · · Score: 5, Informative
    People need breaks. I know when I was working hourly I legally had half an hour for lunch and a few 15min breaks reguardless of what the company said.

    Now as a salaried employee, I constantly have slashdot, fark, etc open. On the other hand, I will read it, then do a bit of this, then read. In all honesty my productivity improves because to answer tough questions many times you have to distract yourself from them for a bit. (I am one of the most productive people in my group.) If the person wasn't playing solitare he'd be over in the other cube talking to a friend, getting some water, just roaming around, etc. That kind of thing has happened for AGES. To fire someone for playing a game for 5min is rediculious though it would be justifiable if the guy was always playing.

    --
    I do security
  21. Smokers...? by heli0 · · Score: 4, Insightful

    ... are allowed to take a 5-10 minute break every hour in order to get their fix? Is someone waiting outside to fire them for wasting time?

    --
    Whenever the offence inspires less horror than the punishment, the rigour of penal law is obliged to give way...
  22. A similar story... by fm6 · · Score: 4, Interesting
    One day Henry Ford was walking through his factory, when he saw a worker slouched on a crate, trimming a wire in what Ford considered to be a clumsy manner. Ford kicked the crate out from under the worker and yelled, "Get out of my factory! You're fired."

    "But Mr. Ford! You can't fire me!"

    "Why the hell not?"

    "I don't work for you! I work for the phone company!"

    1. Re:A similar story... by Kurt+Granroth · · Score: 3, Funny

      That sounds like a variant of a similar joke:

      A new manager is hired to bring an underproducing office up to speed. He decides that he must fire somebody on the first day to show that he means business. While walking through the office, he spots a man leaning against the wall, not doing anything. He is in a room full of workers and so decides that this is the perfect way to start.

      "You! How much do you make a week?", he bellowed at the slacker.
      "About $300," came the reply.

      The manager pulls out his wallet, peels off three hundred dollar bills, and throws them at the man.

      "Here's your money. Now get out and don't come back!"

      Feeling pretty good about the firing, he glared around room. "What was this man's job?", he asked.

      From the back of the room came the reply: "Pizza delivery man"

    2. Re:A similar story... by curious.corn · · Score: 3, Interesting

      Dude you're wrong. It's not the workers that wrecked your auto industry, it's the management. The USA automotive industry develops mostly for the domestic market and there's no way in hell an american car will ever sell on the worldwide marketplace. Your cars are too focused on your national taste and distant from the EU, developing countries or Asia. US cars are generally speaking gargantuan, auto-drive, semi-trucks; such platforms are impossible to reengineer for foreign markets from which you have more or less cut yourself out. Add up some ferocious competition in a mature, saturated industry and some quality control issues and there is your recipe for disaster. Mind you, I'm italian and we have the exact same problem here with FIAT, rescaled appropriately.

      --
      Mi domando chi à il mandante di tutte le cazzate che faccio - Altan
  23. Solitaire Schmolitaire by Toxictoy · · Score: 5, Funny

    Back in 1998 I was working in a helpdesk and a user who was known to be a chronic complainer called saying that she couldn't do her work as there was something wrong with MS Word. We were able to remote control workstations without users having to give permission so I connected to her workstation and what did I see?? Solitaire. Rather than let her know I could see what she was doing I kept asking her about her screen and what she could see on it - all she was doing was giving me ficticious error messages and she was actually continuing her game while she was talking to me. How I resolved the problem was to move her cards around for her and then open MS Office. Once it was open I asked her if there were any other problems she wanted to talk about. After a long silence she said "No- thank you for helping me" and hung up the phone. Needless to say we didn't hear anything from her for a while.

    1. Re:Solitaire Schmolitaire by laing · · Score: 3, Informative

      This reminds me of the old SUN3 workstations. There was almost no security. You could remotely log into another machine, do a "screendump" to an NFS shared partition, and then do a "screenload" on your local workstation to see what anyone was doing anywhere. We used it to look at the managment plan to outsource our entire division to another state and knew about the plan 2 weeks before it was announced.

  24. Re:Good! by Catbeller · · Score: 3, Insightful

    "Who the hell's going to argue with that? Seriously?Who the hell's going to argue with that? Seriously?"

    Me.

    I guess I'm unusual.

    Terry Pratchett once observed that cows are herded by men that, if the cows every thought about it, the cows could convert into a damp smear on the ground in two seconds.

    But the cows never think about it. They are cows. Rebellion never crosses their minds, so they let the pink monkeys herd them into slaughterhouses.

    (plaitive tone) why are we all cows? people died for over a hundred years to create unions so that employers couldn't treat people like peons on a feudal estate. Why do you hate yourselves so much?

  25. Uninstall?? by queenb**ch · · Score: 4, Insightful

    If there is software he's not supposed to be using while he's at work, why is it even installed? It is quite simple to supress the installation of all of the "Games". How's this for logic, Mr Smarty Pants Mayor...If you don't want your employees playing games, DON'T INSTALL THEM....DUH!!!! I really don't see why an employee should be fired for using software that you provided him with, even if it is a game.

    2 cents,

    Queen B

    --
    HDGary secures my bank :/
  26. Re:LOL by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 4, Funny

    It's "Sieg heil".

    Regards,
    Spelling nazi

  27. Re:evolved culture, identity politics, immigration by heinousjay · · Score: 3, Insightful

    Believing in a rigid class structure is simply an incorrect mindset that feeds itself the poison you've spewed in your comment. It would certainly help to achieve your aims, because a leftist society requires a rigid class structure to keep the workers in line, but what you're talking about is wishful thinking, not a valid observation.

    These elite shape our culture over decades to make it suit them. They are capital. We are labor. Our interests are for the most part, directly opposed.

    This is only in a society where there is enforced stratification, which isn't the case at all. Anyone, with proper application of willpower, can bring themselves into the level of the so-called elite. No one has a magic barrier preventing this. Only people who refuse to raise themselves up are stuck.

    And anyway, if you thinks American culture is driven by a so-called elite you obviously haven't noticed any popular entertainment over the last fifteen years.

    --
    Slashdot - where whining about luck is the new way to make the world you want.