Slashdot Mirror


Fired for Solitare At Work

schlick writes "The Associated Press is carrying a story about a NYC employee fired after Mayor Michael Bloomberg noticed a game of solitare on the employee's desktop at work." From the article: "Greenwood, who earned $27,000 a year and had worked in the office for six years, said in a telephone interview that he limited his play time to his one-hour lunch or during quick breaks when he needed a moment of distraction. 'It wasn't like I spent hours and hours a day playing, because I had plenty to do,' Greenwood said. 'If I had been working at something exhaustively for two hours, I might get a cup of coffee and play for a minute but then go right back to my work.'"

119 of 680 comments (clear)

  1. If they enforced this by trickonion · · Score: 5, Funny

    If they enforced this I think about 99% of the slashdotters would be fire. I know I'd be 0wned

    --
    I got you an Andes mint, but it melted in my pocket
    1. Re:If they enforced this by slashbob22 · · Score: 5, Insightful

      I think you're right. There are a lot of people within the slashdot community which probably would loose their jobs if their Resource Use Agreement was enforced. I know I could end up in hot water one day for it. Thankfully I have an excuse, albeit weak, that I am monitoring IT trends - which loosely couples with my position.

      I would personally like to see a study on how many people are compliant with their agreements. From a survey of my cube-buddies; I know we would all fail. At the same time, I don't usually stop for lunch, so I don't see the harm in taking a thought-break - without which, I am sure my productivity would drop.

      --
      Proof by very large bribes. QED.
    2. Re:If they enforced this by Ucklak · · Score: 3, Funny

      1 word....

      soduko

      --
      if you steal from one source, that is plagiarism, if you steal from many, well, that's just research.
    3. Re:If they enforced this by oneils · · Score: 2, Interesting

      This has to be some sort of hoax. Aren't government employees in the States, or New York, unionised? If not, I apologise for my ignorance. I am a government employee in Canada. The most common way to fire me would be as part of a downsizing exercise and even in that case pains would be taken to transfer me elsewhere. The only other way would be to have a well documented case history of my incompentence. One game of solitaire just would not cut it. I don't know why anyone would put up with this and just shrug and say "oh well, he's the boss...you/he/I should shape up." You're reaction should be, damn...its time to get some organised labour up in here.

    4. Re:If they enforced this by hdparm · · Score: 5, Insightful

      If this is a policy at NYC, the whole desktop management team should have been fired too, for leaving the game available for users.

    5. Re:If they enforced this by Catbeller · · Score: 3, Insightful

      You have to love it, Canadian person. Look at the postings on this page; they are siding WITH THE MAYOR against one of their own. That's where our unions are.

      I've been immersed in this culture my whole life, and it takes a short shock of outside air to look at it anew. We've a country that hates "socialism" so much that they organize to keep inions OUT of their workplace. The salaries shrink, pensions disppear, healthcare is repeatedly slashed for current employees and denied to new, "temporary" employees who never will become permanent. And they will side with the employers every time.

      There's a book, "What's the Matter with Kansas?", which, altho not really being about Kansas, addresses this all-pervasive phenomenon here in the south. Wage slaves vote against their own interests, and those of the families, because of their distaste of "socialism" and "big government".

      It's a waterfall to the bottom of the gorge. The center ain't holding, and we're all being flushed, except for the very tippy top of the social scale, which is swimming in money and will pretty much own everything.

      Got any room up there for expats? I'm thinking WAY up north, given the warming to come. A place without cameras on every street, a scenario the Mayor of Chicago is bringing to fruition. Our new transit passes will track our movements, we're to be watched at all times, they're reading our email and listening to our phones down here. I didn't waste all that time growing up to live in a prison populated by cowards overseen by the paranoid and greedy.

    6. Re:If they enforced this by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Funny

      Maybe you should try crossword puzzles for a while. ;)

    7. Re:If they enforced this by operagost · · Score: 3, Funny

      I just can't believe that this guy's been working at the same job in NEW YORK and only makes $27,000! A newly-hired custodian makes more than that! Bloomberg may have done him a favor.

      --

      Gamingmuseum.com: Give your 3D accelerator a rest.
    8. Re:If they enforced this by networkBoy · · Score: 3, Insightful

      ironically though, spending hours on /. is less likely to get you canned than 1 min of solitare. Why? because it's not a "game" so the PHB is less wise of it.
      -nB

      --
      whois gawk date unzip strip find touch finger mount join nice man top fsck grep eject more yes exit umount sleep dump
    9. Re:If they enforced this by JWtW · · Score: 2, Insightful

      I'm in mechanical design (sorry, not IT), and many times throughout the day, I need to focus on something different. Slashdot is my usual refuge, because I dare the network nazis to ban me from here (if any of you are reading, this isn't my work acount. My UID is much lower at work.. :-)

      Anyway, as far as the RUA, I think that everybody could get fired--if it was enforced. It's never enforced until it's needed.

      How many of you admins pass over the receptionist's Christmas shopping on company time?

      I'm seeming cocky here, even trollish, but, isn't this a case of 'you gotta go'?

    10. Re:If they enforced this by StarKruzr · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Basically, the guy got really unlucky and got made an example of. I hope he finds some way to get compensation, but it isn't likely.

      --

      +++ATH0
    11. Re:If they enforced this by platypus · · Score: 5, Funny

      Heh, we are reading "stuff that matters".
      Nobody gets fired for that!

    12. Re:If they enforced this by Voltageaav · · Score: 3, Interesting

      Yeah, here where I work, Slashdot is one of the VERY few nongovernment sites not blocked. Even some sites relavant to my work are banned. Even my personal webpage is blocked after two visits to it for links.

      --
      Someone save me from this sanity.
    13. Re:If they enforced this by BigGerman · · Score: 3, Insightful

      yes I used to wonder why that was. Not-blocking Slashdot is very typical for all kinds of sensitive sites I worked at: defence contractors, three-letter agencies, etc. Then I realized: security folks and sysadmins have to read something too.

    14. Re:If they enforced this by GeekyMike · · Score: 2, Interesting

      heck, its on the favorites folder of all new network profiles, under "Industry News" I work for a cable provider owned by Paul Allen. I wonder if that has anything to do with it.

      --
      Beware the fury of a patient man
      - John Dryden
  2. Terms of use by Unknown_monkey · · Score: 5, Interesting

    What was his computer policy at work? If I do it, I'm fired if they want to enforce it.

    1. Re:Terms of use by Mrs.+Grundy · · Score: 5, Insightful

      I'm sure a lot of places of similar policies. To me, though, the disconcerting part of this story isn't that someone got fired for playing solitaire, it's that the mayor came in and fired somebody of whose work performance he was ignorant based on one impression. This guy could have been the most productive person in the building for all the mayor knew. If I was in charge of this employee I would have been seriously pissed if someone came in and decided to fire my employee. It's arrogance and micromanagement taken to an extreme height. On the other hand it appears this guy new the mayor was coming to shake his hand and have a photo taken and left the game up--that's really not so bright.

    2. Re:Terms of use by gswallow · · Score: 5, Insightful

      Oh come on.

      The frickin' MAYOR is coming to your office. Not of Paducah, KY, but of New York City. He probably hasn't been there for three years. Don't you think you'd better make yourself a little more presentable?

      --
      Diplomacy is the art of saying "nice doggy" until you can find a rock.
    3. Re:Terms of use by Billly+Gates · · Score: 4, Interesting

      I work in a different industry but its like this where I work.

      I do I.T. work at an amusement park but I also drive trams when its busy because its what I did before I got promoted. Anyway the CEO here has fire d people for sitting down at work and for even using a cell phone in a private break area away from guests. No cells allowed nor is looking like your not working in front of guests allowed. Cells outside of the public are allowed but its different when he is around. Even though I work in IT, I was asked by him why I was not picking cigarette butts where I was volunteering to work (clearing trams). I would have been termed onsite and to me its silly but that is just business as usual.

    4. Re:Terms of use by CustomDesigned · · Score: 4, Insightful
      Two of my clients had a no games policy. However, they had me remove all games from the computers. This way, there was no temptation. One went further, and had me install squid with a list of approved websites needed for business. Everything else was blocked.

      It really is unreasonable to have such policies without some kind of technical help to enforce them. It doesn't need to be bullet proof - it just makes things easier for the employees honestly trying to follow the policy.

      A related issue is the monthly limit on total bytes transferred with my cable company TOS. I wouldn't mind it, if only they provided a meter on their website somewhere where I could see how much I had left for the month. Without that, I am just guessing and hoping they don't get strict on me all of a sudden. I know I could build a system to track it myself using iptables - but haven't got around to it yet.

    5. Re:Terms of use by 88NoSoup4U88 · · Score: 2, Insightful
      Ok, but those conditions (as I would assume) were made up clear up-front, and ifnot, the first time you'd make the 'offence' he would (and again, I assume) give you at least a first (and last) warning.

      Whereas it probably also was made clear beforehand that playing games during businesshours was prohibited in the case of the NYC employee, there could at least have been a 'final warning' or serious discussion: What this guy did is purely covering his own ass: -HE- wanted to be a publicity whore, he'd better prepare and sterilize the grounds he's doing that on beforehand (eg. don't give people priviledges to play/install games).

      On a side note: I am too tired to dig up any past Slashdot articles, but I clearly remember one research that stated that having those little game-breaks/walk-breaks stimulated productivity overall in the end (the mind being more clear/just having something to get distracted from a few minutes).
      It's measuring with two sizes (if that's even a valid expression) if people -are- allowed to have their watercooler breaks, but aren't allowed to have a 'game-break'.

      And of course, one should not be playing Solitaire all day at work... or reading Slashdot for that matter. Get back to work!

    6. Re:Terms of use by Bad+D.N.A. · · Score: 4, Insightful

      ...has fired people for sitting down at work and for even using a cell phone in a private break area away from guests.

      Sounds to me like it's time to get a new job.

      If you are good at what you do, then why are you putting up with these kind of working conditions?

      My recomendation is to quit NOW

      --
      "Truth is much too complicated to allow anything but approximations"
    7. Re:Terms of use by subterfuge · · Score: 2, Interesting

      The mayor should be fired for wasting his and the staff's time with this touchy-feely Grab 'n' Grin nonsense.

      Additional point: If use of this app is against policy why did IT leave it on the image? If is wasn't there is wouldn't be used. If NYC IT needs help in this area I am available for US$5000/wk plus travel, two meals/day [my choice of which meals and where], a room at the Trump for the duration [Park View w/jacuzzi] and tickets to Spamlot...

      = ; ^ ) >

    8. Re:Terms of use by Midnight+Warrior · · Score: 5, Insightful

      If a big-time politician came wandering through my cube, (and a couple have) you have two obligations: clean up your desk, and greet the distinguished visitor with a smile. If your boss asked you to work during the tour, let's not be an idiot about it - find some work, or at least repeat some work you've already done. The VIP doesn't know the difference. "Sir, I'm working on an analysis of the workload levels of the T&M contractors the city hires to see if we're getting a good return on our contracts." Never mind it was something you did 3 months ago.

      Oh, and don't act like you aren't the BOFH that opens up old network statistics charts or network snoops, pouring over them when the big boss comes in. "Sir, I'm tracking through some anomalous network activity our SOA layer got during last night's advertising during the Olympics opening ceremony."

      Anybody caught doing something stupid when a VIP is in the room deserves what they get. It's like seeing a cop in the median a mile ahead and then getting the bright idea to shift four lanes of traffic and pass on the right. You're begging for it. "My cell phone rang and I was just trying to honor good road safety rules, officer." Yeesh.

    9. Re:Terms of use by SnowZero · · Score: 2, Insightful

      He wasn't playing Solitaire; he had left it on his computer from a while ago.

      According to who?... Oh yeah the person who got fired; Of course he'd tell the truth if he was playing at the time, right? Really, how many people leave Windows applications up that you aren't using? If you're not using it, it should be minimized. Windows doens't have enough screen real estate otherwise, and it blocks your access to the desktop.

      So in short, I think the guy is whitewashing his story. Getting canned for playing a game is harsh, but you should know better when a VIP comes to visit.

    10. Re:Terms of use by PsiPsiStar · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Your eating fast food doesn't give me diabetes.

      I'm fine with laws that protect people from each other. I'm against laws that attempt to protect people from themselves. Seems simple enough to me.

      at least smoking tends to kill quickly.
      Emphysema and heart disease are slow enough.

      --

      ___
      It's the end of my comment as I know it and I feel fine.
    11. Re:Terms of use by Syberghost · · Score: 2, Informative

      I'm sorry, but at this point, one's work history is irrelevant. There have been so many people fired for playing games that playing a game at work, even if it complies with the written words of your company's policies, is such an act of monumental stupidity that it marks the offender as someone with such colossaly bad judgement that they are clearly not to be trusted making decisions for your business, at any level.

      I mean, you KNOW this will probably get you fired, you KNOW that people can see you doing it from across the room, through the door, and down the hall, and you KNOW that no court is going to make things "right" if you do, because a jury is unlikely to be composed of 12 people with ADD who understand the concept that you can play solitaire and still get 5 times as much work done as anybody else.

      So, if you play solitaire at work on your main PC where everybody can see, you're a dumbass who needs to be fired because what other horrible lapses of judgement are you going to inflict upon your employer?

      Get a laptop and go into a conference room, facing toward the door. Duh.

    12. Re:Terms of use by Martz · · Score: 3, Funny

      Ob. Bill Hicks Quote:

      'Hicks, how come you're not working.'
      I'd go, 'There's nothing to do.'
      'Well, you pretend like you're working.'
      'Well, why don't you pretend I'm working? Yeah, you get paid more than me, you fantasise. Pretend I'm mopping. Knock yourself out. I'll pretend they're buying stuff; we can close up. I'm the boss now, you're fired. How's that? I'm on a fucking roll. We're all millionaires and you're dick. I'm pretending shit, I'm wacky, I can't be stopped.'

      I don't know if I have the right attitude for the workplace.

    13. Re:Terms of use by scottv67 · · Score: 2, Insightful

      I would have been termed if I told him I refuse to pick cigarette butts

      Dude, what's your fixation with cigarette butts? I work in I.T., make a *lot* more than $9/hr but I still do my part to keep the workplace clean. If I see something on the carpeted floor in our office area, I pick it up and throw it in the trash.

      When I am in one of our hospitals for a meeting or to fix something in one of the data centers, I still do my part to keep the place clean. Just like your employer, we provide a "service" to our "customers". And one of the things that they expect when they visit our facilities is that the place is clean.

      When I was in college (which was almost two decades ago - yikes!), I used to work at a "water park" for $3.50/hr. Yeah, we were expected to sweep up cigarette butts and other grunt work like that (just like your job). But I also noticed that the guys who owned the water park (who had more money than God) would also stop to pick up a cup, hamburger wrapper or cigarette butt. Hell, I saw one of the owners stop to pick up a nickel or dime once.

      You shouldn't look at your "cigarette butt" picking at some sort of punishment. Yeah, it may seem demeaning but as one of the employees of that organization, you are expected to pitch-in and make the place look nice. As I mentioned above, I do the same thing at my place and our customers come to us for a totally different reason. But they still expect the place to look nice. And they deserve it.

    14. Re:Terms of use by wpanderson · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Yes, yes, yes! If there is a local "no games" policy, the normally pre-installed games such as Solitaire should and must be removed. Who cares that one guy played a game on his lunch break? The local IT bods should be fired for distributing games to all their workstations :)

      --
      neuro at well dot com (when I post, it's my opinions, no-one elses)
  3. strangely quiet by mgabrys_sf · · Score: 5, Funny

    Topic hitting close to home - or am I really first?

  4. Not something to worry about by Kohath · · Score: 4, Insightful

    If you can get fired for playing solitaire, then you can (and most likely will) get fired for anything. Some employers randomly fire people. It's unfortunate. Solitaire is just an excuse though. Excuses are easy to find.

    1. Re:Not something to worry about by rob_squared · · Score: 5, Interesting

      Most employers also try to fire someone because they aren't liked, or if they are perceved as a liability to the company. And let me explain what that means.

      There is a person at a company I work for, that gets the mandatory levels of productivity needed to keep the job. They are also very outspoken about company issues, which disagree with the current practices (union and so on). So every time he gets audited (monthly process) they purposefully find his worst interactions in the hopes that he'll be below standard and they can fire him. Some people didn't believe this so he purposefully made a small mistake in one interaction and wrote down the ID of that interaction. The next month, that was the one audited. This has been shown more than once, and they're just waiting for an "approved" reason to terminate employment.

      This kind of discrimination does exist, they just hide it behind protocol and procedure.

      --
      I don't get it.
    2. Re:Not something to worry about by Limecron · · Score: 2, Insightful

      I'm sure there were also political motivations that would not be present in a normal corporate environment.

      If you work in a public office, you've got people coming in and out all day, many of which are ordinary citizens. All it takes is one person to notice and say, "Oh, I am paying for that guy to play Solitaire." Something like that may come out against you in an news article or in your re-election campaign.

      So yes, he looks like an asshole, but then again, he also looks like he's stongly protecting the use of NYC's tax payers' money. Of course, neither, either or both may be true. :)

    3. Re:Not something to worry about by Theatetus · · Score: 4, Insightful
      I'm sure its not in your job description that you have to clear your head once every two hours.

      No, Ayn Rand, it's not in your job description, but it's precisely in almost every state's labor laws.

      --
      All's true that is mistrusted
    4. Re:Not something to worry about by Idarubicin · · Score: 4, Insightful
      Working is NOT a right. It's a privilege. Employers should be able to fire you if they don't feel you are doing the job they hired you to do.

      The grandparent poster was talking about someone who was doing the job he was hired to do.

      Employees and employers both have extensive rights and responsibilities that are enshrined in job descriptions, employments contracts, and state and federal laws. Working isn't a right or a privilege--it's a mutually beneficial arrangement extensively regulated by contract and labour law.

      An employee who complains because the employer isn't holding up their end of the contractual or legal obligations shouldn't face sanctions (unfair evaluation practices as described by the grandparent poster, for instance).

      --
      ~Idarubicin
    5. Re:Not something to worry about by cyber-vandal · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Working is a transaction between an employer and an employee. Workers are not slaves and should not be treated as such. Just find another job is such a cop out, what if all jobs in a particular field suck, employers should have to conform to standards too, they shouldn't just act as if the employee is a possession of the company.

    6. Re:Not something to worry about by Ihlosi · · Score: 4, Insightful
      Working is NOT a right. It's a privilege.



      No, it is neither. It is merely the matter of a contract between two parties.

  5. So? by missing000 · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Really now, don't you know that what you do at work WITH COMPANY RESOURCES is up to the (shock) COMPANY?

    1. Re:So? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Of course. Their computers, their rules.

      However, one could make the argument that, since the game was installed, it was 'approved' for use....

    2. Re:So? by lukewarmfusion · · Score: 5, Insightful

      The problem isn't that it's not within their rights (in my state, we have at-will employment and you can be fired for damn near anything). The problem is that some employers fail to recognize that eight full hours of productivity isn't a realistic goal. In this case, he claims to use solitaire for a "quick distraction." When I'm stuck on a problem, I take a walk, play a game of Sudoku, or check Slashdot. Sometimes it's a change of scenery that refreshes me. Other times its simply a change of perspective. In either case, it's important to realize that any employee who consistently claims to be productive for 100% of his time is lying.

      I've worked for employers that didn't understand this. Burnout and turnover rates were astonishingly high. Meanwhile, I've worked for employers that recognized the value of this kind of freedom/flexibility. They also realized the non-value of an employee that needs to get away.

      Solitaire/minesweeper/Sudoku or the occasional "why don't you go home early" often translates to a refreshed and more productive employee tomorrow.

    3. Re:So? by Bacon+Bits · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Indeed. They installed the solitare software, then, didn't they? They provided the software, and the required rights to use it.

      It's akin to giving a deck of cards to every employee as they are hired and then firing anybody who uses them at work.

      --
      The road to tyranny has always been paved with claims of necessity.
    4. Re:So? by fermion · · Score: 2, Interesting
      The issue is not that the company has a right to determine the employee can and can't do at work, at least to a degree. The issue is the companies inability to manage resources. I have often said a big problem with MS Windows is it's inability to install an OS suitable for business use. Why do we need solitaire, minesweeper, and media cores on a machine that will be used to run billing software, for instance?

      The bottom line is that if a company does not want an employee to use a resource, then they company should not supply the resource, or limit the use. For instance, reading ponography at work is probably also frowned upon, but would a company have a case if it provided that SWANK in the library, and then fired employees that chose to utilize it?

      Now, one might say that employers provide the internet, and that can be used for ponography. The thing is the employer does not actually provide the ponography/ In fact, if the employer was smart, filters would in place to limit access to these sites, and employees who tried to circumvent the filters could then be fired.

      In the end firing this guy is like firing a guy who picked up $10 from the ground. Sure one could say it was theft, but it might also be entrapment. Hiring and trainine employees cost a lot of money, and one does not fire them friviously. Unless, of course, one is borrow and spend republican.

      --
      "She's a scientist and a lesbian. She's not going to let it slide." Orphan Black
    5. Re:So? by MrNougat · · Score: 2, Insightful

      And what difference does it make if you break for solitaire once in a while, as long as you're getting done what you need to get done? I know that, overall, I am most productive when I bust ass for an hour or two, then take fifteen or twenty screwing off and doing whatever I want, then getting back to it for an hour or two. When I'm focused, I'm focused really hard, and I can't keep that up forever. And I can't figure out how to focus less hard, either.

      This worked better when I was in more of an office setting. Now I'm doing field service, and even though I know I need a break, I can't let the client see me walk away from their BSODed server to go have a smoke and play Bejeweled -- even though I know that's just what I need to get a better perspective on the issue at hand. This has happened once already, recently, and I ended up chasing my tail for four hours, with a headache to boot. I should have just taken the fifteen minutes.

      --
      Web 2.0 == Giant Blogspam Circle Jerk
    6. Re:So? by drsmithy · · Score: 2, Interesting
      I have often said a big problem with MS Windows is it's inability to install an OS suitable for business use. Why do we need solitaire, minesweeper, and media cores on a machine that will be used to run billing software, for instance?

      It is so trivially easy to remove or disable access to this sort of software, that it boggles the mind anyone would even consider trying to make an issue out of it.

  6. Bloomberg thus joins the ranks by Perp+Atuitie · · Score: 3, Insightful

    of the rest of the undeserving rich who haven't the slightest clue about how work gets done.

    1. Re:Bloomberg thus joins the ranks by bluprint · · Score: 4, Insightful

      You don't understand. The term "rich" no longer has anything to do with wealth. It's simply a term people throw around that means "someone who I think for some misguided reason should be treated badly or differently".

      And to the GP, you will find if you pay attention, that most rich people who's names you know have worked very hard.

      --
      A modern day witchhunt.
    2. Re:Bloomberg thus joins the ranks by zorander · · Score: 4, Informative

      Bloomberg build one of the largest privately held companies from the world from the ground up. His coworkers, some of whom I know, testify whenever possible as to the sweat and intensity he put into the business and how wonderful he was to work for. The benefits offered at his company are among the best in the industry. It's hard to accuse him of not understanding how work gets done or how to/not to treat employees in light of what he's accomplished in his life, in particular from a management perspective.

      Also, if the employee were so indispensible, I assume his manager would have defended him and done whatever possible to give him another chance. Honestly, if the man got fired by a chance remark, even coming out of Bloomberg's mouth, he probably was on the line already for other reasons.

    3. Re:Bloomberg thus joins the ranks by ColaMan · · Score: 4, Insightful

      is puncuatian gonna be part of our final grade, ohh grate teachar of slashdot postars.

      It fucking well will be in real life. If you can't spell or put together a proper sentence, you will go nowhere fast.

      Any job application / report to a customer / business proposal instantly loses its authority in the eyes of the recipient if said recipient detects a spelling or grammatical error. Think about that before applying the sarcasm on with a trowel next time.

      --

      You are in a twisty maze of processor lines, all alike.
      There is a lot of hype here.
  7. Rules by BrookHarty · · Score: 4, Interesting

    If he was playing on a break or on his lunch time, i dont see an issue. If his job wasnt getting done fire him..

    That was a scumbag move of the mayor, firing him without even talking to him.

  8. Two paragraphs from TFA ... by Daniel+Dvorkin · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Office assistant Edward Greenwood IX was going over some papers at his desk as Bloomberg made the rounds with his photographer, greeting workers and posing for pictures. When the mayor reached him, Greenwood stood, they shook hands and the photographer snapped a photo.

    -- and --

    "I expect all city workers, including myself, to work hard," the mayor said. "There's nothing wrong with taking a break, but during the business day, at your desk, that's not appropriate behavior."

    Yep, workin' hard there, Mr. Mayor. Workin' hard.

    --
    The correlation between ignorance of statistics and using "correlation is not causation" as an argument is close to 1.
    1. Re:Two paragraphs from TFA ... by ChrisKnight · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Yup, almost as bad as "City taxes pay for the mayor to have his glamor shots taken in an office where other people are working..."

      -Chris

      --
      -- This sig is only a test. If this were a real sig it would say something witty. --
  9. Not nearly as bad as... by alyawn · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Smoking. Co-workers that smoke use up far more time than those that blow off steam with Solitare. When you see an employee playing Enemy Territory, *then* you need to worry.

    1. Re:Not nearly as bad as... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Funny

      Though I don't encourage anyone to take up smoking, it can make for a good bonding experience with upper management.

      Yeah, you might both end up in the same hospital ward coughing your lungs up. That's a fantastic bonding experience.

  10. A little extreme, but... by NorbrookC · · Score: 2, Insightful

    When you know the boss is going to be around, with reporters, why would you be playing a game on your computer? I'm sorry the guy lost his job, and yes, I think a reprimand would have been more appropriate, but still, he wasn't very bright.

  11. not first but still - a question by mgabrys_sf · · Score: 3, Funny

    The only question I have about the story is what kind of crappy job is there in the Mayor's office - that pays less than 30k a year - IN FRIGGING MANHATTAN? I guess he'll have to change jobs - and get to STOP EATING TOP-RAMEN.

  12. Bloomberg... by LordSnooty · · Score: 5, Funny

    ... must be a Freecell fan.

    1. Re:Bloomberg... by prockcore · · Score: 4, Funny

      If only he was playing Minesweeper. He could've claimed to be looking for WMDs.

  13. Only a few minutes? by digidave · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Can we all agree that this guy is lying. Of course he played for more than a few minutes. We all have our necessary distractions. I browse Slashdot. My boss downloads hockey fights and forwards me Nigerian email scams (I kid you not!).

    Every good manager knows that employees need a bit of time to themselves. Just look at Google's policy for working on personal projects and what a great benefit that policy is to both Google and its employees.

    At my last job we had short Unreal Tournamet sessions one day a week and nakednews.com viewings in the morning, and everybody was really happy with their job. Everybody got a lot of great work done.

    --
    The global economy is a great thing until you feel it locally.
    1. Re:Only a few minutes? by Threni · · Score: 3, Funny

      > Can we all agree that this guy is lying.

      You mean "assume", right? Perhaps it's `creative dismissal`. If I'd been fired for playing a game at lunchtime you can bet I'd be hiring a solicitor right now. Well, as soon as I finish this level...

    2. Re:Only a few minutes? by kfg · · Score: 2, Funny

      Every good manager knows that employees need a bit of time to themselves.

      Not every manager is a good one.

      I was working as a bicycle mechanic, once upon a time, and was 10 hours into a 12 hour day without a break. Nothing. No coffee, no lunch. Nothing. Completley illegal as it happens. It was spring tune up rush and I was willing to bend to meet the labor demand. I was young and stupid. Ya know, like an EA programmer.

      Someone handed me a Pepsi and I opened it up and started to take a drink and the owner walked up to me and said, "You know you can hold that can in one hand and turn a wrench with the other."

      Not every manager is a good manager.

      He never got the chance to fire me. I was gone before that.

      KFG

  14. Back in the day of Windows 3.1... by dcavanaugh · · Score: 5, Funny

    We were in the process of replacing our beloved VAXstations with high-end (60 MHz!) Pentium PCs running Windows 3.1. One of the big wigs was walking through the data center, and noticed a programmer playing Solotaire. He asks, "What is she doing?". A co-worker in the neighboring cube notices the situation and defuses the crisis by spewing a load of BS: "She's doing mouse calibration; they have you use this program, so the pointer on the screen can be aligned with the roller ball inside the mouse. It only takes a few minutes and it lines up the pointer for you."

    1. Re:Back in the day of Windows 3.1... by sparkz · · Score: 4, Interesting

      When I did PC support, there was a new-hire secretary who had no Windows experience. (This was in the days of Win3.1). I showed her how to find the games, as these would help her to use the mouse. Without that, she'd no idea about what the mouse did, or what it was for.

      --
      Author, Shell Scripting : Expert Re
    2. Re:Back in the day of Windows 3.1... by 3ryon · · Score: 2, Interesting

      We were in the process of replacing our beloved VAXstations with high-end (60 MHz!) Pentium PCs running Windows 3.1. One of the big wigs was walking through the data center, and noticed a programmer playing Solotaire. He asks, "What is she doing?"

      Your boss was absolutely correct in questioning why a programmer was in the data center.

  15. Another reason to smoke by RingDev · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Smokers take their 15 minute morning and afternoon breaks. And they will band together to ensure that no one imposes rules against them. Hell, unions have even been used to protect the glorious smoke break. But what about non-smokers? Ever since I quite smoking I have also quit taking 15 minute breaks. Now, when I need a break, I hit slash dot, check my email, and try to let my brain relax. So yeah, some hard ass could can me for "abusing web privledges", but I can point out to him how my web browsing is inplace of smoking, and by browsing the web I am saving him thousands of dollars in sick time and increased health insurance premiums.

    -Rick

    --
    "Most people in the U.S. wouldn't know they live in a tyrannical state if it walked up and grabbed their junk." - MyFirs
    1. Re:Another reason to smoke by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Informative
      Smokers take their 15 minute morning and afternoon breaks.

      More like their 10 minute early morning break, 10 minute late morning smoke break, 10 minute pre lunch smoke break, 10 min post lunch smoke break, 10 min early afternoon break and 10 minute late afternoon break. Many, perhaps most, smokers habbit is far to consuming to go hours without a smoke.

    2. Re:Another reason to smoke by MyNymWasTaken · · Score: 2, Interesting

      When I worked at a gov. office, and every one of my co-workers took smoke breaks, I very insistently took reading breaks. Whenever a manager tried to call me on it, I asked why the smokers could wander off whenever they wanted to.

      I do believe I had one boss try to claim that was different because "smoking is an addiction". My response was on the order of "well... reading is my addiction."

    3. Re:Another reason to smoke by aeoo · · Score: 2, Funny

      I'm a non-smoker and I take my 15 minute breaks just like any smoker. The only difference is that instead of smoking I walk around the block meditating. This is good for many reasons. Eye strain reduction, RSI prevention, and spiritual needs (which to me is a hands-off area...I don't care what anyone says -- the world may collapse and I will still take a 15 minute meditation break if I feel the need).

    4. Re:Another reason to smoke by tritab · · Score: 2, Funny

      15 minutes twice a day? Try 15 minutes every hour.

    5. Re:Another reason to smoke by rossz · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Under California law, your employee is required to give you two breaks during the day on the clock if you work an eight hour shift. At my last job they were so anal they tried to insist I clock out for my two breaks. Not only did I always ignore this demand, I printed out the part of the labor code that specified my break rights and posted it prominently.

      Now I work at a better paying job where there is no time clock and my boss smokes more than me. When I take a smoke break, it's usually with my boss and we discuss work related issues. It improves our productivity (and we're sticking with that story).

      --
      -- Will program for bandwidth
  16. Awesome by PCM2 · · Score: 2, Insightful

    So let's get this straight. The guy works the same menial office job for six years, his salary was only $27,000, and Mayor Bloomberg fires him for taking a break during the workday at his desk, which according to the mayor was "not appropriate behavior."

    I mean ... would you cry about it? I can't think of any greater favor Bloomberg could have done for this guy than to get him the fuck outta there.

    --
    Breakfast served all day!
  17. Re:Seriously, who doesn't do this? by dlasley · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Because all too often the modern workplace focuses more on appearance, propriety, and popularity - and less on true productivity and a healthy, relaxed environment.

    I'm just amazed that Bloomberg has managed to completely revitalize the lower east side and stomp out crime in all the boroughs, and now has enough time on his hands to wander around snooping on his staff, looking for the evil sol.exe.

    &laz;

    --
    when it rains, it gets real soggy. when it pours, i'm under the tap just _waiting_ for the joy
  18. Solitare used to be my wallpaper. by jzarling · · Score: 4, Funny

    I worked in a call center for more time than I would like to admit, and every month or so a new policy like this would come down the pipe.
    As an act of civil disobedience I made solitare my wall paper, and removed all my icons.

    --
    It is better to be the hammer than the anvil.
  19. It wasn't in Manhattan by PCM2 · · Score: 4, Informative

    The guy didn't work in New York, he worked at the Albany city legislative office. The median income for a male living in Albany is ~$31,000.

    --
    Breakfast served all day!
  20. Evil breeds evil... by Thunderstruck · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Nobody ever gets fired for playing tabletop role playing games at work. At least, nobody I ever heard of. Surely this is because computer games are so much more detrimental to productivity.

    On a related note, back in Law School, most folks used laptops to take notes. The Dean used to walk through the back of class from time to time. If he was in a particularly bad mood, he'd signal the professor teaching to call on whoever was playing solitare. Getting "called on" in law school is often just as unpleasant in real life as it appears in movies like "Legally Blonde." More so when you're playing solitare and not paying attention. It was evil, really.

    Nobody ever got kicked out of school for it though.

    --
    Trying to use sarcasm in text-based forums does not work.
  21. And the next story... by gold23 · · Score: 5, Funny

    Fired For Reading Slashdot Article About Worker Who Was Fired For Solitaire At Work

    --
    Trust not a man who's rich in flax / His morals may be sadly lax
  22. Re:Heh. by Original+Replica · · Score: 2, Interesting
    if I didn't know a few bosses just like him that managed things so poorly there was plenty of downtime.
    Bloomberg actually manages things quite well, he is excellent at running a bussiness, even the guy who got fired thinks so. It was just as likely the presence of the Photographer that caused the overreaction. Imagine the media heyday if the mayor is on the front page shaking the hand of a city employee and the game screen showed up in the photo. I hope that guy was just a temporary example and they hire him right back though.
    --
    We are all just people.
  23. Not NYC - Albany by Joiseybill · · Score: 3, Insightful

    "...The Republican mayor stopped by the city's legislative office in Albany a few weeks ago ..." Cost of living in Albany is considerably lower than NYC. Original article also implies this guy had been reminded of the computer policies in 2004. Sounds like a repeat offender, and moreover he embarrassed the boss in front of company.

    1. Re:Not NYC - Albany by NormalVisual · · Score: 3, Informative

      Original article also implies this guy had been reminded of the computer policies in 2004. Sounds like a repeat offender, and moreover he embarrassed the boss in front of company.

      No, what it said was, "The mayor's office said its records show that in 2004 Greenwood reviewed the policy that prohibits "inappropriate" use of city computers." That means that they gave everyone a written copy of the AUP and had everyone sign something saying they received a copy of it and read it, something that practically everyone that works in an office of any size does in this day and age. It doesn't in any way imply that he'd broken the rules at any time.

      --
      Please stand clear of the doors, por favor mantenganse alejado de las puertas
  24. like a teenager and a car... by SuperBanana · · Score: 5, Interesting
    Really now, don't you know that what you do at work WITH COMPANY RESOURCES is up to the (shock) COMPANY?

    Yep. It's like my parents and I when I was in high school:

    Mom: "Okay, what car are you taking?"

    Me: "My car."

    Dad: *COUGHAHEM*

    Me: "The car which I am permitted to use."

    Dad: "Have fun!"

    I see it all the time- employees get very posessive about their computers. The word "my" is thrown around very casually, they get attached to them, etc. Hell, I worked at places where people (almost exclusively sales staff) would take laptops with them when let go, and they'd act REALLY pissed when we called them and asked for them back. Some we had to literally harass the CRAP out of, to get machines returned- and when they were, they'd invariably be damaged, usually the keyboard and mouse/trackpad buttons; it was clear they whacked the shit out of it with a shoe or something just to piss us off.*

    It's equipment. Capital. I don't see a machine shop operator getting pissed when he's fired and he can't take the mill home with him...


    *I've also had to lock sales people out of databases WHILE they were getting "The Talk", because in the past, every single one of their predecessors had immediately logged in to the customer database from home and dumped it... un frigging believeable. Never had more trouble with terminated/let go employees than with sales dweebs/bimbos. ZERO morals, which I'd like to think was part of the reason they were fired.

    1. Re:like a teenager and a car... by Phroggy · · Score: 2, Insightful

      ...sales dweebs/bimbos. ZERO morals, which I'd like to think was part of the reason they were fired.

      Or possibly the reason they were hired in the first place. Honesty doesn't make higher sales. ;-)

      --
      $x='S24;r)>63/* h@<5+oZ)32"5cz';$me='phroggy'x$];
      $x=~y+ -xz+\0-Tx+;print$_^chop$me for split'',$x;
  25. Re:Paid for 8 hours work or to be present for 8? by Gyorg_Lavode · · Score: 5, Informative
    People need breaks. I know when I was working hourly I legally had half an hour for lunch and a few 15min breaks reguardless of what the company said.

    Now as a salaried employee, I constantly have slashdot, fark, etc open. On the other hand, I will read it, then do a bit of this, then read. In all honesty my productivity improves because to answer tough questions many times you have to distract yourself from them for a bit. (I am one of the most productive people in my group.) If the person wasn't playing solitare he'd be over in the other cube talking to a friend, getting some water, just roaming around, etc. That kind of thing has happened for AGES. To fire someone for playing a game for 5min is rediculious though it would be justifiable if the guy was always playing.

    --
    I do security
  26. Whoa, that's a tough pill to swallow by AaronPSU777 · · Score: 2, Informative

    "Greenwood, who earned $27,000 a year and had worked in the office for six years" That's a crying shame he lost that high-paying job, maybe he can move up in the world and get a job at McDonalds. Seriously though, 6 years and he's making $27,000 and still has to deal with crap about playing solitaire once in awhile? Bloomburg needs to lighten up a little.

  27. Unrealistic expectations by Y-Crate · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Somehow I doubt the managers who love to fire people for "time-theft" of this nature are busy 100% of the time they are at work, and aren't the kind who take 2 hour lunches and skip out early on Fridays when they please. The more management creates and enforces rules against the most minute off-task behavior, the more their flagrant flaunting of such rules negatively impacts morale.

    The human mind is not designed to stay on one task for hour after hour without a few minutes of mental downtime, and failing to recognize this and not to simply expect productivity, but blind mechanical function in a sentient being is not only wrong but fails to deliver the intended results.

    It's a sad state of affairs when you realize that many people in their position tend to have a more anthropomorphic view of their pets than their employees.

  28. Smokers...? by heli0 · · Score: 4, Insightful

    ... are allowed to take a 5-10 minute break every hour in order to get their fix? Is someone waiting outside to fire them for wasting time?

    --
    Whenever the offence inspires less horror than the punishment, the rigour of penal law is obliged to give way...
  29. A similar story... by fm6 · · Score: 4, Interesting
    One day Henry Ford was walking through his factory, when he saw a worker slouched on a crate, trimming a wire in what Ford considered to be a clumsy manner. Ford kicked the crate out from under the worker and yelled, "Get out of my factory! You're fired."

    "But Mr. Ford! You can't fire me!"

    "Why the hell not?"

    "I don't work for you! I work for the phone company!"

    1. Re:A similar story... by Darth_brooks · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Do some reading about "Harry Bennett", who was Ford's union buster.

      Ford was definatly a genius, but with genius comes serious eccentricities. He held very firm beliefs about the "working class" and how they should be treated (and in return how they should act.) An extension of that feeling was his belief that the "international jew" was conspiring against the working man.

      He was also quite shrewd. Read the fine print about the "five dollar day." You didn't just get a job, work a day, and walk out the door with a five dollar bill. You had to be a clean living family man (by Ford's standards) and even then, you still made the standard factory wages (two-ish dollars a day). the "Five dollar day" came from the bonus you received after a set period of employment. A bonus that usually spent on....the purchase of a Ford vehicle.

      It didn't help that Ford was effectivly senile for the last ten or so years of his life. Fascinating man, but also bat-shit insane.

      --
      There are some people that if they don't know, you can't tell 'em.
    2. Re:A similar story... by Kurt+Granroth · · Score: 3, Funny

      That sounds like a variant of a similar joke:

      A new manager is hired to bring an underproducing office up to speed. He decides that he must fire somebody on the first day to show that he means business. While walking through the office, he spots a man leaning against the wall, not doing anything. He is in a room full of workers and so decides that this is the perfect way to start.

      "You! How much do you make a week?", he bellowed at the slacker.
      "About $300," came the reply.

      The manager pulls out his wallet, peels off three hundred dollar bills, and throws them at the man.

      "Here's your money. Now get out and don't come back!"

      Feeling pretty good about the firing, he glared around room. "What was this man's job?", he asked.

      From the back of the room came the reply: "Pizza delivery man"

    3. Re:A similar story... by curious.corn · · Score: 3, Interesting

      Dude you're wrong. It's not the workers that wrecked your auto industry, it's the management. The USA automotive industry develops mostly for the domestic market and there's no way in hell an american car will ever sell on the worldwide marketplace. Your cars are too focused on your national taste and distant from the EU, developing countries or Asia. US cars are generally speaking gargantuan, auto-drive, semi-trucks; such platforms are impossible to reengineer for foreign markets from which you have more or less cut yourself out. Add up some ferocious competition in a mature, saturated industry and some quality control issues and there is your recipe for disaster. Mind you, I'm italian and we have the exact same problem here with FIAT, rescaled appropriately.

      --
      Mi domando chi à il mandante di tutte le cazzate che faccio - Altan
  30. It's everywhere by cyranoVR · · Score: 2, Funny

    I was walking down the street here in NYC and noticed a police van with the door open. Looked in and saw one of those nifty in-car laptops...

    Yup, they had left their Windows Solitaire game up on the screen.

  31. Re:The real question is..... by TeknoHog · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Why should an operating system's default install include games in the first place? Especially a professional edition? Besides, isn't it unfair competition against other game vendors?-)

    --
    Escher was the first MC and Giger invented the HR department.
  32. Re:I dunno about you guys by BoneFlower · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Realistically, roomates. Preferably several with compatable shift/sleep schedules.

    Alternately, you'd be surprised what you can live on. Here in CT minimum wage is 7.55/hr. That works out to 15,704 dollars per year. Absolute crap money pretty much anywhere.

    Rents can be found as low as 500/mo if you really look hard, realistically 600-700 is the lower range for a studio or smallish one bedroom(working on moving out ATM, so my info is fairly current for the New Haven area). Get fond of ramen and Goodwill stores, and you can survive on minimum wage. You will have a pretty shitty life, but you wont' be homeless, and you won't die of malnutrition(some malnutrition related illnesses are possible, but not likely to face a lethal problem in the short term).

    Granted, NYC is a lot more expensive than the ghettos of CT that I'm referring to here, but 27k is also a lot more money than 15.7k. I'm sure most people can survive on that much in NYC if they are willing to be ruthlessly frugal. Not a life many would want, but it is possible.

    This isn't even accounting for various welfare programs which can make living on shit wages much easier, such as Section 8 housing which fixes the max rent you will pay to 1/3rd of your income(run the numbers above, that minimum wage in CT scenario leads to well over half of your income going to housing).

  33. Re:The media goes political again, Go figure. by thx1138_az · · Score: 2, Insightful

    It's the prototypical big mean rich republician squashes the innocent little poor guy news piece. It's meant to incite class envy and to increase a reader base for the reporter/news agency. Here's more...

    > ...But the eagle-eyed mayor - a billionaire former businessman with a certain idea of how offices should be run - noticed Greenwood's game of solitaire glowing on his screen...

    > ..."It's not like I'm the only one that ever did this," said the 39-year-old father of a toddler.

  34. Solitaire Schmolitaire by Toxictoy · · Score: 5, Funny

    Back in 1998 I was working in a helpdesk and a user who was known to be a chronic complainer called saying that she couldn't do her work as there was something wrong with MS Word. We were able to remote control workstations without users having to give permission so I connected to her workstation and what did I see?? Solitaire. Rather than let her know I could see what she was doing I kept asking her about her screen and what she could see on it - all she was doing was giving me ficticious error messages and she was actually continuing her game while she was talking to me. How I resolved the problem was to move her cards around for her and then open MS Office. Once it was open I asked her if there were any other problems she wanted to talk about. After a long silence she said "No- thank you for helping me" and hung up the phone. Needless to say we didn't hear anything from her for a while.

    1. Re:Solitaire Schmolitaire by laing · · Score: 3, Informative

      This reminds me of the old SUN3 workstations. There was almost no security. You could remotely log into another machine, do a "screendump" to an NFS shared partition, and then do a "screenload" on your local workstation to see what anyone was doing anywhere. We used it to look at the managment plan to outsource our entire division to another state and knew about the plan 2 weeks before it was announced.

  35. Re:The real question is..... by Detritus · · Score: 2, Insightful

    User training. Teaching new users how to use a mouse and the basic operations of a GUI. It may seem archaic now, but think back when everyone was switching from DOS/WordPerfect/Lotus-123 to Windows.

    --
    Mea navis aericumbens anguillis abundat
  36. Also lost my job. by Gunslinger47 · · Score: 2, Informative

    I also lost an office job a long while back. They never gave me a reason when they told me it "wasn't working out", but I've learned the details about it recently. Turns out the reason was because the logs showed that I surfed the Internet "three times" in one day. Non-coincidentally, my two coffee-breaks and one lunch break add up to having a break "three times" a day.

    It's such total BS that I'm tempted to call the union, but I won't. The job sucked, and I'm glad to have it behind me.

  37. Re:Just because you can, doesn't mean you should by Limecron · · Score: 2, Funny

    Not that I entirely disagree with you, but a guy who worked at the same job in NYC for 6 years and was only making $27,000/yr was not exactly part of their brain trust.

    Many entry-level retail employees in NYC make $27,000/yr.

  38. Re:The real question is..... by uberjoe · · Score: 2, Interesting

    This might be an urban legend, but I always heard that MS included solitaire to teach people the funtamentals of 'double-click' and 'click-and-drag'. I also seem to remember Apple including a sort of adeventure game on the Apple II gs to teach users similar skills.

    --

    The days of the digital watch are numbered.

  39. lol by majortom1981 · · Score: 2, Insightful

    To bad the didnt say the whole story . It was in newsday. HE was underperforming.

    Also that office was getting downsized.

    That was just the icing on the cake. He was not fired unjustly.

    Boy to people overreact

    1. Re:LOL by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 4, Funny

      It's "Sieg heil".

      Regards,
      Spelling nazi

  40. My worst boss ever... by BiAthlon · · Score: 2, Interesting

    When I was an independant consultant I had the worst boss I've ever had in my life. I got no vacation days, he made me go to work when I was sick, and the bastard was on my ass all the time to find the next gig before the current one was up.

    I will never by my own boss again, I'm an asshole.

  41. Literally... by XanC · · Score: 2, Interesting

    harrased the crap out of them? That must be messy!

  42. The term of the day is "At Will" by Evil+W1zard · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Policy or not its an At Will state just like most of the rest of the country and since the firing isn't because of any protected reason (race, sex, age, etc) then he's out of luck. Shit they could have fired him because they thought he talked too much or they didnt like the way he was looking at them. Right or wrong doesnt really matter when at-will rules the workforce today. Doesnt matter if there was a computer use policy or not. Sucks but its the law of the land for 49 states...

    And good luck trying to prove wrongful termination in court without blatent supporting evidence.

    --
    News Reporters Make Tasty Polar Bear Treats!
  43. How the hell... by sabedoria · · Score: 2, Interesting

    did this employee survive in NYC with 27K a year??!!

  44. Re:Delete the games by Prof.Phreak · · Score: 2, Funny

    Besides, he got fired from a 27K job, in New York. How hard could that be to replace?

    For someone with 6 years of Solitare experience?

    --

    "If anything can go wrong, it will." - Murphy

  45. should have tried nethack by valdean · · Score: 2, Informative
    Nethack is the best game to play at work... no one has a clue what you're doing. Bloomberg wouldn't have even blinked.

    Solitaire is always going to get you in trouble because it's so recognizable.

  46. Re:Good! by Catbeller · · Score: 3, Insightful

    "Who the hell's going to argue with that? Seriously?Who the hell's going to argue with that? Seriously?"

    Me.

    I guess I'm unusual.

    Terry Pratchett once observed that cows are herded by men that, if the cows every thought about it, the cows could convert into a damp smear on the ground in two seconds.

    But the cows never think about it. They are cows. Rebellion never crosses their minds, so they let the pink monkeys herd them into slaughterhouses.

    (plaitive tone) why are we all cows? people died for over a hundred years to create unions so that employers couldn't treat people like peons on a feudal estate. Why do you hate yourselves so much?

  47. Uninstall?? by queenb**ch · · Score: 4, Insightful

    If there is software he's not supposed to be using while he's at work, why is it even installed? It is quite simple to supress the installation of all of the "Games". How's this for logic, Mr Smarty Pants Mayor...If you don't want your employees playing games, DON'T INSTALL THEM....DUH!!!! I really don't see why an employee should be fired for using software that you provided him with, even if it is a game.

    2 cents,

    Queen B

    --
    HDGary secures my bank :/
  48. Re:Good! by heinousjay · · Score: 2, Informative

    No, they fought for the right to form unions so they wouldn't have to working physically backbreaking jobs 14 hours a day seven days a week for a pittance. Nobody died to get the right to slack off in front of the bossman, in lieu of performing their cushy duties.

    --
    Slashdot - where whining about luck is the new way to make the world you want.
  49. I got reamed for Freecell by MsWillow · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Every morning, while my cow-orkers and bosses wasted half an hour getting coffee and talking about TV, I spent 10-15 minutes doing a serious mental workout playing Freecell. It helped me concentrate, and enabled me to better see the consequences of my actions, something very important when fixing bugs or adding features to legacy code. However, my boss's boss only saw that I was playing a game (one that he never could win, to my 25+ game streak), and forced me to stop. So my code quality dropped, but that was irrelevant. What mattered more was that I was seen to be working harder.

    The company got bought out. He kept his job; I ended up homeless.

    --

    Lemon curry?
  50. Ridiculous by omeg · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Totally ridiculous. When you're at work, you can only focus on your daily duties for so long.

    Even the most concentrated employees have to look up Slashdot or their favorite news site at some point for some well-earned distraction. And why? Because it makes you work better afterwards!

    I do this often and I'll thankfully never be fired for it, given the size and type of the company that I work at (graphic design and web development studio), but I don't think that company size has any correlation to the usefulness of a little bit of distraction every now and then.

  51. I play Klondike... by Shag · · Score: 2, Funny

    ...on my Treo, while using the bathroom. At work. No one's complained so far.

    Of course, if I get my work done for the day, then it's Warcraft time...

    No, not on the Treo.

    --
    Village idiot in some extremely smart villages.
  52. Re:Entrapment? by Fire+Dragon · · Score: 2, Insightful

    I would say it is borderline entrapment if you install "illegal" software on someone's computer and bust them when they start to use it...

    goverment allows me to have a car that goes 130mph, but busts me when I do so on 55mph zone.

    I'm allowed to have a gun, but get busted doing something illegal with it.

    I'm living in a free world, having free will. If I know something to be illegal or against policies it is up to me to choose what I want to do. I may break the law/policies as much as I want to, but I have to face penalties if being coucht.

  53. Violate guidelines; would you do one quake frag? by PhYrE2k2 · · Score: 2, Informative

    Oh come on.

    Plain and simple, what you do at work must be within the guidelines of your employer and its computer usage policy.

    You wouldn't bring up quake, even for just a single frag, so why do people think it's suddenly okay to pull up solitaire, hearts, or the latest java/flash game from third party Web sites? The employer couldn't care less that you wanted only a single frag, playing games is probably against their computer policy, and this person is a clear violator of it. You wouldn't pull out a deck of cards either and start playing a game on your desk, though that'd be more of a company policy than a computer and company policy.

    So this is simply that someone didn't follow the rules and is now whining. Some employers are a bit more lax during lunch hours, and that's okay, but you should never just assume that the employer will be okay with you checking personal mail, surfing the net, or playing games during lunch.

    I'm sure what happened in more detail is a boss walked by a few times in a week at varying times (11, 2p, 3p, etc) and saw half the time that this person was playing games instead of working. The employer has every right to kick them out. They're on someone elses dollar, so they damn-well be worth it

    --

    when you see the word 'Linux', drink!
  54. Perception more important -seen this by MonsterMasher · · Score: 2, Interesting

    After years of overwork I was finially given an assistant to train who would help me at my engineering support position in a small company. He spent no more then 15 minutes a day eating a brown bag lunch and playing the ASCII version of startrek.

    Unfortuentally, his desktop could be seen from the hallway and it happened the owner saw this game being played a number of times. He was reassigned away because "he did nothing but play computer games."

    A short time later after getting an amazingly bad performace review I left the company and they hire 3 people (kid you not) to do my jobs (and kept me as a part time consultant for 6 months).

  55. Re:evolved culture, identity politics, immigration by heinousjay · · Score: 3, Insightful

    Believing in a rigid class structure is simply an incorrect mindset that feeds itself the poison you've spewed in your comment. It would certainly help to achieve your aims, because a leftist society requires a rigid class structure to keep the workers in line, but what you're talking about is wishful thinking, not a valid observation.

    These elite shape our culture over decades to make it suit them. They are capital. We are labor. Our interests are for the most part, directly opposed.

    This is only in a society where there is enforced stratification, which isn't the case at all. Anyone, with proper application of willpower, can bring themselves into the level of the so-called elite. No one has a magic barrier preventing this. Only people who refuse to raise themselves up are stuck.

    And anyway, if you thinks American culture is driven by a so-called elite you obviously haven't noticed any popular entertainment over the last fifteen years.

    --
    Slashdot - where whining about luck is the new way to make the world you want.
  56. Solitaire by SuiteSisterMary · · Score: 2, Funny

    One fine day, after installing Microsoft SMS 2.0, I wanted to try out the 'server licensing' feature; install software on each computer, tell SMS how many licenses you actually have, and it lets only that many copies run at a time, queues people up, and so on.

    I decide to test it on Solitare; so I tell the thing that only one copy of sol.exe is allowed to run, fire a copy up on my desktop, try firing it up on my laptop, and sure enough, the laptop gets a message.

    A few minutes later, over comes one of the Vice Presidents, asking me to kindly turn Solitare back on.

    --
    Vintage computer games and RPG books available. Email me if you're interested.
  57. NYC will loose this one by ebrandsberg · · Score: 2, Interesting

    A few months ago I passed a NYC police car at night, and when I glanced in, I saw two police officers playing solitair. The next night, I passed ANOTHER police car with two cops doing the same thing. I went online, and searched for a bit, and found that yes, they WERE allowed to play it by policy during lunch and breaks. This implies it was probably general policy for the city, and as such, simply observing it on someone's desk is not grounds for termination.