Slashdot Mirror


Adult Gamers and Their Ulterior Motives for Gaming

twistedcaboose writes "The Philly Inquirer is running a nice little article about why parents game with their children. Seems that adult gamers are still on the rise." From the article: "In a national survey released in January, 35 percent of 501 parents living with children age 2 to 17 said they played computer or video games, according to the Entertainment Software Association. Of those, 80 percent also played with their children. On average, these fathers and mothers - yes, almost half were women - spent 9.1 hours a month gaming with the children."

203 comments

  1. duh! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny
    why parents game with their children.


    duh! its easier to defeat a kid..

    1. Re:duh! by MyLongNickName · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Yeah, right. Kids have a lot more free time, and studies show that reflexes begin to deteriorate after 25. It tends to be very slow at first, and depending on your work/hobbies may not be noticible... but I know I've been schooled by teeny boppers on many FPS ;)

      --
      See my journal for slashdot ID's by year. Mine created in 2005. http://slashdot.org/journal/289875/slashdot-ids-by-year
    2. Re:duh! by Neoprofin · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Yeah, but kids also seem to know surpsingly little about strategy and tactics. Their nimble little fingers may rule FPSs and fighting games but RTS and TBS will always be the domain of a well sculpted mind.

    3. Re:duh! by Bootvis · · Score: 5, Insightful

      Skilled fps-gamers tend to be smart also. There is actually thinking involved in games like CS and Quake. With good reflexes you can rack up some kills on a public without thinking, but as your opponents improve thinking ahead and predicting them gets more important.
       
        Teamgames also require some good communication-skills

      --
      Read, refresh, repeat.
    4. Re:duh! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      This reminds me of an article I read a long time ago about Michael Jordon.
      In the begining, he was a dominant basketball player because of his physical attributes. But, as he got older, his physical attributes were no longer as dominant, but at that point he'd learned so much more about strategy, about how to play the game, that we was still able to compete.

      However your advantages can only compensate for your shortcomings for so long. Eventually one of them wins out.

    5. Re:duh! by Isotopian · · Score: 1

      That's why you play Battlefield 2. With proper planning and coordination (not the teeny boppers strongest points) a squad can easily defeat even the most talented reflex gamer.

      --

      It's poetry with a beat behind it! And guns! They're like beatniks with automatic weapons.

    6. Re:duh! by Turn-X+Alphonse · · Score: 2, Insightful

      HAHAHAHAH!

      You haven't played RTS games lately have you? They figure out what is the uberish unit early on and rush your ass. Which if you're not prepared for totally owns your ass. So you have to play into their hands and they beat you through know every little trick of the game and using tactics they found on a forum perfected for tournament play.

      --
      I like muppets.
    7. Re:duh! by ShieldW0lf · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Yeah, but kids also seem to know surpsingly little about strategy and tactics. Their nimble little fingers may rule FPSs and fighting games but RTS and TBS will always be the domain of a well sculpted mind.

      Don't know about you, but when I was younger playing MegaTF on Quakeworld, we were doing offense vs defense training and tactics twice a week for weekly 12-on-12 CTF league matches. I'm proud to say that at one point, I was the top ranked Pyro in the world, and could use evasion, communication and guerilla tactics to penetrate and disrupt the flow of just about any defensive strategy. I imagine young people today are doing the same sort of thing, and generalizing them as poor thinkers and strategists is both prejudicial and stupid.

      --
      -1 Uncomfortable Truth
    8. Re:duh! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      My kids kick my butt every time, and they have for the last 5-8 years.

      Fortunately, my eldest is married, and I should be getting a fresh supply of kids to kick around before too long. :)

      On a totally different topic, might I possibly be the first /. grand-dad? Frist old-fart!

    9. Re:duh! by miyako · · Score: 5, Interesting

      There is truth to this. I never was into FPS myself, but a friend of mine used to be hardcore into counterstrike. I remember watching him play when his clan was practicing for the CPL and I was baffled by the amount of strategy that they developed. I actually saw my friend kill several people by shooting through objects when he couldn't see anyone, simply becuase they had their strategy worked out well enough that he knew where it was very likely that people would be.

      --
      Famous Last Words: "hmm...wikipedia says it's edible"
    10. Re:duh! by Sigma+7 · · Score: 2, Insightful
      Their nimble little fingers may rule FPSs and fighting games but RTS and TBS will always be the domain of a well sculpted mind.


      No.

      TBS and RTS games, at the current level of implementation, follow the "click-on-build-dwarf, attack-with-dwarf-army" click-fest. Some games are worse than others, where there is an extremely early rush tactic that wipes everything out. (Civilization included, since enough militia can wipe out a battleship - and "enough" is suprisingly small based on the combat mechanics.)

      Even a kid will recognize when a single unit type is going to be too powerful, and with the advent of the Internet, a kid can just as easily do a websearch. I hope you know the counter-unit (if there is one at all.)

      This is also not counting how most RTS games do their buildup - you start with one Capitol and a few Zerg Drones and need to start from there. This encourages the optimum rush tactic - as well as cranking up the speed to a point where a single Musketeer shoots enough bullets per second to pierce through an invulnerability device.
    11. Re:duh! by Hogwash+McFly · · Score: 3, Funny

      You don't seem to have much luck with games, do you?

      --
      Mother, do you think they'll like this sig?
    12. Re:duh! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      -1, Crybaby

    13. Re:duh! by Saint+V+Flux · · Score: 0

      Which is why Blizzard instituted 'tax' on your gold based on your number of troops with Warcraft 3 -- so that way people would actually learn to use strategy. That's why I rarely play RTS games online.....the other people have no mind, they just think "build lots real quick, rush, done" -- wheres the fun in that?

    14. Re:duh! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      By strategy, it sounds like you mean hax

    15. Re:duh! by ToxicBanjo · · Score: 2, Interesting

      That is the strength of BF2 over other shooters.

      A friend and I play almost every night and we almost always get top of our team. Mainly because we are on TS and working with intelligence and planning. Helps we are both killer shots.

      We just need Ea and Dice to "SORT OUT THE BUGS!!!!" and we'll be fine.

      --
      There are only 10 kinds of people in the world. Those that understand binary and those that don't.
    16. Re:duh! by ObsessiveMathsFreak · · Score: 4, Interesting

      This is why I never got into Counterstrike. I play games to relax, not wind myself up into gordian knots of ultra tension while juggling fifty different variables around in my head only to have someone unexpectedly pull the plug by using a rail gun or nearest cultural equivilent.

      I value my arteries.

      --
      May the Maths Be with you!
    17. Re:duh! by packslash · · Score: 0

      this is very true I've yet to come across a really top level quake player who was't intelligent.

    18. Re:duh! by jred · · Score: 1, Insightful

      Man I hate those fuckers. You shouldn't be able to shoot through a stone/concrete wall!!!

      --

      jred
      I'm not a mechanic but I play one in my garage...
    19. Re:duh! by pkhuong · · Score: 1

      Don't hide right in a corner, then. Camp just off corners and other natural camping spots instead. There isn't any substantial tactical difference, and people shooting at the usualy camping spots won't hit you, or only your limbs.

      --
      Try Corewar @ www.koth.org - rec.games.corewar
    20. Re:duh! by Neoprofin · · Score: 1

      It's a large generalization, about as large as the gap between the quality of the gameplay between tournament level clans and your average 14 year old on a public server. Knowing a few tricks to keep yourself alive longer and having a predefined cordinated action between multiple players in night and day.

      I would never say that there's no thought invovled, but I would certainly say there's less though, and that's coming from some who played just about every major FPS from the day they were released.

    21. Re:duh! by d4nowar · · Score: 0

      That's called wallhack.

    22. Re:duh! by Neoprofin · · Score: 1

      Firstly, I would argue that even the 1:05(or whatever they got it down to) Zerg rush takes more mental strain than playing the average FPS. Secondly, not every strategy game is so flawed. You brought up Civilization, which is the perfect example of what happens when you try to make combat a gradual numerical increase in power and defense and then fit real world equivilents over it. A better example all around would be Alpha Centauri where the combat actually makes sense. Wnat to go even further, explain to me how the complexity of Counterstrike rivals Hearts of Iron, a game even I refuse to play because I don't want to think that hard.

    23. Re:duh! by Nataku564 · · Score: 1

      I assume you are talking about C&C : Generals. I concur, that game blows, and I refuse to classify it as a RTS title, let alone part of the C&C legacy. Granted, its an EA game, so it makes sense.

      I really knew it was bad when one of my friends stated they love it. This friend hates Starcraft. This friend also dislikes games with story elements. This friend was also able to defeat me in about a minute or two.

      C&C Generals is not RTS. Its a top-down twitch-jerk.

      *sob* I miss Westwood.

    24. Re:duh! by ajpr · · Score: 1

      I was voted the spammiest player in the UK. Teamfortress was tactical but most of the time it didn't matter if you lived or died, only when the flag was on the move.

      Now I play CSS/CS and I think it's a lot tougher than TF, because a kill/death is so important and it can happen so easily. A fire fight usually lasts around a second and then the round is often decided. It's better than Quake dm though, as minor skill differences aren't exaggerated. I remember in TF/Q3f I could beat most players in 1v1, but in dm I was really bad. Where am I going with this....Not sure I guess i mean to say teamfortress better portrayed a persons skill than CS and DM, with the latter increasingly increasing the gap between similar skilled players.

    25. Re:duh! by Sigma+7 · · Score: 1
      Firstly, I would argue that even the 1:05(or whatever they got it down to) Zerg rush takes more mental strain than playing the average FPS.


      Once it's obtained, others are sure to follow. It may take some mental strain but only for the first group of times you do it.

      Secondly, not every strategy game is so flawed. You brought up Civilization, which is the perfect example of what happens when you try to make combat a gradual numerical increase in power and defense and then fit real world equivilents over it. A better example all around would be Alpha Centauri where the combat actually makes sense.


      It is true that not every strategy game in flawed - but most are. In some cases, you won't know problems exist until after the game is released.

      Civilization used a system where the total attack value is paired against the total defence value. A Militia has a base defence of 1. +50% for veteren, +200 City walls, and +200 for mountains gives an increase of +450% raising the defence to 4. This gives it around a 4/18 chance of surviving a battleship attack. It also means that throwing sticks against Fighters/Bombers is an effective way of driving them off.

      You could state that the Militia have been upgraded to better weaponry (e.g. muskets) but in that case, the unit itself should be upgraded. It's also a general reason why old cities controlled by players simply have a single Militia or Phalanx - they are cheap and effective defenders.

      That's why Civilization 2 started with the strength system.

      Alpha Centauri has it's own oddities, where there's a varying strength about units depending on whether it is attacking or defending. While this does make sense, it puts a strain on the feeling of the combat system - and generally results in 13-1-1 or 1-13-1 units or however they are.

      Wnat to go even further, explain to me how the complexity of Counterstrike rivals Hearts of Iron, a game even I refuse to play because I don't want to think that hard.


      Haven't played Hearts of Iron.

      But yes, there is that kind of complexity even in an FPS. There's already complaints about "AWP whores" and shields being the invulnerability device of the 21st century. Obviously, those weapons are generally restricted on clan servers.
    26. Re:duh! by Jackmn · · Score: 2, Insightful

      It's called proper use of sound.

      By simply listening for footsteps you can track people well enough to trace them with your crosshair.

      Lots of terribles accuse/ban players for simply knowing how to use sound and where to wall.

    27. Re:duh! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Funny

      I am a 50-year-old man from Sweden. Can I game with your child?

    28. Re:duh! by Criterion · · Score: 1

      "its easier to defeat a kid"

      You've *clearly* never gone up against a child who was raised with a controller in his hand. I've put him (my 7yr old, the one wearing the shirt that says "Berserker") up against mid and late teens (you know, those guys that seem to think they're the best of the best), and the looks on the teens faces when they have death rained down upon them instantly is just priceless.

      For the record, 41yr old mom, gamer pretty much since the inception of computer/console/arcade games.

      --
      We have enough youth, how about a fountain of SMART?
    29. Re:duh! by bronney · · Score: 1

      This is why I never got into Counterstrike. I play games to relax, not wind myself up into gordian knots of ultra tension while juggling fifty different variables around in my head only to have someone unexpectedly pull the plug by using a rail gun or nearest cultural equivilent.

      It's funny but somehow I find the challenge you mention quite relaxing compared to the mundane "challenge" we face everyday at work. I do graphic design and yes we have our challenges but most of the time the client would rather take in "dull but safe" visuals instead of "dynamic but risky (to present to the boss)" visuals. And eventhough I do my best job to slide in function and form, it feels pretty weak at the end of the day.

      That's when I fire up some CS:S at home and pwn some n00bs; and relax a bit.

    30. Re:duh! by Tim+C · · Score: 1

      Sounds like a pretty good work out for your heart, yet without any of that pesky, smelly, time consuming exercise stuff...

    31. Re:duh! by stunt_penguin · · Score: 1

      And when you pwn them, you can get an answer to the question:

      "Whosyourdaddy!"

      "You are, uh, dad"

      I'm a sick, sick man

      --
      When the posters fear their moderators, there is tyranny; when the moderators fears the posters, there is liberty.
    32. Re:duh! by ultranova · · Score: 1

      Civilization used a system where the total attack value is paired against the total defence value. A Militia has a base defence of 1. +50% for veteren, +200 City walls, and +200 for mountains gives an increase of +450% raising the defence to 4. This gives it around a 4/18 chance of surviving a battleship attack.

      Well, even in real life a battleship might not be so good at attacking a walled city in the mountains ;).

      It also means that throwing sticks against Fighters/Bombers is an effective way of driving them off.

      Civ3 solved this problem nicely, with its bombard/air supremacy missions.

      --

      Forget magic. Any technology distinguishable from divine power is insufficiently advanced.

    33. Re:duh! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Adult Gamers and Their Ulterior Motives for Gaming?

      Two words: bouncing boobies.

    34. Re:duh! by Turn-X+Alphonse · · Score: 1

      What can I say, I'm English. If I don't get a tea break every round I'm outright offended. I perfer to play in a way everyone has fun and not abusing the games rules to own everyone.

      Maybe it's just me but I'd rather everyone had fun than being top of the leader board. Go figure.

      --
      I like muppets.
    35. Re:duh! by Guppy06 · · Score: 1

      "Yeah, but kids also seem to know surpsingly little about strategy and tactics."

      What more do they need to know beyond "zerg rush?"

    36. Re:duh! by DennisInDallas · · Score: 1

      obviously not posted by the parent of a teen...

      I have to threaten the kids with grounding/loss of priv/telling their freinds that they play with the old man just to keep from getting beaten too badly.

      Conversely, I buy 'em ice cream when they let me win.

    37. Re:duh! by Sigma+7 · · Score: 1
      Well, even in real life a battleship might not be so good at attacking a walled city in the mountains ;).


      Navarone would be close enough to be a walled city in the mountains, although it's armament isn't really sticks. :)

      It matches the requirements: a walled "city" (really a fortress) within a mountain. There's nothing preventing the battleship from waxing whatever's on the mountain - the only problem would be the coastal defences in the mountain that return fire.
    38. Re:duh! by ultranova · · Score: 1

      Navarone would be close enough to be a walled city in the mountains, although it's armament isn't really sticks. :)

      It matches the requirements: a walled "city" (really a fortress) within a mountain. There's nothing preventing the battleship from waxing whatever's on the mountain - the only problem would be the coastal defences in the mountain that return fire.

      Another problem is the size of the city. The battleships in Civ don't carry significant amount of soldiers, they're just floating gun platforms. As a result, they can bombard the city, but can't invade. Since the city covers a large area, the defenders can simply disperse around the city to minimize their casualties; since the city is in mountains, there's likely to be lots of caves and such they can get to.

      Besides, with a battle being the chaos it is, there is no guarantee of victory, ever, no matter how hopelessly outmatched the enemy might seem. Maybe the militia managed to get a few people to the battleship during the night, and they blew up the armory ?

      Don't forget David vs. Goliath, Greek vs. Persia, the English vs. the Great Armada, RAF vs. Luftwaffe, USA vs. North Vietnam and Finland vs. the Soviet Union - you can never be absolutely certain of who is going to win.

      --

      Forget magic. Any technology distinguishable from divine power is insufficiently advanced.

    39. Re:duh! by Neoprofin · · Score: 1

      You understadn what I said but you missed the point. Civilizations combat system is completely numbers based, an accepted practice, nothing wrong with that. Then to fit into the theme of the game they gave these units names the corrispond to existing ideals. Suddenly a 1-3-1 was "Guy with a sheild" and 6-1-1 was "Guy with a laser rifle" looking at it mathmatically it's obvious why guy with a shield wins when he's in a city defending, he has all sorts of bonuses and was a pretty good defender to begin with, but unfortunately people are still left shouting "GUY WITH A LASER WOULD TOAST GUY WITH A SHEILD! THIS IS BULLSHIT!" based soley on our ideals of imaginary combat between a guy with a sheild and a guy with a laser rifle, much like your example between the militia and the battleship,which is why all the units in the Civ games are flawed and Alpha Centauri is a much better model. Rather than bringing all the associated ideas that we have about the names of the units the progressively better units are simply that, progressively better units.

    40. Re:duh! by buck_wild · · Score: 1

      I have no medical resources to back me up, but I've always heard that you're at the top of your game at age 18. Everything after that is down hill.

      There is an upside, though, as experience counts. If you have an idea of what's coming next (whether it be in life (driving, for example) or games) then you still may have an advantage over the whippersnappers.

      --
      If all you have is a hammer, everything looks like a nail.
    41. Re:duh! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      "I actually saw my friend kill several people by shooting through objects when he couldn't see anyone, simply becuase they had their strategy worked out well enough that he knew where it was very likely that people would be."
      gg H4X!
  2. Doom! by RalphSleigh · · Score: 1

    I wonder what they would think of me playing cooperative doom with dad when I was 9?..

    --
    Come as you are, do what you must, be who you will.
    1. Re:Doom! by cyberwench · · Score: 2, Informative

      *grins* My Dad and I would play Quake with everyone after work at the computer place. Awesome times. We're still hunting for a good game to play long-distance, but his connection's not so hot. Well, that and my brother always skins him alive when we play Warcraft, so that's out. =)

      When we're all at home, we play Soulcalibur. The version depends on whose house we're at, but it's something almost all of us can get into. I play, my guy plays, my brother plays, my sister and her guy play, and Dad plays. Mom... plays solitaire on her laptop, but she does it in the room while we're playing, so she's still pretty sociable.

      --
      ~ Leilah
    2. Re:Doom! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "I wonder what they would think of me playing cooperative doom with dad when I was 9?.."

      Well, it was only yesterday, invite them round tomorrow when you do it again!

  3. "Darn!" by LiftOp · · Score: 5, Funny
    "Darn," mutters 8-year-old Rosemary Corcoran, staring at the 52-inch TV.

    I'd be a little more impressed with that TV, missy. That's your college education you're looking at.

    1. Re:"Darn!" by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "Darn," mutters 8-year-old Rosemary Corcoran, staring at the 52-inch TV.

      I'd be a little more impressed with that TV, missy. That's your college education you're looking at.


      Bah, college education at McCollege maybe. A 52-inch TV barely covers a year worth of school lunches in K-12.

    2. Re:"Darn!" by dotgain · · Score: 1

      I'll bet you're lots of fun at parties!

    3. Re:"Darn!" by Eccles · · Score: 1

      52" TV ~= $2000 = a college education? Where can I sign?

      --
      Ooh, a sarcasm detector. Oh, that's a real useful invention.
    4. Re:"Darn!" by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      here -> http://www.affordabledegrees.com/

      You can get 10 PhDs for $2K, and have $10 left over to by a pizza for your graduation party.

    5. Re:"Darn!" by Mr2001 · · Score: 1

      If she could invest that $2000 and get a 15% annual return (pretty high, but let's say she gets lucky), she'd have over $8000 by the time she turned 18. That's not too bad for college tuition.

      And frankly, $2000 is cheap for a HDTV that big, especially if it was bought a year ago.

      --
      Visual IRC: Fast. Powerful. Free.
    6. Re:"Darn!" by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      52" TV ~= $2000 = a college education? Where can I sign?
      You silly Americans, in my "socialist" European country, you've got a lot left over on that ammount. I got a diploma at the best university in the country for less than that ammount. If my parents would have been poor, it would have been even less (free education with money on top).

      And yes, I like to pay taxes :P
    7. Re:"Darn!" by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      Ok, $8,000 saved for 18 years...



      So how do they pay for the next quarter? Loans? Not with Congress cutting those repeatedly.

    8. Re:"Darn!" by Mr2001 · · Score: 1

      About 60 percent of students attending public four-year colleges pay less than $6,000 for tuition and fees per year.

      $8000 isn't an entire college education, but it's nothing to scoff at. The $2000 price tag on that HDTV set could pay for a quarter all by itself.

      --
      Visual IRC: Fast. Powerful. Free.
    9. Re:"Darn!" by Eccles · · Score: 1

      a 15% annual return (pretty high...)

      Yes, pretty high. Assuming more than 10% is unreasonable, and most assume more like 8%. At 10%, you end up with $5,200.

      And frankly, $2000 is cheap for a HDTV that big, especially if it was bought a year ago.

      At the moment, Best Buy has 52" projection TVs from $1100 to $2600.

      But what of it? $2K is a relatively small part of any family's budget, especially for something that a fairly long time. I've spent more than that on cable/internet in the last two years. (And, in the meantime, contributed quite a bit to a 529 plan for each kid.)

      --
      Ooh, a sarcasm detector. Oh, that's a real useful invention.
    10. Re:"Darn!" by elrous0 · · Score: 1
      I'll bet you're lots of fun at parties!

      Women want to be with him, men want to be him.

      -Eric

      --
      SJW: Someone who has run out of real oppression, and has to fake it.
  4. Did anyone else read the headline by antifoidulus · · Score: 5, Funny

    and think of a different meaning for the word "adult"?

    Pr0n with my parents would just be a bit odd...

    1. Re:Did anyone else read the headline by MyLongNickName · · Score: 1

      Pr0n with my parents would just be a bit odd...

      Damn... and I just ate.

      --
      See my journal for slashdot ID's by year. Mine created in 2005. http://slashdot.org/journal/289875/slashdot-ids-by-year
    2. Re:Did anyone else read the headline by sharkey · · Score: 1

      Unless you're Quagmire. Giggidy-giggidy-giggidy-goo!

      --

      --
      "Outlook not so good." That magic 8-ball knows everything! I'll ask about Exchange Server next.
    3. Re:Did anyone else read the headline by TubeSteak · · Score: 1
      Pr0n with my parents would just be a bit odd...

      Damn... and I just ate.

      And yet your sig says: ...the whole _point_ of slashdot is to have this big public wanking session...

      Are you 100% sure your dad and/or relatives don't post to Slashdot?

      Cause if they did... that'd be kinda gross. For you at least.
      --
      [Fuck Beta]
      o0t!
    4. Re:Did anyone else read the headline by NitsujTPU · · Score: 1

      I thought that it would be a scare article about pedophiles.

    5. Re:Did anyone else read the headline by gardyloo · · Score: 1


              Pr0n with my parents would just be a bit odd...

                      Damn... and I just ate.

      And yet your sig says: ...the whole _point_ of slashdot is to have this big public wanking session...

      Are you 100% sure your dad and/or relatives don't post to Slashdot?

      Cause if they did... that'd be kinda gross. For you at least.


            I love insight from people with nicks like "TubeSteak".

    6. Re:Did anyone else read the headline by inerte · · Score: 1

      My dad used to steal my porn magazines :p

    7. Re:Did anyone else read the headline by caston · · Score: 0

      But it was only to see if your mum was in them again.

      --
      Beings aspergers AND pulling chicks... I enjoy the challenge!
    8. Re:Did anyone else read the headline by gstoddart · · Score: 1
      Pr0n with my parents would just be a bit odd...

      Watching Pr0n with your parents would be odd.

      Any other possible interpretation of that sentence would be beyond odd.
      --
      Lost at C:>. Found at C.
    9. Re:Did anyone else read the headline by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      If you saw my stopmom you might think it was a good idea.

  5. Uninsightful by Austerity+Empowers · · Score: 5, Insightful

    People who enjoyed games as kids play as adults with their kids. Shock, dismay.

    People who enjoyed playing football as kids, watch football as adults and live vicariously through their kids playing football.

    The only people who wouldn't expect this are people who didn't play games as kids. They also happen to be the social types with lots of misconceptions about what 'normal' is.

    There's nothing to see here, move along.

    1. Re:Uninsightful by iocat · · Score: 5, Insightful

      To you or me, it's obvious, but let's give credit when credit is due: after all the pointless, stupid, incorrect, negative articles about games, it's excellent to see some (well deserved) good press.

      --

      Dude, I think I can see my house from here.

    2. Re:Uninsightful by syphax · · Score: 0, Flamebait


      Huh. I basically grew up playing video games (from the 2600 on up), and now have kids. I have no desire to have them play video games, nor do I play many anymore ('cept killing time in airports and such on my Treo). I view all that time playing games and watching TV as largely a waste.

      And don't assume that I am a pyshco parent who doesn't let his kids have any fun. Far from it; if anything my kids are under-programmed. I prefer to spend time when them just, you know, doing things. Reading books. Going outside. Jumping on the bed. Playing with Legos.

      When they get older, I'm sure we'll butt heads and maybe end up with a console. But its use will be heavily restricted.

      So, my point is (and maybe I'm an outlier), it doesn't follow that we all seek to replicate our childhood.

      BTW, what the hell does The only people who wouldn't expect this are people who didn't play games as kids. They also happen to be the social types with lots of misconceptions about what 'normal' is mean?

      --
      Simple Unexpected Concrete Credible Emotional Stories
    3. Re:Uninsightful by Jonboy+X · · Score: 4, Funny

      So you're saying the same toys we enjoyed as children, we still enjoy as adults? It seems only natural that we might outgrow...

      Hold on one sec, FunPhone call.

      Yes Goofy, I like talking to you too.

      As I was saying...

      --

      "In a 32-bit world, you're a 2-bit user. You've got your own newsgroup, alt.total.loser." -Weird Al
    4. Re:Uninsightful by pla · · Score: 4, Insightful

      I view all that time playing games and watching TV as largely a waste.

      Spoken like someone who makes "adult" something I never want to "grow up" and turn into - And I say this as a 30YO.



      And don't assume that I am a pyshco parent who doesn't let his kids have any fun.
      ... we'll butt heads and maybe end up with a console. But its use will be heavily restricted.


      Uh-huh. Spoken like a true psycho parent who will do anything to deny it.

      Do you even remember why you played games as a kid?

      We get to slave away 40+ hours a week for the majority of our lives. Let the buggers have fun while they can.



      BTW, what the hell does ... mean?

      Just asking means it refers to you. You may have escaped as a child, but have since apparently bought into the lie full-on.

      It means people who consider childhood wasted on children - Why, just think of all the productive activities they could engage in, like memorizing dates and multiplication tables, social networking, part-time jobs, and backstabbing their way up the young Republicans club ladder!

      No. Kids just want to play and have fun. And I say, "let 'em".

    5. Re:Uninsightful by Angostura · · Score: 1

      When they get older, I'm sure we'll butt heads and maybe end up with a console

      Speaking as a parent of a 3 year old and a 6 month old, I think the 'butt heads' things is a bit weird. My kids get to watch virtually zero TV but enjoy mucking about with me on the computer and playing simple games. This isn't competitive any more than playing with play dough is, or building train tracks (OK, I build a mean train-track). It's a way of sharing some fun. And if she learns to handle a mouse, so be it.

    6. Re:Uninsightful by syphax · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Apparently the gamers have mod points today; I got modded 'troll' for the 1st time ever, and the AC who responded to you also got trolled.

      Anyway, I'll bite:

      Uh-huh. Spoken like a true psycho parent who will do anything to deny it.
      Yeah, and you certainly have enough information to make that judgement.
      We also limit how much TV the kids (and we) watch (we don't have cable, on purpose), and plan to discourage smoking and excessive underage drinking. Call DSS.

      Do you even remember why you played games as a kid?
      Since you asked- my dad died when I was six, and my mom was (and is) mentally ill. That's why I've seen every single episode of the Brady Bunch N times over and spent much of the remainder of my time at a console. My best memories of childhood, however, are of playing in the woods with friends.

      Let the buggers have fun while they can.
      Yeah, I'm anti-fun. That's why I spent 2+ hours playing 'jaguar and penguin' with my kids yesterday. I'm not exactly sure what the rules were, but it basically involved whomever was the jaguar chasing the penguins.

      You may have escaped as a child, but have since apparently bought into the lie full-on
      I escaped reality as a child, but now rather enjoy real life. If by 'the lie' you mean the idea that gaming and TV aren't the be-all and end-all of human experience, than yeah, I bought in fully.

      just think of all the productive activities they could engage in
      See: the jaguar and pengiun game

      backstabbing their way up the young Republicans club ladder!
      Bzzt. Wrong again.

      Kids just want to play and have fun. And I say, "let 'em".
      I agree fully.

      To summarize: Fun is good. Too much of TV or video games (esp. TV) is bad. I prefer 'real' fun to the packaged kind.

      --
      Simple Unexpected Concrete Credible Emotional Stories
    7. Re:Uninsightful by Breakfast+Pants · · Score: 2, Insightful

      And yet parents enjoy playing peekaboo with their kids for some reason.

      --

      --

      WHO ATE MY BREAKFAST PANTS?
    8. Re:Uninsightful by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Ah, right. "Real fun". I see your brilliance!

    9. Re:Uninsightful by eht · · Score: 2, Interesting

      You might want to leave the Republican vs Democrat junk out of this, most of the groups who want to ban the games and music to save the kids groups are supported by people who claim they're Democrats, Hilary Clinton, Tipper Gore, and Joseph Lieberman to name a few.

    10. Re:Uninsightful by Y0tsuya · · Score: 1
      No. Kids just want to play and have fun. And I say, "let 'em".

      When I was a kid, this means poking at dead animals in the back yard, or watch same scenery go by as we drive cross-country in our station wagon. Why can't kids today do the same?

      No I say we kick them out to the street and don't come back until they've poked at least a few dead carcasses a day.

    11. Re:Uninsightful by porcupine8 · · Score: 1
      Wow, thanks for making me giggle. A whole lot. And then read it again so I can giggle some more. Even if you're not a 35-year-old businessman in a suit and tie sitting in a corner office, that is what I have pictured you as for purposes of reading your comment over and over and continuing to giggle.

      Sorry I have no mod points for you.

      --
      Warning: Apple/Nintendo fangirl. Likes her electronics cute & cuddly. May be rabid.
    12. Re:Uninsightful by Voltageaav · · Score: 1

      Sure,I had a computer by the ime I was 7. I had the original Atari before that and I've owned every console Nintendo's put out since they started. But untill I was in High School, my main idea of fun was taking wooden swords we all had and start swinging at each other. Sure, there were a few broken fingers and a collar bone one time, but it was all in fun and kids heal fast. Once I was in highschool, I played video games more, but I would still rather go out on an ATV/Snowmobile or hoseback riding if there was someone else who wanted to go. Paintball is still a blast and If I see a casual foltball game, I'll be playing. Minds aren't the only thing kids develop when their young. It affectes how athletic they are later in life. Now If I had any, sure, I would let them play video games, but I would do my very best to get then to want to get out and do other things.

      --
      Someone save me from this sanity.
    13. Re:Uninsightful by Austerity+Empowers · · Score: 1

      s/FunPhone/CellPhone/g
      s/Goofy/The Boss/g

      Pretty much the more things change, the more they stay the same.

    14. Re:Uninsightful by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Games and TV are completely different worlds. Don't confuse the tube with the medium.
      Games are two way, in the player's control, challenge you, and you can put it down whenever.
      No different from going outside except lacking in exercise.

      TV barks at you, puts in phony debates, puts you to sleep, and you can only get that show at some specific time.
      No different from turning our homes into prisons.

    15. Re:Uninsightful by rtb61 · · Score: 2, Interesting
      Oddly enough true. Democrats - production (create your own content), Republicans - consumption (pay for approved content). Guess which group receives the majority of "er" funding from the pigopolists.

      Not that games are bad but I can understand a parents point of view but at the same time don't beat yourself up for "wasting time" playing games that you could have supposably spent being more productive or successful, likely enough without the stress relief of gaming you could end up a lot worse off rather than being a lot better off.

      Dropping the dumb jock attitude helps as well, chasing a ball on grassy field or running around in circles like the neighbourhood bow-wows (although a lot of them seem to be of a similar intellect) is some how more constructive than going for a pleasant walk and playing computer games afterwards.

      The beauty of computer games is that the whole family can play together largely free from the risk of injury and as a bonus dumb jocks. Why spectate when you can play instead ;-).

      The future of family game play and education, networked notebooks.

      --
      Chaos - everything, everywhere, everywhen
    16. Re:Uninsightful by Elemenope · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Because in that case, the kid is the toy. A blubbery interactive toy. Bouncy, too.

      --
      All the techniques ever used to make men moral have been themselves thoroughly immoral... (Nietzsche)
    17. Re:Uninsightful by Criterion · · Score: 1

      "No different from going outside except lacking in exercise."

      Unless, that is, you make sure to throw in a round of DDR at least once a day :).

      --
      We have enough youth, how about a fountain of SMART?
    18. Re:Uninsightful by elrous0 · · Score: 1
      My best memories of childhood, however, are of playing in the woods with friends.

      Yeah, me too. That's how I got molested for the first time.

      Oh Juan, I went into that shed a boy and came out a man. How I miss your special games.

      -Eric

      --
      SJW: Someone who has run out of real oppression, and has to fake it.
    19. Re:Uninsightful by Guppy06 · · Score: 1

      Open accounts payable, Mina speaking, just a moment.

    20. Re:Uninsightful by SailorMeeko · · Score: 1

      You should check out TiVo, http://www.tivo.com/, it will help with that last part. Now you can play your video games even longer, safe and secure in the knowledge that your favorite shows are being saved up for you to watch later.

      > TV barks ... and you can only get that show at some specific time.

  6. I only play for one reason.... by Daemonik · · Score: 5, Funny

    That brief 24 hour window when I can crush my nephew in a new game before he can devote all his free time to memorizing all the combo-moves and strategy guides. It doesn't matter if I never win a game again after that, the memory of that defeat is seared into his soul. Muahahahahahahah

    1. Re:I only play for one reason.... by __michikal · · Score: 1

      And if he does this before you get the game?

    2. Re:I only play for one reason.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

      That's the trick though:

      Kid: So unc, I've been playing this game for a couple of weeks. It rules, wanna go?
      Old Fart: Nah. What about this one though?
      Kid: Never heard of it
      Old Fart: Let's Play... >:D

  7. Nothing To See Here by TooMuchEspressoGuy · · Score: 4, Insightful
    I suppose it may come as a surprise to some gamers whose parents never really supported their habit, but there are those mothers and fathers out there who can enjoy games just as much as their kids.

    Heck, back when I owned an N64 my dad used to get in rounds of Goldeneye and Mario Kart with me and my brother after school. And he had never really touched a game system before, except for brief spurts on the systems that we owned before that (NES and SNES).

    This might even be seen by some as an improvement over the television habit that many parents have and pass on to their kids.

    --
    Many Bothans died to bring you this sig.
    1. Re:Nothing To See Here by nwbvt · · Score: 5, Insightful

      I think the headline here is that parents are spending time with their kids, which is something that apparently now is so rare that it has become newsworthy.

      --
      Mathematics is made of 50 percent formulas, 50 percent proofs, and 50 percent imagination.
    2. Re:Nothing To See Here by Arramol · · Score: 1

      Definitely true. If parents want to spend time with their kids, they're going to have to do it by doing the things the kid enjoys. Playing games with your kids strikes me as a very healthy habit. It allows the parents to maintain a good relationship with their child, and it keeps them aware of what kind of games their kids are playing so they can actually do something about it if the games do start to have a negative influence. And you certainly hit the nail on the head as far as TV goes. Video games have been shown to have a number of positive effects on the brain. If such benefits exist as far as television goes, I'm not aware of them.

  8. All the natural by Tellarin · · Score: 4, Insightful

    I don't get why all this about grown ups playing games. It is all the natural.
    As Huizinga points in his book (Homo Ludens), since 1939 and before, play is part of culture. And play is inevery aspect of our lives.

    1. Re:All the natural by shokk · · Score: 1

      On the contrary. We must be robots, working at 100% efficiency between sleep cycles, Comrade Tellarin!! Play is for the weak. At least until that little pecker gets anywhere near my Team Snipers ranking.

      --
      "Beware of he who would deny you access to information, for in his heart, he dreams himself your master."
    2. Re:All the natural by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Huizinga had a Game Man? All I got was a Game Boy...

  9. Gaming with my son by Bob+McCown · · Score: 4, Informative


    My son, 12, and I often play PS2, or multiplayer PC games together. Crash Team Racing, or Gauntlet on the PS2, and assorted games like Age of Sail II, etc, on the PC. We have fun, and that's what counts.

    1. Re:Gaming with my son by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      My son, 12, and I often play...

      You named your son 12?

      That's pretty weird.

    2. Re:Gaming with my son by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Maybe his son is a cylon.

    3. Re:Gaming with my son by daniel422 · · Score: 1

      Abolutely agree. Lego Star Wars has become a staple at my house for my son (4 yrs old) and I. It's about all I let him play, but he loves it and we have a great time together. I'll also agree with some of those "other" parents who say too much of anything is bad -- we try to limit our kids TV time, simply because it's too easy to watch TV. They get plenty of it -- it's good to encourage other activities.
      But I still love the social aspects of gaming -- I think it's one of the best elements video games have to offer.

    4. Re:Gaming with my son by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I love slashdot.

  10. Re:Oh, the pain. by Lumpy · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Not.

    I still regularly kick my stepson and his friends arses in Quake4, UT2004 and C&C generals zero hour. Also a good game of Mariokart is usually a good time for a smackdown where out of 10 races I tend to be the victor overall.

    Every once in a while A new friend of his comes along with some skills until I learn his pattern and start the Ownage.

    Yup 37 and can kick the arse of any teen in a FPS. It's all about prediction and less about twitch skills.

    Yes I used to go to lanpartys all the time back when it was popular in college. No I do not recover as well the day or two after spending 24 hours gaming drinking caffeene and eating only junkfood.... that is the problem with getting old.

    --
    Do not look at laser with remaining good eye.
  11. Better than dumping them in front of the TV by hattig · · Score: 5, Interesting

    And the TV companies know this, hence they love to dredge up anti-game news whenever they can.

    When I was a kid, I didn't have a computer or console until I was 11, and that was a second hand 8-bit CPC464. My mum played Stockmarket with me but that's about it.

    And it is good to have your parents play games with you, it makes it more social, it stops them watching TV (oooh, Timeteam is on, must speed this post up) and probably sharpens their mind a little, counteracting the gradual decline due to everyday life they otherwise suffer.

    It's good for bonding too, too few parents do this. And the parents can see what the games are like and if they're suitable.

    I'm sure it will lead to more rounded teenagers and adults, better able to cope with problem solving and jumping from ledge to ledge, as you do.

    1. Re:Better than dumping them in front of the TV by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Rounded... yes indeed. Both in the "well" and "physical" sense.

    2. Re:Better than dumping them in front of the TV by Criterion · · Score: 1

      "Rounded... yes indeed. Both in the "well" and "physical" sense."

      My my.. an AC, on /. commenting about lack of physical excercise during a chosen activity.

      Does anyone besides me see the irony?

      --
      We have enough youth, how about a fountain of SMART?
  12. co-operative play by zmollusc · · Score: 5, Funny

    You can bond with your children by sharing the gaming experience. Even when they are too small to operate the keyboard and mouse, they can always wear the headset while playing CS or Battlefield 2. "Tell DethBr1n90r he is a fucking faggot, honey!"

    --
    They whose government reduces their essential liberties for temporary security, receive neither liberty nor security.
  13. Real simple by scolby · · Score: 3, Funny

    I enjoy pwning my newb children on a regular basis. Best that they learn from me rather than out on the streets.

    1. Re:Real simple by MyLongNickName · · Score: 5, Funny

      Man #1: Dad's starting to lose it. Just the other day, he put the milk outside at night, and put the cat in the fridge.
      Man #2: Yea, bro, I've noticed he's getting worse by the day.
      Man #1: Yea, I'm thinking I should get him to move in with me, so my wife and I can watch over him close. Would you mind helping out on the weekends?
      Man #2: Yeah, right!
      Man #1: What do you mean?!
      Man #2: You remember when we played Enemy Territory? And he'd covert ops our asses left and right?
      Man #1: Yea... and he'd always voip over to use "You've been pwned noob! Just cuz he's got your uni on doesn't mean he's on your team. LOL!"...
      Man #2: Send the fucker to a home.
      Man #1: Yeah... what was I thinking?!

      --
      See my journal for slashdot ID's by year. Mine created in 2005. http://slashdot.org/journal/289875/slashdot-ids-by-year
    2. Re:Real simple by Hortense+Yaya · · Score: 1

      Try playing a spelling game with them

    3. Re:Real simple by Criterion · · Score: 1

      Enjoy them while they're young, because before you know it, they'll own your ass in a heartbeat.

      --
      We have enough youth, how about a fountain of SMART?
    4. Re:Real simple by pembo13 · · Score: 1

      Dam tha was funny. I think I shed a tear or two luaghing.

      --
      "Thanks for all the money you paid to us. We've used it to buy off ISO among other things" -Microsoft
    5. Re:Real simple by emilper · · Score: 1

      Watch out ... you might just teach them that "pwning" is fair game with you ...

      When I was a kid (a long, long time ago), my father thought that computers were just game machines and refused to buy one even if before 1989 microcomputers were quite afordable this part of the world, but last year, when I bought him a PC, I was shocked when he was really upset/dissapointed when he discovered that I did not install games, and for almost a day did not speak with me ... so I left him only with word processing and spreadsheets for a couple of month ...

    6. Re:Real simple by elrous0 · · Score: 1
      so I left him only with word processing and spreadsheets for a couple of month ...You know, if you substitute "no food and water" and "a waste bucket" for "word processing" and "spreadsheets" then I would have the exact same story. Small world, huh?

      -Eric

      --
      SJW: Someone who has run out of real oppression, and has to fake it.
  14. I play 2 games with my 5-year old by ylikone · · Score: 5, Informative
    "Planeshift" on the computer and "Heroscape" on the table top.

    He loves them both and so do I.

    http://planeshift.it/

    http://heroscapehq.com/

    --
    Meh.
  15. What a stupid article title! Family gaming is fun! by WidescreenFreak · · Score: 3, Insightful

    What is this "ulterior motive" crap? That summary screams "Conspiracy!!"

    I've been a gamer since the Commodore 64 days. Why do I play them? Because they're fun, perhaps? So many of these articles act like it's shocking that those who grew up gaming are (shocking!) still gaming and (more shocking!) getting their kids involved with gaming.

    Why would I play games with my daughter? Because it's something that we can do together without the rigamarole of Want to play this? No. Want to play that? No. We know what games we like to play as a family, and it's at least better time than just sitting around watching TV.

    Having been a gamer for 20+ years and having a wife who's really not into gaming, this is a great way for me to finally have a gaming partner. Sure, I'm not about to let my 6-year-old play Battlefield 2 (not that she could anyway), but even something as simple as Mario Kart 64 is still fun!

    But for me there's an even more important aspect. Those who don't have kids - and even some parents, unfortunately - might have difficulty understanding that kids want their parents' attention. Yes, I want my BF2 time, but if given the choice between BF2 or some N64 game with my kids, the N64 will win every time. I get to have fun; my kids get to have fun; and I get to show my kids that I'm willing to spend my time doing things with them. That means a hell of a lot more to me (and my kids, I'm sure) than getting a Veteran Support Badge while my kids sit watching TV.

    --
    The Overrated mod is for reversing inappropriate, positive mods, not for voicing disagreement with a post.
  16. Re:Oh, the pain. by ShieldW0lf · · Score: 3, Funny

    I bet my daughter would kick your ass at Putt-Putt Saves the Zoo. She beats me every time. But I can still beat her at Rapunzel.

    --
    -1 Uncomfortable Truth
  17. Re:What a stupid article title! Family gaming is f by __michikal · · Score: 1

    The adults want to play video games! OMGOMG! They're gonna infect da chil'ens!

  18. Kiddie gamers becoming adult gamers... by __aaclcg7560 · · Score: 3, Funny

    When are we going to have a presidential candidate who will make this promise: "A gamepad in every hand and a T1 line in every home!"

    1. Re:Kiddie gamers becoming adult gamers... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Informative

      When you realize that T1 is only 1.5 mbps... and that most home connections already exceed that easily. :P

    2. Re:Kiddie gamers becoming adult gamers... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      But A t1 is bi-directionaly sycronous at least, none of this 512k up crap.

    3. Re:Kiddie gamers becoming adult gamers... by ZeroExistenZ · · Score: 2, Interesting
      When are we going to have a presidential candidate

      The Belgian SP.A already did. Overhere we don't work with Presidents, but or ministers sortof function like one, so it's about the same.

      In essence, they state a child growing up in relative poverty thus being unable to grow up with a PC and internet is put behind in development and wont get as much chances as a child having access to a PC and information found on the internet as a PC is considered a requirement these days for education and work. So the SP.A proposed a project to sell computers for 40% under the normal price with a cheap formula for an internet connection which got approved and these PCs can be found starting this month in Belgium. With the PC comes a free 4-hour computer course as well so "noone has to miss out on the digital revolution" :)

      --
      I think we can keep recursing like this until someone returns 1
    4. Re:Kiddie gamers becoming adult gamers... by __aaclcg7560 · · Score: 1

      A T3 then? You can't expect politicians - or garden-variety /. posters - to keep up with all the latest technological advances. :P

    5. Re:Kiddie gamers becoming adult gamers... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      To add to what he said, T1 lines don't have line sharing either. It's a full 1.5Mbps, not a random percentage of the advertised speed.

    6. Re:Kiddie gamers becoming adult gamers... by Guppy06 · · Score: 1

      If Slashdot were any sort of representative cross-section, he'd ignite a civil war for saying "gamepad" and not "keyboard and mouse."

  19. Re:Oh, the pain. by shokk · · Score: 3, Funny

    Only until the inevitable "Monopoly Moment" (aka, the Great Scattering) where controllers go flying, the console breaks against the wall, and the unstoppable primal scream of Hulk Smash!! Then who Pwnz who, eh?!? Or so I've heard.

    --
    "Beware of he who would deny you access to information, for in his heart, he dreams himself your master."
  20. Virtua Fighter 2, (Back in the Day). by RossumsChild · · Score: 2, Interesting

    I distinctly recall, in late high school, a period when the Virtua Fighter games were all I played. In particular, I thought I had gotten pretty skilled at VF2. I had the run of an arcade and was accepting challengers left and right, then sending them off dejected. . . .that is until a mexican kid that can't have been more than seven years old showed up. They actually had to get the kid a footstool so he could reach the controls. And he cleaned my clock in consecutive rounds. I don't think I've ever been so thoroughly beaten in any game on any system. So, just a thought, there are abberations to the rule.

    1. Re:Virtua Fighter 2, (Back in the Day). by Idealius · · Score: 1

      Why did he beat you? Superior endurance, expression, exposition of your intentions, etc?

      If you don't know how you lose then winning is a gamble. The best way to become unstoppable is to find a strategy that is hard to figure out, that way when you beat someone you can still beat them the next time. Basic rules of power, art of war stuff, though I've never read those two.

      Anyway my point is it sounds like he beat you because he cared more, in which case congrats: You have a life. :)

  21. You are never to old to have fun! by Kilz · · Score: 3, Insightful

    Wouldnt this world be boreing if you had to give up things you engoy just because of age? I am 42 and will never give up gaming. Why? Because I can aford it and I enjoy it. The same reason I have a computer and a ton of other toy's. Being interactive is a lot better than sitting in front of the TV like a lot of people my age.

    --
    I trust Microsoft as far as I could comfortably spit a dead rat
    1. Re:You are never to old to have fun! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      To bad gameing dosent improve you're speling.

    2. Re:You are never to old to have fun! by Kilz · · Score: 1

      Keep posting as Anonymous Coward. I think it fits you.

      --
      I trust Microsoft as far as I could comfortably spit a dead rat
    3. Re:You are never to old to have fun! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      He has a point though, you can't spell for shit, chieftan.

    4. Re:You are never to old to have fun! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      He cant spell, and you have no courage. Sounds like a draw to me. Dam to many english teachers here.

    5. Re:You are never to old to have fun! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      At least the original poster was on topic.........

    6. Re:You are never to old to have fun! by Madmongo · · Score: 0

      And a Massive W00T to that! Damn, Im 35 now. Haircut, real job... That means I can now afford to have a sweet set of guitars and pay for some online game time through a fat internet connection. And now, my kids can jump on their laptops (and usually the couch in my study) and fire up Anarchy Online...and we can go pwn some mobs together, eat to much junk food and generally have a fat old time :) And I wouldnt have it any other way!

  22. Sample size is too small by soricine · · Score: 4, Insightful
    This is a 'national' survey, with a sample size of 500?

    With a sample so small, this is speculation masquerading as data.

    1. Re:Sample size is too small by endersdouble · · Score: 2, Informative

      Um...no.
      Learn statistics before you make statistical claims.
      Seriously, as much as I hated stat this year in college, it was a damn useful class, and everyone should have to take it in high school. Until you actually know a bit about how this stuff works, it's surprising how misinformed you can be. All sorts of stuff is masqueraded as "statistics" in the media, when a lot of it's just plain BS. People have so many misconceptions about stat it's not even funny.

      And yes, it's still true that there are lies, damn lies, and statistics.

    2. Re:Sample size is too small by microarray · · Score: 1

      Well, the sample size is small, but it really depends on how they were selected. Of course, the item of most concern is that it's not a peer-reviewed study published in a reputable journal, it's just a "survey".

    3. Re:Sample size is too small by euxneks · · Score: 1

      I'm not a statistician, but from what I can recall from University, you only need a sufficiently representative group of people in order to have some valid statistics - this could mean that, if you had this group, you could probably poll less people and have a more representative statistic than with a larger group of people.

      Granted, the more people you get the more representative it would probably get, but after a certain number of people, the error margin for the statistics become rediculously similar for larger increments of the polling group.

      Anyone care to correct me on this?

      --
      in girum imus nocte et consumimur igni
  23. Ulterior Motives by sdamberger · · Score: 4, Insightful

    The only ulterior motive mentioned was to know the content of the games which is certainly a good thing. I like to know what my son is getting bombarded by daily so that I can combat anything I think is negative.

    I just enjoy the games and the time spent with my son. I also like to game with him because it lets me see how he reacts to competition in a friendly environment. I get to give him advice on how to handle winning and losing.

  24. Re:Oh, the pain. by Da+Stylin'+Rastan · · Score: 1

    37 Huh? Assuming you went to college at a traditional age, its funny, I dont remember too many LAN parties in 1989...

  25. The "ulterior motive" by rsilvergun · · Score: 3, Informative

    is playing video games instead of the usual 'Family fun' with the wife and kids. i.e. "Sure Honey, lets spend the evening together as a family... Power Leveling in WoW!". Plus it's a great way to talk the missus into letting you drop 8 grand on high end computers for the entire house or 4 grand on a home theatre + game console.

    --
    Hi! I make Firefox Plug-ins. Check 'em out @ https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/youtube-mp3-podcaster/
  26. The only ulterior motive I can see by Opportunist · · Score: 3, Insightful

    The same reason why my dad got me a train set: He wants to play with it and doesn't want to admit it.

    So they can say "Hey, it's not like I wanna play. It's the kid, and I gotta play with them because, as a responsible parent, I should know what they're doing... Damn, I'm outta rockets."

    --
    We used to have a Bill of Rights. Now, with the rights gone, all we have left is the bill.
    1. Re:The only ulterior motive I can see by Helios1182 · · Score: 1
      Probably the same reason my dad got me a BB gun, model rockets, chemistry kits, and a bunch of other stuff. He had fun with them as a kid, he had a kid, why not have fun with you kid?

      He didn't get into video games with me much, but it was him who started me on computers. We did play a lot of Sim City and similar games back in the day though. He also got me a GameCube for Christmas a year ago, just what a college senior needed. You never need to grow up all the way.

  27. The wife and I game with our youngins, too by MikeyTheK · · Score: 5, Interesting

    I'm...not young. I remember when Pong was brand new and way cool. First game console: Coleco. The wife isn't young either. We have...several kids. The oldest is eight. She loves to play Halo 2 on Live with Ma or Pa or both. It is yet another way for her to interact with us, and on a more engaging, exciting level. It's constant action, so it's more interesting for them than, say, throwing the ball in the yard or riding a bike. It's also lots of fun for us to play with her because it's a relatively level playing field. It's something we can all do, and nobody sucks any worse at than anybody else does.

    Of course, we also found that we were suffering from "video game tummy", until we stumbled upon DDR (Dance Dance Revolution). All of a sudden there was another game, one that involved some exercise, that also keeps all of us interested, but also draws in the other kids. They all want to play. It's one of the few activities (short of watching "Finding Nemo"...again...) that everyone gets into. Everyone wants in, and everyone has a blast doing it. The game is easy enough yet challenging enough so nobody gets bored or feels like they can't do well.

    I love gaming with my kids. My kids love gaming with me. It's a hell of a lot cheaper than taking them to a game, too!

    --
    Friends help you move. Real friends help you move bodies.
    Never forget: 2 + 2 = 5 for extremely large values of 2.
  28. my father's idea of gaming... by albamuth · · Score: 4, Funny

    Back in the day, my dad would give me a bunch of magazines and a Vic-20 with a cassette tape drive.

    "Here you go son, I got some new games for you."

    "But there's only a memory cartridge in the machine!"

    "No, the games are in here," he'd say, patting the stack of magazines. "Let me know when you have something typed, in so we can play together."

    --
    [pink beam of light]
    1. Re:my father's idea of gaming... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      How many hours of therapy did you need to get over it?

    2. Re:my father's idea of gaming... by MikeBabcock · · Score: 2, Interesting

      I remember typing about 90% of a basic program out of a book into my TI99/4A and running out of RAM (all 12k of it).

      I was almost depressed.

      It took me hours to type that much code, and I couldn't even run it.

      --
      - Michael T. Babcock (Yes, I blog)
    3. Re:my father's idea of gaming... by Spit · · Score: 1

      My mother used to enjoy typing games into my Vic, of course I would have to play them then.

      --
      POKE 36879,8
    4. Re:my father's idea of gaming... by Madmongo · · Score: 0

      LMAO. Wow, I think...you...are...me! This was also my dad's way of making me 'learn' basic. Gotta admit though, I did enjoy sitting there taking 'shifts' typing in pages of basic code with the old man. And then enjoyed playing the games with him after too. ...well, once we waited a month for the next magazine to come out with the corrections to the code for the game we spent hours typing in and going over and over and over... I tried this with my daughter a while ago, after I found an old C64 for sale. She's back on the PS2. I'm still trying to master sprite collision...

  29. A novel idea by Demonspunk · · Score: 5, Funny

    I never thought of having kids for multiplayer purposes... could be quite useful when your buddies are busy.

  30. Re:Oh, the pain. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Informative
    37 Huh? Assuming you went to college at a traditional age, its funny, I dont remember too many LAN parties in 1989...


    He could be like me (I'm 37 now) and had a previous life in another career. I was in the Army for awhile as an electronics tech, then picked up a degree in my 30's using the GI Bill. At first it was tough being the outcast until they figured out that some old guys like me are decent with test equipment and are crackerjack soldering artists in the EE lab.

    Back to the point: I've been gaming since the 2600 and will stop about two minutes after they certify me dead. I just can't wait for Quake X in 2023 with the coveted "Molasses Mod" for senior citizens. ;)
  31. I couldn't help but notice by TubeSteak · · Score: 1

    I couldn't help but notice... that you're Canadian.

    I can't imagine any other reason you'd scream "Then who Pwnz who, eh?!?"

    Anyways, all the comments on this article remind me of the Chappelle Show "Make A Wish" sketch
    http://media.putfile.com/2Funny-Chapelle-Show-Stre et-Hoops-Video-

    It sums up the "Then who Pwnz who" spirit

    --
    [Fuck Beta]
    o0t!
    1. Re:I couldn't help but notice by shokk · · Score: 1

      Nope, not Canadian, but...

      "I'M the future Billy! I'M the future!"

      --
      "Beware of he who would deny you access to information, for in his heart, he dreams himself your master."
  32. old age and treachery ... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Will beat youthful reflexes and skill any day :-)

  33. Gaming with my 5 year old by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Interesting

    My kid has a gamecube and a ton of games in his room, but when his little friends come over all they do is beg me to play MAME games on my projector. I have had up to five kids taking turns playing Marvel vs Capcom and the Metal Slug series to name a few. The best part is the adults in the room also get their turns and have just as much fun as the kids with the button mashing. People are cheering and throwing controllers, much better than just sitting their watching a movie.

    As for my kid, he has known me as an addicted Medal of Honor player since he was born. He became fascinated at three by watching me play that and Battlefield. He loved Battlefield but would get auto-kicked off too much for either killing himself to much by driving his jeep to fast or he would just wonder around exploring. Medal of Honor Freeze-tag objective became his game. I explained the rules to him. You get a point for unfreezing and a point for freezing someone, besides that, plant the bomb. He wasn't very good at three but did figure out how to open doors and would shoot someone once in awhile.

    Now at 5, even though he still can't read, on a ~30 person server with ~15/team he is placing in the top 4 or 5 for his team. He gets most of his points by simply unfreezing his teammates, but he also pulls in a good score from freezing. I think his biggest advantage is he is completely unpredictable. What amazes me is that people on the server are always trying to talk to him. He plays so good they don't even realize he is just a little kid whose little fingers have to really stretch across the keyboard to even play. What boggles me is, who are these people that have lower scores than him? I wonder how many other children are out their dominating us adults in games and we don't even realize it.

    1. Re:Gaming with my 5 year old by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

      Your five year old kid can't read? I think you need to have a wee think about how much gaming he's doing.

    2. Re:Gaming with my 5 year old by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Ummm...
      Lighten up. Most kids can't read in kindergarden. Hopefully they know the alphabet before they get there, but many don't. Kindergardent is for D-O-G and C-A-T, and things like that. Yes, a substantial proportion of kids can to that already or maybe read sentences, but those kids are at the high end of the bell curve. Just because this is Slashdot, and you were probably at the high end of that curve, you still shouldn't insult a parent for having a normal kid.

    3. Re:Gaming with my 5 year old by gobbo · · Score: 4, Interesting
      Lighten up. Most kids can't read in kindergarden.

      Absolutely, nor, necessarily, should they. The opinions on this matter vary, but it really is OK, so long as you read out loud to them regularly, have lots of age-appropriate books in their space, and let them see you reading, for instance, take them to the library, and get books for yourself too. They practically teach themselves under these circumstances, when they're ready.

      What concerns me here is that kids are trained to shoot people shortly after they learn to walk. Yay, let's naturalize war for them early on. I mean, WTF? GIGO.

    4. Re:Gaming with my 5 year old by Anthony+Boyd · · Score: 1

      Most 5 year-olds can't read. It isn't abnormal, nor should the OP be berated for the situation. -T

    5. Re:Gaming with my 5 year old by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Well in New Zealand we start primary school at five so our kindergarten year begins at four, and most people start learning to read when they start kindergarten.

      I started learning to read before I began kindergarten and I don't think there's anything really stopping US kids from learning earlier either.

    6. Re:Gaming with my 5 year old by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      A basement dwelling single adult male whose last conversation with a woman was his mom yelling down to him to go out and get a job is mocking a five your old for not being able to read. Being a sexual predator does not teach the same parental skills as actually having your own children.

      Parents who waste their time forcing young children, who still lack the ability to comprehend, to memorize and regurgitate information and facts isn't doing them any favors.

      As for the idea that any five year old, except a freak of nature, could communicate effectly in an online game chat during an intense action game is ridiculous. Not to mention the fact that the five your old would have to be able to type 30+ wps to even keep up with the conversation.

      It's ok though buddy, next year he will probably post to slashdot and probably have an intelligent insightful comment to make, unlike yours.

    7. Re:Gaming with my 5 year old by phriedom · · Score: 1

      "What boggles me is, who are these people that have lower scores than him? I wonder how many other children are out their dominating us adults in games and we don't even realize it."

      Obviously it IS amazing how quickly some children can learn. And I too always wondered who those people were, until I played with one for some time and when I was dead follwed him and saw his choices. This bad player and many other like him don't play like it is a game, they aren't committed to the objective of the game. They are totally risk averse, concerned with "surviving" (its a game) camp in a "safe" place, and are totally predictable because they are playing scared. They are sitting ducks for people who willing to risk losing for a chance to win.

      A young child is totally fearless because they are still much more in tune with "pretend" than most adults are. A childs simplistic view of the game and egoless total commitment to the goal can be very valuable assets in certain types of games.

      I know that I play at my best when I am totally oblivious to my own personal score and totally focused on the team goals and countering the opponent. Then I'll notice that I have a great score and I'm number one on the server and it totally throws me off, I can't play well when I'm self-conscious. Children have an easier time being completely in the moment and engrossed in the game.

      --
      Don't moderate flamebait as Troll. Know the difference or you will be Meta-moderated.
    8. Re:Gaming with my 5 year old by Tim+C · · Score: 1

      What concerns me here is that kids are trained to shoot people shortly after they learn to walk. Yay, let's naturalize war for them early on. I mean, WTF? GIGO.

      I'm 31. When I was five years old, there were no home computers or consoles, or at the very least, none that could manage anything more advanced than Pong.

      One of my lasting memories of that age is of playing war in the school playground. A big group of us (all boys, now I come to think of it), running around "shooting" each other with our fingers, stabbing each other with knives of air, etc. I, like most of my peers, also had a fair collection of plastic soldiers, and little toy tanks and the like.

      We may not have been being "trained to shoot people" shortly after learning to walk, but we sure as hell play-acted it. All computers have done is make it that little bit more realistic-looking.

    9. Re:Gaming with my 5 year old by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      A friend of mine lets his 7 year old play WoW (albeit with the chat turned off - and he never lets him play unsupervised). Prior to playing, his son had to struggle through even a simple sentence.

      After just a few weeks of cycling out his quest log, he rarely has to ask what a word means. Motivation is a powerful force.

      Ok, ok - so he has got a vocabulary that consists of words he may not use in normal conversation - but he can spell Gnomeregan for crying out loud. That has to count for SOMEthing.

    10. Re:Gaming with my 5 year old by SpacePunk · · Score: 1

      "And I too always wondered who those people were, until I played with one for some time and when I was dead follwed him and saw his choices. This bad player and many other like him don't play like it is a game, they aren't committed to the objective of the game. They are totally risk averse, concerned with "surviving" (its a game) camp in a "safe" place, and are totally predictable because they are playing scared. They are sitting ducks for people who willing to risk losing for a chance to win."

      They are all tied up in their personal score instead of focusing on the win. I often place mid-last because I'm out there pushing to win, take more risks, while over half the team is sitting back camping a spot. Those people are NOT team players, and will cause your team to get owned real quick.

  34. Re:What a stupid article title! Family gaming is f by SenatorOrrinHatch · · Score: 1

    With an attitude like that, you dont deserve a veteran support badge!

    --
    The Christian in me says it's wrong, but the corrections officer in me says, 'I love to make a grown man piss himself.'
  35. Re:Ten bucks says... by east+coast · · Score: 1

    The only adult video game players I know are absolute nothings whose only skills are playing video games and reproducing.

    Don't forget drinking. I'm a very good drinker... but I have a job and no kids... I guess I needed to take up the slack elsewhere.

    --
    Dedicated Cthulhu Cultist since 4523 BC.
  36. Re:What a stupid article title! Family gaming is f by WidescreenFreak · · Score: 1

    Yeah. Heaven forbid that I have my priorities straight. :)

    --
    The Overrated mod is for reversing inappropriate, positive mods, not for voicing disagreement with a post.
  37. DDR's hidden dark side by typical · · Score: 4, Funny

    Of course, we also found that we were suffering from "video game tummy", until we stumbled upon DDR (Dance Dance Revolution). All of a sudden there was another game, one that involved some exercise, that also keeps all of us interested, but also draws in the other kids. They all want to play. It's one of the few activities (short of watching "Finding Nemo"...again...) that everyone gets into.

    Meanwhile, every time a new DDR title is released, thousands of downstairs-apartment-owning tenants cry out in agony...

    --
    Any program relying on (nontrivial) preemptive multithreading will be buggy.
  38. Pet Peeve by TheShadowzero · · Score: 0
    "And even an enthusiastic gamer-parent like Breining has limits. He hasn't ventured near Ronny's GameBoy Advanced portable."
    Oh gosh. People, it's Game Boy Advance, NOT GameBoy Advanced. I can't figure out what's worse, when people say GameBoy Advanced, or when people think the DS is a Game Boy.
    --
    If history repeats itself, why can't we study the future?
  39. The kids would easily beat me unless we ... by Skapare · · Score: 1

    The kids would easily beat me unless we play on my old video game.

    --
    now we need to go OSS in diesel cars
  40. I've played Mario Party with my parents by jameseyjamesey · · Score: 1

    I've played Mario Party with my parents (55 & 51) and sister (21) when I (25) went home for Christmas the last few years. Everyone has a fun time button mashing and I get a little bit trashed with the folks. I showed Nintendo Revolution propaghanda videos to my parents and they cant wait until next Christmas.

  41. Real content by andy_t_roo · · Score: 2, Insightful

    well, prehaps the game industry might now realise that there is demand for more in games than the flashy lights that appease the average 12 year old.

  42. Speaking with nearly two decades of hindsight... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful

    Something that I "knew" intellectually as a kid, but really didn't think about until this article (Heh, wierd what'll trigger introspection) was that I was basically the only gamer in my entire family of 5. My sister would occasionally play Super Mario Brothers (and this was in the SUPER Nintendo era) but that was nearly yearly in it's occurance. My brother didn't have the patience (ADHD posterchild, he was, but he channeled it all into track, the bastard ;-D) and my parents never even considered picking up the controllers. I'm not sure where I'm going with this, but thinking back, thinking about all the opportunities to PLAY with my family when all they had to do was pick up a controller and say "can I try?" instead of "Turn it off, we want to watch the news/Sitcom of the week" or "I'm tired of those damned beeps and bops," well... it almost makes me want to cry. Especially since my Father comes so close to getting it (don't get me wrong, we've got a GREAT relationship, I admire and respect him more than I could ever put into words, and he's proud of my own accomplishments) that it seems so sad that the last little step was never taken... Looking back, I don't think there was anything more that would have pleased my moody little heart than to have ANYONE in my family join in with me.

    I guess what I'm saying is, play with your kids, blast it. I don't care if you've never played before, if you've never picked up a controller in your life, just try it! They'll love to teach you, and they'll love you for trying.

  43. Depressing for kids by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 4, Interesting

    I remember playing the Original Mario Bros on Atari. with my dad when I was a young boy. Players are supposed to play it cooperatively, but I started to notice he'd die a lot more often that I did. I then suggested we play competitively: trying to jump on each other and flip the turtles such that they kill the other person. Then I started to notice that I was a lot better, in general, than my dad. Normally, a child will go a pretty long time in his life before he is better than his father at anything, but video games gave me the opportunity to discover rather early on that my father is a normal person who can't do everything well. It was actually a pretty sad realization for a 7 year-old.

    1. Re:Depressing for kids by Guppy06 · · Score: 1

      Speak for yourself; when I was 4 my father would consistently cream me in Warlords.

  44. Re:Ten bucks says... by Kpau · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Then you live in a very small world... sad for you. Perhaps you hang out with the wrong crowd.

    I'm 48, have a BSEE, make about $100K/yr and play regularly with my teenage sons games such as WoW, CS, Total War, Battlefield, and random RPGs. My wife (a pharmacist) plays console games and online board games (fps type games make her a bit dizzy). Most of my friends are engineers, lawyers, research types... all play at least console games though many play FPS and MMO type games. My first computer game was Adventure played on a Perkin-Elmer 8/32 back in 1981 (not including the arcade games in the late 70s).

    Oh I know... you must have missed the monolith meeting. Too busy throwing poo at the waterhole :)

  45. Old school gaming with the last generation.... by oztemprom · · Score: 1

    Who remembers this trend of gaming with the older gen from their own childhood? (~ 30 YO) Always had to fight with uncles and coousins especially... Omegas, Ataris 2600s ahh I miss the good old days

    1. Re:Old school gaming with the last generation.... by Shiva42 · · Score: 1

      Ahh the good ole days... I remember constantly playing Radar Rat Race with my Dad on Commodore 64. We'd end up sending my Mom to Radio Shack to buy us new joysticks because we'd manage to break like three a week. (The hardware quality was not so good back in the day) Heck, my Dad and I *still* bust out Super Pong once in a while.

    2. Re:Old school gaming with the last generation.... by oztemprom · · Score: 1

      Ahh,

        I forgot the joys of the Commodore 64..... was it a computer or sth you put a cartridge into the keyboard?

  46. 500 is plenty for this by oztemprom · · Score: 1

    1000 to 2000 is industry norm for surveys of social science............ +/-5%

  47. Re:What a stupid article title! Family gaming is f by Criterion · · Score: 1

    "I'm not about to let my 6-year-old play Battlefield 2 (not that she could anyway), but even something as simple as Mario Kart 64 is still fun!"

    Methinks you seriously underestimate your young one. Mine was playing Gran Turismo at 4, Halo at 5 (yes, he beat it way back when, and is working through it on Heroic), and Halo2 at 6 (beat it the 3rd day we had it on Normal difficulty). We play multiplayer Halo (1&2) both coop and head to head regularly (he is normally victorious... and I don't suck). He has a BF2 demo and is quickly getting the hang of it. He plays Steel Battalion! His only drawback so far is that some of the text in many games is a bit advanced for his skill level. I'm working on that with him now. On the other hand, he is the math star in his class, therefore he has no problem understanding things like how much ammo he has left lol!

    Pretty much the only games I restrict are the obvious.. GTA type games (street gang kinda stuff), and overly gorey horror type games.

    --
    We have enough youth, how about a fountain of SMART?
  48. Re:Speaking with nearly two decades of hindsight.. by Criterion · · Score: 1

    Oh gods. I don't know if I'm pms'ing or what, but I started crying when I read that.

    Thank you :).

    --
    We have enough youth, how about a fountain of SMART?
  49. Re:my father's idea of gaming... 0 TI99/4A by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    hours and hours typing basic code into the 99/4a from the blue book, because the casettes that came with it no longer worked, then saving them to casettes purchased from a dollar store, only to find that the new tapes don't work a day later, who has ever had more fun?

  50. www.iwantloot.com and company by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful

    Seems like all too often parents playing with their kids leads to buying EQ or WoW Gold from sites like www.iwantloot.com

  51. Bonding and button mashing by ami-in-hamburg · · Score: 3, Interesting

    I play video games with my son all the time. I think it really helps me to stay involved in his life because of the conversations we have. We tend to talk a lot during play, not just smack, and I can usually keep in touch with what is going on in school, with his friends, trends amongst the teens, etc...

    The only problem that I have is that, IMHO, most 20somethings and younger are button mashers and not actually skilled gamers. They like to think that they're good at games but, again IMHO, not really. They totally lack creativity, strategy and tactics.

    For example, we usually play the football titles. When a new version comes out he'll spend a day or two experimenting with the offense until he finds a handfull of pass plays that he can use every time regardless of what defense is called. He'll practice only those plays until he gets the timing down just right so that no matter what you do his receiver will catch the ball 99% of the time. For the most part, he will totally disregard the running game because, at least I think, he can't time a pattern like you can with pass plays.

    Whether that's a problem with the game or not can be debated. However, it just gets boring when it's the same thing over and over. Rather than try having fun with different alignments, different receivers, running the ball, or whatever, his one and only concern is winning even though, I believe, he sacrifices his pride with timing rather than actually becoming good as something.

    1. Re:Bonding and button mashing by soupforare · · Score: 1

      Most games aren't hard to the point of being unfair anymore, it's just the way shit is now. Hit the buzzer, win a cookie.

      --
      --- Do you believe in the day?
  52. Re:Oh, the pain. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Someone needs a hug

  53. MOD PARENT BACKUP for chrissakes by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    let me know when your interested so i can help you give a black eye to all those assholes who like to use the redundant mod as well. Looks like some spiteful mod troll decided to get you.

  54. Re:Ten bucks says... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Wow, what a 'tard. I'm a 55yr old woman, IT Security professional making just under $100k/yr with a house, no kids and a a busy life (including social). I also love gaming and am currently enmeshed in WoW (this is just the latest gaming obsession, not the first). Quite a few of the people in my guild are in their mid to late 30's with families, jobs and mortgages. Many game with spouses and/or kids. (We've got one kick-ass druid who's all of 12...his parents both play, but they're hunters. They make a damn effective team in world pvp).

    So maybe you ought to get your ass out of the house and check out the real world of online gaming, eh? Just because YOU don't know any "adult video game players" with lives and accomplishments doesn't mean we aren't out there.

  55. Uh oh by Sirak · · Score: 1

    "Of those, 80 percent also played with their children"
    Jack Thompson will have a field day with a quote like that...

    -Sirak

    1. Re:Uh oh by tbone1 · · Score: 1
      "Of those, 80 percent also played with their children"
      Jack Thompson will have a field day with a quote like that...

      You quit making jokes like, lad, or you're going to have to answer to me, Father Murphy of the Boston Archdiocese!

      --

      The Independent: Reverend Spooner Arrested in Friar Tuck Incident - ISIHAC, Historical Headlines
  56. The cow says Mooooooo! by elrous0 · · Score: 1
    Man, even now 25 years later, this has never gotten old. Take that, Mom!

    -Eric

    --
    SJW: Someone who has run out of real oppression, and has to fake it.
  57. Yup by GmAz · · Score: 1

    I play World of Warcraft and one of the people I played with always had another person in the group. It always confused me because the other guy never talked and he never talked to the other guy. After a month or so, I finally asked him who he was and it was his dad. The guy I was playing with was only 12 and his dad wanted to make sure he wasn't being manipulated. I thought it was cool. It was him and his dad getting time together and having fun. I plan on doing it with my kid when he/she is old enough.

    --
    Click Click Bloody Click PANCAKES!
  58. Colecovision by Dareth · · Score: 1

    Montezuma's Revenge! Awesome game. My grandmother made a map of the entire game by hand on the green/white strip computer paper. About 20 sheets all taped together.

    This was about 15-20 years ago. She is 77 now and mostly plays solitaire, with cards. I miss the good ole days sometimes.

    --

    I only look human.
    My mother is a halfling and my dad is an ogre, so that makes me an Ogreling
    1. Re:Colecovision by MikeyTheK · · Score: 1

      Uh, thanks, but my Coleco predated Colecovision. It had four pong-like games, and two games that you used a light-capture gun for. I'm pretty sure it's still in my parents' basement, along with all the other old consoles...

      --
      Friends help you move. Real friends help you move bodies.
      Never forget: 2 + 2 = 5 for extremely large values of 2.
  59. "Old School Experience".... by Dareth · · Score: 1

    My younger brother came to live with my grandmother while I was in college, around late 90's.

    He had never really played any games past some NES and SNES. I loaned him my old computer and got him to playing Doom II, Hexen, and even Betrayal at Krondor. He loved those games. I never told him that at the same time I was playing Unreal,Starcraft and Tribes.

    He got the whole "Old School Experience" more than half a decade late. He appreciates the modern now, but still has respect for the playability of the older games.

    Don't waste all the old games you loved back in the day. Share those experiences with children too young to know there is "something better".

    --

    I only look human.
    My mother is a halfling and my dad is an ogre, so that makes me an Ogreling
  60. Who says old dogs can't learn new tricks? by fusioncow · · Score: 1

    fusioncow: Yes, Mom, this is called the warthog. You just walk up to the left side and hit 'e'.
    fusioncow: Oh, you found the sniper rifle.. No you can't use the sniper rifle while you're driving..
    fusioncow: hey.. watch where you point that..
    fusioncow was killed by Crazy_Asian
    fusioncow: ... I'd say that was an accident, except that it was two rounds that went into my face...
    Crazy_Asian: :)