Slashdot Mirror


Laptop Fuel Cells Coming Soon

tomsastroblog writes "Soon laptop batteries could last all day and be recharged from a cartridge. BBC News has a piece on fuel cells as laptop batteries, and what their adoption could mean for laptop usage." From the article: "At the Cebit technology fair in Hanover, Taiwanese hi-tech firm Antig said its fuel cells should be on the shelves of computer shops by early 2007. The first versions of the methanol-using units should keep a laptop going for up to nine hours. Fuel cell technology got a boost recently when international air flight regulators changed rules that banned passengers from carrying flammable methanol onto aircraft."

181 comments

  1. dupe?!?!?!?! by jollyroger1210 · · Score: 0

    I swear this is a dupe, I just cant find the original!!

    --
    Purple, because ice cream has no bones.
    1. Re:dupe?!?!?!?! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Informative
    2. Re:dupe?!?!?!?! by MikeCapone · · Score: 1

      Well, I first read about it here:

      http://www.treehugger.com/files/2006/03/fuel_cells _for.php

      But hey, that's just me. It links to Engadget, though, so maybe that's where you read about it.

    3. Re:dupe?!?!?!?! by Echnin · · Score: 1

      "Is going to exhibit at CeBit" is not the same as "Has exbitied at CeBit".

      --
      Lalala
  2. eheheh by soapdog · · Score: 5, Funny

    gives a whole new meaning to "this laptop is burning my legs..." sorry could not resist...

    --
    -- Por mais que eu ande no vale das trevas e da morte, meu PowerMac G4 Não Travará!!!
    1. Re:eheheh by SeeMyNuts! · · Score: 2, Funny


      That isn't the laptop burning your legs. The Alien that sat in that seat before you got a paper cut and bled acid all over the upholstery. Check the back of your pants before standing up--that could be really embarrassing!

    2. Re:eheheh by LiquidMind · · Score: 5, Funny

      just make sure you don't accidentally set your scrotum on fire

      --
      This sig contains repetition and redundancy.
    3. Re:eheheh by Zach978 · · Score: 2, Funny

      Am I the only one afriad to click a link "set your scrotum on fire"...

      --

      "I told you a million times not to exaggerate!"
    4. Re:eheheh by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      That's worse than the "hot contents" on the coffee lids. If enough heat was building up (one one's scrotum) over the corse of an hour I would remove the head source.

    5. Re:eheheh by sharkey · · Score: 1

      At least it didn't say, "Distended his rectum in a manner not humaly possible" or "ejected liquid fecal material in a vertical direction".

      --

      --
      "Outlook not so good." That magic 8-ball knows everything! I'll ask about Exchange Server next.
  3. Price and Stocks by komodo9 · · Score: 5, Insightful

    I especially like the ability for them to fit into existing laptops (in the media bay), rather than only working with new, specially-designed laptops. Overall it sounds great, however expensive. It'd probably be years before they can get the price down to a reasonable level. Either way, it might not be a bad idea to go invest in fuel cell stocks now. :)
    --
    BMW Forum

    1. Re:Price and Stocks by mtenhagen · · Score: 2, Informative

      Well methanol isnt that expensive. You will probably be sued if you start refilling cartridges but the methanol price is not the issue.

      Europe (Valid through March 31, 2006)
      European Posted Contract Price                         Euro 268/MT

      North America (Valid through March 31, 2006)
      Methanex Non-Discounted Reference Price         USD 1.07/Gal*    USD 356/MT

      Asia Pacific (Valid through March 31, 2006)
      Asian Posted Contract Price                         USD 330/MT

      * Converted to USD/MT using a conversion rate of 332.6 Gal per MT

      --
      200GB/2TB $7.95 Coupon: SAVE90DOLLAR
    2. Re:Price and Stocks by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Informative

      Before you go invenst in fuel cell stocks, beware they've had a pretty good run recently.

      A good index for tracking this industry (and green/alternative energy in general) is the WilderHill Clear Power Index, which is tracked by Exchange Traded Fund PBW.

      That said, here are some interesting stocks in the industry (off top of head):

      MDTL, Medis Technologies
      HYGS, Hydrogenics
      ENER, Energy Conversion Devices
      BLDP, Ballard Power
      FCEL, Fuel Cell Power
      QTWW, Quantum Fuel
      PLUG, Plug Power
      DESC, Distributed Energy
      MCEL, Millenium Fuel Cell
      ASRNF.OB, Astris Energy

      And a few non-fuel cell focused alt/energy companies:

      ACPW, Active Power
      CPST, Capstone Turbine
      HOKU, Hoke Scientific
      XSNX.OB, XSUNX Inc.
      CESV, China Energy Saving Technology
      GSHF.OB, Greenshift

      Honestly, how long can we really go before becoming seriously focused on minimizing the impact of our energy consumption? This seismic shift is coming soon. Some day, a -responsible- US president will not only give lip service, but will actually sets us on the path of an 'Apollo project' in the environmento/energy sector.

    3. Re:Price and Stocks by stunt_penguin · · Score: 2, Insightful

      *slaps forehead*

      I think he may have been talking about the price of the technology, not the price of methanol as fuel.

      --
      When the posters fear their moderators, there is tyranny; when the moderators fears the posters, there is liberty.
    4. Re:Price and Stocks by ryanov · · Score: 1

      I don't. You know, I put MEDIA DEVICES in my media bay. How am I supposed to watch a DVD without my drive in there? Why not in the BATTERY tray, something I won't be needing while this device is in.

    5. Re:Price and Stocks by fprintf · · Score: 1
      Honestly, how long can we really go before becoming seriously focused on minimizing the impact of our energy consumption? This seismic shift is coming soon. Some day, a -responsible- US president will not only give lip service, but will actually sets us on the path of an 'Apollo project' in the environmento/energy sector.


      What do you think a president does? Right, he pays lip service to stuff and gets other folks to do it for him. It is your votes in Congress that get the funding and the US government moving in the right direction.

      But while we are at it, what about the rest of the world? All I hear is carping from everyone about how we need to do this and that, and how wrong this country is. What I never hear is how England, France or Germany are making these huge technical leaps to help the US reduce its dependence on oil. Help us out, o smart ones over the pond!
      --
      This post brought to you by your friendly neighborhood MBA.
    6. Re:Price and Stocks by MrPC81 · · Score: 1

      You mean like deploying trams, light rail trains, heavy rail trains, buses, bicycle facilities and most importantly, walkable urban communities that can accomodate the needs of families, singles and others alike? Oh, those have all been developed. It's Europe that's actually implementing them/has already got them. Most of what the US puts down is mere lip service to what is considered a foreign notion.

    7. Re:Price and Stocks by Kiffer · · Score: 1

      My dvd drive is on the side of my laptop.
      My media bay has a floppy disk drive, I have not used this for some time and wish I'd bought a second battery to put in there.

      By the time these fuelcells come out (in 2007 or when ever) I hope to have bought a new laptop, and battery life is a major problem for me, I'm going to make sure that I get a second battery, and hopefully it'll be able to take these things.
      8 hours of laptop usage sounds too good to be true...

    8. Re:Price and Stocks by iTristan · · Score: 1

      Well, Canada was the leader in bringing fuel cell technology from the proverbial dark ages into the realm of truely applicable technology.

      Whether we remain the leader remains to be seen, but fuel cell test buses and cars have been built, tested and funded largely from Vancouver, Toronto, and Ottawa for many years.

      Similarly, Iceland is all over this tech. Probably moreso than Canada in terms of trying to apply it to everyday society right now.

    9. Re:Price and Stocks by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      There's Lip Service = I'm full of crap and don't mean it, and there's Lip Service = I'm goddamn serious. When Kennedy said we're going to the fucking moon, he meant it. When Bush in 2003 talked up fuel cells in his State Of The.. err... State of... ehh.... Speech to the... erm, whatever you want to call it, his Speech To The Nation, they were words without backing, aka bullshit. Unfortunately, he lies a lot.

    10. Re:Price and Stocks by Fred_A · · Score: 1

      Now what on earth is a "MT" ??

      Is this some sort of methanol specific unit ? What does it translate to in SI units ?

      --

      May contain traces of nut.
      Made from the freshest electrons.
    11. Re:Price and Stocks by miach · · Score: 1

      Probably "Metric Ton" (1000 Kg)

    12. Re:Price and Stocks by Fred_A · · Score: 1

      Thanks for clearing that up. After googling a bit I found out that there are things called Long Tons and Short Tons in addition to the standard Tonne (the metric ton of 1000 kg). I wish this unit mess finallly ended. :(

      --

      May contain traces of nut.
      Made from the freshest electrons.
  4. Hardware: Laptop Fuel Cells Coming Soon ... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Interesting

    ...again...

    Seriously, hasn't this appeared every few months for the last 2 years? Can't we have stories about products being 'here' - and preferably built in, rather than having a giant can of Zippo hanging off the side?

    I'll get modded down as Cynical or something, but any way you view it, it's true...

    1. Re:Hardware: Laptop Fuel Cells Coming Soon ... by Concerned+Onlooker · · Score: 4, Insightful
      I can understand your possible burnout on the topic, but I think that Slashdot is generally read by people who are interested in cutting edge tech. If the editors only posted articles about things that had already been produced then this would be nothing more than a consumer review site.

      As for the "giant can of Zippo," yes, we would all like to have a fuel cell battery that lasts for a week and fits right into the old battery slot, but cut them a little slack. It's a new thing and it's bound to improve and the fact that there may be a laptop fuel cell at all in the near future is pretty interesting.

      --
      http://www.rootstrikers.org/
    2. Re:Hardware: Laptop Fuel Cells Coming Soon ... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Seriously... I read this every month, for the past year!!! This is old news, and I would much rather read an article about when it is used in actual products.

  5. Dupe by SirDaShadow · · Score: 0, Redundant

    Ok, So when the hell are these coming? This is like the second article about it in less than 2 weeks or so. Dupe!

    1. Re:Dupe by RobertLTux · · Score: 1

      In My case i will get excited when meth cells have a SKU at the Circle R (i wonder 273 or 230 series?)

      --
      Any person using FTFY or editing my postings agrees to a US$50.00 charge
  6. Convenience Really Counts by BoRegardless · · Score: 3, Insightful

    Most laptop owners don't sit in a proverbial flower field and run their laptops.

    Hence, what % of laptop owners would buy a new and no doubt very expensive methanol fuel cell module &, expensive methanol (prepackaged of course), and this assumes a properly package fuel cell module is available for your particular Laptop.

    If it leaks and destroys your laptop is it covered by a warranty that replaces your laptop?

    Lots of unanswered questions

    1. Re:Convenience Really Counts by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      If it leaks and destroys your laptop is it covered by a warranty that replaces your laptop?

      It's easy to trot out the "Gee, methanol on aircraft, what could possibly go wrong?" cliche here, I'll admit. However, lithium is not exactly a happy fun metal, either. I'd say give the methanol cells a fair chance in the marketplace. It sounds like a neat technology.

    2. Re:Convenience Really Counts by Firehed · · Score: 4, Insightful
      The reason I'm selling my old laptop on eBay right now is that the battery life is horrid. Now of course 1.5 hours is on the low end of bad nowadays, but I'm really looking for something that should last for a full day of school. While I may not be in some field of flowers, longer battery life is a must for me. I'd say it's just as important as, if not more important than the price of the thing. I don't need a powerhouse (I've got my desktop for that) but being able to get some work done on the go is extremely important for me. I know there are some units available rated for six hours, but that's probably time spent just sitting at the desktop.... I need to at least be able to have a word processor or spreadsheet open. I'd imagine every other soon-to-be college student in the world is looking for that at the very least, not to mention most people that are looking for a laptop that's not to act as a DTR.

      Most people wouldn't care whether it's a micro-fusion reactor in their laptop or a flock of nano-gerbils on micro-running-wheels as long as they get good life out of the thing. Well I suppose PETA would take some offense to the latter, but they don't need to know. Point being, for most people, having a laptop is all about mobility, and for the most part battery life is the main issue that comes into play, probably with network access coming in next.

      --
      How are sites slashdotted when nobody reads TFAs?
    3. Re:Convenience Really Counts by MrFlibbs · · Score: 1

      My first reaction to this was "why not just carry a second battery?" However, the fuel cell does offer two potential advantages:

      1) You don't have to shut down and swap in the second battery.
      2) It can be recharged in seconds by just topping it off.

      Of course, there are issues about cost, number of recharges, possible leakege, etc., but if these are resolved the fuel cell might be a viable product.

    4. Re:Convenience Really Counts by KylePflug · · Score: 2, Informative

      Gateway CX2618 Tablet PC. 14" widescreen, more than 6-hours battery with regular use (and that's in my experience, not on the box), Pentium M 1.6ghz, 1gb RAM, DVD burner, 128mb video, and it's a Tablet, for crying out loud. Runs almost silent. Charges fast. As low as $1399 new, probably cheaper used.

      I'm not saying you should buy it, just saying high-performance high-battery laptops are not rare anymore, although admittedly the CX2618 is on the heavy side for a Tablet.

    5. Re:Convenience Really Counts by AndroidCat · · Score: 2, Funny

      I'd like a combination laptop-chainsaw!

      --
      One line blog. I hear that they're called Twitters now.
    6. Re:Convenience Really Counts by Millenniumman · · Score: 1

      1) You don't have to shut down and swap in the second battery.

      My computer, a MacBook Pro, can sleep with the battery taken out, and I was under the impression a lot of laptops could now. I know the Powerbooks could.

      2) It can be recharged in seconds by just topping it off.

      That's assuming there is a nearby laptop fueling station, or you carry a lot of laptop fuel around. AC outlets are neary everywhere.

      --
      Stupidity is like nuclear power, it can be used for good or evil. And you don't want to get any on you.
    7. Re:Convenience Really Counts by Jeremi · · Score: 1
      If it leaks and destroys your laptop is it covered by a warranty that replaces your laptop?


      If the existing batteries in your laptop leak and destroy your laptop, are they covered by a warranty that replaces your laptop?

      --


      I don't care if it's 90,000 hectares. That lake was not my doing.
    8. Re:Convenience Really Counts by Antimatter3009 · · Score: 1

      I have a Dell 600m with an extra battery. On one charge with a mid-level brightness it lasts about 7 hours. The extra battery was $50 with the laptop and slides in the side in place of the cdrom drive. It uses that one first and then switches over to the regular one without a reboot or anything. I would recommend this type of thing if you're looking for extra long battery life, especially if you can combine an extra battery with a laptop that gets good battery life to begin with. The 600m has above average battery life to begin with, but you can probably find better.

    9. Re:Convenience Really Counts by $exyNerdie · · Score: 1

      Try getting a laptop with Intel Ultra Low Voltage processor. You can easily get 5-6+ hours of battery life.

    10. Re:Convenience Really Counts by neildiamond · · Score: 1

      "Point being, for most people, having a laptop is all about mobility..."

      Boy I wish that were true. I'd like a 14" laptop with good battery life, but 14" were mostly phased out for 15" widescreen plus. Smaller are available for almost double the price, so no thanks. (What makes a smaller lcd pricier for christ sake?) No, people buy laptops as desktops these days, not for real mobility.

    11. Re:Convenience Really Counts by anotherzeb · · Score: 1

      Another question - as I know nothing about laptops, would someone tell me how many CD/DVD bays there are likely to be and if the fuel cell takes up the only one (if that is the case), how would I then use it to rip cds?

      --
      Good luck sometimes arrives disguised as bad
    12. Re:Convenience Really Counts by Lally+Singh · · Score: 1

      Not hard to imagine that the fuel gets easily available. For example, coffee shops would be smart to sell it.

      --
      Care about electronic freedom? Consider donating to the EFF!
    13. Re:Convenience Really Counts by From+A+Far+Away+Land · · Score: 1

      I haven't looked into tablets much. Is there a keyboard feature, so that it displays a keyboard and the person touchtypes like an [Star Trek] Enterprise display panel, where a thinner video panel is on top of the keyboard?

    14. Re:Convenience Really Counts by rapidweather · · Score: 1

      I read somewhere that a guy living in a tent had a laptop powered by a car battery, recharged with solar panels stolen from some sort of highway sign. To make this story interesting, he has wireless broadband. Eventually got caught, apparently some highway worker spotted the solar panels and recognized them (Again, I have added this to make this story interestingly believeable).
      With day-long Fuel Cells, the car battery won't be necessary, but how would this guy charge up those things sitting in his tent in the woods? He'll have to carry a bunch of those required disposable capsules of methanol, apparently.

    15. Re:Convenience Really Counts by bhtooefr · · Score: 1

      That model's a "convertible" model, which means one minute, it's a normal laptop, the next, it's a tablet.

    16. Re:Convenience Really Counts by AaronLawrence · · Score: 1

      Most laptop owners don't sit in a proverbial flower field and run their laptops.
      But lots of people do sit on planes or trains for 8 or more hours. I don't know about US domestic flights but on international, I have only occasionally been able to connect my laptop power so far ... and the second time it would constantly overload and cut out.

      --
      For every expert, there is an equal and opposite expert. - Arthur C. Clarke
    17. Re:Convenience Really Counts by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      there is one other scenario - the opposite, that is good with methanol (although I just thought it up..)

      this is that most of the time I have no problem finding an outlet to use, so I really need the battery rarely. so rarely in fact that my problem isn't how long it lasts, it having it ready when I need it! to do that, you keep it plugged in most of the time which invariably ends up stessing the battery even when plugged most of the time. this sucks. but with methanol, I should probably be able to just fill it; ONLY when I really need to use it as well. with the cost and waste of power PLUS new battery ever now and again, methanol sounds better.

      Not that i'm sure about the durability of the methbatts. .j.

    18. Re:Convenience Really Counts by hunterkll · · Score: 1

      iBook G4. Want battery life out of something cool and useful? :) I get about 5-6 hours a charge, varying backlight levels, usage IN school, lasts me pretty much teh whole day (Might hve to charge it during band or something if i don't leave it in the night before)

    19. Re:Convenience Really Counts by Firehed · · Score: 1

      Actually, that's what I'm planning to get. I'm just waiting for my bank account to recover from my most recent toy.

      --
      How are sites slashdotted when nobody reads TFAs?
  7. I need a fuel cell powered laptop... by Nova+Express · · Score: 4, Insightful
    ...to run my copy of Duke Nukem Forever. By my estimate, we've been hearing about the imminent arrival of each for about the same length of time...

    --
    Lawrence Person (lawrencepersonh@gmailh.com (remove all "h"s to mail)

    http://www.lawrenceperson.com/

    1. Re:I need a fuel cell powered laptop... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      hmmm...hasn't Duke Nukem Forever been canceled?.....hope the fuel cell isn't the same....

    2. Re:I need a fuel cell powered laptop... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
    3. Re:I need a fuel cell powered laptop... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      They're making Duke Nukem Forever exclusively for Vista now.

  8. You realize... by Burning1 · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Laptop fuel cartrages mean new DRM and propriatary designs as well as messy (and dangerous) 3rd party refil kits.

    Consumers aren't the only ones looking forward to this.

    1. Re:You realize... by LiquidCoooled · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Its the Gilette principle brought to computers.

      Never before has anyone had to purchase daily consumables for their computer.

      My bet, once these take off, they will be sold in the stores at the cig counters alongside the lighter fuel.

      --
      liqbase :: faster than paper
    2. Re:You realize... by pla · · Score: 4, Informative

      Laptop fuel cartrages mean new DRM and propriatary designs as well as messy (and dangerous) 3rd party refil kits.

      A lot of people keep saying this, but it just doesn't hold true!

      First of all, methanol doesn't pose nearly the health risk most people believe. As someone with a solid non-practitioner background in both chemistry and pharmacology, I would play with methanol over toner or ink any day... Additionally, the breakdown products the the electrolyte in Li-ion batteries makes methanol exposure look like a cool drink of mountain water by comparison (for an idea, the most common counts as a chemical WMD in a different context).

      Second, methanol doesn't pose nearly the fire/explosion risk most people believe. The Li-ion batteries we use now pose a FAR greater risk of explosion, and as for fire, if you take the same precautions you would when refueling your car (with yet another far more flamable/explosive liquid), you have nothing to worry about.

      Third, refilling... Aside from the previously-mentioned toxicity of ink and toner, methanol evaporates cleanly. So if you spill a few drops, you can just let them evaporate rather than permanantly staining yourself, your table, your laptop, your carpet, your dog, and seemingly anything else even in sight of the ink refill kit.


      The biggest complaint about the idea of using fuel cells over a rechargeable battery in laptops comes from the UPS-factor. Even an all-but-dead laptop battery will let it stay up (assuming you have it on AC) through a short power outage, or to move to another outlet, or to quickly reinsert the plug your cat pulled out, etc. Running on a fuel cell, all those advantages disappear unless you use the fuel cell as your primary power source, which could get expensive over time (despite methanol's low cost, AC power costs a hell of a lot less).

    3. Re:You realize... by Burning1 · · Score: 1

      I'm not saying that fuel cels are dangerous. I'm one of those guys who wouldn't mind nuclear powered cars. I'm saying that I don't like dealing with ink refil kits, and I don't think fuel cell refil kits would be any more fun.

    4. Re:You realize... by frankmu · · Score: 1

      hmm. i'm waiting for "Monster Cable" brand methanol. lasts 2 hours more than the generic methanol! there's gonna be some interesting marketing.

      --
      Supreme executive power derives from a mandate from the masses, not from some farcical aquatic ceremony.
    5. Re:You realize... by Burning1 · · Score: 1

      It's possible it could be like lighter fluid, but if ink has taught us anything it's that people are always looking for new ways to make money on inexpensive hardware.

    6. Re:You realize... by Tim+C · · Score: 1

      DRM? I know what you mean (ie purposeful incompatibilities between brands protected by patents and the like), but you don't really mean Digital Rights Management...

    7. Re:You realize... by loraksus · · Score: 2, Informative

      Thanks for posting this. As someone whose [censored by NDA clause of settlement] PDA burst into flames while it was in my shirt pocket and scared the shit out of me, it surprises me that so many people are oblivious to the fact that LiIon cells can erupt in flames. Then again, I guess it doesn't happen that much anymore, although I learned that it used to be a serious problem.

      Like you said, toner isn't exactly the most friendly substance either, when I was younger a couple of friends and I got a couple bottles of the stuff and had lots of fun making it explode and using it for mischief. Karma perhaps...

      --
      1q2w3e4r5t6y7u8i9o0pqawsedrftgthyjukilo;p'azsxdcfv gbhnjmk,l.;/
    8. Re:You realize... by rebelcool · · Score: 1

      LiIon explosions can still happen, but usually the culprit is shoddy made knock-off batteries. Good batteries will contain overload prevention circuitry that will detect and prevent shorts.

      Cheaply built batteries will either not have this at all, or will be made so poorly that they become damaged in ordinary use.

      I've found most of these cheap batteries also have nowhere near the life that a good "authentic" version has, even if it has the supposedly same MaH rating on its label (like they wouldnt fake that too...)

      --

      -

    9. Re:You realize... by loraksus · · Score: 1

      Yeah, but in my case, it was the original battery in a 3 week old PDA ;) Fun fun!

      --
      1q2w3e4r5t6y7u8i9o0pqawsedrftgthyjukilo;p'azsxdcfv gbhnjmk,l.;/
    10. Re:You realize... by pla · · Score: 2, Informative

      LiIon explosions can still happen, but usually the culprit is shoddy made knock-off batteries

      The "culprit" involves nothing more and nothing less than an autocatalyzing eletrolyte decomposition product. "Name brand" has nothing at all to do with that.

      Now, some higher-quality batteries may use what amounts to a catalyst posion (the choice of anode material, for example, plays a HUGE role in decomposition rate). But don't assume the original manufacturer uses anything even remotely resembling high quality parts - On the contrary, they choose the cheapest reasonably-safe batteries available at the time of product release, to give the greatest profit for the lowest price-point. Post-release 3rd party batteries just don't come under the original warrantee, so we hear more about them sucking than the OEM ones. But if you don't buy something like "Emergizer" or "Durasell" brand knockoff crap as replacements, you'll most likely get a higher quality battery than the original.

    11. Re:You realize... by Burning1 · · Score: 1

      No, I really mean DRM. Some modern ink cartrages have DRM protected electronics that report information to the printer. The electronics are required for the printer to use the cartrage, and breaking the DRM is required to produce 3rd party cartrages.

  9. Laptop, not plugstop. by miffo.swe · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Today most laptops are just dragged between electric outlets since they wont go for more than a couple of hours without recharging. Having nine hours worth of computer time changes the way you can use a laptop in a pretty significant way. From being used as a portable desktop you can use it as a really portable computer, taking it whereever you go without running amok for a piglets nose.

    For me this is something i have longed for since the dawn of laptops.

    --
    HTTP/1.1 400
    1. Re:Laptop, not plugstop. by graphicsguy · · Score: 1

      There's actually already a solution to this problem. It's called "extra batteries". They cost money and have weight, but they do work.

    2. Re:Laptop, not plugstop. by cdrudge · · Score: 1

      They also have the advantage of being able to go just about anywhere and have access to a power outlet to recharge them. You can recharge them in hotel rooms, convention centers, office cubicals, etc. The same can't be said about methanol. I can honestly tell you right now that if you had to buy an ounce of methanol, I couldn't tell you where to go to find it.

    3. Re:Laptop, not plugstop. by rcw-home · · Score: 1
      I can honestly tell you right now that if you had to buy an ounce of methanol, I couldn't tell you where to go to find it.

      Hobby shops or chemical distributors.

      Now, if they can make the fuel cell run on methanol, ethanol, or a mix of the two, then your options are wide open. Just buy a gallon of denatured alcohol at the hardware store and you're good for a week or two of untethered operation...

    4. Re:Laptop, not plugstop. by AK+Marc · · Score: 1

      I can honestly tell you right now that if you had to buy an ounce of methanol, I couldn't tell you where to go to find it.

      I don't know where you are, but around here I can get meth on just about every street corner.

    5. Re:Laptop, not plugstop. by chris_7d0h · · Score: 1

      Today most laptops are just dragged between electric outlets since they wont go for more than a couple of hours without recharging

      Agreed. Laptops are mostly used as portable laptops from my experience as well. This however is not affecting productivity as far as I've seen. At work we typically roam from room to room with our AC-adapters for meetings, presentations or getting some work done in the labs. Coupled with this we also roam to different client locations which all have power outlets for our adapters. Point is that the pattern is people moving from location A to location B and spending the majority of time not moving around. When stationary, plugging in the AC-adapter is not a big deal.

      However, compare this to a full blown stationary setup with a 15Kg case and a 7Kg monitor, not to mention all the associated gadgets such as keyboards, mice and cables, the true benefit of a laptop for a person who isn't completely stationary at one site becomes clear. A all-in-one computer to bring with you to each new location.

      Battery really isn't that big of a problem from what i've gathered from clients in most industries. What people in my experience clamor for is the same stuff as desktop users want; More speed and, better displays and more storage.

      Sure the ongoing 10% yearly increase in battery life is nice, but other attributes take precedence.

      PS. Imagine the new logistic problem with fuel cells for companies with multiple sites. "6 hours" (9 hours and subtracting the 1/3 optimistic marketing figure addition) on each kit, meaning I'd use about 2 a day. At our office alone, we'd have to stock up with 8000 each week. The company as a whole would burn through about 1.6 million a day or about 350 million kits/refills a year... For one company alone.

      --
      In a society that believes in nothing, fear becomes the only agenda ~ Bill Durodié
  10. More useful by Epsillon · · Score: 3, Interesting

    IMHO, more useful than a Li-Ion replacement fuel-cell would be a fuel-cell powered universal PSU. Should be:

    * No bigger than a mains PSU brick
    * Easily replenishable whilst running
    * Inexpensive
    * Under ten dollars shipping on eBay

    OK, that last was a wise crack, but let's sort out the machines that are out there first. After all, what's the point of having your Lappy 486's 41 pounds of allegedly portable dominance running for nine hours if you can't watch a DVD on the 'plane? (RTFA: Media bay, not battery slot)

    --
    Resistance is futile. Reactance buggers it up.
    1. Re:More useful by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      copy the film to your hard drive before you board?

    2. Re:More useful by queazocotal · · Score: 1
      41 pounds?

      More like 3.7 pounds (486/75 (DEC hinote ultra CT475), with 3 hour + battery life.

      Laptops at the ultraportable end have not got appreciably lighter, or with more battery life.

      The screens have gotten a little bigger, and more stuff has gotten built in, and they've gotten cheaper - the above laptop was $5000.

    3. Re:More useful by mikek3332002 · · Score: 1

      if it could be powered by impure ethanol eg fill it up with beer

    4. Re:More useful by Epsillon · · Score: 1

      41 pounds?

      Sorry, obscure reference. You may want to check out Strong Bad's e-mail on Technology.

      --
      Resistance is futile. Reactance buggers it up.
    5. Re:More useful by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      42.

  11. Re:"flammable" by eobanb · · Score: 2, Informative
    --

    Take off every sig. For great justice.

  12. Not just laptops, but cell phones too by donutz · · Score: 3, Interesting

    There's a several-months-old PC World article that says that fuel cells for mobile phones will be arriving (in Japan) in 2007.

    1. Re:Not just laptops, but cell phones too by The+One+and+Only · · Score: 1

      Shouldn't that be, "fuel cells for mobile phones will be arriving in 2007... in Japan! ?

      --
      In Repressive Burma, it's not just your connection that dies. slashdot.org/comments.pl?sid=314547&cid=20819199
  13. Re:"flammable" by rolfwind · · Score: 1

    flammable Audio pronunciation of "flammable" ( P ) Pronunciation Key (flm-bl)
    adj.

            Easily ignited and capable of burning rapidly; inflammable.

    http://dictionary.reference.com/search?q=flammable

  14. Re:"flammable" by Yahweh+Doesn't+Exist · · Score: 1

    actually there is such a word as flammable, and it is the preferred version for fire warnings.

    "inflame" comes from the same lating word as flammable (flamma), but is more often used figuratively or in non-technical contexts e.g. "imflammable issue".

  15. Re:"flammable" by licamell · · Score: 2, Funny
    Not sure if this was meant to be a joke or not, but I'll bite...

    Definition of inflammable:

    1. Easily ignited and capable of burning rapidly; flammable.

    2. Quickly or easily aroused to strong emotion; excitable.

    Definition of flammable:

    1. Easily ignited and capable of burning rapidly; inflammable.

  16. Sounds Dangerous by morgan_greywolf · · Score: 3, Funny
    FTFA:

    "There used to be restrictions on passengers to take methanol on flights," said Ms Tsai.

    But, she explained, the International Civil Aviation Organisation (ICAO) recently changed its guidelines to allow passengers to take methanol cartridges with them when they travel.


    From the MSDS for Methanol:

    Warning! Flammable liquid. May cause skin irritation. May cause central nervous system depression. May be absorbed through the skin. May cause kidney damage. May cause respiratory and digestive tract irritation. May be fatal or cause blindness if swallowed. May cause fetal effects. Causes severe eye irritation and possible injury. Target Organs: Kidneys, central nervous system, eyes.

    It's a neurotoxin! It casues blindness! And it's highly flammable!

    Sounds like a terrorist's dream.
    1. Re:Sounds Dangerous by Dunbal · · Score: 4, Insightful

      It's a neurotoxin! It casues blindness! And it's highly flammable!

      Sounds like a terrorist's dream.


            These toxic effects take far to much time for it to be effective as a weapon. Plus you would need an incredible amount of it if you planned to kill people with an methanol aerosol. In fact ethanol (another neurotoxin you may be more familiar with) might be more effective for this. If you offer it free in a glass to most people, they will actually drink it!

      --
      Seven puppies were harmed during the making of this post.
    2. Re:Sounds Dangerous by Kaptain_Korolev · · Score: 0
      Yes sounds dangerous doesn't it?

      But... have you looked at what's in your laptop or cell-phone battery? The answer is a rather unpleasant mix of corrosive substances and reactive metals.

      Good design abstracts the user from the dangers of using such materials while allowing them to garner the benefits of doing so. It's an immature technology, give it a chance.

    3. Re:Sounds Dangerous by fermion · · Score: 5, Funny
      Other terrorist plots
      • All agent fart on the plane at once
      • Hit passengers over head with NiMH batteries.
      • Bring the new Apple boom box on the plane and force everyone to jump to thier death by playing Celine Dion and Cher.
      • Force passenders to watch a Adam Sandler Marathon on the flight from New Yok to Bejing.
      --
      "She's a scientist and a lesbian. She's not going to let it slide." Orphan Black
    4. Re:Sounds Dangerous by (H)elix1 · · Score: 1

      These toxic effects take far to much time for it to be effective as a weapon.

      No kidding. By the time they started to try and spray methanol everywhere, I know I would give serious thought to using a low tech "beat the living bejesus out of them" with my old school li-ion battery pack.

    5. Re:Sounds Dangerous by fjf33 · · Score: 1

      The fact that you found the MSDS means to me that you have a clue about what the MSDS is. So my only conclusion is that you are a troll looking for a reaction.

    6. Re:Sounds Dangerous by pilkul · · Score: 3, Funny
      That's nothing. The highly dangerous chemical Dihydrogen Monoxide has been allowed on aircraft for years, and calls for banning it have been summarily ignored. According to this essay at DHMO.org, it is known to frequently cause severe burns, and inhaling it is often lethal. Its MSDS states it forms dangerous explosive gases if you only mix it with calcium carbide.

      Now that's a terrorist's dream. Methanol is the least of our problems.

    7. Re:Sounds Dangerous by fm6 · · Score: 2, Interesting
      It's a neurotoxin! It casues blindness! And it's highly flammable!

      Sounds like a terrorist's dream.

      Sounds like whiskey. Well, that's an exageration. But the key fact here is that methanol (methyl alcohol) and ethanol (ethyl alcohol, or just alcohol to most people) are both alcohols, and thus share characteristics, such as flamability and toxicity. The main difference is that methanol is not considered safe for beverage use in any quantity (though some people drink it anyway), whereas ethanol is considered safe is small quantities (though some people dispute this).

      So, not a terrorists dream, just something that's a little more dangerous than a substance that's already allowed on planes.

    8. Re:Sounds Dangerous by gwjgwj · · Score: 1

      In fact ethanol (another neurotoxin you may be more familiar with) might be more effective for this. If you offer it free in a glass to most people, they will actually drink it!
      In fact, methanol has the same odour and taste as ethanol. So, they would actually drink methanol as well.

    9. Re:Sounds Dangerous by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      In fact, you are so full of shit you squeak when you walk. Methanol smells nothing like ethanol.

    10. Re:Sounds Dangerous by Eternauta3k · · Score: 0

      Read what may happen to you if you eat Vick VapoRub. A terrorist's dream!!

      --
      Yeah. Would you choose a neurosurgeon who pokes around people's brains in his spare time? I wouldn't.
    11. Re:Sounds Dangerous by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      yea...if the terrorist can get you to bathe in it and then drink a liter of it. That's for extreme exposure. I'm a chemist....you spill some methanol....go wash your hands....not really that big a deal.

      Here's another "terrorist's dream" MSDS

      Warning! Flammable liquid. May cause skin irritation. Hygroscopic. May cause central nervous system depression. May cause kidney damage. May form explosive peroxides. May cause reproductive effects based upon animal studies. May cause severe eye irritation and possible injury. Causes digestive and respiratory tract irritation. Target Organs: Kidneys, central nervous system.

      Yea...this one is for isopropanol....better known as rubbing alcohol. Don't scare people when it's not necessary.

    12. Re:Sounds Dangerous by Gortiag · · Score: 1

      Actually, the smells are quite similar.

      That's why there has been accidents where people have swallowed too much methanol and actually gone blind.

      I can't remember any similar case with, let's say, propanon.

    13. Re:Sounds Dangerous by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Warning! Flammable liquid. May cause skin irritation. May cause central nervous system depression. May be absorbed through the skin. May cause kidney damage. May cause respiratory and digestive tract irritation. May be fatal or cause blindness if swallowed. May cause fetal effects. Causes severe eye irritation and possible injury. Target Organs: Kidneys, central nervous system, eyes.

      Couldn't the same symptoms be applied to beer?

      Oh no! The terrorists have doused us in beer. Whatever shall we do?

    14. Re:Sounds Dangerous by LordofEntropy · · Score: 1

      Fortunately the antidote for methanol poisoning is ethanol! So you just need to slam a couple shots in the event of a terrorist methanol weapon attack.

      Also keep this in mind for really old soda with aspartame, which can eventually degrade into methanol. Just add rum to that really really old diet coke and you'll be fine!

      --
      Entropy just isn't what it used to be.
    15. Re:Sounds Dangerous by sharkey · · Score: 1

      You left out: Sneaking into the Pentagon one morning, and flushing all 700+ toilets at once, thus rupturing the pipes and rendering the American military complex higglety-pigglety.



      Berke Breathed, we miss you.

      --

      --
      "Outlook not so good." That magic 8-ball knows everything! I'll ask about Exchange Server next.
    16. Re:Sounds Dangerous by Cyberax · · Score: 1

      Well, here's safety information for common table salt:

      http://www.jtbaker.com/msds/englishhtml/S3338.htm
      Inhalation:
      May cause mild irritation to the respiratory tract.
      Ingestion:
      Very large doses can cause vomiting, diarrhea, and prostration. Dehydration and congestion occur in most internal organs. Hypertonic salt solutions can produce violent inflammatory reactions in the gastrointestinal tract.
      Skin Contact:
      May irritate damaged skin; absorption can occur with effects similar to those via ingestion.
      Eye Contact:
      Causes irritation, redness, and pain. (For salt concentrations greater than the normal saline present.)
      Chronic Exposure:
      No information found.
      Aggravation of Pre-existing Conditions:
      No information found.

  17. Re:"flammable" by bcrowell · · Score: 3, Funny

    "Flammable" is a neologism, meant to prevent people from getting killed because they think "inflammable" means "impossible to set on fire."

  18. Right around the corner.... by drgonzo59 · · Score: 1

    These people start to sound just like the guys with the flying car and tabletop fusion -- it is always "just around the corner", "any day now", "start investing today!"...sheesh!

    1. Re:Right around the corner.... by bobcat7677 · · Score: 1

      Yes, I'm getting a tad tired of the "Fuel cells in laptops next week" articles. Looking through the archives I see we were having the same discussion in June of 2004. I believe Toshiba was demoing a fuel cell laptop around that time. It has very much become a "I'll believe it when I see them on the shelf" situation.

  19. SmartFuelCell by danimrich · · Score: 4, Informative

    There is a German company (http://www.smartfuelcell.de/ that is already producing fuel-cell powered generators for camping. I guess it won't take too long until they are small enough to fit in a laptop bag.

    --
    where's all that Karma?
  20. Last week, it was 8 hours... by jxyama · · Score: 1
    This week, it's 9. Which is it?

    http://hardware.slashdot.org/article.pl?sid=06/0 3/03/0134241

    1. Re:Last week, it was 8 hours... by GrumblyStuff · · Score: 1

      Wow! They're getting better already. At this rate next year, we'll have laptops that can run over 60 hours!

  21. We should think about polution as well by CMBologna · · Score: 1

    Although the promise of running an entire day on these batteries sounds nice, given how many days there are in a year, how many laptops there are and the cost of the resupply network, I belive it will lead into the same problem that we have with the use of fossile fuels.

    1. Re:We should think about polution as well by pentalive · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Even better, what about several of these running in a closed environment, like a plane in a 4 hour flight! re-cycled smog!
      What does methanhol burn to? probably CO2 and water vapor?

    2. Re:We should think about polution as well by Millenniumman · · Score: 1

      Methanol is not burned in a fuel cell.

      --
      Stupidity is like nuclear power, it can be used for good or evil. And you don't want to get any on you.
    3. Re:We should think about polution as well by slashdotmsiriv · · Score: 1

      From the web.

      "In DMFC the electrolyte is a polymer and the charge carrier is the hydrogen ion (proton). However, the liquid methanol (CH3OH) is oxidized in the presence of water at the anode generating CO2, hydrogen ions and the electrons that travel through the external circuit as the electric output of the fuel cell. The hydrogen ions travel through the electrolyte and react with oxygen from the air and the electrons from the external circuit to form water at the anode completing the circuit.

              Anode Reaction: CH3OH + H2O => CO2 + 6H+ + 6e-
              Cathode Reaction: 3/2 O2 + 6 H+ + 6e- => 3 H2O
              Overall Cell Reaction: CH3OH + 3/2 O2 => CO2 + 2 H2"

      It seems that the by product is some CO2 and hydrogen which most likely is turned into water.

      What I dont know is the volume of the produced gases and whether or not they are actually released in the atmosphere
      or somehow stored in the cell where they can be released upon refueling or at another time. My guess is that the volume/mass of the produced gases are no more than what is produced by simply burning methanol of the volume of a cartridge.

      That's not a lot but could potentially contribute to the greenhouse-effect if everybody starts using them instead of batteries. It would also be a big problem indeed in closed spaces such as planes.

      Anybody knowns some answers and what the actual masses/volumes of the by products are? Also anybody knows if those are released upon reaction in the atmosphere or can be released on demand?

    4. Re:We should think about polution as well by paeanblack · · Score: 1

      Even better, what about several of these running in a closed environment, like a plane in a 4 hour flight! re-cycled smog!

      A methanol fuelcell for a laptop produces CO2 and water vapor at about the rate of a single human lung. The average human anus releases a far greater quantity of toxic gas than one of these fuelcells. If you are worried about smog in airplanes, processing the human flatus would yield more for your efforts.

    5. Re:We should think about polution as well by bloobloo · · Score: 1

      It's not burnt uncontrollably but it is still oxidised with air to form carbon dioxide and water.

    6. Re:We should think about polution as well by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Sure it is. It's burned to heat water to steam which then drives a mini steam engine which in turn powers a small dynamo to produce the electricty your laptop runs on.

  22. enlighten me by RelliK · · Score: 1

    So if they can make fuel cells for ficken *laptops* why can't they do the same thing for cars??

    --
    ___
    If you think big enough, you'll never have to do it.
    1. Re:enlighten me by Jeremi · · Score: 1
      So if they can make fuel cells for ficken *laptops* why can't they do the same thing for cars?


      They can, and do. Once the price comes down (or people become willing to pay $500,000 for a car), and the infrastructure issues get worked out, we will have them.

      --


      I don't care if it's 90,000 hectares. That lake was not my doing.
    2. Re:enlighten me by mmarshall · · Score: 1

      Most vehicles can already go for several hours without recharging

  23. flammable methanol? by cperciva · · Score: 0, Redundant

    international air flight regulators changed rules that banned passengers from carrying flammable methanol onto aircraft

    Yes, but what about the rules which ban passengers from carrying inflammable methanol onto aircraft?

    1. Re:flammable methanol? by ClippySay · · Score: 0

      In fact, is there any non-flammable methanol???

      --
      cpu0: Microsoft Clippium ("GenuineClippy" ChromedMetal-Class). Paperbinding, lockpicking, fish-hook-hack support.
    2. Re:flammable methanol? by Blastrogath · · Score: 1

      Fuels aren't usually 100% pure, additives and ipurities are commonplace. You simply need to dilute the methanol suficiently with a non-flammible liquid that won't interfere with the fuel cell's operation. It may not work well diluted that far though.

      --
      "The price good men pay for indifference to public affairs is to be ruled by evil men." -Plato
  24. Ok I don't get it. by NDPTAL85 · · Score: 1

    So why would I want to pay to recharge my laptop on an almost daily basis when I can simply plug it in for free with a rechargable battery instead?

    --
    Mac OS X and Windows XP working side by side to fight back the night.
    1. Re:Ok I don't get it. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

      obviously it would be more convenient if they just burnt gasoline like your car. Then you could fill your laptop upw hile youre at the gas station filling your car.

    2. Re:Ok I don't get it. by Concerned+Onlooker · · Score: 1

      Free laptop wash with every fill.

      --
      http://www.rootstrikers.org/
  25. Bad Idea - I can't drink it! by failedlogic · · Score: 1

    Before it even make it out to market, I propose beer, vodka, whiskey or gin based batteries. At least when you get sick of work, you can have some fun!!!

  26. Corn Squeezings by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    When they start shipping fuel cells that can use Ethyl Alcohol, then I'd have a use for them thar corn squeezings.

  27. Methanol On Board by wildsurf · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Fuel cell technology got a boost recently when international air flight regulators changed rules that banned passengers from carrying flammable methanol onto aircraft.

    So now when the guy sitting next to you's computer bombs, it means something entirely different.

    --
    Weeks of coding saves hours of planning.
  28. Welcome to the Futurama by EZLeeAmused · · Score: 1

    Can ethanol burning robots be far behind?

    --
    Some see the vessel as half full; others see it as half-empty; We pour it out on the floor and laugh
  29. Will Short-lived Devices Survive a Year by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Microsoft recently announced Origami, which has been criticized for it's short battery life of about three hours (among other things). If the fuel cells will actually double or triple the life to six or nine hours, it would certainly be a lot more attractive as a product. Will it last as a commercial product until Microsoft can convert it to fuel cell? Perhaps by that time we'll have a good Linux distribution or two for it as well.

  30. Cost + fuel medium by DarkMan · · Score: 3, Informative

    The reason fuel cells are much hyped, and preferred over batteries is that they use liquids to produce the electricity. This means that the size of the reaction interface is decoupled from the energy storage medium (whereas in a battery, they are intimately linked [normally]).

    So, the size of the reaction interface determines the power that you can get out of the fuel cell, and the size of the energy reservoir determines how long it will last.

    A laptop draws, what, 100 watts peak? A car with an 80 hp engine is at 60 kW - 600 times more. A fuel cell big enough to power that would be prohibitive in cost. Not to mention, the fuel cell will degrade with time - impurities in the fuel, and (if it's a polymer cell), degradation in the polymer itself.

    Next point is the fuel medium. The energy density of methanol is less than gasoline, at about 22MJ/kg vs 45MJ/kg for gasoline. So, assuming comparable fuel efficency with the internal combustion + mechanical drive vs fuel cell + motors, you'd need twice as much fuel.

    There are no good fuel cells that operate on gasoline - the more complex the hydrocarbon, the harder it is to build a fuel cell. Couple that with the way the sulpher tends to kill fuel cells, and it's not feasable (low sulpher gasoline is available - have you ever seen guarenteed no sulpher gasoline?)

    So, it would cost more, and you'd only get half the distance on a single tank of methanol. Assuming that you can get the methanol. The whole fuel distribution problem is a seperate case.

    All the numbers here are conservative - I'm sure my powerbook draws significantly less than 100W, 80 hp is at the low end for a car - I believe 100hp is more typical. The laptop fuel cells don't use pure methanol, it's methanol and water, further reducing the energy density.

    1. Re:Cost + fuel medium by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You leave out a very important factor: ICE engines waste much of the energy in gasoline in, well, combustion. Heat is where most of the energy goes. This is MUCH less of an issue with fuel cells.

    2. Re:Cost + fuel medium by LordVader717 · · Score: 1

      Not to mention, the fuel cell will degrade with time - impurities in the fuel, and (if it's a polymer cell), degradation in the polymer itself.

      Which is why there are alot of hopes set on hydrogen. Storing it isn't that much of a problem anymore.

      One of the main problems with using fuel cells in cars is however that the catalysts need alot of platinum. Thus, they are very expensive, and certainly not suitable for mass production.

      There is the promising idea of using carbon nanostructures to replace the platinum catalysts, but they're still a few years away.

      You're assumption of comparable efficiency is totally wrong though.
      An Otto motor will have something like 33% efficiency, if you're using a Diesel motor you might get one or two percent more.

      An electric motor on the other hand has about 95% efficiency, and PMFC's have upward from 70%.
      So total distance would probably be comparable if you're using mathanol.
      Hydrogen, on the other hand, is in a totally different league.

  31. Are fuel cells the right answer? by jolyonr · · Score: 3, Interesting

    I was thinking before that I'd really love to be able to have a laptop with 9 hours of battery life - something I could use in the departure lounge waiting for my transatlantic flight (someone else always gets the seats near the power sockets before me) and then use on a 7hr flight without worrying about battery life.

    That's why I got the IBM X41 - I have a 7 cell extra-life battery plugged into the back, and a second slim battery that plugs onto the base of the laptop. The two together give me between 7 and 10 hours of battery life, depending on what I'm doing (usually programming, so I'm not a 'power' user).

    Buying the IBM was one of the best decisions I've ever made (no connection to the company, or to Levono who now own their PC business). After my recent flight from London Heathrow to Toronto I had 1.5hrs of battery life left on the machine when I shut it down as we were preparing to land.
     
    So... this wasn't that expensive - the laptop and all batteries were less than 1000GBP including tax... is there really a genuine need for fuel cells?
     
    Jolyon

    --


    Please read my Canon EOS tech blog at http://www.everyothershot.com
    1. Re:Are fuel cells the right answer? by miffo.swe · · Score: 1

      Laptops arent the only electronic device that benefits from small fuel-cells. I can think of many other uses for those other than laptops. I also assume here that the efficency of fuel cells will improve over time. The first ones will probably not be optimal. Ofcourse you can solve it with bigger batteries but wight seems to be important. The big breakthrough is more energy stored in a smaller space.

      This is something long since needed in electric cars.

      --
      HTTP/1.1 400
    2. Re:Are fuel cells the right answer? by paeanblack · · Score: 1

      Laptops arent the only electronic device that benefits from small fuel-cells.

      I can see Schick planning its response to the Gillette Turbo now....

    3. Re:Are fuel cells the right answer? by mingot · · Score: 2, Funny

      Six Blades!

  32. Whiskey Galore by mlush · · Score: 1
    Fuel cell technology got a boost recently when international air flight regulators changed rules that banned passengers from carrying flammable methanol onto aircraft.

    Regulations that oddly do not ban the taking of flammable liter bottles of 120+ proof cask strength whiskey aboard. Theres about 1.5 tons of alcohol aboard a passenger 747

    1. Re:Whiskey Galore by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Laddie, don't ya know that true uisge beatha is spelled without an "e", w-h-i-s-k-y? Yah might as well use that whisk*e*y stuff for a fuel cell, weapon, or thinning paint.

      Tomar: [drunkenly]What's that?
      Scotty: [drunkenly]It's ...[stares at bottle]... green.

      You'll pardon me while I go pour a wee dram of Arbeg and toast the memory of a fine scotsman and engineer.

  33. Ultra capacitors are the future by erik_norgaard · · Score: 1

    I recall there was a post on this somewhere recently, else see this:

        http://lees.mit.edu/lees/projects/cnt_ultracap_pro ject.htm

    Ultra capacitors now can hols 6Wh/kg which is only a fraction of conventional Li-Ion batteries but according to MIT this can be boosed to 1000 battery capasity by using nanotubes.

    And ultra capacitors have a large number of advantages: no dangerous components, recharge in a matter of minutes, better temperature tolerance, longer durability ...

    I don't know why people bother to talk about fuelcells...

    1. Re:Ultra capacitors are the future by Blastrogath · · Score: 1

      >I don't know why people bother to talk about fuelcells...

      Because they may want long life laptop power cells in 1 or 2 years as oposed to in 10 or 20 years?

      --
      "The price good men pay for indifference to public affairs is to be ruled by evil men." -Plato
    2. Re:Ultra capacitors are the future by imsabbel · · Score: 1

      >And ultra capacitors have a large number of advantages: no dangerous components, recharge in a matter of minutes, better temperature tolerance, longer durability .

      how about:
      a) toxic nanoparticles (potentially carciogenic?)
      b) recharge is current-limited. A supercap that actually HAS more capacity/volume than a LiIon would melt if you try to charge it that quickly
      c) ultra-low breakthrough voltage, requires extensive step-up circuit.
      d) those 6 Wh/kg EXTREMELY warp the picture to benefit supercaps (as they are not very dense at all).

      conclusion: people talk about fulecells because they are about 250-500 times better in terms of energy density than supercabs.
      (plus have you any idea how fucking expensive those vapourware nanotube caps would be?)

      --
      HI O WISE PRINCE. WHT TOOK U SO DAM LONG?
    3. Re:Ultra capacitors are the future by erik_norgaard · · Score: 1

      a) Nanotubes made of carbon are quite harmless, actually research is done on how these can be used for medical treatment for example to encapsulate vira.

      True, nano and micro particles in the air can be harmfull, but this is not the case for the nanotubes in a closed container. When the ultracapasitor is disposed it contains less harmful chemicals than a Li-Ion battery.

      b) You have a point, but this is mostly an engineering problem to make it charge correctly. Wether they would melt is a completely unfounded claim. They could catch fire too, since they consist of carbon.

      c) Again, if this is a significant problem, it seems to be one that can be handled.

      d) Here you refer to the current capacity and this is not yet convincing, but the OP was about future development.

      So, if you want to give critics, then read the article and correct my error (too late now): I confused power and energy density. They claim a power density 1000 that of bateries is possible and an energy density comparable to Li-Ion.

      This is still very interesting I think due to the positive impact on environment and faster recharge. The fact that you can recharge faster will give you more independence and mobility.

  34. Is that 'soon' as in... by Expert+Determination · · Score: 1

    ..."it's dinner time soon" or 'soon' as in "we expect our fusion reactor to achieve a positive return very soon".

    --
    "The White House is not an intelligence-gathering agency," -- Scott McClellan, Whitehouse spokesman.
  35. Re:"flammable" by Peteee · · Score: 1

    "Don't worry, It's Inflammable."
    (After the explosion) "Inflammable means flammable? What a country!"

    Dr. Nick

  36. The big question! by Jugalator · · Score: 4, Funny

    The big question (for males) is obviously, would fuel cells increase or decrease the risks of burning the scrotum and penis? :-o

    --
    Beware: In C++, your friends can see your privates!
  37. Forever by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I can't wait to play Duke Nukem Forever on my Fuel Cell Laptop... coming sooon...

  38. Available now 7+ hours battery life by $exyNerdie · · Score: 1

    For example, Sony VAIO TX Series. If you can afford them, check them out:

    * Intel® Centrino(TM) Mobile Technology.
    * Microsoft® Windows® XP Professional
    * Ultra-light 2.76 pounds
    * Up to 7.5 hours of battery life

  39. Re:"flammable" by Psykus · · Score: 3, Funny

    Did you know that "gullible" isn't in the dictionary?

  40. Re:"flammable" by XanC · · Score: 1
    Yes, I was attempting to coyly criticize dumbing things down for the lowest common denominator, especially in a non-life-or-death Slashdot post.

    Judging by the response, that doesn't work on the Internet though... :-)

  41. Dupe - Ten-year-old News Story by billstewart · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Just about every year since the mid-90s Internet boom we hear that fuel cells will be available Real Soon Now. They're a really cool idea, you obviously want them, and I hear that they're packaging them with a free copy of Duke Nukem Forever....

    --

    Bill Stewart
    New Fast-Compression-only CPR http://preview.tinyurl.com/dy575ks
  42. and what happens when... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    You run out of fuel? DO you just plug it in to recharge? Must you run off to the nearest filling station?

    Oh please. No thanks.

  43. what I really want by sentientbrendan · · Score: 1

    Is a gasoline powered laptop. Now there's something I can play quake on!

  44. China Syndrome in miniature by John+Jorsett · · Score: 2, Funny

    How much energy can we pack into a small package before we need to start treating it like thermite? If we're putting many watt-hours into a cartridge and it malfunctions, could it, for example, end up melting its way through the cabin floor and skin (and the fuel lines) of an aircraft?

  45. I think the big picture issue here by Rogerborg · · Score: 1

    Is why isn't this being announced by an American company?

    --
    If you were blocking sigs, you wouldn't have to read this.
    1. Re:I think the big picture issue here by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Why is this not announced by an *Australian* company?

      http://www.solve.csiro.au/1104/article6.htm/

  46. Is this really a big deal? by neildiamond · · Score: 1

    Maybe I'm missing the point here, but my HP laptop with the extra capacity battery can go for four hours (not gaming of course) on a charge (many of the low voltage laptops do much better than that). A fuel cell, which is disposable would get me 9. Why do I not care?

  47. Sounds sketchy by cpuenvy · · Score: 0

    "air flight regulators changed rules that banned passengers from carrying flammable methanol onto aircraft"

    So, aside from the fact that you can easily pack some c4 into your laptop and set the charge with your modem, I am still supposed to feel safe flying? Would I be scrutinized if I brought a case of lighters onboard?

    Sounds dangerous. Anyone have a good link to the technology behind these fuel cells? There is something about having a few fuel cells kicking around the plane that sketches me out.

    --
    DISCLAIMER:

    I don't believe what I write, and neither should you.

  48. Re:"flammable" by weg · · Score: 1

    *argh* It's mutually recursive! Now I'll have to read the definition of flammable/inflammable till the end of my days.. (unless I manage to exit the loop via "excitable")

    --
    Georg
  49. Which one? by woolio · · Score: 1

    Just curious, which auction is yours?

    I recently got a **new** LiION battery for my laptop. Total cost was about $50. (I found the /proc/acpi/battery stuff in Linux even confirmed that it was a new battery)

    Also you can get a 12V car adapter and an external 12V battery pack really cheap ~$100. [External LiION batteries for laptops are much more expensive and less flexible].

    If you can run your CPU at half/lower speed and turn down the LCD brightness, it helps a lot.

    My laptop draws ~4amps at full load/speed with a bright screen.
    It draws about 2 amps at half speed and and dimmer screen [full load]. And about 1amp with a dimmer screen, half cpu speed, and idling.

    1. Re:Which one? by ScrewMaster · · Score: 1

      Just pick up a 35 watt inverter at Best Buy for $20 and jack it into your cigarette lighter, I mean, auxiliary power outlet. In addition to running/charging the laptop, you can use it to run your electric razor on days when you're running late for work and need to shave in the car.

      --
      The higher the technology, the sharper that two-edged sword.
  50. Why can't we just have a hand crank by bllius69 · · Score: 1
  51. Flammable methanol permitted? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    You are kidding right; no way in US airspace, I hope.
    Too many restrictions on what can be carried aboard; gee, if I can carry on methanol, then why can't my wife carry on her private (approved hardware for flight) medical oxygen?
    Many airlines will not permit oxygen at all and only few will (with many hurdles) rent you their O2 supply.
    In short, I can now have a laptop in my lap, but not my wife?... ok, I promise to buy her a seat too but only if I have to!

    1. Re:Flammable methanol permitted? by aschlemm · · Score: 1

      Not only that but here in the US you cannot even carry a cigarette lighter on board an airliner and so I really doubt they're going to allow someone to carry a fuel cell powered laptop on board.

  52. Reversibility? by stevenm86 · · Score: 1

    What about direct hydrogen fuel cells? Those could technically be run in reverse to, in essence, recharge the cell. No point in having to put more fuel in - have a container for the waste steam from the reaction, condense it to water, then electrolyze it when AC power is available. No point in letting the steam vent, anyway - it would just condense in/on the machine and rust or corrode the electronics

    1. Re:Reversibility? by LordVader717 · · Score: 1

      Why wait hours for some friggin water to electrolyze when you can replace the gas in seconds? That's one of the main advantages over batteries. BTW, you won't get far trying to electrolyze water using AC.

  53. Even better... by nobodynoone · · Score: 1

    For me, I would rather have something like a fuel-cell inverter type thing, which has an outlet on it so that I can plug in my laptop on the go. Having fuel cells replace rechargables as the main power source is not really practical with such a small increase in battery life at such a high cost compared to AC power from an outlet. A inverter sort of thing would give the best of both worlds, and would allow laptops to keep the nice form factor we are used to today.

    Just a thought.

  54. Same story, different year - by 0x0000 · · Score: 1

    Anyway - I'm just tired of hearing this tired, recycled bull about "laptop fuel cells" - I was on board with it until the 2nd story came out around the time cells hyped in the first article were supposed to see market...

    It seems like the "this will be on the shelves by" date has getting incremented by 12 to 18 months each time the story sees daylight since the I first started seeing it in - what, 2003? 2004?

    The point about it that disrupts the "willfull suspension of disbelief" that I typically rely on when trying to grasp most other "news" is the ongoing emphasis on form factor: If "they" realy can make a methanol fuel cell with sufficient current to e.g. power a laptop computer, why don't they just put it on the market with a cord that will plug in as the present-day power supply brick does?

    Such a device would be generic to the point that it could be used with a wide variety of models, as well as with devices that are not computers - but just try asking for a "19-volt 200W methane fuel cell" in Best Buy or Radio Shack and see what you get...

    --
    "The Internet is made of cats."
  55. Re:Hardware: Laptop Fuel Cells Coming Soon ...too by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    too costly. its something for special niche applications like military where costs don't matter. recharging laptop batteries is dirt cheap and buying an extra battery pack like those valence n charge or whatever slab batteries that add 5-9 horus to your laptop for 2-3lb cost about 250 dollars withotu the fuss of playing with fuel. i'm sure they'd love to sell em to us like they do with inkjet carts, but its not going to happen, the cost per fuel cell cart isn't going to be low enough to ever be acceptable to mainstream, its hype. unless they sell huge 5 gallon refill bottles for home refills, i don't see the point of the hype.

  56. Media bay vs battery bay by Descalzo · · Score: 1
    I think that most laptop media bays are the same size, while most battery bays are different size. I read somewhere on a support forum that basically all laptop optical drives are the same size, with a different bezel on the end of the tray. If that's so, then this will be a lot cheaper to produce.

    That said, I would definitely prefer it in the battery bay.

    --
    I cried real tears when Li Mu Bai died.
  57. Real turnoff for fuelcells - electricity vs. heat by allanj · · Score: 1

    I've actually been involved in the preliminary designs of a small very powerful wearable computer, and we looked really hard at a fuel-cell solution - from Antig, no less. The real turn-off was not risk of fire or anything (this can be handled), but the fact that for every 10W of electrical power they generate 12-15W of heat. It's already difficult to get rid of ~25W from the electronics in a lunchbox sized device to be worn on the body. Now imagine adding ~35W of heat to generate the 25W - no thanks. I hope they've improved that ratio since we last checked, but I'm not expecting a miracle here...

    Hydrogen fuel-cells are better in this respect, but still nowhere near the ratio for rechargable batteries, where the ratio is something like 1W of heat for 10W of electrical power. But hydrogen is more difficult to handle than the watered-down methanol most fuel-cells use (the limit was something like 28% for airplane approval last I checked, but that was admittedly about a year ago).

    --
    Black holes are where God divided by zero
  58. New Tag Required by Linker3000 · · Score: 1

    Note to editors - new category required:

      [+] power, fuelcell, laptops, dupe (tagging beta)

    The developers should arrange that once a new article is tagged, up pops a list of references to all other articles with a similar tags match (arranged in reverse chronological order) so they can check for dupes - or would that be too sensible - or does it happen but the editors are just sloppy?

    --
    AT&ROFLMAO
  59. Better Batteries by gkbarr · · Score: 1

    It strikes me (and most /. users it would seem) that fuel cell laptops are a total joke for countless reasons. Everyone knows that battery technology needs to take a quantum leap forward... well, it has - http://www.a123systems.com/

    --
    Sapere Aude - Homer
  60. Re:"flammable" by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    From Merriam-Webster's Concise Dictionary of English Usage: "Flammable, inflammable: These two words are synonymous. Flammable is a much newer word, apparently coined in 1813 to serve in a translation from Latin".

    Ah yes, one of those (almost) two centuries old neologisms!

  61. I can hear it now... by epp_b · · Score: 1

    Oh yeah? Well how many cycles per gallon are you getting?

  62. Ploy for recurring revenue by orev · · Score: 1

    This fuel cell thing sounds nice on the surface, but do you think for one minute you'll be able to buy any old can of fuel at the store and plug it in? Not a chance. Every company wants recurring revenue, and the idea that Dell will be able to sell you fuel for the lifetime of the laptop is too good to pass up (for them).

    Mark my words, we will see Staples full of fuel tanks for every different laptop, right next to all the ink tanks for printers.

  63. You have to put it in your CD-drive? by Kittie+Rose · · Score: 1

    This kind of worries me, did it just say that you have to use it where your CD Drive is supposed to be? Surely one of the big uses of extent power would be to finally use CDs/DVDs on the go? Not good.

    --
    EpiAdv - if you like Pokey the Penguin, try this comic!
  64. Processing human flatus might sound like a joke... by LunaticTippy · · Score: 1
    There are a wide range of filters available here

    [insert joke]

    I've got a friend whose wife has IBS. That's how I know.

    --
    Man, you really need that seminar!
  65. hmm by Rob+Nance · · Score: 1

    I claimed a few years ago we'd see an OLED + fuel cell Powerbook from Apple before anyone else, but it looks like OLED dev has slowed down, and they didn't make the right alliances in Japan to make the fuel cell thing happen. Apple really could have benefited from having fuel cells in laptops or at least iPods before anyone else. They need to keep on the technology cutting edge to keep their geek street cred up.

    1. Re:hmm by sf2k · · Score: 1

      methanol is made from natural gas, which is in worldwide decline. far better to get your laptop solar panels ready and use more low powered chips, even the wind-up laptop from MIT than "burn" yourself with a gas powered laptop! I'd like to see more of those wind-up machines. No harddrive true but solid state flash cards instead. Good enough for linux and nethack ;) Kinda like a big PDA with a full keyboard. In the next few years we're going to have more to worry about than air travel and gas powered anything. More like gardening! cheers (google peak oil, see the DVD End of Suburbia) peakoil.org or peakoil.com www.princeton.edu/hubbert/current-events-06-02.htm l www.princeton.edu/hubbert/current-events.html