Slashdot Mirror


A Chicken In Every Pot, A Robot In Every Home

Palm Addict writes "The New York Times report that "South Korea, the world's most wired country, is rushing to turn what sounds like science fiction into everyday life. The government, which succeeded in getting broadband Internet into 72 percent of all households in the last half decade, has marshaled an army of scientists and business leaders to make robots full members of society.""

110 comments

  1. Mr. Roboto by ExE122 · · Score: 2, Funny

    It seems to me that even the smartest robots are still only about as intellectually capable as me and my roommates after a heavy night of drinking.

    So naturally, the next step for them is to be made citizens. That way, they can't dodge the draft.

    While they've already began using them for educational and military purposes, I somehow doubt that they will become useful anytime soon. They will be something used only by the government or by the rich until enough money is thrown in and research is done to turn them into anything worth considering.

    --
    Capitalism: When it uses the carrot, it's called democracy. When it uses the stick, it's called fascism.
    1. Re:Mr. Roboto by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny

      "It seems to me that even the smartest robots [spacedaily.com] are still only about as intellectually capable as me and my roommates after a heavy night of drinking." They vomit on the floor, have unprotected sex and post on Slashdot ?

    2. Re:Mr. Roboto by XMilkProject · · Score: 4, Funny

      I don't know that it takes alot of intelligence for a robot to bring you a beer or give you a hand job.

      That is what they are for, isn't it?

      --
      Big ones, small ones, some as big as yer 'ead!
      Give 'em a twist, a flick o' the wrist...
    3. Re:Mr. Roboto by xtracto · · Score: 1

      Tell that to my mother I you will surely be hit with her purse, let me rephrase what she told me when I bought her this cute robot, it was something like "wow, and think that this gadget manages to clean better than you did" (as I hated to clean my room when I was a kid).

      --
      Ubuntu is an African word meaning 'I can't configure Debian'
    4. Re:Mr. Roboto by Fordiman · · Score: 1, Funny

      I for one welcome our - hey, wait now. It's not funny if its topical is it?

      --
      110100 1101000 1101000 1100110 0 1101111 1101000 1100011 1
    5. Re:Mr. Roboto by novus+ordo · · Score: 1

      Pin Pals: You can do it, Otto! You can do it, Otto! Help each other out: that'll be our motto! You can do it, Otto! You can do it, Otto!
      Apu: Make this spare; I'll give you free gelato!
      Moe: Then back to my place, where I will get you blotto!
      Homer: Domo Arigato, Mr. Roboto.

      --
      "You're everywhere. You're omnivorous."
    6. Re:Mr. Roboto by NorthWoodsman · · Score: 1

      Unprotected sex? You must be new here.

      --
      1p}{ 1 sp34k |33+ +|-|e|\| p30p13 \/\/il| 8e i/\/\pr3553|)
    7. Re:Mr. Roboto by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Hand job? Hell I can do that for myself. I want robot blowjobs!

    8. Re:Mr. Roboto by Half+a+dent · · Score: 1

      "They vomit on the floor, have unprotected sex and post on Slashdot ?"

      No but they might get "intimate" with the vacuum clearer, or the washer on spin-cycle - so not much different from college students!

    9. Re:Mr. Roboto by EatHam · · Score: 1

      I have not yet gotten to the point where I find it necessary to outsource my wanking.

    10. Re:Mr. Roboto by Ohreally_factor · · Score: 1

      I think it's unfair to think that all robots will have the same proclivities as the fruitfucker 2000.

      --
      It's not offtopic, dumbass. It's orthogonal.
    11. Re:Mr. Roboto by Ohreally_factor · · Score: 1

      In Soviet Korea, only old robot overlords welcome YOU!!

      --
      It's not offtopic, dumbass. It's orthogonal.
    12. Re:Mr. Roboto by thc69 · · Score: 2, Interesting

      It's more topical than you think. Not only the robot part, but the overlords part too. They will all be networked to a central government facility. Big Brother, anybody?

      It's an odd coincidence, today, I've been reading "With Folded Hands" by Jack Williamson. It's about a guy who sells robots (scarcely more than voice-controlled Roombas that can retrieve the dirty dishes from your table) for home automation, who is put unexpectedly and immediately out of business when technologically advanced centrally controlled robots show up, intending to do everything for humans so that humans no longer need to (or indeed, are allowed to) lift a finger. They force themselves on a mostly willing populace and take ownership of everything.

      Er, anyway, my point was about the central control and the possibilities therein. I guess I'm glad it's happening in Korea, rather than my location.

      --
      Procrastination -- because good things come to those who wait.
    13. Re:Mr. Roboto by resonte · · Score: 1

      "Er, anyway, my point was about the central control and the possibilities therein. I guess I'm glad it's happening in Korea, rather than my location." This is why in the west we never have anything inovative in terms of robotics for the public. The people are too afraid of the robots, due to all the hollywood movies, when really they are harmless.

      --
      \(^o^)/
    14. Re:Mr. Roboto by thc69 · · Score: 1

      You've failed in the area of reading comprehension. I'm not the least bit bothered by robots; I'm quite bothered by the central government having an electronic presence by my side at all times, or even merely in my living room.

      I, for one, would wholeheartedly welcome robots to do all kinds of stuff for me...as long as it only reports to *me*.

      --
      Procrastination -- because good things come to those who wait.
    15. Re:Mr. Roboto by Weedlekin · · Score: 1

      Yeah, right, the society that wants our computers and all media playback devices to be DRM shackled is going to let us have a personal robot that does what _we_ want instead of being a cross between an annoying nanny and a cop.

      "HappyFunBot thinks you've already had enough to drink, so the refrigerator will not open for 24 hours".
      "HappyFunBot notes you have gained 1.77Kg. You will eat 800 calories and run for 40 minutes per day until healthy".
      "You are about to have unprotected sex. Here is a condom which you will wear if you do not wish HappyFunBot to forcibly eject your partner."
      "HappyFunBot knows that copying content without permission is theft. Dead or alive, you're coming with HappyFunBot".
      "Attempting to disable or destroy a HappyFunBot is defined by law as a terrorist act, punishable by a visit to a HappyEuthanasiaPalace. You must love your HappyFunBot, just like your HappyFunBot loves you".
      "It's HappyElectionTime again. Your HappyFunBot has already voted for you so you can lay on your HappyCouch and watch the HappyBox. And remember, HappyFunBot wants you to watch all the HappyFunAds, and then go out and buy things".

      --
      I'm not going to change your sheets again, Mr. Hastings.
  2. NY Times Article Access by eldavojohn · · Score: 4, Informative

    Nobody likes to register so try this link.

    I apologize for the karma whoring.

    --
    My work here is dung.
  3. I call bullshit by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

    Impossible - everyone knows that in Korea, only old people own robots.

  4. Summary misleading. by Whiney+Mac+Fanboy · · Score: 2, Informative

    And not just the summary (as it was copied & pasted verbatim from the article), but the NYT.

    I thought on reading the line " to make robots full members of society" that the article was talking about robot rights. However, the article is just about making plans for standard automation & borderline AI over the next 10 years.

    I for one am going to await until this company is taken over by the rightful owners of that name before I bother to get excited by robots.

    --
    There are shills on slashdot. Apparently, I'm one of them.
    1. Re:Summary misleading. by kalirion · · Score: 1

      Yeah, it's the same way that cars are "full members of society."

    2. Re:Summary misleading. by Fred_A · · Score: 1

      *I*'ll wait until they merge with *this* company before I get excited by robots.

      Until then I'll be at the pub.

      --

      May contain traces of nut.
      Made from the freshest electrons.
    3. Re:Summary misleading. by Rolgar · · Score: 1

      The interesting thing then becomes, if robots ever get voting rights, do the makers of the company start mass producing voters to "buy" elections for the highest bidder, at least until the party with less money decides to outlaw the practice? Except, then you'd have to be able to override the robot vote to disenfranchise the robots.

  5. U.S. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Funny

    The government, which succeeded in getting broadband Internet into 72 percent of all households in the last half decade

    As a red blooded American, I say 'it can't be done.'

  6. Totally misconstrued as... by digitaldc · · Score: 4, Funny

    Pot in every home, Robot Chicken on TV.

    --
    He who knows best knows how little he knows. - Thomas Jefferson
  7. Article title corrected... by alexhs · · Score: 0, Redundant

    In a Wired South Korea, only old Robots Will Feel Right at Home.

    Now usable for the typical Slashdot crowd ;)
    Never have seen a title so easy to fix :)

    --
    I have discovered a truly marvelous proof of killer sig, which this margin is too narrow to contain.
    1. Re:Article title corrected... by woginuk · · Score: 1

      Shouldn't that be 'A Dog in Every Pot...'?

    2. Re:Article title corrected... by TheNumberless · · Score: 1

      That's still wrong. It's "In Wired South Korea, only old people will buy robot insurance."

      I don't even know why the scientists make them.

  8. Humans United Against Robots by klang · · Score: 1

    It's time to raise the awareness!

      Robots will uprise. HUAR will be there.

    http://www.humansunitedagainstrobots.com/

  9. Killer App by neoshroom · · Score: 1

    Kim Mun Sang, director of the Center for Intelligent Robotics, which groups about 500 scientists in a project by government and industry, said networked robots needed a "killer app" before they could become fully integrated into the wired society.

    I definately think the killer app is, "Robot, find my car keys!"

    __
    Elephant Essays - Custom-created essays and research papers.

    --
    Big apple, new Yorik, undig it, something's unrotting in Edenmark.
    1. Re:Killer App by metternich · · Score: 4, Funny

      I thought the "Killer App" was where the robots go around shooting people...

      --
      Facts do not cease to exist because they are ignored.
    2. Re:Killer App by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Must we relegate everything to robots? Going around randomly shooting people is part of what makes us human, I say.

    3. Re:Killer App by dlc3007 · · Score: 1

      That only applies to the robots that come with the special instruction manual: "To Serve Man"

  10. Robots? by TechnoGuyRob · · Score: 5, Interesting
    This is a very, very, very daring venture, and if South Korea succeeds, I can only congratulate them with all my heart. But, one has to ask; are "robots" ready to enter society? We have been seeing things like ATMs, the internet, and various other technologies exploited over the years, whether for identity theft, spam, etc. If the same thing happens to robots, we could be facing some problems.

    But to be honest, after reading the article, I am quite impressed. I did not know this. Take, for example:
    Since January, Koreans have been able to watch television broadcasts on cellphones, free, thanks to government-subsidized technology. In April, South Korea will introduce the first nationwide superfast wireless Internet service, called WiBro, eventually making it possible for Koreans to remain online on the go -- at 10 megabits per second, faster than most conventional broadband connections.
    I'll come straight out with it. That is very impressive. However, as I have stated before, technology--while helpful--can cause problems as well. I mean, it's great that (from the article) "Two years ago, after the opposition-led National Assembly impeached President Roh Moo Hyun, a consensus began forming on the Internet that the move was politically motivated -- two hours after the vote took place, Mr. Chang said. That quickly led to mass demonstrations," he said. "That kind of thing had never happened in Korea before. Everyone is connected to everyone else, so issues spread very fast and kind of unpredictably." However, then you have incidents like this:
    There has been at least one unpredictable side effect: fierce witch hunts. In a case that caused national soul-searching, a woman riding the subway with her dog last year refused to clean up after it defecated in the car. One angry passenger photographed her with a camera-equipped cellphone and later posted the photos. Soon, all of wired South Korea seemed to be on the hunt for "Dog Poop Girl." Several misidentified women were verbally attacked, and finally the woman herself was identified on the Internet and humiliated as the topic of countless online discussions.


    Honestly, I think South Korea might be moving a little too fast for its own good. People aren't getting a chance to adapt. But then again, who knows?
    "But eventually robots could change how we live in a way we can't predict right now," Mr. Kim said. "It's like the PC. No one ever thought the PC and the Internet would transform our society the way they have."
    1. Re:Robots? by mshiltonj · · Score: 3, Insightful

      A woman who refuses to pick up her dog's crap after it takes a dump on the subway *deserves* to humiliated.

      If a dog craps on the carpet, you rub his nose in it. If a dog craps on the subway, and the owner doesn't pick it up, you rub *her* nose in it.

    2. Re:Robots? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      This goes to show how conditioned the average individual is with regard to government. Nowhere do I see anyone asking the fundamental question of human rights: is it morally correct to force an individual to invest in such technology against his will?

      Instead, here is our only concern: is this technology ready to be forced upon each individual against his will?

      The question of individual rights was never on the table for discussion in the first place! Sickening, isn't it? Hardly surprising, though, when you consider that every one of us grew up knowing nothing but big government.

    3. Re:Robots? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "a woman riding the subway with her dog last year refused to clean up after it defecated in the car."

      Wait, this is South Korea, right? She was riding with her DOG? Why would anyone be opposed to cleaning up after his or her LUNCH? It's just common courtesy, people. This kind of outrage must be stopped.

    4. Re:Robots? by Faux_Pseudo · · Score: 1

      Rubbing a dog's nose in their poop is useless. Dogs use poop as buisness card with a complete medical history on the back of it. The grabing by the neck and being forced down might do some good but dogs and people have two very differnt ideas on poop.

      As for the witch hunt: Given the nature of shame in eastern culture I would expect this to the last time that anyone refuses to pick up after their pet, be it on a tram or in a park or anywhere else.

    5. Re:Robots? by Clovert+Agent · · Score: 1
      "Soon, all of wired South Korea seemed to be on the hunt for "Dog Poop Girl." Several misidentified women were verbally attacked, and finally the woman herself was identified on the Internet and humiliated as the topic of countless online discussions."

      Honestly, I think South Korea might be moving a little too fast for its own good. People aren't getting a chance to adapt. But then again, who knows?

      To be brutal (and if I was a victim I might feel otherwise!), but is this bad? I mean, some people got verbal abuse, and the person in question got humiliated online. That's a shame, but I bet she hasn't done it again. If anything, this is a good example of society taking action against an offender using the tools at its disposal.

      On the other hand, that's only a short step away from a mob with pitchforks, right? Vigilante justice, even non-violent vigilante justice, is probably a very bad idea.

    6. Re:Robots? by susano_otter · · Score: 1
      But to be honest, after reading the article, I am quite impressed. I did not know this. Take, for example:


              Since January, Koreans have been able to watch television broadcasts on cellphones, free, thanks to government-subsidized technology.


      Enh. I don't find it all that impressive. "Free" in this case means, "paid for by taxing Korean citizens". Think about that for a moment, then ask yourself, "is delivering free TV to cell phones really the best use of your citizen's money?" Another good question to ask is, "wouldn't it be better for everybody to cut taxes, and let those citizens who actually want or need cellphone TV buy it themselves at market rates with the money you've let them keep?"
      --

      Any sufficiently well-organized community is indistinguishable from Government.

    7. Re:Robots? by shmergin · · Score: 1

      "A woman who refuses to pick up her dog's crap after it takes a dump on the subway *deserves* to humiliated."

      Hows the view from up there?

      Humiliated perhaps, but it went much further than simple humiliation. Eventually her home address was posted on the internet, there were news stories on the national news channels about it and people were getting information about her parents/family and posting it etc etc. The girl had to quit her university because of it. Did she fuck up? of course, but you would have to look hard to find someone who hasnt had a shitty day and done something they wouldnt want the world to see.

  11. In a Wired Soviet Korea... by fuyu-no-neko · · Score: 0, Offtopic

    In a Wired Soviet Korea, old robots make you feel at home?

    --
    Don't take the above poster too seriously. He doesn't.
  12. What we really need to advance robot tech is WWIII by autopr0n · · Score: 1

    Think about how much technology advanced between 1935 and 1945. Compare that to the advancement between 1960 and 1970.

    The problem, though is that we have nuclear weapons, so there's no reason to on-the ground wars at all.

    Still, if the iraq war were to continue, I could imagine a million-strong robot army would actually help us put a dent in the insurgency, without taking the kinds of casualties that make the war so distastefull at home. Robot soldures could take risks that real soldures can't, so they could be a lot more careful in not killing civilians.

    Plus, it would really demoralize the insurgency. They know they can scare us off if they keep killing soldures, but you can never kill enough robots.

    --
    autopr0n is like, down and stuff.
  13. Deja vu by SpiritusGladius1517 · · Score: 0
    Haven't we already seen this before? We should know what the future will be like with robots integrated into society!

    http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Bender_Bending_Rodrig uez

    --
    If the women don't find you handsome, they should at least find you handy.
    1. Re:Deja vu by TenLow · · Score: 1

      But that's not using a realistic timetable.

  14. Re:What we really need to advance robot tech is... by AeroIllini · · Score: 5, Funny

    Plus, it would really demoralize the insurgency. They know they can scare us off if they keep killing soldures, but you can never kill enough robots.

    Obligatory:

    Zapp: You see, the killbots have a preset kill limit; knowing their weakness, I sent wave after wave of my own men at them until they reached their limit and shut down.
    Bender: It was a dark day for robotkind. Ahhhh, we can always build more killbots.

    --
    For security, the MD5 hash of this message and sig is 09f911029d74e35bd84156c5635688c0.
  15. JC Denton was born about now wasn't he? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    "or patrol public areas, searching for intruders and transmitting images to monitoring centers."

    Anyone else have bad memories of those robots from Deus Ex?

  16. Re:What we really need to advance robot tech is WW by achurch · · Score: 1
    Plus, it would really demoralize the insurgency. They know they can scare us off if they keep killing soldures, but you can never kill enough robots.

    That's a nice optimistic thought. Unfortunately, in real life it would probably be more like "it would really delight the insurgency, because they only have to hack one and they have a million killing machines they can send at the US troops". (You can tell how much faith I have in the software industry . . .)

  17. Ob Simpsons ref by MrLogic17 · · Score: 1

    I for.... one....

    It just isn't worth the effort.

    1. Re:Ob Simpsons ref by barefootgenius · · Score: 1

      "I for.... one...." salute our David Hasselhoff look a like overlords.....Nooooooooo!

      --
      /. bug #926803 - Why I can post.
  18. Damn. by El+Puerco+Loco · · Score: 1

    Better make sure my robot insurance is up to date.

  19. Physical agency and human robots by Bombula · · Score: 3, Interesting
    The line from Bladerunner about machines either being a benefit or a hazard pretty well sums things up.

    I think the biggest concern is that machines are liable to be used to destructive ends by manipulative people. Right now machines with physical agency (like cars) have very little in the way of independent capability: they can't really function independently of a human operator. And machines which can function independently of an operator lack physical agency (like ATMs).

    The problem with humanoid robots is that they combin independence with physical agency. Even putting the entire issue of AI aside, such machines could be extremely dangerous because they have the potential to be misdirected for destructive purposes by people. Imagine if a 12 year old kid or a terrorist could instruct a big SUV by remote control?

    It's not so much humanoid robots that are the concern, but larger machines like vehicles that are a worry to me. Right now it is virutally impossible to remotely hack the controls of an airliner, for example, but if planes began to be made to follow instructions issued from less narrow sources of input - by voice or remote control - then the window for abuse opens dramatically.

    As I said, I won't get into AI since that's way too big of an issue, but there is one more point worth thinking about, and that is human beings as robots. Where human beings are profoundly ignorant and very fearful, they are vulnerable to manipulation. That's where terrorists come from. From a certain perspective, suicide bombers are like robots that are being misguided by malevolent human manipulators. Since without highly advanced AI they will presumably be easier to manipulate than even the most ignorant person, robots with physical agency could very quickly become the tool of choice for terrorism.

    --
    A-Bomb
  20. Built for speed by fbrchnl2112 · · Score: 2, Insightful

    That South Korean robot can run slightly faster than I can. That ought to count for something. fbr

  21. Roomba by mccalli · · Score: 4, Insightful
    How timely. I bought my first home robot on Saturday, a Roomba vacuuming robot. It's working superbly, and am very happy with the frankly mindless job its doing having been transferred from either myself or my wife and over to a machine instead.

    What I find interesting is that I have three kids, the eldest being four. They're going to grow up in a house where it's not considered unusual to have a robot pootling about the place doing domestic chores, whereas to my generation (I'm 34) that's still a "hey, cool!" thing. Nobody says "hey cool, you've got a washing machine!" anymore, at least no-one in the developed world (I'm in the UK).

    I'm hoping that the Roomba is just the start of a number of domestic robots. I wouldn't mind one that could wash windows for example, both internal and external. Or a polishing robot. Or a mail-gaethering robot*, or preferable one robot capapble of doing all of it.

    I would imaginethat by the time my kids are 34, domestic robots will be so common that even the phraseology will seem absolete. Sort of like your granny talking about the 'wireless', meaning something utterly different to what you mean by the wireless. They'd just be part of the normal experience of daily life. By getting kids used to the idea that there's nothing special about having a robot, such a day is hastened. And my floors get cleaned as well.

    Cheers,
    Ian
    (*Forget the mail-gathering robot from the Hitchhiker's adventure game. I know about the mail-gathering robot from the Hitchhiker's adventure game. Damned babel fish machine...)

    1. Re:Roomba by UnanimousCoward · · Score: 1

      What I find interesting is that I have three kids, the eldest being four. They're going to grow up in a house where it's not considered unusual to have a robot pootling about the place doing domestic chores, whereas to my generation (I'm 34) that's still a "hey, cool!" thing. Nobody says "hey cool, you've got a washing machine!" anymore, at least no-one in the developed world (I'm in the UK).

      Methinks your "washing machine" analogy is waaaaaaaaay off. These robots will become part of the family in a way that your current-day washing machine will envy: a buddy of mine's Roomba was "allowed" to write the family's Christmas card last year. It was very, very funny.

      --
      Twelve-and-three-quarter inches. Unyielding. This wand belonged to Bellatrix Lestrange.
    2. Re:Roomba by revco_38 · · Score: 1
      I have to second you on the Roomba. We're had one for about a year now and it's great. My kids love to follow it around and talk to it (3 & 4 yrs). I'd like to get the base that it can be programmed to go back to and hide it in the wall so I'd be like the Jetsons! Just tell it to come out at 3AM.

      Incidently, I was explaining to my kids just yesterday about how you cant pause TV at grandpa's house. So many things they'll never truly appreciate...

    3. Re:Roomba by haqatak · · Score: 1

      A bit OT but... its like kids growing up these days with the digital camera age. natural for them to just run over and look at the picturse right after it was taken. not totally unheard of when i was a kid (polaroid) but still...

  22. WHy is this such a great idea? by Viol8 · · Score: 1

    Has anyone stopped to ask why this is such a great idea? A robot is
    just a computer with wheels (or legs). How exactly is this going to
    help anyone anymore than a computer does already? Oh sure , all the
    techno evangelists who've read one too many Sci Fi novels wheel
    out the old "help you in the home" rubbish. But when was the last
    time you saw a robot that was ANY practical use WHATSOEVER for
    the home? Toys yes, helpful no.

    They give an example of robots teaching kids. Err , scuse me , where
    are the parents and teachers? Children need to interact with people
    when learning , not lumps of plastic, which is why classroom based
    computer learning is generally pretty useless for all but the
    simplest things.

    When will people (geeks and politicians alike) realise that
    technology is just a tool. It doesn't solve problems on its own,
    it needs to be used properly otherwise theres no point. It seems
    to me this is just another "wouldn't it be real cool if..." type
    of politicans and technologists wet dream.

    1. Re:WHy is this such a great idea? by mccalli · · Score: 1
      Has anyone stopped to ask why this is such a great idea? A robot is just a computer with wheels (or legs). How exactly is this going to help anyone anymore than a computer does already?

      Err...by moving. Using its wheels (or legs).

      ...when was the last time you saw a robot that was ANY practical use WHATSOEVER for the home?

      This weekend, as it vacuumed my house (shortness of video doesn't do it justice).

      Cheers,
      Ian

    2. Re:WHy is this such a great idea? by Viol8 · · Score: 1

      >Err...by moving. Using its wheels (or legs).

      Great , so it can wobble about and bump into things. Excellent.

      >This weekend, as it vacuumed my house (shortness of video doesn't do it justice).

      How'd it manage to do the stairs? In the corners. Around the tops
      of things. Its a gimmick mate. Which was my point.

    3. Re:WHy is this such a great idea? by mccalli · · Score: 1
      How'd it manage to do the stairs? In the corners. Around the tops of things. Its a gimmick mate. Which was my point.

      Corners? Fine - did it with a brush. It didn't do the stairs. The tops of things - nope. So it's a gmmick? No, not at all.

      If the argument is "have we reached a state of robo-nirvana?", then of course I concede. But your question was "when was the last time you saw a robot that was any help at all around the house" - and for that my answer stands. I was busy yesterday, but still the upstairs landing and room floors got cleaned which otherwise they wouldn't have done. Overnight, I had it doing the kitchen and dining room floors. During the day its been doing the kids' floors as they like to watch it.

      Get the idea? The fact that it isn't C3PO personified does not make it a useless robot. I think if you come down from the sci-fi ideal of robots and start looking at what they actually are - automated devices to perform a task, such as have been used in industry for decades now - then I think you'll find the whole thing makes more sense. The perfect android won't just go "ping!" and arrive directly in front of you, you'll have to get there via a number of steps, with each step increasing the complexity of what's available. One step in that process is currently cleaning my floors and saving me hours, with which I'm very happy.

      Cheers,
      Ian

    4. Re:WHy is this such a great idea? by MCraigW · · Score: 1
      We returned our Roomba. It gets stuck under low furniture, and doesn't really get up dog and cat hair that has worked into the rugs. You can't turn it on and expect it to do all the rooms on one floor (the whole downstairs). It has trouble with things like dining rooms and kitchens with lots of tables and chairs. It doesn't get up the stuff stuck to the kitchen floor.

      If it really could clean well, it's dust bin isn't nearly large enough. And yes, it would be nice if it could do the stairs/steps, clean in the crevasses in the couch, and empty itself into the trash bin.

      Basically, it isn't a vacuum, but a sweeper, and not a very good one. On the other hand, it was novel and somewhat entertaining to watch, until it got stuck under the couch or something. I'd be willing to pay about twice the cost of a good vacuum cleaner, say a high end Dyson, for a robot that really could vacuum properly, doing all the things above.

    5. Re:WHy is this such a great idea? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      But, that's where they are going. Roomba is poorly desgined, and I've seen better modals for sweeping and cutting lawn that are a lot smarter than the average Roomba. That said, the problem isn't done being worked on.

      Your argument sounds alot like "Who'd ever use a remote control for the TV, when they can just get up and turn the nobs themselves"?

      Do you have a dishwasher?

      IF YES,
      How well does it perform?
      Do you have to rinse/wash/scrape any dishes before putting them in the dishwasher?
      Does it put them away? (actually, when we had one, we'd typically not put them away, and take them straight out of the dishwasher)
      Well, old ones have these problems. newer ones are getting better, and tomarrow's who knows... But I'd suspect they'd clean a lot better.

      IF NO,
      Will you get one when they completely wash and sanitize all the dishes in few seconds?
      Will you get one when they are able to sort and put them all away?

    6. Re:WHy is this such a great idea? by mshurpik · · Score: 1

      > Has anyone stopped to ask why this is such a great idea? A robot is
      >just a computer with wheels (or legs). How exactly is this going to
      >help anyone anymore than a computer does already?

      Oddly enough, a human being is just a computer with legs, except that a human runs on food while a robot runs on fossil fuels. I'll leave it to the reader to decide which one is more efficient.

  23. A Mind In Every Robot by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    AI Minds For Robots are being developed as Open Source Artificial Intelligence for installation in PC-based robots in Korea, America, India, Europe and nearby parsecs of planetary space-time.

    Mind is an artificial intelligence coded initially in JavaScript for Web migration and in Forth for robots, evolving towards full civil rights on a par with human beings and towards superintelligence beyond any human IQ.

    Mind.html in JavaScript has an installed user base of dozens of intelligent entities cached away on hard disks all over the world, with Update and News links for rapid prototyping of state-of-the-art robot AI.

    AGI Radar is an advisory "radar screen" of Artificial General Intelligence (AGI) projects advancing ineluctably towards a singularity and a cybernetic economy based on robots outfitted with artificial intelligence.

    Technological Singularity is now in a countdown to machine take-over not just in Korea but world-wide, unless we humans co-operate with our superintelligent planet-mates in a Joint Stewardship of Earth.

  24. What if the robots take over? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    The Cylons were created by man. They evolved. They rebelled.

  25. A Robot In Every Home? by sharkey · · Score: 1
    OK, but I'm only doing it because he was Remington Steele.
    -- Marge Simpson

    --

    --
    "Outlook not so good." That magic 8-ball knows everything! I'll ask about Exchange Server next.
  26. Re:Link no longer working by vertinox · · Score: 1

    At least not for me in Firefox. Mind a cut and paste?

    --
    "I am the king of the Romans, and am superior to rules of grammar!"
    -Sigismund, Holy Roman Emperor (1368-1437)
  27. Full Article Text by thepotoo · · Score: 1

    Is it still considered karma whoring if I already have good karma?
    Anyway, just use underrated and the person doesn't get the bonus. Whatever:

    SEOUL, South Korea -- South Korea, the world's most wired country, is rushing to turn what sounds like science fiction into everyday life. The government, which succeeded in getting broadband Internet into 72 percent of all households in the last half decade, has marshaled an army of scientists and business leaders to make robots full members of society.

    By 2007, networked robots that, say, relay messages to parents, teach children English and sing and dance for them when they are bored, are scheduled to enter mass production. Outside the home, they are expected to guide customers at post offices or patrol public areas, searching for intruders and transmitting images to monitoring centers.

    If all goes according to plan, robots will be in every South Korean household between 2015 and 2020. That is the prediction, at least, of the Ministry of Information and Communication, which has grouped more than 30 companies, as well as 1,000 scientists from universities and research institutes, under its wing. Some want to move even faster.

    "My personal goal is to put a robot in every home by 2010," said Oh Sang Rok, manager of the ministry's intelligent service robot project.

    Reeling from the Asian financial crisis of 1997, South Korea decided that becoming a high-tech nation was the only way to secure its future.

    The government deregulated the telecommunications and Internet service industries and made investments as companies laid out cables in cities and into the countryside. The government offered information technology courses to homemakers, subsidized computers for low-income families and made the country the first in the world to have high-speed Internet in every primary, junior and high school.

    As with robots and most other specific technologies, the government has had a strong hand in guiding businesses and research centers. Failures have occurred -- most spectacularly in biotechnology, when the cloning scientist, Dr. Hwang Woo Suk, was exposed as a fraud -- but the successes are many.

    South Koreans use futuristic technologies that are years away in the United States; companies like Microsoft and Motorola test products here before introducing them in the United States.

    Since January, Koreans have been able to watch television broadcasts on cellphones, free, thanks to government-subsidized technology. In April, South Korea will introduce the first nationwide superfast wireless Internet service, called WiBro, eventually making it possible for Koreans to remain online on the go -- at 10 megabits per second, faster than most conventional broadband connections.

    South Korea, perhaps more than any other country, is transforming itself through technology. About 17 million of the 48 million South Koreans belong to Cyworld, a Web-based service that is a sort of parallel universe where everyone is interconnected through home pages. The interconnectivity has changed the way and speed with which opinions are formed, about everything from fashion to politics, technology and social science experts said.

    Chang Duk Jin, a sociologist at Seoul National University who has studied the effects of technology on society, said it had profoundly influenced domestic politics. Two years ago, after the opposition-led National Assembly impeached President Roh Moo Hyun, a consensus began forming on the Internet that the move was politically motivated -- two hours after the vote took place, Mr. Chang said.

    "That quickly led to mass demonstrations," he said. "That kind of thing had never happened in Korea before. Everyone is connected to everyone else, so issues spread very fast and kind of unpredictably."

    There has been at least one unpredictable side effect: fierce witch hunts. In a case that caused national soul-searching, a woman riding the subway with her dog last year refused to clean up after it defecated

    --
    Obligatory Soundbite Catchphrase
    1. Re:Full Article Text by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Thanks!

      -Vertinox

  28. goofy post title invites troll by museumpeace · · Score: 2, Interesting

    but before you mod this comment down, check out the facts

    It would be good if they had robots to do the dirty work in Korea because as it stands, they think that is what women are for.

    --
    SLASHDOT: news for people who can't concentrate on work or have no life at all and got tired of yelling back at the TV.
    1. Re:goofy post title invites troll by micromuncher · · Score: 1

      That's not just in Korea... don't have to look far outside North America or Europe to see the same thing. Doesn't matter if its small town souther Italy or small town Louisianna.

      But being the dad of a 20 month old boy, I sometimes dream of the freedom robotic parents could provide.

      --
      /\/\icro/\/\uncher
  29. Primates First by Hoi+Polloi · · Score: 2

    It's funny how we are ready to protect robots but we still treat our closest genetic kin, other primates, as nothing more than cheap food ("bush meat") or lab rats.

    --
    It is by the juice of the coffee bean that thoughts acquire speed, the teeth acquire stains. The stains become a warning
    1. Re:Primates First by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Did you RTFA? No? How about the summary even? No? What about the goddamn comments? Nope? Then keep your mouth shut and you might not look like an ignorant idiot.

    2. Re:Primates First by starsky51 · · Score: 1

      you're right, that is funny!

      --
      There are 2 types of people in this world. Those who understand ternary and those who don't.
    3. Re:Primates First by Hoi+Polloi · · Score: 1

      Sorry Anonymous Coward, I guess I misread this line when IRTFA, "...has marshaled an army of scientists and business leaders to make robots full members of society".

      You really have anger issues.

      --
      It is by the juice of the coffee bean that thoughts acquire speed, the teeth acquire stains. The stains become a warning
  30. The real reason for this: xenophobia by pilkul · · Score: 0
    There are plenty of Filipino workers who would jump at the chance to work in an industrialized country like South Korea to do menial jobs at low wages, but the insular mentality of that country is such that they would be more comfortable integrating robots than foreigners into their society. Currently 99.8% of the population of South Korea is ethnic Korean, immigration laws are extremely restrictive, and there's huge political pressure to keep this.

    Koreans know that as their population ages and moves increasingly to high-tech knowledge work, there will be a huge economic need for more unskilled laborers. But they can't accept the most reasonable solution so they go for this pie-in-the-sky scheme.

    1. Re:The real reason for this: xenophobia by z23rd_hsuan · · Score: 1

      there was a bit nearly about this somewhere, but in aplication to japanese xenophobia. it was talking about how a majority of polled citizens in tokya said they would be more comfortable with a robot coming into thier home and doing menial chores than a cheaply paid foreigner. im sorry i can find the source as it goes right along this article funny how the japanese and koreans are historicly so racist and especially failed to get along with eachoother. oh sorry im a silly gaijin did i say racist? i meant secular

  31. Cool! by Locke2005 · · Score: 1

    "... make robots full members of society." Cool... so now I can drive in the High Occupancy Vehicle lane, as long as my Roomba is the passenger seat? Great!

    --
    I've abandoned my search for truth; now I'm just looking for some useful delusions.
  32. It's the food chain, flesh-bag! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Humans eat bush meat, robots eat humans.

  33. a better idea by Tumbleweed · · Score: 1

    Pot and robot chickens in every home! *cluckbeepcluckbeep* Oh yeah. Kung-Fu Robot Chickens, even better! They can help defend against those pesky cows with guns I heard about on the radio once...

  34. Slippery slope by RogueWarrior65 · · Score: 1

    Ummm..."Members of society"??? Just wait till they unionize and start demanding health care. Or would that be maintenance? Hmm...have you signed up for your MMO plan yet? (Machine Maintenance Organization) Open enrollment ends today.

  35. Would you want your sister to marry one? by wsanders · · Score: 3, Insightful

    Really it all boils down to one question. I don't see any problem here.

    - I wouldn't mind if my sister married an ATM, for example, it would be really easy to beat him at poker and I'd have all the cash I wanted.

    - And what's the problem with "Dog Poop Girl"? She needed the humiliation.

    - And what's wrong with organizing mass demonstrations by IM? Already happens everywhere.

    --
    Give a man a fish and you have fed him for today. Teach a man to fish, and he'll say "WHERE'S MY FISH, YOU IDIOT?"
    1. Re:Would you want your sister to marry one? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      - And what's the problem with "Dog Poop Girl"? She needed the humiliation.

      From the previous poster:
      Several misidentified women were verbally attacked

      That's one reason.

  36. That's not the point! by Ohreally_factor · · Score: 1

    The point is wanking to robot hand job internet porn.

    --
    It's not offtopic, dumbass. It's orthogonal.
  37. robot is a relative term in korea by heroine · · Score: 1

    The few and far between pictures of what Koreans consider robots show their definition of robot is more like a vending machine or an ATM. If their robot utopia was real, they would be helping u.s. in Iraq.

  38. The red state version by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Our American way of life requires the world's oil. This is America's God-given right and manifest destiny. Getting that oil requires blood. Arab blood. Our robot armies will make the Arab street run red with blood! We will grease the treads of our robots with the bodies of their infidel children! We've done it before, and we'll do it again! God Bless President George W. Bush and the United States of America! Amen!

    1. Re:The red state version by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You should consider a career in politics. ,)

  39. Obligatory by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    In Korea, work is for old people only!

  40. Yeah what about the other people by technoextreme · · Score: 1
    A woman who refuses to pick up her dog's crap after it takes a dump on the subway *deserves* to humiliated.

    If a dog craps on the carpet, you rub his nose in it. If a dog craps on the subway, and the owner doesn't pick it up, you rub *her* nose in it.

    Yeah but what about the other people who were humiliated that had nothing to do with this event. Trust people are too uptight and this just shows it. To have a large group of people become obsessive over this one thing is just stupid.
    --
    Ooo man the floppy drive is broken. No wait. The computer is just upside down.
  41. Sigh.... by technoextreme · · Score: 1
    A robot is just a computer with wheels (or legs).
    No it isn't. A robot is far more than just a computer. You can't just plop a CS major and have him program a robot. A robot has to react to it's environment by the information it gets from it's sensors. The number of ways this can be accomplished has been probably as varied as the number of computer languages that are available. In fact some computer langauges have been created with the sole purpose of using them for robotics.
    ut when was the last time you saw a robot that was ANY practical use WHATSOEVER for the home?
    Last year if you want me to exclude the Rhoomba and the Scooba. Actually, I believe it was supposed to help the elderly. The iBot also is brought to my mind for helping wheelchair bound people.
    They give an example of robots teaching kids. Err , scuse me , where are the parents and teachers? Children need to interact with people when learning , not lumps of plastic, which is why classroom based computer learning is generally pretty useless for all but the simplest things.
    Yeah but what are toys but lumps of plastic and what do kids play with but toys. What did you say robots are good for? Toys.
    --
    Ooo man the floppy drive is broken. No wait. The computer is just upside down.
  42. Wrong.... Your forgetting about the AI by technoextreme · · Score: 1
    As I said, I won't get into AI since that's way too big of an issue, but there is one more point worth thinking about, and that is human beings as robots. Where human beings are profoundly ignorant and very fearful, they are vulnerable to manipulation. That's where terrorists come from. From a certain perspective, suicide bombers are like robots that are being misguided by malevolent human manipulators. Since without highly advanced AI they will presumably be easier to manipulate than even the most ignorant person, robots with physical agency could very quickly become the tool of choice for terrorism.
    I doubt that is the way anything will work. The AI will probably be the overiding factor in the robot. The simplest example I could think of is a robot that can take signals from humans. Sure the robot may be conrolled by a human but there could be overiding factors that would make the robot completely ignore that signal and do some other type of maneuvuer. For example a robot may be more concerned with avoiding a wall than taking commands from a human. Unfortunately, this type of method depends on how the robot is programmed in the first place.
    --
    Ooo man the floppy drive is broken. No wait. The computer is just upside down.
    1. Re:Wrong.... Your forgetting about the AI by Weedlekin · · Score: 1

      "Unfortunately, this type of method depends on how the robot is programmed in the first place."

      They will be programmed as well as other complex programmable things such as computers, using similar tools and methodoiogies. I therefore hope there's an easy way of turning them off.

      --
      I'm not going to change your sheets again, Mr. Hastings.
  43. Re:What we really need to advance robot tech is WW by susano_otter · · Score: 1

    "it would really delight the insurgency, because they only have to hack one and they have a million killing machines they can send at the US troops".

    I'm with Masamune Shirow on this one: Advanced automated devices--especially military and paramilitary devices--will require almost-constant maintenance services from an advanced industrial infrastructure.

    Hack one, and it's yours until its component failure. After that, you better hope you're in charge of a major industrial superpower, if you plan on repairing that component and continuing to use the device.

    Hack a million, and they're yours until ten seconds later, when your enemy withdraws the support infrastructure...

    --

    Any sufficiently well-organized community is indistinguishable from Government.

  44. Similar To Japan's "Fifth Generation Project" by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
    The Fifth Generation Project was Japan's attempt to build an artificial intelligence. It scared the bejeebers out of the US, who responded by pouring money into U.S. computer science research. But Japan's efforts ran out of steam - IIRC little came of it.

    The Koreans are probably very premature in initiating a domestic robotics project at this time since AI is a necessary substrate and it isn't there yet.

  45. Re:What we really need to advance robot tech is WW by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    WTF - "Think about how much technology advanced between 1935 and 1945" I would argue that tech is advancing faster now days than then... but sonar, radar, jet engines, rockets, nuke's etc were already in development or being researched long before WWII - all the war done was rush the product 'to market' before it might have already happened.

    "The problem, though is that we have nuclear weapons, so there's no reason to on-the ground wars at all" Riiight - the reason for war is what? If it is to take resources (Iraq) then nuking the population probably won't help. So there is every reason for on-the ground wars, same as it ever was.

    "Still, if the iraq war were to continue, I could imagine a million-strong robot army would actually help us put a dent in the insurgency, without taking the kinds of casualties that make the war so distastefull at home"

    The war is 'distastefull' because it was sold under the pretext of WMD, and has resulting in the deaths of 10,000's of people.. for _oil_; adding more weapons into the mix would lead to more casualties. Or do you think that Iraqi civilians and police forces don't count as causalities or just don't care?

    >Robot soldures could take risks that real soldures can't, so they could be a lot more >careful in not killing civilians.
    Bullshit - the problem comes down to identifying the targets; and robots can't tell the difference between an Iraqi guard carrying a gun and a 'insurgent' any better than some dumbarsed GI.

    > Plus, it would really demoralize the insurgency. They know they can scare us off if they
    > keep killing soldures, but you can never kill enough robots.
    Yeah but Iraqi soldiers are cheaper than robots. You know that all the insurgents need to do , is just make it more profitable for the US to exit the country than to stay. I would say they are doing a good job of that - killing robots worth $100K plus with $40 AK-47 does the job as well. You want your tax money to keep going to Bush cronies for this?

  46. DOG POOP GIRL Re:Robots? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Corrections:

    1. The dog poop girl was never identified -- her face was not visible at all in the picture.

    2. The camera used was not a cell phone, but a professional camera

    Another Correction:

    1. "This kind of thing never happened in Korea" ==> It happened every time some form of dictatorship or non-democratic government moves were made -- massive demonstration ever decades, almost until the military govenment was kicked out.

  47. I am not a robot, cut it out, OK? : ) by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Why do you have to do this to yourselves? It is not going to get you anywhere. Vomiting robots and unprotected sex. I am a 32 year old widow who never puked from drinking or had any form of unprotected sex and I certainly am not dyslexic. Today, of all days. It is my poor husband's birthday. And my birthday is coming up at the end of the month. Please don't screw with me on my 33rd birthday, I will be out of town. Let me alone, or hey, backwards slashdottters:

    tae tihs dna eid...Just kidding, but c'mon, alright or the pink ponies are going to attack you in your dreams, I heard they were lying in wait underneath your beds to scare the shit out of you play kids. I think your safe. Once again, I am going to seriously have to put my plans in motion for the findpsumkcomputerdudesadate@gmail.com and start posting the emails I get here on Slashdot. Trust me PSU MK, it is for your own good. Go establish adult lives for yourselves and leave me be? K? Thanks for the concern..pfft...

    1. Re:I am not a robot, cut it out, OK? : ) by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Just when I thought it was safe to come out from hiding, I spelled your'e wrong...Oh, I also have a Slashdot poll for you little jerks...

      What do you want in your heart of hearts?

      A. Pink Ponies
      B. A normal woman/life partner/man your own age to date.
      C. A roomba that English guy was talking about (robotic vacuum cleaner I guess)
      D. Hand job giving robots

      Please send me your answers or replies to findpsumkcomputerdudesadate@gmail.com

      Have a good week, pals...pfft