Slashdot Mirror


Microsoft Launches Linux Labs Website

mjdroner writes "ZDNet is reporting that Microsoft is launching a website to 'share the activities of its internal Linux laboratories.' Microsoft says its goal is to foster communication with those who use open-source. The article also mentions that Microsoft runs a 300-server Linux installation to test open-source products." From the article: "Customers will be able to submit requests to Microsoft employees. For example, a person could ask how to best test the use of Linux desktops working with Microsoft's directory software. In addition, Port 25 will do video interviews with Microsoft employees with experience in the open-source or Unix world, Hilf said."

205 of 275 comments (clear)

  1. Then stop breaking things by liliafan · · Score: 4, Insightful

    My biggest question to MS regarding their interaction with Linux/*NIX would be why the hell windows XP SP1 broke my Samba PDC!! Before SP1 I was able to load roaming profiles without any problems, I applied SP1 and it all fell apart.

    Microsoft seems willing to help you get your Linux workstation running against their PDC but are unwilling to reverse and allow their desktops to run against a Unix PDC.

    MS has always seemed to break interaction with samba at every opportunity, I suspect this is completely intentional, especially considering their server products (that include the PDC functionality) is their flagship productline.

    --
    GeekServ Unix Consulting Services (http://www.geekserv.com)
    1. Re:Then stop breaking things by liliafan · · Score: 1

      Is it possible that they intentionally change the protocol to stop samba working given the history of MS?

      --
      GeekServ Unix Consulting Services (http://www.geekserv.com)
    2. Re:Then stop breaking things by psocccer · · Score: 5, Informative

      Actually it was apparently a security fix, I recently went through this since we're migrating to XP and samba 3.x + ldap. There is a setting in the group policy editor for checking ownership of roaming profiles in SP1. You have to disable this check by enabling the "Do not check ownership" thing. There are details here, but once you're done it all works fine.

    3. Re:Then stop breaking things by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Interesting

      Kids these days! You'd think they've never heard "DOS isn't done until Lotus doesn't run".

    4. Re:Then stop breaking things by liliafan · · Score: 1
      Dear Mr. Baby buying I am trying to get in all the first posts Buy My Child need to raise my Karma +1,


      Thanks for noticing my site, FYI I recently got a subscription to slashdot, I am not aiming to be first post on any occasion but I am seeing the stories like 30 minutes before they publish and by then I am already read the article and written my opinion, you will notice I don't comment on all articles since I don't have an opinion on them all, additionally I am not a karma whore I already have a karma of excellent I have no reason to try and push it higher since it is capped.

      I don't have a radeon card I have used nvidia ever since the major opengl problems ATI had way back with the rage pro, and this particular problem isn't related to AGP in any way shape or form it is related to the smb protocols.

      Thanks for the wish of good luck.
      --
      GeekServ Unix Consulting Services (http://www.geekserv.com)
    5. Re:Then stop breaking things by marcosdumay · · Score: 2, Funny

      "MS has always seemed to break interaction with samba at every opportunity, I suspect this is completely intentional..."

      No way! Microsoft would need an entire Linux lab for doing that intentionaly...

      Oh,ok. Never mind...

    6. Re:Then stop breaking things by MightyMartian · · Score: 3, Insightful

      My biggest question is how much of this Linux "lab" is really dedicated towards finding ways for Napoleon Gates and his foul minions at Redmond to spread more of their FUD near and far. After all, we all know that all the Linux types that go into the sanctum of Redmond come out reprogrammed to shit on Linux at every opportunity.

      --
      The world's burning. Moped Jesus spotted on I50. Details at 11.
    7. Re:Then stop breaking things by TekPolitik · · Score: 4, Informative
      When the Samba developers do not maintain close communication with Microsoft about potential changes to roaming profiles and implement support for those changes, it is not Microsoft's fault when things break. It is the Samba team's fault.

      The open source projects that in an ideal world would be working closely with Microsoft (most notable are Samba and Wine) are perfectly happy to do so and even occasionally approach Microsoft. Their discussions are of course conducted on open mailing lists and Microsoft could easily establish this co-operation any time they wanted, but with Microsoft on the other hand the discussions are secret, the identity and contact details of the people who need to be involved are closely held, and requests through the available channels hit a brick wall.

    8. Re:Then stop breaking things by smash · · Score: 1
      Note: I actually agree to an extent regarding you comments on software cost vs reliability being important.

      However, converseley, 1 day of downtime (worm, virus, cumulative scheduled downtime due to critical patching required) on your microsoft software is costing you as much as your annual licensing fees.

      smash.

      --
      I run: Windows, OS X, Linux, FreeBSD. Just because you have a hammer, doesn't mean everything is a nail.
    9. Re:Then stop breaking things by Spasmodeus · · Score: 2, Funny

      You are not of the Body? Landru, help me!

    10. Re:Then stop breaking things by Elbowgeek · · Score: 1
      Windows isn't done until Samba won't run...

      (To paraphrase the saying at Microlimp in the early days about the development of DOS)

      --
      Who is this delectable creature with an insatiable love of the dead?
    11. Re:Then stop breaking things by Sithgunner · · Score: 1

      They break -> provide support -> get more money

      So... it's not unnatural for a company.

    12. Re:Then stop breaking things by mpe · · Score: 1

      When the Samba developers do not maintain close communication with Microsoft about potential changes to roaming profiles and implement support for those changes, it is not Microsoft's fault when things break. It is the Samba team's fault.

      It would be the Samba Team's fault if a change they made to the server which caused the breakage.

      When you cannot get support for your PDC because it is running a non-Microsoft platform, that is not Microsoft's fault. It is your platform provider's fault.

      The platform in question is Microsoft Windows XP. The platform provider here is Microsoft. However they chose to change the behaviour of their platform without clearly documenting these changes.

    13. Re:Then stop breaking things by advocate_one · · Score: 2, Funny

      could explain why their patches take so long to come out... prolly making sure they break things in Linux...

      --
      Donald 'Duck' Dunn: We had a band powerful enough to turn goat piss into gasoline.
    14. Re:Then stop breaking things by maxwell+demon · · Score: 1

      Of course not. Just as in the days of Windows vs. OS/2 it was surely pure coincidence that NTFS got exactly the same partition type number that HPFS already had. And of course in the even older days, the warning you got when running Windows on top of DR-DOS was just to secure the customers, after all, if MS didn't make the DOS, how could they guarantee that Windows ran correctly on top of it?

      --
      The Tao of math: The numbers you can count are not the real numbers.
    15. Re:Then stop breaking things by CDarklock · · Score: 1

      > Their discussions are of course
      > conducted on open mailing lists
      > and Microsoft could easily establish
      > this co-operation any time they wanted

      This effectively amounts to a demand that Samba should be a Microsoft product. Let's look at a series of events.

      1. A protocol is designed.
      2. A client is built to implement the protocol.
      3. The protocol is changed by its designers.
      4. The client no longer works.

      Whose fault is it that the client no longer works? Should you go to the protocol developers and complain that your client doesn't work anymore? What should they do about it? Should they revert to the previous protocol version because your client doesn't work? Should they volunteer their time and energy to fix your client?

      Imagine that you can't view web pages anymore, because of some change made to the HTML standard. Who is to blame for this? Is it the standards body's fault? Or is it exclusively the responsibility of the people who make your browser?

      --
      Microsoft cheerleader, blue flag waving, you got a problem with that?
    16. Re:Then stop breaking things by jc42 · · Score: 1

      Imagine that you can't view web pages anymore, because of some change made to the HTML standard. Who is to blame for this? Is it the standards body's fault? Or is it exclusively the responsibility of the people who make your browser?

      In my experience, this has amost always been Microsoft's fault. They made and sold the software that generated the standards-volating (-redefining? ;-) web page. When I investigate a page that doesn't work in some browser, I almost always find evidence in the HTML header that it was produced by MS software.

      I don't blame the users of this software, who are generally not techies, but rather "users" who just want to create web pages, and they've been convinced by others that you need fancy-schmancy complicated GUI tools to do this. They were suckered by MS; they're not the ones to blame.

      Of course, MS isn't the only culprit here; they're just the biggest, baddest of a bad lot. Thus, I've been in a few discussions about the problems with commedycentral.com, especially the Daily Show's videos. Web geeks that first look at the html behind this site are usually shocked that something can be so incredibly poorly done. They usually express aesthetic offense at what they see. Then they notice that it's only the video clips that have problems; the ads work just fine. So it's not an accident.

      But examining their html doesn't seem to turn up any evidence that MS was involved. They run on Sun servers, and there is enough variety in the html to infer that a number of different packages are involved. None of them seem to identify the producing software at all. This in itself says that it's probably not from MS software, because they usually include boilerplate ads for the software.

      In any case, there is plenty of blame to pass around for web pages that "extend" the standards. Microsoft isn't the only one trying to make life difficult for users of competitors' equipment. But they are easily the biggest and worst violator.

      </rant value="Microsoft"> ;-)

      --
      Those who do study history are doomed to stand helplessly by while everyone else repeats it.
    17. Re:Then stop breaking things by CDarklock · · Score: 1

      > In my experience, this has amost always
      > been Microsoft's fault.

      This has never happened. The fictional example is about a change in the standards which prevents existing browsers from displaying compliant documents. No such change has ever been made to the HTML standard.

      However, when changes have been made to a web standard and a particular browser does not support them - like, for example, the "first-word" or "first-letter" pseudo-elements in CSS not being supported in IE6 - nobody goes to the standards body and demands that the standards be altered to accurately reflect what IE is displaying. They go to Microsoft and demand that these optional elements be fully and completely supported, because they're still *in* the CSS standard. That's what you should do. You complain to your client software's manufacturer, because you want the standard supported.

      But strangely, when Microsoft changes a standard they own and control, and Samba does not support it - the Samba team are not the ones taking the heat. Microsoft are clearly to blame, because they are the ones who created the standard that Samba is not following. The simple fact that they have no obligation whatsoever to support the Samba team is irrelevant, because Samba is cool and Microsoft are teh suck.

      The open source community is, of course, fully within their rights to behave inconsistently and irrationally. They are, however, not allowed to behave this way *and* deny doing so... unless they elect to identify themselves as a religion.

      --
      Microsoft cheerleader, blue flag waving, you got a problem with that?
  2. Its a trap! by LiquidCoooled · · Score: 5, Insightful

    I'm serious.

    --
    liqbase :: faster than paper
    1. Re:Its a trap! by Atzanteol · · Score: 5, Insightful

      I think it's time "itsatrap" becomes a tag on slashdot...

      --
      "Ignorance more frequently begets confidence than does knowledge"

      - Charles Darwin
    2. Re:Its a trap! by LiquidCoooled · · Score: 1

      I've done it, now if enough people do it it can become a real tag.

      --
      liqbase :: faster than paper
    3. Re:Its a trap! by Amouth · · Score: 1

      it looks like it made it.. and first on the list :)

      --
      '...if only "Jumping to a Conclusion" was an event in the Olympics.'
    4. Re:Its a trap! by Atzanteol · · Score: 1

      Wooo! Looks like it was successful. :-)

      --
      "Ignorance more frequently begets confidence than does knowledge"

      - Charles Darwin
    5. Re:Its a trap! by Eil · · Score: 1

      I'm probably not the first to make this realization (nothing like it showed up at +3, though).

      Anyone else notice that the name of the site is Port 25? The same port that spammers and viruses attack looking for open relays?

      Seems an odd but chillingly appropriate choice for a Microsoft website.

  3. obligatory by sTeF · · Score: 4, Funny

    in other news: hell just froze over.

    1. Re:obligatory by jdray · · Score: 1

      I was thinking of putting that in as a tag, but decided just to wait for the comment to come along. I didn't have to wait long, though. Thanks.

      --
      The Spoon
      Updated 6/28/2011
    2. Re:obligatory by _Sharp'r_ · · Score: 4, Funny

      Right. Next you'll be telling me that Apple is selling x86 machines. Sheesh.

      --
      The party of stupid and the party of evil get together and do something both stupid and evil, then call it bipartisan.
    3. Re:obligatory by networkBoy · · Score: 1

      Tagged as unholy

      --
      whois gawk date unzip strip find touch finger mount join nice man top fsck grep eject more yes exit umount sleep dump
    4. Re:obligatory by grassy_knoll · · Score: 1

      Either that or Microsoft's calendar is running five days late...

    5. Re:obligatory by DurendalMac · · Score: 1

      Yep. Beelzebub just bought a snowblower and John Wilkes Booth, Hitler, Al Capone, and Superman are passing out ice skates.

    6. Re:obligatory by alexhs · · Score: 1

      Either that or Microsoft's calendar is running five days late...

      Prabably Port25 wasn't ready on time and delayed...

      --
      I have discovered a truly marvelous proof of killer sig, which this margin is too narrow to contain.
    7. Re:obligatory by AVryhof · · Score: 1

      DAMMIT! Now I have to do all that work I've been putting off!

    8. Re:obligatory by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

      ...and that these x86 Apples will boot Windows XP!!

    9. Re:obligatory by vwjeff · · Score: 4, Funny

      Right. Next you'll be telling me that Apple is selling x86 machines. That run Windows.

    10. Re:obligatory by ebyrob · · Score: 1

      *taps calendar*

      I think this thing must be off by 5 days or so...

  4. Embrace... by LithiumX · · Score: 4, Interesting

    We all know what this is. They've more or less claimed it as a prime mantra behind their business logic. Embrace and "Extend". The Embracing has started, but that Extension is going to be considerably less fun.

    --
    Do not confuse "Freedom of Choice" with "Free Will".
    1. Re:Embrace... by nizo · · Score: 4, Funny

      Just for once I wish Microsoft would "embrace" face to face and not sneak up from behind. Can we at least get some lube for the "extend" part this time?

    2. Re:Embrace... by Frozen+Void · · Score: 1

      I heard DRM is contagious...

    3. Re:Embrace... by rob_squared · · Score: 1

      I prefer the 3E's myself:

      Embrace
      Extend
      Extinguish

      --
      I don't get it.
    4. Re:Embrace... by rdoger6424 · · Score: 1

      Use a GPL condom!

      --
      "Hello 911? I just tried to toast some bread, and the toaster grew an arm and stabbed me in the face!"
    5. Re:Embrace... by symbolic · · Score: 2, Insightful

      I think the community-at-large should be very careful with this. Linux is open source, no doubt. But, what if, over time, Microsoft became *the* resource for open-source software, advice, etc., relegating much the current open source effort to a class of unimportant distinction? What better way to eventually rid yourself of a huge problem - support it out of existence.

    6. Re:Embrace... by slashname3 · · Score: 1

      Embrace and "Extend".

      Damn spam. Yet another Viagra ad.

      I do find it funny that Microsoft is running a lab with 300 linux servers.

    7. Re:Embrace... by zanglang · · Score: 1
      While I suspect Microsoft is well-intentioned this time, note that to 'Extend' they have to at least achieve the existing standard and then increase the value by incorporating new features to said product... which I don't see happening considering the Vista delays and stuff. Microsoft Linux (trust them to not take up cool names like Port25 Linux :P)?? No siree.

      And then there's that 'Extinguish'... the only sound method to out-distro every other distro out there is to both ship bundled with OEM's and stay FREE. And then cut down Vista sales?? No siree, not going to happen.

  5. USAF had practice units act like Soviets ... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 4, Interesting

    The U.S. Airforce once had some of their practice squadrons use Russian tactics and made 'em speak Russian and had 'em briefed with a Soviet flag in the background. This helped the regular pilots practice "against the enemy".

    I wonder if this is sort of the same concept going on here.

    1. Re:USAF had practice units act like Soviets ... by DragonKai · · Score: 1

      Keep your friends close and your enemies closer...right?

  6. It's the fox in sheeps clothing by Iceman4234 · · Score: 2, Insightful

    For all of these years M$ has tried to Buy, steal or distroy anything to do with Linux, Then why do they want to be so nice to anyone dealing with Linux, Be afraid.

    1. Re:It's the fox in sheeps clothing by vandon · · Score: 5, Insightful
      For all of these years M$ has tried to Buy, steal or distroy anything to do with Linux, Then why do they want to be so nice to anyone dealing with Linux, Be afraid.

      It's pretty simple. They've tried killing, buying, and trashing Linux. It's not going away. So now the question is 'How can I make money off of Linux?' This is market research to find out what MS-Linux interoperability tools people may need and how to best sell them.
    2. Re:It's the fox in sheeps clothing by paullyjunge · · Score: 1

      Bait and switch.

    3. Re:It's the fox in sheeps clothing by doodlebumm · · Score: 1

      MS Linux Lab: You want to do flurblizing? We have found that you can't do flurblizing very well with Linux. We do have this sweet little OS called Vista that might do what you want, though....

    4. Re:It's the fox in sheeps clothing by babbling · · Score: 1

      Anyone who goes to Microsoft for Linux advice deserves the misinformation/FUD that they're going to get. It's kinda like going to kernel.org for Windows help.

    5. Re:It's the fox in sheeps clothing by sl4shd0rk · · Score: 1

      They've tried killing, buying, and trashing Linux. It's not going away. So now the question is 'How can I make money off of Linux?'
      I don't agree. Microsoft has never *ever* done anything to the competition short of
      a) buying it
      b) stealing it
      c) choking it with legal expenses
      d) fud/sabotage it to death.
      a and b are pointless here, c is still going on with SCO vs. IBM. and d is always a work in progress.
      Whatever they are up to now is going to fall into one of the above 4 categories.

      --
      Join the Slashcott! Feb 10 thru Feb 17!
  7. I can see it now... by jacobcaz · · Score: 4, Funny
    For example, a person could ask how to best test the use of Linux desktops working with Microsoft's directory software.

    Answer: Thank you for choosing Microsoft(TM) Software. We have studied this problem and have determined to best use Linux desktops with Microsoft's Active Directory(SM) first format the machines and install Windows(TM) XP Professional(SM)...

    1. Re:I can see it now... by tuppe666 · · Score: 1

      I can't my eyes are burning

    2. Re:I can see it now... by SleepyHappyDoc · · Score: 1

      Did you pull that right out of the playbook for front line support techs? It has that canned, almost-but-not-quite-helpful ring to it...

      --
      Stasis is death. Embrace change.
  8. Obvious by dadragon · · Score: 3, Insightful

    Well, to me it was pretty obvious that Microsoft runs Linux machines. How can they test their competition if they don't? I expect that they also have HP machines with HP-UX, Sun, FreeBSD, NetBSD, OpenBSD, and Apple machines. It's just good business sense to know what the competition is doing. I'd be disappointed if they didn't.

    Oh, OpenBSD also forms the base of Services for UNIX, so that'd be a shock if they didn't have at least some OpenBSD servers.

    Now, Microsoft writing about it, that's kinda neat.

    --
    God save our Queen, and Heaven bless The Maple Leaf Forever!
    1. Re:Obvious by value_added · · Score: 1

      It's just good business sense to know what the competition is doing. I'd be disappointed if they didn't.

      Be prepare to be disappointed. Note the choice quote in the summary:

      In addition, Port 25 will do video interviews with Microsoft employees with experience in the open-source or Unix world, Hilf said.

      My guess is that those employees are few in number, and most work off-site, in the basement, or are otherwise segregated from the rest of the collective, but get to attend weekly meetings with the folks in Marketing.

      Do you think they'd be reinventing themselves every few years if they understood the Unix world?

    2. Re:Obvious by flimflammer · · Score: 1

      Working for Microsoft doesn't automatically make someone's knowledge in a field just dissapear. I highly doubt the requirements for working at Microsoft involve "You are not allowed to be near, operate, look at, or have previous knowledge of Linux, Unix, BSD, etc"

      Do you think just because someone works for Microsoft, they are a MS "Zealot" of sorts, who cant see past Windows? Or working for Microsoft is some sort of Taboo in the software industry where only the rejects end up?

    3. Re:Obvious by Intron · · Score: 1

      A friend of mine who works at MS told me that he was prohibited from installing OSS on his machine at work. I think there was some fear of GPL code contaminating his work.

      --
      Intron: the portion of DNA which expresses nothing useful.
    4. Re:Obvious by Frozen+Void · · Score: 1

      This is the consensus on slashdot.
      Nothing to discuss here,move along.

    5. Re:Obvious by WilliamSChips · · Score: 1

      In some /. interview with a dev for MS, the guy said they have Linux computers with every major distribution, and various other Unices, and even boxes running BeOS! Although that guy got fired for showing Microsoft loading some Macs, so I think it's supposed to be a secret.

      --
      Please, for the good of Humanity, vote Obama.
    6. Re:Obvious by MightyMartian · · Score: 1
      Do you think just because someone works for Microsoft, they are a MS "Zealot" of sorts, who cant see past Windows? Or working for Microsoft is some sort of Taboo in the software industry where only the rejects end up?

      You would think so, but look what happens when MS tries to "embrace" open source by sending out one its converted minions to "answer" our questions.

      Microsoft has no notion of co-operation, it firmly believes, and so do its employees (apparently) that only it has any right to exist in the operating system and software world, and while it will tolerate outside software houses in certain areas, eventually it will come to eat them alive as well (look at anti-virus software). This Linux "lab" is nothing more than a way to generate FUD, by a) making it look like it's Linux guys who are generating all sorts of anti-Linux results and b) by finding ways to put roadblocks up. Microsoft doesn't want its customers running Linux at all, and this is just yet another tired variation on the scam they've been foisting on everybody since they first started hiring a few guys from the open source world under the bullshit that they were trying to understand open source.

      Microsoft is anti-Linux, anti-open source and anti-competitive. Period.

      --
      The world's burning. Moped Jesus spotted on I50. Details at 11.
    7. Re:Obvious by zenhkim · · Score: 1

      Good point. It's like corporate tools / CEOs pretending to be ordinary customsers so they can check out their competition.

      With Micro$OFT, however, I suspect it is far more sinister. How else are the Microdrones going to know *exactly* how to fuck up a Linux server so that the piece-of-shit Win2K machine in the testbench looks like the winner?

      --
      "All hands, BRACE FOR IMPACT!"
    8. Re:Obvious by CCFreak2K · · Score: 1

      Know your enemy and yourself? Or was it as yourself?

      --
      "Beware of he who would deny you access to information, for in his heart he dreams himself your master."
    9. Re:Obvious by lengau · · Score: 1
      Do you think just because someone works for Microsoft, they are a MS "Zealot" of sorts, who cant see past Windows? Or working for Microsoft is some sort of Taboo in the software industry where only the rejects end up?
      Yes
      --
      I really wanted to change my sig to something witty, but all I could come up with is this.
    10. Re:Obvious by Phat_Tony · · Score: 2, Insightful
      They keep the competition around for something.

      But Shhhh! They'll fire you if you tell anyone. At least, they did before this announcement.

      --
      Can anyone tell me how to set my sig on Slashdot?
    11. Re:Obvious by amliebsch · · Score: 1
      Although that guy got fired for showing Microsoft loading some Macs, so I think it's supposed to be a secret.

      Of course it's not supposed to be a secret. What else would their Mac software developers use? The guy didn't get fired for revealing the HORRIBLE TRUTH that Microsoft uses Macs. He got fired for taking and publishing photos of secure areas.

      --
      If you don't know where you are going, you will wind up somewhere else.
  9. Actual Link by Ctrl+Alt+De1337 · · Score: 4, Informative

    Since the summary did not provideth, here's a link to the actual site: http://port25.technet.com/

    1. Re:Actual Link by kimvette · · Score: 1

      Server: Microsoft-IIS/6.0
      X-Powered-By: ASP.NET
      X-AspNet-Version: 1.1.4322

      I was hoping it'd be running on LAMP. So much for embracing open source on their Linux-related site.

      --
      The Christian Right is Neither (Christian nor right). See: Matthew 23, Matthew 25, Ezekiel 16:48-50
    2. Re:Actual Link by I'm+Don+Giovanni · · Score: 1

      Yeah, and Microsoft's MacBU site http://mactopia.com/ doesn't run on OSX Server. So much for MacBU embracing Macs. /sarcasm

      --
      -- "I never gave these stories much credence." - HAL 9000
  10. Can only imagine first email by caffiend666 · · Score: 5, Funny

    Hello dear friend,

    While this message my come as a surprise to you, I have spent extensive time trying to port MS Windows applications to Linux. After my company (Loki Software) went bankrupt, the CEO mistakingly transferred $100m (One Hundred Million US Dollars) to my Nigerian bank account and I am looking for a partner in transferring this money back to the United States. In exchange for this service....
    --
    Here's to losing my Karma Bonus again....
  11. Documentation! by XanC · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Is it possible that MS could document the protocol, then we wouldn't have this problem?

    1. Re:Documentation! by Changa_MC · · Score: 2, Informative

      How is a standardized protocol for sharing files over network the same as innermost secrets of an OS?

      --
      Changa hates change.
    2. Re:Documentation! by isometrick · · Score: 1

      Innermost?! Considering that it's a protocol to speak between computers, I'd consider it more like outermost. This isn't their kernel or something. So, they should document it for interoperability. Either that, or continue being stinkheads.

    3. Re:Documentation! by bugg · · Score: 5, Insightful
      Did you just make the argument that networking protocols are "innermost workings" of an operating system?

      They're not inner at all, they're outer: they're designed to be used with others. I do believe this is an important distinction...

      --
      -bugg
    4. Re:Documentation! by eikonos · · Score: 1

      Why should Microsoft document and publicize the innermost workings of its OS for the benefit of a (competing) third party?

      1) it's not "the innermost workings", it's just a communication protocol. nobody is suggesting they give away the code for their implementation, just that they provide documents about how the protocol works
      2) it's not for the benefit of the third party, it's for the benefit of the consumer

    5. Re:Documentation! by TheRealMindChild · · Score: 1

      Id imagine it is because the protocol is in a state of "flux". I am sure for every little change, they have to go back through every imlementation on every OS to see if there is any adverse effect.

      So long as it passes, I would imagine it would still be "compatible".

      I imagine the exact same can be said about the Macromedia Flash file format... and a billion other things.

      --

      "When life gives you lemons, don't make lemonade. Make life take the lemons back!" -- Cave Johnson
    6. Re:Documentation! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Nice Troll.

      How about because the EU has said that is extactly what they must do.

    7. Re:Documentation! by spanommers · · Score: 5, Interesting

      Having spent a summer at Microsoft, I can verify that Microsoft does, in fact, treat protocols as "innermost workings." They are treated as intellectual property, and when the protocols are good, that means they are valuable business assets. Interoperability is not a metric for many protocols (unless you consider different versions of Windows).

    8. Re:Documentation! by tacocat · · Score: 1

      Well, they've had over a decade to get it stabilized. How long did it take to stabilize any other protocol: NFS, TCP/IP, SSH, SMTP?

      Sorry, I just don't buy that state of flux arguement. Nothings changed that much.

      I'm more curious why they don't just use NFS?

    9. Re:Documentation! by soulhuntre · · Score: 1

      I'm more curious why they don't just use NFS?

      Because NFS sucks?

      Seriously, NFS has been a hti or miss proposition for a long time now. Some people swear by it and others have lost huge amounts of data to it.

      --
      --> Fight tyranny and repression.... read /. at -1!
    10. Re:Documentation! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Insightful

      "Interoperability is not a metric for many protocols (unless you consider different versions of Windows)."

      which means Microsoft prioritizes its interests before its customers' interests. Whatever happen to the customer is number-one? I firmly believe that customers benefit from interoperability. So many people have been programmed to think it is okay for companies to protect their interest at the expense of their customer. Not in my book, I say. And that's one reason Microsoft doesn't get my business anymore.

    11. Re:Documentation! by Zonnald · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Which Customer is number one? I really think that you have to consider the numbers here, most customers are not mixing their operating system environments, running *nix along side Windows boxes. It will often appear that a company is looking after it's own interest, when it is just looking after the majority of customers.

    12. Re:Documentation! by Criterion · · Score: 2, Insightful

      And how, pray tell, does inconveniencing a smaller set of customers look out for the larger set, when the larger set has no benefit or loss either way due to interoperablity with other systems? It's pure selfishness. The stories about looking out for customers is all smoke and mirrors.

      --
      We have enough youth, how about a fountain of SMART?
    13. Re:Documentation! by Criterion · · Score: 1

      If it's in a "state of flux" it's purely because MS willingly makes it that way.

      --
      We have enough youth, how about a fountain of SMART?
    14. Re:Documentation! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Insightful

      I really think that you have to consider the numbers here, most customers are not mixing their operating system environments, running *nix along side Windows boxes.

      Really? I've yet to work at a place that hasn't. Even at the staunchest "We are a Microsoft only shop" that I worked at a few years ago, they had a Linux box in the corner of the server room.

    15. Re:Documentation! by Zonnald · · Score: 1

      That's great, it proves what point?
      I too can suggest that I know several companies and plenty of individuals who have no desire to use anything other than Windows. We could spend all day citing isolated examples of why microsoft is wrong or right.
      In 20 years in IT, I am happy to admit to having not yet seen it all.
      I am just looking to establish that when a company makes a decision that I don't like, I can't make the conclusion that the are being totally self serving and lacking in concern for their customers.

    16. Re:Documentation! by tonyr60 · · Score: 1

      And you think no one swears by SMB or has ever lost data to it. Actually the amount of data that wanders over the internet via open smb shares probably dwarfs all the data ever mounted on nfs.

    17. Re:Documentation! by TheRealMindChild · · Score: 1

      google "NFS" and "No Fucking Security"

      --

      "When life gives you lemons, don't make lemonade. Make life take the lemons back!" -- Cave Johnson
    18. Re:Documentation! by MemoryDragon · · Score: 3, Informative

      Maybe because they stole it from IBM extended it embraced it and closed it. SMB once was an open well documented protocol, and now IBM has to pay the samba guy s to keep the documentation and implementations intact to something which once was their baby.

    19. Re:Documentation! by lahvak · · Score: 1

      How in the world is the majority of customers going to benefit from MS keeping their protocols secret?

      Also, perhaps the reason that so many customers do not mix environments is because MS makes it difficult by not properly documenting their protocols. Wait, I see it now: the customers benefit because they are not tempted to waste their time and resources on some inferior UNIX systems, instead they are forced to stick with clearly superior MS products. That's smart!

      --
      AccountKiller
    20. Re:Documentation! by BeanThere · · Score: 1

      and when the protocols are good

      Does Microsoft have good network protocols? Certainly you aren't talking about SMB. (Or does "good" have a different baseline when you're talking about MS products?)

  12. Thats strange. by vertinox · · Score: 4, Funny

    I dunno. Isn't this kind of like Stalin asking for input on the democratic process:

    Stalin: Hey guys... I know I've been kind of totalitarian in the past, but... Um... Let's foster some thoughts about that democracy thing we keep hearing about over in the States.

    KGB Adivsor: I hear they don't have secret arrests over there...

    Stalin: Ok. Thats a start... Anything else?

    Army Commisar: They don't have secret laws or show trials.

    Stalin: I seeee....

    Politburo Advisor: Oh... And they watch funny shows on TV and actually own their own homes and cars and mow their lawns and have these things called elections so that everyone can have their input into the process... Oh and almost forgot there is the...

    Stalin: *cuts advisor off* Ok. I think that is enough fostering for a very long time. Lets get back on the subject of 'summary executions'. You know guys, I was thinking maybe we could double our efficiency if we outsource to the Chinese.

    --
    "I am the king of the Romans, and am superior to rules of grammar!"
    -Sigismund, Holy Roman Emperor (1368-1437)
    1. Re:Thats strange. by say · · Score: 1

      Hey, Bill has already made it quite clear that it is *linux* users who are the communists.

      --
      Roses are #FF0000, violets are #0000FF, all my base are belong to you
    2. Re:Thats strange. by rbarreira · · Score: 1

      Wow, you missed Godwin's law for a millimeter!

      --

      The AACS key is NOT 0xF606EEFD628B1CA427BEA93A9CA9773F
    3. Re:Thats strange. by Phillup · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Isn't this kind of like Stalin asking for input on the democratic process

      Well, MS isn't asking anyone anything... they are "providing information".

      Their intent is to make the "information" look legitimate by having a huge resource that they could use for "research" if they really wanted to.

      So... a more appropriate analogy would be:

      Asking Satan for the best way to get into heaven.

      In the end you really have to consider the true intentions of the source of the information.

      --

      --Phillip

      Can you say BIRTH TAX
    4. Re:Thats strange. by Eil · · Score: 1

      KGB Adivsor: I hear they don't have secret arrests over there...

      Army Commisar: They don't have secret laws or show trials.

      Politburo Advisor: Oh... And they watch funny shows on TV ... and have these things called elections so that everyone can have their input into the process...

      *sniff* I miss the old us.

    5. Re:Thats strange. by BESTouff · · Score: 1
      Stalin: Hey guys... I know I've been kind of totalitarian in the past, but... Um... Let's foster some thoughts about that democracy thing we keep hearing about over in the States.

      KGB Adivsor: I hear they don't have secret arrests over there...

      Uh ?!?

    6. Re:Thats strange. by kjart · · Score: 1

      It's somewhat ironic that you paint Bill Gates as a 'communist' asking about democracy....shouldn't it be the other way around?

    7. Re:Thats strange. by amliebsch · · Score: 1
      when the USSR was the nation most guilty of "extraodinary renditions"

      I think not. What country could the USSR turn its prisoners over to, that would treat them worse than the USSR?

      --
      If you don't know where you are going, you will wind up somewhere else.
    8. Re:Thats strange. by jc42 · · Score: 1

      Wow, you missed Godwin's law for a millimeter!

      Well, I was thinking of asking an even closer question: In a discussion of George Bush, which name is more likely to pop up first, Orwell or Mussolini? Or Stalin, for that matter.

      I wonder if we could get reliable statistics? ... wanders off to google window ...

      --
      Those who do study history are doomed to stand helplessly by while everyone else repeats it.
  13. What a world we live in by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny

    First Apple lets people install Windows then Microsoft lets its own people install Linux.
    Whats next ?
    Balmer takes an anger management course and Steve Jobs changes his appearence ?

    1. Re:What a world we live in by RLiegh · · Score: 1

      What's Next? Stallman takes a bath.

    2. Re:What a world we live in by Jesus_666 · · Score: 1

      First Apple lets people install Windows then Microsoft lets its own people install Linux. Whats next ?

      Gentoo for NT.

      --
      USE HOT GRITS WITH STATUE OF NATALIE PORTMAN (NAKED AND PETRIFIED)
    3. Re:What a world we live in by bcmm · · Score: 1
      --
      # cat /dev/mem | strings | grep -i llama
      Damn, my RAM is full of llamas.
    4. Re:What a world we live in by zanglang · · Score: 1

      Ooh I know I know, Linux lets its own people install Apple?

  14. Re:Port 25? by Skiron · · Score: 1

    Not anymore - you will have to config Linux to use all the MSN clones on port 25 now (stops the spam too)- innovation!

  15. In other words by jlebrech · · Score: 5, Funny

    Microsoft Linux Virus Labs

    1. Re:In other words by smittyoneeach · · Score: 1

      In the first place, while I may disagree heavily with Mr. Softy, I'd not go accuse them of generating Linux viri. I don't think their evil that blatant; such would be beyond the pale of hard business competition.

      The political backlash against such would be severe, if it were discovered; the damage would outweigh any possible gain. Even in a completely amoral thought mode, you still can't get the cost/benefit analysis to justify it.

      Too, time spent devising Linux viri would only further divert company resources.

      Then there is the cheap shot about whether they could muster the skill...

      Beyond that, you've got questions about whether there is any substantial enough base in Linux to target. By the time you extend past the kernel to a full GNU/Linux system, the sheer diversity would blunt any vector substantially, I should think.

      An application-level attack against, say, Firefox, could possibly have better success, but would be quickly and cheaply patched. Net effect: stronger competition for Mr. Softy. Oops.

      Now, maybe they'll do something smart like port MS Office to their own MS/Linux distro. Wouldn't that be a kick in the naughty bits?

      --
      Get thee glass eyes, and, like a scurvy politician, seem to see things thou dost not.--King Lear
  16. who do you want to sue today? by geoff+lane · · Score: 3, Interesting

    MS admits that staff inspect and use open source.

    How do they ensure that none of that source doesn't leak into MS products?

    It would be interesting to discover the facts, we've shown you ours, how about you show us yours?

    1. Re:who do you want to sue today? by Phillup · · Score: 1

      How do they ensure that none of that source doesn't leak into MS products?

      By realizing it doesn't really matter if you don't ever let anyone see that particular piece of code?

      Ever wonder why they *really* don't ever "share" enough of the code to compile the whole thing and compary signatures of the binaries...

      --

      --Phillip

      Can you say BIRTH TAX
    2. Re:who do you want to sue today? by ClamIAm · · Score: 1
      It would be interesting to discover the facts, we've shown you ours, how about you show us yours?

      We could call it the "get the facts" campaign. Wait hold on...

    3. Re:who do you want to sue today? by tshak · · Score: 2, Informative

      Actually MS is *very* sensitive about employees looking at open sourced code (particularly viral licenses such as the GPL). I would imagine that the employees looking at things like Linux source are doing so for reporting purposes only, and do not share their knowledge with the product groups.

      --

      There is no longer anything that can be done with computers that is nontrivial and clearly legal. -- Paul Phillips
    4. Re:who do you want to sue today? by Churla · · Score: 4, Funny

      From personal experience.. "I'll show you mine if you show me yours" stops working when people hit puberty and figure out some key things.

      --
      I'm a fiscal conservative, it's a pity we don't have a political party anymore
    5. Re:who do you want to sue today? by stony3k · · Score: 2, Insightful

      More people spouting the FUD about how the GPL is "viral". MS have already started winning the FUD war, and I'm very much afraid this "Linux Lab" will result in only more FUD.

      --
      Freedom is not worth having if it does not include the freedom to make mistakes. - Mahatma Gandhi
    6. Re:who do you want to sue today? by SwashbucklingCowboy · · Score: 1
      How do they ensure that none of that source doesn't leak into MS products?

      I don't know this, but I would imagine they use software from either Blackduck or Palamida. While these are not foolproof, they are good at finding tainting from open source.

    7. Re:who do you want to sue today? by drsmithy · · Score: 1
      >More people spouting the FUD about how the GPL is "viral".

      It's not FUD. It might not be the nicest way of putting it, but "viral" describes what the GPL does and was designed to do. Some GPLed code getting into a proprietry, commercial software codebase would have the potential to be very bad, especially if it happened deliberately.

  17. Date confusion by Dollyknot · · Score: 1

    Have my last five days been spent in a time warp?

    --
    It's called an elephant's trunk whereas it is in fact, an elephant's nose, a nose by any other name would smell as sweet
    1. Re:Date confusion by Dollyknot · · Score: 1

      Mummbles about slashdot, and crashes.

      --
      It's called an elephant's trunk whereas it is in fact, an elephant's nose, a nose by any other name would smell as sweet
  18. Of course MS wants you to submit proposals. by Like2Byte · · Score: 4, Insightful

    {anti-microsoft rhetoric ON}
    What's to stop Microsoft from receiving a request then patenting it and stiffling all future OSS development for your submission?

    On the covers, it sounds like Microsoft is opening their arms to open-source development - which is what the OSS community has been wanting for years - but, under the covers, what's to prevent Microsoft from garnering too much control of any given project?

    This move isn't to gain the respect of the IT community, it's a ploy aimed directly at removing the ever-increasing market share that GNU/Linux has been gaining. Every Linux installation removes the Microsoft Tax Revenue Stream from Microsoft's coffers and that is a threat to them.

    Until you see a Microsoft release of a GNU/Linux distro, don't expect Microsoft to support Linux too earnestly. This is just another move by Microsoft geared to directly affect GNU/Linux installations by those installations being replaced with Microsoft server OSs.
    {anti-microsoft rhetoric OFF}

    1. Re:Of course MS wants you to submit proposals. by Kirth · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Swim with the 100ton-Pliosaur, and you'll be eaten. So don't try to deal with Microsoft, you'll loose, no matter how.

      --
      "The more prohibitions there are, The poorer the people will be" -- Lao Tse
  19. In other news... by gentlemen_loser · · Score: 4, Funny

    The Prince of Darkness (TM) as set up a new site called "Port 666" where residents of Hel will discuss their experiences with that Other guy. As a quote from the PoD himself, "We'd really just like to help the community out there understand the implications of the decesions they make." More on this later...

    1. Re:In other news... by Z34107 · · Score: 1

      This is from a previous slashdot article. The "missed opportunity to market software and services" line was for Microsoft PARNERS and AFFILIATES - the people who specialize in MS products. In other words, they're telling their own vendors that selling less is bad.

      Not really all that malicious.

      --
      DATABASE WOW WOW
    2. Re:In other news... by NatteringNabob · · Score: 1

      [that computers running Linux or other F/OSS OS'es are included in their piracy statistics.]

      As well they should be. Why, I myself specifically bought a naked PC so I could run a pirated copy of Fedora Core 5 that I got from the notorious warez site fedora.redhat.com. I just hope it doesn't get slashdot'ed now that I've posted it here.

  20. Woody Allen Quote, marginally on topic by wsanders · · Score: 1

    "The Lion and the Lamb shall lie down together, but the lamb won't get much sleep."

    --
    Give a man a fish and you have fed him for today. Teach a man to fish, and he'll say "WHERE'S MY FISH, YOU IDIOT?"
  21. The enemy within.... by caluml · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Hmmm :) Isn't this how revolutionaries bring down governments - from the inside?

  22. In other news... by init100 · · Score: 5, Informative

    ...Microsoft urges UK PC vendors to not sell PC's without an OS, since this is a missed opportunity to market their software and services. They also claim that so called naked PCs are often used to install pirated copies of Microsoft software.

    Note that they do not specifically mention that this OS is Windows, but I think it is implied between the lines. It is also common knowledge that BSA counts systems sold without a commercial OS as using a pirated OS, which means that computers running Linux or other F/OSS OS'es are included in their piracy statistics.

  23. GPL by mtenhagen · · Score: 1

    As long as they follow the GPL rules (which they legaly must) I dont see the problem.

    --
    200GB/2TB $7.95 Coupon: SAVE90DOLLAR
    1. Re:GPL by ZachPruckowski · · Score: 1

      Can't they build and then link to completely separate binaries? If they write a closed source library or program, and make their advancements dependent on that, won't that slow re-implementers down?

    2. Re:GPL by Phillup · · Score: 1

      The GPL basically says they don't have to release one bit of code if they keep everything internal.

      And hell really will freeze over before MS releases GPL code.

      So... they won't have one bit of problem "complying" with the GPL in this instance.

      --

      --Phillip

      Can you say BIRTH TAX
    3. Re:GPL by Richard_at_work · · Score: 2, Funny

      Microsoft have distributed many GPLed applications, including GCC, for some time as part of the Software for Unix package. Hells still going strong, and provides central heating for the sun.

    4. Re:GPL by MyHair · · Score: 1

      As long as they follow the GPL rules (which they legaly must) I dont see the problem.

      <cough> binary code with GPL wrapper <cough> a la Nvidia <cough>

      If they can get people using their proprietary connectors they can embrace and extend at a whim and leave reimplementers in the dust.

      I think all supported MS OS'es have Windows Update and Automatic Updates built in, and they're not supporting XP prior to SP1. They could require their binary connectors to use Windows Updates for updates and claim security patches are the reasons you have to update your binary connectors--which by the way don't work with Samba because [insert BS reason here].

    5. Re:GPL by jZnat · · Score: 1

      You can only do that with LGPL software. If you use GPL software in your software program, you must GPL that software as well (or perhaps an equally permissive and restrictive copyleft license in the future). There are only a small handful of GPL'd programs that can even be used via linking like you mentioned, and that's GCC (glibc).

      --
      'Yes, firefox is indeed greater than women. Can women block pops up for you? No. Can Firefox show you naked women? Yes.'
    6. Re:GPL by Phillup · · Score: 1

      I said RELEASES... not DISTRIBUTES.

      As in: modifies the code and let's others have it under a GPL (license... but that would be redundant).

      --

      --Phillip

      Can you say BIRTH TAX
    7. Re:GPL by livewire98801 · · Score: 1

      Because Microsoft is going to follow the law to the letter if they can't be caught.

      Seriously, if they release nothing but .exe binaries and keep their sourcecode under the typical Rhura Penthe style security, how would anyone be able to tell them that they violated the GPL? How do we know that they haven't done this for years?

      --
      "He may be mad, but there's method in his madness. [...] It's what drives men mad, being methodical." G.K.Chesterton
    8. Re:GPL by topace3 · · Score: 2, Interesting

      If they only release EXEs, they break the GPL.
      you must supply the sources of the OSS you've used.
      That is one of the reasons apple built their OS from BSD instead of Linux.

      as for what Microsoft's aim is, I have no idea. GPL is a hard nut to crack,
      seeing as how any changes they make must be positive, or will never be accepted.

      To have a say in the developement of OSS, what you do must be positive for the
      project. That's the overwhelming beuaty of the Open Source model.

    9. Re:GPL by livewire98801 · · Score: 1

      Thats not what I meant. They hide their sourcecode, so they won't be caught unless someone that worked on the project they stole from is employed by them in the right place. They have stolen code from BSD because it was there and the BSD license doesn't prohibit it, but that was just convenient.

      And they're getting more aggressive. I have no doubt that they wouldn't lose a bit of sleep if they stole from a GPL'd project if they were sure it wouldn't be found out. Because their source is so protected, its not like the F/OSS community can audit them. Remember the big deal that they made over the Windows sourcecode leak a few years ago? That made bigger news than Hurricaine Rita. Wonder what would happen if someone got a chance to really review the code in WinVista?

      --
      "He may be mad, but there's method in his madness. [...] It's what drives men mad, being methodical." G.K.Chesterton
    10. Re:GPL by dfgchgfxrjtdhgh.jjhv · · Score: 1

      ms havent stolen any bsd code, as you say it is allowed to use bsd code in commercial apps. even if it wasn't allowed, it still wouldnt be stealing, it'd be copyright infingement.

    11. Re:GPL by livewire98801 · · Score: 1

      I used the word 'steal' not because it's technically correct, but in the spirit of the action. Microsoft has done nothing but criticize and attack Open Source, but they'll exploit the efforts of that community.

      But you are correct, they were legally entitled to do so. However, they did it because it was convenient, not because it was morally right. In the spirit of F/OSS, they should give something back to the community, even if it's just letting F/OSS develop in peace.

      --
      "He may be mad, but there's method in his madness. [...] It's what drives men mad, being methodical." G.K.Chesterton
    12. Re:GPL by drsmithy · · Score: 1
      I used the word 'steal' not because it's technically correct, but in the spirit of the action.

      You cannot "steal" something that is being given away.

      Microsoft has done nothing but criticize and attack Open Source, but they'll exploit the efforts of that community.

      Microsoft "criticise and attack" the *GPL*, not "Open Source".

      However, they did it because it was convenient, not because it was morally right.

      People develop under the BSD license so their code can be extensively distributed and reused. What is "immoral" about doing what they want ?

    13. Re:GPL by rtb61 · · Score: 1

      Well that is the catch 22, past behaviour is the metric to measure any company by, so as microsoft starts to move closer to Linux (which is the goal of any open sourcer, it just a shame there was a lot of kicking, screaming and chair throwing from a few non-geek ignorant managers at microsoft), what are they actually planning and what will they really be doing and trust has very very very long way to go to be re-earned. A step would be starting to use Linux where it is definitively the most appropriate solution rather than as they currently do, blindly throwing away money to keep it out.

      --
      Chaos - everything, everywhere, everywhen
    14. Re:GPL by livewire98801 · · Score: 1
      Perhaps we should revisit the Halloween documents. Microsoft is attacking Linux and the GPL because they are bigger targets, and percieved as a bigger threat. They are convinced that ANY open source is working against them. They are willing to 'play nice' with BSD for the short term until the Linux threat is demolished. Just like in battle, you concentrate on the nuke before the grenade.

      Don't doubt that if Linux were destroyed tomorrow, Microsoft would be going after BSD before the weekend.

      As far as the immorality of it, Linux is like a barter faire. Everything is free, but you have to give something back, and do the same for everyone else there. BSD is a good samaritan. BSD gives, not because it expects something in return, but because someday, you will do something good for BSD. If I released something based on BSD, then announced that the BSD contributors were a bunch of idiots, I would be lynched, and rightly so. But thats exactly what Microsoft does. They have used BSD licensed code on multiple occasions, and will stll propigate FUD telling us that Open Source are a bunch of flaky hippies that can't do for you what Windows does. BSD is less visible, so they let it be for now. But if they ever get the wolf, they WILL attack the mosquito.

      --
      "He may be mad, but there's method in his madness. [...] It's what drives men mad, being methodical." G.K.Chesterton
    15. Re:GPL by 6031769 · · Score: 1

      Phew - that's all right then, because we all know that Microsoft would never do anything illegal.

      --
      Burns: We're building a casino!
      McAllister: Arrr. Give me 5 minutes.
    16. Re:GPL by mpe · · Score: 1

      The GPL basically says they don't have to release one bit of code if they keep everything internal.

      Actually copyright law says that you need permission to pass copies to third parties. This is the definition which matters as opposed to whatever some software company might like to define "release" to mean.

    17. Re:GPL by Phillup · · Score: 1

      This is the definition which matters as opposed to whatever some software company might like to define "release" to mean.

      Well, since I was paraphrasing... I have to take any blame for the word "release".

      And, in my original statement, I meant that MS would not give any of *thier* code to any party under a GPL license... and that they would not have to if they didn't give it to anyone.

      They are more than happy to give away *other* people's code tho...

      --

      --Phillip

      Can you say BIRTH TAX
  24. Microsoft just has to adapt to business reality by Glowing+Fish · · Score: 3, Insightful

    As large as Microsoft is, they can't totally control the computing choices of all of the businesses and governments in the world.
    As much as marketing is importing in the consumer field, I think aggressive advertising is not taken as favorably in the business world. Many large businesses and organizations have chosen to use Linux on various servers, and Microsoft has to acknowledge this, especially if they want to keep their core desktop business.
    For example, say you are a large university and you keep thousands of students and staff members' e-Mail on a Linux computer (or computers), and you have labs full of desktops that students use to access it. Say the IT department at this university calls Microsoft up with a question about some minor problem this is causing. Microsoft tech support can't really say "oh, just format that closet full of mail servers and put Windows on them!" They might be able to suggest such a thing in advertising, but they know that if they try it with corporate professionals, they are just going to be laughed at.
    Microsoft needs to adjust itself to the decisions corporations, governments, universities and the like are making. It is as simple as that.

    --
    Hopefully I didn't put any [] around my words.
    1. Re:Microsoft just has to adapt to business reality by utlemming · · Score: 2, Interesting

      You, know, part of me is wondering whether this part of there attempt to satisfy the EU. After all, the EU demanded that MS play nice with competitors. By 'supporting' Linux in the sense of helping people to integrate other solutions with MS, they might actually be helping their case in the EU. MS could claim that they have documented stuff and that they now are offering support via a website to help people integrate. Afterall, MS needs the EU to calm down before they get in some serious trouble with Vista; the EU has already expressed concerns with Vista to begin with. So while we look at this with suspicion (and I defently do), I would argue that the reasons are a lot less sinsiter as we have presumed and may just be an attempt at propaganda to get the EU off their back. What we have to ask ourselves is what is the economic benefit of offering integration support? And with the EU about to charge them $2.4million a day ($864million a year), I would call that a serious economic benefit. Even if Microsoft loses some sales as a result of doing the support, I doubt that they are going to lose as much as they would by the EU ruling. Also, you'll notice that MS is offering Linux support now in their virtualization product.

      --
      The views expressed are mine own and do not express the views of my employer.
    2. Re:Microsoft just has to adapt to business reality by biffta · · Score: 1

      Well it has always been said one of the main commercial opportunities of open source software is the free market in which to provide support for it. I guess I just never realised that microsoft could be one of those support companies!

  25. Re:Port 25? by Quizro · · Score: 3, Informative
    The answer is on the site itself, in a post titled Welcome to Port 25:
    "On a server, the port for SMTP is 25. When you open a port on a server, such as to allow for SMTP traffic, it is commonly referred to as 'listening' on the port. Port 25, therefore, is a metaphor for how we are opening the communication lines to for a discussion around Open Source Software and Microsoft. Cute, huh?"
  26. Nah by AoT · · Score: 1

    That's called a coup.

    Hmmm. An open source coup at MicroSoft.

    I like it.

    Let's get working on this kids.

    1. Re:Nah by Phillup · · Score: 1

      That's called a coup.

      In 'merica we call them elections.

      Just make sure your friends are the ones counting the votes...

      But, to pull it off you have to make sure the local military is busy in another country. That way you can make it look like you are "building up the military" with increased budgets... but you are really syphoning off money from the treasury and running the military into the ground.

      So, when everyone catches on... it is too late.

      And if you get caught? Pardons all around!

      (Gotta give them credit, it took a time to craft an education system that would produce citizens this stupid.)

      --

      --Phillip

      Can you say BIRTH TAX
  27. Keep your friends close... by MindPrison · · Score: 3, Insightful

    ...and your enemies even closer!

    --
    What this world is coming to - is for you and me to decide.
    1. Re:Keep your friends close... by alas_anon · · Score: 1
      > ...and your enemies even closer!

      Damn you. I was about to post this one. I've never got a mod 3 before and you stole it from me. A curse on your head.

      Bill is doing what any wise business person does: he is investigating the competition. He will also get the opportunity to run his own studies to tell customers why Windows is better than Linux.

      On a totally different subject, can anybody tell me why I get port scanned on 6588 and 3382 when I make a post to slashdot? It happens every time.

    2. Re:Keep your friends close... by RealGrouchy · · Score: 1

      Oh, good. I've found the section for hackneyed comments. I would like to contribute:

      "My mother always told me to beware of geeks wearing gifts."

      - RG>

      --
      Hey pal, this isn't a pleasantforest, so don't waste my time with pleasantries!
  28. Meanwhile, in a private Yoga class in Redmond... by Spy+der+Mann · · Score: 3, Insightful

    Yoga Tutor: OK, now put your arms in front of you. Now slowly join your hands making a circle, and breathe out.

    Breathe out....
    Now extend your arms and breathe in.

    Breathe out...
    Breathe in...

    Join your arms again. Embrace...
    Now extend your arms and breathe in. "Extend".

    Keep doing it guys...

    Embrace...
    Extend...

    Embrace...
    Extend...

    Well done! See you next week!

  29. Embrace and extend by Opportunist · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Why is the first thing that went through my mind "Ok, how're they going to use it against Linux?"? Maybe because it's always been like this so far?

    I pondered, and so far the only explanation is their usual "embrace and extend" practice. Take a standard, implement it, then extend with some "extra features" nobody else supports, hope that devs jump the wagon and make use of those "features" until customers have to use their flavor or else something doesn't work.

    It worked before in the Browser War, I'd guess it's a tactic that could work again.

    Now, how?

    My guess goes towards .net. Yes, there's Mono, but MS has the advantage of setting the standard. If they provide a Linux version of the next .net version, Mono will have a rather hard time holding a foot in that market. The framework is free anyway (has to be, who'd buy it?), so MS isn't even losing anything.

    After a few years, Mono will vanish. And then MS can start pulling resources from the Linux version, making it less stable, making it slower (unless it's neither stable nor fast from the beginning). Yes, that takes time. But MS is in no hurry.

    --
    We used to have a Bill of Rights. Now, with the rights gone, all we have left is the bill.
    1. Re:Embrace and extend by 16K+Ram+Pack · · Score: 1
      Even though I know .net, I'm not going anywhere near mono.

      Part of my reason for moving to open languages is because I want more freedom, not to be following what someone decides is the way forward.

    2. Re:Embrace and extend by Opportunist · · Score: 1

      You won't have much choice but to follow the .net herd soon. It's very likely that sooner or later .net or similar frameworks (but knowing MS they'll do whatever is in their power, and there's lots that is, to make sure .net is going to be THE framework) will be required to run code "safely".

      It is also likely that the next MS OS after Vista will rely entirely on .net and run "native" code in some emulator. We now have the horsepower in our machines that we can easily waste the cycles required to run in a "safe" environment.

      "Safe" of course meaning "making sure the user only does what he is allowed to do". Not that you're safe from the code. The code's kept safe from you.

      --
      We used to have a Bill of Rights. Now, with the rights gone, all we have left is the bill.
  30. Riiiight by PhotoGuy · · Score: 1

    I'm guessing this is mostly a "know thy enemy" kind of thing; the more they learn and explore about Linux, they more they can try to poke holes in it or create F.U.D.. I'm guessing the rewards would be great for someone within MS who can come up with fundamental low-level areas where they can say Linux falls down as compared to XP (whether they are actual, or not).

    --
    Love many, trust a few, do harm to none.
  31. So, they count BSD as a Linux distrobution. by assassinator42 · · Score: 2, Interesting

    At least, this makes it seem like they do: "The lab's software is even more diverse, with some 15 versions of UNIX and 50 distributions of Linux--including many lesser-known ones like Asianux, CentOS and NetBSD." http://port25.technet.com/archive/2006/03/31/14.as px Looks like there are already a few comments there about it though.

  32. Re:Port 25? by yupie · · Score: 1

    Which does not really explain why it should be port 25. Other ports are "listened to" just as well (80, 110, 22, you name it). Maybe they thought it sounded the most sexy since 25 is one of the better known port numbers.

    --
    Sig (appended to the end of comments I post, 120 chars)
  33. Good idea. by Spy+der+Mann · · Score: 1

    Let's just hope that Microsoft's port25 website remains Open so EVERYONE can see what they're up to.

  34. OK, I will repeat this once again... by TheNetAvenger · · Score: 3, Insightful

    OK, I will repeat this once again...

    I have said this a lot on Slashdot, and usually it gets dismissed, but I will restate it.

    Know your competition and DO NOT under estimate Microsoft.

    This just shows that at least they 'get' this concept of knowing their competition. This also would demonstrate that Redmond is not blind to the advances in the Open Source world.

    Not only are the using and learning from it, but all it would take is a bit of popularity to see a Linux subsystem for NT, like the already MS *nix subsystem shipping free for NT.

  35. My letter to Microsoft by Spy+der+Mann · · Score: 2, Interesting
    I posted this on Kishi's Korner on port25. I really hope they publish it.


    Dear Microsoft:

    Before investigating Linux, would you guys please do the following so we can testify of your good faith?

    * Opening the Excel and Word binary formats
    * Adapting the Open Document Format for Microsoft Word
    * Fixing the Web Folders to be 100% compatible with existing standards (I want to use webfolders on my php-based site!)
    * Adopting the ext2 and ext3 (and reiser if possible) file systems for Windows XP and Vista
    * Releasing the Internet Explorer sourcecode (including but not limited to the extensions like XML and XSLT handling) under the GPL
    * Supporting the w3c standards in Internet Explorer - for this we web designers have had to endure constant headaches.
    * Promise not to file any patent suits against Open Source programmers and companies
    * Stop the "embrace and extend" business please...

    Also, there's something I have against Microsoft. For years I've found bugs in various of your products but me, as a mere mortal user have found no means to contact you. Please adopt collaboration tools like Sourceforge - trust me, they're great.

    P.S. If you could get Steve out of the company and put MiniMSFT in his place, I'd be delighted :D

    Thanks!
    1. Re:My letter to Microsoft by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful

      * Adapting the Open Document Format for Microsoft Word
      * Stop the "embrace and extend" business please...


      Two contradictory items: How will they adapt an open document format for their needs if they can't extend it?

    2. Re:My letter to Microsoft by amliebsch · · Score: 1
      Promise not to file any patent suits against Open Source programmers and companies

      So you want OSS companies to be able to blatantly rip off MS and freely violate patents, and not have Microsoft be able to do anything about it? Yeah, I'm sure they'll be happy to agree with that.

      --
      If you don't know where you are going, you will wind up somewhere else.
  36. Sample Advertisement by darthservo · · Score: 1

    Where to go when you want to learn more about Linux - http://www.microsoft.com/linux.asp

    --

    Prove it.

    1. Re:Sample Advertisement by micler · · Score: 1

      There is no such address.

  37. Open Source cannot be extended by Yuioup · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Ah but everyone... here's the catch...

    OPEN SOURCE CANNOT BE EXTENDED. At least not the way Microsoft wants it to be.

    Why? Because it's based on open collaboration and open standards. It's a collective which cannot be controlled. What happens if Microsoft tries to control OSS? Simple. You fork it. What happens when Microsoft tries to find a way to exclusivly make money off of OSS? Simple. You make a free (beer, speech) alternative and put all the documentation on-line. All of it.

    You see, Open Source cannot be killed. That's the beauty of the whole concept. Cut off one head and another grows... and I mean it in a good sense.

    1. Re:Open Source cannot be extended by ylikone · · Score: 1

      You are correct, but my worry is that MS will figure out some way to penetrate the open source community and mindset and eventually warp it... to the point where everyone is just too lazy or apthetic to try and do things the "old way" anymore. Let's hope I'm wrong and the community will never forget what the point of open source software is.

      --
      Meh.
  38. Money Shot? by Doc+Ruby · · Score: 1
    --

    --
    make install -not war

  39. 99 comments by Captain+DaFt · · Score: 5, Funny

    And yet nobody has yet said:
      "Finally! The ease of linux combined with the security of Windows!"

    Really guys we're slipping here.

    --
    The U.S. really needs an English to Wisdom dictionary.
  40. Re:obligatory.. Nahh, it just frizzed over... by davidsyes · · Score: 1

    Later, it'll FIZZ over...

    Maybe ms is opening this stuff up more because many companies and even governments (foreign and domestic rightfully) are giving them the middle finger or outright telling microsoft (lower-casing/deprecation of ms' name iintentional/perpetual with me):

    "*UCK you ms and the lame-assed horse you rode in on!"

    Hmmm... image word: "infamous"

    --
    Previously: "Linux... Toward the Sunrise..." Now: "Linux... Toward the-- No, now, part of Every Sunrise"
  41. Re:Working at Microsoft by alx5000 · · Score: 1

    Yeah, I think so... but the other way round.

    --
    My 0.02 cents
  42. Re:april fool's month? by SmartSsa · · Score: 1

    Seriously, i had to check my calendar on this one :\

    Ugh! make it stop!

  43. new apt-get comand for Microsoft Debian.... by frankmu · · Score: 2, Funny

    apt-get assimilate

    (resistance is futile)

    --
    Supreme executive power derives from a mandate from the masses, not from some farcical aquatic ceremony.
    1. Re:new apt-get comand for Microsoft Debian.... by advocate_one · · Score: 1

      sudo apt-get update
      sudo apt-get install windows-base windows-desktop
      sudo shutdown -r now

      --
      Donald 'Duck' Dunn: We had a band powerful enough to turn goat piss into gasoline.
    2. Re:new apt-get comand for Microsoft Debian.... by gnud · · Score: 1

      #apt-get ms-tools
      #ms --embrace && ms --extend

  44. Re:Port 25? by RandomPrecision · · Score: 2, Funny

    Cute, huh?

    ...kill me now...

  45. Re:Accepting linux? by kimvette · · Score: 1

    AC says, as Ballmer gently penetrates his (unmentionableorifice). "Thanks Steve, the lube was a nice gesture," he said.

    Uh, You were saying?

    --
    The Christian Right is Neither (Christian nor right). See: Matthew 23, Matthew 25, Ezekiel 16:48-50
  46. Alien Resurrection by gmuslera · · Score: 2, Funny

    Like in that movie, I can visualize badly cloned, mutant penguins in that lab, suffering and asking for death. Someone must stop Microsoft to do those evil experiments.

  47. Re:Meanwhile, in a private Yoga class in Redmond.. by rrohbeck · · Score: 1

    Embrace...

    Extend...


    SteveB shouts: Stop it! I can't stand this any longer! I have to fucking kill somebody! Why don't they have any chairs in here?

  48. Re:Working at Microsoft by micler · · Score: 1

    Probably they get looked at funny. This has been mentioned long ago, only about Mac people at MS.

  49. Re:Dear Microsoft... by hazah · · Score: 1

    Dear AC, all you need is computer, electricity, and a brain.

  50. Thanks for calling MS Linux support! by evgen88 · · Score: 1

    MS Linux support Operator: Thanks for calling Microsoft linux support, how can I help you?
    Poor Newbie Linux user: I'm having trouble connecting Evolution to our Exchange server.
    MSLSO: Ah, that's a documented issue . . . see our linux version of the KB, KL-LNX666 . . . I'll run through the fix with you . . . first do you have a sledge hammer?
    PNLU: Uh, no . .. why? Do I need one?
    MSLSO: Yes, you will, we'll ship one out to you free of charge!
    PNLU: Wow thanks! I can't bel . . . hold on, someones at the door, I'll be right back . . . . . . ZOMG, that was a courier with my sledge hammer! That was fast!
    MSLSO: We're dedicated to "fixing" all Linux compatability issues!
    PNLU: How did you know my address?
    MSLSO: We'll you're running dual boot with XP, and it forwarded all your details to us to help server you better!
    PNLU: OK . . . so what do I do?
    MSLSO: Well, take the sledge hammer, hold it up high in the air, and smash it down on your Linux box.
    PNLU: OK, how will I know if I've done it right?
    MSLSO: Keep doing it untill all the sparcs and sound stop coming out of the box, it you hear a sound like breaking glass thats a good sign, that's your hard disk.
    PNLU: Ok, hold on . . .
    SMASH!
    BANG!
    KZZZZZZ!
    SMASH!
    FSHZZzzzzzz.z.z.z.z......
    PNLU: OK, I've done what you instructred me, now my machine won't boot at all!
    MSLSO: Ah, well you know, this wouldn't have happened if you used Windows! That's Geniune Microsoft advantage!

  51. Remember. You asked for it. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

    In Soviet Russia, Air Force acts like YOU!

  52. tcp/666 by totallygeek · · Score: 1

    Well, I listen to 666 just for the hell of it...

  53. just like Zun Tsu says... by (c)Broke · · Score: 1

    Know your enemy before you fight them.....

  54. Marketing Ploy by Jerim · · Score: 3, Insightful

    This is a classic marketing ploy. Pretend to be "concerned" about the needs of a competing product. In actuality, they are attempting to "re-educate" you. Oh, you have a question about why something doesn't work with Windows? "Well such and such won't work with us. It is best to just use Windows."

    True, they aren't going to be that obvious. But the attempt here is to see the concerns of users of a competitors product and best understand how to meet those needs through their own product. Don't think for one second that MS is actually looking for ways to make their products work better with Linux. They are looking for what doesn't work and see if they can turn that into a compelling reason to stay with MS based products.

    Since I manage an ISP among other duties, it would be like me offering advice to AOL users, with that advice always boiling down to AOL sucks, use my product which is better. Sure, I can throw in some technical jargon to make it sound legitimate, but it is still just a sales pitch.

    Don't be fooled.

    1. Re:Marketing Ploy by maxwell+demon · · Score: 1
      True, they aren't going to be that obvious.

      Some example of a non-obvious way to make Linux look bad would be, if instead of telling the correct, straightforward and perfectly working way to solve a problem, to tell a partially working, instable, complicated way. Or to offer proprietary helper programs to achieve what you want (of course to use in a cumbersome way), instead of telling how to get it working directly under Linux. Or telling to do changes which destabilize the system (say, telling them to install alpha drivers, when there would be perfectly working stable drivers). You see, it's quite easy to harm a system by providing "support" for it.
      --
      The Tao of math: The numbers you can count are not the real numbers.
  55. Video interviews via port 25?!? by absinthminded64 · · Score: 1

    So what host name will we be telnetting to to receive the animated ansi text video?

  56. scare tactics v3 by surgeon · · Score: 1

    First they launched their crap 'virtual server 2005v2' for free and and now they seem to have brainwashed some communists... big deal

    no not scared at all, they're losing it.

    --
    [ No prescription needed ]
  57. Port 25 website only available on port 80 by LodCrappo · · Score: 3, Funny

    Their "Port 25" website is in fact not accessable via port 25 at all. On a hunch I tried port 80 and some kind of web site about port 25 came up. This is apparently another embrace and extend type of thing, where port 25 is now accessable only via port 80 and god knows where they've extended port 80 to or what's actually running on port 25.

    --
    -Lod
  58. acknowledging MS loss of market share by GhodMode · · Score: 1

    "... Microsoft competes against open-source products ..."

    Implied, of course, by this statement is

    1. Open-source products are competent and hold a significant part of the market.
    2. Open-source products have the advantage in some markets and Microsoft must work to compete against them.

    An alternative wording could have been Open-source products compete against Microsoft in many areas ..., but this would have conveyed the opposite meaning.

    If this reflects anything at all, it's just the impression of the author of that article... or just my impression of the article.

    I am a Web developer and programmer who abandoned Microsoft products years ago in favor of open-source alternatives. I have purposefully allowed my MS-related skills and knowledge to weaken.

    This little thing puts a smile on my face. -- Ghodmode

  59. embraceextendextinguish by mu22le · · Score: 1

    I tagged this story
    embraceextendextinguish eee

    If you find them meaningful use them too

  60. so... by DrDr0ne · · Score: 1
    Is SCO still sueing company's?

  61. thanks for the feed... by 16K+Ram+Pack · · Score: 1
    The U.S. Airforce once had some of their practice squadrons use Russian tactics and made 'em speak Russian

    but remember, you must think in Russian.

  62. MS pulls Samba docs from Support by TakeArms · · Score: 1

    I remember back about 5 years or so ago when Microsoft pulled all Samba tech support documents from their Support knowledgebase... luckily, I had printouts already. We all assumed the removal was due to increasing utilization of Samba, to the detriment of MS's PDCs, etc.

  63. Unholy by specialbrad · · Score: 1

    I just find it funnny someone tagged this post "unholy". Congradulations to you!

  64. WTF? by berenixium · · Score: 1

    It's funny because the world has now gone officially mad.

    Nice 'unholy' tag, it's the only thing that makes sense today. :)

  65. Re:Adopt Gecko for IE by I'm+Don+Giovanni · · Score: 1

    I like how slashdot zealots like yourself on the one hand proclaim how great "competition" is but on the other hand demand that everyone adopt their pet software. Do you really want *every* browser to be Gecko based, so there's no competition in that area? Just like your wet dream is to have *every* OS unix-derived, as if unix is the be-all and end-all. You guys are too much.

    Let FF and IE and other browsers compete to make each other better. If not for IE, we'd be stuck with the mess that was Netscape. If not for FF, IE would be stuck in it's current outdated state with no improved version on the horizon.

    Having multiple browsers (not all Gecko based) allows competition to make all browsers better. If Microsoft dumped IE, FF would likely languish, or at least slowdown in its development. More importantly, hackers would target FF (they'd have no choice) and we all know FF has holes to be exploited.

    --
    -- "I never gave these stories much credence." - HAL 9000
  66. Yes, it has been confirmed ... by dm6079 · · Score: 1

    After visiting the Port 25 web site, I stepped outside. There are geese flying backwards, pigs roosting in the trees, the sun did indeed rise in the west, and the sky is really green. I think I'll go home and fix a stiff drink .....

  67. Re:In Soviet Microsoft...while in South Korea..... by chawly · · Score: 1

    Only old people go to the Linux Labs website. And only after lunch on Sundays (before their nap).

    --
    How many beans make five, anyhow ? ... Charles Walmsley
  68. thanks by u2pa · · Score: 1


    I'd just like to thank my brother for being such a nice guy.

    --
    Officially: "No comments"
    1. Re:thanks by u2pa · · Score: 1

      and thanks to Microsoft for making software that makes the world go round.

      --
      Officially: "No comments"
    2. Re:thanks by u2pa · · Score: 1

      and thanks to all the programmers that have helped make Linux possible...

      it really amazes me, that collaboration on such a massive scale is possible

      --
      Officially: "No comments"