Slashdot Mirror


Chinese Company Produces $150 Linux PC

srinravi writes to mention an Ars Technica article about another ambitious 'inexpensive computer' project. A Chinese manufacturer, YellowSheepRiver, is aiming to make available a $150 Linux PC built with inexpensive hardware components. From the article: "Urging potential customers to 'Say no to Wintel,' YellowSheepRiver is devoted to using its own Linux distribution and hardware designed and manufactured by Chinese companies. YellowSheepRiver hopes to close the "digital divide" by making computer technology available to the Chinese public at an affordable price. The Municator, which comes with 256MB of RAM, uses a unique 64-bit CPU with an instruction set based on a subset of the MIPS architecture. Designed by a Chinese company called BLX, the the cheap chip is clocked at 400 or 600MHZ and supposedly provides performance comparable to that of an Intel P3."

325 comments

  1. How much is how much? by Dutchmaan · · Score: 4, Interesting

    Bear in mind that $150 dollars probably means a lot more in the Chinese economy than it does here in the U.S.

    Basically, how much is $150 to the average chinese citizen?

    1. Re:How much is how much? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Informative

      Basically, how much is $150 to the average chinese citizen?

      About 1200 yuan.

    2. Re:How much is how much? by MasterC · · Score: 4, Informative

      Just randomly picking from a google search finds this PDF which says the average household income for a rural household is 2262 Yuan which is about $327 USD. So a $150 computer would be about 6 months work for a rural family.

      The graph on this page confirms the ~2200 Yuan for rural households and shows urban households at just more than double that of rural.

      So, from 3 to 6 months net income for an average household.

      --
      :wq
    3. Re:How much is how much? by Kanaka+Kid · · Score: 1

      $150 is between one month and five months salary for the average Chinese worker, where I define "average Chinese worker" to mean the average worker in a community. Viz., Beijing, Shanghai, Guangzhou and Shenzhen's shop store clerks and factory workers would be making about $150 per month, whereas the same jobs would command $30 per month in more rural areas.

    4. Re:How much is how much? by The+Raven · · Score: 1

      The lower your income, the bigger random windfalls become. The $100 raffle pays out $100, whether you make that much in a month or that much in a day. That extra kidney you didn't really need sells for $2000 even if that's more than you make in 5 years.

      Then there are families that pool their resources... very common when you get to the dirt poor. Houses with 4 families in them are common. Why not pool their resources and get a communal PC? It's not as off-the-wall as you make it sound.

      --
      "I will trust Google to 'do no evil' until the founders no longer run it." Hello Alphabet.
    5. Re:How much is how much? by Dufffader · · Score: 1

      Forget about the rural household. They're more interested in how the crops/livestocks are doing since their income depends on it.

      The urban family however, although richer, are getting more and more status conscious. I'm just wondering if they'll spend 150$ on a "cheap" computer or spend a years salary on something more "western" if you like, something with more status than a cheap Linux machine. After all, you get workers in China today that is willing to spend a few months pay on the latest mobile phones. I suspect this company will fight an uphill battle...

    6. Re:How much is how much? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      There's a pretty good list of Chinese prices here:
      http://www.daveschina.com/dave/articles/china/what DoThingsCostInChina
      it has apples through marijuana.

    7. Re:How much is how much? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      In other news, hundreds of chinese computer manufacturer employees forced to take pay cut. They are now paid in beans. It's funny how arguably the largest (in most ways if not the largest) superpower behind the US is run by a gov't that is mostly in the stone age when it comes to human rights, treatment, religious and economic equality, environmentalism, etc. Not that the US and the rest of the western world don't have problems but you don't see many of us imprisoning, torturing, and killing the population because they want to beleive in a non gov't approved anything, and then ask to have the Olympics.

    8. Re:How much is how much? by MasterC · · Score: 1

      It's not as off-the-wall as you make it sound.

      The question was how much $150 is to the chinese. After finding some data, I answered between 3 to 6 months work. I wasn't making it sound any particular way.

      I wrote: So, from 3 to 6 months net income for an average household.

      [sarcasm]Boy, there's so much spin on that that I think Bill O'Reilly would be speechless.[/sarcasm]

      --
      :wq
    9. Re:How much is how much? by aemain · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Ummm...from your own pdf:

      In 2003, per capita income in rural area is Yuan 2622 (RMB).

      Per capita != "household income." And, from your same source (in the same paragraph!):

      Ratio of urban household income to rural household income is 3.2:1.

      So, for a urban family of three, their total household income would be $3139 ($327*3.2*3)...so a $150 computer would be ~5% of their total annual household income...

      The median US household income is $43318. 5% of that figure is $2165--basically the price at which computers went mainstream in this country.

    10. Re:How much is how much? by SamoVasGledamo · · Score: 1

      Hold on -- The pdf you quote doesn't specify whether the income is yearly or monthly. Income is often quoted monthly in countries outside the USA, especially if workers are monthly. If the average Chinese household makes $327 a year, that means that the average Chinese household (3 people) subsides on less than 0,30cents per day, which would make China the poorest place on the planet. The 150 computer is more lika a week or two for the average Chinese

    11. Re:How much is how much? by etrusco · · Score: 1

      Except that these number are for monthly income...

    12. Re:How much is how much? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      There are plenty of people in China who have enough money and it is a huge market. They have whole malls over there with computer equipment. In the cities, everyone has broadband access and families have nice systems over there. This could be a boon considering that they will just put on a pirated version of Windows XP on there anyway.

    13. Re:How much is how much? by numb · · Score: 1

      Big Mac Price in USA in USD: 3.07$
      Big Mac Price in China in USD: 1.27$

      reference: The Economist's Big Mac Index June 2005, at: http://www.economist.com/markets/bigmac/displaySto ry.cfm?story_id=4065603

      --
      NumB http://www.engvig.net
    14. Re:How much is how much? by MasterC · · Score: 1

      Case in point on why providing sources is Good Thing. :) Glad to know they'll be much more affordable than I initially thought.

      --
      :wq
    15. Re:How much is how much? by ozmanjusri · · Score: 1
      So, for a urban family of three, their total household income would be $3139 ($327*3.2*3)...so a $150 computer would be ~5% of their total annual household income.

      In addition, China has a much steeper poverty-to-wealth gradient than most western countries. In 2002, there were more than 50 million households having an annual average income of 75,000 yuan (US$9,068) or more.

      --
      "I've got more toys than Teruhisa Kitahara."
  2. So, when do we get one over here? by the_humeister · · Score: 2, Interesting

    With the death of commodity of PowerPC computers imminent with Apple's switch, this can fill the niche for commodity alternative architectures. I'd get one if it comes here. Hopefully it won't be a "Lisa Lionheart."

    1. Re:So, when do we get one over here? by mrchaotica · · Score: 1

      What's most interesting about it for me is the question of whether it has integrated Treacherous Computing. With both Intel and AMD chips becoming infested with it in the near future, a computer with a foreign chip like this might be the only alternative (which reminds me, I need to check on the status of IBM, Via, Transmeta, and other chips).

      --

      "[Regarding the 'cloud,'] ownership was what made America different than Russia." -- Woz

    2. Re:So, when do we get one over here? by MyOtherUIDis3digits · · Score: 1

      Death of PowerPC? Um, what about the IBM RS/6000 servers that accounted for about 99.5% of PowerPC processor usage, even during the peak of Apple PPC sales? I am a big fan of both AIX and OS X and the equipment they run on, but the simple truth is that the loss of Apple as a customer by IBM will be an insignificant dip in PowerPC sales.

      --
      Ignore anything I said above, I actually agree with everything you believe - mod accordingly.
    3. Re:So, when do we get one over here? by Kadin2048 · · Score: 1

      Well, I've heard that the Chinese government has its own TCPM type chip that it either mandates inclusion of, or gives some sort of incentive to companies that install it. Apparently Lenovo computers made for the home market have it in preference to the one used in units destined for the rest of the world.

      So it's probably treacherous, but in ways that would be different than ours here in the U.S. It might still be advantageous for a freedom-loving American to get a crippled Chinese PC (and vice versa) because the software to utilize the crippling features of it might not be as widely available or as thoroughly implemented here. I doubt that most software looking for a TCPM is going to be able to use the Chinese security chip, and their software (in the PRC) which expects one probably isn't going to be able to use the one that Dell's installing.

      As for your other question, I'm not positive, but I don't believe that the big IBM workstations have them installed (at least the RISC ones). The Opteron based ones might or might not, I'm not sure what the motherboards are like in there. Of course you're talking real money compared to a commodity PC, even if you get an x86-based IBM workstation. It may be 2006 out here but they price those things like it's still 1995. (They were home of the "most expensive PC" last time I checked around.)

      --
      "Ladies and gentlemen, my killbot features Lotus Notes and a machine gun. It is the finest available."
    4. Re:So, when do we get one over here? by Kadin2048 · · Score: 1

      I'm going to go out on a limb here, but I have a distinct feeling that Apple moved more units of PPC Macs than IBM did of RS/6000s. Those things aren't exactly a dime a dozen; you can't just walk down to CompUSA and pick one up to put under the Christmas tree.

      I can't find any hard sales figures recently, but back in 2000, at the height of the Bubble, IBM was touting that it had sold "over 1,000,000 RS/6000" servers total to date, while Apple shipped more machines than that (1.12M) in the fourth quarter of 2000 alone.

      I've been told on good authority that the biggest users of Power chips have always been embedded systems, and that this is where IBM was putting the majority of its development focus (particularly on lowering power consumption and making them run cooler).

      --
      "Ladies and gentlemen, my killbot features Lotus Notes and a machine gun. It is the finest available."
    5. Re:So, when do we get one over here? by mikeabbott420 · · Score: 1

      game machines not servers are what makes IBM care little about the apple loss

      --
      This program was made possible by a grant from the Ultra-Humanite, and viewers like you.
    6. Re:So, when do we get one over here? by the_humeister · · Score: 1

      uh, I said "commodity PowerPC." Last time I checked, those RS/6000 machines don't sell in large enough numbers to be considered "commodity."

    7. Re:So, when do we get one over here? by MyOtherUIDis3digits · · Score: 1

      You are absolutely correct. I stand by my conclusion, but should have been more explicit (er, accurate) in my explanation. Although their servers contain many processors each as opposed to 1 or 2 in the desktops, embedded systems do constitute the majority of the PPC processor sales. They are very focused on console systems at this time according to the conversations I had at the last p5 presentation I attended.

      --
      Ignore anything I said above, I actually agree with everything you believe - mod accordingly.
  3. But can it run Linux? by OctoberSky · · Score: 2, Interesting
    Urging potential customers to 'Say no to Wintel,' YellowSheepRiver is devoted to using its own Linux distribution and hardware designed and manufactured by Chinese companies

    But can it run (my) Linux?

    1. Re:But can it run Linux? by lolocaust · · Score: 1

      Sure, if you have the source code.

      --
      Why does my post history abruptly stop? I want to laugh at the stupid things I posted as a kid.
    2. Re:But can it run Linux? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      I doubt it. In the video he goes on about how it is a good substitute for Wintel but really its just to support China.

      VIA - a Taiwanese cpu maker - make boxes just aas small as that and are just as cheap too. I'd say if u benchmark this against a VIA the VIA would whup it!.

      And, VIA is completely whupped by AMD and Intel in terms of performance. It's a nice start and at some functions I's say this chip isn't bad but it's really for one user group - the home user running basic office apps.

      I reckon it could sell like hot cakes in China and with the money from that this company could see some very nice RnD injections. Who knows, in about 10 years..

      It's perfect for the Chinese market - it has a video jack for a TV ..

      It is dependent on a ATI graphics card though.

      $150 - that must be a couple of months hard work for a typical Chinese family .

      It's only the ~relatively upper middle class families in China (preofessionals etc.) that'll be able to afford them. Hope it's not DRM'd ...

  4. Danger for GNU/linux by Enquest · · Score: 5, Insightful

    There is a danger that GNU/Linux will get a bad name because it mostly installed on very cheap systems. Often these projects tend to fail and then the scape goat will be GNU/Linux. Better would be that large hardware firms put GNU/Linux on there system. Just imagine Ubuntu on all Dell, HP ... systems. That would be the break for GNU/Linux

    1. Re:Danger for GNU/linux by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Or the death knell of Dell and HP. I love Linux, but any company that tried to push Linux on its customers like that would likely go bankrupt. Virtually no one switches operating systems just because their "favorite" vendor wants them to. (And no, new versions of Windows are *not* the same thing)

    2. Re:Danger for GNU/linux by towsonu2003 · · Score: 1
      There is a danger that GNU/Linux will get a bad name because it mostly installed on very cheap systems. Often these projects tend to fail and then the scape goat will be GNU/Linux. Better would be that large hardware firms put GNU/Linux on there system. Just imagine Ubuntu on all Dell, HP ... systems. That would be the break for GNU/Linux
      one step at a time... baby steps preferred...
    3. Re:Danger for GNU/linux by sheehaje · · Score: 1

      Actually, all Dell Servers come with a form of GNU/Linux. There server installation program uses Linux and X Window. I haven't used HP servers in a long time, but I think all their Proliant computers uses a form of Compaq's old server installation software, which was also a variant of Linux and X Window.

    4. Re:Danger for GNU/linux by Trigun · · Score: 1

      Put two or three NIC's on this guy, and you can bet that it won't fail. Why should my firewall require a 250 watt PSU?

    5. Re:Danger for GNU/linux by houghi · · Score: 1

      Just imagine Ubuntu on all Dell, HP ... systems.

      What? Having no choise in my Linux distribution is the same as having no choice in my Windows distribution.

      I would prefer to have a real choice. I like SUSE, somebody else would rather have Fedora or any other.

      --
      Don't fight for your country, if your country does not fight for you.
    6. Re:Danger for GNU/linux by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Uhm...if they picked Ubuntu, lol, it would give the plan a bad name...

      Why does Ubuntu get such a free ride/free press? It's not best linux desktop distro, it's not the best live install-from-just-a-CD distro, it's not the best business based distro, it's not even the best hacker/do-it-yourself-distro.

      What gives?

    7. Re:Danger for GNU/linux by Enquest · · Score: 1

      The GNU freedom philosophy that the phrase?

    8. Re:Danger for GNU/linux by grumpyman · · Score: 1

      So you think GNU/Linux should be open, but selectively open? Why bother GNU license then? Why is there such a 'danger'? Just coz they're Chinese??

    9. Re:Danger for GNU/linux by operagost · · Score: 1

      The OLD version of SmartStart (5.x and below) used DOS and Windows. The current versions use Linux and the Mozilla browser is the interface.

      --

      Gamingmuseum.com: Give your 3D accelerator a rest.
    10. Re:Danger for GNU/linux by int19h · · Score: 1

      Try out the latest greatest Xubuntu, and I think you'll be surprised at how incredibly nice it is.

      Why, for instance, Debian is supposed to be so much more hardcore than Ubuntu beats me, as they have the same possibilities, only Ubuntu makes the defaults so much nicer. At least Xubuntu does, imo.

      Since 95, I've used Slackware, Redhat, Mandrake, Debian and Ubuntu, and tested a few others. And, Xubuntu is the best Linux-experience I've ever seen. It should come as no surprise that I recommend it wholeheartedly.

      I'm not even affiliated with it, it's just very nice!

    11. Re:Danger for GNU/linux by WindBourne · · Score: 1

      Yes, those mini coimputers (VMS, PDPs, etc) were put out of business by the mainframes. But not before the minis put those PCs out of business who fortunately put those cheap laptops out of business, who put out of business those horrible cell phones/ipod deals. Oh, wait...

      --
      I prefer the "u" in honour as it seems to be missing these days.
    12. Re:Danger for GNU/linux by int19h · · Score: 1

      Well, it is the most popular distro, at least at this page: http://distrowatch.com/

    13. Re:Danger for GNU/linux by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      --
      > Knock-knock.
      > - Who's there?
      > Under the Patriot Act, we don't have to tell you that.


      Knock-knock.
      - Who's there?
      A retard that knows nothing about the PATRIOT Act beyond the FUD he reads in a hysteric op-ed at epic.org

    14. Re:Danger for GNU/linux by Cal+Paterson · · Score: 1

      I don't think thats an issue at all; most users of GNU/Linux would hardly care.

      Even so, to address your point, there are many examples of large it companies using GNU/Linux; Google is a good example. Lots and lots of linux servers everywhere. As long as they put the real Ubuntu on Dell's, and not some crappy Dellisation of it, I think we can sleep easy. :)

    15. Re:Danger for GNU/linux by Crayon+Kid · · Score: 1

      There is a danger that GNU/Linux will get a bad name because it mostly installed on very cheap systems. Often these projects tend to fail and then the scape goat will be GNU/Linux. Better would be that large hardware firms put GNU/Linux on there system. Just imagine Ubuntu on all Dell, HP ... systems. That would be the break for GNU/Linux

      This is a very simplistic way of looking at things, in so much that I don't know where to begin.

      No, GNU/Linux won't get a bad name for working on cheap hardware, it will get a good name for working everywhere. And what's wrong with cheap hardware that gets the job done? Who says I have to spend thousands on a new computer every time someone releases a new shiny OS or game?

      Large enough companies already put Linux on their products. Think IBM. Think supercomputers.

      As for Dell and HP, and many other vendors, they are tied with lots of threads into the market and its connections. They can't very well afford the message that bundling GNU/Linux would send. Perhaps, in time, but it's often a delicate matter. You think Microsoft would just sit there and take it? Have we forgotten all the sweet OEM deals going around, the under the table hand twisting, the monopoly allegations?

      --
      i ate crayons when i was a kid and now i have two braincells and the blue ones taste nicer
    16. Re:Danger for GNU/linux by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      Considering that the first steps for commercial use of Linux were here in the top 500 supercomputers, where linux dominates with 74.4% of the top 500, I think Giant steps are more called for than baby steps.


      Windows has a long way to go before it can compete on serious servers. And Linux on these small devices really is an odd fit for it - but I guess necessary due to the expensive licenses of alternative OS's.

    17. Re:Danger for GNU/linux by towsonu2003 · · Score: 1
      Considering that the first steps for commercial use of Linux were here in the top 500 supercomputers, where linux dominates with 74.4% of the top 500 [top500.org], I think Giant steps are more called for than baby steps. Windows has a long way to go before it can compete on serious servers. And Linux on these small devices really is an odd fit for it - but I guess necessary due to the expensive licenses of alternative OS's.
      I meant Baby steps for Linux on the desktop. From cheap products ($100 laptop; $150 Linux PC; Linspire PC and so on) to streamline HP and Dell desktops and notebooks with small steps.
      Remember the GP wants Linux to be shipped in HP computers now. Regardless of it is ready or not (it's ready for me), users need to be familiarized with it before HP/Dell/whatever picks it up for anything major.

      For servers, I don't see a reason to step up (giant steps), it's already dominating the market.

  5. Its a bunch of crap by abhinavkaiser · · Score: 0, Troll

    With that kind of configuration, we will be going back to the 1990s. It is not worth 150 bucks. If you pay 200 dollars more, you could get a emachines desktop computer with the latest technology.

    1. Re:Its a bunch of crap by Opportunist · · Score: 0, Troll

      With or without DRM? That's the key question here, not the price.

      I'd prefer to pay 300 bucks for a P3 that is mine over paying 150 bucks for a P6 that isn't under my control.

      --
      We used to have a Bill of Rights. Now, with the rights gone, all we have left is the bill.
    2. Re:Its a bunch of crap by krakelohm · · Score: 1

      We are talking about China here they are full of D&M, but the Rights is no where to be seen.

      --
      You are all a bunch of idots.
    3. Re:Its a bunch of crap by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      WTF are you talking about? You dont think the Chinese, who are known for jailing bloggers and journalists, wouldnt load that fucker up with spyware, and nanny chips to monitor eveyone who buys one? And now you will accuse us companies of putting drm in their procs? Once again WTF?

    4. Re:Its a bunch of crap by monkeyGrease · · Score: 1, Insightful

      With that kind of configuration, we will be going back to the 1990s. It is not worth 150 bucks. If you pay 200 dollars more, you could get a emachines desktop computer with the latest technology.

      Stupid reply. The whole point of the cheap entry computer is because of low incomes. I could just pay 20k more than 15k and get a BMW instead of a Hundai, but maybe I don't have that extra 20k.

      I can't believe someone serious asserts something based on "you could just pay 133% more..."

    5. Re:Its a bunch of crap by Chandon+Seldon · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Assuming that this processor is no slower than a 600mhz Pentium III, the machine can easily run a normal set of productivity applications and access the internet. It'll be slow, but not too bad.

      As other posters have stated, $150 in rural China is like half a year's pay. Paying more than twice as much for better performance isn't nessisarily the plan. It'd be like if I had gotten a BMW C series instead of my Hyundai Accent - possible, but not nessisarily economically responsible.

      --
      -- The act of censorship is always worse than whatever is being censored. Always.
    6. Re:Its a bunch of crap by theNYX · · Score: 1

      Am I the only one that noticed the fact that yours and the comment above it both talk about upgrading Hyundais to BMWs? That's funny.

    7. Re:Its a bunch of crap by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Has Intel's crap propaganda made you retarded? Clock speed is not always the best measure of performance.

      My laptop (a few years old) has the performance scaling feature to save power. The full speed is 1.4GHz. You can scale it down to 600MHz. For 99% of what I do on the laptop, there is no noticable difference! The only thing I can notice is that C compilers are a bit slower. But, I often scale it down to 600MHz and forget to scale it back up later. I end up doing C compiles, watching dvd rips, and don't notice the thing is set at 600MHz until I check!

      600MHz is not slow. Especially if you're talking about a chip that is not brain-damaged like x86. If someone gave me a 600MHz MIPS machine, and offered to trade it for an eMachine (ugly, ugly systems, theirs) as you have suggested, I'd say hell no.

    8. Re:Its a bunch of crap by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      Assuming that this processor is no slower than a 600mhz Pentium III, the machine can easily run a normal set of productivity applications and access the internet. It'll be slow, but not too bad.

      It won't be that slow. My home desktop is a P3-600MHz and I can run Firefox, OpenOffice, Mplayer, xterms fine. Admittedly, I have 512MB RAM, but the YellowSheepRiver PC can be upgraded too. While it is actually more expensive than my second-hand PC, at that price, weigh, size and built-in UPS, it'd make a kickarse home-server. Just as long as I can fit in a 500GB monster or something. I wonder how Debian runs on that thing? Is MIPS still a first tier architecture?

  6. Re:1 problem by The+Warlock · · Score: 4, Insightful

    To be fair, that's 600 MHz on MIPS, which is quite a bit more clock-efficient than a Pentium 4. Saying "zomg, the P4 has four times the gigahurtz!" is not exactly a fair comparison.

    --
    I've upped my standards, so up yours.
  7. Now with built in firewall!! by gasmonso · · Score: 5, Funny

    I bet this thing filters questionable content right out of the box!

    http://religiousfreaks.com/
    1. Re:Now with built in firewall!! by Knight+Thrasher · · Score: 1

      Not just filters, but alerts the proper authorities if some criminal breaks into your house and searches Google on the topic of "free speech!"

    2. Re:Now with built in firewall!! by kevmo · · Score: 1

      How are buyers supposed to get their daily fix of Pintsize then????

    3. Re:Now with built in firewall!! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You are a TOOL!

  8. Such a (sucky) deal! by execute85 · · Score: 0

    Wow, this is much better than a $299 dell (which includes monitor and windows). Not!

    Who greenlit this idea? A custom chip, a custom linux distro, a crappy processor. This is a nightmare waiting to happen.

    I'm sure $300 is a big difference vs. $150. But when you consider $300 is the before sale price of Dell and I didn't even shop around on pricewatch. It's a no brainer.

    I expect this to sell as much as the new lenovo thinkpads.

    1. Re:Such a (sucky) deal! by cduffy · · Score: 4, Insightful

      You're forgetting the target audience. To compensate, let's do a thought experiment: Scale the prices up.

      Let's say that right now the cheapest PC you could get were $3000 (akin to the Dell $300 box), and a really good one cost $30,000 (think your $3K gaming box). Making a crappy machine for $1500 means that there are a whole bunch of folks would couldn't possibly afford a new computer who now can.

      Remember, these things aren't targeted at the US market, and aren't targeted at people who can afford current prices.

    2. Re:Such a (sucky) deal! by smidget2k4 · · Score: 1

      Exactly. I don't understand why there is so much "OMGZLOLSUXX0rs 400mhZhaaN00b" going on today. These machines aren't for the general techie who craves the ability to play games at 200fps, it is for someone who just wants a web browser (if that). I still have a P3 in my basement that I still use as a server for small tasks and web browsing when my other computers are doing something intensive.

      I think it is a great thing to make computer available to people who otherwise couldn't afford them.

    3. Re:Such a (sucky) deal! by LunaticTippy · · Score: 1
      There's one thing I don't understand.

      We throw away millions of computers every year. China sends us new stuff and the boats go home empty.

      Why don't we send them our old computers for $10 each?

      --
      Man, you really need that seminar!
    4. Re:Such a (sucky) deal! by powerlord · · Score: 1
      --
      This space for rent. All reasonable inquiries will be entertained at proprietors discretion.
    5. Re:Such a (sucky) deal! by Tim+C · · Score: 1

      That's something you'll notice about slashdot if you pay attention. On stories like this, there are lots of comments along the lines of "those specs suck!". On stories about the latest and greatest PC kit, there are lots of comments along the lines of "no-one needs that much power!"

    6. Re:Such a (sucky) deal! by Cthefuture · · Score: 1

      Actually your scale is off. According to the other post the average salary is between $300 and $600 a year. Lets split the difference and say $450/yr. Compared to average American salary which is conveniently right about $45,000/yr.

      Now scale those figures.

      The $300 box is equivalent to $30,000 in China for the average worker. And the $3k box is, wait for it, $300,000 to the Average Chinese person.

      Now I think we see an accurate picture.

      --
      The ratio of people to cake is too big
    7. Re:Such a (sucky) deal! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Because we don't support oppresive exploitive governments?

      The people would probably never see the equipment and some Chinese company or government agency would just strip the parts and resell them to America. Therefore making a couple rich people in a country with billions of residents.

    8. Re:Such a (sucky) deal! by LunaticTippy · · Score: 1
      Yeah, I know that.

      Seems you could install linux on them and sell them for $150 instead of 'recycling' them. Why is nobody doing this? Do I have to move to china and become insanely rich?! I am very lazy. Please, somebody do this so I don't have to.

      --
      Man, you really need that seminar!
    9. Re:Such a (sucky) deal! by execute85 · · Score: 0

      Sorry for the misunderstanding. I'm not forgetting the target audience and I understand how $300 = 2 x $150.

      My point is that you can currently get a system for $300 from Dell using Intel, Windows and with a monitor. So a custom chip/linux distro with no monitor for $150 is not a good deal.

      If Dell can market a PC for $300 retail to the US with all that crap, I'm sure they can market a similar system for $150 to China that doesn't suck so hard. Order a couple thousand and Dell starts knocking down the price, especially if you take out the support contracts and the windows price.

    10. Re:Such a (sucky) deal! by cduffy · · Score: 1
      If Dell can market a PC for $300 retail to the US with all that crap, I'm sure they can market a similar system for $150 to China that doesn't suck so hard. Order a couple thousand and Dell starts knocking down the price, especially if you take out the support contracts and the windows price.

      The $300 retail PC already doesn't have much of a margin on it. The substantial per-unit profits are on the high end of the market, not the low. Remember, the goal isn't to make something that can be manufactured for $150; rather, it's to make something which can be sold for $150, making back both fixed and marginal costs. From that perspective, using Microsoft and Intel is a losing proposition.

      Dell's overall net profit margin is 6.4% -- and that's for their entire business, including the higher end of the market. Expecting them to be able to cut the cost of their bottom-end systems by 50% (or even 20%) and still turn a profit on those systems is ludicrous.

    11. Re:Such a (sucky) deal! by execute85 · · Score: 0

      Remember your post when Dell rolls out $150 desktops.

      The Dell system includes support, a monitor, faster chip, bigger hard drive and windows. Strip all that stuff down to the China spec and you are near $150.

      Also, the 6% margin doesn't apply to every product, just to the company overall.

    12. Re:Such a (sucky) deal! by cduffy · · Score: 1
      Remember your post when Dell rolls out $150 desktops.

      If it's far enough in the future that the relevant economics have changed -- or if Dell is using providers other than Microsoft and Intel for the relevant parts -- I'll be able to remember my post smugly.

      The Dell system includes support, a monitor, faster chip, bigger hard drive and windows. Strip all that stuff down to the China spec and you are near $150.

      Sure, Dell could make a system at the Chinese spec for not too much more than the Chinese company does... but the Chinese company can build a system at the Chinese spec and actually expect to turn enough of a profit off it to sustain their business with that system as their key product. That's a pretty big difference. Also, Dell's fixed costs (as they'd be paying for a custom chip developed with R&D at American rates rather than Chinese ones) would be huge.

      Also, the 6% margin doesn't apply to every product, just to the company overall.

      That's true -- but the lowest end of the market is already going to have the smallest margins. If a product makes back its marginal cost (buying the components and paying any additional payroll costs which can be attributed to assembly, QA and sale of the individual machine) but not its share of fixed costs (paying for product development and testing, accounting, advertising, and all the other stuff that the company has to do if it wants to roll out another product without regard to exactly how many units of that product they sell), it's a money-losing proposition even though each individual machine may turn a profit.

      Now, what would you contend that Dell's marginal profit on a per-machine basis is? A lot more than 6.5%, right? That means that the fixed costs are sufficient to bring Dell's overall profit down from the much higher marginal value to only 6.5% after paying said costs -- so they're too high to trivialize away.

      A company based in China has not only lower marginal costs but also much lower fixed costs, as what they're paying for land and labor (including the accountants, the advertisers, the marketers, etc) is far, far lower; consequently, they have much less by way of fixed costs that any profitable product needs to make up for. Dell may have economies of scale on their side -- but the differences between costs when even the fixed-cost component of one's expenses are paid at a Chinese scale is almost certainly sufficient to put them at a disadvantage in this market. (That is: If Dell dumped Windows and started selling something at a similar spec in China, expect the Municator's selling price to drop below what they could match).

  9. It is so slow that by t0qer · · Score: 2, Funny

    Designed by a Chinese company called BLX, the the cheap chip is clocked at 400 or 600MHZ and supposedly provides performance comparable to that of an Intel P3."

    When you watch american kung fu flicks (chuck norris) they automagically get the "out of sync english voiceover" effect.

    1. Re:It is so slow that by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I would have no trouble believing that a 600MHz MIPS could out-do a P3. Intel's strategy for a long time has been "just bump up the clock speed". That doesn't offer real performance. In many regards it makes things worse.

  10. thin client? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful

    I see it as a powerful thin client... hmmm. nice!

  11. YellowSheepRiver?? by pr0nbot · · Score: 4, Funny

    I ain't drinkin from that river!

    1. Re:YellowSheepRiver?? by digitaldc · · Score: 1

      It's just a name, don't let it pull the wool over your eyes.

      --
      He who knows best knows how little he knows. - Thomas Jefferson
    2. Re:YellowSheepRiver?? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      No, no, no, don't worry. It's lemon.

  12. Re:1 problem by Xymor · · Score: 1

    It maybe be crap, But it's WAY more realistic than the U$ 100 bucks laptop project.

  13. Re:1 problem by Burlap · · Score: 2, Interesting

    of course it's a clunker... its $150! but look at the target buyers, first time computer users on a VERY limited income. They arn't aiming at the hardcore gamers, even the casual web serfer is well above the bar that they are aiming for. let me put it another way.... if all you can aford is a mo-ped, will you really be complaining you didnt get a BMW?

  14. Re:1 problem by castoridae · · Score: 4, Insightful

    It'll be insanely tough to convince customers that a 600mhz, 256mb ram linux machine is equivalent or better than a 2.0ghz, 512mb winbox

    You don't have to. You just have to convince them it's a better bang for the buck. Not everyone drives a Mercedes - and it's not because they think their Kias are better cars.

  15. Not that cheap: don't even have to factor curreny by everphilski · · Score: 5, Informative

    Seeing as you can get a Pentium III processor for about $10, 256MB RAM for $25 (both on Pricewatch)... throw in a motherboard ($25) with onboard video, sound, etc. and a hard drive ($30 for a 40gb EIDE) and you have a similar product for cheaper, and we didn't even have to resort to OEM/bulk pricing.

    The unique feature is a 64 bit RISC chip and S-video out for a TV interface. No need for a computer monitor.

  16. Branding Issues by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

    In another lost in translation marketing descision an Chinese firm decides to put "Yellow and River" together in their name. I'd call that a piss poor decision?

    1. Re:Branding Issues by chill · · Score: 2, Informative

      In another lost in translation marketing descision an Chinese firm decides to put "Yellow and River" together in their name. I'd call that a piss poor decision?

      No, it is simply your total lack of education. Google on "Yellow River China" and you'll find it is one of the most important rivers in the world and along with the Tigris/Euphrates and Nile is where one of the earliest civilizations developed, sometime around 4000 B.C.

      It is named after the color of the silt in the water, just like the Red River which is also in China.

      --
      Learning HOW to think is more important than learning WHAT to think.
    2. Re:Branding Issues by PFI_Optix · · Score: 1

      The Yellow River is one of the major rivers in China.

      http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Yellow_River

      --
      120 characters for a sig? That's bloody useless.
    3. Re:Branding Issues by shawb · · Score: 1

      Yeah... because Yellow River has connotations for most people besides the Huang He. Especially those in the target demographic: Chinese people. But most people in China won't think of the Huang He when someone says "Yellow Sheep River," they'll think of a small very poor village near the Gobi Desert whose economy is primarilly textile related but people have been trying to make the next technological showcase. Sounds like a really good name to me, as long as you don't have the mind of an 8 year old.

      --
      I'll never make that mistake again, reading the experts' opinions. - Feynman
  17. Re:1 problem by Knight+Thrasher · · Score: 1
    The crunching capabilities of a processor arn't always about it's clockspeed. And technically, besides gaming, 600mhz is fairly solid for running Linux on, for most web browsing and general office applications.

    I'd think the most likely reason these won't sell well in the US is marketing and incompatibility. For one, good luck outmarketing Dell and Intel here in the US. For incompatibility, who the heck will be writing compatible drivers for this sort of system for us geeks to add video cards to, connect MP3 players to, etc?

    All in all it's certainl possible that these will be functional web browser systems, but I wouldn't expect a single thing else from them. For $150, you get what you pay for.

  18. Why put a drive in there? by kawika · · Score: 3, Interesting

    Clearly with specs like this it's not going to run any heavy-duty apps, so I would think a typical application would be to run a browser and web/intranet apps to keep the client footprint small. Instead of a 40GB drive, why not put 2GB of flash onto the board formatted as a file system, and make the spinning drive optional? That would reduce power consumption and increase reliability.

    1. Re:Why put a drive in there? by castoridae · · Score: 1

      I would think a typical application would be to run a browser and web/intranet apps

      Perhaps that's what it's called the [com]Municator? :-)

    2. Re:Why put a drive in there? by wirah · · Score: 0

      Yes, and how long before the flash wears out?
      I used to compile java on my usb pendrive, and it lasted a number of weeks before it wore out.
      It just isn't feasible.

    3. Re:Why put a drive in there? by MoxFulder · · Score: 5, Insightful

      What if you want to store lots of MP3s, run a small web server, do software development, play movies, etc.? I was happily running on a fairly similar laptop (okay, 1 ghz CPU) until a few weeks ago. It ran linux quite well... if you can afford the latest-and-greatest to run your high-powered apps, that's great, but if not an older system works pretty well even for a lot of resource-intensive tasks.

    4. Re:Why put a drive in there? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Your overlooking the obvious, price. A 2gb flash drive cost about 60 bucks. that's basically a very low end hd. Hd makes more sense in terms of longevity and size.

    5. Re:Why put a drive in there? by Bloater · · Score: 1

      400 MHz is plenty for all but the most demanding computation jobs and games. And 256MB RAM is more than enough for a web browser, spreadsheet, word processor, GUI database designer, compiler, development suite, presentation designer, DTP suite, and image editor to be in core for each of three simultaneously logged in users.

      The only problem is the current breed of desktop environments and the software that runs on them. They perform poorly, consume far too much memory, and don't work reliably.

      2GB flash is *very* expensive if you want reasonable performance, you're best off with the cheapest hard drive available if cost is your primary concern.

    6. Re:Why put a drive in there? by Mister+Whirly · · Score: 1

      "What if you want to store lots of MP3s, run a small web server, do software development, play movies, etc.?"

      Then you are not a rural Chinese farmer trying to buy a "first computer" and this isn't the machine for you...

      --
      "But this one goes to 11!"
    7. Re:Why put a drive in there? by MoxFulder · · Score: 1

      Oh yeah? When my grandma bought my family's first computer ~1989, I don't think she expected me to do computer programming, 3D graphics, connect to BBS's, etc. But I did anyway!

      I think it's retarded to design what COULD be a very general-purpose computer with the premise that people are only going to use it for a few specific uses. Witness the demise of dedicated word processing machines and the mediocre reception of web-browser-only Internet terminals for home use.

    8. Re:Why put a drive in there? by Mister+Whirly · · Score: 1

      Your grandma also spent a lot more than $150 on that system - probably closer to $3000...I think the whole point of this machine is to get the more rural areas in China to be able to connect to the internet - so that is what purpose they likely designed it around.

      --
      "But this one goes to 11!"
    9. Re:Why put a drive in there? by erbmjw · · Score: 1
      It doesn't state that the drive is in the machine, from the article;
      For storage, the Municator comes with a 40 GB external USB drive and support for an optional external optical drive
    10. Re:Why put a drive in there? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      What about temporary files, or other activities that _writes_ to the drive continuosly? Flash drives can take a couple hundered thousand writes before they start failing. That might seem alot, but if the computer is constantly writing to a swap file for lack of physical ram, those writes go by quickly.

    11. Re:Why put a drive in there? by OwnedByTwoCats · · Score: 1

      In October 2000, Apple introduced the iMac DV. 400 MHz g3 processor, 128 MiB RAM, 10 (or 13) GB HD, DVD-ROM, Rage 128 graphics chip on an integrated 15" 1024x768 CRT display. USB, FireWire, and EtherNet. $1,300 (US) retail.

      So the machine they're selling has roughly the same power is machine was entry-level 6 years ago; they're selling it for a tenth of the cost.

      Yes, this is enough power to process documents, surf the web, and play some older 3D games (Marathon, anyone?).

    12. Re:Why put a drive in there? by RalphTheWonderLlama · · Score: 1

      step one: connect to internet step two: download music yes they probably want a hard drive

      --
      simple, fast homepage with your links: http://www.ngumbi.com/
    13. Re:Why put a drive in there? by Wizarth · · Score: 1

      In a similar manner, my HTPC is a P3 500Mhz, with the BIOS updated to take larger drives, and 512MB of RAM. It's also my home web/socks/squid/ftp/ssh/screen session server.

      Even using KDE, which is generally considered bloated, it runs quite well, and was for a while my main use machine, until I got tired of reading text on the TV (ick). A good part of that is due to using the nVIDIA accelerated X drivers.

      The only things I've found it underpowered for is HD res video, the right-click menu's in Amarok are slow, and cross-fading tracks will skip if the system is under load, such as file transfer. Since the TV output is only 800x600, not playing HD video's is not a big deal to me!

  19. don't drink the yellow water.... by everphilski · · Score: 3, Funny

    ...it tastes baaaaaaaaaad!

  20. Re:1 problem by neonprimetime · · Score: 0

    I understand this ... u understand this ... slashdot understands this ... but all i was saying was that the customers that walk into the store would not ... they'd think you're feeding them a line of bull ...

  21. YellowWhatTheHeck? by wirah · · Score: 0

    Haha. YellowSheepRiver has to be the most awesome chinese name i've heard yet! Forget LongShine!

    Oh but yeah, the pc sounds good too...

  22. CeBIT 2006 Demo by fred911 · · Score: 4, Informative
    --
    09 F9 11 02 9D 74 E3 5B - D8 41 56 C5 63 56 88 C0 45 5F E1 04 22 CA 29 C4 93 3F 95 05 2B 79 2A B2
    1. Re:CeBIT 2006 Demo by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      After watching the video it does look like an impressive little box. The only gripe I have is that even though it is running their own linux that interface is god awful ugly. Reminds me of a WebTV interface and that just scares me.

    2. Re:CeBIT 2006 Demo by CatsupBoy · · Score: 1
      The only gripe I have is that even though it is running their own linux that interface is god awful ugly.
      Yes, but your grandmother wont be calling you about how to drop to a command prompt to run mplayer.
    3. Re:CeBIT 2006 Demo by suv4x4 · · Score: 0, Troll

      here's a demo of the product.

      Oh, good, good. Now that we know it's not x86 compatible or Windows compatible so the majority of ordinary people can't do anything useful on it, like run Word or Excel, it also doesn't look like a computer.

      It looks like a huge cellphone battery. Except you don't have that big of a cellphone to fit it in.

    4. Re:CeBIT 2006 Demo by Jeremi · · Score: 1
      Now that we know it's not x86 compatible or Windows compatible so the majority of ordinary people can't do anything useful on it, like run Word or Excel


      I hate to break it to you, but Word and Excel are no longer the primary tasks people use computers for. Web browsing and email are.


      That said, for people who need to word process or do spreadsheets, this machine is capable of running word processors and spreadsheet apps.

      --


      I don't care if it's 90,000 hectares. That lake was not my doing.
    5. Re:CeBIT 2006 Demo by suv4x4 · · Score: 1

      I hate to break it to you

      Why, are you afraid I may go mentally unstable and throw myself from a bridge?

      but Word and Excel are no longer the primary tasks people use computers for. Web browsing and email are.

      I don't need a computer that looks like a brick for that, for the price of this computer (when you add the monitor, kb and so on) you can get a PDA with a large screen, browsing and e-mail capabilities.

    6. Re:CeBIT 2006 Demo by rhendershot · · Score: 1

      grade D- for salesmanship....

    7. Re:CeBIT 2006 Demo by DemonThing · · Score: 1

      The Municator comes with something called RedOffice. The video link in the grandparent demonstrates it -- it looks like a rebranded OpenOffice.

    8. Re:CeBIT 2006 Demo by martian265 · · Score: 1

      That was a painful video to watch. The camera work was jerky and was obviously shot with a consumer quality camcorder. And since the interviewer was also the camera man and he was using the onboard mic, everytime that the image would switch from the interviewee's face the conversation became very hard to follow.

      Also, it looked like he tried to launch a DVD using the touchscreen and the app crashed or didn't start, but since the screen was reflecting the lights and you couldn't hear the interviewee I can't be sure that's what they were doing.

    9. Re:CeBIT 2006 Demo by swillden · · Score: 1

      when you add the monitor

      You don't need to add a monitor. It's designed to be connected to a TV, which you presumably already have.

      --
      Note to ACs: I usually delete AC replies without reading them. If you want to talk to me, log in.
  23. See the video here by denisbergeron · · Score: 4, Informative

    People at linuxdevice have a good article on it and even a link to a interview with a chinesse seller in video made by a french reporter! I post this a some time ago, but people here don't like my syntax.

    --
    Ceci n'est pas une Signature !
    1. Re:See the video here by denis-The-menace · · Score: 1

      I post this a some time ago, but people here don't like my syntax.

      That's why I don't post anymore.

      --
      Obama's legacy: (N)othing (S)ecure (A)nywhere and (T)error (S)imulation (A)dministration
    2. Re:See the video here by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      That's why I don't post anymore.
      And that's why Slashdot have now only old... very old stories about stuff that matters and stories about stuff that I don't give a fcuk about it !

    3. Re:See the video here by edbulldog · · Score: 1

      Me am agree. English is not the first language for a large part of internet users, so... there are some of us who just plain suck at english. Please keep the thought around.

  24. Re:1 problem by justsomebody · · Score: 1

    It'll be insanely tough to convince customers that a 600mhz, 256mb ram linux machine is equivalent or better than a 2.0ghz, 512mb winbox

    Hey, I'm a techie and I'll buy one.

    Wanna know why?
    Small and obviously perfectly runs linux, I can create my self one hell of a media center with it (or irc console, or office machine, or browsing, mailing), but in the same time require as less space as possible.

    I'm very satisfied with buying Opterons for my workstations (and I got 10 of them), but for my media center or low-needs purposes, this machine is more than ideal. Or at least it seems so. Why would anybody wanted to buy something small but overpriced or something big and clumsy if he doesn't need it.

    --
    Signature Pro version 1.13.2-3 release 83.5 beta3try7 after-breakfast edition
  25. MIPS rip chip by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    http://www.theinquirer.net/?article=24882

    It's a knockoff. The sad thing is that an American company that tried the same thing was sued out of existance. They were innocent but they couldn't afford the lawyers.

    Our court system is giving a huge advantage to the Chinese.

    1. Re:MIPS rip chip by the_humeister · · Score: 1

      That raises an interesting question: why didn't they go with an open architecture such as SPARC or PowerPC?

  26. Re:1 problem by kcbanner · · Score: 0, Offtopic

    My boss is hooked up Intel. "Well look 3.2GHZ, AMD sucks their pieces of crap.". Every time my AMD Athlon XP 2500+ chip outperformed/outlasted the intel chip and it was alot cheaper. Its not about GHz.

    --
    Obligatory blog plug: http://www.caseybanner.ca/
  27. Now running Rinux by EntropyXP · · Score: 0, Funny

    See, the unique feature is that it's all chinese. Do their bits read from left to right?
    The most expensive part, though, will be the keyboard!
    http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Image:Large_chinese_k eyboard.jpg

    --
    "No one will really be free until nerd persecution ends."
    1. Re:Now running Rinux by Lord+Agni · · Score: 1

      ...then a half an hour later you're running Windows again.

    2. Re:Now running Rinux by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful

      "then a half an hour later you're running Windows again."

      Will Windows run on this "unique 64-bit CPU" made by this Chinese company? Does anyone know something about that?

    3. Re:Now running Rinux by Hal_Porter · · Score: 1

      Probably not. The Godson is a MIPS clone, and NT 4.0 worked on MIPS, but you need ARC firmware. My guess would be that this just runs Linux from flash, with not much in the way of firmware. Also, I'm not sure if Godson is a 100% MIPS clone, or if they left out the patented bits. It was described as "95% MIPS compatible", which makes me think that you probably need to tweak the compilers a bit to make it work.

      More importantly, what's the point of running NT 4.0 these days?

      --
      echo -e 'global _start\n _start:\n mov eax, 2\n int 80h\n jmp _start' > a.asm; nasm a.asm -f elf; ld a.o -o a;
    4. Re:Now running Rinux by Swave+An+deBwoner · · Score: 1

      EntropyXP writes:

      Now running Rinux

      There is an "L" sound in Mandarin, so your "subject" is curious, though the intent is clear.

    5. Re:Now running Rinux by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "There is an "L" sound in Mandarin"

      Are you suggesting it is pronounced "Mandalin"?

  28. BLX allegedly stole MIPS architecture by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Interesting

    It's easy to make stuff cheap when you are stealing IP from the USA. Thanks again China!

    http://www.eetimes.com/news/design/business/showAr ticle.jhtml?articleID=166402034

    1. Re:BLX allegedly stole MIPS architecture by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      MIPS designs have been public domain and fully documented for quite a long time. Why do you think they are popular in computer architechture classes?

    2. Re:BLX allegedly stole MIPS architecture by Russ+Nelson · · Score: 1

      Stole or copied? Are you one of those folks who think that every idea should be owned? Did they infringe copyright by duplicating masks? It sounds like not, since it's not 100% compatible. Did they infringe a patent? The EE Time article doesn't allege that. Trade secret? But you can only infringe a trade secret by getting it from someone who has it. You can't infringe a trade secret through independent reinvention. It's not likely to be a trademark infringement. You can say "MIPS-like" or "MIPS-compatible", because both of those terms acknowledge that the product *isn't* MIPS, and trademark infringement requires that you create confusion in the marketplace by using someone else's trademark to imply or claim that your product is approved by the trademark-holder. There's also trademark dilution, but that's harder to prove.

      --
      Don't piss off The Angry Economist
    3. Re:BLX allegedly stole MIPS architecture by ClamIAm · · Score: 1

      Regarding copyrights and such, I wonder whether this company will comply with the GPL. With the average person not understanding copyright licensing very well, they might not even get questioned.

    4. Re:BLX allegedly stole MIPS architecture by skwirlmaster · · Score: 1

      Well i'm not going to argue with your use of the word "stole" in regards to IP, so I'll use the term infringe.

      No, intellectual property laws in the US do not cover instruction sets (amd).

      However particular instructions can be implemented in such a way that the implementation can be patented. Of course the patent can be worded in such a way that those instructions cannot be implemented without requiring a license to that IP.

      The original MIPS I instruction set only had 4 functions that were covered by patents, and the Goodwin family of processors in question doesn't implement those instructions. I don't know about IP associated with 64bit MIPS so I won't comment about that.

      My point is that it is possible to implement an instruction set without infringing on IP. And besides the MIPS I instruction set was developed at a university (Stanford), not by a company, so the information was Free from the beginning.

      --
      My inner self is ineffable, so don't eff with me.
    5. Re:BLX allegedly stole MIPS architecture by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      One thing is whether they really stole something...

      Other thing is WHO cares?
      Some chinese worker spending $150 for a computer? - I think not.
      Chinese goverment? - Wanna make me laugh?
      The manufacturer of those computers? - Yeah, sure, they feel really guilty and ashamed. I can see even here how red they look in the face from blushing.

      SW patents, and IP is IMHO overrated in modern societies, and they will have really hard time to compete with those Asian countries who just simply don't care.

    6. Re:BLX allegedly stole MIPS architecture by iminplaya · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Thanks again China!

      Absolutely! They're putting stuff on the market that otherwise be locked down by the "owner". If China sets one good standard on the planet, it would be their present attitude towards IP law. Let's hope it spreads to other parts of the world. Then we can say China actually promoted freedom. Unfortunately, the WTO will have something to say about this. And it won't be good since China will bend over to appease them.

      --
      What?
  29. Video by torrap · · Score: 0, Redundant

    Here is a link to a good video from CeBIT 2006 http://video.google.com/videoplay?docid=-920346214 8706105599 I am intrested in purchasing many of these but they will not return any contact

    1. Re:Video by torrap · · Score: 1

      Since I got beat to the google video here is the source with available Hidef version. http://cebitvideo.com/?p=20#comments

  30. Too bad it does run Linux by SlappyBastard · · Score: 2, Funny
    Because a key selling point for any product is to see how long it takes to get Linux on it.

    If they really wanted to make a killing, they'd hamstring the machine to ensure that it could never run Linux, and then the company would make outlandish claims about how Linux will never run on their machine.

    Then, there would be a rush of people trying put whatver toaster oven version of Linux on the thing. Within weeks, the free publicity machine would splatter screen shots of those first beautiful lines of [FAILED] [OK] [OK] [FAILED] [DEAR GOD, WHAT DID YOU DO?]
    --
    I scream. You scream. I assume that means we're both acquainted with the problem. We proceed.
  31. Re:1 problem by neonprimetime · · Score: 1

    to clarify ... i was not denying the fact that techies would love / eat this up ... i was only saying that non-techy customers would not ...

  32. Re:1 problem by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Maybe, but it doesn't help that the average consumer will go "ZOMG the P4 has a number 4 times as much, and only costs twice as much for a full PC". Good luck getting it to sell to anything but the techno-geek crowd in the western world.

  33. brand Name? by lbmouse · · Score: 2, Funny

    OK...
      Communicator
    - Communist
    ----------------------
          Municator

    1. Re:brand Name? by flamingspinach · · Score: 1

      Sorry, but communicator - communist = cator-st :/

    2. Re:brand Name? by ichigo+2.0 · · Score: 1

      Municist?

    3. Re:brand Name? by humaniverse · · Score: 1

      look like another loser complains. - Once one can't compete, one would find some well known excuse.

    4. Re:brand Name? by corrosive_nf · · Score: 1

      and that is an anagram for CASTRO! OMG!

  34. Warning off letter by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    These guys better watch out for one of these letters. Ah, wait a minute -- they're in China, so, on past form, aren't they immune to American IPR?

  35. Old Proverb by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
    Confucius say:

    If one enough sheep in valley that river runs yellow, then wise man refrains from swimming in river.

  36. Performance claim probably spot on. by Toasterboy · · Score: 5, Informative

    I have an SGI Octane with dual MIPS R12k 300 mhz and it outperforms a P4 2ghz on floating point ops all the time. Integer performance isn't as good, but that's the way the things are built. Some of the reason it's faster at floating point than a much newer P4 is because each chip has 2MB cache, and MIPS chips have way more registers than intel+friends, but still...it's a ten year old machine.

    Even if the MIPS implementation these guys are using is dated and has a teensy cache, 400-600 mhz MIPS would be roughly in the ballpark of a P3... and 64-bit to boot. And have a lot more registers, which makes it easier to write fast code because you dont have to swap things out of your primary (what, four? =P) registers to do anything, like on Intel + friends.

    1. Re:Performance claim probably spot on. by Chandon+Seldon · · Score: 1

      The only thing I'd be afraid of is the fact that it uses a "subset" of the MIPS instruction set. It's not like MIPS is a wildly complex and hard to implement instruction set...

      --
      -- The act of censorship is always worse than whatever is being censored. Always.
    2. Re:Performance claim probably spot on. by mobby_6kl · · Score: 1

      Yeah, because fp performance is what's really important for home users.

    3. Re:Performance claim probably spot on. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Well you apparently have a magic pair of R12k CPUs, because at 300MHz one cannot compete with a 800MHz P3. A 2GHz P4 will have about three times the FP performance.

      Oh, what's that, you just lied through your teeth? And then rationalized by misunderstanding the differences in memory hierarchy and the number of registers present in the ISA rather than entries in the register file?! Who could have guessed!

      MIPS is an ISA and as such it only contributes to, and does not specify performance of the processor. Without detailed technical information about the microarchitecture or benchmarks, it's impossible to know how fast that it is.

    4. Re:Performance claim probably spot on. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      >> I have an SGI Octane with dual MIPS R12k 300 mhz and it
      >> outperforms a P4 2ghz on floating point

      Nope, not a chance. Even without SSE, a 2ghz p4 will beat the 12k by a large margin. With SSE the margin would approach 10x in favor of the pentium.

    5. Re:Performance claim probably spot on. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      you need to get out more, 'toasterboy'

    6. Re:Performance claim probably spot on. by Bert64 · · Score: 1

      Not hard to implement, but fighting a patent infringement case in court because you implemented patented instructions is a lot harder.

      --
      http://spamdecoy.net - free throwaway anonymous email - avoid spam!
    7. Re:Performance claim probably spot on. by Bert64 · · Score: 1

      The MIPS boxes are more balanced...
      A typical P4 will take a significant performance hit when it stalls the pipeline or has a cache miss, whereas the Octane is less likely to have a cache miss (bigger caches) and the penalty of going to main memory is lower...

      The Octane also has a better multiprocessing architecture, the entire system is based on a crossbar switch architecture (very similar to AMD hypertransport but came much earlier) so all the processors (the octane can theoretically take 4 cpus, but sgi never made cards for them supporting more than 2) the memory, and the IO slots.
      This is why MIPS systems have been scaled to thousands of processors, while x86 can only be clustered.

      --
      http://spamdecoy.net - free throwaway anonymous email - avoid spam!
    8. Re:Performance claim probably spot on. by iminplaya · · Score: 1

      ...but fighting a patent infringement case in court because you implemented patented instructions is a lot harder.

      Not if you're China. Until they become a WTO member, they can just tell the courts to take a hike. But since they're in the appeasement phase of the negotiations, anything could happen.

      --
      What?
  37. Re:Not that cheap: don't even have to factor curre by johnfink · · Score: 2, Informative
    No need for a computer monitor.
    Have you ever tried using a TV as a monitor using S-Video? If you're not using software specifically designed for it (MythTV/Media Center) then it's all but useless. The signal from S-Video is in some respects like a low resolution VGA signal, but it's very sloppy in comparison, smearing the pixels across a comparitively wide area. It's fine for graphics and very large print on things like buttons, but it just isnt' accurate enough to make legible text unless that text is pretty big.
  38. Re:Not that cheap: don't even have to factor curre by mspohr · · Score: 4, Informative
    Or you could just buy the LinspirePC from TigerDirect which includes a 2.4GHz Celeron, 256Meg, 40 Gig HD, CD-RW, network, integrated graphics and audio for $199.

    (Please restrain yourselves from flaming about Linspire, TigerDirect, Celeron, etc.... this IS a CHEAP machine. It does, however, show what can be done at the low end of the market.)

    --
    I don't read your sig. Why are you reading mine?
  39. Re:Not that cheap: don't even have to factor curre by HunterZ · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Plus, who can afford a TV with S-Video inputs but can't afford a low-end VGA monitor?

    --
    Arguing about vi versus Emacs is like arguing whether it's better to make fire by rubbing sticks or banging rocks.
  40. Tired of being cheap by fak3r · · Score: 1

    I'm tired of the 'hook' of Linux is that it's free -- it should be seen as an equal alternative; albeit one that is free/open and community supported. I'm sure this scares folks off, but to have those fears doused simply because something is cheap seems the wrong tactic. I remeber seeing those crappy 200$ eMachines PCs running some hacked up KDE desktop (that looked about 2 years out of date) at Fry's, and the whole thing was cheap. Cheap keyboard, cheap mouse, all onboard crap, cheap, cheap, cheap. Why not produce a reasonable box for home use? Look at how inexpensive some Dell's are, and they're not using just cheap crap, some of their components are good, and their case design has come a long way. Having them as an equal alternative to a Windows box would be my wish. Before I get the na-sayers, yes, they are equal for 80% of the population; they can surf the web, check email, listen to musak, whatever most of the ppl do...they don't need 14 kinds of cd burning software to choose from for example...Linux has all the apps they need. At that point it would fall to brand recognition, which many would still go with Windows, but I bet more would go for an alternative if they saw it as an equal value, and not just some cheap hacked together box. .02

  41. Re:Not that cheap: don't even have to factor curre by Tim+C · · Score: 1

    No, *you* can get that stuff for those prices.

    Can the Chinese people that this is actually intended for also do so?

  42. Red Office by JumperCable · · Score: 1, Insightful

    With China's policies on internet, I think using their system would be akin to using an OS designed by the CIA.

    1. Re:Red Office by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Actually Red Office seems to be a "modified" version of OpenOffice

  43. Re:Not that cheap: don't even have to factor curre by koweja · · Score: 1

    People here don't like TigerDirect? I love it. The rebates are annoying and Newegg is usually cheaper, but occationally TD is has the better deal. Since they have a different method of calculating shipping costs, it's cheaper to buy in bulk from TD than from NE.

  44. Chip Design Issues? by mckwant · · Score: 1

    From another article (which, predictably, I can't find), it sounded as if there are some issues with the processor design that keeps this processor from being marketed in the US. It's not really my area, but does anyone have insight on this issue?

    Other than that, I'm thinking we might be looking at the next Audrey or something. I'll never figure out why they don't put every piece of documentation on the web and open the box up to the hacker community. Seems straightforward to me, but I'm no marketer (thankfully).

    --
    ceci n'est pas un sig.
  45. Re:1 problem by adolfojp · · Score: 2, Insightful

    My first x86 computer was a 386 with 2 megs of ram and a 40 MB hard drive.

    I used it for word processing, spreadsheets, charts, databases, basic programming and even games!

    Our need for something faster is somewhat artificial. People don't need to have the latest and the greatest unless they want floating transparent rotating windows or to play duke nukem forever.

    Our perception of utility and function has been distorted by our voracious consumerism.

    By our logic and reasoning, if we were ever visited by a more advanced civilization, all of our technology would become obsolete instantly. The fact that it worked right up to that moment is completely irrelevant.

    -----------
    I sometimes drive my 17 year old car for fun and it works great. It is looked down upon by society, but it does the same basic tasks that the newer cars on the street can.

  46. Re:Not that cheap: don't even have to factor curre by mrchaotica · · Score: 1

    You could also by the same thing at Fry's for the same price. Therefore, there's no need to restrain yourselves from flaming about TigerDirect, at least! ; )

    --

    "[Regarding the 'cloud,'] ownership was what made America different than Russia." -- Woz

  47. Re:Not that cheap: don't even have to factor curre by everphilski · · Score: 1

    A chinese company can. That's the point. This computer isn't cheap.

  48. products specs by Janek+Kozicki · · Score: 4, Informative

    Is it so difficult for the article submitter, to provide a link to the actual product ?

    --
    #
    #\ @ ? Colonize Mars
    #
    1. Re:products specs by Janek+Kozicki · · Score: 1

      hey! I think it's skype, or something very similar. From their website there is a link to some videos, pick this one, scroll forward to 10:06.

      --
      #
      #\ @ ? Colonize Mars
      #
  49. As Compared to This? by Illbay · · Score: 1
    http://shop1.outpost.com/search?cat=-46612&pType=p Display

    $270 American vs. $150? Linspire vs. whatever PRC government-approved distro this is?

    Big deal (or not, really).

    --
    Any technology distinguishable from magic is insufficiently advanced.
    1. Re:As Compared to This? by DigitalRaptor · · Score: 1

      Yes, but that won't fit in my dashboard or in my ATV cargo-box.

      The Municator would be ideal for a cheap car PC, or for a GPS mapping box I want to build for my ATV.

      At $149 I'm ready to buy one and see how easy it is hack / alter.

      --
      Lose Weight and Feel Great with Isagenix
  50. The sheep of things to come by FishandChips · · Score: 2, Insightful

    The box from YellowSheepRiver may sound like a bit of an April Fool - too bad it's not called the Munchicator and boots from a .baa file since we are talking sheep - but what we're seeing is another early step from the Chinese economy towards designing, manufacturing and assembling all its own IT stuff right down to the microchips. This may not sound much right now, but it sure will before long. The folks at Intel, AMD and other Wesern chip houses, Dell, etc., must feel a little queasier every time they see an announcement like this. I guess the same may eventually be true on the software side. The box is shipping Linux, but then didn't Microsoft recently ask the Chinese authorities to stop producing naked boxes with no OS on board? I guess the Chinese are now doing exactly what Microsoft asked.

    --
    Las qué passoun
    tournoun pas maï
    1. Re:The sheep of things to come by hownowbrowncow · · Score: 1

      >The box is shipping Linux, but then didn't Microsoft recently ask the Chinese authorities to stop producing naked boxes with no OS on board? I guess the Chinese are now doing exactly what Microsoft asked. Somewhere a chair is thrown. And McNealy sniggers.

    2. Re:The sheep of things to come by hownowbrowncow · · Score: 1

      The box is shipping Linux, but then didn't Microsoft recently ask the Chinese authorities to stop producing naked boxes with no OS on board? I guess the Chinese are now doing exactly what Microsoft asked.

      Somewhere a chair is thrown. And McNealy sniggers.

      Sorry about the formatting.

      But it really is a good move to shove off MS's constant encouraging of organisations and governments to lock themselves into MS for life.

  51. Can you find it anywhere? by xenocide2 · · Score: 5, Interesting

    Apparently this is somewhere between 2 months to half a year old. Someone on digg was trying to get ahold of these for mass purchase and failed to get any replies. I haven't seen any pictures floating around of this thing in the wild online. You can't buy them anywhere. Multiplied by the fact that BLX hasn't acquired a MIPS liscence (their CPU likely borrows certain patents originally designed for MIPS, given how similar it is), I doubt you'll see many of these floating around on eBay. Some theorize it's a grandstand by the Chinese government to demonstrate how much better they are than other local countries such as Korea, Taiwan or Japan. Plausible, but I suspect this is just the first visible vaporware company out of China.

    In summary, it's not a 150 dollar device until you can acquire one somewhere at that price.

    --
    I Browse at +4 Flamebait

    Open Source Sysadmin

    1. Re:Can you find it anywhere? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      China doesn't respect US or international patents generally and since their makret isn't the us, they have no reason to obtain licensing. Stop thinking like a facist, United States pig and start seeing the world for what it is. We lose.

    2. Re:Can you find it anywhere? by Crayon+Kid · · Score: 1

      If it's vaporware, the Chinese gov would have to be in on it, and I don't see the purpose. You don't just pull cheap tricks like this in China and get away with it.

      --
      i ate crayons when i was a kid and now i have two braincells and the blue ones taste nicer
    3. Re:Can you find it anywhere? by wew · · Score: 1

      This processor was discussed on slashdot in July last year. They haven't implemented the parts of the MIP architecture that are patented, so patents shouldn't be an issue.

      See http://hardware.slashdot.org/article.pl?sid=05/07/ 26/0029224

  52. Re:Not that cheap: don't even have to factor curre by Chandon+Seldon · · Score: 1

    So... you can get the same machine for $50 more with one difference: A Celeron instead of the non-intel processor. If the almost-MIPS thing has the power benifits that I'd expect it to have, then for the rural chinese market it could easily be the better deal.

    --
    -- The act of censorship is always worse than whatever is being censored. Always.
  53. (Yawn) by danwesnor · · Score: 0, Troll

    I'm tired of seeing these el-cheapo computers heralded as an achievement. X Box costs $150, PS2 is $130. Both of those systems could run linux probably as well as or better than this box.

  54. very interesting by MORTAR_COMBAT! · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Looks like it would make a decent little headless server, for http/imap/ftp/etc. The Godson-3 (successor to this Godson-2) chip plans look even more interesting. basically take a 4-pipeline 64-bit superscalar MIPS chip (Godson-2) and put 4 cores on a chip.

    http://www.infoworld.com/article/05/08/01/HNgodson 2_1.html

    Assuming, though, that legal and patent issues don't prevent it being sourced in US-bound computers and components...

    --
    MORTAR COMBAT!
  55. Re:1 problem by smithmc · · Score: 1

      It'll be insanely tough to convince customers that a 600mhz, 256mb ram linux machine is equivalent or better than a 2.0ghz, 512mb winbox

    Why should they even try? It's a Linux box, that costs $150. In parts of the world where $150 is a considerable amount of money, I would think that would be a pretty strong selling point compared to a $2K dual-core SLI Windows machine.

    --
    Downmodding is the refuge of the weak. Don't downmod, make a better argument!
  56. Re:Not that cheap: don't even have to factor curre by david.given · · Score: 2, Insightful
    Plus, who can afford a TV with S-Video inputs but can't afford a low-end VGA monitor?

    People who already have a TV?

  57. Is this really so bad? by frostoftheblack · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Am I the only one that doesn't exactly see this as a terrible thing? I don't think it would be a good idea for familes or individuals to have this as their main computer, but think of the other options. Think of public libraries: dozens and dozens of computers where people just want to do Internet research, nothing else. Card catalogues where the only software the computer runs is either a browser or a card database. Think of public kiosks that could be made with free internet access. I'm sure the thing is a piece of crap to run a lot of software, but if you just want a system that runs basic applications (especially a browser), I don't see anything wrong with this.

    --
    Do not mark in this space. For official office use only.
  58. Re:Not that cheap: don't even have to factor curre by LWATCDR · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Yes but with this computer all the money is staying in China! China sees no reason to give billions of dollars of it's money to the US for Windows or for Intel/AMD cpus.
    They see no need to be tied to the X86 ISA.
    It makes a lot of sense in that it helps China become more independent of the West and possible make the west more dependant on China.
    You want to sell systems to the Chinese government? Someday it may have to have a Chinese CPU in it.

    --
    See my blog http://ilovecookes.blogspot.com/ for light hearted technical information.
  59. Re:1 problem by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    It'll be insanely tough to convince customers that a 600mhz, 256mb ram linux machine is equivalent or better than a 2.0ghz, 512mb winbox

    I don't think they're trying to do that. A lot of people are more concerned with cost than performance.

  60. Re:Not that cheap: don't even have to factor curre by Tim+C · · Score: 1

    But can they buy them in sufficient quantities? You quote $10 for a Pentium 3, but they no longer manufacture them; how long before the supply dries up? How long before that before people realise that they're suddenly worth something to someone, and jack the price up?

  61. Performance of Municator vs. VIA Epia by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
    VIA has been producing their Epia series of small form factor, all-in-one (processor included) boards within a similiar price range for some time now--some of them are even fanless and are available for under $100 US.

    I'm curious to know how the PC mentioned in TFA will perform compared to those of VIA's current offerings.

  62. YellowSheepRiver? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Apparently downstream from the semiconductor foundaries...

  63. Re:1 problem by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Agreed. If the cheapest pc the chinese can make is $150 there's no way anyone else can make a $100 laptop.

  64. You Guys Miss the Point by jtvisona · · Score: 1

    This isn't about the fact that it's vaporware, because that doesn't make a difference to the Chinese people. Let's face it, the entire government has failed to deliver the republic to the people in a country named the PRC. And it's not about patent issues. Don't like our IP laws, we'll just crash your economy silly Americans. (They could if we weren't busy trading our country into even deeper debt to them...) And it's not about showing they're building IT from the ground up there, because eventually, that's a given. WHAT IT'S ABOUT IS laying the ground work for distributing PC's to everyone in China with the intent of including a distributed client to calculate the empirical formula of the perfect sweet sauce for spring egg rolls. Failure to recognize this means I have to believe that Slapdot is slipping... :(

  65. Ambitious by suv4x4 · · Score: 1, Troll

    another ambitious 'inexpensive computer' project

    You know, purely based on context, the meaning of the word "ambitious" starts shifting to a new meaning of "brave but clueless".

    Why would I need a computer based on non-Intel chip for? Is there any software for it? The article says we'll do it to say no to WinTel. I need to buy a $150 worthless piece of hardware to say no to WinTel.

    Are they targeting kindergardeners or something?

    That's like selling cheap Internet that's however not Internet so you can't connect to any site or anything.

    They claim their chip performs like P3, that kinda doesn't matter since what will I benchmark it with. Photoshop? 3DSMax? AutoCAD? Ah no, none of them will run on an exotic 64-bit chip under Linux.

    They run on a WinTel...

    1. Re:Ambitious by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      Why would I need a computer based on non-Intel chip for? Is there any software for it?


      This is the *SINGLE BIGGEST ADVANTAGE* of Linux and open-source software.


      Since the compiler (gcc) works (as proven by the fact that Linux compiled), ALL THESE SOFTWARE PACKAGES are available - including firewall software used by Cisco, supercomputing software used by most of the top 500 supercomputers, office software used by Munich and Massachusetts, rendering software used by ILM, etc.


      Of course if you want 16-or-32-bit windows software you're best off running it on a 16-or-32-bit windows machine. But if you're trying to solve an actual problem rather than run one particular brand of software, you'll easily find what you need for this system.

  66. Re:1 problem by 0x0000 · · Score: 1
    who the heck will be writing compatible drivers for this sort of system for us geeks to add video cards to, connect MP3 players to

    I would expect video card drivers to be produced for this platform as video cards get into the same pricing bracket w.r.t. video cards that this machine is w.r.t. PCs generally - I would expect this to be true not just for video cards, but any sort of add on devices that require drivers.

    As far as MP3 players go, most of those I've run across (not many, perhaps, but the ones I have seen) don't require drivers - the simply map as a USB drive and files can be copied back and forth. Some of the USB cameras behave the same way. If the device is made to those kinds of standards, there's no real need for a driver.

    --
    "The Internet is made of cats."
  67. Re:Not that cheap: don't even have to factor curre by mwilli · · Score: 1

    Where can you get a motherboard for $25 with onboard video, sound, and the works?? You're looking at at least $75-$100 just for that.

    --
    My sig beat up your sig.
  68. Interesting Uses by Postmaster+General · · Score: 3, Insightful

    These things aren't actually as crappy as most everyone here seems to believe they are.

    I challenge anyone here to actually go out and purchase the equivalent, new (not refurbished/used,) components and put it together into such a small footprint as this thing, with the ability to power it by lithium-ion battery, for under $150 USD.

    The most appealing spec to me is the size. This thing is t-i-n-y. With that in mind, here are a couple uses I have thought of for them:

    1. Car PC (media player, engine performance monitor, GPS navigation.) You can roll your own Car PC's these days, but for $150? ... good luck.

    2. Home automation controller (have a touchscreen monitor mounted into a recessed area in a wall, with this thing inside a small space, which would also be recessed into the wall, under the monitor.)

  69. YellowSheepRiver by loconet · · Score: 3, Funny

    A much more appropriate name would have been YellowCheapRiver. Ha Ha.,

    Thank you. I'll be here all week.

    --
    [alk]
    1. Re:YellowSheepRiver by TheGratefulNet · · Score: 1

      the problem is, half an hour after you boot the system, you need to boot it again...

      (I'm here all week, as well).

      --

      --
      "It is now safe to switch off your computer."
  70. Yeah, but... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Can you install XP on it?

  71. Driver Support by CookieJago74 · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Correct me if I'm wrong, of course, but I would have thought that the different style of CPU would make things difficult in terms of driver support, and maybe breaking existing applications for obscure reasons. Though the Chinese will obviously test it thoroughly, I can still forsee architecture problems.

    1. Re:Driver Support by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful

      Not if they are open source drivers. Recompiling them will sort that out.

      If there is hardware that doesn't have OSS drivers, they either won't go in, get reverse-engineered or china are making them and will take the tech.

  72. What are the market drivers? by ivoras · · Score: 1
    Don't forget what population is the market drivers in the IT industry everywhere - it's not gamers, for the most part it isn't even home users. It's goverment and businesses. And this segment doesn't require high powered CPU's, memory or video cards - they need a computer to do their business on.

    I doubt the target market for such cheep computers is families at home - as many people pointed out, it'd take 4-6 months pay for them. It's businesses that will make most use of this hardware, and in bulk orders of hundreds per company.

    --
    -- Sig down
  73. Every opportunity has risks. The future is here. by twitter · · Score: 0, Troll
    There is a danger that GNU/Linux will get a bad name because it mostly installed on very cheap systems.

    Not if they work. Unless the hardware is complete crap, it will work. The same factories are already making reliable electronic devices, including PCs that everyone else rebrands. If they don't work, the reputation will be cured by the next $100 device that does work.

    This is just the first of the cheap machines. There will be many more and the price point won't support anything but free software. As long as they don't have DRM dongels built in, all sorts of things can be made with them.

    imagine Ubuntu on all Dell, HP ... systems.

    I can do that myself already but I don't unless I haul it out of the trash or a used computer shop.

    Those major brands have major problems and repair records show that people are happier with cheaper hardware. While 3/4 of all PCs are white boxes, the majority of computers that show up at the computer store are major brand. It may be that major brands are brought to the computer store because people think their computer is worth repairing, where the white box owner just buys a new one. In any case, the legions of people working on both home and office PCs indicates a serious reliability problem.

    Dell, HP and others will follow or die.

    --

    Friends don't help friends install M$ junk.

  74. Sun Rays by rjschwarz · · Score: 1

    I'm kind of surprised the Chinese government hasn't cut a deal with Sun to buy a boatload of Sun Ray clients. They could give them away to their universities and people ($100 a pop) and look like good guys while promoting computer literacy, helping the economy, and avoiding Microsoft. They'd have a better/cheaper upgrade path since the clients rarely ever have to be upgraded and it since everything is done server side they could spy on/censor their people and their people's surfing habits far easier than they could with a million desktops.

  75. For an Entire Village by Nazmun · · Score: 1

    So these machines might not be affordable for rural families, but what if an organization funds 1-4 of these per village. Much better then not having any computing.

    --
    Hmmm... Pie...
  76. Day Late and a dollar short on this /. by gillrock · · Score: 1

    This was featured on Rocketboom on March 23, 2006.
    You can view the clip here --> http://www.rocketboom.com/vlog/archives/2006/03/rb _06_mar_23.html
    This is old hat.

    --
    "...the shortest distance between two points may be straight line, but it is by no means the most interesting."
  77. Interesting Name. by sammy+baby · · Score: 1

    "Yellow Sheep River."

    Well, I guess it beats "Sheep Yellow River," which can sometimes be found downhill from where large numbers of sheep are grazing.

  78. Wintel? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    > Chinese Company Produces $150 Linux PC

    Chinese Company also Produces $150 Pirate Windows XP PC

  79. Re:Not that cheap: don't even have to factor curre by tepples · · Score: 1

    Have you ever tried using a TV as a monitor using S-Video?

    Yes I do use my 27" TV as an arcade-size monitor for StepMania.

    If you're not using software specifically designed for it (MythTV/Media Center) then it's all but useless.

    This is a new platform. Software will be specifically designed for it.

    it just isnt' accurate enough to make legible text unless that text is pretty big.

    Text at 14 point in a suitable font shouldn't be too hard to read.

  80. I disagree by catch23 · · Score: 4, Insightful

    This is extremely similar to Seiko's crappy watches, Toyota's crappy cars, or Intel's crappy computers back in the 70's & 80's. Clayton Christiensen calls it disruptive technologies. You can read more about this phenomenon in his book, "The Innovator's Dilemma". Dr. Christiensen gave a talk at OSCON2005 (I think) that roughly described the contents of the book if you're too lazy to read the whole book, download the podcast at itconversations.com (called Capturing the Upside) and see how cheap crappy (yet decent) products eventually turn the tide. Companies in the past have avoided the cheap low end market simply because they don't want their name associated with it, and plus the margins at the high end sector is usually much more appealing to investors. Dr. Christiensen's ideas were one of the reasons Andy Grove created the Intel Celeron brand to compete with the extremely low end market.

    1. Re:I disagree by kimvette · · Score: 1

      re: "Seiko's crappy watches,"

      ITYM "Timex's crappy watches", or "Casio's crappy watches" because Seiko watches in general are not crappy, especially compared to their competition within the same price range or less.

      --
      The Christian Right is Neither (Christian nor right). See: Matthew 23, Matthew 25, Ezekiel 16:48-50
    2. Re:I disagree by catch23 · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Uhm, that was the point. AMD & Cyrix both had "crappy" low end processors that Intel really didn't care about because their more expensive processors had higher margins, but they did not see that AMD & Cyrix were producing the so-called disruptive technology that would could force the upper market to disappear. For example, DEC made minicomputers that were better and better but never focused on the personal computer which was significantly underpowered at the time of introduction. Had they focused on creating a separate brand to compete with the lower end "crappy product market" they may have saved their higher end market as well. If you look at Toyota in the early 1980's, they created crappy cars that only college students would want to own. The expensive automakers took no notice because these cars were not competing in the same price markets as theirs. And of course, if you look at Toyota today, they've got expensive brands like Lexus.

      Back to your original point, Seiko, Casio, and Timex all had crappy watches when they brought their first products to market. Had companies like Rolex created a new low-end brand to compete with the low end market, Seiko would have probably not grown to the size that it is today. Such business strategies are discussed in Dr. Christiensen's new book, "The Innovator's Solution". It's the same reason Intel created a separate company/brand to focus on the Celeron product to compete with AMD & Cyrix. At the time, AMD & Cyrix were eating up Intel at the low end and Intel took no notice because it actually made their high end products produce greater margins. The instant Intel started competing at the low end, they basically forced brands like Cyrix into non-existence (bought out by AMD).

    3. Re:I disagree by kimvette · · Score: 1
      Back to your original point, Seiko, Casio, and Timex all had crappy watches when they brought their first products to market.


      They all had crappy products in the beginning because Japan was barely out of being a third-world country and we nuked two of their larger cities back to the stone age. All of Japan's exports were crap in the beginning - and most took American consultants' advice, thought long term rather than America's quick-buck quarterly-results thinking, and shifted to building reliable products as soon as they could afford to.

      Seiko quickly became a high-end commodity watch (they were one of the first to bring reliable LCD watches to the mass market) and introduced a lower-tier line, which too soon became a high end watch (I just bought the Pulsar PM7001 after comparing about five flight computer watch lines (Seiko, Pulsar, Citizen, and a company which produces ONLY pilots' watches, in two lines) - Pulsar had the best features, even compared to the upscale Seiko version, and every bit as good of a warranty). I hate chunky watches (and sent that and other feedback to Seiko) but unfortunately you can't get features without size.

      Casio and Timex watches? Both are still cheap crap. They go for the volume market where people buy disposable goods and focus more on price rather than quality.

      Had companies like Rolex created a new low-end brand to compete with the low end market, Seiko would have probably not grown to the size that it is today.


      As far as Rolex is concerned, I don't think you will ever see them dilute their name by moving downmarket - just like you'll never see a Ferrari or Porsche econobox (everyone knew Ferrari was a Fiat company and Porsche had close ties with VW but they were very careful to keep the lines distinct in both cases - to avoid brand dilution). Lotus did that (moved downmarket and forsook the upmarket customer) for a couple of years when they killed off the Esprit, offering only the Elise and the Exige, and look where they ended up - scrambling to put the Esprit back into production because they lost an entry in the performance car market (I've never seen the new Exige or Elise on the road but see quite a few Esprits).

      If Rolex were to do anything downmarlet, it'd be similar to what Lotus did when they designed the Lotus X100 (the Toyota MR2) - they'd either partner with another company and license engineering, or they'd create a subsidiary with a different name and limit the public perception of any ties between the companies. It's different from what Seiko did with Pulsar - they actually capitalize on the two being different lines from the same company because neither line skimps on quality. No, they're not Rolex, but they do not strive to be.
      --
      The Christian Right is Neither (Christian nor right). See: Matthew 23, Matthew 25, Ezekiel 16:48-50
    4. Re:I disagree by catch23 · · Score: 1

      As far as Rolex is concerned, I don't think you will ever see them dilute their name by moving downmarket - just like you'll never see a Ferrari or Porsche econobox (everyone knew Ferrari was a Fiat company and Porsche had close ties with VW but they were very careful to keep the lines distinct in both cases - to avoid brand dilution). Lotus did that (moved downmarket and forsook the upmarket customer) for a couple of years when they killed off the Esprit, offering only the Elise and the Exige, and look where they ended up - scrambling to put the Esprit back into production because they lost an entry in the performance car market (I've never seen the new Exige or Elise on the road but see quite a few Esprits).

      I really don't want to comment further, because it does not make sense if you have not read "Innovator's Solution" by Dr. Christiensen. Rolex would never dilute their name by releasing a lower end product. What they would do is create a separate company with a separate brand to combat the lower market. These ideas & concepts are not mine, they are ideas of Dr. Christensen, a professor at the Harvard Business school. If you feel his ideas are inadequate, please complain to him instead, but please before you complain, read his book so you know what's going on here.

  81. Re:1 problem by Mister+Whirly · · Score: 1

    Hey, they gotta do something with that warehouse full of Speak 'n Spells....

    --
    "But this one goes to 11!"
  82. Re:Not that cheap: don't even have to factor curre by AnotherBlackHat · · Score: 1

    Or for $180 you can get one with an AMD geode.
    http://www.netaffilia.com/ad/electronics/frys/i/20 06/02/17/15325.html

  83. most computer users by Ivan+Matveitch · · Score: 1

    do not venture far from the web browser

    1. Re:most computer users by suv4x4 · · Score: 1

      do not venture far from the web browser

      Explain that to the said computer users: no movie sites, no game sites, no interactive sites, no web games.

      Why? Because there's no Flash for this CPU architecture and there won't be. You can bet computer users care about that.

    2. Re:most computer users by ratboy666 · · Score: 2, Informative

      Why is this a problem?

      First, applications ARE available on "alternate" (from your point of view) platforms. Lots of applications. Photo editing, CAD, Office applications. Instant messaging, email and web browsing applications. Gaming, video conferencing, diagraming and project management applications. Financial, programming, and database applications.

      Second, there will be a "flash rendering" component available. Start with "gnash".

      Third, QEMU will be able to run Intel binaries, where it is otherwise impossible. Indeed, I have used QEMU to run Wine.

      The biggest risk item is running nVidia (and other) binary drivers. If the basic i/o with the box is sufficient, then this isn't a concern (for the target audience) either.

      The reason that *I* won't be using one of these is that it provides no value proposition for me. But I may rework applications to run on this platform. A potential audience of millions or tens of millions, or, potentially a billion simply cannot be ignored.

      Again, this is not a "Wintel" platform; from that perspective it fails. But that is not the target.

      Ratboy

      --
      Just another "Cubible(sic) Joe" 2 17 3061
    3. Re:most computer users by suv4x4 · · Score: 1

      "Second, there will be a "flash rendering" component available. Start with "gnash".

      You're kidding yourself, there's no open source player in existence that plays current flash content. Gnash supports a modest ubset of Flash 7. A subset means the majority of Flash 7 files won't work.

      The current version is 8, which is vastly improved, and in 3 months 9 will be out, which a rewritten VM.

      Gnash or any other effort can never catch up.

    4. Re:most computer users by ratboy666 · · Score: 1

      So your contention is that because FLASH 8 and 9 will only be available on INTEL/WINDOWS (maybe MAC OS X) and no other application can possibly "catch up" that ALL home platforms must use INTEL/WINDOWS?

      FLASH 7 and 9 are the most important part of the "computing experience" for you?

      Ratboy

      --
      Just another "Cubible(sic) Joe" 2 17 3061
    5. Re:most computer users by suv4x4 · · Score: 1

      So your contention is that because FLASH 8 and 9 will only be available on INTEL/WINDOWS

      It's available for PowerPC and Intel on a set of Linux distribution, OSX, BSD and Windows.
      What it's not available on is ane xtoci 64-bit chip that Adobe will certainly not care about.

      FLASH 7 and 9 are the most important part of the "computing experience" for you?

      I thought we've established that people will use those for e-mail and browsing. Even if Flash isn't that relevant to the computing experience, it's pretty relevant, in 2006, to the browsing experience of a consumer user.

  84. Lets sum it all up: by gentimjs · · Score: 1

    Ok, lets sum up the arguments:
    1) The specs suck. 2) It doesnt need big specs because the target market is lower/middle class in China that dont currently own a PC. 3) Linux will effect it poorly somehow, or it will poorly effect Linux. 4) Its a no-brainer for a Chinese budget PC to use Linux, since the CPPRC has been pushing for a domestic IT industry based around Linux/FOSS for several years now. 5) Its probably based off of that "Dragon" mips chip we heard about a year or two ago. 6) Could be good in other parts of the world for a "thin client" type station or simple 4th grader net terminal... so when the kiddo breaks it, its no big deal. 7) OMFG CHINA COMMUNIST EVIL! FREE TIBET! BASH THE COMMIES AND THIER EVIL RISC BASED HERESY! 8) Poor people in China dont need this, they need $CONSUMER_GOOD_X 9) This cant compete with Dell. 10) Nothing to see here, move along.

  85. Re:Red Office -- You mean SELinux? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    You mean SELinux? wait thats NSA not CIA

  86. Municator? by suv4x4 · · Score: 0, Redundant

    Municator? Did they mean communicator but were too cheap to hire a translator?

    Apart from the cheap jokes, I wonder if that cheap PC will still be cheap if we tag on the cheap monitor, cheap keyboard, mouse, and of course a pair of cheap stereo speakers on it.

  87. Media players? by houghi · · Score: 1

    Will it include a legal mediaplayer and recorder for mp3, dvd, avi and what not?

    --
    Don't fight for your country, if your country does not fight for you.
  88. This is good by iminplaya · · Score: 1

    The Chinese are getting fully licensed computers. I'll bet that's not what Microsoft was hoping for when the Chinese made that promise :-) And not only that, they're using a superior chip to the Intel/AMD kludge. Unlike a certain American company that switched. It looks like soon the Chinese will be setting the standards for tech and civil rights(that's not good).

    --
    What?
    1. Re:This is good by Tolkien · · Score: 1
      The Chinese are getting fully licensed [slashdot.org] computers. I'll bet that's not what Microsoft was hoping for when the Chinese made that promise :-) And not only that, they're using a superior chip to the Intel/AMD kludge. Unlike a certain American company that switched. It looks like soon the Chinese will be setting the standards for tech and civil rights [chinapost.com.tw](that's not good).

      Y'know, I realized when I re-read the article you link to, something that hadn't occurred to me the first time I read that article.

      The Chinese government probably decided to force fully-licensed OSs on manufacturers in hopes that it would force them into installing Linux, rather than Windows, to keep their prices low and competitive. Since Linux is free, it'd save manufacturers millions (understatedly). All the manufacturer would have to do is include instructions with their products that explain how to replace the pre-installed Linux with Windows (sold seperately, hah), if they so choose.

    2. Re:This is good by Ritchie70 · · Score: 1
      All the "civil rights" article you linked to really says is that the protester was charged with some stuff, which I believe are all misdemeanors, and that the charges weren't immediately dismissed by the judge.

      She wasn't even locked up, she's been released pending further court actions.

      Do you think China lets their protesters wander around free while their judicial system considers their rights? I somehow doubt it.

      --
      The preferred solution is to not have a problem.
    3. Re:This is good by iminplaya · · Score: 1

      The Chinese government probably decided to force fully-licensed OSs on manufacturers in hopes that it would force them into installing Linux...

      I don't believe they care about low prices, operating systems, and such as much as they are just trying to cash in on some of that WTO bounty. If they want to be a member, they're going to have to "play ball". From the looks of things, the WTO will be writing a new Chinese constitution. The kind of operating system on the computer is irrelevent. They're trying to build a credit industry to acquire a large population of wage slaves to provide low cost labor for all those new investors coming in. However, I am very pleased to see that they don't use Intel's junk. Through this, we might actually real competition and innovation on the hardware side of things. Maybe, if they keep the IP carpetbaggers away(no chance of that with the WTO looking over their shoulders), they can revive the Alpha chip. As it is now, we are still using 1970's tech. Smaller yes, better no. And Linux might get a nice boost...at least until SCO opens an office over there.

      --
      What?
    4. Re:This is good by iminplaya · · Score: 1

      It only a matter of degree. Simply showing her the door would have been sufficient, but evidently, the gov't now considers our freedoms to be an embarrassment. Today they let them go. Tomorrow, I doubt it. The fact that she was charged with anything and that we aren't upset about it, shows the degradation of permitted essential freedoms. I didn't say that we are as bad as China, but we are definitely headed in that direction.

      --
      What?
  89. Re:Not that cheap: don't even have to factor curre by kiatoa · · Score: 0, Troll

    Someday it may have to have a Chinese CPU in it

    I don't know what it is but when I saw "Chinese CPU" I just couldn't help somehow imagining a CPU with asian physical features and trouble handling the letter "r" in strings. Someone with a talent for art could have a field day with that line.

    --
    90% of the wealth is in 2% of the pockets. Bummer to be in the majority.
  90. and by Ivan+Matveitch · · Score: 1

    it's a much better idea to buy a nice monitor and a dirt cheap computer.

  91. No, it's not that slow. by twitter · · Score: 0, Troll
    Is it so slow that when you watch american kung fu flicks (chuck norris) they automagically get the "out of sync english voiceover" effect?

    Only if Bill Gates tries to port Windoze and WMV to it. I've never had sync problems with xine like that, even on a 233 MHz PII. This machine should work as well as a PIII and that's good enough to play movies and do other things at the same time. That S video will be nice to have.

    --

    Friends don't help friends install M$ junk.

    1. Re:No, it's not that slow. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      Bill Gates tries to port Windoze [...] I've never had sync problems with xine like that, even on a 233 MHz PII

      ROFL!

  92. Could also be good for GNU/linux by Kanaka+Kid · · Score: 1

    There are many university graduate programmers in China that work for about $12 to $15 per day. When I used to work with Chinese graduate students, I was impressed with their ability and cleverness at working with low spec hardware and hacking software. Considering the value of the computer to a worker ($150 being between one and four months wages for shop clerks and factory workers), the problems encountered by the buyers of such computers would increase the need for GNU/Linux technical consultants. Combine this with the push by Microsoft and others for China to improve its IP protection, the Chinese government's mandate that all computers be shipped with an OS, the 90% software piracy rate in China and the $150 box becomes a reasonable--and legal--alternative to Wintel computing.

  93. Depends on usage by Werrismys · · Score: 1

    My 250MHz, 64M RAM Linux RISC machine outdoes wintel boxes in many areas. For example, checking RSS feeds and reading eBooks while taking a dump at work. 770 rules. My TI-84 outdid 3GHz wintel boxes for doing quick calcs (1 second boot time).

    --
    'Once scientists, even the dim-witted social scientists, get muzzled, the Western Civilization is finished.' - oldhack
  94. And watch out where the huskies go [N/T] by mobby_6kl · · Score: 1

    N/T

    1. Re:And watch out where the huskies go [N/T] by RalphTheWonderLlama · · Score: 1

      Nanook a noo nooo

      --
      simple, fast homepage with your links: http://www.ngumbi.com/
  95. Cool name, YSR-639 by twitter · · Score: 1
    Thanks for the link, I was too lazy to look it up.

    All I could think when I saw the specs was YowSeR, YowSer, YowSer! The Mac Mini purchase just got put off indefinitely.

    --

    Friends don't help friends install M$ junk.

    1. Re:Cool name, YSR-639 by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
  96. lol by Ivan+Matveitch · · Score: 1

    hahah regulating gnome or kde

  97. Chinese middle class by peter303 · · Score: 1

    China has an upper class and middle class of about the same numbers as the US - 25 million and 200 million, respectively. But it has a huge poor farmer and urban labor lower class- thereabouts 800-1000 million.
    If you restrict the discussion to the middle class, they are probably making about $10,000 in equivalent US purchasing power- about quarter US median income. That number is a little dicey, because economic sectors vary widely and the Chinese currency is assumed artificially lower than free market price by 50-100%.
    I try to get Beijing condo prices out of visitor-owners. China has been replacing traditional housing with condo-towers for some years. I heard numbers of RMB 10,000 / meter2, whihc is about $100 / sqft US. A starter condo is about 50 meters or $50,000. It works out to five years salary of average middle class- not wholly out of line with US middle class housing.

    1. Re:Chinese middle class by anandsr · · Score: 1

      These condo's must really be inside the city, or else Beijing is way more expensive then Delhi. I spent just 40,000$ for a house (ground floor of a three floor building) in a suburb of built up area of 1500sqft, ie around 140m2, not including the front and back lawn. Ofcourse that was in early 2003 and now the prices have more than doubled, ie around 100,000$.

  98. Introducing: the $30 computer! by suv4x4 · · Score: 0, Redundant

    I've two of them here, and full of them all over the world: Celeron 500Mhz (second hand, apparently), floppy 15 GB Disk, 128 RAM, 100MBps LAN, USB and so on, OEM XP Home.

    For total of $80, I can throw in a 15 inch CRT, keyboard mouse and speakers.

    So what, does that make me a "yet another ambitious cheap computer" project initiator or I just have more common sense that the rest of the world.

    Why is everybody afraid of second hand electronics?

  99. Re:Not that cheap: don't even have to factor curre by HunterZ · · Score: 1

    None of my TVs have S-Video inputs. I have 3 CRT NTSC TVs at home, ranging in size from 13" to 29" and in age from 5-10 years. Two of them have composite inputs, one only has cable RF.

    Maybe new TVs come standard with S-Video now, but as I said a low-end VGA monitor would be just as cheap and offer at least double the resolution.

    --
    Arguing about vi versus Emacs is like arguing whether it's better to make fire by rubbing sticks or banging rocks.
  100. Re:1 problem by yog · · Score: 1

    The $100 laptop project is being developed by a non-profit organization and is not intended to make a profit. That cuts out some percentage of markup--admittedly not a huge difference, since hardware tends to have slim margins, but still a difference. It is also innovative technically; they are using a dramatically less expensive LCD display.

    "Realistic" is a fairly arbitrary term that means little in the context of an altruistic project like the $100 laptop initiative. If you want to be realistic, stop giving food to starving people, and Darwinian principles will prevail. However, compassionate people are not "realistic" in that sense.

    I think the Chinese $150 PC is a nice idea, although it's certainly neither original nor all that attractively priced; you still need to buy a display, or have a very clear, sharp TV set that won't ruin your eyesight.

    Walmart marketed a $199 linux PC for a while, though they seem to have discontinued it. Some people mentioned a similar Tigerdirect model, but I haven't found it on their site. You have to really look for these deals.

    I suspect that as Linux matures and especially as Wine improves, the cheap Linux PC will make a comeback, though it's awfully hard to sell the public on something that works with about 50% of the stuff out there--devices, software, peripherals--when for another $50 you can get something that works with 90% or 100%. I just did my taxes using Turbotax 2005 running in Crossover/Wine on my fedora workstation, and while it basically worked, a few features such as help pop-ups were broken and I had to do a lot of manual data entry because the stock investments download feature didn't work perfectly. Would I pay $50 more to avoid this kind of aggravation? Of course and so would everyone else.

    The other thing I would worry about is compatibility. Is it worth paying $150 for a machine that uses a non-Intel compatible CPU? Especially when slower Intel/AMD cpus can be had for quite cheap these days. If it's just a matter of national pride--it has to be all Chinese-built--well, come on, almost all computer parts are made in China already, so just go buy any PC you like--Lenovo, Dell, Toshiba--and chances are it'll be 80-90% Chinese content.

    --
    it's = "it is"; its = possessive. E.g., it's flapping its wings.
  101. Made by only Chinese companies? Xenophobia? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    From the srticle summary:

    >> ... A Chinese manufacturer, YellowSheepRiver ...
    >> ... Urging potential customers to 'Say no to Wintel,' YellowSheepRiver
    >> is devoted to using its own Linux distribution and hardware designed
    >> and manufactured by Chinese companies ...
    >> ... Designed by a Chinese company called BLX ...

    Why is it that when the Chinese promote a product as being "made exclusively by Chinese companies" and urge the customer to "say no" to American products (e.g. Wintel) that it is okay.

    However if an American company were to promote a product as being "made exclusively by American companies" and to "say no" to Chinese companies then everyone would be screaming xenophobia and making jokes about fat-lazy-suv-driving Americans???

    Of course that last part is just hypothetical since Americans don't actually make anything anymore :-)

  102. Debian MIPS by twitter · · Score: 1
    $270 American vs. $150? Linspire vs. whatever PRC government-approved distro this is?

    You should compare it to a mac mini and tell me if anything is not made in China these days.

    Red Flag, Microsoft, same thing. Good thing you don't need either. Expect to see a lot of activity with Debian MIPS.

    --

    Friends don't help friends install M$ junk.

    1. Re:Debian MIPS by Illbay · · Score: 1
      Expect to see a lot of activity with Debian MIPS

      I love it! Not content with going full-tilt in advocating some Linux distro with 15,000 users, some of us have the overwhelming need to advocate one with 15 users!

      (I guess "a lot of activity" would be--what--six packages submitted per month?)

      --
      Any technology distinguishable from magic is insufficiently advanced.
  103. deja vu by ptomblin · · Score: 1

    Those who do not remember the NetWinder are doomed to repeat it.

    --
    The next Cmdr Taco duplicate will be ready soon, but subscribers can beat the rush and see it early!
  104. Already got one by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I already have a $150 PC with PIII performance...it's called an XBox! I can get it even cheaper if I buy it used.

  105. Re:Not that cheap: don't even have to factor curre by curecollector · · Score: 1

    Did china ever see a reason to pay billions of dollars for Windows? Just curious.

  106. Server farm? by suggsjc · · Score: 1

    How would a cluser of say 10 of these things perform? 100? 1000? At ~$1500 for 10, I would imagine that it would be pretty good considering you can barely find a decent server for that much. For some applications like a web or mail server just load balance the requests. Other applications probably wouldn't be as successful Forget virtualization, when you need a new machine, just buy X of these to fill that need. If one breaks, throw it away as it would cost more in tech support to have someone actually take a look at it. Don't know how the power issue would be, but this could be an interesting idea...anyone know of a reason it would/wouldn't work?

    --
    When I have a kid, I want to put him in one of those strollers for twins and then run around the mall looking frantic.
  107. One word...just one word...FRY'S! by Newer+Guy · · Score: 1

    Frys has a better system then this that is on sale all the time for $149.95. Regular price is 179.00. In fact, it was on sale on black Friday for 99 bucks. AMD Sempron 2200, 40 gig HD, CD Rom, Internal Video, 128 megs RAM, Mini tower case, speakers. Loaded with Linspire. Here it is WAY overpriced at Outpost. http://shop3.outpost.com/product/4714029?site=sr:S EARCH:MAIN_RSLT_PG

  108. If you can only affort one... by Comboman · · Score: 1
    Maybe new TVs come standard with S-Video now, but as I said a low-end VGA monitor would be just as cheap and offer at least double the resolution.

    But you can't watch TV on it (not without an expensive TV-to-VGA box anyway). If you can only afford to buy one, you buy the one that can do both. Kinda like the old days with the Commodore 64, it was a good way to get your parents to buy you a TV for your room.

    --
    Support Right To Repair Legislation.
  109. Re:1 problem by SomeoneGotMyNick · · Score: 1

    but all i was saying was that the customers that walk into the store would not ... they'd think you're feeding them a line of bull ...

    Using cars as an analogy to computers works well on many levels. In this case, I would compare it to a small four cylinder engine, when designed properly, tweaked, and with the proper supporting components, can outrace a stock V6 from another vehicle. And it will probably use less gas in the process.

    It's a rough comparison, but it begins to paint the picture. Raw power means nothing if you can't make it efficient.

  110. Lockout chip business model by tepples · · Score: 1

    I'm tired of seeing these el-cheapo computers heralded as an achievement. X Box costs $150, PS2 is $130.

    Both the Xbox and the PStwo are subsidized (even if only in R&D and marketing costs) by the sale of licensed games, enforced by a lockout chip. This is an achievement for a non-subsidized device running a Free operating system out of the box.

    1. Re:Lockout chip business model by danwesnor · · Score: 1

      I'm sure that by now both the XBox and PS2 are being sold above production costs. Also look at some of the VIA boards which retail under $100 and have everything you need except a case (roll your own), power supply ($20), memory ($40), and drives ($30 HD + $20 CD). You can build a full-up computer for less than $225 paying retail prices. I imagine if you paid wholesale, it would easily be less than $150.

  111. Implements the subset that isn't patented by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Misaligned loads and stores. Google for more info.

  112. Re:Not that cheap: don't even have to factor curre by LWATCDR · · Score: 1

    I doubt that the Government and major companies pirated all the Microsoft Software they use.
    http://www.bloomberg.com/apps/news?pid=10000087&si d=a8xcRyjeh_YU&refer=top_world_news
    As you can see Microsoft is making a big push to get people in China to stop pirating.
    BTW some of the billions of dollars I was talking about was going to Intel and AMD. Via could be an option but I doubt that sending money to Taiwan makes China happier than sending it to the US.

    --
    See my blog http://ilovecookes.blogspot.com/ for light hearted technical information.
  113. Re:Not that cheap: don't even have to factor curre by david.given · · Score: 1
    Two of them have composite inputs, one only has cable RF.

    S-Video to composite connectors cost about 10p each in bulk --- they consist of two or three resistors wired together. I'll possibly agree with you that the RF-only TV, but if you really needed to get it working, video modulators are only a little more expensive --- remember all those 8-bit micros that had them?

  114. Sufficient box by grumpyman · · Score: 1

    600MHz is sufficient for a lot of stuff. I had my old PII-166MHz installed W98 with Apache and FileZilla. If the end-users use it for office applications, web browsing, emailing - it should be more than sufficient.

  115. Re:Not that cheap: don't even have to factor curre by ClosedSource · · Score: 1

    "I'll possibly agree with you that the RF-only TV, but if you really needed to get it working, video modulators are only a little more expensive --- remember all those 8-bit micros that had them?"

    Yes I remember those 8-bit micros that could display a maximum of 40 chars/line. Gee, perhaps such an application could make UNIX command brevity relevent in the 21st century.

  116. RedOffice by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Here is the link ... it took me a while to find it: http://www.ch2000.com.cn/download/redownload/RedOf fice2.0_ForLinux.tar.gz

  117. P6? Bad example by tepples · · Score: 1

    I'd prefer to pay 300 bucks for a P3 that is mine over paying 150 bucks for a P6 that isn't under my control.

    A Pentium III is a P6. The CPU core known as Intel P6 debuted in the Pentium Pro, and later versions of P6 were used in the Pentium II, Pentium III, and Pentium M processors.

    But I too would pay more for a Pentium III based PC than for an Xbox, especially now that "loophole" games are harder to find (with silent upgrades that fix the buffer overflows) and newer versions of the Xbox BIOS don't allow dashboard replacement.

  118. Re:Not that cheap: don't even have to factor curre by winse · · Score: 1

    maybe they could afford to buy an s-video to composite cable like I did.

    --
    this sig is deprecated
  119. Just great!! by ravee · · Score: 1

    It is projects such as these which will make the propritery OS companies make a run for their money. Just think of it... The company making these hardware devices need only invest money for the hardware and not for the OS. The OS comes at an unbeatable price. Thus they are able to bring down prices of their devices and make it available to the masses. Cheap computing in the making I would say.

    --
    Linux Help
    for all things on Linux
  120. Value of a dollar by amightywind · · Score: 1

    Bear in mind that $150 dollars probably means a lot more in the Chinese economy than it does here in the U.S.

    Indeed it does. The average working Chinese is much poorer than he should be. The Chinese government sets the exchange rates relative to other currencies artificially low, to encourage exports and employment. This is blatant currency manipulation and is against WTO rules. The Japanese public has been similarly willing to be screwed for decades as well. We in America are enjoying the free lunch they provide. But the behavior hurts the working class in the United States and should be curbed. Economic competition would work better without market distortion.

    --
    an ill wind that blows no good
  121. Architecture? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I've hear a lot of discussions modern processers that Suns 'RISC' are too complex to be risc, and intels/amd micro-op code can't qualify it for disc.
    Is this one the first RICE based processor?

  122. This is actually something I want by OrangeTide · · Score: 1

    I have a MiniITX VIA epia-800 (800MHz VIA C3 Ezra), but the hardware has finally gone flakey on me (it has only been running non-stop for about 3 years). I think taking it in and out of cases without using any anti-static protection has made it flakey.

    A little 400Mhz MIPS-like box with TV-out would replace my broken epia-800 nicely. The only problem I have with it is that it isn't available in the US right now. I guess I might just have to buy something else to replace my machine.

    --
    “Common sense is not so common.” — Voltaire
  123. Re:Not that cheap: don't even have to factor curre by dakirw · · Score: 1

    Actually, it's the Japanese who (sterotypically) have a hard time pronouncing L's. Look at all of the Chinese last names that start with L: Lee, Li, Lu, etc.

  124. Linux pc in dollar store? by Agent_OO7 · · Score: 1

    oh ya! that's gonna happen :D

  125. Re:Not that cheap: don't even have to factor curre by pla · · Score: 1

    Where can you get a motherboard for $25 with onboard video, sound, and the works?? You're looking at at least $75-$100 just for that.

    Alone - $25 - no. $35, yes.

    Newegg has the PC Chips M851G, with onboard video, 6ch sound, and 10/100 LAN for $35.50. They have 40-50 boards under $50 meeting similar specs, for both AMD and Intel CPUs.

    If you get them as combos with CPU and RAM, then subtracted out the price of the CPU and RAM... I suspect that yes, you could probably push $25 for "just" the motherboard.

  126. the the by DoctorEternal · · Score: 1

    he he

  127. Re:Not that cheap: don't even have to factor curre by westlake · · Score: 1
    Yes but with this computer all the money is staying in China! China sees no reason to give billions of dollars of it's money to the US for Windows or for Intel/AMD cpus.

    How many billions in exports is the Wintel platform worth to China?

    How much in foreign investment? Microsoft to invest heavily in China The People's Daily.

    When President Hu Jintao vists the United States, it is Bill Gates who greets him, Bill Gates he wants to see. Guess who did not bone up on China Malayasia News Online.

    The world is flat.

    It was Lenin's birthday on Sunday. The most important Communist Party meeting in five years was under way. And the star of the show was the world's most famous capitalist, Bill Gates.

    The Vietnamese President, Prime Minister and Deputy Prime Minister all excused themselves from the party meeting to have their pictures taken with Gates, the chairman of Microsoft, who has more star power in Vietnam than any of them.

    Gates finds it's just capital in Vietnam

  128. This is based on a Chinese-made processor by default+luser · · Score: 1

    Most likely, it is the BLX Godson-2, a MIPS-like 64-bit processor developed entirely in China. This would mesh well with the Chinese government's intent to encourage the Chinese people to buy Chinese electronics.

    Unfortunately, we have no idea what the architecture is like. I know a lot of you think MIPS is inherently "more efficient" than x86 per clock, but that's just foolish fanboyism. MIPS-compatible processors come in a variety of speeds with different Instruction Per Clock capabilities. Some are VERY simple, single pipelined designs intended for embedded markets, while others are aggressively clocked, with superscalar designs like those from SGI.

    Just making it MIPS doesn't guarantee better performance. BLX has never publically stated exact performance comparisons, and they could be comparing it to a "200 MHz P3 (yes, I know this doesn't exist)" for all we know. Think about how difficult it would be for an updtart chip maker to compete with a Pentium 3 clock-for-clock: the processor would require supercalar design with out-of-order execution, including dual integer pipelines and a pipelined FPU. This is very unlikely from a project that has only been designing processors for 5-6 years.

    More likely, the processor is more like the older Winchip, with a single integer pipeline and a low-latency non-pipelined FPU. This would give the 600 MHz Godson-2 performance on the order of a P3 at 200-300 MHz.

    --

    Man is the animal that laughs.
    And occasionally whores for Karma.

  129. Re:Not that cheap: don't even have to factor curre by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    You can buy a Via C3 CPU for $10-20. You can even buy a motherboard with built-in C3 CPU for ~$50.

  130. Re:Not that cheap: don't even have to factor curre by 1u3hr · · Score: 2, Informative
    S-video out for a TV interface. No need for a computer monitor.

    That's IN ADDITION to normal VGA. I live in Hong Kong, you can get used 14 or 15" CRT monitors free, people are throwing them out all over to get LCD screens. You can buy them in a PC junk shop for US$3. Bigger monitors ar absurdly cheap too if you have the deskspace.

    The full specs of the PC are here. The video specs:
    ATI Radeon 7000-M
    33MHz 32-bit PCI
    Internalized with 16MB DDR RAM buffers
    Support VGA port & S-Video output

    It's really small; weighs 650g, half the Mac Mini.

  131. But is cheap just skin-deep (on the shop shelf)? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    As far as initial impressions go (when you see the device in the shop), getting the outside of the machine not to look cheap is probably the main thing. A nice case, and keyboard and mouse that don't look flimsy, will probably get you a long way!

  132. Re:Every opportunity has risks. The future is here by 110010001000 · · Score: 0, Informative

    Twitter, why do you continue to lie? Whitebox PC's do not make up 75% of the PC market, they make up more like 30%. See here for more information: http://www.technewsworld.com/story/33596.html.

    Of course the majority of computers that show up to be repaired major brand PC's - they are the majority of the market!

    You future of "everything is free" isn't going to happen. Its not sustainable and no one who matters wants it. This isn't new, there have been many low cost PC's available that run Linux. No one is switching.

  133. Re:Not that cheap: don't even have to factor curre by Joe+The+Dragon · · Score: 1

    TigerDirect also has Retail Outlet Stores that you can get parts form with out haveing to pay shiping on of them is in the warehouse.

  134. the cpu is also known as the dragon chip by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
    here is the video link:

    municator

  135. Re: spying by gentimjs · · Score: 1

    To Quote Zap Brannigan from "The Problem With Popplers":
    'People Of Earth ... Shhhh ... '

  136. Re:Not that cheap: don't even have to factor curre by timjdot · · Score: 1

    I've got a box with a Via Eden. 1GHz. Sloooooow. Tiny (embedded style). But sloooow. Our company was considering selling these as app devices but they are just too slow. Talked to a Via vendor at a tradeshow but Via is clueless AFAICT.
          BTW, this sort of argument is what I thought about the $100 PC. You can get an almost free old PC from the local charity store. Nobody wants a piece of junk. Even 3rd world people. Rich people think poor people want their old junk. They don't. Don't give them old fish. Teach them to fish.

    TimJowers

    --
    Expect Freedom.
  137. Confucius Say... by Lost+Race · · Score: 1

    Yellow River use IP freely!

  138. Can't beat Dell by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Dell Dimension B110 for $299

    Intel Celeron D 2.53GHz
    XP Home Edition
    256MB DDR Memory
    80GB ATA100 7200RPM Hard Drive
    48x CD/RW + DVD Combo Drive
    17" Monitor
    USB Keyboard/Mouse
    10/100 Ethernet
    56k Modem

    B110 link

  139. Re:thin client? Cluster? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
    What is more interesting is that this thin client could easily produce cheap supercomputers for the third world. Just imagine a 400 node cluster of these cheapos chomping away with a 64bit os. It all depends on the bus though, and if the com ports are fast enough. Just imagine the possibilities, within 5 years the Chinese could easily take the lead (again) in scientific research and developement. The west is going to slip behind very quickly if we keep treating China and India as backward "third world" nations!

    The Ratfynk

  140. Re:Not that cheap: don't even have to factor curre by insane_machine · · Score: 0

    I think that the ad is expired.

    "Price Good from Friday, Feb 17, 2006 through Tuesday, Feb 21, 2006."

  141. yellowsheepriver is a translation for... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Lenovo

  142. Cheap boxes = Pirated M$ (usually) by Ponga · · Score: 1

    In general, I would expect people to buy a CHEAP pc and as soon as they get home with it, borrow thier friends or relatives Windows XP disk to install over whatever OS the computer came with... so with these boxes being based on MIPS, those folks are out of luck! This will be an interesting!

  143. mips lexra or nonmips.sourceforge.net by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Yes, the Lexra company was sued (then bought?) by MIPS,
    But the use of similar mips chips is increasing.
    I guess eventually gcc and linux kernel will support them without all the extra patches.
    (called something else besides mips (or lexra) )

  144. And Windows is what? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    And Windows is what?
      Do you trust or believe Windows is not related with the US Elite Power Machine???

    Do you believe that US Americans are free citizens!??

  145. Re:Not that cheap: don't even have to factor curre by LWATCDR · · Score: 2, Insightful

    "How many billions in exports is the Wintel platform worth to China?"
    That is fine for exports. China makes lots of stuff for export that it wouldn't sell in China. The difference is anything sold in China with an Intel or AMD CPU and Windows involves money leaving China. If it exported then it is a net gain.

    --
    See my blog http://ilovecookes.blogspot.com/ for light hearted technical information.
  146. Re:Not that cheap: don't even have to factor curre by Isaac-1 · · Score: 1

    Your looking at this the wrong way, you should be looking at the refurb/used computer export business. Working used / Off Lease P2, P3 business systems are now available here in the U.S. for under $50 complete with keyboard, mouse, and a 15 inch monitor in individual quantities if you know where to shop. I know an IT manager that works for a major cell phone company, disposal of used computers has always been a problem for them, they typically replace hundreds per month, recently they have a contract with a computer reseller that buys all of there end of life cycle computers for $10 each as is. Currently these are PIII-700 and faster, maybe even low end P4's depending on store closings, etc.

    Ike

  147. I'm sick and tired of this argument by porkThreeWays · · Score: 2, Insightful

    The rationale that "I can just get a used computer for the same price so this product shouldn't exist" is retarded and I'm so sick of reading it. Selling used uniform equipment would be difficult and wouldn't scale. Please tell me where I can get 10,000 500 mhz celerons, 15 GB hard drive, same brand of 128 MB of RAM, same NIC, etc etc, all used, all the exact same model, all in great condition.

    I do sidework where we have to worry about these kinds of things. After we find a good deal on parts we ask ourselves "Can this company supply us enough units if this product takes off?", "Is this company going to be around in 3 years?", "Are they going to be able to supply this exact product for the next 3 years?", and so forth. Long term supply of uniform parts is a HUGE deal to companies. If you interchange your parts haphazardly you will run into issues. Issues that cost money. Any money you saved by doing so will be lost in support costs.

    Building a PC for your grandma and building a PC for 10,000 customers are two different ballparks. Every screwup, every tiny cost, every little bit is multiplied 10,000 times. But I suspect many on here don't understand that.

    --
    If an officer ever threatens to taze you, say you have a pacemaker.
  148. And by Belial6 · · Score: 1

    And if you hate Linspire, use it to download another Linux Distro and install that. After all, coming with Linspire does mean that the hardware has linux drivers.

  149. Microarchitecture of the Godson - 2 Processor by sfan · · Score: 1

    here is the paper published by Godson team http://www.newsmth.net/att.php?p.272.15916.11.0.25 1.pdf

  150. Re:Not that cheap: don't even have to factor curre by RalphTheWonderLlama · · Score: 1

    son of a bitch, those kinds of things really piss me off. It's the fricking white house, you'd think someone would know something about China. It's the office of the president of the USA, you're supposed to fscking represent our country to the world and you're making us all look stupid. Stop it. If I was the fricking president I would learn as much as I could about the world, foreign countries, governments, cultures. It's your job. As it is, maybe I already know more than them now since I have a friend there and I've always enjoyed geography.

    --
    simple, fast homepage with your links: http://www.ngumbi.com/
  151. Re:Every opportunity has risks. The future is here by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
    Dell, HP and others will follow or die.

    God, this is hilarious. Where do you people come from?

  152. Microsoft should be thrilled! by swillden · · Score: 1

    If these boxes really take off in China, Microsoft won't have to worry any more about all of the copies of Windows that the Chinese are pirating. Windows won't run on these boxes anyway, so no one will steal Windows!

    They should throw a party in Redmond.

    --
    Note to ACs: I usually delete AC replies without reading them. If you want to talk to me, log in.
  153. Re:Not that cheap: don't even have to factor curre by kimvette · · Score: 1

    I used Commodore 64 and Commodore 128 computers with S-video outputs, and I liked it, you insensitive clod!

    --
    The Christian Right is Neither (Christian nor right). See: Matthew 23, Matthew 25, Ezekiel 16:48-50
  154. What a wonderful machine! by cowboy76Spain · · Score: 1

    You convinced me, please tell me, where can I buy one of these wonderful SGIs! :P

    --
    Why can't /. have a rich-text editor? Editing your own HTML is so XXth century.
  155. Re:thin client? Cluster? by kimvette · · Score: 1

    China is not treated as a "third world nation" but as a "second world nation"

    Second world: Communist bloc nations, usually associated with the former soviet union
    Third world: under-developed/developing capitalist (or at least non-communist) nations not under a communist regime and not associated with first world nations or alliances (e.g., NATO, etc.)

    --
    The Christian Right is Neither (Christian nor right). See: Matthew 23, Matthew 25, Ezekiel 16:48-50
  156. How about DRM by SmallFurryCreature · · Score: 1
    IF western computer companies are determined to force DRM down our throaths will China do the same? I am perfectly happy with the performance of my dual P3 rig and although the proposed machine will be slower this may not be forever. Anyway if the choice is between a fast windows slave and a free linux machine then I am willing to be slow and free.

    Could be an odd alternative. A free PC from a dictatorship. We live in intresting times.

    --

    MMO Quests are like orgasms:

    You may solo them, I prefer them in a group.

  157. Re:Not that cheap: don't even have to factor curre by moro_666 · · Score: 1

    for 114$ you can get a via epia motherboard with the cpu, add memory and hdd and boot it up. usual 'integrated everything' onboard, vga out, s-video out, 5.1 audio etc.

    150$ for a ~400mhz 64-bit risc cpu powered machine is a robbery in year 2006. even the via epia series will probably be faster.

    and ffs s-video ? most chinese people probably have 21" 60hz good old tv-s, can you imagine the impact on their eyes from looking at 640x480pixel image at 60hz with radiation of the old tech tv ?

    ofcourse performance wise, geode kicks the butt of via. and most probably, they will both kick the butt of that 64 bit risc thing.

    ps. does anyone have a link to a site that sells transmeta cpu's along with motherboards ?

    --

    I'd tell you the chances of this story being a dupe, but you wouldn't like it.
  158. I can buy a used PIII for $59 bux by cdn-programmer · · Score: 1

    That may be well and good but I can buy a used machine for $59 bux and typically they have a good assortment of PCI slots to plug cards into.

    Of course as long as it runs Linux I'll be all for it.

  159. Could've been... by cr0sh · · Score: 1

    ...YellowSnowRiver...

    --
    Reason is the Path to God - Anon
  160. Recycling by mikefe · · Score: 1

    There is already so much hardware out there, why buy new? Get a real PIII instead and recycle. (Make sure you avoid the bad old chipsets used in AMD & Cyrix systems from the era. Try it with memtest86+. Any system with the L2 on the CPU and PC100/PC133 should have a memory bandwith of ~250MB/second. Anything less and you'll regret it.

    Upgrade the memory and put in a new PATA hard drive in and you're set for the $150 or less. And a nice side affect if you're at all interested in the environment is this doesn't require more chemical production in manufacturing plants (if you don't count the additional memory & new hard drive of course).

    With enough memory (512 - 1GB) and a speedy hard drive you'd be surprised how well the old computers can work.

    Also if you're a developer, programming on slower computers (and even slower dual cpu systems like my dual pII 450) gives you an encentive to make faster, lower resource using code.

    --
    There: Something at a specific location.
    Their: Owned by someone.
    Please make sure your english compiles.
    1. Re:Recycling by smash · · Score: 1
      There is already so much hardware out there, why buy new?

      Warranty vs hardware failure.

      Simple really. I mean, i like re-using old hardware as much as the next guy (my p2-350 -> p3-700e - yes, i upgraded it with a slotket :D is still going strong as my toy box), but hardware failure is a fairly likely occurrence that most people do not want to deal with.

      If you're relying on a machine as your ONLY pc (as the target market no doubt will be) - buy new, with warranty.

      smash.

      --
      I run: Windows, OS X, Linux, FreeBSD. Just because you have a hammer, doesn't mean everything is a nail.
  161. Re:1 problem by labratuk · · Score: 1

    The MIPS is just an ISA. The implementation of it could be great, it could suck.

    Just as both the athlon and the P4 both speak the x86 ISA, but show very different performances clock for clock.

    --
    Malike Bamiyi wanted my assistance.
  162. Re:Not that cheap: don't even have to factor curre by aminorex · · Score: 1

    The Chinese (stereotypically) have a hard time pronouncing the English letter "R".

    The English (stereotypically) have a hard time pronouncing the French letter "R".

    The French (stereotypically) have a hard time pronouncing the Spanish letter "R".

    The Spanish (stereotypically) have a hard time pronouncing the Japanese lettter "R".

    Strange, but true. Those liquids are a bitch.

    --
    -I like my women like I like my tea: green-
  163. Too bad it's only in China by kiljoy001 · · Score: 1

    Imagine if the US goverment/retailers carried this thing ? I would be awesome - there would be no execuse for anyone not to have a computer...

  164. OffTopic:Why is no one competing with the Mac mini by rlh100 · · Score: 1

    I know this is off topic, US market not China, AMD/Intel not MIPS, but...

    Why are no vendors competing with the Mac mini?

    I would have expected it by now. Same basic specs, same basic features,
    but $100-$200 cheaper.

    I like small computers, but I am totally frustrated with the PC vendors.
    If you want a smaller box, you have to pay more. Hugh??? The box
    is smaller, less metal and plastic. The mother board is smaller, less
    PC board. The system has less stuff in it (or potential stuff) so the
    power supply is smaller. Everything is smaller but you pay a 20%-30%
    premium for it? It just does not make sense.

    Design:
    Take a medium powerful CPU, AMD Semtron or Intel Celeron, and mother board
    chip-set that includes video, 5.1 sound, USB, firewire, and either a PATA
    or SATA disk interface. Build a 5 1/4" by 6-8" mother board around it
    with 1 or 2 memory slots and no floppy or PCI slots. Put it in a small
    case with a 3 1/2" disk and a CD/DVD -R/RW drive (maybe external USB
    or Firewire). If there is space us an internal power supply, otherwise
    use an external supply like the Mac mini. Design the case so it can be
    mounted on the back of a LCD display. And wallah, you have an almost zero
    footprint computer.

    In a normal size, you can by a similar system, CPU, 256Mb, 80G, CD-DVD,
    for about $300. It should not be hard to make a similar small foot
    print system for about the same amount.

    I see two big markets for this type of system:
    Consumers who need a web browser, email, a word processor,
                    a Quick Books like financial application and simple games
    Businesses who need to deploy 100's of systems to specific job
                    functions: customer service, call centers, order entry,
                    warehouse, and other non-computer specific jobs.

    In the first case my parents come to mind. She does not do a lot with
    their computer. Mostly web browsing, email, and keeping track of their
    fiances. The only thing the have upgraded in their computer is memory.
    Other upgrades like card readers and zip drives have used USB. The last
    few times they have thought about upgrading more they have decided
    to buy a new computer. Sound familiar? I think that there are many
    people who feel less intimidated if the computer was the size of a long
    hardbound book. My mom would like it in violet.

    The second case is business. A smaller computer would mean less desk
    space or floor space waisted. It would also take less power and would
    use less air conditioning. With energy costs the way they are, this
    is a big concern. A computer with less bells and whistles might mean
    fewer distractions for the employee. And again, for a group, 20-100, of
    computers what was the last upgrade you added inside the case? Memory?
    Maybe a new disk drive? What I see is that when the company decides to
    upgrade their computers, they just buy new computers. At $300 a unit,
    it not much more than a nice office chair or desk.

    What I am surprised at is that none of the major computer vendors
    have made a product like this.

    Just my thoughts.

    RLH

  165. Re:Not that cheap: don't even have to factor curre by o'reor · · Score: 1
    Well, I actually thought of a huge array of tiny abacuses (imagine a Beowulf cluster of those), which should be feasible now using nanotubes technology...

    Ah well... imagination often goes wild when you're Western and ignorant about other civilizations.

    --
    In Soviet Russia, our new overlords are belong to all your base.
  166. Yes but only in China by dalroth5 · · Score: 1

    Like it says above.

    The salesman at CeBIT states quite clearly that it is intended to help poor Chinese cross the 'digital divide'. It isn't expected to go on sale in the West.

    --
    "We reject kings, presidents and voting. We believe in rough consensus and running code." Dave Clark, IETF
  167. Re:This thing is t-i-n-y. by dalroth5 · · Score: 1

    Yes. That's because you were looking at just the motherboard box. The HDD is an external. Nearer the end of the video you get to look behind the monitor and the rest of what's normally tucked inside a much bigger box is there, all tangled up in a large mass of cables as you'd expect.

    All in all there's nothing new about the Municator except the price. Which doesn't include a monitor. And it's only on sale inside China. So it's not very exciting really.

    --
    "We reject kings, presidents and voting. We believe in rough consensus and running code." Dave Clark, IETF
  168. Re:Not that cheap: don't even have to factor curre by Bert64 · · Score: 1

    An actual 600mhz MIPS processor (R14000) is actually pretty speedy, especially at floating point.. Not sure about the chinese mips clone tho. But once you consider performance per watt the mips should do quite well in any case, the later SGI machines using mips processors at around 600mhz used passive cooling on the processors, and the sgi processor modules for their highend kit could fit 16 MIPS processors in 4U while they could only fit 4 itanium chips in the same space.

    --
    http://spamdecoy.net - free throwaway anonymous email - avoid spam!
  169. Re:Not that cheap: don't even have to factor curre by Bert64 · · Score: 1

    And also don't forget, that modern Intel/AMD processors are effectively RISC processors with extra (power consuming performance sapping) silicon to convert x86 CISC instructions into blocks of internal RISC equivalents.
    By removing this extra overhead, you can potentially decrease power usage, improve performance (with a good compiler) and generate less heat making it easier to create higher clocked processors.

    --
    http://spamdecoy.net - free throwaway anonymous email - avoid spam!
  170. The Chinese MIPS clone by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Ah, that would be the unlicensed MIPS clone.

    http://hardware.slashdot.org/article.pl?sid=05/07/ 26/0029224