Slashdot Mirror


Classic Star Wars Trilogy Finally on DVD

chinton writes "From starwars.com: 'In response to overwhelming demand, Lucasfilm Ltd. and Twentieth Century Fox Home Entertainment will release attractively priced individual two-disc releases of Star Wars, The Empire Strikes Back and Return of the Jedi. Each release includes the 2004 digitally remastered version of the movie, as well as the original theatrical edition of the film. That means you'll be able to enjoy Star Wars as it first appeared in 1977, Empire in 1980, and Jedi in 1983.'"

104 of 673 comments (clear)

  1. DVD by gentimjs · · Score: 5, Interesting

    Didnt george lucas come out years back with some rhetoric about how DVD was tehsux and lucasfilm would only pump out VCDs or some shit like that? .. yeah .. good plan ..

    1. Re:DVD by Gord · · Score: 5, Informative

      Didn't he also say something along the lines of 'The only version that exists now is the version in my head and that's the special edition remakes' and that original versions would never be re-released?

    2. Re:DVD by grub · · Score: 5, Insightful


      He did say that, but then his pizza budget hit an all-time high so he decided to milk this withered udder one more time. Until the release on BluRay and HD-DVD are available, that is.

      --
      Trolling is a art,
    3. Re:DVD by LiquidCoooled · · Score: 2, Insightful

      I think the fact its on laserdisk will maintain the price.

      Its like holding onto old wax recordings, the disks themselves are a piece of history - its a bonus that theres movies on them.

      --
      liqbase :: faster than paper
    4. Re:DVD by DesireCampbell · · Score: 2, Informative

      He also once said films don't need special visual effects to be ood - and that they distracted the audience from the story.

      Of course he was talking about colour - but he changed his view real quick.

      --
      Whoo, signature!
      DesireCampbell.com
    5. Re:DVD by Urchlay · · Score: 2, Insightful
      > Therefore I will only buy ... Star Wars (ORIGINAL) trilogy DVDs.

      I bought mine a year ago. Bootleg? Yes. But I had been waiting for a long time, and Lucas sounded like he meant it... so I don't feel bad about paying for a bootleg DVD (transferred from the laserdisc edition, very nice quality).

      How many times will I pay for the same movie? Let's see...

      1. Half-price kids' tickets to all 3 movies when I was a kid
      2. Bought original trilogy on VHS (pre-special edition). The tapes wore out from repeated viewing over the years.
      3. Full-price adult tickets to all 3 movies when they were re-released in the 1990s. Saw each movie at least twice, except Jedi (sorry, I hate Ewoks).
      4. Bought special edition trilogy on VHS (actually, this was a gift for someone else)

      So I've already paid for these movies approximately 4 times each. I don't feel the least bit bad about owning a bootleg, at this point.

  2. What is it now? by secondsun · · Score: 4, Funny

    So wouldn't this be the re-re-re-re-re-rerelease?

    --
    There is nothing wrong with being gay. It's getting caught where the trouble lies.
    1. Re:What is it now? by The+Walking+Dude · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Next will be the Blu-ray/HD-DVD releases. Then it will be the Star Wars 3D releases. I lucked out on episodes 4, 5, and 6 - I bought all three of them on DVD in China for $3.

      This reminds me of Game Boy. As soon as I buy one, they come out with a new one, or make a slight improvement. Just bought a DS? Here comes the DS Lite on June 11th. I feel like a sucker, but I buy them anyway. Marketing schemes suck, but high quality entertainment makes it acceptable. Hopefully I'm in China in 2030 so I can get a deal on the Holographic Edition of Star Wars episodes 7, 8, and 9.

  3. If only by Oldsmobile · · Score: 5, Insightful

    If only they could now release episodes one through three with remastered versions that don't feature lousy acting, shallow characters and crappy plots.

    --
    Some say he is made with ascii, others that he is eyeballed daily by millions. All we know is, he is known as the Sig
    1. Re:If only by The+Snowman · · Score: 2, Insightful

      If only they could now release episodes one through three with remastered versions that don't feature lousy acting, shallow characters and crappy plots.

      Episode 3 was actually pretty good. It had plenty of action, but enough slow parts that tied the story together and developed the characters. It was dark and evil, definitely had a consistent and welcome theme throughout. I don't know which of the 6 movies is the best, but Episode 3 is a strong contender in my mind.

      Episodes 1 and 2 left a lot to be desired, but thanks to the fast forward function of my DVD player, really aren't all that bad. No more frolicking in the meadow, no more talk of midichlorians, etc.

      --
      24 beers in a case, 24 hours in a day. Coincidence? I think not!
    2. Re:If only by cultrhetor · · Score: 3, Insightful

      One could say the same thing about the "classic" trilogy. You were just younger and less discerning when it came out. George Lucas writes the world's worst dialogue. The movies were all meant to be comic-book style fantasies: not shakespeare.

      --
      "Tu fui, ego eris" - Virgil
    3. Re:If only by halivar · · Score: 2, Funny

      Yeah, but at least they didn't have Bea Arthur as a singing cantina owner. Some things do improve with time. That said, I definitely think Harvey Corman could have played a good Sith.

    4. Re:If only by 16K+Ram+Pack · · Score: 2, Insightful
      Sure, the dialogue in EP4-6 was terrible, but at least you cared about the characters and what happened to them. At least they were exciting.

      EP1&2 (not seen 3) are CGI-fests with badly written stories about characters that you cannot form any interest with.

      If people were just forgiving of films because they were kids, we'd have sp.editions of Battle Beyond the Stars and The Black Hole.

    5. Re:If only by mobiux · · Score: 5, Insightful

      Exactly!!!!!
      It's the kids that ruin sequels.
      Look at The Mummy. I really liked the first one.
      So i decided to take the family to the 2nd. That god damn kid ruined the entire thing.
      Hollywood thinks that if a movie does well, making a sequel and putting an obnoxious 9 year old to bring in the kid audience must make everything even better.

      Lucas was one of the first to try this, with those god-damn Ewoks.
      He just perfected it with Ep.1

      I am waiting for a Fight Club 2 with kids beating up each other and a pg-13 rating to finally bring about the apocalypse .

    6. Re:If only by grasshoppa · · Score: 2

      Episode 3 was actually pretty good.

      In what sense? Piss poor acting. Not just from Hayden ( who seems to operate in that mode ), but from everyone. Even my man Jackson. Shallow story, poor execution of what little plot they had. Cheesy Darth Vader scene, characters breaking from the mold they set in the previous two films.

      I'll give you an example of that last one; Pademe losing her will to live? Here is a strong woman who has an almost limitless well of compassion in her ( think about her comments about being a part of the government for her people ), who is having two babies. And because her husband tries to kill her, she loses her will to live.

      Bullshit.

      I won't even go into how she changed from a strong character to a whiny housewife between 2 and 3.

      The only thing 3 had going for it was Force and saber fights, but even in that #1 has it beat.

      --
      Mod me down with all of your hatred and your journey towards the dark side will be complete!
    7. Re:If only by neuromancer2701 · · Score: 3, Interesting

      If you check out IMDB, Lucas just came up with the Story, which he is good at, for V and VI. I think IV is the weakest of the orginal three but it was so revolutionary that people look past the flaws. V and VI were directed and Written(screeplay) by different people that did not happen with I,II,III. Lucas is just terrible at writing dialog. V and VI maybe a little cheese but Han is just so funny. The story and dialog was just all messed up in I,II,III that I think I liked the Matrix Trilogy better, but that is just me. Way to much CGI, Matrix and LotR trilogies did a better job of combining CGI with real sets, How do you interact with something that is not there or when you are just talking to someone in front of Green screen and have no context/environment to act in.

      Matrix > III best vs best
      Reloaded > II
      Revolutions == I worst vs worst
      Advantage
      Keanu

      Han Solo: Hey, Your Worship, I'm only trying to help.
      Princess Leia: Would you please stop calling me that?
      Han Solo: Sure, Leia.
      Princess Leia: Oh, you make it so difficult sometimes.
      Han Solo: I do, I really do. You could be a little nicer, though. Come on, admit it. Sometimes you think I'm all right.
      Princess Leia: Occasionally maybe... when you aren't acting like a scoundrel.
      Han Solo: [laughs] Scoundrel? Scoundrel? I like the sound of that.
      [Han takes her hand and starts to massage it]

      --
      "If you like Battlestar Galactica, you're probably a huge nerd." -Stephen Colbert
    8. Re:If only by thebdj · · Score: 2, Insightful

      You obviously have no kids. Women get pretty moody while pregnant and can change lots. But further into that degree, it wasn't Anakin/Vader trying to kill her that caused her to lose the will to live, it was his turn to the dark side and the vicious creature he turned into because he wanted to "save her." She realized the monster he had become and this is why she lost her will to live. It goes much, much deeper then you are even putting into it.

      As for acting, has it ever been that good throughout any of the SW movies? The actors in the original trilogy mostly fell into obscurity. The only one who had much of a career post SW was Harrison Ford. They actually used more established actors in the new trilogy, but you still had a lot of poor acting, which I would attribute more to poor direction then I would to poor actors.

      --
      "Some days you just can't get rid of a bomb."
    9. Re:If only by finkployd · · Score: 2, Insightful

      But further into that degree, it wasn't Anakin/Vader trying to kill her that caused her to lose the will to live, it was his turn to the dark side and the vicious creature he turned into because he wanted to "save her." She realized the monster he had become and this is why she lost her will to live. It goes much, much deeper then you are even putting into it.

      Oh no it doesn't, it is a lame plot no matter how much anyone tries to rationalize it.

      Anakin is driven to the dark side by a desire to save her (from a bad dream he had for that matter), then he almost kills her. Real believable. Then he wakes up as Vader and is all concerned about her again.

      Also Padme was portrayed as a strong woman in the first two. If you think any mother (let alone a strong, independent one) is going to just lose her will to live and abandon her kids because her husband turnes into a bad guy then YOU obviously don't have kids. Alternatively, Padme is a complete and total spinless wuss and it was actually her decoy who was all brave, strong, and acting as her in all scenes in the movies one and two.

      Finkployd

    10. Re:If only by bsane · · Score: 2

      How about:

      "Hold me like you did by the lake on Naboo."

      That's a timeless classic that I've heard quoted a lot.

      Of course its a joke about how crappy the move was... the audience even laughed when she said it.

    11. Re:If only by Goo.cc · · Score: 2

      I don't think it was just the dialog that was the problem, especially with EP1. Personally, my problems with EP1 are three things:

      1. Anakin is too young
      2. Jar Jar
      3. Midochlorians ('nuff said)

      Number one is a big deal for me. I think Lucas should have made Anakin about the same age as Luke was when we first see him in EP3 (for allegorical reasons if nothing else). Not only would the pod racing scene have been more believable, Lucas could have introduced a sexual attraction between Anakin and Padme which also would have made their getting together in EP2 more believable.

      I didn't have much of a problem with Jar Jar existing but his character really doesn't have a purpose off of Naboo.

    12. Re:If only by ByTor-2112 · · Score: 2

      That's pretty much been my stance on the whole "prequel" mess. Lucas was pretty good at a general "story", but when it came to writing, directing and producing he was just total ass.

      I don't think you can blame the terrible acting on the actors alone. I've seen most of them in other roles where they excelled. You can't blame the poor dialog delivery on the actors. It's all the director's fault. His job is to decide if the actors are performing as they should. It's his call whether or not a scene is finished. I personally think Lucas was too busy daydreaming about how many awesome special effects he would be adding to the scene later to worry about this silly "actors". The end result was a set of really crappy movies.

      I remember all the TV specials in the 80s about the miniatures, puppeteers and animatronics that Lucasfilm used to make the films. Those were fascinating. Nowadays all you get is some bullcrap about some warehouse filled with 5000 computers that spent 6 months rendering a movie with an impossible palette of colors. Booooooooooooooring. CGI is just too damned impersonal. Bring back the stunt men, makeup artists and elaborate sets. Burn your green screens.

  4. Who shot first? by booch · · Score: 5, Interesting

    Is it truly the original? Did Han shoot first?

    --
    Software sucks. Open Source sucks less.
    1. Re:Who shot first? by iamjoltman · · Score: 3, Informative

      I don't know if you're being serious, but the answer is yes. That is probably one of the prime factors people think of in terms of original vs SE, and if they claimed it was the original and didn't have that, they would just be shooting themselves in the foot. But I guess the foot would have to shoot at them first, missing horribly.
      Anyway, one of the first images you see at starwars.com says
      This September: Original Unaltered Trilogy on DVD
      See Han Solo shoot first

    2. Re:Who shot first? by Megane · · Score: 2, Informative

      It's not truly the original if it says "A NEW HOPE" in the title. But it's close enough.

      --
      #naabhaprzrag, #sverubfr-000, #agi-fcbafberq, negvpyr[pynff*=' negvpyr-ary-'] { qvfcynl: abar !vzcbegnag; }
    3. Re:Who shot first? by redtape · · Score: 5, Insightful

      If this is the original, Han doesn't shoot "first" since, in the original, Greedo NEVER shot!

    4. Re:Who shot first? by GundamFan · · Score: 2, Insightful

      That's just silly... the whole point of "shoting first" is to kill the other guy before he shots you.

      So yes he shot first but he also shot last.

      --
      I don't give a damn for a man that can only spell a word one way.
      Mark Twain
    5. Re:Who shot first? by dswensen · · Score: 2, Informative

      TFA seems to have been edited from last night, but last night it read:

      See the title crawl to Star Wars before it was known as Episode IV; see the pioneering, if dated, motion control model work on the attack on the Death Star; groove to Lapti Nek or the Ewok Celebration song like you did when you were a kid; and yes, see Han Solo shoot first.

    6. Re:Who shot first? by Vinnie_333 · · Score: 3, Interesting
      If this is the original, Han doesn't shoot "first" since, in the original, Greedo NEVER shot!

      That's because Greedo was so coked up at the time. If you look at the original print, Greedo had a white powdery ring around his nose. That's one thing that was digitally changed in the SEs.

      --

      "We shall party like the Greeks of old! You know the ones I mean." - HedonismBot
    7. Re:Who shot first? by edwdig · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Greedo didn't shoot, but he was sitting there with a gun pointed at Han saying "I'm going to kill you."

      Han killing Greedo before Greedo can get a shot off doesn't make Han a bad ass, it just makes Greedo an idiot.

    8. Re:Who shot first? by xmuskrat · · Score: 2, Funny

      I can't quite remember if that's true or not. I might have been coked up at the time.

      --
      activestudios web design
  5. Release to Theatres for Every Generation by eldavojohn · · Score: 5, Interesting

    You know, there's something undeniably good about Episodes IV, V & VI.

    Especially when you see it on the big screen. Unfortunately, I was born in 1982 meaning that I wasn't quite to the point of being able to go see it in theatres when it was released. But the special edition releases changed all that--though the changes George Lucas made did leave me feeling kind of hollow (wtf, Han?).

    I would think that the mass turn out to see the special edition movies would be proof enough that releasing the originals to theatres every ten years would be profitable. In fact, I would conjecture that releasing it every ten years would give everyone the chance to see it at an early age and be beneficial to the Star Wars franchise. I know Lucas wouldn't be able to resist changing parts of it but hopefully he'll be preoccupied with destroying the Indiana Jones Trilogy by then.

    I did notice that Mr. Lucas isn't cited once in this article and instead we hear from Jim Ward who is perhaps actually interested in what the fans have to say as they are providing his paycheck.

    If you were to ask me on any day of the week, "Would you like to go see one of the Star Wars movies on the big screen?" You bet I would. It's immeasurably better than the utter drek that's in theatres now. Oftentimes my friends propose we go see a movie only to discover that there is nothing but pure crap. What does Lucasfilm have that so few movies today lack? Timelessness--the ability to surpass the aging of the film and the advances in technology that every movie today uses.

    While it's true I'm a fan of Star Wars so my opinion might be biased, I've never found anyone who's outright hated it.

    Well, I got original separate movies for my birthday at a young age, the VHS set of this trilogy when I was about 15, I bought the special edition DVDs in wide screen format a couple years ago and now it looks like I'll be purchasing yet another copy of these movies. Boy, Lucasfilm sure has my number.

    --
    My work here is dung.
    1. Re:Release to Theatres for Every Generation by the_duke_of_hazzard · · Score: 2, Interesting

      "While it's true I'm a fan of Star Wars so my opinion might be biased, I've never found anyone who's outright hated it. " I hated it. Although I'm 30 I first watched IV in the cinema in the late nineties. I was bored by the barely-existent plot, the generally poor acting. Only Ford and Guinness made it worth watching. I would have walked out otherwise.

    2. Re:Release to Theatres for Every Generation by hackstraw · · Score: 2, Interesting

      If you were to ask me on any day of the week, "Would you like to go see one of the Star Wars movies on the big screen?" You bet I would.

      Actually, that is what I did in 77, 80, and 83. Which is what I thought

      That means you'll be able to enjoy Star Wars as it first appeared in 1977, Empire in 1980, and Jedi in 1983.

      meant.

      I haven't read the FA yet. But I'm wondering how "original" these are. Personally, I liked all of the remastering and cleanups they did to the special addition ones. I liked the introduction of Jabba in IV. The _only_ thing that disgusted me about the remakes was the Han Solo/Greedo thing. That was BS.

    3. Re:Release to Theatres for Every Generation by SatanicPuppy · · Score: 4, Informative

      They cropped a lot of incidental violence, as part of Lucas's conversion to namby pambyism. Like a lot of people who get shot, actually "fell down" in the original version. He hacked out a few frames around a lot of the shot people, to "lower the impact" of some nameless badguy getting whacked.

      --
      ad logicam Claiming a proposition is false because it was presented as the conclusion of a fallacious argument.
    4. Re:Release to Theatres for Every Generation by Mister+Whirly · · Score: 2, Funny

      I mean hey, it's not like it's rocket science or anything...

      --
      "But this one goes to 11!"
  6. Awesome by squarooticus · · Score: 5, Informative

    I bought the four disc DVD set when it came out, but that POS is hitting half.com when I get my hands on this. Finally, no Jabba, no "whoosh!" at Alderaan, no ring of fire when the Death Star explodes, no interruption of the wonderful "Hyperspace" piece at the end of Empire, and...

    HAN FIRES FIRST!

    --
    [ home ]
    1. Re:Awesome by PMuse · · Score: 2, Funny

      I'm impressed. I had assumed when LucasFilm released the last of the films on DVD that the only way for them to milk more money out of us was to release a 6-movie boxed set (probably in 4Q 2006). How wrong I was. Clearly, their schwartz is bigger than mine.

      --
      "We reject as false the choice between our safety and our ideals." --The American President (20.1.2009)
    2. Re:Awesome by Cro+Magnon · · Score: 4, Insightful
      no Jabba

      Yes! I am surprised that more people haven't bitched about this - and even then, it's always because of how he appears (small, mobile, making goofy facial expressions, etc, etc) and never that the conversation with him is damn near the same conversation Han had with Greedo just a minute before


      Here's what bothered me about that scene. Imagine you're the biggest crime boss in the galaxy. You're chewing out some underling that just cost you a lot of money. And he steps on your tail! Don't you think you'd do a little more than give a quick squeal?
      --
      Slow down, cowboy! It has been 4 hours since you last posted. You must wait another few hours.
    3. Re:Awesome by VWJedi · · Score: 2, Informative

      Are you sure Jabba was in Episode I? I just remember references to "the Hutts". Several of them (of various sizes) appear on screen at the pod race. Do they ever specify which (if any) of them are Jabba?

  7. BASTARDS! by aborchers · · Score: 5, Interesting

    I should have known they'd eventually cave to milk another buck out of me. I never would have bought the redux trilogy if I'd believed this was coming. Sad thing is, I know I'll buy them...

    --
    Trouble making decisions? Just flip for it.
    1. Re:BASTARDS! by TychoCelchuuu · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Lucas releases Star Wars Trilogy on DVD!

      Slashdot: You suck! We don't want Han to shoot first! Gives us the original version, not the Special Edition!

      Lucas releases Classic Star Wars Trilogy on DVD!

      Slashdot: You suck! I... uh... asked for this a year ago.

      --
      Against stupidity the Gods themselves contend in vain.
  8. The almighty dollar by viking099 · · Score: 3, Insightful

    Well, now we know that even someone like George Lucas can be influenced by the promise of a ton of money. Well... probably not Lucas himself but all the people who can influence him.

    So now we'll have the opportunity to purchase yet another copy, bringing some people up to 5 seperate copies of the same set of movies.

    That's pretty impressive.

  9. Can he do that? by twoshortplanks · · Score: 4, Interesting

    I seem to remember back when they were selling the original films on VHS in the UK shortly before the remastered version came out the advertising said that this was the last chance to buy this version of the film.

    --
    -- Sorry, I can't think of anything funny to say here.
    1. Re:Can he do that? by Jugalator · · Score: 3, Funny

      Yeah, I wonder if they can after having announced this...
      Maybe they'll hire actors and cut together a new edition, calling it the original one. :-p

      Seriously, the only thing that claim would tell me is that:
      1. We don't plan to release the original one in more editions => this is your last chance.
      2. We changed our minds.
      3. Profit.

      --
      Beware: In C++, your friends can see your privates!
  10. Awesome! by Jeian · · Score: 5, Interesting

    It pissed me off to no end when I got the original trilogy on DVD, and they'd replaced the ghost of the "old" Anakin Skywalker with the ghost of the "young" Anakin Skywalker at the end of RotJ.

  11. No thanks by MemoryDragon · · Score: 5, Funny

    I am still waiting for the Jar Jar Binks edition. The one where the movies are done as they were meant to be, with Luke being replaced by Jar Jar Binks.

    1. Re:No thanks by powerlord · · Score: 2, Insightful

      I am still waiting for the Jar Jar Binks edition. The one where the movies are done as they were meant to be, with Luke being replaced by Jar Jar Binks.

      You know ... that actually might explain a lot of the plot twists and acting style.

      --
      This space for rent. All reasonable inquiries will be entertained at proprietors discretion.
  12. Re:In response to overwhelming demand ... by aug24 · · Score: 5, Funny

    Sorry, in this modern world, you can't shoot *first* unless you're the baddy...

    You'll have to wait till the SW fans try to shoot you and miss.

    Justin.

    --
    You're only jealous cos the little penguins are talking to me.
  13. I was so waiting for this news story! by forgotten_my_nick · · Score: 5, Funny

    Just so I could say "May the 4th be with you".

    *drumroll* *cymbals*

    Thank you, thank you, try the lobster.

  14. I felt a great disturbance in the Force... by phlegmofdiscontent · · Score: 5, Funny

    as if millions of hells had frozen over and were suddenly silenced.

  15. Nice to see by MImeKillEr · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Nice to see that they're relasing the original versions in the same boxes. Now I can show my kids the versions I saw, and not the "digitally enhanced" (read:bastardized) versions where they cut/rearranged scenes.

    See http://www.dvdactive.com/editorial/articles/star-w ars-the-changes-part-one.html for a listing of the changes between thr original Star Wars and the 2004 "digitally enhanced" version. No doubt, the DVD release will match those of 2004.

    I imagine he's bastardized Empire and Jedi as well.

    --
    Cruising the internet on my TI-99/4A @ a whopping 300 baud!
    1. Re:Nice to see by Lord+Bitman · · Score: 2, Funny

      Just be sure to keep the remastered versions that come with them in a locked box where the kids can't reach.

      --
      -- 'The' Lord and Master Bitman On High, Master Of All
  16. We saw this coming, right? by sdo1 · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Come on. Let's not kid ourselves. As much as George likes to pretend he's taking the high ground and being true to his artistic vision (which annoyed me, but at least I could respect), we all knew this would come down to $$$$. In the grand scheme, it's a trivial amount of work to get these DVDs ready to go and the cost of production is trivial. This decision will bring in millions upon millions of dollars into Lucasfilm and there's no way they could turn that down.

    It has nothing to do with the pressure we collectively put on them. It has nothing to do with George caving on his desire to keep tweaking his movies.

    It has to do with bringing in more moolah. Just keep milking the cash cow.

    Um... and I... um.... well... I'll probably be first in line to squeeze the teet.

    -S

    --
    --- What parts of "shall make no law", "shall not be infringed", and "shall not be violated" don't you understand?
  17. Pricing and the MPAA by zaguar · · Score: 2, Insightful

    They are "attractively priced" at $200 so the MPAA can recoup the losses that occur when someone who buys the set makes a copy of each disk for individual usage, at 6 disks, $35 for each disk (conservative estimate by the MPAA), they lose $210 (What does the MPAA expect? A user to buy 2 copies?). The MPAA, in their generosity and wisdom, is prepared to accept losing $10 per sale, hence the price of $200

    --
    "Sure there's porn and piracy on the Web but there's probably a downside too."
  18. This was Palpatine's idea by sg3000 · · Score: 2, Interesting
    I, for one, am happy with the remastered, remixed, redone versions. In fact, I think that Lucas should make even more random changes in the next versions. Like changing it so that when Itchy plays Scratchy's rib twice in succession, it makes three different tones!

    However, if Lucas wants to put out new DVDs, more power to him. However, you know what's funny? Sure, Lucas is releasing DVDs that have the original uncut versions of the OT on them. But note:

    Each release includes the 2004 digitally remastered version of the movie and, as bonus material, the theatrical edition of the film.

    If you absolutely have to have the original versions, you have to buy the Special Editions to get them. So if you've already bought the DVD collection, you get to buy it again. So the "OMG!!1! HAN DIDN'T SHOOT FIRST?? I'M SO BUMMED!!" crowd get to buy the version they hate *twice*.

    Sure, those consumers will put the other versions up for sale on Ebay as fast as possible. But by the time they sell, the Bluray/HD-DVD version comes out.

    The circle is now complete!
    --
    Insert simplistic political, ideological, or personal proselytization here.
  19. Wish someone would do the same for Blade Runner by trellick · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Personally ( and I know I might be in the minority here) I preferred the original theatrical release to the 'Director's Cut'.

    Mr Scott I have a lot of time for - but in this case, I have to disagree.

    1. Re:Wish someone would do the same for Blade Runner by iainl · · Score: 2, Informative

      A 3-version box of Blade Runner has been prepped by Warners (Theatrical, "Director's Cut" and an actual new cut by Ridley, rather than what was basically a workprint) for years now. But it's up to its proverbial neck in a legal quagmire, with no sign of a release. At this rate, I doubt it will appear on DVD at all, but make the jump to the next format.

      --
      "I Know You Are But What Am I?"
  20. Re:In response to overwhelming demand ... by MobileTatsu-NJG · · Score: 2, Funny

    "You'll have to wait till the SW fans try to shoot you and miss."

    Don't panic. It sounds tougher than it really is. You can get right up in their face and they'll STILL miss.

    --

    "I like to lick butts!" by MobileTatsu-NJG (#32700246) (Score:5, Informative)

  21. Twenty-nine years of accumulated spoilers by dpbsmith · · Score: 3, Insightful

    It's not possible to "enjoy Star Wars as it first appeared in 1977."

    Watching a DVD is NOT the same as watching projected film on a screen in a theatre.

    But the big problem is, I don't know of any safe way to erase, then subsequently restore, my memories of the past couple of decades so that I can see the film knowing nothing about the movie except a Time magazine review and a friend saying it was great.

    How can I watch the 1977 Star Wars without the burden of twenty-nine-years'-worth of accumulated "spoilers?."

    1. Re:Twenty-nine years of accumulated spoilers by FurryFeet · · Score: 4, Interesting

      Do what I did. Have a kid and raise him until he's around 8-9 years old. Get the original trilogy in DVD. Sit down on a Sunday afternoon and watch it with him. Relive the moment.

      Granted, my boy is only two right now, so my plan won't come to fruition for a few more years. Also, I don't know what to do whith the kid afterwards. Oh, those pesky details.

  22. Don't get too proud of this technological terror by mrshowtime · · Score: 4, Interesting

    Lucas is essentially releasing a high grade dvd bootleg of the Uber 1993 Laserdisc release. The picture quality will be 1993 and the sound 2.0 stereo AND you still have to essentially re-buy the crappy 2004 release which comes in the same set. Lucas is such a cock. I know damn well he has perfect, unaltered, un-CGI'ed, versions of Star Wars; he has to have them. But, instead, he is pretending that they were somehow destroyed.

    --
    "Jeremy, you need to get to an internet cafe and cut and paste some appropriate sentiments about me from the world wide
  23. Re:In response to overwhelming demand ... by shreevatsa · · Score: 3, Informative

    You're acting like George Lucas, insisting that one needs an excuse (Lucas's official line is that Han shooting Greedo first makes him seem cold and heartless, nevermind the fact that Greedo had a gun pointed at him, and besides, "cold and heartless" is how we like Han, anyway). To counter that lame line, someone put together this page: Top 10 Other Things that Han Shot that Didn't Shoot at Him First.

    To the GP — your thoughts about Han and Greedo might be slightly altered after you see this alternate version ;)

  24. I want the ultra configurable version by 91degrees · · Score: 5, Funny

    Options:

    Han shoots first.
    Greedo shoots first.
    Both shoot at the same time.
    Greedo doesn't shoot.
    Han doesn't shoot. Greedo accidentally shoots himself.
    Nobody shoots. Greedo declares the life of a rogue is not for him, and goes off to enjoy the sunshine
    Jabba shoots first.

    1. Re:I want the ultra configurable version by warkda+rrior · · Score: 2, Funny

      When does Cowboy Neal shoot?

      --
      You need to install an RTFM interface.
  25. The Dukes of Hazzard? by eldavojohn · · Score: 5, Funny
    Since this is coming from a user with the ID "the_duke_of_hazzard," I don't think you're in any position to complain about plot.

    The Dukes of Hazzard had the worst cookie cutter plot lines ever. From the above link:
    The plot of a Dukes Of Hazzard episode is the least essential part of the script. Be creative in the structure of your episode, but adhere to the following rule: If the question "Is this the episode where Boss Hogg comes up with a crazy scheme to put the Dukes in jail or swindle honest folk, but in the end is foiled in part due to his own stupidity?" doesn't apply to your episode, you've got to go back to the drawing board. Remember: there is no "very special episode" where Uncle Jesse reveals that he can't read, or the Dukes learn a special lesson about teenage pregnancy. A "very special episode" of Dukes Of Hazzard is one that features the Oak Ridge Boys.
    --
    My work here is dung.
    1. Re:The Dukes of Hazzard? by the_duke_of_hazzard · · Score: 2, Funny

      How very dare you! My PhD was in existential motifs in Dukes of Hazzard sub-plots. Those Duke boys never did mean no harm.

    2. Re:The Dukes of Hazzard? by Rakarra · · Score: 2, Insightful
      Remember: there is no "very special episode" where Uncle Jesse reveals that he can't read, or the Dukes learn a special lesson about teenage pregnancy. A "very special episode" of Dukes Of Hazzard is one that features the Oak Ridge Boys.

      Honestly this is probably one of the Dukes of Hazzard's few strengths. Those "very special episodes" almost always fall flat in most dramatic shows, and especially fall flat in comedies. They're generally worthless, don't make you feel empathy for the characters, and too often involve blatant heartstrings-manipulation.

  26. Re:In response to overwhelming demand ... by tomhudson · · Score: 2, Funny

    Don't panic. It sounds tougher than it really is. You can get right up in their face and they'll STILL miss.

    So Dick Cheney isn't a Star Wars fan, I presume.

  27. But I thought.... by cvd6262 · · Score: 4, Informative

    AP: Why not release both the originals and special editions on DVD?

    Lucas: The special edition, that's the one I wanted out there. The other movie, it's on VHS, if anybody wants it. ... I'm not going to spend the, we're talking millions of dollars here, the money and the time to refurbish that, because to me, it doesn't really exist anymore.

    Source (9/15/2004)

    --

    I'd rather have someone respond than be modded up.

    1. Re:But I thought.... by jridley · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Well hell, if it doesn't exist, then he shouldn't mind if I make a few hundred copies and hand them out at conventions.
      As far as I can tell, the original trilogy had been the subject of more "labor of love" really well done fan DVD sets than anything else I can think of. I personally have three different DVD sets, all well done, some with nice extras and good menus.

      Honestly, I've already bought the original trilogy at least 3 times, once on CED videodisc (!), once on VHS, then again on VHS special edition (I recently put that box set on a "freebies" table at a convention and nobody took it). I'd probably buy the original series on DVD, but I'm not buying a combo original+SE copy; I wouldn't want anyone to think that I actually bought it because of the SE.

    2. Re:But I thought.... by m50d · · Score: 2, Interesting
      to me, it doesn't really exist anymore.

      He's not saying it actually doesn't exist. He's saying he doesn't give a fuck about it. And you'll notice he's not promoting it. Seems the studio feels different. No contradiction.

      --
      I am trolling
  28. What about Biggs at the beginning? by Saint+Fnordius · · Score: 4, Interesting

    I know that the scenes were filmed, and I seem to remember seeing the scenes with Luke's friends in Anchorhead, where Biggs told him he was joining the rebellion (leaving Luke behind on Tattooine). Sure, it's 29 years ago, and I was only nine years old at the time, but I can still remember later reports saying that it was in the original theater release (and the first victim of George's redacting desires). It was one of those things that Lucas didn't want to do, but added because he was told just having the 'droids would remind people of THX 1138 in a bad way.

    I personally liked the scenes. It made it easier for the audience to feel Luke's feeling of being left behind while important things happened Elsewhere, and made Bigg's death in the trench more painful.

    1. Re:What about Biggs at the beginning? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Informative
  29. Re:In response to overwhelming demand ... by squiggleslash · · Score: 3, Insightful
    When I revealed that I (a) bought the 2004 versions and (b) liked them... a lot, there were people I knew who didn't want to talk to me, and I got some barbed comments against the notion in my journal.

    There are a lot of people who have a particular memory of how things were, and want that memory respected. I think, in all seriousness, there's only one serious flaw in the 2004 remakes, the whole Han-on-Jabba's-tail thing. The Han and Greedo shoot each other simultaneously is, really, nothing. It doesn't matter. It would never have been an issue, nor changed anyone's view of Han as a character, had it been that way in 1977. It only matters because it's a change, and because it replaced an even bigger change in the (awful) 1990s releases. For the most part, the 2004 versions fixed the ugliness of the 1990s versions. The CGI is fixed. There are no serious characterization issues (beyond Jabba's tail.)

    I think this release is a good thing. There are people who'll watch both and will say "1977's for me, it's the real deal, I'm never going to like anything else", and there are others who'll watch both and say "You know, now I've seen it, I don't think my fears about the 2004 version are realised." We'll see.

    Hopefully the number of valueless idiots who keep comparing Lucas's wish to keep his movies true to his vision to an act of terrible violence perpetuating largely against women will dwindle too. There's no excuse any more for it.

    --
    You are not alone. This is not normal. None of this is normal.
  30. Re:All I want to know is by WormholeFiend · · Score: 4, Informative

    He's probably referring to Jabba's slave dancer's wardrobe malfunction, in ROTJ, just before he flushes her down the drain.

  31. Oh, you just reminded me by Maximilio · · Score: 3, Insightful
    Do you mean the idiotic sequence they inserted with Vader "going to his shuttle" where they couldn't even be bothered to hire James Earl Jones for 10 seconds of dialogue dubbing -- which additionally ruined the entire soundtrack by putting a dead-ass-dragging darth vader's theme in the middle of the escape from Bespin sequence?

    That one galled me more than Han shooting first, and it was mostly because there was so little reason for it to have been there -- I as a 10-year-old understood perfectly that Vader could have caught a shuttle to his star destroyer in the time allowed. I didn't have to fucking have it spelled out for me, and I especially didn't need to see it done so badly. I mean, there were maybe 2 or 3 things in all of the special editions that were done so well they were a pleasure to see -- the re-done Mos Eisley, and the liftoff of the Millenium Falcon from same, but they didn't clean up a lot of the obvious green blotches on the screen left over during the final battle scene, and almost all of the extras were in some way slopped in there. It's like we've got a clone of George Lucas monkeying with his films, because whatever touch he had in the '80's with filmmaking he's completely lost -- he thinks nothing of shattering the rhythm of a scene with gratutious special effects or fanboi money shots. This applies to the new films as well. It's like they were made by a different person.

    I still own the originals on laserdisc, but like a complete tool I will probably be buying these re-issues because the resolution is higher on DVD. And my LD player is broken and I can't think of a good reason to replace it.

  32. Re:All I want to know is by hkgroove · · Score: 5, Funny

    Dunno, we'll have to find out. My VHS copies are dying. There is still good in you, George, I can feel it!

  33. Episode VII: Repackaging of the Clones by digitaldc · · Score: 3, Informative

    Finally! Another way to donate to one of my favourite charities: The Lucas Family Inheritance

    I wonder if he will be re-releasing Star Wars in 3-D in the original, and altered formats?

    The money will never run out at this rate ;)

    --
    He who knows best knows how little he knows. - Thomas Jefferson
  34. Re:WTF? 1977? by Digi-John · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Copying a 20-30 year old work does not deprive the artist of that work. They've had plenty of opportunity to sell it & can continue to sell it.

    If our copyright terms hadn't been extended so many times, the movies could very well be in the public domain already; Lucas could keep selling them, but others would be free to distribute them as they please.

    --
    Klingon programs don't timeshare, they battle for supremacy.
  35. Re:No need to cry .... by voice_of_all_reason · · Score: 2, Funny

    No need to cry ...over spilled milk.

    Pfft. I only cry over spilled blue milk.

  36. OMG! Now I can buy them for the 7th time!! by mrfett · · Score: 2, Funny

    OMG! OMG! OMG! OMG! OMG! OMG! OMG! Thank you George for milking me for my entire net worth!

  37. LaserDiscs by HeaththeGreat · · Score: 2, Funny

    Now the value of my Star Wars LaserDiscs is going to plummet!

  38. Re:In response to overwhelming demand ... by Professor_UNIX · · Score: 4, Funny

    3. I don't remember seeing Episodes IV through VI (I was more into Star Trek as a kid) and I'd like to pick them up to find out what happens with this whole Darth Vader guy from Episode III that I just watched last week for the first time. Does he ever figure out he has two kids? Will he make up with Obi Wan? Whatever happened to the Jedi order? Did it die off or are there still Jedi out there? What about Yoda? Whatever happens to him? I think I'm officially hooked on this whole Star Wars thing and I'm dying to know how it all turns out so I'll be sure to pick up these DVDs. For example, whatever happens to Jar Jar Binks after Episode III? Hopefully Episode IV will clear that up.

  39. Can you REALLY trust your memory? by Zontar_Thing_From_Ve · · Score: 2, Interesting

    I have no idea whether or not this scene was in the original version of the film, which I did see when it came out. It's been too long for me to remember stuff like that. I can say that the human mind has an amazing ability to remember things that never happened. I worked with 2 guys a few years who both swore they saw on TV an episode of _You Bet Your Life_ with Groucho Marx where supposedly the following conversation took place:

    Groucho: Why do you have so many kids? (NOTE: the man is said to have had 9 kids or maybe more, depending on who tells the story.)
    Man: I love my wife.
    Groucho: Well, I love my cigar, but I take it out every now and then.

    I read some of a biography of Groucho and the author looked into this. He said that it NEVER happened on the TV show, but a conversation somewhat similar did happen in the early 1950s on Groucho's radio version of the show, which predated the TV version by some years. Interestingly enough, the incident did NOT happen on broadcast, but happened while the show was on a commercial break. If you look on the Internet, this whole story has been debunked at various sites, yet I had 2 guys who were very vehement that they saw this. I told one of them that there was no evidence anywhere to support his story and lots of evidence that it never happened and he basically said "I still remember seeing it."

    One of the guys used to tell stories about a couple of Soupy Sales shows he swears were broadcast nationally in the early 1960's that involved some jokes about 4 letter words. I did some research on the internet and these have been debunked, yet this guy swears he saw these episodes. Frankly, it makes no sense at all that this could even be true in that era of broadcast TV, but this guy was about ready to fight you if you suggested that it didn't really happen. Maybe you're right and it was in the film, but sometimes memory plays tricks on us.

  40. Obligatory SWHS joke by zoeblade · · Score: 2, Funny

    What does Lucasfilm have that so few movies today lack? Timelessness

    Yep, Star Wars Holiday Special makes people cringe just as much today as it did when it first aired.

  41. Sigh... by Mayhem178 · · Score: 2, Insightful

    I know it's trendy to bash George Lucas and Star Wars and all, but I'm getting a little tired of hearing the same arguments against them over and over.

    "George Lucas makes a lot of money, therefore he's a sell-out and evil." Well, gee, I never would have guessed that a guy should expect to make money off a venture into which he has poured 32 years of his life and millions upon millions of dollars of his own money. And let's not forget that when he was first starting out, he fully expected failure. He produced ANH with the movie studios laughing in his face. Even the actors working for him thought it was a little silly.

    "George Lucas says one thing, then a few years later changes his mind." Such high standards! I know that something I said a few years ago sure doesn't hold much much water with me now. What do you expect him to do? Read the future?

    "Star Wars sucks!" Wonderful. It's great that you're outspoken and all. I don't think you're gonna be able to talk Lucas out of releasing this new box set, but you're welcome to try.


    So, we've had an original VHS release, a special edition release, and a DVD box set release of the original trilogy. So what if he wants to release the originals again on DVD? No one's forcing you to buy them. If it's really that big a deal to you to see the original cut vs. the remastered/re-edited versions, then buy them. If not, then don't. It's as simple as that. Don't put the blame at Lucas' doorstep.

    Me, personally, I'm probably going to hold out and see what the impending 6-DVD box set will be like. I already have the special edition VHS tapes and the remastered box set. If the 6-DVD box set doesn't include the original trilogy as it was before the special edition re-editing, then I'll just buy this set that coming soon.

    --

    "You will pay for your lack of vision..." - Emperor Palpatine to Ray Charles

  42. Re:shouldn't RotJ be in THX like in the theatres?? by _Shorty-dammit · · Score: 2, Informative

    THX isn't an audio format, it is specifications for audio reproduction. It isn't 5.1, or 6.1, or 7.1, or any other digit.digit for that matter. THX is just a guarantee that it meets certain qualities. Nothing is "in THX." www.thx.com

  43. OriginalTrilogy.com by Tryfen · · Score: 4, Informative

    Come take a look at http://originaltrilogy.com/ - these are real fans who've taken the original Laserdiscs(!) and created DVDs with ALL the original content in them.

    Top stuff for any fan.

    --
    If a square is really a rhombus, why aren't all triangles purple?
  44. Re:In response to overwhelming demand ... by dfung · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Hilarious!

    My favorite "pointless thing that you notice" in the original Star Wars was when Obi-wan tells Luke after the jawa vehicle attack "These blast points are too accurate for anyone but Imperial stormtroopers." Those troopers basically didn't hit anything they were aiming at for the next 2 movies/6 years!

    I too have the laserdisc versions both of the original commercial release and the remastered edition. Lucase wants our money. How long can it be before the "super-original" version comes out where the scrolling text starts with "Star Wars" instead of "Episode IV:A New Hope"? Now that would be something!

  45. The classic saga by Joe+the+Lesser · · Score: 4, Funny

    Ben Kenobi: For almost two decades the star wars movies were enjoyed by all. Before the dark times. Before the Edits.

    Luke Skywalker: How did the movies die?

    Ben Kenobi: A film producer named George Lucas, who was an idol of mine until he turned to evil, helped the industry change the scenes. He betrayed and murdered the Star Wars movies.

    ---------------------

    Darth Vader: "There is no escape. Don't make me edit you. Luke, you do not yet realize your importance. You've only begun to discover your power. Join me and I will edit your training. With our combined strength we can end this great film series and bring profit to the company"

    Luke Skywalker: "I'll never join you!"

    Darth Vader: "If you only knew the power of the Movie Business. Obi-Wan never told you what happened to the movies."

    Luke Skywalker: "He told me enough! He told me you killed him!"

    Darth Vader: "No. I am the movies."

    Luke Skywalker: "No. That's not true! That's impossible!"

    Darth Vader: "Search your feelings. You know it to be true."

    Luke Skywalker: "Noooooooo!"

    Darth Vader: "Luke, you can destroy the Movie Business. It has foreseen this. It is your destiny. Join me, and together we shall rule Hollywood as father and son. Come with me. It is the only way."

    ---------------

    Luke Skywalker: "Search your feelings, Lucas. You can't do this. I feel the conflict within you. Let go of your hate."

    Darth Vader: "It is too late for me, consumers. The Movie Business will show you the true nature of money. It is your master now."

    Luke Skywalker: "Then my movies are truly dead."

    -------------------

    Anakin Skywalker: "Luke, help me take these edits off."

    Luke Skywalker: "But you'll die."

    Anakin Skywalker: "Nothing can stop that now. Just for once, let me look on you with my original film."

    (Luke disconnects and releases the original films on dvd.)

    Anakin Skywalker: "Now, go my consumer. Leave me."

    Luke Skywalker: "I won't leave you here; I've got to save the movies!"

    Anakin Skywalker: "You already have, Luke. You were right, you were right about me. Tell your fellow consumers you were right..."

    --
    "I only speak the truth"
    Karma: null(Mostly affected by an unassigned variable)
  46. Everyone forgets by DrugCheese · · Score: 2, Interesting

    the most important thing lost from the original 3.

    We'll finally be able to dance to the Yub Nub song at the end of Jedi again

    --
    *DrugCheese rants*
  47. Bad Joke... by red_kenotic · · Score: 2, Funny

    May the forth... be with you

  48. grail by uberjoe · · Score: 2, Funny

    Please, Please, this is supposed to be a happy occasion. Lets not bicker and argue about who killed who.

    --

    The days of the digital watch are numbered.

  49. Sorry Lucas - I've owned these for FIVE YEARS by AudioEfex · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Sorry George. I bought bootleg copies (very nice bootlegs) a half a decade ago when you stated publicly that you would NEVER release these.

    Now that you've changed your mind, I'm not just going to run out and buy them. Why should I? I already have them. Sure, they may have a bit better video quality, but I'm refusing to give you my $ just because you realized you needed the cash and it meant more than your supposed "artistic integrity".

    Too little, too late. You had a good 15 years of me buying everything you put out (FS VHS, Widescreen VHS box set, Definitive Collection LD's, "face" CLV LD's)....but your attitude towards fans, in spite of this 11th hour reversal, just make me not care.

    I have no problem paying good money for great product, but conversely when someone like Lucas dicks fans over and over I have no problem going the bootleg/download route. I bet the BitTorrent sites will have it before it even comes out. :) And it's all Lucasfilms fault that I'm not giving them any more of my cash. I didn't buy the 2004 editions (raping the memory of dead actors by replacing them digitally was the limit for me), and I won't buy these.

    AE

  50. X0 edition by gEvil+(beta) · · Score: 2, Interesting

    So, does this mean that those guys can stop the work they've done on the X0 laserdisc rips?

    --
    This guy's the limit!
  51. Re:All I want to know is by ffrinch · · Score: 4, Informative
  52. Re:In response to overwhelming demand ... by Sage+Gaspar · · Score: 2, Insightful

    For a lot of people, Han Solo made Star Wars. I really don't care about the Jedi, good vs. evil, all that rehashed crap... the cool part is a cocky, badass smuggler with a cobbled-together tin can of a spaceship living on the frontier. Han's the only remotely interesting character in all six films aside from Obi-Wan, Lando, and a couple of minor players.

    As a similar change, what if we edited it so that in the Emperor's room at the very end, Vader attacks first instead of Luke striking out in anger. That sorta changes the mood of the whole scene and Luke's entire character. Same thing with Han allowing Greedo to get a shot off at point blank range, and also Greedo somehow missing from two feet away.

  53. Yoda is the Jedi Measuring Device by Ahnteis · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Actually, it seems that pretty much ANY jedi can sense another jedi's strength. Why not just have Yoda et al say "hey! This one's teh strong!".

    1. Re:Yoda is the Jedi Measuring Device by ultranova · · Score: 3, Interesting

      Actually, it seems that pretty much ANY jedi can sense another jedi's strength. Why not just have Yoda et al say "hey! This one's teh strong!".

      Two reasons.

      First, it becomes impossible to show that Anakin's strongest ever. Sure, Yoda might say that Anakin's the strongest for 900 years, but beyond that, you need some sort of numerical indicator.

      And second, Lucas got the retroactive continuity syndrome. It seems to hit to every successfull author who returns to his old stories sooner or later. You start wondering if you couldn't refine some point a little, and before you know it, Takhisis has turned from the Dark Queen to a pathetic punch of neurosis who gets killed by an equally pathetic lovesick elf, the Valheru have stopped being the supreme threat from the past and become little more than puppets on a string, and oh yes, the Force has become something that a rodent (ysalamiri) can nullify and a cell organ (midichlorian) can influence.

      That's the most difficult part of writing stories and peeling onions: you have to know when to stop.

      --

      Forget magic. Any technology distinguishable from divine power is insufficiently advanced.

  54. I have this to say about the "special editions" by C0vardeAn0nim0 · · Score: 2, Funny

    "Don't be too proud of this technological terror you've constructed. The ability to destroy a movie is insignificant next to the power of the Force."

    with my apologies to Lord Vader.

    --
    What ? Me, worry ?
  55. Re:Finally? by MrP-(at+work) · · Score: 2, Informative

    "original" doesn't mean the first 3. original means han shoots first, no stupid cgi, no haydens ghost at the end, etc. the actual ORIGINAL theatrical releases

    --
    [an error occurred while processing this directive]
  56. Star Wars Finally? by W4HTX · · Score: 2, Informative

    I hate to burst your bubble, but they released the 'box set' of all three of the Star Wars original Trilogy a good while back, 2 years ago just before Christmas I think. I have it on DVD, and while it does not contain the original theatrical release, who would really want that? It isn't anywhere near the quality of the digitized DVD version. So as to compare how good DVD is over film? What's the point, they've demonstrated that already!

  57. It's a trap! by binary+paladin · · Score: 4, Interesting

    No. He's more machine now than man, twisted and evil.

    Seriously, this isn't about good in the least. Let me do some translating here. From TFA:

    "Over the years, a truly countless number of fans have told us that they would love to see and own the original version that they remember experiencing in theaters," said Jim Ward, President of LucasArts and Senior Vice President of Lucasfilm Ltd. "We returned to the Lucasfilm Archives to search exhaustively for source material that could be presented on DVD. This is something that we're very excited to be able to give to fans in response to their continuing enthusiasm for Star Wars."

    Like all PR machines, there's a certain amount of fudging that goes on, let me translate:

    "Over the years, a throng of vicious purists have told us that the so called 'improvements' suck balls. What they want to see is the original before we did more damage than repair. There was also a large number of nerds stationed outside George's house chanting, 'Han Shot First.'" said Jim Ward, President of LucasArts and Senior Vice President of Lucasfilm Ltd. "Pretty much, all we have to do is take the last VHS release before the special editions and prime it for DVD release. However, don't make the mistake that we're being altruistic to our fans in any way. The fact is, many of these weak willed nerds broke down and bought the first DVD release and now that their failure is complete, we can sock it to them with yet another release. George loves cash, what can we say? We double charge the weak and now even milk the cash out of the purists that were holding out."

    Dammit. Dammit. Dammit.

  58. Re:In response to overwhelming demand ... by obender · · Score: 2, Funny
    What about Yoda? Whatever happens to him?

    Details here