Slashdot Mirror


Notebook with Huge 20 Inch Screen Reviewed

An anonymous reader writes "Trusted reviews has a look at the Acer Aspire 9800. This massive machine has a 20.1" screen, two 120GB hard drives in a RAID 0 array, super-multi DVD burner, analogue and digital TV tuners and an Intel Core Duo dual core CPU. And at over 17lb you can even use it for weight training!"

307 comments

  1. Not only that, by fredistheking · · Score: 5, Funny

    It almost gets to the windows loading screen before the battery dies.

    1. Re:Not only that, by Whiney+Mac+Fanboy · · Score: 2, Insightful

      It almost gets to the windows loading screen before the battery dies.
      hehehhe - so true, but everyone I know who has one of the Acer (or Asus) monster laptops falls into that (quite large) 'other' category of laptop users - those who occasionally lug a laptop between work & home & rarely (if ever) have a need to use a laptop away from AC (that outweighs the need for a cheap laptop with big hdd & screen).

      For those users, I guess this laptop will be good, but I bet it will still suffer from the 'goddamn thats one noisy ~0@#\/|3r' problem of having waaaaaaaaay to many fans....

      --
      There are shills on slashdot. Apparently, I'm one of them.
    2. Re:Not only that, by stunt_penguin · · Score: 2, Funny

      I'd say a large, large chunk of the weight is batteries alone, balancing things out a bit

      That said, at 17lbs, it's much less the Acer Aspire as the Acer Perspire.

      Maybe they can get Sure to sponsor them.

      --
      When the posters fear their moderators, there is tyranny; when the moderators fears the posters, there is liberty.
    3. Re:Not only that, by Fulcrum+of+Evil · · Score: 1

      Buy it today and get 3 free sessions with a local chiropractor!

      --
      "We returned the General to El Salvador, or maybe Guatemala, it's difficult to tell from 10,000 feet"
    4. Re:Not only that, by russellh · · Score: 1, Interesting

      I'd rather lug a 20 inch iMac than one of these things.

      --
      must... stay... awake...
    5. Re:Not only that, by Bing+Tsher+E · · Score: 1

      I'm pretty agnostic these days about what I run NetBSD on. The iMac would probably be more expensive, though.

    6. Re:Not only that, by Millenniumman · · Score: 1

      The iMac would be far cheaper. This laptop costs $2600 - $3100. The 20 inch iMac costs $1700 - ~$2500, and is probably a lot more more powerful. The 20 inch model only weighs a few pounds more than this. It doesn't have a battery at all, though.

      --
      Stupidity is like nuclear power, it can be used for good or evil. And you don't want to get any on you.
    7. Re:Not only that, by timeOday · · Score: 1

      They should just forego batteries altogether for these types of machines. It would avoid comparison with normal laptop computers, and practically the only place for battery operation is on the plane anyways, which this thing is definitely not built for.

    8. Re:Not only that, by hey! · · Score: 2, Funny

      Hardly ever a problem. Turns out you can swap the battery in from your Prius.

      --
      Post may contain irony: discontinue use if experiencing mood swings, nausea or elevated blood pressure.
    9. Re:Not only that, by russellh · · Score: 1

      The point (unstated) being simply that physically the imac is set up for use at a desk, being up more at eye level, real mouse, real keyboard etc., without portable power design constraints. But it's also quite luggable. If you're doing video or 3d rendering you could even take 2, 4, or even 6 core duo minis and one lcd.

      --
      must... stay... awake...
  2. Only 1680 x 1050 resolution by peterdaly · · Score: 5, Insightful

    It may have a 20.1" screen, but it's a little light on the pixel density side of things.

    "So let's start with that huge screen. With a widescreen aspect ratio, you're getting a native resolution of 1,680 x 1,050, which to be honest is pretty low considering the physical size. Considering that many 17in notebook screens have a resolution of 1,920 x 1,200, I can't help but find the resolution on this 20.1in display somewhat disappointing. Closer inspection gives some clue as to why the resolution is limited - quite simply, Acer has bolted one of its desktop monitors onto a notebook. Whereas most notebook screens and consequently lids are getting slimmer and slimmer, the lid on the Aspire 9800 is 30mm thick - it's therefore a safe bet that it's exactly the same panel that Acer sells in it's 20.1in desktop monitors."

    Personally I have an older Dell C800 (I or something like that) with a 15" 1600x1200 screen. I value pixels more than size, so for me it's great.

    1680x1050 is horrible resolution for 20" of screen space, but I guess if you value size more than pixels, then this is the laptop for you. I would guess that for some users, particularly gamers, raw pixel resolution may not be your highest priority. There's also the "mine's bigger than yours" aspect.

    Frankly, I'm surprised it took this long for a company to bolt a 20" desktop screen onto a laptop base.

    Oh yeah...don't forget the Holy 17 Pounds Batman! I'd be willing to bet that doesn't count the power brick. Does it come with wheels and a pull handle?

    Anyway, if I had the cash burning a hole in my pocket, I'd pass this one by.

    1. Re:Only 1680 x 1050 resolution by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      No, 1920x1200 is the wide screen pixel count. See how that height in pixels is the same there? even my 17" dell widescreen is 1920x1200, along with my 24" dell , mmmmmmmmmm.

    2. Re:Only 1680 x 1050 resolution by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 4, Funny

      > Anyway, if I had the cash burning a hole in my pocket, I'd pass this one by.

      And soon after the cash did, the laptop would as well.

    3. Re:Only 1680 x 1050 resolution by VorpalRodent · · Score: 5, Funny
      Frankly, I'm surprised it took this long for a company to bolt a 20" desktop screen onto a laptop base.

      I did that long ago. The problem was that the CRT made the laptop a bit top heavy.

      --
      Take it to the limit, everybody to the limit, come on, everybody fhqwhgads.
    4. Re:Only 1680 x 1050 resolution by Kemanorel · · Score: 1

      Wow, what a truly insightful and enlightening comment. If I had mod points, I'd mod you to oblivion.

      TFA stated that 17" monitors tend to come in at 1,920 x 1,200. How can 1,680 x 1,050 be "just a monitor with a different aspect ratio?" That is fugging light on the pixel count for that much real estate, no matter what ratio it's in.

      */troll fed/*

      --
      Mess not in the affairs of dragons, for you are crunchy and good with ketchup.
    5. Re:Only 1680 x 1050 resolution by cpsc2005 · · Score: 1

      Anyway, if I had the cash burning a hole in my pocket, I'd pass this one by.

      A wise decision. It's not even endorsed by a superhero.

    6. Re:Only 1680 x 1050 resolution by Jherek+Carnelian · · Score: 2, Funny

      1680x1050 is horrible resolution for 20" of screen space, but I guess if you value size more than pixels, then this is the laptop for you. I would guess that for some users, particularly gamers, raw pixel resolution may not be your highest priority.

      Indeed. It isn't size that matters - its what you do with it that counts.

    7. Re:Only 1680 x 1050 resolution by mlinksva · · Score: 2, Informative

      15.4" laptop screens that support 1920x1200 have been around for awhile too. I'm satisfied with mine.

    8. Re:Only 1680 x 1050 resolution by P3NIS_CLEAVER · · Score: 1

      What's old is new
      It is about as heavy as my old Kaypro

      --
      Please sign petition to restore sanity to our banking system!!!

      http://financialpetition.org/
    9. Re:Only 1680 x 1050 resolution by INeededALogin · · Score: 1

      My Apple 20" iMac is 1680 x 1050 and it is gorgeous. Same with the 1400 x 900 17" PB... while it is outdated now... is still gorgeous.

      More pixels on most of our modern operating systems will make you go blind reading small fonts and probably most end users use a lower resolution on-top of those amazing native resolutions to be able to read stuff(I know my mom did). Hopefully, the next round of OSs will fix this... but until then... I just think you are compensating.

      Yes, 1680 x 1050 could certainly be better... but the resolution is better than 1080i and TVs blow that up to 70"+

    10. Re:Only 1680 x 1050 resolution by poot_rootbeer · · Score: 1

      1680x1050 is horrible resolution for 20" of screen space

      ???

      That's about the same resolution as the highest-quality HDTV format, and people don't seem to mind looking at that even on a 61" TV screen.

      1680x1050 on a 20" LCD screen is a fine resolution.

    11. Re:Only 1680 x 1050 resolution by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      1080i is 1920x1080, so it's not better than 1080i (it is progressive though).

    12. Re:Only 1680 x 1050 resolution by Firehed · · Score: 1
      It may have a 20.1" screen, but it's a little light on the pixel density side of things.
      People say that, but they rarely have a problem with the desktop displays. I've got a 20" Dell widescreen that runs at the same 1680x1050, and never once have I thought to myself "gee, this could be much higher resolution." It depends what you're doing, of course - you're not going to want insane-o resolution for gaming since you won't have a card fast enough to run it native. Actually, for most uses, the size is better than sheer pixel density - I really don't want to imagine the squintfest that trying to type documents at 1920x1200 on a 17" screen would be, and I know I wouldn't have purchased my 24" widescreen if it were a 17" of the same resolution.

      Come to think of it, I can think of very few situations where you'd want resolution much beyond 100dpi (which is what most desktop LCDs run at, give or take a little). I just figure that having twice as many apps open at once, all of which are unreadably small, isn't the slightest bit more useful than what you'd get from a screen with a more typical pixel/inch ratio. I've modded one of those 5" Playstation LCDs that run at 640x480, but it's really useless for anything that involves text, even if it's sharper for images (though running Photoshop on a 5" screen seems mighty stupid to me).

      But that's just me. I'd take size before sheer resolution, at least when you're in the desktop panel range (no 640x480 15" panels or anything). I fail to see how people bitch and moan about desktop and some notebook screens not being high enough resolution when HDTVs, for example, are stupidly low-resolution for their size (1280x720 over 42"? What a joke!) Of course, for me notebooks are all about portability, and I shudder at the thought of lugging something that big around (I wouldn't want anything bigger than the 15" MBP I have now)

      --
      How are sites slashdotted when nobody reads TFAs?
    13. Re:Only 1680 x 1050 resolution by drew · · Score: 2, Insightful
      Oh yeah...don't forget the Holy 17 Pounds Batman! I'd be willing to bet that doesn't count the power brick. Does it come with wheels and a pull handle?


      How about (if my conversions are correct) holy 19"x15" (x2"). That's ridiculous- not only will this thing not fit in most any laptop bag or backpack, it will barely fit in airline standard carry on luggage.
      --
      If I don't put anything here, will anyone recognize me anymore?
    14. Re:Only 1680 x 1050 resolution by ces · · Score: 1

      That's about the same resolution as the highest-quality HDTV format, and people don't seem to mind looking at that even on a 61" TV screen.

      Nope ... that would be 1920x1080.

      FWIW my IBM ThinkPad with a 14.1" screen does 1440 x 1050 and my 20" panel at home does 1600 x 1200

      Video is a very different animal from text, line art, or even still photographs. Due to the motion people tend not to notice the low resolutions also people tend to sit much further from a screen when they are watching video versus reading/editing text or CAD drawings.

      Personally since I work with lots of text I tend to prefer very high resolution screens. Anything less than 1280 x 1024 tends to feel cramped.

      --
      Happy Fun Ball is for external use only.
    15. Re:Only 1680 x 1050 resolution by DurendalMac · · Score: 1

      I think it comes with a muscular dwarf to haul it around for you.

    16. Re:Only 1680 x 1050 resolution by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      you moron, you think we use a PC like a TV, only to look at videos ?

      Videos always had the worst resolution. My still photographs are 3264x2448 and would look very bad on a stupid 61" HDTV. They look good on a "little" screen (no more than 20") and on paper, that's it.

      Reading text, using photoshop on your 61" TV would look stupid. 1680x1050 for 20" is bad and very stupid.

    17. Re:Only 1680 x 1050 resolution by dorkygeek · · Score: 1
      More pixels on most of our modern operating systems will make you go blind reading small fonts and probably most end users use a lower resolution on-top of those amazing native resolutions to be able to read stuff(I know my mom did).

      I see this argument coming up again and again! What the hell is WRONG WITH YOU, PEOPLE??! Why don't you just go to the settings dialog and increase that damn system font size instead of whining about improved resolutions?? Jeez.

      --
      Windows is like decaf - it tastes like the real thing, but it won't get you through the day.
    18. Re:Only 1680 x 1050 resolution by dorkygeek · · Score: 1
      I just figure that having twice as many apps open at once, all of which are unreadably small, isn't the slightest bit more useful [...]

      Ever thought about increasing the font size, dude?

      --
      Windows is like decaf - it tastes like the real thing, but it won't get you through the day.
    19. Re:Only 1680 x 1050 resolution by dwater · · Score: 1

      re: ~15" 1920x1200 notebooks.

      Well, I can't find any online. They all seem to be 17" and ~15" ones are less resolution.

      I have a Apple TiBookIII, and am looking around for a replacement. The features I want, but am unable to find are :

      1) full-sized IEEE1394a port (ie has power)
      2) ~15" 1920x1200 (I just added this one)

      Any recommendations?

      Max.

      --
      Max.
    20. Re:Only 1680 x 1050 resolution by INeededALogin · · Score: 0, Flamebait

      How do you make the start button bigger... icons(this may exist on Windows)... seriously... the entire UI is scaled, who wants a task bar that you have to squint to see. And, yes I know you can make it bigger, but it doesn't make the widgets inside of it bigger.

      Also, who wants to have a special CSS file for their webbrowser to increase the fonts to 20pt because your OS renders those fonts in the webbrowser so small. What about applications that are not aware about your system preferences of normal font * 200%.

      Don't lie to yourself... OSs do not support desktop scaling. OS X has a couple of features, but it is far from ideal.

    21. Re:Only 1680 x 1050 resolution by mlinksva · · Score: 1

      Dell Latitude D820 seems to be the only current Dell model anyway.

    22. Re:Only 1680 x 1050 resolution by dwater · · Score: 1

      Strange that I couldn't find that before - though Dell's web site is a nightmare to navigate (IMO).

      In any case, it doesn't seem to have any firewire :(

      Are there *any* non-Apple laptops with full-sized firewire ports, or should I resign myself to some plug-in option?

      Max.

      --
      Max.
    23. Re:Only 1680 x 1050 resolution by mrchaotica · · Score: 1
      Come to think of it, I can think of very few situations where you'd want resolution much beyond 100dpi
      You want it once resolution-independent UIs finally show up in mainstream operating systems (i.e., when Mac OS X Leopard and Windows Vista come out). At that point you'll be able to have a 300dpi monitor and view your text at exactly the same size, but at a much higher quality (e.g. laser printout-like).
      --

      "[Regarding the 'cloud,'] ownership was what made America different than Russia." -- Woz

    24. Re:Only 1680 x 1050 resolution by Firehed · · Score: 1

      Doesn't that just take you back to where you started - making everything bigger, and therefore fitting less on the screen? Additionally, handing in school papers in 18pt tends to go somewhat frowned upon.

      --
      How are sites slashdotted when nobody reads TFAs?
    25. Re:Only 1680 x 1050 resolution by NeMon'ess · · Score: 1

      Notice how your 20" doesn't have as high a DPI as your 14"? To be the equivalent, it ought to do 2048x1536, but virtually the only 20" screen that does that resolution is a highest-end CRT from Viewsonic or the like. 20" LCDs only do 1600x1200, while 19" ones take a huge hit to 1280x1024. I realize users will sit a little farther back from a big screen, but still, what's up with that?

    26. Re:Only 1680 x 1050 resolution by NeMon'ess · · Score: 1

      What about the icons for apps, or squinting at the thumbnails to click on too-small webpages?

    27. Re:Only 1680 x 1050 resolution by tehcyder · · Score: 1
      Indeed. It isn't size that matters - its what you do with it that counts.
      This always brings to mind the quote from Roseanne Barr (I think) about her ex: "what he lacked in size he sure made up for in speed."
      --
      To have a right to do a thing is not at all the same as to be right in doing it
    28. Re:Only 1680 x 1050 resolution by drsquare · · Score: 1

      1680x1050 is horrible resolution for 20" of screen space, but I guess if you value size more than pixels, then this is the laptop for you.

      High resolutions are overrated. Most applications/OSes don't work well at high resolutions anyway, they struggle to consistently scale the fonts and images, so you end up with sections of tiny text and tiny images.

      For most users, high resolution only makes things slightly sharper, execpt for those geeks with inch-thick glasses who have everything in 8pt fonts at 1920x1200, but then there's probably a reason why they wear inch-thick glasses.

      Oh yeah...don't forget the Holy 17 Pounds Batman! I'd be willing to bet that doesn't count the power brick. Does it come with wheels and a pull handle?

      Seventeen pounds is only 7.7kg, if you can't carry that then you must have a wasting disorder.

    29. Re:Only 1680 x 1050 resolution by dorkygeek · · Score: 1
      [...] who wants to have a special CSS file for their webbrowser to increase the fonts to 20pt because your OS renders those fonts in the webbrowser so small

      Preferences... -> Tab "Content" -> Section "Fonts & Colors" -> Size: 20. No need for custom CSS or other fancy stuff...

      Don't lie to yourself... OSs do not support desktop scaling.

      Desktop -> Preferences -> Font -> whatever you want.

      Sorry, but I don't see your problem.

      --
      Windows is like decaf - it tastes like the real thing, but it won't get you through the day.
    30. Re:Only 1680 x 1050 resolution by dorkygeek · · Score: 1
      Doesn't that just take you back to where you started

      Well, that depends on how much you increase it. But nevertheless, every glyph is rendered using more pixels, therefore increasing sharpness etc. Furthermore, things which don't need to be that big then still leave you with more screen real estate.

      Additionally, handing in school papers in 18pt tends to go somewhat frowned upon.

      He hehe hehehehehe, hey man, this joke really just made my day!! :) Or, at least I hope you meant it as a joke, no? Because otherwise, you should turn in your geek card immediately (*mumbles something about n00bs and computers*).

      --
      Windows is like decaf - it tastes like the real thing, but it won't get you through the day.
    31. Re:Only 1680 x 1050 resolution by dorkygeek · · Score: 1

      Well, if the icons get smaller, you gain screen real estate. That's the very idea behind it. Now that squirting on web pages you keep talking about...

      --
      Windows is like decaf - it tastes like the real thing, but it won't get you through the day.
    32. Re:Only 1680 x 1050 resolution by Borland · · Score: 1

      Anyway, if I had the cash burning a hole in my pocket, I'd pass this one by.

      You might, but for someone looking for a semi-portable desktop replacement it's fine, though expensive. The only place I take my main computer is lan parties...otherwise any old laptop will do for business purposes.

      That being said, the Dell 20.1" laptop is better but still too expensive for me.

    33. Re:Only 1680 x 1050 resolution by Jeff+DeMaagd · · Score: 1

      There's the problem of dot pitch. I'd love that for playing HD video and looking at photos, but damn, 150dpi is tiny for any current user interface. Teens and young adults can handle that just fine, but generally they'll probably find in a decade that they won't be able to use that density anymore. I like having smother text and UI elements, not blurry ones or tiny ones. I like sitting back a bit for general use, so I usually set my 21" CRT to SXGA+, for looking at the occasional HD video and good photos, then I might occasionally kick it as high as quad XGA. I hope Vista and Leopard allow me to have true point-size text but crisper text and sharper photos at the same time.

    34. Re:Only 1680 x 1050 resolution by mlinksva · · Score: 1

      HP's "business" line seems to have models with WUXGA and firewire, no idea about full-sized firewire.

    35. Re:Only 1680 x 1050 resolution by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The 2007fp I have here is 1600x1200, so you lose screen size by going to a wide screen format? That sucks.

    36. Re:Only 1680 x 1050 resolution by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Eww. Thanks for forcing me to think about Rosanne Barr having sex. :shudder:

    37. Re:Only 1680 x 1050 resolution by dwater · · Score: 1

      OK...looks like you can get them without MS Windows, which is an advantage over Dell (for one) - but I can't seem to get configure web page to take MS Windows out of the bundle to get a price.

      Ah - no DVI out (without having to buy a dock). I guess I missed that one on my requirement - I thought it would be a given these days. Bummer.

      --
      Max.
    38. Re:Only 1680 x 1050 resolution by NeMon'ess · · Score: 1

      Meh, I don't need them any smaller and harder to click. If my 19" CRT was a 19" LCD (with multiple native resolutions using technology from the future), I'd bump up from 1280x960 to 1360x1024. I don't currently because text gets too fuzzy. For a 20" I wouldn't want to go any higher than 1600x1200 except for occasional messing around in photoshop with some pictures I've taken. That's when I'd like 2048x1536.

  3. lb? by Whiney+Mac+Fanboy · · Score: 4, Informative

    And at over 17lb you can even use it for weight training

    Thats 7.7kgs for those of us not still using British imperial measurements ;-)

    --
    There are shills on slashdot. Apparently, I'm one of them.
    1. Re:lb? by BrianTung · · Score: 2, Informative

      I think the units used in the U.S. are actually an amalgam of various pre-Imperial systems. The U.S. gallon, for instance, is not equal to the Imperial gallon; it's a pre-Imperial gallon (back before the Sith took over).

    2. Re:lb? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

      Nah, it's pretty light in britian. Only 1.1 stone....

    3. Re:lb? by nizo · · Score: 5, Informative
      I just wondered, why are pounds written as "lbs"? I found the answer here



      [Q] From Andrea: "Why are pounds, when used as a weight, abbreviated lbs?"

      [A] The origin is in the Latin word libra, which could mean both balance scales (hence the symbol for the astrological sign Libra, which was named after a constellation that was thought to resemble scales) and also a pound weight, for which the full expression was libra pondo, the second word being the origin of our pound.


      Who says Slashdot isn't educational???

    4. Re:lb? by Coryoth · · Score: 5, Funny

      Given that, as pointed out, the units used in the US are not actually Imperial units, the question must be asked as to what exactly to call that particular unit system. Some suggestions: "Archaic", "Irregular" "Primitive", "Obsolete", or "Wrong".

      Jedidiah.

    5. Re:lb? by kfg · · Score: 1

      The weight in pounds given in the blurb is a conversion from the weight in kilograms given in the FA.

      KFG

    6. Re:lb? by BrianTung · · Score: 3, Insightful

      I'm sure you're not entirely serious, but "archaic" and "obsolete" are obviously incorrect, since they are in current usage in the U.S. The U.S. system cannot be wrong (except from a technical elegance point of view), and it's not primitive in any meaningful sense. That leaves "irregular," which it certainly is.

      Sorry. If it were up to me, we'd have standardized on metric a long time ago, but we're too busy legislating morality. So we'll have to get back to you on that.

    7. Re:lb? by dedazo · · Score: 1
      If you speak or understand any of the Romance languages evolved from vulgar latin (such as Spanish or Italian) you already know this. Because in those languages the word for "pound" is also "libra", so it doesn't take much to relate the "lb" contraction to it.

      So I'd guess about 1/4th of the planet's population already knew this.

      But OK, we'll say Slashdot is "educational". Just this once!

      --
      Web2.0: I love when people Flickr my cuil and digg my boingboing until my google is reddit and I start to yahoo
    8. Re:lb? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      or 1.467 stone or well over half a tod. By the old definition that kind of weight was reserved for portables not laptops. By any weight standard it's like having a small child on your lap.

    9. Re:lb? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      Yeah, it's just us hick Americans who aren't so versed in the ways of the world as the superior Europeans. Please, oh great one, enlighten us some more with this new 'learning'?

      Christ the 'smug' is getting deep in here.

    10. Re:lb? by pistolpfm · · Score: 1

      Not quite as big as this one http://www.argoncorp.com/201lt.html

    11. Re:lb? by Rob+the+Bold · · Score: 1
      Thats 7.7kgs for those of us not still using British imperial measurements ;-)

      That's assuming that the weight was measured at 1G . . . If I were selling laptops, I'd list their weight on Mars. Sure you could use the Moon, but no one would believe you.

      --
      I am not a crackpot.
    12. Re:lb? by protohiro1 · · Score: 3, Funny
      I have a great idea. American's love feet and inches. But they are a pain to work with. So my proposal: the decimal foot.

      That's right, ten inches in a foot. 100 inches in a yard and 1000 yards in a mile. What could possibly go wrong?

      --
      Sig removed because it was obnoxious
    13. Re:lb? by vwjeff · · Score: 2, Funny

      Thats 7.7kgs for those of us not still using British imperial measurements ;-) Or approx. $23,000,000 worth of pure Columbian cocaine.

    14. Re:lb? by tm2b · · Score: 1

      I use the label, "monkey units."

      --
      "It is our blasphemy which has made us great, and will sustain us, and which the gods secretly admire in us." - Zelazny
    15. Re:lb? by Kenshin · · Score: 4, Funny

      What could possibly go wrong?

      The next Mars Rover exploring your backyard?

      --

      Does it make you happy you're so strange?

    16. Re:lb? by Coryoth · · Score: 2, Funny

      I was, of course, not being serious. However, it's worth noting that several of those descriptors are in fact applicable given the right definition:

      obsolete: 2. Outmoded in design, style, or construction;
      primitive: 2b. Being little evolved from an early ancestral type.

      Oddly the US is, technically, a metric country. Some selected quotes from this page on the history of metric measurements in the US:

      "As a result, the U. S. has been "metric" since 1866, but only in the sense that Americans have been free since that time to use the metric system as much as they like."

      "In 1875, the U.S. was one of the original signers of the Treaty of the Meter, which established the International Bureau of Weights and Measures (BIPM)."

      "In 1893, Congress adopted the metric standards, the official meter and kilogram bars supplied by BIPM, as the standards for all measurement in the U.S. This didn't mean that metric units had to be used, but since that time the customary units have been defined officially in terms of metric standards."

      "In the 1970's there was a major effort to increase the use of the metric system, and Congress passed the Metric Conversion Act of 1975 to speed this process along."

      "In 1988, Congress passed the Omnibus Trade and Competitiveness Act, which designates "the metric system of measurement as the preferred system of weights and measures for United States trade and commerce." Among many other things, the act requires federal agencies to use metric measurements in nearly all of their activities, although there are still exceptions allowing traditional units to be used in documents intended for consumers."

      So it seems the US has a long history on slowly plodding toward metric - indeed, it is defined as the standard system for the US. You just seem to have done an appallingly bad job of it.

    17. Re:lb? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Given that, as pointed out, the units used in the US are not actually Imperial units

      Are you saying the US isn't an empire? I beg to differ.

    18. Re:lb? by Coryoth · · Score: 1

      That sounds quite perfect! Thank you.

    19. Re:lb? by HardCase · · Score: 1

      So I'd guess about 1/4th of the planet's population already knew this.

      By your calculation, 3/4 didn't. So?

      -h-

    20. Re:lb? by Dolda2000 · · Score: 1
      Just a tip for those among you who haven't found the great 'units' tool:
      $ units
      2084 units, 71 prefixes, 32 nonlinear units

      You have: 17 lb
      You want: kg
      * 7.7110703
      / 0.12968368
    21. Re:lb? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      No, he's saying that they aren't Imperial units, such as those used in the UK. The US corruption is similar, but has a number of differences. thus; Wrong.

    22. Re:lb? by sasdrtx · · Score: 1

      The resistance to the metric system is one of the best things America's ever done. The utility of a measurement system is in having units that can easily be visualized, mentally manipulated, and are appropriate to the things being measured.

      It's long past time for metric fans to quit bragging about how easy it is to convert centimeters to kilometers. Who cares? How often does anyone need to do that? And what's the point? Why not just stick to the basic meter, liter, and gram without the greek prefixes? Since all metric units are artificial, why have more than one?

      Furthermore, there's this new thing called a calculator that makes converting angstroms to parsecs quite simple if you've a mind to.

      The metric system is just as silly as the ten-day week.

      --
      Most people don't even think inside the box.
    23. Re:lb? by WalksOnDirt · · Score: 1

      That almost makes sense, but the yard would be rather long.

      As an alternative, let's make the inch shorter for more precise work: Say by a factor of 2.54. Then we can make a foot ten of these new inches, and a ten foot yard would be just about the right length.

      --
      a,e,i,o,u and sometimes w and y (at be if of up cwm by)
    24. Re:lb? by russellh · · Score: 1
      I have a great idea. American's love feet and inches. But they are a pain to work with. So my proposal: the decimal foot. That's right, ten inches in a foot. 100 inches in a yard and 1000 yards in a mile. What could possibly go wrong?
      it's been in use for a long time. I have a ruler my dad used in the 1960s that is graduated this way. He called it an architect's ruler.
      --
      must... stay... awake...
    25. Re:lb? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Back before i actually know what it was called, i called imperial units inferior units, and compared to metric, it is :)

    26. Re:lb? by geekoid · · Score: 1

      We were supposde to be converted a long time ago, but Reagan(bastard) cut the spending of promoted it, so it stopped. There was a brief time were some freeways had MPH and KPH on them, cars had speedometers for both readings, and conversation was a manditory to be taught.
      I don't care what system the worl uses, just as long as it is the same.

      --
      The Kruger Dunning explains most post on /. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dunning%E2%80%93Kruger_effect
    27. Re:lb? by anagama · · Score: 1

      Interestingly the old Japanese "foot" (shaku) was base 10. There were 10 sun in a shaku and 10 bu in a sun. For reference, one shaku is just shy of one foot. It starts to break down after that though ... for example, there are 6 shaku in one ken. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Japanese_unit

      --
      What changed under Obama? Nothing Good
    28. Re:lb? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      How about "freedom units"? Afterall, the French use the metric!

    29. Re:lb? by arminw · · Score: 1

      ....The U.S. system cannot be wrong (except from a technical elegance point of view), and it's not primitive in any meaningful sense. That leaves "irregular," which it certainly is......

      The US system is more poetic. A miss is as good as a kilometer just doesn't make for good literature. Going the the second kilometer? How about "Give a man a centimeter and he'll take a kilometer"? Or the 2.54 centimeter worm? We still ned the US measuring system at the very least for literature and poetry.

      --
      All theory is gray
    30. Re:lb? by zenhkim · · Score: 3, Informative

      True -- unless you're measuring weight for certain kinds of materials. This can be illustrated by a riddle that sounds an awful lot like a trick question:

      "Which weighs more -- a pound of feathers or a pound of gold?"

      The obvious answer would be "Neither!" since logically a pound of x should be exactly as heavy as a pound of y. Unfortunately, there are two different (and maddeningly incompatible) standards for measuring a pound: troy and avoirdupois.

      A troy pound is defined as weighing twelve ounces and (historically) is used almost exclusively for precious metals, whereas an avoirdupois pound has sixteen ounces and is used for nearly everything else. Based on this, the pound of feathers weighs *more* than the pound of gold!

      As if that weren't bad enough, the troy ounce is *slightly heavier* than the avoirdupois ounce -- therefore an ounce of feathers weighs less than an ounce of gold! Are we sufficiently confused yet??

      http://www.unc.edu/~rowlett/units/custom.html

      No wonder people dumped that Old English system for metric....

      --
      "All hands, BRACE FOR IMPACT!"
    31. Re:lb? by tehcyder · · Score: 1
      the Treaty of the Meter, which established the International Bureau of Weights and Measures (BIPM)
      Who said History isn't exciting?
      --
      To have a right to do a thing is not at all the same as to be right in doing it
    32. Re:lb? by hey! · · Score: 1

      But they are a pain to work with.

      Actually they're not.

      Inch, foot, yard, furlong, mile, league: these measurements evolved by common people figuring out practical units of measurement for describing everyday things in reasonably round numbers. The advantage of metric is in performing calculations, but only if you use arabic numerals, which they didn't.

      --
      Post may contain irony: discontinue use if experiencing mood swings, nausea or elevated blood pressure.
    33. Re:lb? by adrianmonk · · Score: 1
      I just wondered, why are pounds written as "lbs"? I found the answer here

      I already looked into that. My dad and my uncle, when they were fairly young kids (maybe 6 or 8?) got a job selling some kind of fruit or something door to door, and they did their darndest trying to sign people up to buy this or that many "lubs" of fruit. Much to many of the neighbors' amusement.

      I myself heard that story when I was a kid, so I got curious about it and, I think, asked my teacher at school why it was written "lbs." anyway, and ended up finding out the Libra answer.

  4. For a limited time with our 17lb units by nizo · · Score: 5, Funny

    Included with the purchase of a new unit: one year of free adustments by the chiropractor of your choice.

    1. Re:For a limited time with our 17lb units by CRCulver · · Score: 1

      Indeed. Didn't the Mac Portable tank because its weight was up around that much?

    2. Re:For a limited time with our 17lb units by joe+155 · · Score: 1

      did you check out the price of this thing? £1699 for that I'd want a whole new body when mine broke from carrying it around...

      --
      *''I can't believe it's not a hyperlink.''
    3. Re:For a limited time with our 17lb units by raider_red · · Score: 1

      I think it was only 12 or 13 pounds. I sure wouldn't want to take this thing on a plane. Not only would it be a bear to unload it for the security checkpoint, but you wouldn't have room on the tray table to watch a movie on it.

      --
      It's good to use your head, but not as a battering ram.
    4. Re:For a limited time with our 17lb units by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
  5. Amazing by Nutmegan · · Score: 4, Funny

    ...but can I use it as cell phone?

    1. Re:Amazing by general+scruff · · Score: 1

      HELLO!?!??!?! I Can Barely Hear You!!!!


      (Stupid Caps Limit! What if you really ARE trying to yell!)

      --
      As a rule, I never trust dark brown ketchup.
  6. Battery capac... by network23 · · Score: 5, Funny
    This massive machine has a 20.1" screen, two 120GB hard drives in a RA...

    And a battery capacity to power the unit for 4.5 seco...

    - - -

    Oh Lord, won't you buy me a Color MacBook?

    1. Re:Battery capac... by CrazyJim1 · · Score: 1

      [blockquote]And a battery capacity to power the unit for 4.5 seco... [/blockquote] Oh come on, you couldn't have been typing that in under 4.5 seconds on that machine because Slashdot won't let you post something under like 30 seconds. Nice try buddy, but you're not fooling anyone.

    2. Re:Battery capac... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      We get more tail from both genders every week than you'll get in your entire life, PC user.

    3. Re:Battery capac... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Use the damn preview button. It's there for a reason.

  7. Any commercials about it that use migdets? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Cause those are really funny.

  8. Battery power by dotpavan · · Score: 5, Funny
    FTA:

    "but still has enough battery life to give you a full days work on the move."

    What does it come with? a power plant attached?

    1. Re:Battery power by crazyjeremy · · Score: 1

      The author wasn't talking about this computer when he made that comment... he was talking about latops in general.

    2. Re:Battery power by Overzeetop · · Score: 1

      What they mean is a full day's productivity, which, for your slashdot addict is somewhere around 1.5 hours. No, they really don't count the 6.5 hours we spend on the web as "productive". Go figure.

      --
      Is it just my observation, or are there way too many stupid people in the world?
    3. Re:Battery power by ChrisGilliard · · Score: 0

      What does it come with? a power plant attached?

      It uses cold fusion. :)

      --
      No Sigs!
    4. Re:Battery power by prell · · Score: 1

      Hey, I've worked at some crappity jobs where I only did about two hours of "actual" work per day. So this threshold is variable.

    5. Re:Battery power by Gat0r30y · · Score: 1

      Thats only true because the "work" part of the day is about 15 minutes and the slashdot part of the day is 8 hours.

      --
      Prediction: The real iPhone killer is going to be sex robots from Japan. Think about it.
    6. Re:Battery power by kimvette · · Score: 1

      I'd have guessed plutonium stolen from Libyan terrorists for using fission to generate the 1.21 jiggawatts. . .

      eh, nevermind. I got nothing.

      --
      The Christian Right is Neither (Christian nor right). See: Matthew 23, Matthew 25, Ezekiel 16:48-50
    7. Re:Battery power by Surt · · Score: 1

      They omitted the *'s:

      FTA:

      "but still has enough battery life to give you a full days work on the move.**"

      ** Note: one standard full slashdotter work-day, involving one-half hour of work, 1.5 hours reading slashdot, and 3 hours idling the computer hanging around the break room.

      --
      "Who is the Journal of Quantum Physics going to believe?" --Stephen Hawking
    8. Re:Battery power by HTL2001 · · Score: 1

      but "typical work" does not require 2 huge HDDs and optical drives. I'm guessing that if you actually use those its a lot lower

      --
      By reading this, you have given me brief control of your mind.
    9. Re:Battery power by st0rmshad0w · · Score: 1

      ...on the move.

      So does it come with porters to lug the thing around?

    10. Re:Battery power by I+didn't · · Score: 1
      Actually the author wanted to say:
      a full days work-out on the move."
    11. Re:Battery power by metamatic · · Score: 1

      It's a full French working day.

      --
      GCHQ Quantum Insert installed. If only our tongues were made of glass, how much more careful we would be when we speak
    12. Re:Battery power by romrom97 · · Score: 1


      Did you read the accessories page? Mr. Nuclear comes as option that you can order with it.

  9. Oblig. by Saedrael · · Score: 1

    ...and can it run linux?

    1. Re:Oblig. by grammar+fascist · · Score: 1

      Imagine a Beowulf cluster of these... in Korea! That old people use!

      What's next?

      --
      I got my Linux laptop at System76.
  10. As Strong bad would say... by jollyroger1210 · · Score: 0

    ..A whopping battery life of one half of ten minutes!!

    --
    Purple, because ice cream has no bones.
  11. Half-assed effort by word+munger · · Score: 4, Insightful

    This is such a slapdash attempt at a laptop it's pointless. There's a one-inch margin around the edge of the keyboard, yet the keyboard itself doesn't even have full-sized cursor keys. You've got a full-sized monitor, why not a full-sized keyboard? Obviously it's meant to be lugged around as a gaming machine for LAN parties and the like, but if you're going all-out, why not actually make the thing useable?

    1. Re:Half-assed effort by Rob+T+Firefly · · Score: 1

      I'm a bit confused by the lack of bulky NiCad batteries and a highly dirt-susceptible rollerball pointing device, to complete the fifteen-years-ago form factor they were obviously struggling for.

    2. Re:Half-assed effort by el_gordo101 · · Score: 2, Informative

      I think you want something like this monster...

      --
      TODO: Insert witty sig
    3. Re:Half-assed effort by SeaFox · · Score: 1

      I wonder if it ever occured to the designers to only put in one hard drive and use the extra room for a larger battery.

  12. slugs by everphilski · · Score: 3, Interesting

    0.53 slugs for the engineers in the house

    1. Re:slugs by tehshen · · Score: 4, Informative

      4.64371564×10^27 atomic mass units, for the physicists

      --
      Guy asked me for a quarter for a cup of coffee. So I bit him.
    2. Re:slugs by HardCase · · Score: 0, Redundant

      What fraction of the Library of Congress is that?

    3. Re:slugs by uberjoe · · Score: 1

      Yeah but how many hogsheads is that?

      --

      The days of the digital watch are numbered.

    4. Re:slugs by Gilmoure · · Score: 0

      1/3 a rod off a hogshead.

      --
      I drank what? -- Socrates
    5. Re:slugs by Enrique1218 · · Score: 1

      Like you needed to tell us!

      --
      You don't have to be smart to use a Mac, you just have to be smart enough to buy one
    6. Re:slugs by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      That's like, heavy for the OMG Poniez!!! crowd.
       

    7. Re:slugs by adrianmonk · · Score: 1
      4.64371564×10^27 atomic mass units, for the physicists

      Or a little over 0.15 zentner for Germans who don't like these newfangled metric units.

      (Or for people who are bored enough to go digging through the output of strings /usr/bin/units and use that as a launching point for some creative google-based time wasting.)

  13. Similar in weight to my x286 laptop by gasmonso · · Score: 3, Funny

    I got a beautiful x286 laptop with a couple megs ram and a 10MB drive that weighs that much :) Anyone interested?

    http://psychicfreaks.com/
    1. Re:Similar in weight to my x286 laptop by Short+Circuit · · Score: 1

      Maybe. Drop me a line. :)

    2. Re:Similar in weight to my x286 laptop by jokerr · · Score: 1

      The Lappy 486 is still better than your measily x286.

  14. noteBOOK? by heson · · Score: 3, Funny

    more like an encyclopedia to me.

    1. Re:noteBOOK? by ettlz · · Score: 1

      Actually, it reminds me of the the Atlas of Finite Groups...

  15. market segments by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

    In europe this will be marketed as a workstation replacement and in USA it'll be marketed as compact PDA (just the size of your back pocket).

  16. The SUV of notebooks... by GillBates0 · · Score: 1

    New meme: People who buy SUVs and Aspire9800s are just trying to compensate for their little winkies.

    --
    An Indian-American Hindu committed to non-violent thought/speech/action alarmed by the global explosion of radical Islam
    1. Re:The SUV of notebooks... by heson · · Score: 5, Funny

      Acer Canyonero!

    2. Re:The SUV of notebooks... by generic-man · · Score: 1

      *ahem*

      The "SUV of notebooks" is the HUMMER(R) Laptop. "Just as tough, reliable, and go-anywhere as a HUMMER vehicle, this laptop is the perfect addition to your active lifestyle! Featuring the latest in mobile technology, it's ergonomically styled, and tough enough to survive the wear and tear of every day use whether at home, in the car, or on the go!"

      --
      For more information, click here.
    3. Re:The SUV of notebooks... by toleraen · · Score: 1

      12 yards long, 2 lanes wide, 65 tons of [Taiwanese] Pride!

    4. Re:The SUV of notebooks... by HermanAB · · Score: 1

      Need to power this baby with a fuel cell: "My laptop gets 20 hours to the hogs-head and that's the way I like it..."

      --
      Oh well, what the hell...
    5. Re:The SUV of notebooks... by ettlz · · Score: 5, Funny

      Can you name the 'top with two hard-drives
      A built in webcam and a screen that's wide?
      Ninety-eight double-zero-oooooh,
      9800.

      Well it goes real fast with dual-core brain,
      It's the super-size 'book too big for a plane,
      Ninety-eight double-zero-oooooh,
      9800.

      380 mills deep, 490 mills wide,
      7.8 kilos of Taiwanese pride,
      Ninety-eight double-zero-oooooh,
      9800.

      Top of the line in weightlifting sports,
      Knackered elbows are a matter for the courts,
      Ninety-eight double-zero-oooooh,
      9800.

      She stuns everybody with a CrystalBrite screen,
      She's a 20-inch dual-core computing machine,
      Ninety-eight double-zero-oooooh,
      9800.

    6. Re:The SUV of notebooks... by Carnildo · · Score: 1

      If it can't survive falling down a 50-foot cliff into a mountain stream, I'm not interested.

      --
      "They redundantly repeated themselves over and over again incessantly without end ad infinitum" -- ibid.
    7. Re:The SUV of notebooks... by Gilmoure · · Score: 1

      But can you get it to run on bio-diesel made from resturant grease. Willie would be proud!

      --
      I drank what? -- Socrates
  17. RAID 0? by caluml · · Score: 1

    Personally, I'd find RAID 1 a better choice. Whack it through the dm-crypt layer, plonk XFS on top, and it'd be good to go.

    1. Re:RAID 0? by rad_chad · · Score: 1

      Then you aren't who Acer is targetting with this monster. I can't even fathom the idea of wanting to own this thing, but I can totally see why they'd stick 2 drives in there with RAID 0. The elite hardcore gamer LAN party-goer would eat it up for the perfomance and bragging rights.

    2. Re:RAID 0? by pe1chl · · Score: 1

      Until he bumps it a bit hard, and one of the drives dies.

    3. Re:RAID 0? by mrbooze · · Score: 1

      No, RAID 0 is perfect. I was just thinking the other day about how most laptops really are too reliable, and wondering if there was some way I could cut the MTBF in half.

      I really don't get the RAID 0 thing. I bet 99% of the people who use this laptop won't see any significant performance increase in disk I/O for what they use it for.

  18. This is an Eierlegende Wollmilchsau by Zweideutig · · Score: 2, Insightful

    This is what is referred to in German as Eierlegende Wollmilchsau. This essentially means "egg laying sow." The reason I say this is because it is a laptop trying to be a workstation. This would be better in Apple II C form. I personally don't like anything larger than my 12" iBook (which runs Linux well). I wouldn't want anything larger than my 14" Compaq Evo laptop. There are two types of people that will buy this from Acer: (1) those that like high tech lifting weights (2) those who won't remove their laptop from their desk.

    --
    Powered by caffeine and sugar; BSD
    1. Re:This is an Eierlegende Wollmilchsau by heson · · Score: 1

      I love my Fujitsu lifebook (B142), even if its obsolete.

  19. Having taken up all that desk space by ettlz · · Score: 2, Funny

    I'd at the very least expect some recesses on the top of the lid for a plate, cup and come cutlery. Disconnect the fans, it could even keep my dinner warm!

    1. Re:Having taken up all that desk space by TeknoHog · · Score: 1

      At least it comes with a super multi cup holder.

      --
      Escher was the first MC and Giger invented the HR department.
  20. Jeeze! by DoofusOfDeath · · Score: 1

    At least let me get some tissues before describing the box! And I'm at work, son of a #@$#$%#$

  21. It even comes with a free chiropractor! by Cixel+Sid · · Score: 1

    I got a chassis of HP BL25ps in the basement... heck, why not put a flat-panel on it and lug it around. Weighs the same and has 10x the power. This product will likely miss the market...

  22. Just because... by Shadow+Wrought · · Score: 5, Funny

    The average American lap is increasing is no reason for laptops to follow suit.

    --
    If brevity is the soul of wit, then how does one explain Twitter?
    1. Re:Just because... by SaDan · · Score: 2, Funny

      If you had to lug this 17 pound SOB around, I'll be that lap starts to shrink pretty quickly!

      Maybe this is part of a hidden agenda to get tech people in better shape? I hear they sell a 4 pound USB mouse to go with this thing...

    2. Re:Just because... by geekoid · · Score: 1

      I think the American lap is actually srinking(the amount of available lap, to be precise), so you would need a smaller computer.

      --
      The Kruger Dunning explains most post on /. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dunning%E2%80%93Kruger_effect
    3. Re:Just because... by r00t · · Score: 2, Funny

      We need a 3:1 widescreen form factor for modern laps.

  23. Y'know... by mikecardii · · Score: 1

    I was thinking of getting a lapdesktop for college...

  24. Quality by phorm · · Score: 3, Insightful

    What I've found with Acer in general is that they throw a lot of quantity (in terms fancy features) with not a lot of quality. Fragile frames, dying screens, and various other problems have been a plague to Acer machines for years. Moreover, I've seen the same type of power issues occur in their notebooks from my old 233MMX (T310 I think) notebook all the way to the last Acer machines we bought (about a year ago).

    Having a notebook with features is great, but not when you can't use the thing or have to keep sending it in for repair due to poor design. I'm not sure that this laptop would be any more or less reliable than previous models, but I'd be careful that all those great "features" don't cause one to overlook the issues of reliability.

    1. Re:Quality by John+Harrison · · Score: 1, Informative

      Yet it seems that you buy Acers over and over again. Might I suggest a quality laptop such as an Apple or a Lenovo?

    2. Re:Quality by Kenshin · · Score: 2, Interesting

      I have to agree. A while ago I got a computer with components from Acer's A-Open brand. The motherboard was nothing but trouble, and the monitor went into spasms after about 18 months. I know someone who curently has an Acer laptop, and she says that's a piece of crap, too.

      Beware of BenQ. It's just Acer's new name for consumer electronics.

      --

      Does it make you happy you're so strange?

    3. Re:Quality by phorm · · Score: 1

      Not I, that lesson was learned with my first Acer. It was a former employer who saw "oooo lotsa gadgets for only $1000" that was the culprit for the continued Acer purchases... I'm just the one that got to deal with the warranty issues and fixing 'em.

  25. In other news: by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Acer engineers have decided to expand on the idea of portable performance: It will now offer a desktop case with holds to attach your monitor, keyboard, and a small UPS for carrying ease.

  26. Yes, but..... by HillBilly · · Score: 5, Funny

    ... can it run windows vista?

    --
    "Go into the hall of mirrors and have a bloody hard look at yourself" - HG Nelson
    1. Re:Yes, but..... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yes, but not very well. I'm not too impressed with the specs considering it's XBOX-like HUEG-ness.

  27. Big Muscles! by parasonic · · Score: 5, Funny

    And at over 17lb you can even use it for weight training!**

    ** Applies only to those reading this Slashdot article

    1. Re:Big Muscles! by CDarklock · · Score: 1

      My thoughts exactly. You'd have to be pretty weak to consider 17 pounds a weight worth lifting. Anything less than 50 isn't even worth *counting*, is it?

      --
      Microsoft cheerleader, blue flag waving, you got a problem with that?
    2. Re:Big Muscles! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      Anything less than 50 isn't even worth *counting*, is it?

      You don't lift empty sticks (that's 20 kg), do you?

    3. Re:Big Muscles! by Mignon · · Score: 1
      You'd have to be pretty weak to consider 17 pounds a weight worth lifting.

      Depends what muscle you use to lift it...

  28. Add one more type of user to your list... by raygundan · · Score: 3, Interesting

    3. Those who work at a desk at client sites, but are required by company policy to take their machines home at night.

    I'd LOVE a monitor that size-- but I'm stuck with a puny laptop screen as long as I'm working outside our main office.

  29. Commercial by blackdragon7777 · · Score: 1

    For some reason after reading the blurb on here I am reminded of the dish tv commercial with the guy standing next to the huge speakers and of course the old lady eating the 5 pound steak with the song in the background singing "Big and huge and huge and big!"

  30. Flex by Sazarac · · Score: 1
    From TFA:
    There's a significant amount of flex when typing and the break is a little spongey too.
    And you'll be glad too, when your rowmate on the plane attempts to repeatedly slam your head in it because you whipped out such a big friggin' laptop. God help you if you buy one of these and want me to give up my portion of the armrest so you can play Spider in relative comfort...
    --
    This sig is exempt from disclosure under the privacy Act of 1974.
    1. Re:Flex by foo12 · · Score: 1

      If you're flying in coach, you're not going to be able to open the screen fully let alone fit it within the confines of your personal space. Actually I wonder if seatback tray tables can hold 17lbs without buckling.

    2. Re:Flex by Sazarac · · Score: 1

      I'm sure you are correct. I had to get good at watching movies on my Asus M6N with the screen open only about 30 degrees. The trick was to rest the front part of the laptop on my belly, so I wouldn't have to scrunch down in the seat to peer into the crack and see the movie. Eventually I gave up, and now I just read books in-flight.

      --
      This sig is exempt from disclosure under the privacy Act of 1974.
  31. One good thing might come of this by nonlnear · · Score: 1

    Designers of 17" laptops might look at that beast and finally realise that there has been room for a numeric keypad all along...

    --
    argumentum ad fallacium: Fallacy of defining a fallacy which allows one to dismiss the argument in question.
    1. Re:One good thing might come of this by bazorg · · Score: 1

      You might want to search google for "LG P1 J555P" or for "laptops with numeric keypad" to see (at least) 2 LG models with 15,4" screen and a numeric keypad.

  32. stop dissing it. by nblender · · Score: 4, Insightful
    You're all dissing this thing because it won't fit in your front pocket or run for a week without going to a power outlet. It is what it is. It's a desktop computer that can easily be pitched in your vehicle, driven to a destination, unpacked and used within seconds. Sometimes when you're working, and need to concentrate on a particularly nasty problem or are architecting a really nasty piece of code, you just want to take your computer and go _somewhere_else_. I don't want to pack up all my monitors, keyboard, mouse, cpu, cables, etc. I want to flip the lid down and go to the library or the cabin or wherever.

    My employer bought a Dell D810 for me to use. This thing is so far from being portable it's not even funny. It's huge, heavy, a little flimsy, etc. But it's fast, has a big screen, lots of pixels, and does everything I need (except run OS X). However, when I travel, I still bring my 12" PBG4.

    1. Re:stop dissing it. by joe+155 · · Score: 2, Insightful

      well you just kind of disproved your own point there because, as you say, you always take the smaller one with you. If people want to have a powerful computer and a portable one; get two seperate computers - a desktop and a 12" laptop. If you want to connect them then use a cross over cable.

      The only way this could be useful if for LAN parties (as you mentioned) - which are pretty rare anyway - and not enough of a reason not to buy a desktop which you can upgrade

      --
      *''I can't believe it's not a hyperlink.''
    2. Re:stop dissing it. by ABoerma · · Score: 1

      "[A] desktop computer that can easily be pitched in your vehicle, driven to a destination, unpacked and used within seconds. Sometimes when you're working, and need to concentrate on a particularly nasty problem or are architecting a really nasty piece of code, you just want to take your computer and go _somewhere_else_."

      In such a situation, I'd recommend you to get a 20" iMac. Those _do_ run OSX, and weigh just 5lbs more than this notebook.

    3. Re:stop dissing it. by nblender · · Score: 1
      yes, but I can't "sleep" it, and I have to haul a keyboard/mouse as well. I'd also look silly setting up my imac at the local library of coffee shop. I do have a 20" intel iMac incidentally.

      The previous reply also indicates that I'm contradicting myself, but I'm not. I consider there to be a difference between travel (business, vacation) and changing locations to solve a problem. When I travel, it's for recreation/escape or meetings/training and for that, my PBG4 is perfect. When I change locations to work on a hairy problem, I'm not trucking through an airport, staying in a hotel, etc. I'm going into my truck, driving somewhere in town, and pulling out my desktop-replacement. I carry my huge 'laptop' and its power adapter. no keyboard, mouse, usb hub, etc.

    4. Re:stop dissing it. by pimpimpim · · Score: 1
      Most people that I know only own a notebook, and just use it at one place, max. 2 places. It's just because they don't want the bulky PC case and all the cable mess that comes with it. So for that (PC substitute) it might be a nice thing, but then one thing becomes most important: the keyboard.
      FTA:

      Another issue with the keyboard is that there is such a huge expanse of chassis in front of it - for someone like me who has small hands, I end up with my forearms resting on what would otherwise be a wrist rest.

      From the looks of that, it'll be an ergonomic disaster. You could add an additional keyboard, but then you're almost at the imac again :)

      --
      molmod.com - computing tips from a molecular modeling
    5. Re:stop dissing it. by bobcardone · · Score: 1

      I agree...
      In my job as a construction superintendant, many times in the field I have to pull up a 3D archectural rendering of some minor construction detail or finish illustration.
      The ability to set the machine up in seconds and display the detail in question can be a real labor, money and timesaver.
      The large screen allows quite a few people to see everything easily at once and the large storage capacity lets' one store a lot of CAD files.
      I currently use a large screen Acer laptop in this capacity, and I would seriously consider this one as a replacement.
      BTW, 17 lbs is NOTHING compared to some of the equipment I have to lug around, and yes I always have AC power available to juice up.

      Oh, and for the anti-SUV/ big truck crowd, some people NEED their cargo capacity. I do agree that anyone who does not and drives one is a POSER.

      --
      What, me worry?
    6. Re:stop dissing it. by Nexx · · Score: 1
      I do agree that anyone who does not and drives one is a POSER.

      <soccermom> but how else will I get my kid to soccer practice???? </soccermom>

      *runs and ducks for cover*

    7. Re:stop dissing it. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Doesn't run OSX? I'd say check out http://www.osx86project.org/

    8. Re:stop dissing it. by kraut · · Score: 1

      > When I change locations to work on a hairy problem, I'm not trucking through an airport, staying in a hotel, etc. I'm going into my truck, driving somewhere in town, and pulling out my desktop-replacement.

      If you need a truck to take your laptop to the coffe shop, you have a whole host of issues, dude,

      --
      no taxation without representation!
    9. Re:stop dissing it. by MSSM+Junkie · · Score: 1

      It's a desktop computer that can easily be pitched in your vehicle, driven to a destination, unpacked and used within seconds.

      So, they figured out how to make the iMac fold now?

      --
      Applesauce!
    10. Re:stop dissing it. by toddestan · · Score: 1

      If people want to have a powerful computer and a portable one; get two seperate computers - a desktop and a 12" laptop. If you want to connect them then use a cross over cable.

      You mean a powerful computer OR a portable one. If you want to have both (a powerful computer that is also portable), you pretty much have to by one of those behemoth laptops and lug it around.

    11. Re:stop dissing it. by kabz · · Score: 1

      Yeah, I cart a Precision M60 and a 12" PBG4 all over the states. The M60 is so huge that my GF always breaks into hysterics when I open it up on the sofa. It's *hilariously* big, but it packs a punch, it's pretty solid, and the screen goes up to 1900x1200 which kick most other laptops into a cocked hat.

      The PBG4 runs a lot cooler, a lot longer and gets most of the after hours and airplane use, unless I need the pixels.

      --
      -- "It's not stalking if you're married!" My Wife.
    12. Re:stop dissing it. by Reservoir+Penguin · · Score: 0

      Then stop calling it a notebook computer. There is another word for it. It's called 'luggable' computer.

      --
      US-UK-Israel: The real Axis of Evil
  33. The weight is impressive but not a record by Beryllium+Sphere(tm) · · Score: 2, Interesting

    The once-popular Osborne I was 23 pounds (over 10 kg to most of the world)

    1. Re:The weight is impressive but not a record by jfengel · · Score: 1

      And with a spacious 5" black-and-white screen.

      God, I loved that computer.

  34. Mobility by Umbral+Blot · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Most people own laptops because they can go places with them, which for the most part means fitting them in a backpack or other bag. (weight is less of an issue, students carry loads of textbooks arround all the time on their backs, so what is a few more pounds?) However with a 20 inch screen I have problems imagining the kind of bag it would fit.

    1. Re:Mobility by dogmatixpsych · · Score: 1

      A body bag.

    2. Re:Mobility by Sky+Cry · · Score: 1

      Most people own laptops because...

      Guess what? This isn't a notebook for most people.

  35. 17 lbs is heavy? by milgr · · Score: 2, Funny

    My first computer was one of the original Compaq "portable computers". If I remember correctly, it weighed about 34 lbs. That was before the day of laptops. I probably moved it more than my current laptops. I lugged it between college and home - a trip that included commuter rail, subway, shuttle bus, airplane, express bus, another commuter train, and several long walks -- along with a clothing bag and numerous books.

    Hmm.... Maybe I was nuts.

    --
    Where law ends, tyranny begins -- William Pitt
    1. Re:17 lbs is heavy? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yeah, I bet you just use that as an excuse for your over-developed forearm muscles.

    2. Re:17 lbs is heavy? by bob_herrick · · Score: 1

      Mine was the first model with a 5MB HD. Lugged that sucker all over Europe one trip. That was back in the day when airport scanners were first being put into practice. I vividly recall some tense moments with a secruity guard in Zurich who was very uncooperative about scanning my 'luggable.'

    3. Re:17 lbs is heavy? by FurryFeet · · Score: 1

      And it was uphill both ways, I'd wager. Yeah, even when the airplane was landing, it did it uphill.

  36. Cold Fusion? by steveo777 · · Score: 1

    Yeah, that must be using the frosty power plant keep the CPU and all those HDDs cool at the same time. er... yeah...

    --
    This sig isn't original enough, it's time to come up with something witty...
  37. I dont think it will be usefull by skyfi · · Score: 1

    It is so big so in that way it is no more notebook.)))
    It is not useful. I cant understarnd why customer will be needing RAID controler!, and 240 gigabytes space for data.

    1. Re:I dont think it will be usefull by TeknoHog · · Score: 1
      I cant understarnd why customer will be needing RAID controler!, and 240 gigabytes space for data.

      I can't understand why anyone would need more than 640 KB of memory.

      --
      Escher was the first MC and Giger invented the HR department.
  38. Numeric Keypad by RealGrouchy · · Score: 1

    When I first saw the picture, I thought to myself, "Wow! There's enough extra space to put in a numeric keypad!"

    Then I realized there already was one!

    - RG>

    --
    Hey pal, this isn't a pleasantforest, so don't waste my time with pleasantries!
    1. Re:Numeric Keypad by nonlnear · · Score: 1
      That was my reaction too.

      My beef with the industry is that there has been room for a numeric keypad on the 17" laptops all along. On some widescreen 15.4" ones also if they really wanted to. I really hate pushing the "special" key to use the fake crooked number pad. It's one of my pet peeves.

      --
      argumentum ad fallacium: Fallacy of defining a fallacy which allows one to dismiss the argument in question.
  39. Insecure? by fuzzyfozzie · · Score: 1

    People that get that thing have to be compensating for something.

    1. Re:Insecure? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful

      Like poor eyesight, perhaps?

  40. "super-multi DVD burner" by Frightening · · Score: 2, Funny

    Is that like better than the uber-max DVD burner? Now I know why the post was anonymous.

    ALso, what is it with R&D these days? It's like they make em work straight for a month or so, then they have an office party where they get the managers drunk:

    Employee A: Lets make a 20 inch Laptop with RAID 0. And lasers.

    Manager: Yeah dude that would be amaaaazing. Can I lick your balls?

  41. Time to Apply the Term.. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    .. luggable. Remember the Osborne?

  42. Man with Huge 20 Inch Penis Reviewed by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    go to macslash and ask Trollaxor about Ben's 2 in peppis!

    TEH NUE JESUSGEEKS -> http://macslash.org/

  43. server by mikesd81 · · Score: 1

    It's a portable server

    --
    That which does not kill me only postpones the inevitable.
    1. Re:server by TeknoHog · · Score: 1

      Yes, because when you're buying a server you obviously want to spend money on a big flat screen.

      --
      Escher was the first MC and Giger invented the HR department.
  44. Not Big Enough by gidzero · · Score: 1

    I'll wait for someone to bolt one of Apple's 30-inch Cinema HD Displays to a "laptop".

  45. Re:Battery power - 1234567890 by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I'm waiting for the realization of cool fusion.

  46. Re:Mobility - in N. America by johnty · · Score: 1

    In north america, its considered mobile if it is smaller than the largest storage space of an SUV.

    --
    I am unique, just like you, and you, and you...
  47. Force != Mass by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

    Aren't you assuming a 1 g gravitaitonal field? How very Sol III centric of you.

    1. Re:Force != Mass by Noted+Futurist · · Score: 1

      Oh, that is goooooood. I'm stealing that one.

    2. Re:Force != Mass by grammar+fascist · · Score: 1

      Aren't you assuming a 1 g gravitaitonal field? How very Sol III centric of you.

      It's horrible. What we need is some kind of affirmative action for gravitational fields.

      The proportions of citations of Earth-pounds, Moon-pounds, Jovian-pounds, Rigel Kentarus A-4-pounds, etc., should all match the proportions of intelligent life forms on those planetoids. Of course, these ignorant Philistines will keep using Earth-pounds... except possibly those who listen to Coast to Coast AM...

      --
      I got my Linux laptop at System76.
  48. Close, but no cigar. by Octopus · · Score: 1

    I ALMOST like this laptop (even though it's an Acer). ALMOST. And just because I want a bigger laptop.

    But I agree with others - THERE'S PLENTY OF SPACE FOR A FULL-SIZE KEYBOARD ON THERE, YOU NICKELBAGS. Go flush to the edge and get rid of the damn touch-pad. The nerds that would really use a good powerful laptop like that HATE TOUCH PADS - can't count how many times I've seen developers making a scrunched up face jamming their thumb on the pad just trying to minimize a damn window, let alone done it myself. (Spare me a lecture about hotkeys please.) So much usable space there, wasted to make room for the touch pad.

    Christ on a crutch, it pisses me off. I could easily pack a mouse or even a slim Wacom tablet with the thing and be very happy with the 20" screen.

  49. Size by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

    It's not the size that matters! It's the battery life..

  50. Short battery life.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    slashdotted already!

  51. law suits by objwiz · · Score: 1

    so how long will it before there are lawsuits against laptop manufactors because someone hurts their back lifting a laptop?

  52. That's it? by brian0918 · · Score: 2, Funny

    With something that big, you'd think it would come with a handle, and maybe some headlights and deer whistles. The sidewalks and campuses of the world are no longer safe.

  53. Imagine! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Imagine watching porn on that while on the move!

    Thats the only logical reason to use one of those.

    Quoting from the article:
    Size does matter

  54. Excellent Large-Screen Portable Television by reporter · · Score: 0, Redundant
    peterdaly (123554) wrote, " 1680x1050 is horrible resolution for 20" of screen space, but I guess if you value size more than pixels, then this is the laptop for you. "

    Due to the horrible resolution, if you viewed DVD movies close-up on this laptop, then you would see the square-ish outline of each pixel. However, this laptop would make a great portable, large-screen television. Just place it about 15 feet away from your sofa in the living room and crank up the brightness of the LCD panel. At 15 feet, your eyes would blur the outline of each pixel and would form a smooth contour of each object in the scene.

    Incidentally, this portable television would be excellent for viewing pornography when your wife has taken the kids to soccer practice on Saturday. About 5 minutes before she returns, you quickly delete the porn mpeg file, close the lid of the laptop, and shove it into the closet. No one would be the wiser.

    1. Re:Excellent Large-Screen Portable Television by Fulcrum+of+Evil · · Score: 1

      No one would be the wiser.

      Have you forgotten about the $2000 divot in your checkbook?

      --
      "We returned the General to El Salvador, or maybe Guatemala, it's difficult to tell from 10,000 feet"
    2. Re:Excellent Large-Screen Portable Television by G-funk · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Look, when will you pansies learn? Just admit to the damned porn! If you like it, you won't be able to live a porn-free life for very long, nor should you. And if you're watching it on the down-low, she will find it. I assure you, she will find it eventually. And then not only are you a porn-guy(tm), but you're a lying bastard as well. Just man up and tell her "I like porn. I don't care if you agree with it." if she's a normal (anti porn) woman, she'll say, "Aren't I enough for you?", to which you respond "Yes you are, which is why I'm not sleeping with anybody else. But I like to watch people fuck". If she's a manipulative bitch she'll say, "If you loved me you'd quit". The answer to that is of course, "If you loved me you're accept my porn habits".

      The short of it is this: you can't hide the porn, and you can't give it up for long. Seriously. She will find it. Be honest. Perhaps your girl needs to look within herself to see why she's threatened by a Jenna Jameson DVD.

      --
      Send lawyers, guns, and money!
    3. Re:Excellent Large-Screen Portable Television by mrchaotica · · Score: 1
      Due to the horrible resolution, if you viewed DVD movies close-up on this laptop, then you would see the square-ish outline of each pixel.
      No you wouldn't. That's exactly the same resolution as the screen on the 20" iMac I'm typing this on, and DVDs look great on it.
      --

      "[Regarding the 'cloud,'] ownership was what made America different than Russia." -- Woz

    4. Re:Excellent Large-Screen Portable Television by tronbradia · · Score: 1

      damn somebody had a bad experience with a girl. Any reasonably horny girl will not whine about her boyfriend maintaining the libido with a little porn. My girlfriend thought she didn't like it personally (considering it a guy thing), but now after seeing it a couple times she like requests that I bring my computer over. My friends report similar experiences. Maybe we just know how to pick 'em. I guess we're not really the types to hide such habits either. Do any girls actually read this and have any comments to make?

    5. Re:Excellent Large-Screen Portable Television by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful

      As an, er, girl, one might make the observation that there are several reasons to take up porn. One of them is the good old maintenance of the libido. Another one is that girls on video are a whole lot easier to deal with than an actual human being; they don't nag, they don't make demands on your time and there's a convenient fast-forward, pause and rewind.

      The first is just fine with me (and probably, as you say, with most reasonably horny girls). The second one is fair enough, but it's kind of easy to overdo it that way and wind up girlfriendless and bitter. Watching porn is a laugh and there should be more of it around. However, having your boyfriend come home shagged-out on a porn overdose and getting no sex out of it is no fun at all. So yeah, share the porn. ;-)

  55. subwoofer by tedpearson · · Score: 1

    It's so big, they even put a SUBWOOFER in it! Better be careful with this on your lap (if your lap can support its weight), not only might it cause infertility due to heat, but it will be booming and bouncing all over your lap as well.

  56. Not 'nuff redundancy for me. by suv4x4 · · Score: 1

    Intel Core Duo dual core CPU

    You forgot to mention it's from Intel. Again.

  57. Raid 0??? by advocate_one · · Score: 1

    madness... lose one drive, lose all the data

    --
    Donald 'Duck' Dunn: We had a band powerful enough to turn goat piss into gasoline.
    1. Re:Raid 0??? by Twisted64 · · Score: 1
      lose one drive, lose all the data
      Look, dude, it's a notebook. It's not a PC, and it's certainly not a server. Personally, I'd rather have faster access, and halve the life-span of the data, than wait for stuff to load and have it all backed up. I don't keep important things on my notebook, and if I did, I'd probably have one of those... automatically updating network folder thingys to mirror it on a PC once a day.
      --
      Consciousness is a myth. Trust me.
  58. What a joke by KlomDark · · Score: 1

    Way too few pixels. Laptop I'm typing this on has 1620 x 1200. Maybe the Acer is good for people who don't have 20/10 vision like I have.

    Still, I was hoping for some monster resolution like 2560x1600. I'm not interested.

  59. Who needs this? by eebra82 · · Score: 1

    I know some people will buy this because there is always someone who will love even the stupidest of all products.

    What I don't get is, if laptop stands for portability, then why is it not really portable? And who would want to show it off anyway? I bet people would only laugh. For heaven's sake, this thing even has a numpad and an LPT port.. Not that it's necessarily a bad thing but..

    a) The majority is looking for a laptop with decent hardware yet portable (read: 15" or less).
    b) A smaller part wants really tiny laptops with minimal screens that basically fit in large pockets.
    c) Another small part of the crowd demands super performance and usually 17". If you need performance beyond that, get a Shuttle computer or something.

    As seen above, our 20.1" laptop does not fit in. Last but not least, a laptop is purchased because.. a) It is portable and runs on batteries, meaning that you can use it everywhere.
    b) It is excellent for educational purposes due to its portability.
    c) It is great for business purposes due to its portability.
    d) It works great as a multimedia station and a node between a network of computers.

    Okay, a), so the Acer can be used anywhere, but it's too heavy and too awkward. And b), it is nowhere to be found in schools. You'd probably block the view for everyone behind you. And c), yes, I can imagine the usefulness of this computer for some people but I really doubt that the advantages are that great since the resolution is too small for CAD and such. And finally, d), a multimedia station should be small enough to carry around and small enough to hide in case you want it to serve partially as a music/video station.


    Anyway, the day I see someone sitting with this laptop in economy class on a Boeing/Airbus will be the day that I laugh so hard that I pee my pants down.

  60. Jesus fucking christ, don't click parent's link. by loraksus · · Score: 0, Offtopic

    Goddamn!

    Important Stuff

            * Please try to keep posts on topic.
            * Try to reply to other people's comments instead of starting new threads.
            * Read other people's messages before posting your own to avoid simply duplicating what has already been said.
            * Use a clear subject that describes what your message is about.
            * Offtopic, Inflammatory, Inappropriate, Illegal, or Offensive comments might be moderated. (You can read everything, even moderated posts, by adjusting your threshold on the User Preferences Page)

    Problems regarding accounts or comment posting should be sent to CowboyNeal.

    --
    1q2w3e4r5t6y7u8i9o0pqawsedrftgthyjukilo;p'azsxdcfv gbhnjmk,l.;/
  61. notebook with 20 in screen by matt328 · · Score: 1

    The mere concept is in itself an oxymoron.

    --
    Check out the cave on the east side of lake Hylia. Strange and wonderful things live in it.
  62. Re:educational by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Don't forget: There will be a pop quiz when Michael posts the dup tomorrow!

  63. Perspire, not Aspire by Alioth · · Score: 1

    Surely this should be the Acer Perspire 9800 instead of Aspire. After all, perspire is what you'll do after lugging this around for a while on a warm day.

    If you're essentially going to make a desktop replacement like this, at least equip it with a desktop type full stroke keyboard with cursor keys so it's not a machine with all the drawbacks of a laptop and all the drawbacks of a desktop. In the late 1980s, even the cheapo PC maker Amstrad made a portable with a 102-key full stroke keyboard rather than a compromised laptop keyboard. The Amstrad was probably about the same width as this thing. The photo shows lots of wasted space on the edges of the keyboard which could have been better used to provide a full sized keyboard.

  64. For Extreme Power Users Only?? by zenhkim · · Score: 1

    Funny that you're the only poster who thought of mentioning the heat factor -- it was the first thing that came to my mind when I read this:

    > This massive machine has a 20.1" screen, two 120GB hard drives in a RAID 0 array, super-multi DVD burner, analogue and digital TV tuners and an Intel Core Duo dual core CPU.

    I mean, Jesus Fucking H Christ!! How many BTUs does all that give off? Not to mention that actual "laptop" users are complaining their machines are practically cooking their thighs; how the hell is anyone going to be able to cope with this 17lb. hi-tech heat generator?

    Hmmm.... maybe that could be used by Acer for an ultra-macho-extreme-sports themed ad campaign:

    "Are You Tough Enough For It? Acer's Aspire 9800 -- THE LAPTOP FROM HELL!"

    --
    "All hands, BRACE FOR IMPACT!"
    1. Re:For Extreme Power Users Only?? by ettlz · · Score: 4, Funny

      "The Nadburner(TM): 'Ave You Got The Balls?"

    2. Re:For Extreme Power Users Only?? by grammar+fascist · · Score: 2, Funny

      "The Nadburner(TM): 'Ave You Got The Balls?"

      Not anymore.

      --
      I got my Linux laptop at System76.
  65. You are off by 0.1 :-) by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    > Thats 7.7kgs for those of us not still using British imperial measurements ;-)

    Not quite--it's 7.8 kg, actually, if you read TFA :-) I guess the submitter translated it to Imperial units for fun or something.

  66. Kaypro II is even heavier by freeweed · · Score: 1

    I've got one of these sitting in my basement.

    26 pounds. Feels twice that heavy if you move it more than a few dozen feet. It's like a tank. The metal case adds some weight over the Osborne's plastic :)

    A few years later they added a hard drive and brought the weight up to 31 pounds.

    --
    Endless arguments over trivial contradictions in books written by ignorant savages to explain thunder in the dark.
  67. Forget That! by Dot+Solipsism · · Score: 1

    I'm holding out for Acer's 40" laptop with 5 HDDs and 3 Multi-Super-Duper Drives, 2 full size keyboards w/number pads, TV-Tuner w/ built-in staelittle reciever, 3.5" & 5.25" floppy drives and a chached copy of the entire internet on an internal Flash Drive. Seriously, Acer's notebook construction is so poor that I guess they need to make waves by making larger and more obscene laptops.

  68. Slashdotted by Enrique1218 · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Here is the review of Dell's 20" laptop if you hungering for a review from a site that won't be easily slashdotted. With that out of the way, I notice a lot of 20" inch springing up all over the place. Is there really a demand for these behemoths? I know some people might enjoy the screen real estate for some graphical as well spreadsheet applications but 17 to 20 lb notebook? It gets any bigger and they won't let you take it on the plane. Is there someone who will shell out 2000 extra for this just for the ability to clear their desk once in a while? Buying a bigger desk is expensive these days. Also, are lan parties that popular? Oh Lord, I must be so geeky that geeks don't want to invite me to their parties! Though I have been to few parties, we generally bring beers not computers. Where is the market?

    --
    You don't have to be smart to use a Mac, you just have to be smart enough to buy one
  69. Back to the old "lugable computer" by Zadaz · · Score: 1
    17 pounds isn't a notebook, and not a laptop. It's merely a more portable computer.

    But c'mon. It weighs as much as 6 of my current laptops. Or as much as my current laptop and a 23" cinema display....

    I could add a 1TB firewire hard drive and not go too much over the weight limit. But I'd have to duct tape it all together to make it as "portable".

    Too bad port replicators are things of the past. I have one for my laptop and it means when I want to be mobile I've got something that weighs 2.75 pounds, less than an inch thick and runs for 5+ hours on a charge. When I'm not mobile I dock it to a 500GB raid, full size keyboard and 23" display. Works brilliantly for what I do. I'm sure there's a purpose for this thing, but it seems like a very small niche product.

    Besides when people look at my laptop and say "It's so small" I get to respond "Yeah, I'm not compensating for anything." and soak up the laughter of my sharp jest.

  70. ror! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I posted the original comment, but I have to admit your link made me laugh. Nice one.

  71. OT: What would Janis Want? by colinrichardday · · Score: 1

    Oh Lord, won't you buy me a Color MacBook?
    My friends all have Acers, but I want the look.
    Worked hard all my life, don't leave me forsook.
    So, oh Lord, won't you buy me a Color MacBook.

  72. 17 lbs... by m0nstr42 · · Score: 2, Funny

    ... with the hard drive empty. Fill all of those 120 gigabytes and it weighs a full 20 lbs.

  73. But... by sxltrex · · Score: 1

    What's that in stone? And can we have a screen measurement in hands, please?

    1. Re:But... by Fulcrum+of+Evil · · Score: 1

      Depends on what you're weighing, really.

      --
      "We returned the General to El Salvador, or maybe Guatemala, it's difficult to tell from 10,000 feet"
    2. Re:But... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      dont bother swearing to god, he's in on it too.

  74. What the hell? by bguzz · · Score: 1

    This makes me very, very sad.

    Shee-yit. Now Tom's got a Hummer too. Well, I guess I could buy that big computer from the Internet. It even sits in my lap. That's good for th' in-you-wen-dough.

    Restraint? You pussy.

  75. Digital Tuner... by Trip+Ericson · · Score: 1

    Note that the digital tuner that's included is for DVB, not American ATSC. I wish this had been specified.

    1. Re:Digital Tuner... by pe1chl · · Score: 1

      Hey, this is an English review of a UK model of a laptop.
      Of course it has DVB! That is only natural. When it would have ATSC, that would certainly have been specified.
      (because it would be useless)

    2. Re:Digital Tuner... by Trip+Ericson · · Score: 1

      The summary did not say it was British.

      The site is not at .co.uk.

      How was anyone who's not familiar with the site supposed to know?

    3. Re:Digital Tuner... by pe1chl · · Score: 2, Informative

      By clicking on the link in the summary and seeing the "UK", "Ltd." and UK Pound signs all over the place.

  76. Dell Already has one by Patentmat · · Score: 1

    The top of the line XPS laptop has a 20.1 inch screen too, and unlike the Acer they didnt bolt on one of their other products as a screen. http://www.dell.com/content/products/productdetail s.aspx/xpsnb_m2010?c=us&cs=19&l=en&s=dhs

  77. Hefty, but cool by kdcttg · · Score: 1

    Personally, this is my kinda thing. The screen may be a little obsessivly large, and I agree it needs a full sized keyboard, but it has all the features a geek could dream of (except maybe turning into a woman to cheer you up when it crashes).
    I currently use a 17" widescreen notebook/portable-computer/whatever, and its great because it does all the things a desktop does but its portable. I dont own a desktop (well one with all the parts left, and I know alot of people would do the same if they had one of these hefty things.
    If I hadnt spent so much on my notebook 6 months ago I'd consider this.

    P.S. I reccon i could do with the weight training anywa ;)

  78. Better be good for gaming!!! by Theovon · · Score: 1

    This is much too large and heavy to be considered anything remotely portable. It's not. It's a desktop replacement. Considering how much it's got to cost, it had better have really damn fast response time on the LCD (16ms or better) and not have an overly-constrained CPU-to-memory bus. And the graphics chip had better be connected via something faster than PCI (like it apparently is in my HP notebook).

    If not, this thing is only worthwhile if all you're trying to do is save desk space. Otherwise, you're better off with a cheap Dell.

  79. Resolution is fine. by imunfair · · Score: 1

    I don't know what experience these people asking for higher resolutions are used to - I'm guessing they use CRT monitors. 1680 x 1050 is pretty standard for 20" widescreen flat panels. It isn't "light on the pixels" as some of them have been saying. Frankly, I don't know why you'd want to go for a higher resolution on a 20" - your fonts would be tiny at the "normal" settings.

    Some people just want a reason to bitch and moan about everything.

  80. Laptop? by Chas · · Score: 1

    For WHOSE lap? Carol Yager?

    --


    Chas - The one, the only.
    THANK GOD!!!
  81. Why all the negative comments about size and batt by Cartack · · Score: 1, Insightful

    This a notebook that was designed specifically for one task. That task is to be a high performance luxury desktop notebook replacement. The choice to use 2 harddrives in performance mode (obvious power drainer) should further cement what market they were targetting with it. Sure there will be some people who try to use this as a mobile notebook, just like there are people who will drive a hummer cross country.


    --------- http://http//akurl.com/5a9cba/ - Unlike The department of health, Akurl has a solution for Fattties

  82. 6.8GHz 1TB RAM and 2TB HDD laptop by scovetta · · Score: 0, Offtopic

    Is this a dupe of this article? I've been running this 6.8GHz laptop for about 9 months now and it's great! The quantum-optical technology means that I can finish playing Kings Quest III before I even start!

    However, I don't have a super-multi DVD burner. I wonder if that'll let me burn pr0n faster than I can download it on my super-multi cablemodem!

    Wow, technology is great! Even when it's bullshit.

    And at over 17lb you can even use it for weight training!
    You're speaking in the wrong venue about weight training.

    --
    Wer mit Ungeheuern kämpft, mag zusehn, dass er nicht dabei zum Ungeheuer wird. --Nietzsche
  83. They're finally here! by epp_b · · Score: 0

    This must be one of those newfangled Origa--oh, uh...

  84. Have we forgotten why technology created a laptop by RedHatChilliPeppers · · Score: 1

    This is just really stupid! why do you buy a laptop? so its lightweight & mobile! these designs are totally going nowhere and misleading people! buy a 20" screen laptop which weighs nearly a common desktop?! buy a high-end one and use it for what? WORD? EXCEL? Solitaire? complete waste of money If you going to buy something, ask yourself what is it for FIRST.

  85. Re:Have we forgotten why technology created a lapt by epp_b · · Score: 0
    ...buy a high-end one and use it for what? WORD? EXCEL? Solitaire?
    Just think, it might be stable with this hardware.
  86. Simply not a notebook by Adelec+Bakkal · · Score: 1

    It simply should not be called a notebook. I didn't say a laptop because Acer named it a notebook. I agree with nblender : "I want to flip the lid down and go to the library or the cabin or wherever.", moreover, if you think of all the devices it can replace, you will see that it is not that bulky. This naming story is similar to Apple's when they had to avoid the word 'laptop' in their laptop's users guide just because it was too hot to put on your lap (skin burn and infertility matters). Yeah, and this 7.7 Kg Aspire 9800 is just too heavy for that. On the other hand, the screen resolution is very dissapointing, why would I want a huge screen just for its size?

    1. Re:Simply not a notebook by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Because size matters! At least that's what your girl told me last nighht... :-)

  87. I dont understand the "bigger" trend. by TheBadger · · Score: 1

    Have a smaller one... and get an external bigger screen!
    I want a nice ultraportable one (Lifebook P1510 P-M 1.2GHz 512MB 60GB 8.9 XP Tablet) ... but they cost a fortune. Hey, I'm getting less here!!!

  88. Backpackin by ezwip · · Score: 0

    Yellowtop/Redtop Ultima Batteries sold seperately.

    --
    "I guess I'm gonna fade into Bolivian."
  89. Thanks by nonlnear · · Score: 1

    I haven't seen an LG laptop before. Good to know.

    --
    argumentum ad fallacium: Fallacy of defining a fallacy which allows one to dismiss the argument in question.
  90. Uglyness by arnorhs · · Score: 1

    Ok ok ok... It's a laptop with a HUGE screen, we got that. But why on earth does it have to be this ugly? It's got at least 5 shades of gray on various different panels just on the keyboard panel. It looks like it was put together from 15 other smaller laptops.

    I think acer should definately start "borrowing" some ideas from Apple. Visually appalling...

  91. Only a Geforce Go 7600???? by PhotoBoy · · Score: 1

    For a laptop that vast I would have expected at least one MXM 7800 GTX card in there, or possibly two in SLI. A 7600 would certainly be great for recent games, but in a machine that big I would have expected better.

    Personally I think the best laptop out there at the moment from a size/performance ratio is the Sony VAIO SZ. Dual core CPU, 1GB RAM, 120GB HD and a Geforce 7400 all in a very pretty thin and light case. It would certainly be my first choice if I had the cash...

    1. Re:Only a Geforce Go 7600???? by Propaganda13 · · Score: 1

      Exactly! For a 20" screen, I was expecting a better video card, so you could get a decent framerate at the native resolution.

  92. An iMac 20" is the very same resolution. by Shivetya · · Score: 1

    and its all fine and dandy when sold by Apple.

    This isn't a bash of Apple but perhaps the goal wasn't so much to make the best laptop but something similar in usage to an iMac, just a tad bit more portable and capable? Honestly calling anything with a screen over 15" a laptop seems bizarre to me. Desktop Replacement needs a catchy term to make it more palatable.

    --
    * Winners compare their achievements to their goals, losers compare theirs to that of others.
  93. Re:Half-effort by Zeus_olympian · · Score: 1

    You wantted the lug around game machine as a portable, you got it... but sorry its not with an Acer... Its a Dell. Yuppers thats rite... the full size keyboard, 20.1 inch monitor and surround sound, and a nice little handle to boot.. its its own case! Check it out! http://www.dell.com/content/products/productdetail s.aspx/xpsnb_m2010?c=us&cs=19&l=en&s=dhs CheerS!

  94. In Soviet Russia... by k1980pc · · Score: 1

    this is still a pda

  95. I hate reviews with no mention of battery life by electrongunner · · Score: 1

    How can someone review a laptop and not even mention the battery life. Maybe I skimmed it too fast, but if there's no battery life tests then this review is a total waste of my time. I will literally sprint to the store to buy the first 17"+ laptop that can run for 5+ hours on a charge and includes a decent gaming graphics card. Until that day, I will not waste my money on a new laptop. My Dell Inspiron 7500 is still kicking despite the case disintegrating due to heat and age. It still works fine for 99% of what I need a laptop for. The one and only innovation I care about in laptops these days is BATTERY LIFE. When are we going to start seeing manufacturers using all this new battery technology that I've been reading about for years? ATTENTION MANUFACTURERS: If your laptop can't run for 5 hours on a single standard battery charge then you have FAILED to make a decent portable computer.

  96. US Customary System by DragonWriter · · Score: 1
    Given that, as pointed out, the units used in the US are not actually Imperial units, the question must be asked as to what exactly to call that particular unit system.
    The name I've seen most often to distinguish it from both the SI/Metric system and the Imperial system is "US Customary".
    1. Re:US Customary System by r00t · · Score: 1

      US Customary is the "Queen Anne" system.

      What is odd is that Britain changed. They now have a gallon that is about 25% bigger. I guess the King said he wanted bigger jugs, and his word was law, so...

  97. Less cables by lymond01 · · Score: 1

    Wife is always telling me to get a cable organizer for the monitor, mouse, keyboard, network, and tower. This aspire is basically an all-in-one that's slightly portable if you want to move it to the kitchen table. One cable (power). Aesthetically pleasing. I wonder if that's who they're marketing to....(husbands of interior designing wives).

  98. Re:Have we forgotten why technology created a lapt by fishbowl · · Score: 1

    >This is just really stupid! why do you buy a laptop? so its lightweight & mobile!

    More important to me is silence. The typical portable machine is much quieter than a dektop even after tweaking it for silence. You can spend a small fortune to quiet down a desktop and still not do better than the average notebook.

    --
    -fb Everything not expressly forbidden is now mandatory.
  99. Hammer, Feather, Freefall on the Moon: Revisited by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    "Fall heavy towards the moon, and the moon falls also towards you." -- Nietzsche

    Hammer and feather are dropped simultaneously from equal heights (as measured by distance from the center of the moon), separated laterally by a distance substantially less than the moon's diameter. Both hammer and feather experience force from the moon's gravity proportional to their mass, and hence both accelerate at the same rate. Meanwhile, the moon is also accelerating towards the other two objects, but unevenly so: the hammer exerts a greater gravitational pull due to its greater mass. The moon is therefore subject to a torque, causing it to accelerate more rapidly towards the hammer.

    The hammer is first to hit the ground.

    Anyone who denies this truth is a spatially absolutist lunocentric whose refusal to recognize the validity of hammer mechanics/experience places him wholly beyond the help of Galilean metaphysics. Such hammer (feather) rejectionists ought to be banished to the stars, for their own good and for the good of not only hammers and feathers but all subjugated smaller objects, everywhere, who find themselves victims of this scientifically perpetrated emassculation.

    --
    a756f345ec354225c08ff1a10a43162a

  100. Dell XPS M2010 dwarfes this! by samplehead · · Score: 1

    The new Dell XPS M2010 kinda blows this Acer out of the water...

  101. Case by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Wow think I could go ahead and use my red rider wagon to lug this bad boy around?

  102. it ain't got nuthin... by jbaltz · · Score: 1

    ...on my Osborne 1, which I purchased with bar mitzvah money lo those many years ago.

    - 5" monochrome screen
    - 2 massive 92kB 5.25" floppy drives.
    - 64 kB bank-switched memory.
    - z80A processor.

    It weighed in at 20 lbs!

    sheeya.

    --
    I am the Lorvax, I speak for the machines.
  103. wow! by cashman73 · · Score: 1
    Imagine what a beowulf cluster of these things could do?!?! :-)

  104. At that size and 17 lbs I'd expect... by Chaoticmass · · Score: 1

    At that size and 17 lbs I'd expect a better keyboard.

    Aside from the numeric keypad it looks like a standard crappy laptop keyboard. Why not go full size, and give the keys some more travel and feedback? Oh yes, I forgot; cost. I'm sure the primary users of this laptop will probably use it for DVDs and web surfing and hardly use the keyboard, making ergonomics a low priority for Acer.

    I'm not against a 20" laptop. Desktop Replacements have thier place-- but a desktop replacement also needs to replace the nice keyboard on my desk as well as the fast computer and large display. This one does not fit the bill as a desktop replacement as far as I am concerned. I guess at 17 lbs you could always tote a nice fullsize external keyboard with you and not really tell the difference.

    BTW, Raid 0?? Why not just let the two drives work as seperate drives? Scared the users would be confused by having a "C:" and a "D:" hard drive? Raid 0 == twice the likelyhood of failure.

    1. Re:At that size and 17 lbs I'd expect... by daverabbitz · · Score: 1

      BTW, Raid 0?? Why not just let the two drives work as seperate drives? Scared the users would be confused by having a "C:" and a "D:" hard drive? Raid 0 == twice the likelyhood of failure.

      Performance you fuck head! Anyone that doesn't back up their laptop is a fucktard! What if you drop it or have it stolen/lose it. Why would you even care about reliability on a laptop, they're fucking useless when their warranty runs out, so as long as it runs for 3 years, then it's all good, and if it doesn't then get it replaced.

      Now fuck off you stupid cunt.

      --
      What could be better than a jet powered motorcycle? http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=u8l6GTHLSWE
  105. That's no moon... by Sean0michael · · Score: 1

    That's no moon... It's a Space Station!

    --
    Funtime Candy Wow! - my plan for eventually conquering Japan.
  106. Gringo measurements are *STUPID*!!! by mangu · · Score: 1
    The utility of a measurement system is in having units that can easily be visualized, mentally manipulated, and are appropriate to the things being measured.


    I always see gringos mentioning this point, and that's *exactly* why gringo measurements are so stupid!


    Let's see, how many yards are there in a mile? How many gallons in a hogshead? If I walk two miles in an hour, how many feet do I walk in a minute? How long will it take to empty a ten gallon tank with a cup?


    I have a 5/16" steel rod and I want to drill a hole in a plate where this rod will fit easily but without too much play. Sould I use the 23/64" drill or the 0.4 in. drill? How can I choose if I can't find the calculator?


    Those are the simple day to day questions one wants to have a feeling about, a mental image without having to use a calculator!


    Now, let's see the equivalent calculations using the International System:


    There are a thousand meters in a kilometer. A thousand liters in a ton of water. If I walk six kilometers an hour, then I walk a hundred meters in a minute. A ten liter tank has 40 cupfuls of 250 ml each.


    An 8 mm steel rod will just fit into an 8.5 mm hole. Use the 7 mm drill for the 6.5 mm rod.


    Most simple day to day calculations in the International System are done immediately in your head, without any conscious effort. Try to convert feet to miles or ounces to gallons without a calculator.

  107. C= by Roger_Wilco · · Score: 1

    This thing's almost as heavy as the Commodore SX-64, though I suppose its features are a little better.

  108. ergonomic by r00t · · Score: 2, Interesting

    With that much room, they could split the keyboard down the middle and angle the halves a bit.

    Why does nobody do this? Regular keyboards make me hurt.

    It's making more and more sense now, with bigger screens and with the old 4:3 screen shape being abandoned.

    I'll take a 21.5 inch (19x10) screen please, 1920x1024 (100 dpi, .254mm pitch) or better, with a full split keyboard that has 100% of the standard keys and nothing else.

  109. A giant among laptops... by StikyPad · · Score: 1

    and yet they couldn't even put a fullsize keyboard on it.

    Honestly, if you look at the pictures, it looks like they actually tried to keep from using all that space. I'm sure that's not the case, and they just wanted to use the components they already have, but would it really be that much more expensive to use a keyboard for grownups?

  110. the 19" width is critical by r00t · · Score: 1

    I have a Microsoft Natural Pro keyboard here in front of me. It's comfy. I don't want to give it up. Regular keyboards make me hurt, and will probably lead to disability.

    The keys total 18.8 inches in width, plus another 0.4 inches of margin around the edge. (chopping off the number pad is OK with me, and helps center things better, but it only saves 3.2 inches)

    Front to back, the standard non-multimedia keys total about 6 inches. It'd be a bit more if Microsoft didn't skimp on the function keys. Add another inch for a margin and better function keys, bringing it to 7 inches.

    So I need a 19x7 keyboard area. It'd be sick to make the screen any smaller.

    Reasonable resolutions are: 1920x720, 2000x800, 1920x768, 2048x768, 1920x640, 2560x864, 2560x900, 2560x960

    I might prefer 19x10 though. That's still rather widescreen, being about 2:1 instead of 3:1.

    Oh, let the hinge slide sideways too, so I can center the keyboard without losing the arrow keys. Never mind if this adds another pound.

  111. six kilometers an hour and the danger of metric by r00t · · Score: 1

    That's a nice way to dance around your failure to use metric time. :-)

    Try 7 kilometers per hour.

    One of the dangers of metric is that people get used to shifting the decimal point until things look right. You get used to not really thinking about the conversion factors. Suppose you compute something, and the result is about 10x off from what you expect. You might just shift by an extra decimal place to make things look right. Perhaps you left out the gravitational constant (9.8 m/s/s), but you won't notice because the results look so nice. Perhaps the odd result really was correct, and you just mangled it by a factor of 10x to make it look right.

    1. Re:six kilometers an hour and the danger of metric by mangu · · Score: 1
      One of the dangers of metric is that people get used to shifting the decimal point until things look right. You get used to not really thinking about the conversion factors


      Mistakes in calculations can happen anywhere. You can just as easily misplace the decimal point in 10.75 kilometers as in 10.75 pounds.


      But how many people make the mistake of multiplying pounds by 12 to get ounces? I actually saw an American engineer do that once, he was trying to calculate the weight of the oil in a barrel, he had the density in oz./ cu. in. and the conversion from cubic feet to cubic inches left the wrong conversion factor in his mental buffer.


      What defenders of the old British measurements don't realize is that there is *no* need at all to multiply by ten in day to day metric system measurements. What's the smallest length you normally handle? The thickness of a piece of paper, that's a fraction of a millimeter. What's the biggest distance you walk? A few kilometers. If a typical order of magnitude is needed, the metric system has the unit for that. For instance, one seldom uses the "hecto" prefix, but wine is measured in hectoliters because it's the typical order of magnitude of a barrel. Sometimes special names are invented for measurements that are used very often, a square hectometer is called a "hectare", because it's the best order of magnitude for measuring land in a farm.


      The gravitational constant being about 9.81 m/s**2 is a coincidence, although a happy one. The metric system has a few other such "almost right" constants: atmospheric pressure is about 1 kilogram-force/cm**2, pressure increases about 1 atmosphere for each 10 meters in water depth, water weights about one kilogram/liter. Such close-but-not-quite factors actually are a big help in avoiding mistakes. Only American engineers who have no intuitive feeling for orders of magnitude will "shift the decimal point", International engineers will redo the calculation if it doesn't "look right".

    2. Re:six kilometers an hour and the danger of metric by r00t · · Score: 1

      No, a US person wouldn't misplace the demimal point in 10.75 pounds. The decimal point is never moved. With metric, people carelessly move it all the time.

  112. It's portable by PsyCHZZZ · · Score: 1

    but far from calling it a notebook... frankly, more of a Desktop Replacement Model. I wouldn't want to be lugging this enormous machine around town and hooking it up in Starbucks but it'll be useful for those who wants to work in office and from home (yeah; no life) to be able to tranfer the entire machine rather than copying file all the time.

    --
    Strong minds have wills, feeble ones have only wishes.
  113. That's not a laptop !! by __aahlyu4518 · · Score: 1

    It's a leg-crusher

  114. Imagine... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    a beowulf cluster of these //sorry

  115. display is crap by bokmann · · Score: 1

    I'm all for having a 'desktop that folds' over a miscule little laptop for the way I work, but this screen is just pathetic. The resolution is only 1680 x 1050... my Inspiron 9300 is 17 inches, and gives me 1900 x 1200. I need screen real estate more than I need just sheer size; at that resolution this screen make this the "Readers Digest Large Print Edition" of the laptop world.