Slashdot Mirror


Peter Cullen Chosen to Voice Optimus Prime (Again)

bigdady92 writes "Yesterday at Comic-Con it was announced that the new voice for Transformers the Movie was to be Peter Cullen who will voice Optimus Prime, the leader of the Autobots. Peter Cullen was the voice of the original Optimus Prime. The lending of his voice to the cast in a quick 'intro' at Comic-con was greeted by unanimous cheer from the crowd. Many fans, internet boards, blogs were calling for the return of Cullen to voice his most famous and well-loved character Optimus Prime."

201 comments

  1. I'm sorry, but by buswolley · · Score: 0, Flamebait

    I'm not a kid anymore.

    --

    A Good Troll is better than a Bad Human.

    1. Re:I'm sorry, but by dzus · · Score: 1

      So what ... Lets roll out !!

    2. Re:I'm sorry, but by jellomizer · · Score: 4, Interesting

      I am guessing you are one of the following.

      As a child There were transformers but you never liked them much. You may have preferred He-Man, GI-Gjoe, or Something else.

      When you were a child Transformers were either Non-Existant just starting but you were a little to old to like them much.

      WHen you were a Kid Transformers were going out of style.

      When Growing up you had Transformers and you liked them but you are trying so hard to be grown up you hide you wish to play with toys like you did as an adult.

      I am an adult to. I am getting Married Have my own how, work a full time job which pays more then the national average. I am a responsible mature adult by all measurements. But heck I still like transformers I watch the DVDs yea in retrospec the cartoons were a little cheesy but still they were fun. What is there not to like about Robots turning into cars and back.

      --
      If something is so important that you feel the need to post it on the internet... It probably isn't that important.
    3. Re:I'm sorry, but by Stray1 · · Score: 1

      True that,

      How can you NOT like the transformers? I wasnt too excited when this project was first accounced, (another hollywood bludgeoning of an icon from my childhood) but this is promising.
        I'm close to assuming this movie isnt going to be as bad as I originally thought, Lets hope Bay doesnt go all Uwe Boll on us and completely destroy the Transformers.
      Peter Cullen has done a lot of voice over work for movies for the last couple of years, but everytime I hear his voice I think, "ooh optimus!". Hopefully this will be seen as a coup-de-gras of his career and he can get the recognition he deserves.

      As for the type of guy I was back then, jellomizer, I still own all 113 of my transformers.

    4. Re:I'm sorry, but by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0, Interesting

      Or maybe he thinks on his own rather than going with the mindless sheeple that goes with whatever is popular., or maybe he just outgrew them and doesn't go by nostalgia.

      I am of the former, I wasn't into whatever was popular at the time. I don't go for the brain-rotting device called television. I spend a good part of my free time reading. That brings me to another point, whatever happened to children entertaining themselves by using their imagination, or is it cool and the 'in thing' to follow the crowd like a bunch of mindless sheeple.

    5. Re:I'm sorry, but by despisethesun · · Score: 1

      In my experience, people who use the word "sheeple" are just as mindless as the people they bitch about.

      --
      This poo is cold.
    6. Re:I'm sorry, but by buswolley · · Score: 0, Troll
      No. I loved Transformers as a child. I have a tape of myself singing the theme song as a CHILD. I did not own any transformers. They were too expensive for my parents. I just got the stupid knock-off Go-bots.

      I don't care much now, even though I loved them then. Sure, if I saw it on TV I'd watch it--if my wife could take it. However, I am NOT excited about this movie. I am too busy studying and doing research for a Transformers movie.

      You see, there is more "More Than Meets the Eye" in psychological research, than in Transformers.

      --

      A Good Troll is better than a Bad Human.

    7. Re:I'm sorry, but by buswolley · · Score: 1

      I liked transformers, but I liked Robotix better.

      --

      A Good Troll is better than a Bad Human.

    8. Re:I'm sorry, but by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      I am too busy studying and doing research for a Transformers movie.


      So you're doing research for your own Transformers movie? Wow.
    9. Re:I'm sorry, but by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      but i bet you'd make time to suck your own dick if you were flexable enough... ...you certainly had time to metaphorically do it here.

    10. Re:I'm sorry, but by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You're a self-important whiny douche. Some of us have no inclination to play with toys, and happened to be born in 1980 and grew up watching Transformers every morning before going off to school. Take your higher than median income (oh, that's hard to obtain in the IT world), wife (gee, how'd all these people get here?), and your how (english hard) and waste $10 on a cartoon because you aren't capable of developing new interests after nearly 30 years of life.

    11. Re:I'm sorry, but by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Perhaps during your "psychological research" you'll come across the 18 Logical Fallacies and realize you're engaging the the fallacy of False Dilemma. You don't actually have to choose between your research and a 90-120 minute film. They're not mutually exclusive concepts.

    12. Re:I'm sorry, but by buswolley · · Score: 1

      I'm just not interested in the movie.

      --

      A Good Troll is better than a Bad Human.

    13. Re:I'm sorry, but by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You are an angry little man(?).

      Hah!

    14. Re:I'm sorry, but by Angostura · · Score: 3, Insightful

      I was a wee bit old for Transformers. I used to watch occassionally, and assumed that the TV programmes were simply adverts for the merchandise. I can't see that I was really wrong. The production values were true cheese.

    15. Re:I'm sorry, but by rylin · · Score: 1
      ...work a full time job which pays more then the national average.
      I am guessing you are doing one of the following:
      * Compensating for being bullied when you were a transformers-watching kid
      * Compensating for something else.

      Yours trolly,
      - r
    16. Re:I'm sorry, but by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Apparently you aren't too busy to stop your hectic schedule to read Slashdot and take the time to comment about how you don't have time.

      You're behaving like a troll who decided he wanted to get his kicks taking a shit in our nice banana-slice enhanced bowl of cornflakes.

    17. Re:I'm sorry, but by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      Robotech.

      That is all.

    18. Re:I'm sorry, but by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Nope, the sheeple have no capacity to think on their own, whereas I do think on my own. For example, Jerry Springer from what I have heard has the biggest share of sheeple. Not only are the ones that are on Springer, but also the ones that love every episode of it. I have the ability to formulate my own opinions, which is something sheeple are not capable of doing. They believe whatever is presented to them at face value. But I am glad to see that I must have hit a nerve as my post was modded down. This site must have the biggest concentration of sheeple. A good portion of slashdotters seem to have a herd mentality of software, hardware, love of Google, etc. What I mean by 'love of Google' is the use of 'google this' or 'google that'. In other words a good portion of slashdotters think the same way, and are like a sheep being led to slaughter.

      Also, you seem to be using profanity "incorrectly at that". The proverb I like to use most is "Profanity makes ignorance audible", showing just how ignorant a good number of slashdotters are.

    19. Re:I'm sorry, but by Dachannien · · Score: 1

      I did not own any transformers. They were too expensive for my parents. I just got the stupid knock-off Go-bots.

      Perhaps you'd be interested in some of these then.

    20. Re:I'm sorry, but by zakezuke · · Score: 1, Insightful

      How can you NOT like the transformers? I wasnt too excited when this project was first accounced, (another hollywood bludgeoning of an icon from my childhood) but this is promising.

      Before I start, I respect anyone who has any "Transformers"(tm). As a toy, it was a cool idea, and on top of that helped to boost hand eye co-ordination. And as a collectors item, I don't know their value but they came out after the great starwars bonanza, where *those* suckers were more valuable than baseball cards.

      But as a story... I think I might be missing something. I know nothing other than the afternoon cartoon. Now don't get me wrong, I was big on Japanese animation by this point in my life. I had already went out of my way to watch Star Blazers and Robotec and I was expecting another interesting epic. But with all kids programing airing was sporadic at best, so if there was a bigger story arc I didn't know about it. The first set get repeated into the ground with no real means of finding out when the new season was going to arive, let alone which season was which, and when it finally came to town, my half hearted interest started to fade, then came along a new series of characters followed by the flood of new toys associated with them which killed my suspencion of disbelief and I began to see it for what it was, one long commercial for overpriced toys. Parents went out of their way to get their children Arialbots which IIRC were crap, not only proportionatly smaller than the prior generation but were as simple as the Go-bots. And by this point in my life I had better things to do, either that or walking home from school took long enough that I missed the wonderful cartoon hour, that wonderful hour for those fortunate enough to be close enough to home from school to catch. Not to speak of the fact that VCRs were still new to the home and catching them in their proper order was unlikely.

      So... "How can you NOT like the transformers?", there wasn't much of a plot in the cartoon that I noticed, but rather two sets of robots stuck on earth making pointless raids always resulting in a stalemate.

      --
      There is no sanctuary. There is no sanctuary. SHUT UP! There is no shut up. There is no shut up.
    21. Re:I'm sorry, but by Tibor+the+Hun · · Score: 1

      Can't believe I'm wasting my breath on a "good troll" but,
      I am too busy studying and doing research for a Transformers movie.
      but you have enough time to post 3 times on /. thread about Transformers!?

      I'm sure the quality of your "psychological research" is undeniable, and a true gift to the human spirit.
      Thanks for playing:)

      --
      If you don't know what AltaVista is (was), get off my lawn.
    22. Re:I'm sorry, but by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      we can't all be big dicks like you, oops sorry I meant have big dicks, that's what you were implying right?

    23. Re:I'm sorry, but by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Then get the fuck out of this thread, stink-hole.

    24. Re:I'm sorry, but by buswolley · · Score: 0, Troll

      Do you realize that it is 113 degrees Fahrenheit here? My mind is degenerated to Slashdot level. So Fuck you.

      --

      A Good Troll is better than a Bad Human.

    25. Re:I'm sorry, but by Tim+C · · Score: 1, Troll

      For what it's worth, I don't think the comment was worth the down-modding. This story may arguably be "news for nerds", but "stuff that matters"? Enough for the front page? Maybe I'm just getting old...

    26. Re:I'm sorry, but by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      How about you sit back, relax, and watch an old Transformer's tape, then?

    27. Re:I'm sorry, but by 91degrees · · Score: 1

      Sorrty, but you're deluding yourself. You follow a crowd just like everyone else. You just follow a different crowd. The crowd that hates Jerry Springer and hates those who watch the show.

      Why else would you be using somebody elses proverb to make your point?

    28. Re:I'm sorry, but by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      But you are interested enough to read the thread, write a comment, and imply that people who want to see the movie are "kids".

      I.e. you're an asshole thinking you're smuggly superior than everyone else on slashdot because you are "mature" and have "important" things to worry about.

      I take it you never saw Star Wars episodes 1-3, then?

    29. Re:I'm sorry, but by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It's 111 right now where I am and I havn't turned into a whiney bitch like you.

    30. Re:I'm sorry, but by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Wow, you don't even bother reading the whole story. How can I be a part of the "crowd that hates Jerry Springer and hates those who watches the show" when I don't even have the brain-rotting device known as the television? Also, those that follow a crowd don't usually think for themselves, rather they go with what is popular with their peers.

      Also the point I was making was showing how ignorant a good number of slashdotters are, since they love to use profanity. Since I just nullified your arguments, what crowd are you going to say I follow? I can guess you are a mindless sheeple that goes for whatever is popular and does not have an original thought.

      Also, a little off topic, but people would take you a little more seriously if you were to proofread your posts.

    31. Re:I'm sorry, but by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      Since it appears you want to be a pendant:
      Also, a little off topic, but people would take you a little more seriously if you were to proofread your posts.

      But wait, what do we have here?
      What I mean by 'love of Google' is the use of 'google this' or 'google that'. In other words a good portion of slashdotters think the same way, and are like a sheep being led to slaughter.

      Also, you seem to be using profanity "incorrectly at that". The proverb I like to use most is "Profanity makes ignorance audible", showing just how ignorant a good number of slashdotters are.

      Do you know the difference between single and double quotes?

      Perhaps more importantly, why do you come to slashdot and post anonymously deep within threads about Transformers? Why do you need to let everyone know how superior you are to them, because you are able to think critically and write without profanity (and don't own a television)?

      If you really were so superior you'd be above all this. You wouldn't need to post deep within a thread about the voice of Optimus Prime sounding like a smug, though insecure, jerk.
    32. Re:I'm sorry, but by buswolley · · Score: 1

      Robotix --the cool construction play set--not the stupid cartoon. But robotech is the bomb. Forget the transformers.

      --

      A Good Troll is better than a Bad Human.

    33. Re:I'm sorry, but by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      To prove a point, not many here really think on their own, rather they just follow a crowd.

      Another point I made was "whatever happened to children entertaining themselves by using their imagination"

      Does anyone here use their imagination at all, or is it too much work for someone to use?

    34. Re:I'm sorry, but by 91degrees · · Score: 1

      How can I be a part of the "crowd that hates Jerry Springer and hates those who watches the show" when I don't even have the brain-rotting device known as the television?

      What does owning a television have to do with whether you hate those who have such a device?

      Also, those that follow a crowd don't usually think for themselves, rather they go with what is popular with their peers.

      You still follow a crowd. You might believe you think for yourself, but your thoughts are coloured by prejudices picked up from society. Hence you consider television to be a "brain rotting device". You're quite clearly a member of a pseudo intellectual, television dislikng crowd. You consider that other people don't think for themselves and that you do. Lots of people feel this way, but I find in all cases, there are certain prejudices acquired from other people, or the media. How many people do you know who watch Jerry Springer? How do you know how bad the show is if you don't have a television? Have you actually watched a few shows to confirm that it is as bad as you think?

      Also the point I was making was showing how ignorant a good number of slashdotters are, since they love to use profanity

      This is beside the point. What makes you think profanity is indicative of ignorance? Seems to me that somebody else said so. Someone you may consider a peer perhaps.

    35. Re: I'm sorry, but by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Sorry to be a grammar nazi, but for this sentence to mean the way this AC is interpreting it, it needs a comma:

      I am too busy studying, and doing research for a Transformers movie.

      Otherwise, the speaker is obviously too busy studying and doing research for a Transformers movie.

      [posted anonymously because this really doesn't need to be at 1, 0 is far more appropriate.]

    36. Re:I'm sorry, but by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Sure.

      I imagine that you're both hilarious at parties and a sure-fire hit with the ladies.

      Oh, you erudite chap, you!

    37. Re: I'm sorry, but by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It should have a comma either way for just these clarity reasons.

      I am too busy, studying and doing research, for a Transformers movie.

      It doesn't change the meaning of the sentence to take out the entire clause, so it should be "comma-wrapped."

    38. Re:I'm sorry, but by Axe+336 · · Score: 1

      They were originally were just going to have robots turn into cars and stay that way, but the idea was quickly scrapped and turned into Knight Rider

    39. Re: I'm sorry, but by buswolley · · Score: 1

      This is great. Mind the comma.

      --

      A Good Troll is better than a Bad Human.

    40. Re:I'm sorry, but by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Ah yes, I see you have run out of talking points which proves my point even more.

  2. Don't bother clicking the link, its a spam site by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Informative

    uly 22, 2006 - During Paramount's presentation on Friday at Comic-Con International in San Diego, the studio made an official announcement regarding their live-action feature film version of Transformers.

    While the announcement, which was preceded by a taped greeting from director Michael Bay, wasn't as momentous as the much expected first look at the giant robots in action, it was almost as eagerely anticipated by the fans.

    A vocal "greeting" by Optimus Prime himself announced that voice actor Peter Cullen, who played the character in the popular 1980s cartoon TV series, will voice Optimus Prime in nest summer's big -budget movie version.

    The announcement was met with rousing applause from Comic-Con attendees. The fans have long desired that Cullen reprise the role he'd made famous on TV.

    1. Re:Don't bother clicking the link, its a spam site by crazyjeremy · · Score: 1

      How is IGN a spam site? Granted the article is quite short, and most of us aren't transformer-savvy enough to know or care who Peter Cullen is, and IGN supports itself with ads, but how does that make it a spam site? Wait, why am I responding to an AC?

    2. Re:Don't bother clicking the link, its a spam site by SvnLyrBrto · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Compare the number, placement, and obtrusiveness (ESPECIALLY when they serve up these fscking annoying flash-based ones!!!) of the ads on IGN, add in the ads-disguised-as-content links to ebay, amazon, pricegrabber, and such; and compare all that to the ads on, for example.... Google.

      It may be a bit of an exaggeration to describe IGN as a full-out spam site. But the AC does have a point.

      cya,
      john

      --
      Imagine all the people...
    3. Re:Don't bother clicking the link, its a spam site by Cylix · · Score: 1

      Hell,

      Even I wanted some page views on some odd ball site I had made up and asked a friend to post a link on IGN.

      We know whats its for, stop lying to yourselves and use the tools you have ;)

      --
      "You should always go to other people's funerals; otherwise, they won't come to yours." -- Yogi Berra
  3. What about the movie theme song? by Average_Joe_Sixpack · · Score: 4, Funny

    Will Lion reunite one more time for this project? otherwise this film would be a waste of time.

    1. Re:What about the movie theme song? by Hotawa+Hawk-eye · · Score: 4, Funny

      You're thinking of the wrong movie ... the Lions reunite for the Voltron movie, not the Transformers movie.

    2. Re:What about the movie theme song? by BathTub · · Score: 1

      I heard they are just going to hire Dirk Diggler.

    3. Re:What about the movie theme song? by SuiteSisterMary · · Score: 1

      Lion did the rock theme song for the animated Transformers movie back in the 80s.

      Something evil's watching over you....

      --
      Vintage computer games and RPG books available. Email me if you're interested.
    4. Re:What about the movie theme song? by Skevin · · Score: 2, Funny

      Thanks, now I know who's going to try to sue me when I release my rendition of the song:

      Conformers
      Campaigns full of lies.
      Democrats wage their battle to destroy the evil forces of
      The Republicans.

      Solomon Chang

      --
      "Twice half-assed makes an ass whole." --Solomon K. Chang
    5. Re:What about the movie theme song? by foniksonik · · Score: 0, Offtopic

      hmmm personally I was thinking maybe he meant Thundercats! Liono was great of course and important but I'm much more intrigued by Cheetara!

      --
      A fool throws a stone into a well and a thousand sages can not remove it.
    6. Re:What about the movie theme song? by iamcf13 · · Score: 1

      Thanks, now I know who's going to try to sue me when I release my rendition of the song:

      That'd be Hasbro/(Mattel?) by way of the original composers, Rob Walsh and Johnny Douglas.

      I'm surprised I still remember that after all these years.

      But personnaly I wasn't a Transformers fan but did see the old feature movie from the 1980s directed by Nelson Shin.

      CAPTCHA for this post: bushels

      LOL since 'Shrub W' is in office now as of this post... XD

      Nice little parody song!

    7. Re:What about the movie theme song? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Well, Doug is touring with Whitesnake at the mo', and that's gotta be better for him. Although I swear the Transformers Movie soundtrack is why I like metal now..... Instruments of Destruction is great....

  4. Nostalgia by AlexanderYoshi · · Score: 0

    Awesome. They couldn't have picked a better voice actor.

  5. Peter Cullen? Damn! by tidokoro · · Score: 1

    I heard it was going to be Jackie Mason.

    --
    tidokoro
    what turns a man's karma neutral? lust for gold? power? or just a heart born full of neutrality?
  6. Waste of time by BobSutan · · Score: 1, Insightful

    What a waste of time that show was (on G4). The only thing we got out of it about Transformers is that Optimus Prime is 32' tall and that Peter Cullen is doing the voice. That, and there won't be any actual CGI of them until January or so. Basically it means its going to be a while until we get a real trailer like we were lead to believe they'd be showing.

    --
    "On a scale from 1 to 10, people are stupid"
    1. Re:Waste of time by mrseigen · · Score: 2, Insightful

      You may be the last person in the world to discover G4 cannot actually deliver on anything.

    2. Re:Waste of time by cyberformer · · Score: 2, Informative

      Haven't they already made a CGI trailer, showing a giant robot on Mars? It doesn't show very much (you can't identify which TF it is), but it's still CGI.

      I loved the Transformers, but I can't really get excited about the voice actors (even if they could resurrect Orson Welles...). They need to get Simon Furman involved.

    3. Re:Waste of time by BobSutan · · Score: 2, Interesting

      I've never bothered to watch G4 in the past as everything I've tried to sit through was, well, painful. The closest thing to any of their content I'll watch is old reruns of ST:TNG. With their claim of a Transformers exclusive I was suckered into recording it on the DVR. Thankfully I was able to watch it on FF until they got to the segment on TF that I was waiting for. And we all know the rest...

      --
      "On a scale from 1 to 10, people are stupid"
    4. Re:Waste of time by kannibal_klown · · Score: 2, Informative

      Yeh, but you only see a sillouete for like 0.5 seconds before the camera cuts out. For all you know that could be something a CGI threw together without any real source materia.

    5. Re:Waste of time by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You think that's bad? It has been reported that the director has no intentions of showing you *any* CGI of the transformers until you were in the theater and watching the movie. Even the official trailer will end up being more like that silly theater preview they're showing now.

    6. Re:Waste of time by LocoMan · · Score: 1

      That was original for the trailer and won't be part of the movie, so I guess they meant no CGI that will actually appear in the movie.

    7. Re:Waste of time by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      A tad offtopic, but I think the overall quality has dropped ever since G4/TechTV merged. None of my favorite TechTV shows got in after the merger.

      Back on topic, I was going to watch just to get that TF moive exclusive. Seems like a good thing I missed it, based on the rather un-inspiring description.

  7. typo ? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    "was to be"
    surely they mean "is going to be" ?

  8. Re:Hey Editors! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    If bigdady92 submitted a paragraph enclosed by quotes, then the editors have little choice. If they remove the quotes then they cannot claim that this is what bigdady92 wrote anymore.

    Any sequence of ascii characters is allowed in the submission box. Get used to it.

  9. I Say good. by jellomizer · · Score: 3, Insightful

    Part of the goal in the movie is to regain nostalgia of when we were kids, no doubly it will be different in a lot of aspects. Just having The Voice of Optimus Prime make us feel at home. His voice was perfect of Optimus Prime, Was a Good Guys Voice but with authority, Other voices could make him seem Either to Pansy and Mean and heartless.

    --
    If something is so important that you feel the need to post it on the internet... It probably isn't that important.
    1. Re:I Say good. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Learn english, faggot.

    2. Re:I Say good. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I love the random capitalizations in your posts.

      No, really, I do. Reminds me of my homeboy Thomas Jefferson.

    3. Re:I Say good. by kfg · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Part of the goal in the movie is to regain nostalgia of when we were kids . . .

      In exchange for your adult money.

      KFG

    4. Re:I Say good. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      They'll come to [Transformers] for reasons they can't even fathom. They'll turn up your driveway not knowing for sure why they're doing it. They'll arrive at your door as innocent as children, longing for the past. Of course, we won't mind if you look around, you'll say. It's only $20 per person. They'll pass over the money without even thinking about it: for it is money they have and peace they lack.

    5. Re:I Say good. by MrLint · · Score: 1

      Well ya know what's odd. I was watching Eureka last night and Gary Chalk was on there doing a non-russian voice (like he does on SG1) and im like 'i know that voice' and lo and behold. he does the OP voice on that new series cybertron and a few of the other CGI shows.

  10. Who cares? by SuperBanana · · Score: 3, Insightful
    I take it this will be the start of a series of "news articles" on Slash, AP, Reuters, etc about the movie?

    I recall reading recently that entertainment "news" is very popular with newspapers and TV stations because they don't have to have a reporter do any leg-work or research, just get a clip or parrot a quote from the celeb's agent.

    These days, thanks to newspaper/radio/tv mergers, all the big wigs care about is profit margin. Entertainment "news" like "Britney marries again!" can be made to fill the same amount of time as a story about (gasp) some bill before the House of Representatives that takes a reporter, camera crew and van travelling to the statehouse, fact checking, interviewing a couple representatives etc. Guess which is cheaper, by far?

    1. Re:Who cares? by tedrlord · · Score: 1

      I don't really understand what your point is, though. Slashdot doesn't check any of its stories anyway.

      --
      [insert witty quote here]
    2. Re:Who cares? by 1stpreacher · · Score: 1
      You really think this is the fault of the "news" sources?


      I mean I don't think it's cheaper for a news org. to check up on a bill, all of that info is available through phone calls, email, or web sites... The simple fact is that entertainment news is more "interesting" to the general public. Maybe you don't get excited about the thought of a new movie coming out, I don't know, but I'm interested in this movie...

      That said, I DO think it's sad that we don't have more interest in the govt... But many of us have given up... Not because of the left, or the right, but because all of them are evil bastards that don't give a crap what we think... *shrug*

      I love movies, I hate government... By taking a more active interest in govt, I'll just get pissed off... Bring on the entertainment...

      Sorry.

    3. Re:Who cares? by Aeamarth · · Score: 1

      Is it a cheap van?

  11. What's the appeal of Transformers? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0, Troll

    I don't get it. What's so special about transformers? I remember as kid it just another gimmicky, poorly animated cartoon show designed to market little robot cars and other toys. There was certainly nothing memorable the show that would create a fan following, I don't think. Maybe I'm missing something.

    1. Re:What's the appeal of Transformers? by hyfe · · Score: 3, Informative
      The toys were pretty fun atleast. You got cars, aircrafts and random stuff, aswell as dolls who were macho enough for guys to be able to play with them without their parents being accused of trying to turn their kids into gays.

      On that note, my parents are fairly open-minded folks, and when my little-brother was 3, he really, really wanted a doll and a stroller. Now, my parents basically looked at eachother and said 'Well, why not? We're not ones to let cultural prejudices get in front of our kids happyness'. We have never, ever laughed so much as when he got it though. He threw out the doll and promptly ran out into the street to play racing cars with it. He crashed fairly often though, and the poor stroller really wasn't built for his abuse. He had to get a new one after a month or so :)

      --
      "" How about taking the safety labels off everything, and let the stupidity-problem solve itself? """
    2. Re:What's the appeal of Transformers? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Go rent the movie, turn up the sound, turn off the lights and enjoy the glory that is 80's cartoons!

      Spoiler: Optimus Prime DIES!

    3. Re:What's the appeal of Transformers? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 4, Insightful

      I can't speak for everyone else, but I happen to like robots, automobiles and electronics. Transformers is a trifecta of all that is interesting to me and the plot happens to revolve around an epic battle of good vs evil, and sometimes good & evil vs greater evil, all with really amazing transformations of these sentient robots into normal everyday human objects.

      What's not to like? I suppose you liked GI Joe or something? Pfft. Gritty quasi-realistic cartoon pitting US vs Them. 'Us'? 'U.S.'? same thing on GI Joe. Good guys = America, hoorah! bad guys = anyone who looks or acts differently than an American, except for Snake Eyes, b/c he'd kill you without hesitation if you questioned his loyalty to the US. But, then again, he is a ninja. They have real ultimate power. Don't cross a ninja. This one time, my cousin's classmate's younger brother's babysitter's sister was walking with her boyfriend, and his leg clipped a bush that a ninja was hiding in waiting for his adversary from a rival ninja clan, and the ninja jumped out and diced him right there! It was over before the babysitter's sister could scream! And then, just because he could the ninja cut off her right arm and left leg and jumped to the rooftops and dashed away to find a worthwhile foe! You don't mess with that kind of power. So, to answer your question, global warming is being caused by Ninjas killing Pirates, because there aren't enough worthwhile ninja foes, so the ninjas have started going after pirates.

    4. Re:What's the appeal of Transformers? by jt2377 · · Score: 0

      No need to get into the politic. G.I. Joe is another kid's show like Transformer for American kids. do you want Bin Laden as good guy for an American show?

    5. Re:What's the appeal of Transformers? by schon · · Score: 1

      You're right. Maybe if it was about robots that turned into buildings.

      Maybe I'm missing something.

      Wasn't the line supposed to be "I don't get it"?

    6. Re:What's the appeal of Transformers? by Kohath · · Score: 5, Funny

      What's so special about transformers?

      They're more than meets the eye.

    7. Re:What's the appeal of Transformers? by aevan · · Score: 1

      GI Joe literally, even then, fell me with amusement....
      A Joe would stroll up, tell some kids to get out of the water because of a tstrom. Kids come out, lightening hits the water "and now we know...and knowing is half the battle". Endorsed by the Children Saftey thingy....

      ..then it's Joes versus Cobra in the water during a storm, a sneeze sends a rocket flying, a pillar in an unstable building topples down on a Joe... rather unsafe? Mixed Messages? :D

      Anyways what I'd have wanted from the show was casualties. For all the fighting, for all the weaponry, I only remember two injuries whatsoever: Shipwreck getting amnesia in an accident, and in the movie a Joe going into a coma. At least transformers took hits and some even became "One with the Matrix". That total absence of risk or plot made me prefer what little anime was on television at time.

      Altho Zarana was hot... ;)

    8. Re:What's the appeal of Transformers? by Tibor+the+Hun · · Score: 1

      But not as hot as the leather dressed, thigh-high booted, dark rim spectacled, Baroness.

      I've said too much..

      --
      If you don't know what AltaVista is (was), get off my lawn.
    9. Re:What's the appeal of Transformers? by ObsessiveMathsFreak · · Score: 1

      Maybe I'm missing something.

      The Knack.

      --
      May the Maths Be with you!
    10. Re:What's the appeal of Transformers? by LinDVD · · Score: 0

      Are you sure you aren't thinking about GOBOTS? They were far less memorable, comparitive speaking.

      --
      Just because you get modded "insightful" on Slashdot doesn't mean you actually are in real life.
    11. Re:What's the appeal of Transformers? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Informative
      For the love of god PLEASE everybody: "trifecta" does not mean "three things". It means you're placing a bet on a race and trying to guess 1st, 2nd, and 3rd place. That's the ONLY thing it means. Ever since Belmont got a lot of press in '03, the world seems to be in love with this word. If you love it, use it CORRECTLY!

      If you feel the need to use a 2-bit word for "three", ANY of the following would be preferable:

      ternion, threesome, trey, triad, triangle, trilogy, trine, trinity, triple, triplet, triplicate, triptych, triumvirate, triune, troika
    12. Re:What's the appeal of Transformers? by MobileTatsu-NJG · · Score: 4, Insightful

      "I don't get it. What's so special about transformers? I remember as kid it just another gimmicky, poorly animated cartoon show designed to market little robot cars and other toys. There was certainly nothing memorable the show that would create a fan following, I don't think. Maybe I'm missing something."

      I think the first thing you're missing is that you didn't look at it through the eyes of an 8 year old. Yes, you're right,it was gimmicky and yes it was designed to market toys to kids. Nobody's kidding you about that. The toys were cool. Back then, you had GI Joes, Hot Wheels, and Star Wars. Transformers were new, and they were different. Heck, even my parents like getting me the toys because this was back in the day when die-cast metal was still being used. They would 'last' longer than my other toys. They were also intriguing because I had no problem transforming them, but my parents couldn't. Heh.

      Then the movie came out. Oh man. That was a trip. The movie was MUCH larger than the TV series aspired to be. Not only did it add to the mythos of the Transformers, but it also featured a much stronger drama than we had seen on the small screen. Main characters died. That's a shock when you're 10 years old. Suddenly the battle for energon turned into a galaxy saving event, and many characters we loved paid the ultimate price for it.

      Then there was the comic books. I cannot talk with authority about the quality of the comics because I never had the chance to read them. I did, however, catch up on the summary of them on Wikipedia and found that they had developed a rather strong sci-fi story around the existence of these machines. From a scifi point of view, there's a very interesting tale about how these guys came into being and their significance in the universe. I think a lot of people would agree with me that if this franchise were taken to an 'adult' level, something very rich could be made of it. Head on over to Wiki and you may see what I mean.

      As for being memorable, the Transformers helped define a generation. It's hard to look at it today without experiencing it in your youth. Take any 25-30 year old, male or female, and mention the Transformers, and they'll go "oh.. yeah! I remember those!" After missing this, I can understand your point of view. It took a lot to make the Transformers popular.

      I have to say, though, that I'm worried about the movie. This is one of those franchises that the fans will nitpick to death. Normally I wouldn't fear this too much because the hard-core fan base is usually pretty small, but considering who the movie is aimed at and how many people actually watched this cartoon, I'm not even sure there's a 'right' way to do it in order to make the fans happy. We've all got our own ideas about what it was that made the Transformers fantastic. Myself included. There are two details that I feel they should incorporate into this movie that, without them, I'll have a hard time accepting. I'm embarrased to admit this because it reveals me to be one of those obsessed detail-oriented nerds with all of the social charm of the Comic Store Guy in the Simpsons. But maybe it'll give you a little clue into why this movie is contraversial.

      In the cartoon, the Transformers made a dinstinctive CHUK-CHUK-CHUK-CHUK sound when they transformed. In later attempts to revive the franchise (Beast Wars, for example...) they tossed the sound and made the transforming sequence slower. The reason for this change isn't a bad one. As mentioned before, the original cartoon was poorly animated. To simplify those shots, they transformed them quickly and dubbed in the sound. In the latter cartoons, the animation quality was higher, so they showed the more elaborate transforming sequence. Not a bad reason, right? Afterall, the fans want to see how these transformations work, right? This little difference, though, made the original Transformers seem more advanced and alien. Well... magical is a better word. The slower transform

      --

      "I like to lick butts!" by MobileTatsu-NJG (#32700246) (Score:5, Informative)

    13. Re:What's the appeal of Transformers? by Denyer · · Score: 1

      The comics, some of which were better than just toy promotion -- a guide and some info: here. In the US, the focus was more on the TV show.

      --
      Ph-nglui mglw'nafh Gates M'dna wgah'nagl fhtagn.
    14. Re:What's the appeal of Transformers? by NewbieProgrammerMan · · Score: 2, Insightful

      There's more than you can buy.

      --
      [b.belong('us') for b in bases if b.owner() == 'you']
    15. Re:What's the appeal of Transformers? by fahrvergnugen · · Score: 2, Interesting

      I hear you on the mass thing, but I think the clever boys over at Hasbro have this one licked. Check out the Alternators line. They're amazing.

      --
      Even Jesus hates listening to Creed.
    16. Re:What's the appeal of Transformers? by BRUTICUS · · Score: 1

      Great post...transformers being able to change in size definitely added to their technological advancement level. Yeah, it was a gimmick put into the series/movie simply to squeeze in a strange toy design but if a child can find a way to explain how and why it works, if a child can find a way to explain how it realistically possible. I'm sure Hollywood can find a way to put it on screen so that an adult can see it as technological magic.

      Soundwave should definitely be able to change size!

    17. Re:What's the appeal of Transformers? by Rude+Turnip · · Score: 1

      "For the love of god PLEASE everybody: "trifecta" does not mean "three things"."

      If enough people decide that it does, then it does. That's how languages evolve.

    18. Re:What's the appeal of Transformers? by geminidomino · · Score: 1

      CARTOON HEROS ARE FOR people smart enough to realize there's no such thing in the real world anymore!

      Fixed it for you.

      Mommy, what does 'jaded' mean?

    19. Re:What's the appeal of Transformers? by kthejoker · · Score: 1

      Seriously, no.

      Trifecta comes from combining the prefix "tri-" and the word "perfecta", meaning perfect. It simply means achieving three criteria perfectly. They don't have to be in order (that's not implied by the word.) So if I said in order to win a game, you had to a) collect $100, b) cross the finish line, and c) answer a trivia question, and you did so, then you've hit a trifecta.

      In fact, trifecta is a great word to use if there are 3 conditions that really sum up a particular position or situation. If you win the 100m, 200m, and 400m races, you've hit the trifecta of track glory. Or if you win the Oscar, Golden Globe, and SGA award, you've won the trifecta of a solid acting performance.

      Trifecta. Three perfections. That's it. Not just horse racing.

    20. Re:What's the appeal of Transformers? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "In the cartoon, the Transformers made a dinstinctive CHUK-CHUK-CHUK-CHUK sound when they transformed. In later attempts to revive the franchise (Beast Wars, for example...) they tossed the sound and made the transforming sequence slower."

      Here's a geek moment for you. In the Beast Wars series, there's a story arc where Ravage returns from Cybertron in order to take the (new) Megatron into custody. He ends up switching sides though, with a "Decepticons forever!" yell, and transforms...using the traditional old-school sound when he does so.

      Upon hearing that sound, everyone watching in the room cheered.

    21. Re:What's the appeal of Transformers? by RobinH · · Score: 1

      You forgot: Menage a trois. :)

      --
      "I have never let my schooling interfere with my education." - Mark Twain
    22. Re:What's the appeal of Transformers? by StikyPad · · Score: 1

      I don't get it. What's so special about transformers? Maybe I'm missing something.

      You must be. Let me break it down for you:

      A Transformer or Transportation Former is an intelligent machine that is able to "transform", reconfiguring itself into a common and innocuous form, such as a car, aircraft, or animal. The taglines "More Than Meets the Eye" and "Robots in Disguise" reflect this ability. Additionally, this "transformation" is often accompanied by a "Wa-a-a-a" sound, not unlike the sound the lead singer makes in the song "Down With the Sickness," although several octaves lower and somewhat more synthesized-sounding.

      Now do you get it?

    23. Re:What's the appeal of Transformers? by StikyPad · · Score: 1

      That's the most ridiculous thing I've ever heard. Everbody knows transformers work on AC, and alternators output DC. They're wholly incompatible!

    24. Re:What's the appeal of Transformers? by Sketch · · Score: 1
      Megatron could turn into a gun that Starscream could wield.

      In additon to that, I recall at least one episode where he turned into a gun that a human could wield. So, not only does his size change between modes, but it even varies in the same mode.

      I grew up at the right time to catch Transformers, and I found a lot about it that is very near and dear to me. There are lots of people like me.

      I, too, was a huge Transformers fan in childhood. However, from watching a few of the TV shows recently, I have found that they really haven't aged very gracefully for the most part. Even the movie is much more simplistic and a bit cheesier than I remember it being all those years ago. I guess that's a downside of being aimed at children...

      --
      -- OpenVerse Visual Chat: http://openverse.com
  12. stuff that doesn't matter that much. by brunokummel · · Score: 5, Funny

    What about the slashdotters that are not american, you insensitve clod!?
    We'll probably enjoy much more watching it dubbed by the same guy who dubbed the animated series!

    something like:
    "Sayonara, Optimus Roboto-sam! "
    "Hasta luego, Señor Optimus Roboto!"
    "Auf wiedersehn, Herr Optimus Roboter"

    --
    What is best in life? To crush your enemies, to see them driven before you and to hear the lamentations of their women.
    1. Re:stuff that doesn't matter that much. by despisethesun · · Score: 4, Informative

      In Japan, he was actually known as Convoy.

      --
      This poo is cold.
    2. Re:stuff that doesn't matter that much. by Abrilon · · Score: 1

      But since the Japanese have no "V" sound it was really "conboy"... oh Japan.

    3. Re:stuff that doesn't matter that much. by Cerberus7 · · Score: 1

      Holy crap, a comic character has come to life on Slashdot!

      http://www.shortpacked.com/d/20060710.html

      --
      I don't know about you, but my servers run on the power of cotton candy and happy thoughts. -Anonymous Coward
    4. Re:stuff that doesn't matter that much. by kisielk · · Score: 1

      I just want to let you know your comment made me laugh uncontrollably. Thank you.

    5. Re:stuff that doesn't matter that much. by pimpimpim · · Score: 1
      In the Netherlands, we watched the original one, even without subtitles. I still could catch the story anyway, as they were not too hard. My first english words were "transformers, go!". Not very practical on daily life? As a nine year old, they are! :)

      But they'll should get back the voice of Megatron as well, that was a pretty nasty voice.

      Just to start a troll: Is there anyone who remembers MASK nowadays? Damn, that was just one cheap ripoff of Transformers. Fakers!

      --
      molmod.com - computing tips from a molecular modeling
    6. Re:stuff that doesn't matter that much. by geminidomino · · Score: 1

      I do remember MASK.

      The theme song was rather similar to the BGM from Elec Man's stage in the original Mega Man.

  13. Re:What a bunch of dorks. by 91degrees · · Score: 1

    Yup.

    So, do you have anything else to say, or does it simply make you feel better to call other people dorks for liking things you don't?

  14. Dammit... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I just browsed to Slashdot, pressed "Read More", pressed "Reply" and wrote this text....

    I'm the lowest being on earth...

    Quick... back to Youtube where time is well spend..

    1. Re:Dammit... by A.K.A_Magnet · · Score: 2, Funny
      Quick... back to Youtube where time is well spend..
      Hell yeah!!!! So insightful111!!! LOL11!
    2. Re:Dammit... by A.K.A_Magnet · · Score: 1

      Mhh, the random link above is unfortunately more representative of the YouTube community, but this or that link seem more appropriate :)

    3. Re:Dammit... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Whoa.. that was a fat, ugly bitch... I sue the shit out of you for posting that link!!!!! You bastard!!!

  15. Re:Hey Editors! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Sure they can. I submitted and article a couple of days ago that was accepted and the editor almost rewrote the whole submission, yet it still said I wrote it.

  16. The obvious by killermookie · · Score: 1

    What can I say? How can you go wrong with this decision?

  17. So? by Virak · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Just because you're not a kid anymore doesn't mean you shouldn't have fun either.

  18. Best... news... EVAR! by hellfire · · Score: 2, Insightful

    At this point and time, I'm only worried about three things in any transformers movie remake:

    1) It has a good and entertaining plot
    2) It has stunning artistic quality in the visual effects
    3) That peter cullen is optimus prime

    You can argue til your blue in the face as to what the characters look like and the technology bullshit of disappearing parts or even including the dinobots. The appeal of the Transformers has always been about the characters. They weren't just cute toys, or an afternoon cartoon. The brilliance has always been about the characters. Who they were, what they did, as well as what they transformed into. It was the total package.

    The total package includes Peter's voice. It's unmistakable, unduplicatable, and undeniably the best!

    --

    "All great wisdom is contained in .signature files"

    1. Re:Best... news... EVAR! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I agree. Still, I would rather avoid the dinobots. But if the story is good, it won't matter.

    2. Re:Best... news... EVAR! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Don't forget Frank Welker's voice! Frank is probably the best-known unknown as he is possibly one of the most talented voice actors in the U.S. having appeared in almost half of its cartoons and a multitude of movies doing vocal effects, and yet you don't hear him mentioned by name a lot.

      Of the top of my head, in Transformers he was Megatron, Soundwave, and at _least_ a half dozen others.

      *begin rant* Ahh, but this being a "live action" movie, I'm suprised they choose to have any original voices, pleasantly surprised (as in I may actually go to the movies). With its track record of poor stories, Hollywood long ago made me critical about going to the movies. (I want to go, but I'm not paying almost $10 to watch hashed or rehashed drivel fronted by commercials before the previews along side ludicrously expensive food. Does Hollywood and theaters even care about those who _want_ to go to the theater anymore?) *end rant*

      --Dave Romig, Jr.

  19. Growing up... by osu-neko · · Score: 1

    There's a particular view where certain interests and behaviors are associated with childhood and certain interests and behaviours are associated with adulthood, and if you're a good child you follow those, and when you become an adult you continue to behave in the way society tells you to.

    Then there are people who grow up, which among other things means leaning to think for yourself, decide for yourself, and be responsible for your own decisions and their consequences.

    For people who've grown up, whether to be excited about this or not is a matter of personal preference, but for those who haven't really grown up yet, the fact that they're an adult and not a kid anymore is relevant to this. To the latter group, the comment "I'm not a kid anymore" is a valid explanation for why they would not be interested in this. If and when they ever do grow up, they'll refrain from making those kinds of comments about things that simply don't interest them for whatever reason.

    --
    "Convictions are more dangerous enemies of truth than lies."
  20. Your Own How? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I am an adult to. I am getting Married Have my own how,

    You and Aslan both.

  21. Supposed Set Photos by rainman_bc · · Score: 1

    Set Photos here

    Notice how lame Optimus Prime looks with those flames.

    Nice Jubblies though in the last pic.

    --
    09 F9 11 02 9D 74 E3 5B D8 41 56 C5 63 56 88 C0
    1. Re:Supposed Set Photos by 2nd+Post! · · Score: 1

      Compare the set photos to the 1995 Laser Optimus Prime. I wonder if the robot mode will look the same too?

  22. The rapidly dropping quality of Hollywood by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Granted; a lot (if not most) movies were made after some author wrote a book which was picked up by a director who eventually made it into a movie. All in all it used to be one (or more) people who wanted to get a story out. Actually create something enjoyable by the masses.

    But these days I taste none of that, its like people are desperatly trying to find certain storyline(s) for the sole purpose of making more money. First you've seen this behaviour happening on the 'superheroes' front where Marvel created movies from their several characters, even when there already was such a movie (Spiderman comes to mind). But even in those cases you're basicly making a movie from a phenomenon. The 'superheroes' saga has lasted for years and was enjoyed by millions of people, young and old alike.

    However, IMO it started becoming a little ridiculous when you get movies from cartoons while the cartoon itself was already a phenomenon in itself. Take, for example, 'Masters of the Universe'. Whats even striking me more is that this series was originally launched with the idea of merchandize in the back of people's mind. Is that really a good starting point to make a movie from it ? Or what about the 'Flintstones' ? In my opinion thats an even worse movie since it doesn't even try to be a regular movie but mimicks all the cartoon effects, sometimes in a more than ridiculous manner.

    In the end all of those movies don't pay attention to anything which made the whole thing great and basicly introduces the "directors liberty". You know; when a simply known fact from the original is twisted because "it matches the movie/story/scene/whatever better". You've seen this happening in many if not all movies. Narnia: The professor met the kids right after they left the closet. Hello; wasn't there some tour going? In the original BBC series they looked him up in his study. Master o/t Universe: In the end battle Skeletor rambles about getting the power to become God. Hello? Don't tell me that the whole "Master of the Universe" has already degraded to nothing more than a mere title? In the original Skeletor always tried to become the Master of the Universe. Inspector Gadget: Lets not even get into this one, when compared with the original it was just bad since nothing was adopted, not even the mystery behind Dr. Claw. Lord of the Rings: While not totally bad its plain out obvious that the story isn't exactly the most important anymore, its the special effects. Where previous cartoons totally focussed on story and passion these movies need the special effects for "massive battles". A pity IMO.

    In all honosty the last example isn't fair since this isn't something which has been remade. It simply is the first real movie from the book, just like any other of its kind. But it does goes to show you that money is ruling supreme here. Being a big Transformers fan myself at the age of 36 (I stopped caring when we got Beast Wars and the Transformers Armada) and a big Evangelion fan (basicly I just like cartoons but these two are rather special IMO) I'm really not looking forward to the upcoming live movies. I'd rather see some television station doing a re-run of the original series, and I don't mean the horrible series where they started sticking the serie together with an awfully annoying cube animation.

    Why can't we leave something great as great as it is and simply acknowledge its greatness by enjoying the original all over again?

    1. Re:The rapidly dropping quality of Hollywood by walnutmon · · Score: 1

      Lord of the Rings was a book, they didn't make up giant battles so that you could see them. They existed in the story, and they had the ability to show them in the movie. It wasn't using special effects to compensate for a story. Two things were bad about LOTR, they both involved Orlando Bloom skateboarding.

      Oh yeah... "Master o/t Universe"?

      You wrote a needlessly long essay, but "of the" was just a waste of time?

      --
      You take it, I don't want it...
    2. Re:The rapidly dropping quality of Hollywood by ObsessiveMathsFreak · · Score: 1

      Hollywood isn't in the business of making quality films. It's in the business for making flashy trailers to get people to pay to come to an overcrowed, overpriced cinema; and buy merchandice for their kids. If a film has to actuall be made in order to make this trailer, so be it, but no-one said it had to be good. these days, the best talent in Hollywood goes into making the TV trailers and billboards.

      Anyone still going to the movies, is a sucker. Even TV can surpass the tripe that Hollywood passes off as entertainment. And that's saying a lot.

      --
      May the Maths Be with you!
    3. Re:The rapidly dropping quality of Hollywood by irm · · Score: 1

      You can; there's nothing in a re-imagining that changes anything about the original, and no one is forcing anyone to trundle off to the new movie.

      I do think, however, that it's important to be wary of willful nostalgia: don't make the original into something it wasn't. (Star Wars comes to mind: an important movie that was - let's be honest - in spite of its cultural resonance, mediocre at best.)

  23. Great news, but... by FriendOfBagu · · Score: 3, Funny

    ... the bad news is that he's going to be voicing a robotic lawn mower.

    1. Re:Great news, but... by sunwukong · · Score: 1

      Actually I'm looking forward to Megatron's transforming and showering the Lawnobots with chocolate sauce (or, if filled with Energon, melted cheese).

      I especially can't wait to see how they handle Unicron in cruise ship mode ...

    2. Re:Great news, but... by mink · · Score: 1

      "I especially can't wait to see how they handle Unicron in cruise ship mode ..."

      I think that explains Speed 2.

      --
      Well I've wrestled with reality for thirty five years doctor, and I'm happy to say I finally won out over it.
  24. Transformers the movie. no.. the other one. by Sark666 · · Score: 1

    I grew up watching tf and loved it. But going back and watching the original series, you see a lot more cheese than you remembered. Still a fun ride but not the same. But the animated movie I watched a few times over the years and I think it really stands the test of time. Ya it was an obvious ploy to kill a bunch of em for new toys, but they did it with such style. The animation is obviously better than the series, the story more serious, and c'mon, Orson Welles as unicron! (I've read it's the last thing he did but imdb has things credited later but probably older material resurfaced from some projects, not to mention best voice ever next to james earl jones). Even Leonard Nemoy was great as galvitron.

    Discussing voices, who is going to be the voice of megatron? I sure hope Frank Welker will reprise the role.

    1. Re:Transformers the movie. no.. the other one. by Thrymm · · Score: 1

      According to the imdb entry he's rumored to be Megatron!

      http://imdb.com/name/nm0919798/

  25. Indeed by brian0918 · · Score: 0, Offtopic

    Agreed. They've done that with my submissions in the past too, rewriting them to sound more dramatic/wrong. Then I get the blame for the inaccuracy.

    1. Re:Indeed by Foobar+of+Borg · · Score: 1

      There is only one possible solution. Zonk must be fired into the Sun (or at least out of a cannon).

  26. Re:What a bunch of dorks. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    There is one AC posting all (or most) of these stupid ass comments. The writing style is exactly the same.

  27. Is that Optimus? by TCQuad · · Score: 1

    Notice how lame Optimus Prime looks with those flames.

    Has Optimus Prime ever had an extended front? Every time I've seen him in vehicle mode, it's always been a flat-front truck...

    1. Re:Is that Optimus? by falcon5768 · · Score: 1
      Bsy explained why in a blog post on his site. Basically OP and a lot of the transformers played with a lot of size issues in order to work in the cartoon (IE the animators didnt give a rats ass at it being beliveable)

      In order for Bay to make it beleiveable and to use live effects the way he wants to, he had to modify them to fit vehicals that could realistically become 30 foot tall robots. The truck that makes OP is infact the biggest big-rig in the world, and the only one that could realistically become OP and have all the parts actually work and not "dissapear"

      as for the flames, they come later. the OP we first see doesnt have them, its for a scene in the script where they disguise OP

      --

      "Slashdot, where telling the truth is overrated but lying is insightful."

    2. Re:Is that Optimus? by Svet-Am · · Score: 1

      in trucker parlance (a few relatives of mine are truckers), flat front trucks are referred to as pug-nose trucks. and, yes, OP has ALWAYS been a pug nose truck. Hell, even the teaser truck they had at E3 was a pug nose truck in the proper color scheme. where the hell did these flames and crap come from. my bet is that that is either a DIFFERENT character than OP or the pic is fake.

      --
      [move .sig! for great justice, take off every .sig!]
    3. Re:Is that Optimus? by Truekaiser · · Score: 0

      could it actualy be the leader of the stunticons? i think his name was motormaster?

    4. Re:Is that Optimus? by bigbadwlf · · Score: 1

      in trucker parlance (a few relatives of mine are truckers), flat front trucks are referred to as pug-nose trucks.

      Around here it's called cab-over.

    5. Re:Is that Optimus? by vrwarp · · Score: 1

      Will megatron still transform to a gun :P?

      --
      --vrwarp
    6. Re:Is that Optimus? by brother_b · · Score: 1

      Generation 2 Laser Prime had an extended front in vehicle mode.

    7. Re:Is that Optimus? by falcon5768 · · Score: 1

      no he's a huge fucking russian tank. Again because the gun was unbelievable.

      --

      "Slashdot, where telling the truth is overrated but lying is insightful."

    8. Re:Is that Optimus? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      No, Megatron is now a fondue pot.

    9. Re:Is that Optimus? by Rude+Turnip · · Score: 1

      Last I read, he's going to be a jet.

    10. Re:Is that Optimus? by geminidomino · · Score: 1

      Bitch! They'd better not scrap Starscream for that!

    11. Re:Is that Optimus? by Rude+Turnip · · Score: 1

      Megatron will be a Cybertronian jet (you already know what they look like, right?), while Starscream will be an F-22 jet.

  28. The CGI trailer by TCQuad · · Score: 1

    Haven't they already made a CGI trailer, showing a giant robot on Mars? It doesn't show very much (you can't identify which TF it is), but it's still CGI.

    Here's the direct link. Basically, it appears to be Independence Day 2: Transformers. They're even releasing it on the 4th of July.

  29. The best choice possible. by Maul · · Score: 3, Insightful

    I was a little dismayed seeing some of the "creative" changes that Bay seemed to be applying to this film. I can handle Optimus Prime being a long-nose truck, mainly because in some iterations of the franchise (i.e. Armada), he does appear that way. However, the decision to paint him with flames, as well as making Bumblebee a Camero, indicated to me that Bay had no regard for the original personalities of the Transformers. Basically he just wanted to make everything be "eXXXXXtreeeme" as possible.

    Cullen voicing Prime will at least ensure that some elements of character's original personality will stay intact, and this is probably the selling point for me seeing the movie.

    --

    "You spoony bard!" -Tellah

    1. Re:The best choice possible. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Thank goodness he didn't choose a Camaro.

    2. Re:The best choice possible. by 2nd+Post! · · Score: 2, Interesting

      What "creative" changes? In 1995 Optimus Prime was a red-black long nose truck sporting flames.

      Also if VW was unwilling to allow Bumblebee to be a New Beetle in the current Alternators toy line, why do you think they would allow him to be a New Beetle (or an old one) in the movie?

  30. Young men with disposable income 20s-30s by bussdriver · · Score: 1

    Congrats fellow 20-30 men in america! You are now in the demographic that spends money on worthless crap. So now you will be targeted in a more mainstream way than before when you were just part of the kid demo and they were busy targeting your parents. Back then, you were not interested in the crap your father was getting sold on and probably being told how great that stuff from his childhood was that he was getting back into--inbetween the "i walked miles in snow to school" compensation.

  31. My grandfather loved John Wayne movies... by Greg_D · · Score: 3, Insightful

    He loved the way the Duke always came out on top. Loved the way Wayne's characters acted and lead and showed men how to be men.

    And all that stuff.

    And while I've never watched a John Wayne movie, I tip my hat to them despite how cheesy they may have been, because I loved and respected my grandfather and those movies were the ones we bought for him when he was suffering from cancer at the end of his days. He was in obvious pain, but he enjoyed them nonetheless.

    Optimus Prime is the John Wayne of the generation who grew up in the 80s. Sure, there was Duke from GI Joe, but he was usurped in midstream by a general. There was Lion-o, but the Thundercats were too wierd for most kids to take seriously. There was He-Man, but he was never anything more than a bad Superman re-interpretation.

    But Optimus, man... Optimus was a truck and an action figure all in one. And when he spoke, he did so with conviction on the side of right and he used his leadership to defeat those who would harm others. And even when he was wrong, he eventually did the right thing. I don't own any "toys" anymore. I mean, I have recreational objects that I use to unwind with, but nothing that a kid would understand or find interesting. Except one. My 20th anniversary edition Optimus sits proudly on my desk. The original toy looked little like the cartoon character. But this one? 60 bucks and it doesn't even matter... Optimus looks like he shoulda. He's a kickass poseable paperweight.

    When Optimus died in the movie, I was a kid, and I was upset. Who was this Rodimus dude, and what did he do with our hero? See, even with the neat futuristic car and the neat flaming paint job, Hot Rod and Rodimus just weren't as cool. Didn't matter that he could fight Galvatron and kick some Swoop ass... he wasn't the hero. He wasn't the legend. And when Optimus came back, he died saving the universe again. And then he came back for more.

    Children today will tell their kids about the time they saw Kobe Bryant score 81. They'll swear Duane Wade was the best ever. But they never saw Jordan play. They never watched Magic pass. But I never got to see Wilt in his heyday, or see Oscar Robertson average a triple double. They'll claim that LaDainian Tomlinson is the best RB to ever lace them up because of his fancy moves, but they never got a chance to watch Barry spin the way I never got a chance to see Jim Brown knock people over.

    Everyone grows up and has their own legends to tell tales about. For the 80s bunch, Optimus Prime saved the day after school, and that's why so many love and respect the character to this day. And you can't have Optimus Prime without the deep, John Waynesy voice of Peter Cullen. Just wouldn't be right.

    1. Re:My grandfather loved John Wayne movies... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Optimus Prime is the John Wayne of the generation who grew up in the 80s.
       
      Speak for yourself faggot. I grew up in hte eighties and I fucking hated all this kind of shit. I could see, even at such a young age, that it was just a rip off without substance. You know, when you're 12 it's OK to be into shit without substance but there's a point where you have to leave that kind of bullshit far in your past. Put the transformers down and step into the light of adulthood.
       
      That shit's for kids. Leave it behind as a memory and don't either spoil the memory with a second rate hollywood film or end up getting fucked by the man by trying to exploit your past, or both.

    2. Re:My grandfather loved John Wayne movies... by cornface · · Score: 1

      And while I've never watched a John Wayne movie

      Do you live in a cave?

    3. Re:My grandfather loved John Wayne movies... by zakezuke · · Score: 1

      Optimus Prime is the John Wayne of the generation who grew up in the 80s. Sure, there was Duke from GI Joe, but he was usurped in midstream by a general. There was Lion-o, but the Thundercats were too wierd for most kids to take seriously. There was He-Man, but he was never anything more than a bad Superman re-interpretation. ....
      Everyone grows up and has their own legends to tell tales about. For the 80s bunch, Optimus Prime saved the day after school, and that's why so many love and respect the character to this day. And you can't have Optimus Prime without the deep, John Waynesy voice of Peter Cullen. Just wouldn't be right


      While I agree with the idea that we all have our heros, I don't see Optimus Prime as being prolific as "The Duke".

      Though Peter Cullen according to the IMDb does have a pretty long resume. I'm seeing things like the voice for sour puss from Pac-man, 1981 Spiderman's "Red Skull", Eeyore in "Winnie the Pooh", even Voltron. I was starting this responce out as a sort of flame on the idea that a cheezy marketing ploy such as Transformers could even compare to "The Duke", and the only truth I can find is this Peter Cullen gent seems to have such amazing range that there is no chance in hell he would be typecast as "Optimus Prime".

      So while I can't see Optimius Prime being a true cultural icon which stands the test of time the way that "The Duke" has, I must say that if you grew up in the 80s, odds are you know his voice.

      --
      There is no sanctuary. There is no sanctuary. SHUT UP! There is no shut up. There is no shut up.
    4. Re:My grandfather loved John Wayne movies... by Megahurts · · Score: 1

      Odds are, if you've been to a movie or watched TV in the last 30 years, you know his voice. He does a LOT of voiceovers. He's one of about 4 or 5 VO 'stars' in hollywood whose voices are rarely ever not heard in the pre-screening trailers and commercials.

  32. Doesn't matter... by mshiltonj · · Score: 2, Insightful

    With Michael Bay running the show, the movie will still suck.

  33. I thought for sure... by TheOldSchooler · · Score: 1

    They'd pick Will Smith. "OH! I know you Decepticons didn-t just invade earth baby! No you in trouble!"

    1. Re:I thought for sure... by trupoet · · Score: 0

      lol I just had a vision of Optimus dancing to "Gettin jiggy with it"

  34. KARR! by payndz · · Score: 3, Informative

    Optimus Prime? Bah! Peter Cullen will always be KARR to me. (Even though he wasn't in KARR's second appearance. :p) "I have checked my data on basic human desires. Therefore, I understand your needs. You wish to eat. You wish to drink. You wish to reproduce. Which one first?"

    --
    You must think in Russian.
  35. Re:What a bunch of dorks. by computational+super · · Score: 1

    We don't have anything better to do than get excited about a Transformers movie.

    You don't have anything better to do than think about us getting excited about a Transformers movie.

    I'd rather be me here.

    --
    Proud neuron in the Slashdot hivemind since 2002.
  36. Oh bother by Dash16 · · Score: 0

    Peter Cullen also voiced Eeyore of Winnie the Pooh. O_O

  37. AUTOBOTS TRANSFORM AND ROLL OUT! by BRUTICUS · · Score: 1

    finally some good news for this movie.

  38. The man is Eeyore by thefinite · · Score: 3, Informative
    ...to voice his most famous and well-loved character Optimus Prime.

    I think a billion little kids--not to mention most of their parents--would take issue with calling Optimus Prime his "most famous and well-loved character." Peter Cullen has voiced Eeyore from Winnie the Pooh for decades.

    --
    Boom Shanka
    1. Re:The man is Eeyore by tedrlord · · Score: 1

      I must admit I love Eeyore, he's practically my role model in life, but growing up in the Eighties, Optimus Prime was my hero and the hero of every boy my age. Most of it was because of Peter Cullen's voice. You just had to listen to what he said.

      Optimus Prime was like General Patton with lasers that transformed into a giant truck. There was nothing better than him when I was young.

      --
      [insert witty quote here]
    2. Re:The man is Eeyore by AmberBlackCat · · Score: 1

      Oh, bother.

    3. Re:The man is Eeyore by Rude+Turnip · · Score: 1

      That's the hook to get your girlfried to see the movie with you. All girls are obsessed with anything Pooh-related.

  39. "Slow news day" by Rebelgecko · · Score: 1

    Despite being tagged "Slow news day" this announcement is definitely more than meets the eye.

    --
    CATS/Diebold '08- All your vote are belong to us!
  40. All the characters are androids. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    And there are hundreds of them. That's unique for the fiction I've encountered.

  41. Don't f***king go then. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I swear, it is like you people are dedicated to having no fun in this lifetime.

    A medium-well steak is no more nutritious for me than a few bites off of a cow. It costs more but I'll enjoy it a lot better, trust me.

    There's a reason it is called the "entertainment industry", they make money by entertaining people. The nerve.

    1. Re:Don't f***king go then. by kfg · · Score: 1

      I swear, it is like you people are dedicated to having no fun in this lifetime.

      "At one of my own performances I was introduced by the promoter as someone who ". . . is obviously having so much fun you can't help but have fun along with him."

      I was once informed by a friend that a group of friends had gotten together and decided that my last name was a verb, meaning "to make laugh uncontrolably." In fact, at the moment I seem to have gathered a small cadre of aspiring young stand up comedians who like to just listen to me talk, trying to figure out how to be funny (they write good jokes, but they really don't have much skill at being funny yet. I don't have any "material" at all. I'm just funny. I guess I'd be in the "Billy Connolly School" of comedy). One of them is begging me to let him make a film about me. He says I "need to be documented."

      I'd posit that I know something both about having fun and entertaining people.

      "A medium-well steak is no more nutritious for me than a few bites off of a cow. It costs more but I'll enjoy it a lot better. . ."

      Indeed. Bugs Bunny;medium-well steak. Transformers;Three day raw dead cow - advertised as medium-well steak to somehow induce you into buying toys of ill manufacture, but momentary intrigue.

      Well, I guess someone had to have the misfortune to spend their childhood in the 1980s, the most culturally bankrupt decade in all of human history, and I'm aware of a good deal of human history. If you're nostalgic for it I suppose it's not your fault, by virtue of not knowing any better.

      There's a reason it is called the "entertainment industry", they make money by entertaining people.

      It's called the entertainment industry because it's an industry, not entertainment, and their chief output seems to be constant whinging that people are ignoring them in ever increasing droves.

      Maybe they need to learn to be funny . . . and some decent material, 'cause they sure suck at making it up as they go along.

      KFG

    2. Re:Don't f***king go then. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      "...but my mom says I'm talented!"

      I'm not trolling, but you tend to get into discussions on /. just to be a dick and whore for karma, and you never have a point to make that matters. It's like saying "M$ sucks!!1", that's pretty much how deep and insightful you are on here.

    3. Re:Don't f***king go then. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      kfg thinks he's funny, but as far as I can tell he just posts stupid responses to everything. "LOLOL I made a pun" Way to go, Senfield.

  42. Wow. I'm so not a geek. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Where can I hand in my license and compiler?

    I can't stand the original Transformers. I tried watching a few episodes recently, and came only to the conclusion that with all that cheese, I now have an explanation for why I'm so f'd up in the head. (Between that and Thundercats.. Christ.)

    Furthermore, I *liked* Beast Wars.

  43. Re:Hey Editors! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Wow... So here I am with a couple mod points to give away when I run across this article. Afraid I lost 20 minutes of my life I'll never get back, fruitlessly searching for anything useful or interesting. Don't get me wrong; I plan to see the movie, love the concept, but /.ers didn't bring their "A" game today. Can I mod the entire thing down -1 (pointless)?

    -- A.C.

  44. Re:What a bunch of dorks. by MobileTatsu-NJG · · Score: 2, Insightful

    "You heard me. I can't believe all of these losers. Its a freaking kiddie cartoon."

    $5 says you creamed in your shorts over previews of Episode I, Matrix Reloaded, and Serenity. Even if I'm wrong about one of them, I'm still willing to bet you shouldn't be casting any stones.

    --

    "I like to lick butts!" by MobileTatsu-NJG (#32700246) (Score:5, Informative)

  45. Interesting thought... by TCQuad · · Score: 1

    could it actualy be the leader of the stunticons? i think his name was motormaster?

    That's a really interesting thought. While Motormaster is really a flat-front truck, as seen in this cel found online, changing him slightly would be significantly more palatable than having that be Optimus Prime.

  46. A Transformers movie? by SamSim · · Score: 1

    I would've waited an eternity for this!

  47. Unicron by SFSouthpaw · · Score: 1

    What a shame Orson Welles isn't still around. IMO, his voice was up there with Peter Cullen's.

    --
    ---southpaw
  48. Well at least it wasn't Tom Cullen by /dev/trash · · Score: 1

    M-O-O-N spells Optimius

    1. Re:Well at least it wasn't Tom Cullen by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Your drop of obscure reference is noted and appreciated. Especially since this is all about the nostalgia... brings me back to reading all 50000+ pages of that book.

  49. Real life Optimus Prime by RazzleDazzle · · Score: 1
    Here is a guy who legally changed his name to Optimus Prime a couple years back. His military buddies kicked his butt a little bit over this. From the article

    "They razzed me for three months to no end," said Prime. "They really dug into me about it."

    --
    ZERO ZERO ONE ZERO ONE ZERO ONE ONE! Just brushing up for my next big invention: Ethernet over Voice (EoV)
  50. childhood, adulthood... by beaverfever · · Score: 1

    Believe it or not, it is possible that someone could have enjoyed children's entertainment when they were a child and find it immature as an adult without some sort of outside influence, as you suggest. It's a kid's show, and kid's toys, after all. Unfortunately it seems that pop-culture has gotten to the point that a man not being entertained by the silly tv shows he enjoyed as a kid is somehow considered abnormal (or a troll/flamebait). Does your wife still watch Care Bears or pink pony cutsie cartoon shows?

    For better or worse, a lot of my childhood revolved around my imagination being blasted wide open by the Star Wars movies, yet as an adult I think that those same Star Wars movies are kinda dumb and immature. Shocking, I know.

    Oh, and I never liked the Transformers; even as a kid I thought the show was dumb and the toys were cheap, flimsy and, well... dumb.

  51. Oh, come on. by DavidTC · · Score: 1

    Not a single Clerks 2 reference yet?

    --
    If corporations are people, aren't stockholders guilty of slavery?
  52. Optimus Prime circa 1995 by 2nd+Post! · · Score: 1

    11 years ago Optimus Prime was a long nosed truck.

    In fact, black with red flames.

    The toy was actually pretty good.

    I wonder if the robot looks the same too.

    1. Re:Optimus Prime circa 1995 by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Well no WONDER they needed to disguise him in the movie! He's got "Optimus Prime" written all over him!

  53. A better info resource for those who care.... by 8127972 · · Score: 2, Interesting

    ..... Can be found below:

    http://www.transformersthemovie.com/

    --
    This is my opinion. To make sure you don't steal it, it's covered by the DMCA.
  54. Re:Hey Editors! by Foobar+of+Borg · · Score: 1

    It would be useful if we could mod the editors as well as the articles. Imagine how often Zonk would get the -1 Dumbass mod!

  55. good news... by Tumbleweed · · Score: 2, Funny

    ...for Elias. He's gonna go nuts over this.

  56. Re your link by TheStonepedo · · Score: 1

    The sounds in every video clip are awful. I remember transformations back when I watched the show in the 80s sounding like a serious of computer generated tones in a bit of dischord. The previews makes every mechanical action sound like a dozen cheap power drills going into metal and a few prison cell doors slamming shut. Since the transformations are all CG and not necessarily realistic, using supposedly realistic sounds just ruins things for fans. Also the attempt to tie the plot into a transmission from a crashed Mars lander seems overplayed. Is George Bush directly funding this film? Who gives a damn about Mars these days?

    --
    I'll be your candy shop of infinite deliciousity if you'll be my discotheque of endless rump-shaking.
  57. News Flash! by StikyPad · · Score: 1

    News is entertainment.

  58. And now you know by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    And knowing is half the battle.