Slashdot Mirror


A Different Kind of WGA 'Problem'

Ed Bott recently attempted to scout out the problems reported in so many horror stories floating around the net relating to Microsoft's WGA. He did experience problems, however, not the ones that you might expect. He intentionally installed a pirated copy of Windows XP to see how the process worked but was unable to get WGA to recognize his computer as pirated. From the article: "I'm reluctantly running a pirated version of Windows and can't get caught no matter how hard I try. But these same people want us to believe that the WGA software they've developed is nearly foolproof. They claim that all but "a fraction of a percent" of those 60 million people who've been denied access to Microsoft updates and downloads are guilty, guilty, guilty. Right."

348 comments

  1. If that's what you can get away with... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Imagine what the ones who got caught must have done!

  2. A solution to your problem by TheOtherChimeraTwin · · Score: 5, Funny

    I'm reluctantly running a pirated version of Windows and can't get caught no matter how hard I try.

    Here you go!

    1. Re:A solution to your problem by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Interesting

      Do those guys go after GPL violators as well? I'm pretty sure I know of a case where a company's not following the GPL, and would love to get these guys involved. Or are they hypocrites who don't go after their members when they break copyright laws themselves?

    2. Re:A solution to your problem by SpaceLifeForm · · Score: 4, Informative
      You want this.

      BSA is for proprietary violations.

      --
      You are being MICROattacked, from various angles, in a SOFT manner.
    3. Re:A solution to your problem by Chabil+Ha' · · Score: 4, Insightful

      You see, the BSA doesn't have a financial interest to go after GPL violators because there's a lack of monetary incentive. If any of the GPL software was owned by a multi-billion dollar company shelling out the big bucks to enforce the infringement of their IP, sure the BSA would be right after them.

      --
      We're all hypocrites. We all have hidden parts, it's the contrast between them that make us more a hypocrite than others
    4. Re:A solution to your problem by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      who cares, I have never bought a copy of winblows, never will, it's either linux or a pirated version of Billy the bastard software, as for the WGA, yes it installed itself, but I just hunted it down and killed it :)

    5. Re:A solution to your problem by MindStalker · · Score: 1

      See the BSA is an association. A club like the boyscouts. They don't care about pirated software from non members. If for instance RedHat became a member they would enforce any RedHat specific code even if it was GPL (theoretically, they might not, but thats another story entirly).

    6. Re:A solution to your problem by CastrTroy · · Score: 3, Interesting

      Maybe IBM can push some dollars their way for them to go after GPL violators.

      --

      Anthropic principle: We see the universe the way it is because if it were different we would not be here to see it.
    7. Re:A solution to your problem by billcopc · · Score: 2, Insightful

      No, No, NO! The BSA is bad, we DON'T want to give them money. How would you like to have a bunch of armed rent-a-cops and dial-a-lawyers show up at your door for an "audit" ? They're not exactly nice people, in fact I'd venture to say I'd sooner trust a hell's angel-type dude than a BSA "agent", mainly because the biker doesn't lie about pursuing criminal behavior. My honest advice is that if a BSA team shows up at your door, let them in, lead them to your server room, then beat them over the head with an old HP rig until they stop moving. They are trespassers and racketeers, nothing more. They get paid by the top software publishers to keep the sheep aligned. They'll shake down a few strategic offices, make the news and instill fear into everyone else in true Orwellian fashion.

      Lawsuits have little to do with law, and everything to do with money. There is little point in suing a GPL violator because the free software projects don't have the financial justification to pursue legal actions, plus it's hard to defend in court when you're giving your product away for free. Software licenses don't mean shit to the average state judge, unless the software license is in defense of a Fortune-500 company.

      --
      -Billco, Fnarg.com
    8. Re:A solution to your problem by Arker · · Score: 1

      Nah, they're an MS subsidiary in effect. Ask Novelle, and Symantec, and lots of other companies. The BSA catches folks pirating a wide range of software, but their 'remedy' is typically to pay MS a ton and forget the other vendors.

      --
      =-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-
      Friends don't let friends enable ecmascript.
    9. Re:A solution to your problem by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "He intentionally installed a pirated copy of Windows XP to see how the process worked but was unable to get WGA to recognize his computer as pirated."

      That means pirated copy gives more value for less price.
      In fact i am ready to pay the hackers who made the windows more useful and less pain to use so i fund them to keep doing their very useful work

    10. Re:A solution to your problem by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 4, Interesting

      BSA are con artists: they con the software companies to pay them to protect their rights (and they don't do it). I received letters from BSA for about 6 months in 2003: one letter every two weeks, asking me to buy legal copies of the pirated software they supposed I used and they were supposed to "protect", threatening with "2 to 5 years in jail" and warning me they might come any time to inspect my software setup.

      Fortunately for me:
      * I did not use at that time and I do not use now unlicenced software, nor did the company I worked for at that time use unlicenced software.
      * The law in my country would not put me in jail for using unlicenced software (only a fine).
      * BSA do not have the right to make inspections in my country. They can log a complaint and have the police come to me.

      Still, I was responsible for IT, and had to receive the letters, read them and explain to my betters what were those letters about every two weeks. I did not enjoy being threatened to be put in jail, being acused of stealing, and being taken for a full. The letters stopped arriving when I answered one of them, asked BSA to explain me why they think they have the right to do what they threatened to do, and had the word "lawyers" in that reply.

      Why are they con artists ? I was in their database because my company already bought the software they claimed to "protect". BSA are lazy, at least around here: they don't look for infringers, they just pound honest people with threats in order to have something to report to their sponsors. BSA does not look for the interests of their sponsors, only for the money they pour into BSA for those "awareness campaings" etc.

      Unfortunately for their sponsors,
            after my experience with BSA:
      * I don't buy or recomend to the people in charge to buy software from the companies members of BSA. There is always a good enough alternative, and running the risk of getting in the spotlight of BSA is not worth the trouble.
      * I still think it's lame to use "pirated" software, but I am kinda glad so many people do it, as far as the sponsors of BSA are concerned.
      * I run a clean shop, free as in free speech.

    11. Re:A solution to your problem by tehcyder · · Score: 1
      I'm reluctantly running a pirated version of Windows and can't get caught no matter how hard I try.
      Here you go!
      Great site! As they say you may get a reward for dobbing someone in, I shall report the author of TFA one million times, even at £1 a pop that's not bad.
      --
      To have a right to do a thing is not at all the same as to be right in doing it
    12. Re:A solution to your problem by richlv · · Score: 1

      at first i wanted to ask "why is novell still shelling out money, then ?"
      i bothered to check, though : http://www.bsa.org/usa/about/BSA-Members.cfm

      novell has disappeared from there, probably because of their move towards or linux (or maybe they just noticd that bsa isn't helping them much).

      symantec and a couple of others who probably will get killed soon by microsoft are still there ;)

      --
      Rich
    13. Re:A solution to your problem by Arker · · Score: 1

      I'm fairly certain Novell pulled out before they got into linux. They had a number of incidents where the BSA caught businesses pirating Novell and NT, and their 'solution' was to require the businesses to migrate everything to NT and pay MS a nice fine. Novell got nothing. Neither did Symantec, for that matter. Why do they stay onboard? Battered wife syndrome, perhaps?

      --
      =-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-
      Friends don't let friends enable ecmascript.
  3. Post the key! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny

    No, I just want to confirm the article. Really.

    1. Re:Post the key! by X0563511 · · Score: 1

      [blockquote]five volume license keys that had reportedly been posted on September 9 2004.[/blockquote]

      That right there should be enough information to find they key. Thanks, Ed!

      --
      For large sets, this will be our guide even unto death, for the LORD will work for each type of data it is applied to...
  4. Corporate by crabpeople · · Score: 4, Informative

    Its simple. Hes using the corporate VLK. Microsoft would _never_ damage its corporate customers by subjecting them to WGA. I thought it was well known that corporate versions of things (windows, symantec) are vastly superior and thusly are the most heavily pirated. Always go for a pirated corp copy over a real one. Those leet software pirates know how to do the job right, the first time.

    --
    I'll just use my special getting high powers one more time...
    1. Re:Corporate by hawkbug · · Score: 4, Informative

      You're wrong I think, I've seen VLK's get flagged as pirated. However, they were :) When a legit key was put in place, the warning goes away.

    2. Re:Corporate by dtfinch · · Score: 3, Informative

      The majority of the users WGA identifies as pirate are using corporate volume license keys.

    3. Re:Corporate by Abreu · · Score: 3, Interesting

      I know for a fact that all the windows machines at my job are installed with the same keys for its software (due to laziness from our IT dept, all the licenses are there --locked in a closet somewhere).
      All our computers are patched regularly and automatically, without a problem.

      --
      No sig for the moment.
    4. Re:Corporate by Achromatic1978 · · Score: 4, Interesting

      Yeah, it doesn't take long searching any torrent site, "keygen" site or such to find compromised VLKs, and it takes Microsoft equally little time to find same keys and blacklist them. I'm guessing many of the WGA updates are to do with blacklist updates, as well as ways of preventing DLL subversion and such.

    5. Re:Corporate by Keaster · · Score: 0, Flamebait

      No moron, thier not lazy, there using a VLK.

    6. Re:Corporate by calebb · · Score: 4, Interesting

      Try using the infamous pre-SP1 vlk that starts with FCKGW http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/FCKGW

    7. Re:Corporate by poliopteragriseoapte · · Score: 5, Interesting
      What is a "corporate version"?

      I work for a university, and I have a Windows XP laptop (university property) installed using our school of engineering key (we have a site-wide license). Is that a "corporate" version? Anyway, I had not booted that laptop in Windows in a LONG while, since I had been mostly using it with another hard drive with SuSE linux installed.

      Recently, I booted it, and gave my ok to its doing 18 Windows Updates (techstaff won't support my laptop unless I do the updates). After doing the updates (from my home, I am not sure if this is relevant), Windows now claims that the copy is pirated.

      Since it is certainly not pirated, I decided to simply not bother with it. The fun part is that in some couple of weeks, I am going to give a talk at Microsoft with that laptop... and no, I don't plan to fix it before then!

    8. Re:Corporate by Jtoxification · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Oh, please make sure to incorporate that into your speech :-D

      A friend of mine is actually afraid to update his new xp 64 software for that reason, and it's a shame too. That's a fast computer and he stays on xp 32 since until he gets all the drivers and fixes for xp 64 (he's manually loaded as many as he can), it's going to be fast as molasses.

      --
      --I gots 99 problems but a new machine ain't one!
      AMD! Asus! Whoot! 6 years!
    9. Re:Corporate by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Informative

      Contrary to warez labelling there is no such thing as a "corporate version" of XP (or any other version of windows), it's just XP Pro installed with a VLK. The use of the VLK is what tells XP it's volume licensed and hence disables activation. So yes you have a 'corporate' version, and apparently the key has leaked and been widely used to do unauthorised installs.

    10. Re:Corporate by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Actually, the copies most schools sell are the same as the full Retail versions of the software. Yes, you usually need to buy the license and CD separately, but I've been able to get those licenses purchased from a university to work with a generic Windows XP (Home/Pro) Retail box CD.

      Unless your school is just handed out its volume license key to everyone...

    11. Re:Corporate by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "The fun part is that in some couple of weeks, I am going to give a talk at Microsoft with that laptop... and no, I don't plan to fix it before then!"

      Gosh, you're such a radical! That'll show 'em, fer shure!

      Karma whore.

    12. Re:Corporate by Raideen · · Score: 4, Informative

      VLA, retail, and OEM media are different. Using a VLA key on an installation done with retail media won't work.

    13. Re:Corporate by ThurstonMoore · · Score: 2, Informative

      The VLK that are in use by some of my customers will not work on an OEM Windows XP Pro CD, they require a Volume Licence CD.

    14. Re:Corporate by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Informative

      the volume licence version doesnt contain windows activation either

    15. Re:Corporate by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful

      Good work, fucktard. You've managed to use two words both sounding like "they're" in place of said word, in the same sentence! You sir, need to learn how to use fucking homonyms.

    16. Re:Corporate by smithy242 · · Score: 1

      I have a client who had installed pirated copies of Windows XP Professional (no domains with XP Home), using a keygen'ed corporate VLK . Two of the systems failed WGA, and one of them has been fine. They have since became fully compliant from a licensing perspective (purchased the licenses required), but still continue to run a keygen'ed corporate VLK on a workstation which passes WGA.

    17. Re:Corporate by pueywei · · Score: 1

      Actually, any windows disc can be modified to be oem, corp or retail. Look at nLite or similar. ;)

    18. Re:Corporate by Lord+Kano · · Score: 1

      This is not true. The "Corporate" version of XP will ONLY install with a VLK. You can't install it with a regular XP license key. Only a VLK will permit you to complete an install.

      LK

      --
      "Hi. This is my friend, Jack Shit, and you don't know him." - Lord Kano
    19. Re:Corporate by The+Ham+of+Truth · · Score: 1


      PLEASE update on how that goes!

    20. Re:Corporate by toddestan · · Score: 1, Informative

      Try using the infamous pre-SP1 vlk that starts with FCKGW

      That probably wouldn't work, as that key is blacklisted from even downloading SP1, which means no WGA for you.

    21. Re:Corporate by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The fun part is that in some couple of weeks, I am going to give a talk at Microsoft with that laptop... and no, I don't plan to fix it before then!

      Good for you! Way to get the issue in front of people! Now, how much good do you think it will do? The way to do real good is to install Linux dual-boot on the system and immediately boot into Linux on the same system and accomplish what needs to be done! Got those balls?

    22. Re:Corporate by Afrosheen · · Score: 1

      4 out of 5 of our corporate, OEM-keyed Dell laptops were nailed by WGA. One was preformatted from the factory, the rest we had installed from XP Pro SP2 discs that Dell shipped to us. Since they were Dell discs they never asked for a key. All machines shipped with keys on the stickers of course, so fixing them was a matter of using a reactivation tool, phone support, then change key procedure. Still a hassle and our CEO was frantic since the company recently went public.

        Thanks for stressing us out for what we legitimately paid you money for, Microjerks.

    23. Re:Corporate by Fordiman · · Score: 4, Interesting

      'cept that the dll subversion trick works miracles. Almost always 0-day fix, and can be implemented without a working windows system using a small, automated Linux LiveCD (the same one I use to ghost my system once in a while).

      --
      110100 1101000 1101000 1100110 0 1101111 1101000 1100011 1
    24. Re:Corporate by Fordiman · · Score: 2

      Actually, in the world of 'suckit' and 'fucktard', my favorite is 'assknuckle'. Or, maybe 'scrotagonal'. Kind of a tossup.

      Feel free to mod this offtopic.

      --
      110100 1101000 1101000 1100110 0 1101111 1101000 1100011 1
    25. Re:Corporate by Fordiman · · Score: 2, Informative

      Well, yes and no.

      Universities do (generally) use XP Professional, and (generally) they do use VLKs to handle installs/updates. Unfortunately, since they often pass these out to students, they're often the first to be pirated. Which means they're often the first to be blacklisted with this WGA shite.

      Fortunately, for compters wired to the University intranet (that don't have remote management shut off), the University IT staff will dynamically update the VLK if theirs becomes blacklisted (Microsoft will notify the owner of a VLK before it becomes invalid and give instructions on performing a mass VLK update). The problem is that when an individual has to reinstall, the IT guys are usually willing to just give out the VLK rather than insisting that they do the reinstall themselves - thus restarting the cycle.

      In short: take your laptop to your IT dept and tell 'em your computer thinks it's been pirated; they'll be able to fix it.

      That is, if you give a shit.

      --
      110100 1101000 1101000 1100110 0 1101111 1101000 1100011 1
    26. Re:Corporate by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It'd be one thing if you used the SAME incorrect they're twice, but you managed to change mid-sentece, which shows you have absolutely NO excuse to hide behind ignorance. If you didn't know which one it was, you wouldve used the same version twice.

      You sir, are an idiot.

    27. Re:Corporate by TheViewFromTheGround · · Score: 1

      I recently left a gig at a non-profit, and I could find no rhyme nor reason to WGA's piracy reporting based on my experience there. We have a 75-seat volume license, which is a shade more than double the number of office-owned PCs that run XP. However, two of the workstations (and note, all of these boxes use the same friggin' system image). I re-imaged the boxes, had the same problem. Next update/imaging cycle, they went away. Who knows, maybe they'll come back again. The whole business is so wonky and opaque.

      Anyway, if WGA blows up on the same friggin' image using a VL, how is it ever going to be used in the courts to pursue pirates? If they come after people like my former employer, who can show the number of boxes they own and hold up the VLAs and receipts and so forth, MS is going to get laughed out of court. I suppose in such a scenario, MS could claim that someone stole the media or whatever, but we didn't keep media lying around: just a few CDs in the always-locked server closet (even the janitors and building maintenance folks don't have keys to that room) and a slipstreamed ISO on a server that only the acting sysadmin has access to. Anyway, if MS pursues the wrong folks often enough, it will be that much harder to make cases against real pirates.

      I'd hypothesize that the cost/benefit ratio of these sorts of schemes is pretty much barking mad.

      --
      Online citizen journalism from the inner city: The View From The Ground
    28. Re:Corporate by mpe · · Score: 1

      4 out of 5 of our corporate, OEM-keyed Dell laptops were nailed by WGA. One was preformatted from the factory, the rest we had installed from XP Pro SP2 discs that Dell shipped to us. Since they were Dell discs they never asked for a key. All machines shipped with keys on the stickers of course, so fixing them was a matter of using a reactivation tool, phone support, then change key procedure. Still a hassle and our CEO was frantic since the company recently went public.

      Remembering that time is money too... Depends if you mean 4 or 800 laptops :)

    29. Re:Corporate by MickDownUnder · · Score: 1

      Correct. As covered earlier by slashdot this was the case with Paul Thorrott to quote the article:-

      The key I had used to install Windows was a known pirated key, and required a modified version of winlogon.exe.

      I expect WGA probably uses a combination of things such as checking the digital signatures of key assemblies as well as blacklists.

      Maybe this guy should ask Paul for a copy, or perhaps just read a little more slashdot.

    30. Re:Corporate by MickDownUnder · · Score: 1

      NO WAY !!!

      A copy of windows circulated amongst students is flagged as pirated !!!

      I'm shocked !

      I'm sure Microsoft will also be shocked and appalled... *cough* *cough* actually they'll probably pat their WGA architects on the back for a job well done.

      Dude just ask your Uni's techies to give you an updated (less pirated) version of XP, that way you won't look so clueless when you go to Microsoft.

      At the end of the day is WGA really that unfair ? I mean why should MS give you updates and access to their online resources when you are associated (via your copy of windows) with people who are basically stealing from Microsoft ?

      If WGA formatted your hard disk or refused to boot etc etc... sure I'd have a sympathetic ear for those people in your situation. However no, I have no sympathy at all for those with WGA problems.

    31. Re:Corporate by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Xp corp is just xp pro but can be installed on more than one machine, it also does not need activation. It's not free from WGA unless you don't install it from windows update.

    32. Re:Corporate by fullphaser · · Score: 1

      Yes and if you had read TFA you would know the key he used has been floating around sence 2004 ;)

      --
      Did someone say cake?
    33. Re:Corporate by TheSpoom · · Score: 1

      What surprises me is that the way that WGA is supposed to work is via a combined white- and black-list; only keys that Microsoft have actually dispensed are in the whitelist and those that Microsoft finds to be pirated are placed in the blacklist. To get past WGA, you have to be in the whitelist and not in the blacklist. So here's what's odd: Are these Volume License Keys that have been sent out with pirated copies (or that nice keychanger list) actually still in legitimate use? One would think that Microsoft would at least replace the keys in the compromised legitimate installs and blacklist the old key, rather than simply allow both to keep working. Maybe they're too widespread to replace?

      --
      It's better to vote for what you want and not get it than to vote for what you don't want and get it.
      - E. Debs
    34. Re:Corporate by Achromatic1978 · · Score: 1

      No, it's not that. It's that there's two methods: the Key is algorithmically generated, so the key is valid for installation (where the whole point of the VLK amongst other things is to avoid 'activation'). Now along comes WGA and says "Oh, no, apropos of that, if you want /these/ components, you have to 'activate/authenticate/validate', and this is where the problem comes in (although it may not be for users of SUS etc, where they might be able to 'authenticate' against it, or have it distribute 'authentic' updates.

    35. Re:Corporate by matt328 · · Score: 1

      I used to work as a help desk technician in college. One of my duties was to give out copies of Windows XP to anyone with a name and a valid university ID card. I still have one of the custom made cds as a coaster on my coffee table with the university's name and the serial number stamped right on it.

      --
      Check out the cave on the east side of lake Hylia. Strange and wonderful things live in it.
    36. Re:Corporate by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "and yes if fucktard is a word than so is suckit"

      You mean 'then'. ;-)

      (Will I make a grammatical error and continue the game?!?!?! Who knows!!!!)

    37. Re:Corporate by sumdumass · · Score: 1

      The "corperate version" doesn't actualy refere to the version of XP. It referes to the plan or catagory the licensing falls under.

      You have, OEM and retail licenses with would be in the "consumer" sections.
      Then you have teachers and students version in the "educational" sections
      Then there are volume licenses such wich are refered to as "corperate"
      there are also technet and promotional licenses but i forget what they callisfied them as. If i remeber right, they are seperate in a not for retail sale catagory.

      It really is just a place that they can seperate and store the licenses so changes can directly reflect the types of intended custumers. There might be a few more catagories by now. It has been a while since i showed upto a product launch.

    38. Re:Corporate by rriven · · Score: 1

      I had the same problem. My school sells copies of XP pro for 20 bucks on a burned disk. (not sure if it is legal, they say it is so whatever) I bought 2, one for my lapop and one for my desktop. Just out of the blue a few weeks ago my laptop said it was a pirate copy. I just left it alone and on the next WGA update my laptop now says it is not a pirate. Who knows. I talked to some other people who got the cheap XP from my school and some had the same problem so my guess is my school talked to Microsoft and got it fixed. Mabye the same will happen to you

      --
      Dan
    39. Re:Corporate by TheSpoom · · Score: 1

      Well I know the key will still work in terms of allowing an installation, I meant in terms of WGA.

      --
      It's better to vote for what you want and not get it than to vote for what you don't want and get it.
      - E. Debs
    40. Re:Corporate by tehcyder · · Score: 1
      Actually, in the world of 'suckit' and 'fucktard', my favorite is 'assknuckle'. Or, maybe 'scrotagonal'. Kind of a tossup.
      Fnarr fnarr.
      In the UK "tosspot", "tosser" and derivatives are quite good as slightly milder versions of "wanker".
      --
      To have a right to do a thing is not at all the same as to be right in doing it
    41. Re:Corporate by bampot · · Score: 1

      My "friend" uses the corporate VLK edition with SP2 (leaked/generated key). WGA will be downloaded via Automatic Updates, but they chose not to install it. There is an option "not to prompt again", and if selected, it won't.

    42. Re:Corporate by phorm · · Score: 1

      Care to elaborate? Searching "WGA DLL subversion" on google didn't come up with a lot of useful hints. Does it allow legit versions to update without calling home or activing WGA?

    43. Re:Corporate by insomniac8400 · · Score: 1

      Or just run a program that will give you the cd key on a lab computer at such a university. Granted, if your caught you will probably be expelled.

    44. Re:Corporate by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Find yourself a broken version of legitcheckcontrol.dll for the version that has been installed. My kubuntu system allows read-write access to my NTFS partition (and hence I have free reign over all those files that windows "protects" users from) using FUSE.
      You could also simply fill the dll with 90's and modify the file attributes to deny write access to everything, including SYSTEM. Once that's done, nothing will be able to touch the file from within windows. (But you could use AutoUpdate, and simply use the previous procedure to kill the WGA notifier (since autoupdate will still function regardless of WGA status)

    45. Re:Corporate by Fordiman · · Score: 1

      Exactly the point. WGA is useless, as new VLKs are being exposed constantly; MS can even change 'em up continuously, and they won't stop piraters.

      Essentially, it's a big business trying desperately to fight the ingenuity of those with little cash, the ability to keep their risk low, and plenty to gain (respect in the 'scene' can be considered something of value here).

      --
      110100 1101000 1101000 1100110 0 1101111 1101000 1100011 1
    46. Re:Corporate by MickDownUnder · · Score: 1

      I think you need to think about the likely algorithms they are using in WGA. It's probably very logical (being a computer program and all). Maybe it goes by date.... what if when your organisation got it's 73rd computer, someone had already illegally used your keys to license two systems not belonging to your "non-profit gig"... hence the 73rd and 74th system may have been flagged as illegitimate. Then maybe by your actions perhaps WGA managed to correctly identify illegal systems and the WGA problems shifted from your npg machines to the actual illegitimate machines.

  5. Well, shit, I have the opposite problem... by drinkypoo · · Score: 0

    ...anyone think I can get him to trade? :D

    (to tell the truth, I am currently running zero illegal copies of microsoft products. work bought me a laptop that came with a license, and I put linux on my stinkpad, and used its windows 98 license in a virtual machine so I can play alpha centauri)

    --
    "You're right," Fisheye says. "I should have set it on 'whip' or 'chop.'"
    1. Re:Well, shit, I have the opposite problem... by peterfa · · Score: 1

      Why don't you just bittorrent the Linux version? Or you can get a Linux installer... it adds the Linux binaries but requires the game data.

    2. Re:Well, shit, I have the opposite problem... by ppc_digger · · Score: 0, Troll

      work bought me a laptop that came with a license, and I put linux on my stinkpad, and used its windows 98 license in a virtual machine so I can play alpha centauri

      Using OEM licenses on computers other than the one they came with is illegal.

      --
      Of all major operating systems, UNIX is the only one originally meant for gaming.
    3. Re:Well, shit, I have the opposite problem... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Alpha centauri has a linux native version and works like a charm, even in my amd64 system.

    4. Re:Well, shit, I have the opposite problem... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      If it is running inside of a virtual machine that is running on the same physical machine that the license was bundled with, is it still a violation of the OEM license??

      If so, that *really* stinks.

    5. Re:Well, shit, I have the opposite problem... by drinkypoo · · Score: 0, Troll
      work bought me a laptop that came with a license, and I put linux on my stinkpad, and used its windows 98 license in a virtual machine so I can play alpha centauri
      Using OEM licenses on computers other than the one they came with is illegal.

      Show me where in my comment I said I was using it on a computer other than the one it came with, and I'll kiss your ass.

      Since I didn't say that, why don't you fuck off and try reading my comments before replying to them? A lot of you idiot slashbots have that same problem.

      See, the virtual machine is not real, it's imaginary in the sense of actual computers. Windows 98 is indeed running on the same machine for which the OEM license was granted. In fact, since it's done through virtualization, it's even running [almost entirely] right on that machine's CPU.

      --
      "You're right," Fisheye says. "I should have set it on 'whip' or 'chop.'"
    6. Re:Well, shit, I have the opposite problem... by Tony+Hoyle · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Using OEM licenses on computers other than the one they came with is illegal.

      Bullshit. You can get OEM Windows licenses with a mouse or keyboard (in fact it's the cheapest way to get them, short of buying in bulk from fire damaged stock (one company I worked with licensed all their machines that way - far cheaper than a volume license deal)).

    7. Re:Well, shit, I have the opposite problem... by JPribe · · Score: 2, Informative

      Do your homework. There is no requirement to buy *any* hardware at all.

      --

      Why go fast when you can go anywhere? O|||||||O
    8. Re:Well, shit, I have the opposite problem... by kimvette · · Score: 1

      You don't "license" commodity goods, you BUY them. Don't fall for the doublespeak in their brainwashing efforts.

      --
      The Christian Right is Neither (Christian nor right). See: Matthew 23, Matthew 25, Ezekiel 16:48-50
    9. Re:Well, shit, I have the opposite problem... by ArcticFlood · · Score: 1

      Try to play with an Alpha Centauri install on Windows. I recall reading that only Play By Email would work between the two.

      --
      This is here so you don't ignore the last two lines of my posts.
    10. Re:Well, shit, I have the opposite problem... by Fordiman · · Score: 1

      That would imply that it's against the law.

      s/illegal/a breach of contract/

      Meanwhile, take a look at the GP's sentence you quoted; he says 'a virtual machine', IE a simulated computer running on the computer for which the OEM license is for. Technically, that's not a breach of contract in any way; he's still running the OEM licensed copy of Win98 on the machine for which it's licensed. He's just doing it through an "I don't like badly-written OSes, but they're occasionally useful" wrapper.

      --
      110100 1101000 1101000 1100110 0 1101111 1101000 1100011 1
    11. Re:Well, shit, I have the opposite problem... by mpe · · Score: 1

      Using OEM licenses on computers other than the one they came with is illegal.

      It depends where you are, there is certainly case law in Germany to the effect that the whole OEM/retail distinction has no legal standard. Just becuase Microsoft might claim this dosn't mean anything, suppliers frequently make such claims bogusly.
      Even outside Germany (possibly the EU) there is the matter of what constitutes a "computer" for the purposes of such a licence, let alone the "grandad's old axe" argument. You'd need to spend a great deal of money (and make some lawyers rich) to prove this statement one way or the other.

    12. Re:Well, shit, I have the opposite problem... by Badfysh · · Score: 1

      Well technically speaking, he's not; one laptop + one VM = two machines. He's using Win 98 on the second machine, therefore it's not licensed.

      --

      I was conned by an old man in a cloak. It turns out those *were* the droids I was looking for.

    13. Re:Well, shit, I have the opposite problem... by Fordiman · · Score: 1

      A VM is not an actual machine. In the legal sense, I'm pretty sure it counts as a program, since there's no extra actual hardware involved.

      Note, however, that IANAL. I'd like to hear a valid legal opinion on the matter.

      --
      110100 1101000 1101000 1100110 0 1101111 1101000 1100011 1
    14. Re:Well, shit, I have the opposite problem... by Thundersnatch · · Score: 1

      I knew a company that bought a bunch of OEM windows XP licenses with an equal number of $0.35 CD-rom audio cables. It was perfectly in compliance with the license according to a very large and reputable reseller.

  6. Astounding logic by heinousjay · · Score: 1

    Truly, a display of intellect unequalled in Slashdot history. Someone hasn't been caught, so the people that have been must be innocent. Were Johnny Cochran still alive, he'd have you on the frontline of high-profile criminal defense cases.

    --
    Slashdot - where whining about luck is the new way to make the world you want.
    1. Re:Astounding logic by twofidyKidd · · Score: 2, Insightful

      The logic is that the MS claim of "foolproof" WGA software has only tagged a fraction of the millions of legitimate users as pirates, while true pirated copies are working as legitimate. The logic would follow that for every pirated copy marked as legal, someone with the legal copy is being marked as a pirate. That supposed "fraction" starts to look something like 1/2 or 3/5 or worse.

      --


      Hades, PoD: Official Advocate
    2. Re:Astounding logic by insanecarbonbasedlif · · Score: 4, Insightful

      The logic would follow that for every pirated copy marked as legal, someone with the legal copy is being marked as a pirate. That supposed "fraction" starts to look something like 1/2 or 3/5 or worse.

      That logic doesn't really follow at all. Anyhow, in tests like these, if you want to diminish false positives, then false negatives usually increase. We should be applauding Microsoft for not being overzealous.

      But then again, this is slashdot. MS never gets applause here. At most a murmur of reluctant approval.

      --
      Just because I doubt myself does not mean I find your position compelling.
    3. Re:Astounding logic by WilliamSChips · · Score: 4, Insightful
      Yes, the submitter is using dubious logic, which doesn't even need to be used because there's already evidence that innocents are being caught.Here's some logic for you:
      1. Quite a few people have already been incorrectly accused of piracy by WGA.
      2. There are pirates not being caught by WGA. If someone trying to get caught can't, what about those trying not to get caught?
      3. Every computer accused of piracy is unable to recieve security updates, making it that much more likely to be hit with malware and therefore become a transmitter of such. The more transmitters, the faster the virus spreads.
      4. The majority of pirates will not go out and buy Windows because of WGA. They either don't have the money or don't want to spend it. If anything they will download third-party tools that don't require WGA.
      5. There is no benefit to the Windows Genuine Advantage unless their goal is to get people to purchase Windows 2 or 3 times. Come to think of it, that probably is their goal.
      --
      Please, for the good of Humanity, vote Obama.
    4. Re:Astounding logic by monoqlith · · Score: 1

      I think the (flawed) logic is that since MS is 1) capable of producing false negatives, then 2) it follows that their method of identification is flawed in such a way that it's capable of producing false positives, and 3) if it is capable of producing false positives, then false positives have been produced. There is no logical entailment between any of those premises/conclusions, however, especially since we have limited knowledge of how Microsoft identifies pirated copies. As the other poster here points out, it's probably just the opposite, if empirical evidence of other filtering software holds true. That is, the capability of producing false negatives probably reduces the number of false positives.

    5. Re:Astounding logic by twofidyKidd · · Score: 1

      Sounds like the whole thing is flawed. In any case, you're right, my "logic" is flawed as I used the term loosely. Of course, since MS is the subject of discussion, logic takes a backseat anyhow.

      --


      Hades, PoD: Official Advocate
    6. Re:Astounding logic by Mistshadow2k4 · · Score: 1

      Astounding logiv indeed, since you're completely and totally ignoring the many, many cases of false positives. Funny how you didn't bring that up.

      --
      I dream of a better world... one in which chickens can cross roads without their motives being questioned.
    7. Re:Astounding logic by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Security updates are explicitly not part of WGA.

    8. Re:Astounding logic by Brickwall · · Score: 1

      Which is why I won't download WGA. However, it seems that not doing so blocks me from all the latest security updates, etc. So I either let MS put spyware on my machine, or I leave it vulnerable to everyone else. Thanks Bill! (I have a legit copy of Windows, BTW, purchased with my Dell.)

      --
      What was once true, is no longer so
    9. Re:Astounding logic by PitaBred · · Score: 2, Insightful

      The point is that maybe it shouldn't even exist. Give people a fair product at a fair price, and they'll buy it. Windows is not being sold what the market obviously thinks it's worth.

    10. Re:Astounding logic by ThinkFr33ly · · Score: 5, Informative
      Every computer accused of piracy is unable to recieve security updates, making it that much more likely to be hit with malware and therefore become a transmitter of such. The more transmitters, the faster the virus spreads.


      This is false. Machines that fail WGA cannot download OPTIONAL/NON-SECURITY RELATED updates. Security updates have been, and always will be, available for download by ANY machine regardless of its legal state.

      Despite the fact that your claim has been echoed by many, many others, it remains false.
    11. Re:Astounding logic by WilliamSChips · · Score: 1

      My mistake. Although with all the shutdown rumors they may decide to add security updates to that list.

      --
      Please, for the good of Humanity, vote Obama.
    12. Re:Astounding logic by Fordiman · · Score: 1

      Here's some logic for you:
      Assume first that Microsoft verifies pirated copies by their key, using a blacklist.

      Now, realize that most pirate keys in the wild are from Volume Licenses (VLKs), as these are expected to have a very large number of users attached to them, and thus less likely to raise piracy flags.

      Process:
      Microsoft finds that a key is in the wild, due to one employee out of an easy thousand releasing it. They blacklist it and notify the rightful owner that their key is changed. This leaves some users behind - those not available when the corp does their VLK update. Microsoft also fails to notify a percentage of these VLKs, as some may be anonymous purchases. These are your false positives.

      Meanwhile, pirates are working day and night to get out their 0-day, slipstreamed, pre-keyed, custom WinXP discs into the torrent stream. They have keys that Microsoft doesn't know are wild and would have to download a 250M-4.7G image (depending on how much extra crap is in / how much has been stripped out of this version) just to gain access to the file contining the pre-key. Since 1) several of these come out per day, 2) many torrenters use tools like PeerGuardian to keep people like MS out of the loop, and 3) MS takes their sweet time with updates of any sort, MS has their work cut out for them, and are often behind the curve by several days or weeks. The users of these XP versions are your false negatives.

      Overall, meanwhile, WGA is a bad idea; it's a practically infeasible solution to a problem it doesn't actually solve. It costs money, annoys valid users, and fails to protect against piracy - much like any DRM solution.

      Eventually business sense will overcome the paranoia that brings us DRM, WGA and similar technologies. This awakening has already started in the music industry. It's just a matter of time before MS can convince its shareholders that the experiment isn't working.

      --
      110100 1101000 1101000 1100110 0 1101111 1101000 1100011 1
    13. Re:Astounding logic by bky1701 · · Score: 1

      I guess we need to give Bush applause for only invading/starting wars in half the middle east.

    14. Re:Astounding logic by enthused+i+swear · · Score: 1

      There is a reason for people thinking this: when WGA finds you have a "pirated" copy it flashes up a popup screen when you login that says "This copy of Windows is not genuine and is no longer eligible to receive select security upgrades from Microsoft". Personally I would be *shocked* that Microsoft would limit security updates to those who they believe paid for them, but I would find it more likely that they're just trying to scare people. But I digress, the main point is that there is a definite reason to believe the grandparents claims, since they come from Microsoft themselves.

    15. Re:Astounding logic by Shadow99_1 · · Score: 1

      That depends on the key used... I've had a system flagged as non-WGA that could not recieve security updates... It was in fact dissalloyed the entire Windows Update site and automatic updates would never see anything to get, hence no automatic updates...

      So yes in fact some keys will cause yoyu to not be able to recieve security fixes for XP... Not all of them, but some...

      --
      we are all invisible unless we choose otherwise
    16. Re:Astounding logic by mpe · · Score: 1

      Eventually business sense will overcome the paranoia that brings us DRM, WGA and similar technologies. This awakening has already started in the music industry. It's just a matter of time before MS can convince its shareholders that the experiment isn't working.

      Thing is that similar things were tried about 20 years ago. But obviously the lessons wern't learned then.
      Either it's new people or the same people who somehow think things will work now...

    17. Re:Astounding logic by stinky+wizzleteats · · Score: 1

      I think the point is that WGA doesn't even do what it is supposed to do. As has been mentioned, the problem of false positives is well documented outside of this story. WGA wastes my time and my computer's time in a quixotic quest to eliminate "piracy", further demonstrating that when you install a Microsoft operating system on a computer, that computer belongs to *them* and not you.

    18. Re:Astounding logic by nutrock69 · · Score: 1

      - These are your false positives.

      Other False Positives: I've heard tales of people buying legitimate PC's from big name vendors (like Packard-Dell) with legitimate licenses. WGA runs fine for a couple of weeks, then starts claiming the OS is pirated. The PC has a license key sticker on it and the license key matches the one in the OS. Theoretically, Packard-Dell is getting these stickers from Microsoft. Is Microsoft sending sheets with duplicate license keys (ie: VLK's) to Packard-Dell for distribution to customers? Is Packard-Dell now a distributor of pirated versions of XP?

      - The users of these XP versions are your false negatives.

      Other False Negatives: How about from the referenced article? The person testing WGA used a key that had been posted on a site for around 2 years. While it may be a VLK, it's certainly not from a 0-day, slipstreamed, pre-keyed, custom WinXP disc via a torrent. Microsoft had ample opportunity to search for pirated keys before implementing WGA, and it stands to reason that they would have had tens (if not hundreds) of employees combing the net for them. Yet an easily findable key in a list of 5 keys on a two year old web page was skipped from their blacklist?

      Basically - Micro$oft screwed the pooch big time on the implementation of WGA. I have a legitimate key on my XP box, but I refuse to allow WGA on it because it's nothing more than a protection racket.

    19. Re:Astounding logic by Fordiman · · Score: 1

      "How about from the referenced article? The person testing WGA used a key that had been posted on a site for around 2 years. "

      Sorry, I was assuming a reasonable implementation - one that wouldn't let 2-year in-the-wild keys stay feral.

      'course, I'm expecting too much from Microsoft: a reasonable implementation of anything.

      --
      110100 1101000 1101000 1100110 0 1101111 1101000 1100011 1
    20. Re:Astounding logic by AcidLacedPenguiN · · Score: 1

      bullshit! give people a fair product at a fair price, and some will buy it the others will still steal it! No matter what the price, there will always be someone who is too cheap to buy it, and there will always be someone idealistic/bored enough to provide the means to acquire it.

      --
      disclaimer: I've been known to store numbers in my ass for which to dig out when quantities are required.
    21. Re:Astounding logic by Taevin · · Score: 1

      It seems to me that Microsoft knows that WGA is going to do little against the true pirates that know what they're doing. Instead they have it randomly fail on people so they have to call in and confirm that they are allowed to use the software they already purchased.

      A little random enforcement can go a long way.

    22. Re:Astounding logic by PitaBred · · Score: 1

      But you're only going after the majority. Your assumption that with an infinitely replicable item like software that ONLY people who buy it will use it is what's wrong. You're going to drive off many of the people who would buy otherwise in your quest to catch those other 5% or so of people. It's still illegal to do it. No one's arguing that. But if you make your measures too draconian, even "legitimate" users will get upset. And if people don't think it's worth what you charge for it, well... they'll have less of a problem "stealing" it. If someone thinks you're trying to abuse them or overcharge them (whether you are or not), they won't have any sympathy for you. If you make them think you're doing this for their benefit, and trying to give them a fair deal, they'll be your biggest fan.

    23. Re:Astounding logic by AcidLacedPenguiN · · Score: 1

      please read it again.
      I said that there is always a group of people who will buy it, AND there is always a group of people who will steal it. I was suggesting that it is futile to chase those people who will steal it, because no matter what they will exist. My argument (that admittedly, I should have made explicit) was that instead of always finding ways of locking the theives out, they should try to lock IN the people who purchase it.
       
      Generally AFAIK it is much easier to piss the paying customers off by locking out pirates than it is to piss them off by offering them a good product at a good price. Which is basically the same argument as yours. . .

      --
      disclaimer: I've been known to store numbers in my ass for which to dig out when quantities are required.
  7. Who are the developers by Twillerror · · Score: 4, Insightful

    When things like this come out; things like key checking for a game install and everything else that is designed to stop piracy I often wonder who wrote it?

    Are the best and brightest out there the ones that get stuck with this task? I would think it'd be the interns and that developers everyone hates that get the fun task.

    I've used products that had good licensing tools. Keys that you enabled online, and enabled a number of users etc. Everytime it seems like it comes out of some smaller software company with small bright teams. I'm guessing in these cases the senior level codes and maybe even the whole team got involved.

    Anyone out there have expierence writing key checkers and other piracy related pieces of functionality?

    1. Re:Who are the developers by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful

      For some this is actually a 'fun' task. If you think about it, it is an extreemly hard problem. Some people like to solve hard problems.

      I worked with a guy once who was putting tons of restrictions into his code to 'lock it down'. Then we systematicly showed him how each one could be defeated quite easily. Finaly he threw his hands up and goes 'its good enough you would have to be a computer nerd to know how to get around it', 'but dude all you need to know is 1 nerd'.

    2. Re:Who are the developers by DigitAl56K · · Score: 5, Insightful

      "I've used products that had good licensing tools. Keys that you enabled online, and enabled a number of users etc."

      I _hate_ crap like that. I use DriveCrypt for encryption (from securstar.de), and it has the most horrific license system I've ever had the displeasure to use. You have to activate your software and lock it to a computer, then if you want to use it on an alternative computer you have to uninstall it on the first, then enter a "deactivation" code on the website, then finally you can reactivate on the new PC. God forbid you should format one of your computers forgetting to deactive your license first. I even had a problem where a new version of the software wouldn't accept the current activation on the system. I had to uninstall the newer version, re-install the older version, uninstall it and de-activate, then install the new one again and activate it. At that point I was like "JFK!", and no, that's not a reference to Kennedy.

      Lets face it: People hate activation, and for a good reason. It doesn't stop piracy. It doesn't really reduce piracy either. All it does it cause perpetual headaches to your legally licensed customers. I work on software products and was partly responsible for redesigning our software registration system, which used to also use online activation. We stripped out the 'activation' element and sales didn't drop at all, however the volume of support traffic that we had to handle due to activation issues (the largest type of support incident by far) dropped to almost nothing. Our customers were much happier people.

      Secrets to succesful system: 1) Make a good product, 2) Don't extort your customers, 3) Make the registration process simple.

      An example of a good registration system: I recently bought Sonar 5 from Cakewalk. It came with a serial code in the DVD sleave, which you punch into Cakewalks' website in exchange for a registration code that can be used perpetually. That's it. Simple. Cakewalk get their registration info, you get to use the software you just paid hundreds of dollars for as you want. Sure, there is an element of trust involved in that, but hey, you just paid a few hundred bucks. Maybe they ought to trust you after that. By comaprison, other similar software I have licenses for is heinous. Cakewalk earned a lot of respect from me because of this.

      Pirates will pirate. People with morals who wish to support your work will pay where they can. Respect your customers.

    3. Re:Who are the developers by DigitAl56K · · Score: 3, Funny

      Uh.. ok 'JFK' should be 'JFC'. I was so mad about the whole thing it made me incoherent.

    4. Re:Who are the developers by cdrguru · · Score: 1

      The number of people that pay when they can pirate is about 5%. This has been proven over and over again. If you believe 90% will pay, you are living in a fantasy world. The most solid proof of this is shareware - so we are not talking about hundreds of dollars but more like $20.

      Most companies do not tolerate pirated software, so if your product is strictly for corporate use there is usually not too big a problem. But if you are targeting consumers, expect 5% to pay. Be pleasantly suprised with 8%.

      Money defeats morals about 95% of the time.

    5. Re:Who are the developers by DigitAl56K · · Score: 3, Insightful

      I do not believe 90% will pay when they can pirate. I did not say I believed that. What I said was that providing a simple registration system instead of a complex activation scheme will not reduce your sales.

      If only 5% will pay with activation, still around 5% will pay with simple registration. Why? Because the people who pirate will pirate regardless of which system you use.

    6. Re:Who are the developers by Obyron · · Score: 2, Interesting

      This isn't quite a response to your question, but the responses made me think about it. I run a shop that specializes in creating signs, doing engraving, and other graphically artistic tasks. Before I started this place I used to boggle at how people could pay 3 or 400 dollars for Windows, or 600 dollars for a copy of Photoshop, or (perish the thought!) $1000 for Final Cut Pro. But, That Was Before (TM).

      Some of the software I now use to run equipment in the shop costs over four thousand dollars, and, while it's useful and allows me to run my business (which is why I pay for it), it's not as "worth it" as I'd like it to be. Now I come to my point. None of this software uses serial-based authentication. It's all done via USB or (with older software) LPT dongles. It goes back to the two schools of authentication: something you know versus something you have/are.

      There are HASP dongle crackers out there, but they're not very common, and I have no clue how well they work. I honestly haven't tried. Installing a pirated copy of Windows on grandma's computer so the poor old dear can check her email and play solitaire doesn't bug me, but my morals get rubbed the wrong way by "stealing" something that I plan on using to make a lot of money.

      So, how long is it before we start seeing hardware-based registration schemes? It might be expensive for a company like Adobe to have the keys made, but volume pricing and the amount of money they'd save versus privacy might be worth it. Microsoft certainly has the weight (and the volume) to get them made cheaply enough for it to benefit. The increased usage of dongles would certainly make them a bigger target for cracking (vide: Windows viruses versus Mac viruses), so it might be a wash in the long run. Companies certainly gain mindshare by having their products be ubiquitous, even if it's at the cost of a few pirate copies, but it seems like every z0mg l33t p1r4t3 kiddie out there (at least the ones I know) have a copy of Photoshop even if they don't use it.

      --
      --Obyron
    7. Re:Who are the developers by ScuzzMonkey · · Score: 1

      That's overly simplistic, and as it's stated, demonstrably incorrect. Everyone can pirate Windows; pretty clearly, more than 5% actually do pay for it regardless.

      The reality is that there is a sliding scale of factors that actually control piracy. It's never as simple as "Everyone will do it if they can" or "Only a small number will do it if they respect you and your product." It's a combination of basic honesty (believe it or not, at least in most of the First World, this exists... police-state crackpot comments aside, society doesn't have nearly the resources to enforce basic ethical and legal codes without overwhelming voluntary compliance), rudimentary registration control, and reputation of the company and the product.

      IMHO, Apple seems to have about hit the sweet spot on this. Most of their users are fans, and therefore willing to pay for the product; they do have some basic controls that make it at least slightly harder than falling off a log to pirate their software, which seems to prevent most casual piracy... but the controls aren't so draconian as to throw a red flag up in front of the hacking community and make it an overwhelming, blood-lust goal to crack them, the way that most Microsoft products seem to be treated. I think there are a lot of pirates who make it their mission to have cracks out for MS software practically as soon as it is out the door--I don't see the same environment around Apple stuff.

      And the bit about most companies not tolerating pirated software? Way off the mark in my experience. The companies that I have seen (and I've seen more than most, as a consultant) are generally very lax about licensing enforcement, unless they've gotten bit at some point by the BSA or their ilk. It's a real challenge to get most corporate IT departments to get serious about license tracking (see other comments in this story for examples) because it's neither interesting nor mission critical, and even if management has made it a priority, the junior techs actually installing crap usually don't give a shit.

      --
      No relation to Happy Monkey
    8. Re:Who are the developers by glowworm · · Score: 4, Informative
      I _hate_ crap like that. I use DriveCrypt for encryption (from securstar.de), and it has the most horrific license system I've ever had the displeasure to use.
      That is why you should support Open Source where possible. Rather than continue with DriveCrypt change to TrueCrypt which can do everything DriveCrypt does PLUS... use a file, say a .gif, as a key, containers compatible between Windows and Linux and also the encrypted containers don't contain DriveCrypt's giveaway signature bytes at the start of the file.

      The only way to stop the re-emergence of copy protection schemes (as were the craze in the mid 1980's with things like pro-lock) is to stop buying their products, instead relying on open source whereever the task at hand allows. DriveCrypt is one of things that you can easily get rid of. WGA is a little harder, but it's day will come.
      --
      Orationem pulchram non habens, scribo ista linea in lingua Latina
    9. Re:Who are the developers by CastrTroy · · Score: 1

      So, now I need a dongle for Windows, a dongle for PhotoShop, a dongle for MS Office, a dongle for SQL Server, a Dongle for VS.Net. And all of a sudden I have no more USB ports. It might work ok if you only have 1 app that requires a dongle, but other than that, it ain't going to work. And don't think you can get all the software producers to settle on a single universal dongle. Besides, it would probably be cracked anyway, because it would unlock such a large number of programs.

      --

      Anthropic principle: We see the universe the way it is because if it were different we would not be here to see it.
    10. Re:Who are the developers by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful

      And the bit about most companies not tolerating pirated software? Way off the mark in my experience. The companies that I have seen (and I've seen more than most, as a consultant) are generally very lax about licensing enforcement, unless they've gotten bit at some point by the BSA or their ilk. It's a real challenge to get most corporate IT departments to get serious about license tracking (see other comments in this story for examples) because it's neither interesting nor mission critical, and even if management has made it a priority, the junior techs actually installing crap usually don't give a shit.

      Then there's those of us that are tired of the licensing treadmill and are switching over to open-source. Mostly so I don't have to track the blessed licenses anymore.

    11. Re:Who are the developers by kimvette · · Score: 1

      The best activation system I've dealt with firsthand from a big vendor is Adobe CS2 - it allows DE-activation for license transfers, EXCELLENT.

      But here's a question regarding Activation: What happens in a few years when Microsoft discontinues Activation support? 10 years from now? Will the activation servers run forever, or will Microsoft quit activating the software? I should download the VLK edition of Windows XP just to ensure that I can still run XP when they decide to not allow activations any longer.

      --
      The Christian Right is Neither (Christian nor right). See: Matthew 23, Matthew 25, Ezekiel 16:48-50
    12. Re:Who are the developers by 1u3hr · · Score: 1
      That's overly simplistic, and as it's stated, demonstrably incorrect. Everyone can pirate Windows; pretty clearly, more than 5% actually do pay for it regardless.

      That proves nothing, almost everyone is forced to buy Windows bundled with their PC in the US.

    13. Re:Who are the developers by 1u3hr · · Score: 1
      So, how long is it before we start seeing hardware-based registration schemes?

      When the "trusted computing" platform becomes the standard. Then the "dongle" is in a chip on your motherboard.

    14. Re:Who are the developers by zerocool^ · · Score: 1


      WGA is a little harder, but it's day will come.

      Lemme get you a time warp.

      http://windizupdate.com/

      Blazzamo!

      ~Wx

      --
      sig?
    15. Re:Who are the developers by zerocool^ · · Score: 3, Informative

      Right, and people don't realize - no matter how complex the security lockout on the door, the pirates go in throught the window.

      Which of these is harder to pirate?

      Scenario 1:
      10 Start game
      20 Check to see if key is legit
      30 if key = legit, goto 50
      40 echo "key is not legit"; stop
      50 Play game
      Scenario 2:
      10 Start game
      20 Really complicated check to see if game is legit, key is activated, disc is inserted
      30 - 800 (really complicated and annoying security checks)
      810 if key = legit, goto 830
      820 echo "key is not legit, and we have contacted the FBI"; stop
      830 Play game
      The Pirates simply take out all the crap between "Start game" and "Play game", using decompilers and jump tracers and a bunch of crap that I don't know how it works, but get the general idea. They don't "defeat" the security. They just sidestep it. But the rest of us still have to deal with "you're not connected to the interweb tubes, you can't play this game".

      ~Wx

      PS Yes, starforce supposedly is impossible to break. Except that it gets its grubby hands in to your computer and causes massive problems, including hardware failures, system instability, and blue screens.
      --
      sig?
    16. Re:Who are the developers by Pfhreakaz0id · · Score: 2, Informative

      I agree. our IT guy was giving a security talk a while back and saying that they were going to get PGP desktop or some other "mount an encrypted volume" software and I pointed him to trueCrypt. I put this on our laptop to have our Quicken stuff on, in case it got stolen. It's simple enough for my wife to use, and comes with a large variety of encryption key options. Very nice and simple to use. It even has support for complex things like a secret encrypted volume inside the encrypted volume so you can put some innocuous stuff on the fake volume in case you were forced to reveal it you could say "see, that's all there is". I don't use all that stuff, but I like it, it's free and Open Source.

    17. Re:Who are the developers by Loonacy · · Score: 1
    18. Re:Who are the developers by Fordiman · · Score: 1

      Funny thing is, nine times out of ten, a piece of software with an online activiation is a piece of software I can live without.

      I mean, honestly, do I really *need* Trijinx for longer than it takes to beat it?

      --
      110100 1101000 1101000 1100110 0 1101111 1101000 1100011 1
    19. Re:Who are the developers by Fordiman · · Score: 1

      "The number of people that pay when they can pirate is about 5%."

      Fortunately for the software industry, the number of people with the knowledge and ability to pirate is kinda low. Most of your computer-using population doesn't want to bother with this torrenting thing and will instead go out and buy something from the software bargain bin.

      --
      110100 1101000 1101000 1100110 0 1101111 1101000 1100011 1
    20. Re:Who are the developers by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I just figured it was for Jesús F'ing Kerrrrrist.

    21. Re:Who are the developers by nachoboy · · Score: 1
      But here's a question regarding Activation: What happens in a few years when Microsoft discontinues Activation support? 10 years from now? Will the activation servers run forever, or will Microsoft quit activating the software? I should download the VLK edition of Windows XP just to ensure that I can still run XP when they decide to not allow activations any longer.
      This question was among the first asked when Microsoft introduced product activation in Windows XP 5 years ago. The answer is posted at Microsoft's Product Activation FAQ, quoted here for your convenience.

      Will Microsoft use activation to force me to upgrade? In other words, will Microsoft ever stop giving out activation codes for any of the products that require activation?

      No, Microsoft will not use activation as a tool to force people to upgrade. Activation is merely an anti-piracy tool, nothing else.

      Microsoft will also support the activation of Windows XP throughout its life and will likely provide an update that turns activation off at the end of the product's lifecycle so users would no longer be required to activate the product.
      Note that the product lifecycle for business products is 10 years, so you still have another 5 years of activation before Microsoft releases the official "activation crack" patch.
    22. Re:Who are the developers by fotbr · · Score: 1

      No, this is why you should support software without this type of nonsense, REGARDLESS of wether its open-source or not. Good closed-source, not-free-software exists. Support it when you find it.

    23. Re:Who are the developers by Tom · · Score: 4, Insightful

      PS Yes, starforce supposedly is impossible to break.

      Except that there are torrents of every single starforce game ever around, and they all come with either cracks or mini-images, and there are at least a dozen competing "anti-starforce" tools.

      Starforce is sold as being impossible to break. In the end, it's not any better than anything else.

      --
      Assorted stuff I do sometimes: Lemuria.org
    24. Re:Who are the developers by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      By comaprison, other similar software

      That just doesn't sound very healthy.

    25. Re:Who are the developers by aaarrrgggh · · Score: 2, Interesting

      What seems to be more common in expensive software is that the key is used in some kind of math within the program, so if you strip the key check, you will eventually get corrupted data in your files, things won't render properly, or whatever. This is much harder to just strip out; you end up needing to reverse engineer a significan portion of the program.

    26. Re:Who are the developers by mpe · · Score: 1

      I use DriveCrypt for encryption (from securstar.de), and it has the most horrific license system I've ever had the displeasure to use. You have to activate your software and lock it to a computer, then if you want to use it on an alternative computer you have to uninstall it on the first, then enter a "deactivation" code on the website, then finally you can reactivate on the new PC. God forbid you should format one of your computers forgetting to deactive your license first.

      How does it cope with malware and hardware failures?

      Lets face it: People hate activation, and for a good reason. It doesn't stop piracy. It doesn't really reduce piracy either. All it does it cause perpetual headaches to your legally licensed customers. I work on software products and was partly responsible for redesigning our software registration system, which used to also use online activation. We stripped out the 'activation' element and sales didn't drop at all, however the volume of support traffic that we had to handle due to activation issues (the largest type of support incident by far) dropped to almost nothing.

      You will even get situations of customers using cracked/pirate copies even when they are "fully licenced" because of this "security" causing so many problems with using the software.

    27. Re:Who are the developers by zecg · · Score: 1

      No, because proprietary software that doesn't yet have that type of nonsense will acquire it at the first moment profits start dictating it.

      --
      .i lu doi ringos.star. xu do puku'aroroi dunli dopecaku leni virnu li'u
    28. Re:Who are the developers by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      While I agree with you these days the "play game" section also has code in it to check to ensure it is legit. This makes it harder to remove, not impossible just harder.

    29. Re:Who are the developers by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      The Pirates simply take out all the crap between "Start game" and "Play game"

      Even if game protection worked like that circa '82, i think you're mistaking "Copy Protection" and "CD Check".
      What you describe is a simple CD/Key Check that can be removed easily, but don't forget that the actual protection is an *encryption* mecanism that prevents the file from being reverse-engineered.

      Nowadays "Cracking" means removing this encryption and releasing a plain clear exe.

      Furthermore, for years it has been a standard practice from major game cracking groups to release their cracks with the CD Check (if any) still in there, that's why you could see "No-CD" releases from other groups who would simply remove the cd check (as you described) from already cracked/unprotected exe.

      They don't "defeat" the security. They just sidestep it

      You couldn't be anymore wrong.
      Modified binaries that "sidestep" protections are called "loaders" and don't qualify at all as cracks.
      You won't see them often in widespread cracked releases, as it's not the proper way to do:
      basicaly, if you trick the original binary into running it'll still have the protection mecanism, so:
      - you won't be able to debug the game and produce trainers or any kind of dox
      - you'll run some bloat while playing the latest game for no apparent reason
      - you didn't remove the protection !!

      Anyway I just wanted to clear some points about how game cracks are done:

      - CD checks are trivial, but game protection are nasty encyption schemes (up to x86 code mangling)
      - tricking the protection is not a serious option (at best a temporary or proof-of-concept one), it must be fully reversed

    30. Re:Who are the developers by dwandy · · Score: 1
      The most solid proof of this is shareware - so we are not talking about hundreds of dollars but more like $20.
      Shareware registration ratios are useless for a few reasons:
      • Most notably, the download:pay ratio is skewed even if every unique person eventually buys it because most people download the same software more than once. I'm pretty sure I've downloaded Winamp *dozens* of times; when I rebuild a WinBox it's just easier to download it again. It's a tiny amount of bandwidth and gives me the latest version.
      • Many people download shareware for a one-off task, and have no intention of using it forever, and so are very strictly within their legal usage.
      • There is no way to check if any download that hasn't paid is in use. No where near every person who downloads a copy decides to keep using it.
      • But lastly and (imho most importantly) most people don't think of 'shareware' with 'piracy': For many people "shareware" is synonomous with "free".

      So, in short, I don't agree that 5% is anywhere near the right number, and shareware has way too many other factors to be a useful/meaningful giude.
      By way of contrast, all Oracle products are free unencumbered* downloads from some really fast servers, but of course require payment to Oracle for legal production usage. I really don't think Larry is a billionare because 5% of the users of Oracle products have paid for it ...
      BSA/CAAST puts the worldwide piracy rate at 35% for 2005, and rates vary world-wide, (and US and European rates are much lower) and that's from people who want us to believe that the sky is falling... so I suspect that the true rate is even *lower*. Beyond that, the true "non-paying" piracy rate is much lower, because the 35% would (at a minimum) include people who in all honesty unknowingly bought a fake...they are willing to buy it, and they paid for it (just not to the rights-holder).

      So despite the ease and availability of pirate software, still some 65%+ choose to hand over cash...

      *Requires registration with Oracle, which if I recall is a web-form that can't ensure that Santa Claus hasn't just registered...(or his nephew, if Santa is already registered)

      --
      If you think imaginary property and real property are the same, when does your house become public domain?
    31. Re:Who are the developers by jez9999 · · Score: 1

      "Unfortunately, Ubersoft.net is currently experiencing technical difficulties. As soon as we can pry the paperclip out of the works, we'll be back in the swing of things..."

      Looks like Clippy has sabotaged whatever you wanted to link to there! Was it about hacking XP to allow multiple dongles?

    32. Re:Who are the developers by Bunyip+Redgum · · Score: 1
      So, how long is it before we start seeing hardware-based registration schemes? It might be expensive for a company like Adobe to have the keys made, but volume pricing and the amount of money they'd save versus privacy might be worth it. Microsoft certainly has the weight (and the volume) to get them made cheaply enough for it to benefit.

      Microsoft already use hardware based schemes: X-Boxen.

      The next hardware based scheme will be Palladium or whatever they call it this week, dressed up as the only way to combat spyware and trojans.

    33. Re:Who are the developers by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Well, the last time I checked for a StarForce crack (X3: Reunion), there was none to be had for months after the game's release. There were a few recipies that involved unplugging all other optical drives, rebooting and whatnot to play but for all practical purposes it was uncracked. I also remember FADE, where supposedly cracked copies would start to act wierd during the game, and you had to go get several updated cracks. Yes, eventually it will be broken but it sure boosts initial sales and prevents anything like casual copying. Yes, you could get a torrent with the ISO of X3 but no crack, so I know for a fact that you are wrong when you say "they all come with either cracks or mini-images".

      The other reason StarForce has become so loathed apart from being somewhat effective, is that it's the closest thing to a rootkit you get within the Windows driver architecture. It hijacks all your optical devices, it's not compatible with all drives, it has disrupted many non-StarForce protected apps, it prevents you from using any form of virtual CD software (which is how I keep all my #/%# driver CDs which I can never find when I need them) and I sure wouldn't want to sort out the mess if another CD protection method was also trying to do the same.

      It essentially turns your entire Windows installation into a huge anti-piracy tool (though I prefer no-CD with legally bought games as well), with the result that StarForce can fuck up the whole Windows installation. In terms of "I wouldn't have bought it anyway", well it might keep me from pirating it but it'll be a cold day in hell before I buy it legally (yes, I do a mix). All StarForce games are immidiately on the "No way, pirate if possible and forget if not" list.

    34. Re:Who are the developers by coop535 · · Score: 1

      You're impressed because they gave you a site license on the cheap. "pay where they can" isn't something you find on a purchase page. Customers that reuse the same licensing key over and over on different boxes are pirates. Don't kid yourself.

      Small businesses need you to buy licenses for each machine you install it on. Salaries add up real fast, advertising is torture (Google is really expensive), Over-time happens so much, Rent, Infrastructure, etc. If it's too much to commit to this, you lean towards FOSS. Nothing wrong with either side of the fence, just don't kid yourself.

      Now, if you just hate the concept of being accused of wrong doing because your box blew itself to bits. That's a function of customer service. You'll find the software company that doesn't accuse you of wrong doing, but gets in there and fixes you up ~ them's the boys you want to keep doing business with. That would be the company I work for. *Nobody* likes activation, but we have proof that it does make a difference... and our job is to ensure that customers get more value out of our software and customer service to make up for the bad.

    35. Re:Who are the developers by ScuzzMonkey · · Score: 1

      Amen. I've been preaching that quite a bit in situations where it's practical--the real cost of license management for anyone who is serious about compliance is significant, and when you factor it into TCO, often tips the scales decisively toward free OSS solutions.

      --
      No relation to Happy Monkey
    36. Re:Who are the developers by fotbr · · Score: 1

      Well, maybe its because I'm not an EFF, FSF, OSS, Stallman-esque fanatic (not saying you are, just that the argument is common from that crowd), but I still think that supporting propriatary solutions that don't do this nonsense makes sense. Supporting those without activation nonsense, while shunning those that do, might eventually convince software companies that the activation crap isn't required.

      Dumping commercial software for FSF/OSS doesn't send the message to companies that they can BE profitable without activation, it sends the message that there won't be a company. Companies don't like that message, and as we've seen, refuse to hear it, preferring to put their hand over their ears and say "lalalala I can't hear you" while not changing anything.

      Showing businesses that there is an alternative to activation and similar nonsense that allows them to remain a profitable business is a message that they're much more likely to listen to. And they have to hear the message before they can do anything with it.

    37. Re:Who are the developers by DragonWriter · · Score: 1
      Microsoft will also support the activation of Windows XP throughout its life and will likely provide an update that turns activation off at the end of the product's lifecycle so users would no longer be required to activate the product.
      "Likely". Sure. Saying that it is likely now serves Microsoft's marketing purposes. When the end of the product's supported "life" comes, OTOH, actually releasing the no-activation patch will not been in Microsoft's marketing interests. And its not like they ever committed to it...
  8. This is surprising by spykemail · · Score: 3, Funny

    because none of Microsoft's software products have any flaws...

  9. Funny that... by dcapel · · Score: 4, Funny

    It seems I can't get Canonical's apt program to recognize I'm running a pirated version of ubuntu. It should be obvious, since I even got it as an iso file on the internet for free...

    --
    DYWYPI?
    1. Re:Funny that... by click2005 · · Score: 5, Funny

      apt-get install WGA

      --
      I am a free slashdotter. I will not be modded, blogged, DRM'd, patented, podcasted or RFID'd. My life is my own.
    2. Re:Funny that... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      zenity --error --text "Your copy of Ubuntu is not genuine.\n\nYou may be a victim of software counterfeiting."

    3. Re:Funny that... by Jester1023 · · Score: 1

      And don't forget to sudo.

    4. Re:Funny that... by akeyes · · Score: 1

      Wouldn't that be UGA (Ubuntu Genuine Advantage)?

    5. Re:Funny that... by garvon · · Score: 1

      To completely hose your system don't forget the next command.
      sudo wine WGA

    6. Re:Funny that... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      billg@microsoft:~$ sudo apt-get install WGA
      Password:
      Reading package lists... Done
      Building dependency tree... Done
      E: Couldn't find package WGA

  10. Many people just use their employeer's key by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Informative

    I know a number of people who 'borrowed' a Windows Support Key from their employeers, and applied the key to their pirated version of Windows. None of them have had a problem with the Windows Validator tool.

    1. Re:Many people just use their employeer's key by LiquidCoooled · · Score: 1

      What happens though when Microsoft detects all 11 out of your 10 licensed machines online at the same time?

      (this is of course hypothetical for now)

      Which one will be the one that gets disabled?
      Best hope its not one of the directors machines.

      5 computers at office, 2 at directors home, 3 in the warehouse and 1 from a residential ip.

      I wonder if the employer could extract customer details from the ISP based upon this or if they would have to go via a john doe lawsuit (like RIAA)?

      --
      liqbase :: faster than paper
    2. Re:Many people just use their employeer's key by Joebert · · Score: 3, Funny
      What happens though when Microsoft detects all 11 out of your 10 licensed machines online at the same time?

      Isn't it obvious ?

      Whoever made out the schedule to have more than 10 people working that day is fired.
      --
      Wanna fight ? Bend over, stick your head up your ass, and fight for air.
    3. Re:Many people just use their employeer's key by mallardtheduck · · Score: 3, Interesting

      The best thing to do is to copy down the key written on the authenticity sticker on corperate machines.
      Those machines are likely set up with a corperate VLK, so the key on the sticker is not in use (and the company has arguably paid twice for their software, so those licences are "spare" too...).

    4. Re:Many people just use their employeer's key by cnfrisch · · Score: 1

      One common misconception is that if you are a Microsoft Volume License Customer, you can use your Volume License media to install the initial full Windows license on a new PC. It's important to understand that Volume License Agreements offer Windows Upgrades only and not full Windows licenses. Therefore the OEM Product Key affixed to a new PC "is not a spare" and cannot be reused with a different PC.

  11. I'm just worried that I'll buy by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Insightful
    a copy from a store (you can't return software), MS then says it's pirated, and I'm fucked out of hundreds of bucks.

    How do ypu prove that you're not a pirate if MS says you are?

    1. Re:I'm just worried that I'll buy by dtfinch · · Score: 1

      Make a lot of noise. Seems to work.

    2. Re:I'm just worried that I'll buy by wanax · · Score: 3, Insightful

      As long as you're willing to rat out the reseller, MS will replace your pirated version with a genuine one.

      http://www.betanews.com/article/NonLegit_Windows_U sers_Get_Amnesty/1115239342

    3. Re:I'm just worried that I'll buy by madsheep · · Score: 2, Funny

      Yea, turning in my Uncle was worth the savings though! What a great program.

    4. Re:I'm just worried that I'll buy by Cyberllama · · Score: 4, Informative

      Mine's legit and WGA rejects it. I attend classes at University which pays microsoft 4 million dollars a year and in exchange all of the students get microsoft products for free (the univeristy charges 5 dollars per disc, or you can download them for free ).

    5. Re:I'm just worried that I'll buy by assassinator42 · · Score: 1

      Well, either call Microsoft or email the administrator of the MSDNAA (or whatever it is) program.

    6. Re:I'm just worried that I'll buy by Ucklak · · Score: 1

      Use American Express.

      --
      if you steal from one source, that is plagiarism, if you steal from many, well, that's just research.
    7. Re:I'm just worried that I'll buy by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Unless you can provide the appropriate papers from your government (that is, Letters of Marque), unfortunately, you'll have to be taken back to Redmond and hanged, sir.

    8. Re:I'm just worried that I'll buy by dieman · · Score: 1

      Its not always MSDNAA, some schools license it via their Campus Agreement, too.

      --
      -- dieman - Scott Dier
    9. Re:I'm just worried that I'll buy by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1
      MS then says it's pirated, and I'm fucked out of hundreds of bucks.

      There's an incredibly simple solution to this problem that Microsoft has set up for you. If you do the right thing, you are guaranteed to not have your software investment arbitrarily take from you.

      Pirate it. Anything with copy-protection should be pirated. It's the only way to make sure the copy-protection doesn't harm you.

    10. Re:I'm just worried that I'll buy by BagOBones · · Score: 1

      Are they origonal CDs with unique keys or do they hand you a burned disk or something?

      If the University is using a volume license key chances are that some student somewhere uploaded a copy and got the key flagged.

      --
      EA David Gardner -"... but the consumers have proven that actually what they want is fun."
    11. Re:I'm just worried that I'll buy by Cyberllama · · Score: 1

      They're pressed cds, but they have the university logo on them and I'm pretty sure they all have the same cd key with them. I think they do it differently now, and give out actual cds -- but you're not allowed to buy more than one copy of the same piece of software so I've just been figuring It'd have to be on hold until vista came out.

    12. Re:I'm just worried that I'll buy by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      Actually (hold on... check PA...okay) the primary application for my business is AutoCAD. I own a license for it, and I pay the extortion^Wsubscription fee each year and get the most recent version. I run a pirated version on my machine, though, because it never activates and never has issues with the license server. I do the same for Adobe products FUCK YOU, ADOBE! (oops, sorry, did I type that out loud?). I own a copy but run the cracked versions. So many fewer headaches.

  12. So what we need to do by joshetc · · Score: 1

    Is get him to host an ISO and share his cd key (or google one I guess) so none of us naughty pirates get attacked by WGA.

    I mean, maybe he should distribute it for all the people that are being wrongfully accused of having a pirated version.

    On a less stupid note, exactly how much of Microsoft's software has worked 100% of the time? Especially with all these false positives out there is it really to be so unexpected that a single person would be able to slip through the cracks?

    1. Re:So what we need to do by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Oh, come on. I dislike microsoft software (most of them, at least) just as the next guy (in /.). But exactly how much of humanity's software has worked 100% of the time ? Give me a break. They do lousy software ? Of course they do. But that comment was pushing it too much.

      All software is bugged, some are just so well written that their bugs are not in the execution path :)

    2. Re:So what we need to do by joshetc · · Score: 1

      It wasn't meant as exactly "how much does 100% of Microsoft's and ONLY Microsoft's software work?".

      Though you do bring up a good point. Obviously every piece of software will have an error sometime. Even if in some cases its for some extremely obscure reason or as a result of hardware failure (or both)

  13. Re-create the problem. by Keaster · · Score: 2, Funny

    To beter help troubleshoot the issue I ask that you please send me an .iso and key. I would like to attempt to help re-create the problem to further assist you troubleshoot.

    Thanks,

  14. It's still a problem. by Jerk+City+Troll · · Score: 4, Insightful

    It's far more of a problem for casual, non-technical pirates than the handful of legitimate customers who have been misidentified.

    I personally know of at least half a dozen people who have subsequently either a) purchased a legitimate copy of Windows, b) downgraded back to their older, legitimate version or c) bought a Mac, because they lack the technical knowledge to keep up with the WGA arms race.

    WGA is certainly going to reduce the level of Windows piracy. Unfortunately for Microsoft, it's going to do so because some people will move away from Windows altogether.

    Simple fact is that WGA is utterly transparent and utterly irrelevant to most legitimate users, and even those it isn't, it isn't an issue for very long.

    1. Re:It's still a problem. by Kelson · · Score: 5, Interesting
      Simple fact is that WGA is utterly transparent and utterly irrelevant to most legitimate users, and even those it isn't, it isn't an issue for very long.

      I can't speak for "most legitimate users," but I can describe my own brief run-in with a WGA malfunction.

      A few weeks ago, when the updated version of WGA was pushed out, my Dell-with-the-original-OS booted with a notice claiming that Windows was not genuine (despite the previous version of WGA reporting no problems). I grumbled about Microsoft's lying sack of *ahem* I mean, POS anti-piracy crap that couldn't tell a real copy of Windows from a fake one, then logged in, fired up a web browser, went to the Knowledge base, mucked around until I found a link that said something like, "Validate here"... and it said, "Oh, yeah, you're genuine. No problem, pal." (Actually, it's a Dell, so that would be "No problem, Dude.")

      I spouted some variation of "WTF?" Then I rebooted the machine, just to check, and sure enough it said absolutely nothing about being a pirated copy of Windows.

      I eventually concluded that Norton In(ternet)Security had probably blocked the initial validation attempt. With no desktop shell, I didn't have the chance to say "yes, let the damn packet through."

      The whole process took maybe 10 minutes, but it was an annoying 10 minutes. I've had my share of frustrations with Linux,* but it's never told me I was ripping off RedSuMandrivuntu.

      *My main PC is a Fedora Core box. My wife's main PC is a Mac. We share this Windows box, mainly for gaming.

    2. Re:It's still a problem. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      None of them went to Linux huh :(
      I can understand gamers, but you said Mac... guess WGA isn't going to do much for the install base.

  15. I am having this same problem... by Itninja · · Score: 4, Funny

    ...except I am running Linux. No matter how hard I try, I can't get those dweebs at Linux Corp. to understand that I never paid for this copy. I keep calling them and asking for a invoice or bill or something. But I guess they don't have a record of my purchase. Go figure. Just lucky I suppose.

    --
    I judt got a nre Kinesis keybiartf so please excusr ant egregiou typos.
    1. Re:I am having this same problem... by FuturePastNow · · Score: 5, Funny

      You're just calling the wrong people: http://www.sco.com/

      --
      Give a man fire, and you warm him for the night. Set a man on fire, and you warm him for the rest of his life.
    2. Re:I am having this same problem... by Schraegstrichpunkt · · Score: 4, Funny

      Talk to Trading Standards in the UK.

  16. predictably -mostly the honest are inconvenienced by hguorbray · · Score: 4, Interesting

    I have 2 OEM copies of windows that I bought from Fry's years ago.

    Unfortunately -and predictably, in the course of 2 moves I have lost my activation key #s -I didn't glue them to my machines as recommended because I planned on moving the license to another, newer machine eventually.

    Now I can't even finish the install without having to find some cracked key from some warez site. Then it won't let me install any security patches or Service Packs.

    After the 30 days or whatever is up and I have to activate I then try the warezed key and am told that this key has been used too many times -Duh! a

    and then I have to call MS support and get a new activation key from them. Fortunately they haven't given me too much grif, but its still a hassle.

    Thanks to old flakey hard drives I have had to do this twice and now it has died a third time.

    This time I said screw it and went to fry's and bought a new HP dual core media center PC for $750. so I guess MS won this round.....

    But I will be trying this again since I have several more machines sitting around -I guess I'd better write down the key# the next time they give me one over the phone again. Does anyone know if the activation #s they give over the phone are 1-time codes or if they will work multiple times?

    Has anyone had any luck just asking them for new activation codes?

    -What's the speed of Dark?

  17. A different WGA problem by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Informative

    Not too long after WGA came out I tried using System Restore to revert to a back up from about a week earlier to see if it would solve some issues I was having. After reverting to the backup, WGA was sure I had a pirated copy, but if I then reverted to the state it was in before using system restore, it didn't have problems at all. I haven't checked since then to see if maybe it was just because the backup was from before installing WGA, but it's sort of annoying that they would make one of their more useful features useless if the issue still happens.

  18. foolproof-just-found-a-better-fool dept. by industrialvegan · · Score: 0, Offtopic

    I just love the name of the department issuing this story, given the content/context of it. LOL!
    I'm going off to actually read the article from the link now.

  19. Not likely by Drakin020 · · Score: 0, Troll

    So wait...You mean to tell me you just called up Microsoft one day and said "Yeah I'd like a pirated version of windows please" And they just handed it over? Yeah smells like BS to me.

    --
    The greatest revenge in life is massive success.
    1. Re:Not likely by Golden+Section · · Score: 1

      Ed Bott, a Stephen Glass wannabe?

      --
      Nostalgia isn't what it used to be.
  20. but is it activated? by Eric+Coleman · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Or does it even need activation? having to call MS with your personal information to continue running xp after 60 or so days could be the end of his freedom.

    1. Re:but is it activated? by Peyna · · Score: 1

      Given that it was a Volume License Key, it probably does not require activation.

      --
      What?
  21. There is Anti-WGA cracks... by Borgschulze · · Score: 5, Informative

    Microsoft.Windows.XP.Professional.Corporate.SP2.In tegrated.July.2006.MULTI.IMAGE.REPACK-ETH0 That has all the latest updates... and has a WGA crack in it... no wonder he can't get it to recognize it's pirated.

    --
    In Soviet Russia, Linux compiles you!
    1. Re:There is Anti-WGA cracks... by Aceticon · · Score: 1

      Once again the pirates provide superior service for a superior price.

      It makes one wonder if IP in it's current form (state enforced, long term monopolies) and the business models that were born from it, are actually harmfull for society as whole.

      Some kind of very time-limited copyright (say 5 years) would probably force faster innovation cycles in IT products and force competition based on selling quality products to customers and providing good related services instead of of the current competition based on artificial barriers to entry (of other competitors into the same market) and networking-effects (eg most applications are made for the most common OS, which means that said OS is more likelly to be bougth since it is required for most applications).

      Imagine a generics market for old applications/OSes...

  22. Re:What fucking morons modded this up? by WilliamSChips · · Score: 1
    How many other people know [at least part of] a certain 25-character-long alphanumeric string that begins with FCKGW?
    We all do now, silly! FCKGW! (which amusingly sounds like Fuck George W.)
    --
    Please, for the good of Humanity, vote Obama.
  23. Feh! Windows XP Pirate Edition by Orion+Blastar · · Score: 5, Informative

    Obviously the P2P Pirate edition of XP uses the VLK and has modified the legitcontrol.dll, wgatray.exe, and wga*.dll files to not report a WGA violation.

    Want to really test the WGA? Use your original copy of Windows XP and search the Internet for a known CD-Key and install with that key that millions of other people have used. Then watch as the retail or OEM version of Windows with unpatched WGA files reports you as a pirate.

    Ninja Pirate Hackers and Crackers have modified the WGA files with something called MSIL that is like assembly language. For example if a valid key is found, you might have a comparision done and a JNE to 2000:1345 which calls the part of the code that turns on the "Your copy of Windows is not legit" function. Turn that JNE 2000:1345 into a NOP and the comparison does not match and the program does not jump into the Anti-Pirate code. Or change it to a JE 2000:1345 and if a valid key is found it jumps to the Anti-Pirate code and if an invalid key it does not. Or just take the code at 2000:1345 that turns on the Pirated bit and fill it with NOPs. I am just guessing here, I could be wrong, but I think the pirated version of Windows and those WGA-Fix patches do those sort of things.

    Meanwhile my legit copy of Windows XP has to have the WGA spyware on it to get updates from Microsoft. Yeah Windows Update and Microsoft Update require that I install WGA in order to use them. If not, no updates from the web. WGA trashed my fast user switching after it got installed. I can see the WGA files eating my system memory, CPU cycles, and using up bandwidth to report back to Microsoft, yes folks it is spyware. I would guess the pirate version of the WGA Fixed files remove the spyware as well.

    Not only that I heard that the pirate version of XP has special tweaks and bug fixes that the retail and OEM versions do not have. Yet your chances of malware infections are greater with the pirate version, because you never know who last modified it before you got a copy. So beware.

    --
    Remember, Slashdot does not have a -1 disagree moderation, and no, troll, flamebait, and overrated are not substitutes.
    1. Re:Feh! Windows XP Pirate Edition by RobertLTux · · Score: 2, Informative

      try this go to autopatcher.com and download a full set (you may have to download an older full set and then the upgrade sets to get to august)

      --
      Any person using FTFY or editing my postings agrees to a US$50.00 charge
    2. Re:Feh! Windows XP Pirate Edition by Kaenneth · · Score: 1

      JNE/JE thing is exactly what I did with some BBS software I bought when the key didn't work (back in the 286 days).

      However, there were multiple places that needed it, my first attempt turned off the invalid key error message; but didn't actually enable the software.

      I'd expect small checks to be added in multiple places.

    3. Re:Feh! Windows XP Pirate Edition by toneslook · · Score: 1

      Would Get A decent OS, but can't somehow..

    4. Re:Feh! Windows XP Pirate Edition by ElleyKitten · · Score: 1
      Want to really test the WGA? Use your original copy of Windows XP and search the Internet for a known CD-Key and install with that key that millions of other people have used.
      That's pretty much what he did. Go read the article.
      --
      "What is Internet Explorer 7? Are you saying we can't access the normal internet?" - I love tech support. Really.
    5. Re:Feh! Windows XP Pirate Edition by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Here you can find the real guide to fixing the genuine advantage (without hassles). This will allow you to access windows update and download files from m$ unencumbered.

      Included in this release is a file which is actually the first cracked release of the genuine advantage dll ever put out. It has been modified to allow me (and now you) to download stuff from microsoft as of 07/26/06. How does this work?

      A few things you should know - when microsoft wants to be they're exceedingly lazy. Very, very, very lazy. Why do I say this? Well lets look at how this system works.

      This dll is loaded into internet explorer as an add-on. When you access the site, the site checks the file is the right version, asks it "is this computer genuine", and trusts the dll to find out. The dll send the yes or no to them without some sort of thing attached to say "and this is why I think so". All it sends is a yes, or a no. That means the dll just needs to always send a yes. Well what about that first part, the whole "checks the version". Microsoft must have some crc checking or something right? Wrong! It does not check the crc (or any info) on the exe aside from the version string. That's it.

      What does this mean? It means we can have a surefire way of getting around this with only 1 cracked dll.

      Step 1: go to the microsoft site and when it tells you it needs to put genuine advantage ocx on to work, go ok. It'll tell you your copy is bad (or else why are you reading this?)

      Step 2: get an old cracked 'LegitCheckControl.dll' file from anywhere. Keep this file safe.

      step 3: take your trusty copy of resource hacker, resource workshop, whatever (resource hacker available free from http://www.angusj.com/resourcehacker/), and open the old file. Run another instance and open the other.

      step 4: so now you have both files open. Expand "version info", then 1, on both. In 1033 you'll see

      1 VERSIONINFO
      FILEVERSION 1,5,530,0
        ...

      step 5: look at the newer, noncracked file. See how the version is a larger number? Either change the numbers on the older file to look like the newer one, or just copy paste the script exactly from the old file into the new.

      Step 6: hit compile script, save the old dll, and copy it into your system directory, overwriting the non-cracked one (make sure internet explorer is closed or this won't work).

      You're done. That's it. You can do this every time it stops working. That wasn't so bad now was it?

    6. Re:Feh! Windows XP Pirate Edition by Orion+Blastar · · Score: 1

      Autopatcher does not like me having SP2 installed and says my Windows XP is the wrong version and it refuses to run. Feh!

      --
      Remember, Slashdot does not have a -1 disagree moderation, and no, troll, flamebait, and overrated are not substitutes.
    7. Re:Feh! Windows XP Pirate Edition by Orion+Blastar · · Score: 1

      I call BS then, because people have used that FCK* key that millions of people use and got the pirated message from WGA files when they use the original Windows XP install disk and not the P2P pirate version.

      Unless he used a key generator program instead and made an original key that nobody else is using, he is bullshitting because I know of cases where people used a pirated key and I had to get them to buy a real copy of XP Home Edition once I found out. It is just too much of a hassle to keep updating the OS each month with a new WGA crack for a lot of noobs I have to deal with that are asking for help. Either that or it was a VLK key he used, which bypasses activation and WGA checks.

      --
      Remember, Slashdot does not have a -1 disagree moderation, and no, troll, flamebait, and overrated are not substitutes.
  24. can I get a link by lophophore · · Score: 4, Funny

    can I get a link to that Google page with the 5 valid keys, please?

    --
    there are 3 kinds of people:
    * those who can count
    * those who can't
    1. Re:can I get a link by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

      me too! please send via email to l33t_H4x0rZ@gmail.com

    2. Re:can I get a link by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      OOPS!!!!1

      Sorry, that email address was l33t_H4x0rZ@aol.com!!!!

      THank you!!!!!!!

    3. Re:can I get a link by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      add me to yuor lsit plx

  25. Mod Parent UP by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    How is that more people haven't pointed out that this post uses completely bullshit logic?

    Let me be perfectly clear for all the kiddies out there: A high false-negative rate DOES NOT IMPLY a high false-positive rate! Understanding this only requires basic comprehension skills.

    1. Re:Mod Parent UP by WilliamSChips · · Score: 1

      You're true in that a high false-negative rate does not imply a high false-positive rate. But the point you miss is that we already have a high false-positive rate.

      --
      Please, for the good of Humanity, vote Obama.
    2. Re:Mod Parent UP by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "we already have a high false-positive rate"

      It only seems that way because you read slashdot.

  26. Intentional installed a pirated copy... by madsheep · · Score: 2, Funny

    Right... so he intentionally installed a pirated copy. Good work. I think we should hold these genius responsible for breaking the law now. In other news I intentionally stole a car with armored tires and proved the cops couldn't catch me and the spike strip they laid out to stop me couldn't rip my tires... blah blah blah.

    1. Re:Intentional installed a pirated copy... by mallardtheduck · · Score: 1

      If he installed his pirate copy on a computer that came with a valid licence, I see no legal or moral problem.

    2. Re:Intentional installed a pirated copy... by tinkerghost · · Score: 1

      More importantly, he did it with the knowledge, consent, and help of MS for a controlled test.
      If I own the copywrite, and say "sure you can run that through the copier.", then there is no legal issue at all. That's what they did here, they gave him permission to run a pirated copy - in fact sent him the CD he used to do the install. That's the thing about big companies, if you sweet talk them a bit - dangle the publicity carrot infront of them - they usually give you nice stuff.

  27. Acceptable flaw-ware by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    What does the author expect? Microsoft Windows also brought "acceptable to ship with known bugs", or at least redefined to current levels. While software has always had bugs in code and design, it is now acceptable to download anything, throw it in and expect it to work. Much like many I/T departments and management, as long as the PR/BS sounds right and the CIO owns the MSFT stock you are a Microsoft Pwnd. Microsoft isn't about quality well engineered software, it is about market manipulation, anti-competative dominance like bundling, PR and sales. They have no sizable competition because of the way it is sold. No competition means poorly functioning and insecure products.


    Now imagine if you buy a PC, you had the legal right not to pay for the Microsoft part, and perhaps choose to send the $75 to Red Hat or Suse, or perhaps Ubunto, whould Microsoft have a 95% monopoly? My guess is not, as like cars, 95% of use don't drive the same cars nor buy gas from the same vendor.

    At least you get to run a bootleg version as legit. It does not always work that way. When MS said my Word was illegal even though it was not, I simply unloaded it and loaded Open Office. I simply look at Microsoft as an overpriced monopoly.

  28. Alpha Centauri by alexhs · · Score: 1

    There's a Linux version of Alpha Centauri available as a torrent.
    I downloaded it in April (and I do not feel guilty of copyright infringement because I've bought the ms-windows version and Loki who made the port doesn't exist anymore...)
    A quick Google "torrent alpha centauri Linux" sent me here.
    Now, it's the full ISO, it could be useful to share only the binaries, as you have already artwork files...
    Only issue I have with it is that fullscreen uses a modeline that doesn't fit completely in my screen :(

    --
    I have discovered a truly marvelous proof of killer sig, which this margin is too narrow to contain.
    1. Re:Alpha Centauri by drinkypoo · · Score: 1

      Well, I was making a point that I hadn't done any copyright violation, and here you are telling me to violate copyright. I think that is actually a lot worse than pirating the original game; someone took the effort to port to linux and then you don't reward 'em? Then again, I'm not rewarding them either, because I'm not paying $50 for a game tht's $20 for windows in the bargain bin.

      --
      "You're right," Fisheye says. "I should have set it on 'whip' or 'chop.'"
    2. Re:Alpha Centauri by cduffy · · Score: 1
      someone took the effort to port to linux and then you don't reward 'em?
      Since they've been out of business for over four years now, I'm pretty sure it's moot. Not saying that software piracy is moral or such, but that it's somewhat less repugnant under the circumstances in question.
  29. However what might be happening by Sycraft-fu · · Score: 4, Informative

    Is he might be using a legit corperate key. We have a VLK here (university) and you can just install XP on any system no problem, and it'll report as legit. They don't check vs number of license to make sure it's an exact count. So you could install it unlicensed on a personal laptop, and it'd report as legit no problems. Now however if they found tons of systems outside of the university cropping up, and saw the key on a serials board, they might invalidate it and issue us a new one.

    However just installing a copy of corperate unlicensed won't do anything. It doesn't activate and there's not a hard limit check.

    To really test WGA you need to do something like get a known pirate key or take a non-volume copy of XP and install it on more systems than you are allowed to.

    1. Re:However what might be happening by fishbowl · · Score: 3, Insightful

      "Now however if they found tons of systems outside of the university cropping up, and saw the key on a serials board, they might invalidate it and issue us a new one."

      Or, they might just invalidate it and leave it to the folks in your IT organization to explain why they need to buy retail licenses from now on...

      --
      -fb Everything not expressly forbidden is now mandatory.
    2. Re:However what might be happening by Sycraft-fu · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Well that would violate the contract so no, probably not. It actually turns out that MS doesn't like to piss off their customers in general. It's the people that aren't paying they are mad at. It's not even really the inidivduals as much as the resellers that claim to be selling legit Windows, and charge for it, but don't.

    3. Re:However what might be happening by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Though it turns out individual end-users aren't their "customers." That's restricted to the big corporate clients and the OEMs. The handful of people who buy boxed copies of windows are SOL because they get lumped in with the rest of the "consumers."

    4. Re:However what might be happening by fishbowl · · Score: 5, Interesting

      I'm quite cynical on this topic because of my experiences with MSDN. Even though I've been an MSDN subscriber for a LONG time (a lot longer than I want to admit), I was treated very poorly when I received MSDN activation codes that were supposedly pirated. I had to (literally) threaten to sue (yes, Microsoft) before someone got a fire lit under their chair (to my surprise), and took care of my situation, eight weeks after my purchase, and after several people had essentially accused me of infringement even as I had sales receipts and original media in my hand.

      --
      -fb Everything not expressly forbidden is now mandatory.
    5. Re:However what might be happening by Manitcor · · Score: 4, Informative

      RTFA, he used a key from a serials site that was marked as 2 years old. MS is apparently not keeping up with its pirateed key list

      --
      "Don't mess with him, he taunts the happy fun ball."
    6. Re:However what might be happening by mpe · · Score: 1

      We have a VLK here (university) and you can just install XP on any system no problem, and it'll report as legit. They don't check vs number of license to make sure it's an exact count. So you could install it unlicensed on a personal laptop, and it'd report as legit no problems. Now however if they found tons of systems outside of the university cropping up, and saw the key on a serials board, they might invalidate it and issue us a new one.

      Even if Microsoft charged nothing for doing this the cost to the university would probably be considerable.

    7. Re:However what might be happening by MickDownUnder · · Score: 1

      Pirating MSDN at $2000 USD a pop is a license to print money. I suspect you'll find you purchased your copy from someone who is in the active game of counterfeiting MSDN or purchasing counterfeit MSDN software. From my experience and what I have seen over the years Microsoft does not go after small time mum & dad, friend to friend type pirates, they go after those who are creating thousands of copies and selling them retail. You'll probably find what Microsoft was really after was information about where you got your bogus copy of MSDN from.

      Was this MSDN subscription substantially less than the normal retail price ?

    8. Re:However what might be happening by MickDownUnder · · Score: 1

      It would be interesting to try the later. I suspect you'll find that you can install a single copy of windows on a number of machines and run happily for quite some time, I've had to run the same copy of windows with the same license key for some period of time whilst migrating from machines, so I know that you don't get WGA'd the instant you install a single license copy of windows more than once. I suspect there's probably a time limit, or possibly a limit on the number of copies that can be made before the license is blacklisted.

    9. Re:However what might be happening by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Of course he purchased it at a substantial "discount". But you'll never get an answer from the guy admiting as much, because that might make it seem like Microsoft's behavior was reasonable...

    10. Re:However what might be happening by SharpFang · · Score: 5, Insightful

      >To really test WGA you need to do something like get a known
      >pirate key or take a non-volume copy of XP and install it on more
      >systems than you are allowed to.

      Nope. That's what you need to trigger it.
      To test it, you take most obscure cases of license violation plus most convoluted cases of legal use.
      And then as result the test shows WGA is hopelessly broken.

      --
      45 5F E1 04 22 CA 29 C4 93 3F 95 05 2B 79 2A B2
    11. Re:However what might be happening by rtb61 · · Score: 2, Informative
      The whole WGA ia not about pursuing pirates it is about pursuing families, with more than one computer. Pirates will continue pirating with out pause, the skilled ones of course, the dumb ones will still get caught as always. Hackers and skilled users who want to cheat will do so as well.

      It is only the unskilled trying to install one copy across all the families computers who are really getting caught, it is targeted at unskilled mothers and fathers and their children.

      The easiest way around WGA is to download the updates and install them manually and anybody with a reasonable amount of skill can do it quite readily (obviously avoid the WGA one, as well as the other pointless ones). The only reason I bothered with WGA is that I was curious as to what it what do. I prefer manual updates and have automatic updates disabled.

      When my browser/toy console (I always treat it as a toy when it boots to windows) breaks I want to know which specific patch caused it, so I can fix it. I treat it like a toy because when it comes to the typical end user customer that's the way microsoft treats it.

      Windows NT taught me the folly of relying on or trusting microsoft with a blank check on patches, I still prefer to wait and let the mug punters do the microsoft beta testing of patches before I give it a shot even on my toy machine.

      --
      Chaos - everything, everywhere, everywhen
    12. Re:However what might be happening by wild_berry · · Score: 1

      Not in the volume license agreement I read while at uni. Unauthorised installations have a license-termination clause, so that the whole university loses its license.

    13. Re:However what might be happening by fishbowl · · Score: 1

      "I suspect you'll find you purchased your copy from someone who is in the active game of counterfeiting MSDN or purchasing counterfeit MSDN software."

      Incorrect.

      "You'll probably find what Microsoft was really after was information about where you got your bogus copy of MSDN from."

      I purhcased from what Microsoft calls a "Select Reseller."

      "Was this MSDN subscription substantially less than the normal retail price ?"

      No. You certainly seem to be making some wild assumptions here.

      I bought my subscription through the same channel that I use to purchase for my company -- volume in the thousands.

      --
      -fb Everything not expressly forbidden is now mandatory.
    14. Re:However what might be happening by fishbowl · · Score: 1

      >Of course he purchased it at a substantial "discount".

      I am "the guy" you refer to, and my discount was on the order of 20%, and the reseller involved was
      referred by the Microsoft rep who deals with the large-ish company account for my employer that I'm not going to name.

      And, eventually, I was satisfied. When they finally did acknowledge the problem and took action, they took really agressive action. I actually think I got somebody fired, because they tried to accuse a certain sales rep.

      I don't feel great about the experience. But I sure as hell am not going to entertain the implied assumption that I bought through anything like a disreputable source.

      --
      -fb Everything not expressly forbidden is now mandatory.
    15. Re:However what might be happening by in2mind · · Score: 0, Offtopic
      RTFA, he used a key from a serials site that was marked as 2 years old. MS is apparently not keeping up with its pirateed key list

      What are you talking? Because a person uses a 2 year old Xp pirate key,Microsoft wouldnt detect it as a pirated version?I really cant get your logic.

    16. Re:However what might be happening by MickDownUnder · · Score: 1

      There has been a case in Australia where a major retailer was involved with selling bogus Microsoft software. I wasn't implying that you had knowingly engaged in a disreputable business. My other hunch was someone at Microsoft may have fucked up, or someone at Microsoft was actually engaging in fraudulent behaviour and giving your keys away to other people.

    17. Re:However what might be happening by fishbowl · · Score: 1

      "My other hunch was someone at Microsoft may have fucked up"

      That appears strongly to have been the case.

      "or someone at Microsoft was actually engaging in fraudulent behaviour and giving your keys away to other people."

      We have not ruled out the possibility, but I believe someone in support took the rap. I actually feel pretty bad about that, but they backed me into a corner where I had to respond with guns blazing (and with the letter-writing abilities of the legal department at my pretty big company.)

      --
      -fb Everything not expressly forbidden is now mandatory.
    18. Re:However what might be happening by MickDownUnder · · Score: 1

      If it were any other web site than slashdot I would have said that to begin with. Here I'd rather not jump on the Microsoft bashing bandwagon until I have to. I actually believe that due to the nature of computing that a monopoly for the desktop platform was and still is inevitable. As far as companies go I don't think Microsoft is really all that bad, try Haliburton, McDonalds, or Rothmans. I think the whole fight to stop them bundling new features with the OS will be seen as idiotic in retrospect 50 years from now... something like "How could you thiink of shipping a computer without virus protection, media, browsing, mail, VOIP virtualisation software etc etc etc?"

  30. Not to rush to Microsoft's defense, but... by mauricew9 · · Score: 1

    ... the frequency of false positives and false negatives don't have to be related at all. The fact that WGA might not reject lots of invalid licenses doesn't say anything about how often it rejects valid licenses. Without knowing the details about how WGA works, it's easy for me to imagine that Microsoft engineered the scheme to err on the side of identifying licenses as valid, e.g. to avoid pissing off large corporate customers, as another poster remarked.

    For example, I have a method for figuring out in the morning if the Dow Jones Industrial Average will rise or fall by the end of the day. If I look out my window and see investors plummeting out of office buildings, it will go down. Otherwise, it will go up. My success rate for predicting up days is about 50/50, but my success rate for predicting down days is just about perfect!

    1. Re:Not to rush to Microsoft's defense, but... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I agree that the false negative rate can be completely different than the false positive rate. However, if there is a high enough false negative rate then the system stops being an effective deterrent.

      The consumer advantage to WGA is that if pirates are made to pay then more resources should be available to Microsoft to create better results for the consumer. Instead, it is just Microsoft's "lucky rabbit's foot." The fact is the foot didn't provide much luck to the rabbit since it is now dead and won't provide any "luck" in turns of positive out-come by being passed to the consumer.

      To show just how stupid WGA is, download a copy of the GenuineCheck.exe offline WGA checker and try it on WINE. Without any MS provided DLL's installed on a Linux system at all, I am able to get the code returned by GenuineCheck.exe to work to download software from MS that requires WGA. So what has the consumer that has bought Windows gained by going through that extra step. It hasn't encouraged me to buy a real copy of Windows. In fact, it still remains more convenient for me to use my current method to "trick" the WGA check system than it does to pay for a copy of Windows and install it.

      What I think is worse is that Microsoft is throwing technical hoops at their legit customers without providing the man power so there is any real reward to anyone. The R-U-LEGIT branch of Microsoft is filled with brainless drones. I got an email claiming to provide an "OEM discount" on Microsoft XP Pro and Office Pro where I could have one for $40 or both for $60. These are clearly not legit prices for the US. So, I provided the full email header and the URL of the "store front" to piracy@microsoft.com. I later got back a pre-written responce that my submission was not complete because it either was missing the full email header or a method to contact the sender. I resubmitted with the full email header, the URL of the store front, the whois information for the store domain and the ARIN information for the store IP address. They again sent back the same exact response even after being spooned all the details for starting an investigation.

      So, while someone might claim that WGA helps Microsoft stop illegal OEMs and computer repair shops, I highly doubt it. My experience has been the R-U-LEGIT does not do the leg work needed to shut down such operations. And from what I have been told by University students that have run into WGA problems after getting a discount laptop or a store provided re-install is that Microsoft puts the blame on the student.

      Microsoft had marketted that Windows XP would "provide a more streamlined eXPierence." It seems very clear that the artifical hoops that WGA adds violates that marketting slogan. The message that Microsoft is sending actually is very simple: Microsoft feels that treating the customers poorly will not effect it's bottom line and if you don't like that then maybe you should consider getting a Mac next time.

  31. Damn that Microsoft! by wbtotb · · Score: 3, Interesting

    I thought false positives were bad, but holy crap, letting a few pirates go with false negatives is so much worse! They may never get to experience the pleasures of those prompts or being prevented from downloading updates and utilities.

    Why is this a problem for anyone but Microsoft (or those who have a perverse desire to be labeled as a pirate and then blog about it)? Do you suppose maybe he got a false negative because Microsoft is less willing to pull the trigger when in doubt?

  32. Is this really such a shock? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    When was the last time Microsoft told the truth, rather that just piled money into some crud ridden marketing smear campaign? Heck, when was the last time they even wrote something worth your time? As you can see, they can't even get this little flagship utility working! Can you really trust your company to these guys? Really?

  33. Re:predictably -mostly the honest are inconvenienc by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    If you are so sick of activating Windows XP, why not use a WPA crack (Windows product activation crack)

  34. What happens if you WANT to get caught? by ronwolf · · Score: 2, Interesting

    If you're running an illegal version of windows, but happen to actually have a license for a legit copy, how can you go about getting legit?

    My friend has a pirated keygen'd version of xp pro, and also has a hologramed cd of xp pro complete with serial number and all... Is there an easy upgrade path available to him to go legit, without having to reinstall (too many games/apps/whatever he says.)

    1. Re:What happens if you WANT to get caught? by ronwolf · · Score: 1

      I should mention- it might be the corp version (the current pirated os he's running) if it makes a difference.

    2. Re:What happens if you WANT to get caught? by lordperditor · · Score: 2, Informative

      Use sysprep(found on the xp cd in tools/reskit/deploy.cab or just search the cd for deploy.cab) extract sysprep.exe and run sysprep.exe -reseal. when the machine reboots you can enter the COA from your legit copy of XP. (This was from a post last week - forget the posters name)

    3. Re:What happens if you WANT to get caught? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Informative

      If the two keys are for the same version of Windows, i.e. one isn't for the corporate XP Pro and one for the retail XP Pro, you might be able to do this with Magical Jelly Bean Keyfinder. It makes it trivially easy to change your key.

    4. Re:What happens if you WANT to get caught? by _tognus · · Score: 1

      Try changing the key using this little tool.

      IIRC it's just scripts from MS packed up in a nice easy front-end. I've used it several times with success.

  35. A fraction of a percent? by Tweekster · · Score: 1

    That is still a LOT of people...

    I hate WGA, every other week a new "update" that bugs me about rebooting just because microsoft suddenly cares about piracy. It is obnoxious as hell.

    --
    The phrase "more better" is acceptable English. suck it grammar Nazis
  36. Seems you know that BSA page address by heart :-) by AndreyFilippov · · Score: 1

    It was just the 3-rd post.

  37. Re:predictably -mostly the honest are inconvenienc by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    -What's the speed of Dark?

    The same as the speed of light.

  38. Fraction of a percent... by DragonWriter · · Score: 2, Funny
    They claim that all but "a fraction of a percent" of those 60 million people who've been denied access to Microsoft updates and downloads are guilty, guilty, guilty. Right.

    Right. Remember, 3/2—or 119,990,000/2—is, after all, a fraction.

    Just not a proper fraction.

  39. Volume License Keys Always Pass The WGA by lordperditor · · Score: 5, Interesting

    Corporate Volume License Keys always pass the WGA test.

    e.g. HP has all the computers in the Sydney office running with one Volume License Key, now if someone were to leave HP's employ and continue to use the key MS would have no way of knowing so has to let it pass the WGA.

    It has to just shrug and go well thats HP let it pass or risk annoying the hell out of a lot of HP people if they refuse it.

    1. Re:Volume License Keys Always Pass The WGA by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      In such a case HP would have a WSUS server pulling down updates and Pre-EULA'ing them all before internal distribution to the supposed black-listed VLK clients.

      The internal blacklisted VLK machines would never see the Internet version of Windows Update to complain about being non-genuine in this scenario.

    2. Re:Volume License Keys Always Pass The WGA by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Corporate Volume License Keys always pass the WGA test.

      No, the contrary: those keys that fail the WGA test are often volume license keys that got posted on the Internet!

  40. Re:What fucking morons modded this up? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    it's Fuck Gates World

  41. What MS shoudl do by cab15625 · · Score: 4, Funny

    It's probably been suggested before, but what MS should do is what games used to do back in the '80s. When you turn on your computer, it asks you "on page 10 of the manual, what is the 7th word in line 13?"
    Espeically since windows has become too complex for a purely software based solution to ever work reliably.

    1. Re:What MS shoudl do by BulletMagnet · · Score: 1

      When was the last time you saw a manual with Windows?

    2. Re:What MS shoudl do by cab15625 · · Score: 1

      That was suposed to be part of the joke ... I can't believe it got rated +1 ineresting.

    3. Re:What MS shoudl do by Bitsy+Boffin · · Score: 1

      Hmmm, Win 95 had a manual if I remember correctly, 3.1(1)/WfW certainly did.

      Perhaps they could issue a code book:

      Windows says: "The ducks fly early in the morning."
      You reply: "I had spinach for dinner last night".

      --
      NZ Electronics Enthusiasts: Check out my Trade Me Listings
    4. Re:What MS shoudl do by tokul · · Score: 1
      "on page 10 of the manual, what is the 7th word in line 13?"
      Company will spend money on printed manual and crackers will provide scanned copy of manual.
    5. Re:What MS shoudl do by tumbleweedsi · · Score: 1

      That would of course mean that Microsoft would have to produce a manual... why do that for 'free' when they can charge a licensing fee to companies who sell 'manuals' for £40 a throw?

      Plus, let's face it, photocopiers are much better now that they were in the 80's!

      On a side note, the pirates are getting so good that Microsoft analyses the glue which holds the box together as it is often the only clue that the product is a 'fake'. I reminds me of the time when a bunch of US Mint paper was stolen and some forged bills were produced which were so good that they were actually legal tender (in the US if it is on the right paper and has all the right stuff on it then it IS money regardless of who printed it).

      --
      Be nice, sponsor me: http://jailbreak.ragabonds.org.uk
    6. Re:What MS shoudl do by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      That is incorrect. The bill has to be monetized to be legal tender in the United States.

  42. The bigger licensing issue is of course ACADEMIC by lordperditor · · Score: 2, Interesting

    The bigger licensing issue is of course ACADEMIC

    Mrs Smith trots off to the high street computer co and wants Windows XP, now does she buy the full version for $300 or the academic version for $98?

    Come on M$ $300 for XP but only $98 if you put a red sticker on the outside of the box with Academic Version written on it?!

    I would be interested to know how many of the boxes are sold at $300 in high st stores!

  43. Re:predictably -mostly the honest are inconvenienc by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    What I do is keep a text file containing all the CD keys for all the software that I own, and back it up along with the rest of my stuff. That way it doesn't matter if I lost the original CD case or sticker, as long as I've got the install CDs (original or downloaded) and at least a semi-recent backup.

  44. poor logic by taybin · · Score: 2, Insightful

    False negatives don't imply false positives.

  45. I wan't overly good in math class but.... by westcoast+philly · · Score: 1

    a fraction of a percent.... isn't 1/2 of 100% still a fraction of a percent? hell, 2/2 of 100% is also!

  46. Faulty Reasoning by slackmaster2000 · · Score: 0, Flamebait

    So the key that he's using hasn't hit Microsoft's ban list yet. There could be a number of simple reasons for this as others have pointed out.

    None of this has anything to do with legitimate license keys being rejected, which is a completely different problem with the same system. Just because a specific pirated copy of XP passes WGA does not mean that it's likely for legitimate copies of XP to be rejected by WGA.

    The nice thing about both of these problems is that they can be fairly easily resolved with a single phone call :)

    PS, I didn't RTFA, I'm simply responding to the last line of the quoted text. If there is some reason that this guy's experience has any direct relationship to legitimate copies of XP being flagged as pirated, please correct me.

    PS2, I'm no fan of WGA. When I saw it come up in automatic updates on my XP box, I unchecked it. It continues to appear now and then, and often the system doesn't tell me that updates are ready until I'm shutting the machine down, at which point if I accidentally hit the big red shutdown button, WGA will be installed. No way to see which updates will be applied when that happens either.

  47. The first hit must always be free by AHuxley · · Score: 1

    MS has to get Vista out.
    MS would hate to see a generation of young users trying other products.
    Young ppl cannot be allowed to enter the workforce unexposed to Vista.
    They might bring dangerous new ideas about other products with them.
    WGA is for the share holders, IT journals, periodicals and trade magazines.
    WGA is not going to slow the spread of Vista.

    --
    Domestic spying is now "Benign Information Gathering"
  48. Re:MORON! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    this is basically truth! i don't understand how this is flamebait!

  49. Bullshit by Mycroft_514 · · Score: 1

    I have yet to install WGA, and I am downloading the latest security patches with no trouble at all. Now, I am not using auto-update (I never used auto update, or I WOULD have WGA by now.) For example, last night I downloaded and installed all 12 patches.

  50. Re:predictably -mostly the honest are inconvenienc by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Informative

    You don't need WGA to install updates. All you need is Windows Baseline Securty Analyzer - it will scan what updates you need and provide direct links to them. It's a little more tedious than Windows Update but it does the job. Another option would be to set up a WSUS server but that's a little more involved.

  51. It's okay... by writermike · · Score: 4, Funny

    *My main PC is a Fedora Core box. My wife's main PC is a Mac. We share this Windows box, mainly for gaming.

    It's okay, man. You don't have to prove yourself to us. :-D

    --
    If Nalgene water bottles are outlawed, only outlaws will have Nalgene water bottles.
  52. WGA/Sp4 by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Well I can attest to many problems with WGA and or Win2k Sp4. One was one of the updates horked up the boot record so to shutdown I had to yank the darn thing from the wall. Basicly all tech support said to do was reinstall-not a huge BFD I don't use it for anything but games. The most amusing WGA issue I saw here was a new store (Davids Bridal and Mens apparel) that used a some sort of Windows Kioske-after it the store manager had the thing sent back as deffective. In its' place their installing a few XServes. a few leased G5's and only runing the nescosary software (CueCat esk software). However as a result of WGA giving them so many headaches it's no at least company policy that running windows is grounds for suspension (for managers ) and firing for floor staff. :)

  53. I know this may be slightly off-topic... by djbckr · · Score: 1

    ... but I've been trying to find an inexpensive (read: not cheap) computer *without an OS* so I don't have to pay the M$ tax. Where can I find such a thing?

    1. Re:I know this may be slightly off-topic... by mbakunin · · Score: 1

      Every EULA in its very first paragraph includes a clause to the effect that if you do not agree to it in all its shrink-wrap glory, you may return it for a full refund. So, just buy any PC you like. If it's bare of an OS, bully. If it comes with Windows, boot it, do not accept the EULA, call the OEM and ask for your refund.

      It is my experience that enough time spent with their 800 number on speaker while you do your work will eventually get you about a $50 check from the OEM.

      You have to be a real pest, though.

    2. Re:I know this may be slightly off-topic... by WuphonsReach · · Score: 1

      What's your price point? You can build a pretty good bare-bones machine for around $750. (MWave part numbers)

      MB-BA22658 AMD ATHLON 64 X2 4200+
      BA22972 ASUS M2N-E nVIDIA nFORCE 570ULTRA CHIPSET SERIAL ATA300 ATX
      BA20518 MWAVE 2x 1GB 533MHZ NON-ECC 240-PIN DDR2 DIMM
      $425 for the CPU/MB/RAM, plus it comes assembled and tested

      $103 BA30107 ANTEC SONATA II (BLACK) MID TOWER W/SMARTPOWER 2.0 450W ATX
      $80 SATA-II drive (250GB)
      $9 Floppy drive
      $37 DVD-RW
      $100 mid-range PCIe video card
      ----
      $329 for the misc components

      Other notes:
      X2 3800+ is $34 cheaper
      1GB of RAM is $65 cheaper
      Integrated graphics would save a bit

      If all you want is a basic office machine, you can cut the price down to around $400 if you go with integrated graphics, smaller hard drives, 1GB of RAM and an inexpensive single-core CPU. We're opting for a bit more future-proofing and spending around $550 (hardware costs) for our office machines (dual-core and 2GB).

      Assembly time is about 2 hours and we'll pay around $75 in shipping costs for parts. But we get machines that are exactly what we want and we're not afraid of doing our own tech support. Replacement parts are easier because everything is standard commodity parts. Nothing proprietary in the mix that we'd have to worry about not being replaceable. It also helps that we have spare parts laying around which is cutting a bit off the build cost.

      --
      Wolde you bothe eate your cake, and have your cake?
  54. Re:predictably -mostly the honest are inconvenienc by Sloppy · · Score: 2, Insightful
    This time I said screw it and went to fry's and bought a new HP dual core media center PC for $750.
    That'll teach 'em! Nothing tells a company they can't get away with treating their customers like shit, than to .. um .. keep buying their products as though you were a very happy customer and everything is ok.
    --
    As copyright owner of this comment, I authorize everyone to defeat any technological measure which limits access to it.
  55. Re:predictably -mostly the honest are inconvenienc by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Dark can move superliminally, such as a shadow cast at an angle by an object at a great distance.

  56. WGA - Microsofts Marketing at its finest by NullProg · · Score: 2, Funny

    From the PR notices: http://www.microsoft.com/genuine/downloads/whyVali date.aspx

    Confidence and Peace of Mind
    Your software is authentic, properly licensed and supported by Microsoft or a trusted partner.


    Ongoing Improvements
    You will get access to updates, enhancements, and innovations that help you protect and do more with your PC.


    Capabilities You Expect
    Your system will deliver the features, options, and performance you need to maximize your productivity and enjoyment.


    Greatest PR/Marketing campaign ever. Don't you feel the Love?

    Enjoy,

    --
    It's just the normal noises in here.
  57. Re:MORON! by The+MAZZTer · · Score: 1

    Possibly because of your overzealous insulting.

  58. Re:MORON! by obeythefist · · Score: 4, Informative

    Why is this flamebait? The license terms and conditions for an MS OEM license specifically states you cannot transfer the license!

    When the grandparent violated the terms of his license and installed Windows on a machine that is not covered by his license agreement with Microsoft, that installation of Windows became effectively "pirated".

    I'm not saying that Microsofts OEM licensing scheme is a legitimate or morally correct form of business, but from a (IANAL) legal perspective, the guy violated his license agreement and then was completely astounded when WGA told him that he had violated his license agreement... (jokes about Microsoft software actually working well enough to do what it should aside...)

    --
    I am government man, come from the government. The government has sent me. -- G.I.R.
  59. Re:It's still a problem. RedSuMandrivuntu by davidsyes · · Score: 1

    Is that the version localized for:

    Vunavutu?
    Tuvalu?
    Fiji?
    Esperant Plus?

    Dammit man, we wanna KNOW!

    --
    Previously: "Linux... Toward the Sunrise..." Now: "Linux... Toward the-- No, now, part of Every Sunrise"
  60. Who needs updates anyway? by b0s0z0ku · · Score: 3, Informative
    Stick it behind a firewall. Put good antivirus software on there (which can be free like Avast or AVG Free). Scan for other spyware periodically. Use Firefox to surf sites whenever possible, and don't surf obviously sketchy sites. And don't run executables that you don't know about.

    I still have an unpatched Windows 2k SP3 box which has been running behind a firewall for the last 2 1/2 years. Still relatively fast and shows no evidence of malware infestation.

    I can see updates being necessary on Server 2003, which is often quite buggy and needs patches for stuff to work, but an XP or 2k box doesn't desperately need the updates if it's used in a reasonably sane manner.

    -b.

    1. Re:Who needs updates anyway? by Vorondil28 · · Score: 1

      So what you're saying is, "Don't bother to talk your girl into getting the Pill, and condoms are mostly worthless. But as long as you don't sleep with sleazy women and pull out before you blow your load and you'll be fine!"

      When something useful is available, for free... USE IT! You're a lazy dumbass who's going to deserve it when the law of averages bites him in the ass.

      --
      This sig rocks the casbah.
    2. Re:Who needs updates anyway? by psymastr · · Score: 1
      Stick it behind a firewall. Put good antivirus software on there (which can be free like Avast or AVG Free). Scan for other spyware periodically. Use Firefox to surf sites whenever possible, and don't surf obviously sketchy sites. And don't run executables that you don't know about.

      What an irresponsible and ignorant thing to say. Patches are not only sexurity fixes, an OS still has BUGS you know. Do you also leave your games unpatched?

      Also, the fact that your machine hasn't been compromised doesn't mean it isn't possible. My father has been smoking and driving without a seatbelt on for 40 years and he's still alive!

      --
      Improve at backgammon rapidly through addictive quickfire position quizzes: www.bgtrain.com
    3. Re:Who needs updates anyway? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I guess you missed the part where he said: "Stick it behind a firewall. Put good antivirus software on there (which can be free like Avast or AVG Free). Scan for other spyware periodically." So, it was more like saying: "Get your girl on the pill, use a condom, and don't sleep with sleazy women. That way, you don't need to rely on other people to take responsibility for your sex acts." It sounded like quite reasonable advice to me.

    4. Re:Who needs updates anyway? by b0s0z0ku · · Score: 1
      What an irresponsible and ignorant thing to say. Patches are not only sexurity fixes, an OS still has BUGS you know. Do you also leave your games unpatched?


      I'm aware of OS's having bugs. At the moment, the machine does its job just fine in its current state; no problems. So if there *are* bugs - who cares? - since they're not manifesting themselves and reducing the utility of the machine! Granted, I'd never treat a client's computer in such a cavalier fashion, but I'm not having problems with this one...


      -b.

  61. Answer by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    "exactly how much of Microsoft's software has worked 100% of the time?"

    Microsoft Bob, the purpose was to annoy my mouse-potato'd ass and it did, 110%!

  62. Re:predictably -mostly the honest are inconvenienc by b0s0z0ku · · Score: 5, Informative
    But I will be trying this again since I have several more machines sitting around -I guess I'd better write down the key# the next time they give me one over the phone again. Does anyone know if the activation #s they give over the phone are 1-time codes or if they will work multiple times?

    Once you have a working machine - activated and all - go to C:\windows\system32 and copy the files wpa.dbl and wpa.bak to secure off-computer location(s) like a USB key or even a floppy. When you need to reinstall XP due to HDD death or whatever, reinstall as normal with the key you used on the previous install (if you don't know the key, download Magical Jelly Bean Keyfinder, run it, and write down the key). After you install, boot into Safe Mode (hold down F8 at boot and select from the menu). Copy the old wpa... files back into your C:\windows\system32 directory.

    -b.

  63. Comment removed by account_deleted · · Score: 1

    Comment removed based on user account deletion

  64. Has anyone complaining tried the phone? by Kusand · · Score: 1

    I had an MSDNAA key through my computer science department. I installed it one too many times due to some hard drive failures, and the authentication system on the install blocked me. I called the number it said to. Half an hour later, I told someone in India I had not installed it on multiple machines and I was given a new key and was officially free and clear to use Windows XP at will. Make the effort to make a phone call if it happens to you and you probably won't have to panic going "they want me to buy four copies oh no!!"

    1. Re:Has anyone complaining tried the phone? by LocalH · · Score: 1

      That's not WGA, that's just standard activation.

      --
      FC Closer
  65. WGA failure by Merithiel · · Score: 1

    Actually, I bought a Dell recently. To my ineptitude and ignorance, I didn't realize that it was a special offer and couldn't choose XP Home, but only media center and Pro, of which Pro is like $100 more. So I end up doing a wipe and reinstall with a build 2600 version of Pro.

    Installed. Drivers done. Now, I want to get some PowerToys, particularly the desktopmanager and something else. I go to MS, try the WGA download tester thing. Fine. It labels me as having a pirated version. Big deal. I go into a computer running a legal version of it, get the WGA code thing. ^C^V. Done. I can download whatever in hell I want from the MS site.

    So the fact is, unlike mentioned in TFA, it's unnecessary to waste as much as 15 minutes googling for a new key and spending some time to patch it on. Just copy and paste the key from a legal or a patched-to-legal and you are done. I saved it for future use in case I need something else from M$'s site.

  66. The speed of Dark is.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

    the speed of light in reverse.

  67. Sonny Bono owns you by tepples · · Score: 1
    Since they've been out of business for over four years now, I'm pretty sure it's moot.

    Copyright is life plus 70.* Copyright infringement is also a crime in many developed countries, which can be prosecuted independently of the knowledge of any copyright owner. Developed countries' governments are most certainly not out of business.

    * Term of exclusive rights, not term of imprisonment (yet)

    1. Re:Sonny Bono owns you by Fordiman · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Copyright infringement is not a crime. It's a civil infraction you can be sued for, but it's not even a misdemeanor as far as the government is concerned. Copyright infringement is not 'prosecuted' by the government at all, though the person/company the copyright has fallen to after a company folds (someone always buys out the IP) has the right to sue for infringement.

      Seriously, man. Where do you get this shit? Been sucking at the teat of the RIAA for too long?

      --
      110100 1101000 1101000 1100110 0 1101111 1101000 1100011 1
    2. Re:Sonny Bono owns you by cduffy · · Score: 1
      Copyright is life plus 70.* Copyright infringement is also a crime in many developed countries, which can be prosecuted independently of the knowledge of any copyright owner.
      So what?

      Do you honestly expect that a prosecutor's office (all of which are constantly overworked) is going to spend time and resources to prosecute a crime in which the victim is a company which no longer exists? Prosecutors' offices typically have more -- and more pressing -- business to keep them busy, and if they wanted to make an example of someone by actually prosecuting a case of criminal copyright infringement, that example probably wouldn't be a lone individual collecting abandonware.
  68. Re:MORON! I AM an OEM by hguorbray · · Score: 1

    Umm,

    when I bought an OEM licensed version of Windows from Fry's I BECAME an OEM. both Microsoft and Frys allow this.

    I built the system myself -as I have done with every system I have ever owned except for laptops and my new media center PC. If I pop the HD that enabled me to buy the OEM software into another sytem I have built the license transfers.

    So morally (and legally) I regard myself as a HECK of a lot more legit than people using cracked or site versions of XP.

    -What's the speed of dark?

  69. Dear Pirates: by zerocool^ · · Score: 1


    Dear Pirates:

    http://windizupdate.com/

    Please send beer. Thank you.

    --
    sig?
  70. I am so going to try by Domstersch · · Score: 1

    wine ~/.wine/drive_c/windows/system32/WgaTray.exe

    --
    =w=
  71. So how long until we see ... by Ungrounded+Lightning · · Score: 2, Interesting

    So how long until we see, in the wild, a virus/worm/whatever with a birthday payload that makes WGA think the compromised machine is pirate.

    Or one that makes WGA think it's legit.

    Either could cause all sorts of havoc.

    I wonder if it's already happened?

    (Wouldn't it be interesting if it had happened to the author of TFA? B-) )

    --
    Bantam Dominique roosters crow a four-note song. Once you've heard it as "Happy BIRTHday" you can't NOT hear it that way
  72. don't you know ... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    that if M$ makes anything that doesn't suck, it would be a vaccuum cleaner.

  73. False Positive != False Negative by ThinkFr33ly · · Score: 1

    Give me a break. The fact that WGA missed a pirated copy of Windows is absolutely not evidence that it doesn't work as it should.

    The vast majority of WGA checks have to do with simply checking for known pirated keys. This particular key hadn't been picked up by Microsoft yet.

    WGA missing this pirated copy is not the same as it falsely accusing a users of pirating a copy that is legit. The former will probably happen often, the later is extremely rare.

  74. Bingo by Mycroft_VIII · · Score: 1

    Activation is about controll for profit's sake, not stopping illeagle copies.
    ALL schemes that require the goodwill of the vendor for you use the software
    will eventually result in "sorry we no longer support that product, you'll need to
    buy a newer version". I suppose it's possible for company to be just that paranoid
    and stupid, but that doesn't guarantee they won't go bankrupt or get bought out or
    get greedy later.

    Mycroft

    --
    https://signup.leagueoflegends.com/?ref=4c3ed6600b6ea
  75. A simple bug by real+gumby · · Score: 3, Funny

    They just forgot a "!" in the checking code!

    A 10MB mandatory patch should clear that one right up.

  76. So WGA errs on the side of the user? by I'm+Don+Giovanni · · Score: 1

    Seems that WGA errs on the side of the user, resulting in false negatives, which is good. This doesn't prove that there are tons of false positives, quite the contrary.

    --
    -- "I never gave these stories much credence." - HAL 9000
  77. Re:predictably -mostly the honest are inconvenienc by toddestan · · Score: 1

    If you are so sick of activating Windows XP, why not use a WPA crack (Windows product activation crack)

    That's risky. First of all, the hack itself could be a trojan or other malware. Even if it's not malicious and from a trusted source, it's still a hack that could very well break Windows. And even if you get it successfully installed, Microsoft could easily "accidently" break your system with some update. At the very least it's certain that they will likely break the hack, which means you have to hunt down another crack.

    I find it easier just to not run IE, not run Outlook Express, and run a software and hardware firewalls, and just stay behind the curve when it comes to Windows updates so I don't have to deal with WGA.

  78. Re:predictably -mostly the honest are inconvenienc by Josuah · · Score: 1

    So basically you lost something and now you're grumbling about having to go through hoops to get a replacement for free. It's your fault you lost something, not Microsoft's, or the key scheme itself. If you lose the remote to a television that doesn't have all the functionality on the face of the TV, you need to buy another remote. If you lose the key to your house, you need to pay a locksmith to make you a new key.

    Maybe the hoops were a little annoying, and so you can blame Microsoft for making it so difficult, but I don't think that has anything to do with this key scheme. Some companies handle things like this better. Some companies worse.

  79. My WGA Issue by robbak · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Here is my WGA story.

    A client's laptop started complaining. I checked its key, and it did not match the key on the sticker. So I attempted to change the key. No go with MS's vba script. No go with the activation wizard (which is another suggested way to change it) - it stated that the key was invalid. Further 'hacking' with the activation wizard (No, I don't know what I did, but there was a maximum of three buttons I could have clicked, and one of them was 'cancel!') got me a key I could use on the phone, and, after telling a bored Indian the story ("Have you installed this software on any other machine?" - I swear that quoting a snatch of Alice in Wonderland would have succeded!) he coughed up the activation code. WGA no more, but my it's a drag!

    If I charged them full price, It may well have been more than a new licence. Even so, it probably would have taken just as long to get it to accept the freshly bought key.

    --
    Prediction for end of Universe #42: Fencepost error in Quantum_bogosort.cpp
    1. Re:My WGA Issue by Dtw33k · · Score: 1

      reminds me of the day my boss was out and I had a 'rush' job come through. HP laptop format&reload (shuts em up quick) get the version and off we go.

      Enter license key: [license on official HP sticker]
      Invalid Key

      same problem with a couple dells... have to use their special spyware disks or recovery partitions (even if HD crashes) or no go

  80. In other news... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    ...the original owner of the windows key which was pirated by Ed Bott, was killed when he was struck by a chair.

    Sources tell us that a monkey boy was scene in the vicinty chanting "developers...developers"

  81. Re:MORON! by khallow · · Score: 2, Informative

    Why is this flamebait?

    Probably due to the excessive and inappropriate use of the term "moron". Also, saying "you can't do that" without saying why is pretty unhelpful. I think the modding is appropriate.
  82. But is it really that much? by StuffedFrogYK · · Score: 1

    Are there really 60 million people using hacked versions of Windows XP, or any other Windows OS's? Because if so, doesn't Windows see that threatening them with WGA-like threats,and, BTW, not denying that they may have a kill switch for the hacked Windows versions, will get these users over to Linux or Macs in no time, especially if they don't want to shell out the monies for the real stuff?

  83. False positives waste hours of my work day. by j741 · · Score: 3, Interesting

    I service computers for a living. I've done so for more than 10 years. Over the past few years, I've observed a vast increase in unrecoverable hard drive failure rates, and an even larger increase of malware which negatively affects the system beyond reasonable repair. In these situations it is often much faster (and cheaper for the client) for me to re-install the customer's Windows. I'd guess that more than 80% of these re-installs involve an OEM release of Windows, where the product license key is on a sticker physically and permanently attached to the computer's case. One which is quite obviously either a legitimate license or an extremely well made (and unlikely) counterfit. Now, about half of all re-installs (which require product re-activation) fail the product activaiton (even before I can install the WGA spyware). This requires a phone call to Microsoft's product activation line. Here, if someone asks me a question or the other phone line rings or I hickup, Microsoft's non-human system will often make me start all over again repeating a boring string of numbers. After this, I get informed that the product key can not be validated (Which is the reason I called in the first place) and put on hold again until I finally get a human (if not English) voice. Then I'm asked to repeat the first part of the boring string of numbers before I'm questioned like a murder suspect about why I want to activate Windows. After all this, I am usually provided the clearance code to activate Windows. Total time for this process per client computer is approximately 20 minutes. Repeat 4 or 5 times each day, 5 days a week and Microsoft has managed to waste a very large quantity of my billable time. However, after jumping through these hoops, WGA did not bother these clients (yet).

    --
    - James
    1. Re:False positives waste hours of my work day. by mpe · · Score: 1

      This requires a phone call to Microsoft's product activation line. Here, if someone asks me a question or the other phone line rings or I hickup, Microsoft's non-human system will often make me start all over again repeating a boring string of numbers. After this, I get informed that the product key can not be validated (Which is the reason I called in the first place) and put on hold again until I finally get a human (if not English) voice. Then I'm asked to repeat the first part of the boring string of numbers before I'm questioned like a murder suspect about why I want to activate Windows. After all this, I am usually provided the clearance code to activate Windows. Total time for this process per client computer is approximately 20 minutes.

      That's 20 minutes when you can't do much else. Whereas if you are fixing machines in an repair shop environment you may well be able to work on several at once.

    2. Re:False positives waste hours of my work day. by Bunyip+Redgum · · Score: 1

      Why don't you include the cost of re-validating as a separate line item on the bill?

    3. Re:False positives waste hours of my work day. by swb · · Score: 1

      He should charge for it, and why bother making it a seperate line item on the bill? When I've worked consulting, my time is billed by the hour, and validation calls are just part of the process, if necessary, and particularly so if the root cause is the software supplied by the client or *missing*/lost by the client. It's not like your mechanic fixes car problems for free because GM's transmission design sucked or you didn't change the oil.

      I did have one employer who took the attitude that we should just use "whatever XP installer we had" (MSDN, Action Pack, VLK) for systems with XP license stickers on it, with the idea that it wouldn't matter which license key was used for the install, as long as the client had some proof they were licensed for XP. It's a compelling argument, but I suspect that MS licensing officials would violently disagree and point to legalese in tear/click-through license agreements.

    4. Re:False positives waste hours of my work day. by swb · · Score: 1

      I agree that re-installing is almost always a better bet for clients vs. hours of wasted troubleshooting time, but the biggest problem for me isn't WGA problems but clients that completely lack install media.

      I worked for a place that had an unofficial policy encouraging using "other" copies of software if the client had some proof that he was licensed for software -- usually this meant OEM OS stickers on the machine. It's a reasonable argument, but I don't think MS would accept it.

    5. Re:False positives waste hours of my work day. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Just a note, you can dial the numbers on your phone rather than say them. I've had to go through the same rigamarole myself many times and it shaves some time off the whole thing if you do it that way.

  84. Variant on WGA problems by GregWebb · · Score: 3, Interesting

    Hi all

    Had a problem last week that I'd never seen before...

    I had to reinstall XP Pro at home, so duly provided my license key during installation. Much to my displeasure, I was then required to go through the whole WGA problem to get some critical security updates.

    It flagged my license as a dud, and put my code on screen for me to see and sort out.

    Except that it didn't put in my code - the one I'd set when I installed Windows - but a completely different code...

    --

    Greg

    (Inside a nuclear plant)
    Aaaarrrggh! Run! The canary has mutated!

  85. FCK GW indeed! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Didn't know yet that MS license keys contain political statements :-)
    Maybe this key was intended for the French market.

  86. So am I by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I am using, at home, a pirated copy of windows XP Pro...lifted from a company that I no longer work for...Huge organisation with corporate versions...Works flawlessly...I am, however, planning of buying Vista unless the cost is too high (as is the case for XP), at which point I will wait until I can get another corp version.

    Posting anon

  87. Re:MORON! by vadim_t · · Score: 1

    Question: What is the computer, and what exactly is transferring?

    Is it transferring if you move the hard drive to another box? What if the board dies and you replace all the hardware around the disk? What if only the motherboard dies and you replace it (same or different model)? What if the disk does and you restore an image to the new one?

    What I called "my desktop computer" went gradually from a Duron 850 to a dual Athlon MP 2000+, with gradual replacement of motherboard, video card, sound card, addition of a disk, and SCSI card. Yet through the whole process I kept the same Linux install (Windows didn't survive the motherboard swap), and it was in my eyes the same computer, just a bit better. I never got to the point of having two desktops, just a box that was getting upgraded and a box of spare parts that was growing larger.

  88. Re:The bigger licensing issue is of course ACADEMI by Mister+Transistor · · Score: 1

    That red sticker wouldn't be in the shape of a large letter "A", would it?

    You'd just hear all the hoots from your PDA and Laptop, whispering behind it's back, "How Cheap, for Shame!"

    Sorry, I couldn't resist. Props to all the Hawthorne fans...

    --
    -- You are in a maze of little, twisty passages, all different... --
  89. Criminal copyright infringement (17 USC 506) by tepples · · Score: 1
    Copyright infringement is not a crime. It's a civil infraction you can be sued for

    Most of the time copyright infringement is a civil matter. However, in some cases it's a criminal offense: see 17 USC 506 and foreign counterparts.

    1. Re:Criminal copyright infringement (17 USC 506) by Fordiman · · Score: 1

      "(a) Criminal Infringement. - Any person who infringes a copyright willfully either -

      (1) for purposes of commercial advantage or private financial gain, or

      (2) by the reproduction or distribution, including by electronic means, during any 180-day period, of 1 or more copies or phonorecords of 1 or more copyrighted works, which have a total retail value of more than $1,000,

      shall be punished as provided under section 2319 of title 18, United States Code. For purposes of this subsection, evidence of reproduction or distribution of a copyrighted work, by itself, shall not be sufficient to establish willful infringement."

      Very nice. You're right; in the even I'm trying to sell infringing copies as real, the gov't will slam down on me. There's a good reason I don't bootleg.

      Meanwhile, even though (2) seems like it's supposed to cover prepping for sale of bootlegs (making hundreds of copies in 6 months? What is being done with these copies?) and filesharing, the last sentence pretty much sums up this clause as difficult-to-enforce on filesharers.

      Still, gotta give you that, in cases where the infringer is essentially committing fraud (selling copies as the Real Thing(tm)), yes he can be prosecuted.

      That's not to say your everyday infringer (with several thousand tracks) is in danger of being arrested (subpoenaed, yes), but it's likely that the maker of the game in question might.

      Still, I think probably that the copyright holder (whoever it's been sold to) needs to file a complaint before any of this can happen. IE: there is no crime if there is no victim, and you can't even claim society on this one.

      --
      110100 1101000 1101000 1100110 0 1101111 1101000 1100011 1
  90. You have no clue by Alphager · · Score: 1

    A MSDN-subscription is a subscription to the MSDN-online service hosted at MICROSOFT.COM . there are no "cracked" MSDN-subscriptions.

    1. Re:You have no clue by fishbowl · · Score: 1

      > A MSDN-subscription is a subscription to the MSDN-online service hosted at MICROSOFT.COM . there are no "cracked"
      > MSDN-subscriptions.

      Apparently, people used keygens to get activations before they were ever sold. So in that sense, there certainly are "cracked" subscriptions, and the impression I get is that when a customer hits one, the customer loses, and the person with the clandestinely-generated code keeps using it.

      --
      -fb Everything not expressly forbidden is now mandatory.
  91. Activation Problems by embracethenerdwithin · · Score: 1

    I recently bought a laptop from dell that came with Windows Home. I gave that disc to my sister and bought pro with my student discount and actually got both versions for less then dell charges for Pro.

    I wiped the drive, set up a dual boot(ubuntu) and installed pro a few minutes after opening the box. When I booted up it asked me to activate, so I setup my internet connection and tried to activate online. It wouldn't let me, it kept saying my internet wasn't configured and presented a web link for help. I clicked the link and it worked just fine.

    When I got to the site it said my copy was probably not genuine and I should take action to fix this by buying a legit copy. I bought my copy in a box off microsoft(through the college). I tried everyday for 29 days to get it to activate and everyday the same thing happend. Finally I did the phone activation which worked fine.

    This made me wonder how many people would beleive there copy was not legit and buy a new one from MS. It also made me wonder why it would direct me to a website to resolve the issue AFTER telling me my internet connection was not valid.

    I knew my copy was legit, but how many people have been duped into buying another copy this way? It assumed activation failed because it wasn't genuine, not because my internet connection failed. It just all seemed very odd...

  92. WHAT?! by shaneh0 · · Score: 1

    How did you get my CD Key?

    You... killed my son... you.... pirate bastard.

  93. I'm not trying to get caught by Time+Ed · · Score: 1

    Or maybe I am. I couldn't care less.

    I downloaded a copy of XP Pro SP1 from somewhere (can't remember the site) nearly four years ago. The license.txt file that came with the .iso has over 100 keys in it. I picked one. Lately I've let WGA install and do its thing and never had a problem.

    These days I have the same XP load running under VMWare on my Fedora box. If WGA ever shuts it down, I'll just delete the image and go on with life. I wish it was that easy for everyone....

  94. Phillies or Yankees? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I know for a fact that all the windows machines at my job are installed with the same keys for its software

    Abreu? Bobby Abreu? Was that at your job before the trade or after? I always figured the Phils was a Windows shop.

  95. OP is a tool. WGA does work by js3 · · Score: 1

    A couple of years ago (when I was a bum and had no money) I had one of these VLK thingies installed. Fast forward to 2-3 years later, good job, new car, laptop (with geniune windows) and all that jazz, my old installation still exists on one of my computers. I can download updates but fail the wga authentication, from what I've seen it works like it should.

    yea yea I should probably go buy a real windows xp but I already have a real one on my laptop and vista is around the corner so I'll just wait for that. The OPs logic is a bit weird tho. Just because your key hasn't been banned does not mean WGA does not work.

    --
    did you forget to take your meds?
  96. WGA a critical update, my donkey by Rowe+Shamboe · · Score: 1

    I have initially not WGAed my home computer, my girlfriends computer, and my work computer just because the Big Brother concept pisses me off. All those machine have legit licenses and my work has a MSDN license for me ontop of those licenses. This has prompted me, a long time Visual Studio supporter (sadly even in the MFC days), to start dual booting my machines with linux and practicing C++ development with cross-platform IDEs. I fear the day when my OS is owned and leased to me from Microsoft as my content provider. We do not need another cable company.

  97. Please, don't! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    That'd possibly make some peaple read and, as you know, reading is dangerous.

    Especially reading software-manuals endangers valuable tech-support.

  98. erm... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    am i the only one that just unchecks the box that says 'Windows Genuine Advantage Tool' under Windows Update? just click that, tell it not to bother you about that update, and continue to recieve every update released without problems =]

  99. Re:MORON! by arkhan_jg · · Score: 1

    What licence? They sold me the software via a reseller, with no requirement to read, agree, or sign anything from microsoft prior to the purchase.

    Once the product is delivered, there are nice pretty stickers saying I have to agree to a licence before I use the product. But what licence? It's my box, my CD, and my copy of Windows. First Sale doctrine says that once they've sold me a copy of a copyrighted work, that copy is mine and they cannot use copyright law to apply any further terms to my use of said copy POST SALE. That sticker is now my sticker, my receipt says so, so they can stuff their OEM terms wherever they like.

    You could argue that I need to agree to the licence in order to use windows update and activation, (i.e. an ongoing relationship), but I don't recall any notice to that effect when you activate. Nor should an artificial technical restriction to get round first sale doctrine stand up well in court.

    --
    Remember kids, it's all fun and games until someone commits wholesale galactic genocide.
  100. dongle cracking by Agent0013 · · Score: 1

    Actually cracking a dongle probably isn't any harder than cracking a regular serial key or cd check system. I have used, err not me, I don't pirate, my friend, yeah that's right a friend of mine has used a pirated copy of software in which there was a crack to suppress the dongle checking code in the program. If the code that checks the dongle is skipped, or given the correct response, then the program can work. Of course more complicated dongles might actually decrypt part of the program before it can be run, but even those can probaby be cracked in only software and no physical dongle copy need be made.

    --

    -- ssoorrrryy,, dduupplleexx sswwiittcchh oonn.. -Quote found on actual fortune cookie.
  101. The statutory definition of "financial gain" by tepples · · Score: 1
    Meanwhile, even though [17 USC 506](2) seems like it's supposed to cover prepping for sale of bootlegs (making hundreds of copies in 6 months? What is being done with these copies?) and filesharing

    At least in the United States, (1) covers file trading through the 17 USC 101 definition of "financial gain":

    The term "financial gain" includes receipt, or expectation of receipt, of anything of value, including the receipt of other copyrighted works.
    1. Re:The statutory definition of "financial gain" by Fordiman · · Score: 1

      Still, the 'evidence of copies/distribution clause is not evidence of criminal infraction' bit is enough to relegate filesharing to the realm of civil law.

      I'm pretty sure evidence of actual monied transactions are what are required for it to become a criminal issue.

      --
      110100 1101000 1101000 1100110 0 1101111 1101000 1100011 1
    2. Re:The statutory definition of "financial gain" by cduffy · · Score: 1

      That's what used to be the case. The explicit definition of receipt of other copyrighted works as value received was a modification made to permit criminal copyright law to apply against online piracy groups. (This was before P2P file sharing hit it big, but it wouldn't take much to convince a judge that applicability to that as well is within both letter and intent of the law).

      The reason filesharing is mostly a civil matter isn't that criminal laws don't apply, but because public prosecutors have better things to do with their time.

  102. Software prices by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Some people like to justify their pirating using inflated software costs.

    XP Home OEM (good enough for home use for most people, really - that's if it didn't already come bundled on their PC) - 96$ CAD at ncix.com last I checked.

    As for Photoshop, I've legally purchased CS2 for home use. Too expensive they all say... 150$ right from amazon.com (an upgrade version, from any version, like the v5 LE that came bundled with a cheap digicam, or version 2.5 on floppies for 99 cents off ebay or something...) I use it extensively, and I have no problems paying for it. Might have been cheaper than 150$ if I even bothered looking at other places. Alternately, my dad bought photoshop elements (for ~half of what I paid), which is almost as good, and more user friendly to boot. Oh, and I'd had similar apps (MS digital imaging suite - latest version) bundled for free with a keyboard/mouse combo (haven't bothered even opening it though, as I really wanted PS, but it would be good enough for most people too). And lots of people like Paint Shop Pro better, which is only ~100$ CAD (for latest version - "X") IIRC. Older/2nd versions (which are still suffucient for most people) or even upgrades are even cheaper. Yet people will whine the usual "I can't afford the 1000000000000000000000000$ photoshop costs!!!1!1!one!!!1" - total B.S.

    Never used final cut pro though... No idea what it does or if there are any cheaper mostly equivalent apps or such.

    Of course, not all software is cheap (I can't afford Win2003, even if I need it), but most of the time it's just a pretext people use to pirate stuff and feel good about it. I pirate what one can't afford (if there are no decent alternatives - not many cases), and buy what's decently priced to support the people who make it.

  103. Re:MORON! what if the drive dies? by hguorbray · · Score: 1

    The OEM license rights you are speaking of are those of the OEM customer which limits that customer from taking their Gateway PC license and putting it on a homebuilt machine or giving the disc to a friend to install on their old Dell.

    I don't want to get too philisophical, but what constitutes a machine from an OEM manaufacturer (my) standpoint?

    I bought my OEM license with a HD and built a system with that HD. What happens when that drive dies? DO I not have the right to put a new hardrive in that system and reload windows?

    Likewise, if that motherboard goes can I not put the hard drive into another system?

    I believe that there is more right of transferability as an OEM than as an OEM customer from machine to machine -but not from customer to customer.

    As far as I am concerned, when I have bought an OEM license as an OEM that license is good for one machine -old or new. Otherwise I would be buying a new license every time I decommissioned a machine -and I don't think I am going to get very good terms on a site license ;-)

    -What's the speed of dark?

  104. does it really matter? by Erlking · · Score: 1

    I've been using a bad copy of Windows xp for years now. Sure they dont allow you to go to windowsupdate and download patches, but automatic update still works fine. So the moral of the story is that it doesnt matter, the threatened punishment is completely hollow.

  105. Old axiom, new threshhold by HTH+NE1 · · Score: 1

    They claim that all but "a fraction of a percent" of those 60 million people who've been denied access to Microsoft updates and downloads are guilty, guilty, guilty.

    A fraction of a percent (i.e. < 1%) of 60 million are legitimate? That would be anything under 600,000 people.

    So, better that a thousand pirated copies run free than six hundred thousand legitimate copies be denied a security update?

    --
    Oh, say does that Star-Spangled Banner entwine / The myrtle of Venus with Bacchus's vine?
  106. Don't know about RedSuMandrivuntu, but... by Jesus_666 · · Score: 1

    Gentoo users can soon share the Windows users' feeling of, well, whatever Windows Genuine Advantage provides. Just enter USE="-working" emerge genuineadvantage and watch in marvel as ninety percent of all ebuilds become hard-masked. Gentoo Genuine Advantage, coming soon to an overlay near you.

    (Note: The Microntoo Corporation does not advise usage of the "cracked" USE flag. If you install the pre-cracked version of GGA the terrorists have already won.)

    --
    USE HOT GRITS WITH STATUE OF NATALIE PORTMAN (NAKED AND PETRIFIED)
  107. Re:predictably -mostly the honest are inconvenienc by iaredam · · Score: 0

    In order to download the MBSA, you need to be authenticated by WGA

  108. Re:MORON! by GigsVT · · Score: 1

    Depends. If you are in a UCITA state you have the pleasure of having terms of a sale applied retroactively to items you bought. Of course, only two states passed the UCITA, Virginia and one other.

    --
    I've had enough abrasive sigs. Kittens are cute and fuzzy.