Slashdot Mirror


How To Make Your Friends Call You More

B0bReader writes, "Simply sign up to something called jajah (a VOIP service that connects real telephones) using your friend's number (mobiles included), then log in and dial your own number. Your friend's phone will ring and after they hear a brief 'Jajah is connecting your call' they will be calling you and incur all charges. As an added bonus you will quite probably receive your friend's latest voice-mail message as your own (at least on Irish networks), which you may or may not wish to hear. There is even a Jajah Firefox extension — which at the time of writing is the Firefox featured add-on — so you can do it right from your browser. This is about the best example of a bad idea, with terrible implementation, that I have seen all day. And with the wonderful publicity the Firefox page offers it should reach a wide audience in no time."

233 comments

  1. Drinkdrink by eldavojohn · · Score: 5, Funny

    The makers of Jajah are hoping that it is as popular as Drinkdrink. Drinkdrink worked where you simply signed up using your friend's credit card number, then logged in and ordered booze. Your friend would receive the bill and then they would hear a brief 'Your friend is drinking your alcohol.' They would usually be calling you and rushing to find you. As an added bonus you could quite probably receive a specialized form of your friend's affection (at least in Irish cities), which you may or may not wish to experience.

    Irish police are still investigating any correlation between the popularity of Drinkdrink and a sudden spike in Irish homicides where in most cases the victim new their assailant prior to the fatal encounter. Similar incidents are on the rise--possibly due to Jajah.

    Seriously, if I tried this on one of my friends, not even a surgeon would be able to locate my cell phone.

    --
    My work here is dung.
    1. Re:Drinkdrink by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      best first post yet

    2. Re:Drinkdrink by Saint+Stephen · · Score: 0, Offtopic

      I guess I'll get a +5 Funny for this:

      Jajah Binks.

    3. Re:Drinkdrink by dotdevin · · Score: 1

      ..."Mulrooney walked into the bar and ordered up a round. He left his drink to telephone, and Clancy drank it down. Mulrooney said "Who drunk me drink? I'll lay him in his tomb!" Before you could pat the top of your hat, Clancy lowered the boom!"... From Clancy Lowered The Boom, Author unknown at least to me.

    4. Re:Drinkdrink by __aaclcg7560 · · Score: 1

      What a waste in technology and resources. My friends call me on my cell phone. My enemies call me on my home phone which I don't answer since I used the land line for DSL only. A nice and simple solution. Although trying to get my friends and enemies to buy me booze is more difficult.

    5. Re:Drinkdrink by Morphine007 · · Score: 1

      +5, Funny ... -1, Offtopic... it's all the same right? lol

    6. Re:Drinkdrink by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      +5 Funny = off-topic shit that moderators decided to reward.

      -1 Offtopic = off-topic shit that moderators decided not to reward.

      most of the shit modded as "AH HAHAHA FUNNY SO SO INSANELY HILARIOUS!!!!!1111oneoneone" really isn't that fucking funny. It's a bunch of repetitive bullshit that keeps getting posted and keeps getting rewarded. Huh huh huh, I'd love to see a Beowulf cluster of those!

    7. Re:Drinkdrink by Morphine007 · · Score: 1

      good that you're not bitter or anything...

    8. Re:Drinkdrink by dwater · · Score: 1

      ...or lager or stout :)

      --
      Max.
    9. Re:Drinkdrink by Control+Group · · Score: 1

      You're posting AC? And here I was going to mod this funny...

      --

      Reality has a conservative bias: it conserves mass, energy, momentum...
    10. Re:Drinkdrink by mikiN · · Score: 1

      ...As an added bonus you could quite probably receive a specialized form of your friend's affection (at least in Irish cities), which you may or may not wish to experience.

      In a certain city in England that might very well be a Liverpool kiss...

      --
      The Hacker's Guide To The Kernel: Don't panic()!
    11. Re:Drinkdrink by Morphine007 · · Score: 1

      oh noes.... where's Statler & Waldorf when you need them...

    12. Re:Drinkdrink by orasio · · Score: 1

      Moderation is a mixture of a reward for the poster, and helping other readers to find the good stuff.
      That's why comments that are moderated up are more visible, plus the poster gets karma.

      When we are dealing with funny, that balance is broken, because the poster doesn't get a karma reward.
      A +5 Funny is not as much of a reward as a -1 Offtopic, or -1 Overrated is a punishment, because the last two affect your karma, and funny doesn't.
      When you see "Funny" moderations, it's mostly stuff that people want to make relevant to other readers, more than a reward for the posters.
      Of course, you don't have the same sense of humor they have, but you can always configure Funny posts not to be relevant in your user configuration, once you decide to log in.

    13. Re:Drinkdrink by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      ...more often referred to in England as a "Glasgow kiss" (whether fairly or unfairly I can't say - I've never been to Glasgow).

    14. Re:Drinkdrink by walt-sjc · · Score: 1

      You have enemies? What the hell did you do to have enemies? I used to get a lot of annoying calls from telemarketers and such (before I installed Asterisk which can block them,) but I don't have "enemies".

    15. Re:Drinkdrink by __aaclcg7560 · · Score: 1

      Read my Slashdot F.A.Q. and be afraid!

    16. Re:Drinkdrink by uchian · · Score: 2, Insightful

      The story is eroneous, the call charges are incurred to the jahjah account, neither phone get's charged, so unless you can get access to your friends jahjah account (on par with getting their email password and using it to spam their friend's inboxes) it's not going to cost them anything.

      In fact, all that the story is talking about is a rather weird way of calling your friends. If you want to jump through so many hoops in order to say hi to people, you probably deserve to be lonely, just call them ffs!!!

    17. Re:Drinkdrink by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Shut up, you walking skeleton.

    18. Re:Drinkdrink by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      haha thats funny! my home line is the same. no one is suppose to call it so when they do I know its some asshole, marketing ass, enemy or someone I don't want to talk to.

      funny ..

  2. Hey, this is Slashdot by $RANDOMLUSER · · Score: 5, Funny

    Instead of "How To Make Your Friends Call You More", we need "How To Make Friends".

    --
    No folly is more costly than the folly of intolerant idealism. - Winston Churchill
    1. Re:Hey, this is Slashdot by c_forq · · Score: 3, Funny

      When I first read this I thought it was a joke, but maybe this is what you are looking for:
      http://www.wikihow.com/Make-Friends

      --
      Computers allow humans to make mistakes at the fastest speeds known, with the possible exception of tequila and handguns
    2. Re:Hey, this is Slashdot by RonnyJ · · Score: 2, Insightful

      I love how this is currently modded overall as 'Insightful', rather than 'Funny'.

    3. Re:Hey, this is Slashdot by $RANDOMLUSER · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Trust me, it was meant to be "Funny", but "EmbeddedJanitor"'s response was much funnier.

      --
      No folly is more costly than the folly of intolerant idealism. - Winston Churchill
    4. Re:Hey, this is Slashdot by Digitus1337 · · Score: 1

      I find your ideas interesting, and would like to subscribe to your newsletter.

    5. Re:Hey, this is Slashdot by Iron+Condor · · Score: 3, Funny

      What are those "friends" you speak of?

      --
      We're all born with nothing.
      If you die in debt, you're ahead.
    6. Re:Hey, this is Slashdot by The+One+and+Only · · Score: 4, Funny

      Oh, that's easy. In your class declaration you just put:

      friend foo (bar)

      where "foo" is a function that's outside of the class in question. Of course, the friend can't call you, because it's a friend of the class, not any of its methods.

      --
      In Repressive Burma, it's not just your connection that dies. slashdot.org/comments.pl?sid=314547&cid=20819199
    7. Re:Hey, this is Slashdot by MorePower · · Score: 2, Funny
      What great advice:
      Step 1: Decide what kind of friends you want and make a plan to make these types of friends....

      So to make friends, my first step is to figure out a plan for how to make friend. Gee thanks, if I knew how to do that I would already be able to make friends on my own.

      Next WikiHow: How to get rich
      Step 1: Decide how much money you want to have and make a plan for how to get it....

    8. Re:Hey, this is Slashdot by Control+Group · · Score: 2, Informative

      This is only rated 2?

      Come on, people - someone give this guy points. It was the perfect response!

      --

      Reality has a conservative bias: it conserves mass, energy, momentum...
    9. Re:Hey, this is Slashdot by pseudorand · · Score: 1

      I think there's a bug in the slashdot moderation system. Parent was mod'd +4 funny. It should have been +4 infomative.

    10. Re:Hey, this is Slashdot by generic · · Score: 1

      These look like the directives to a robot. How about be yourself and if you have no friends maybe your an asshole.

      --
      Microsoft aggravates my tourettes syndrome.
    11. Re:Hey, this is Slashdot by Jesus_666 · · Score: 1

      People with a green orb next to their user name, as opposed to Foes (red orb), Fans (blue orb) or Freaks (orange orb).

      --
      USE HOT GRITS WITH STATUE OF NATALIE PORTMAN (NAKED AND PETRIFIED)
  3. Stupidity must be contagious ... by DavidRawling · · Score: 0

    Oh. My. God.

    How retarded is this idea? Now all the telemarketers can call you on your dime (or is it a quarter nowadays - being from the Antipodes I have no idea what an American phone call costs).

    How does someone come up with such idiocy? Did they lock the people in a room after removing and pickling their brains, and tell them not to come out until they could prove that people are dumber than slugs?

    1. Re:Stupidity must be contagious ... by majoritywhip · · Score: 3, Funny

      I can't remember who said it: If you took the 10 smartest people in the world, put them in a room and asked them to invent the dumbest thing in the world, they would never invent anything as dumb as astrology" (or something like that). But they might come up with something this dumb

    2. Re:Stupidity must be contagious ... by stunt_penguin · · Score: 5, Informative

      RTFA and try and grasp the concept better than the idiot who posted this article; the only service that gets charged here is your own JaJa account - the site phones your landline and your friend's landline using VoIP credit in YOUR account (a lot like skypeout), and your landlines get connected together.

      This is a good service, and not worthy of an amateurish slashdot post like this.

      --
      When the posters fear their moderators, there is tyranny; when the moderators fears the posters, there is liberty.
    3. Re:Stupidity must be contagious ... by nuzak · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Do you know what slashdot is? It's a feed of nouns. Stories are posted, and when one looks like it could be about something interesting, you plug the nouns into google, and get something much more like the truth. The adjectives and verbs are extra, and occasionally related.

      It's doesn't quite have quite the volume of a noun-feed like digg, though it does have a few more top-level categories.

      --
      Done with slashdot, done with nerds, getting a life.
    4. Re:Stupidity must be contagious ... by LordNightwalker · · Score: 5, Interesting

      Mod parent up; the moron who submitted the article totally failed to grasp the so-called "article" he links to. Submitter should have done his homework before he posted this crap on slashdot; this ain't even a subtle mistake anymore, and I'd hardly call the concept difficult to understand. It might help if he actually read the stuff he links to instead of trying to be the first to post it...

      --
      Install windows on my workstation? You crazy? Got any idea how much I paid for the damn thing?
    5. Re:Stupidity must be contagious ... by rayde · · Score: 1

      i'm glad somebody else at least LOOKED at the jajah website (unlike the submitter, apparently). i don't see what the big negative fuss is about..

    6. Re:Stupidity must be contagious ... by Gordonjcp · · Score: 1

      How can phoning them cost them money? Unless they accept a reverse-charge call, it doesn't work.

    7. Re:Stupidity must be contagious ... by B0bReader · · Score: 1

      Have you tried it? You don't need voip credit, you just need phone numbers, the person you created the account on behalf of gets charged to their mobile phone bill. Why are you so angry stunt penguin?

    8. Re:Stupidity must be contagious ... by B0bReader · · Score: 1
      Somehow this company has been given god-like access to telephony systems worldwide - you don't get a choice.

      Whether you answer or not, whether your phone is on or not, you, or your personal voice-mail for the recipient to hear, will be connected to the recipient if your phone number has been entered as the originating number.

    9. Re:Stupidity must be contagious ... by devilspgd · · Score: 1

      You appear to be dumber then most -- I've been a Jajah user since well before the /. retards heard of it.

      First off, you do need "VoIP credit" -- Accounts start out with $3.75 though, so you can sign up and start using it.

      Second, neither the dialing nor receiving party is billed at all, other then regular air time for receiving a call (if applicable) -- So that's no different for your "victim" then if you just dialed them directly.

      So why do I use Jajah? I have unlimited incoming calls on my cell, so it means I pay $0.025/minute to Jajah instead of using my rather limited outbound cell minutes during peak hours.

      --
      Give a man a fish, he'll eat for a day, but teach a man to phish...
    10. Re:Stupidity must be contagious ... by devilspgd · · Score: 1

      God damn some people are stupid.

      All Jajah does is dials two numbers at once and conferences the calls. Nothing more, nothing less. No god-like access, no magical billing, nothing else.

      --
      Give a man a fish, he'll eat for a day, but teach a man to phish...
    11. Re:Stupidity must be contagious ... by B0bReader · · Score: 1
      You don't see what is wrong with being able to make it appear as if a person has rung another person?

      Nor the fact that for whatever reason on at least some networks you will get no-password access to anyones personal voicemail (I mean to the messsages that were left on that persons voicemail by other people, and be able to configure their voicemail settings, including changing their message, I don't mean just to be able to leave them a message)?

      So there's nothing wrong with being able to do these things?

      It is not stupid to think that these things are outrageous

  4. correct headline? by macadamia_harold · · Score: 0

    Your friend's phone will ring and after they hear a brief 'Jajah is connecting your call' they will be calling you and incur all charges.

    I'm thinking that's a good way to get your friends to call you less, not more.

  5. I can prevent this happening to me by Nasajin · · Score: 3, Funny

    I'll just get rid of all my friends.

    1. Re:I can prevent this happening to me by mangledspine · · Score: 1, Funny

      You must be new here.

    2. Re:I can prevent this happening to me by jtobin · · Score: 1

      You're on /. so that shouldn't be a problem.

      *ducks*

    3. Re:I can prevent this happening to me by danpsmith · · Score: 1

      I thought this might happen in advance, so I just didn't make any.

      --
      Judges and senates have been bought for gold; Esteem and love were never to be sold.
    4. Re:I can prevent this happening to me by MoOsEb0y · · Score: 1

      Your UID is higher than his. Mine on the other hand, is much lower :)

    5. Re:I can prevent this happening to me by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Your UID is higher than his. Mine on the other hand, is much lower :)

      Umm...
      Nasajin (967925)
      mangledspine (172332)

      967925 > 172332

    6. Re:I can prevent this happening to me by chis101 · · Score: 1

      When you have a 4-digit UID basic math skills are not required for one to be able to put others down

    7. Re:I can prevent this happening to me by oldstrat · · Score: 1

      There's one stupid thread for the books

  6. Hyper-reaction! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Informative

    Obviously the Irish voicemail system you refer too is poorly designed in these days of confrence calls...

    This service however does not cause your friends phone to call you, thats rediculous. The service calls you localy, and calls them localy, and then links your calls with VOIP, saving any long distance calls. Thats about it.

    1. Re:Hyper-reaction! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      rediculous


      Nice pun.
    2. Re:Hyper-reaction! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      That can't be it, because when the Slashdot editors received the story and phoned Jajah to confirm it the mistake would have been discovered instantly.

      No, wait. Dammit I keep confusing this forum with a news site.

  7. I would use it for International Calling by stroustrup · · Score: 2, Informative

    The rates they are offering are much lower than any other service I know of. The only concern I have is privacy. They say privacy is guarenteed, but how I can know for sure?

    --


    If you lost your job today, don't despair. You may die tomorrow anyway.
    1. Re:I would use it for International Calling by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Because it's guaranteed so it must be 100% accurate.

    2. Re:I would use it for International Calling by anthony_dipierro · · Score: 1
      The only concern I have is privacy. They say privacy is guarenteed, but how I can know for sure?

      It's going through the telephone system. Of course you don't have privacy. At least not if you're living in Bush Country (the United States). This has nothing to do with the fact that it's VOIP.

    3. Re:I would use it for International Calling by Iron+Condor · · Score: 1

      The rates they are offering are much lower than any other service I know of.

      google: skype

      --
      We're all born with nothing.
      If you die in debt, you're ahead.
    4. Re:I would use it for International Calling by Firehed · · Score: 1

      Who would dare back down on their guarantee? You can trust it.

      --
      How are sites slashdotted when nobody reads TFAs?
    5. Re:I would use it for International Calling by uchian · · Score: 1

      This is like skypes skype in/skype out services - you don't need to be at a computer to use it, and can call people who are not at a computer.

      I'm not sure if skype offer similar functionality on those grounds. or if skype requires that one or both parties are connected to a computer.

      Anyway, I've tried the jahjah service and it works well.

      You are correct, rates are comparable.

    6. Re:I would use it for International Calling by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      yawn

    7. Re:I would use it for International Calling by anthony_dipierro · · Score: 1
      I'm not sure if skype offer similar functionality on those grounds. or if skype requires that one or both parties are connected to a computer.

      Skype requires the party initiating the call (and paying for the call) to be connected to a computer.

  8. ?file not found by Peganthyrus · · Score: 1

    Except the featured Firefox addon of the moment is "Sage", using the search box on the Firefox addons page for "jahjah" gets nothing, and jahjah.com doesn't seem to exist.

    Although Googling for "jahjah voip" does return hits, so whatever.

    --
    egypt urnash minimal art.
    1. Re:?file not found by Peganthyrus · · Score: 1

      Never mind, their site works now - and the Firefox featured addon is Clipmarks. Said feature seems to be randomly selected every minute or two.

      --
      egypt urnash minimal art.
    2. Re:?file not found by noamsml · · Score: 1

      Actually, it is randomized each time it serves the page.

    3. Re:?file not found by kras · · Score: 1

      try jajah, not jahjah. and it is a very useable tool, original poster should read this interview with one of the co-founders of jajah to get a more accurate view on the topic.

      --
      memento mori
    4. Re:?file not found by Peganthyrus · · Score: 1

      I'd get the same thing repeatedly if I reloaded repeatedly. Could be browser cache issues; I didn't probe.

      --
      egypt urnash minimal art.
  9. Wow, what a ridiculously bad idea. by QuantumFTL · · Score: 0

    I consult with VPS VOIP solutions for LyliX.net, and let me tell you, if one of our customers wanted to set up something like this, I think we'd refer them to someone else :)

    This idea is bad on so many levels - not only are you introducing a third party unnecessarily, but it's just a rehash of collect calling, but even more annoying! If you want your friends to call you, how about texting them? A lot less akward and more convenient.

    1. Re:Wow, what a ridiculously bad idea. by Khakionion · · Score: 2, Funny

      "How about texting them?"
      Shit yeah, I be textin' my ass off. Bitches love textin'. Matter of fact, I also be textin' my weed man, too, cause, you know, he don't like to be on the phone, so I text 'im!

      --
      OMG! Wau!
    2. Re:Wow, what a ridiculously bad idea. by QuantumFTL · · Score: 1
      Matter of fact, I also be textin' my weed man, too, cause, you know, he don't like to be on the phone, so I text 'im!
      I think this is a very insightful post. When dealing with illicit drug dealers (friendly or otherwise) it is important not to say anything incriminating over the phone where the Feds might hear, but if you send a text message in the style of teenage texters, that is practically encrypted!
    3. Re:Wow, what a ridiculously bad idea. by c_forq · · Score: 1

      That was actually a quote from the Boondocks, I remember seeing that one on adult swim.

      --
      Computers allow humans to make mistakes at the fastest speeds known, with the possible exception of tequila and handguns
    4. Re:Wow, what a ridiculously bad idea. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      This idea is bad on so many levels - not only are you introducing a third party unnecessarily, but it's just a rehash of collect calling, but even more annoying!

      Well, you're introducing a third party because of the telcos' anticompetitive behavior. As for it being a rehash of collect calling, I really don't see what this idea has to do with collect calling at all.

    5. Re:Wow, what a ridiculously bad idea. by lagfest · · Score: 1

      I usually don't defend slashvertisement, but i didn't have mod point to mod either you or (if i could) submitter of this article down. :P

      Your friend won't know the difference between this and a regular call. And you still pay for it, unless of course your friend has an account. In fact it's pretty much like skypeout except that you are using your regular phone.

    6. Re:Wow, what a ridiculously bad idea. by Joebert · · Score: 1

      The only dealers that would say ANYTHING over the phone talk like teenagers anyway.

      --
      Wanna fight ? Bend over, stick your head up your ass, and fight for air.
  10. WRONG! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Informative

    Hey Jackass have you ever used Jahjah? The call is _free_ for both sides. Are you a shill for some competitor? How does this shit get on slashdot unverified?

    1. Re:WRONG! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 4, Insightful

      This is Slashdot. Nobody RTFA.

      - Dave

    2. Re:WRONG! by slughead · · Score: 4, Funny

      Hey Jackass have you ever used Jahjah? The call is _free_ for both sides. Are you a shill for some competitor? How does this shit get on slashdot unverified?

      By raffle.

    3. Re:WRONG! by Frogbert · · Score: 2, Informative

      I think it has to do with how US Mobiles are priced. For some stupid reason in the US the one receiving the call is the one who has to pay. The rest of the world goes the more sane route where the person making the call pays.

    4. Re:WRONG! by MightyYar · · Score: 1

      There are advantages to the European system. The disadvantage is that the US is huge and would have to have a large block of mobile-only area codes so that you would know that you were calling a mobile. In each of the European countries they have dedicated mobile codes for exactly that reason. Also, the US system requires less regulation - the price of a call to a mobile phone always has to be the same amount or you would never know what kind of charges you would incur. For this reason, the US system allows better price competition. Of course, you could get a message every time you dial a mobile that gave you rate information, but that would get really old very quickly.

      --
      W..w..W - Willy Waterloo washes Warren Wiggins who is washing Waldo Woo.
    5. Re:WRONG! by TubeSteak · · Score: 1

      The voicemail thing wasn't by raffle.

      I got that two out of two tries.

      P.S. Like the summary says, it wasn't my voicemail.

      --
      [Fuck Beta]
      o0t!
    6. Re:WRONG! by kalidasa · · Score: 1

      Actually, in the US, BOTH sides have to pay: the caller pays airtime and call charges, the callee just airtime.

    7. Re:WRONG! by Tim+C · · Score: 1

      Also, the US system requires less regulation - the price of a call to a mobile phone always has to be the same amount or you would never know what kind of charges you would incur. For this reason, the US system allows better price competition.

      Let me get this straight - because all calls must cost the same, you have better price competition? If they all have to cost the same, then you have no price competition!

    8. Re:WRONG! by MindStalker · · Score: 1

      What he is saying is that in the EU, the caller is also billed for the callees airtime.

    9. Re:WRONG! by students · · Score: 1

      More likely this is some particularly odd marketing on the part of jajah. The headline is clearly pro-jajah and the body is unbelievable, prompting people to actually click the link to see if it goes to evidence (I clicked). Seeing as you cannot spell it, I would guess you have not used jajah either.

    10. Re:WRONG! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Let's be realistic, just about everyone pays a monthly fee for cellular/mobile service. So everyone pays for the call.

      My plan from Verizon Wireless comes with a certain amount of minutes, and I've had cellular service from T-Mobile and Cingular in the past, and I know they work the same way. Each call uses minutes, whether it is incoming or outgoing, during 9 AM to 9 PM. Between 9 PM and 9 AM, calls are meterless. Any time of the day, calls to-from callers with the same carrier are typically meterless. You don't really start to pay for calls until your minutes are used up.

      The distinction in the US is that after you pay for your monthly service with a landline, if someone calls you, it's on their dime. (But remember, they can't call you if you don't have service.) In Europe/UK, and ostensibly other parts of the world, you don't ever pay for the incoming call, whether it's a landline or a mobile call.

      (shrug)

      Each method has its merits.

      What really blows is that cellular/mobile services allow the sort of activity that the service discussed does. If it doesn't originate with my handheld unit, then I shouldn't get charged. Sounds like a horrible security flaw in their systems.

    11. Re:WRONG! by x1n933k · · Score: 2, Informative
      JaJah is not free. It is not free for local calls, it is not free for long distance calls. Although, it is quite cheap. They give you 60 cents or so and then charge you every time you use it and then a few cents per minute. I know this because I have been using it for the last few months.

      Didn't think of adding friends numbers though. The problem I see if after they rack up a bill they link it to your IP. That and of course, your friends would notice,"One moment please. Jajah is connecting your call" automated voice that talks when the 'caller' calls the 'called party'.

      [J]

    12. Re:WRONG! by MightyYar · · Score: 1

      No, I phrased that poorly. In the US, there are no set prices for calling a certain exchange. This leaves the cost open to competition.

      --
      W..w..W - Willy Waterloo washes Warren Wiggins who is washing Waldo Woo.
    13. Re:WRONG! by WoTG · · Score: 1

      But that would be no different than ANY phone call that someone answers on a cell phone in the USA (or Canada).

      IMHO,t his JahJah service actually looks pretty useful...

    14. Re:WRONG! by Geoffreyerffoeg · · Score: 1

      For some stupid reason in the US the one receiving the call is the one who has to pay. The rest of the world goes the more sane route where the person making the call pays.

      No, in the US the one who's mobile pays, unless he's within his free minutes deal (e.g., free nights and weekends). This has nothing to do with making or receiving and everything to do with "airtime".

      (In the US the person making a long-distance call also pays, but that's different and usually very small.)

    15. Re:WRONG! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      For some stupid reason in the US the one receiving the call is the one who has to pay.

      For some stupid reason, Europeans are constantly getting this wrong. No one "pays" to receive calls. Both sides of a mobile-to-mobile call burn some of their allotted time, if the two phones are on different carriers. All carriers have unlimited mobile-to-mobile calls within their network (sometimes for a flat fee). I, for example, have Nextel. My phone works in 144 countries, and I never pay in money or minutes to receive calls, from anyone, landline or mobile -- ever. I do pay $5/month for unlimited mobile-to-mobile chat between Nextel, Sprint, and Boost Mobile (ghetto prepaid phones).

      So please, once and for all, stop saying that all charges are borne by the recipient of calls. This is simply not true. Mobile-to-mobile calls within the same carriers never burn any minutes (or cost any money), and some of us never pay in the form of money or minutes to receive calls from anyone at any time! Do you have unlimited free incoming calls from other mobiles or landlines?

    16. Re:WRONG! by JaJ_D · · Score: 1

      Chill......

      Give it a few days and scuttlemonkey will repost it as breaking news....

      Jaj

      Go on Mr Monkey, then I can link back to this post!

    17. Re:WRONG! by PHPfanboy · · Score: 1

      You my friend are the jackass.

      I am an unsatisfied Jajah customer and can assure you that the call is most definitely *not* free for both sides. You are either:
      1) a Jajah marketing droid
      2) ignorant of the telecoms industry and that little inconvenience called a "termination charge"
      3) both

      I am also an unsatisfied Rebtel customer. Go check em out too people.

      Both of these services suck big time and are only really worth it if you have a big monthly minutes package on your mobile.

      In terms of usability Jajah is marginally better (at least you don't have to give everyone your new number) but the call quality is so bad it's virtually unusable.

      In any case the calls are not free. So stop posting crap. That goes for the guy who posted the story in the frist place (ironic intentional typo).

      If you want free calls use Skype on from your PC to another PC (people replying to this, please don't pretend anybody you know uses the Gizmo project).

      --
      29 mpg. YMMV.
    18. Re:WRONG! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      My only concern is that their development center is in Israel.

      I am not some anti-Zionist nutjob, but I think there is a good chance that global phone traffic that is routed through Israeli servers or handled with Israeli software is monitored by the Mossad in some way. Not that it really matters to me, but it is something to keep in mind.

    19. Re:WRONG! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      As far as I can tell, in Europe INCOMING calls are always free for the called party (either from landlines or mobiles), unless the caller explicitly requests reverse charge and, in this case, the called party gets to decide if he wants to receive (and pay) for the call.

    20. Re:WRONG! by anandsr · · Score: 1

      It is not Free. It is not cheap either. I am in France and one telecom provider gives unlimited calls to landlines in 100 countries, including about 30Mbps internet + 50 channels (with HD) for 35Euros. I am also getting unlimited calls to landlines in my native place in India, for 30Euros/month including 24Mbps internet connection. Also when I have to call India I can get calls to Mobiles (in India) via calling cards at the low low rate of 9cents, which is much much cheaper than the 16cents this service is calling.

    21. Re:WRONG! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      As opposed to the mobile prices being fixed by the communist party in Europe? Hint: in Europe, the caller's subscription determines how much the call costs. There's plenty of competition.

    22. Re:WRONG! by MightyYar · · Score: 1

      I know that you are being funny with the communist party reference, but there is a lot more regulation and state control of telecommunications in Europe. I understand that you have competition among providers and that your outgoing call rates differ from plan-to-plan, but there is little pressure for competition on your incoming rate, since you don't pay it. I'm sure that you are more familiar with the system than I am in at least one of the countries, so I won't presume to tell you how that works, but in some countries all calls to mobiles are billed at the same surcharge rate. I'm not judging which system is "better", just pointing out the advantages of each.

      --
      W..w..W - Willy Waterloo washes Warren Wiggins who is washing Waldo Woo.
    23. Re:WRONG! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      fair enough.

    24. Re:WRONG! by ivan256 · · Score: 1

      That's not exactly true. In the US (generally... Pricing is per-carrier) both people pay.

    25. Re:WRONG! by blake3737 · · Score: 1

      How does this shit get on slashdot unverified?

      Welcome to Slashdot, You must be new here.

    26. Re:WRONG! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      No, this is a trivial problem with an obvious solution that incurs huge opposition from people who are fixated on the NPA-NXX-XXXX format, just as they were fixated on two-digit years before Y2K.

      All you have to do is add an extra digit, as has been done in several ETSI (the European area telecommunications standards body) countries. If that digit is present and (for example) a 1, then you are calling a mobile phone (and may be paying a premium as a result).

      So, 1-212-555-1212 is on your usual tariff; 1-1-212-555-1212 or 1-212-555-1212-1 is a mobile phone.

  11. Woosh! by bcat24 · · Score: 5, Funny

    Joke: -===>
    You:  O
          >-<
           |
          / \

    1. Re:Woosh! by Null+Perception · · Score: 1

      Parent's funny picture -===> You o >- | / \

      --
      Great new book on Evolution: The Greatest Show on Earth by Richard Dawkins
    2. Re:Woosh! by SocialEngineer · · Score: 4, Funny

      /. Comment System: -===>
      You:                 O
                          >-<
                           |
                          / \

      --
      "Better to be vulgar than non-existent" -Bev Henson
    3. Re:Woosh! by uncle_riley · · Score: 3, Funny

      Does that stickman have four arms or just claws instead of hands?

    4. Re:Woosh! by WilliamSChips · · Score: 1

      s/Joke/Chair/

      --
      Please, for the good of Humanity, vote Obama.
  12. For Americans by MightyYar · · Score: 1, Interesting

    If this seems pointless to Americans, it's because it is. In the US, the holder of a cell phone is always responsible for the charges, no matter who places the call. In Europe, if you make a call to a cell phone YOU pick up the charges. They have special exchanges just for cell phones, so most Europeans rarely get hit with charges accidentally. Neither system is as bad as it seems from the other side :)

    --
    W..w..W - Willy Waterloo washes Warren Wiggins who is washing Waldo Woo.
    1. Re:For Americans by Thisfox · · Score: 1

      So in America... You get to pay for the prank calls you recieve?

      Sounds like telemarketers would have a field day. Currently I have lots of those on my housephone in Australia.... but mobiles cost too much for telemarketers to call all that often.
      I can't imagine paying the phone company for calls I didn't want in the first place... Flagfall alone would be bad, even if I hung up immediately...
      Or am I missing something here?

    2. Re:For Americans by Shados · · Score: 1

      As far as I know its illegal for telemarkers to call cellphones, and they have to remove you from their list if they catch you by mistake, etc. I have never, ever, not even a single time, got a telemarker on my cell, ever.

      And it really is just a matter of how you see things. Right now, I'm looking for a job, and i'm out a lot... The idea of someone calling me for an interview, and having to pay for calling me, is just messed up. So both ways have their advantages.
      Also, a lot of cellphone plans have "free incoming calls", so -no one- pays for those, thats always great.

    3. Re:For Americans by Zebedeu · · Score: 1

      Oh, come on!
      If your prospective employer doesn't want to fork out for a measly phone call, then you probably wouldn't want to be working for them anyway.

    4. Re:For Americans by Gentlewhisper · · Score: 1
      Also, a lot of cellphone plans have "free incoming calls", so -no one- pays for those, thats always great.


      Australia is caller-pays
    5. Re:For Americans by MightyYar · · Score: 1

      His was just an example. If I have a business cell I don't want to make my clients pay for the call... There would be some merit to offering both systems for those that need to be reached for free.

      --
      W..w..W - Willy Waterloo washes Warren Wiggins who is washing Waldo Woo.
    6. Re:For Americans by afaik_ianal · · Score: 2, Insightful

      So use a call forwarding service. With most providers in Australia, you can hit a button on your land-line and it will divert all calls to your mobile. You pay for the redirection as if you're calling from your land-line. The caller just pays for the local call.

      In reality though, it's really common for small businesses to use mobiles (especially tradespeople). AFAIK, no one really worries too much about the cost of a mobile call - it's really not that much money in the scheme of things.

    7. Re:For Americans by anthony_dipierro · · Score: 1
      If this seems pointless to Americans, it's because it is. In the US, the holder of a cell phone is always responsible for the charges, no matter who places the call.

      Actually, some cell phones in the US have free incoming calls. At 2.5 cents a minute for a mobile-to-mobile call, that's a pretty good deal.

    8. Re:For Americans by rayde · · Score: 1
      not everybody will use ONLY a cell phone to use this service. and making a phone call with it during the free nights and weekends that all mobile phone operators offer means it's free even if you DO use a cell phone.

      so it's not pointless to americans. and, as other posters have mentioned, some carriers (namely, Sprint) offer free incoming calls.

    9. Re:For Americans by MightyYar · · Score: 1

      You have to understand the market in the US - people are not used to paying much of anything at all. You can get like 1000 minutes plus free calls on nights and weekends for $40/month on a cell phone. Vonage gives you unlimited free calls to almost anywhere in the world for $30/month. In contrast, the $0.18/minute that you pay in Australia seems very expensive. Even if I only use 500 of my cell minutes, I'm still only paying $0.08/minute. If I use up all 1000, it's only $0.04/minute. If I have the mobile cost in Australia wrong, my apologies... that's the premium that I pay Vonage for calling a mobile number in Australia.

      --
      W..w..W - Willy Waterloo washes Warren Wiggins who is washing Waldo Woo.
    10. Re:For Americans by jacksonj04 · · Score: 1

      It just goes to show how bloody expensive the US phone market is. For my £30/mo contract ($56) I can spend up to £90 of allowance ($170) on either texts, or calls to any UK landline or mobile. I don't pay a penny if people call me, whether I have allowance left or not.

      --
      How many people can read hex if only you and dead people can read hex?
    11. Re:For Americans by aaza · · Score: 1
      Calling from a mobile depends on your mobile provider: I pay $49.95 (I think) a month, and can make up to $120 worth of calls, text etc. Texts are 22-25 cents (depending on provider, and I never come close to my limit, so I don't care). Calls are anything from 1cent per second to 18 cents per 30 seconds (or less, I really don't bother checking - I don't come close to my limit), again, depending on your provider and plan.
      Calling to a mobile depends on your landline plan and provider. Usually it doesn't cost more than $1 for five minutes, which is enough for most calls.
      Calling mobile to mobile can be completely free if they are on the same network, and your plan includes that. Otherwise, see point 1.

      I should point out that while I check my bill every month, I don't tend to remember exact costs, just the total.

      --
      In theory there is no difference between theory and practice.
      In practice, however, there is.
    12. Re:For Americans by Acer500 · · Score: 1

      Heh. In my country (Uruguay), we use the European system, and rates for calls from a landline to cell phones start at U$ 0.25/minute, up to almost U$ 0.5/minute , depending on the cell phone company you're calling to, and cell phone to cell phone are similar, but cheaper on weekends & night (depends on contract).

      I usually end up paying close to 20 dollars for 50 minutes of cell phone calls.

      --
      There are three kinds of lies: lies, damned lies, and statistics.
    13. Re:For Americans by Reaperducer · · Score: 1

      There are cell phone companies in the U.S. that feature free incoming calls, too. So get off your Euro-centric high horse.

      U.S. cell phone service is dirt cheap compared to places like Japan. People in North America and Europe like to pretend that Asia is some electronic utopia where all the experimental features are enabled on all phones and using them is free, but it's not. The typical calling plan in places like Tokyo is US$60/month for 100 minutes but unlimited texts. The typical calling plan in the U.S. is $20/month for 1,500 minutes and a few hundred included texts.

      --
      -- I'm old enough to have lived through six different meanings of the word "hacker."
    14. Re:For Americans by NMerriam · · Score: 1

      It just goes to show how bloody expensive the US phone market is.

      The American cell market grew slowly because our landline service is insanely cheap compared to anything on the continent or UK. And it's not as if we're getting ripped off on our cell phones -- a $30/month cell phone contract will come with unlimited minutes during evening and weekends, when most lengthy personal calls are made. It's not hard to find ones with unlimited minutes to anyone on the same network, unlimited calls to numbers you select, free incoming calls, unlimited text messages, etc.

      Yes, we do have a different billing and marketing system. No, it doesn't mean we're paying any more than customers in any other developed country. We both pay in different ways. Your market thinks it's illogical the person receiving a call should be charged at all. Our market thinks it's illogical that someone should have to figure out ahead of time what device and network the person on the other end of a call will be using. Quite the contrary, we specifically don't want our numbers to be tied to a particular device or network. We want our phone numbers to connect to a person, regardless of what company they're a customer of this month.

      --
      Recursive: Adj. See Recursive.
    15. Re:For Americans by whoever57 · · Score: 1
      In Europe, if you make a call to a cell phone YOU pick up the charges.
      Unless the callee is roaming internationally, in which case the callee also pays for the call at the relevent international roaming rate.
      --
      The real "Libtards" are the Libertarians!
    16. Re:For Americans by Reaperducer · · Score: 1

      I pay $49.95 (I think) a month, and can make up to $120 worth of calls, text etc. Texts are 22-25 cents... Calls are anything from 1cent per second to 18 cents per 30 seconds

      That would never fly in the 'States. Too much math.

      --
      -- I'm old enough to have lived through six different meanings of the word "hacker."
    17. Re:For Americans by rHBa · · Score: 1

      In the UK you NEVER pay for incomming calls unless it is a special number. There are 0800 numbers (free phone) 'Lo-Call' numbers (call costs about 5p/min from anywhere in the country) Making a call from a mobile costs anything from free to ~30p/minute. Generally the more you pay in line rental the cheaper the calls are so if you have a pay-as-you-go phone - no line rental or contract (annonymous) calls are paid for in advance - you will pay the top rate per minute and there will be a minimum of 1 minute charged per call. If you have a high usage contract you'll get loads of free minutes, texts, mobile to mobile calls, 2-10p/min for other calls and charged by the second from the first second (no minimum charge) but you pay £40-60/month line rental.

    18. Re:For Americans by afaik_ianal · · Score: 1

      But that's just a market thing. Phone calls in the US have always been cheaper than Australia (and most other places too, AFAIK). If Australia had the population density of the US, or the population to support the levels of competition in the US, we would pay much less per minute for outgoing calls.

      Given the low cost of calls in the US, the European billing model would make even more sense. If calls only cost 4c/min, then who'd mind paying 20c for a 5 minute call to their electrician?

    19. Re:For Americans by MightyYar · · Score: 1

      The low price of phone calls is a rather new phenomenon, and the prices keep getting lower. I don't think anyone could have foreseen low prices like this when the cellular system was set up... I remember the call costs being measured in dollars/minute, like satellite service now. Even for landline access, I was paying about $300/month for long distance when my wife was across the country less than 10 years ago. In any event, I doubt that they'll change it anytime soon. I hear very few complaints about the cost of phone service here, and I think that people in the US like the "all you can eat" plans that are available (especially for internet).

      --
      W..w..W - Willy Waterloo washes Warren Wiggins who is washing Waldo Woo.
    20. Re:For Americans by jayratch · · Score: 1

      Where the hell are you getting your cell service?

      Right now, in the US ALL of the major providers have the SAME plans. $40 a month gets you 450 minutes of daytime calling and either unlimited or thousands of night/weekend minutes. No included text messages, but you can get 200 (text or picture) for about $5 (US).

      This whole thread is confusing to me because I am being mindful of exchange rates. I'm wondering what "90 pounds worth" of value translates to, as well. To illustrate:

      On Cingular, if you do prepaid (akin to what the non-US bit of the world uses for most mobiles) it's $0.25/minute or text, or $0.10/min + $1/day. So a typical plan gives you, by that math, $112.5 worth of minutes for $40, or $50 worth of texts for $5. I sell this stuff for a living, so at times I'll point out to a customer that with a $15 "data package" you get "$50 worth of internet (at a penny a kilobyte) and $250 worth of messages."

      Ok, so really, my point is, cell service is really not very expensive in the US for those who buy the packages and who use the services. I really am curious what it costs in the rest of the world. What are the usual per minute rates to make call in the UK, EU, and asia?

      I do know that when I did prepaid service in Malaysia and Hong Kong, it cost me about the same to call the US from my cell phone as it would have cost to call the US from a prepaid phone in the US, so I'm sure the rates were, in US economic terms, unfathomably good. But I still don't know what those rates were.

    21. Re:For Americans by The+Cisco+Kid · · Score: 1

      You are confusing airtime cost with 'long distance' cost.

      In the US, 'long distance' is always paid by the caller, and is entirely unrelated to wether a number is a cellphone or not. (Although some cell providers offer 'unlimted' or 'free' long distance, but see the following point) (Some types of phone providers offer effectively free/unlimited 'long distance' [mainly VoIP providers])

      In the US, cell 'airtime' is paid for by the person who's name is on the cell phone account. It doesnt matter wether the call is outgoing or incoming. Most cell providers plan's include a base amount of airtime minutes which are 'included' at no charge, what amount that is depends on the plan. Sometimes airtime during 'off peak' hours is free, or more is included, than airtime during 'peak' hours. There are *some* cell providers that offer 'free incoming' airtime, with some or all plans (Nextel, Centennial)

    22. Re:For Americans by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You don't have to figure out in advance what hardware and network is being used. It's a phone number. Also, in the UK at least, numbers can be transferred between landline account providers without issue. As for mobiles, do you really enter the digits for each call, or use the name you entered in the address book?

    23. Re:For Americans by Zebedeu · · Score: 1

      I know that in Europe, you can have a toll-free number that your clients can call and not be charged a cent for it.
      However hard I think about it, there is no justification for having the receiver pay for the calls, except that it allows for more calls to be placed globally as the caller is not the one paying for it, and hence, is good for the mobile company (which would explain why they want to keep it).

    24. Re:For Americans by say · · Score: 1

      "What are the usual per minute rates to make call in the UK, EU, and asia?"

      My plan in Norway makes me pay $1.50 per month. One minute of calling time (to another mobile phone) costs $0.08. Text message costs $0.08 as well.

      --
      Roses are #FF0000, violets are #0000FF, all my base are belong to you
    25. Re:For Americans by jacksonj04 · · Score: 1

      Number porting between networks is easy. As for working out what device you're calling - mobile numbers in the UK begin with 07. The caller's provider defines their charges to call mobiles, so you don't have to guess what network the other person is on.

      I can see the benefit of having one number connect to one person though. That's why we have call forwarding. You get one number and divert it to wherever you are at the time, and pay for the forwarded part of the call.

      VoIP renders it all obsolete anyway. I just wish someone would hurry up with a Skype WiFi phone that can use browser-based authentication. (Insert rant about Skype vs. SIP)

      --
      How many people can read hex if only you and dead people can read hex?
    26. Re:For Americans by MightyYar · · Score: 1

      I wasn't confusing it, I was deliberately simplifying the American system because my message was directed toward Americans :) The shortest way of explaining the US system is that everyone's phone charges are different - it's 100% dependent on what your plan is. However, given the same exchange, it will NEVER - no matter what plan you have - cost you more to call a cell phone than a regular phone. "All phones are created equal." :)

      --
      W..w..W - Willy Waterloo washes Warren Wiggins who is washing Waldo Woo.
    27. Re:For Americans by MightyYar · · Score: 1

      If you read some of the comments above, you'll see that there ARE advantages to both systems. The cost of calling in the US is cheaper than in most (all?) other countries, so it can't be all bad. I've also never met an American who was confused about how it all works, which is saying a lot because at least 1/4 of people are idiots. Nice idiots sometimes, but idiots nonetheless.

      --
      W..w..W - Willy Waterloo washes Warren Wiggins who is washing Waldo Woo.
    28. Re:For Americans by jamar0303 · · Score: 1

      Just 100 minutes for US$60? What about SoftBank? Free calls and mail within the SoftBank network for a little less than $30 (gack, missed the fine print- only 200 minutes allowed at night, but unlimited during the day, but "mail" means picture mail too). Heck, they even throw in 2 months (data usage and basic charge) free! See for yourself, if I'm not getting everything- sounds a lot better than you described it.

      --
      OSx86 FTW
    29. Re:For Americans by nacturation · · Score: 1

      It just goes to show how bloody expensive the US phone market is. For my £30/mo contract ($56) I can spend up to £90 of allowance ($170) on either texts, or calls to any UK landline or mobile. I don't pay a penny if people call me, whether I have allowance left or not.

      For the equivalent of £21/month, I get unlimited incoming and outgoing local calls any time of the day, any day of the week. I can combine this with various long distance alternatives -- dial a local number first, pay 3.5 cents per minute for any calls in North America and 5 cents a minute to most of the modern world. It's quite effective... dial a local number first, get a dial tone, dial your long distance number. If you split your long distance calls 50/50 in North America and International dialing, that's an average 4.25 cents a minute which works out to 450 minutes of world-wide long distance for an extra £9/month. So I've met your £30/month deal and got a hell of a lot more from it.

      Sounds like your plan is bloody expensive.

      --
      Want to improve your Karma? Instead of "Post Anonymously", try the "Post Humously" option.
    30. Re:For Americans by David_W · · Score: 1
      So in America... You get to pay for the prank calls you recieve?

      In addition to the points already made, as far as I know every cell plan comes with caller ID standard. You only have to "pay" if you actually answer the call. If it's not a number you recognize, you can always let it drop to voicemail.

      I also put pay in quotes because generally you never end up paying over and above the cost of your plan, which includes a cache of minutes every month. I share 700 minutes across 2 phones, and have only once went over that allowance.

    31. Re:For Americans by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      >Phone calls in the US have always been cheaper than Australia (and most other places too, AFAIK). If Australia had the population density of the US, or the population to support the levels of competition in the US, we would pay much less per minute for outgoing calls.

      I wish it were, but I live in Canada, one of the least populated countries in the world, and our voice rates are often cheaper than the US. We pay about $20 US a month for a landline with unlimited incoming calls, and I pay about 2.2 cents a minute for long-distance to anywhere/anything in North America.

      Your phone system is ripping you off, plain and simple, sorry. :-(

    32. Re:For Americans by Shados · · Score: 1
      But that's just a market thing. Phone calls in the US have always been cheaper than Australia (and most other places too, AFAIK). If Australia had the population density of the US, or the population to support the levels of competition in the US, we would pay much less per minute for outgoing calls.

      Nothing to do with it: Im canadian and I pay roughly the same price (less?) than my girlfriend (New Yorker) does, even if we check different phone companies :)

      End of line is: this is just a cultural thing. I beleive that making people pay because -I- decided to have a cellphone, is rediculous. You guys feel that making someone else than the caller pay, is rediculous. When you think about it, both make sense. So it just depends which one you've been used to.
    33. Re:For Americans by Zebedeu · · Score: 1

      Well, as someone also said above, the cheaper prices in the US might not be related at all to the system, but be a byproduct of a much larger market and/or other factors.
      If it's true that the receiver-pays system is responsible for the cheaper prices, then I agree that there are advantages to both systems, but otherwise, I continue seeing no advantage in the american one.

    34. Re:For Americans by MightyYar · · Score: 1

      Well, in the US system you never have to wonder how much a call to an exchange is going to cost - it will cost whatever it costs according to your phone plan. There is another advantage, though it really comes down to just a technical limitation. The US is much bigger than any one European country, and just one or two additional "cell phone" exchanges would not suffice. Of course, they could adopt a "dial 6" prefix or something, but that would obsolete a lot of phone equipment and software. It would also wipe out another advantage of the US system: number portability. I've had the same phone number since 2001, despite several moves - even out of state. Sure, I have a "Pennsylvania" phone number in New York, but it hasn't been an issue yet. By putting cell phones on an equal footing with landlines, the number works more like an IP address, only better because it can be carried to a different service provider. Again, I'm not arguing that the US system is "better", just that it is not without merit.

      --
      W..w..W - Willy Waterloo washes Warren Wiggins who is washing Waldo Woo.
  13. Wait until advertisers get ahold... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Remember SMS spam? When you paid per message for their advertising?

    Same thing, different name.

  14. Is that a Firefox plugin? by EmbeddedJanitor · · Score: 4, Funny

    I've searched Google already.

    --
    Engineering is the art of compromise.
    1. Re:Is that a Firefox plugin? by Lord+Ender · · Score: 1
      No, you start by trying:
      apt-cache search friends
      --
      A slashdotter who didn't build his own computer is like a Jedi who didn't build his own lightsaber.
  15. Make anyone you want call anyone you want! by Facegarden · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Hey, lets make some people we don't like call 911 (emergency in the states)! Or... anything we want! you just put two numbers in the form and it just makes the first person call the second one, even if they're not you!
    lovely implementation....
    -Taylor

    --
    Worldwide Military budgets: $2100 billion. Worldwide Space Exploration budgets: $38 billion. Really, world? Really?
    1. Re:Make anyone you want call anyone you want! by Schraegstrichpunkt · · Score: 1

      I just tried this attack against the local weather number. When you're the "caller", your number shows up in caller ID. When you're the "callee", the local VoIP number shows up in caller ID.

    2. Re:Make anyone you want call anyone you want! by virg_mattes · · Score: 1

      While I found the jajah site to be nearly incomprehensible, I did get the gist of it, and what you describe is not how it works. What you described would be a criminal offense in the U.S.. The way the service works is that you give it two numbers, and jajah calls your number, then calls the other number, then connects you with the other caller using VOIP. Charges are not sent from one phone to another, and to use it for more than a five minute test, you need to register (and assumably pay for) an account for continued usage.

      Virg

  16. I don't think they will be a friend after that. by Antony-Kyre · · Score: 1

    If someone is stupid enough to actually do something like this, the concept of using this one friends is going to result in a less number of friends.

  17. Alas... by QuantumFTL · · Score: 1

    Alas... girls I give my number to never call me. At least now I just what to do! Ladies - watch out, Jajah's got my back, hear?

    1. Re:Alas... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      Alas... girls I give my number to never call me. At least now I just what to do! Ladies - watch out, Jajah's got my back, hear?

      So what exactly is your plan, here? You still don't have their phone number and your until you resolve your apparent illiteracy I can't see any ladies helping you out in that department.
  18. I know... by NetCow · · Score: 4, Funny

    Assuming this is true - well, I've always felt I should become friends with Darl McBride...

  19. Good idea by ipooptoomuch · · Score: 1

    It sounds like it is completely worthless but Slashdot just made it ingenious. It is worthless for the end user but it is great for novelty value. Just think how many slashdotters are going to use this service after Slashdot gave it free advertising points. Jajah is going to make LOTS of money from just an average person using it as a joke.

  20. Slashdot service: Translation of Article Title by Dystopian+Rebel · · Score: 1

    "Get G-G-G-Girls To Call You"

    --
    Rich And Stupid is not so bad as Working For Rich And Stupid.
  21. Not worthless for what it's meant to do. by stunt_penguin · · Score: 1

    This not a completely worthless service- in fact I think it's quite clever- certainly too clever for the writer of this article to grasp. This service allows international calls to be made for the price of two local rate calls. Sounds pretty fucking good to me.

    I just used the service to connect my Irish landline here to my parent's phone at home in N.Ireland, and it worked perfectly; whatever rate the two calls cost (local calls are free in the UK at certain times), it's certainly cheaper than the 40 cents a minute I'd normally pay for such a call.

    It's a tricky concept to grasp, but if people 'get' it, then this service is of at leas *some* value for the time being.

    --
    When the posters fear their moderators, there is tyranny; when the moderators fears the posters, there is liberty.
    1. Re:Not worthless for what it's meant to do. by G_Sus2019 · · Score: 1, Funny

      Its also perfect for revenge. I just used it to connect someone who stole my copy of Rushmore to various gay phone sex lines. Watching the animation as it went from "Pick up your phone" to "Dialling the other number" to "Connected" made my heart smile.

    2. Re:Not worthless for what it's meant to do. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      yeah i kinda feel that the original poster is totally missing the point of this service. and it seems that if the call is between 2 registered users, it is free.

      i don't see where the problem is..

    3. Re:Not worthless for what it's meant to do. by fbjon · · Score: 1

      It seems pretty expensive actually, compared to SkypeOut. Except for the free offer of course.

      --
      True confidence comes not from realising you are as good as your peers, but that your peers are as bad as you are.
  22. JaJah is GREAT! by yfarjoun · · Score: 5, Informative
    I don't know what the poster is high on. Jajah is simply a way to call long-distance for cheap. I use it all the time for calling international and long distance (I hate talking on the cell-phone for a long time).

    The way that they work is that they call both you and your party and connect the call via VOIP. However, you foot the bill with a credit card. I tried many other calling-card companies, Skype, and whatnot. So far, Jajah is pretty good, and darn cheap.

    Sure, you could sign up and put your friends number, but it will not charge any money to them. My only complaint is that you can only change your phone numbers 3 times so if you move often (as I have over the last few months) you might have to open a new account.

    They even give you a few $$$ to spend BEFORE they ask for your credit card number! so you can try them out for "free".

    yfarjoun.

    1. Re:JaJah is GREAT! by ichandarin · · Score: 1

      Futurephone (www.futurephone.com) works pretty well, too -- You call a number in Iowa (which is free for many people with cell phones) and they connect (presumably via VoIP) to whatever land line you want, internationally. So far there don't seem to be any catches. You can't call many international cell phones, and you do have to pay for a call to Iowa. But other than that, it's totally free!

      --
      Denn wir sind wie Baumstaemme im Schnee. Scheinbar liegen sei glatt auf, mit kleinem anstoss sollte man sie wegschieben
  23. The question is this... by TCK314 · · Score: 0

    Which is the worse idea, Jahjah or Jar Jar Binks?

  24. Story is Deliberately Misleading by Aelix · · Score: 1

    This is a hypothetical situation that only occurs if you purposely use the system wrong. Normally, if you enter your number for your number, and their number for their number, everything is charged as it should be... and nothing AT ALL is charged unless you get charged for you cell airtime. If someone was actually abusing this their friends would get right pissed off in no time, if a company was abusing this they would get in so much legal trouble... this is a non-issue.

    1. Re:Story is Deliberately Misleading by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Because spammers, telemarketers and politicians are always oh-so-careful not to misuse systems or annoy people. But I'm glad to see you have confidence in your fellow citizens.

      What was your phone number again?

    2. Re:Story is Deliberately Misleading by devilspgd · · Score: 1

      What possible misuse is there? The only misuse I can see anywhere is to waste someone's airtime -- But you don't need Jajah for that, just phone them directly.

      --
      Give a man a fish, he'll eat for a day, but teach a man to phish...
  25. submitter confused by BarneyRubble · · Score: 2, Informative

    Jajah call works by making 2 two local calls to to the participants and then
    connecting these two local calls over the internet (voip). The advantage for
    international calling should be obvious.

    In normal use jajah requires you to credit your account (visa,mastercard etc) and then charges
    for calls. And although you could use it for prank calls by registering someone else
    phone number then connecting them to someone else (the queen or whoever) you would have to
    pay.

    There is a free trail where you could set up a prank call for free but your friends wouldn't pay,
    it would be jajah that would pick up the bill.

      Unless in the US or somewhere you have to pay to *receive* calls but even
    then it wouldnt cost your friend anymore than if you phoned him/her normally.

  26. Another Bad Idea by Nom+du+Keyboard · · Score: 1
    This is about the best example of a bad idea, with terrible implementation, that I have seen all day.

    Well, the day ain't over yet, so why not cause as much trouble as possible by publicizing this on a slow news day? I blame the editor for letting this one through.

    --
    "It's the height of ridiculousness to say for those 9 lines you get hundreds of millions."
    1. Re:Another Bad Idea by foobsr · · Score: 1

      I blame the editor for letting this one through.

      The general audience gets the editors it deserves, namely, quote from his site; "Someone who will do the job right -- according to you -- the first time, on time and on budget."

      I bet especially the latter mentioned quality aspect was the right fix.

      CC.

      --
      TaijiQuan (Huang, 5 loosenings)
  27. Even dumbed than JaJah... Slashdot ers by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    This is pathetic. How many people are so stupid that they are going to miss understand what JaJah does and then trash it for being a dumb idea.

    Good Work.

  28. More serious: DOS their phone by coljac · · Score: 1

    Sure, in the US the receiver of a mobile call has to use his minutes. But even if I exchange the source and destination numbers in Jajah, how is this different to just calling my friend on his mobile *without* Jajah? It seems like a sensible service to me. However, you could use it to make prank calls; that doesn't seem like a groundbreaking loophole - you can make prank calls already - although in this case you could write a script to DOS someone's phone vua the Jajah website.

    --
    Everyone knows that damage is done to the soul by bad motion pictures. -Pope Pius XI
    1. Re:More serious: DOS their phone by The+Cisco+Kid · · Score: 1

      Several mobile carriers offer 'free' incoming calls (eg no airtime charges).
      If you and the person you want to call both have that feature, theoretically you could use this to call each other and neither of you have to use chargeable airtime. There are better ways of doing that, though.

    2. Re:More serious: DOS their phone by devilspgd · · Score: 1

      Sure, but that's not what the article is about.

      I'm also not coming up with any better ways of connecting two free-cell phones that both have free incoming calls, care to share?

      --
      Give a man a fish, he'll eat for a day, but teach a man to phish...
    3. Re:More serious: DOS their phone by The+Cisco+Kid · · Score: 1

      Unlimted 'long distance' VoIP account with three-way calling.

      An ATA and a voicemodem, and some automation (Or an appropriately setup Asterisk server with similar automation)

      Of course, the other end doesnt need to be a cellphone, you could use this to place calls anywhere your VoIP can call, after first calling your free-incoming-calls cellphone.

    4. Re:More serious: DOS their phone by devilspgd · · Score: 1

      I guess the definition of "better" is what was lacking here -- You could do it a bit cheaper, assuming you use enough minutes that the $0.025/minute (US/Canadian) rate on Jajah is cost prohibitive vs an unlimited plan.

      But for definitions of better including easier, you won't beat Jajah...

      --
      Give a man a fish, he'll eat for a day, but teach a man to phish...
    5. Re:More serious: DOS their phone by The+Cisco+Kid · · Score: 1

      With Jajah, you need net/browser access to initiate the call(s).

      With the appropriate automation connected to a VoIP account with 3-way calling, there is no such requirement. I've actually set this up and used it, so I'm not just talking theory here - you program your Asterisk box to recognize the CID of your cellphone, and when you call, it doesnt pick up, but instead after a few moments delay, it calls you back, and when you answer, it presents you with a passcode-protected dialtone which you can then use to make the other leg of the call.

  29. Exes by Joebert · · Score: 3, Funny

    This has Ex-Girlfriends written all over it.

    --
    Wanna fight ? Bend over, stick your head up your ass, and fight for air.
  30. Best way to get you friends to call you More by brusk · · Score: 2, Funny

    Be descended from this guy: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Thomas_More.

    --
    .sig withheld by request
    1. Re:Best way to get you friends to call you More by It'sYerMam · · Score: 1

      I think it's worrying I read it as "get your friends to call you `whore`"

      --
      im in ur .sig, writin ur memes.
  31. Not quite by Sycraft-fu · · Score: 3, Informative

    So the way it works on the American system is cell phone users are always responsible for airtime charges. This means that any time you are on a call on your cellphone, it is counted against your minutes, or billed per minute if you've exceeded your monthly allotment. However any other charges are the responsibility of the caller. So if it is long distance between the two parties, the initiator of the call pays those charges, if applicable, regardless of the type of phone on either endpoint.

    There are plenty of plans that make airtime charges more complicated, such as no airtime charges nights and weekends, no charges to people on the same network and so on but the basis is that the owner of the phone pays for the time it's actually on the air. However they don't pay for other charges on received calls. You can call from Germany and you'll pick up the long distance tab, I'll just be responsible for airtime. However if I call Germany I am responsible for both the airtime and the LD.

  32. Nice but limited... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I prefere VoipBuster.

    http://www.voipbuster.com/
    http://www.voipstunt.com/
    http://www.netappel.fr/
    http://www.sipdiscount.com/
    etc...

    10 euros and you can call in many countries for *free* during 120 days
    after theses 120 days, these countries cost 1 euro-cent/min
    When you are low in credit, you just need to add 10 euros to your account and you have 120 free days again.

    You can also enter the phone number where you are (mobile phone, landline, work phone number, friend phone number, etc) and the number where you want to call. This cost only 5 euro-cents (not by minutes... only 5 cents).

    This way, you can make long distance from work (if you have a direct number... or if you correspondant know your company and extension number...) even if you are not authorised for long-distance call. With this, you only need the computer with internet to make the connection, after that, you can close the browser.

    You need to install their software to subscribe to their service.
    After that, you can use any softphone or hardphone compatible SIP.
    So you can use x-lite, sjphone or whatever else to make the calls.
    Personnally, I use this service only for the phone-to-phone connection at 5... you have more flexibility and it's cheap!

    1. Re:Nice but limited... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      This is the way I think!

  33. The joke's on me? by BeeBeard · · Score: 1

    I've read their website and I watched their demo, and I'm just sure there is some kind of catch. Could someone who has been using this service for a while report if there have been any unexpected surprises on their phone bill? Is the quality like Skype i.e. is it sometimes cackly and doesn't handle bidirectional speech well?

    Sidenote: It doesn't help either that I speak Spanish and keep reading the name of their service as "Hah Hah". You know like, "Ha hah, the joke's on you when we bill you three dollars a minute 18 months from now..."

    Inform me, please.

    1. Re:The joke's on me? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Since when you are billed 5$/min by receiving a call?

      You need to approve a collected call... by the way, never answer the phone by: "Yes"
      You could accept a collected call ;-)

      This is SIP, VOIP quality... they have good Internet Access.. but sometimes, it can be "cackly" as you said...
      Most of the time, this is really good or good enough for a conversation.

      Sometimes... it's like sh**

      It's often worst if you have VOIP and you call someone who is already on voip... 1 delay plus 1 delay plus 1 delay = 1 long delay :-/

      The best... try it and see for the quality... with jajah, you have 5 minutes
      with http://www.voipbuster.com/ you can try the same thing but during 1 minute

      Personnaly, I use voipbuster...

  34. But I have no friends... by rannala · · Score: 1

    ...you insensitive clod!

    Btw. in soviet russia, you call friends.. no wait.

  35. what just happend? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Ok. I don't like this idea at all and plan to push to have this service turned off!

    I've (since this posting) have received 4 calls from porn sites. How do you block your own phone from calling you?

    So No I have to manage getting spam in my snailmail, in my email, spam in text messages to my phone, and NOW I have to get spam on my Cellphone in the form of phone calls?!?!

    Oh... AND IT's anonymous?

    Hellz no!

    If something isn't done about this, you'll be hearing my pain months from now...

  36. EXPLANATION by Crazyswedishguy · · Score: 2, Informative

    So to make things clear, before others keep posting about how stupid this thing is:
    Jajah is basically similar to Skype, except that instead of using your laptop to talk, you use your phone. The end result is the same, that is you are connecting over IP to the other person.
    So, you go ahead and schedule a call, your phone rings, you pick up, and you're connected to your friend. In Europe, you don't pay for incoming calls, so this makes phone calls free.
    Now you're thinking, so what's the point of using this in the U.S.?
    Suppose I want to call my family in Sweden, but I'm in New Hampshire. I don't want to pay a fortune for that call. I could use Skype, but I want to take a walk without dragging my laptop around (and I don't have a PocketPC). With Jajah, I pay to receive a local call, they connect me over IP (for free, or else a very low charge, like 2 cents/minute). I've used this a few times, and though it's not completely reliable, and doesn't work every time, on average it works very well. And I expect it to get better.

    --
    This space up for sale.
  37. Second story today that is JUST WRONG by AgNO3 · · Score: 1

    This is the second story today that is just plain WRONG. The service doesn't charge your friends it charges the CALLERS account voip credits.

    --
    OMG Ponies!!! with Glitter!!!! I miss Pink :-(
    1. Re:Second story today that is JUST WRONG by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Looking at who let this story go through might give a hint to what's actually wrong.

      *hint*hint*kdawsonsucksass*hint*hint*

  38. I'm thinking claws by BeeBeard · · Score: 4, Funny

    I for one welcome our tiny, non-joke-getting lobster stick men overlords!

    1. Re:I'm thinking claws by Lazerf4rt · · Score: 1

      First time I laughed throughout this whole thread.

    2. Re:I'm thinking claws by Short+Circuit · · Score: 1

      They're quite clearly underlords.

    3. Re:I'm thinking claws by SeaFox · · Score: 2, Funny

      You know, in Soviet Russia, the joke gets you.

    4. Re:I'm thinking claws by janeowit · · Score: 1

      Oh the funniness.

      --
      Paper beats rock. Rock beats scissors. Science beats romance.
  39. Halloween Prank by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    With Halloween being two days away, this is so cool I figure out how to call someone and make it seem like it is coming from their own phone. The first number input into the JaJah call thing, gets a call from jajah, with its own number showing up on caller ID...which could easily be interpreted as someone is calling you from within your own house..muhahahaha Devils Day will never be the same...

  40. And Comic Book Guy Says..... by Cr33pybusguy · · Score: 1

    worst idea. ever. (well it was till I RTFA)

    --
    Hee Hee The drinking bird does all the work!
  41. RIGHT! by Geoffreyerffoeg · · Score: 1

    Hey Jackass have you ever used Jahjah? The call is _free_ for both sides. Are you a shill for some competitor? How does this shit get on slashdot unverified?

    The call is not free for either side if you have to pay for airtime. If your friends pay for airtime and you have a free incoming calls deal....

  42. Better site by beckman101 · · Score: 1

    Better yet, call them using 1-866-460-SECS, and enjoy the call later at for60secs.

  43. Hilarity Ensues by DeltaHat · · Score: 1

    Use the service to get two pizza places to call each other.

  44. U.S. system also has its advantages. by Kadin2048 · · Score: 3, Interesting

    There are big advantages to the U.S. system as well. With number portability, you can take your landline number, with its same exchange, and move it to a mobile phone, and use it as your primary number without making everyone who wants to call you pay extra.

    The area code of where you transfer the number from (the original geographic exchange) will determine which people pay for it as a "long distance" call, but that's far less expensive for most people than European mobile airtime is, I think.

    I wouldn't be willing to keep a mobile phone as my only phone number, if doing so required everyone who wanted to call me pay extra. That just seems rude. I'm quite content to pay for people's incoming calls to me, since I'm the one deciding to attach the number to a mobile, rather than fixed phone.

    From the caller's perspective, the U.S. system puts land and mobile numbers on equal footing, which seems more logical to me.

    --
    "Ladies and gentlemen, my killbot features Lotus Notes and a machine gun. It is the finest available."
    1. Re:U.S. system also has its advantages. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      That's just silly. I use a landline number for my mobile phone, it costs extra just like it does for you but the service is available. It has nothing to do with call rates for mobiles. The simplest way to achieve it is to tap in the little numbers that transfers all your calls to your mobile. But it's also available as a special service. In this case, the US model is just crap, pure and simple, and creates all sorts of loopholes when it breaks the telecom model that caller pays. As for just keeping a mobile, yes, that was an issue about ten years ago when people started doing it. Today not many people here keep a landline anymore so no other thinks about it (as calling another mobile is the same price as calling a landline). Only offices use landlines.

    2. Re:U.S. system also has its advantages. by houghi · · Score: 1
      From the caller's perspective, the U.S. system puts land and mobile numbers on equal footing, which seems more logical to me.


      Not realy. If I call a cellphone, I know I call a cellphone and then can decide wether or not how much time I spend. If I want to call somebody and I want spend my money, it is I who should pay, not the person I am calling.

      If I want to spend money on a friend, I would not like to hear 'sorry, gotta go, this is costing me'.

      I only have a cellphone and most of the people I know don't have a landline anymore. I must say that we communicate very seldom by phone, we use either email or send and sms to see each other in person. My phonebill is about 3EUR per month.
      --
      Don't fight for your country, if your country does not fight for you.
  45. Random VOIP rambling by QuantumFTL · · Score: 1

    Not long after I got the internet (back in 1996, but it was AOL so that hardly counts), I envisioned a future where you'd get your TV, radio, phone, movies, music, email and web access all through the same data line. Of course looking back on it now, it's obvious that it was going to happen, but back then not that many people were talking about that kind of convergence.

    It's amazing to me to see that what I had thought would require a fiber connection is now totally feasible with a standard cable modem. I get all of that (and some things I never dreampt of back then) though a little box on the wall. A lot of people talk about how there's a lack of innovation in the computer industry, but I say it's mostly been focussed on these kinds of things, and the WWW, rather than just making some silicon faster or fancy schamcy "artifically intelligent" computer programs. The future is here, and it's pretty cool, as long as you don't get sued for using it :)

  46. The Answer by Quantam · · Score: 5, Funny

    is in basic C++: A friend is somebody that has access to your private parts

    --
    You have tried to support your argument with faulty reasoning! Go directly to jail; do not pass Go, do not collect $200!
    1. Re:The Answer by Dekker3D · · Score: 1

      from a c++ tutorial: "we can also define a class as friend of another one, granting that second class access to the protected and private members of the first one." hmm, i should be more "friendly" http://www.cplusplus.com/doc/tutorial/inheritance. html

  47. No more telemarketers? Nope, bummer. by ancientt · · Score: 2, Interesting
    No, I didn't read TFA. I'm bummed though. I was thinking this would be great for telemarketers, I'd try to figure out ways to get them to call each other. If I could do it in large numbers with a mechanize perl program, I'd get geek points and do the world a service. Imagine telemarketers going broke from huge phone bills from unprofitable calls to each other.

    Dang.

    Disclaimer: If you figure out how, please don't tell me or mention my name during the interrogation.

    --
    B) Eliminate all the stupid users. This is frowned upon by society.
  48. Voicemail Snooping! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    If you use someones mobile number to call you and their phone is off or can't get a signal, their voicemail will call you and you will be instantly connected to their mailbox without the requirement of a password. Not sure how long this will last... i guess make sure you check/delete your voicemails quicly for the time being. ANYONE WHO KNOWS YOUR NUMBER CAN LISTEN TO THEM!

    1. Re:Voicemail Snooping! by B0bReader · · Score: 1
      Exactly! There is so much wrong with this service. Did you know it can even connect the voice-mails of the phones to each other if both phones are turned off? What a tragically funny waste of call credit.

      Right, I'm off to get my parents talking again after so many years, and let's see, um, my Father will pay for the call.

    2. Re:Voicemail Snooping! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I wanted to add a note on the snooping comment that this only works if your phone service supports "calling your own phone" voicemail access. I know cingular does... and that's enough users to matter in itself i think.

    3. Re:Voicemail Snooping! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I don't understand. When does someone pay?

      Probably, in the US where you pay to get called. That's plain stupid, but not specific to jajah... I live in France, we have free ADSL-to-phones in 20 countries (include US mobiles). I can call my "friends" for free and they pay to listen to me.

      You are stupid, are you a competitor?

    4. Re:Voicemail Snooping! by B0bReader · · Score: 1

      Yes, I am a competitor who has set up an equally illegal and immoral company and I would like people to force calls upon other people from my service... not

  49. JaJah = Callback + Computer - little advantage by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    As far as I can see Jajah is Callback plus an application.

    Such applications have been around for ages. There are already a number of companies around who offer web or wap based dialers.

    None of them have taken off in a major way because it requires that the user utilizes a computer or some wap application (which again incurs costs).

    In any case, a typical VoIP company should be able to make calls at half the price because they only need to cover the costs for one call-leg. Callback/Jajah requires two legs.

    So JaJah cannot compete with straight VoIP.

    The advantage of these callback applications versus straight callback is that the leg to the caller needs only to be established after the callee has picked up the phone.

    However that advantage can only be realised when the user has a computer - and if he has a computer he might as well use VoIP.

    So Jajahs potential customers are mainly those who sit at home, want to talk through a normal phone (not computer) and dont have a VoIP analog adapter.

    Is there a business ?

    Cheers

    GeeJay

  50. Let that be a lesson in structured design by Moraelin · · Score: 2, Funny

    If someone forced a collect call on me with no more warning than "someone is connecting your call", I _might_ call free() or delete() on their private parts.

    And this, kids, is why you should use getters and (if needed) setters instead of making an Orkut-inspired design where everyone is "friends" with everyone they ever heard of. If anyone needs your private parts, they can ask nicely and you can give it to them in a civilized manner.

    --
    A polar bear is a cartesian bear after a coordinate transform.
    1. Re:Let that be a lesson in structured design by Quantam · · Score: 1

      If someone forced a collect call on me with no more warning than "someone is connecting your call", I _might_ call free() or delete() on their private parts.

      ...that sounds so much like me it's scary. Except I use the holy castrating sledgehammer rather than the CRT.

      --
      You have tried to support your argument with faulty reasoning! Go directly to jail; do not pass Go, do not collect $200!
  51. Criminal by B0bReader · · Score: 2, Funny
    I never paid for any kind of voip credits, yet so far today I have:

    1. Made most of my former friends call me twice.

    2. Listened to the rest of my former friends' personal voice-mails (because their phones were turned off when they "called me" so this is only fair, right?).

    3. Gotten my parents talking to each other after so many years (although my Father wasn't best pleased that he had to pay for the call).

    1. Re:Criminal by devilspgd · · Score: 1

      1) You go girl.

      2) This isn't anything new, you could do it by dialing them with any phone service (VoIP or not) that allows you to spoof your outbound caller ID.

      3) He didn't pay for the call. You didn't read the site, did you?

      --
      Give a man a fish, he'll eat for a day, but teach a man to phish...
    2. Re:Criminal by B0bReader · · Score: 1

      3. Well he was roaming or in the states so yeah he did

    3. Re:Criminal by devilspgd · · Score: 1

      Sure, but that's also nothing specific to Jajah -- That's no different then if the other person phoned him directly, no?

      --
      Give a man a fish, he'll eat for a day, but teach a man to phish...
  52. I know... by risk+one · · Score: 1

    I know how to make your friend call you more. You fix their goddamn computer....

  53. ha hah haa! by joshsnow · · Score: 1

    but I think there is a good chance that global phone traffic that is routed through Israeli servers or handled with Israeli software is monitored by the Mossad in some way.


    HA HA HA! That's so funny on so many levels that I wish I had some mod points.

  54. Only in Korea by DikSeaCup · · Score: 1

    do old people get the joke.

  55. Friends defined by Fallen+Mongoose · · Score: 1

    "Friends are just enemies who don't have the guts to kill you." Judy Tenuta

  56. Incorrect article by shayben · · Score: 1

    Jajah is actually quite a usefull service. Personally, my internet connection is too unstable for sustaining VoIP connections, and using jajah's VoIP infrastructure is as cheap as SkypeOUT, plus you get around 1000 minutes a week for free. The main difference is jajah is not mainstream yet, so there are some potential issues such as privacy, or dependability... Anyhow, dont knock it till you try it. Peace.

  57. Firefox has us fooled by Chris+whatever · · Score: 1

    Firefox is advertising this product?

    Maybe microsoft is evil in not sharing anything and not letting anyone attach stuff to there software but at least they dont put crap on their website or send you publicity about crappy software.

    So much for "do no evil" i would change that to "Do nothing"

    1. Re:Firefox has us fooled by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "Firefox is advertising this product?" No

    2. Re:Firefox has us fooled by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "Do no evil" is Google's slogan, not Mozilla's.

  58. Make-Friends.. by pentalive · · Score: 1

    Friends love presents. Offer your prospective friend a fruitcake, or, even better, two!

    ????????? Fruitcake???

  59. I don't want my "friend's" to call me more... by cr0sh · · Score: 1
    Mods, please excuse this rant, or mod it down, I don't care - I just need to get this off my chest...


    Call me more? I want them to care enough to call at all...

    I have some "friends" that literally live about a block away. I have known these people over 10 years. I would go over to their house fairly regularly (in many cases, to help with some electronic work or other, in other cases, just to chat). One day I thought about it a little, and I wondered: Why am I always over at their house? Why am I helping them with things (one time I cleaned their kitchen for a party being held that night - the kitchen was nasty), but not getting anything back (a hello, how are you doing, that kind of thing)?

    One year I even went out of my way to think what each of them might like for a Christmas gift (not expecting anything in return, mind you), and I went out and purchased these items. I took them over a couple of days before Christmas, and gave the gifts to them. A few thank-you's, some chatting, then I left. I never heard from any of them how they liked the gifts, what they thought, whether they even cared.

    Another time I invited them to a party I was having at my house - this was after going to several of their parties, and helping out setting things up, and cleaning up afterward. Not a single one of them showed up, nor did any appologize or offer an explanation.

    I was fed up, so I asked one of them: "You know where I live, you know my phone number, why don't you call?". I didn't get a good answer, just one excuse or another. So, I decided to do an experiment: I would no longer go over, call, or email any of them. I felt I had done my part as a friend for long enough, and I had done my best. If they cared at all, they would notice the absence.

    So far, it has been over two years. I don't consider them "friends" any more than I consider my neighbors my "friends" (and these self-same neighbors have helped me and my wife out more than these other slobs I was actually friendly with!). These people that I know are nothing but lazy, good-for-nothing, narcissists who seem to care more about their insular world than they do about people who actually want to care for them.

    Fuck them.

    Currently I don't have any friends, and I am not sure I want to know people if this is the way they are going to treat me. I have my wife, my dog, my family, and most importantly, myself. Maybe it is best not to have any friends - they would only want you to fix things and borrow your tools...

    --
    Reason is the Path to God - Anon
  60. Bart would be proud by Joebert · · Score: 1

    I've been having a field day with this site.

    Ever wondered what would happen if you had a bartenders cellphone call the bar phone ?

    --
    Wanna fight ? Bend over, stick your head up your ass, and fight for air.
  61. Spam or scam? by Some_Llama · · Score: 1

    I have been getting calls recently from a long distance number, when i answer the phone it is a spanish speaking voice recording.. it seems to be saying something about rates and calling (from the little espanol I understand).

    Could they be using this service to rack up charges to their phone number much like the pervious oversees number scams (where they would call you and tell you to dial an 900 number claiming you won a prize) or is it just spanish speaking telemarketing spam?

    I had been thinking about this a lot lately and then I saw this article... anyone else seen or experienced anything like this?

    1. Re:Spam or scam? by B0bReader · · Score: 1

      Why not? Someone from a public ip address with an anonymous email makes your phone initiate a call with a sex-chat line, sounds clever to me...

  62. Really get your friends to call more... by jonnyhink · · Score: 1

    Check out http://www.dagruk.com/. They allow you to assign great pictures to people in your contact list. Your friends become instant comics because you'll be choking laughing when you see these people show on your phone when your friends call.