Slashdot Mirror


Former Spy Poisoned By Radiation In UK

An anonymous reader writes "BBC new is reporting the death of the ex-Russian spy Alexander Litvinenko with a major dose of radioactive polonium-210. But nobody knows how it got there. Suspicions have fallen upon the Russian security services (who deny involvement). The task of the pathologists now is to unpick what really killed him and how it was administered. Quite what techniques they will use to solve this puzzle is unclear." From the article: "A post-mortem examination on Mr Litvinenko has not been held yet. The delay is believed to be over concerns about the health implications for those present at the examination. But Roger Cox from the HPA said a large quantity of alpha radiation emitted from polonium-210 had been detected in Mr Litvinenko's urine."

432 comments

  1. russian reversal by eneville · · Score: 0

    In UK you get poisoned, in Soviet Russia poison finds you!!

    1. Re:russian reversal by Harry_Ballsak · · Score: 0, Offtopic

      Howcome I read the news (on 2 ocassions today) at 8am today and then at 3pm /. decides to post it???

      just a thought.

    2. Re:russian reversal by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You must be new here.

      My name is Anonymous Coward, and I'll be your guide. Just believe everything I say here.

  2. that's not how the joke goes by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    you fail it!

  3. Reading the artcle...... by 8127972 · · Score: 5, Funny

    ......found this curious comment:

    "Mr Putin himself has said Mr Litvinenko's death was a tragedy, but he saw no "definitive proof" it was a "violent death"."

    Clearly the term "violent death" has a different definition in Russian than it does in English.

    --
    This is my opinion. To make sure you don't steal it, it's covered by the DMCA.
    1. Re:Reading the artcle...... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Interesting

      Or more likely, he's just not being honest.

      Mr Putin himself has said Mr Litvinenko's death was a tragedy

      Mr. Litvinenko was apparantly more than your average former KGB agent - he's accused Putin of pedophilia, among other things. Even if Putin weren't behind this poisoning (which he almost certainly is), he probably wouldn't consider Mr. Litvinenko's death a tragedy at all.

      Isn't it strange how Putin's most vocal critics inside Russia are just dropping like flies...

    2. Re:Reading the artcle...... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Insightful

      This was said before the postmortem and before Po poisoning was officially confirmed.

      Before that the UK medics went through a list of at least 3-4 different hypothesis each of which proved to be loads of bull. Tallium, radioactive Tallium, strange objects in his intestines, etc you name it.

      So at the point where Putin said it nothing was known yet. I have not heard what he said in Russian so it is also quite likely that some nuances have been lost in translation (like a "yet" at the end of the sentence).

      As far as you noticing that his idea of violent death differs from our idea of violent death that is a definite. He would not have had his past job if this was not so.

      It is quite interesting that AFAIK this is the first high profile poisoning with radioactive substance. Considering the guaranteed lethality and obvious ineptitude of the medics in diagnosing it I am surprised that this does not happen more often. Actually, probably it does, but using much smaller doses which end up in effects indistinguishable from cancer. If the dose was a small fraction of what he got he would have died quietly from leukemia 6 months from now. Whoever killed him wanted to make a point and also wanted the fingers to be pointed at the usual suspects.

      Which makes me on a second thought post anonymously :-)

    3. Re:Reading the artcle...... by VJ42 · · Score: 1

      Isn't it strange how Putin's most vocal critics inside Russia are just dropping like flies...
      Indeed, and these are people who are meant to be on "our side" now. Does anyone really think Russia isn't sliding back towards a totalitarian regime?

      --
      If I have nothing to hide, you have no reason to search me
    4. Re:Reading the artcle...... by mabhatter654 · · Score: 0
      wasn't Putin somehow involved with the KGB in Cold War times? Anyway, their definition of "violent death" probably excludes things like minor torture, suffocation, poisoning, shot to the brain stem, etc... the CIA and KGB were pretty creative in the Cold War Spy days... they could make a "hit" death look like anything they wanted...mugging, traffic accident, electrocution in the tub, natural gas explosion for a city block or two... most only looked "violent" if they were botched.

      Frankly, I'm waiting for the TSA response to this!!! I wonder when they'll start forcing flyers to discard things that "look" like radioactive isotopes... or even "isotopes" tee-shirts!!!

    5. Re:Reading the artcle...... by CmdrGravy · · Score: 1

      Not sure about totalitarian, more like a crimistocracy or crimocracy or perhaps crimotarian.

    6. Re:Reading the artcle...... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny

      We have always been allied with Russia. We have always been at war with Islamic fundamentalists.

    7. Re:Reading the artcle...... by gmuslera · · Score: 2, Interesting
      Even for me that dont speak english natively, that could not apply for my "violent death" definition. Falling from a building (ok, hitting the floor after) is violent death, like being hit by a car, or a bullet in the head. But a somewhat slow, maybe taking days death because poison, starving, thirst or whatever dont fall in my category.

      Now, also what he could mean is that there are not conclusive evidence to tell if was he was killed, or it was accidental (touching dust/old things from work/whatever and then food?), or was an intentional suicide (dont think so, but still odds are not nil)

      Of course, this is unrelated with if Putin was sincere or not saying so, just my understanding of that semantic.

    8. Re:Reading the artcle...... by lawpoop · · Score: 1

      I think in this context, Putin means "was murdered by someone" as opposed to "died by accident".

      --
      Computers are useless. They can only give you answers.
      -- Pablo Picasso
    9. Re:Reading the artcle...... by CmdrGravy · · Score: 1

      I think he was in charge of the KGB for a while.

    10. Re:Reading the artcle...... by goddidit · · Score: 5, Funny

      Minitrue mark the post doubleplusfunny.

      --
      This .sig is exactly 120 characters long.
    11. Re:Reading the artcle...... by bvdbos · · Score: 1

      Putin said this before it became public that polonium was the cause of death and after the docters said no "strange shadows" were discovered and that thallium wasn't the cause of the death...

    12. Re:Reading the artcle...... by b0s0z0ku · · Score: 2, Insightful
      Not sure about totalitarian, more like a crimistocracy or crimocracy or perhaps crimotarian.

      Same thing. Only difference is that in a totalitarian state the criminals generally operate under color of law.

      -b.

    13. Re:Reading the artcle...... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      why ruin such a beautiful comment? i think everyone got the point ...

    14. Re:Reading the artcle...... by idugcoal · · Score: 1

      cue the joke with the "woosh" and the "sound" and the "over" and the "head"

    15. Re:Reading the artcle...... by tobe · · Score: 0

      + 1000 the two parent posters who show possibly the most acute understanding of what's going on in this sphere that I've seen round here for a long time.

    16. Re:Reading the artcle...... by goddidit · · Score: 2, Funny

      Here comes the woosher to woosh up your head!!

      --
      This .sig is exactly 120 characters long.
    17. Re:Reading the artcle...... by Moofie · · Score: 2, Insightful

      The word you're hunting for is "kleptocracy".

      --
      Why yes, I AM a rocket scientist!
    18. Re:Reading the artcle...... by Marcos+Eliziario · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Look for photos of person sick with acute radioative poisoning. You'll agree that's pretty violent.

      --
      Your ad could be here!
    19. Re:Reading the artcle...... by deglr6328 · · Score: 0

      There is one other instance I can think of. In 1990 a disgruntled employee of the Point Lepreau Nuclear Generating Station in New Brunswick dumped heavy water from the primary heat transport loop of the reactor into the office water cooler. The water was of course heavily contaminated with radioactive tritium due to neutron bombardment of the deuterium in the heavy water and 8 people recieved significant radiation doses. On person recieved about 20 REM (200 mSv)! Not nearly deadly but not nice at all.

      --
      - "Hear that?! The percolations are imminent! Cease your ingress!"
    20. Re:Reading the artcle...... by MMC+Monster · · Score: 1

      I wouldn't call it ineptitude. All of medicine goes by the doctrine: "If you here hoofs, look for horses, not zebras." As you said, this is a fairly unusual form of poisoning. I'm surprised it was even diagnosed properly (assuming that it was, of course). IANAT (I am not a toxicologist), but the effects of a poison are typically not known until someone succumbs to it. While others have been poisoned by this particular element, it couldn't have been that many people compared to all the other possible toxins available.

      --
      Help! I'm a slashdot refugee.
    21. Re:Reading the artcle...... by Master+of+Transhuman · · Score: 4, Insightful


      According to Justin Raimondo's analysis of the case, Litivenko is a raving lunatic whose accusations in general have been ridiculously unsubstantiated.

      Therefore, the likelihood is that he was killed precisely to frame Putin for his murder, since he had no other value to anybody, apparently.

      The assumption that Putin is behind it just because the individual was ex-KGB is a clear case of jumping to conclusions based on no evidence.

      --
      Richard Steven Hack - This sig is TOO GODDAMN SHORT TO DO ANYTHING USEFUL WITH! MORONS!
    22. Re:Reading the artcle...... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It's amazing that the persons that are always bashing Bush for everything he does, are the sames ones that are prompt to justify real dictators acts. Yeah, right, the doctors are incompetents and the translation was biased...

    23. Re:Reading the artcle...... by PixelSmack · · Score: 1

      As far as diagnosis gose he would almost certainly have died either way. An alpha source used as a poison will kill medical diagnosis from an alpha source of radiation will have to come from a tissue sample as opposed to being diagnosed "from the outside" this indicates to me that there has been a tisue sample analysis since his death.

    24. Re:Reading the artcle...... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      B-b-but Bush looked into Putin's soul, and saw a good man! Are you questioning the august and learned judgment of the President of the United States?

    25. Re:Reading the artcle...... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Insightful

      There is one other instance I can think of. In 1990 a disgruntled employee of the Point Lepreau Nuclear Generating Station in New Brunswick dumped heavy water from the primary heat transport loop of the reactor into the office water cooler. The water was of course heavily contaminated with radioactive tritium due to neutron bombardment of the deuterium in the heavy water and 8 people recieved significant radiation doses. On person recieved about 20 REM (200 mSv)! Not nearly deadly but not nice at all.No. Deuterium is an oddball nuclide and does not absorb neutrons. This is why it is used as a moderator in some nuclear reactors (heavy water is not as good at slowing down neutrons and normal water, but normal water has resonance absorption of neutrons which makes it overall a worse moderator). You make tritium out of neutron bombarding lithium (which you won't have in a reactor unless it is the brief byproduct of boron-10 neutron absorption and subsequent alpha decay).

      Primary coolant will have chemicals in it to make it less corrosive and it will also have some radioactive material that has rubbed off of parts activated in a neutron flux (such as Co-60). The chemicals are likely to make someone sick, but the radioactive material is fairly low. It would be useful to note whether the 20 rem was a lifetime calculated dose or a acute dose. A 20 rem lifetime dose is not really that significant, but a 20 rem acute dose is about half as much needed to make someone get radiation sickness.

    26. Re:Reading the artcle...... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      so let me get this straight some group promoted a raving lunatic for years to then kill him and blame it on Putin?

    27. Re:Reading the artcle...... by johansalk · · Score: 1

      Therefore, the likelihood is that he was killed precisely to frame Putin for his murder

      Nah, I think it's a KGB plot to make it look like it was made to look like it was a KGB plot. Yeah, I know, you gotta think it all backwards to understand Russia.

    28. Re:Reading the artcle...... by MightyMartian · · Score: 1

      Anybody that thinks Russia is an ally of the West is ignoring several centuries of history. Russia and the West may have some common ground, but watch European energy prices if you want to know what kind of ally Russia really is.

      --
      The world's burning. Moped Jesus spotted on I50. Details at 11.
    29. Re:Reading the artcle...... by deglr6328 · · Score: 1

      I'm afraid you are wrong about the neutron cross section absorption of deuterium and its transmutation into tritium. page 5.

      --
      - "Hear that?! The percolations are imminent! Cease your ingress!"
    30. Re:Reading the artcle...... by Phanatic1a · · Score: 1

      According to Justin Raimondo's analysis of the case, Litivenko is a raving lunatic whose accusations in general have been ridiculously unsubstantiated.

      Justin Raimondo calling someone a raving lunatic is a bit like Barry Goldwater calling someone a staunch conservative.

    31. Re:Reading the artcle...... by autophile · · Score: 1
      I have not heard what he said in Russian so it is also quite likely that some nuances have been lost in translation (like a "yet" at the end of the sentence).

      Actually, I believe he paused after his statement, and then said, "NYET!!!"

      --Rob

      --
      Towards the Singularity.
    32. Re:Reading the artcle...... by rahvin112 · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Polonium 210 is difficult to obtain from it's natural sources. In fact it's so difficult to purify that you need a full blown nuclear laboratory to separate the element. There are only a dozen labs in this world capable of extracting it. All of these labs are state controlled. So if it's very difficult to purify, can only be obtained from a limited number of state run laboratories, do you honestly believe that anyone other than a head of state could have ordered the poisoning? What about the Ukraine and the orange revolution? Yushchenko was poised by Russia, of that there is no doubt, it just didn't kill him. It obvious to me that they decided giving someone a cup of dioxin wouldn't kill them so they moved onto something that they knew would and would actually prevent an autopsy for fear of contaminating the doctors doing it.

    33. Re:Reading the artcle...... by Goaway · · Score: 3, Insightful

      can only be obtained from a limited number of state run laboratories

      http://unitednuclear.com/isotopes.htm

    34. Re:Reading the artcle...... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

      Sure! They are part of the new axis of evil... it's well known that they have lots of WMD... we should just invade Russia so we can have lower energy prices ... I think I've seen this movie before... :-/

    35. Re:Reading the artcle...... by rbanffy · · Score: 2, Informative

      As far as killing him of leukemia 6 months from now, this would not be enough to contain any information he migh have - 6 months is time enough to write a biography.

      If this is a case of silencing him because he was about to disclose something really nasty, why not run over him with a truck or hit him with a falling brick or, even better, making him vanish without a trace? That's nothing a boat and a pair of cement shoes couldn't achieve. Although it's unclear if anyone was ever murdered with cement shoes, I could bet some money it's more frequent than with Polonium.

      If I am ever to have information people would kill me to avoid spreading, I would spread it as fast and wide as I could, leaving my potential killers scrambling for damage control and lower my value as a target.

      Of course, they might kill me later, for revenge, but later is better than sooner.

      But remaining a high value target is something really dumb to do.

    36. Re:Reading the artcle...... by AaronPSU777 · · Score: 1

      Remember that we are all working from a translation of Putins' statements. Unless you have a Russian translator to back you up it's pointless to speculate on subleties of semantics because a translation is never perfect. It's certain that some information will be lost or modified.

    37. Re:Reading the artcle...... by kimvette · · Score: 1
      we should just invade Russia so we can have lower energy prices ... I think I've seen this movie before... :-/


        Was that the movie that CNN and Faux News aired a few years ago?
      --
      The Christian Right is Neither (Christian nor right). See: Matthew 23, Matthew 25, Ezekiel 16:48-50
    38. Re:Reading the artcle...... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Actually it's still on air

    39. Re:Reading the artcle...... by Fred_A · · Score: 1
      most only looked "violent" if they were botched.
      Or if they wanted a point to be clearly made. As is presumably the case here.
      --

      May contain traces of nut.
      Made from the freshest electrons.
    40. Re:Reading the artcle...... by Mondor · · Score: 1

      You probably have no idea what the history is, do you?

      If talking about west we talk about England, there were no conflicts between Russia and England. In fact, kings of Russia and England were from one family, even look very similar.

      If we're talking about Germany, Russia had several wars with Germany, and won every one of them. Especially glorious was the victory on Ladoga lake, where German Teuton crusaders were wiped out by Alexander Nevsky.

      Sweden also was defeated by Russian king Peter the Great in the beginning of 1700s. In the same time, relations between Netherlands and Russia and between Germany and Russia started a new era of warm friendship between countries and bring the western civilization into Russia. That was the beginning of modern European style Russia as we know it.

      Well, also Russia won a terrible war with Mongolia, wars with Poland, France (they defeated Napoleon, although he was the only one who captured the Moscow. Interesting, that the city was razed... by Russians themselves, just before he entered it).

      Later, in 20th century, Russia saved the world from Hitler (although they defeated only about 70% of his forces, other 30% were defeated by Allies, so we can say that the whole Humanity defeated Nazi), helped Greeks and Spanish to fight fascism in 30s, won a war against Finland (after Finland was given a territory and independence, as it was a part of Russia before) and conquered some tiny countries like Estonia and Latvia, who also were given independence by commi, as before they were a part of Russia.

      Also, later, USSR (read: Russia) won a war against USA in Vietnam and Korea, and lost one war against USA/Bin Laden alliance in Afghanistan. They also were in all kind of wars in Africa and Middle East, but that's unofficial, just a helpful hand.

      So, taking into account that brief history, I can tell you, that there is no such thing as "the west" as there are a lot of different countries with different history. Russia have exceptionally good relations with mighty Spain and Greece, they have strange but friendly relations with Germany, and really bad relations with ex-parts of Russia, like Poland, Estonia, Latvia, Lithuania and Ukraine. All of these countries excerpt Ukraine are EU. So as you can see, some countries in EU hate "mother Russia", and some - like her. If EU would be one person, he would suffer from mental illness, like schizophrenia. That's when you think you are two persons :)

      And regarding the prices for gas from Russia, buy it from someone else! Or sell what you have for the price they want. Or go to Norway and get yourself some coal. That is capitalism, my friend, everything costs so much as you are ready to pay for it. And that is democracy, when good relations with leader of Russia will not bring you discounts.

    41. Re:Reading the artcle...... by Mondor · · Score: 1

      Oh, I forgot to mention glorious wars between Russia and Turkey and between Russia and Austria. In both cases aggressors were defeated. Also Russia had a conflict with China, still in war (that's funny) with Japan, and well, it's a few hundred times bigger than my country :)

      Imagine, they have good relations with Japan (although in war) and bad with Poland, although in peace. Maybe it is because Japan doesn't want to get Russian gas for free?

    42. Re:Reading the artcle...... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Of course, they do. Then again, so does the United States.

    43. Re:Reading the artcle...... by Alioth · · Score: 1

      Sliding back? It's been totalitarian ever since Putin came to power.

      I find Putin's denials of involvement unconvincing - Po-210 has a short half life and is made in a nuclear reactor. Hardly the stuff of a private assassin. I'd say the balance of probability is that this assassin was a government supported one - the choice of poison is a hell of a smoking gun.

    44. Re:Reading the artcle...... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Putin said that before the poisoning was announced from the U.K. so he was right at that time. As I understood it, the confirmation of poisoning came on the same day but shortly after Putin made his statement.

      But I am not saying the Russian government has nothing to with it - quite the opposite. It is not new for the Russians to do things like this. As an example of how they behave, from my national memory I remember them accusing Finland of bombing their troops in 1939 (while we were under a non-aggression pact) and giving them the right to start the Winter War, attack & invade Finland (yes they failed, even with overwhelming resources). No such bombing came from the Finnish Defence Forces, they arranged the scene completely by themselfs and also admitted it in the 1990's after getting enough pressure.

      When the houses in Moscow were blewn up and they blamed the Chechens for doing it, I was already back then suspecting that it is the Russians themselfs who blew the houses up (also what Litvinenko said), just to get an excuse to start the war in Chechnya. Looks very, very similar to what happened in 1939 with Finland... it is thus not a wonder at all that there is still a big gap between Finland and Russia even in these "modern" days. They are not making any kind of attempts to make us trust them more and the recent incidents only make the situation much worse, showing how Russia is really governed.

    45. Re:Reading the artcle...... by tigga · · Score: 1
      You probably have no idea what the history is, do you?

      And you are definitely don't, aren't you?

      If talking about west we talk about England, there were no conflicts between Russia and England.
      How about Crimean War (1854-56)?

      If we're talking about Germany, Russia had several wars with Germany, and won every one of them. Especially glorious was the victory on Ladoga lake, where German Teuton crusaders were wiped out by Alexander Nevsky.
      Oh-oh. Lake Peipus (Chudskoye Lake) it was and by Livonian chronicle "Twenty brothers lay dead and six were captured" - those are Teuton losses. By the way Germany did not have any relation to that conflict. It was crusade by Teutonic Order knights. You might heard about Battle of Grunwald (1410) but Kingdom of Poland and the Grand Duchy of Lithuania won it, not Russia. First real war Russia had with Germany was WWI and it shattered Russian Empire. Do you call victory the Treaty of Brest-Litovsk (March 3 1918)? Russia lost Finland, the Baltic provinces, parts of Poland and Ukraine. Only on November 11,1918 Armistice with Germmany was signed.

      Russia won a terrible war with Mongolia.
      That's interesting - Rus' principalities (no Russia) were beaten and were paying annual tributes to Mongol Horde for 240 years. There were a lot of battles, of course. But Rus still was paying. The Great standing on the Ugra river in 1480 stopped it - but it was just standoff, no battle was won.

      helped Greeks and Spanish to fight fascism in 30s,
      Greeks? Do you mean Greece Civil war 1946-49?

      USSR (read: Russia) won a war against USA in Vietnam and Korea
      Please read something. Soviet Union helped but did not participated directly (some pilots and technical support did but in small numbers). North Korea was almost lost but China military intervention save North Koreans. No victory for both sides. Do you know Paris Peace Accords was signed and USA moved out its troops from Vietnam by March 29, 1973 ? South Vietnam was won over in 1975 but without US participation.

      there is no such thing as "the west"
      Try read here - http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Western_world

      That is capitalism, my friend, everything costs so much as you are ready to pay for it
      You do not know economics either. Your education should include some Karl Marx..
      It is a bit more complicated, seller also has word in price definition, right?

      And that is democracy, when good relations with leader of Russia will not bring you discounts.
      So why some countries, like Belarus pay for oil substantially less than Ukraine and Georgia? Democracy?

      You've got almost all your facts wrong. How could you make any conclusions?

    46. Re:Reading the artcle...... by shutdown+-p+now · · Score: 2, Informative
      Which they do here in Russia nowadays.

      But no, it's not totalitarian. The fact that I'm - a Russian, living in Russia - is able to write it, and noone will go after me for this, proves otherwise. Nah, it's not even anywhere near China yet. It's just your typical African-style third-world country with utterly corrupt but formally democratic government (and if you look at various freedom, life quality, wealth distribution & corruption indices, that's where Russia is today, somewhere in the company of Ghana, Mozambique and Zimbabwe). Noone cares what you say in general, until your words start to inconvenience those in power - for that they must at the very least be heard by someone who cares, so kitchen talk and random ranting on the Net (like this post) are not enough to make the government interested in you. But when you are a journalist or otherwise notable figure with access to mass media channels, and your words are heard and listened to... that's when they try to shut you up by any means necessary. Jail & assassination are the last resort measures in this game, though by no means unheard of.

    47. Re:Reading the artcle...... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      Do you think that 8000km of oil pipe line doesn`t cost anything? Well, if it`s too expensive, you could buy oil from Saudi or from Iran...

      About allies... Let`s look how many times Western European countries tried to conqest Russia... Poland in XVII, France in 1812, Germany in 1914 and 1941. It`s only great wars, I don`t mention wars with Prussia, Austria, England (with help of Turkey) and others. Our army was in Paris, Berlin (twice), Milan, etc. It was an answer for agression from the west. Russia many times was in war, but most of these wars was made in the west...

    48. Re:Reading the artcle...... by coastwalker · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Disagreeable though Putins reign may be I dont automatically think this apalling act was comissioned by him. If you take a look on Wikipedia at Polonium 210 you will see that it is used in commercial elctrostatic dissipators. If I was AlQuaida I could buy these things and dissolve the Polonium in Hydochloric acid and make a Polonium salt. This material is 5000 times more toxic than radium and totaly leathal if you can get a pin heads worth to be drunk by your victim.

      The assasination would be a handy political thing for Al Quaida, to stop Russia from supplying Europe with oil and gas and force Russia to sell to China and India instead. That way you would be more likely to see a continued occupation of Iraq and a continued running sore between the West and the Moslem world - not to mention the increased likelyhood of war between the West and oil supplying Arab states. All this is grist to the mill of Al Quaida which needs continued conflict in order to exist. Remember that their winning card is that their warped religion allows them to kill as many of their own people as the enemy in order to achieve their goals - and to get away with doing this.

      Putin is the obvious source of this assasination but its an increadibly stupid move if you want to increase the value of your oil and gas revenues where the more customers there are the higher a price you can charge. I dont think it was at the behest of Putin. Though its always possible it was done by a stupid Russian criminal who hoped to gain favour. My guess is that it was commissioned by a chezen cell under the direction of Al Quaida.

      --
      Facts are history now plebs have politics for religion on social media.
    49. Re:Reading the artcle...... by M1FCJ · · Score: 1

      George Bush Sr. was the head of the CIA for a while, that didn't make him a prezident... Oh, Wait...

    50. Re:Reading the artcle...... by Mondor · · Score: 1

      I have no idea where did you get the numbers of "twenty brothers", in the battle on Chudskoe lake in 1242 were killed more than 500 knights (!) and no one knows how much normal warriors. As I said - 500 knights, and that's elite. I'm sorry for calling Chud by name of Ladoga, I was thinking about the conflict with Sweden.

      This information was just verified with the book "The history of military art in 6th-17th centuries" by E.Razin.

      Then, Belarus is not paying for gas less than Ukraine. At this moment they are paying nearly the same, but both will pay much more since January 1st 2007. Moreover, Belarus have a very friendly relationship with Russia, historically. They never had any conflict. At least memorable one.

      Unfortunately, Russia really lost the WW1, thanks to Germans, who bought the Russian soviet revolution. But then, without that revolt probably Germany wouldn't loose the WW2. So, Russians paid a heavy price but won.

      And the same is about war with Finland, I have no idea where did you get the information regarding Russia "loosing" that war. If Russia lost, than why Finland lost part of it's territory?.. Probably you need to read some chronicles again.

      I'm sorry, but your hatred to Russia won't change the history. And, by the way, I have the economical education :)

    51. Re:Reading the artcle...... by DenisV · · Score: 1
      Oh-oh. Lake Peipus (Chudskoye Lake) it was and by Livonian chronicle "Twenty brothers lay dead and six were captured" - those are Teuton losses

      Yes, they write in chronicle this stuff. But if Teuton losses is only 26 men, why did they run away?

      Two years before in 1240, Alexander Nevsky defeats Swedish army.

      First real war Russia had with Germany was WWI and it shattered Russian Empire. Do you call victory the Treaty of Brest-Litovsk (March 3 1918)?

      You have missed. You forgot war between Frederic the Great and Russia. Russian army under command of marshal Nikolay Saltykov takes Berlin.

      About empire... During WWI 2 empires have died (Russia and Austria) and two seriously wounded (GB, Osman). So WWI shattered many empires.

      Do you call victory the Treaty of Brest-Litovsk (March 3 1918)? Russia lost Finland, the Baltic provinces, parts of Poland and Ukraine. Only on November 11,1918 Armistice with Germmany was signed.

      No, it`s not a victory, but Germany is also isn`t a winner. It was a "deal" between Lenin and people. Lenin give them peace, and they give him a power. That's interesting - Rus' principalities (no Russia) were beaten and were paying annual tributes to Mongol Horde for 240 years. There were a lot of battles, of course. But Rus still was paying. The Great standing on the Ugra river in 1480 stopped it - but it was just standoff, no battle was won.

      1380 -- Russian Duke Dmitry of the Don won Battle of Kulikovo. The last battle with mongols were in time of Ekaterine the Great.

      That is capitalism, my friend, everything costs so much as you are ready to pay for it

      You do not know economics either. Your education should include some Karl Marx.. It is a bit more complicated, seller also has word in price definition, right?

      Anyway, you have to pay for any of more than 8000km of oil pipe line.

      So why some countries, like Belarus pay for oil substantially less than Ukraine and Georgia? Democracy?

      Because Ukrainian and especially Georgian governments (governments, not people!) have forgot about Russian help, Russian blood, Russian friendship. And this is a rule of thumb: if you think that you are self-dependent and you don`t need anyone, you have to be self-dependent.

    52. Re:Reading the artcle...... by muyuubyou · · Score: 1

      Ukrainian and Georgian people don't want to be run by russian thugs. Trust me on this.

      Russia is all nice and dandy, but let independent countries run their own biz. They call that, you know, imperialism.

    53. Re:Reading the artcle...... by bergeron76 · · Score: 1

      Okay - I'm sure that _NUMEROUS_ people whom have access to Polonium-210 would be out to kill a "raving lunatic" rather than trying to take out a political foe.

      I would've thought it would have been a teenager killing his teacher because he failed a test. Strangely, it was an ex-KGB agent killed by the Prime Minister.

      What a fool I must be.

      --
      Don't think that a small group of dedicated individuals can't change the world. It's the only thing that ever has.
    54. Re:Reading the artcle...... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      Ukrainian and Georgian people don't want to be run by russian thugs. Trust me on this. Russia is all nice and dandy, but let independent countries run their own biz. They call that, you know, imperialism.

      It`s only high-flown words. The only reason for Georgian government to blame on Russia is poor economical situation. They can`t goes off from crisis (crisis starts years before the wine war) so they blame that Russia is evil Empire. It`s so simple... Bush made the same thing: he blame on Iraq and won elections.

      Ukrainian government more than half year (a year later orange revolution) was in war between two parties. They don`t do anything about economics, they have a battle for power. Of course they blame that Russia is evil empire because they can`t come to agreement. Some of Ukrainian ministers were criminals, and they blame on Russia for this... It`s look like a kind of inferiority complex.

    55. Re:Reading the artcle...... by tigga · · Score: 1
      Oh-oh. Lake Peipus (Chudskoye Lake) it was and by Livonian chronicle "Twenty brothers lay dead and six were captured" - those are Teuton losses

      Yes, they write in chronicle this stuff. But if Teuton losses is only 26 men, why did they run away?

      They did not count common people losses for sure. It was a victory but it's significance was overrated for propaganda purposes in Stalin time.

      You forgot war between Frederic the Great and Russia. Russian army under command of marshal Nikolay Saltykov takes Berlin.

      Yes, I've forgotten about Seven Years' War. It was war between Great Britain, Prussia, Hanover and Austria, Saxony, France, Sweden, Spain, Russia. Winston Churchill called it World War. It can't be called war between Russia and Prussia only. There were a lot of battles. And Frederick lost Berlin at least twice in the war including one in year 1760 to Russians under General Pyotr Saltykov and Austrians under General Lacy. Britain, Prussia and Hanover won the war. Result of war for Prussia - they lost nothing but gained influence. Result of war for Russia - they got nothing but some international recognition.

      ... So why some countries, like Belarus pay for oil substantially less than Ukraine and Georgia? Democracy?
      Because Ukrainian and especially Georgian governments (governments, not people!) have forgot about Russian help, Russian blood, Russian friendship.

      So they should be punished, right?

    56. Re:Reading the artcle...... by tigga · · Score: 1
      I have no idea where did you get the numbers of "twenty brothers", in the battle on Chudskoe lake in 1242 were killed more than 500 knights (!) and no one knows how much normal warriors. As I said - 500 knights, and that's elite. I'm sorry for calling Chud by name of Ladoga, I was thinking about the conflict with Sweden.

      This information was just verified with the book "The history of military art in 6th-17th centuries" by E.Razin.

      In English - http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Battle_of_Lake_Peipus
      IN Russian - http://ru.wikipedia.org/wiki/%D0%9B%D0%B5%D0%B4%D0 %BE%D0%B2%D0%BE%D0%B5_%D0%BF%D0%BE%D0%B1%D0%BE%D0% B8%D1%89%D0%B5
      Link from Russian Wikipedia to research - http://www.polit.ru/research/2005/04/15/poboitshe. html

      "...
      And the same is about war with Finland, I have no idea where did you get the information regarding Russia "loosing" that war.

      I mentioned loss of Finland for Russia as it happened in 1917.
      I did not mean to relate to USSR Pyrrhic victory in Soviet-Finnish War.

      I'm sorry, but your hatred to Russia won't change the history.
      It is sad that pointing on some historic factual errors means hatred of Russia for you. I did not criticize Russia, I just meant to point out necessity to check facts you mention in forum. It is so easy with Internet access now.

      And, by the way, I have the economical education :)
      Good, just please do not try to express complicated ideas in one sentence - only genius can do it.

    57. Re:Reading the artcle...... by shutdown+-p+now · · Score: 1

      Given that Chechen separatists have already started dissiminating information that Litvinenko converted to Islam shortly before death, there might be some truth to this.

    58. Re:Reading the artcle...... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The guys that are dropping "like flies", represent quite an interesting group. All of them come from what can be described as a lunatic fringe of Russian politics, however they have acquired a degree of notoriety in the West by pandering to the interests, which view Putin government as not sufficiently compliant with the wishes of the Masters of the Universe (TM). At the same time, none of them carried enough political weight to present an effective threat to the concept of Singapore-style managed democracy that Putin is implementing. Moreover, this group is largely the reason why Western-sponsored changes got a bad rap in Russia after the chaotic 90's. This makes their murder a rather obvious tool for mounting a campaign to further alienate Russia from the West, which is confirmed by the immediate slew of reports all too happy to implicate Kremlin in these crimes.

      The actual people that have the will and the wherewithal to constitute a threat to the current ruling elite in Russia, whose elimination would be far more logical for Putin to pursue, remain largely below the radar of the press in the West. Most of them acquired huge amounts of money in Russia during the 90's with a demonstrated lack of scruples (a corpse here and there was NOT an exception) and had to leave the country having lost the privileges they enjoyed during that time. They are definitely not happy about the loss of their influence and thus the plot thickens...

    59. Re:Reading the artcle...... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      They did not count common people losses for sure. It was a victory but it's significance was overrated for propaganda purposes in Stalin time.

      So they has to go away -- it has significance.

      You forgot war between Frederic the Great and Russia. Russian army under command of marshal Nikolay Saltykov takes Berlin.

      Yes, I've forgotten about Seven Years' War. It was war between Great Britain, Prussia, Hanover and Austria, Saxony, France, Sweden, Spain, Russia. Winston Churchill called it World War. It can't be called war between Russia and Prussia only. There were a lot of battles. And Frederick lost Berlin at least twice in the war including one in year 1760 to Russians under General Pyotr Saltykov and Austrians under General Lacy. Britain, Prussia and Hanover won the war. Result of war for Prussia - they lost nothing but gained influence. Result of war for Russia - they got nothing but some international recognition.

      I`m sorry, of course Petr Saltykov (Nikolay was his son).

      ... So why some countries, like Belarus pay for oil substantially less than Ukraine and Georgia? Democracy? Because Ukrainian and especially Georgian governments (governments, not people!) have forgot about Russian help, Russian blood, Russian friendship.

      So they should be punished, right?

      Punished? Russia doesn`t punish Georgia or Ukraina. Georgia has to sell good wine as Armenia or Moldova or France or anybody else. Georgia must clean his territory from terrorists bases as anybody else. Poland has to control exported meat quality. Thats all.

      Also Georgian government has to respect his neighbors, especially Osetia and Abkhasia.

    60. Re:Reading the artcle...... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Completely agree with this comment. It is interesting that the only news org that mentioned that Mr. Litvienko converted to Islam and supported a fugitive Chechen rebel leader in the UK is aljazeera.com. All of the accusations Litvienko made against the FSB never had any evidence, yet he co authored a book blaming FSB for explosions in Moscow, and guess who his sponsor was, Mr Berezovsky another fugitive blamed for one of the largest financial scams in Russia. Remember what happens to people like that here, at least most of the time. Then he claims to have been ordered to assasinate Mr. Berezovsky by the FSB, hence the reason for his defection to the UK, how convinient. Might I add that it is exactly how Beria became a favorite of Stalin in his days. So now the EU is screaming foul, let's have a massive investigation, yet they were presented with evidence of Berezovsky's support for militant muslims, no response there, as long as his not killing europeans. There is this funny saying that if militants are killing Russians, they are freedom fighters, if they are killing Westerners, they must be terrorists. This is defintely the way EU is running its policies, UK included. Time for them to wake up, soon they will not have the luxury of picking which fights to pick.

    61. Re:Reading the artcle...... by Master+of+Transhuman · · Score: 1

      Thank you for pointing out some facts conveniently overlooked by the Western press eager to hang Putin.

      And you got scored zero for it - typical of /.

      --
      Richard Steven Hack - This sig is TOO GODDAMN SHORT TO DO ANYTHING USEFUL WITH! MORONS!
    62. Re:Reading the artcle...... by muyuubyou · · Score: 1

      Nobody is claiming Ukraine is better or worse than Russia. There are two sides to this:

      1 Ukrainian people (for the most part, especially in the western half) believe they (or shall I say "we" as I have family there) have better chances outside of the russian sphere of influence. Seriously, you may think otherwise from the outside, but except for people who have very close ties to Russia and depend on them, the majority of the country is aware of the benefits to the west.

      2 They think Russia just want to police and share their stuff. Why dealing with both your mafia and the russian mafia?

      This is not about friendship, it's about a foreign power wanting to have a hold of your own resources. Of course there is a battle for power in Ukraine and both parties are crooked, but it's pretty safe to say they have a better shot in the near future next to the EU than to the Russian Federation. This is all the people want - to live better, and during their lifetime if possible ;)

      Russia is a close, very similar people, but it's not the very same people and they have their own interests. It's just that. I like Russia as much as the next guy, but I wouldn't want them to hinder my own prosperity.

    63. Re:Reading the artcle...... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      >Napoleon [...] was the only one who captured the Moscow

      the Poles and Lithuanians also did this in 1605. Amusingly 400 years later Russians still can't get over it and last year Putin even invented a special holiday called "Day of People's Unity".

    64. Re:Reading the artcle...... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I haven't heard anything about Poland demanding Russian gas for free. The issue seems to have more to do with the fact that that Poland has been under Russian occupation for over almost 200 years (with a 20 year brake between the world wars), while Japan managed to repel Russian aggression. And many Russians still believe Central and Eastern Europe to be some soft of their zone of influence. Russia continues to make clearly hostile moves towards countries in that region (an example from the top of my head Russia imposed an embargo on Polish meat, as we now know based on forged document, shortly after the Polish society demonstrated their solidarity with Ukrainians during the Orange Revolution).

    65. Re:Reading the artcle...... by davidsyes · · Score: 1

      "Dudley Goodhead, from the UK's MRC Radiation and Genome Stability Unit, agrees that the poisoning must have been "a high-tech operation". But he points out that, in one respect, it was "stupid" because it left such an easily detectable trail. Further analysis of the polonium, and any other associated isotopes, could provide important clues as to its origins, he says."

      I got that from:

      http://www.newscientist.com/article/dn10668-exspys -polonium-poisoning-suggests-sophistication.html

      My take is this:

      -- Someone wanted him guaranteed D.E.A.D., DEAD! as in eRADicated...
      -- Someone doesn't care that polonium would be detected or traced to the Sushi bar.

      -- Someone knows that polonium is an emitter, but is so small they can pass it through airports undetected or virtually so

      -- Someone wants to deliver a message that as long as polonium can be produced or stolen, NO one is safe if the server of the poison has access to the target's food or drink or to the target's supplier of food or drink

      Those ideas being posited, I suspect that was some HOT Sushi. Maybe hotter than hot. I wonder how cold the Sushi chef's hands are anymore. I heard (well, in a Korean film) that women don't make good Sushi chef's because their hands are too warm. But, after handling or fearing having handled polonium such chefs might be a bit warmer than usual.

      And, for some reason, I am thinking "Appolonia", that group from the 80's...

      --
      Previously: "Linux... Toward the Sunrise..." Now: "Linux... Toward the-- No, now, part of Every Sunrise"
  4. History repeating, sort of by Phanatic1a · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Shades of Georgi Markov, a Soviet expatriate/dissident who was also assassinated in London. He was stabbed in the leg with a special spring-loaded umbrella that subcutaneously injected a metal pellet contaminated with ricin. They didn't even find the pellet until he was already dead, and it took some work to find out just what had killed him.

    I wonder how they got the polonium into him. For a death this rapid, he'd pretty much have had to ingest it.

    1. Re:History repeating, sort of by meshko · · Score: 3, Informative

      a Soviet expatriate/dissidentBulgarian For a death this rapid, he'd pretty much have had to ingest it.Three weeks is nto that rapid.

      --
      I passed the Turing test.
    2. Re:History repeating, sort of by Chicane-UK · · Score: 2, Informative

      Not sure if its mentioned in TFA (have to admit I didn't look) but the reports from the BBC this week, about his poisoning (and before his death) stated that he'd met two men for lunch at a Sushi bar and began to feel seriously ill a few hours after eating there.

      Not sure if they would be able to put polonium into sushi without him realising? Not even sure what it is or how large a dose you'd need to kill someone! :|

      --
      "Hey! Unless this is a nude love-in, get the hell off my property!!"
    3. Re:History repeating, sort of by peragrin · · Score: 3, Funny

      for polonium to kill you with alpha radiation, it would have to be ingested. The real question is what seasonings they use to cover up the taste. Of course it is british cuisine we are talking about. So they may never know.

      --
      i thought once I was found, but it was only a dream.
    4. Re:History repeating, sort of by dewie · · Score: 2, Funny

      Not sure if they would be able to put polonium into sushi without him realising?

      Isn't it obvious? The wasabi! You could hide anything in that stuff, and no-one would ever taste it. It'd even cover up the telltale green glow!

      --
      Jurisprudence Fetishist Gets Off On A Technicality --theonion.com
    5. Re:History repeating, sort of by thue · · Score: 2, Interesting

      The real question is what seasonings they use to cover up the taste

      For the curious, Thallium is odorless and tasteless. I guess animals just don't evolve receptors for substances not usually found in nature.

    6. Re:History repeating, sort of by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      A previous x-ray showed up three anomolous blobs, which might be significant.

    7. Re:History repeating, sort of by Phanatic1a · · Score: 4, Informative

      It is for a death from radiological causes. To kill someone in mere days requires obscenely high doses of radiation, we're talking prompt-criticality accidents. Slotin took 2100 rems in an instant, enough to noticeably heat the air in the room, and he still lasted for 9 days.

    8. Re:History repeating, sort of by CmdrGravy · · Score: 3, Funny

      Yes. Sushi stalwart cornerstone of British cusine since time immemorial.

    9. Re:History repeating, sort of by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I wonder how they got the polonium into him. For a death this rapid, he'd pretty much have had to ingest it.

      It would be a lot simpler to use the standard Russian assassination technique of lead poisoning. In that case, the method of introduction is trans-occipital injection at a rate of 2,900 ft/s.

    10. Re:History repeating, sort of by LWATCDR · · Score: 2, Informative

      While funny it probably isn't a real problem.
      From the wikipedia the "safe" body load of Po210 is a massive 6.8*10^-12 grams.
      I doubt that you would have to ingest very much of it to kill you.

      --
      See my blog http://ilovecookes.blogspot.com/ for light hearted technical information.
    11. Re:History repeating, sort of by ahillen · · Score: 4, Interesting

      It is for a death from radiological causes. To kill someone in mere days requires obscenely high doses of radiation,

      But as far as I understand it, it is not claimed that he died from the radiation, but from the fact that Polonium is also very toxic.

    12. Re:History repeating, sort of by demondawn · · Score: 1

      Mr. Litvinenko fell ill after having lunch at a sushi restaraunt with one Mario Scaramella (now hiding in fear of his life somewhere, according to http://www.timesonline.co.uk/article/0,,13509-2462 162,00.html. There are also reports he had tea with a Russian friend before going to lunch. So ingestion isn't exactly far-fetched.

    13. Re:History repeating, sort of by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Can I get that measurement in something easier to visualize?

      Perhaps Libraries of Congress?

    14. Re:History repeating, sort of by tobe · · Score: 1

      Just for reference the UK has the largest concentration of Michelin starred restaurants anywhere in the world right now including France.

      Compare and contrast with the US where Chuck-e-Cheese is a restaurant and I nearly got thrown out of a place for correcting the waiter on the pronunciation of the wine Merlot (it's Mer-loh).

    15. Re:History repeating, sort of by deglr6328 · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Polonium is horribly toxic BECAUSE of its unbelieveably high radioactivity rate. It is a radiotoxicity not a chemical toxicity. I'm sure Po also posesses chemical (heavy metal) toxicity properties as well but you would be stone dead from the radiotoxicity alone of a tiny dose LONG before any heavy metal toxicity was an issue. I don't think people are appreciating just how radiotoxic it actually is, for instance a mere tenth of a milligram of Po-210 would give you a dose hundreds of times greater than Louis Slotin had.

      --
      - "Hear that?! The percolations are imminent! Cease your ingress!"
    16. Re:History repeating, sort of by Moofie · · Score: 1

      You're seriously using Chuck E. Cheese as a benchmark of American cuisine? Come on, now. I know it's fashionable to make like Americans are all ignorant louts, but you're really reaching here.

      --
      Why yes, I AM a rocket scientist!
    17. Re:History repeating, sort of by petermgreen · · Score: 1

      there is generally quite a large difference though between "considered safe" and "known to be deadly"

      --
      note: i'm known as plugwash most places but i screwd up registering that here somehow in the past and now can't register
    18. Re:History repeating, sort of by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Smaller than a grain of sand, I suppose.

    19. Re:History repeating, sort of by tobe · · Score: 1

      Nah.. not really.. it's just an easy target.. but the UK right now, especially London, has 4 of the top 10 restaurants in the world and fully 1 in 4 of the top 50. The idea that British cuisine is lumpen is 20 years old. It's often forgotten that whilst they share so much with the culture of the US they are actually a European nation.

    20. Re:History repeating, sort of by Stanneh · · Score: 1

      sushi a british cuisine?

      let me guess your a yank?

      im just taking a guess here but im willing to bet more peaple have died from that great american cuisine the big mac meal than have died from sushi dripping with polonium.

      --
      I Predict A Riot
    21. Re:History repeating, sort of by Moofie · · Score: 1

      You are going to need to explain bangers to me, though. Why would you eat sausage that tastes like slightly salty sawdust?

      --
      Why yes, I AM a rocket scientist!
    22. Re:History repeating, sort of by Ed+Avis · · Score: 1

      Take $20 and try to buy a meal in London - in Paris - in Buenos Aires. I'm sure you won't find that London has the best food. The existence of a small number of vastly expensive restaurants doesn't do much good when 80% of the population is stuck with junk food.

      --
      -- Ed Avis ed@membled.com
    23. Re:History repeating, sort of by debrain · · Score: 2, Insightful

      I guess animals just don't evolve receptors for substances not usually found in nature.

      Artifical flavours taste pretty strong to me. ;-)

    24. Re:History repeating, sort of by 2sheds · · Score: 1

      While we do have many excellent restaurants, and the old cliches about British food are as out of date as a map of the world with the important bits coloured pink (and mostly have an origin in WWII-era shortages anyway), I think a big problem here is that food is not truly ingrained into popular culture like in, say, France or Italy.

      Sure, we can enjoy a good meal out, but as a country we seem to see day-to-day eating more as a chore than anything else - something we have do do, which is a shame, because good food is such a pleasure. You'd think a nation obsessed by TV cookery programmes would do better.

      On the one hand, there is hope in the growing slow food and organic movements and the likes of farmers markets re-connecting people with wonderful ingredients and physical suppliers, but then on the other hand we seem to be refusing to teach kids about healthy eating and nutrition in school; the average spend per saturated fat-tastic state school meal was 35p a head until very recently when celebrity chef Jamie Oliver started a campaign for reform. Even now it's not all that much higher; compare to France where food is a religion and the spend is between UKP1.50 and 4.00.

      --

      Absit Invidia
    25. Re:History repeating, sort of by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      ...lead poisoning. In that case, the method of introduction is trans-occipital injection at a rate of 2,900 ft/s.

      Brynn Hartman, is that you?
      http://www.cnn.com/SHOWBIZ/TV/9805/28/hartman/

    26. Re:History repeating, sort of by bcrowell · · Score: 1

      No, it's the radiation. 210Po is 5000 times more radioactive than radium, so radioactive that a pure half-gram chunk will heat itself as hot as your oven when you set it on "clean." It's almost a trillion times more toxic than cyanide, and that ain't because of its chemical properties.

    27. Re:History repeating, sort of by QRDeNameland · · Score: 1

      Even so, the "known to be deadly" dose could be 1,000,000 times the "considered safe" dose, and it would still be 6.8*10^-6 grams or 6.8 micrograms. Doesn't seem like it should be so hard to hide in food.

      --
      Momentarily, the need for the construction of new light will no longer exist.
    28. Re:History repeating, sort of by the_brobdingnagian · · Score: 1

      Artificial flavours are specially modeled to fit to specific receptors.

    29. Re:History repeating, sort of by QRDeNameland · · Score: 2, Informative

      According to this, a grain of sand can range from 0.30 mg to 13 mg. That's milligrams: 1/1,000ths of grams.

      The quoted safe dose of Po-210 is 6.8 picograms, which is trillionths (1/1,000,000,000,000) of grams.

      Without taking the differences of density between sand and Po-210 into account (quartz is 2.65, Po is over 9), that amount is in the order of one-billionth of a grain of sand.

      --
      Momentarily, the need for the construction of new light will no longer exist.
    30. Re:History repeating, sort of by oohshiny · · Score: 0

      Just for reference the UK has the largest concentration of Michelin starred restaurants anywhere in the world right now including France.

      I suppose that settles the matter for you if you are the kind of person that thinks that a mass-market French paperback tourist guide defines what good dining is.

      and I nearly got thrown out of a place for correcting the waiter on the pronunciation of the wine Merlot (it's Mer-loh).

      Mainly what that tells us is that you're an uncivilized lout; no reasonable person would stoop to engaging in discussions about French pronunciation with a waiter.

    31. Re:History repeating, sort of by kravlor · · Score: 5, Informative

      The problem is that Po-210 is a potent alpha emitter. Since these guys are kicking off 5 MeV alphas, you will get a huge dose localized to a few cm from the parent nucleus. In the digestive system, you'll quickly tear things apart, killing the stem cells of the intestinal tract. It gets worse if absorbed into the bloodstream and the bone marrow.

      While I'm not a toxicologist, I am a nuclear physicist; one of the foremost rules of radiation safety is to avoid ingesting alpha sources (or any other source, for God's sake) for precisely this reason. FWIW, alpha sources are one of the safer things to work with, for exactly the same reason that they're so bad for you if ingested: a few cm of shielding is sufficient to stop the penetrating alpha particles.

    32. Re:History repeating, sort of by kravlor · · Score: 2, Insightful

      When it comes to eating alpha sources, nothing should be considered safe, since the localized range (~cm) of the emitters, coupled with the strong energies of the alphas (~MeV) do terrible damage to the body.

    33. Re:History repeating, sort of by tobe · · Score: 1

      $20 will not buy me a great meal in London. It will buy me a good meal though. $20 in LA will buy me a lot of calories.. but a great meal.. no.

    34. Re:History repeating, sort of by cmd · · Score: 5, Interesting
      New York Times: Mr. Litvinenko, 43, a prominent opponent of the Kremlin, was hospitalized earlier this month. He said that he fell ill after having lunch at a sushi restaurant with a man who said he had information about the killing of Anna Politkovskaya, a journalist who had made her name as a critic of the government's policies in Chechnya.

      I read another article in which Litvinenko suspected the poison was in the tea served to him.

      Also, Litvinenko and Putin have a long history:
      New York Times: (from the archives, paid registration required)

      November 21, 1998
      Report of Plot to Kill Tycoon Leads Yeltsin to Call Inquiry
      By MICHAEL WINES

      President Boris N. Yeltsin ordered an inquiry today into spectacular charges leveled earlier this week -- so far without evidence -- that Russia's equivalent of the F.B.I. plotted to kill one of the country's most influential tycoons.

      The tycoon is Boris A. Berezovsky, an oil magnate and director of Russia's biggest television network, who was a leading supporter of Mr. Yeltsin during the last presidential campaign in 1996.

      Mr. Berezovsky, who is still alive, released a letter last week asserting that the Federal Security Service, a spinoff of the old Soviet K.G.B. that is responsible for domestic law enforcement, plotted last winter to murder him.

      On Tuesday the source of Mr. Berezovsky's information, a Security Service colonel named Aleksandr Litvinenko, called a news conference to elaborate on the accusation and warn that a rogue element was running wild within the agency.

      ...

      The list of very prominent people who once opposed Putin and suffered extremely nasty reversals of fortune is growing conspicuously long:

      • Life sentence to a Siberian gulag [Mikhail Khodorkovsky]
      • Slow, painful, and irreversible death from radiation poisoning [Litvinenko]
      • Execution (hitman style) on one's doorstep [Anna Politkovskaya]
      • Execution leaving a soccer game [Andrei Kozlov]
      • Execution at one's dacha [Enver Ziganshin]
      • Dioxin poisoning (nearly fatal) [Viktor A. Yushchenko]

      Ironically, an interview of Litvinenko from December 15 2004 included this prophetic quote:

      "The view inside our agency was that poison is just a weapon, like a pistol," said Alexander V. Litvinenko, who served in the K.G.B. and its Russian successor, the Federal Security Service, from 1988 to 1999 and now lives in London. "It's not seen that way in the West, but it was just viewed as an ordinary tool."
    35. Re:History repeating, sort of by MightyMartian · · Score: 1

      You bought a bottle of wine at Chuck E. Cheese? That's more pathetic than American cuisine.

      --
      The world's burning. Moped Jesus spotted on I50. Details at 11.
    36. Re:History repeating, sort of by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Bulgaria was, at the time, a Soviet country.

    37. Re:History repeating, sort of by Bitsy+Boffin · · Score: 1
      The list of very prominent people who once opposed Putin and suffered extremely nasty reversals of fortune is growing conspicuously long:


      While I certainly wouldn't put it past any leader of a super power to, err, neutralise dissidents, it pays to remember that in any political system there are certain factions removed from the direct process who seek to influence the political climate.

      I don't follow Russian politics, so I don't know who stands to advantage from removing those "unfaithful" to Putin, but there surely would be some powerful and ruthless enough to have conducted such assasinations, outside of the government, without thier knowledge, for thier own ultimate advantage.
      --
      NZ Electronics Enthusiasts: Check out my Trade Me Listings
    38. Re:History repeating, sort of by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      As part of my work I've travelled around Europe a lot, many many places, mostly for about a week each place.

      One thing I've noticed is that the standard of reheatable frozen or refrigerated packaged food is awful compared to the UK.
      The reason is that in the UK, we live on it. Rest of Europe, it's not so important.

      Other than that, it's pretty much the same.

    39. Re:History repeating, sort of by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I died from radioactive sushi, but you don't hear me complaining about big macs.

    40. Re:History repeating, sort of by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      Nah.. not really.. it's just an easy target.. but the UK right now, especially London, has 4 of the top 10 restaurants in the world and fully 1 in 4 of the top 50. The idea that British cuisine is lumpen is 20 years old. It's often forgotten that whilst they share so much with the culture of the US they are actually a European nation.


      No, but they ARE the lapdogs of the U.S., and they'd do well not to forget that.

      Waves at Tony and Gordon
    41. Re:History repeating, sort of by bcmm · · Score: 1

      A few nitpicks:

      Prompt-criticality accidents on the scale of the one that killed Slotin probably do not cause major heating of the air. If they did, the room would still be hot after the event, and sudden air movements would be observed due to uneven heating. It is more likely that the reported "heat wave" is caused by direct stimulation of nerve endings by the radiation or by the general tissue damage it causes.

      Also, Slotin was exposed to strong gamma radiation for under a second. Litvinenko was exposed to internal alpha radiation for several days. The dosages are hardly comparable.

      --
      # cat /dev/mem | strings | grep -i llama
      Damn, my RAM is full of llamas.
    42. Re:History repeating, sort of by sillybilly · · Score: 1

      There is a reason why da man wants everyone kept on pills, if nothing else, vitamin pills. Then it's only a matter to changing their pills. The taste is already covered up, because nobody chews pills and expects them to taste good. Easy does it, don't even need a "violent" death like J.F. Kennedy needed it, it's enough to get an "accidental overdose" like Marilyn Monroe with a lot less mess to deal wtih.

    43. Re:History repeating, sort of by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Hey, thanks for clearing that up! Now, if he would have died of Thallium poisoning the mystery would be solved!

    44. Re:History repeating, sort of by salimma · · Score: 1

      Soviet bloc. "Soviet citizen" would be understood as referring to someone from the USSR.

      --
      Michel
      Fedora Project Contribut
    45. Re:History repeating, sort of by drsquare · · Score: 1

      $20 won't buy you much anywhere these days, that's not a very good example. Even at average restaurants you're going to pay more than $20 for a decent meal.

    46. Re:History repeating, sort of by kestasjk · · Score: 1

      Artificial flavors are supposed to be chemically similar to natural flavors.. You can produce the ester which makes orange smell like orange very easily in the lab, but that doesn't mean we can taste unnatural chemicals.

      --
      // MD_Update(&m,buf,j);
    47. Re:History repeating, sort of by Richard+W.M.+Jones · · Score: 1

      Provided you don't want to drink, you can get an excellent meal for under $20 (around £11-12) in London at one of the many excellent vegetarian southern Indian restaurants on Drummond Street, near Euston.

      Rich.

    48. Re:History repeating, sort of by Thomas+Miconi · · Score: 1

      You do realise that the most popular British dish is Chicken Tikka Masala, right ?

    49. Re:History repeating, sort of by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Just for you to know, internal radiation is far mor dangerous than external radiation. For example, alpha-sources are not much danger whilst outside, ingest some and you're in trouble.

    50. Re:History repeating, sort of by deglr6328 · · Score: 1

      wow thanks! hey, did you know that the sky is blue?!

      --
      - "Hear that?! The percolations are imminent! Cease your ingress!"
    51. Re:History repeating, sort of by tobe · · Score: 1

      Heh.. yes.. I know those places.. and on the more expensive scale of things, Blah Blah Blah in Goldhawk Rd, Manna in Primrose Hill, Mildreds in Soho, Terre a Terre in Brighton is truly excellent.

      Good vegetarian that I am.

    52. Re:History repeating, sort of by Fred_A · · Score: 1
      Take $20 and try to buy a meal in London - in Paris - in Buenos Aires.
      I'm not too sure about the other two (Buenos Aires because I haven't been yet and London because the prices have gotten quite insane lately) but in Paris you can get a meal for about 12 € if you go in a café outside of the tourist areas and take the dish of the day. 12 € is still probably less than $20 even now...
      --

      May contain traces of nut.
      Made from the freshest electrons.
    53. Re:History repeating, sort of by hughk · · Score: 1

      The accounts of the Slotin incident all mention a wave of heat being felt by the observers who were closest to the experiment. The air wouldn't have been heated directly, more likely it it was the surfaces of the Pu hemispheres heating up with the reaction. Note that we do feel radiated heat quite well (particularly on the face), it isn't necessary for there to be any direct stimulation of the nerves from other forms of radiation.

      --
      See my journal, I write things there
    54. Re:History repeating, sort of by Jaseoldboss · · Score: 1
      I found this article very informative.

      Alpha particle radiation has a very destructive effect on animal tissue because virtually all of its very high ionizing energy is expended within the tissue. Due to its double positive charge, limited range in tissue and enormously high energy, an alpha particle can produce huge numbers of ion pairs in substances with which it interacts. For example, 20,000 ion pairs can be produced per alpha particle per centimeter path length in air. DNA chromosome damage by alpha particle radiation is much greater, by 100 times, than by exposure of DNA to other types of radiation.

      OT. but towards the end, it suggests that almost all cancers from smoking are a result of the tiny 210Po content. Which makes you wonder if they could make safer ones with hydroponics. (The Po comes from the phosphate fertiliser).
    55. Re:History repeating, sort of by hughk · · Score: 1

      You missed out on the assassination of Galina Starovoitova in 98. Not in Putin's time, but she was firmly in favour of democracy and transparency. She would certainly have upset some of the people behind Putin.

      --
      See my journal, I write things there
    56. Re:History repeating, sort of by ochinko · · Score: 1

      Not only is Georgi Markov a Bulgarian but he was killed on the birthday of the Bulgarian head of state and the Communist party then. Just like Politkovskaya which death Litvinenko was investigating was killed on Putin's birthday. It's supposedly a gift from the secret services to their leader.

    57. Re:History repeating, sort of by Alioth · · Score: 1

      Not with Po-210 - it is EXTREMELY radioactive (only has a half life of 139 days), and only tiny quantites are needed. A radioactive source INSIDE the body is far more dangerous than one outside - it sits in the body, irradiating everything. A normal alpha emitter outside of the body wouldn't even penetrate the skin with alphas. Inside the body is a completely different matter. It's entirely feasable that someone can die in three weeks from radiation sickness from being slipped some Po-210.

    58. Re:History repeating, sort of by Alioth · · Score: 1

      Since when was sushi British cuisine? They could have hidden it in the wasabi - you can hide anything in wasabi!

    59. Re:History repeating, sort of by Ed+Avis · · Score: 1

      Thanks for the suggestion. I just got the buffet at Chutneys restaurant. L7.25 including a cup of tea, and not bad. I ate a bit too quickly (which I always do, and particularly in this case because they were closing soon) and gave myself hiccups.

      --
      -- Ed Avis ed@membled.com
    60. Re:History repeating, sort of by Reservoir+Penguin · · Score: 1

      Chodorkovsky was sentenced to 7 years for tax fraud.

      --
      US-UK-Israel: The real Axis of Evil
    61. Re:History repeating, sort of by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Well yesterday I had a reasonable meal at a normal reastaurant for £9. But I live here, so I avoid the tourist places.

    62. Re:History repeating, sort of by deglr6328 · · Score: 1

      wow, you sound like you're an enourmous gaping asshole.

      --
      - "Hear that?! The percolations are imminent! Cease your ingress!"
    63. Re:History repeating, sort of by ivano · · Score: 1
      mmm...americans and english fighting about which nation is better with food.

      Let's see: UK: good food comes from below, the working class, housewifes, kids and the family, not from the number of michelin star restaurants. On the other hand the local produce from around the UK is amazing.

      Now the States: Maybe you guys should stay away from the conversation at the adult table until you can figure out what entree means. On the other hand Good Eats is the greatest cooking program of all time.

      Life is so complicated.

      Ciao

    64. Re:History repeating, sort of by Richard+W.M.+Jones · · Score: 1
      Hey no problem :-?!? I hope you enjoyed it. Our particular favourite is Diwana.

      Rich.

  5. Pro tip: by antifoidulus · · Score: 0

    No matter how cool it may look traveling down that conveyor belt, never EVER eat the neon-green glowing sushi!

    1. Re:Pro tip: by falcon5768 · · Score: 1

      here is a funny thought (going off that whole thing), you think they put it in the wasabi?

      --

      "Slashdot, where telling the truth is overrated but lying is insightful."

    2. Re:Pro tip: by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      a) why 'tf do you care what we think? cant you even analyze your own idea?
      b) it's not funny

    3. Re:Pro tip: by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Out of interest...
      Can a radioactive object's Cherenkov radiation through air appear green at RTP?
      Or is it always blue?

      I'm sure there were reports of a green glow over chernobyl, but I'd always thought that kind of radiation was mostly ultraviolet and above.

  6. In Soviet Russia... by Fuckin+ROBOTS! · · Score: 0, Funny

    Joke Punches YOU!

    --
    You see 'em? They're EVERYWHERE!
  7. The non-reversal should read: by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    In Putin's russia, the KGB poison you.

    The wealth and reach of the Russian Mafia (Putin and his former KGB cronies) is terrifying and the UK government just love that dirty money.

    1. Re:The non-reversal should read: by Master+of+Transhuman · · Score: 1, Flamebait


      Unfortunately for your theory, Putin is not involved in the "Russian Mafia" - which should read as "the Russian-Israeli Mafia" since some seventy of the Russian oligarchs that Putin chased out of Russia now have Israeli passports (whether they were ever "Jewish" or not, apparently.)

      Read Justin Raimondo's analysis of the case at Antiwar.com. He makes a good case for Putin being framed for this by US and other neocons and oligarchs trying to restart the "Cold War".

      It works the same as Syria being framed for the Harriri (and now Gemayel) murders in Lebanon - since the real beneficiary of all this is Israel, who is known to have assassination squads operating in Lebanon for several years.

      Personally, I think in 2008 we should run Putin for US President - with either George Galloway or Segolene Royal as Vice-President. At least we'd get a smart President and either a smart and/or good-looking (Segolene makes Hillary look like Ernest Borgnine - and he's been dead for years) Vice President - instead of getting another neocon or the Democratic equivalent in both slots.

      --
      Richard Steven Hack - This sig is TOO GODDAMN SHORT TO DO ANYTHING USEFUL WITH! MORONS!
    2. Re:The non-reversal should read: by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Wow, it didn't take long for someone to blame this death on Bush, the neocons, and Israel (and the assassinations in Lebannon to boot).

      Btw, were Bush, the neocons, and Israel also responsible for blowing up the levees in New Orleans just like they blew up the WTC and bombed the trains in Spain and England?

    3. Re:The non-reversal should read: by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Oh, of course the Jews are behind it all, what an original theory.

    4. Re:The non-reversal should read: by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      (Segolene makes Hillary look like Ernest Borgnine - and he's been dead for years)

      Ernest Borgnine is still alive (and working).

      Nevertheless this was still more accurate than the rest of your diatribe.

      S.

    5. Re:The non-reversal should read: by heroofhyr · · Score: 1
      Oh, of course the Jews are behind it all, what an original theory.

      The poster you're replying to does sound a bit...out there...but he/she is right in one thing: there are a lot of non-Jews from former Soviet countries that went to Israel in the 90s. Organised crime, drug and weapons smuggling, and forced sex trafficking in Jerusalem and Tel-Aviv are serious problems--and most of it comes from criminals who came to Israel under the mass exodus from the USSR (who the governments were happy to be rid of) and who probably think "kosher" is a mispronunciation of "kasha." I don't really see how it can possibly be linked to neoconservatives or Bush unless you include those insane evangelical organisations in the USA like "Eagles' Wings" and "Christians for Israel"1 that pretend to want to help people in former Soviet blocs escape persecution and send them to Israel, but only because they want to try and fulfill the Armageddon prophecies of the Bible by restoring the Kingdom of Jerusalem. In other words, to a lot of fundamentalist Christians support of Israel is merely a means to an end--quite literally. By the way, as polemic and full of assumptions without anything to back them up as the parent was, throwing in the comments about the World Trade Center bombing et al was a bit unfair. Regardless of the poster's real feelings on the subject, the parent wasn't explicitly making anti-Semitic comments (in fact, anyone who assumes that every Israeli citizen must be Jewish is the one making the generalisations and shows they've obviously never been to Israel) and throwing things in that they never said to ridicule wasn't the best (or even an acceptable) way to go about replying.



      1. From the About Us section of http://www.c4israel.org/ :
      Christians for Israel is an international spiritual movement of Christians who recognise the return of the Jewish people to Israel as fulfilment of biblical prophecy and a major sign pointing toward the coming of the Lord Jesus Christ.
      --
      brandelf: invalid ELF type 'KEEBLER'
    6. Re:The non-reversal should read: by Vitriol+Angst · · Score: 1

      Good point.

      Our CIA had a lot to do with supporting the "Russian Mafia" during the Cold War... perhaps there are still ties. It's one of the reasons that the CIA got involved in the drug trade here in the US -- so that no foreign nation could. If it didn't, how could it be possible with all the enemies our country has had, that no foreign government has ever assasinated a US politician? (Except of course, for JFK, but that's another story and was our own doing). So I don't necessarily HATE that the CIA runs our drug trade -- just that why is this stuff illegal at all? If we cannot stop foreign infiltration of this lucrative crime, cannot stop its use without a worse police state, then why stop drugs at all? So our drug trade has corrupted the CIA and has now corrupted our own government.

      Our standing military complex, has influenced politicians, and so has created MORE wars that the US finds necessary. When there is more war -- they get more money, it's that simple.

      Now Afghanistan is exporting a lot of Opium again, and that is being passed from our Afghani allies (who were just the drug lords who the Taliban crushed in the first place), to our special forces, and then is passed on to the Russian-Israeli Mafia... at least according to www.waynemadsenreport.com which is my pick as "BEST SOURCE FOR WHAT IS GOING ON."

      Wayne Madsen is all over this story, and it seems it is another attempt to discredit Putin. The NeoCons are hip-deep allied with the Russian-Israeli mafia, and because of election-rigging in the Ukraine, and other Oil Resource Wars, are now no longer friends of Putin, it stands to reason that making Putin look bad will be the story line for Western (NeoCon fascist-controlled) Media, and other friendly NeoCon states.

      But before I get into that,.. I find it interesting WHY he was poisened this way -- HOW is going to be too tough of a question, he hung around with a lot of people who traded nuclear material. I remember reading that during the cold war, the Russian spies liked to put radioactive elements on shoes and in people, to allow them to track movement. If this guy had so much radioactivity in him, either it was to send a message, or to create a person who could be tracked from space. But most likely, to silence a person who knew too much, was expendable, and make Putin look bad.

      Here's what Wayne Madsen has to say;
      "
      November 28, 2006 -- In addition to Russian-Israeli Mafia, Litvinenko radiation poisoning now linked to Iraqi oil business and military occupation. British police have discovered traces of polonium 210, the radioactive substance sued to kill former Russian FSB and KGB agent Alexander Litvinenko, in the office of wanted Russian tycoon Boris Berezovsky. London sources confirmed that traces of the radioactive substance were found at 7 Down Street in London's Mayfair district, according to a report in the Guardian newspaper.

      An Internet search shows that the Interpark House office building at 7 Down Street also houses the headquarters of the coal, oil, and energy hedge fund firm Starsupply Tullett Energy; offices of Metro International, the global media firm; Nichiei, Ltd., a Japanese consulting firm; and Capital Corporation plc, which owns three London casinos, Crockfords and the Colony Club in Mayfair and the Cromwell Mint in Kensington.

      Although British police were on guard at Berezovsky's office, the Russian-Israeli businessman who is wanted for a variety of crimes in Russia, told the Guardian, "I don't know anything about police at my office," and refused any further comment on the case. Berezovsky was a colleague of Litvinenko and were working jointly to topple the administration of Russian President Vladimir Putin. The Russian President has made it a hallmark of his administration to crack down on the Russian mobsters and oligarchs who looted the Soviet and Russian treasuries, consorted with Chechen terrorists and engaged in "true flag" bombings involving Chechens in Moscow and other Russian cities, and then fled to Israel.

      --
      >>"ad space available -- low rates!!!"
    7. Re:The non-reversal should read: by Vitriol+Angst · · Score: 1

      That's because they've been very busy being, very, very bad.

      If I blamed a crime spree on a bank robber who robbed like twenty banks... would that be whinning?

      The only controversy here, is that these people haven't been arrested or even investigated.

      I don't know if anyone could prove the idea about the New Orleans levees... but if you wanted a rhetorical argument, you should have thrown in Big Foot... that always seems to be just far fetched enough to make people think that our Crim Lord in Chief wasn't involved. The bombings in Spain and England do have some possible connections to NeoCons, however ... so I wouldn't throw those in. The WTC... heck, Marvin Bush took over the security company that started "securing" the WTC buildings that year... what's the worst that could happen?

      --
      >>"ad space available -- low rates!!!"
    8. Re:The non-reversal should read: by Master+of+Transhuman · · Score: 1


      You're right about Borgnine - I must have been thinking about his last wife.

      Still, he's always LOOKED dead, which was the point.

      --
      Richard Steven Hack - This sig is TOO GODDAMN SHORT TO DO ANYTHING USEFUL WITH! MORONS!
    9. Re:The non-reversal should read: by Master+of+Transhuman · · Score: 1


      I follow Wayne Madsen as well.

      Now it turns out from another source that Bob Lazar, the Area 51 UFO guy, runs a company that sells chemicals and he can sell you polonium for $69 from his Web site. Apparently the stuff is hard to produce, but relatively easy to obtain as it isn't tracked as a hazardous substance that you need authorization to buy or is surveilled by any agency.

      So much for it being hard to get and thus requiring a state to do this form of hit.

      --
      Richard Steven Hack - This sig is TOO GODDAMN SHORT TO DO ANYTHING USEFUL WITH! MORONS!
    10. Re:The non-reversal should read: by Master+of+Transhuman · · Score: 1


      Well, as far as the WTC is concerned, the Zim company moved out shortly before it occurred - after a decades-long presence there, and foregoing a $50,000 penalty. And one of the bigger stockholders happens to be the State of Israel.

      Not to mention that Mossad agents were known to be shadowing the WTC conspirators (as "handlers", perhaps) for months before the attack - and only bothered to alert the US - in vague terms - perhaps a month before the attack.

      Not to mention the Israeli agents caught filming the WTC attack - and their "employer" in New Jersey who fled to Israel when questioned by the FBI.

      Oh, by the way, the company that runs the video monitoring systems in the London Underground - which allows anyone associated with them easy access to the Underground - is Israeli.

      All the above facts are readily available to anyone who bothers to check.

      Any more questions?

      --
      Richard Steven Hack - This sig is TOO GODDAMN SHORT TO DO ANYTHING USEFUL WITH! MORONS!
  8. examination by bcrowell · · Score: 4, Informative

    The delay is believed to be over concerns about the health implications for those present at the examination.
    If they're concerned, they're too ignorant about science to be qualified to do the exam. The rule of thumb is that alpas are stopped by air. Even if the guy's body fluids got on you, the alphas wouldn't get through your epidermis -- and I assume people doing autopsies are going to be wearing latex gloves, a mask, etc., since they don't want to get exposed to AIDS, etc.

    1. Re:examination by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      One would hope that in addition to gloves they might also wear a condom (each). If they are worried about getting AIDS that is. (And just what form of Autopsy have YOU been participating in??0

    2. Re:examination by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Um...

      and you reckon you know that they will only find alpha particles inside him? Say, we don't need to do the autopsy, then!

      PS - I like the script-suppression word for this one - EMITTER

    3. Re:examination by Essellion · · Score: 1
      The delay is believed to be over concerns about the health implications for those present at the examination.

      If they're concerned, they're too ignorant about science to be qualified to do the exam. The rule of thumb is that alpas are stopped by air. Even if the guy's body fluids got on you, the alphas wouldn't get through your epidermis -- and I assume people doing autopsies are going to be wearing latex gloves, a mask, etc., since they don't want to get exposed to AIDS, etc.

      I think they are more concerned about the Polonium-210 being somehow accidentally introduced into their system during the autopsy rather than the direct radiation.

      A quick read about Polonium shows that its soluble in dilute acids. I wonder if thats how it was introduced?

    4. Re:examination by pakar · · Score: 0, Troll

      Ehmmm... You do know that blood carries the HIV virus right?? Do dont need to f**k to catch it...

      Not shure if you where sarcastic, but lets hope so.. Aleast for your sake... ;>

    5. Re:examination by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      If it's polonium, that's exactly what they'll find. You do know that we have tables and charts documenting which isotopes of various elements emit what kinds of radiation, right? Heck, even if it was some other radioisotope, alpha radiation is the most likely hazard. And we're talking very small levels of material (especially given that the chemical toxicity probably had more of a role in his death).

      If it isn't polonium, then somebody screwed up the blood test... Which is something they should have done right the first time (but then again, poisoning by polonium isn't exactly common).

    6. Re:examination by Moofie · · Score: 1

      "being somehow accidentally introduced into their system"

      Yeah, the traditional pathologist's post-autopsy Shot O' Bile would probably be a bad idea. Seriously...how would you accidentally ingest somebody's body fluids? Wear a face mask. You're all set.

      --
      Why yes, I AM a rocket scientist!
    7. Re:examination by chrisbtoo · · Score: 2, Funny

      A quick read about Polonium shows that its soluble in dilute acids. I wonder if thats how it was introduced?


      Pickled ginger FTW!
      --
      Registering accounts later than some other chrisb since 1997
    8. Re:examination by stair69 · · Score: 2, Informative

      Though you're right that alpha doesn't penetrate the skin, you still need to take extreme care with Polonium. The reason is that it has a tendency to become airbourne even at room temperature, and once in the air it is there is inhalation danger to people nearby unless they are wearing respirators. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Polonium#Chemical_cha racteristics

      The high level of alpha decay in Po-210 is responsible for this evaporation (spallation) - alpha collisions with atoms near the surface can cause atoms to be knocked free into the air.

    9. Re:examination by Essellion · · Score: 1

      "being somehow accidentally introduced into their system"

      Yeah, the traditional pathologist's post-autopsy Shot O' Bile would probably be a bad idea. Seriously...how would you accidentally ingest somebody's body fluids? Wear a face mask. You're all set.It would not have to be ingested, or even breathed if polonium particles were airborne (someone else commented on this). Lots of sharp things are used for cutting in an autopsy, a small slip and you could cut through your protective gear while wrist deep in blood. How much polonium would be dangerous? A half gram in one place will heat itself to 750 kelvin from released energy so the stuff is pretty potent.

    10. Re:examination by dbIII · · Score: 1
      If they're concerned, they're too ignorant about science to be qualified to do the exam.

      Or perhaps they are not quick to jump to conclusions since the cause of death is not completely certain. Whatever it is (chemical, biological or radiological) may still be deadly, may be more than alpha particle emission and latex is not some magical force feild that stops everything.

    11. Re:examination by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      If they're concerned, they're too ignorant about science to be qualified to do the exam. The rule of thumb is that alpas are stopped by air. Even if the guy's body fluids got on you, the alphas wouldn't get through your epidermis -- and I assume people doing autopsies are going to be wearing latex gloves, a mask, etc., since they don't want to get exposed to AIDS, etc.
      Well, HIV is inactive after maybe a few hours.

      But you should know that the daugther product of polonium deexcites with the emission of 800keV gamma rays after the alpha emission!
      They are very penetrating and still somewhat harmful to others nearby (for deadly quantities of po in his body). They should also be easily detectable....

    12. Re:examination by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Bloodnok was usually introduced by his theme music. This was followed by explosions or liquid noises, with Bloodnok yelling in pain followed by cries of "Never again!" or "Oh, that Chinese ginger! There ought to be a law against it!". Once subsided, he comments one of many catch-phrases, including, "It goes right through you, you know!", "No more curried eggs for me!" and "There must be a cure for it." Later in the series, the music would be followed by silence, to Bloodnok's obvious relief: "I'm cured!"

  9. Symptoms are a dead giveaway by 1992+Called · · Score: 1, Funny

    Heartburn, Nausea, Indigestion
    Upset Stomach, Diarrhea!

    --
    Trolling the trolls who troll the trolls since '92
    1. Re:Symptoms are a dead giveaway by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

      Oh shit, I knew should have passed on that Dhansak last night. Am I fucked?

    2. Re:Symptoms are a dead giveaway by ancient_kings · · Score: 1

      You forgot "May cause drymouth and gas"...

  10. Worried, me? by sane? · · Score: 3, Insightful

    Hands up who's not worried by this?

    Lots of talk of what Al Qaeda might do, but these are the people with their hands on thousands of nukes, much of the energy supplies and they are now poisoning people with radioactive isotopes because they say they are scheming murdering psychopaths.

    Do we really need another bunch of homicidal f*ckwits in the world?

    1. Re:Worried, me? by Catbeller · · Score: 4, Insightful

      I've come to the conclusion that the American illuminati hated the Russians because they were too alike, too close in methodology and goals, to the Americans. Now that all the ideology is stripped away, there really isn't much difference between the Bushes+the CIA and Putin+the KGB. Except that the Russians are so much better at the nasty stuff, as they aren't hampered by thinking of themselves as morally superior.

      The ex-KGB boys used a poison that is produced at the rate of 10 grams per year worldwide. They didn't do it to be clever. They did it to send a message that they did it, there's nothing that can stop them, and when you fuck with Putin and the New Russian Order and you get a creative agonizing death.

      Putin was behind it. So again with the reporter a few months ago. Protest, die.

      Now that we know that our "ally" is putting the finishing trim on his capitalist dictatorship, how will our millionaire media airheads and our millionaire government respond? Do I hear crickets?

    2. Re:Worried, me? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny
      Now that we know that our "ally" is putting the finishing trim on his capitalist dictatorship, how will our millionaire media airheads and our millionaire government respond? Do I hear crickets?

      Easy, Terrorism, Islam, Arabs, Tree-Huggers, Gays, Commies, Atheists. Fear, Uncertainly, Doubt.

      Forgotten all about our inconvenient ally yet? No?

      Look over there, Paris Hilton! That crazy chick. hehehe. I wonder what she will do next. Yeah, we all know she's crap, so why don't we watch more of her advertising-sponsored videos and let's make fun of her together, hehehe. Crazy chick. hehehe. Oh, oh, oh, you so won't believe what TomKat did yesterday...

    3. Re:Worried, me? by DrVomact · · Score: 4, Insightful
      Putin was behind it.

      You know this for a fact? How?

      Certainly, it's possible...but there's no proof. Moreover, I fail to see how Litvinenko's very public death would benefit Putin. The old KGB apparat splintered into many pieces after the demise of the USSR. Some of them work for the present Russian government, some are self-employed, and some work for...other organizations. It's possible that Litvinenko's poking around was getting close to someone in the "Russian Mafia" who had the means to pull this off, or the motive may be something as banal as a personal grudge held by an ex-subordinate. Litvinenko certainly flouted one of the basic rules for enjoying a long life: avoid making enemies whenever possible. He not only had many enemies—his enemies were dangerous.

      It does seem likely to me that Litvinenko's death can be attributed to the ex-KGB, if for no other reason than that they are one of the few organizations that would have had quantities of exotic poisons stashed away. The problem is which faction or members of the ex-KGB might be responsible. Russian mafia? Rogue clique within the present Russian secret police org? An old boy (or a whole pissed-off department of the defunct KGB) pulling in some favors and activating connections to finally get even? Insufficient facts, I'm afraid.

      You might want to pick up Litvinenko's book: Blowing up Russia : Terror from Within.

      --
      Great men are almost always bad men--Lord Acton's Corollary
    4. Re:Worried, me? by ElephanTS · · Score: 1

      Bush and Putin even get on......

      http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/world/europe/1392791.st m

      I looked into his soul . . . .

      OMG!

      --
      spoonerize "magic trackpad"
    5. Re:Worried, me? by MightyMartian · · Score: 1
      Certainly, it's possible...but there's no proof. Moreover, I fail to see how Litvinenko's very public death would benefit Putin.

      Let's see. Other Russians within or outside Russia who dare criticize Putin end up dead. Message sent. I will fuck you over if you dare stand up to me.

      Putin doesn't give a shit what the Brits or the Yanks think. He doesn't have to. Russia is growing rich and powerful again, and no matter how much of a vile butcher Putin turns into, we're all going to have to accept that reality. So Putin has nothing to lose by such flagrant actions. What are the Brits going to do?

      --
      The world's burning. Moped Jesus spotted on I50. Details at 11.
    6. Re:Worried, me? by bogjobber · · Score: 1

      Now that all the ideology is stripped away, there really isn't much difference between the Bushes+the CIA and Putin+the KGB.

      Please tell me you're kidding. There isn't much difference except that Putin is a dictator (some people may call Bush a dictator, but those people are stupid), and he ruthlessly suppresses dissent in his country using murder and torture (or sometimes just sends dissenters to jail in Siberia and takes their property). Please stop the stupid bullshit. If you are going to say things that are that obviously wrong, please keep your "conclusions" to yourself. Making ridiculous claims like this undermines legitimate criticism of the president.

    7. Re:Worried, me? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Nah, this isn't worrisome. I'll tell you what should worry you: dimethylmercury. That's some scary shit.

    8. Re:Worried, me? by smash · · Score: 1
      There isn't much difference except that Putin is a dictator (some people may call Bush a dictator, but those people are stupid),
      Questionable US elections? Putin was elected himself, unless I'm mistaken? If you want to claim Russian elections are a crock, lets have a good hard look at the US too...
      ruthlessly suppresses dissent in his country using murder and torture (or sometimes just sends dissenters to jail in Siberia and takes their property).
      Guantanmo Bay? Hell, Iraq, Afghanistan?

      Oh, there is a difference :) Bush+CIA isn't limited to his own country/citizens... :)

      --
      I run: Windows, OS X, Linux, FreeBSD. Just because you have a hammer, doesn't mean everything is a nail.
    9. Re:Worried, me? by bogjobber · · Score: 1

      I'm not saying there isn't anything to criticize George Bush (both of them) for; that's obviously not true. I'm saying George Bush and Vladimir Putin are not even remotely similar people. Putin is a rough-handed, power hungry dictator. Bush is an incompetent, misguided ideologue. Bush is not assassinating his political opposition. Bush is not murdering thousands of his own citizens. Comparing the two is absurd.

    10. Re:Worried, me? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "Russian Mafia"

      There's not a whole lot of difference between that and the Russian Government. Of course, I think that large chunks of what the US Government does is criminal too...

    11. Re:Worried, me? by smash · · Score: 1
      Depending on what you believe, one could argue that 9/11 was the organised murder of several thousand US citizens for "the greater good"; to provide an excuse for the patriot act, invading iraq, etc.

      I'm not saying I necessarily believe that myself just yet, but there's several suspicious aspects to the whole 9/11 situation that have not been sufficiently explained.

      --
      I run: Windows, OS X, Linux, FreeBSD. Just because you have a hammer, doesn't mean everything is a nail.
    12. Re:Worried, me? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "stashed away"?

      Po's half-life is ~130 days. The stuff that got Litvinenko was produced in the past year or two.

    13. Re:Worried, me? by hughk · · Score: 1

      It does seem likely to me that Litvinenko's death can be attributed to the ex-KGB, if for no other reason than that they are one of the few organizations that would have had quantities of exotic poisons stashed away.

      Most of the ex-KGR people are from the early nineties and the fall of the Soviet Union in 91. Given that Po210 has a half-life measured in days (134 days), this sample was *recently* obtained. Whether or not someone with a direct link to the KGB performed the execution is arguable, but it seems that whoever did this had a direct link to a govt. lab. A fifteen year old sample would have been largely, just decay products.
      --
      See my journal, I write things there
    14. Re:Worried, me? by hughk · · Score: 1

      If you want to hurt Putin, it is easiest to do so bt proxy. Gazprom, the state gas and oil company is effectively an organ of Kremlin policy. The company is publically listed and even allows foreign shareholders, but the Kremlin retains control through their majority holding. They already supply a lot of gas to western europe and they are looking to buy up the supply chain, in particular RWE in Germany and Centrica in the UK. As both companies are publicly owned and Gazprom is run by the Kremlin, I'm sure that any such purchase could be reasonably blocked by their respective governmen ts or even the EU. That's unless Blair or Merkel are looking for a Gazprom directorship like Markel's predecessor.

      Gazprom still needs access to foreign capital and expertsie. As a state organ, there is much corruption and it is run very inefficiently, as evidenced by its failure to develop fields. Sure the company makes money, but at the same time, it is losing it, with no outside help, this is likely to continue.

      --
      See my journal, I write things there
    15. Re:Worried, me? by lawpoop · · Score: 1

      "You might want to pick up Litvinenko's book: Blowing up Russia : Terror from Within"

      If you are taking LItvinenko's words at face value, note that the in last things he said, he laid blame at Putin. What would it benefit a dying man to blame someone other than his murderer? Who knows his enemies better than himself?

      There is never proof in a murder case. There is only evidence.

      --
      Computers are useless. They can only give you answers.
      -- Pablo Picasso
    16. Re:Worried, me? by shutdown+-p+now · · Score: 3, Interesting
      Russia is not your ally. Has never really been, except maybe for a short period in early 90's. Definitely not after the Kosovo war.

      I can tell you that when 9/11 happened, the overwhelming feeling over here was "yankees got what they deserved". I remember the results of the polls published soon afterwards showed the same reaction on the large scale. It was really scary. It seems that the hatred towards America and the West in general was so deeply indoctrinated to everyone in the USSR that it didn't took much for it to surface again.

      What's worse, in the last few years, there has been a large-scale Westernophobia campaign coming from the government. They're telling us about how morally corrupt European countries and the U.S. are, denouncing Western liberalism (that's social liberalism - freedom of religion/speech/press etc - not economical) which is "morally harmful" and "destabilizing society", and then go ahead to tell how superior Russia is in going our own "special" way - reminds you of something going on in some other parts of the world mayhap, say, Iran, or North Korea? Oh, apparently we also need some special kind of democracy for our country - "sovereign democracy" is the official term for it - somehow distinct from the evil and corrupting Western democracy.

      The worst part of it is that most people here seem to support this political course. So, yes, you should be worried about this. But there's nothing you can really do - we've got nukes, and lots of them too. And nuclear subs. And other nasty stuff like biochem weapons. And people shall willingly take the arms and fight against NATO forces if it ever comes to a war to "defend the country against foreign aggression" (and with it, the corrupt regime).

      So your leaders will keep smiling to Mr.Putin, and they will always be good friends, and Russia will always be just a special kind of democracy, absolutely unlike Iran or NK.

    17. Re:Worried, me? by DrVomact · · Score: 1
      Ah, that's interesting! Thanks for introducing (gasp) facts into the discussion. I think you're very likely correct.

      What about Polonium 209, though? It has a half-life of 100 years. From what I can tell, reports seem to specify Po-210 as the culprit, but the British haven't exactly been fast on the uptake here.

      --
      Great men are almost always bad men--Lord Acton's Corollary
    18. Re:Worried, me? by hughk · · Score: 1

      Once they have it on a mass-spec then seperating one isotope from another is a doddle. They seem quite certain that the material was Polonium as opposed to other materials so I guess some tests have been done. Note that this incident is now classified as terrorist originated nuclear contamination so we are no longer talking just about the metropolitan police and UCL. The other hitter is the radiation level Po210 burns much faster with different byproducts (209 goes to lead and bismuth, 210 just goes to lead). Ironically, although Po209 is much more stable, it is much harder to produce.

      --
      See my journal, I write things there
    19. Re:Worried, me? by DrVomact · · Score: 1

      BBC is saying specifically Po-110 now. The more I think about it, the weirder it seems. It's hard for me to imagine how this poison could have been administered. Remember, we're dealing with a very small quantity here. In the case of Po-110, "large" means greater than a few mg (From the LANL link you gave):

      The energy released by its decay is so large (140W/g) that a capsule containing about half a gram reaches a temperature above 500C. The capsule also presents a contact gamma-ray dose rate of 0.012 Gy/h. A few curies (1 curie = 3.7 x 1010Bq) of polonium exhibit a blue glow, caused by excitation of the surrounding gas.

      Given the rarity of Po-110, the problems inherent in having much of it in one place, and its extreme efficacy as a poison, we are probably talking about a quantity of less than a microgram. Exactly how do you carry this tiny amount of deadly stuff around? Do you put it in a little capsule and sprinkle it in tea or sushi? But the quantity involved is so tiny that you can't be sure what you're doing--are you certain you got those microscopic grains where they're supposed to go? Or did they float and land somewhere else? Are you sure you didn't get even one speck on your hands? Better not chew your nails. (In fact, judging by the traces found in at least two places Litvinenko had been, the administration of the poison must have been a bit messy.)

      I'm not saying it can't be done; it was done. It just seems to me that the implementation of an assasination plan involving Po-110 by a governmental agency would be seen by such an agency as presenting insuperable difficulties in planning, logistics, technical knowledge, and risk, so that using it in this fashion at all would be dismissed out of hand. I don't think this is how professional spies or assassins work. Even professional criminals would use something else. An amateur, on the other hand, who does not feel obliged to to adhere to high professional standards in his handling of Po-110, would have a much simpler task.

      So who would and could do something like this? A smart person with little regard for his own safety. Someone acting alone who has access--through his work or his political connections--to quantities of a very rare material sufficient for his purpose. Someone with a point to make, or a grudge to even out. The list can't be very long, and--it must be said--Litvinenko himself cannot be excluded.

      --
      Great men are almost always bad men--Lord Acton's Corollary
    20. Re:Worried, me? by hughk · · Score: 1

      You don't have to administer Po itself, just a salt of Po diluted in about 10ml water and carry it in a phial, whether glass or plastic. A few mm is all you need to kill the Alpha. It is low risk to you (unless you throw it around) and it could easily easily be administered.

      --
      See my journal, I write things there
  11. a bit late on the news.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    no offence to ./ but I heard about this yesterday at around noon (australian time)....
    bit late on the news I think

  12. If the FSB did it, I'm sure they felt justified by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Who's the fool to risk importing that stuff in and get caught up? That would be stupid obviously.

    Then again, obvious is used most frequently by the unimaginative.

    Why would any governments condemn Russia for this? Isn't it now that extra-judicial killings of suspects without any trial are now acceptable to "civilized" nations? So why are people making a big deal out of it? Yes, of course I am being sarcastic.

    "We hold these truths to be self-evident. That all men are created equal; that they are endowed by their Creator with certain unalienable rights"

    People just don't truly believe that crap anymore, so expect to see more of these types of evil acts.

    1. Re:If the FSB did it, I'm sure they felt justified by CmdrGravy · · Score: 1

      It's worth pointing out that even if Putin has ordered his execution it's not necessarily illegal since under Russian law anyone considered a danger to Russias security can be killed regardless of whether they are on Russian soil or not.

      This is obviously a vital law to protect innocent Russians in the face of this awful wave of worldwide terrorism, certainly no other countries are passing similarly effective legislation ( which has the totally unexpected side effect of allowing them to do what they like to further their own personal agendas ) so I think we should all lobby our governments to offer us the same level of protection as the Russians are now enjoying.

    2. Re:If the FSB did it, I'm sure they felt justified by b0s0z0ku · · Score: 2, Insightful
      even if Putin has ordered his execution it's not necessarily illegal

      Not under Russian law maybe, but British law tends to frown upon murder on British soil. If whoever did it is caught, they'll be spending a long stretch in a small dark hotel room...

      -b.

    3. Re:If the FSB did it, I'm sure they felt justified by CmdrGravy · · Score: 1

      We are certainly not amused however I suspect whoever is responsible is by now far far away from our shores.

  13. Apparently by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

    When it comes to things to avoid eating, apparently, he forgot Polonium!

    1. Re:Apparently by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      poloni0wn3d!

    2. Re:Apparently by b0s0z0ku · · Score: 1
      poloni0wn3d!

      This is a man murdered, probably by agents of a totalitarian state. With the level of freedom-consciousness that's usually evident on Slashdot, I'm surprised you all are joking about it and not up in arms. It's not only the US and "Western" countries that do Bad Things to people whom they dislike! Sadly, most of the same people that were running Russia during the Communist dictatorship era are still running the show.

      -b.

    3. Re:Apparently by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      In Soviet Russia, dinner kills you!

    4. Re:Apparently by fafaforza · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Russia's actions are much more appalling because they are done in such openness, with such indifference to how easily it can be traced back to the state, underscoring their government's brazenness in doing whatever the heck they feel like doing. The list includes jailing an oil tycoon and using a fake company -- with shown ties to the government and billions of dollars that it gathered seemingly out of nowhere, to bid for the oil company, when sell it back to the state for pennies on the dollar. Or cutting off natural gas to entire countries in the midst of the coldest winter in years.

      It is amazing to me how nothing has changed in Russia since the cold war, the KGB, Solidarity, etc. Russia is the big bully of Europe and there doesn't appear anyone that can stand up to them, and there's definitely too many business/trade ties for other governments to use any strong tactics to chastise Putin.

    5. Re:Apparently by Possibly+Malignant · · Score: 1

      This is a man murdered, probably by agents of a totalitarian state. With the level of freedom-consciousness that's usually evident on Slashdot, I'm surprised you all are joking about it and not up in arms.
      In fairness, Russia has yet to be officially implicated in this affair. True, there was an obvious motive for the Russian government to assassinate Mr. Litvinenko.

      And the elsewhere-mentioned similarity with the Markov assassination.

      Plus the method of murder clearly (hopefully?) rules out civilian involvement.

      Dang... Russia is getting sloppy.

    6. Re:Apparently by b0s0z0ku · · Score: 4, Interesting
      Dang... Russia is getting sloppy.

      Wrong answer. This may be intended as a very public warning to other possible defectors and traitors not to follow in Litvinenko's footsteps. The same deal as the (apocryphal?) story Oleg Penkovsky (GRU double agent in the 60ies) being burnt alive and a film of the execution being shown to all new KGB recruits to discourage disloyalty.

      -b.

    7. Re:Apparently by Simon+Garlick · · Score: 1

      It is amazing to me how nothing has changed in Russia since the cold war

      Cold War? Russia has been like that since we were living in caves.

    8. Re:Apparently by drgonzo59 · · Score: 1
      I don't know if the actions are more appalling because of their openness, I think they are just appalling. For every poisoning and assassination that we hear about, there are hundreds more that we do not know of.

      I don't really think that this was meant to be a secret killing, in other words they could have just made him "slip and fall" somewhere, or find other ways to kill him. But they:
      1. Made sure the chemical used (Po-210) is exotic and rare enough that only a professional would have access to (governments make the top of the list here)
      2. Chose poisoning. Poisoning is painful and terrifying. It is like being burned or being tortured slowly. The world and the loved ones watched him die slowly as nobody could do anything -- Good show for the media though, everyone in the world got to witness it.
      3. Made an ambiguous comment of "how sorry" Putin feels about this guy's death. You mean the guy who criticized you and accused you of pedophilia?...Right, Putin is "so sorry".
      The above leads me to believe that this was a well orchestrated show of force. A message has been sent that says "if you defect, or criticize us in any way, this will happen to you."
      FSB(KGB)-1, The world-0

    9. Re:Apparently by hughk · · Score: 1

      Probably they missed out on no. 2. Pain management is well developed in the UK because of experience with long-term cancer care. I believe (and hope) that on admission to hospital he didn't feel a thing. The person committing the murder may not be aware of this as this area of russian medecine was less well developed. However the victim would be aware that he was being killed and this is the kind of thing that certain sickos on the edges of a rogue security service may appreciate.

      --
      See my journal, I write things there
    10. Re:Apparently by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Bingo!
      This is the way Russians deal with dissidents to discourage others.
      Communists are equal to fascist (and Putin it one of them)

  14. Former USSR = nutbag central? by 0jjjjjjjjjj0 · · Score: 5, Interesting
    It will be interesting to see how this investigation concludes. Some dismiss a lot of what comes out at these press conferences as simple 'nutbag syndrome', however well-founded their claims may be. See, from the article ...

    As the conference drew to a close, a heckler interrupted saying he was from Ukraine and had also been the victim of poisoning.

    He's been labelled a heckler, when he may well have a genuine issue at hand. The same thing, perhaps a little more dramatic, happened at a press conference regarding the demise of the Kursk.

    On 18 August, Nadezhda Tylik mother of Kursk submariner Lt. Sergei Tylik, produced an intense emotional outburst in the middle of an in-progress news briefing about Kursk's fate. After attempts to quiet her failed, a nurse injected her with a sedative and she was removed from the room, incapacitated. The event, caught on film, caused further criticism of the government's response to both the disaster, and how the government handled public criticism of said response.

    When Russia (yes, even modern-day Russia) gets its hands near an investigation, the result is usually indeterminate or irrelevant, never indisputable.

    --
    WANRING: This warning is misspelt.
  15. polonium-210 by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

    Who's to blame? Poland, obviously.

  16. Which Is Preferable? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    The US or UK would kidnap you THEN kill you.

    Let's not imagine that a high-ranking secret service officer from ANY country would be allowed to tell all they knew to another country's journalists, authors or government..

    Oh and good timing with that new Bond film recently released..

    1. Re:Which Is Preferable? by meshko · · Score: 1

      Well, he didn't really have much to say, he didn't know any real "intelligence secrets", he workd for the KGB branch which worked against ogranized crime. He was just exposing the corruption inside the agency.

      --
      I passed the Turing test.
    2. Re:Which Is Preferable? by meshko · · Score: 1

      um... what I meant is that if it is in fact Krelmin that is behind Litvinenko's death, it is so much more outrageouns because he was not killed to prevent some secret information leakage, but for the revenge sake only.

      --
      I passed the Turing test.
  17. Poorly trained by edwardpickman · · Score: 0

    What do they teach these guys? Didn't he ever see a Bond movie? Radioactive sushi? The first beautiful female spy or space based laser cannon this guy ran into he'd have been dead meat. It's a wonder he lived as long as he did.

  18. Re:Devotion to one's cause by b0s0z0ku · · Score: 1
    Perhaps this man was so convinced of Putin's evil that he poisoned himself and insisted very loudly that Moscow/Putin was responsible in order to put pressure on Putin.

    You can't exactly buy Polonium-210 at every corner drugstore ... (but you will be able to in 1985).

    -b.

  19. Polonium-210? What legitimate uses does it have? by schwit1 · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Other than in nuclear weapons?

  20. Strange way of killing someone by Jugalator · · Score: 4, Insightful

    I don't understand why of all things, they were using Polonium-210 to kill him. Since that's not exactly something you buy over the counter, wouldn't there be "better" ways of killing him by poisoning without drawing as much attention? Only about 100 grams of Polonium, any isotope, is estimated to be produced yearly and it's extremely rare in nature. It's hard to imagine a better way of drawing attention to the government.

    --
    Beware: In C++, your friends can see your privates!
    1. Re:Strange way of killing someone by bigberk · · Score: 2, Insightful

      It's hard to imagine a better way of drawing attention to the government.Maybe that's the point of it: a message to others thinking of disgracing the state, "who do you THINK could use this to poison him, of course it's us". Kind of a classy (in a twisted psycho way) to do a state execution before the world's eyes That being said, I take anything in the media with a grain of salt. The west (incl UK) isn't exactly friendly to Russia. They would probably rather make it sound like a Russian hit given a chance

    2. Re:Strange way of killing someone by Goaway · · Score: 4, Interesting

      Not over the counter, but how about on the internet? Only $69!

    3. Re:Strange way of killing someone by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Well, an eccentric coyote and a large anvil come to mind...

    4. Re:Strange way of killing someone by ElephanTS · · Score: 1

      that's right. It can be 2 things:

      a) Putin's people were behind it and wished to send a strong message to anyone else opening their mouths about his Putinship's sexual habits. An utterly horrible way to die - public too.

      b) Some agency is framing Putin by carrying this out as payback or to increase tensions between UK (the West?) and Russia.

      Interestingly, it's all ok for the Western MSM to run this as lead and to talk about various conspiracies. In a reversed situation they would have kept it down and dismissed CTs as crazy without any thought.

      --
      spoonerize "magic trackpad"
    5. Re:Strange way of killing someone by fearanddread · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Holy cow. That site is so ghetto I'd be afraid to give them my credit card number. Guess there isn't enough money in nuclear e-commerce to gussy the site up a bit.

    6. Re:Strange way of killing someone by Barnoid · · Score: 1
      Holy cow. That site is so ghetto I'd be afraid to give them my credit card number. Guess there isn't enough money in nuclear e-commerce to gussy the site up a bit.


      Have a look at the main site, especially the animated nerd.gif with the tile "Looking for Some URANIUM? Click Here". I seriously hope this whole site is a joke, I wouldn't want to have such guys produce & sell radioactive material.
    7. Re:Strange way of killing someone by neanderlander · · Score: 1

      A strange way indeed, but one that is very effective in bringing over the message.

      The BBC reported that polonium is a very exotic material. To produce this material requires very special resources: the BBC reported that only a few facilities exist to make it. So, obviously, this fact leads to a small group of suspects.

      To get this polonium into the UK , administer it as poison , and get away with it, requires a very professional organization.

      So we're then left with a possible suspect who is suspected BECAUSE we cannot proof it. And for that same lack of evidence, we never can be sure as well. Common sense says everything, yet the rationale always keeps it unresolved. But everyone understands what the message of the crime was.

      BTW when is the movie coming out?

    8. Re:Strange way of killing someone by Jeian · · Score: 1

      What keeps bugging me is... what if it was done by someone who wanted us to *think* it was the Russians?

    9. Re:Strange way of killing someone by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      unless they wanted to draw attention, the message to their own citizens is "we'll get you wherever you go" and to the West "we can do what we want and what are you going to do about it"

    10. Re:Strange way of killing someone by fearanddread · · Score: 1

      Okay. After seeing the rest of the site the 'poisoning' is starting to make sense

    11. Re:Strange way of killing someone by g00bd0g · · Score: 1

      Interesting story of United Nuclear, raided by FBI, etc...

      http://wired.com/wired/archive/14.06/chemistry_pr. html

    12. Re:Strange way of killing someone by ratpack91 · · Score: 1

      No it's real. The owner of the site was on CNN today. You'd need to order about 50 000 from him to get a lethal dose though.

  21. What can say except.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    ...spying very danger-making

  22. Re:Polonium-210? What legitimate uses does it have by Jugalator · · Score: 1
    Wikipedia says research has been made to see if it could be used to heat spacecraft. Also:

    When it is mixed or alloyed with beryllium, polonium can be a neutron source. Other uses include:

            * This element has also been used in devices that eliminate static charges in textile mills and other places. However, beta sources are more commonly used and are less dangerous.
            * It is used on brushes that remove accumulated dust from photographic films. The polonium used in these brushes is sealed and controlled thus minimizing radiation hazards.
            * 210Po has been used as a lightweight heat source to power thermoelectric cells.

    I'm unsure if all the above applies to this specific isotope, but further down there's this:
    210Po has been used as a lightweight heat source to power thermoelectric cells in artificial satellites. A 210Po heat source was also used in each of the Lunokhod rovers deployed on the surface of the Moon, to keep their internal components warm during the lunar nights.
    --
    Beware: In C++, your friends can see your privates!
  23. Re:Polonium-210? What legitimate uses does it have by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Like many radioactive elements it is quite effective at killing people.

  24. Re:Polonium-210? What legitimate uses does it have by Dunbal · · Score: 1

    Ok here's a creepy thought.

          What if this guy blaming Putin is a red herring and that ACTUALLY he managed to get his hands on radioactive material and managed to smuggle it and sell it to someone...sort of like the drug couriers who swallow condoms full of cocaine or heroin, and have an unfortunate accident. Scary eh?

    --
    Seven puppies were harmed during the making of this post.
  25. Not so strange by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    If this was a public example, "they" want any defectors to know that they can and will be dealt with.

  26. The same seasoning they use... by fuego451 · · Score: 2, Funny

    to cover up most dishes: Curry. I had so much curry as a child I now need it to survive. Mmmm, kidney pie.

  27. A modern day take on Thomas Dolby... by IgLou · · Score: 1

    "She poisoned my with sci-ence"

    If you thought that was bad I could have posted an obligatory Simpsons reference: "Mmmm, Polonium. D'OH!"

    --

    Oops, how did this get here?
    09 F9 11 02 9D 74 E3 5B D8 41 56 C5 63 56 88 C0
  28. Re:you fail 1t.. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

    Red fox, this is blue panda. Please repeat your 3AS, over.

  29. Polonium by no-body · · Score: 4, Informative
    Polonium-210 is very dangerous to handle in even milligram or microgram amounts, and special equipment and strict control is necessary. Damage arises from the complete absorption of the energy of the alpha particle into tissue.


    The maximum permissible body burden for ingested polonium is only 0.03 microcuries, which represents a particle weighing only 6.8 x 10-12 g. Weight for weight it is about 2.5 x 1011 times as toxic as hydrocyanic acid. The maximum allowable concentration for soluble polonium compounds in air is about 2 x 10-11 microcuries/cm3.


    From: there


    Soluble in acidic environment.
    Apparently he was repeatedly invited by by an unkown russian person to drink tea....
    A little sourness in tea with a few milligram of metal dissolved.


    1. Re:Polonium by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      > A little sourness in tea with a few milligram of metal dissolved.

      A few milligrams? Six point eight times ten to the power of minus twelve?

      > 6.8 x 10-12 g

      Your own figures show the lethal dose is closer to the weight of a single particle, consider a hydrogen atom weighs only around 1.7 x 10-24 g.

    2. Re:Polonium by aweinert · · Score: 1

      Well, more like 10 billion particles.Calculation
      The number is based on radioactivity of polonium and the maximum load the body can take. True, one can assume this is worst case scenario, with the element perfectly dissolving. Still, microg is 10^-6g, or ~100000 times more than the number stated (10^-12g) Wikipedia

  30. mod parent up by BorgCopyeditor · · Score: 1

    Bingo.

    --
    Shop as usual. And avoid panic buying.
  31. What an awful headline by Tim+C · · Score: 4, Informative

    He wasn't poisoned by radiation in the UK, he was poisoned in the UK by radiation.

    The former implies that it was the radiation present in the UK that poisoned him; the latter makes it clear that he happened to be in the UK when he was poisoned by radiation.

    1. Re:What an awful headline by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      No, that is the opposite of what everybody didn't mean. Which is to say yes.

    2. Re:What an awful headline by crabpeople · · Score: 1

      The radiation was inside him, and he was present in the uk at the time. So therfor, the radiation was present (and still is present in him) in the UK.

      Are your reading comprehension skills honestly so bad that you couldn't parse the original sentence?

      --
      I'll just use my special getting high powers one more time...
    3. Re:What an awful headline by Wilson_6500 · · Score: 1

      If we're being pedantic, he wasn't poisoned by radiation at all--he was poisoned with a radioactive substance.

    4. Re:What an awful headline by Tim+C · · Score: 1

      Of course I parsed the original sentence; how else would I be able to supply a criticism and correction? I think perhaps you need to brush up on your reasoning skills.

      Yes, the radiation is present in the UK, but that's almost irrelevant. If I said that someone was poisoned by radiation in the reactor room at Chernobyl, you would understand that to mean that the radiation in the reactor room at Chernobyl poisoned them. "Former spy poisoned by radiation in UK" has exactly the same sentence structure, yet you don't see the problem with it?

      I know what it means; it just doesn't say what it means.

    5. Re:What an awful headline by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      regardless, the sentence "He wasn't poisoned by radiation in the UK, he was poisoned in the UK by radiation." isn't true as he was, in fact, poisoned by radiation in the UK, even if the fact of the radiations presence is not relevant.

    6. Re:What an awful headline by autophile · · Score: 1
      He wasn't poisoned by radiation in the UK, he was poisoned in the UK by radiation.

      I'm gonna post way too much on this, but hey, this is /. where subjects wander all over the place. And by "subjects", I don't mean people who are beholden to the king of the land of Slashdot.

      See, I agree that the latter sentence is better than the former, but the argument you make would also lead to the argument that "he was poisoned in the UK by radiation" could also mean that "the UK" is a body part, which is ridiculous. And so is interpreting the former sentence as his being poisoned by the general level of radiation in the UK.

      There are plenty of syntactically and semantically ambiguous sentences in English -- that's why it isn't suited for a programming language. However, adding the conceptual level normally resolves the ambiguity. Just as we know the UK is not a body part because of our conceptual model of the human body, we also know that there is not a high enough level of radiation in the UK to kill anyone because of our conceptual model of radiation sources, geography, and history.

      The canonical ambiguous sentence is "I saw a man in a park with a telescope". This is a very good ambiguous sentence because it's ambiguous even at the conceptual level -- nothing in our understanding of parks, telescopes, and men tells us whether it's more or less reasonable to see things with a telescope, or have men with telescopes. If really faced with this sentence in isolation, you would have to interpret the sentence using your own prejudices. My own prejudice is to treat the viewer as having the telescope. YMMV.

      Well, that was a pointless discussion, but it *was* fun.

      --Rob

      --
      Towards the Singularity.
    7. Re:What an awful headline by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      There are two parks near my home. One has a freely accessible telescope that visitors may use, the other does not.

    8. Re:What an awful headline by brpr · · Score: 1

      The sentence is ambiguous. It can be parsed without "radiation in the uk" being a constituent. It might perhaps have been better to use a non-ambiguous sentence, but since the intended interpretation is pretty clear, who cares.

      --
      Freedom is not increased by mere diminuation of government. Anarchy is freedom for the strong and slavery for the weak.
  32. Re:Polonium-210? What legitimate uses does it have by b0s0z0ku · · Score: 1
    What if this guy blaming Putin is a red herring and that ACTUALLY he managed to get his hands on radioactive material and managed to smuggle it and sell it to someone...

    If he was dying, don't you think he'd have dropped a hint so that doctors might be able to treat him? If he was truly a self-serving criminal, he'd likely value his life over protecting his "associates."

    -b.

  33. I am surprised by mike449 · · Score: 1

    A couple of things are really, really strange.
    First, if SVR/FSB wanted the death to look accidental, why would they use such deliberate method? Polonium poisoning just screams of a well-funded agency doing the job. Not covert at all. The only explanation is that they wanted it to be obvious, as a lesson to other guys. Then they might just admit "yeah, we did it", but they are denying everything.
    Second, why it took so long for British to recognize obvious symptoms of radiation sickness? Nobody tried to check Litvinenko with a Geiger counter while he was alive, but after his death he was diagnosed instantly. This is just weird.
    Both sides don't tell all they know. This is to be expected in a spy scandal, though.

    1. Re:I am surprised by CmdrGravy · · Score: 1

      Gosh yes, a geiger counter ! I bet they never thought of that, if I were you I'd get the first flight out the UK and apply for the job as Chief Lord High Sargent Major Of All Inspectors, they'll offer you the job for sure once they realise how talented you are.

    2. Re:I am surprised by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Second, why it took so long for British to recognize obvious symptoms of radiation sickness? Nobody tried to check Litvinenko with a Geiger counter while he was alive, but after his death he was diagnosed instantly. This is just weird.
      Both sides don't tell all they know. This is to be expected in a spy scandal, though.


      Alpha particles would not be detectible with a geiger counter as they would get stopped by the body...

      d'oh!

      Also, the symptoms of radiation sickness are pretty close to the symptoms of thallium poisoning, which was found in his blood.

    3. Re:I am surprised by Xest · · Score: 4, Interesting

      They did try a Geiger counter but it wouldn't detect alpha radiation. As alpha radiation poisoning is so uncommon and unheard of it wasn't an obvious option, also as alpha radiation wouldn't even escape out of his body through his organs and skin the only way to detect it was if traces of it left his body through other methods - i.e. his urine which is where they eventually found it.

    4. Re:I am surprised by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I'm not. His records are probably already well & truly lost in the new British NHS database, just like everyone else's...

    5. Re:I am surprised by arkhan_jg · · Score: 1

      They did suspect radiation before his death, given the symptoms (there's been coverage in the news for about the last week; he was poisoned about 3 weeks ago).

      The problem was detecting what the precise source of the radiation was, given it was only present in trace amounts and was an alpha source so not detectable outside the body; they thought he'd ingested radioactive thallium (thallium-201) on monday. Thing is, we don't know for certain what the medical staff knew and when they knew it, as the media coverage has been speculating based on what little concrete information that's been released. There's quite a big information lockdown due to the ongoing investigation (standard procedure here, so that later jury trials aren't prejudiced because all the info is in the public domain before the trial - it comes out at the trial itself, as evidence)

      --
      Remember kids, it's all fun and games until someone commits wholesale galactic genocide.
  34. Re:Devotion to one's cause by William_Lee · · Score: 1
    Perhaps this man was so convinced of Putin's evil that he poisoned himself and insisted very loudly that Moscow/Putin was responsible in order to put pressure on Putin. Perhaps I am an idiot.

    Perhaps you are...I don't think anyone would willing choose to die of something as horrifically painful as radiation sickness.

  35. Re:Polonium-210? What legitimate uses does it have by RobertB-DC · · Score: 3, Insightful
    Surely I'm not the only one to immediately look up the element on the Wooden Periodic Table Table?
    Antistatic brush.
    These brushes, which you can still buy today (2002) are made for brushing static charge off of photographic negatives. The radiation from the polonium element (which must be replaced every year or so because the half life is only 138 days) ionizes the air around the brush, making it conductive and carrying away the static charge.
    [...]
    Later, while I was in Boston to receive the Ig Nobel Prize for the wooden periodic table, I purchased a brand new brush with a full charge of polonium. That's why this sample is classified as having about 20% actual polonium: It's an average figure assuming I buy a new one every few years (they are fairly cheap).

    Sounds like all our Russian "friends" needed to do was to visit the local camera store's going-out-of-business sale.
    --
    Stressed? Me? Of course not. Stress is what a rubber band feels before it breaks, silly.
  36. Re:Polonium-210? What legitimate uses does it have by Ellis+D.+Tripp · · Score: 1

    You can actually buy small amounts of the stuff OTC, in the form of a "Staticmaster" brush for removing dust from film negatives or other sensitive surfaces.

    http://www.2spi.com/catalog/photo/statmaster.shtml

    The alpha particles emitted from the source ionize the surrounding air, and neutralize any electrostatic charge holding dust particles to a surface.

    --
    Remember "News for Nerds, Stuff that Matters"? Help make it a reality again! http://soylentnews.org
  37. They find out NOW? by bcmm · · Score: 1

    I've been wondering why his symptoms sounded so much like acute radiation poisoning since I first heard about this, and I don't even have any medical background. In a really suspicious case like this, one would think it would be obvious to test for radioactivity early on. It would have been really easy and completely non-invasive. Geiger counters sensitive enough to detect something like this are easy to come by, and hospitals have plenty of film badge dosimeters, etc. for ensuring the safety of radiomedicine workers. So why didn't they check him? It seems like this finally got discovered in a general urine test they conducted to try and identify the poison, rather than any attempt to measure radioactivity.

    --
    # cat /dev/mem | strings | grep -i llama
    Damn, my RAM is full of llamas.
    1. Re:They find out NOW? by RealSurreal · · Score: 1

      I don't have a medical background either but given that polonium emits alpha particles which are blocked by most substances including human tissue I doubt a geiger count would have picked much up.

    2. Re:They find out NOW? by NittanyTuring · · Score: 1

      They DID check him. For a long time, they thought it was Thallium, another radioactive element. They only ruled it out a couple days ago.

    3. Re:They find out NOW? by bcmm · · Score: 1

      They talked about poisoning by the non-radioactive isotope, which is still a very toxic heavy metal.

      --
      # cat /dev/mem | strings | grep -i llama
      Damn, my RAM is full of llamas.
    4. Re:They find out NOW? by joe+155 · · Score: 1

      Indeed it wouldn't. It is also worth noting that nothing like this has ever happened in the UK, so no one knew to check for it. Not only that but it is very difficult to get hold of (some people have been posting that there are ways of getting it as a private citizen but channel4 news suggested that you would need a nuclear reactor to get this quantity of the stuff).

      And the sad part is, there is nothing we can do about this...

      --
      *''I can't believe it's not a hyperlink.''
    5. Re:They find out NOW? by bcmm · · Score: 1

      RTFA. They mentioned the danger to hospital staff from the Polonium leaving his body in sweat, etc.

      --
      # cat /dev/mem | strings | grep -i llama
      Damn, my RAM is full of llamas.
  38. Re:Devotion to one's cause by Goaway · · Score: 1
  39. WFUD Special Report: Deadly Domestic Dangers by BorgCopyeditor · · Score: 1

    Sounds like a teaser for the local news.

    Did you know that your hallway closet could become a prison? That a simple length of wire from an ordinary household lamp could be used as a garotte? That a trained killer could use a kitchen knife, not to chop vegetables for a family meal, but as a deadly weapon? Find out more on WFUD's special report: Deadly Domestic Dangers, tonight at 10, right after "24."
    --
    Shop as usual. And avoid panic buying.
  40. Re:Polonium-210? What legitimate uses does it have by Dunbal · · Score: 2, Informative

    If he was dying, don't you think he'd have dropped a hint so that doctors might be able to treat him?

          You can't save a patient that has this level of radiation poisoning. Impossible. Maybe he knew it, so he decided to play for the maximum political advantage. If people can fly aircraft into buildings, they can do this. Anyway it's just a creepy thought, probably not true at all - where would he get it? It will be interesting to see what the cause of the radiation is at the sushi bar. So long as it's not coming from the sewer ;)

    --
    Seven puppies were harmed during the making of this post.
  41. Borat did it by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Learnings of the Russian politics for make benefit the glorious nation of the United Kingdom.

  42. screenplay by Roald Dahl by BorgCopyeditor · · Score: 2, Funny

    Well, you only live twice.

    --
    Shop as usual. And avoid panic buying.
    1. Re:screenplay by Roald Dahl by dances+with+elks · · Score: 1, Funny

      or so they say

      --
      Will wash cars for karma
  43. Re:Devotion to one's cause by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    He was an ex-KGB defector and therefore more likely to have the contacts to get Polonium-210 that most people. On the other hand, the suggestion that that may have happened does seem pretty wild.

  44. Polonium? Russians? by BorgCopyeditor · · Score: 1

    I can't believe no one has said this. If this were a Dan Brown novel, the big mystical secret that it would take a university-trained "symbologist" to decipher is that the true culprit, the maleficent agent behind the poisoning was, not Russia, but ... (wait for it) ... Poland!

    --
    Shop as usual. And avoid panic buying.
  45. Re:Devotion to one's cause by LWATCDR · · Score: 1

    And it is a 1uCU of Po210. How many of these would you have to buy to get a dose that would be fatal in the a week or two?
    Also the PO 210 in that is sealed. It would difficult to get it out.

    --
    See my blog http://ilovecookes.blogspot.com/ for light hearted technical information.
  46. Re:Devotion to one's cause by b0s0z0ku · · Score: 2, Interesting
    He was an ex-KGB defector and therefore more likely to have the contacts to get Polonium-210 that most people. On the other hand, the suggestion that that may have happened does seem pretty wild.

    Interesting question - what if he's found to have some other terminal disease at the autopsy? What if he knew he was going to die within a few months anyway and decided to suicide in a rather spectacular manner that would embarrass the fuck out of the Russian government? Wild speculation here of course.

    -b.

  47. Yes, exactly, that is the reason by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Insightful
    This makes it bloody clear that someone with some real power (how else to get the stuff) wanted this person death AND succeeded. It sends a message. Cross us and you die and we don't give a shit who knows. You can kill someone to send the victim a message OR to everyone else who is aware of the killing.

    Offcourse it might just as well be a setup. Someone who wants to make it look like it was Putin.

    Frankly I don't know enough about the guy to make a guess wich one is the case but the use of an obvious method of execution is not that hard to explain. Because if it was Putin then so what. Will britain go to war over this? Even a mere trade war? Most likely not. If it was Putin this was a show of power. Basically saying,"we are still here and don't you forget it."

    Offcourse the other option, that this is a setup to frame Putin is less likely but far more intresting. Russia is screwed up enough that Putin has lots of enemies in Russia itself and with its security system all messed up someone getting hold of a rare material is not that unimaginable.

    So the question is, why would Putin want this guy dead so badly (more acuratly why would Putin want the world to know that he wanted this guy dead and succeeded) OR who wants to make it look like Putin killed this guy.

    Ah, were is 007 when you need him?

  48. Putin '08! by bigwang · · Score: 1

    Elect putin in 2008.
    He's a guy i'd like to have a beer with.
    And some polonium pretzels.

    1. Re:Putin '08! by crabpeople · · Score: 1

      Well its sexier than renditions.

      Putin 08!

      --
      I'll just use my special getting high powers one more time...
    2. Re:Putin '08! by WilliamSChips · · Score: 1

      And some polonium pretzels.Bush doesn't need polonium to choke on pretzels.

      --
      Please, for the good of Humanity, vote Obama.
    3. Re:Putin '08! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Actually, there is a constitutional two-term limit, so Putin is supposed to leave the office in 2008. Which is also what he has announced he will do, although there has been some talk about changing the constitution. It should be interesting to see what will happen.

  49. Polonium 210? by Enrique1218 · · Score: 3, Insightful

    I could have thought of 200 better ways to off someone discretely just by watching the Sopranos or The Wire. With all the poisons in the world, they pick an exotic and rare poison yet whose symptoms are ubiquitous and unique. What is the cover story? He moonlights as a nuclear technician? I think the spies have watch too many James Bond films. It would have been better to have taken him to an abandon house, clipped him, and then pour lye over him to removed the evidence. Or here is a better thought, stop doing bad things. Russia should try to be more civil and stop offing dissidents and take a more American approach- brand them unpatriotic.

    --
    You don't have to be smart to use a Mac, you just have to be smart enough to buy one
    1. Re:Polonium 210? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      I could have thought of 200 better ways to off someone discretely just by watching the Sopranos or The Wire. With all the poisons in the world, they pick an exotic and rare poison yet whose symptoms are ubiquitous and unique.

      Similar to: Why would a foreign terrorist send Anthrax (a strain only available from US military labs) almost exclusively to Democrats?

      (hint: the perpetrator isn't who you think it is)
    2. Re:Polonium 210? by tigga · · Score: 1
      they pick an exotic and rare poison yet whose symptoms are ubiquitous and unique.

      Well, those are not unique symptoms. Those are radiotoxic symptoms. They was not recognized as Po intoxication for some time. My guess perps were thinking about faster death and for unknown reasons. Oh well, in Russia people die for unknown reasons, it is kind of usual there.

  50. what had he swallowed? by Frogg · · Score: 1

    http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/uk/6175424.stm

    there's not much mention of these 'three objects' that they've found inside him.

    i'm no expert - maybe they're not important? -- but i'm sure they'll get to find out when they do the post mortem.

    1. Re:what had he swallowed? by b0s0z0ku · · Score: 1
      there's not much mention of these 'three objects' that they've found inside him.

      Interesting, that lends support to the "smuggling of radioisotopes" theory advanced by another poster.

      -b.

    2. Re:what had he swallowed? by Xest · · Score: 1

      Those objects were in fact media misinformation, one of the doctors examining him came forward after those articles to explain that what appeared as objects in the xrays were in fact just marks caused by some substance they get people to ingest to show up parts of people's innards on the x-ray or something like that ;) British media in particular however doesn't in general like to admit when it's reported wrongly which is why the noise about these "objects" was far louder than the correction that these weren't in fact objects as such. The correction was noted in a later BBC article but you'll have to dig for it as it was burried a little deeper iirc ;)

  51. Re:Devotion to one's cause by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Cool, they even take PayPal!

    I'm pretty sure Po-210 is the isotope used in smoke detectors, so it's not as rare or exotic as the stories would suggest. The dose, as always, makes the poison.

  52. Re:Polonium-210? What legitimate uses does it have by deglr6328 · · Score: 3, Interesting

    I know you're making a joke but this isn't as far fetched as I bet you think it is....It COULD have been done that way. The CEDE for ingested polonium (comitted efective dose equivalent) is an astounding 2,000 mREM/microcurie or 2,000 REM/millicurie (a lethal dose of radiation to 50% of people is only ~500 rem). He would need to ingest only .5-1 millicurie of Po-210 to get a lethal dose and each anti-static brush contains how much Po? .2-.5 millicuries per brush apparently.... I'm not saying that's how it happened, I'm sure the KGB has access to far larger amounts of Po that they would have used but it does give an idea of just how incredibly tiny an amount is needed to do harm. Even a THOUSAND TIMES the lethal dose of .5 mCi would be a mere tenth of a milligram.

    --
    - "Hear that?! The percolations are imminent! Cease your ingress!"
  53. MOD PARENT UP by crabpeople · · Score: 0

    assassins resource +1 informative at least

    --
    I'll just use my special getting high powers one more time...
  54. BARIUM by FreakerSFX · · Score: 1

    The 'three unknown objects' in his bowel were remnants of the barium used for medical imaging....old news....and over-sensationalized.

    --
    This sig contains a manual self-destruct. Kindly please put your foot through your monitor in 8 seconds.
  55. Putin Pedophile Link by ElephanTS · · Score: 4, Interesting

    http://www.cbsnews.com/sections/i_video/main500251 .shtml?id=1760111n

    There's a video there of Putin kissing the 5 year old boy's stomach. This started a lot of speculation and I have read that the KGB gathered video from a hotel room proving that he was from years ago. When Putin headed the KGB all these videos obviously disappeared. There is stuff about it on teh web if anyone needs to do some research. I suspect it's true.

    --
    spoonerize "magic trackpad"
    1. Re:Putin Pedophile Link by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 4, Insightful

      A link to the hardly unbiased Chechen Press, and a harmless video on YouTube of (shock horror) "a politician kissing a small child in public" are not quite what I would consider hard evidence.

    2. Re:Putin Pedophile Link by ElephanTS · · Score: 1

      Well done. Case closed.

      --
      spoonerize "magic trackpad"
    3. Re:Putin Pedophile Link by drgonzo59 · · Score: 1
      That video was creepy, but I know Russian and while talking with the crowd and before kneeling down I think I heard the world "golodneyeh" - hungry. In other words, were the children orphans and hungry and by kissing his stomach perhaps the great leader "made the hunger go away?"

      I am not saying the video is normal, it sure looked messed up, but it wasn't like he raped the child in a dark alley, so even as disturbed as I am, I could not say that based on that video he is a pedophile...

      But do I think the Russian govt. poisoned the guy? - Yes, I do! It is so much like them to do it. I grew up in Soviet Union and have been going back once in a while in the last 15 years, and I have to say that there is not a single fact I can pinpoint to that proves the Russian poisoned the guy, but just by knowing the Russians, how they think and do things, this is something they would do.

    4. Re:Putin Pedophile Link by ElephanTS · · Score: 1

      Did you see what the ex-spy wrote aswell?

      http://slashdot.org/comments.pl?sid=208238&cid=169 80952

      --
      spoonerize "magic trackpad"
    5. Re:Putin Pedophile Link by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      In Russia a kiss between two people may not have a sexual context. You could see in our old films kiss between two men as a part of traditional greeting. You could find video or photo with kiss between Gagarin and Hruschev, between Brezhnev and other, etc. When I kiss my father or my mother, or a child of my best friend it`s a sign of tenderness. The same tradition you could find in many other countries.

    6. Re:Putin Pedophile Link by ElephanTS · · Score: 1

      on the stomach by pulling up a shirt?

      --
      spoonerize "magic trackpad"
  56. Re:Devotion to one's cause by Mateorabi · · Score: 2, Informative
    Perhaps I am an idiot.


    Yes, but a useful one.

    --
    "You saved 1968." - Ms. Valerie Pringle to the crew of Apollo 8

  57. Just to add some fuel to the conspiracy... by Xest · · Score: 1

    On the news here (one channel at least, I can't remember which - was around 6pm so the BBC iirc) in the UK they claimed that the statement read out on the news was dictated by Litvinenko as he was dying last night, however at the end of the statement the guy reading it quoted it as being dated 21st November 2006, last night was the 23rd. I'm not sure why the discrepancy and realistically I don't think it's related to any kind of conspiracy, I think the news editorial probably misunderstood and that the statement probably was put together on the 21st however all the same I just thought I'd point this out in case anyone could offer perhaps an alternative explanation ;) ?

  58. Re:Same old Russia by tobe · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Barbarians compared to the US of course who indulge in no such activites..

    Like rigging elections, assasinating democractically elected heads of state they don't agree with, invading countries for suggesting they might prefer to sell oil in Euros thus causing a huge run on the already weak dollar, selling arms and torture equipment to countries with appalling human rights records, wire-tapping their own citizens on a scale undreamed of by the most autocratic of regimes, collaborating with despots for profit, operating an institutionally rascist judicial systm, atempting to deny women rights fundamentally accepted as basic by the entire western world, accepting graft as a proxy for politic.. yadda yadda yadda..

    I'm not saying the rest of the western world's any better.. the brits, the french, the israelis.. they're all doing their bits to help out f ck it all up.. but really.. it's the sheer bare-faced hypocrisy of the US that disappoints the most.. still.. we seem to be growing up slowly..

  59. Litvinenko's statement before he died by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Informative
    I would like to thank many people. My doctors, nurses and hospital staff who are doing all they can for me, the British police who are pursuing my case with vigour and professionalism and are watching over me and my family.

    I would like to thank the British government for taking me under their care. I am honoured to be a British citizen.

    I would like to thank the British public for their messages of support and for the interest they have shown in my plight.

    I thank my wife Marina, who has stood by me. My love for her and our son knows no bounds.

    But as I lie here I can distinctly hear the beating of wings of the angel of death.

    I may be able to give him the slip but I have to say my legs do not run as fast as I would like.

    I think, therefore, that this may be the time to say one or two things to the person responsible for my present condition.

    You may succeed in silencing me but that silence comes at a price. You have shown yourself to be as barbaric and ruthless as your most hostile critics have claimed.

    You have shown yourself to have no respect for life, liberty or any civilised value.

    You have shown yourself to be unworthy of your office, to be unworthy of the trust of civilised men and women.

    You may succeed in silencing one man but the howl of protest from around the world will reverberate, Mr Putin, in your ears for the rest of your life.

    May God forgive you for what you have done, not only to me but to beloved Russia and its people.

    http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/uk_news/6180262.stm
    1. Re:Litvinenko's statement before he died by rHBa · · Score: 1

      Here's a conspiracy theory for ya:

      Litvinenko killed himself in order to frame Putin, he certainly got the attention of the public before his certain death and then pointed the finger squarely at Putin. IANAD so correct me if I'm wrong but if, hypothetically, he had been diagnosed with the early signs of cancer the symptoms would have been hard to detect in a post mortem after dying in such a way, this would give him a possible motive and he obviously had the opportunity...

      All complete speculation of course.

  60. Re:Polonium-210? What legitimate uses does it have by udderly · · Score: 2, Funny

    What if rogue clowns from some other planet drove their flying space armadillo to the UK, abducted this guy and used an anal probe to implant the polonium in his ass?

    Seriously, have you never heard of Occam's Razor?

  61. The only reason.. by Plutonite · · Score: 0

    that this is on /. is that a radioactive substance was involved in the assasination. Isn't that a little scary - the thought that the newsworthiness of the murder to nerds is supposed to be the polonium and not the human life or the state of the world today?

    I feel uncomfortable.

    1. Re:The only reason.. by Sloppy · · Score: 1

      It must be the state of the world today. Actually, the state of the world for the last ten million years. Murder happens every day, and 99% of it doesn't count as news. This, however, is an "interesting" murder.

      --
      As copyright owner of this comment, I authorize everyone to defeat any technological measure which limits access to it.
    2. Re:The only reason.. by antispam_ben · · Score: 1

      There are many interesting points about this case, another is the method of murder that allowed the victim to live long enough to talk to the news media. He was on the front page of cnn.com twice in recent days, once concerning the rare, radioactive poison he had injested, and again announcing his death.

      --
      Tag lost or not installed.
  62. US propaganda at work by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    What I do not understand is why kill him now?

    Surely, if Russian secret services wanted to kill him, wouldn't it make more sense to kill him, say, several years ago, when he was on top of his anti-Russia campaign? Why kill now when has fallen in to obscurity and irrelevance? The same goes for that Russian whats-her-name reporter that also killed about a couple of months ago.

    How is it in Russia's interests, if Russia is actually behind the murder(s)? It appears that those deaths are more profitable to the US propaganda machine then to Russia, and that can help one make some guesses with reference to who is behind the murders.

    With the US influence in the world crumbling, the dollar sinking and the "(eternal) war on terror" hysteria losing its effectiveness, the US needs a new enemy to push its agenda. Note the similarities in the "free" US media's reporting between this ex-spy death and "Iraq has WMD" propaganda. Again "objective and balanced" US media has an obvious bias yet presents no proof.

    It seems that US needs more enemies to sustain its "We are at war!" campaign. Russia fits that purpose perhaps even better than al Queda.

    1. Re:US propaganda at work by WilliamSChips · · Score: 1

      Personally, my favorite theory is that the spy did it to himself because he was close to dying anyways and so ate the polonium to do political damage to Putin. Not that Putin wouldn't've done it himself...

      --
      Please, for the good of Humanity, vote Obama.
  63. Answers to the question... by TheOriginalRevdoc · · Score: 5, Insightful

    I've seen a few posts here asking "why use such an obvious method of killing someone?"

    The answer is: it's very, very far from obvious. The mere fact that it's taken so long to work out what the poison was indicates how subtle Polonium poisoning is.

    1. Based on the Wikipedia entry for Polonium, the dosage required is incredibly small. We're not talking milligrams, here; we're talking micrograms, or less. Just detecting such a tiny quantity distributed throughout the victim's body is going to be incredibly hard.

    2. The poison won't produce discernable radiation outside the victim's body, either, because alpha radiation is so readily absorbed by tissue. (That's also what makes it such a good poison, of course.)

    3. The thing with poisons is that you have to actually look for them. Polonium is such an unlikely poison - given its rarity and inherent handling hazards - that even considering it is far-fetched. The fact that the victim's urine contained helium was the only clue the pathologists had, and I think they deserve a huge amount of credit for getting from that result to polonium as the cause.

    1. Re:Answers to the question... by TempeTerra · · Score: 1

      Polonium is such an unlikely poison - given its rarity and inherent handling hazards - that even considering it is far-fetched.

      Luckily Hugh Laurie was visiting England at the time of the autopsy, or they never would have got it.

      --
      .evom ton seod gis eht
    2. Re:Answers to the question... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Not necessarily since all that an alpha particle realy is, is a helium nuclues. so the only real conclusion that can be drawn from Helium found in the his urine is radiation poisining. so the only other question left after that would be what types of radiatcive substances give off alpha particles and the conclusion would be obvious as Polonium 210 as the " most likely" candidate.

    3. Re:Answers to the question... by JustNiz · · Score: 1

      err... Hugh Laurie IS English.

    4. Re:Answers to the question... by TempeTerra · · Score: 1

      I was assuming that in his capacity as Dr Gregory House he lives in the US these days. Never mind, nobody seems to feel like modding me up anyway. *sniffle*

      --
      .evom ton seod gis eht
    5. Re:Answers to the question... by identity0 · · Score: 1

      You're forgetting that this isn't an ordinary murder, but an attempt to silence the Kremlin's critics. Like terrorism or a mafia hit, the purpose of this is not just to kill the target, but to silence the other critics through intimidation - "See what happens to those who go against us" is the message they're trying to send.

      For those purposes, this method makes perfect sense - it grabs headlines internationally, and the sheer outlandishness of it makes people conclude it *must* have been the Russian spies, but there is no direct evidence link that points back at the Russians. This allows them to intimidate their critics, *and* get off scott-free in diplomacy, without even a stern talking-to from the UK.

      It's the reason why the mafia uses ways of kiiling to intimidate - a victim found with his tongue cut out means "he shouldn't have talked", but it that doesn't make it mean the mob boss ordered it.

      I wouldn't take on president Putin in public if I were you...

  64. Re:Devotion to one's cause by Goaway · · Score: 1

    They most definitely do not use it in smoke detectors, the half-life is far too short to be useful.

  65. In the West... by alunharford · · Score: 0, Troll

    In the West, Putin kills You!

    In Soviet Russia, Putin Kills You!

    1. Re:In the West... by sillybilly · · Score: 1

      Ha ha ha.. you can run but you can't hide from Putin!

    2. Re:In the West... by alunharford · · Score: 0

      Somebody shoot the moderator.

      I was proud of that!

  66. The real question by CptPicard · · Score: 3, Interesting

    What truly puzzles me here is why exactly any secret service such as the FSB would be stupid enough to poison some Kremlin critic with a really hard to acquire substance such as Polonium. It should be assumed that the British WILL find out what killed Litvinenko, and when it is something as obscure as Polonium, it's got to be the Russians. You're practically implicating yourself by being too good at what you do.

    The guy is far more valuable to his cause as a confirmed martyr than some loud-mouthed expat living in Britain. If I were Putin, I probably wouldn't bother, and if I wanted to bother, I would want it to look like a traffic accident or a random mugging. The tinfoil hat guy in me actually is willing to believe this was a CIA job that wants to implicate the FSB. Let's face it, if you want to make Russia look bad, this is what you'd do.

    Unless, of course, I REALLY wanted to make a point of Russia's reach, but in that case, Putin's guys are simply miscalculating...

    --
    I want to play Free Market with a drowning Libertarian.
    1. Re:The real question by b0s0z0ku · · Score: 1
      was a CIA job that wants to implicate the FSB.

      ... more likely Chinese or N. Korean intelligence than us. Russia is more useful to us as an ally in the "war on terrah" than as an enemy.

      -b.

    2. Re:The real question by CptPicard · · Score: 1

      And what is the motive there? Breaking Russia-West ties, thus making sure Putin has to move back closer to Russia's old allies?

      --
      I want to play Free Market with a drowning Libertarian.
    3. Re:The real question by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      being a western you naturally assume this was a message directed at the west, however it's much more likely it's for other potential defectors.

    4. Re:The real question by CptPicard · · Score: 1

      Or, other would-be critics of Putin, and, in a perverse way, to impress the Russians. There is a deep nationalist streak in Russians, and they like their "Czar", whatever he may be called at any point in history, as long as he's perceived as strong... sad to say, I am sure a worryingly large percentage of the rank-and-file Russians feel a warm fuzzy feeling when they see "their country" being able to pull this off despite the low points of the 90s and perceived weakness before the West.

      I don't really think Putin cares much about "defectors", if you mean people who just leave the country. Criticism doesn't really matter as long as it happens somewhere else. Critics living abroad can easily be just painted unpatriotic and anti-Russian -- "love it or leave it".

      Litvinenko of course was ex-KGB though, so he potentially knows too much.

      --
      I want to play Free Market with a drowning Libertarian.
  67. Re:Same old Russia by NittanyTuring · · Score: 0, Redundant

    You shouldn't object to them killing you either... because then they'll kill you twice.

  68. Puts the lie to "Bush is Hitler" comments, eh? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Criticize Putin - die an agonizing death.

    Criticize Bush - get modded up on /.

    The crickets you hear are the sheltered, BDS-afflicted /sheep getting hit over the head with reality.

  69. Re:EVILO SONY POST by hazem · · Score: 1

    I don't know. The methodology sounds much more "George Smiley" than "James Bond".

  70. Wow... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    ...I think a lot more people would probably agree with you if you didn't intersperse sensible points with downright stupid ones.

    "assasinating democractically elected heads of state they don't agree with" - absolutely

    "selling arms and torture equipment to countries with appalling human rights records" - absolutely

    "wire-tapping their own citizens on a scale undreamed of by the most autocratic of regimes" - gimme a break; they dream of it alright, and if they don't do it it's because they don't have the technology, not because they respect anyone's privacy

    "invading countries for suggesting they might prefer to sell oil in Euros" - okay now that's just plain stupid

    1. Re:Wow... by WilliamSChips · · Score: 1

      That last point is not completely stupid, considering Iraq. But the whole "selling oil in Euros" thing is only part of the equation. Another part is that Bush is deluded enough to think that Saddam was the one trying to kill Bush41 during Gulf War 1.

      --
      Please, for the good of Humanity, vote Obama.
    2. Re:Wow... by tobe · · Score: 1

      "and if they don't do it it's because they don't have the technology"

      That was kind of my point..

      And as for the Euro thing... consider the effect on the US economy if the OPEC nations decided to convert to the euro.. wholsale conversion of currency reserves (mainly chinese held) into the euro.. max exodus of capital out of the states and into harder currencies such as Sterling and the Euro.. crippling debt for the States as repayments are converted from the relatively weak dollar to much stronger european currencies.. check out the buying power of your average brit in New York this christmas.. the US economy is in a very precarious position right now.. the recent downturn almost a direct consequence of more mature nations deciding to consolidate trade relations amongst their own power blocks as EU, Chinese and Indian economies prove more attractive to do business with than an increasingly theocratic seeming US (although recent political events give great hope). They know the US is going to heal itself but they're not going to waste a decade of profit waiting for that to happen. Coming out the other side of this history will see the Bush presidency as the point at which the world started to realise the US was only *one* of the important trading nations and a new power balance based on the expanding economies of the Chinese, a unified Europe, India, an emerging and an increasingly independent South America will emerge. Economic power in this kind of situtation will return to the diplomatically skilled countries like the UK and France. The US will be increasingly side-lined..

    3. Re:Wow... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      Economic power in this kind of situtation will return to the diplomatically skilled countries like the UK and France. The US will be increasingly side-lined..


      That'd be true if the UK and France knew anything about how to compete economically.. which they don't. They're moribund socialist institutions destined to wither. The bottom line is that the future will be trade between Asia, NAFTA, and the EU. And given that the EU can't even unfuck their booze taxes I'm not worried about them.. it's the Chinese I'm worried about. Of course if somebody would grow a pair of balls and tell them to revalue their currency or slap tariffs on them it might help. And yeah, China could sell all our debt blada blah blah. They'll go down right along with us.
  71. I'd believe it was upon Putin's order if... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Informative

    I'd really believe it was Putin who ordered someone's assasination if it was Mr. Berezowski who was all of a sudden dead... Seriously this guy has been a thorn in Putin's ass for much longer than either the journalist (of whom no one really knew or read anything by in Russia before her death) or this Litvinenko guy...

    I could of course believe that perhaps some secret service was involved... but believing that everything in Russia is done upon Putin's order is like saying that Bush is directly responsible for every law that is passed and every corporate deal in the US...

    Anyways, Litvinenko is directly linked to Berezowski who is directly linked to the Chechen mafia (criminals aka terrorists)... so I wouldn't be too surprised if it's rather that group of people who are directly involved in his death. Btw, I still find it amazing that one of the Chechen terrorist leaders, who was directly responsible for recruiting and training British citizens to become terrorists on Chechen territory is still walking freely around London, especially in the post-London-tube-bombing situation. The guy's name is Zakaev and he is often shown on British TV ;)... admittedly the Russian's did mess up the extradition request... but alas... with all the hard talk about the anti-terrorist war from Tony Blair it still seems very strange.

  72. suspects? by in_fla · · Score: 1

    So what countries have the ability to produce Polonium-210?

  73. Im sorry but i have to say this : by unity100 · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Russia's current president is an ex kgb president. he is a thug, as well as the big-money who is now running the country are mobs, mafia and thugs, who are suppressing russian people and being harmful not only to russian citizens and to the world.

    i see russia more dangerous than north korea while mafia placed presidents/governments, especially ones with kgb or such background at the helm.

    1. Re:Im sorry but i have to say this : by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      $comment =~ s/KGB/CIA/g;
      $comment =~ s/Russia/America/gi;

    2. Re:Im sorry but i have to say this : by WilliamSChips · · Score: 1

      Bush isn't a CIA man, that's only the new Secretary of Defense.

      --
      Please, for the good of Humanity, vote Obama.
    3. Re:Im sorry but i have to say this : by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Bush's father was head of the CIA in the 70s, though...

  74. Re:Polonium-210? What legitimate uses does it have by rkww · · Score: 4, Interesting

    Even a THOUSAND TIMES the lethal dose of .5 mCi would be a mere tenth of a milligram.

    At 9196 kg/m^3 ~= 9 mg / mm^3, that's about a hundredth of a cubic millimeter, assuming it was given in elemental form.

    The sheer quantity of alpha radiation it produces also explains why it's used in satellites - "The power density of polonium is unique and made it attractive as a power source. One pound of polonium-210 occupies a volume of approximately 3 cubic inches and produces heat at the rate of 3.6 x 10^8 British Thermal Units (BTUs) per minute or about 64 kilowatts of electric power."

  75. can the isotopic signature be traced? by ridgecritter · · Score: 2, Interesting

    For some synthetic elements (like Pu, Np, etc.) the abundance of isotopes in the material can be an identifier of the production site, and in some cases, of the particular reactor that made the material. Is anyone here enough of a nuclear synthetic chemist to know if what is nominally Po210 actually has enough other minor Po isotopes that one might identify the production site by the mix, or secondarily, by looking at the decay product mix?

  76. Wimp! by alienmole · · Score: 1
    Whoever killed him wanted to make a point and also wanted the fingers to be pointed at the usual suspects.

    Which makes me on a second thought post anonymously :-)

    Wimp. I know who did it, and I plan to provide definitive evidence to authorities in three countries, as well as to various rival crime organizations (just to be sure of some action), but I'm darned if I'm going to post as an Anonymous Cow%.@# NO CARRIER

  77. qui bono & other side by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Interesting

    Why would I use polonium?

    To make it seem like the Russians were the guilty ones.

    As can be seen from /. : the majority of the people seem to assume the Russians to be behind it, just for the reason that this kind of substance was used.

    Qui bono, I mean really?

    One side to benefit from making Putin seem bad, is USA&UK. We remember that in the Caspian and Caucasus area there is, surprise surprise, oil, on which both sides are eyeing. So it would be beneficial for the Bush&Blair to weaken the political power of Russia even a little.

    Just thinking this for the sake of balance, and not to forget this possibility.

    1. Re:qui bono & other side by LupusCanis · · Score: 1

      ... this guy wasn't exactly a big shot. Beyond the fact that he probably couldn't get polonium by himself, why would he poison himself? He had just become a British citizen, starting a new life with his family, a month before. Traces of polonium have been found at the restaurant he ate at, in an impromptu lunch. He didn't do it himself.

      The British government wouldn't do it, because, put bluntly, we can't afford to invade the oil fields. We have a health system that's in severe debt (I believe £100m in the West Midlands alone) due to a VERY poorly conceived IT system (£20-30 billion so far (!!!!)) - we have an army which is strained for equipment and regularly targetted by terrorist attacks in Iraq and regularly get into battles with the Taliban in Afghanistan. We don't have the resources. This is to say nothing about public perception of this kind of tactic. People were generally pro-invasion for Afghanistan. People weren't pro-invasion with Iraq but because of some false documents Blair pushed ahead anyway. People would definitely not be pro invading Russia. Everywhere is VERY anti-American since Iraq. Even if the motive is there, the means is not.

      Now, the American government. Much deeper pockets, less critical public sure, but really, the same points stand. Besides which, what we know of CIA activity shows that they usually just fund opponents of their enemies, only to be bitten in the arse a decade or so down the line. I think that the theory that the CIA did it is giving the CIA a bit too much credit, really, and should be dismissed as a conspiracy theory.
      Given the mysterious deaths of many vocal critics of Putin's Russia, coupled with the fact that the American and British forces are barely coping with Iraq and Afghanistan (the Americans seemed to have pretty much bailed on Afghanistan, British forces are engaged in battles with the Taliban almost every day - plus there've been horror stories of equipment shortages, or deaths caused by cheap equipment being used...) I think that it's safe to assume that it is Russia. It might not be, but currently all signs are pointing very obviously to our nice friend Putin.

      Who, incidentally, IS bad. Besides the treatment of critics and oligarchs who got a bit too powerful, his attitude to the free press make Bush look like a vocal supporter of free speech. His elections, although not rigged, were extremely one-sided with their advertising. The media in Russia is state controlled (directly, not like the BBC, which is actually a staunch critic of the British government), and he exploits this rather than freeing the media. Chechnya too, of course. He is a bad person, put bluntly. I'd say worse than Bush, who I don't exactly have a high opinion of. Hell, I'd say that Putin is one of the major stumbling blocks for Russia to modernise and join the western club.

  78. Re:polonium-210; We need a fall guy! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I'd blame Marie Curie. It's her stuff!

  79. Sushi preparation in Britain by alienmole · · Score: 1
    Sushi, stalwart cornerstone of British cusine since time immemorial.

    Well, sure, as long as it's boiled[*] or fried in batter! (And w'out any of that funny-flavored rice or wasabi, mind you.)

    [*] Me gran calls it "poached"

    1. Re:Sushi preparation in Britain by smash · · Score: 1

      Actually wasabi isn't THAT far removed from english mustard.

      --
      I run: Windows, OS X, Linux, FreeBSD. Just because you have a hammer, doesn't mean everything is a nail.
    2. Re:Sushi preparation in Britain by listen · · Score: 1

      And horse radish sauce is a hell of a lot closer to wasabi than mustard.

  80. Re:Devotion to one's cause by h3llfish · · Score: 1

    The guy was ex-KGB. I think he could buy pretty much anything if he made a few phone calls.

    The thing that's so weird about this is, why kill the guy in this way? As you said, it's not easy to get your hands on this stuff, so that narrows down the list of subjects considerably. Why not just a double tap with a Makarov to the head, like when they did that journalist a couple weeks ago?

    Poster's theory is the first answer to that question that actually makes sense to me. Of course, it's just a theory...

    Shawn

  81. Alternate theory of the crime by alienmole · · Score: 1

    What's interesting about this is that it means that almost anyone could have committed the crime, not just people with close associations to governments with access to nuclear material. Even Litvinenko himself could have done it to embarrass Putin et al, if he were sufficiently mentally unbalanced, which isn't that far-fetched for an ex-KGB spy.

    1. Re:Alternate theory of the crime by drgonzo59 · · Score: 1
      So this guy killed himself because he wanted embarrass Putin? Putin, obviously _very_ embarrassed, said, "Sorry about his death, we all feel bad, I am going back to being a dictator, what's for lunch?"

      If anything, KGB spies are not mentally unbalanced. Quite the opposite. There is no way that the former KGB (now FSB) would hire someone who is unbalanced in anyway. They need people who can keep their cool.

    2. Re:Alternate theory of the crime by alienmole · · Score: 1

      Have you read about Litvinenko's final statement? Quote:

      You may succeed in silencing me, but that silence comes at a price. You have shown yourself to be as barbaric and ruthless as your most hostile critics claim.

      You may succeed in silencing one man. But a howl of protest from around the world will reverberate, Mr Putin, in your ears for the rest of your life. May God forgive you for what you have done.

      Whether any of this bothers Putin is irrelevant, the point is how Litvinenko saw it.

      As for KGB/FSB not hiring the mentally unbalanced, they only care about the mental state of their agents while they're employed by the FSB. Read a bit about Litvinenko's background (e.g. here or in this obituary), and a few things stand out: he was very angry about how he was ejected from the FSB, he spent 9 months in a "remand center" before being acquitted of his alleged crimes, and then went into exile in England. That kind of thing has a strong effect on anyone's mental state. He's been a vocal critic of the FSB and Putin since being in exile in England, and is notoriously paranoid. Of course, it's possible that the FSB has been harrassing him, but if you really think about it, wouldn't they either just kill him efficiently if they really cared, or forget about him?

      One very plausible explanation of Litvinenko's behavior is that he was unwilling to let go of his previous lifestyle, and had a strong need to remain "important" and involved in the kind of work he had been forcibly ejected from, as well as a need to try to correct what he saw as injustices in his home country. The sheer mental pressure of his paranoia (justified or not) combined with a taste for the dramatic and a desire to be "proved right" could have led to him taking his own life in this way.

      Try to put yourself in the position of someone who has fought his way to the top of Russia's secret service only to be ejected without honor and exiled from your own home country, left to fret in irrelevance in another country. Combine with that the concern that an agency notorious for its theatric brutality against its enemies might be after you. Litvinenko clearly was not the kind of person able to put such things out of his mind and move on. His previous lifestyle and treacherous bosses loomed large in his mind. By striking back, as he would have seen it (by his own statements), he would have been able to take a kind of control back from the fear that was ruling his life.

      Then again, I could just be an FSB agent assigned to Slashdot to sow FUD. In which case, argue with me at your peril! ;)

  82. Re:Polonium-210? What legitimate uses does it have by Omnifarious · · Score: 1

    I just looked it up on my periodic table t-shirt with the radioative elements marked with glow-in-the-dark radioactivity symbols.

  83. Re:EVILO SONY POST by WilliamSChips · · Score: 0, Offtopic

    Sony only owns 20% of MGM. And MGM is resposible for Stargate. Which makes it better than 90% of Slashdot.

    --
    Please, for the good of Humanity, vote Obama.
  84. some guy, some story, some PR by esiminch · · Score: 1

    Ltivinenko was involved with his ally/boss BAB in a number of issues with Russia and Ukraine (business, politics). now it's obvious that he was killed and that in some kind people from this governments and businesses are linked to this event. But there are to much possibilities that to say that Putin is behind this is to say nothing

    already years is Litvinenko active in propaganda from London. nothing happened, until he was writing about the "truth" on russian special services nobody cared. but elections are soon now, and it looks like his activities became more subjective and he was in some kind involved in some new stuff.

    the difference between how he told the story of his last contacts (something linked to Politkovskaya death) and how the person he met told this (some termination list) makes it look like as he was trying to make some loud accusations and was trying everything to produce a 'sensation'.

    now this, and the fact that BAB financed the PR company around his poisoning and his death makes everything look very suspicious to me.

    I would be very interested in facts that could be revealed during an investigations on his and BAB-s last activities

    maybe another book, that would be written by someone like Paul Khlebnikov (now dead), but as always - this happens many-many years after this events took place

  85. I'm amazed! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I didn't know the Queen read slashdot!

  86. Re:Devotion to one's cause by WilliamSChips · · Score: 1

    Smoke detectors do not use polonium. Smoke detectors use americium. Why do you hate Americium?

    --
    Please, for the good of Humanity, vote Obama.
  87. Why kill him in this way? by h3llfish · · Score: 1

    The thing that I can't understand is method of execution. One of the possible reasons cited for Litvinenko's murder is that he was speaking out on the murder of one of Putin's other critics, journalist Anna Politkovskaya. When she was killed, she was shot in the head with a Makarov pistol, which was then dropped next to her. Now, my extensive knowledge of espionage, gained by watching many hours of '24', tells me that this is how a pro commits a political hit. But to kill Litvinenko with an extremely had to get radioactive isotope means that the list of suspects is darn short. Is it possible that Litvinenko obtained the stuff himself, through the type of black market contacts that one would assume a former KGB agent has, and kill himself with it, just to give Putin a black eye? It's a somewhat nutty theory, but this is a nutty story. Can anyone else come up with a reason why this rather unusual method was employed? Shawn

    1. Re:Why kill him in this way? by smash · · Score: 1

      Maybe dying of radiation sickness/poisoning is a real painful way to go?

      --
      I run: Windows, OS X, Linux, FreeBSD. Just because you have a hammer, doesn't mean everything is a nail.
    2. Re:Why kill him in this way? by sillybilly · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Because shooting a spy with a gun does not instill a new fear into the population. Nasty stuff happens day in and day out, all over the world, but I'm always curious to see what the media wants to emphasize, and try to poke at what the motives must be. Spies are killed left and right and you never get to know about it. The important part here is that da man through his media channels decided to make a story about it, meaning it will probably have a desired effect. One effect I can think of is the "proliferation" of nuclear poisons and materials, giving you another reason to get stripsearched at an airport. It used to be that cops just tossed a small bag of white powder in your car, and you were caught redhanded, possessing drugs. You can swear you never saw that thing in your car, right, all pepople in prison swear they are innocent. But the penalties for finding powder on you are only nominal, there needs to be something that automatically takes you out of circulation for good, without parole. Soon you'll see people on "cops" caught carrying 2 mg of polonium! Wee! And the law enforcement is ready to counter the threat for your protection! It's like IE7 with "anti-phishing" measures! Gotta have some excuse, something latest and greates and novel to push something on you, getting stripsearched for drug possession is so old-fashioned and boring, but hey, not you'll be "phished" for polonium! Wee! That's the new vogue to get arrested for!

    3. Re:Why kill him in this way? by sillybilly · · Score: 1

      Oh, and by the way we get the message out that Putin is a pedophile. He must be a hardass and tough negotiator, so this is one way to erode some of his political aura - kill somebody, blame it on him, then blame it on him being a pedophile not wanting the news to get out. Even if people pass over it, it remains in the subconscious every time they see his face from now on. That could be another reason why this is "news."

    4. Re:Why kill him in this way? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Anyone considered the hypothesis that the target could have been *someone else* (due to fly out soon, say?), and the administration (or preparation) went wrong, even got 'switched'? In the words of the 1956 movie "The pellet with the poison's in the vessel with the pestle; the chalice from the palace has the brew that is true!"

    5. Re:Why kill him in this way? by VENONA · · Score: 1

      "Spies are killed left and right and you never get to know about it."

      If you never know about it, how can you claim it? And I can make no sense of the last four sentences (from the IE7 reference on) whatsover.

      --
      What you do with a computer does not constitute the whole of computing.
    6. Re:Why kill him in this way? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "Because shooting a spy with a gun does not instill a new fear into the population. Nasty stuff happens day in and day out, all over the world, but I'm always curious to see what the media wants to emphasize, and try to poke at what the motives must be. Spies are killed left and right and you never get to know about it."

      I'd just like to point out that spies certainly aren't shot in the UK left and right. Gun murders are so rare here that it basically all gets reported, and anything that isn't a suicide or a domestic or gang fight gets lots of attention. If 50% of shootings were of well-travelled, well-educated, multilingual and wealthy individuals people would notice.

  88. Reading the discussion by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    It is indeed amazing how most of the slashdot crowd participating here is a perfect representation of how sheepish and easily brainwashable the majority of the populous in fact are.

    An article is all it takes for people to go and grab their pitchforks and run out to chase an enemy they got scared about when watching Bond movies. Proof or awaiting at least proper and definite results of an investigation is not necessary because all you people seem to be interested in is to get a target to aim at. And how convenient if research and investigation of the subject is not even necessary because it is written in the NEWS. Oh I forgot - media are always speaking facts, are neither politically motivated nor trying to influence peoples opinion, right?

    Maybe trying to understand grown-up issues are not for you and you should go back to playing with your XBox.

  89. Uh Duh by PenGun · · Score: 1

    He was a KGB defector. Oh forget it you'll never figure it out.

        PenGun
      Do What Now ??? ... Standards and Practices !

  90. Didn't your momma tell you... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    that if you kept chewing on that toy kaleidoscope you'de end up swallowing some stars?

  91. Yes, it can be a translation problem by saikou · · Score: 5, Interesting

    I believe in this case Mr Putin used term "nasilstvennaya smert'" which basically means someone else killed that person. While "nasilstvennaya" has the same root as "nasilie" = violence, the meaning is "forced upon someone" versus "estestvennaya" (which would mean "natural causes" i.e. old age or an illness). Means of inflicting premature death could be violet (hacked with a saw) or not-so-violent (sleeping pills poisoning) but in both cases it would be an "unnatural cause of death"/"nasilstvennaya smert'".
    Of course it's way more fun to use "violent" in articles, as it paints Russian President as a fierce person who doesn't think that deaths not involving excessive violence are worthy of an investigation.

    Frankly I personally don't know what to think about this whole story. It's some sort of James Bond in real life. If it was really an evil plot, why did they use highly exotic means? Why not just shoot him during "robbery" or "accidentally" run him over with a car? To give him enough time to make an accusation? Did perpetrators they take into account his hate toward Russian government and simply used him for their own purposes? Or they knew we'd think that and reality is even more twisted? I don't think he'd do it on purpose -- sacrificing one's life is a very high price for a political statement to make.
    So my only option is to wait for the final results of the autopsy and then hope that source of the radioactive material will be found quickly, to prevent any other radiation poisonings.

    1. Re:Yes, it can be a translation problem by GnuDiff · · Score: 1

      > If it was really an evil plot, why did they use highly exotic means?

      Well, what are the options if it WEREN'T an evil plot? Highly radioactive substance administered by accident?? How did it get into him? Is there really nobody else hurt/dead?

      As regards highly exotic means - perhaps whoever planned this, had reasonable grounds to believe the stuff would not be found? I mean - how often do medics test for radioactivity in urine in hospital?

    2. Re:Yes, it can be a translation problem by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      that's fairly simple, they didn't want to simply kill him , they wanted to get a message across to anyone who would consider betraying "Mother Russia"

    3. Re:Yes, it can be a translation problem by o'reor · · Score: 1

      The Wikipedia page for Polonium specifies how exceedingly rare Polonium is, with restricted applications such as a lightweight heat source to power thermoelectric cells in artificial satellites. So the theory of "accidental administration" is quite unlikely IMHO.

      --
      In Soviet Russia, our new overlords are belong to all your base.
    4. Re:Yes, it can be a translation problem by marsonist · · Score: 1

      Any one of your scenarios for a non-exotic death allows for witnesses and a high probability of apprehension. A crime that isn't noticed until hours, days, or weeks later allows plenty of time for the criminal to get away. Considering the risks involved I could see Russia not wanting a captured agent to spill the beans.

  92. God Dammit! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Polonium is gonna be tomorrows crisis dejour. The evolutionary luddites will be swarming about like an Alabama fire ant nest freshly run over with the lawn mower.

  93. The Kremlin Pedophile By Alexander Litvinenko by ElephanTS · · Score: 3, Interesting


    The Kremlin Pedophile

    By Alexander Litvinenko

    A few days ago, Russian President Vladimir Putin walked from the Big Kremlin Palace to his Residence. At one of the Kremlin squares, the president stopped to chat with the tourists. Among them was a boy aged 4 or 5.

    'What is your name?' Putin asked.

    'Nikita,' the boy replied.

    Putin kneed, lifted the boy's T-shirt and kissed his stomach.

    The world public is shocked. Nobody can understand why the Russian president did such a strange thing as kissing the stomach of an unfamiliar small boy.

    The explanation may be found if we look carefully at the so-called "blank spots" in Putin's biography.

    After graduating from the Andropov Institute, which prepares officers for the KGB intelligence service, Putin was not accepted into the foreign intelligence. Instead, he was sent to a junior position in KGB Leningrad Directorate. This was a very unusual twist for a career of an Andropov Institute's graduate with fluent German. Why did that happen with Putin?

    Because, shortly before his graduation, his bosses learned that Putin was a pedophile. So say some people who knew Putin as a student at the Institute.

    The Institute officials feared to report this to their own superiors, which would cause an unpleasant investigation. They decided it was easier just to avoid sending Putin abroad under some pretext. Such a solution is not unusual for the secret services.

    Many years later, when Putin became the FSB director and was preparing for presidency, he began to seek and destroy any compromising materials collected against him by the secret services over earlier years. It was not difficult, provided he himself was the FSB director. Among other things, Putin found videotapes in the FSB Internal Security Directorate, which showed him having sex with some underage boys.

    Interestingly, the video was recorded in the same conspiratorial flat in Polyanka Street in Moscow where Russian Prosecutor-General Yuri Skuratov was secretly video-taped with two prostitutes. Later, in the famous scandal, Putin (on Roman Abramovich's instructions) blackmailed Skuratov with these tapes and tried to persuade the Prosecutor-General to resign. In that conversation, Putin mentioned to Skuratov that he himself was also secretly video-taped making sex at the same bed. (But of course, he did not tell it was pedophilia rather than normal sex.) Later, Skuratov wrote about this in his book Variant Drakona.

    --
    spoonerize "magic trackpad"
    1. Re:The Kremlin Pedophile By Alexander Litvinenko by kestasjk · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Is there any evidence for anything other than the part where he kissed the 5 year old's stomach?

      --
      // MD_Update(&m,buf,j);
  94. It doesn't happen often because... by Richard+Mills · · Score: 1

    Folks don't poison others with Polonium very often because 1) Po is exceedingly rare and 2) once it's determined that it was used, it really narrows down the range of suspects because of (1). If you want to obtain Po, you'll very likely need connections at a government laboratory like Oak Ridge or Los Alamos... or, say, a weapons lab in Russia.

    Of course, any would-be assassin would also want to be very careful with the stuff since it is more than 10^11 times as toxic as hydrogen cyanide, which one might imagine makes it pretty dangerous to handle.

    1. Re:It doesn't happen often because... by Flowmaster · · Score: 1

      Wouldn't cyanide be faster acting, easier to obtain/manufacture, and much more difficult to trace? I suppose the poisoner didn't want Litvinenko collapsing in the same place he was poisoned.

    2. Re:It doesn't happen often because... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "Wouldn't cyanide be faster acting, easier to obtain/manufacture, and much more difficult to trace? I suppose the poisoner didn't want Litvinenko collapsing in the same place he was poisoned."

      Obviously correct, but what the poisoner really wants in this case is to scare anybody else who might become a problem. This case appears to be one of a high-profile murder that can easily be assumed to be the work of someone specific. Someone who knows that he can get away with the crime, probably because he's very well protected. Unfortunately, the practice may spread.

    3. Re:It doesn't happen often because... by davidsyes · · Score: 1

      Maybe the assassin/killer was playing a TRUE game of Russian Roulette?

      as for:

      "by MMC Monster (602931) Alter Relationship on Friday November 24, @04:26PM (#16979636)
      I wouldn't call it ineptitude. All of medicine goes by the doctrine: "If you here hoofs, look for horses, not zebras." As you said, this is a fairly unusual form of poisoning. I'm surprised it was even diagnosed properly (assuming that it was, of course). IANAT (I am not a toxicologist), but the effects of a poison are typically not known until someone succumbs to it. While others have been poisoned by this particular element, it couldn't have been that many people compared to all the other possible toxins available."

      WELLLLLL....

      I've always wondered whether horses and zebras really sound all that different. Of course, other than the horse going "haroruroo haorururoo , haroruroo haorururoo"... (Too bad I haven't seen breathless zebras in documentaries... I might be tempted to text that sound, too...)

      If I were the medic, I'd look for the horse's HOOVES, to see where it'd been stepping.

      --
      Previously: "Linux... Toward the Sunrise..." Now: "Linux... Toward the-- No, now, part of Every Sunrise"
  95. Re:Devotion to one's cause by rHBa · · Score: 1

    If he was diagnosed with the early signs of some type of cancer (leukaemia perhaps?) then surely the effects of the Po210 would cover this up in a post mortem?

  96. How much Bismuth 210 was in the mix? by muridae · · Score: 1

    Po 210 is the last steps of the U 238 decay cycle towards Lead 206, at least according to my old reference book. And higher energy then even U 238. Working backwards, Bismuth 210 has a low beta decay and short half life (5 days), Lead 210 has a long half life (22 years) and also a low beta decay. What are the chances that this was exposure and not poisoning? And why is a man in a black suit knocking at my door?

  97. Ludicrously Complex Murder by MrSteveSD · · Score: 2, Informative

    The Russian government has often assassinated enemies with stupidly obvious methods like exotic poisons delivered through micro-machines pellets. The whole point of killing with these methods is to send a signal and leave little doubt who was responsible.

    However, killing him has probably backfired since more people know about the FSB bombing allegations (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Russian_apartment_bo mbings#FSB_involvement) than before. The allegations seem quite credible. It's very much like a 911 conspiracy, i.e. Stage a terrorist outrage as an excuse to start a war. However, unlike 911 conspiracies, you find that you are not rolling your eyes with this one.

  98. You need to get out of your mom's basement more by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    And going out to buy some more weed doesn't count.

    Your BDS is showing. What are you going to do in 2008? Try to get a life?

    The funny thing is - you probably really think you're smarter than most people.

  99. rarity by JustNiz · · Score: 1, Informative

    The Russians were stupid to use polonium-210. Its so rare and hard to get, it proves a government did it.

    You need massive resources like a ton of uranium and a nuclear proccesing plant to get 100 micrograms of polonium. It also has a half-life of 138 days so you don't have too long to use it either.

    I guess they were completely banking on the fact that no-one would think of looking for it in a post-mortem. Now the Brits found it, the Russians are completely in the sh1t.

    1. Re:rarity by 1.000.000 · · Score: 2, Insightful

      And what can you or the rest of the world do about it? Nothing. And thats the point.

      --
      This is a viral signature. You are now infected!
    2. Re:rarity by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "You need massive resources like a ton of uranium and a nuclear proccesing plant to get 100 micrograms of polonium. It also has a half-life of 138 days so you don't have too long to use it either."

      Not entirely true.

      You can make Polonium 210 from Bismuth: (From http://education.jlab.org/itselemental/ele084.html )

      Due to its scarcity, polonium is usually produced by bombarding bismuth-209 with neutrons in a nuclear reactor. This forms bismuth-210, which has a half-life of 5 days. Bismuth-210 decays into polonium-210 through beta decay. Milligram amounts of polonium-210 have been produced by this method.

      It does, however, require a nuclear reactor...

  100. USA-USSR & Gentleman's Agreement in Cold War by reporter · · Score: 1, Troll
    During the Cold War, the USA (and the rest of the West) had a gentleman's agreement with the USSR. Moscow would send spies to the USA but would not engage in outright assassinations in the USA. Similarly, Washington would send spies to the USSR but would not engage in outright assassinations in the USSR. The USA and the USSR were locked in a cat-and-mouse game but would never actually commit physical violence on the opponent's soil.

    For this reason, I strongly doubt that Putin ordered the assassination of Alexander Litvinenko. He was on Western soil (i.e., Great Britain), and, by the terms of gentleman's agreement, was in the "safe" zone. If he had been in Russia and continued to be a Russian citizen, then Putin would have killed him, regardless of whether he is a permanent resident of Britain.

    Someone outside of the official Russian government killed him, but who would want to kill him?

    Currently, many reports claim that the Russian government is in chaos. It has numerous renegade factions that actually support criminal elements and that coordinate assassinations. These factions operate outside of the control of the official Russian government lead by Putin. These factions are likely implicated in the murder of Anna Politkovskaya.

    In my opinion, one of these factions orchestrated the murder of Litvinenko because he was aggressively investigating the murder of Politkovskaya. Putin would never have killed him; Putin is a veteran of the KGB and clearly understood the gentleman's agreement.

    By the way, I despise Putin. This despot is currently broadcasting Russian propaganda via a satellite-delivered broadcast called "Russia Today". When Moscow tried to brutalize the Georgians, "Russia Today" omitted broadcasting the Georgian point of view. "Russia Today" is almost as biased as Al Jazeera.

  101. Re:Devotion to one's cause by fluffy99 · · Score: 1

    It's not exactly hard to come buy. The public can buy it over the internet. http://www.unitednuclear.com/isotopes.htm A few hundred dollars buys you a nice lethal dosage.

  102. United Nuclear by Kadin2048 · · Score: 3, Insightful

    I think someone might notice when you call up United Nuclear and try to order 1,000 of their 0.1 uCi Polonium sources. (And I'm not even sure if 1,000 of them would be enough to poison someone. That's a really minute amount they're selling.)

    --
    "Ladies and gentlemen, my killbot features Lotus Notes and a machine gun. It is the finest available."
    1. Re:United Nuclear by FromellaSlob · · Score: 1

      Yeah, 0.1 micro-Curies is a tiny, tiny amount. Of course, 3,700 Bequerels would be a lot, right?

      That's a rate of emission, 3,700 alpha-particles per second. The half-life of this stuff is 140 days, so it wouldn't drop off much over the timescale of this guy's illness.

    2. Re:United Nuclear by Goaway · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Well what do you expect for $69 on the internet? Point was, it most definitely can not "only be obtained from a limited number of state run laboratories".

    3. Re:United Nuclear by exp(pi*sqrt(163)) · · Score: 1
      I think someone might notice
      I think not. My evidence is here.
      --
      Doesn't it make you feel good to know that our freedoms are protected by politicans, lawyers and journalists.
  103. Maybe he just had some really bad sushi? by arcite · · Score: 1

    You know what they say if it isn't preparted properly...

  104. Re:Polonium-210? What legitimate uses does it have by DerekLyons · · Score: 1
    Sounds like all our Russian "friends" needed to do was to visit the local camera store's going-out-of-business sale.

    Carey Sublette has calculated that several thousand anti static brushes would be needed to provide a sufficient dose.
  105. Chernobyl victims by drgonzo59 · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Yes, I have heart of people visiting the "liquidators"(people who were sent to clean up the mess) from Chernobyl. Some had gotten so much radiation, that they got cooked alive -- their flesh had lost all feeling was just coming off the bone like you see on an overdone turkey. Pretty sick, doctors just prescribed wine and vodka and waited for them to die. All my mom's plants on the balcony turned yellow, I wonder if my children would have to heads...

  106. Re:polonium-210; We need a fall guy! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Marie Sklodowska-Curie was Polish.

  107. It's easy: by Ihlosi · · Score: 1
    I don't understand why of all things, they were using Polonium-210 to kill him.



    Do you want the answer ?


    Because they can. (And because most others cannot).


    It's as simple as that.

  108. Dissappointing by AaronLawrence · · Score: 3, Insightful

    After heading for a democracy, Russia is falling back into old ways. When I was there one woman earnestly asked me what I thought of Putin, and: "He is a strong leader isn't he"? Perhaps there is something in the Russian pysche that wants a strong leader more than a moral leader.

    Their treatment of Georgia and other nearby states is not good lately, and this suggests that there are powerful and nasty organisations still calling shots there.

    Please, Russians, don't go down the same road again!

    --
    For every expert, there is an equal and opposite expert. - Arthur C. Clarke
  109. Re:Polonium-210? What legitimate uses does it have by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Here's another creepy thought.

    What if someone is looking for a cheap scare and proposes a far-fetched and dangerous body-ingestion smuggling event for a poisonous product which is readily available off-the-shelf in every country in the world?

    I think I'm more scared that this moron is alive (and presumably making decisions somewhere) that that the Russian Security Service are copying the Israelis and Americans and going for assasination as a normal part of their politics.

    And what is it with the anti-script words for this topic? The last one I had was 'emitter', and now I've got 'radiates'!

  110. Re:Reading the article...... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0


      The text of Putin's statement was published in English by official russian press agency

      He said:

      " Death is always tragic. I present my condolences to the friends and the family of Mr. Litvinenko. As far as I know, the postmortem report does not say it was a violent death. If that is so, there is no reason for such suggestions , he told a Friday press conference after the Russia-EU summit ...."

    If the note was really written before the death of Mr. Litvinenko, I wonder why they did not make it public while he was still alive, Putin said. If the note appeared after the death, what comments can be made? People who did that are not the Lord, while Mr. Litvinenko is not Lazarus. It is a pity that such tragic events as death are being used for political provocative acts, he said.
    http://www.itar-tass.com/eng/level2.html?NewsID=11 018098&PageNum=0

          " effects indistinguishable from cancer "

      That I doubt. The effects of Polonium on human organs are well known

    " From 1945 through 1947 Manhattan Project researchers injected .... five human subjects with polonium .."

        It could have escaped the attention of an average coroner, but it is not a good 'undetectable poison'

    The physical half-life of d 210Po is 138.38 days

    getting it is hard and it's choice points to state sponsored terrorism

    http://www.dnaindia.com/report.asp?NewsID=1066031

        Similar to the Anthrax Attacks, only thing we know for sure is that there is a group, or groups
    with access to controlled substances, able and willing to kill

      and that public reaction to their crimes are used to point fingers.

      If that is the motive, or only motive, we do not know

  111. SPY? by Mondor · · Score: 0, Flamebait

    I'm sorry, but Litvinenko was not a spy. He was not an AGENT of FSB, but a colonel. Although many newspapers dupe each other, the truth is - he had nothing to do with agents and espionage. He was "fighting" the organized crime inside Russia.

    After all, why he is so much against Russian president? There are 2 reasons:

    1. There is only one chance to stay in UK if you are FSB officer - say, that your life is in danger and Russian elite forces are hunting you.
    2. Money of Mr. Berezovski, who is saying a lot shit about Putin because he can't return to Russia. Obviously, because all his millions were stolen.

    Now, if you ask me, I think that death of Litvinenko and journalist Politkovskaja was the part of Berezovski master plan. Although I don't really care. I think that if this was done by Russian military that's even better, as traitors don't deserve to live. Any traitors - whether they are working for FSB, CIA or MI5, if they become renegades, they deserve to die.

    And after all, I think that putting such "news" on Slashdot is a mistake, because a lot of Slashdot readers love Russia, and a lot of them hate Russia, for different reasons. Seeding hate between /. users is the last thing /. administrator should do. If he is not paid by someone, of course.

    1. Re:SPY? by hughk · · Score: 1

      Interesting idea, that Berezovsky was behind it all (did you forget to prefix his name "that Jew", which many do when criticising). In truth, Berezovsky originally behind Putin and met with him before he came to power (at Berezovsky's villa at Sotto Grande). However Putin seemed to align himself with the military/security service interests.

      You are right though to link this to Politkovskaya. There is fundamentally about Chechnya and the alleged use of agent provocateurs. In Russia, there may be corruption, but I've heard people tell me that it is much, much worse in the military. Those who have been to Chechnya tell how bad it is there, but there are plenty of opportunities for business. Look at how well some of the senior officers are living, and what is their official salary? A war in Chechnya is convenient for many, which is perhaps why it is taking so long to contain it.

      Yes, there are many friends of Russia here, but to be a friend of Russia doesn't mean being a friend of certain interests that may be connected with the Kremlin. What upsets me is how far Russia is going backwards. There was one major success of the soviet union and that was universal education. Outside the military, there is little industrial devlopment (not even in the poorly run oil/gas sectors). I know businessmen scared to let their companies grow for fear of state intervention. I know others who have been forced to leave their companies to allow state appointed directors to take over. Why is it so much easier for me to outsource to India or even China than Russia?

      Why is it that Russia is being held back and who is doing that?

      --
      See my journal, I write things there
    2. Re:SPY? by Mondor · · Score: 1

      Although I hate political correctness, I have nothing against Jews in general, or against any other nation. I think the problem is in culture, not nationality.

      And regarding Russia, the problem is - all we know about it, we know from sources, that belong to someone who wants to manipulate us in some way regarding the subject.

      And regarding the outsourcing, there is no problem in outsourcing to Russia. If you want to have some good contacts, visit CeBIT next March in Hannover - a part of the exhibition is related to outsourcing. I have some contacts, but the problem is :) - it costs the same as outsourcing to west Europe. Much cheaper is to outsource to China or India.

    3. Re:SPY? by hughk · · Score: 2, Informative

      Along with the other oligarchs, Berezovsky did some very unfortunate things. Many Russians say "he is Jewish" and leave it at that. However, the 'Siloviki' just seem to be replacing the old Oligarchs with new ones, in the process reducing any notion of private ownership. Before Putin, the view held by many in the Russian markets was that the Oligarchs had stolen their bit during privatisation, but overall they needed things to settle down for them to realise their investments. In such an environment, ordinary people could have investments, insurance policies, pension funds or whatever. The attack on Yukos and Khordokovsky was a lesson that Russia wasn't ready for transparency in business or government.

      Actually it remains a lot cheaper but only if you go direct. Someone who is going to get a stand at CeBIT is generally to expensive, i.e., a large amount of cost is the payoff because your company is big enough to be 'noticed' and there is probably also a local company taking a hefty margin (yes I know some Russian/German companies). India is extremely expensive for an onshore/offshore project, the major vendors ask a blended rate of around 500 Eur/day for on-site and still 300 or so Eur a day for a senior person in India. However, despite the infrastructure issues in India, it is perceived to be a much lower risk by major customer, particularly in the area of financial systems.

      People die all the time in India, from starvation or whatever. There is even terrorism as well. However, it is seen as being a much safer bet than Russia. High profile assassinations make people uncomfortable. So does the fact that the army/MVD can hang around Pulkovo airport and arbitrarily and illegally 'fine' foreigners with impunity.

      --
      See my journal, I write things there
  112. itsu by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    statement from itsu (sushi bar branch of piccadilly) :

    http://www.itsu.co.uk/press/litvinenko.htm

  113. Re:EVILO SONY POST by hughk · · Score: 1

    I disagree, George Smiley was a gentleman (even when his wife was having an affair). It was Karla that was the ruthless whatever and he was KGB in the books heading up a department at 'Moscow Centre'. Interestingly enough Karla is supposed to be based on Markus Wolf who headed the East German Stasi.

    --
    See my journal, I write things there
  114. Re:USA-USSR & Gentleman's Agreement in Cold Wa by tigga · · Score: 2, Interesting
    You are forgetting about Stepan Bandera (killed in Munich on October 15, 1959) and Georgi Markov (killed in London on September 11, 1978). Both were poisoned. Those are two verified cases of famous people which were assasinated by KGB. There might be a lot more people died for "unknown reasons".

    BTW communists were not gentleman - they might appear to follow agreement for their propaganda purposes. Communists are gone (mostly) now and there is no reason Putin would pursue old days agreements.

  115. A Letter from Litvinenko's Bedside by tulimulta · · Score: 2, Informative

    The Finnish Newspaper Helsingin Sanomat published yesterday a letter from the Russian film director Andrei Nekrasov. (Coincidentally, mr. Putin was also visiting Finland yesterday as part of the Russia-EU summit.) The letter is a scathing analysis of the present-day Russian society.

  116. Polonium 210 didnt kill him by howard_coward · · Score: 1

    It is extremely unlikely that Po-210 killed Litveninko. It is in the oxygen family (Oxygen, Sulfur, Selenium, Tellurium, Polonium). No stable isotopes are known. There are two possibilities: Dose him enough to get chemical poisoning; and dose him with a radioactive sample that's hot enough to cause radiochemical poisoning. I really doubt if its the latter case. Any alpha emitter would do and there is no reason to choose Polonium. He would be extremely hot. This is notr consistenmt with styatements to the effect that "traces" of Po-210 were found. And as far as chemical poisoning with Po, Someone correct me but I really doubt if the chemical properties of Po make it a very good candidate for metabolic poisoning. My guess is that this is counterspy spin.

  117. Someone finally mentions GWB, next MS by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Russian Putin has an ex Russian spy killed and some doofus mentions GWB. All we need now is to find a way to bring up Microsoft in all this.

  118. Merry Christmas... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny
    Slow, painful, and irreversible death from radiation poisoning [Litvinenko]
    Death is usually irreversible. There was this one guy, though...
  119. Polonium is not hard to get by Amid60 · · Score: 0

    Polonium is not very hard to get. You can buy a device with, I think, a tenth of lethal dose for $71: http://www.osmolabstore.com/OsmoLabPage.dll?BuildP age&1&1&1005

  120. Oh, I think Putin had him killed by dsmall · · Score: 3, Interesting

    I think perhaps in all the very, very politically correct talk about how the United States is really just the same morally as other countries like Syria, Uganda and Russia is how incredibly _evil_ the KGB was/is. It is just not politically correct to say bad things about the ex-Soviet Union.
    However, having been to Berlin a few days after the Wall came down, and having talked to people from the former Soviet Union, I can tell you that this remote academic theorizing is so much ear's wax, and some people really need to get outside more. In some ways it is fitting that the last of the ugly huge Lenin posters, etc, are by Chernobyl.
    Pretty much everyone knows that PC conceals truth. What's the truth?
    Putin rose to head the KGB because he's the chief scum of some extremely evil scum. They were the enforcement arm of a political system that killed more people, and enslaved more people, than any other this world has ever known.
    The Soviet Union, which crashed Dec. 25 1991, has become a Third World country. I have friends who have left that place because they were under death threats to pay up or be killed. Another friend tried to set up an export business but was stopped by the Russian Mafia. The Museum of Soviet Spaceflight was burned to the ground because it could not pay off two rival "protection" gangs. The Buran "Space Shuttle Clone" sits in a park as a plaything.
    So, do I think Putin would off this guy with polonium? Yep. It had a good chance of not being detected.
    Has the KGB offed other people who gave them a bad time in England? Yep. They whacked Georgi Markov in 1978. He had a radio show that intensely annoyed them.
    Did the KGB try to whack the Pope with a Bulgarian hitman? Yep. The East Germans were notified of this pre-whack try to cover themselves; this was found in their files.
    It is within a pattern of consistent behavior for Putin and his KGB/NKVD/FSB buddies to whack this guy. People on this list are supposed to be rational. Pattern recognizers. If a Unix system kept popping the same output at the same time of day each day, you'd say, "Cron is doing something". If the KGB keeps killing people, you'd say, "Gee, that KGB keeps killing people."
    But amazingly, given the evidence, people keep saying, "Why, no, that KGB has changed from its institutional roots, from the sociopath Laventina Beria under Stalin to now, and is now peaceful, cuddly, and furry."
    Crap. They're killers.
    -- thank you, have a nice day.
    David Small

  121. Polonium Is Not A Rarity... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Rare? Hard to get? Not really.

    Want 500 microcuries of Polonium 210? Got $36.58? Buy a few 3" antistatic elements.

    [url]http://www.2spi.com/catalog/photo/statmaster. shtml[/url]

    The fact that Polonium was used proves nothing. Maybe the guy's wife is a shutter bug - or if she has a lover, the lover is a shutter bug?

    All of that is pure speculation. Putin, the Russian mafia, a wife's lover.

    What it will take is an isotopic examination of the contamination in his body and even that may be inconclusive because of the time and low levels involved.

    Most likely this will be more of a case where they track his whereabouts as best as possible and look for other traces of radioactive contamination. That is one thing about radiation - it is easy to detect it at extremely low levels - though alpha radiation is harder because so many things shield it.

    One other thing about the Polonium decay series - if you don't see the alphas, you don't get any other chances. Polonium 210 decays direct to a stable lead isotope (Lead-206) through the emission of the alpha particle (a helium nucleus - which is why helium was spotted in the guy's urine). If there was another decay or two that gave off something more penetrating, it would be harder to hide.

  122. Talking about conspiracies by ifchairscouldtalk · · Score: 1

    From http://unitednuclear.com/about.htm:

    United Nuclear was formed in 1986 by Los Alamos scientist, Bob Lazar.Bob Lazar? This Bob Lazar? Yes.

  123. Chilling Effect. by Kadin2048 · · Score: 1

    I think you're missing the point. The method of killing was obviously intentional -- nobody goes to that much work without thinking about it -- so what does it suggest? Not that they wanted to prevent him from giving up some key piece of information, because obviously he had time to sing like a canary on his deathbed.

    So what's the benefit of killing someone in some excruciatingly slow, mysterious way? How about that it's scary as fuck? If you were someone in Russia, thinking about criticizing the Putin regime, the act that they managed to poison somebody who had basically defected and was living (ostensibly protected) in a Western country, ought to give you a lot of food for thought. It's basically saying "there's no place that you can run where we won't get you."

    I don't see this killing as much of a threat to anyone outside Russia; it seems more like a way to scare dissidents within the country, by making it clear that they can't be protected by anyone on the outside.

    --
    "Ladies and gentlemen, my killbot features Lotus Notes and a machine gun. It is the finest available."
  124. The guy had terrorist connections by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    This article (in Bulgarian):
    http://www.monitor.bg/article?sid=&aid=102511&eid= 907
    says Litvinenko was muslim and had connections to terrorists in Chechnya. No wonder he's blaming Putin for his death in TFA.

  125. Re:EVILO SONY POST by hazem · · Score: 1

    I agree with you. I guess I meant the kind of story it would be in... and I couldn't think of who wrote Bond. The poisoning in this manner was a definite message, with enought subtlety that it would be more La Carre than the Bond author.

    Alec Guinness's portrayal of Smiley - so superb!

  126. Re:EVILO SONY POST by hughk · · Score: 1
    I agree, Alec Guinness played the part with such subtlety. John Le Carre later admitted that Guinness 'took over the character' in his mind and the two remained good friends. On being interviewed, Stella Rimmington, the former head of MI5 admitted that le Carre's novels were pretty close to the services at the time, which were under a crisis of self doubt since Philby, Burgess and Maclean.

    Funnily enough, we saw Karla in the television adaptation of Smiley's People, when he is blackmailed into defecting and Karla is played by a much younger Patrick Stewart who was probably quite fresh out of playing a devious imperial guard, Sejanus in I, Claudius.

    --
    See my journal, I write things there
  127. Re:I am NOT surprised by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Took long? Geeze, wait until we have HillaryCare here in U.S. and A.

    Everyone underestimates the ineptitude of socialized medicine except those who are prisoners of it.

  128. In central London? You must be joking. by jotaeleemeese · · Score: 1

    You can't walk 10 meters without being filmed by one camera or two.

    They get shoplifters with this for gods sakes, there is no way such actions would go unnoticed.

    --
    IANAL but write like a drunk one.
  129. New theories: CIA or KGB behind the murders by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
    Antiwar has published The Nuking of Alexander Litvinenko covering the theories behind the murder. From the article:

    "The world media is rushing to judgement and condemning Putin as the mad mastermind behind this terrorist act, yet there are some rather big problems with this theory: none of the known suspects are likely KGB assassins. Their loyalties, as far as can be discerned, lie in quite the opposite direction: Lugovoi, who ran afoul of the Putin administration, and Scaramella, whose anti-KGB credentials are apparently impeccable. The prejudices of the media, and the editorial writers, lead us down one path, but the facts - at least as they are known so far - take us down quite another. ...In any case, Lugovoi is part and parcel of the Berezovsky network, and if he had anything to do with the murder then the theory that this was a falling-out among Russian exiles, dressed up to look like a KGB hit, gains credibility. But how, then, does one explain the method utilized: polonium-210, which only a state is likely to have access to?

    Then again, if we look at Berezovsky's estimated fortune of some $3 billion, his empire is for all intents and purposes a mini-state. Add to this the assets of other exiled oligarchs, including many who fled to Israel, and you have resources equal to the task of procuring and delivering polonium-210 to any target. Yet this still doesn't rule out state involvement in the operation, even if we assume Litvinenko's death resulted from some internecine squabble within the London-based exile community."

    One correction though. You certainly do NOT need anywhere around $3 billion to get Polonium-210, not even close. You can get Polonium-210 for $69, legally, you do not even need a license. The site states: "No NRC license required! All our radioactive isotopes are legal to purchase & own by the general public." See "Alpha-only radiation emitters" section if you want to buy Polonium-210.