Slashdot Mirror


Sea Snail Toxin Offers Promise For Pain

Khyber writes to tell us about research out of Australia that holds out hope for chronic pain sufferers. The toxin of a sea snail, called conotoxin, has a component that has been shown to directly target pain receptors in experimental animals. Unlike essentially all existing pain relievers, conotoxin seems to suppress pain without side effects. Human trials are a year away.

206 comments

  1. Toxin...Toxic? by jellomizer · · Score: 3, Insightful

    Isn't a Toxin Toxic to people. Or is it just Toxic to the Snail?

    --
    If something is so important that you feel the need to post it on the internet... It probably isn't that important.
    1. Re:Toxin...Toxic? by Tyler+Eaves · · Score: 4, Insightful

      It's all in the dosage. *ANYTHING* (even, say oxygen or water) is toxic if given in a high enough dose.

      --
      TODO: Something witty here...
    2. Re:Toxin...Toxic? by BytePusher · · Score: 1

      It's most likely a defense mechanism for the snail.

    3. Re:Toxin...Toxic? by CyberLord+Seven · · Score: 1

      The snake on the staff is there for a reason.

      --
      We have always been at war with Eurasia!
    4. Re:Toxin...Toxic? by Mizled · · Score: 1

      I'm sure just part of it is "Toxic" and they can break it down and just use the useful qualities (such as the pain relieving effects)... Wasn't there an Article recently on ./ about how Human spit had the same qualities and didn't have any side effects either?

      --
      Bite my shiny metal ass.
    5. Re:Toxin...Toxic? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Could be, no. Reason: Google defines "Toxin" as "a chemical compound from one organism that is harmful to another organism"

    6. Re:Toxin...Toxic? by smallfries · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Isn't a Toxin Toxic to people. Or is it just Toxic to the Snail? Another way to look at it is read what the submitter really meant. You often have
      to translate slashdot stories. "Unlike essentially all existing pain relievers,
      conotoxin seems to suppress pain without side effects." really means "Like all
      existing drugs that haven't been through large scale trials, conotoxin appears
      to be free from side-effects. The toxicity is probably dependent on the dose, the
      patient, the length of usage and about a million other (currently) unknown
      factors.
      --
      Slashdot: where don knuth is an idiot because he cant grasp the awesome power of php
    7. Re:Toxin...Toxic? by bensafrickingenius · · Score: 1, Informative

      Wouldn't be the first time we've used a toxin in non-toxic ways. Botox (botulism toxin), anyone? I'm sure it hurts like hell if you're *stung* with the toxin, but has no such effect when ingested. (or something).

      --
      I am not left-handed, either!
    8. Re:Toxin...Toxic? by MrLogic17 · · Score: 2, Informative

      Yes, but not the reason you think.

      http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Nehushtan
      Numbers 21:4-9

      (Pardon the King James, couldn't find a modern transation in short order)

      21.6. And the Lord sent fiery serpents among the people, and they bit the people; and much people of Israel died. 7. Therefore the people came to Moses, and said, We have sinned, for we have spoken against the Lord, and against thee; pray unto the Lord, that he take away the serpents from us. And Moses prayed for the people. 8. And the Lord said unto Moses, Make thee a fiery serpent, and set it upon a pole: and it shall come to pass, that every one that is bitten, when he looketh upon it, shall live. 9. And Moses made a serpent of brass, and put it upon a pole, and it came to pass, that if a serpent had bitten any man, when he beheld the serpent of brass, he lived.

    9. Re:Toxin...Toxic? by CyberLord+Seven · · Score: 1

      I didn't know that. Thank you for the information.

      --
      We have always been at war with Eurasia!
    10. Re:Toxin...Toxic? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You did not know it because it is incorrect. It is the Rod of Asclepius that you were writing about, assuming you meant the symbol of healing the often used logo in medicine.

    11. Re:Toxin...Toxic? by gt_mattex · · Score: 1

      It's all in the dosage. *ANYTHING* (even, say oxygen or water) is toxic if given in a high enough dose.

      Including ethanol, nicotine and caffeine to name a few.

      --
      "No doubt one may quote history to support any cause, as the devil quotes scripture." - Learned Hand
    12. Re:Toxin...Toxic? by CyberLord+Seven · · Score: 1
      Yes, that is exactly what I was writing about. What I didn't know was that there was a similar symbol in use prior to that.

      It's amazing how similar humans are no matter where they are from. Take the swastika for instance. It has turned up, in many different forms, and in many different cultures prior to the Nazi use of it. In fact, they borrowed it from other anti-semitic groups that used it before them.

      Back on topic now. I wonder how many other cultures have used a snake on a rod as a symbol of healing.

      --
      We have always been at war with Eurasia!
    13. Re:Toxin...Toxic? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Why are 'human trials' (i.e. experiments on humans) necessary? I thought experiments on animals worked, and weren't a big fraud? If experiments on animals work, then there is no need for human trials. After all, according to the 'scientists', when I'm ill I would be just as well off going to my vet and getting some dog or cat drugs, right?
      If animal experiments predicted human outcomes, there would be no need for clinical trials on humans, all drugs would go straight onto the market without needing to be tested on humans. Clinical trials = experiments on humans. Most drugs FAIL clinical trials. How can they fail clinical trials if the animal experiments said they worked and were safe? Because drugs react differently in animals and humans. They obviously react differently between all species of animals too, so what animal should we choose to test drug X on? A rabbit? A guinea pig? A rat? A mouse? A cat? Or a monkey? They all give different results - so none of them can be relied on to predict the outcome when a human takes the drug. Therefore vivisection is medical fraud.

      I wonder how they created the pain that the victims - sorry - animals, had to be relieved of, by this toxin? Can you say "Evil psychopathic 'researcher' with too much time on their hands and a complete inability to feel the pain of others"?

    14. Re:Toxin...Toxic? by Sponge+Bath · · Score: 1

      The snake on the staff...

      As shown here.

    15. Re:Toxin...Toxic? by torako · · Score: 3, Informative
      While your Bible citation applies too, most people would say that the Rod of Asclepius is a symbol of Greek mythology (probably older than your Bible text) Wikipedia text: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Rod_of_Asclepius The summary says:
      The Rod of Asclepius is an ancient Greek symbol associated with astrology and healing the sick with medicine. It consists of a serpent entwined around a staff. Asclepius, the son of Apollo, was practitioner of medicine in ancient Greek mythology. He was instructed in medicine by the centaur Chiron also connected to the constellation Ophiuchus.
    16. Re:Toxin...Toxic? by heinousjay · · Score: 1

      I love offtopic diatribes about fringe causes. Makes me proud to be an American.

      --
      Slashdot - where whining about luck is the new way to make the world you want.
    17. Re:Toxin...Toxic? by aluminum_geek · · Score: 1

      Botulism toxin is toxic if ingested. That's was the food poisoning "Botulism" is, eating food contaminated with botulism toxin.
      http://hgic.clemson.edu/factsheets/HGIC3680.htm

    18. Re:Toxin...Toxic? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Biochemistry is complicated. Genetic similarity to varying degrees allows the weeding out of the drugs that do not depend on that variation between species to trigger negative effects. Experimenting on animals allows those drugs to be removed prior to human testing. It is worse to kill a human than it is to kill a mouse, but a mouse is very similar genetically and serves as one of the main experimental subjects because it can demonstrates unsafe interactions from the common genes.

    19. Re:Toxin...Toxic? by sessamoid · · Score: 1

      Wouldn't be the first time we've used a toxin in non-toxic ways. Botox (botulism toxin), anyone? I'm sure it hurts like hell if you're *stung* with the toxin, but has no such effect when ingested. (or something).

      Wow, talk about being completely off-base. Botulinum toxin is never transmitted through bites or stings. You either get it from dirty wounds or from ingesting it in contaminated food. And it doesn't sting. The way it kills is that it paralyzes you, including the muscles you use for breathing.

      --
      "No, no, no. Don't tug on that. You never know what it might be attached to."
    20. Re:Toxin...Toxic? by Tim+C · · Score: 1

      "All things are poison and nothing is without poison, only the dose permits something not to be poisonous." [or popularly, "The dose makes the poison."] - Paracelsus.

    21. Re:Toxin...Toxic? by bensafrickingenius · · Score: 1

      "Wow, talk about being completely off-base. Botulinum toxin is never transmitted through bites or stings. You either get it from dirty wounds or from ingesting it in contaminated food. And it doesn't sting. The way it kills is that it paralyzes you, including the muscles you use for breathing."

      Wow, talk about putting works in someone's mouth. At what point did I say botulinum toxin is transmitted through bites or stings? I was referring to the snail toxin (you know, the subject of TFA?)when I used the word "stung," which you'd have understood if you were reading for understanding instead of poring through text in search of an attack vector.

      --
      I am not left-handed, either!
    22. Re:Toxin...Toxic? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Large dosages of water have been found to cause swimming in laboratory animals.

      (from USENET circa 1985)

    23. Re:Toxin...Toxic? by HolyCrapSCOsux · · Score: 2, Funny

      Proves the power of prayer when combined with the power of a magic stick.

      --
      0xB315AA8D852DCD3F3DCA578FD2E0BF88
    24. Re:Toxin...Toxic? by PitaBred · · Score: 1

      You were talking about Botulism toxin being used in a non-toxic way. Then you used the unspecified "it" hurting when stinging, which you apparently meant the snail toxin, but in context, appeared to refer to the botulism toxin being injected through a sting.

      Basically, you need to take a course on written communication and be better able to express your thoughts without causing confusion.

    25. Re:Toxin...Toxic? by JoGlo · · Score: 1

      Oh no! CHOCOLATE IS TOXIC!!!!! How will we ever survive without it! (I KNEW that there must be a rerason why it tastes so good!)

      --
      Will those of you who think that you know what you are doing, get out of the way of those of us who know what we are doi
    26. Re:Toxin...Toxic? by Hatta · · Score: 2, Informative

      It's all in the dosage. *ANYTHING* (even, say oxygen or water) is toxic if given in a high enough dose.

      Including ethanol, nicotine and caffeine to name a few.


      With the notable exception of THC, the active ingredient in marijuana. There has never been a single fatal case of THC poisoning in all of medical history.

      --
      Give me Classic Slashdot or give me death!
    27. Re:Toxin...Toxic? by SevenHands · · Score: 1

      Um, This is Slashdot... Who the fuck do you think you are? Lecturing on gramer. Sheesh.

    28. Re:Toxin...Toxic? by Vellmont · · Score: 1

      At what point did I say botulinum toxin is transmitted through bites or stings?

      My guess is right here:

      Botox (botulism toxin), anyone? I'm sure it hurts like hell if you're *stung* with the toxin

      You changed the subject to butulism toxin, then used the pro-noun "it". Since you didn't mention a change in subject it's pretty easy to make the assumption that you're still talking about botulinum toxin. I know I was confused. Try to be more specific in your statements to avoid confusion in the future.
      --
      AccountKiller
    29. Re:Toxin...Toxic? by robyannetta · · Score: 1

      Calling Rush Limbaugh... Rush Limbaugh please pick up the white courtesy phone...

      --
      - Just my $0.02, take with a grain of salt, your mileage may vary.
    30. Re:Toxin...Toxic? by drinkypoo · · Score: 1
      It's amazing how similar humans are no matter where they are from. Take the swastika for instance. It has turned up, in many different forms, and in many different cultures prior to the Nazi use of it. In fact, they borrowed it from other anti-semitic groups that used it before them.

      Not to mention that there were native Americans (well, Siberian immigrants, but anyway) who also used the symbol for issues unrelated to Judaism.

      Back on topic now. I wonder how many other cultures have used a snake on a rod as a symbol of healing.

      Here's an interesting read on serpents and religion: THE DIVINE SERPENT IN MYTH and LEGEND Note that the rod is basically one of our oldest symbols, usually representing the phallus, which is why the fact that kings sit around on thrones stroking their sceptres is so hilarious. The snake, of course, frequently represents the same thing...

      --
      "You're right," Fisheye says. "I should have set it on 'whip' or 'chop.'"
    31. Re:Toxin...Toxic? by The_Wilschon · · Score: 1

      No, it doesn't so much hurt like hell. It just kills you. IIRC, it paralyzes you, including your diaphragm. I suppose it hurts as much as any other form of suffocation.

      --
      SIGSEGV caught, terminating

      wait... not that kind of sig.
    32. Re:Toxin...Toxic? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      > Take the swastika for instance. It has turned up, in many different forms, and in many different cultures prior to the Nazi use of it. In fact, they borrowed it from other anti-semitic groups that used it before them.

      I don't know about other uses of it, but in eastern cultures, it's the manji and represents wisdom. Of course, it's not set at an angle (it doesn't rest on one corner, but rather on one side) and it spirals in the opposite direction from the swastika.

      I believe it was level 3 of the original Legend of Zelda that had a dungeon shaped like a manji, which confused me at the time because I thought it looked like a swastika, not being aware of the difference.

    33. Re:Toxin...Toxic? by B.D.Mills · · Score: 1

      You may also want to read about Dracunculiasis. This is a parasitic worm that can be removed by wrapping the worm around a stick.

      --

      The only thing necessary for the triumph of evil is for good men to do nothing. - Edmund Burke
    34. Re:Toxin...Toxic? by chameleon3 · · Score: 1
      It's all in the dosage. *ANYTHING* (even, say oxygen or water) is toxic if given in a high enough dose.

      Including ethanol, nicotine and caffeine to name a few.


      With the notable exception of THC, the active ingredient in marijuana. There has never been a single fatal case of THC poisoning in all of medical history.




      Just because there has never been a fatal case does not mean it's not possible. Enough THC (roughly 68 grams) would most assuredly kill you. Now, it's impossible to get that much THC from smoking marijuana, but if you, say, ingested that much straight THC, you would die.
    35. Re:Toxin...Toxic? by profplump · · Score: 1

      You're forgetting charcol. There is no recorded case of charcol poisoning in all of medical history. Heavy metals and their ores sure, but not good ole charcol.

      Finding a medical case that involves charcol in the bloodstream but not massive trauma (limiting the study to victims of massive trauma would make survival studies complicated), or in finding a study subject willing to be injected with solid charcol is left as an exercise to the reader.

    36. Re:Toxin...Toxic? by HeadlessNotAHorseman · · Score: 0

      Actually, in Eastern culture the Swastika can be found facing in either direction, for example in Hinduism when facing right it represents the evolution of the universe (Pravritti), and when facing left it represents the involution of the universe (Nivritti). A lot of myth and misinformation has sprung up about the symbol since some German nutcase with a bad haircut decided he liked it. Loads of information here

      --
      I like my coffee the way I like my women - roasted and ground up into little tiny pieces.
    37. Re:Toxin...Toxic? by TranscendentalAnarch · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Actually, it is.  It contains Caffeine, Theobromine, and other chemicals, that with the correct dose can kill you.  Theobromine is actually responsible for the death of dogs and cats that have consumed too much chocolate.  http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Theobromine

    38. Re:Toxin...Toxic? by JoGlo · · Score: 1

      Um, This is Slashdot... Who the fuck do you think you are? Lecturing on gramer. Sheesh

      More like lecturing gramer! (you know - as in "teaching gramer to suck eggs" - loaded with botulism, of course!)

      --
      Will those of you who think that you know what you are doing, get out of the way of those of us who know what we are doi
    39. Re:Toxin...Toxic? by JoGlo · · Score: 1

      Actually, it is. It contains Caffeine, Theobromine, and other chemicals, that with the correct dose can kill you. Theobromine is actually responsible for the death of dogs and cats that have consumed too much chocolate. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Theobromine

      Yes, I was being flippant. It cost me over $1000 for a vet to look after our Kelpie/Heeler cross when he ingested about 1/2 kilo of my daughter's dark chocolate earlier this year. Fortunately, one of the girls recognized the problem, when he started getting hyperactive and racing around the yard.

      The girls wouldn't allow "nature to take it's course", and get another similar dog from the pound for $50 next weekend - oh no! It had to be the full service, with my car as the ambulance to transport a hyperactive cattle dog to the overnight vet at about 1 a.m. local time. My credit card, as well, of course!

      Needless to say, chocolate is now kept either behind locked doors, or on a VERY high shelf in our house.

      --
      Will those of you who think that you know what you are doing, get out of the way of those of us who know what we are doi
    40. Re:Toxin...Toxic? by Nefarious+Wheel · · Score: 1
      It is the Rod of Asclepius that you were writing about

      The Caduceus is the Rod of Asclepius?

      Is that like a high-level pally or cleric weapon? Where does it drop? Can it be multi-quested? Mana cost? Come on guys, you give us some technology you can at least provide the stats.

      --
      Do not mock my vision of impractical footwear
    41. Re:Toxin...Toxic? by cammoblammo · · Score: 1

      I'm still trying to figure out what an 'experimental animal' is.

      --

      Cogito, ergo sig.

    42. Re:Toxin...Toxic? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Read your own damned link. The Caduceus is unrelated to medicine, and is for commerce instead.

    43. Re:Toxin...Toxic? by jellomizer · · Score: 1

      It could be around the same age as the Bible text who know which came first or if they are related. Moses was Well in the BC Period as was Ancient Greek. Moses was around during the Ancient Egypt was a major power.

      --
      If something is so important that you feel the need to post it on the internet... It probably isn't that important.
    44. Re:Toxin...Toxic? by Nefarious+Wheel · · Score: 1

      Read past the first paragraph -- it came to be associated with medicine in the 7th century. Old news.

      --
      Do not mock my vision of impractical footwear
  2. Misleading title by Rosco+P.+Coltrane · · Score: 3, Funny

    Shouldn't it read "Sea Snail Toxin Offers Promise For Pain SUFFERERS"? At first I thought it was an article about some new clever torture method for Gitmo prisoners or something...

    --
    "A door is what a dog is perpetually on the wrong side of" - Ogden Nash
    1. Re:Misleading title by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You are not mistaken. The US in under termendious pressure to stop torturing people, its even tried to redefine torture so that it can it. But still, it has a bad image. With this new research, the US can just dope up the inmates, and torture them all they like, as those that get tortured will feel no pain when sugery is done to them.. while they are awake to see there own intestens, and smell it to.. ew.

    2. Re:Misleading title by pilgrim23 · · Score: 4, Funny

      Human trials are still a year away? I see the research is progressing at a snail's pace...

      --
      - Minutus cantorum, minutus balorum, minutus carborata descendum pantorum.
    3. Re:Misleading title by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      True, it's a misleading headline... and summary. They say the toxin "targets pain receptors", but this is not necessarily a good thing; lots of other things target pain receptors, too: fire, freezing, salt, capsaicin, being stepped on, etc. Better to say that it blocks pain receptors.

    4. Re:Misleading title by sublimusasterisk · · Score: 3, Funny

      True, but given it's a sea snail, I'd say it's coming along swimmingly.

      --
      True believers seek redemption from the sin of death.
    5. Re:Misleading title by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Are you gonna be here all week?

    6. Re:Misleading title by Virtualtaco · · Score: 0

      I thought that too. Makes me want Randy Savage to be the spokes person. "SNAP IT TO A SEA SNAIL! OOOOOO YEAAA!"

    7. Re:Misleading title by FireFlie · · Score: 1

      Not necessarily. I don't think the article said anything about its method of action, but if this toxin is an agonist on pain receptors it will target pain receptors by binding selectively to them. I suppose that this as well as other mechanisms of action could be thought of as blocking, but targeting may be an apt description for what is going on.

    8. Re:Misleading title by Archangel+Michael · · Score: 1

      "Shouldn't it read "Sea Snail Toxin Offers Promise For Pain SUFFERERS"?"

      Just like insanity, I don't suffer pain. I enjoy every minute of it. :-D

      --
      Agent K: A *person* is smart. People are dumb, stupid, panicky animals, and you know it.
    9. Re:Misleading title by StikyPad · · Score: 1

      Here's to hoping it goes better than TGN1412.

    10. Re:Misleading title by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Learn to spell. Don't drink that Koolaid.

  3. This should come in handy for anyone that by zappepcs · · Score: 1

    likes to hang out in karaoke bars, or watch dancing with the stars.... oh, its not the right kind of pain? damn

    1. Re:This should come in handy for anyone that by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Demerol already works well for that, no need for anything new.

    2. Re:This should come in handy for anyone that by rolyatknarf · · Score: 1

      from TFA

      "Unlike other anaesthetics, it's very specific against the pain and doesn't cause any side effects - it's the first time anyone has discovered anything like this," she said.

      "Conventional medicines such as morphine can cause a range of unpleasant side effects, including nausea, vision and movement defects and drowsiness."

      As a person who suffers from chronic and neuropathic pain, after six surgical procedures on my spine, I would welcome something like this new treatment. I hope it comes sooner than later.

    3. Re:This should come in handy for anyone that by AndersOSU · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Yeah but morphine, heroine, cocaine, and many, many other drugs have promised pain relief without any side effects. I'm not a doctor, but I'd be surprised if there were ever a drug that didn't have any side effects.

      People are complex intertwined systems, you can almost never change something without unintentionally changing something else.

    4. Re:This should come in handy for anyone that by FireFlie · · Score: 1

      When has it been promised that these drugs would give relief with no side effects? Surely not recently. At the very least they are all highly addictive.

    5. Re:This should come in handy for anyone that by CyberLord+Seven · · Score: 1
      Heroin, morphine, and cocaine are all derived from Opium and have been around for a LOOOONG time. There was another derivative called laudlin or something like that. All of these derivatives were easily obtained around the turn of the 20th century.

      In the 1950s drugs such as Thalidomide were thought to be safe.

      It won't take much "googling" to find current drugs that were once thought to be safe.

      What the post above yours was saying is that, in this culture, the promises of drug companies as to the safety of their products is something to be taken with a large pinch of salt.

      --
      We have always been at war with Eurasia!
    6. Re:This should come in handy for anyone that by kyouteki · · Score: 1

      Which is why all of them are used rather sparingly in common medical situations. Heroin is still perscribed as an analgesic in the UK, and was initially developed as a "non-addictive substitute" to morphine, and to escape the side effects of Aspirin. Cocaine was used as a local anesthetic, though the side effects of that application (vasoconstriction) were pretty well known when it was being used as such. Oh, and there was always Coke.

      --
      A slashdotter who didn't build his own computer is like a Jedi who didn't build his own lightsaber.
    7. Re:This should come in handy for anyone that by smallfries · · Score: 1

      So... is your chronic and neuropathic pain caused by hanging out in Karoke bars taking Demoral, or did you RTFA but fail to read the fucking context that you were replying to?

      --
      Slashdot: where don knuth is an idiot because he cant grasp the awesome power of php
    8. Re:This should come in handy for anyone that by rolyatknarf · · Score: 1

      If you are responding to me, yes, I did RTFA.

      What the fuck are you talking about? Do you have reason to believe my condition is related to Karoke bars or is that just noise coming out of your ass?

      http://www.postgradmed.com/issues/1999/11_99/pn_ne uropathy.htm

      At least try to sound educated no matter how hard it is for you.

    9. Re:This should come in handy for anyone that by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You're full of shit. Cocaine is not an opiate. Cocaine is a naturally occuring substance found in the common (in Central and South America) coca plant. Cocaine is closer to the amphetamines in its chemistry and effects on the brain than to natural or synthetic opium derivatives. The opiates are among the safest known drugs. Yes, they are addictive. But with a clean and plentiful supply, a person could use opiates indefinitely without any ill health effects. If dosages are increased slowly, a person could use grams of the stuff every day. In fact, heroin is still used medically for cases of extreme pain. I heard a story from a doctor once -- he was a pain specialist working with terminal cancer patients. A particular patient wasn't responding to the normal medications. So the doctor prescribed heroin. It worked very well at first, but the patient's tolerance increased fairly quickly. Within two months, the patient was using 4 grams of medical grade, uncut, 99.99% heroin every day, with no ill effects. Opiates metabolize very cleanly. Laudanum was an elixir, which specifically means that it was opium dissolved in alcohol.

    10. Re:This should come in handy for anyone that by smallfries · · Score: 1

      You replied to a comment joking that Demorel was good enough to stop the pain in Karoke bars. I didn't accuse you of not reading the article, in fact had you read my comment I said that you had - but that you didn't seem to have read the comment that you were replying to. I guess that's twice you've done that now. Are you aware of how stupid it makes you sound?

      --
      Slashdot: where don knuth is an idiot because he cant grasp the awesome power of php
    11. Re:This should come in handy for anyone that by rolyatknarf · · Score: 1

      You seem to have no idea where to direct your anger. I am sorry for your confusion.

    12. Re:This should come in handy for anyone that by smallfries · · Score: 1

      Well done you! You've proven that you are a fucktard

      --
      Slashdot: where don knuth is an idiot because he cant grasp the awesome power of php
    13. Re:This should come in handy for anyone that by rolyatknarf · · Score: 1

      I said I was sorry for you. What more do you want?

  4. Bitter Irony by susano_otter · · Score: 4, Insightful

    In before "we must halt all industrial and technological advancements, to stop global warming before we lose all these wonderful natural cures!"

    The bitter irony is that it's these very industrial and technological advancements that make the discovery, analysis, synthesis, mass production, and world-wide distribution at affordable prices of this painkiller possible in the first place.

    It's depressing how many people demand the benefits of civilization, without accepting any of its tradeoffs.

    --

    Any sufficiently well-organized community is indistinguishable from Government.

    1. Re:Bitter Irony by Chris+Burke · · Score: 4, Insightful

      I don't think there are actually that many people who say "we must halt all technological development".

      That's usually the hyperbolic strawman of the anti-conservationist who extrapolates spending money on better alternatives to current tech and trying to use less of what we do now (e.g. drive more fuel efficient cars) into some crazy luddite back-to-nature wildlife.

      Personally I think that point of view is retarded. I'm a conservationist and environmentalist because I like the benefits of civilization, and I would like for myself and as many generations of descendents as possible to be able to keep them.

      One of the tradeoffs of civilization is figuring out how to make it sustainable. Our current method is not sustainable. Refusing to change because you want to keep your lifestyle is to guarantee that you lose that lifestyle.

      Anyway, I think slug-slime pain killers are awesome.

      --

      The enemies of Democracy are
    2. Re:Bitter Irony by jotok · · Score: 1

      world-wide distribution at affordable prices

      Where exactly is this happening?
      Where I'm from--a planet called "Earth"--the lack of widely-distributed and affordable drugs is a pretty big problem, which is currently being exacerbated in innumerable ways due to globalization, although the pundits claimed--still claim--that the opposite should be true.

      It's depressing how many people demand the benefits of civilization, without accepting any of its tradeoffs.

      To me, it's somewhat more depressing how many people fail to question if the "tradeoffs" are really necessary in order to get the "benefits." If one industrial process is cheap but pollutes, and another is expensive but clean, it seems obvious to me that in the long term the expensive-but-clean process is probably better.

      And let's not even get started on whether or not the "benefits" are actually good for us. A society that kills the environment slowly for the privilege of killing itself slowly is not really one I want to be a part of.

    3. Re:Bitter Irony by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Why is that depressing, it is just human nature.

      Witness the responses to any submission about copyright here at Slashdot. We all want to innundate ourselves with tepid entertainment but we don't want to compensate anyone for creating it.

      We want to stop Corporations from using GPL'd code but we don't want Sony to stop us from making unlimited copies of the music they sell.

      Big Oil is a bunch of bastards but they power all the servers and desktops and laptops and trucks that deliver the servers and desktops and laptops.

      The internet should be free and open to all but corporations shouldn't be allowed to astroturf.

      The government is evil and needs to stop spying on us but lets turn over the entire healthcare system to them so we don't have to pay for it any more.

      Global Warming is evil so people driving around in the SUV I wish I could afford are evil.

    4. Re:Bitter Irony by biocute · · Score: 1
      I guess one has to decide whether:
      1. To advance to a point that you know a cure is available, but the source is long gone, or
      2. To remain ignorant of this cure.

      I used to ask people this question:

      You've been religiously buying the same Lotto number for 20 years, now God offers you two options:

      a. That Lotto number turns out to be the biggest winner in the history, except you forgot to buy it that particular week. At least you know your magic number is a winner, or

      b. That Lotto number is never a winner, and you'll never know that until your death.
    5. Re:Bitter Irony by rednip · · Score: 4, Insightful

      The bitter irony is that it's these very industrial and technological advancements that make the discovery, analysis, synthesis, mass production, and world-wide distribution at affordable prices of this painkiller possible in the first place.

      So, you think global warming is an advancement. Personally I see it as an accounting issue; hidden costs which some people pass on to other people, in particular future generations. Perhaps the reason why the Northeast is considered so 'liberal' is that one doesn't have to go far to find a brown field. A place of dead earth, unfit for human development, left by some long gone business which was unburdened by environmental regulation. The cleanup of someone else's mess is a continuing burden, both on the treasury, and the health of people who have long ago, if ever, benefited from their creation.

      At one point cities didn't have sewers or trash collection, they just threw their daily waste into the middle of the street. Often the contents of chamber pots would rain down on the pedestrians below, and the rivers became so choked with human and animal filth, that they caused plague, and misery. Eventually cities, and towns raised taxes for sewers, required trash collection, then sanitary sewers, and eventually waste treatment facilities. Today one doesn't think of these things as unnecessary, or too costly, as the benefits of these requirements obviously far outweigh the costs of not having them, yet when the laws were first developed buffoons such as yourself, fought their implementation as being too costly, and unneeded. History has proven those fools wrong, as it will you.

      --
      The force that blew the Big Bang continues to accelerate.
    6. Re:Bitter Irony by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      "In the world I see, you are stalking elk through the damp canyon forests around the ruins of Rockefeller Center." - Tyler Durden


      Best quote ever. I would love to see this come to pass.

      Technological advancement is just another way to widen the gap between the haves and the have-nots, the people who dole out the advancement making sure that they receive from each recipient a lifetime of servitude. Prolonging life only to squeeze every last bit you can out of a shriveled up walking corpse, then taking whatever else it has left in return for the deed to a little patch of ground for it to fall over and rot in.

      The culture of taking, aided and abetted by technology. Hooray.

    7. Re:Bitter Irony by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It's depressing how many people demand the benefits of civilization, without accepting any of its tradeoffs.

      And how much of this is because companies don't talk about the tradeoffs? Which makes the company more money: telling people that for each shiny trinket they make the company has to club a baby seal, or making shiny trinkets and clubbing baby seals and just forgetting to mention that to potential customers? How much money would companies make if they slapped a "Made with 100% Authentic Slave Labor" label on their goods?

    8. Re:Bitter Irony by Hijacked+Public · · Score: 1

      it seems obvious to me that in the long term the expensive-but-clean process is probably better

      That might be obvious, but are you willing to pay for it? More accurately, are enough of your like minded bretheren willing to pay for it?

      To further derail things, what constitutes 'better'? In the long term is it better to kill all the buffalo to help the natives die so we can drive them off the land we want to develop for the debatable overall improvement of humanity? Better to test snail toxins on rabbits so we can one day keep humans from having to live with pain? Better for that one specific rabbit we use to see how high a dosage a rabbit can tolerate before it flatlines?

      Better is not even easy to define in hindsight. I'm firmly in the Aldo Leopold school of conservationism and I like the work I see Quail Unlimited doing, convincing farmers to maintain grass transitions around their fields to provide quail habitat, but is that a 'better' tradeoff compared with the food that could have been grown there? No idea, but I like shooting quail, so thats where my money goes.

      People are more or less self serving. They might buy into the 'better world for your kids' ideal, but they need a whole lot of convincing.

      --
      "Sacrifice for the good of The State" - The State
    9. Re:Bitter Irony by susano_otter · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Here's the thing, though: Life itself demands a lifetime of servitude.

      And the work I do now, to keep body and soul together, not only is it easier than the work I would've had to do without civilization, but my quality of life is better, the scope of leisure activities available to me is greater, and the surplus wealth I have accumulated is greater, than anything our primitive cave-dwelling ancestors ever enjoyed. And that's with The Man exploiting me every day.

      What does your post-apocalyptic Rockefeller Center have to offer me, that's superior to civilization? And if the uncivilized wilderness really has that much to offer, why are you here fondling the Internet, instead of stalking beasts in the Amazon the way Mother Nature intended?

      --

      Any sufficiently well-organized community is indistinguishable from Government.

    10. Re:Bitter Irony by russotto · · Score: 1
      I don't think there are actually that many people who say "we must halt all technological development".
      They don't say it that way. Instead, they insist that governments adopt the precautionary principle.
    11. Re:Bitter Irony by susano_otter · · Score: 1

      Aspirin and other OTC painkillers are available around the world, at affordable prices.

      In fact, there's hundreds of thousands of widely-distributed, affordably-priced medecins out there.

      Please don't confuse the small number of brand-new, cutting-edge drugs, still paying off their extremely expensive R&D efforts, with the vast majority of affordable medications.

      --

      Any sufficiently well-organized community is indistinguishable from Government.

    12. Re:Bitter Irony by susano_otter · · Score: 1

      I see a different dilemma:

      1. Cut back on industrial activity and technological innovation, in order to preserve a naturally-occuring medecine that will require industrial activity and technological innovation in order to be useful, OR

      2. Continue with industrial activity and technological innovation, to better exploit what natural medicines we encounter, as well as more quickly develop synthetic medicines.

      For all we know, we may be six months away from discovering a synthetic painkiller which operates in the same way and doesn't depend on a rare and changing ecological niche for its production.

      --

      Any sufficiently well-organized community is indistinguishable from Government.

    13. Re:Bitter Irony by steelfood · · Score: 1

      Actually, humans have been doing this without all the technology for many thousands of years in the form of traditional medicines. The advantage to having all this technology is to speed the discovery process up slightly and allow for more people to get at it while still keeping the prices down. Yeah, it also helps in the understanding of why certain chemicals do the things they do, but considering how much knowledge the 'why' actually gives us in terms of medical applications, that particular aspect of medicine becomes largely academic.

      I'm not saying technology is necessarily bad. But in the case of finding new medicines, all the true benefits we reap from advance technology (i.e. that we otherwise would be incapable or hindered from doing in the absence of technology) are offset by consequences that, IMHO, are worse. Would I rather delay the discovery and/or propogation of the cure for all cancers by a few decades rather than see the source of that cure go extinct? Yeah, I would. And in this case, that's really all that it comes down to.

      Now, when it comes to other aspects of medicine like understanding the human physiology to develop and improve life-saving techniques, and understanding what's around us at a molecular level to improve living conditions, that's a different story.

      --
      "If a nation expects to be ignorant and free in a state of civilization, it expects what never was and never will be."
    14. Re:Bitter Irony by susano_otter · · Score: 1
      So, you think global warming is an advancement.

      Actually, I think global warming is a cyclical phenomenon, of which anthropogenic causes make up an insignificant fraction during this particular cycle; and that the pain and suffering caused by reducing anthropogenic causes will greatly outweigh the benefits (and will not actually have a significant effect on the cycle, since we're still not capable of massive terraforming or weather control).
      --

      Any sufficiently well-organized community is indistinguishable from Government.

    15. Re:Bitter Irony by jotok · · Score: 1

      Your point is well-taken, but consider the third world--the desperately poor parts of it. I think in a lot of places they are still working on the "Getting pennecillin past the warlords" bit much less the "Desperately needed AIDS cocktails."

    16. Re:Bitter Irony by jotok · · Score: 1

      Better is not even easy to define in hindsight.

      Granted! But I think universally, solutions that directly produce fewer new problems are superior to solutions that are going to produce more.

      If you know your process is going to be more expensive, you can budget for that. If you know it's going to harm the environment--well, the environment is a pretty delicate toy to be messing around with and there's no warranty. It's like the 360 I got my godson for Christmas--short-term, he might have fun throwing it around the house, but in the long run it's easier to leave it on the shelf than to try to fix it later.

    17. Re:Bitter Irony by dasunt · · Score: 1
      One of the tradeoffs of civilization is figuring out how to make it sustainable. Our current method is not sustainable. Refusing to change because you want to keep your lifestyle is to guarantee that you lose that lifestyle.

      John Mccarthy (the father of lisp) believes that our progress is sustainable in a form remarkably similar to what we have now.

    18. Re:Bitter Irony by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      OK, so now, what about mercury, lead poisoning, benzene and all the other things which ARE actually killing off wildlife (and humans)?

      Global warming may or may not end up being a canard, but all of the other various externalized costs of industrialization are still there, causing problems. It's a shame we haven't managed to force companies to internalize the costs of their waste. If chemical plants had to pay for the cancer treatments of people exposed to their daily leakage of chemical soup, they'd invest heavily into cheap cancer treatments.

    19. Re:Bitter Irony by jackbird · · Score: 1
      I think slug-slime pain killers are awesome.

      Just as a note - it's not slime. It's a toxin injected by a very fast-firing dart the snail uses to hunt. Research on these snails started because every year a few people picked them up on beaches in the Phillipines and dropped dead moments later. Turns out the snails pack a cocktail of toxins that includes the active ingredients in several other well-known venoms. I saw the PriAlt guy speak a few months ago, and it was completely fascinating. Showed video of the snail spearing a clownfish, which had enough time to wriggle about once before it died.

    20. Re:Bitter Irony by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      As soon as I saw Fight Club, I figured there'd be a lot of trust-fund anarchists out there who Just Didn't Get The Irony(tm). Your comment just confirms it.

      Have you ever actually picked up a knife, bow, or hell, even a gun, and hunted anything that wasn't made out of pixels?

      Seriously, I don't get people who whine about "the gap between the haves and have-nots" with the assumption that we'd all be better off living as have-nots. The only way you will ever see egalitarianism in your lifetime is as the result of a disaster. The irony, of course, is that your whole dream is nothing but Hollywood wish-fulfillment at work.

      Grow the hell up and stop watching 'R'-rated movies without adult supervision.

    21. Re:Bitter Irony by TobascoKid · · Score: 1

      Exactly, Global Warming gets all the press, but tangible pollution is neglected. If anything, that's what causes the paranoid skeptic in me to question global warming - why are the world's politicians and psuedopoliticians going out of their way to call for draconian measures to stop one form of pollution thats effects will mainly be felt in the future (and then, allegedly, mostly by the the third world) and where the level of anthropogenic involvement in the process is debatable, while doing little if anything to combat other, more obviously toxic pollutants that are affecting us here and now in the first world? Surely we should start by getting rid of those pollutants first.

      I know I'm a bit cynical, but I really think most of reasons for the hype around global warming stems from a desire for greater government control and taxation than from any real desire to protect the environment.

      --
      At some point, somewhere, the entire internet will be found to be illegal.
    22. Re:Bitter Irony by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Have you ever actually picked up a knife, bow, or hell, even a gun, and hunted anything


      Yes.

      The majority of the meat I eat is from animals I have hunted. The rest is chicken, from chickens that were running around in my backyard before I killed them.

      I also grow most of my own vegetables and gather a fair amount of food from the woods around my house.

      I can start a fire with two sticks and a piece of bark. I have a crucible in my garage, and a forge, both powered by wood. I make my own cutlery and many of my own tools. I can knap flint. I know which mushrooms will kill me. I can make a figure 4. And set a snare. And brain tan. And build a solar water collector.

      Right now I am at the library reading about water purification methods that do not require power. I would just ask a neighbor, but it seems that most of the people who knew these kinds of things have passed, and I have to get my information from books.

      What my way of living offers is a kind of freedom that you slaves to progress will never understand. While you people worry over whether you'll be able to afford both rent and food this month, I do not. While you debate whether hydrogen powered cars will save you from killing yourselves, I do not burn any fossil fuels at all. While you seek cures for diseases you bring on yourself through excessive consumption, I do not suffer in the first place.

      Continue on. Enjoy growing fat on cheap ground beef, flown halfway across the world in fossil fueled jets after having been raised on newly cleared rainforest because that ensures that it is available at the absolute minimum cash price possible, which you demand. So you can buy more of it, and grow fatter. The same people selling you the beef will happily sell you some pills to melt the fat back off you. And some pills to cure the cancer the beef gives you. And a hydrogen powered scooter to cart you to the ground beef counter, your legs having atrophied from lack of use and disease and a general lack of interest in your doing anything requiring leg power.

      Enjoy.

    23. Re:Bitter Irony by susano_otter · · Score: 1

      Your point is also well-taken, but what does it have to do with the controversy about limiting industrial activity and technological innovation for the purposes of reducing anthropogenic global warming at whatever the cost to people everywhere?

      --

      Any sufficiently well-organized community is indistinguishable from Government.

    24. Re:Bitter Irony by jotok · · Score: 1
      Re-read the parent. He asserted that "industrial activity" had led to cheap and widely-available drugs...
      The bitter irony is that it's these very industrial and technological advancements that make the discovery, analysis, synthesis, mass production, and world-wide distribution at affordable prices of this painkiller possible in the first place.
      ...and I in turn pointed out that this actually is not true where it is most needed.

      The point being that the benefits of industrial activity are lopsided, whereas both you and the OP imply that they are universal. In truth, the negative effects of this activity spread around pretty well, but the bennies, well, not so much.
    25. Re:Bitter Irony by susano_otter · · Score: 1

      Actually, I am the OP, as well.

      But no matter.

      I do think the bennies spread around a lot better than you claim. But I'm also not a naive idealist who thinks that everyhing is going to be perfect real soon now; nor that there won't always be marginal situations in which the bennies don't spread around at all,; nor that human beings at their worst won't continue to introduce complications and failures into the best of solutions, for the forseeable future of the human race.

      The fact that Africa continues to be a seething pesthole of misery and violence, with no sign of letting up, in spite of all the benefits several thousand years of human civilization have been able to come up with, says more to me about the limitations of human nature than it says about the limits of human invention and industry.

      --

      Any sufficiently well-organized community is indistinguishable from Government.

    26. Re:Bitter Irony by jotok · · Score: 1

      I do think the bennies spread around a lot better than you claim. But I'm also not a naive idealist who thinks that everyhing is going to be perfect real soon now; nor that there won't always be marginal situations in which the bennies don't spread around at all,; nor that human beings at their worst won't continue to introduce complications and failures into the best of solutions, for the forseeable future of the human race.

      The fact that Africa continues to be a seething pesthole of misery and violence, with no sign of letting up, in spite of all the benefits several thousand years of human civilization have been able to come up with, says more to me about the limitations of human nature than it says about the limits of human invention and industry.


      That's odd, because I would think that your view of the reach of the benefits is a lot more optimistic than my own. Does that make me a naive idealist? Or were you directing this ad-hom at someone else?

      The (new and different) argument that you are putting forth--that there will always be imperfections and imbalances, therefore there is no reason to slow down industry or attempt to mitigate its harmful effects in order to correct them--does not address the original question in any way. Nor is it true; in some cases "the process" is itself directly responsible for creating "seething pestholes of misery and violence," and in nearly all cases the long view could be benefited if we switch "the process" to ones that are more sustainable.

      The fact that we as a society prefer cheap goods today over clean air tomorrow does, however, speak to the sad state of humankind. I'll give you that much.

    27. Re:Bitter Irony by Dog-Cow · · Score: 1

      Says the guy posting on slashdot from a computer.

    28. Re:Bitter Irony by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      In a library, no less.

      Oh, well. Our civilization is strong enough to carry him on its back, I suppose. There aren't enough like him to be an actual burden.

  5. TOXIN! by Alyks · · Score: 0

    It's produced in red tide plankton and can be extracted from shellfish who eat red tide plankton. Very neurotoxic chemical.

  6. Pat. pend. Medicine. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Interesting

    "Human trials are a year away. "

    Hopefully they will not patent it.

  7. Bad idea? by phantomcircuit · · Score: 0, Redundant

    It should be noted that this toxin has been known to have a slight side effect in large doses.

    Specifically DEATH.

    1. Re:Bad idea? by joe+155 · · Score: 1

      Everything in excess can cause death... too much water will kill you.

      --
      *''I can't believe it's not a hyperlink.''
    2. Re:Bad idea? by kfg · · Score: 1

      Specifically DEATH.

      I smell a comeback for Henry Gibson.

      KFG

    3. Re:Bad idea? by Alyks · · Score: 0

      True, but it would take a lot more water to kill you. This toxin would kill you in the milligram amounts.

    4. Re:Bad idea? by CyberLord+Seven · · Score: 1

      Even small amounts of water will kill...sandworms. :)

      --
      We have always been at war with Eurasia!
    5. Re:Bad idea? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Shai-Hulud... lets make some water of life.

  8. Well if it does kill you... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    You wont feel anymore pain now will you?

    win win!

  9. Ouch. by Das+Auge · · Score: 5, Funny

    Death, the ultimate pain release...and it's good for weight loss, too.

  10. Experimental animals? by jonnythan · · Score: 4, Funny

    "The toxin of a sea snail, called conotoxin, has a component that has been shown to directly target pain receptors in experimental animals." ..... What about regular animals?

    Is that the next step?

    Experimental animals -> regular animals -> experimental humans -> regular humans??

    1. Re:Experimental animals? by Cali+Thalen · · Score: 1

      ...I think they plan on testing it on snails...

      --
      Chaos, panic, disorder...my work here is done.
    2. Re:Experimental animals? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

      Experimental animals are things like the platypus, yeti, and snipes.

    3. Re:Experimental animals? by owlnation · · Score: 1

      I read it that way too - I'm thinking that experimental animals are kind of like Robot Chicken???

    4. Re:Experimental animals? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Wesley Snipes?

    5. Re:Experimental animals? by wildstoo · · Score: 1
  11. Wow.. by FunWithKnives · · Score: 4, Interesting

    This could be great for people like me. I suffered a lower-lumbar spinal fracture almost seven months ago. The doctors tell me that, essentially, I have to deal with chronic neck and lower back pain for the rest of my life. I take opiate-based pain medicine twice a day for it. The stuff wigs me out sometimes, though, and I slog through the day in somewhat of a fog. Not good for a college student. Hopefully this will make it to the market, and I can finally get some pain relief without getting "high".

    --
    "We may face a scorched and lifeless earth, but they're accountable to their shareholders first."
    1. Re:Wow.. by Elbows · · Score: 1

      Kind of off-topic, but you should talk to a massage therapist, acupuncturist, or some other practitioner of "alternative" medicine. They are good at dealing with chronic pain, especially neck and back problems, and can often help people who mainstream doctors have given up on. At the very least, the placebo effect is a powerful thing. ;-)

      Since you're a student, money is probably an issue, but you can most likely find someone who will charge on a sliding scale or otherwise work out a reasonable fee with you.

    2. Re:Wow.. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Weird. I also take morphine (ms contin) twice a day, for chronic upper back pain (C4-C7), caused by car accident.

      Even if I take the extras for breakthrough pain, I don't get high or anything like that. And that's the only time where I feel in somewhat of a "fog". And that still beats being in so much pain that you can't take your mind off of it and get stuff done.

    3. Re:Wow.. by MidnightBrewer · · Score: 1

      Ive done acupuncture, and I can highly recommend it. The doctor combines it with physical therapy techniques, so you get a very robust treatment.

      --
      "Give a man fire, and he'll be warm for a day; set a man on fire, and he'll be warm for the rest of his life
    4. Re:Wow.. by Manchot · · Score: 1

      Why bother with that when I've got a perfect drug I can sell you? It's called Plasibeau, and it works wonders on all sorts of ailments!

    5. Re:Wow.. by Velocir · · Score: 1

      You lucky bugger...

  12. Cannibas already available... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Why not use just use cannibas?

    1. Re:Cannibas already available... by Adult+film+producer · · Score: 1

      Because the politics of this country are dominated by right-wing christian extremists. Any drug that makes a person feel good and causes laughter immediately falls under the suspicious eye of our moral overlords. If you can't get high on jesus than you have no reason to at all.

    2. Re:Cannibas already available... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      And dance naked around the camp fire?
      No th^H^H^H^H^HHmm sound good.

    3. Re:Cannibas already available... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Because the politics of this country are dominated by right-wing christian extremists.

      Flame on, you crazy troll.

    4. Re:Cannibas already available... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Right on, brother

    5. Re:Cannibas already available... by Greg.Rodden · · Score: 1

      Get lost hippie. Have you even seen what cannabis abuse can do to someone over long term use?? or are you that far gone already. they are talking about a viable clean pain killer with out people being off their heads, ruining themselves and loved ones.

      --
      I have ridden the mighty moon worm!
  13. So Let Me Get This Straight by dch24 · · Score: 1

    I can grind up snails to put on my wounds...

    Or I can get the pretty girl sitting next to me to kiss it better

    1. Re:So Let Me Get This Straight by davidsyes · · Score: 1

      Yeh, so after you finish scraping or cutting yourself up in the garden, you can make every,uhh, es-scar-got...

      --
      Previously: "Linux... Toward the Sunrise..." Now: "Linux... Toward the-- No, now, part of Every Sunrise"
    2. Re:So Let Me Get This Straight by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Whose Dick Hertz?

  14. I have a name already by Aqua_boy17 · · Score: 1

    And I'm trademarking it.....Announcing "Snotox"(TM)

    --
    What if the Hokey Pokey really is what it's all about?
    1. Re:I have a name already by StalinsNotDead · · Score: 1

      I'm going to make a competing product called escargotox.

      --
      Thanks to the internet, we can now all die alone together! -SomeWoman
    2. Re:I have a name already by Aqua_boy17 · · Score: 1

      Well, good luck with your tradmark application. Mine is proceeding at a snail's pace.

      --
      What if the Hokey Pokey really is what it's all about?
  15. Before anyone else chimes in.. by Khyber · · Score: 4, Informative

    It's not the toxin itself, rather a component of the toxin that offers the pain relief. The /. editors must've edited that out, from my original entry.

    --
    Still waiting on Serviscope_minor to wake up to fucking reality and realize that Jessica Price isn't going to fuck him.
    1. Re:Before anyone else chimes in.. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      No, it's in there. Everyone who has posted so far is just illiterate.

    2. Re:Before anyone else chimes in.. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      No, conotoxin is the active component of the venom. (Look at the sequence at the bottom of the link -- conotoxin is a tiny little thing.)

      By the way, is "Human trials are a year away." your hallucination or the editor's? Even if the story didn't explictly say otherwise, no way were they getting this from such an early stage into humans in a year.

    3. Re:Before anyone else chimes in.. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      From the submission:
      The toxin of a sea snail, called conotoxin, has a component that has been shown to directly target pain receptors in experimental animals.
      So they didn't edit it out. Your post seems like you're bashing the editors for the purpose of karma whoring. Why were you modded up again?
    4. Re:Before anyone else chimes in.. by Khyber · · Score: 1

      It was directly in the article. They "EXPECT" Human trials to start within a year. Again, NOT MY ORIGINAL POST. This was edited. Get off the acid.

      --
      Still waiting on Serviscope_minor to wake up to fucking reality and realize that Jessica Price isn't going to fuck him.
    5. Re:Before anyone else chimes in.. by Khyber · · Score: 1

      Because if they left my original submission alone, this kind of confusion wouldn't have happened (which i suspect is done anyways so there's more discussion+pageviews+ad exposure/revenue.) Editorializing things for profit = keeping details low so more peopel keep looking/digging.

      --
      Still waiting on Serviscope_minor to wake up to fucking reality and realize that Jessica Price isn't going to fuck him.
  16. Is this new news? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
    Prialt has been out for some time, and it's a synthetic drug that is supposed to be identical to the sea snail venom.

    Regarding the side effects, I can speak for Prialt. My wife tried it in her infusion pump, and she had terrible problems. Massive headaches (like a spinal fluid leak), burning skin, etc. We forced our way into the Doctor's office and insisted they flush her pump out with saline. As we were leaving, we met another woman also there to cut off her Prialt because of side effects.

  17. The Cone Snail? by Hubbell · · Score: 0

    Isn't the toxin of the Cone Snail(correct name?) the most deadly toxin in the world? Is it a combination of multiple toxins or just a single one? If multiple, I can see this working, but if it's a single toxin then even a small dose would probably cause harmful effects as well as pain killing, in fact the painkilling might be a side effect of the harmful effects. And no, I didn't RTFA because usually they are already /.'ed and I prefer the discussions more than the actual article.

  18. Its already a drug that is 100-1000 times morphine by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
  19. How long until Rush is hooked on conotoxin? by xxxJonBoyxxx · · Score: 0, Flamebait

    I wonder how long it will be until Rush is hooked on conotoxin. Any guesses?

    (BTW, in case you don't get this, you may not be alone. I'm not even sure "Rush Limbaugh" is still on the air - anyone know for sure?)

    1. Re:How long until Rush is hooked on conotoxin? by soft_guy · · Score: 1

      I wonder how long it will be until Rush is hooked on conotoxin. Any guesses?
       
      (BTW, in case you don't get this, you may not be alone. I'm not even sure "Rush Limbaugh" is still on the air - anyone know for sure?)
        He died of AIDS, I think.
      --
      Avoid Missing Ball for High Score
  20. implications by snarfbot · · Score: 1

    well it probably targets the nerves responsible for pain and stops them from functioning, lots of venom contains toxins that affect the central nervous system like the black widow's for instance.

    the thing id worry about is less that a huge dose would kill you, because it probably wouldnt, id worry that you could become completely immune to pain overtime and hurt yourself without even knowing, like contorting into a wierd position during sleep and breaking your own spine.

    pain lets you know that your doing something wrong and you correct it, if you cant feel pain your liable to injure yourself doing mundane tasks, like walking for instance, or drinking scaldingly hot coffee, etc etc.

  21. Elan already has a Conotixin on the market by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Informative

    Irish biotechnology company Elan Pharmaceuticals markets the first commercial conotoxin analgesic, ziconotide (Prialt), for intractable nerve pain. It is from the omega-conotoxin family, one of five major families of conotoxins.

    http://www.theage.com.au/news/creative--media/pain killer-comes-out-of-its-shell/2005/07/24/112214372 8598.html

  22. Links to university release & the article in P by PrebleNY · · Score: 3, Interesting
    here is the press brief from the university's website, includes a picture of Dr Ekberg
    http://www.uq.edu.au/news/index.html?article=11048

    and if you have the chops to read the study, here is a link to the abstract
    http://www.pnas.org/cgi/content/abstract/103/45/17 030

    looks like the full text is free (unless my institution's IP range has a subscriptionn and it would otherwise be locked down)

  23. Brought to you by the Military Industrial Complex by edraven · · Score: 1

    I cannot possibly be the only person who sees military applications for this research. I don't foresee them having any trouble with funding.

  24. Mod parent up by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    This is old news there is a drug on the market based on the snail's toxin.

  25. This is news? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    The drug Prialt was approved by the FDA in 2004...

  26. Different from ziconotide? by Wilson_6500 · · Score: 3, Informative

    There's already an anesthetic drug out there that's based off of a conotoxin. Ziconotide, from what I can tell, is a synthetic conotoxin substance based upon omega-conotoxin derived from the cone snail. Wikipedia has an entry on it, including that it's already in use as the drug "Prialt."

    I don't understand why nothing in the article even mentions this already-existing drug derived from (probably different) conotoxins.

  27. Modern translations by camperdave · · Score: 1, Offtopic

    Pardon the King James, couldn't find a modern transation in short order.

    You may want to bookmark http://www.biblegateway.com/ or http://www.blueletterbible.org/ for future reference.

    --
    When our name is on the back of your car, we're behind you all the way!
  28. At least one conotoxin already commercialized. by Vellmont · · Score: 3, Informative
    A brief look at Wikipedia indicates there's already a commercially available drug derived from conotoxin that provides relief from pain:

    -conotoxin inhibits N-type voltage-dependent calcium channels. Because N-type voltage-dependent calcium channels are related to algesia (sensitivity to pain) in the nervous system, -conotoxin has an analgesic effect: the effect of -conotoxin M VII A is 100 to 1000 times that of morphine. Therefore -conotoxin M VII A is used as an analgesic drug named ziconotide; it is marketed under the brand name Prialt®.


    Presumably this is a different component of conotoxin.
    --
    AccountKiller
    1. Re:At least one conotoxin already commercialized. by alkaloids · · Score: 2, Informative

      Right. The article is horrendously vague, though I guess it has to be. "Conotoxin" is the name of actually a family of different compounds (small peptides) that tend to interact with ion channels. Ion channels are the proteins in neurons that basically transmit electrical information from one end of a neuron to the other. So if you can clog up ion channels, you can stop information transfer - including pain information. There are lots of ion channel types, and lots of different ion channel blockers and it's long been one of the promises of understanding ion channels that if we can block specific ones with high potency and specificity we'll be able to stop pain. The hope is that you'd be able to block the channels involved in transmitting information about pain, but not interfere with the channels that transmit signals from the brain to the muscles. This is all similar to how drugs like lidocaine work where they will 'break' an ion channel for awhile and so you can't feel pain from those neurons. However, this is different from other pain treatments which function by changing your perception of pain (things like morphine or other opiates).

      So anyway, that's why toxins can be used to treat pain. The earlier drugs developed were (omega)-conotoxins, which tend to target the voltage-dependent calcium channels. This is from the (mu-O)-conotoxins which is a different family that tends to block the voltage-gated sodium channel, which is actually the channel I've done most of my PhD research on. In fact, I was in the process of writing a research proposal to do pretty much what the experimenters in this study have done. It looks really interesting, but there are still tons of problems involved in using peptides therapeutically (your digestive system tends to be remarkably good at tearing peptides to bits, for example). Oh well, you can't win 'em all.

    2. Re:At least one conotoxin already commercialized. by StikyPad · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Prialt has a few caveats.

      Be nice if they could find something better than morphine though. I've been on drips twice in my life. (Yeah, I guess I'm accident prone.) Anyway, 1) it's not so much pain relief as much as "I'm so euphoric that I don't care that my arm hurts like a bitch," especially for something like getting a wound scrubbed out with a Brillo pad, 2) the side effects suck and 3) coming down is like the worst hangover you've ever had, only worse. Even thinking about it right now makes me nauseous.

    3. Re:At least one conotoxin already commercialized. by Fnkmaster · · Score: 1

      The Wikipedia article on Ziconotide gives a slightly more balanced view. To quote:

      Due to the profound side effects or lack of efficacy when delivered through more common routes, such as orally or intravenously, ziconotide must be administered intrathecally (directly into the spine). As this is by far the most expensive and invasive method of drug delivery and involves additional risks of its own,[3] ziconotide therapy is generally considered appropriate (as evidenced by the range of use approved by the FDA in US) only for "management of severe chronic pain in patients for whom intrathecal (IT) therapy is warranted and who are intolerant of or refractory to other treatment, such as systemic analgesics, adjunctive therapies or IT morphine".[4]

      However, this must be weighed against the high level of pain management, both in terms of degree and length, and the apparent lack of tolerance and other signs of addiction even after extended treatment along with the need for alternatives to other therapies that have not worked for the patient. Ziconotide is also contraindicated for patients with certain preexisting mental disorders (e.g. psychosis) due to evidence that they are more susceptible to certain severe side effects.[5]


      So imagine if you had severe, long-term, opioid resistant pain. The common side effects of "dizziness, nausea, confusion, and headache" might not seem quite so severe given the benefits.

      Of course, if somebody could make a conotoxin based pain medication with a lower side-effect profile, and that was easier to administer, it would be much wore widely applicable and could be quite the blockbuster drug.

  29. you are such a govt stooge. by cheekyboy · · Score: 1

    More likely, failures tend to use it more, but would you call Paul Mcartney a failure?

    Alcaholics are more failures and tend to ruin others lifes too and families, but hey its legal, because the govt
    gets their cut in taxes and thats good.

    --
    Liberty freedom are no1, not dicks in suits.
    1. Re:you are such a govt stooge. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Firstly, in my view, Paul Mcartney is pile of crap even if he's rich. Perhaps he was a bit too stone before marrying his ex-wife?

      But more to the point, I certainly agree that alcohol is terrible. I see bums all the time on the streets. I also see worthless people smoke pot in staircases and such places quite frequently. I can imagine that without the pot ban, they'll be the next bum generation.

      As a libertarian, I actually don't care what people do. I also know that most people can do it (pot and alcohol) without turning into subhuman parasites. But as a taxpayer and an active member of society, I dont want any shared resources to go towards such people that have easily avoidable addictions. Private charities can pay if they want, so long as they are also ready to pay for the consequences of their failure.

      I am only ready to pay for bullets for putting down these people if they should ever cross the line that defines my well being. That's the scope of my tolerance of alcohol and pot users.

    2. Re:you are such a govt stooge. by palutke · · Score: 1

      Alcaholics are more failures and tend to ruin others lifes too and families, but hey its legal, because the govt
      gets their cut in taxes and thats good.


      Also, the (U.S.) government tried to do away with alcohol use (despite the lucrative taxes it brings in) and the results were even more disastrous than our current War on Drugs.

      --
      'I ain't a liar, baby, and I ain't proud I just want what I'm not allowed.' -- Violent Femmes, 36-24-36
    3. Re:you are such a govt stooge. by kyouteki · · Score: 1

      I am only ready to pay for bullets for putting down these people if they should ever cross the line that defines my well being. That's the scope of my tolerance of alcohol and pot users. Or, I would imagine, anyone else, amirite?

      --
      A slashdotter who didn't build his own computer is like a Jedi who didn't build his own lightsaber.
  30. For those interested in other conotoxins by achesterase · · Score: 1

    This reminds me an awful lot of an article I read in Scientific American on some research done at the University of Southern California. They did quite a lot of work with omega-conotoxin (an N-type Calcium channel blocker), a.k.a. SNX-111 and as far as I know, it has already been through certain clinical trials (see Prialt), although I am not sure about the current status of approval or the results of those trials. This article probably refers to research done on a different conotoxin, but I would recommend the Sciam article to anyone interested in learning about the mechanisms of action of these toxins. I do not know if Sciam provides free access to their archives (I doubt it), but it would be the April 2005 issue (A Toxin Against Pain).

  31. Cone Snail Venom by eli+pabst · · Score: 2, Interesting

    I recently saw a very cool lecture by Baldomero Olivera, one of the people who discovered these compounds in cone snail venom. Apparently back in the day, they were trying to find the compound in cone snail toxin because it was terribly toxic and a lot of people in the Phillipines died from stepping on snails. So they took some cone snail toxin, fractionated it and then injected individual fractions into mice, expecting to see a single fraction that contained the "toxin" compound of interest. Instead, when they did the experiment they found that a large number of fractions had all kinds of crazy effects on the mice, including behavioral and motor effects. What they discovered was that there are a large number of compounds that make up the cone snail venom, each had a slightly different role in capturing prey. Some worked as short term paralysis agents that allowed the snail to capture its prey while others worked long term and allowed the snail to slowly eat its prey whole. There were also some that had overlapping function, but appeared to work better against different types of prey. Very cool talk considering it was about Cone Snails.

  32. Re:Brought to you by the Military Industrial Compl by Wilson_6500 · · Score: 1

    Hey, I think I see some applications, too! We could make a weapon that, when used in one way, heals people of the pain of their wounds. Used in a different way--say, applied to an enemy--it poisons them!

    Problem is, you would want ordinary soldiers to be able to use it without a bunch of gadgets to fumble around with. It should be easy--like swinging an axe! You could call it a bioaxe! (Warning: link has embedded MIDI)

  33. What is good in life? by CyberLord+Seven · · Score: 1

    I would quote it here, but that is something that begs to be heard in the original...whatever the hell it was he was speaking. :)

    --
    We have always been at war with Eurasia!
    1. Re:What is good in life? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Mongolian? This sequence? Mongol General: What is best in life? Conan: To crush your enemies, to see them driven before you, and to hear the lamentations of their women.

    2. Re:What is good in life? by CyberLord+Seven · · Score: 1

      See, it doesn't work when printed. We tend to read in our own voices. This needs to be heard. :) G'wan, rent the DVD. It's hilarious!

      --
      We have always been at war with Eurasia!
  34. osteopathic manipulation to release stored trauma by nido · · Score: 1
    I second this, though I would specifically recommend a Cranial Osteopath or a registered cranio-sacral therapist (osteopathic-style manipulation done by a non-osteopath).

    Osteopathy is the knowledge of the structure, relation and function of each part of the human body applied to the adjustment or correction of whatever interferes with the harmonious operation of the same.

    George V. Webster, D.O. 1921 (source)


    From the original poster:

    I suffered a lower-lumbar spinal fracture almost seven months ago. The doctors tell me that, essentially, I have to deal with chronic neck and lower back pain for the rest of my life.

    The fracture was in the low back, and yet the neck hurts too. I wonder if the Medical Doctors offer a decent explanation for the seeming incongruity?

    Neurofascial release works essentially at the level of one type of connective tissue which is called the "fascia". The connective tissue is the glue which holds us together by connecting one part of the body to another. In addition, it makes up the compartments and coverings of other tissues and organs, and it is even connected to itself, all in a very complex and organized way. Therefore, the connective tissue structurally unifies the body, giving it much of its strength and support. This is a unique function which is not performed by any of the other body tissues.

    Experts tell us that we "live in our fascia" as though it was a body suit. One indication of the quality of our health is how well this "body suit" functions. Injuries can affect many of our tissues, but especially our fascia. The site of the injury usually causes a local problem, but there is a great deal of truth to the expression, "When my toe hurts, my whole body hurts". A pull or twist in the fascia can also be transmitted along all of its connections, making it possible to produce distant problems as well. When our "body suit" fails to function properly, we can experience pain, headaches, restricted range of motion, and many other problems affecting our general health.

    -http://healthabounds2.com/neurofasc.htm


    Drugs have their place, but it's generally much better to fix the actual problem if you can, than to just cover up the symptoms.
    --
    Learn the rules so you know how to break them properly.
    www.teslabox.com
  35. You know what else offers a promise for pain? by ziggamon2.0 · · Score: 1

    Chuck Norris!

    1. Re:You know what else offers a promise for pain? by Coucho · · Score: 1

      Chuck Norris jokes are soooooooooo last year

      --
      *pSig = NULL;
  36. experimental animals by JThundley · · Score: 1

    Anyone know when these animals will be moved into stable?

  37. It's not a pain killer by shaneh0 · · Score: 1

    Even people that support medicinal marijuana don't do so for it's pain killing abilities. It only fights pain in so much as people scarfing down oreos aren't focused on their bad back.

    1. Re:It's not a pain killer by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Bullshit. Cannabis is considered the 2nd most effective natural pain killer, behind opiates.

  38. How Soon Before... by SRA8 · · Score: 2, Funny

    How Soon Before...my kids in high school start sniffing this stuff? Damn kids these days...

    1. Re:How Soon Before... by Sam+Nitzberg · · Score: 1

      I don't know, but I've heard that in France some kids actually eat snails! Some adults, too !! Agghhhh!

  39. Rod of Asclepius. by morgan_greywolf · · Score: 1

    Not for the reason you would think. I think you would be looking for the Rod of Asclepius, which predates the Nehushtan by a few thousand years. It is possible, however, that the Nehushtan was inspired by the Rod of Asclepius.

    1. Re:Rod of Asclepius. by Transcendor · · Score: 1

      No it can't be. The Asclepios saga, especially the snake rod part, is typical of later greek mythologies (which I can't prove, because I didnÄt look anything up, it just fits the pattern of the heroic human struggling agains the gods, which is a common subject in later greek antique but not in greek texts before 500bc), while the Pentateuch is roughly dated around 500bc or in even older dates (up to 1500bc for some parts, which have been traded orally).

    2. Re:Rod of Asclepius. by morgan_greywolf · · Score: 1

      Ok, so Asclepius predates the Pentatuch by a few hundred years, "Asclepius was most probably a skilled physician who practised in Greece around 1200BC (and described in Homer's Iliad). Eventually through myth and legend he came to be worshipped as Asclepius, the (Greek) god of Healing." (reference). As far as the use of the Rod of Asclepius, it's been known to be used well before Homer wrote about Asclepius in the Iliad in ca. 8th century BCE (though possibly as late as the 6th century BCE, as argued by some)

    3. Re:Rod of Asclepius. by Transcendor · · Score: 1

      Ok. You're right. Sorry to post misinformation (will check on my theses next time, I promise. Especially the fact that he was mentioned in the Iliad is some kind of errr most embarrasing.)
      I was mislead by the nature of the way Asclepios' death is described: Reviving a dead mortal, he was killed by Zeus with a strike of lightning, because he dared to lean up against the will of the gods (and annoyed Hades).
      Later greek and (hellenistically touched) Roman writers have adopted this motive and made a martyr of the medician, which couldn't happen in an early period of greek religion where the gods would never have to justify themselves before mere mortals (in contract to especially late Athen and Roman culture where man became the measure of things).
      Thank you very much for your correction!

  40. MOD PARENT DOWN by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Score: -1, Flamebait. Read the followup for an Insightful post that happens to be TRUE rather than "truthy".

  41. Re:Misleading title maybe the pain by davidsyes · · Score: 1

    will travel painfully slow snail's pace along the nervous system...

    Then, they'll have to come up with hummingbird-fast anti-toxin, or, maybe an multi-dimensional-gateway/time-shifting olfactory treatment...

    --
    Previously: "Linux... Toward the Sunrise..." Now: "Linux... Toward the-- No, now, part of Every Sunrise"
  42. Re:osteopathic manipulation to release stored trau by Bryansix · · Score: 1

    I agree with all the above. Just wanted to add the real Osteopaths carry a "DO" (Doctor of Osteopathic Medicine) at the end of their name and are licensed in just the same way as a Medical Doctor. They meet the same guidelines (and then some) and can prescribe medication just like an MD can.

  43. ...in experimental animals by rbgaynor · · Score: 1

    Bah, call me when you have it working in production animals...

    --
    "Good things don't end with eum, they end with mania or teria." - H. Simpson
  44. Re:osteopathic manipulation to release stored trau by Bearhouse · · Score: 1

    Agree - keep off the opiates (strong painkillers). I had a bad accident, did those for a while. Result = brain mixed up for a YEAR. See a decent chiro / massage guy. The regular docs said I'd be in a wheelchair at 25. I'm now 45 and going ski-ing this w/e.

  45. Re:regular vs recursively enumerable animals by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
    What about regular animals?
    I'm going to start with the basic premise that you have a failure to misunderstand the basic misapplication of computer science terminology, so I'll try to unclear up the confusion!!!

    First off, history teaches us that humans are unrestricted/recursively enumerable animals (refer to the constitution and the 13th amendment; as for the recursively enumerable part, I'll refer you to the bible). Next, mathematics tells us that experimental animals are also known as regular/finite animals (ok -- there are some exceptions like tape worms, but we won't get into that today). As I promised, here is the misinformation you requested: The proper stages in between regular and unrestricted animals are:

    Type-3: regular animals (e.g. elephants, lions, tiger, and bears. oh my!)
    Type-2: context-free animals (e.g. free range chickens, cows, etc)
    Type-1: context-sensitive animals (e.g. cats, dogs, some birds, and bleeding heart liberals)
    (* recursive animals go here; these include the goatse guy and people with their head up their asses)
    Type-0: unrestricted/recursively enumerable animals (adam begat bob; bob begat charlie; charlie begat doug; doug begat ernest; ...)

    I hope this misinformation wasn't to your disliking. If this helps, I can also give dislectures on such topics as data structures, operating systems (vs homeopathic remedy systems), and nondeterministic computation.
  46. As usual. . . by oneandoneis2 · · Score: 1

    . . .more time & effort is spent on hiding a symptom than on finding a cure for the cause.

    I'm a chronic pain sufferer myself - I spend 8 hours a day on a PC and I have RSI in both hands. Yet I wouldn't touch this stuff with a 10-foot pole. The pain is telling you that you're doing yourself damage. Masking the pain so you can do yourself even more damage in complete comfort is the worst thing you could possible do.

    For myself, I learned that improving my posture was enough to stop the RSI causing me a tortuous day: Little things, like keeping my shoulders back instead of slumped forward; and not letting my hands bend backwards so the tendons in my wrist scrape against each other and the joint, eliminated more of my pain than all the wrist supports, ergonomic chairs, and painkillers ever did.

    --
    So.. it has come to this
    1. Re:As usual. . . by SydShamino · · Score: 2, Interesting

      And the guy several posts above who broke his back and has been told by his doctor that he will suffer from chronic pain for the rest of his life? Should we not research medications to ease his pain, so he can better figure out why his back hurts? (Hint: It hurts because he broke it.)

      Just because your chronic pain is self-induced, it doesn't mean all people's pain is so caused.

      --
      It doesn't hurt to be nice.
    2. Re:As usual. . . by ni42 · · Score: 1

      I also have RSI, and also generally avoid painkillers for it. I totally agree that when misused, they can downright aggravate the condition. I'm glad you brought this up.

      But isn't this an issue of medical usage, rather than medical research? I strongly support the research and subsequent availability of new pharmaclogical tools. In addition I support research about the numerous forms of chronic pain and investigation into treatments that are solutions rather than just management. I agree that currently we rely too much on painkillers, and are rarely presented with any other options -- chronic pain is not well understood. Furthermore, I dislike the way the media discusses these things, very focused on drugs.

      But by Science I still want as many painkiller options as possible! (I want as many antibiotic options as possible, even though many diseases are viral.) This is important.

      In the end, it largely comes down to what your doctors conclude in the 10 minutes of time they have to see you. I don't think that having more painkillers is going to make them more "pro-painkiller." They are appropriate for some people (not us), and having more options can make a huge difference for them.

    3. Re:As usual. . . by oneandoneis2 · · Score: 1

      Congratulations on completely missing the point!

      I'll make it easier for you: Which of these is the more beneficial scenario:

      Somebody sustains an injury that causes chronic pain, and millions is spent on developing a new painkiller so the damage won't hurt even though it's still present

      -or-

      Somebody sustains an injury that causes chronic pain, and millions is spent on developing a way to repair the damage so he doesn't suffer from chronic pain.

      I work in the pharmaceutical industry, and I can tell you that far more money is spent on the former than the latter. After all, there's no money to be made out of healthy people: Far better to have chronically ill patients that will buy your products for the rest of their lives.

      And people fall for it, that's the sad thing. Pain is marketed as a disease, and painkillers as the cure. But pain isn't a disease, it's a symptom. Curing a disease is beneficial, masking the symptoms is not.

      --
      So.. it has come to this
  47. LOL by shaneh0 · · Score: 1

    By you?

    Well, that puts the issue to rest!

    Even NORML's website doesn't reference pain-killing as a reason for it's use. It talks about it's benefits as an anti-inflammatory, anti-convulsant, appetite-stimulant, etc.

    So please, put down the doobage.

  48. Salty by Joebert · · Score: 1

    I bet a year from now there's a side effect that requires me to pour salt in my wound.

    --
    Wanna fight ? Bend over, stick your head up your ass, and fight for air.
  49. "Without side effects" by NerveGas · · Score: 1


        Of all of the times that's been said of a new drug, I wonder just how rarely it was actually true.

    --
    Oh, you're not stuck, you're just unable to let go of the onion rings.
    1. Re:"Without side effects" by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The existing conotoxin-derived pain drug, ziconotide or prialt
      actually has some nasty side effects.

      I take the "without side effects" bit with a pinch of salt.
      If the claims are true, this new drug is likely to replace prialt altogether.

      Yours Birger Johansson

  50. New Scientist article by cswinter · · Score: 1

    I can remember a New Scientist article on this from when I was at school or a first year undergrad (~10 years ago). If I recall conotoxin was a promising drug candidate due to its receptor specificity (i.e. pain receptors only) and was reckoned to be approx. 200 times more potent than morphine without the side effects. Its good to see that progress is being made in this area of research.

  51. Cone shells by kbahey · · Score: 2, Interesting

    These things are very pretty and very deadly as well.

    The proper name for them is not "sea snails" (there are lots of snails in the sea). The are called cone shells or cone snails. See the Wikipedia article on them.

    I used to see them when snorkeling in the Red Sea. They are one of the few snails that are "clean" since they have a mantle withdrawn over the shell and hence algae and barnacles do not attach to it. The other snail that does that is the cowrie shell. If you find a dirty shell, then it is because the animal inside it has died, and the algae has move on it.

    The cone shells are very very toxic and as far as I recall have no antidote. They have a harpoon like needle that injects venom, and a proboscis to swallow prey with.

    One true horror story from Sinai in Egypt was about a woman tourist who was found dead under the water after scuba diving. They took the body out and checked the regulator, the air supply, ...etc and all was good. When they unzipped the wet suit, a live cone shell fell off. What seemed to have happened is that she saw this pretty shell and did not know it was toxic. She just decided to keep it safe and unzipped the suit and tucked it in.

  52. late... by peektwice · · Score: 1

    Shit, I'm so late making this comment. But then again, Slashdot is waaaaay late posting the article.
    From 2005: http://www.nih.gov/nihrecord/03_01_2005/story03.ht m

    --
    Other than this text, there is no discernible information contained in this sig.
  53. Scientific American by rrohbeck · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Scientific American had it too: http://www.sciam.com/article.cfm?chanID=sa006&colI D=1&articleID=000D45AD-46FB-1237-81CB83414B7FFE9F

    April 2005 issue

    INNOVATION
    A Toxin against Pain
    For years, scientists have promised a new wave of drugs derived from sea life. A recently approved analgesic that is a synthetic version of a snail toxin has become one of the first marine pharmaceuticals

  54. rofl by Greg.Rodden · · Score: 1

    mao...

    --
    I have ridden the mighty moon worm!
  55. How potent is it? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Does it work for Windows Vista?

  56. What kind of animals? by DynaSoar · · Score: 1

    > to directly target pain receptors in experimental animals.

    Man, I've got to get me some of those. Here I've been using the traditional, evolved sort. I bet I could get lots better results from my experiments if my animals were experimental too. And then maybe some experimental humans.

    --
    "I may be synthetic, but I'm not stupid." -- Bishop 341-B
  57. News? by disturbedite · · Score: 1

    i don't mean to sound condescending, or anything like that, but i heard and watched a program where this very thing was talked about in length two or three years ago...

    --
    http://www.ronpaul2008.com/ Ron Paul for President 2008 http://www.infowars.com/
  58. Pain medication by XNormal · · Score: 2, Informative

    Aspirin, ibuprofen (Advil), etc are anti-inflammatory drugs. They block the body's response to provocations which is often what causes most of the pain. They all have the unfortunate side effect of irritating the stomach lining and increasing the chances of getting an ulcer. Nobody really knows how many (mostly elderly) people die from internal bleeding caused by these drugs every year.

    Opiates affect the way the brain perceives pain. They work great and are relatively safe - but addictive. Some people find them pleasurable but most people don't really enjoy the experience. Both groups can become addicted if they use them often enough. The first group is simply more likely to do so for non-medical reasons.

    Nobody is really sure how acetaminophen (Tylenol) actually works. It appears to be a variant on anti-inflammatory drugs with fewer side effects but it may also have some direct effect on the brain. It's safe and effective for minor pains but its usefulness is limited for severe pain because larger doses are toxic to the liver. This one also kills many people every year who don't take the warnings seriously. Many of the victims are children.

    A new drug that affects the pain receptors directly could be a welcome addition to this arsenal.

    --
    Stop worrying about the risks of nuclear power and start worrying about the risks of not using nuclear power.
  59. Animal Holocaust by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    > The toxin of a sea snail, called conotoxin, has a component that has been shown to directly target pain receptors in experimental animals.

    So the researchers actually tortured test animals to be able to test painkillers on them? That is gross and unacceptable.

    I can now understand PETA digging up the dead relatives of test animal industry people and blackmailing them out of business by hiding the corpse. Anything is allowed to vanquish these Mengeles!

  60. Sea Snail Toxin Offers Promise For Pain by ComfyRest · · Score: 1

    My problem was pain from a herniated neck disk. Among my different aspects of my life it was a severe problem during a vacation at the beach while lying on my stomach in the sun with my head turned to the side to breathe. I ultimately invented and patented the SquidFace and ComfyRest pillows to relieve my pain. These pillows enable me to lie facedown comfortably and breathe without turning my head to the side. Unexpected benefits of these pillows are snoring relief; Neck, shoulder and back muscle tension relief; sinus, migraine, ear pain, snoring and more. Stomach sleepers are finding their backs feel better after using these pillows. Many of the benefits are on my website. www.SquidFace.com

  61. chronic pain - a BIG PROBLEM - dr's charged by ClioCJS · · Score: 1
    The D.E.A. has been making it a new habit to charge doctors who prescript painkillers with *MURDER* when they overdose. This is happening all over the country. People in high chronic pain are ABSOLUTELY UNABLE to receive the dosages they made, because of a few bad apples (Rush Limbaugh, anyone?).

    I pray that the congressman who are responsible for the D.E.A. doing this have the most intense chronic pain for the last 20 years of their lives, and have no recourse to stop it. They've made their own bed.

    Read more about it on http://www.drcnet.org/ among other places.

    The D.E.A. is not supposed to make medical decisions. You, the voter, let this happen. And if there is any justice: You, the voter, will feel intense chronic pain for supporting this (note: comment applies only to those who voted for those who caused this to happen -- mostly republicans.)

    --
    -Clio
    Karma: Bad (mostly from not giving a fuck)
    Blog: http://clintjcl.wordpress.com