Slashdot Mirror


Google Opens Gmail To All

Reader Russian Art Buyer lets us know that GMail is now open for all ("Google Mail" in the UK). The service is no longer by invitation only. This welcome page shows an ever-increasing amount of storage available per user, currently about 2,815 MB.

231 comments

  1. Capacity drop? by Short+Circuit · · Score: 4, Interesting

    I wonder if we'll see a drop in storage capacity with the increased number of users.

    Also, my GMail account still says I only have 73 invites left. If it's open, why don't they drop the limited number of invites?

    1. Re:Capacity drop? by THE+anonymus+coward · · Score: 5, Insightful

      I doubt we will see a drop in capacity at this point. Everyone who wants a gmail account has had it for at least a year now, so I don't think many will come who haven't come yet.

      --
      I guess thats all I have to say.
    2. Re:Capacity drop? by Hiween · · Score: 0, Redundant

      I don't think so. With 99 invitations per user, I think everybody that wanted a GMail account could get one, I doubt there will be much more growth now. I have seen the invitation system as something that made you want have a gmail account. When the invitations were more limited, it was kind of VIP to have an account (actually, gave the feel of VIP only). Maybe this is the first step to end the beta stage of the service...

    3. Re:Capacity drop? by Short+Circuit · · Score: 3, Interesting

      Most people I meet on campus have never even heard of GMail.

      With Google holding the top search engine spot, they need only add a link to GMail to the search page, and they'll get millions more users.

    4. Re:Capacity drop? by duffbeer703 · · Score: 4, Insightful

      The invitations had more to do with mapping social networks than limiting capacity.

      --
      Conformity is the jailer of freedom and enemy of growth. -JFK
    5. Re:Capacity drop? by mfh · · Score: 5, Funny

      Most people I meet on campus have never even heard of GMail.

      Where do you go? Remind me never to hire any of those uninformed tech grads!
      --
      The dangers of knowledge trigger emotional distress in human beings.
    6. Re:Capacity drop? by JavaArtisan · · Score: 1

      Google is going to have some very skewed networks mapped for early users then. A lot of folks were giving away (or selling) invites to people they did not know at all, and did not correspond with again.

    7. Re:Capacity drop? by LoverOfJoy · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Not everyone knows they want one yet. Others want one but aren't sure it's worth the price of dealing with a shift in addresses. My brother just recently accepted my invitation to gmail after getting fed up with all the ads on hotmail. I'd invited him long ago but he didn't want to have to tell everyone of his new email address. He's gotten to the point where it's worth switching and just occasionally checking up on his old address for the few that never got the notice of his change in address.

    8. Re:Capacity drop? by rm999 · · Score: 1

      Getting an invite has been pretty much trivial for about 2 years now. They know this, so they didn't even remember to remove the invites. I don't think anyone who wants gmail doesn't have it at this point.

    9. Re:Capacity drop? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Yeah, cause it is not like they have any other way of knowing who you send email messages to...

    10. Re:Capacity drop? by ubergenius · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Seriously. No offense to wherever you go, but I know of no one... Literally, not a single person... who does not have a Gmail account, much less heard of Gmail.

      --
      Student Manager - Take control of your education!
    11. Re:Capacity drop? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      No offense to wherever you go, but I know of no one... Literally, not a single person... who does not have a Gmail account
      You travel in a rather limited circle, then. (No offense to your circle, who I'm sure are very nice people.) Out here in the real world, there are lots of people who neither have Gmail nor want it.
    12. Re:Capacity drop? by duffbeer703 · · Score: 1

      That sort of thing is pretty trivial to identify.

      --
      Conformity is the jailer of freedom and enemy of growth. -JFK
    13. Re:Capacity drop? by leenks · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Unless this was exactly what they were trying to model. Seeing how a popular service grows, and the type of person involved (geeks, researchers, "real users", etc) could be a very useful thing to do if you plan on giving away services in future and want to see the kind of infrastructure involved (think Google productivity suite or YouTube and modelling what kind of hardware would you need to support those as they grow).

    14. Re:Capacity drop? by spirit+of+reason · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Everyone who wanted one and was already looking for an email account has one. However, that doesn't include all the people (particularly teenagers) that decide they need an email account of their own now. They'll probably turn to the place they've grown up using for search, Google. And now it's easy to get an account on a whim.

    15. Re:Capacity drop? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      While I agree with you, I would suggest that in any scientific or technological field in University, it is extremely exceptional not to have heard of gmail; and that in less scientific and technological fields, it's not as uncommon as the post's ancestor said.

    16. Re:Capacity drop? by chaoticgeek · · Score: 1

      I agree, my grandmother still uses hotmail, I set her up an account that was the same exact login name and password, I ported all her contacts and all she had to do was tell the family to send email to @gmail.com instead of @hotmail.com. Pretty simple, but still no go. She just does not want to move over to it so I guess gmail will have to offer something for most people to want other than the storage because other places have larger storage that go beyond what they need anyways. 100megs is more than enough for my grandma.

      --
      hello
    17. Re:Capacity drop? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Do you know many people? Also, why would it be perceived as an offence to where he or she goes? Just because everyone you know does something, it doesn't make it good. That's not to say it isn't -- I use Gmail. But whether or not a person has heard of a particular e-mail service is hardly a measure of their worth.

    18. Re:Capacity drop? by lahvak · · Score: 1

      Yeah, most people in such field probably has heard about gmail at some point of time, but most people in such fields usually have their .edu address they are typically rather proud of, and couldn't care less about gmail. The few gmail users I know use gmail because they have some reason to keep their private email separated from their work address.

      --
      AccountKiller
    19. Re:Capacity drop? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Also, my GMail account still says I only have 73 invites left. If it's open, why don't they drop the limited number of invites?

      Brilliant! Sign this guy up as a tester! His brain is staggering...

    20. Re:Capacity drop? by xeoron · · Score: 1

      But you can keep your old addresses and have your gmail account slurp that messages in other pop accounts. So unless you do not have pop access, that argument doesn't hold water-- all Google or all of us Gmail users have to do is point this fact out.

    21. Re:Capacity drop? by nwbvt · · Score: 1

      Oh, I'm sure there are plenty of people who don't have gmail addresses. Privacy freaks who are mad at them for including advertisements taken from email data, people who are mad at them for caving into China's demands (and who didn't hear that Yahoo and MS did the same thing), old people, etc. Hell there are people out there who don't even have computers. And of course there are plenty of people out there who are perfectly satisfied with their existing email service, and don't want to go through the hassle of switching.

      Though I'm sure most college students are at least aware of its existence.

      --
      Mathematics is made of 50 percent formulas, 50 percent proofs, and 50 percent imagination.
    22. Re:Capacity drop? by Tiro · · Score: 1
      Really.

      At my college, all ten of my closest friends use GMail, and most of them forward their mail from their .edu account to GMail.

      Also, use of AIM has dropped off significantly, b/c most of them feel more comfortable using GoogleTalk.

      Personally, I use Gaim to connect to AIM and GTalk at the same time. It's nice.

    23. Re:Capacity drop? by Mark-Allen · · Score: 2, Insightful

      I've heard of GMail but have no desire to have an account. The idea that all my emails are sitting around on a company's servers that I don't trust sounds like a bad idea. Others may feel differently but Google isn't a company that gives me a high level of confidence.

      Their motto (whatever) "Do No Evil" is so lame, I won't even comment.

      And for those who believe that for-profit companies won't do "evil", well.... one man's evil is another man's profit.

      --
      If you can stay calm, while all around you is chaos... then you probably haven't completely understood the question.
    24. Re:Capacity drop? by Short+Circuit · · Score: 1

      Almost everyone in the Computer Club here has a Gmail account. But I'm at a community college, not a technical college.

    25. Re:Capacity drop? by Short+Circuit · · Score: 2, Insightful

      I see my .edu email address as transitory. If I'm not a student there for a semester, it goes away.

      Same with work addresses; I doubt I'll be at one company, with a stable email naming system, my entire career. My GMail address, though, will stick with me as long as GMail is around.

    26. Re:Capacity drop? by Short+Circuit · · Score: 1

      I moved my grandparents over to GMail because their previous ISP was going under. I set up their existing Outlook installation to work through Google's POP3 and SMTP. All they do is pass around a different email address. (Which they did this past Christmas.)

    27. Re:Capacity drop? by Short+Circuit · · Score: 1

      Almost all of my friends use GMail. However, I work as a student tutor, working with literally hundreds of students per semester. Geeks' friends have heard of GMail, but the average person hasn't.

    28. Re:Capacity drop? by Short+Circuit · · Score: 1

      You can? I used to submit that feature request every couple weeks, until I gave up.

      Guess it doesn't matter now that the ISP my old email address ran under is now gone. I suppose I could set up domain-specific email addresses on my sites, though.

    29. Re:Capacity drop? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      When did you get turned down for a job at Google?

    30. Re:Capacity drop? by Bert64 · · Score: 1

      I fully understand that, which is why i run my own mail server.
      But i can still communicate with gmail users, both through email and through google talk (jabber)...
      For those who can't or won't run their own servers, google is about the best free mail provider out there right now. In order to communicate with people using any of the competing messaging services, i am forced into signing up for an account with them.

      --
      http://spamdecoy.net - free throwaway anonymous email - avoid spam!
    31. Re:Capacity drop? by Bert64 · · Score: 1

      The best part of gtalk, is that you can interoperate with other jabber servers.
      I have my own server, under my total control, on which a few friends have accounts... But i can still communicate with gtalk users through the same account. Those who choose to let their chats go through google are free to do so, but those who want privacy can use a server they totally control.
      Plus it lets you have your own identity, when with google any cool names have already gone, and you end up with something like joe3213213@gmail.com

      --
      http://spamdecoy.net - free throwaway anonymous email - avoid spam!
    32. Re:Capacity drop? by xeoron · · Score: 1

      Yes, one can do that now in gmail-- setting it up is in the account settings. From what I have heard some people still do not have access to this feature, but soon will be usable by all.

  2. Just checked... by nathan+s · · Score: 4, Informative

    ...and I don't see any way to sign up other than the "use your mobile" promotion that they've had going for a while. There's no link from TFA either.

    1. Re:Just checked... by Monty845 · · Score: 1

      Try clicking the link, you get a page asking for your cell phone number so they can text you an invitation code...

    2. Re:Just checked... by moranar · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Not for the Italian google mail service: it takes me directly to the signup page.

      --
      "I think it would be a good idea!"
      Gandhi, about Internet Security
    3. Re:Just checked... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Informative
    4. Re:Just checked... by Monty845 · · Score: 1

      You cannot log into Gmail using your Google Account username and password. GMail uses a seperate acount system.

    5. Re:Just checked... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Just realized that...so much for open to public.

    6. Re:Just checked... by cp.tar · · Score: 3, Informative

      You cannot log into Gmail using your Google Account username and password. GMail uses a seperate acount system.

      Does it now? I just launched IE to check it (easier than logging out of everything in Firefox) and the text above the login box said "Sign in to Gmail with your Google Account".
      So I'd guess that yes, you can log into Gmail with your Google Account username and password.

      And it doesn't ask for a cell phone or anything like it, either.

      I just wonder if they're going to drop the invites altogether...

      But I read somewhere below that the problem may be with you living in North America...

      --
      Ignore this signature. By order.
    7. Re:Just checked... by xpiotr · · Score: 2, Informative

      I noticed a link on mail.google.com
      marked "Sign up for Google Mail"
      http://mail.google.com/mail/signup

      Could maybe be what you are looking for.

    8. Re:Just checked... by FlashyGustaf · · Score: 1

      Does it now? I just launched IE to check it (easier than logging out of everything in Firefox) and the text above the login box said "Sign in to Gmail with your Google Account". Well you didn't probe far enough. If you try to log in with a Google account it will not work. What I'm trying to figure out why this article was even posted, as if it's some kind of new news...GMail has been offering invitation codes via mobile phone for quite some time now.
    9. Re:Just checked... by RaNdOm+OuTpUt · · Score: 0

      A Gmail account is a Google account, but a Google account is not a Gmail account. The Gmail account works anywhere a Google accout is requested (suffixed with "@gmail.com" or not). That's why it says you can sign in with a Google account... one that was created through Gmail, not another service.

      --
      13. Any legal action is absolutly excluded. (Pi World Ranking List rules)
    10. Re:Just checked... by gfreeman · · Score: 1

      But I read somewhere below that the problem may be with you living in North America...

      I hear that a lot.

      --
      Ceci n'est pas un sig.
  3. annnd checked again... by nathan+s · · Score: 4, Informative

    If I try to go to gmail.com, I get the old URL (the one with &ltmpl=m_wsad and no way to sign up) but the link in the summary (with &ltmpl=m_blanco ) has a sign up form. Interesting. This with clearing my cache first to be sure that it isn't a browser caching issue.

    1. Re:annnd checked again... by SaDan · · Score: 1

      I just hit http://www.gmail.com/ and was able to get an account. Had to send myself an invite to my mobile phone, but it worked.

    2. Re:annnd checked again... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      They've had the sign up with a mobile phone invite for a long time now.

  4. try www.gmail.com by ReidMaynard · · Score: 1

    There's a big Sign Up For Gmail link

    --
    -- www.globaltics.net

    Political discussion for a new world

    1. Re:try www.gmail.com by ReidMaynard · · Score: 1

      whoops my bad .. it wants the cell phone

      --
      -- www.globaltics.net

      Political discussion for a new world

  5. Not really by Monty845 · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Maybe the submitter has a different definition of all than I, but Gmail still requires either an invation or the ability to receive text messages. While the number of people who can't get text messages may be small, there are still many people who cannot sign up.

    1. Re:Not really by bad_fx · · Score: 2, Informative

      Check again - they seem to have removed the requirement to receive the text message...

    2. Re:Not really by Monty845 · · Score: 3, Informative

      Maybe you should read the FAQ: "Can I sign up without the invitation code? Or without a mobile phone? You need to receive and enter a special invitation code in order to create an account. Currently, we are only sending these codes as text messages to mobile phones. So you will need to have a mobile phone with text message capabilities (most phones have this) and the invitation code itself. One of the reasons we are offering this new way to sign up for Gmail is to help protect our users and combat abuse. Spam and abuse protection are two things we take very seriously, and our users have been very happy with the small amount of spam they've received in their Gmail accounts. We take many measures to ensure that spammers have a difficult time sending their spam messages, getting these messages delivered, or even obtaining a Gmail account (spammers will often use many different accounts to send spam). Sending invitation codes to mobile phones via SMS is one way to address this, as the number of accounts per phone number can be limited. If you want to open an account a different way, you may want to ask a friend with a mobile phone to receive an invitation code for you or to ask someone you know who already has a Gmail account to email you an invitation. updated 2/7/2007" Show me where someone can signup without a code or a cell phone to receive a code...

    3. Re:Not really by wpegden · · Score: 2

      There's also the issue of privacy. Both methods of signing up make it difficult to set up an "anonymous" gmail account.

    4. Re:Not really by AKAImBatman · · Score: 5, Informative

      Gmail still requires either an invation or the ability to receive text messages.

      I haven't read the CNN article linked here, but I did read the article on my Wii last night. The long and short of it is that signup is geographically limited. Just about everyone not in North America is now able to sign up without going through the text message routine. The Google spokepeople have promised that North America will follow "soon".

      Hope that clarifies things.
    5. Re:Not really by kabocox · · Score: 1

      Maybe the submitter has a different definition of all than I, but Gmail still requires either an invation or the ability to receive text messages. While the number of people who can't get text messages may be small, there are still many people who cannot sign up.

      https://www.google.com/accounts/SmsMailSignup1

      What if I don't have any intention of giving google my telephone number? Well, I don't want there service anyways.

      I signed up for this service sometime around 98 and they only know what I filled out in the form.
      https://edit.yahoo.com/config/eval_register?.intl= us&new=1&.done=http%3A//mail.yahoo.com&.src=ym&.v= 0&.u=94cvl9h2smgh7&partner=&.partner=&pkg=&stepid= &.p=&promo=&.last=

      Why would the tin hat slashdot crowd want to sign up for a service that wants to know more about you?

    6. Re:Not really by montyzooooma · · Score: 4, Informative

      But if you're signing up for a gmail account you're already trading a certain amount of privacy away anyway.

    7. Re:Not really by jbarr · · Score: 4, Informative

      Maybe you should read the FAQ...
      Their FAQ pages have not been updated yet. As with almost all previous Gmail enhancementsit takes time to roll things out globally. When I navigate to Gmail.com using IE7 or Firefox, I see a nice "Sign up for Gmail" panel with a link that takes you right to a signup screen--no invitation is necessary. (Now, I'm using a company proxy that hits the Internet in Europe, so YMMV depending on your location.)

      Give it a day or so, and you should see the non-invitation link.
      --
      My mom always said, "Jim, you're 1 in a million." Given the current population, there are 7000 of me. God help us all!
    8. Re:Not really by xdotx · · Score: 1, Flamebait

      What? Care to explain? Because at present that looks like flamebait.

      --
      Our wealth breeds emptiness
    9. Re:Not really by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      >>I haven't read the CNN article linked here, but I did read the article on my Wii last night.

      Can I subscribe to your Wii news feed?

    10. Re:Not really by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      FTF:
      Spam and abuse protection are two things we take very seriously...

      Well, it seems that they are trying to keep the spam monopoly.

    11. Re:Not really by jbarr · · Score: 5, Informative

      Per a user on the "Gmail Users" Google Groups, this may be only for certain non-United States locations. When I connect to Gmail from my home in the USA, I only get the SMS screen, but when I connect through my office (through a company proxy that hits the Internet in France) I get the non-invitation screen.

      --
      My mom always said, "Jim, you're 1 in a million." Given the current population, there are 7000 of me. God help us all!
    12. Re:Not really by toleraen · · Score: 2, Informative

      I'm guessing the GP is referring to the fact that gmail scans your emails to display ads. And if you stay logged in, they track your searches. And if you log into gtalk, it (optionally) records your conversation. I'm sure I'm missing some stuff.

    13. Re:Not really by wiz31337 · · Score: 1

      ...And if you log into gtalk, it (optionally) records your conversation... I believe this option is set to record your conversations to gmail by default. The user must go in and opt not to have them recorded.
      --
      /whisper/ Thanks for the candy!
    14. Re:Not really by rising_hope · · Score: 1

      Email has never been secure. Everything sent or receive is unencrypted. The FBI has been reading our mail for years. If you're really that concerned about what they do with the data they could potentially mine from you, get PGP and use their free POP servers to send mail securely, incapable of being mined, since it was encrypted before it makes it to their servers.

    15. Re:Not really by anthony_dipierro · · Score: 1

      Yep, I just confirmed this using a proxy server in Germany. Now hopefully my university's IT staff doesn't come after me!

  6. Fastmail by kahei · · Score: 1


    How does gmail compare to fastmail? I've been using a fastmail account (the kind where you pay once to set it up and it's free thereafter) to consolidate my emails for years and it's ok but it's gradually being overwhelmed by the amount of spam I get. How does gmail stack up, especially in the area of spam killing? Does anyone have both?

    --
    Whence? Hence. Whither? Thither.
    1. Re:Fastmail by jrwr00 · · Score: 2, Interesting

      as you can tell i show my email address on /.
      and the spame filter work well, i get some 5K in spam and MAYBE 1 email will get past

    2. Re:Fastmail by Nimloth · · Score: 5, Informative

      I do have both except I pay for the Enhanced account at Fastmail. GMail doesn't compare in terms of features, with Fastmail offering full Sieve scripting, I've got my domain hosted and sieve lets me do pretty much everything I ever wanted to do with email. It's also great for managing spam.
      Fastmail lets me use webDAV to access my file storage, and I just love IMAP/IDLE support. With Fastcheck installed that monitors my mailbox with IDLE, the notification often pops up before I get it on my Blackberry (PUSH-based), something Exchange has never managed to do at work.
      I get loads of spam in my GMail even though I've never given it to anyone, which I think speaks for itself. 1 or 2 spams a week with Fastmail and I've had it for 8+ years.

    3. Re:Fastmail by slumberer · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Yeah I have both and personally I have fastmail set up to just forward my email to gmail. It's a matter of preference but I find the gmail interface a lot easier to use than the fastmail one. As far as spam goes gmail does a great job of stopping it from getting to my inbox.

      The reason that I still use the fastmail account is because it still checks my other email accounts - especially my hotmail account - that I have stopped using but still have the odd email sent to. Gmail doesn't offer the same way of checking other email accounts but having fastmail forward to gmail works just as well.

    4. Re:Fastmail by SpinyNorman · · Score: 2

      GMail seems to do a pretty good job of spam filtering - I can't recall getting any spam that wasn't detected and put into my spam folder, although I have to say that Optimum Online (having been though a couple of spam filtering revisions) now do a very good job also. The worst spam filter is Mozilla mail, which despite my "training" it daily since day one still lets large volumes of spam though every day.

      I guess being a giant provider of e-mail puts you in a good position to do filtering since you could (in theory at least - don't know if Google is doing it) simply see if the same mail/mail template is being sent to very many accounts and reasonably classify it as spam based purely on that.

    5. Re:Fastmail by Cochonou · · Score: 1

      I have both. I mainly use Fastmail because it has IMAP support and none of the annoying POP3 quirks of GMail.
      From a spam point of view, I find both very effective, but it might be because I use the account where you have to pay $20 every year, which supposely offers enhanced spam protection.

    6. Re:Fastmail by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I can't compare, but I will say I have had more legitimate email go to spam than I've had spam get through, but very few of either. Whether that's good or bad is a personal matter.

    7. Re:Fastmail by tmarthal · · Score: 1

      Just something you may want to check about "I get loads of spam in my GMail even though I've never given it to anyone, which I think speaks for itself." is that gmail automatically delivers mail that does not match a gmail recipient to the closest one. How it decides what the closest one is a google secret, but you should check those spam messages that are being sent to you.

      For instance nimloth at gmail might receive messages addressed to (nimlo nimolotha etc.).

      Its a crazy feature of gmail, and one not very talked about!

    8. Re:Fastmail by akorvemaker · · Score: 1

      I have both, and I strongly prefer FM over gmail.

      FM simply offers more flexibility. IMAP lets me access my mail in a variety of email clients, or using the web interface, and always see the same mail in the same folders. I could use POP to access it if I wanted. Same thing with the server-side filtering. I routinely access my mail from Mail.app, Thunderbird, the web interface, and sometimes Outlook, using a variety of computers. For some things the web interface works better. For others a mail client is better. FM gives me the option to work with my mail as I want.

      I have a Full account at FM, so I'm paying a yearly fee. This gives me much better spam filtering. I find the gmail and FM spam filters roughly equal. Dealing with about 30-100 pieces of spam a day, both go through phases of letting up to 20/day through, but usually catch about 90% or more.

      The gmail interface bugs me. It takes forever to load. By the time my mailbox appears I've already read half my mail in FM. It's designed to work in a single window, but I prefer to open everything in tabs and then work my way through them. FM offers me that option.

      That said, I have all my incoming mail at FM forwarded to a gmail account for backup, and then I use the gmail notifier on that account to let me know when I have new mail at FM. Kind of backwards, but it works.

    9. Re:Fastmail by hollywoodb · · Score: 1

      I have a fastmail.fm account, I'm a "Full" member, so I pay a subscription (every three years iirc).

      GMail's spam filtering doesn't compare to FastMail's at the "Full" level, I can't comment on the free account level. I very very rarely have a false-positive with FastMail's spam filtering, and it very rarely misses spam. At my service level you can define your own rulesets as well if that's your thing. Also, in my experience FastMail.fm is significantly faster than GMail, and works with more browsers. I can use links or lynx if I want to with FastMail.fm depending on my environment.

      Personally I only use GMail as an account I use when I signup for things I may not use often, mailing lists for various open source projects, etc. For anything serious/important. I greatly prefer FastMail.

      Maybe I'm old-fashioned, but I like defining rules and using "folders" more than GMails tagging approach. FastMail.fm also has an impeccable service record. They have a "blog" here for up-to-date goings-on, and there is http://fastmail.fm/beta/ which is what I use as it occasionally offers features that haven't gone mainstream yet.

      --
      I may have to share this planet with animals, but I'm doing my damn best to eat every last one of them.
    10. Re:Fastmail by maeka · · Score: 1

      I get loads of spam in my GMail even though I've never given it to anyone, which I think speaks for itself. 1 or 2 spams a week with Fastmail and I've had it for 8+ years.

      Odd, I have two unpublished GMail accounts, and in their seventeen months of life they haven't received over a dozen spams total.
      The other reply to your post said that GMail has an undocumented feature where improperly addressed mail is delivered to the "nearest neighbor" - a feature (if true) I find offputting - but assuming it is true perhaps my accounts aren't very "neighborly".
    11. Re:Fastmail by maeka · · Score: 1

      After replying to the grandparent post, I got to thinking a little bit more about your statement that "gmail automatically delivers mail that does not match a gmail recipient to the closest one."
      So I ran a little experiment.
      From a variety of email accounts I emailed a message to a collection of misspelled, misread, and mistyped variations on my account name.
      dmhal@gmail.com, dmhalll@gmail.com, dmhalk@gmail.com, dhall@gmail.com, dmha11@gmail.com, dhall@gmail.com, and dmhalls@gmail.com all came back "PERM_FAILURE: SMTP Error (state 9): 550 5.1.1 No such user"

    12. Re:Fastmail by tmarthal · · Score: 1

      Hrrm, you're right. I just sent out a few emails and noticed the same thing.

      I think that the behavior that I was describing (but never empirically recorded**) originated around the time when the 'dot' in account names/emails were being ignored and there were then multiple destinations for the same email. What I mean is that x.yz@gmail was unique to xyz@gmail; yet they instituted the change that x.y.z+${description} would all be routed to the xyz@gmail address. So, what it looked liked they were doing was figuring out where best to send the mail and deliver it there. I don't know exactly though, but obviously they discontinued this.

      **My gmail is my last name which starts with a pretty typical women's name 'martha'. I was getting messages sent to addresses like martha@gmail.com and marthax12314. it was awhile though since I have verified all of my spam and random mail being delivered is correctly addressed.

  7. It's about time... by jsight · · Score: 3, Insightful

    Now if only they would add IMAP support and improve security, they might have a chance of being successful with Google for Domains.

    1. Re:It's about time... by gkhan1 · · Score: 2

      If by "improving your security", you mean that they don't use SSL when reading your mail, you are sadly mistaken. You can use SSL, they make it optional. If you go to https://mail.google.com instead of just http://mail.google.com/ (note the https), you get SSL all the way. If you meant "doesn't use PGP", well, no web-mail provider does. Use a client instead.

    2. Re:It's about time... by jsight · · Score: 2, Interesting

      It's a major weakness that I have to use a client for S/MIME capability, but they don't support the best protocol for doing this (IMAP).

      With regards to SSL, my issues there mostly apply to Google for domains. As far as I know, they don't allow you to mandate SSL for that either, and that is a weakness in an environment where you can't always trust your users to access with optional security every time.

    3. Re:It's about time... by gkhan1 · · Score: 1

      I can't speak really about google for domains, but if you run that, shouldn't you be able to just redirect the standard portal to the secure one? However, I know nothing about it, so I bow to your knowledge. As for per-mail security I use GnuPG and Thunderbird over POP and I don't have any problem with it (and I get a fuckload of mail). I realize IMAP is better, but surely POP is "good enough" for most circumstances?

    4. Re:It's about time... by jsight · · Score: 1

      It's not good enough if you want all of your email to be accessible from the client, but organized into folders on the server. :)

    5. Re:It's about time... by Bert64 · · Score: 1

      There are plenty of webmail systems which support PGP, squirrelmail, horde-imp etc... Just that none of the free webmail providers support it, but there are paid ones which do...
      I can even provide such accounts fairly cheap, bert64@sdp.firenzee.com

      --
      http://spamdecoy.net - free throwaway anonymous email - avoid spam!
    6. Re:It's about time... by sasdrtx · · Score: 1

      Gmail's take on POP3 is pretty nice. It works like any other POP3 server, except you have the option to never delete any messages off the server. Works for me.

      --
      Most people don't even think inside the box.
  8. here comes the spam by superwiz · · Score: 1, Insightful

    By invitation only was a perfect way to protect against spammers signing up quickly. Well, not perfect, but at least you could always know who the root of the spam tree was and could handle the whole tree. Now they (at Google) destroyed the reason for their own success.

    --
    Any guest worker system is indistinguishable from indentured servitude.
    1. Re:here comes the spam by jrwr00 · · Score: 0

      the whole SMS sign-up deal still stops some spammers,

    2. Re:here comes the spam by multipartmixed · · Score: 1

      PSSSSSSSST!

      Spamming is when you *send* UCE. Signing up to gmail allows you to *receive* mail.

      Unless you think the spammers have *so many* people they could actually poison the filters by clicking on the "no, this viagra email ISN'T spam button"

      --

      Do daemons dream of electric sleep()?
    3. Re:here comes the spam by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      I'm not sure if you're being purposefully dense, but if a spammer gets an account easily with gmail, he can use it to send emails to people.

    4. Re:here comes the spam by Nasarius · · Score: 1

      if a spammer gets an account easily with gmail, he can use it to send emails to people.
      GP doesn't make sense as a reply, but I doubt Gmail would be a good platform for spammers, certainly no more so than Hotmail et al. I'm guessing that sending out a few bulk emails would get your account and IP flagged pretty quickly, especially if the messages set off the spam filters.
      --
      LOAD "SIG",8,1
    5. Re:here comes the spam by sholden · · Score: 1

      Because it's so difficult to send it without one. Hence why there has been no spam at all prior to this.

    6. Re:here comes the spam by mgblst · · Score: 1

      He is probably talking about the nigerian bastars, who spam/scam you when you advertise anything for sale.

      And it is a shame, usually warning signs would go up when I got an email from yahoo (or less often hotmail). Hopefully they will all still stay at yahoo.

    7. Re:here comes the spam by maxume · · Score: 1

      I get plenty of spam from 'legitimate' yahoo email addresses, i.e., they contain correct spf headers. I imagine the gp was talking about similar happening with gmail now.

      --
      Nerd rage is the funniest rage.
    8. Re:here comes the spam by superwiz · · Score: 1

      Umm... no, gmail allows you to send and receive. As a matter of fact, I use it as my outgoing server. Very conveniently this allows me to not have to reconfigure my laptop all the time. Now spammers can hope accounts by creating one gmail account for every mass spamming they create. Before (when google knew who the root of the tree was) this could have been easily stopped.

      --
      Any guest worker system is indistinguishable from indentured servitude.
  9. Surge in users? by EveryNickIsTaken · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Great. Now we get to see how Gmail handles thousands of accounts being created just to send out spam.

    1. Re:Surge in users? by Red_Foreman · · Score: 0, Interesting

      Not only does GMail have a much better spam filter, but Google will proabbly do what MS won't - aggressively delete spammer email addresses.

      Besides, most spam is generated from zombie windows boxes in South Korea, anyways.

      Still, if you don't want spam, don't publish your email address and only give it to competent people.

    2. Re:Surge in users? by EveryNickIsTaken · · Score: 1, Insightful

      Given that Google so far has done a horrible job at policing their YouTube users (as far as copyrighted + inappropriate/obscene/pr0n content), I'm not quite sure why you think they'd suddenly do an excellent job at policing spammers within Gmail.

    3. Re:Surge in users? by daeg · · Score: 3, Insightful

      They have incentive to police spammers that use gmail accounts -- volume reduction. If every spammer that uses a gmail account sends enough e-mail to fill a full 2GB (in the Sent folder), that also nets 2 GB on the receiving end -- removing the spammer's account can reduce storage requirements by up to 4GB per spammer removed.

      They also will get a very nice benefit to closing spammer accounts -- their sent folders are 100% spam. What better way to see what tricks spammers are using than have 2GB of sent spam in one easy location? They can easily see what percentage of that spam folder was then in turn delivered as non-spam and how many users read it and marked it as not-spam.

    4. Re:Surge in users? by DaFallus · · Score: 1, Informative
      From the sign up site which I'm assuming you didn't look at:

      You need to receive and enter a special invitation code in order to create an account. Currently, we are only sending these codes as text messages to mobile phones. So you will need to have a mobile phone with text message capabilities (most phones have this) and the invitation code itself.

      One of the reasons we are offering this new way to sign up for Gmail is to help protect our users and combat abuse. Spam and abuse protection are two things we take very seriously, and our users have been very happy with the small amount of spam they've received in their Gmail accounts. We take many measures to ensure that spammers have a difficult time sending their spam messages, getting these messages delivered, or even obtaining a Gmail account (spammers will often use many different accounts to send spam). Sending invitation codes to mobile phones via SMS is one way to address this, as the number of accounts per phone number can be limited.

      If you want to open an account a different way, you may want to ask a friend with a mobile phone to receive an invitation code for you or to ask someone you know who already has a Gmail account to email you an invitation.
      Sucks if you don't have a cell phone or free text messaging, but I think this addresses your concerns regarding spam.
      --
      No one cares what your captcha was

      Houston TX, USA
    5. Re:Surge in users? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      If you want to open an account a different way, you may want to ask a friend with a mobile phone to receive an invitation code for you or to ask someone you know who already has a Gmail account to email you an invitation. Sucks if you don't have a cell phone or free text messaging, but I think this addresses your concerns regarding spam. Sucks if spammers are your only friends.
    6. Re:Surge in users? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I sure hope Google is smart and doesn't keep multiple copies of the same message. That is real volume reduction

  10. It's just a publicity stunt by betterunixthanunix · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Come on. I can't think of anybody who wasn't able to get a GMail account. If a large number of users necessitated a drop in storage, it would have happened a long time ago.

    --
    Palm trees and 8
    1. Re:It's just a publicity stunt by harves · · Score: 2, Insightful

      I agree there won't be a large drop in storage space, but...

      I would expect there's a large number of people who don't have the option of using gmail. Remember, everyone you know, probably knows you; if they wanted GMail access they would ask you for an invite. What of those slowly-entering-the-technology-age households who don't have anyone they can easily ask? You know, the kind of people you *don't* hang out with? There's got to be a decent number.

    2. Re:It's just a publicity stunt by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      They could have used one of the sites that takes 'donation' invites and sends them to people that request it. It's how I got my gmail.

    3. Re:It's just a publicity stunt by tepples · · Score: 1

      They could have used one of the sites that takes 'donation' invites and sends them to people that request it. It's how I got my gmail.

      Google has since requested that those sites cease their operations.

    4. Re:It's just a publicity stunt by MMC+Monster · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Most people don't ask for invitations to new email systems. They use what they have or try to register a new one. GMail in the U.S. has been open so long as you have a valid (cell?) phone number, which is pretty good penetration.

      If someone wants a new service (particularly for increased storage), they would likely have heard about the increased storage (compared to what they had in the past, at least) at Yahoo mail and Hotmail as well.

      --
      Help! I'm a slashdot refugee.
    5. Re:It's just a publicity stunt by chimpo13 · · Score: 0, Redundant

      I sent an envelope full of tiny monkeys to someone for my invite.

      Plastic monkeys. Ateles paniscus plasticus.

  11. Playing the same game MS played by 140Mandak262Jamuna · · Score: 4, Interesting
    First get all the data of the users into its servers, relatively easily, cheaply and painlessly. Like Word5' importing WordPerfect or Excel importing Lotus123 without any hitch. Once all the data is safely collected MS increased the switching costs and made it nearly impossible to get back to the competitors. Till date it keeps changing file formats, macro language, APIS, look and feel and tries enshrine even the bugs in Word5 as the new "standard" "open" document format!!!

    In the case of Google, it will find increasing the switching costs to get out of gmail not very easy. Reason are:

    1. It uses a simple browser as its interface and it does not have the same level of control over http protocols and XML protocols MS enjoyed over Windows platform.

    2. Users have become more aware of these issues. The resurgence of OpenOffice and fandom of Firefox shows that.

    3. Google says its motto is "dont do evil" and atleast part of its fan base is taking it at face value.

    Overall, IMHO, if google wrests significant portion of the data from the clutches of MS and shows how advantageous it could be for companies and users to keep their data in a format with eye on the switching costs it would benefit the consumers.

    --
    sed -e 's/Chuck Norris/Rajnikant/g' joke > fact
    1. Re:Playing the same game MS played by thue · · Score: 5, Informative

      Google is actually "not being evil" here, by making it easy to extract your email.

      Just go to "settings"->"forwarding and pop" and select "Enable POP for all mail (even mail that's already been downloaded)". You can then download a copy of all the mail to your computer using a normal email client (You can choose to keep a copy on gmail). You can also get all mail automatically forwarded to an outside email address.

      That makes it easy to switch email provider; I used it the other day to download a copy of all my email, just in case. It seems to me that Google has chosen not to lock in users, but to simply try retain customers by being better. Which is the way it should be, and which makes me more comfortable relying on google services in the future.

      Regards, Thue

    2. Re:Playing the same game MS played by mgblst · · Score: 1

      Yes, this is ok. I still wish they had a backup option, that would save all your messages into a big file for you to store somewhere. That would be perfect.

    3. Re:Playing the same game MS played by Nasarius · · Score: 1

      Exactly. If you're not keeping backups of your own data, and trusting a free service, you're crazy. But Google is generally quite good at letting you get your data in standard formats. POP3 for Gmail, iCal for Google Calender, various formats for Google Docs & Spreadsheets, etc. I don't trust Google more than I trust any other company, but worrying about vendor lock-in just doesn't make any sense here.

      --
      LOAD "SIG",8,1
    4. Re:Playing the same game MS played by J-1000 · · Score: 1

      Just go to "settings"->"forwarding and pop" and select "Enable POP for all mail (even mail that's already been downloaded)". You can then download a copy of all the mail to your computer using a normal email client (You can choose to keep a copy on gmail). You can also get all mail automatically forwarded to an outside email address.
      Exactly. Google not only grants POP access but also allows forwarding. Compare this to an account at Yahoo! where you cannot do either of these things unless you pay a $20 annual fee. This creates a significant barrier for people wanting to switch, even for a person such as myself who has been "happily" paying the fee for years. You see, once I switch mail providers I'll want to stop paying Yahoo's fee, which in turn will cancel the forwarding....
    5. Re:Playing the same game MS played by Nasarius · · Score: 1

      Download everything with POP3 using your favorite email client, then zip up the folder. I don't think there's any universal format for email aside from mbox, so this is about as easy as it gets.

      --
      LOAD "SIG",8,1
    6. Re:Playing the same game MS played by iabervon · · Score: 1

      I don't see why Google would have to make it difficult to extract your data. Unlike Microsoft, they're not planning to make their users want to switch away, because their business model doesn't put them in an adversarial position with respect to their users. (Their business model is based on showing ads to people who might actually want what's advertized, which is beneficial to everybody involved.)

      Most business models involve making it easy for people to adopt your product at some point. That doesn't mean that the rest of the plan is the same.

      Chances are that, if Google acted like Microsoft, they'd be sued by their stockholders, because their prospectus actually says that their future value is based on having a good reputation, and that they intend to sacrifice short-term profits for this reputation.

    7. Re:Playing the same game MS played by CitX · · Score: 0

      At some point I see them charging a fee for POP/IMAP access. Especially as the ad market matures and they need new sources of revenue.

    8. Re:Playing the same game MS played by lahvak · · Score: 1

      Actually, if you really use mbox format, you will have all your mail in one file. If you use MH or another folder based format (IMHO better than mbox), you will end up with a folder. Either way, you can bzip2 the file or tar and bzip2 the folder for archiving purposes. And most of standard email clients will be able to access either of them.

      --
      AccountKiller
    9. Re:Playing the same game MS played by cobbaut · · Score: 1

      You are all forgetting that with Gmail pop access you DO NOT get your "Sent Mail", only the Inbox.
      I would like to see an option to have a local backup copy of All Mail, not just the Inbox.

      Paul

      --
      European Linux user, living in Antwerp
    10. Re:Playing the same game MS played by thue · · Score: 1

      As I said, I just took a backup of all my email. After checking the "Enable POP for all mail (even mail that's already been downloaded)" button mention in my initial post, I was able to download all mail, not just the mail in my inbox.

    11. Re:Playing the same game MS played by aerthling · · Score: 1

      I get my own sent Gmail mail through POP, and always have.

  12. Let the Spamming Begin by popo · · Score: 1

    Now will I receive as much spam as I do from Hotmail addresses?

    --
    ------ The best brain training is now totally free : )
    1. Re:Let the Spamming Begin by marto · · Score: 1

      Perhaps, if you publish your email address. I have found the Gmail system to deal with spam much better than Hotmail ever has.

    2. Re:Let the Spamming Begin by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      I have both. My Hotmail address is older and ends with a string of 5 numbers. My Gmail was made for business and to just look better than the stupid name I choose for Hotmail (about, oh, 7-8 years ago in high school).

      I have since made the Gmail my main and switched over a few forum accounts to it. The result? I'm getting around 5 emails of crap at Gmail (which only happened in the last couple of months) and probably less than 1 a month at the Hotmail account. A bit of the spam as actually gotten past the filter in Gmail but it's a rare occasion and never have I found mail in the spam section that should have made it into the main inbox.

  13. Kinda irrelevant by Atilla · · Score: 1

    Invite spoolers have been around for some time.

    --
    --- sig moved for great justice.
    1. Re:Kinda irrelevant by Bwana+Geek · · Score: 1

      True. That's how I got my account. Anybody who really wants Gmail and never thought to use *gasp* Google to find a way to get an account without an invitation... meh. They're probably perfectly happy with their Yahoo! account.

  14. Worldwide BETA by dlim · · Score: 2, Funny

    Open to the world, yet it's still a "Beta" application. Huh.

    1. Re:Worldwide BETA by Overzeetop · · Score: 4, Insightful

      And this is different from other large applications like, say, Vista how?

      --
      Is it just my observation, or are there way too many stupid people in the world?
    2. Re:Worldwide BETA by scuba964 · · Score: 1

      GMail is a large application? Huh. I think it is infinitesimal compared to Vista....

    3. Re:Worldwide BETA by bogd · · Score: 1
      Open to the world, yet it's still a "Beta" application


      I take it you've never used Windows before?

    4. Re:Worldwide BETA by digitig · · Score: 2, Funny

      Oh, that's unfair. Windows is nowhere near ready for beta yet!

      --
      Quidnam Latine loqui modo coepi?
  15. Here's to hoping frivolous accounts kept in check by Merkwurdigeliebe · · Score: 1

    So, I hope that we don't begin to see inumerable amounts of bot-generated Gmail accountslike one finds in other web-based email services.

  16. old article (2004) and you need a cell phone.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Informative

    That article is 2.5 years old.... There is no link at Gmail allowing a free signup without a cell phone.

    This is what Gmail says about signing up currently:

    Can I sign up without the invitation code? Or without a mobile phone?
    http://mail.google.com/support/bin/answer.py?ctx=m obile&answer=22245&hl=en

  17. Need Invite by Dr_Mic · · Score: 1

    Ya, I've danced around the gmail pages, and I don't have the text messaging capability required. Can anyone send me a Gmail invite?

    1. Re:Need Invite by theguru · · Score: 2, Funny

      Since I can't seem to find a way to contact you in your profile, here: http://mail.google.com/mail/a-918525b4ed-0d5b5e7fa 7-d5b4b8634a

      You get to race the rest of the world for it :)

    2. Re:Need Invite by aj50 · · Score: 1

      Not unless you give them your e-mail Interestingly, I can see a signup link which doesn't ask me for a mobile number

      --
      I wish to remain anomalous
    3. Re:Need Invite by AKAImBatman · · Score: 1

      If you want a GMail account, just send an email to the address in my Slashdot profile. I'll send you an invite in return.

    4. Re:Need Invite by Dr_Mic · · Score: 1

      hrmmm, I'm newish to slashdot (as you can see by my ID) and thought there was a user to user message system that didn't need email. Oh well, hopefully I've changed my display email options.

    5. Re:Need Invite by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Dude, did you even look? His email is linked to from the message you replied to!

    6. Re:Need Invite by theguru · · Score: 1

      Yes, because he updated his profile to show it after he realized it wasn't visible.

  18. I dont see "Sign up" by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I dont see the "sign up" link at all at www.gmail.com. (Cleared cache etc)

    Either this is geographically limited or Google is slow to implement it in all countries....

  19. i love gmail by teh_chrizzle · · Score: 4, Informative

    i'll be the first to admit that i am a pretty serious google fanboy and i haven't used a fastmail account so proceed with caution.

    i have two public access unix accounts, one on SDF and one on hobbiton (hobbiton stopped being public access like 6 years ago). two years ago there was a sudden astronomical increase in the amount of spam that i was getting on both accounts. both systems had not yet set up greylisting or some other anti-spam measures and so i was worried that i would have to abandon an email address that i have had for almost 10 years.

    i got a gmail invite from a friend and set up my new account, and gmail has an option where you can choose to send mail as another account and make that the default method for sending mail, so i set up my gmail account to send as the two unix accounts and then added the gmail address to a .forward for each shell account.

    so now i use gmail as the central store for all of my email. now that both shell accounts have graylisting and other spam filtering i take advantage of that PLUS gmail's ability to bucket spam, so i have not seen a spam email in something like 6 months. i could go back to the old way (i look really oldschool using ssh to check my mail with pine) but i have become so lazy and spoiled thanks to gmail that there is no real reason to go back.

    so, if you want to keep your old address and switch to gmail, it is possible, provided your old provider has some means for you to forward your mail.

    --
    sarcasm:
    -noun
    1. harsh or bitter derision or irony.
  20. WHAT???? No Way!!!! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    You mean I am no longer one of the very select, very few, Chosen and Invited Ones of the email aristocracy???

    Say it ain't so... ;)

    (Love my Gmail)

    1. Re:WHAT???? No Way!!!! by RaNdOm+OuTpUt · · Score: 0

      You (as well as everyone who got an invite in the past, which includes me (T3H AWESOME!!!11!!)) still are "the very select, very few, Chosen and Invited Ones of the email aristocracy". But now other people get to visit.

      --
      13. Any legal action is absolutly excluded. (Pi World Ranking List rules)
  21. Comment removed by account_deleted · · Score: 1

    Comment removed based on user account deletion

  22. There Goes the Neighborhood by beerdini · · Score: 1

    Welcome mass flood of spammers to Gmail! True there were some out there before, but now that it is open its just going to get thousands of times worse. Hopefully they tweak up their internal spam filter to allow for their own domain.

    I'm just glad I got in early enough that I have the names that I wanted before they got snatched up and added extra numbers or other junk to them.

  23. bummer by Mantorp · · Score: 1

    I was hoping to trade 1000 gmail invites for a joost invite

  24. a nagging problem about gmail by supernova87a · · Score: 5, Insightful

    This may be a little off topic, but maybe many others here will benefit from discussing this same concern. I love Gmail, but there is a problem I see that's been slowly nagging me:

    I use Gmail to read the messages off my work/academic Pine accounts, and it has rapidly become my main way to check email because it has a great feature set, and Gmail doesn't pull some of the stupid tricks that other free email services do. I also use it to send messages (i.e. the "from:" field pretending as if it is one of the other work/school accounts I have), and rapidly I'm accumulating email on my Gmail account that now doesn't exist elsewhere.

    However, sometime in the far off future, Gmail may decide not to work one day, or there may be a new technology to replace it. We can't know for sure. So I would like to be able to have a backup of that mail just in case. As much as I trust Gmail and like Google, I need some way to keep my mail on my own, because if it were all lost, it would be awful.

    Couldn't they offer a service, for some reasonable amount of $$, where they would burn my entire Gmailbox onto a DVD and send it to me? With the size of my mailbox, POP downloading is becoming impossible, and this would also be a great way to give users some peace of mind.

    or has anyone else felt this worry, and come up with an interesting/workable solution??

    1. Re:a nagging problem about gmail by the_macman · · Score: 1

      With the size of my mailbox, POP downloading is becoming impossible

      Why? You only have to download all your messages once, then from there on you only download new ones as they come in. Thousands of people, including me, using a POP3 client for their gmail and have local copies of all their emails.

      -JT
    2. Re:a nagging problem about gmail by aug24 · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Watch and see.

      Only last week, some poster here complained that there was no 'open in docs' link for .doc file attachments in gmail. All of three days later (IIRC) it appeared, and I've been using it with pleasure. I hadn't realised I wanted it till it was pointed out.

      So someone there is prolly surfing /. and you may get your wish.

      Justin.

      --
      You're only jealous cos the little penguins are talking to me.
    3. Re:a nagging problem about gmail by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I'd like to think (especially with the upcoming paid business version of the apps) that they'll eventually get around to having *.ics attachments be able to be directly linked into calendar. Right now I have to save them locally. Then manually upload them into calendar (where they only work about 1/2 the time anyway ... grr.)

      If you have slick email/calendar integration, that is over half the battle in getting small businesses to move from Exchange/Outlook.

    4. Re:a nagging problem about gmail by IndieKid · · Score: 1

      Allowing users to request a DVD backup of their e-mail sounds slightly implausible. It might be easier if they allowed users to download a compressed archive of their e-mails instead (say in zip format). Most e-mails are plain text and would compress quite well, saving users bandwidth and lengthy download times. Maybe GMail could do something clever like concatenating e-mail chains into single e-mails when they are downloaded over POP3 (a configurable option, naturally) like they do in their UI; this would save bandwidth and download times too.

    5. Re:a nagging problem about gmail by supernova87a · · Score: 1

      Why? You only have to download all your messages once, then from there on you only download new ones as they come in. Thousands of people, including me, using a POP3 client for their gmail and have local copies of all their emails.

      two problems with this:

      1. Since I haven't used POP ever with the account, on that first download it is going to try to download about 1GB of messages. And in some tests so far, Gmail is not reliable about how far it gets done. It will stop at some arbitrary message and say it's finished, but it's not.

      2. This doesn't cover messages sent *from* the Gmail account, that are not cc:ed/copied to the other accounts. Outgoing mail sent via Gmail will not be POP downloaded because they are not "received mail" to Gmail.

      I could bcc: myself on everything. But this is not an available option by default, and sometimes you forget.
    6. Re:a nagging problem about gmail by supernova87a · · Score: 1

      as a side note, this problem is even more important for people who, unlike me, don't have any other email accounts whose mail is getting forwarded to Gmail to read. For users who use Gmail as their only/primary account, a backup is even more important. Just think of that Lycos user who caused all that trouble over permanently deleted email. Google doesn't tell you how long your account is valid for, does it? A hard copy of your mail in your hands is priceless.

    7. Re:a nagging problem about gmail by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Informative

      Actually, when I bought my new laptop, I set up POP with Gmail and Outlook. I had well over a gig of mail in my Gmail mailbox. You're right when you say it will just download to an arbitrary spot and stop, but the next time you open Outlook up, it will resume the process. I wasn't very stressed about it, so I didn't hurry up the process, but just opening Outlook once or twice daily had my Gmail box downloaded in a week or so.

      Don't worry about your sent items. Mail that I send out is downloaded into my Outlook inbox. I then have a rule move it into the sent items folder.

    8. Re:a nagging problem about gmail by TheCarp · · Score: 1

      Have you considered asking their support if they can offer this, maybe as a pay service.

      You never know... they may already be willing to do that for a fee if you ask.

      Though, don't you only pop download new messages? Why not setup another mailbox somewhere, pop everything off, then setup a filter rule that sends a copy of each message off to the other mailbox. That way you have a real auto-updating archive.

      Then just BCC that mailbox on everything you send too.

      -Steve

      --
      "I opened my eyes, and everything went dark again"
    9. Re:a nagging problem about gmail by Lord+Ender · · Score: 1

      What kind of a crap ISP do you have which makes it impossible to download two gigs if data? Are you on a research station in Antarctica? You won't get much sympathy over having to download two gigs from slashdot. Most people here download CD and DVD images on a regular basis.

      --
      A slashdotter who didn't build his own computer is like a Jedi who didn't build his own lightsaber.
    10. Re:a nagging problem about gmail by jbarr · · Score: 1

      supernova77a,

      I just set up POP on Gmail, and use Thunderbird to do the backup. Yes, the first time, it will have to download EVERYTHING, but once that is done, it's very simple on an ongoing basis.

      Some tips:

      1. Initial Transfer
      For some reason, Thunderbird wouldn't download ALL my emails at once (I had over 3000 messages at the time.) It seemed to pull them in in blocks of a few hundred at a time. It took a number of repeated download sessions to complete the entire download. Yes, it was a bit tedious, but it really wasn't that bad.

      2. Downloading New Messages
      Once you do the initial download, Thunderbird only downloads NEW messages, so succeeding download session times are very, very short.

      3. Set It Up To Work Automatically
      If you have an always-on connection at home (cable, DSL) then set up Thunderbird on a spare PC or on a PC you leave on all the time to auto-download messages. Just set it to download once or twice per day. Honestly, you don't need it to download any more frequently than that.

      4. Take It With You
      Portable Thunderbird would make it a snap to move the files to another location should the need arise.

      5. Just Let It Run
      Once you set it up and get things going, it a set-it-and-forget-it deal. Just occasionally go into Thunderbird and move the messages from the Inbox to a GMail folder and mark 'em all as read.

      6. Labels are NOT transferred
      You lose ALL Labels, so you lose all the associated organization. Is this a potential hassle? Absolutely! But to me, the simple peace of mind of having an offline backup far outweighs that. Besides, with a client like THunderbird, searching is easy.

      I detailed this on my Gmail Tips site...

      -Jim

      --
      My mom always said, "Jim, you're 1 in a million." Given the current population, there are 7000 of me. God help us all!
    11. Re:a nagging problem about gmail by Mex · · Score: 1

      Oh my god, are you kidding? Gmail lets you forward all your mail to any POP3 account.

      I think it would be reasonable to spend a couple of hours downloading your 2 gigs of email forwards with Thunderbird, on any POP3 account, and keep that on your hard drive.

      I mean, that service could be interesting, but... wow, I thought slashdot was for nerds.

    12. Re:a nagging problem about gmail by Evro · · Score: 1

      I'm sorry, but that's a ridiculous idea. They let you download it. It can't be more than 3 gigs, so just download it. This is the worst complaint I've ever heard for Gmail.

      --
      rooooar
    13. Re:a nagging problem about gmail by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I live in the boonies. Nearest tv cable is 10 miles away. The phone company CO is 4 miles away, far more than 10,000 feet, so no DSL. That leaves dialup and satellite. You can't download 2Gb on dialup. Satelite is expensive and would be iffy at best for downloading 2Gb.

    14. Re:a nagging problem about gmail by vaporland · · Score: 1
      --
      Ask Me About... The 80's!
    15. Re:a nagging problem about gmail by Lord+Ender · · Score: 1

      You have my sympathy.

      Access to modern technology was a primary reason I moved to a metropolis.

      --
      A slashdotter who didn't build his own computer is like a Jedi who didn't build his own lightsaber.
    16. Re:a nagging problem about gmail by Echemus · · Score: 1

      1. You can set at which date you want messages downloaded. eg, you can say that you only messages received after a certain date downloaded via POP.

      2. Sent messages are downloaded via POP, I have a procmail rule to filter them into my local Sent folder, so they do not appear in my inbox.

  25. Re:Offtopic: As anyone... by beckerist · · Score: 0, Offtopic

    Dragon hunting was actually really cool. The first person view takes away from the "reader as the subject" personal feel, so it was difficult to get into, but the ending (though expected) was pretty good. You definitely could use an editor: your punctuation is all over the place, starting (incomplete) sentences with And ("And flew away."), etc.
    You kept the same tense throughout: good.
    You didn't end sentences with prepositions: good.
    Funny / Entertaining story: good.
    I give Dragon Hunting an 8/10. Anyone who says otherwise is an Anonymous Douchebag. :)

    By the way, I'm already aware this is off topic but feel free to waste your mod points on me.

  26. Re:wow by petabyte · · Score: 1

    finally........i havent managed to score a gmail account yet!

    Hmm, see that actually suprises me. I've been using gmail for quite a while - its perfect for webmail and I forward my homepage's mail to it. I got my invite by going to one of those sites that banks invites from people and will send you one if you request it.

    That said, am I the only one who was taken aback by the saved searches feature? I don't care that google has it, I DO care very much that it was enabled by default and I had a bunch of saved searches before I disabled the functionally. I then had to clear out all of the saved searches. That was not cool and in my opinion, a bad move on google's part.

    I really hope that projects like RoundCube continue to develop. If the day ever comes where I want to get off the gmail ride, I'd hope to pick up a client just as nice.

  27. Configure GMail to be my spam filter? by RockyPersaud · · Score: 1

    I'm curious about GMail's spam filtering abilities. I've heard that it is pretty good. Can Slashdotters recommend the best way to pass my company's email through GMail and then back to the intended recipient? For example, I have a catch-all address which receives @mycompany.com's email when the recipient doesn't exist, and it just sits there in the catch-all inbox until I clean it out (since my email server's spam filter isn't pushing all the spam to trash). I can configure the catch-all to forward to a gmail account and hope that filters out more of the spam, but is there a better way to do this? And what about legitimated address email, can I filter it through GMail to catch the spam better?

    1. Re:Configure GMail to be my spam filter? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You can forward to a Gmail address, and have a pop pull re-download the mail. Anything filtered as spam wont come back. Use that to determine what Gmail thinks is spam, and nuke it.

      I dont know if that works in bulk.

    2. Re:Configure GMail to be my spam filter? by sherriw · · Score: 1

      Yes, I believe that would work. Gmail allows you to grab up to 5 other email accounts (via pop3).

      If you tried to send those back to the original account though, you might get a loop going.

      I have found that Gmail's spam filters catch almost everything. And I have not experienced a false positive yet.

  28. If the report refers to the mobile phone service by VirusEqualsVeryYes · · Score: 1, Funny

    Shouldn't there be some kind of mechanism in Slashdot to prevent months-old news?

    I must be new here.

  29. Tongue, meet cheek. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Interesting
    This is a 3 year old dupe!

    Selective quoting of discussion follows:

    Prepare to be underhwelmed

    What is left in webmail? The best Google can do is offermore default space than Yahoo and Hotmail. This will cost them money - Yahoo currently soaks $19 a year out of anyone wanting more than 4 MB. Maybe they can do filtering better, but I don't see them outdoing spamassassin etc. Ultimately its just another email address. The geek cachet will wear off quick after everyone you despise starts using googlemail.


    Bad move

    it's a bad bad move on google's part. The infrastructure needed (and the sysadmin) to provide a robust, spam-free , web based email system is of a sheer magnitude greater than just being pure search.
    For starters , the tech support will ramp up ,and add to google's costs. And Googlemail will become the numero uno target for spammers.
    If I were the Google founders, I quite honestly wouldn't bother - it's to much hassle and dilutes the Google "brand".
    But then again, the IPO is coming up, so having a "webmail" component is an easy sell to "analysts" in Five Points ...ahem... Wall Street I mean.


    I really can't see it catching on guys!
  30. Now if only... by proxy318 · · Score: 2, Insightful

    They'd let you use some of that storage for Picasa's web albums. 250MB for pictures, almost 3GB for email? That's kind of ass-backwards.

    --
    Saying your "phone ran out of batteries" is like saying your "car ran out of gas tanks".
    1. Re:Now if only... by mixtape5 · · Score: 1

      You could email yourself the pictures in attachments and store them in Gmail if you wanted to, I've done it.

      --
      WoW: Scheod 70 orc warlock on Shadowmoon
    2. Re:Now if only... by proxy318 · · Score: 1

      Yeah, but that's not the same as the Picasa Web photo albums. They're organized and can do slide shows, etc.

      --
      Saying your "phone ran out of batteries" is like saying your "car ran out of gas tanks".
  31. Yahoo Mail Beta blocks Linux by Xtravar · · Score: 2, Informative

    And at the very same time, Yahoo Mail Beta has blocked Linux users. Maybe it's time to switch.

    --
    Buckle your ROFL belt, we're in for some LOLs.
  32. Brazil only by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Informative
  33. to continue the non sequitur pattern by ClosedSource · · Score: 0, Troll

    I take it you've never used crack before?

  34. illusion of exclusiveness by mixtape5 · · Score: 2, Insightful

    G-mail is hardly exclusive. Anyone that wants a g-mail account can get one. Even if this story is not true, and they have not "opened it for all". I'm sure many of us have gmail accounts with a lot of remaining invites...all anyone who wanted a key has to do is ask around.

    Personally I think its a marketing strategy used by gmail to make people feel special by having it "invite only", but by making so many invites they have destroyed the exclusiveness of it :s

    --
    WoW: Scheod 70 orc warlock on Shadowmoon
    1. Re:illusion of exclusiveness by HawkingMattress · · Score: 1

      Sounds like marketing, but like someone mentioned, it's very possible that the invites were used as a sort of social network mapping tool.
      in that case it make sense to give lots of invites.
      Whatever google does, their final purpose always seems to be to get more data from you.

  35. Re:wow by PieSquared · · Score: 1

    Well, when you realize that nobody has actually found a way to do it without a mobile phone yet I still have 100 unused invites.

    --
    Does a line appended to your comment give your post meaning in and of itself, or only in relation to those without?
  36. Fake capacity by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    > I wonder if we'll see a drop in storage capacity with the increased number of users.

    Unlikely, since it's just a counter.

  37. This is not done lightly .... by cuby · · Score: 1

    Blogger (also a famous google service), recently started the migration of all accounts (optional, for now) to the new ones based on the GMail login. For this reason they must open the subscription to everybody of Blogger who doesn't have a GMail account. From this to open up all the doors is a small step... I think they started the integration of all the company services under the GMail account. It's easier to login but also to track all the users...

    --
    Math is beautiful... e^(pi*i)+1=0
  38. Re:old article (2004) and you need a cell phone... by Cesa · · Score: 1

    Yes there is (a link to a sign up form), try viewing the page via a non-North American proxy (I guess that should work anyway).

  39. UK? All of Europe by Random+BedHead+Ed · · Score: 1

    As I understand it, it's not just Google Mail here in the UK, but throughout all of the EU, since it's actually a German company that owns the Gmail trademark here.

    Funny, I handed out my first invitation to another prospective user (my wife) just three days ago. I have 99 left, and don't need them.

  40. Only now you have to have a cell phone by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I tried to create a new gmail account yesterday but discovered that you can now only create an account if you have a cell phone! This sucks for those of us that can't afford a cell phone. Luckily I got one account long ago when such a thing wasn't required.

  41. Gmail doesn't work with tabs by Pigeon451 · · Score: 3, Interesting

    My biggest gripe is Gmail doesn't work with tabs. When using webmail, I open email into tabs I want to read, and by the time I've finished clicking say 5 or so emails, they have finished loading into my browser and I can switch tabs to view them. Gmail doesn't allow tabbed browsing. Also I find Gmail's interface a bit clunky and limiting, much like Microsoft's products are.

    1. Re:Gmail doesn't work with tabs by smoker2 · · Score: 3, Informative

      My biggest gripe is Gmail doesn't work with tabs....Gmail doesn't allow tabbed browsing.
      It does if you select basic html as the page format.
  42. Didn't need invite/mobile by mavenguy · · Score: 1

    Here in the US I was able to get my first GMail account without an invite or use of mobile phone. Right after Google announced GMail they let people request an account. There were certain Google services that automatically qualified one immediately for GMail ( I forget which one(s)), but I didn't have one of those, so I waited.

    Finally, about 10 months later I received an invite directly from Google, not from any third party.

  43. Excellent by Plutonite · · Score: 1

    So now we can go about the business of signing up without pretending there's something in the way, eh? Should have been done a while ago I think, around the time people started having 90+ unused invites in their accounts. Maybe it's that google is getting more confident about their storage capability, but I doubt it.

    if friends*1000 invites_available_per_capita
            open_it_up_for_gods_sake()

  44. How do I receive SMS on a land-line phone? by tepples · · Score: 3, Insightful

    I noticed a link on mail.google.com
    marked "Sign up for Google Mail"
    http://mail.google.com/mail/signup Which local telephone companies in the United States allow land-line customers to receive SMS? Or do I have to sign up for a 24-month mobile phone contract at $30 per month?
    1. Re:How do I receive SMS on a land-line phone? by VJ42 · · Score: 1

      Clicking on that link from here in the UK, need for an SMS isn't mentioned.

      --
      If I have nothing to hide, you have no reason to search me
    2. Re:How do I receive SMS on a land-line phone? by kv9 · · Score: 1

      you've maid about three posts whining about how expensive mobiles are. we get it. you're not fond of mobiles. how about this: get someone to send you an invite if you really want GMail, or just use another mail provider if it's not worth the hassle. Google products are not mandatory on teh internets.

      and as the article states, and several other posters have mentioned, the service is now open for the masses. it may just take a while until the changes propagate to all the gajillions of servers.

    3. Re:How do I receive SMS on a land-line phone? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Or, you know, $20 for a Tracfone. But why let facts get in the way of a good rant?

    4. Re:How do I receive SMS on a land-line phone? by dissy · · Score: 1

      Which local telephone companies in the United States allow land-line customers to receive SMS? Or do I have to sign up for a 24-month mobile phone contract at $30 per month?

      Short of voip services, no land-line carrier is likely to offer sms, since it originated with the cell networks, their main competition.
      I thought i saw something on skypes site about it with skype in, but didn't look too close.

      One option is to get a free or freeish instant messaging client
      I know Yahoo, AOL AIM, and ICQ all let you send and receive SMS's. I think even Google talk lets you.

    5. Re:How do I receive SMS on a land-line phone? by xaxa · · Score: 1

      Don't they do 'free' phones in the US? I have a pay-as-you-go phone in the UK, I don't pay a monthly fee, just for the calls I make (and SMS, email, WWW etc). The downside is each of those is slightly more expensive than on a contract phone, but I don't use it much anyway. And I had to pay a bit more for the handset when I bought it (the phone was free on any contract but I had to pay £30). Oh, and land-line phones in the UK receive text messages anyway... a robot voice reads them out!

    6. Re:How do I receive SMS on a land-line phone? by LackThereof · · Score: 1

      You still have a land-line telephone?

      Like, copper wires that run from the house to the back of a telephone?

      I think you're at the wrong website. Land-lines are for internet, not for phones. Unless it's VoIP.

      --
      Legalize recreational marijuana. Seriously.
    7. Re:How do I receive SMS on a land-line phone? by alienw · · Score: 1

      Well, you could get a Virgin Mobile phone for $10 with no contracts or monthly fees...

  45. How do I receive SMS on a land-line phone? by tepples · · Score: 1

    While the number of people who can't get text messages may be small

    You mean like everybody who relies on a land-line phone because they don't want to pay $360 per year extra?

  46. Google shut down the spoolers by tepples · · Score: 1

    Invite spoolers have been around for some time.

    I seem to remember Google shutting down the spoolers over a year ago. Now how can people with a land-line phone get an account?

  47. Price for a proxy subscription? by tepples · · Score: 1

    Yes there is (a link to a sign up form), try viewing the page via a non-North American proxy (I guess that should work anyway).

    For people who currently rely on a land-line phone, is a subscription to a reliable non-North American proxy cheaper than a subscription to mobile phone service?

  48. Never realized it was closed by Mainusch · · Score: 1

    If there were hoops to jump through before, they were so negligible that I don't even remember jumping through them.

    --
    Joe Mainusch http://www.weber-amps.com
  49. AdSense can't read pictures by tepples · · Score: 1

    250MB for pictures, almost 3GB for email? That's kind of ass-backwards.

    Gmail has ads, and from all I've read, they use the same contextual algorithm as AdSense. The AdSense engine can't look for keywords in your pictures.

  50. Amazing, but disturbing. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I use Gmail extensively, and it does a remarkable job of identifying spam and automatically putting it into the correct spam folder, where you can zap the entire contents of that folder with a single click. Once every few days, one or two new individual spams might occasionally fool the spam detection filters and sneak past and get into the main inbox folder, and that's not too bad at all. But what's disturbing me the most, is that I also set up a brand new Gmail account with a non-dictionary, oddball random string of characters for the username, and never ever sent any mail to it, or never ever gave that address out to anyone, as a test account to see if spammers would discover that address. Within a month, that account started accumulating spams at about the same rate as my main Gmail account. That proves that somebody is either handing out Gmail address lists to spammers, or spammers are able to extract email addresses out of the Gmail system somehow.

  51. How do I receive SMS on a land-line phone? by tepples · · Score: 0

    There's a big Sign Up For Gmail link

    In which country? When will the invitation be extended to people with land-line telephone service? Why should I have to spend $100 for a prepaid phone and a month of service just to set it up, get a Gmail invite, and cancel my mobile phone account?

  52. SMS w/ ICQ or AIM by Conception · · Score: 1

    If you need a mobile phone, do you perhaps only need an SMS client? I couldn't find any documentation on how to send to AIM or ICQ without just replying, but in theory, could you enter something into the google reg page so it messages your AIM account rather than a phone?

  53. Still requires an invitation? by Corpuscavernosa · · Score: 1

    Invitations to open a Gmail account are still required in North America, Asia and most parts of the South America, but Google spokeswoman Courtney Hohne said those restrictions will be lifted "very soon."

    http://www.physorg.com/news90096289.html

    Now this article was posted 18 hours ago so unless that's "very soon", invitations still seem to be required.

    --
    We figured out a long time ago that it's easier to elect seven judges than to elect 132 legislators.
  54. Comment removed by account_deleted · · Score: 1

    Comment removed based on user account deletion

  55. Re:wow by Zaatxe · · Score: 1

    In Nelson's voice: Ha ha!

    --
    So say we all
  56. Not accessible to Canucks by capebretonsux · · Score: 1

    All I get is the standard invitation-only page, with no sign-up links. I realize from reading other posts that North America isn't included in the non-invitation sign-ups yet, but I don't even have the option to use a mobile phone either. At least the page doesn't allow for my carrier (Rogers) and I don't see 'Canada' as an option under the mobile sign-up page. It's a pity, really, because I've been waiting for a long time to get a gmail account and dump my hotmail account forever. Guess I have to be patient...

    1. Re:Not accessible to Canucks by DrJokepu · · Score: 1

      I can send an invitation for you I you would like.

    2. Re:Not accessible to Canucks by capebretonsux · · Score: 1

      Thanks! If it's possible that you could send me an invitation, it would be greatly appreciated. As I said, I've been waiting to dump my hotmail accounts for some time, and gmail appears to fit the ticket nicely. Thanks again in advance...
      capebretonsux@hotmail.com

  57. Storage and ads by zuhaifi · · Score: 1

    Google is offering a lot of storage for free, which doesn't seem economical. But the company hopes to make money off of e-mail by serving up ads tied to the content of e-mail in your box.

    1. Re:Storage and ads by DarkProphet · · Score: 1

      I've always thought (perhaps incorrectly) that the inbox space google allocates for gmail is unused disk space belonging to all the machines in the googleplex clusters.

      --
      What could possibly hurt the security of the American people more than giving our own government the ability to hide its
  58. Fix. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    where they would burn my entire Gmailbox onto a DVD and send it to me?

    .....
    or has anyone else felt this worry, and come up with an interesting/workable solution??

    Just post your login and password here... and your address.
    I'll send you your DVD full of eMails...
    Don't worry... cost is free the for 1st one. :)
  59. Funny? by extern_void · · Score: 0

    Wow, only one "funny" rated comment until now!
    Thats really funny!
    I know it is over the subject, and it is not funny, please move along.

  60. people just seem to know by fangorious · · Score: 1

    If you have it, you don't need it. If you need it, you don't have it. If you have it you need more of it. If you have more of it, you don't need less of it. You need it to get it. And you certainly need it to get more of it. But if you don't already have any of it to begin with, you can't get any of it to get started, which means you really have no idea how to get it in the first place. Do you? You can share it, sure. You can even stock pile it if you'd like. But you can't fake it. Wanting it. Needing it. Wishing for it. The point is, if you've never had any of it, ever, people just seem to know.

  61. GMail is popular by meist3r · · Score: 2, Informative

    By the way: It's Google Mail in germany too because some other company holds the rights on a "G-Mail" brand.

  62. Making the switch, by BurningFeetMan · · Score: 1

    I made the switch from hotmail to gmail a few years ago, mid 2004, and I've never been happier! Each to their own.

  63. In Soviet Russia... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    In Soviet Russia Art Buys You!!!

  64. Uh, it worked in December by Nathan · · Score: 1

    That's funny, I was able to sign my dad up for gmail with no invite on December 25th. Hrm.

    --
    "E Pluribus Unix"
  65. But are you getting all your ham? by hadaso · · Score: 1

    Getting rid of spam sent to Slashdot users is no big deal. There are many Slashdot users with Gmail accounts, so Gmail's filters should have no problem learning to recognize spam sent to mailing lists compiled from addresses harvested from Slashdot. So you don't see much spam except in the spam "folder". Your private email is a different story. I often see non-spam that Gmail puts in the spam folder, and I see lots of spam there despite the fact that my gmail address had very little circulation (it was only seen by very few people I sent invitation to. Otherwise it is only used by me to forward mail for backup in the Gmail account).

    Besides, I have no idea how Gmail filters spam. I know quite well how FastMail filters spam: the processes are public, the blocklists and policies used in the SMTP gateway are known, and the filtering process is open (Spamassassin - an open source project, and the use of spamassassin scoring is completely customizable by the user).

  66. So this is for the Europeans by hadaso · · Score: 1

    The way I see it, Google will soon have to do in mainland Europe what it had to do in the UK - block users from registering @gmail.com addresses because someone else owns the trademark. So right now it allows Europeans to register @gmail addresses while they still can...

  67. The main difference between Fastmail and Gmail by hadaso · · Score: 1

    The difference between Fastmail and Gmail is that Gmail is run by a billion dollars corporation with huge infrastructure and has about 30,000,000 subscribers and FastMail.FM is run by a few developers on two racks with open source software and has only a 1,000,000 subscribers (perhaps a bit less).

    And the main difference is that if you contact Gmail with a question or suggestion you get a form reply (to their credit they never called back but they did implement some of the suggestions I made). When you contact FastMail you usually get a reply from a developer and often the reply is something like ,"login to /beta/ and see if it works now". There are advantages and disadvantages to this.

    There are people using both FastMail and Gmail (like I do) and enjoy both worlds. Both allow forwarding (free FastMail accounts require a little hacking that is documented in the FastMail wiki to do it) and cross-forwarding works great (both have duplicate suppression. In FastMail it is a documented fact. In Gmail it seems to work). There are people who like Gmail's interface better, and there are people who like FastMail's interface better, and of course FastMail has IMAP functionality on all membership levels including free accounts, so you can choose your interface. FastMail's interface is much geekier, but I guess for many Slashdotters this is an advantage.

    I think Fastmail is worth checking out by Slashdotters at least to see how much functinality can be crammed into one webmail client. So go to Fastmail.FM and try it . Even if you don't adopt it as your main account you'd probably enjoy the experience and find some uses for it. (And if you don't want them to know I sent you remove the STKI parameter from the URL. Unlike Gmail, FastMail would not disclose to me who used my referal but only how many people used it).

  68. There's hardly any Spam going out of Hotmail by hadaso · · Score: 1

    There's hardly any Spam going out of Hotmail. Spam with a Hotmail return address usually is not sent by Hotmail. I have reported thousands of spam messages through SpamCop and have seen very few spam messages that were really sent from Hotmail's servers.

    Email protocols are open standards. Anyone can use any address to identify with, and it is much easier for spammers to to pump out their spam with their own software that they run on the huge networks of computers they form from computers they hijack by infecting them with malware (botnets).

    Webmail providers have tools to detect multiple signups and catch spammers, and Google's invitation system already let a spammer send himself (or herself?) 100 invitations (and then 10000 etc.) and yet there was very little spam coming out of Gmail, so they must have their spammer detection tools working OK, just like Hotmail and Yahoo do.

  69. It is also GMail in the UK by michaelkenward · · Score: 1

    It is also GMail in the UK

    --
    MK