Slashdot Mirror


Linux Starts to Find Home on Desktops

WSJdpatton writes "The much-hyped notion that Linux would be a viable alternative to Windows to run desktop and notebook PCs for corporate users seemed dead on arrival a few years ago. But the idea is showing some new vital signs as companies look for cheaper alternatives to Microsoft products. The Wall Street Journal outlines several firms that are reaping savings and stability on their workplace desktops by rolling out Linux distributions. 'Auto maker PSA Peugeot Citroën last month said it will start using Linux on 20,000 of its workers' PCs. Novell Inc., which sells a version of Linux and is supplying it to Peugeot, says it has recently signed up several large U.S. financial institutions that are installing Linux on some employee PCs. Sales of Linux PCs are showing a really nice uptick at Novell, says Ronald Hovsepian, chief executive of Novell.' Not everyone is a convert, though. 'The State of Illinois recently consolidated its IT systems onto Microsoft software -- and has no interest in using Linux, says Paul Campbell, director of the state's Central Management Services department. "We don't have time for science projects in state government," he says.'"

364 comments

  1. Don't have time by Raistlin77 · · Score: 5, Funny

    'The State of Illinois recently consolidated its IT systems onto Microsoft software -- and has no interest in using Linux, says Paul Campbell, director of the state's Central Management Services department. "We don't have time for science projects in state government," he says.'

    Apparently, they don't have time for security either...

    1. Re:Don't have time by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

      Or stability.

    2. Re:Don't have time by randall_burns · · Score: 4, Interesting

      What do you expect from a state where dead people voting is a cherished local tradition?

    3. Re:Don't have time by GoMMiX · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Honestly, it's amazing Linux has the adoption level and interest that it does given the influence a corporation the size of MS has. Really, it wouldn't be surprising to see MS spend hundreds of millions on lobbying and campaign donations.

      MS also donates software (and otherwise, I'm sure) heavily in districts where people of political influence reside.

      It's sad, but I don't question that a good level of MS support in the government is simply bought - one way or another.

      Mr. Campbell would be wise to word his MS preference carefully, as the voters of Illinois' citizens may feel their tax dollars should go to science projects that could save them tens of millions. Monies that could be put to good use for education in low income areas, real estate I'm well aware Illinois has in great abundance.

    4. Re:Don't have time by SnowZero · · Score: 5, Funny

      I heard that dead people prefer genuine Microsoft Windows(tm) to Linux by almost 4:1.

    5. Re:Don't have time by malevolentjelly · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Linux isn't a magical fairy security and stability wand. It's a also a massive paradigm shift in formats and IT training. The statement is totally valid- corporations have the resources to interopt alternative workstations into their network in order to try things out and make a shift. State governments don't have time for BS. Microsoft's out of the box solution for them likely has been working and will continue to- they are probably correct that it's cheaper for them than Linux.

      Windows Server has been gaining popularity lately with good cause- it's a product that's quickly improving.

    6. Re:Don't have time by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful

      "We don't have time for science projects in state government," he says.'

      Apparently, they don't have time for security either...

      Or even time to evalutae what the options are before making a decision! Nope, just blindly make the M$ plunge and then claim that you some how saved money even though you never bothered to evaluate what the other options are and therefore have no idea as to their actual costs and don't really know if you did save money or not... (pauses to catch breath)

      I think today my company will announce that we are switching over to Amiga, and it is going to save us billions of dollars. Because we don't have time for sci-fi conventions!

    7. Re:Don't have time by DRAGONWEEZEL · · Score: 0, Offtopic

      Damn it! I burned my mod points yesterday...

      That was the funiest thing on slashdot today!

      --
      How much is your data worth? Back it up now.
    8. Re:Don't have time by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      But they damned sure have time to WASTE the tax-payer's hard earned money on the expensive M$ products AND the huge amount of wasted IT labor expenses to keep insecure/broken designs running. Typical government lap dogs at work.

    9. Re:Don't have time by nagora · · Score: 4, Insightful
      Linux isn't a magical fairy security and stability wand.

      Frankly, compared to Microsoft, pretty well any alternative is a magical security wand.

      State governments don't have time for BS.

      If only...

      Windows Server has been gaining popularity lately with good cause- it's a product that's quickly improving.

      I've been hearing that tune since Windows 2.0 came out. Lost interest long ago.

      TWW

      --
      "Encyclopedia" is to "Wikipedia" what "Library" is to "Some people at a bus stop"
    10. Re:Don't have time by Raistlin77 · · Score: 2, Funny

      Linux isn't a magical fairy security and stability wand. It's a also a massive paradigm shift in formats and IT training.

      Windows isn't a magical fairy security and stability wand. [Securing] Windows is also a massive paradigm shift in... IT training.

    11. Re:Don't have time by jazman_777 · · Score: 2, Funny

      More evidence that WGA is not for the customer, because in many cases in Illinois, the customer is dead.

      --
      Slashdot: Failed Car Analogies. Amateur Lawyering. Anecdote Battles.
    12. Re:Don't have time by malevolentjelly · · Score: 1

      But they've been using it for quite a while now...

      Decent IT departments have no problems with MS.

    13. Re:Don't have time by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Interesting

      Is this the same person??

        CMS DIRECTOR RESIGNS
      SPRINGFIELD, Ill. (AP) -- The head of a powerful Illinois government agency resigned today after a sometimes-rocky tenure.

      Paul Campbell's resignation from the Department of Central Management Services takes effect immediately. He had been director for nearly two years and was assistant director before that.

      A spokesman said Campbell will become a vice president at United Health Care.

      Central Management Services is the agency in charge of most state purchasing and hiring. Its influence has expanded under Governor Rod Blagojevich (blah-GOY'-uh-vich).

      But state auditors have repeatedly found management problems there, from paying improper expenses to overstating the results of cost-cutting.

      The agency's hiring procedures have also been scrutinized amid questions about whether Blagojevich has awarded jobs based on politics.

    14. Re:Don't have time by Raistlin77 · · Score: 5, Insightful

      Decent IT departments have no problems with MS.

      Decent IT departments have no problems with Linux either.

    15. Re:Don't have time by 'nother+poster · · Score: 1

      What a load of crap. The Ilinois state government is as bloated as they come. They are much more well positioned to toss a few non standard items out there to test the extent to which they can "save the taxpayers some money" regardless of if it would or not than almost any company. Hell, they could impliment the project several times like they have so many others. remember, Illinois is the poster child for nepotism and cronyism. The Directors statement is correct though. They don't have time for experiments in the State government. It cuts into their graft and corruption schedules.

    16. Re:Don't have time by malevolentjelly · · Score: 1

      What does a characterization of the state government have to do with the cost-viability of switching the entirety of their system to Linux?

    17. Re:Don't have time by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      And, they're getting wined and dined by the lobbiests, too. I'd hate for that perk to disappear, too.

    18. Re:Don't have time by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Informative

      I also wonder how much Microsoft paid them. check out this link for more of the same. Another Story with Paul Campbell

    19. Re:Don't have time by malevolentjelly · · Score: 1

      That's irrelevant in this case since they're not switching to Microsoft, but rather staying with Microsoft. The point is that solid IT is the difference between a secure system and an insecure system, not the OS.

    20. Re:Don't have time by extremescholar · · Score: 0, Offtopic

      Where are my mod point when I need them? +1 Funny

      --
      Using the Freedom of Speech while I still have it.
    21. Re:Don't have time by Raistlin77 · · Score: 0

      That's irrelevant in this case

      If it's irrelevant, then why did you feel the need to make it a point in the first place?

      The point is that solid IT is the difference between a secure system and an insecure system, not the OS.

      Oh right, because the OS that a system is running has absolutely NOTHING to do with the security of the system...

    22. Re:Don't have time by Master+of+Transhuman · · Score: 4, Insightful


      All of which is bullshit because the moron at the Illinois state office said, "We don't have time for science projects..." - which is a clear demonstration that he has no clue what he's talking about when it comes to Linux and therefore isn't a competent IT person.

      The bottom line for any IT department should be just that - the bottom line. And Windows is KNOWN and DEMONSTRATED by industry statistics for being detrimental to the bottom line because of the costs of licensing, the cost of unreliabiliy and downtime, the cost of insecurity, the cost of complexity, and the cost of vendor lock-in compared to UNIX in general and Linux in particular.

      COMPETENT IT organizations will choose that software which over time will be cheaper to own and operate. Training costs are a small part of that effort - and would not be a problem had not INCOMPETENT IT organizations chosen to lock themselves into Microsoft products.

      --
      Richard Steven Hack - This sig is TOO GODDAMN SHORT TO DO ANYTHING USEFUL WITH! MORONS!
    23. Re:Don't have time by idiotnot · · Score: 1

      Mod parent up. Another story from the Chicago Sun-Times .

    24. Re:Don't have time by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Mod +1 for FunnyInsightfulHistoricalPoliticalRemark

    25. Re:Don't have time by Master+of+Transhuman · · Score: 1


      This gets score zero why? The poster is a complete newbie here? Or the Windows shills are out in force again...

      This post demonstrates exactly what I said above - this Illinois state guy is clueless as to Linux and has no idea what he's talking about.

      --
      Richard Steven Hack - This sig is TOO GODDAMN SHORT TO DO ANYTHING USEFUL WITH! MORONS!
    26. Re:Don't have time by 'nother+poster · · Score: 1

      I believe it was you who said the "State governments don't have time for BS". I beged to differ with that opinion. They are eminently positioned for BS. The only one better positioned for BS is the federal government.

    27. Re:Don't have time by stuntpope · · Score: 1

      Wrong, decent IT departments have problems with MS pretty much every day of operation, in a large enough organization. Maybe they don't have problems *fixing* the problems (which I doubt), but they incur high maintenance and support costs due to the vagaries of MS products. While they may have a staff with a high degree of expertise in putting out fires, does that warrant keeping something so prone to figuratively bursting into flames?

    28. Re:Don't have time by Master+of+Transhuman · · Score: 1


      Mod parent UP!

      This article pretty clearly destroys this idiot Campbell as anything but an incompetent and probably crooked state employee who knows absolutely nothing about Linux, IT or anything else but graft, apparently.

      --
      Richard Steven Hack - This sig is TOO GODDAMN SHORT TO DO ANYTHING USEFUL WITH! MORONS!
    29. Re:Don't have time by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      The more things change...

      The much-hyped notion that Linux would be a viable alternative to Windows to run desktop and notebook PCs for corporate users seemed dead on arrival a few years ago.


      The more they stay the same.

      "We don't have time for science projects in state government," he says.


      Sounds like someone just got the full-force reality-based-community smackdown.

      Slashdot doesn't LIKE the FFRBCS!!!!! Slashdot SMASH!!!!!
    30. Re:Don't have time by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It's a also a massive paradigm shift

      Let me guess, you're in marketing.
    31. Re:Don't have time by malevolentjelly · · Score: 2, Informative

      That's irrelevant in this case

      If it's irrelevant, then why did you feel the need to make it a point in the first place?

      The point is that solid IT is the difference between a secure system and an insecure system, not the OS.

      Oh right, because the OS that a system is running has absolutely NOTHING to do with the security of the system...
      In case you've been absent, the initial point was that there's no case to switch. If Illinois was switching from paper and typewriters to computers, we might have a situation where going with Linux could potentially be cheaper.

      The point about OS security should not be taken out of context. Within reason, linux and windows are basically secure if implemented properly in an enterprise environment. Just because a fair share of home Windows users like to go on wild clicking sprees and download everything in sight does not make the OS less secure- there just happens to be more idiots using it, since it's more common. My company is entirely run on Microsoft-based servers and workstations internationally and we've yet to have any major security issues or virus outbreaks. I'm fairly sure the "Linux is more secure" argument would fade away if the system ever became dominant... you know, if Hell freezes over.
    32. Re:Don't have time by ckaminski · · Score: 1

      And numerous industry studies have PROVEN that using Windows improves the bottom line and brings tremendous benefit to "getting shit done." Let's face it, Microsoft and Windows facilitate a lot of really good lowest-common-denominator products that allow businesses to solve problems with little to know significant effort.

      But vendor lock-in still sucks, and there's continuing hope that a heterogenous world will force MS to behave better.

    33. Re:Don't have time by Hymer · · Score: 2, Informative

      No, no... it is the other way around... they don't have the time 'cause the need it for fixing all those security issues in an all Windows environment...
      ...they should propably look at the consequncies... f.ex. a Norwegian bank has just been down FOR ALLMOST A WHOLE WEEK... 11.000 PC's and 1.000+ servers got the Win32/Viking.gt (Normann AV) aka. W32/HLLP.Philis.ha (McAfee) worm and they just couldn't clean it. I can't find anything in english about this case, there are two stories about it in the danish Computerworld but they are of course in danish initial story from March 5 follow up on March 8.

    34. Re:Don't have time by Vexorian · · Score: 1

      State governments don't have time for BS
      hahaha. If I hadmod points I would mod you funny, I loled!
      --

      Copyright infringement is "piracy" in the same way DRM is "consumer rape"
    35. Re:Don't have time by MechaShiva · · Score: 3, Informative

      "State governments don't have time for BS. Microsoft's out of the box solution for them likely has been working and will continue to- they are probably correct that it's cheaper for them than Linux"

      As a state employee, I can assure you we have the time.

      On a more serious note, MS solutions certainly don't work right out of the box. They take a fair amount of massaging and coercing to get them to operate in a mostly functional way. Is Linux a drop-in replacement? By no means. Is it a feasible replacement? Absolutely. And figuring that state governments have huge contracts with whatever vendor they work with, getting the vendor's assistance on porting related issues might be a more reasonable expectation.

      --
      After calming me down with some orange slices and some fetal spooning, E.T. revealed to me his singular purpose.
    36. Re:Don't have time by westlake · · Score: 1
      Honestly, it's amazing Linux has the adoption level and interest that it does given the influence a corporation the size of MS has.

      You will excuse me, I trust, if I don't find "amazing" an adoption rate outside the server rooms that can still be measured in the single digit.

    37. Re:Don't have time by 'nother+poster · · Score: 1

      Oh, just to let you know, they are switching. From Novell and IBM software on the server side to Windows and Exchange.

    38. Re:Don't have time by malevolentjelly · · Score: 0, Flamebait


      As a state employee, I can assure you we have the time.

      Let me clarify- they shouldn't have time for BS. I'd rather the state government I pay taxes to use the more tried and trusted solution instead of using our infrastructure as a cultural software experiment. Less important states like Indiana or Iowa can do that.
    39. Re:Don't have time by IANAAC · · Score: 1

      This gets score zero why? The poster is a complete newbie here? Or the Windows shills are out in force again...

      When someone posts as Anonymous Coward, their starting score is zero. Windows shills have nothing to do with it.

      Nice knee jerk though.

    40. Re:Don't have time by Afrosheen · · Score: 1

      "If Illinois was switching from paper and typewriters to computers, we might have a situation where going with Linux could potentially be cheaper. "

        It's an issue now for many, many IT departments because we're all in for a big, expensive paradigm shift. Remember when you switched from 2000 to XP and suddenly, you needed to upgrade all of your servers and workstations to support the bloat? Guess what, Vista and Server2k3 is pushing this same treadmill on us again. XP has also gotten considerably fatter and slower in all the years of patching. It's amazing to see the difference between a machine running XP SP0 and XP SP2 with all 88 patches. Vista brings the same burden to the table and alot of shops are asking themselves why they need to upgrade to Vista since XP is pretty much 'good' now, particularly in light of the poor software and driver support that Vista currently offers.

        Things are really going to get interesting when Vista is the only option from the big OEMs like Dell and HP. When you can no longer buy workstations with XP Pro, admins are going to get upset.

    41. Re:Don't have time by Master+of+Transhuman · · Score: 3, Insightful


      No, industry studies have proven that using COMPUTERS WITH SOME OS gets things done faster and cheaper over paper and pencil. The fact that the only OS studied was Windows is not relevant.

      And you can't compare an OS that has had hardware vendor lock-in for the last fifteen years - and was the ONLY available cheap OS (DOS) for ten years previous to that - with an OS that only became usable in the last five or so.

      That says nothing about which OS is better NOW. It also doesn't say anything about the excessive costs of the Microsoft approach.

      Linux can facilitate a lot of low-cost common denominator products just as well as Windows - once people realize that the OSS development model is just as good as the commercial development model (and Linux can use the commercial model just as well as Windows, in any event.)

      It simply hasn't reached critical mass yet to do so - and that is because of vendor and corporate inertia encouraged by Microsoft with their contracts, their glad-handling sales reps, and their pseudo-monopoly status.

      The point is, to paraphrase Microsoft, where do corporation want to go? To more vendor lock-in, insecurity, unreliabiliy, and expense - or change the terms of engagement and try a different approach which is already demonstrating its feasibility in large-scale deployments?

      Do corporations really want to make Bill Gates richer while getting nothing but headaches in return, or do thsy want to get on with THEIR business and put some of that saved money into THEIR business?

      In the end, it really comes down to: is there ANYBODY in corporate management who has a clue?

      Oh, wait, never mind.

      --
      Richard Steven Hack - This sig is TOO GODDAMN SHORT TO DO ANYTHING USEFUL WITH! MORONS!
    42. Re:Don't have time by Master+of+Transhuman · · Score: 1


      Okay, I'll buy that.

      Let's see how long it stays zero - it should get at least a one for informative.

      --
      Richard Steven Hack - This sig is TOO GODDAMN SHORT TO DO ANYTHING USEFUL WITH! MORONS!
    43. Re:Don't have time by 'nother+poster · · Score: 1

      Oooh, nice troll. I give it a 7.3. I particularly like the "less important states" part. Subtle, yet not.

    44. Re:Don't have time by jimicus · · Score: 1

      As an IT manager, I can quite happily confirm that in the real world, getting Windows to do what you want (rather than what Microsoft thinks is "right") is a computer science project in itself.

    45. Re:Don't have time by budgenator · · Score: 1

      OK I'll give you that Windows, running Office in a air-gapped network or a VPN through the public internet is just as secure as Linux, but in the real world there is not only access to the public internet but third party apps that refuse to run properly in a secure LUA environment; which blows Windows security all to hell. Also I don't see user training as a drawback either; most IT Guys would love users that knew what they were taught and only what they were taught

      --
      Apocalypse Cancelled, Sorry, No Ticket Refunds
    46. Re:Don't have time by malevolentjelly · · Score: 1

      I didn't think this was a Vista argument. I'm pretty sure by the time Vista is the only option, the workstations will be well fast enough. I've personally found Vista to run quicker on my machine than Gnome- which seems to just throw away resources without being too pretty. XP screams compared to Gnome 2.16...

      Why hasn't anyone hopped into this argument and claimed that Illinois should switch to Mac? It's not an epic Slashdot thread until the Apple fanboy sings.

    47. Re:Don't have time by curecollector · · Score: 2, Funny

      ...and if they can vote in elections, they can certainly vote with their wallets!

    48. Re:Don't have time by nightsweat · · Score: 0, Offtopic

      Quit talking smack about Louisiana.



      The post timer is lame, it punishes those who can type.

      --

      the major advances in civilization are processes which all but wreck the societies in which they occur - A.N. White
    49. Re:Don't have time by Bob+Loblaw · · Score: 1

      My guess would be that he can retire on his MS earnings.

    50. Re:Don't have time by mandelbr0t · · Score: 1

      Windows Server has been gaining popularity lately with good cause- it's a product that's quickly improving. In terms of usability, I'd agree with you. However, there are still major security features missing from the Windows Server platform, and when coupled with the ease of use of recent Linux distros, that's a no-go for me. I need to have SSL-secured SMTP and IMAP, local delivery through procmail or equivalent so that SpamAssassin or equivalent gets tossed in the mix. Oh, and chroot() my server environments please.

      It's getting there, but IIS still sucks, and Microsoft still doesn't care too much about security or encryption.
      --
      "Please describe the scientific nature of the 'whammy'" - Agent Scully
    51. Re:Don't have time by Afrosheen · · Score: 1

      It's not a Vista argument, but the main reason shops are considering switching now, and thus why this is news, is that Vista is pushing heavier requirements and a huge expense on IT departments. It's a tough decision for alot of medium and large business. A CIO must decide which is more cost-effective. Upgrading every workstation on the floor (since many companies are coming up on a hardware refresh cycle) plus the cost of new licensing plus the cost of support increase...or seek a cheaper yet equally effective alternative..or don't upgrade at all.

        FYI our shop has chosen the latter option. XP is 'good enough' for our day to day operations and when the hardware refresh comes around next year, we'll take everything into consideration and probably end up with XP Pro on those stations as well.

    52. Re:Don't have time by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Paul Campbell resigned on Friday to work for an insurance company.

    53. Re:Don't have time by TrailerTrash · · Score: 5, Funny

      Here in Illinois, we take the rights of Deceased Americans (formerly known as dead people) very seriously, including the right to vote. Many issues, such as elections of aldermen, are critically dependent on the outspoken support of Deceased Americans.

      The number of Deceased Americans is expected to grow to unimaginable proportions as time goes on, and so protecting their rights is important to do now.

      This is not to confused with Reanimated Americans (formerly known as zombies), who tend to be vocal almost exclusively on health care issues (notably, brains).

    54. Re:Don't have time by basic0 · · Score: 1

      So you don't have time for a "science experiment", but you see no problem with letting Microsoft engineers/developers/designers have a big bloaty, sketchy, resource-consuming wank-fest on your desktop?

      Seriously though, it's that "look what I can do!" factor that turns me off of using Windows for anything important. Anyone remember Dr.Ian Malcolm in Jurassic Park?

      "Your scientists were so preoccupied with whether they COULD, they didn't stop to think if they SHOULD."

      I, for one, find that Windows is loaded to the teeth with things that bring this quote to mind. I'm not saying Linux or OSX is perfect, but I tend to get a lot more work done with a lot less fighting using either of those.

    55. Re:Don't have time by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      And yet the incessant "Linux is almost ready for the desktop" cries don't bother you?

    56. Re:Don't have time by malevolentjelly · · Score: 1

      I work for a major game development studio... our idea of a "workstation" is pretty excessive compared to most companies. Nonetheless, we're still mostly XP Pro. We need to move over to Vista en masse in the near future to support Games for Windows, though. IT is in a tizzy over it.

    57. Re:Don't have time by sleigher · · Score: 1

      Would you mind coming over and explaining that to my boss...... Seems the 50K times I have done it haven't worked........

      --
      All points of time and space are connected.
    58. Re:Don't have time by Afrosheen · · Score: 1

      Yeah, I bet they are..and now you are starting to see the dilemma here. Not alot of stuff runs on Vista and the driver support is abysmal. Sure, this will change over time, but NOW is what matters to some shops like yours.

    59. Re:Don't have time by cmacb · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Let me clarify- they shouldn't have time for BS. I'd rather the state government I pay taxes to use the more tried and trusted solution instead of using our infrastructure as a cultural software experiment. Less important states like Indiana or Iowa can do that.


      The remark "less important states" aside, we (Americans) would ALL like to know that our tax money was being spent wisely. But applying "tried and trusted" to Microsoft products seems a bit odd unless you are a Microsoft employee or are related to this Jefferson fellow. It is precisely the fact that Windows and office have been tried that leads so many people to the conclusion that they should no longer be trusted.

      How much would it cost to make one application run by the state web-based (I'm not talking about Internet, I'm talking about using a web browser for the user interface)? Such an application would not require the wholesale replacement of Windows desktops, but WOULD allow for selected replacement of some systems. Many "desktop" machines in government are not really desktop, they are really "countertop", sitting in locations where government people interact with citizens and run a single application all day long. Converting just one such system to web-based (or even Citrix based) would allow the client machines to be Windows, Linux, or anything else that supports a full blown web browser (or Citrix client). That could be thousands of Windows licenses saved right there, or if you decided the experiment hadn't worked, you could keep them running Windows.

      On the other hand if you don't even want that potential expense you could JUST focus on a relatively isolated group of true desktop systems and convert them to Linux and Open Office for some period of time.

      I say "experiment", but really, some of us know that the results are that in most cases, it works just fine. I used Linux and Open Office in an "all Microsoft" shop for several years and the only noticeable change was that people started coming to me whenever they were having trouble fixing a messed up Word document, a messed up floppy disk (with Word files on it) or needed to burn a CD that was reusable outside the organization (for some reason the standard configured machines could only produce coasters most of the time). My Word documents and Excels files (produced by Open Office) never caused any compatibility problems and I never had to worry about my e-mail archive being corrupted by Outlook bugs. Cost to government (feds) for this "experiment" = $0. Well, really the cost was a negative number, as the Word documents I rescued would have taken many hours to reproduce and the readable CDs I produced saved tons of delay in sending information out to other agencies.

      While I often characterize government workers as wasteful and lazy, there are pockets of enthusiasm for trying new and potentially better things. I have no doubt you could find departments with such people (even in the "important" state of Illinois) who would delight in trying a new OS/Office combo that would be much less susceptible to virus outbreaks and other malware. How many government workers would have loved to have a tabbed browser several years before Microsoft got around to it, or a machine that seemed to run about twice as fast due to less overhead that a properly installed Linux system has over Windows?

      Switching to Linux is no magic pill. The potential savings in hardware and software costs would only be a fraction of total government waste. On the other hand eliminating the obstacles to such an experiment (see posts below) might be the key to even more savings.
    60. Re:Don't have time by LWATCDR · · Score: 1

      I am afraid it cuts both ways.
      There is a county near me that standardized SUN workstations, Solaris, and Applix a few years ago. It was a nightmare for the county workers. Everybody else on the planet used Office so they had a lot of problems exchanging files. There where many useful programs that they just couldn't get or had to write themselves.
      If you have a lot of time and money invested in complex Excel spreadsheets, Access databases, and Programs written in Visual Basic it could take DECADES to actually save money using Linux if ever.
      People under estimate the evil that is Visual Basic. There are thousands if not millions of programs written in VB. What is worse is that they are useful if not indispensable. I hate it and have banned it from where I work but in many places it is a way of life.
      I think using Windows on a server isn't a good idea I can see why a state government might just go to one vendor. It is the easy way out.
      As I have said before. Nobody ever got fired buying from IBM, I mean Microsoft.

      --
      See my blog http://ilovecookes.blogspot.com/ for light hearted technical information.
    61. Re:Don't have time by MrNormS · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Linux isn't ready for the desktop. I have no problem admitting that. However, it is completely ready for my desktop. It just isn't ready for everyone's needs. My grandmother would have no more problem using Linux than using she does using Windows, as long as I set it all up for her. And don't be all "well you're a linux geek and you were needed set it up," as I also needed to set up her win95 machine that she used up until last year, and her XP machine she uses now. She lives in California... me in Canada, and regularly calls me to get me to explain her how to fix things. Here is where I could either use ssh to solve the problem or VNC to make guiding her easier. But no, she uses Windows due to fear of change (which she openly admits) and I'm stuck trying to guide her through "the printer thing" as her printer "doesn't want to do anything" and a "thing keeps popping up" telling her "something." On the other hand, there is lots of software missing for the Linux platform. Everyone quickly mentions games. Either way, I've been running Linux on the desktop since I was 16 and have never had a problem I couldn't solve with a little googling.

    62. Re:Don't have time by Knuckles · · Score: 1

      Paranoid again?

      --
      "When I first heard Daydream Nation it quite frankly scared the living shit out of me." -- Matthew Stearns
    63. Re:Don't have time by wykthorr · · Score: 1

      It's easy to say you don't have time for science projects especially when it's not your money that's in the game.

    64. Re:Don't have time by malevolentjelly · · Score: 0

      I say "experiment", but really, some of us know that the results are that in most cases, it works just fine. I used Linux and Open Office in an "all Microsoft" shop for several years and the only noticeable change was that people started coming to me whenever they were having trouble fixing a messed up Word document, a messed up floppy disk (with Word files on it) or needed to burn a CD that was reusable outside the organization (for some reason the standard configured machines could only produce coasters most of the time). My Word documents and Excels files (produced by Open Office) never caused any compatibility problems and I never had to worry about my e-mail archive being corrupted by Outlook bugs. Cost to government (feds) for this "experiment" = $0. Well, really the cost was a negative number, as the Word documents I rescued would have taken many hours to reproduce and the readable CDs I produced saved tons of delay in sending information out to other agencies.

      Did your office suffer from some sort of Mummy's Curse?...

      Do you have any idea how much it costs to switch an entire infrastructure over to a different platform? If it can't be done overnight, it's EXTREMELY expensive to lose that time and retrain your entire staff that's been using Windows for as long as they've been using computers. Linux has a ways to go before it's "drop everything and change" good. How come every case where Linux is not the solution is somehow flawed? Open source devs/enthusiasts need to stop lamenting and start competing.
    65. Re:Don't have time by Kyle_Katarn-(ISF) · · Score: 1

      Linux IS ready for the desktop. The desktop just isn't ready for it...

    66. Re:Don't have time by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It couldn't possibly come close to costing as much as it would cost to continue using Windows. Sure, it might be alot of money NOW, but in the long haul, it would be significantly cheaper than any Windows solution.

      Open source devs/enthusiasts need to stop lamenting and start competing.

      It's kinda hard to compete when the competition pays top dollar to get in the back way.

    67. Re:Don't have time by Frumious+Wombat · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Illinois is like Louisiana. Allegedly one of the Longs said, "I want to be buried in Louisiana, so that I can stay active in politics". When I lived there, I don't think they were able to elect a dead guy, but given that that constituency can only go up, it's only a matter of time. We'll also note that dead aldermen will be just as brave as live aldermen in acting independently of the mayor.

      I miss Illinois some days; it was corrupt, but it was competent corruption.

      --
      the more accurate the calculations became, the more the concepts tended to vanish into thin air. R. S. Mulliken
    68. Re:Don't have time by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      State governments don't have time for BS? Sorry, but you're way off. I did a couple years working for a company that did IT contracts. Several of their big ones involved installing systems in various state offices. I've been in all sorts of government agencies across the state of Texas, and at no time were more than a third of the employees ever actually both there and working. We'd roll in, install a couple hundred Dell desktops, and roll out, and most of their time would be spent wandering around, kibitzing, gossiping, and surfing the web. They have more than enough time for however much BS can be shoveled their way.

    69. Re:Don't have time by Frumious+Wombat · · Score: 1

      Guys, guys, it's Illinois. This is not a technical decision, and if it's run like when I lived there, Linux lost because you guys aren't organized enough to kick in 5 bucks each to make sure the right decision got made. There's an old Mike Royko column where he discusses how the ERA lost in Illinois, and a state rep told him that for what the advocates spent on advertisements, posters, etc, they could have used it the time-honored Chicago way, and not only passed the amendment, but he could have gotten them at least a bridge as well.

      So, now you have a goal. Take up a collection, and get Linux adopted at the state government level, and get the Debian Memorial Bridge in Joliet while you're at it.

      --
      the more accurate the calculations became, the more the concepts tended to vanish into thin air. R. S. Mulliken
    70. Re:Don't have time by blackest_k · · Score: 1

      'The State of Illinois recently consolidated its IT systems onto Microsoft software -- and has no interest in using Linux, says unemployed Paul Campbell, EX director of the state's Central Management Services department. "We don't have time for science projects in state government," he says.'prior to resigning last friday
        There fixed that for you :)

      "Campbell was paid $125,736 a year as director.

      Assistant Director Maureen O'Donnell, 42, will take over as acting director until a permanent replacement is named. She is paid $106,912."

      See you can save money with windows

    71. Re:Don't have time by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Linux has a ways to go before it's "drop everything and change" good.

      That's a funny one - show me a Windows version that was "drop everything and change" good.

    72. Re:Don't have time by element-o.p. · · Score: 1

      State governments don't have time for BS.

      Dude, what planet are you from ???

      My wife just finished a four month process of getting a municipal license to open a small business in our town. I have never seen a business drag their heels as much as the local muni does. While you were discussing state government and I am discussing a municipal government, in general government is government, whether municipal, state or federal. The same bureaucratic principles apply.

      If you want to approach the argument from a logical rather than anecdotal standpoint, consider this: while businesses must generally disclose financial reports to their stockholders quarterly, elected government officials generally have a terms measured in years in which to make their impact, unless they really screw something up badly.

      Sorry...it seems to me that muni or state governments should theoretically have even more freedom to experiment with alternative IT infrastructures than businesses. However, since government is funded by tax dollars and business is funded by competition, they have less financial incentive to do so.
      --
      MCSE? No, sir...I don't do Windows. Yes, I am an idealist. What's your point?
    73. Re:Don't have time by Lockejaw · · Score: 1

      I don't see a date on that article, but it says Blagojevich is about to announce a reelection bid, meaning it's probably about a year old. And yet, the problem still hasn't gotten much attention.

      --
      (IANAL)
    74. Re:Don't have time by rising_hope · · Score: 1

      What you fail to see here is that perfectly competent IT organizations sometimes don't have a choice in the matter. In many industries, it's a matter of software availability and ability to inter operate with customers. If software found on Linux doesn't have a Microsoft equivalent and vice versa, it creates compatibility problems that can prevent business from moving forward (the later being more generally true -- but also a good reason to support Win32 versions of apps like GIMP.) ReactOS and WINE are VERY important projects, IMHO, because what they represent is a *real* challenge to Microsoft -- the ability for companies to actually shop alternatives.

      But, for companies such as mine in our particular industry, many of the applications we use are ONLY written for Windows, and we must use Windows in order to develop products for our customers as well as have the ability to share data. So, in our case Linux *does* cost too much -- in lost business. Given a choice, and having done support for both (3 years on the Windows side, 5 on the Unix/Linux side), I'd choose Unix/Linux any day of the week. But, for us, it's not an option.

    75. Re:Don't have time by crayiii · · Score: 1

      I would think that a Windows terminal server (Citrix?) would help in some of those situations...

    76. Re:Don't have time by Ash+Vince · · Score: 1

      Vista faster than gnome?

      Only if morons set Gnome up. On every PC I have put it on I can get it running alot faster and smoother. This centrino laptop I am currently using is no exception. Even under XP it grinds along but Gnome is very nippy.

      --
      I dont read /. to RTFA, I read /. to offend people in ignorance.
    77. Re:Don't have time by nagora · · Score: 1
      How come every case where Linux is not the solution is somehow flawed?

      Any case where you or your company is relying on software it has no control over is flawed, and doubly so if you don't even have control over the data. The ideal solution is that no software is closed-source (and not written by the sort of people MS employs too, but that's another issue). Obviously Linux is not the solution to this as things stand. Companies rely on much more difficult to replace programs than Office - Quickbooks, for example (which is an example where you're locked out of your own data).

      As long as one external company can decide whether the bugs in the software you use every day are worth fixing or not, then you have a problem. Linux is not the only solution to that, nor is it currently a total solution to that, but the principle remains.

      The social cost of having a monopoly controlling one of the most important industries in the world is a factor in wanting to change things too but is WAY off-topic.

      Open source devs/enthusiasts need to stop lamenting and start competing.

      OK. Make it illegal to bundle an OS with a computer, and make it illegal to bundle applications with an OS. Let the users decide what to buy. Strangely, MS spends huge proportions of its cash on making sure governments and companies do not enforce such requirements. Is that what you mean by competing?

      TWW

      --
      "Encyclopedia" is to "Wikipedia" what "Library" is to "Some people at a bus stop"
    78. Re:Don't have time by Woldry · · Score: 1

      But then what about Windows Live?

      --
      How can a post be modded "overrated" or "underrated" when it hasn't been rated yet?
    79. Re:Don't have time by malevolentjelly · · Score: 1

      Ideal solution:

      Computing in the 70's! Problem solved. No closed-source software? That's like the OSS equivalent of being a suicide bomber. Let's just eliminate the jobs "programmer" and "software designer". It'd be better if no one made money doing that. That should be free work.

      In fact, let's just make art and writing free too.

      Food too.

      Yes, everything should be free! All problems solved! No compensation for work, no market, no problems!

      What do you mean by the sort of people Microsoft employs? I have many friends at Microsoft, and they're all brilliant computer science students from excellent universities around the world. What's the major problem here?

    80. Re:Don't have time by h2g2bob · · Score: 1

      I heard that dead people prefer genuine Microsoft Windows(tm) to Linux by almost 4:1.

      So thats what Microsoft's Immortal computing patents were about.
    81. Re:Don't have time by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Of course... Decent IT departments don't use M$.
      How could they have problems with it?

    82. Re:Don't have time by LWATCDR · · Score: 1

      Yes but you are still running Windows and I have heard that Citrix isn't the universal solution that many believe it to be.

      --
      See my blog http://ilovecookes.blogspot.com/ for light hearted technical information.
    83. Re:Don't have time by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      i object. my father and my father's father, and his father's father, down for 5 generations still participate in volting. not like most of the vote-eligable youth these days.

    84. Re:Don't have time by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

      How can you be a registered user for 5 years and not know how anonymous posting works?

    85. Re:Don't have time by joeh5000 · · Score: 1

      Dang it. I needed to get one more MS fud post in to make my quota and you took the last one on the list.

    86. Re:Don't have time by fishbowl · · Score: 1

      >And yet the incessant "Linux is almost ready for the desktop" cries don't bother you?

      There are millions of people happily using Linux on their desktops in various environments.
      I personally switched from Linux to OSX when I got my Macbook Pro, but I still have a linux desktop. Solaris in the server room, though, sorry. It will stay that way as long as it is my call.

      --
      -fb Everything not expressly forbidden is now mandatory.
    87. Re:Don't have time by malevolentjelly · · Score: 0, Troll

      Are you trying to convince me or yourself? Why hasn't this big open source explosion happened yet? Let me tell you something about management- they have a keen eye for cost saving. If they don't, another company or individual will take that approach and dominate. If there's a clear better path for software deployment that simply isn't being exploited and is 100% superior, why is it not being used? Why is someone not capitalizing and trumping their competition? Where's the glowing success story?

      Is it because Microsoft owns the media? What about Apple/Pixar/Disney/ABC?

      Could it possibly be the fact that Microsoft's software is either

      A) Superior but more expensive

      or

      B) Inferior, more expensive, but more profitable?

      It's as simple as the 'Communism doesn't work' argument. Why doesn't it work? Because... where's the sickle and hammer? People need results. Where are the results? If Microsoft offered Illinois excellent support porting their system to Microsoft, then they're the victor fair and square- because I assure you this is a level playing field- managers know what linux is.

      I'll say it again- Open source enthusiasts- stop being a culture of economic angst and try to be a culture of improvement. You're in the free labor market, stop complaining and get to work.

    88. Re:Don't have time by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "We don't have time for science projects in state government," he says.'

      What a moron! As big a boob he is though, adoption is continuing apace! In Japan, there are 400,000 PC's in schools. They are going Linux. All of them. I'm willing to bet that there aren't 400,000 PC's in the Illinois government. Apparently a school student in Japan is now smarter than the director of Illinois' Central Management Services department.

    89. Re:Don't have time by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Linux isn't a magic security wand. Its just that its been audited by more people that microsoft ever can be. It has a proven (by external audits, funded by the office of homeland security) to have far fewer software flaws then comparable commercial software (by a factor of about 8:1). To say 'oh its too expensive' is just BS. That argument fell flat several years ago. Its just bullshit! There is a one time migration cost. The one time cost is recovered in less than 1 year. After that, 2/3 of the cost is saved every year after the one-time expense (every year). So there are two options to the 'sticking with microsoft' story: He's either an idiot, or he's paid-off (possibly both). There is no equivalent to security enhanced Linux in the world of microsoft, neither is there an equivalent to Fort Knox for Linux ...note that one of the sponsors is the Space and Naval Warfare Systems Command San Diego!

    90. Re:Don't have time by nagora · · Score: 1
      Let's just eliminate the jobs "programmer" and "software designer".

      I don't think it's as bad as that, although it certainly would be a huge shake up. The fact is that software has a value, and new software will always be worth paying for regardless of availability of source. Many people today are paid to develop open-source software. I would say that any company that relies on software and does not get the right to use and modify the source is insane, but it could be done under trade-secret/NDA rules; it does not have to be publicly released.

      What do you mean by the sort of people Microsoft employs?

      I mean second rate coders with no pride in their work. I've been at university milk-rounds and seen who applies to them; I wouldn't employ them myself. And the proof of the pudding is in the eating: MS software is badly written and buggy. Applications routinely have bugs that last for decades before being fixed. Shoddy work comes from shoddy workers.

      TWW

      --
      "Encyclopedia" is to "Wikipedia" what "Library" is to "Some people at a bus stop"
    91. Re:Don't have time by Magada · · Score: 1

      "Let me tell you something about management- they have a keen eye for cost saving. If they don't, another company or individual will take that approach and dominate."
      Bollocks, mate. Most markets are oligopolies, with a smattering if irrelevant .01 percenters at the bottom. Cost savings don't really matter.
      It's the aspect of next quarter's bottom line that matters, because that's what is reflected on the stock market and in exec bonuses: if there's 5 dollars lower expenses from not replacing a lightbulb YAY!, if it's 5000 dollars more because you switched over your servers to Linux BOO!, no matter that next trimester you won't be paying through your nose for new CALs anymore. Short-sightedness, to the point of financial irresponsibility.

      --
      Something bad is coming when people are suddenly anxious to tell the truth.
    92. Re:Don't have time by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Another issue people need to realize when dealing with large corporations is the fact that it can take a long time for a corporation to evaluate software for integration into their network, and that's just dealing with a simple upgrade (i.e. Windows XP or Vista from Windows 98 or 2000, Office 2003 or 2007 from Office 2000 or XP). Throw in Linux and you're generally talking about evaluating distributions to find which is going to work best with your applications and your employees, not to mention which comes with the applications you're going to use, and whether or not you're going to configure a deployment that doesn't include applications you don't want users to have access to.

      Evaluation of operating systems at the server level tends to be a little easier, as you have a much more limited scope of applications that will be running on that environment (hopefully) than a network-wide workstation roll-out. This is part of why the server environment has been favorable to Linux (in addition to the fact that a lot of the servers replaced with Linux servers have been Unix servers).

    93. Re:Don't have time by slashchuck · · Score: 1

      Apparently This Campbell character and his agency are under fire for spending over $620 million on consultants with little to show for it. Maybe using a little science would have helped.

      --
      $sig not found
    94. Re:Don't have time by BBandCMKRNL · · Score: 1

      A spokesman said Campbell will become a vice president at United Health Care.

      I'm already having enough trouble with Useless Health Care as it is.

      --
      Without the 2nd Amendment, the others are just suggestions.
    95. Re:Don't have time by Chanc_Gorkon · · Score: 1

      You know, I like Linux as much as this next guy but I call the parent flamebait. A well managed Windows install is just as secure as a well managed Linux install. Yes there's the Zero Day bugs, but overall, since DOS got kicked on it's butt years ago with the switch to the NT Kernel, stability has gone up. What is the problem then? Well, managing a Windows install is harder because of some of the architecture and the developers. Case in point, some programs STILL in this day and age insist you be a administrator to run them and that's stupid.

      Linux installs by default make it harder to install programs. Ubuntu as well as Apple has some of the best ideas for this. Root should be disabled and only allowed to be su'd or sudo'd.

      Anyways, blasting Windows for stability reasons is fun, but things are the way they are because of who they are. Microsoft always thinks of adding features and not just making it better. Just look at Windows Vista which is mostly glitzy eye candy changes that you don't really need to have, but it would be nice to have.

      --

      Gorkman

    96. Re:Don't have time by Bert64 · · Score: 1

      What is more tried and trusted than unix, which has been around a lot longer than windows and was widely used long before windows even existed.

      Would you rather those taxes you pay, go into the pockets of microsoft shareholders? Or be saved for other things, like schools etc... Or paid to local staff to support open software.

      You claim that linux is not "tried and trusted", and yet it has been successfully implemented in many places already, and is based on unix which has been around even longer. On the other hand, windows may be widely implemented but it is also widely known to be unreliable, insecure and flawed.

      Not that linux is perfect, but it does have many advantages from a state government perspective:
      Any flaws it has, can be fixed using some of the money you save on licensing, if everyone does this linux will improve very quickly.
      It's free and open, which saves you not only the cost of buying the software, but also significant savings in procurement procedures and license management. You can also supply the exact same software for people to run at home if they need to.
      The use of open file formats means that state residents are not forced to buy expensive proprietary software to interact with the state, plus important government records will still be readable in years to come. Several states have already realised how important this is.

      The reason companies are considering linux, and local governments aren't, is because in a company there is pressure from above to save money, thus making the company more profitable. Government workers don't care how much money they waste, anything they save will just be squandered elsewhere. This is why state run services are so inefficient, and cost the states running them millions, yet when the services are sold to commercial companies they become hugely profitable (look at the privatisation of water/gas/etc in the UK), if these government services had been run in the same way as a commercial business they could have been huge money earners for the government.

      --
      http://spamdecoy.net - free throwaway anonymous email - avoid spam!
    97. Re:Don't have time by Bert64 · · Score: 1

      Many office workers have been moved between different versions of windows, dos and macos running a variety of different applications. Often supposedly the same applications also differ wildly between platforms (mac versions of msoffice and ie are very different to the windows versions).

      That said, the actual requirements of these workers is fairly low, and it won't take them too long to re-learn, especially if the new applications are similar to the old ones.
      The amount of retraining required for an average user to migrate from xp/msoffice2003 to kde/openoffice is very small, and could easily be less than the retraining required to migrate to vista/office2007.

      As for admin staff, competent linux admins are no more expensive than competent windows admins, but will usually be able to manage more machines. Sure, you can use cheaper and less competent staff to run windows systems, and these less competent staff will probably have never heard of linux... But do you really want incompetent staff running your network? Such staff are likely to configure your network poorly, resulting in virus outbreaks, hacks and/or downtime.

      In terms of software costs, the more machines you have the more you save with linux... And it's not just the cost of the OS, most common apps are available for free too, whereas on windows you often have to buy expensive extras (decent firewall, office apps, antivirus, secure remote management programs, anti spyware)

      The migration can also be handled gradually, you can migrate windows users to running openoffice, firefox etc. There is a plugin for msoffice to support opendocument files now, and openoffice can read ms files fairly reliably (no worse than using multiple versions of word).

      Don't forget that PC's often get replaced every few years, and the apps being used replaced along with them. If well thought out, a migration can be planned over several years, starting by ensuring that any custom in-house apps are platform agnostic (which should always be mandated in any case, because you never know what you might want to be running in the future) and any data is stored in open vendor-neutral formats.

      --
      http://spamdecoy.net - free throwaway anonymous email - avoid spam!
    98. Re:Don't have time by Bert64 · · Score: 1

      It's less to do with shoddy workers, and more to do with commercial attitudes.
      Microsoft products gain a lot of their stability problems from their sheer complexity. Windows is massively more complicated than any other OS, which results in far more places for bugs to lurk, and makes it much harder to maintain. The extra complexity was desired from a commercial perspective, because it makes the software harder to clone (remember the dos clones?).

      They also make a business decision when deciding whether or not to fix problems:
      Will the cost of producing the fix, cost more than the business that will be lost by not fixing it?
      Because of vendor lock-in, the chance of losing customers is much lower (the customers has to do the same assessment, will the cost caused by the bug outweigh the cost of migrating away), so the chance of bugs being fixed is much lower.

      In short, there is very little incentive for microsoft to improve their products, and the only people who do have that incentive (the users/customers) don't have the ability to make the necessary fixes. In contrast, open source software is usually written by people who use the software too, and any user has the potential to fix bugs or pay someone else to do it.

      There is also no incentive for open source software to be more complex than it needs to be, infact doing so is a negative because it reduces the chances of other people wanting to help develop it.

      --
      http://spamdecoy.net - free throwaway anonymous email - avoid spam!
    99. Re:Don't have time by Bert64 · · Score: 1

      Well, while a competent IT department can usually keep both linux and windows secure for the most part...

      A sufficiently complex IT department can fix linux bugs themselves, while they have to wait for microsoft to provide a fix, which can often be up to a month.

      Aside from that, if your staff are sufficiently skilled they will be able to make significant savings by using linux. Most of the complaints about the cost of staff skilled enough to run linux, don't take into account that staff to run windows securely cost the same or more.

      I've seen several comparisons that compare the cheapest staff running windows, with expensive and competent linux admins. In practice, this would result in a horrendously unreliable and insecure windows network. Try putting a job advertisement up, offering a low wage to run a windows based network and see the quality of your applicants.

      --
      http://spamdecoy.net - free throwaway anonymous email - avoid spam!
    100. Re:Don't have time by nagora · · Score: 1
      In short, there is very little incentive for microsoft to improve their products

      I agree but it still leads to shoddy workers. No one with any pride in themselves or their work can survive in that sort of environment and have any semblance of morale left to them; consequently it is mostly people motivated by salary rather than a drive to create good software that apply to work for MS and the few idealists that do get recruited accidently quickly become demotivated or simply leave.

      TWW

      --
      "Encyclopedia" is to "Wikipedia" what "Library" is to "Some people at a bus stop"
    101. Re:Don't have time by Master+of+Transhuman · · Score: 1


      This is an excellent point that people asking "why doesn't Linux dominate NOW?" need to realize.

      Linux is progressing slowly into the corporate desktop market. The early adopters are still just that. The main switch will come when more enterprise infrastructure runs on Linux - which will happen, but it takes time to develop that infrastructure in the OSS manner.

      There's nothing inherent about Linux or the OSS development model that prevents the corporate world from switching to it. It's merely the time it takes for sufficient management to become aware of the benefits, for the necessary enterprise level software to be developed, and in general for inertia to be replaced by an awareness of the need for change.

      The reactions of several foreign governments, a number of city governments around the world, and the recent reactions of the Department of Transportation and NIST here in the US show that when the pressure for the switch to Linux arrives - and it will, albeit in varying speeds at varying segments of the market - the switch will be real. And the issues of training and deployment will be dealt with because it will be seen as doable.

      --
      Richard Steven Hack - This sig is TOO GODDAMN SHORT TO DO ANYTHING USEFUL WITH! MORONS!
    102. Re:Don't have time by Master+of+Transhuman · · Score: 1


      For an individual company NOW it may not be an option.

      That doesn't translate to whether it WILL be an option for the industry at some point. The question is merely whether and when the applications on which your industry thrives which are currently written for Microsoft will be developed by OSS developers interested in your industry.

      Many European companies are leading in this area. They are financing OSS developers to develop critical enterprise infrastructure for their given industries. Unfortunately it seems that US companies are loath to expend any effort that doesn't improve their stock price over the next quarter.

      Nonetheless it will happen. There are niche markets all over the place just waiting for a group of enterprising OSS developers to drop the current commercial market leader and make money selling installation and support for those niche markets.

      Sooner or later, someone will fill those niche markets.

      It's a no-brainer. You want to do OSS and make money? Find a niche market that interests you and start designing and coding.

      There may be some markets resistant to this - markets that require highly technical software that can only be developed by either cooperation of companies in that industry or with considerable private investment in the development team. As I indicated, European companies seem to want to support OSS development in such markets. The US corporations seem to be more short-sighted in this area. They prefer to pay out money forever to other companies rather than invest in their future.

      This is no surprise. Ultimately it's not going to prevent the emergence of Linux in corporations either.

      --
      Richard Steven Hack - This sig is TOO GODDAMN SHORT TO DO ANYTHING USEFUL WITH! MORONS!
  2. The Illini Case Study (or Lack Thereof) by eldavojohn · · Score: 4, Insightful

    I am severely impressed with Illinois' capability of assessing a situation so quickly & flawlessly. They already claim an annual cost savings of U.S. $2.1 million [proprietarily locked DOC warning] for five years ($10.5 million total) by using Microsoft's technologies! Why am I impressed? Well, they didn't even have to try anything else out to discover this! If they did, this case study doesn't show any of it. That document (if you read it) only makes claims but backs it up with nothing. I laugh at the very idea of it being titled a "Case Study."

    You know, where I work, if you make a statement like "would save our company $10 million" you kind of need to make a business case. A large part of the business case is having micro experiments & demonstrations & data to present to back up your business case. In fact, it's a lot like the scientific process where you present facts that prove your argument. Granted, it's not required to be that rigorous but you usually have to get those to agree with you through this.

    If I were a tax paying Illini and that document was the only thing persuading me that my government should use Microsoft products, I would bitch. That's just me, though. I think precisely what this Joseph Campbell needs to do is a "science project" as he calls it. For some reason they're avoiding a "business science project" and I'm really questioning his motivation for circumventing that.

    --
    My work here is dung.
  3. Ouch by Stephen+Tennant · · Score: 3, Insightful
    "We don't have time for science projects in state government," he says.

    I felt that one hit my balls.

    --
    I spend most of my time in bed, darling.
    1. Re:Ouch by geoffspear · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Why, are you a scientist at one of the U. Illinois schools that is apparently closing down unexpectedly after this announcement?

      --
      Don't blame me; I'm never given mod points.
    2. Re:Ouch by DRAGONWEEZEL · · Score: 1

      "I felt that one hit my balls."

      ME too!

      I don't eve use linux on any sort of regular basis.

      --
      How much is your data worth? Back it up now.
    3. Re:Ouch by Timbotronic · · Score: 1

      "We don't have time for science projects in state government," he says. I hate Illinois Nazis

      --

      One of these days I'm moving to Theory - everything works there

  4. And we all know how efficient State Government is! by coolmoose25 · · Score: 3, Insightful

    Even though I prefer Windows to Linux, it is not much of an endorsement when the uber-efficient State government endorses your products...

    --
    Brawndo: It's what plants crave!
  5. So that explains it. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny

    ""We don't have time for science projects in state government,""

    That's why they never bothered to find out how so many dead people were able to vote in Chicago elections.

    1. Re:So that explains it. by spun · · Score: 1

      No, you got it all wrong. Due to the condition of the soil, which may or may not have anything to do with queers building landing pads for gay Martians, science projects in Illinois state government invariably lead to hordes of brain eating zombies rising from the grave and voting Democrat.

      --
      - None can love freedom heartily, but good men; the rest love not freedom, but license. -- John Milton
    2. Re:So that explains it. by Deadbolt · · Score: 1

      Well, as long as said zombies aren't gay. I mean, eating brains and voting Democrat are bad enough, but being GAY?!

      --
      "Honey, it's not working out; I think we should make our relationship open-source."
  6. Re:The Illini Case Study (or Lack Thereof) by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 4, Funny

    You know, where I work, if you make a statement like "would save our company $10 million" you kind of need to make a business case.

    You don't work for the government, do you?

  7. State government exists to pay monopoly rent? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    > We don't have time for science projects in state government

    Your employers (the public) may overrule you on that one kid.

  8. Microsoft and Corporate Welfare by randall_burns · · Score: 1, Interesting

    What is especially interesting here: despite the fact that Torvalds arrived in the US on an H-1b visa, on average, open source companies are much less likely to use that program than Microsoft and its allies. Why does Gates need that program so much when his strongest competitor doesn't? Personally, I think the program as it is now structured is corporate welfare-and subsidization of incompetence. If H-1b were curtailed significantly, Linux would be moving onto the desktop faster.

    1. Re:Microsoft and Corporate Welfare by ZoOnI · · Score: 1

      The reason Microsoft needs H1B visas is because most Americans don't want to work for the company as the pay/stock options are weak and the hours are long.

      Washington State is very behind in green card processing, so as a side bonus M$ takes the H1B immigrant workers waves green cards in front of their faces and then has indentured workers for up to 5 years.

      During those 5 years they can work the snot out of the immigrants with out fear of them going else where.

      --
      "Never say Never."
    2. Re:Microsoft and Corporate Welfare by randall_burns · · Score: 1

      That is why I have suggested the fees on corporate sponsored H-1b visas-to the extent any such visas exist-should be raised considerably, say to $225,000 per visa(which is roughtly the value of lifetime benefits to oneself and descendents US citizenship confers compared to Indian citizenship). Companies recruiting exceptional talent could still afford to pay those kinds of rates. The revenues could be devoted to developing and expanding opportunities for US based talent. Now, I don't think Gates is sincere about really wanting more visas on a basis that doesn't hurt competive US citizens.

    3. Re:Microsoft and Corporate Welfare by fred+fleenblat · · Score: 1

      >> During those 5 years they can work the snot out of the immigrants
      >> with out fear of them going else where.

      And look at what they've accomplished:

    4. Re:Microsoft and Corporate Welfare by randall_burns · · Score: 1

      Kept the world's major purveyor of buggy, insecure, unstable software afloat?

  9. Science Projects? by andy314159pi · · Score: 4, Funny

    "We don't have time for science projects in state government,"
    They are too busy streamlining service at the DMV to install Linux.
    1. Re:Science Projects? by lpangelrob · · Score: 1

      You probably meant that in jest, but to be honest, service at the DMV has been streamlined. Substantially.

      The last time I went for a license renewal it took a grand total of 15 minutes, start to finish. Not 5 years ago that had the potential to be an hour-long process, possibly more at the extremely busy Chicagoland DMVs.

    2. Re:Science Projects? by edbob · · Score: 1

      Illinois does not have a DMV. Motor vehicle licensing and driver's licenses are handled by the Secretary of State.

  10. Re:The Illini Case Study (or Lack Thereof) by M-G · · Score: 1

    Well, they may very well be saving money vs. their old setup. But the real issue you failed to consider in looking at their analysis is how much money MS contributed to the campaign of the person who hired the person in charge.

  11. Re:The Illini Case Study (or Lack Thereof) by $RANDOMLUSER · · Score: 2, Interesting

    So they replaced "IBM Lotus Notes, Novell GroupWise, and Microsoft Exchange Server, with multiple versions of those systems in use" with a single state-wide Exchange site license. Once you factor in the licenses, admin salaries, and redundant servers, you might get to $2.1 million a year.

    --
    No folly is more costly than the folly of intolerant idealism. - Winston Churchill
  12. 80% Solution - Printing? by ThOr101 · · Score: 0, Troll

    I still have a hard time as an administrator to get things like HP Printers to work with Linux. When I do get them working, I run into strange things like not being able to print out a landscape PDF in portrait.

    Or trying to use third party print servers with linux.

    Anyway, I think for 80% of the stuff that people do, Linux is a great choice. But everytime I run into a printer or a scanner, I find the area that Linux lacks, and can't compete against windows.... yet.

    1. Re:80% Solution - Printing? by zootm · · Score: 1

      I still have a hard time as an administrator to get things like HP Printers to work with Linux. When I do get them working, I run into strange things like not being able to print out a landscape PDF in portrait.

      This could explain why the version of Ubuntu I'm running (Feisty, the development branch) has had (I think; I'm at work at the moment) an extra control panel added which is HP-branded, specifically for their printers. It seemed strange at the time but if HP printers require some crazy non-standard software I guess that makes sense.

    2. Re:80% Solution - Printing? by ThOr101 · · Score: 1

      Really? It does. That's cool.

      I don't mean to single out HP as the culprit here. I think my problems were a combination of cups, hal, and HP. I didn't keep the printer on all the time, so I think the USB target was moving. On top of that, I never quite figured out how to solve the battle between A4 and 8.5 X 11. A different driver seemed to help.

      Now it prints, but cups gets back a "Pen Mismatch Error". Even though it is a laserjet. ;-)

      So it isn't just HP. Also, kudos to the crew working on the printers. There are so many of them out there. Also reverse engineering the drivers can't be easy either.

      Glad to see companies like HP stepping up to make this a little easier.

    3. Re:80% Solution - Printing? by morgan_greywolf · · Score: 2, Insightful

      I still have a hard time as an administrator to get things like HP Printers to work with Linux. When I do get them working, I run into strange things like not being able to print out a landscape PDF in portrait. Either you're using very, very outdated printer software (*ahem*redhat*ahem), or you're using applications that aren't designed to work with modern Linux printing software like CUPS, hpijs, gnome-cups and KDE printing support. Whether inkjet or laser, I haven't had such problems with any HP printers in a very, very long time.

    4. Re:80% Solution - Printing? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      And I find just the opposite. Been running a lab for several years using cups. Even prints out how many pages per user, costing, etc. Far, FAR better than anything I have seen for windows labs. I'll never use windows again, thank god. You need to get out more...:-)

    5. Re:80% Solution - Printing? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "I don't mean to single out HP as the culprit here. I think my problems were a combination of cups, hal, and HP."

      It isn't. I had a bit of a time trying the supposedly well supported Brother HL-1650s. Took me awhile because the docs suck and whatever was being sent was hosing hubs. When I got it to work through trial and error, it's fairly impressive for basic printing.

      However, I can't get duplex printing to work or to switch to a different paper stack (I have the hardware option for the 2nd tray). What is nice is that there are a rather large number of comprehensive web sites documenting support or no on Linux, but details are lacking--stuff like you mention (landscape, switching to legal size in the stack) isn't clear and the little options in the GUI don't work either.

      All in all, I still use my XP box for printing. I haven't given up, but Ubuntu 6.10 was as a step backwards from 6.01 and there are other concerns still to be cleared up.

    6. Re:80% Solution - Printing? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      I have the exact same problem with Windows. Every time I try to hook up an HP printer or scanner, it fails. When I try to hook it up to linux, it just works. Even when I get things to work on windows, they just stop working after awhile and I have to reinstall everything. My favorite is that Windows XP only supports a single USB scanner at a time.

    7. Re:80% Solution - Printing? by EvanED · · Score: 2, Interesting

      I also like how you install the Gimp but don't get any printing support by default so have to install Gimp-print later. (I think that may have even required unmerging and remerging the Gimp proper... it's been a while.)

      What sort of image program doesn't have printing support out of the box?

    8. Re:80% Solution - Printing? by drinkypoo · · Score: 2, Informative

      I have a problem on Ubuntu Edgy with my Laserjet 2100. It does not align properly. I've been too lazy to look up the alignment info, because it's not really that important. But it is very stupid. The system claims to know the kind of printer I have. It recommended a driver for the device. Why is it not printing on the page?

      --
      "You're right," Fisheye says. "I should have set it on 'whip' or 'chop.'"
    9. Re:80% Solution - Printing? by dvice_null · · Score: 1

      > I run into strange things like not being able to print out a landscape PDF in portrait

      Let me guess, you have Ubuntu and you only tried the default PDF program to print it? It has a bug, which is fixed it current svn/cvs version, but meanwhile you wait it to arrive to your Ubuntu, install and try xpdf. It is not as pretty, but printing works with it.

    10. Re:80% Solution - Printing? by ArcherB · · Score: 1

      Even though it is a laserjet. ;-)

      Funny! My Okidata LED printer runs flawlessly with Linux as an HP LaserJet 4. Of course, just about any LaserJet compatible printer on earth should run like a champ with the HP LJ 2P driver. If your printer is a LaserJet, I'd start with the 2P driver and move up from there.

      Now inkjets are a different matter entirely. It's a safe bet that any printer that costs less than the ink that goes inside it is not going to work with Linux, or OSX for that matter. These printers have no on-board processing ability and must rely on software for them to print.

      Scanners have been easy as well, provided they are not bundled on top of an inkjet printer. I've had no trouble making both SCSI and USB scanners (usually Epson and Microtek) work with Linux without issue. Of course, this was back in the day when SANE had to be manually configured. I'm sure it's much easier nowadays.

      --
      There is no "I disagree" mod for a reason. Flamebait, Troll, and Overrated are not substitutes.
    11. Re:80% Solution - Printing? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      If you're not using hplip, you need to start. HP has been very good at delivering drivers for most of their scanners/printers. I have an all-in-one and have never had any problems with it.

    12. Re:80% Solution - Printing? by WhiteWolf666 · · Score: 1

      I've seen this issue on my printers (all HP). It always has to do with page size.

      SuSE & openSuSE default to A4. I'm in the USA, so all the paper I buy is letter size. Change the default page size, and this issue vanishes for me.

      I've had this on a color Laserjet (forgot the model number), and a selection of HP PSCs and All-in-Ones.

      --
      WhiteWolf666 an exBush supporter. All you new-school,compassionate,save the children Republicans can rot in hell
    13. Re:80% Solution - Printing? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      HP Printers and scanners are among the best supported.

      See http://hplip.sourceforge.net/ though most if not all major distributions bundle hplip, Ubuntu installs it by default I know.

      I will admit the drivers HP provides may not cover all models but they're pretty danged close. My HP PSC has worked flawlessly with Linux since I bought it.

    14. Re:80% Solution - Printing? by drinkypoo · · Score: 1

      Ubuntu also defaults to A4 (which should really be filed as a bug when it comes to a US-intended release.) But regardless I set both the page area and the page size to Letter and while it did change the extent to which it printed on the page, the print still begins about 3/4" too low on the page. I haven't tried since upgrading to Feisty alpha (just did that a bit ago) so perhaps this weekend I'll find that it works correctly.

      --
      "You're right," Fisheye says. "I should have set it on 'whip' or 'chop.'"
    15. Re:80% Solution - Printing? by WhiteWolf666 · · Score: 1

      Does it print correctly on Windows?

      If so, I suggest filing a bug report with HP; they have semi-official Linux support, and the issue is most likely in HPLIP, the HP Printing stack for Linux.

      It's not the easiest way to get support for someone who is unfamiliar with mailing lists, but they do have HP personnel here: http://hplip.sourceforge.net/mailing_lists.html

      Assuming this is a software problem, it would be nice if you could report it, so that someone from HP can fix it. This will probably take less effort for you than upgrading your distro, or, perhaps, they'll tell you, "Fixed in version XX, avaliable on YY distro."

      If you choose not to subscribe to the mailing list I might suggest a) being very polite ;-) and b) requesting replies to e-mail you in addition to the list.

      --
      WhiteWolf666 an exBush supporter. All you new-school,compassionate,save the children Republicans can rot in hell
    16. Re:80% Solution - Printing? by jimicus · · Score: 1

      That may be, but you can't really hold Windows responsible for HPs software.

    17. Re:80% Solution - Printing? by drinkypoo · · Score: 1

      If so, I suggest filing a bug report with HP; they have semi-official Linux support, and the issue is most likely in HPLIP, the HP Printing stack for Linux.

      The problem with that is that I get pretty much identical results (within 1/8" offset) using pxlmono as compared to hplip. That makes it seem more like a bug either in cups, or in the way Ubuntu Edgy implements it.

      --
      "You're right," Fisheye says. "I should have set it on 'whip' or 'chop.'"
    18. Re:80% Solution - Printing? by jimicus · · Score: 1

      This doesn't exactly produce a fantastic advert for Linux.

      "Use Linux on the Desktop! It's great, except that some very basic desktop functionality has clearly had zero testing as IT DOESN'T WORK!!"

    19. Re:80% Solution - Printing? by WhiteWolf666 · · Score: 1

      Hmm... Odd.

      Perhaps it is a PPD file issue, because both pxlmono and hplip will use the same PPD, no?

      Still, I'd suggest going to the HP mailing list, just because this is the sort of semi-related issue that they will want worked out :)

      If there is a distro-wide issue with Ubuntu's PCL6 support, it would make sense to make the Ubuntu HP maintainers aware, and I bet that they are reading the HPLIP lists.

      Wish I could help you further, but without access to a printer that exhibits this problem, I' m stuck ;-) Best of luck, and I know that this is, unfortunately, not the right kind of support to promote Linux on the desktop :(

      --
      WhiteWolf666 an exBush supporter. All you new-school,compassionate,save the children Republicans can rot in hell
    20. Re:80% Solution - Printing? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      If by "Doesn't work" you mean "has a bug in one of its pdf clients that affects people with certain types of printers, but is fixed in the upcoming release and has a workaround for people using older releases" yeah I guess that TOTALLY makes linux unusable, huh? No, actually that kind of screws up your point.

    21. Re:80% Solution - Printing? by ThOr101 · · Score: 1

      Actually, the machine I was installing the HP onto was a redhat fedora core 6. Are the HPLIP drivers included with this distribution that far out of date as to cause problems?

      Thanks for the advice.

    22. Re:80% Solution - Printing? by morgan_greywolf · · Score: 1

      The main problems I've seen with printing in Fedora Core (now, I haven't used FC6, only FC5) are that system-config-printer doesn't always work right (because it's very outdated), GIMP-Print is very out of date at 4.2.7 (it isn't even called GIMP-Print anymore as of the 5.x series, it's now gutenprint), and CUPS is very out of date (1.2.4 in FC6, vs. 1.2.8 in many other distros). The PPDs they distribute are typically very out of date as well, and I usually end up having to download new ones from linuxprinting.org.

  13. Windows can be as secure as Linux by wiredog · · Score: 2, Funny

    Not by default, and not as easily, but just as secure.

    1. Re:Windows can be as secure as Linux by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny

      Cutting the network cable doesn't count!

    2. Re:Windows can be as secure as Linux by 99BottlesOfBeerInMyF · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Not by default, and not as easily, but just as secure.

      I disagree. For a normal person/environment, this is not the case. Out of the box, the average Linux distro is more secure than Windows Vista. If you put work into Vista you can make it about as secure from a technology perspective as the average Linux install, but you can't change the malware ecosystem which targets Windows more and presents it with more threats, making the overall risk on Windows greater. Also, for more secure, managed environments you can utilize SELinux or something that provides more fine grained control than Vista can offer in a usable environment unless you have access to the Windows source code, which normal people don't.

      So if you're aiming for a level of security that is sort of middle of the road, then you can (with extra work) get Windows to the same state as the average Linux install, but you'll still have a higher risk. Further, if you're aiming for something above and beyond that, Windows just can't achieve some of the security layers that Linux can, so it will always be a bit behind.

    3. Re:Windows can be as secure as Linux by drinkypoo · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Not by default, and not as easily, but just as secure.

      This is not even remotely true. Linux is inherently more secure than Windows by design, at least if the security-related features are actually used (and I'm not even referring to selinux, for which there is no Windows analogue.) And on top of that, security holes in Linux are typically fixed much faster.

      I do not agree that it is possible to make Windows as secure as Linux unless you're not even turning the Windows machine on. And even if it were true, with the same amount of effort put into both, you could still stay far out ahead with Linux.

      --
      "You're right," Fisheye says. "I should have set it on 'whip' or 'chop.'"
    4. Re:Windows can be as secure as Linux by Master+of+Transhuman · · Score: 1

      How is this "informative"?

      Citing the methods would be "informative". As it stands, this is an opinion - one not shared by everybody in the security industry, I suspect. Shared by many in the security industry, perhaps, but not all.

      --
      Richard Steven Hack - This sig is TOO GODDAMN SHORT TO DO ANYTHING USEFUL WITH! MORONS!
    5. Re:Windows can be as secure as Linux by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      And yet, you seem to ignore the testimony that BG gave where he stated that XP and prior had KNOWN security flaws that prevented it from being locked until there was a WHOLE os re-design. I think that is what Vista was all about. But I think that most folks consider Xp to be windows. Now, I am trying to figure how the Frick you got modded up.

    6. Re:Windows can be as secure as Linux by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "Also, for more secure, managed environments you can utilize SELinux or something that provides more fine grained control than Vista can offer in a usable environment unless you have access to the Windows source code, which normal people don't...

      "...Windows just can't achieve some of the security layers that Linux can, so it will always be a bit behind."

      Apparently you're not familiar with NTFS ACLs.

    7. Re:Windows can be as secure as Linux by Ngarrang · · Score: 1

      Windows suffers from being the target that is singled out the most. Could Linux withstand an onslaught of equal proportions and have its reputation survive?

      --
      Bearded Dragon
    8. Re:Windows can be as secure as Linux by 99BottlesOfBeerInMyF · · Score: 1

      Apparently you're not familiar with NTFS ACLs.

      Actually, I am and I've advocated that MS step up to the plate and implement them properly in some version of Windows ever since NT 4.0 was released. While the NT kernel supports ACLs, they are pretty much unusable in real software on Windows unless you have the source code to Windows, which was one of my previous points. For ubiquitous application to all processes they are unusable and for individual processes a VM is actually more practical at this point. I stand by my assertion.

    9. Re:Windows can be as secure as Linux by Fordiman · · Score: 1

      Windows, when you're not running as Admnistrator, is easily just a 'secure' as Linux not running as root, for definitions of 'secure' that mean one user can't kill the whole system, and the Admin account is not compromised.

      That said, Windows has a big red 'X' painted on it as far as scumware authors are concerned.

      Of course, while Linux users are smart enough to not run as root, they will almost never run Windows as anything less than an admin; it's just more of a jab in the nuts to do. (ie: how do you do things as root in Linux? precede every command with 'sudo' or 'gksudo', or just run 'sudo su').

      --
      110100 1101000 1101000 1100110 0 1101111 1101000 1100011 1
    10. Re:Windows can be as secure as Linux by 99BottlesOfBeerInMyF · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Windows, when you're not running as Admnistrator, is easily just a 'secure' as Linux not running as root, for definitions of 'secure' that mean one user can't kill the whole system, and the Admin account is not compromised.

      When on fire you're just as secure as when you're not, for definitions of "secure" that mean you are unlikely to be hit by a russian nuclear device. Seriously, that's not a very reasonable definition of "secure" and even looking at that premise there is at least one outstanding, public privilege escalation in Vista right now and there almost always is in the current version of windows, while the same is not true on Linux. MS has never taken local escalations seriously.

      Windows has a big red 'X' painted on it as far as scumware authors are concerned.

      Windows is the low hanging fruit both because of default security and because of the monoculture install base size. Because of the increased risk on Windows and the education level of the users, its security needs to be technically superior to Linux to achieve the same risk and that is just not likely to happen anytime soon.

    11. Re:Windows can be as secure as Linux by drinkypoo · · Score: 1

      Windows, when you're not running as Admnistrator, is easily just a 'secure' as Linux not running as root, for definitions of 'secure' that mean one user can't kill the whole system, and the Admin account is not compromised.

      That is only one aspect of security, an attack from within the system.

      There are many other aspects to consider, like for instance remote holes.

      Of course, while Linux users are smart enough to not run as root, they will almost never run Windows as anything less than an admin; it's just more of a jab in the nuts to do. (ie: how do you do things as root in Linux? precede every command with 'sudo' or 'gksudo', or just run 'sudo su').

      It's still an annoyance in Unix, like when you want to redirect. You could do sudo sh -c "( command > file )" but that is still an annoyance, so we have a tendency to sometimes sudo bash. Which is counterproductive...

      --
      "You're right," Fisheye says. "I should have set it on 'whip' or 'chop.'"
    12. Re:Windows can be as secure as Linux by swillden · · Score: 1

      Apparently you're not familiar with NTFS ACLs.

      And you're confusing ACLs (which Linux also has) with MAC (provided by SELinux and not available on Windows).

      --
      Note to ACs: I usually delete AC replies without reading them. If you want to talk to me, log in.
    13. Re:Windows can be as secure as Linux by 99BottlesOfBeerInMyF · · Score: 1

      Windows suffers from being the target that is singled out the most. Could Linux withstand an onslaught of equal proportions and have its reputation survive?

      If by some miracle Linux was given 50% or 80% of the desktop market tomorrow due to a massive switch campaign, within a few months we'd be seeing a serious malware problem. The security of the average Linux distro today is not up to the challenge of dealing with that much malware. It might not be quite as bad as Windows, but it would not be all that much better.

      On the flip side, the security process on Linux is quite different. Linux cannot ever wield monopoly influence on the market, because of the open source licensing that shapes the development process. As a result if the above scenario were to take place, 6 months later Linux would have adapted and implemented new security technologies that gutted most of the malware problem and Linux would fair quite well in the ensuing arms race, probably moving to ubiquitous SELinux like security combined with multiple security services for the determination of trust levels and default restrictions. The real problem with Windows security is that MS does not lose enough money when its users are compromised so it has motivation. With Linux, the developers are the users and if they don't fix the problem, someone else will and nothing is stopping people from migrating to that new distro.

    14. Re:Windows can be as secure as Linux by The-Ixian · · Score: 1

      I have administered both linux and windows servers. The only compromise I ever had was on a Linux server through a Horde exploit. He did not get root but was able to open a screen to home base and run spam through.
       
      I have not seen much of a difference between windows and linux security from a remote exploit point-of-view.
       
      The problem is the local install vector, and I would agree with the notion that with the proper privileges set, you needn't worry about this any more than you would on a Linux machine.

      --
      My eyes reflect the stars and a smile lights up my face.
    15. Re:Windows can be as secure as Linux by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      default configurations and best practices aside, i think there is one major reason why linux is more secure than windows. i used to think it was because linux is run with normal user priviledges and requires root password to do anything critical, but i recently realized this has nothing to do with it as most people running linux will know their root password or have sudo setup for them. the single most important and central 'feature' of most linux distros that make them more secure than windows is...
      (drumroll)
      the way software is distributed! windows, you click on a link on webpage, download exe, and run it. very de-centralized.
      with linux, you either download source and compile/install on your own (very few 'suckers' have the confidence or know-how to do this or
      the software is downloaded and installed from a central repository with tools such as apt-get. very centralized control of software.

    16. Re:Windows can be as secure as Linux by ewanm89 · · Score: 1

      I prefix with sudo unless on an Apple Mac where I sudo /bin/bash!

    17. Re:Windows can be as secure as Linux by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      you are so funny. why don't you go and turn yourself off.

    18. Re:Windows can be as secure as Linux by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      you can't change the malware ecosystem which targets Windows more and presents it with more threats
      Your point is moot. If for some reason the popularity of Linux on home PCs skyrocketed in one year and grabbed an incredible 20% market share, a "malware ecosystem" for Linux would soon follow as well.
    19. Re:Windows can be as secure as Linux by 99BottlesOfBeerInMyF · · Score: 1

      Your point is moot. If for some reason the popularity of Linux on home PCs skyrocketed in one year and grabbed an incredible 20% market share, a "malware ecosystem" for Linux would soon follow as well.

      Actually, that point is moot. If you look to the the most basic reason Windows does not become more secure, it is pretty clear it is a matter of motivation. MS does not significantly lose money when their customers are compromised because MS has a monopoly. A user's machine is compromised and becomes and unusable spam bot and in a fit of rage they run it over with their truck. The next day they go down to Walmart or Kmart or BestBuy to pick out a new one and every machine there comes with Windows installed. They don't even know they have another option and if they somehow learn about the existence of Linux, well guess what they still paid MS for a copy of Windows they now don't use. Where exactly is the motivation for MS to invest in better security instead of a token effort?

      Now take a look at Linux. Linux is licensed in such a way that no Linux distribution is ever likely to wield monopoly influence in the market, since it can always be forked. That means if Linux grabbed a significant chunk of the market and malware authors targeted Linux just as much as they do Windows, Linux would immediately begin to adapt to the new situation and increase security. The developers of Linux are the users for the most part and thus security issues cut into their bottom line by stopping them from getting things done. The financial impact of security problems is direct and so is the motivation to fix them. Also, since Linux basically cannot lock people in due to the licensing, nothing is stopping users from migrating to whatever distro does implement better security and there is competition between them to motivate improvements.

      If trojans and malware targeted Linux as heavily as Windows, Linux would quickly improve security, probably by adding a built in malware scanner that contacted numerous competing while/blacklists including free offerings. Then, they would probably make a sprint towards ubiquitous application of SELinux and adapt software to work within the bounds of such software easily. They'd probably implement more strict trust determination in conjunction with their repository system and whitelists. That would basically gut the malware ecosystem reducing it to a few phishing style attacks and trojans with really, really well designed social engineering aspects and which would take a lot more work and have much shorter lifespans. Basically the average user would be a lot better off.

      Do you want to know what is really interesting about your hypothetical situation? If Linux had 20% or 30% of the home desktop, we'd probably see these exact same technologies applied to Windows as well (with more lock-in and no open standards). MS would suddenly have real, financial incentive to fix their security since they would not be able to rely upon their monopoly power to lock in customers. In summary, security on Windows is so poor, because MS is a monopoly and regardless of the current technologies in use, Linux will be relatively secure because they are not a monopoly, so they have to be secure; and MS will have relatively poor security until they are no longer a monopoly.

    20. Re:Windows can be as secure as Linux by jZnat · · Score: 1

      So where can I download a secure by default Windows distro?

      --
      'Yes, firefox is indeed greater than women. Can women block pops up for you? No. Can Firefox show you naked women? Yes.'
    21. Re:Windows can be as secure as Linux by jZnat · · Score: 1

      somecommand | sudo tee somefile
      Or if you need to append:

      somecommand | sudo tee -a somefile
      You can use sudo cat somefile instead of <somefile as well.
      --
      'Yes, firefox is indeed greater than women. Can women block pops up for you? No. Can Firefox show you naked women? Yes.'
  14. Re:The Illini Case Study (or Lack Thereof) by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    They are saying they are saving $10.5 million by using this new Microsoft solution instead of the previous solution, which was based off of Novell Groupwise. They decided to dump Novell because they are transitioning to Linux and most likely the current Groupwise offering with go unsupported which Novell makes the switch. Presumably they already made a business case. I'm sorry they didn't share it with you, but you don't make the decisions. Get a grip. Taxpayers don't have a say in every purchasing decision the government makes.

    By the way, there are plenty of other examples of people switching to "M$". In fact, Microsoft's server and enterprise business has been booming. Check the last few 10-Q filings.

    Of course you will get modded up, and probably already have a karma bonus and I will be modded down, but thats the way it works around here I guess.

  15. Well... by manx801 · · Score: 1

    "We don't have time for science projects in state government," he says.'" of course not. That is only for the federal government. Virtual Case File anyone?
  16. It's true by petrus4 · · Score: 4, Informative

    I dual boot Ubuntu Edgy Eft with Gnome and Beryl. I can play WoW with it, listen to my mp3s with it, surf the web with it, watch YouTube with it, read/write email with it, do office stuff etc...the only two things I'm not doing with Linux yet are watching DVDs (I tried that earlier tonight and had some weird problems) and using my webcam...and the latter is only because I haven't bothered to install the drivers yet.

    I haven't completely weaned myself off XP yet, but I'm working on it. I advocate Ubuntu though to anyone who wants to find out for themselves that desktop Linux, even though it may not have been in the past, is now a genuinely viable reality.

    1. Re:It's true by LaughingCoder · · Score: 4, Funny

      I can play WoW with it, listen to my mp3s with it, surf the web with it, watch YouTube with it...the only two things I'm not doing with Linux yet are watching DVDs
      Sounds like Ubuntu is all ready for use by state government employees then, except for that pesky DVD problem.
      --
      The more you regulate a company, the worse its products become.
    2. Re:It's true by guycouch · · Score: 1

      although on my system, the file is: /usr/share/doc/libdvdread3/install-css.sh

    3. Re:It's true by solevita · · Score: 1

      I haven't completely weaned myself off XP yet, but I'm working on it.
      Just delete it. Getting off Windows is best done quickly. As soon as you delete your Windows partition you'll have to install your webcam drivers and get DVDs playing. That shouldn't take too long and you'll be better for it

      Good luck!
    4. Re:It's true by Mizled · · Score: 1
      DVD playblack works great in Ubuntu you just have to have the correct packages isntalled. DVD backup is also easy to do as well. Webcam isn't too hard to setup either.

      The only thing I can't do in Ubuntu is play most games. I've tried running games with Cegega, CrossOver Office and Wine but nothing seems to work well. Only native *nix games work OK (i.e. Unreal Tournament).

      --
      Bite my shiny metal ass.
    5. Re:It's true by aaronl · · Score: 1

      You should look at Automatix or EasyUbuntu.

      I run one of those two, and I can play back anything I've seen, with the exception of copy restricted WMV files. Honestly, the only home use I have for Windows is to play Supreme Commander, and hopefully that will be fixed soon. I'd be able to ditch Windows at work, but our finance system "upgraded" to a .NET client, and that just doesn't work on WINE. Of course, it also didn't work on the NT machines that I had at the time, either.

    6. Re:It's true by pravuil · · Score: 1
      Yeah, but the only problem with the "weaning" for me isn't DVD's, nor Webcams. They work great on Suse with the nvidia/pacman repos. The problem I have is finding a service that provides music downloads instead of online streaming. Real provides a good personal playlist streaming service for Linux but I don't want to have my computer on all the time just so I can listen to music. I got an iPod and I want to use it. I want flexibility. If someone out there in the Linux community steps up and starts a media distribution method that works with major Media producers then I can finally say "f*** m$, Apple and anybody else trying to single out Linux out of the media market."

      A little rant here about Linux:

      I love Linux, Beryl runs great on it, it plays and manages media files with devices wonderfully, privoxy/tor works better on Linux IMO, it's like I got too much time on my hands now because I'm not fidgeting over maintenance issues all the time. It's like I'm on vacation for the first time in my life and it really sucks because I feel extremely unproductive. I need to find new things to do. I'm not as flustered as I used to be because I don't need to configure scripts all the time. A couple of bugs with XGL and rendering but nothing extreme. The only thing I boot into Windows for is to purchase songs from iTunes and update my iPod with the purchases. I have to be realistic with my interests which prevents me from erasing the Windows partition completely. Other than that, don't really care for their product.

    7. Re:It's true by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Sounds like Ubuntu is all ready for use by state government employees then, except for that pesky DVD problem.

      Not to worry; state governments still use VCD's

    8. Re:It's true by solevita · · Score: 1

      Fair enough. I like iPods, but I didn't buy one because I wanted something I could just drag and drop music to under any operating system. As for music distribution, I buy CDs and rip them myself. I can understand, however, that if you enjoy itunes, linux isn't much help to you.

      I use linux exclusively now and absolutely love it, but I've also been careful to get locked into as few software/hardware combinations as possible, even if it does mean that my computer experience may at times be less flashy than a Mac users, for example.

    9. Re:It's true by clang_jangle · · Score: 1

      Actually I just watched a DVD last night using kmplayer in Debian Etch on a Toshiba Portege laptop.

      The fact is Debian is so thoroughly user-friendly at this point Ubuntu seems almost redundant.

      --
      Caveat Utilitor
    10. Re:It's true by crayiii · · Score: 1

      2 things keep me from removing my windows partition. 1. Photoshop (I'm a pro photographer and need a monitor/scanner/large format printer color matched process. 2. Exchange Server. I use 1and1.com for my exchange server hosting so my phone (ppc-6700) can be used for calendar, tasks, contacts, etc. I use Outlook at home and the office and everything keeps in sync very nicely. 1and1.com does not support Exchange connector and I've tried everything to get it to connect.

    11. Re:It's true by gnu-user · · Score: 1

      You might try mono...

    12. Re:It's true by aaronl · · Score: 1

      The particular app is mixed .NET and Win32. I have to run the program using Wine, but then there are .NET components that won't execute. It's very annoying, and the company is cozying up to MS, which really bothers me. The previous version was pure Win32, and that could be run with Wine no problem.

      It would probably cost me $100,000 to migrate to another financial platform, though.

    13. Re:It's true by EdibleEchidna · · Score: 1

      I dual boot Edgy with XP. Edgy has recently (i) stopped recognising the scanner part of my all-in-one Epson CX5400 which was working fine previously (ii) Gaim crashes on connecting to MSN, which was working fine previously (iii) the print quality in Edgy sucks compared to XP, etc, etc, etc. I've stuck with Linux (SUSE then Ubuntu) for many years, waiting for it to become ready for everyday desktop use, but my next upgrade will be to OS X. I've had enough.

  17. But are they still paying the Microsoft Tax? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Did those 20,000 PC come preinstalled with Windows? Will the next generation of 20,000 PC come preinstalled with Windows, only this time to be wiped and replaced by Linux on the first day?

    Unless big PC manufacturers (the ones able to sell in volume) offer Linux or No-OS as an option, Microsoft isn't impacted: they will just collect their Vista money from this company a few years down the road.

    1. Re:But are they still paying the Microsoft Tax? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      system76 is your friend.

    2. Re:But are they still paying the Microsoft Tax? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      considering the price they're putting on those laptops with a free OS I wouldn't consider them my friend at all.

    3. Re:But are they still paying the Microsoft Tax? by Locklin · · Score: 1

      The MS tax doesnt apply to large purchasers
      1. any OEM will sell you blank PC's if you buy in quantity
      2. governments/corporations usually have site licences (not OEM licences), so it doesnt matter if it's MS or Redhat

      --
      "Knowledge is the only instrument of production that is not subject to diminishing returns" -Journal of Political Econom
  18. Re:The Illini Case Study (or Lack Thereof) by texaport · · Score: 1

    I checked first with the Microsoft Ministry of Trvth for an official position paper on the subject. I am now more confused than ever but I still remain an unmoved, unclean, unconverted unbeliever.

  19. Microsoft lipstick by psyph3r · · Score: 1

    I believe that Microsoft is more of a Customer based experiment than anything else. Microsoft goons have already brainwashed him. Otherwise i would have to severely doubt his intelligence

    1. Re:Microsoft lipstick by theakstonsXB · · Score: 1

      Kind of makes you wonder... isn't this the same Novell wot's in partnership with Microsoft. So Microsoft still gets the $. Hmmm, interesting ploy on their part.

  20. This is regrettable by bogaboga · · Score: 1
    [...]"We don't have time for science projects in state government,"[...]

    Attitudes like these are surely regrettable. No wonder the USA, once the champion of innovation and skill is way behind Asian countries.

    If I were this man's boss, I'd simply ask him to withdraw that statement. I even wonder whether he's on Microsoft's payroll.

    1. Re:This is regrettable by geekoid · · Score: 1

      "No wonder the USA, once the champion of innovation and skill is way behind Asian countries.

      No were not. You got some facts to back up that claim?

      What they do is take innovation made by the US and capitalize on them through different managment practices.

      --
      The Kruger Dunning explains most post on /. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dunning%E2%80%93Kruger_effect
    2. Re:This is regrettable by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Because innovation only happens in the US right? Riiiiiiiight!

  21. Linux has found a home on my laptop by vrmlguy · · Score: 4, Insightful

    I've dual-booted for a long time, but it's only been recently that I started spending more time in Linux than in Windows. (And the shift was both dramatic and quick. In a single day, I went from less than 20% of my time spent in Linux to over 80%.) This is mostly due to the proliferation of Web 2.0. The latest version of Exchange's Webmail means that I no longer need to use Outlook, and Open Office is a more than adequate substitute for Office. There are a few internal web-apps that claim to require IE, but Greasemonkey has been letting me repair the worst of them. (BTW, I would love to have a way for User Agent Switcher to recognize certain URLs as needing a special string, instead of me getting an error page and having to change the string manually.)

    --
    Nothing for 6-digit uids?
    1. Re:Linux has found a home on my laptop by 99BottlesOfBeerInMyF · · Score: 2, Interesting

      My story is sort of the opposite of yours. I'm a long time user of many OS's, but lately I find myself using Linux less and Windows more. The reasons for this are a bit complicated. The recent trend towards hardware assisted virtualization has finally allowed me to consolidate all my workstations into a single laptop. That is very cool and it means I can directly run Linux at the coffee shop, whereas it used to be available only at my desk at work (not counting server use). You'd think that would make me use it more, but in reality it means I use it less. You see, I basically run Linux on the desktop for a handful of applications that operate best there (GIMP, InkScape, OO, XPDF, etc.) The drawback to this system is I can only run 2 OS's at a time. The VMs are running on top of OS X, which is my workstation OS of choice and runs 90% of my apps. I find myself more and more running Windows in the VM for an irreplaceable application, which means I have to shut it down to run Linux. That's not a big deal, but for most of what I do, there are acceptable replacements for the Linux software (Photoshop, Illustrator, TextEdit, Preview, etc.) More and more often I find myself just editing that vector graphic element in Illustrator so I don't have to shut down Windows. Linux may be winning corporate desktops from Windows, but I fear they are also losing a lot of home and power user desktops to OS X. I'll be curious to see if corporate Linux adoption really does take off and if that has the expected impact on home use. If wider adoption means those irreplaceable Windows applications become replaceable, the story will change in a hurry.

    2. Re:Linux has found a home on my laptop by garcia · · Score: 0, Flamebait

      've dual-booted for a long time, but it's only been recently that I started spending more time in Linux than in Windows. (And the shift was both dramatic and quick. In a single day, I went from less than 20% of my time spent in Linux to over 80%.)

      And OTOH I used Linux exclusively from 1997 through 2002 as my main desktop OS. I then switched to XP on my daily use machines because Linux application support sucked.

      While I am still a Linux advocate, it's not for it being run on the desktop. In fact, I would steer *ANYONE* and *EVERYONE* away from it just as I would suggest they do with Vista.

    3. Re:Linux has found a home on my laptop by PieSquared · · Score: 1

      Bah. I get the feeling I'm going to be making that switch fairly soon. As soon as feisty comes out I'm going to wipe my linux partition (I've screwed something up on the graphics end and I've decided to let it slide for a few months).

      My main problem right now is trying to get 3D acceleration working for my laptop video card so I can run modern games under wine... "glxinfo | grep rendering" returned "direct rendering: No" so I tried to fix it and ended up with a string of 5-6 errors instead of the desired "direct rendering: Yes" and honestly I'm not going to stop using windows until I can get that working. Here's to hoping I don't screw up again on feisty...

      --
      Does a line appended to your comment give your post meaning in and of itself, or only in relation to those without?
    4. Re:Linux has found a home on my laptop by Kjella · · Score: 1

      You see, I basically run Linux on the desktop for a handful of applications that operate best there (GIMP, InkScape, OO, XPDF, etc.) (...) That's not a big deal, but for most of what I do, there are acceptable replacements for the Linux software (Photoshop, Illustrator, TextEdit, Preview, etc.)

      Photoshop: From $649 (Adobe store)
      Illustrator: From $499 (Adobe store)
      Textpad: $30
      Preview: You paid for it somehow when you bought the Mac, but let's say $0

      Sure, if you can spend $1000+ on software then there's no problem finding replacements, much better ones too. If you have no budget (or respect for copyright law...) then obviously Linux will lose. I'm sure some Linux geek will protest now, but quite frankly there's a lot of very good commercial software made for Windows/OS X which would easily kill off their OSS clone if they were made open/free (that is really the yardstick for objectively better).

      --
      Live today, because you never know what tomorrow brings
    5. Re:Linux has found a home on my laptop by apathy+maybe · · Score: 1

      Interestingly, I went from using Windows 100% to using Ubuntu 100%. I finally found a distro that installed on my laptop and had wireless drivers so that I could use the Internet (living in student accommodation, with only wireless).

      The fact that I much prefer the GNOME environment to Windows (it is much more customizable and the way the calender integrates with the clock ... (for those not in the know, click on the clock to bring up a calendar and then double click on a date. It brings up Evolution. Add an appointment or task or something, and it adds it to the clock calendar!)), is one reason.

      And the software installation! It is so easy! No fucking around with Google to find the site or anything. Having to use a stupid wizard.

      --
      I wank in the shower.
    6. Re:Linux has found a home on my laptop by 99BottlesOfBeerInMyF · · Score: 2

      Textpad: $30

      I actually wrote "TextEdit" which is another one bundled with OS X (I use it to edit .doc files quickly with a small footprint).

      Sure, if you can spend $1000+ on software then there's no problem finding replacements, much better ones too.

      I'm a professional. My company buys my hardware and software, unless it is something I buy for one of my contract jobs. When I'm doing contract work I bill about $100/hour. The cost/benefit of software that lets me do half my tasks faster pays for this software really, really quickly. One of the things I'd like to stress, however, is that it is not always an either/or situation. GIMP is better for some tasks and I use it for them. GIMP can be installed under OS X too, it just isn't quite as nice. Because Linux does not offer me as much that is non-portable or that is not offered elsewhere, it end up being used less on the desktop. If Windows software was more portable or had more replacements, Linux would start to win that battle. Or, if Linux was more capable on the desktop compared to OS X, or OS X was more portable and ran well in a VM, Linux might win more. As it is, its strengths aren't as important as other platform's limitations.

    7. Re:Linux has found a home on my laptop by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      but lately I find myself using Linux less and Windows more

      Well, lately, like many people, you find yourself obviously using Un*x more and more. If you run Windows under Parallels, your main OS is an Un*x OS. This is a big problem for MS: 12% of all laptops sold nowadays are running OS X (and laptop sales overtook desktop sales, what, two years ago?) and when someone buys OS X, MS is losing its grip. Sure, you still run Windows. But it's Un*x that is running on the bare metal.

      Linux may be winning corporate desktops from Windows, but I fear they are also losing a lot of home and power user desktops to OS X

      Linux has never been big on the desktop. When the sales of OS X are rising so much, the big looser isn't Linux but MS. You fears are unjustified. And even is we take into account the minority of "power user" that used to run beige PCs and that now run OS X, it's still more bucks going to Apple and less to MS-jokeys companies (Dell, HP, etc.).

      Go OS X, go Linux, go Solaris. In other words, go Un*x!

      There's only one company in this industry that has an important position and that has constantly been producing underperforming, closed, insecure sh*te. And the future doesn't look as rosy as it did for that company 5 years ago.

    8. Re:Linux has found a home on my laptop by lordSaurontheGreat · · Score: 1

      That's interesting. When I dual-booted, I was on Linux 100% and Windows 0%. I booted Windows 3 times to fix filesystem errors on the NTFS partition (I didn't know how the fsck command worked back then) and then after 3 months I killed Windows 'cause I hadn't used it. Been using Kubuntu ever since. Okay, so I tried Gentoo, then Fedora, and now I'm back on Kubuntu. I just found that OpenOffice did everything I needed. I use GMail, so that goes with me everywhere.

      In addition, the skills I've learned using Linux have allowed me to use my hosting company's services with greater effect. It's so enabling to be able to log in via SSH and make a post-commit script to slap the latest documentation onto the web directory for every new build. The Windows "easy equivalent" involves Visual Source Safe (sticker price $500 or so, per seat) and IIS 6.0 (which is a much more expensive server, almost $200/month for the same kind of bandwidth/storage I get now under a Linux VPS) and a FTP client and the "copy paste" technique AFTER locating the latest build in the gigantic and cryptic VSS repository (which is like trying to find a needle in a haystack, what with all the files named things like AAAAAAAAAAAB.AAAAAAAAAAA and crap).

      What's more, I've never paid a single penny for Linux. I've tried the free trial of SuSE SLED 10.1 and it's NOT the solution for the future (trust me...) however, Linux itself is. Moving to Linux with either Ubuntu/Kubuntu is the easiest thing there is, and it will save you a lot of money. It will also save you a lot of time. My VSS vs. Subversion example is only one recent event. I have had many kinds of similar experiences with Linux.

      The only reason for not upgrading to Linux is fear of the painful times when you're thunking around in between Windows and Linux. It's like jumping into the pool: it's really painful up to the gonads, but after that acclimation it's all smooth-sailing.

      --
      Consider yourself spoken to.
    9. Re:Linux has found a home on my laptop by 99BottlesOfBeerInMyF · · Score: 1

      If you run Windows under Parallels, your main OS is an Un*x OS.

      Well, technically, Parallels could be running under Windows with another version of Windows in it, but yeah I'm running it on top of OS X.

      Linux has never been big on the desktop. When the sales of OS X are rising so much, the big looser[sic] isn't Linux but MS.

      I don't know. OS X sales are certainly hurting MS somewhat, but I know a lot of Linux on the desktop people who have moved to OS X on the desktop and that has to affect the number of developers available to work on it. What small home/desktop market share Linux had may be hurt pretty badly.

    10. Re:Linux has found a home on my laptop by J0nne · · Score: 1

      I had the same issue (b0rked Xorg), but i just reinstalled Ubuntu and started over.

      When you (re)install, make sure your /home folder is on a different partition, this way you can basically reinstall without losing any settings when you screw up.

      For some reason the Ubuntu installer doesn't tell you that it's a good idea to have /home on a different partition, which is a shame. Ubuntu itself only takes about 5-10gigs, depending on what packages you install. use 15GB to make sure you have enough room. The rest of your disk can be used as /home and for other OS'es.

    11. Re:Linux has found a home on my laptop by vrmlguy · · Score: 1

      When you (re)install, make sure your /home folder is on a different partition, this way you can basically reinstall without losing any settings when you screw up. Or do what I do and burn /home to a CD. This gives me a worst-case backup if my hard drive ever goes south.

      --
      Nothing for 6-digit uids?
    12. Re:Linux has found a home on my laptop by vrmlguy · · Score: 1

      Dapper Drake never worked with my desktop's on-board video card, Edgy Eft worked out of the box; this it what got me to install it on my laptop. Unfortunately, neither release seems to work with my Dell's built-in WiFi. This isn't a big deal at work, where everything is 100baseT, but it means that most of that 20% of the time I'm in Windows is when I'm at home. I eagerly await Feisty Fawn in the hope that WiFi will "just work".

      --
      Nothing for 6-digit uids?
    13. Re:Linux has found a home on my laptop by J0nne · · Score: 1

      my /home is about 70GB right now, so burning that to cd is not an option ;). I do back up to an external USB disk though.

  22. Re:The Illini Case Study (or Lack Thereof) by bangwhistle · · Score: 1

    Such cynicism! Policticians aren't swayed by money, are they?

  23. Don't have time? by crashley · · Score: 1

    The state workers probably demanded the state implement MS. They wanted the extra break time during reboots.

    1. Re:Don't have time? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Funny you should mention that. Today I thought I'd go for lunch while rebooting Windows. But when I came back, the thing hadn't rebooted yet, as it couldn't kill one of the processes. Horay, too breaks for the price of one reboot!

      (Posting anonymously as I don't want anyone to know I actually use Windows).

  24. Re:The Illini Case Study (or Lack Thereof) by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Apparently Mr. Campbell is also clueless as to what a 'science project' is, as well as not knowing anything about computers, operating systems and/or governments, etc.

    Any idiot who uses M$ junk for mission critical stuff is more inline with the 'mad scientist' type of thinking...or perhaps junk science, if they are using M$ junk.

    If I were in Illinois, I'd be calling for a replacement for Mr. Campbell from my local representatives, as a starter. Then get someone who knows what they are doing/talking about in there to start open sourcing systems like the rest of the planet. Mr. Campbell is simply an excellent example of a dinosaur. Perhaps he should do a science project on that, dinosaur thinking.

  25. New distributions are helping a lot the process by gusmao · · Score: 2, Interesting
    I was having a conversation with a friend exactly about that in this past weekend. New distributions are finally managing to be easy to install and use, offering to the user every software they may need to replace windows'. I installed Ubuntu for the first time about a week ago, it took about half an hour and the installation was flawless. No hard questions, every device properly recognized and configured, wireless network perfectly functioning, sweet. Of course there are lots of room for improvement, but it's never been so close

    I've never believed that linux would take over the desktop market, but now that exist distributions that may grandmother can install and mantain by herself and with corporations and governments pushing it more and more, every incentives for non-nerd people to adopt linux are in place.

    1. Re:New distributions are helping a lot the process by The+Monster · · Score: 1

      distributions that may grandmother can install and mantain by herself
      Is your grandmother named 'Grace' by any chance?
      --

      [100% ISO 646 Compliant]
      SVM, ERGO MONSTRO.

  26. Linux is getting there, slowly by sco_robinso · · Score: 5, Informative

    As a windows System Admin (although I run Ubuntu personally), I can finally say that Linux is starting to get there, albeit slowly. I would definately say that linux is ready for a corporate IT envrionment.

    It's still going to take a bit of time before it's fully ready for the home desktop though. I use 802.11 wireless as a perfect example of that - amongst the 'warm and fuzzy' distro's (SuSe, Ubuntu, Mandrake, Lycoris), I have yet to be able to set up a system where there wasn't a fairly significant amount of rigmoral to get something as simple as wireless with basic encryption running. It wasn't really 'hard' for me to get the wireless running, but in each case, it required editing of text files, and typically no less that 7 or 8 CLI entries. Linux has come a long ways, even in the past 2 or 3 years. I think Ubuntu is a great example of a good, easy to use OS. However, there's still a few dark and nasty corners of Linux which need polishing before it's ready for the masses. And let's not mention games and brand name apps which only run under windows.

    Overall, it is exiting to see and watch. For the first time ever in the past few months, I've been able to recommend Ubuntu to begginner and novice users, as an easy-to-use alternative to Macs or Windows, with a straight face.

    1. Re:Linux is getting there, slowly by drinkypoo · · Score: 1

      IIRC Ubuntu Feisty is supposed to have a new network manager to make this easier. I'm in the middle of attempting my upgrade right now or I'd tell you if it's true or not.

      --
      "You're right," Fisheye says. "I should have set it on 'whip' or 'chop.'"
    2. Re:Linux is getting there, slowly by sco_robinso · · Score: 1

      Yes, I've also heard that. 7.04 (Fiesty Fawn) is touting much better support for 'consumer technologies' and such out of box. I've heard wireless and Beryl are supposed to be getting big boosts because of this. Ubuntu's wireless support isn't horrible out of the box, but there's no WPA support, not to mention no GUI front-end for said WPA support. Having to edit configuration files and fire off a series of commands to get something as simple as wireless working is not a good thing for an easy-to-use distro. But let's hope there's indeed improvement in Fiesty.

      And don't even get me started on the giant gong-show of installing beryl and getting it to work properly on various cards....

      I am indeed looking forward to 7.04.

    3. Re:Linux is getting there, slowly by Master+of+Transhuman · · Score: 1


      I agree, Linux is ready for the corporate desktop, as an IT department or consultant can make sure everything works.

      And Linux is ready for the home user who doesn't use any hardware other than what is standard on a desktop PC. Laptops and wireless are still iffy. But that's coming along nicely - and would do so faster if the damn manufacturers could supply driver information, if not actual drivers. I still say IBM and HP and others who are making money off Linux need to pressure - or pay for - the peripheral manufacturers to start supporting Linux with drivers or at least hardware info so the community could write drivers. It's no more than what Microsoft does for hardware manufactuers.

      --
      Richard Steven Hack - This sig is TOO GODDAMN SHORT TO DO ANYTHING USEFUL WITH! MORONS!
    4. Re:Linux is getting there, slowly by WhiteWolf666 · · Score: 1

      Have you tried a distribution using NetworkManager?

      This makes this stuff *much* easier.

      Even with older SuSEs (10.0 and older), YaST2 has pretty good 802.11 WEP/WPA support. Not sure why you had problems.

      Anyways, with the new distributions (in particular openSuSE 10.2), NetworkManager hits the 802.11 ball out of the park; wireless encryption is as easy as on an OS X box, and a great deal easier than on an XP box.

      --
      WhiteWolf666 an exBush supporter. All you new-school,compassionate,save the children Republicans can rot in hell
    5. Re:Linux is getting there, slowly by aaronl · · Score: 1

      Ubuntu Feisty has GUI support for WEP and WPA out of box. Dapper and Edgy work with WEP out of box, and can be made to work with WPA by installing NetworkManager. I have to go into a command line to get a single thing to work on my machine; everything else was done by installing the right package from Add/Remove or Synaptic. The one change from the command line was to enable composite visuals in my X server, and most users wouldn't do that. (It was needed to play around with Compiz and Beryl.)

      I can run most Windows games using Cedega or the current build of WINE, though that is not exactly a perfect situation. Most regular apps work with WINE or CrossOver Office, but hat is also an imperfect solution. .NET junk doesn't work at all, but I hate having to use that stuff anyway due to the horrible performance that typically follows.

      I agree that it all should just work from the start, but that doesn't happen with anything right now, except MacOS. That's a bit of a cheat on Apple's part, since they control the hardware platform, too.

    6. Re:Linux is getting there, slowly by sco_robinso · · Score: 1

      Once additional comment I should make regarding linux and the business world. A lot of these comments are assuming that the business user is just running run-of-the-mill desktop apps, like Word or Excel. But...

      A big problem which a lot of businesses face is the myriad of 'other' 3rd party apps which rely on windows. Many businesses could go to Linux, but many can't. Even if IT is on the bandwagon, you now have to get accounting, payroll, and various other departments on the bandwagon, and hope they don't use software which runs on Microsoft OS's, which the vast majority do, and will have virtually non-existent Linux portability. This is what starts to become the big problem, based on my past experience - there will likely be some app hidden in the deep dark recesses of some employee's computer which the business is reliant upon.

      This is not to say that there isn't ways around this. Often times a few minutes on WINE and all is solved, but there's a lot of extensive testing that needs to go into it first. There is an incredible amount of planning, testing, and more testing that would need to go into a Linux move.

      But yes - in general for a pretty static windows/office based business, the Linux transition could be doable.

    7. Re:Linux is getting there, slowly by jesterzog · · Score: 1

      As a windows System Admin (although I run Ubuntu personally), I can finally say that Linux is starting to get there, albeit slowly. I would definately say that linux is ready for a corporate IT envrionment.

      I don't disagree, but I've also recently noticed that at least some of my Windows-using IT work friends still think that Linux is a command-line-happy OS with no graphical interface.

    8. Re:Linux is getting there, slowly by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You are mostly right about wireless (especially wpa). However SuSe 10.1 required only stepping through the setup and entering my WPA passphrase, everything else was detected. Thinkpad x31 with Intel 2200G.
      MC

    9. Re:Linux is getting there, slowly by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Feisty offers a new WLAN stack and Red Hat's NetworkManager, which by default supports WPA/2

    10. Re:Linux is getting there, slowly by kbahey · · Score: 1

      I use 802.11 wireless as a perfect example of that - amongst the 'warm and fuzzy' distro's (SuSe, Ubuntu, Mandrake, Lycoris), I have yet to be able to set up a system where there wasn't a fairly significant amount of rigmoral to get something as simple as wireless with basic encryption running.


      It depends on the hardware.

      I had nothing but trouble from laptops that use Broadcom (often AMD CPU equipped ones).

      But when using laptops that have Intel PRO wireless, it was a breeze. Worked just by putting the ESSID and WAP key in the wireless assistance (I use Kubuntu).
  27. Re:The Illini Case Study (or Lack Thereof) by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Insightful
    Quoted text from here:

    Paul Campbell began his career as an Investigator for the Internal Revenue Service focused on reducing financial fraud.

    Unnecessarily subsiding a monopoly using taxpayers money, could well be considered fraud.

    He later served as a Special Agent for the Office of the Inspector General, General Services Administration, investigating public corruption.

    Let's not ask why he never looked at alternative suppliers in his current role.

    As an attorney, Paul worked as an Assistant State's Attorney in Illinois and in private practice at Piper Rudnick concentrating on commercial and business litigation matters. In 2001, after earning his M.B.A. at Northwestern University, Paul also served as Piper Rudnick's Knowledge Partner. He joined CMS as Assistant Director in February 2003 and was named Director of the Department in June 2005. Under Paul's leadership, CMS continues to achieve savings and enhance services as it implements new technologies, reduces waste and rethinks many of the administrative operations of the state.

    Where's the scientific data to support that claim? Where are the case studies?

    In light of this guys comments and history, IL residents should complain to their governors office. I'm sure Campbell would happily consent to an audit to ensure everything is above board.

  28. Misquote by NotFamous · · Score: 2, Funny

    It was acutally "We don't have time for science in state government"

    --
    Some settling may occur during posting.
  29. Re:The Illini Case Study (or Lack Thereof) by Gryle · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Taxpayers don't have a say in every purchasing decision the government makes.
    Why the hell shouldn't we? As far as I'm aware of, the govt is using our tax dollars to pay for it right?

    --
    Only two things are infinite, the universe and human stupidity, and I'm not entirely sure about the universe - Einstein
  30. Re:The Illini Case Study (or Lack Thereof) by mikelieman · · Score: 1

    Looks like they avoided all that pesky Due Diligence, too.

    --
    Technology -- No Place For Wimps! Grateful Dead and Jerry Garcia Chatroom -- http://www.wemissjerry.org
  31. Said it before... by tomstdenis · · Score: 0

    OSS is not solely about cost. It's about freedoms. you may not want to develop OSS software yourself, but I'm sure you benefit from the interoperabilities and forks of OSS projects.

    You choose free software because it gives you the freedom to use your computer the way you want.

    It's very superficial to claim that the money savings is the only reason to switch to OSS from proprietary software.

    Tom

    --
    Someday, I'll have a real sig.
    1. Re:Said it before... by Rycross · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Talking about freedom isn't going to fly when making a business case though. Freedom is a great reason to use FOSS, but if you want to get your boss adopted, you have to frame it the right way. Instead of talking about "freedom" as a concept, you ask him how he feels that Microsoft could change their software and make you lose your data, with no way of getting it back. Or, in my case, when evaluating a proprietary product, I could say "Well, this open source one does everything we need, its free, and the big bonus is that if we run into problems with it, we can take that source and work around it. If we use proprietary product X, we'd have to beg them for features." This is actually something I argued.

      To be quite frank, software freedom is kinda an out-there idea for a lot of people not closely associated with FOSS or computers in general. Dropping that on their lap is likely to put them off. If you can frame it in a way that illustrates exactly how it benefits them without bringing all the emotional baggage that typical FOSS screeds carry, then you will be a lot more successful.

      Thats why people talk about cost a lot. Its a very effective trojan to get FOSS into businesses.

    2. Re:Said it before... by Gryle · · Score: 1

      True, but I really doubt the government cares about "the freedoms of software." For them, the bottom line is the important thing.

      --
      Only two things are infinite, the universe and human stupidity, and I'm not entirely sure about the universe - Einstein
    3. Re:Said it before... by DogDude · · Score: 1

      You choose free software because it gives you the freedom to use your computer the way you want.

      I want to use my computer as a point-of-sale workstation that is robust. Free software can't help me with that. What you're saying is only true if you can find an app that does what you need it to do.

      --
      I don't respond to AC's.
    4. Re:Said it before... by bluskye · · Score: 1

      Companies choose to use/buy software that helps them make money (or loose less in the case of government), not put them back in the stone age. Where is an Exchange killer? Excel killer? Sales Territory Mapping software? TI OMAP SDK/Emulator kit? Blackberry Desktop Manager? Yeah, thought so. PS, I used Debian for 8 years during college, until I realized I couldn't do anything productive with it when I started making monies.

    5. Re:Said it before... by tomstdenis · · Score: 1

      Nothing you wrote contradicts what I said. If there waws proper POS software in the OSS domain, you would choose it, because it grants you the freedoms to use it how you want (say add feature, or find additions others wrote, etc).

      Tom

      --
      Someday, I'll have a real sig.
    6. Re:Said it before... by dedazo · · Score: 1

      you ask him how he feels that Microsoft could change their software and make you lose your data

      And when he asks you if you have specific examples of this, what are you going to point him to?

      --
      Web2.0: I love when people Flickr my cuil and digg my boingboing until my google is reddit and I start to yahoo
    7. Re:Said it before... by DogDude · · Score: 1

      That's a pretty disingenuous statement. In reality, it doesn't necessarily let you use your computer any way you want. There's tons and tons of software that simply doesn't exist as OSS, so unless you're a professional programmer, you can't "use your computer any way you want".

      --
      I don't respond to AC's.
    8. Re:Said it before... by tomstdenis · · Score: 1

      You can *choose* to learn to program and extend your environment.

      In Windows you can do that too, for the most part, except where hidden APIs are involved. But more importantly, in OSS world, you can extend existing projects to do what you want better.

      But don't think that the benefits of OSS are lost on non-programmers. Eventually some programmer/developer/etc will come along and extend/improve/fix things and non-progammers can benefit from that. As a non-programmer you're pretty much stuck using popular [or highly demanded] OSS software. But you're not legally forced into that situation. For instance, suppose you run a company, use some software [that is OSS] and it needs new functionality. You could hire a developer to add on to the OSS.

      You'd save money since the developer has something to start with [as opposed to writing it all from scratch] and the resulting product is also freely licensed meaning you're free to use it sans royalties or upgrade fees [etc.]

      If you used proprietary software, and the company went under, you're sunk. Worse, if they use proprietary undocumented data formats [largely the norm] you're doubly sunk.

      Tom

      --
      Someday, I'll have a real sig.
    9. Re:Said it before... by 99BottlesOfBeerInMyF · · Score: 1

      And when he asks you if you have specific examples of this, what are you going to point him to?

      That shouldn't be too hard. MS has introduced many incompatible versions of their software over the years. In fact, I inherited an entire file server full of .doc files when I moved to one job and when I tried to archive them I discovered no currently available version of word could open a significant number of them. OpenOffice, ironically, could open some of the files, for the rest we had to ebay an old copy of Word and then save them in newer formats. That incident by itself was enough for our company to standardize on non-proprietary formats and put a partial moratorium on Word as an internal tool.

      The business case for open source and open standards, however, is a lot more compelling than just files becoming inaccessible. There are real costs involved with keeping an entire company standardized on some version of software and if the availability of that is determined by one company only and they routinely stop selling old versions you have to choose between committing to the unknown but substantial cost of maintaining that upgrade cycle, or moving to a format/software where you can take bids from multiple vendors and/or the upgrade path is guaranteed and free.

    10. Re:Said it before... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      And when he asks you if you have specific examples of this, what are you going to point him to?


      All the mutually incompatible binary versions of word documents, which open differently in different versions of word?

      The corrupted Access database which was stretched beyond its limits?

      Corrupted Exchange databases?
    11. Re:Said it before... by shmlco · · Score: 1

      "Well, this open source one does everything we need, its free, and the big bonus is that if we run into problems with it, we can take that source and work around it."

      Putting more work on your development staff is a good thing? Assuming you have one qualified in that language and system, of course.

      One company I consulted for looked at various open source content management systems, and then paid about $50,000 for a commercial one. The commercial one had great documentation (most of the OSS systems REALLY sucked in that regard) and they offered paid support contracts and had a great reputation for service and fast turnaround for support issues.

      Taking one of their developers off of a project and having him tinker around in some system he know's nothing about in an attempt to "work around" some problem is not what they call "a good thing".

      I also know a few shops who've attempted to use OSS products and probably spent more time (and dollars) working on them and/or attempting to roll their own solutions than they would have spent simpy buying something.

      From my perspective, OSS works best when you're so large you can afford to devote resources to it, or if you're so small and cash-strapped you have no other choice.

      --
      Any sect, cult, or religion will legislate its creed into law if it acquires the political power to do so.
    12. Re:Said it before... by Rycross · · Score: 1

      It took no additional work from our development staff. It worked as-is. The open-sourceness is a safety net, a way out if we ever get trapped by the functionality.

      We pay for software if its what we need. Given two equal options, the one that gives us options in the fact of changing needs and possible failures is the one that is given more weight.

    13. Re:Said it before... by tomstdenis · · Score: 1

      You could pay people to work on OSS. Believe it or not but there are consulting shops that specialize in just that.

      Bonus, their product usually falls under the same license [especially if it's GPL'ed] so your investment is protected in more than one way.

      Tom

      --
      Someday, I'll have a real sig.
    14. Re:Said it before... by shmlco · · Score: 1

      Yes, you can pay, but that sort of falls under my first category, doesn't it? That you're large enough to afford to devote resources to it?

      --
      Any sect, cult, or religion will legislate its creed into law if it acquires the political power to do so.
  32. Re:The Illini Case Study (or Lack Thereof) by teh_chrizzle · · Score: 1

    As far as I'm aware of, the govt is using our tax dollars to pay for it right?

    no, they are using corporate kickbacks. your tax dollars go to pay for the stuff that the corporations don't pay taxes to support.

    --
    sarcasm:
    -noun
    1. harsh or bitter derision or irony.
  33. Re:The Illini Case Study (or Lack Thereof) by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Uh, because its not feasable? How would it work, we have a referendum every time a government agency wants to buy urinal cakes? You elect your leaders to supposedly represent you. You don't have a direct say. If you want a direct say, go work for the government or get elected. Sorry.

  34. Re:Linux discovers the trash can by Gryle · · Score: 2, Insightful

    What interface are you referring to then?
    The biggest drawback to Linux is that it requires a modicum of intelligence to learn. God forbid anyone should have to expend effort in an attempt to learn something new these days.

    --
    Only two things are infinite, the universe and human stupidity, and I'm not entirely sure about the universe - Einstein
  35. The luxury of wealth by atomic777 · · Score: 2

    While perhaps not the richest or largest state in the union, Illinois still has an economy nearly the size of the Netherlands and can afford to throw money away on Windows. The rest of the world, meanwhile, will continue to innovate with OSS and leave the US with bloated, expensive systems to maintain

  36. Re:The Illini Case Study (or Lack Thereof) by Locklin · · Score: 3, Funny

    1: buy MS software
    2: decide to do a "case study" on "total cost of ownership"
    3: recieve massive discounts from MS.
    4: publish the difference between 1 and 3

    everybody wins!

    --
    "Knowledge is the only instrument of production that is not subject to diminishing returns" -Journal of Political Econom
  37. Re:Linux discovers the trash can by Rycross · · Score: 0, Flamebait

    Why should they spend the effort? Most people want their computer to work like their TV, or their Playstation. They don't want to have to think about it. If you want them to expend effort on it, then you have to give them a good reason to do so.

  38. No Standby/Hibernation = No Thanks by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Laptop companies do not provide proper power modes support for Linux. I highly doubt IT wants to support the lack of standby/hibernation on all the laptops. Any real laptop user rarely turns off the laptop unless entering a plane.

    1. Re:No Standby/Hibernation = No Thanks by WhiteWolf666 · · Score: 1

      Depends on how buggy your laptop's bios is. MS has access to all the manufacturer's work arounds, and the Linux community does not. Reference implementations, or close to reference implementations work well, as do models with a lot of marketshare (ThinkPads, Dells).

      My MacBook Pro suspends/resumes just fine using suspend to ram.

      --
      WhiteWolf666 an exBush supporter. All you new-school,compassionate,save the children Republicans can rot in hell
    2. Re:No Standby/Hibernation = No Thanks by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      First of all the manufacturers already hobble the ACPI so *nix systems have to provide a workaround. ACPI requires a base system config known as the Differentiated System Description Table (DSDT). Now when I run 'dmesg |grep DSDT' from the command line here is the output:

      [ 0.000000] ACPI: DSDT (v001 VIAK8T AWRDACPI 0x00001000 MSFT 0x0100000e) @ 0x0000000000000000
      [ 31.849275] ACPI: Looking for DSDT ... not found!

      Notice the MSFT in the output. Yes that stands for our wonderful chair throwing folks over at the house of Redmond. Microsoft's ASL compiler allows really buggy code to be compiled that would be tossed out by let's say Intel's ASL compiler since Intel adheres to the ACPI spec. What does all of this mean?

      Well it means that Microsoft has an advantage because it can compile the DSDT outside of the ACPI spec and it will work just fine on windows, but because *nix systems adhere to the ACPI spec the buggy code will ... wait for it, NOT run on Linux systems.

      In the words of the immortal Jim Nabors "Surprise! Surprise! Surprise!"

  39. Re:The Illini Case Study (or Lack Thereof) by 'nother+poster · · Score: 1

    Because we elect the government officials to do those things for us. They can't take the time to consult the plebs on every thing. What you do, if you feel they are betraying your trusts, is you get a recall vote going and dump their ass on the street. If the position is an appointed one, recall the elected official who has hiring/firing authority over the position if they do nothing. If you can't get the signitures to do a recall, then the rest of the citizens don't agree.

  40. That's true by harry666t · · Score: 1

    That's true. I have installed Debian on my grandpa's computer last friday, and another three Debians at my school today.

    More Debs coming, there are still almost 15 machines left! ^_^

  41. seems fair by teh_chrizzle · · Score: 4, Funny

    seeing as how science projects rarely make time for state governments.

    perhaps the linux community needs to reach out. you know what might do the trick is yet another repackaged ubuntu distro that caters to some cultural minority. maybe you can call it illinibuntu or just dabuntu.

    --
    sarcasm:
    -noun
    1. harsh or bitter derision or irony.
    1. Re:seems fair by sharkey · · Score: 1
      Perhaps GFL - Grossman Fan Linux



      Seems like that would be a rather minor minority!

      --

      --
      "Outlook not so good." That magic 8-ball knows everything! I'll ask about Exchange Server next.
  42. with an attitued like that! by SUSE_RULES · · Score: 1

    don't have time for science projects? with the savings to a linux solution, he could afford to hire all sorts of "scientists". god what a mind set. so much for Illinois...

  43. Case Study of Corruption. by twitter · · Score: 2, Informative

    According to this, the office was a scandal. If anything, it's an example of how not to do things.

    Central Management Services is the agency in charge of most state purchasing and hiring. Its influence over other agencies has expanded sharply under Blagojevich. State auditors repeatedly have found management problems there.

    One particularly scathing audit, released just as Campbell was taking over the agency, found CMS had paid improper expenses to contractors, failed to document the cost-cutting it claimed to have achieved and sometimes allowed contractors to start working before having a signed deal.

    Follow-up audits six months and one year later found continuing problems, as well as some improvement.

    Blagojevich's hiring practices have raised questions, particularly from federal prosecutors.

    Where there's corruption, expect M$ to be crammed down your throat.

    --

    Friends don't help friends install M$ junk.

    1. Re:Case Study of Corruption. by mrskibone · · Score: 1

      Ahhh - CMS.
      I worked there as a contractor in late 2000.
      On my first day, my "boss" didn't know there was a new person starting. Off to a bad start. The manager was out for maternity leave and wouldn't tell anyone when she was coming back. So they got a replacement manager. And he quit. So they got a replacement for the replacement manager - my boss. He was the most clueless of men I have ever had the luxury of working under. He would doze off at his desk multiple times during the day and occasionally wake up to say something stupid.

      The rest of the team - a halfway decent tech; an older gentleman who was dirtier than most of the bums out in front of the building; and a nice young asian guy who I avoided since he was at least one year from what would be considered "basic conversational english".

      I was young(er) and (much more) arrogant back then so after enough times of telling my boss to wake up and stop being a complete idiot, he was given permission to give me the boot.

      The good old days. I did about 2-5 hours of actual work a week and it was the most money I had ever made at the time. Actually, adjusted for inflation, it probably still is the most money I ever made. Ahhh - if only I had learned to keep my mouth shut and collect my paycheck. I'm getting much better at that.
      The life of an apathetic contractor.

  44. Retraining costs is a red herring by gsfprez · · Score: 1

    I use XP at work, all day long, and i just gave Vista a swing on my MacPro via parallels last night.

    Wow. I was so lost, it wasn't funny. Vista and, from the screenshots, Office Vista... whatever... are going to require 100 pounds of retraining per person at any corporation.

    Things are in the wrong place, the menus have all vanished or mysteriously moved to the right side of the window, except now some of them are text and some of them are icons.

    I have a hard time believeing that if you can get your head wrapped around Vista and Vista Office that you can't get your head around Ubuntu. I just don't believe you. The differences may be less stark between 2000/XP and Ubuntu and XP/Vista. And i'm not even using Aqua... errr... Aero. I've even gone to Windows classic mode - and i'm still totally lost in Vista.

    Fear, laziness, and stubbornness are the reasons IT nerds won't even consider Linux.

    --
    guns kill people like spoons make Rosie O'Donnell fat.
    1. Re:Retraining costs is a red herring by dave420 · · Score: 1

      The difference in usability between Vista and Ubuntu are two different things. Vista needs people to be GUI-retrained, whereas Ubuntu requires people know how to configure their wireless card on the command-line. They're not the same problem. "Getting lost" is different to "not understanding fundamental ways of using the OS to do what was previously done in a graphical environment".

    2. Re:Retraining costs is a red herring by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      That's BS and you know it.

      There's no need to configure a wireless card via the command line. It may be faster and easier if you know what you're doing but it's not necessary.

      I know, I configured my wireless card and never once looked at the command line. Network manager made it pretty danged easy, it's a GUI.

    3. Re:Retraining costs is a red herring by techno-vampire · · Score: 1
      ...Ubuntu requires people know how to configure their wireless card on the command-line.


      This isn't, or at least shouldn't be a deal-breaker because it only needs to be done once. When IT installs Ubuntu on a corporate laptop, this should include logging in, setting up the wireless card and doing any other finicky, fiddly bits that need to be done to get everything working. By the time the user gets the laptop, all of that should have been done, just like any custom driver installations under Windows should be finished.

      --
      Good, inexpensive web hosting
  45. Re:The Illini Case Study (or Lack Thereof) by Master+of+Transhuman · · Score: 1


    And where do you get the notion that Groupwise will not be supported under Linux? Novell already runs most of its company under Linux - do you think they use Exchange?

    Another Microsoft nitwit.

    These clowns don't even bother to try thinking for a second before posting this nonsense. They don't even care how stupid it makes them look. All they care about is getting their licks in for Microsoft.

    Here's an idea - why don't you go up to Redmond, find Bill's office and just suck his dick for a living. I'm sure Bill will pay you well. Oh, wait, I forgot. Microsoft shills don't need to be paid to be shills. Being submissive to Bill is all that is required.

    --
    Richard Steven Hack - This sig is TOO GODDAMN SHORT TO DO ANYTHING USEFUL WITH! MORONS!
  46. It has to be 'seamless' by vansamirin · · Score: 1

    People don't want to mess around making every little thing work. Personally, I was sick of Windows, and Vista finally made me decide to switch to something else. I tried Ubuntu 3 or 4 times and Fedora Core. They were great at 'almost' working, but it seemed like there were far to many steps to get to have the machine fully functional. I use my machines for media hubs, and there were so many hoops to jump through to get everything to work in Linux, I just gave up. I bought a Core 2 Duo Imac, and I'll probably never touch Linux or Windows (at home) again. Unix based systems don't have to be hard to use, Apple proves that. If only the distros could eliminate some of those hoops.

    1. Re:It has to be 'seamless' by delire · · Score: 1

      You bought that iMac with an operating system preinstalled, an OS made for that hardware specifically. If you want the same experience with a Linux distribution, and don't want to "jump through hoops", buy a machine with Linux preinstalled, from a company like System 76 for instance. I hear people are very happy with their products and services.

      HTH

  47. Re:Linux discovers the trash can by Gryle · · Score: 1

    Reasons
    1) It's free. You're not shelling out big bucks for an operating system or the programs that go along with it.
    2) Support is fairly simple to find. Most, if not all, Linux distros I'm aware of have a help forum of one kind or another.

    --
    Only two things are infinite, the universe and human stupidity, and I'm not entirely sure about the universe - Einstein
  48. Then I have a suggestion for your boss by SmallFurryCreature · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Either hire a better administrator OR just suck it up and be a windows shop.

    The simple fact is that lack of skills in your employees is a problem you have to deal with in many fields, either hire better ones, train the ones you got OR do without that skill.

    It is the reaon you see those semi-cars. They are small trucks drivable with a car license that have a setup similar to a semi (those big trucks with a tractor element and the eh cargo element (am I dazzling you with my tech speak yet?)) because transport companies find it impossible to hire enough people with truck licenses (and are unwilling to train new ones). They offer more cargo space then a van wich in some business is more important then their low weight limit.

    Linux will have to be a choice similar to that, you can forget getting your nephews 12 year old kid to configure it, you are going to have to move your business software of Excell and you are going to have to hire someone who in 2007 isn't still baffled by setting up a printer.

    Oh am I too harsh? Well, I am so sorry but for the last decade I seen nothing but people come up with one excuse after another why Linux is so hard, while at the same time I get those things working without a sweat. Am I that brilliant, are you that stupid OR are you just making up excuses.

    Use windows, but don't try to put the blame on linux.

    --

    MMO Quests are like orgasms:

    You may solo them, I prefer them in a group.

    1. Re:Then I have a suggestion for your boss by couchslug · · Score: 2, Informative

      (OT)
      "It is the reaon you see those semi-cars"
      Must be a European thing.
      The US equivalents are "hot shot" rigs where a large "dually" pickup pulls "gooseneck" or fifth-wheel trailers.
      Our Department of Transportation is getting wise to this and ticketing appropriately when the rigs aren't permitted for interstate commerce.

      --
      "This post is an artistic work of fiction and falsehood. Only a fool would take anything posted here as fact."
  49. Re:And we all know how efficient State Government by stevesliva · · Score: 1

    Yup, in state government they're too busy making the DMV a model of efficiency to save the taxpayers money. Spare no expense.

    --
    Who do you get to be an expert to tell you something's not obvious? The least insightful person you can find? -J Roberts
  50. Science projects by AJWM · · Score: 1

    I dunno, it seems to me that the combination of Microsft Windows and Office is one huge entomology project.

    --
    -- Alastair
    1. Re:Science Projects by bluskye · · Score: 1

      Yeah. NYC doesn't need garbage cans, they have sidewalks.

    2. Re:Science Projects by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      IIRC, the City of Chicago runs a lot of Redhat servers.
      TFA is about the State of Illinois.

  51. Re:Linux discovers the trash can by Rycross · · Score: 1

    Neither of which applies to your usual consumer. Most people get Windows with their computer.

    As far as support goes, the minute you tell them to go to a forum, you're asking them to put more effort and thought than they're willing to. Most of the regular users I know don't even like calling Dell for support. Posting on forums is a significant barrier in terms of effort and psychology. Most people feel like they aren't talking to a real person over forums, or that a forum post is less reliable than a "trained Dell tech".

    Plus, volunteer help on a forum isn't obligated to help you. I've posted before on forums for help, and gotten no responses. If its not reliable, why should people rely on it?

  52. donations by Mateo_LeFou · · Score: 1
    --
    My turnips listen for the soft cry of your love
    1. Re:donations by rujholla · · Score: 1

      umm I don't know how you searched but I got substantially different results

      open secrets
    2. Re:donations by Mateo_LeFou · · Score: 1

      paste 'em in here? Mine was blank and yr link gets me an error.

      --
      My turnips listen for the soft cry of your love
    3. Re:donations by rujholla · · Score: 2, Informative

      Results:

      52 records found in 0.0469 seconds.

      Total for this search: $1,892,584

      Search Criteria:
      Donor name: Microsoft
      Donor State: WA
      Cycle(s) selected: 2006, 2004, 2002

      Then it goes on to list all the seperate donations -- majority of which appear to go to RNC but there are substantial amounts to DNC also.

      http://www.opensecrets.org/indivs/search.asp?key=9 8JHH&txtName=Microsoft&txtState=WA&txt2006=Y&txt20 04=Y&txt2002=Y&Order=N

  53. Re:The Illini Case Study (or Lack Thereof) by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    It will most likely run under Linux at some point, if it doesn't already. However, Illinois doesn't want the risk of the uncertainty while Novell is making the transition. Its all in the article of course, but you zealots can't be bothered to read facts when the reality distortion field keeps you nice and comfy.

  54. Science Projects by chromatic · · Score: 2, Insightful

    "We don't have time for science projects in state government," he says.

    What if Chicago donated the time of all the workers painting "Richard M. Daley, Mayor" on every garbage can in the city? That could free a lot of time.

  55. sure? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    how can you be sure those "i will turn to linux" companies aren't just trying to "force" Microsoft to give them better prices for large installations, as happened lots of times, when a xp pro licence was payed less than 50 euros?

  56. Re:Here we go....AGAIN??? by Master+of+Transhuman · · Score: 0, Troll


    Bill, Steve says check your cell, Rob Enderle is trying to call you. You didn't pay him for his last shill article.

    --
    Richard Steven Hack - This sig is TOO GODDAMN SHORT TO DO ANYTHING USEFUL WITH! MORONS!
  57. Default and easily are relevant by Mateo_LeFou · · Score: 4, Insightful

    If I said I was capable of customizing a Hyundai so that it outran a Maserati Bora, would you say "Hyundais can be just as fast as Maseratis". Yes? Would you be right? Sorta. But not where it counts

    --
    My turnips listen for the soft cry of your love
    1. Re:Default and easily are relevant by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      My Hyundai is nearly (0-60 6.60 sec.) as fast as a Bora (0-60 6.2 sec.), you insensitive clod.

      Disclaimer: For given values of fast (and a not well-maintained Bora)

    2. Re:Default and easily are relevant by Neoncow · · Score: 1

      Right, but what if you could duplicate that Hyundai for free? That's what Windows admins are doing in the enterprise. They invest the time to customize their operating system images and then ghost it across all the computers. Now if we take the analogy furthur and say that the customization severely restricts the driver from doing other important things, then I can agree with you (USB drives are still useful in the enterprise. Grrr IT!).

  58. Vista by berbo · · Score: 1

    Best argument for Linux yet

    1. Re:Vista by ksd1337 · · Score: 1

      Don't you mean:
      Best. Argument. Ever.

  59. I live in Illinois. This is no big surprise by the_rajah · · Score: 1

    We have the best government that money can buy.

    --


    "Do the Right Thing. It will gratify some people and astound the rest." - Mark Twain
  60. Never lived in Illinois. by Bill,+Shooter+of+Bul · · Score: 1

    The rule of thumb in Illinois government it to spend the most money on the worst product, to create as many jobs for unqualified people and claim that the state is the best due to the amount of money spent.

    --
    Well.. maybe. Or Maybe not. But Definitely not sort of.
  61. Open Source is just another BUSINESS PLAN! by OpenSourceIsAJoke · · Score: 0, Troll

    Admit it, all Linux and Open Source is just another BUSINESS PLAN! I could care less about Open Source or Copyrighted Software. To me support and management for Open Source cost 10 times more. So the only difference is if you pay for it when you buy or download it cost a lot less for support and management. On the other hand if I get an Open Source product for free I PAY TEN TIMES MORE to management and support! So its time to stop HIDING UNDER YOUR UMBERLA OF OPEN SOURCE and come out an admit that you folks also need to make money for a living and your just want me to USE OPEN SOURCE so that you can CHARGE ME 10 TIMES MORE FOR MANAGEMENT AND SUPPORT! FUNNY... I just hired a MYSQL admin at my shop last week for 96,000 while I only pay my MSSQL DBA 65000 who manages all my real production databases! YOUR ALL A JOKE!

    1. Re:Open Source is just another BUSINESS PLAN! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      YOUR ALL A JOKE!
      My all a joke? I think the only joke here is your grammar and sentence structure. Oh, and the fact that you apparently can't shop around for employees.
    2. Re:Open Source is just another BUSINESS PLAN! by Locklin · · Score: 1

      96,000 / 65,000 = 1.48 != 10

      You run a business?

      --
      "Knowledge is the only instrument of production that is not subject to diminishing returns" -Journal of Political Econom
    3. Re:Open Source is just another BUSINESS PLAN! by geekoid · · Score: 1

      The money difference is only a factor whan you measure it against other factors. Performance, stability, etc.

      Maynbe your MS DBA is getting screwed by you?

      "I could care less about Open Source or Copyrighted Software."
      I am sure the BSA will be glad to know that.

      Did you take into account the money it will cost you if MS calls you up and demands you let them audit, or the tell the BSA you are a pirate?
      It's not that uncommon.

      OTOH, you are clearly a liar and do not run a business. . . or you 'run' your daddy's business.

      --
      The Kruger Dunning explains most post on /. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dunning%E2%80%93Kruger_effect
    4. Re:Open Source is just another BUSINESS PLAN! by mhall119 · · Score: 1

      Hmmm, something doesn't seem right here....

      Are you telling me that your MSSQL DBA is incapable of learning MySQL? It's not that hard, I did it when I was 19 from a single O'Reilly book and some testing. I once had to show an MS SQL DBA what indexes are, and how to use them, so maybe the barrier to entry as an MS DBA is lower than for other databases. Kind of like why you pay more for a C++ or Java developer than a VB developer. Maybe that's why you don't pay your MS DBA much money, he's incompetent?

      Have you thought of asking your MySQL DBA if he can administer your MS SQL servers too? If he's worth his 96k, he can. By the way, you could never get a DB2 or Oracle DBA for 65k, does that mean that they are sub-standard to MS SQL as well? I think not. You get what you pay for. If you're happy with play toys you can pay a child to use them, if you want expert tools you need to hire experts.

      --
      http://www.mhall119.com
    5. Re:Open Source is just another BUSINESS PLAN! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      96,000 / 65,000 = 1.48 != 10

      You run a business?
      Verizon
  62. Re:The Illini Case Study (or Lack Thereof) by 'nother+poster · · Score: 1

    Well, if Illinois would have checked... It looks like Groupwise already handles Linux. No transition on their part. Boy, it does NetWare and Windows Server also. Amazing. Short of simply going tits up Novell will be supporting Groupwise 7 for a few years. Pleanty of time for Illinois to run a few science experiments.

    GroupWise 7 server requirements

    32-bit/x86 processor or 64-bit/x86 processor running in 32-bit mode

    Any of the following server operating systems, plus the latest support pack:
    Novell Open Enterprise Server (NetWare or Linux version)
    NetWare 5.1, NetWare 6.0, or NetWare 6.5
    SUSE® Linux Enterprise Server 10
    Windows 2000 Server or Windows 2003 Server
    eDirectory(TM) 8.7 or later
    ConsoleOne® 1.3.6 or later

  63. Re:Linux discovers the trash can by happyfrogcow · · Score: 1

    Well, most of us who use linux use our computer as a computer. Not a t.v., playstation, or whatever.

    Good reasons to use linux, just off the top of my head and in no particular order:
    1. Able to run on old hardware
        - Fewer hardware upgrades cost you less money
    2. Freely downloadable, freely upgradeable.
    3. No phone calls to MS to prove you bought the old software you are trying to install on new hardware.
    4. Proper user accounts (everyone can have their own account, so they don't mess with your stuff)
        - A virus/trojan/worm/"oops what happened" won't destroy your basic installation.
    5. You won't have to reinstall linux because you connected to the internet for 30 seconds without antivirus software.
    6. Free trial as Live CD's.

  64. Didncha read the report? by Mateo_LeFou · · Score: 1

    It's not about productivity, obviously:

    "Both the state and the public are concerned about security, and we did not feel comfortable taking on the risks associated with open source software at this time,"

    It's obviously more about the fact that the baddie terrorists can get into your computer if you use F/OSS

    --
    My turnips listen for the soft cry of your love
    1. Re:Didncha read the report? by malevolentjelly · · Score: 0, Offtopic

      Didncha read the Patriot Act? Open Source developers are terrorists.

    2. Re:Didncha read the report? by Raistlin77 · · Score: 1

      It's obviously more about the fact that the baddie terrorists can get into your computer if you use F/OSS

      Considering that with Windows they are already likely in your computer, it couldn't possibly hurt to try something else.

  65. Re:Linux discovers the trash can by Rycross · · Score: 1

    Those are some excellent reasons, but lets frame them in the context of a common user. Most people don't run into 3. Its not very common. Same with 1, because most people just get the OS with their hardware. The killer apps for the common user are 4, 5, and 6.

    Personally I'd say, "I can set up your computer to use this new software. It does all the things that your current computer does, but it will work better and you won't have to get someone to clean your computer every month. Plus you get free upgrades. I'll give you a free trial, and you can tell me if you like it."

    My point with the original question was not flamebait, but to point out that its very very important how you present it to other people. They don't care why you use Linux, they want to know how they benefit. And what is obvious to us geeks is not obvious to them. Just rattling off why you use Linux isn't going to do a bit of good, unless you can present it as a clear benefit to them.

    Saying something along the lines of "The biggest drawback to Linux is that it requires a modicum of intelligence to learn. God forbid anyone should have to expend effort in an attempt to learn something new these days," is not going to win you converts. You have just insulted your potential users, and implied that your concerns are more important than theirs.

  66. Re:The Illini Case Study (or Lack Thereof) by Knux · · Score: 1

    [i]In fact, it's a lot like the scientific process where you present facts that prove your argument.[/i]

    Have you RTFA? They told they don't have time for scientific process. They are in a hurry.

  67. They may very well not be saving money by Mateo_LeFou · · Score: 1

    "One particularly scathing audit, released just as Campbell was taking over the agency, found CMS had paid improper expenses to contractors, failed to document the cost-cutting it claimed to have achieved and sometimes allowed contractors to start working before having a signed deal."

    http://hosted.ap.org/dynamic/stories/I/IL_CMS_DIRE CTOR_ILOL-?SITE=ILROR&SECTION=HOME&TEMPLATE=DEFAUL T

    --
    My turnips listen for the soft cry of your love
  68. Re:indeed by kbielefe · · Score: 1

    I downloaded thunderbird and surprise surprise

    I'm not normally the RTFM type, but using a package manager to install software instead of downloading it would be one of the first things someone learns when they read the instructions.

    --
    This space intentionally left blank.
  69. Paul Campbell, not Joseph by ciaohound · · Score: 1

    I'm sure Joseph Campbell would have worthwhile advice on this subject. "Follow your bliss," perhaps, or maybe "God is a metaphor for that which transcends all levels of intellectual thought."

    --
    Oh, yeah, it's not easy to pad these out to 120 characters.
  70. Tax dollars by HomelessInLaJolla · · Score: 1

    Tax dollars subsidized the infrastructure for telephone companies. Tax dollars subsidized the startup and growth of ISPs. Tax dollars subsidized the startup and growth of the .com boom. Tax dollars subsidized the infrastructure for the high speed internet.

    Consumer dollars paid for telephone service. Consumer dollars paid for internet service. Consumer dollars bought the home hardware. Consumer dollars fed the websites and paid for the advertising banners on the websites.

    The profit went into the pockets of the VPs/CxOs/and execs and, by proxy (insider stock trading tips), the politicians.

    Create debt, maintain debt, keep people in debt, work those people until they die from debt. Of course citizens don't have a say in purchasing decisions. That would muck up the entire system.

    --
    the NPG electrode was replaced with carbon blac
  71. Re:The Illini Case Study (or Lack Thereof) by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    He has an .edu email address...

  72. targeting pain points by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    http://freedomdrive.org/ and http://homecomputerhelp.org/ are targeting some of the pain points of desktop Linux

  73. You can't blame the distros by cyborg_zx · · Score: 1

    Since you are almost certainly referring to issues arising with MPEG protocols you are going to have to lay the blame at MPEG's feet. It's all about the patents.

  74. It's your government - make them care by cyborg_zx · · Score: 1

    Not much point in having a government if it's just going to act like a corporation.

  75. Re:Linux discovers the trash can by happyfrogcow · · Score: 1

    God forbid anyone should have to expend effort in an attempt to learn something new these days," is not going to win you converts. You have just insulted your potential users, and implied that your concerns are more important than theirs.

    Reading this just reminded me of why techies aren't in marketing. At some point in most of our lives, we were probably ridiculed by someone who knew more than us about something we are interested in, or watched someone be ridiculed about something that could have also been aimed at us. We take that as a challenge, and go on to learn that thing. That's why we are nerds.

    "They" aren't.

    I don't go out of my way to try to convert people to linux. I tell people I use it, even my girlfriend is like "he's a PC user" in that "I'm a Mac user"-derogatory tone. I always reply with, "Yeah, but Linux not Windows".

  76. SO what you are saying is... by geekoid · · Score: 1

    that you have some HOT Debian on Debian action going on!

    --
    The Kruger Dunning explains most post on /. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dunning%E2%80%93Kruger_effect
  77. Re:Linux discovers the trash can by Frozen+Void · · Score: 1

    Intelligence nothing to do with it.Its specific knowledge.A complete moron given enough time will memorize it.
    Its the difference between Vi and Notepad(or its replacements).Vi is more powerful,notepad is easier to use.
    More people would use Notepad because there is zero learning time,and interface is extremely simple and self-documenting.VI requires reading manuals,memorizing dozens of shortcut keys,etc: all that to edit a text file.
    Linux is composed of things like this.Graphical,user-friendly programs? They don't repair the flaws(e.g.Gimp).
    Its a design philosophy which won't get popular outside the enthusiast camp.
    If you needed to learn C++ to use a computer,internet as we know it would not exist.

  78. Come on people--it's the GOVERNMENT by penguin_dance · · Score: 1

    How are they going to spend all those tax dollars in their budget if the software is FREE?

    There's only so many $600 hammers a person needs.

    --
    If you've never been modded as "flamebait" or "troll," you've never tried to argue a minority viewpoint here!
    1. Re:Come on people--it's the GOVERNMENT by techno-vampire · · Score: 1

      What that article doesn't tell you is that the company who sold the Pentagon those hammers didn't want to be making them in the first place. Pentagon procurement rules said that if installing a part required a tool, the company making the part must make and supply the tool. Setting up a special production line for a small number of hammers cost so much that the only way the company could break even was to charge $600 each for them, but the procurement officers didn't care, they insisted that they be supplied. Alas, I don't have a cite for this or I'd give it, but that's the way I heard the story. Same thing (probably) for those expensive toilet seats.

      --
      Good, inexpensive web hosting
    2. Re:Come on people--it's the GOVERNMENT by daverabbitz · · Score: 1

      That doesn't make sense.

      Supply isn't the same as manufacture, otherwise a computer manufacturer for the pentagon would have to manufacture their own CPU's, capacitors, resistors, etc.

      I see no reaon why they couldn't of bought the hammers from DeWalt/Remington etc, and then supplied those with the whatever (I didn't RTFA).

      --
      What could be better than a jet powered motorcycle? http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=u8l6GTHLSWE
    3. Re:Come on people--it's the GOVERNMENT by techno-vampire · · Score: 1

      Don't worry, this isn't from TFA. I read once that when the $600 hammers were sold to the Pentagon the rules said that if a part required a tool for installation, the supplier had to make and supply the tools, not buy them from somebody else and resell them. The company involved had no desire to make hammers or any other tool, but the Pentagon insisted because of stupid rules. Remember: nobody said the incident made sense, but that's supposedly why it happened.

      --
      Good, inexpensive web hosting
  79. Need more domestic examples by Bretai · · Score: 1

    I guess Novell prefers to make vague statements about an "uptick" in Linux sales than share an example of a US firm widely adopting Linux on the desktop. It would be those kinds of examples that would make it harder for people to make ignorant statements about Microsoft saving them millions of dollars. If Linux doesn't suit your needs, just say so, but don't lie about how much money it's saving you.

    --
    Controlling complexity is the essence of computer programming. -Brian Kernigan
    1. Re:Need more domestic examples by MavenW · · Score: 1

      Novell can talk all they want about this, because they have already done it themselves. Not that it saves them all that much when buying new machines. The first thing I do when I get a new machine (complete with the Windows XP shiny colored license sticker on the case) is wipe the Microsoft OS off the hard drive and install Linux. However, they don't need to pay yearly license fees for most of their employees any more. That is a HUGE chunk for a company the size of Novell.

  80. Re:The Illini Case Study (or Lack Thereof) by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    A vendor saying something "works" is a big difference from it actually doing what you want it to do. I would stay away during the Novell transition to Linux too. Anyway, they did the analysis and they said it is costing them $10.5 million less. They know more about their situation than you do.

    I win.

  81. Re:The Illini Case Study (or Lack Thereof) by 'nother+poster · · Score: 1

    Well, who can argue with that illogic. You're right you win. I am humbled by you mental prowess. :)

  82. The future of Microsoft. by corrosive_nf · · Score: 1

    I still believe the only chance for Microsoft is to go to a Unix base like Apple did. My prediction has always been that they will buy Sun and use Solaris as a base for future version of Windows. What does everyone else think? Would that change any ones opinion of Microsoft, or is it just ingrained in the Slashdot collective that only Linux is the answer?

    1. Re:The future of Microsoft. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      or is it just ingrained in the Slashdot collective that only Linux is the answer? /. seems to promote Linux and OSX. It seems that a great many promote OSX for the less technically inclined, while pushing Linux to those with more drive and determination.

      I hate OSX myself, and I refuse to pay Microsoft for tools that should come with an OS, or even used to come with an OS. I shouldn't have to pay for the most expensive version of Windows Vista in order to do what I can naturally with an operating system using a Linux kernel.

      Tonight my last Windows machine is being set up for dual booting with Debian. If the few games I still play on Windows will run fine under Wine (or whatever it is called these days), then I will remove the Windows hard drive and be Linux only. As I refuse to run XP, I have already been dropped by the wayside by most PC game makers, and as they move to a DX10 requirement in the next year, oh well, no more for me.

  83. Re:Linux discovers the trash can by shmlco · · Score: 1

    Most non-Slashdotter's don't want to learn how to use a computer, anymore than they really want to spend time learning Word or Excel or Photoshop. What they want are letters or reports or photos, and to get their work done and get home in time for dinner.

    A good tool is like a hammer. You pick it up, hit something with it, and then put it down and get on with what you're doing. Quick, easy, and intuitive.

    If you have to take a class, read a book, and spend hours dinking with it, then it's just not a very good tool for the average person to deal with...

    --
    Any sect, cult, or religion will legislate its creed into law if it acquires the political power to do so.
  84. accountability by DriveDog · · Score: 1

    Agency directors generally serve at the pleasure of the executive, don't they? This reflects poorly on Illinois' governor, who ought not to be giving away money. Make it known that he will be losing support due to this guy's stance.

  85. Re:The Illini Case Study (or Lack Thereof) by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Of course not.

    They're dictated by it.

  86. voters - wake up by BalkanBoy · · Score: 1

    > "We don't have time for science projects in state government," he says

    Neither should the voters of the great State of Illinois have any patience for ignorant state government employees who preclude any possibility of something that will, in the long term, inevitably pay off as an IT investment. Linux is anything but a science project. It is already in use in other governments throughout the world, much poorer than the Illinois state government. It is also in use by super-large corporations, here in the U.S. and worldwide.

    Then again, I'm not in Illinois (I live in Washington), and I hope Illinois voters read this garbage and vote for incumbents who will not hire ignorant, incompetent government staff such as the one who made this statement, which in the end will end up costing the State of Illinois leaps and bounds beyond the cost of upgrading to Linux now.

    Microsoft undoubtedly makes the best desktop applications (e.g. Office). They have yet to deliver on the best operating system. Vista just isn't it. The next best thing from Microsoft will be a UNIX-like operating system, with a Windows XP emulator, as Apple did with Rosetta for OS 9 on their new platform - OS X. Since supporting hardware initially is going to be a bitch, they can start with the most popular hardware up to a few years old. I know it sounds unrealistic, but what else can they do to renew their public image and instill the coolness they once had 20+ years ago?

    --
    'A lie if repeated often enough, becomes the truth.' - Goebbels
    1. Re:voters - wake up by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "Neither should the voters of the great State of Illinois have any patience for ignorant state government employees who preclude any possibility of something that will, in the long term, inevitably pay off as an IT investment"

      if you have a state government gambling with a "possibility" that linux may pay off I would have thought that was far more of a concern. This is government not some area to experiment with technology, government doesn't need to push the envelope or look for competitive edges, it needs to justify its spend and know what numbers to expect. your very first line immediately justifies there decision.

    2. Re:voters - wake up by BalkanBoy · · Score: 1

      Whatever. At the point of analysing whether to adopt something or not - everything is a possibility. Therefore, they should have ditched windows in lieu of MS-DOS 6.22 15 years ago because Windows was a grand experiment, a science project, a possibility, etc.

      Nice try though.

      --
      'A lie if repeated often enough, becomes the truth.' - Goebbels
  87. Your ideas... by criscooil · · Score: 1

    ...fascinate me, and I wish to subscribe to your newsletter.

    --

    My life is an open book ... up to a point.

  88. Dell Reccomends..... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Anyone notice that above the Dell LINUX survey it says "Dell reccomends windows vista business"

    I think they call that irony, dont they?

  89. not microsoft's fault by sentientbrendan · · Score: 1, Insightful

    If people would actually fix some of the longstanding problems with linux on the desktop, instead of blaming microsoft for all of their problems, linux might actually see adoption on the desktop.

    What I think is hilarious, is that when you mentioned something like "problems with linux" people will say something like "what problems?" or "that doesn't compare to problem x that windows has." Well obviously it does, because on the desktop people have made that comparison and chosen the competition...

    Arguing for linux on the desktop is a process of denial, blame, and self righteousness that I have no interest in taking part in.

    1. Re:not microsoft's fault by hairyfeet · · Score: 2, Informative
      I'm hoping that more projects like Ndiswrapper will come out,Which,IMO would fix the biggest problem I've found in converting folks-Drivers for all the little add-ons they have. Ndiswrapper has done wonders for WIFI (which is how I'm running Xandros 3.0 instead of the WinXP this laptop came with).I'm hoping that similar tools will come out for printers,which always seem to be the trouble I have getting someone to convert.

      Of course the ultimate would be a kind of universal Ndiswrapper where you could use any windows printer/webcam/pci card,etc without having to worry about whether there is a Linux driver written for it.Probably WAY to much to ask for,but it is nice to dream.I'd be happy to settle for a printer Niswrapper so I wouldn't have to run Windows to deal with all these damn buggy Lexmark cheapy printers that seem to be so popular around here.I spent 4 hours trying to get this Lexmark X1270 that was given to me to work in Linux before giving up and just slapping a Win2K partition on my desktop just to deal with the thing.

      I think the Linux desktop is more than ready for the average user.It's the little add-ons that seem to keep a lot of folks on Windows (at least in my exp).

      --
      ACs don't waste your time replying, your posts are never seen by me.
    2. Re:not microsoft's fault by GoMMiX · · Score: 3, Insightful

      I find your argument interesting. However, one thing I like the most about Linux is the fact I actually have the ability to fix any problems I may encounter. Unfortunately, I am not able to say the same thing for Windows.

      In all honesty, were Windows open source - my perspective might well change. I couldn't honestly say, since that option obviously not available. But I would certainly give it a chance.

      An example would be an issue one of my desktops has with msvcirt.dll that causes issues with (some) C/C++ compiled programs. It's a known issue, and there is even a hotfix that was developed in October of 2004. Amazing how it's still a hotfix, in 2007. I can even get the hotfix - all I have to do is pay $59. I might even be able to get it free by calling MS and sitting through a half hour of interrogation about my Windows license (And yes, it's legit - OEM from Dell, it's the principle of the matter that bothers me most. If I wanted to be treated like a criminal just to be a customer, I'd buy music CDs, too.)

      It sounds to me the process of denail, blame, and self righteousness might be at work here -- but I don't believe it's in support for Linux adoption. Linux is free. It is also an extremely reliable platform. Most importantly, it is an open system. Should something go wrong, you are able to fix it yourself -- should you be capable.

      The only thing I see giving MS an advantage is the fact they already have the majority of the market-share. As MS' market-share lowers and Linux adoption grows, we will see a greater level of commercial software development on Linux -- and the game will certainly change then. Personally, though, unless you use MS Office or play games only available to Windows -- there's really no benefit to having Windows over Linux aside from preferences. And I imagine a great many people will always prefer Windows because it is familiar, if nothing else. Honestly, for the work I do on the PC -- were it not for the completely crap inability I have to fix problems within Windows due to it's closed nature -- I would probably prefer Windows for the GUI environment. I guess I just like the GUI better, to be frank. But when it comes to the dirty 'real' work - I will always have a preference for the unix-like command line of Linux.

      Then again, if UltraEdit-32 was available on Linux, haha - that might change too. Ohh my, what a mind twister!

      In the end, both OS' have room for improvement. I like them both, but to say anyone promoting either OS is in denial, blame, or self-righteous is just arrogant at best.

    3. Re:not microsoft's fault by redcane · · Score: 1

      Its all a question of timing IMO. If linux had existed first (damn you Torvalds, you should have been born 10 years earlier!), then it would have taken off as a real alternative. Basically, when I was growing up with computers, MS was the only option. It didn't matter how crap it was, what the problems were, you worked around it because it was your only option. I knew of only one person running a non MS OS, and they ran OS/2 (briefly). If linux was the only option, people would get used to it's idiosyncrasies, and work arounds, same as you do for windows. I honestly believe it's a matter of what you are used to. There are things on both platforms that are hard on the other platform. Any of the good stuff gets ported to linux though ;-) I used to wish all the free software that was on windows was on linux, I used a lot of it. Although I've found everything I need on linux now. Just waiting for everyone else to jump across and code for it. Yeah, Linux has problems, but so did windows for the first 10 years. I think linux is doing ok for it's age and funding, and I look forward to what it brings in the future.

    4. Re:not microsoft's fault by ewanm89 · · Score: 1

      My epson works fine! :)

    5. Re:not microsoft's fault by jZnat · · Score: 1

      Well, GNU existed much earlier, but they sat on their asses and never got around to writing a kernel for it until recently, and even that kernel is pretty alpha and slow to develop. GNU originally was made to replace Unix, so at first it was distributed as a way to replace your Unix programs (e.g. GCC over a proprietary C compiler, coreutils, binutils, etc.) but still run on your current Unix platform. If Hurd (or some other kernel) had been developed earlier, we could've had a completely free operating system before DOS even existed. Because of that damn kernel, you couldn't exactly run GNU on cheap PC hardware since there weren't any Unixes for it (or if there were, they were very expensive).

      Now that we've finally got a working kernel with tons of hardware support, we're still having fun trying to get people to use it due to Microsoft lock-in and "power users" spreading FUD about GNU/Linux systems (I can't change the options via registry hacks! *cries* Linux isn't ready for the desktop [until it's the same exact thing as Windows]). The use cases for GNU/Linux only continue to broaden, so more and more people can try it without having to worry about hardware support and other annoyances common to Linux about 10 years ago.

      --
      'Yes, firefox is indeed greater than women. Can women block pops up for you? No. Can Firefox show you naked women? Yes.'
  90. Agreed, but Linux missed the Win98 upgrade window by schwaang · · Score: 1

    I agree, but Linux missed the Win98 upgrade window entirely. I hope it catches the tail end of the WinXP upgrade window.

    Of four different Win98/ME computers I helped manage, only one (mine) is now primarily Linux-only, and one is about half-time Linux.

    Case 1: mom, WinME, 500MHz Celeron. Usage was mainly AOL and basic digital photo album stuff. Linux could easily cover her hardware and application needs, but I couldn't wean her from the AOL interface. So we replaced WinME with a $550 Dell/Vista box. She's happy.

    Case 2: girlfriend, Win98, 1.6GHz P4. Heavy Excel user. Semi-technical, and able to learn new things. I had her dual-boot Fedora for over a year. She used Fedora happily for browsing whenever Win98 was acting up (often). She was the most likely candidate for a switch to Linux. But she complained bitterly about OpenOffice usability. In the end, I had to upgrade her PC to XP. She's fine with paying $150 for the MS Office upgrade. For her, this is a good value. She also needs to edit PDF files, and I couldn't find a Linux replacement for the Adobe app she uses. Otherwise she was impressed with Linux stability, and didn't need much help to figure out basic web/email/office.

    Case 3: a non-techie, older user, with Win98 on a 1GHz Duron. Like mom, she mostly uses AOL and photo albums. Like the other PCs, 98 has become unstable over time. I installed Ubuntu as a dual-boot for my own maintainance purposes, and she loves it because Ubuntu is totally stable and the system feels fast. She's still a little confused about how to find her files and get to her AOL mailbox. Learning new stuff is hard for her. She boots Ubuntu about half the time, still using Win98 to get to AOL or user her old photo album tool. My recommendation for her is to upgrade to XP, but she doesn't want to spend any money on this system. Ubuntu is making the difference in her case because of cost and ease of use, and her limited needs.

    Case 4: Me. A programmer, Linux-only for years now. I occasionally miss gaming, and the other day my DSL went down and I remembered I had no driver for my softmodem. I had to boot 98 to get online. But Linux far outweighs the minuses for me.

    Linux has allowed 2 of us to keep our old hardware. XP did that for one.
    OpenOffice hitches nixed Linux for one.

    Oddly, Win98's increasing cruftiness (rather than any other need) is what spurred hardware and/or software upgrades in all cases. Otherwise Win98 still meets almost all the needs of every user.

  91. Printer flame by Beryllium+Sphere(tm) · · Score: 1

    >someone who in 2007 isn't still baffled by setting up a printer.

    IPP or LPD? How do I tell? Where's the entry for Samba? What's the queue name? How can I tell?

    Why won't my HL-1440 work? What does it mean that it's not "network ready"? Why does the "network readiness" of the driver matter if all it does is take orders from the spooler? If I get another driver, how do I tell if it's network ready"? If this is all so impossible, why does it work from Windows?

    Why exactly do I have to edit CUPS configuration files? Why are the entries I'm supposed to edit so poorly related to talking to a printer?

    Tell me it's easy to set up a printer hanging straight off my USB port and I'm willing to believe you. Tell me I'm stupid, and, well, I'll draw conclusions you won't like.

    1. Re:Printer flame by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      IPP or LPD? How do I tell? Where's the entry for Samba? What's the queue name? How can I tell?

      WTF? You can tell because you know what type of network print server you're communicating with. Windows almost always chooses RAW printing on port 9100 even when the print server is LPD only. If you don't know the answer to such a basic question, you should find a new job.

      Why won't my HL-1440 work? What does it mean that it's not "network ready"? Why does the "network readiness" of the driver matter if all it does is take orders from the spooler? If I get another driver, how do I tell if it's network ready"? If this is all so impossible, why does it work from Windows?

      I don't recommend that printer for any client (I only do Windows desktops at work, BTW). The part of the spooler that communicates with the printer only sends the pre-processed job to the printer. The way you know it's "network ready" is by reading the box. Again, find another job.

      Why exactly do I have to edit CUPS configuration files? Why are the entries I'm supposed to edit so poorly related to talking to a printer?

      I haven't had to edit CUPS configuration files. I load the drivers through the web interface and I perform all queue management through the web interface. If you want nightmare stories, try using the NT HP LaserJet 2100 Series driver (in an environment that already had that printer driver installed on the workstations) and upgrade the clients to XP. They'll stop printing to all of the HP LJ 6P's until you remove the 2100 driver. That makes more sense, does it? What about the file browser hanging in Office applications when certain HP software was installed? It takes a registry edit to work around that--because we all know every registry setting.

      Tell me it's easy to set up a printer hanging straight off my USB port and I'm willing to believe you. Tell me I'm stupid, and, well, I'll draw conclusions you won't like.

      I boot my Ubuntu laptop and it finds the printers that I have on my Linux desktop. No configuration necessary.

  92. I can attest to that by Lockejaw · · Score: 1

    Not 5 years ago, I spent 15 minutes at the Libertyville DMV (NNW suburb) just watching the clerk wait for the computer to respond. I really hope you're serious about those improvements.

    --
    (IANAL)
  93. Kick! Ouch! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Or

    "Open source software is like generic groceries. It looks a little different than the name brand, but it's a lot cheaper and gets the job done."

  94. Who needs Windows? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I'm glad for this article.
    It points out something that I have recently discovered.

    Linux has matured to a point where anyone can get a Desktop or Notebook working in minimal time with little or no skill.

    I installed Ubuntu 6.10 (Edgy Eft) and got it connecting to my SecureWPA Wireless network in three days (If I read the instruction properly it would have been one day!) It replaces ALL my existing programs, includes open Office which still reads all my previous docs, spreadsheets, etc, AND it picked up the Windows printer and works with CUPS first time. (all other hardware works perfectly too - I was worried about the Wirless though...)

    I would recommend Ubuntu for everyone - especially those who are new to computing. It simply works, and I can download new programs simpy by clicking on Add/Remove programs! (all Free!)

    No license issues, no pirating games - parents, companies and small businesses can all use this immediately with little change to their software and dont have to worry about Microsoft threatening to come aftr them for little Johnies files/games/etc...(ignorance is the biggest fear for individual users - I';m not talkign about Slashdot users here who have at least a few braincells)And the few windows programs I use work and are recognised and WINE fires it up for me

    Regards,
    Jason Brisbane

  95. I've had working DVD playback by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    since Fedora Core 2 about 3 years ago. (currently on Debian Etch)

  96. with VMware Server by alizard · · Score: 1

    you can spend 100% of your time in Linux and run Windows in a VM when you need it without shutting down Linux.

    Exception - some Windows games which don't work so well on a VM.

    Since I don't run them, I don't even bother with keeping a Windows drive for dual-boot anymore, I use that slot to run experimental OSs when need be.

    1. Re:with VMware Server by vrmlguy · · Score: 1

      If I could get my WiFi to work under Linux, then I'd go the VM route. I do use VM server to do rPath development; I've got a Conary repository and a build box running all the time, and test boxes come and go like pop songs.

      --
      Nothing for 6-digit uids?
  97. Adopt Linux, and it will happen! by Slur · · Score: 1

    Here's my theory in a nutshell: If more and more organizations embrace the Linux desktop in one form or another, there are twenty-thousand developers ready to step up and serve the needs of the user community. The real question is, how does a giant ad-hoc system -- y'all -- engender trust in this huge, anxiously waiting user-base? Redhat, Mandrake, Ubuntu, Suse, Debian, and other aggregators have done their part to create pretty packages for Linux, but is that enough?

    What do corporations - especially that sad old hack Microsoft - have to offer this huge hungry population that Linux doesn't? Dell is taking a bold step in partnering with this large distributed community. What if they started contracting Linux developers? What if Dell started to look more like Apple: creating Dell hardware and making their own Linux flavor tightly integrated, and found it so impressive they started putting a Dell logo on the Linux desktop?

    Seems to me this is what's about to happen. Dell is going to get into direct competition with Microsloth as an OS vendor. And the savvy Linux developer should be anxious to get involved.

    --
    -- thinkyhead software and media
  98. how about SCOunix? by alizard · · Score: 1

    They could probably get it for $1 and assuming SCO's debts. Which is only right, since they helped SCO incur them. Obsolete, of course, but even that is probably an improvement on the Vista Core. And since they had a version of Win4Lin, they even would have some legacy Windoze compatibility built in.

    If I were in that position, I'd get a programming team to write a proprietary version of OpenBSD with as many members of the OpenBSD dev team as offering them LOTS of money would persuade to join the Dark Side, license VMware Server with an installed copy of XP on every box to handle legacy compatibility, (maybe even a 9.x and a DOS VM... because they can) and start porting Windoze apps to Win-nix.

    That would give us all a dose of STFU about security and basically run everything anybody ever wrote for MS environments.

  99. donut directors that need sacking by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    "Paul Campbell, director of the state's Central Management Services department. "We don't have time for science projects in state government,"

    Presumeably they dont have any time for spending tax-payers money wisely either.

  100. Tuttle II? by bogidu · · Score: 1

    "In other news, Jerry Taylor, former Tuttle Oklahoma city administrator was recently hired to manage the State of Illinois' computing infrastructure. . . . . ."

  101. pfft by nightsweat · · Score: 1

    "Offtopic?" Talk about missing the joke.

    --

    the major advances in civilization are processes which all but wreck the societies in which they occur - A.N. White