Slashdot Mirror


Gnome 2.18 Released

xdancergirlx writes "Gnome 2.18 was released today (on time as usual). Detailed release notes are available. Nothing revolutionary in this release but definitely some nice new features, bug fixes, and improvements."

253 comments

  1. Underpants gnome? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I was wondering where my tidy-whities went...

    1. Re:Underpants gnome? by Mr.+Underbridge · · Score: 4, Funny

      I was wondering where my tidy-whities went...

      It's 'tighty'. Those things definitely aren't 'tidy' after you leave that nice racing stripe in them.

    2. Re:Underpants gnome? by ChromeAeonium · · Score: 1

      I propose two-tone yellow in the front and brown in the back underwear so that no one notices all those times I thought it was just a fart.

    3. Re:Underpants gnome? by gardyloo · · Score: 1

      I propose two-tone yellow in the front and brown in the back underwear so that no one notices all those times I thought it was just a fart. Believe me -- we noticed. And it wasn't from looking at your underwear.
    4. Re:Underpants gnome? by SevenHands · · Score: 1

      His Girlfriend notices every time she does his laundry. On second thought, since he is posting on Slashdot, His Mother notices every time she does his laundry.

  2. Gnome by xaositects · · Score: 5, Funny

    Gnome 2.18: Nothing special really, just somewhat improved infravision, an extra +10 bonus to detect uneven grades, worked out some bugs in the "failure to run from big scary trolls due to lack of common sense" department. Should be a somewhat more usable gnome.

    1. Re:Gnome by netdur · · Score: 1

      This release has bug fixes and no major new features, isn't that what you were asking for? fix stuff before adding new features? every one loves stability!

      --
      "Steve Jobs invented the world" -- Bill W. GATES
  3. Gnome 2.18 with performance improvements! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny

    Thanks to those I got first post!

    1. Re:Gnome 2.18 with performance improvements! by Mikachu · · Score: 4, Funny

      Hah, first post. Bet you wish you were using KDE now, don't you. ;)

    2. Re:Gnome 2.18 with performance improvements! by cfortin · · Score: 1

      Zwwoooossshhhhhhh

  4. did they include Linus' patch? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Interesting

    *sneaks away and orders popcorn*

  5. Did they include... by Daemonik · · Score: 5, Interesting
    1. Re:Did they include... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Gosh, I don't know. That reminds me, did Linus ever put ESR's CML2 patches into the kernel tree?

      http://kerneltrap.org/node/17

    2. Re:Did they include... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The difference being that Linus produced reasonable patches fixing real problems, whereas ESR produced poo fixing no existing problems.

    3. Re:Did they include... by muszek · · Score: 5, Informative

      AFAIR they haven't, because they were submitted after the feature freeze (or some other kind of a freeze). Don't quote me on that, my memory is a tricy thing.

    4. Re:Did they include... by yoyhed · · Score: 1

      Hey. HEY. Some of us enjoy poop.

      --
      WHO NEEDS SHIFT WHEN YOU HAVE CAPSLOCK/ DAMN1
    5. Re:Did they include... by QuantumG · · Score: 3, Interesting

      How do I know? I've looked. Yesterday I even fixed it. I sent the patches off to add the capabilities. It's a shame he didn't, ya know, attach the patches to his email.. this whole "contribute it to the maintainer" crap is the problem with open source. If you see something you don't like, sure, contribute it to the maintainer to get fixed.. but if the maintainer drops your patch on the floor, don't go cry on the mailing lists, just make your patch publically available so other people who want the same feature as you don't have to recode it themselves. Jesus, Linus should know better.

      --
      How we know is more important than what we know.
    6. Re:Did they include... by Blakey+Rat · · Score: 1

      Wow Linus is a total jackass in his post. I thought he was supposed to be the only Unix figurehead that wasn't a jackass. What's up with that?

    7. Re:Did they include... by macshit · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Linus' patches don't "fix" anything.

      They remove an unnecessary and artificial restriction -- and also apparently simplify the code, which is always a good thing.

      they add one feature.. in particular, the ability to configure left, right and middle click to do what you like. Which, ya know, is useful to like 3 people.

      It sounds pretty useful to me... Obviously the MS-raised proles will never use it, but many more clueful people use Gnome too ("like, ya know").

      --
      We live, as we dream -- alone....
    8. Re:Did they include... by Wdomburg · · Score: 3, Insightful

      No. But some variant of the patches are in trunk for the next release. It really just adds a config option though. Not as big a deal as the brouhaha would suggest. :)

    9. Re:Did they include... by Breakfast+Pants · · Score: 4, Funny

      The Gnome file dialog can turn anyone into a jackass.

      --

      --

      WHO ATE MY BREAKFAST PANTS?
    10. Re:Did they include... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Wow Linus is a total jackass in his post. ...and this from someone with the moniker "BlakeyRat". Sheeesh!

    11. Re:Did they include... by PitaBred · · Score: 1

      Linus was more making a point of how broken Gnome is from the development practices up into the code, rather than trying to make more than a trivial contribution.

    12. Re:Did they include... by QuantumG · · Score: 1

      I know that. He failed. His arguement is that because no-one has done what he wants them to do that there must be something wrong with their development process. Totally ignoring the possibility that maybe the maintainers just don't want that level of configurability and the users of GNOME don't either. It's not just GNOME that takes the "no thanks to the kitchen sink" approach.

      --
      How we know is more important than what we know.
    13. Re:Did they include... by alphamugwump · · Score: 1

      I'm probably not the only one pissed off by the need to middle-drag in nautilus.

    14. Re:Did they include... by PitaBred · · Score: 1

      And it's that "It's our way or the highway" attitude that is driving off users. Too much choice can be a bad thing, but making anything useful impossible to do, and doing it shoddily at that? That's just bad programming AND design.

    15. Re:Did they include... by lorien420 · · Score: 2

      If you really care, here's the tracker for his patches in Metacity's bugzilla http://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=408898

      --
      "[We'll be] really getting inside your head and making it an unpleasant place to be" -- Trent Reznor
    16. Re:Did they include... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      > It's a shame he didn't, ya know, attach the patches to his email.

      It's a shame you didn't check your facts, because he did.

    17. Re:Did they include... by Kjella · · Score: 1

      this whole "contribute it to the maintainer" crap is the problem with open source. If you see something you don't like, sure, contribute it to the maintainer to get fixed.. but if the maintainer drops your patch on the floor, don't go cry on the mailing lists, just make your patch publically available so other people who want the same feature as you don't have to recode it themselves.

      The visibility of that code is minimal in either case, how many are really going to filter through mailing lists, for code that might have been rejected for all sorts of reasons, either because it's bad, has been refactored, causes regressions and whatnot, patch the source and roll their own. Very rarely you get gold standard code that's "WONTFIX - political reasons". Some projects have separate branches like the linux kernel, but they're there to get stuff into mainline, not to keep a permanent fork. Unless you have way too much time on your hands (like certain Gentoo people seem to have) then you're not going to go through that every time your distro manager says a new version is available. Either you work with the maintainer to make it acceptable (there's other ways than to cry and bitch), you try to gather up enough people that think the current policy sucks and make a fork, or your code won't reach 99% of the people who'd want it anyway.

      --
      Live today, because you never know what tomorrow brings
    18. Re:Did they include... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Funny

      Actually, I like his 'Mac emulator' patch - it stops one mouse button from working altogether.

    19. Re:Did they include... by Blakey+Rat · · Score: 2

      Generally, less choice = better usability.

      In fact, probably 90% of usability is finding what people want to do and making it trivially easy. The stuff the majority don't want to do remains hard or impossible. It sounds a little strict, but it seems to pay off for, say, Apple.

      The reason Linus doesn't like it is because he wants every little byte to be configurable, like a lot of Linux users. That's fine; he can use KDE instead. The stupid things about this situation is:

      1) That people give a crap what Linus says about usability. He programs the kernel! The lowest-level component of the OS! He has no usability experience whatsoever. Have you seen the kind of GUIs that kernel programmers design? Look at anything from IBM, for instance. I understand that Linus is like an open source superhero, but you shouldn't trust Linus' opinion on usability issues any more than you should trust Superman's opinion on railway maintenance.

      2) That Linus uses GNOME and gripes about it instead of just using what he likes. Isn't the entire point of the open source ecosystem to give the user choices? Linus can hardly bitch if he doesn't bother to use an alternative.

        2a) Or (even worse) he uses KDE but chooses to go out of his way to bitch at some other open source project.

    20. Re:Did they include... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful

      The big thing with changing what the mouse buttons do for many people is simply which buttons your interface thinks are the left, right, and middle, assuming you have more than 3 buttons on your mouse/trackball.

      I have an MS 4-button trackball that consistantly comes up with the right button in a position where I would never think to right-click, and the MS (intellipoint) software fixes it with no trouble on Windows, but other interfaces may or may not give me the proper choices to fix it (even games can give some trouble in this respect). It's also nice to have the configuration options for the other buttons, though I generally leave them as default (back and forward in the browser/explorer windows under Windows).

    21. Re:Did they include... by Daemonik · · Score: 2, Informative

      2) That Linus uses GNOME and gripes about it instead of just using what he likes. Isn't the entire point of the open source ecosystem to give the user choices? Linus can hardly bitch if he doesn't bother to use an alternative. 2a) Or (even worse) he uses KDE but chooses to go out of his way to bitch at some other open source project.
      Actually, Linus uses and prefers KDE but was raked over the coals for publicly stating that was his preference because of what he saw as flaws in GNOME. It was the GNOME groups complaints about his position and their general "You don't even contribute to GNOME" attitude that pushed him to start submitting patches.
  6. Priorities by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Personal security is now fully integrated into the desktop, allowing digitally signed communications, encryption of emails and local files, and user-friendly management of personal keys. Internationalization records progress in all directions, with support for vertical text layout and a full Arabic localization matching the quality standards. The official release incorporates essential tools for developers, which hopefully will contribute to get more and better software for the GNOME users.

    What's more important, for the first time we ship online games, chess with a 3D look, and endless Sudoku entertainment.

    Good thing we've got our priorities straight.

    1. Re:Priorities by Chandon+Seldon · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Obviously they're being facetious.

      --
      -- The act of censorship is always worse than whatever is being censored. Always.
    2. Re:Priorities by kurtmckee · · Score: 2, Informative

      > Good thing we've got our priorities straight.

      It's a problem of manpower. My understanding is that there was a sudden and unexpected number of Gnome documentation people who were unable to contribute as they have in the past, which is what prompted this post by Quim Gil calling for help.

  7. I can't feel any responsiveness improvements. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Interesting

    I use both KDE and GNOME on a regular basis. I really don't have a preference either way; both allow me to get my work done well enough. But what I've noticed is that with each KDE release, it feels significantly more responsive than the previous releases. I can't say the same with GNOME. If anything, it seems to be getting slower as time goes on. I use OpenBSD, so I end up compiling all of the packages myself. I use the optimal C and C++ compiler flags for my particular system. It's not a matter of my using KDE packages built with a more recent version of GCC, or something like that.

    In any case, earlier today I built GNOME 2.18 on my system. I've been using it for a few hours now. And compared to the KDE 3.5.6 installation I was using earlier today, I think it's significantly slower. Evolution is far more heavy-weight than KMail. Nautilus takes longer to display directories. I have one directory with about 15000 photos in it. Nautilus crashes when viewing it, while with Konqueror I can easily scroll through the thumbnails within about a second.

    Maybe it's just a quality control problem with GNOME. While I don't follow the development mailing lists very closely, I've heard from co-workers that GNOME is suffering from some pretty serious organizational issues. Low-quality code is being accepted into GTK+ and GNOME itself, and many people are noticing a decrease in its quality as of late. Maybe somebody can shed more light on whether or not these rumors are true?

    1. Re:I can't feel any responsiveness improvements. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Informative

      Bug reports welcome. :-)

    2. Re:I can't feel any responsiveness improvements. by yoyhed · · Score: 3, Funny

      And on top of all that, KDE is more configurable!

      --
      WHO NEEDS SHIFT WHEN YOU HAVE CAPSLOCK/ DAMN1
    3. Re:I can't feel any responsiveness improvements. by thephotoman · · Score: 5, Insightful

      The biggest problem I have with GNOME as a user is Evolution. Simply put, Evolution needs to be scrapped in favor of something else. Its Exchange functionality is non-functional, and its calendar could be easily replaced by something else. Why not just do what they did with the default browser and fork from Mozilla? Surely, it'd suck less.

      Nautilus is in dire need of a code audit, just to ensure that everything in there is up to par. Hells, if I were in charge at GNOME, I'd probably stop developing new features in Nautilus and work on the audit for the next cycle.

      Honestly, though, the one thing that hurts GNOME the most is the six month release cycle. If they'd even just use a single one-year release cycle, just to clean things up, they'd be in much better shape.

      All that said, though, GNOME is my desktop. It's what I learned first, and honestly, KDE's configurability just scares me. Also, I remember too well a time when KDE looked like shit out of the box. Thankfully, that's no longer a problem.

      --
      Haec merda tauri est. Ceterum censeo Carthaginem esse delendam.
    4. Re:I can't feel any responsiveness improvements. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 4, Insightful

      and honestly, KDE's configurability just scares me
      I used to be the exact same way. However, a few years ago I decided to sit down and configure KDE to my liking. Now that I've done so, I wouldn't even consider going back to Gnome. If you use your computer for hours every day, I would strongly suggest spending a bit of time to configure KDE. The relatively small amount of time it takes to configure everything to your liking is well worth it. In my opinion, it's a much better desktop environment and practically every KDE application is far beyond its Gnome counterpart.

      Also, with the focus on Mono applications, Gnome seems to be getting slower and even more bloated with every release.
    5. Re:I can't feel any responsiveness improvements. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Bug reports welcome. :-)

      Are you sure? After seeing the whole Linus debacle, I'm not willing to deal with the GNOME developers. At least he submitted patches to fix the problems he encountered. I don't have the time to do that. So why would they even bother to consider my bug reports?

    6. Re:I can't feel any responsiveness improvements. by Andy+Dodd · · Score: 1

      In addition to that, it seems like the Evolution team didn't do ANY regression testing of Palm synchronization between 1.x and 2.0 - The last time I used Evolution, it took me an hour to clean out all the dupe entries from my phone after just two syncs. (Every sync duped every single entry in the phone.)

      --
      retrorocket.o not found, launch anyway?
    7. Re:I can't feel any responsiveness improvements. by phrasebook · · Score: 5, Funny

      KDE's configurability just scares me

      I know what you mean. I had to configure my background in KDE once. Christ, it gave me THREE options! 'No picture', 'Picture' and 'Slide show'. I mean, WTF? I'm not a rocket surgeon.

      Then I wanted Konqueror to open links in tabs. People are right when they say KDE has a cluttered interface. It dragged me into Settings, then into something called Web Behaviour, and then forced me to click the box saying 'Open links in new tab'. After that I had to rest with 2 hours of TV.

    8. Re:I can't feel any responsiveness improvements. by Dan+Ost · · Score: 1

      Its Exchange functionality is non-functional

      No, Evolution Exchange functionality is slow, but very functional.

      Normally, I'd be the first to complain loudly about Evolution, but for all the things I dislike about Evolution, the reason I (have no choice but to) use it is because it's the only usably way to access my corporate Exchange email (no, I can't convince them to turn IMAP back on). It's slow, but functional. If it weren't for Evolution, I'd be forced to choose between the web interface or a second computer to run Windows+Outlook.

      --

      *sigh* back to work...
    9. Re:I can't feel any responsiveness improvements. by electrosoccertux · · Score: 2, Interesting

      AMEN! I just want to affirm what the parent is saying, I've heard people say "I've never noticed that" or "works fine for me" etc...it definitely feels slow.

      I've found KDE to feel simply -less- slow. Could some of this "slowness" be due to a lack of threading? I don't understand how it all works but my intuition was: if lots of services are working in serial and each has to send up a flag for the next to do something, and then nothing happens until the next service refreshes and checks up on the previous service to see if it's raised a flag (for instance say the mouse hovering over a menu item yet the item not lighting up; I notice lag in Gnome in this area _all_ the time), then what you could have is a collection of services that, while very efficient and fast in and of themselves, are slow when added together. Best example I can think of is an assembly line with 15 mutant workers-- each worker can transfer his load from one hand to his other hand instantly, but the next worker has to realize it's his turn to pick up the load and pass it on. 15 guys and this time adds up and you notice GUI lag. Whereas in Windows XP with threading (I never notice this sort of lag in XP that I notice in Gnome), it's like the first worker shouts "alright get ready" and then the time spent handing off and receiving the load between workers is greatly reduced. With lots of services shouting "get ready" this may slow things down, but not where it's important-- if it feels fast, then it is fast.

      Am I completely off the mark?

    10. Re:I can't feel any responsiveness improvements. by Knuckles · · Score: 1

      Are you sure?

      Yes. Just check out bugzilla.gnome.org or the bug tracker of your distro.

      --
      "When I first heard Daydream Nation it quite frankly scared the living shit out of me." -- Matthew Stearns
    11. Re:I can't feel any responsiveness improvements. by alphamugwump · · Score: 1

      Nautilus is what made me give up on gnome. The rest of it isn't so bad, except maybe the configuration suite. Nautilus is slow as hell redrawing, it wastes space, and it has a tendency to lock up on large folders. Furthermore, there aren't really any good GTK file managers at all; thunar and rox is just too simplistic. The file manager is absolutely core to a desktop environment, and usability and feature-completeness are critical. This is what makes gnome a non-starter for me.

      The gnome apps can be irritating too, but usually there are workable alternatives that are still GTK. You can substitute VLC for totem, thunderbird for evolution, and firefox for epiphany. This borks integration, but this isn't really a problem. All the really serious gnome users I know are the sort of people who run FVWM, don't ever use the taskbar, and launch everything from the console. If you never use nautilus, it doesn't make a difference if it's crap, but that also sort of defeats the purpose of gnome being easy to use.

      Unless gnome really gets their act together soon, I don't think it's going to survive in the mainstream. KDE 4 is focusing on cleaner user interface and will have OSX style buttons, which is really the only thing different about gnome. And KDE has apps, too, which will soon be ported to windows, probably gaining users and developers. Against that, I don't think GNOME really has a chance.

    12. Re:I can't feel any responsiveness improvements. by dmiller · · Score: 1

      Except that they aren't.

      I reported a bug in Metacity's focus-follows-mouse behaviour years ago. It turned out to be a dupe of another bug where we were told that the behaviour (different to every other WM I have ever used) was "by design". When a few other people chimed in agreeing and suggesting that the traditional behaviour restored or a (possibly hidden) preference added to control it, the bug was unceremoniously closed. The Metacity developer preferred some tweaky special casing approach that could "do the right thing", but five years later noone has gotten it to work.

      Likewise, I reported a bug in gnome-terminals handling of tab-selection keypresses, also with a patch. It languished for a couple of years before someone finally tweaked the patch and committed it.

      In the meantime, I quit using GNOME and started using KDE. I haven't looked back - it is heaps faster, uses less memory and is able to do simple things like configure my keyboard shortcuts from a GUI.

    13. Re:I can't feel any responsiveness improvements. by Tweekster · · Score: 1

      I agree that the GP did make a big deal about nothing...
      but in all honesty the default behavior for opening new links should be in tabs. that is the sane option and the user should have to specify if you want them seperately

      --
      The phrase "more better" is acceptable English. suck it grammar Nazis
    14. Re:I can't feel any responsiveness improvements. by cp.tar · · Score: 1

      The gnome apps can be irritating too

      And some of the Gnome apps, like deskbar and dictionary applet, are the main reason I'm still using Gnome.

      Well, that and the fact it looks better (and Gnome themes are much nicer than KDE ones).

      Actually, if E17 could swallow the dictionary applet, I think I'd never look back...

      --
      Ignore this signature. By order.
    15. Re:I can't feel any responsiveness improvements. by INowRegretThesePosts · · Score: 1

      I like the Sylpheed mail client. Very lightweight and with a nice interface. I don't even know if it's got calendar, exchange functionality and etc, because I just don't use it.

      For my spam needs, Sylpheed is easily integrated with bogofilter.

      It is GTK.

    16. Re:I can't feel any responsiveness improvements. by rar · · Score: 1

      honestly, KDE's configurability just scares me.

      I'm also a GNOME user, but I think it is not so much the configurability of KDE in itself that scares me. My issue with KDE is that its apps seems to be designed around the idea that every functionality has to be provided by its own widget in the main window. To do this they squeze the UI to a massive cludge of tiny non-descript icon toolbars and usually more than one rows of tabs, some of them vertical. For example, just look at this screenshot of the text editor Kate.

    17. Re:I can't feel any responsiveness improvements. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Er, you do realise that Kate looks nothing like that by default?

    18. Re:I can't feel any responsiveness improvements. by ajs318 · · Score: 1

      I use Kate all the time. I like the fact that I can have several documents open and flick easily between them without having multiple windows or browser-style tabs. I like the fact that I can have "sessions" which load several documents to work on together -- a bit like "projects" in Visual Basic for DOS (I'm sure that Microsoft's newer Windows compilers took the project idea further, but I've never used any of them). There's also a handy terminal window for checking out scripts.

      All that being said, you do need a big monitor -- at least 1280x1024 -- to make proper use of Kate. But it's not really cluttered; everything you see on that screen does something important. You could certainly have a more minimalist-looking editor, but if you wanted to keep the same level of functionality, you'd end up having to learn a lot of keystrokes and/or master a complex menu structure.

      --
      Je fume. Tu fumes. Nous fûmes!
    19. Re:I can't feel any responsiveness improvements. by rar · · Score: 1

      But it's not really cluttered; everything you see on that screen does something important. You could certainly have a more minimalist-looking editor, but if you wanted to keep the same level of functionality, you'd end up having to learn a lot of keystrokes and/or master a complex menu structure.

      I think you demonstrate exactly the point I was trying to make about the KDE app design philosophy. Apparently you like this design philosophy, "Everything does something important (so it is needed on the screen)". Personally, I am not a fan. I prefer but the most basic options to be tucked away into organized menues where I can find them when I need them, but where they do not distract me when I am doing other things.

    20. Re:I can't feel any responsiveness improvements. by twbecker · · Score: 1

      No, Evolution Exchange functionality is slow, but very functional

      I call bullshit on this, unless by "very functional" you mean crashes regularly. Evolution is by far the worst piece of software I have ever used. Normally I'd grant them some leeway since they're trying to work with closed source software, but they've been at it long enough that it should be stable. It's not even close. You're right though in that if your IT dept won't turn Exchange IMAP access on then you've got little choice.

      --
      "The problem with internet quotations is that many are not genuine" -Abraham Lincoln
    21. Re:I can't feel any responsiveness improvements. by thegux · · Score: 1

      ...and configure my keyboard shortcuts from a GUI. Isn't that whhat gnome-keybinding-properties is for?
    22. Re:I can't feel any responsiveness improvements. by dmiller · · Score: 1

      Isn't that whhat gnome-keybinding-properties is for? Interesting, that's new (or at least new since I stopped using GNOME). Maybe in another five years they will revert all their other asshat dogma (I seem to recall them being dead set against preferences like this) and have a desktop that I will want to use.
    23. Re:I can't feel any responsiveness improvements. by TractorBarry · · Score: 1

      Sadly I can second the Nautilus slowness issue.

      After a recent upgrade of my Ubuntu machine (within the last month or two) I had to start using Konqueror instead of Nautilus as Nautilus will hang for up to about three minutes whenever it's started or a directory is changed.

      Then again I've not been a fan of Nautilus since Gnome started trying to push that wretched spatial browing rubbish on me (take your Apple GUI crap back to the 1980s where it belongs !)

      --
      Sky subscribers are morons. They pay to be advertised at !
    24. Re:I can't feel any responsiveness improvements. by alphamugwump · · Score: 1

      Yeah, but it's pretty sad if gnome's killer apps are the dictionary and the deskbar.

      Last I checked (a year ago) gnome still didn't have basics like reliable CD burning. Actually, most of the apps exclusive to gnome (regular GTK doesn't count; you can run that on KDE without installing gnome) were screwed up in one way or another. Totem can't find DVDs without assistance. Anjuta doesn't build from source; you have to use debian binaries. Gnomebaker will ruin CDs, if it can find the drive.

      Now, there are a lot of GTK apps that are better than their kde counterparts, mostly in the are of multimedia authoring: vlc, kino, gimp, inkscape, ardour, and synfig, among others. This is probably because gnome users tend to be people who own or want to own a mac. GTK also has more office stuff: openoffice and gnucash.

      But for the rest, KDE owns. KDE has amarok, k3b, and konqueror, all three of which are outstanding in their respective fields. And they're always talking about how KOffice 2 is going to replace OO.O and gimp.

    25. Re:I can't feel any responsiveness improvements. by Dan+Ost · · Score: 2

      When I say "very functional", I mean that it reliably does what I need it to do.

      It does crash, but not regularly. I fire it up in the morning, use it all day for email (and occasionally to put things on my calendar), and then shut it down normally before leaving work. Maybe 2 or 3 times a week I'll get a message that some process has gone away unexpectedly, but I've never lost any data because of it. It only costs me the time it takes to read the message, kill any remaining evolution framework, and then restart evolution.

      Do I like evolution? No.
      Would I use evolution if I had a choice? No.
      Does it work well enough to use? Yes.

      --

      *sigh* back to work...
    26. Re:I can't feel any responsiveness improvements. by scotch · · Score: 1

      Evolution->exchange access works pretty well for me, too. Where do you get your data?

      --
      XML causes global warming.
    27. Re:I can't feel any responsiveness improvements. by BrokenHalo · · Score: 1

      I had some similar problems with duplication with the upgrade from 1.x to 2.0. Not on my phone, though. This was on the desktop machine. What really killed Evolution for me, though, was that since I was still running a machine with only 256MB of RAM, I had a choice between running Evolution and having a generally useful system. It was fine up to the last 1.x version, then everything just ground to a standstill.

      At that point, I threw it away and started using Thunderbird.

    28. Re:I can't feel any responsiveness improvements. by SmellTheCoffee · · Score: 1

      I'm primarily a XFCE, Fluxbox, GNOME (in that order) user but I have KDE installed too. Although I've preferred GNOME over KDE because that's what I started using a first, I've checked out KDE and I would love to configure it my way and check it out for few days. Is there a website or a small how-to on some of the common enhancements. I know I could just click my way through the desktop and figure out on my own but then again, a short how-to would be an added incentive.

    29. Re:I can't feel any responsiveness improvements. by gr8_phk · · Score: 1

      Surely that was a joke and not informative. Performance testing and regression testing should be the developers job, not the users.

    30. Re:I can't feel any responsiveness improvements. by Ctrl-Z · · Score: 1

      I'm also a sylpheed (well, okay, sylpheed-claws-gtk2) user. It's fast, lightweight, and it works with my (n)mh mail files.

      --
      www.timcoleman.com is a total waste of your time. Never go there.
    31. Re:I can't feel any responsiveness improvements. by BrokenHalo · · Score: 1

      Last I checked (a year ago) gnome still didn't have basics like reliable CD burning.

      That was indeed the case for a long time.

      CD burning is good now, though (and has been, I think, for quite a lot more than a year). Simple interface, reliable, probably similar enough to the way you might expect it to work on That Other Operating System.

    32. Re:I can't feel any responsiveness improvements. by mr_sas · · Score: 3, Informative

      There's one mono program in the default install (tomboy) and it's not running by default.

    33. Re:I can't feel any responsiveness improvements. by malevolentjelly · · Score: 1

      This is an open source project. It's absolutely essential to its success that people report any problems they're having. I'm appalled that you would suggest this should be out of the users' hands.

      Except, of course, if you're joking. :)

    34. Re:I can't feel any responsiveness improvements. by Ash+Vince · · Score: 1

      The people who maintain the gentoo patches for Gnome must do a damn fine job then because I always find the opposite. For me gnome flies along (even on my old centrino laptop).

      That may explain why it always takes a while for a gome release to be marked as a stable ebuild.

      Of course the real advantage of using Gnome is that it is more intuitive to windows users. It seems that even tho MS have spent a fortune on useability testing, the KDE devs refuse to learn any lessons from it. Gnome seems to be much better at nicking the nicest design features of OSX and Windows. Now all they need to do is sort out the bloody awful way you add items to the start menu.

      --
      I dont read /. to RTFA, I read /. to offend people in ignorance.
    35. Re:I can't feel any responsiveness improvements. by Knuckles · · Score: 1

      I reported a bug in Metacity's focus-follows-mouse behaviour years ago. It turned out to be a dupe of another bug where we were told that the behaviour (different to every other WM I have ever used) was "by design"

      Well, "bug reports welcome" does not mean "maintainer will change his design on the whim of any user who bothers to file a wishlist item"

      --
      "When I first heard Daydream Nation it quite frankly scared the living shit out of me." -- Matthew Stearns
    36. Re:I can't feel any responsiveness improvements. by disasm · · Score: 2, Informative

      regular GTK doesn't count; you can run that on KDE without installing gnome

      You're missing the point of the relationship between GTK and Gnome. Yes, a while back a lot of the important parts of the toolkit were gnome only (printers/druids/etc...), and at that time, gnucash was dependent on Gnome, but now a lot of that essential stuff is being moved into GTK2. This is a good thing (tm). Applications should be built around a toolkit, and not a window manager/desktop. The point of the window manager/desktop is to do just that, manage windows, and if you're weird and like having icons on your desktop, manage those to. The Toolkits are development interfaces. No sane person would learn all the ins and outs of their desktop's API to write a program. That's the problem we non-KDE users have with KDE. Every useful app built around KDE requires KDE (rather than just using a qt toolkit). You can't blame gnome for the 100's of programmers that write good software by not using desktops API's. The greatest advantage about GTK apps is if someone doesn't like the gnome desktop, they can ditch it for fluxbox or xfce which are also gtk based and run the same apps without any of the overhead of the desktop.

      But for the rest, KDE owns. KDE has amarok, k3b, and konqueror, all three of which are outstanding in their respective fields. And they're always talking about how KOffice 2 is going to replace OO.O and gimp.

      I personally only like k3b out of that list. Amarok and Konqueror drive me nuts every time I have to use them. K3B is a great solid app from a functional point of view. It's just a shame they didn't write it using GTK.

    37. Re:I can't feel any responsiveness improvements. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      >The biggest problem I have with GNOME as a user is Evolution. Simply put, Evolution needs to be scrapped in favor of something else.

      I bet some folks are already crying: Yes! Let's change to Creationism.

    38. Re:I can't feel any responsiveness improvements. by mvdwege · · Score: 1

      Instead of whining, you could do something more constructive, as Havoc pointed out many times in that bug report. A report that was closed for the right reason, as the discussion had long veered from how to fix the behaviour into a "flame-Havoc" flamefest.

      And for the record, on Debian unstable (Gnome 2.16), Metacity behaves as desired: no raise-on-click when sloppy focus is set. I should know, because I use it that way.

      Mart
      --
      "I know I will be modded down for this": where's the option '-1, Asking for it'?
    39. Re:I can't feel any responsiveness improvements. by mixmasta · · Score: 1

      It is configurable:
       
      /apps/metacity/general/raise_on_click

      Many actions (e.g. clicking in the client area, moving or resizing the window) normally raise the window as a side-effect. Set this option to false to decouple raising from other user actions. Even when this option is false, windows can still be raised by an alt-left-click anywhere on the window, a normal click on the window decorations, or by special messages, such as activation requests from pagers. This option is currently disabled in click-to-focus mode.

      I have mine set to false and it doesnt raise. This setting has been around for a while, not sure when it appeared though.

      --
      #6495ED - cornflower blue
    40. Re:I can't feel any responsiveness improvements. by spitzak · · Score: 1

      Actually you are off the mark. Threading has nothing to do with it, neither Windows or Gnome are using multiple threads to do the GUI (it actually would be a nightmare of complexity and probably far slower).

      The problem is simply that Gnome, instead of using 15 guys passing instructions to each other, uses more like 200. That menu item probably has 20 or so ways of being changed to the correct foreign language and correctly formatted in swahili or whatever because there are many, many guys interested in how to change it. Meanwhile, the Windows system maybe has 15 guys (maybe each somewhat fatter and slower) and at most only one of them is interested in changing to swahili. In both cases it is enormously easier for any application that wants to display in swahili to just do it itself (with the equivalent of adding one really blindingly fast guy, comparatively speaking), so most of this overhead is a complete waste. It also does not help Gnome at all that those 200 workers are much more likely to do some completely unpredictable thing (something that makes perfect sense to that worker), on Windows a programmer can be reasonably certain that the text they say to draw on the screen will come out with at least the english letters correct.

      Any real intelligent system would have one guy. The menu item should be a char* pointer to utf8 string, and it goes straight to the "draw this text here on the screen call". GUI's were usable on systems that ran at 5mhz, you know. Therefore even Windows must have an unnecessary overhead of at least 500 or so, and Gnome is even worse.

    41. Re:I can't feel any responsiveness improvements. by PastaLover · · Score: 1

      But for the rest, KDE owns. KDE has amarok, k3b, and konqueror, all three of which are outstanding in their respective fields. And they're always talking about how KOffice 2 is going to replace OO.O and gimp.

      If you mean konqueror as a file browser, then maybe. If you mean Konqueror as a web browser, ehm, no. I've been using it for a while and it has tons of annoying little bugs. One that I reported and still hasn't been fixed AFAIK is the completely broken DNS behaviour. So for now, I'm back to firefox most of the time.

    42. Re:I can't feel any responsiveness improvements. by PastaLover · · Score: 1

      Sadly I can second the Nautilus slowness issue. After a recent upgrade of my Ubuntu machine (within the last month or two) I had to start using Konqueror instead of Nautilus as Nautilus will hang for up to about three minutes whenever it's started or a directory is changed.

      There's a difference between general slowness and what looks like a major bug somewhere. I don't think the rest of the people on here are complaining about the same thing you are complaining about.

    43. Re:I can't feel any responsiveness improvements. by Breakfast+Pants · · Score: 1

      Gnome lets you configure most stuff through gconf-editor. I find it preferable to putting everything imaginable in the settings windows as kde does, because you can do things like search.

      --

      --

      WHO ATE MY BREAKFAST PANTS?
  8. Knome skin by goombah99 · · Score: 4, Funny

    The big change is they went to a Knome skin that makes it look like KDE.

    --
    Some drink at the fountain of knowledge. Others just gargle.
    1. Re:Knome skin by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

      Man, how long have you been waiting to use that joke?

    2. Re:Knome skin by Single+GNU+Theory · · Score: 1

      Man, how long have you been waiting to use that joke?


      For a GDE, it must have seemed. A gosh-darned eternity, it was.
      --
      Little Debian: America's #1 Snack Distro!
  9. I wonder if they took Linus's patches? by AaronW · · Score: 0, Redundant

    Anyone know if they accepted the patches Linus Torvalds gave for Gnome?

    --
    This post is encrypted twice with ROT-13. Documenting or attempting to crack this encryption is illegal.
    1. Re:I wonder if they took Linus's patches? by Monkey_Genius · · Score: 3, Funny

      Does he have a problem quitting?

      --
      I've got your sig, right here.
    2. Re:I wonder if they took Linus's patches? by yoyhed · · Score: 1

      More like a problem starting.

      --
      WHO NEEDS SHIFT WHEN YOU HAVE CAPSLOCK/ DAMN1
  10. Re:Yawn by QuantumG · · Score: 3, Insightful

    Riiiiight.. cause that summary really screamed hype to me. I see you got modded up too, moderators can't even be bothered reading the summary now?

    Fuckin' Slashdot.

    --
    How we know is more important than what we know.
  11. Scroll Wheel by big_groo · · Score: 1

    Any place yet to change the scroll speed of my mouse? Seriously. KDE has it.

    1. Re:Scroll Wheel by muszek · · Score: 3, Informative

      System -> Preferences -> Mouse
      I'm using Ubuntu 6.10 with Gnome 2.16

    2. Re:Scroll Wheel by big_groo · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Right. Check that to see if you can change your scroll wheel sensitivity. Google it too. Good luck.

    3. Re:Scroll Wheel by Tim_UWA · · Score: 1

      The same place as always... xorg.conf :(

    4. Re:Scroll Wheel by testerus · · Score: 1

      Just go and vote for Bug 89259 - Make scroll wheel step dimensionally correct

      Oh sorry, KDE's Bug-Tracker was the one with voting enabled.

      Honestly, it is much better to supply yourself with an external mouse, just don't use that touchpad for scrolling, they are too sensitive for gnome. (SCNR - ROTFLBTC)

  12. On time as usual... by Monkey_Genius · · Score: 1

    Yeah. Right. Stellar track record. Never late for any reason.

    --
    I've got your sig, right here.
    1. Re:On time as usual... by davydmadeley · · Score: 2, Informative

      It's a pretty good reason to be late. You wouldn't want to discover that someone had compromised the source tree and left something nasty behind, better to be safe than sorry. It's the only time it has ever been late, and for what it's worth, it was ready to ship on time.

  13. Nothing revolutionary by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 4, Funny

    As usual too ;)

    1. Re:Nothing revolutionary by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Funny

      Yes, I'm disappointed, too. From other software projects we've gotten used to 2.17 -> 2.18 transitions to be cataclysmic, jaw dropping and quite simply awe inspiring. The GNOME project has really let us down here...

    2. Re:Nothing revolutionary by T-Ranger · · Score: 1

      Well, Gnome is mainly done in the States. Thus the cataclysmic change will be from 20->21. Most jurisdictions in Canada, its 18->19. Have no idea about Europe.. Anyway: not many places left where 17->18 is the mind blowing coming of age experience it once was.

    3. Re:Nothing revolutionary by nugneant · · Score: 1

      Anyway: not many places left where 17->18 is the mind blowing coming of age experience it once was.

      Whoever thought that Barely Legal would be looked upon with such a nostalgic eye?
  14. Re:Yawn by radarsat1 · · Score: 5, Funny

    Nothing revolutionary in this release but definitely some nice new features, bug fixes, and improvements.


    Yeah, god, I just can't STAND all this hype.
  15. That's Nice by dduardo · · Score: 3, Insightful
    So, when are we going to see smart and innovative desktops that dramatically improve user friendliness?

    Just as some examples:
    • As an end-user why can't I extend applications by simply dragging and dropping features from one application to another? i.e. Dragging a search box from one app to another.
    • I have 1000s of photographs. How can these images be automatically categorized and displayed most effectively without having to manually add meta-data. It should be sorting images by looking at similarities between pictures, date taken and other automatically generated information
    • I have 1000s of mp3s. How can these songs be automatically categorized by mood, tempo, etc without manually entering in meta-data? Think of it as Pandora with your own music collection.
    These are some of the type of things that would make using a computer easier to use.

    Are open source desktop developers so focused on trying to make it "easy" for Windows user to convert they get Microsoft tunnel vision and can't innovate?

    It's the year 2007 and we have desktops with the same intelligence as those back in the early 80's.
    1. Re:That's Nice by imboboage0 · · Score: 5, Funny

      It's the year 2007 and we have desktops with the same intelligence as those back in the early 80's.
      Yeah, but the people got worse.


      *ducks*
      --
      Honesty may be the best policy, but by process of elimination, dishonesty is the second best policy.
    2. Re:That's Nice by petrus4 · · Score: 2, Insightful

      I have 1000s of mp3s. How can these songs be automatically categorized by mood, tempo, etc without manually entering in meta-data? Think of it as Pandora with your own music collection.

      Do you have any idea how difficult something like that would be to code?

    3. Re:That's Nice by SnprBoB86 · · Score: 2, Funny

      Yes, so you better get started soon :-)

      --
      http://brandonbloom.name
    4. Re:That's Nice by OmegaBlac · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Do you have any idea how difficult something like that would be to code?
      Of course he doesn't. If he did he would code it himself or pay someone to do it instead of whining on slashdot where the GNOME developers (or any devs of large desktop environment project) may never see his complaints. The GP would do better to post his wish list on the Gnome mailing lists.
    5. Re:That's Nice by module0000 · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Your suggestions such as "extending applications by simply dragging and dropping features from one application to another" is unfortunately not possible with our current(or dreamed-about) tech. Great concept, kudos for that, but the "frame" all desktop computing operates from just does not allow for this. You are not suggesting improvements to "desktop linux", but you are speaking of changes to desktop computing as a whole, across all platforms; it's not that 'easy', I wish it was. Concerning your suggestion about organizing photographs by similarities...this is not so impossible. It's not particularly easy once again, but a very rudimentary sorting algorithm could be conceived from light conditions, hard lines(etc a persons profile), this could be worked on. As far as the mp3's...I'm afraid that entirely too subjective to the person listening to them. My mood and tempo desires may differ and most likely do, from yours, and yours from your neighbors. This is a question of personal preference, and I don't see mp3 players administering a standardized personality test to guess at your flavor of mood, out of the X number of popular mood categories. Last but not least...I'm afraid there were no desktop os's HOME users even had access to in the *early 80's*. You could go banging over Xerox's door for their machine, or maybe even dear Mr. Gates'. However, in the early 80's, such hardware would cost you [somewhere near] $30,000? More?

      --
      Trackball users will be first against the wall.
    6. Re:That's Nice by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Informative

      A, mostly because different programs use different data models. It's not impossible, at least not in a limited way, but it would hinge more upon app developers than the desktop environment.

      B, because machine image recognition is an area of tricky tricky research and requires serious computational power. Note that spammers have yet to defeat the wonky text + squiggly lines test for posting on slashdot. And thats just OCR. (While people with very limited intellectual capacity seems to make it through in hoards ;)

      C, same as above. Pandora used human experts to classify the music.

    7. Re:That's Nice by kurtmckee · · Score: 2, Funny

      So, when are we going to see smart and innovative desktops that dramatically improve user friendliness?

      Just as some examples:

      • As an end-user why can't I extend applications by simply thinking things into existence? i.e. Dragging and dropping Blender into Gaim?
      • I have 1000s of photographs and I hate metadata. Why can't my computer automatically recognize people's faces and group the photos accordingly? Why can't it analyze the hairstyles and figure out when the photo was taken, and why can't it automatically scan the photos for logos and figure out where the photo was taken?
      • I have 1000s of mp3s and I hate metadata. Why can't my software use voice recognition to figure out the lyrics and then create a playlist using a Bayesian filter? I can filter spam out of my inbox, I should be able to filter ARTIST UNKNOWN out of my GENRE UNKNOWN playlist!

      These are some of the type of things that would make using a computer more like using deep black magic.

      Are open source desktop developers so focused on trying to make it "easy" for Windows users to convert they get Microsoft tunnel vision and can't innovate?

      It's the year 2007 and I want my computer to be more like the computers in the sci-fi movies I saw in the early 80's.

    8. Re:That's Nice by thre5her · · Score: 1
      As an end-user why can't I extend applications by simply dragging and dropping features from one application to another? i.e. Dragging a search box from one app to another.

      This is pointless. The dev has to code the search feature into the app for it work, so let it be up to the dev whether or not a search box is appropriate. GTK provides standard widgets to keep the same look and feel between apps, not to replicate functionality.

      (If you want a search box in list views, type '/'.)

      I have 1000s of photographs. How can these images be automatically categorized and displayed most effectively without having to manually add meta-data. It should be sorting images by looking at similarities between pictures, date taken and other automatically generated information

      Use Beagle or hack on Storage. Or write a 2-line bash script to sort images into different directories by date. Additionally, what's "similar" about two photos is a very complicated question. The orange blob in one photo could be an orange or a hot-air balloon.

      In short, if you want to sort your 1,000s of pictures without tagging metadata regarding the contents of the pictures, you're out of luck. You can't sort based on non-existent information.

      I have 1000s of mp3s. How can these songs be automatically categorized by mood, tempo, etc without manually entering in meta-data? Think of it as Pandora with your own music collection.

      There are automatic tagging solutions out there, such as MusicBrainz clients. Unfortunately, it won't give you moods or tempos. You can detect tempos, which is going to be variable even within one song, and you can get moods from some community database. I doubt there are enough people willing to create a second MusicBrainz just to get mood information, however.

    9. Re:That's Nice by massysett · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Tagging MP3s: Musicbrainz has projects to automatically tag MP3s with metadata on track name, album, etc. As for tagging them with mood: good luck; however All Music Guide has been working on this sort of thing for years; see also Last.fm. Integrating these into a desktop would be nice, though your comparison to "Microsoft tunnel vision" is quite harsh seeing as open source desktops have long had features that Windows sorely lacks, such as transparent SSH file transfers, thumbnailing of PDFs and other non-photo documents, and viewers for multiple file types, embedded right into the file manager.

    10. Re:That's Nice by dbIII · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Your suggestions such as "extending applications by simply dragging and dropping features from one application to another"

      That's why we always keep going back to the command line shell where you can do a grep on the output of just about anything. The GUI has a place but I'd rather send an entire file through sed with a short command than move the mouse to the first character of every line, right click, and scroll down to delete, then left click as I have seen some purely bound to the GUI do.

      The biggest problem with the other examples above is you have to tell the machine what to do sometime - hence the metadata. You would have to tell the stupid machine in simple terms just how to identify the catagories to sort into.

    11. Re:That's Nice by WoLpH · · Score: 1
      • Dragging and dropping features from one application to another would be pretty hard to implement, perhaps it would be possible in KDE as there is a very thorough integration in every KDE application.
      • Perhaps Google Picasa can help you with that? Soring images by date is easily possible with just about any program, as for the rest... what kind of similarities are you thinking about?
      • Try Amarok, it has all the features you want (mood and everything can be automatically indexed for you)
    12. Re:That's Nice by ucblockhead · · Score: 1

      We didn't have desktops in the early 80's. We had command prompts.

      --
      The cake is a pie
    13. Re:That's Nice by Timothy+Brownawell · · Score: 1

      As an end-user why can't I extend applications by simply dragging and dropping features from one application to another? i.e. Dragging a search box from one app to another.

      Very much impossible to do as an end-user, but doable by a programmer with sufficient skill (dependent on how different the applications are, and how well they're coded) and free time (and source code access).

      I have 1000s of photographs. How can these images be automatically categorized and displayed most effectively without having to manually add meta-data. It should be sorting images by looking at similarities between pictures, date taken and other automatically generated information

      I have 1000s of mp3s. How can these songs be automatically categorized by mood, tempo, etc without manually entering in meta-data? Think of it as Pandora with your own music collection.

      I recently saw a news bit about some "AI" system that can learn to recognize simple pictures in approximately this fashion, and I'd imaging categorizing sounds would follow similar principles. So, these two are probably half-way doable by someone who takes enough interest in such things to follow current research (and has obscene amounts of free time).

    14. Re:That's Nice by dduardo · · Score: 1

      In terms of the dragging and dropping features I think one of the big issues is standardizing how data is stored within applications. For example, look at how SQL works. You have a physical data organization, conceptual schema, internal schema and external levels, all of which are designed to be independent. When a top level widget tries to query the main program it should have a very high level look. It shouldn't matter how the physical data is organized.

      In terms of the mp3s, what I really mean is that the computer should play more similar sounding songs if I desire. For example, if i'm listening to song A and I liked it because of my particular mood, the computer should find songs simliar to song A that have the same tempo, beat, etc. All of these features can be extracted using DSP techniques.

      In the early 80's you had the apple lisa

    15. Re:That's Nice by AaronW · · Score: 2, Interesting

      KDE offers some of this, though nothing like dropping Blender into Gaim. In KDE, most applications are also components and can be easily embedded inside other applications. For example, Konqueror is not so much a web and file browser as a container. I.e. I click on a Word document and it opens it in the browser using kword, or I click on a MP3 and it can use Amarok, or a photo brings up my preferred photo viewer inside the browser.

      As far as not requiring metadata for MP3s, Amarok already supports this (another KDE application). It calculates a sound fingerprint of the file and uses the Musicbrainz database to try and figure out the song. Not only that, but I can bring up lyrics, the CD cover and even Wikipedia entries on the band in question. It's pretty amazing.

      As far as grouping photographs, I don't know anything open source that does that based on picture content.

      -Aaron

      --
      This post is encrypted twice with ROT-13. Documenting or attempting to crack this encryption is illegal.
    16. Re:That's Nice by dduardo · · Score: 2, Informative

      1983: Apple Lisa

    17. Re:That's Nice by tr1907 · · Score: 0

      Very much impossible to do as an end-user, but doable by a programmer with sufficient skill (dependent on how different the applications are, and how well they're coded) and free time (and source code access). I don't understand; then that guy has to rewrite all the applications with that has a GUI???? I recently saw a news bit about some "AI" system that can learn to recognize simple pictures in approximately this fashion, and I'd imaging categorizing sounds would follow similar principles. So, these two are probably half-way doable by someone who takes enough interest in such things to follow current research (and has obscene amounts of free time). even though it can be doable, but what if done. Every picture will be have to compared with the rest of pictures in the folder, that is a very big number of comparison to make, which will require a lot of processing power. This might not be feasible to run on a regular hardware as it would require more time then manual sorting.

    18. Re:That's Nice by Blakey+Rat · · Score: 2, Insightful

      As an end-user why can't I extend applications by simply dragging and dropping features from one application to another? i.e. Dragging a search box from one app to another.

      Sounds like Apple's OpenDoc?

      It didn't work because:
      1) They released it too early and it quickly gained a reputation for being too buggy.
      2) The only application that really embraced it was ClarisWorks. Oh, there was some lame web browser Apple made that used it too called Cyberdog, IIRC.

      The idea isn't *bad*, but it really needs a killer app around it to make it work. An app better than ClarisWorks/Cyberdog.

      Are open source desktop developers so focused on trying to make it "easy" for Windows user to convert they get Microsoft tunnel vision and can't innovate?

      Yup. Open source seems to lack a lot of designers-- without designers, you have to program based on established designs. Designs from a company like, say, Microsoft who solved all those problems before. KDE and Windows, in the default configuration, look almost identical. Say what you want about Apple and Microsoft, but at least Windows and OS X don't look and work identically.

    19. Re:That's Nice by jaxle · · Score: 1

      I just recently switched to linux and have tried Gnome, KDE, and xfce.

      What I want is a "Start Menu", "K" menu, "Applications" menu, or whatever, that I can customize with dragging and dropping. And in the case of KDE, actually implement the changes I make. Currently I am running KDE and I am at a loss as to how to fix the poorly categorized 100 or so programs in the menu.

    20. Re:That's Nice by corychristison · · Score: 0

      Are open source desktop developers so focused on trying to make it "easy" for Windows user to convert they get Microsoft tunnel vision and can't innovate?
      Whaa... Geesh. How many trolls are there like you out in the world? If you want all your pretty fancy (probably less user intuitive programs) then build them yourself! Or at least sponsor a developer and ask them to include it. Be sure you can afford to squeeze a lot of cash out of your ass 'cause that's a hefty load of programming.

      I hate to be a prude or anything, but I really actually quite like the current state of the F/OSS desktops. Personally, I prefer XFCE but that's mostly because I like things to be nice & easy, instead of bulky and annoying **cough**GNOME**cough**KDE**cough**. (as an aside, as of right now I am using about 180MB of system memory and no swap -- this is with Firefox, Thunderbird, aMSN, Audacious[w/~1200 songs], and a handful of daemons running)
      When I was using KDE I don't think the memory usage was ever under 300MB... but that was KDE 3.2 I believe.
    21. Re:That's Nice by module0000 · · Score: 1

      In terms of the mp3s, what I really mean is that the computer should play more similar sounding songs if I desire. For example, if i'm listening to song A and I liked it because of my particular mood, the computer should find songs simliar to song A that have the same tempo, beat, etc. All of these features can be extracted using DSP techniques.


      Ahh I see. I misunderstood when I made my post. Defining songs by tempo and beat is as you say..completely possible using DSP and other techniques. Seems like a plugin to start working on for XMMS.
      --
      Trackball users will be first against the wall.
    22. Re:That's Nice by Eideewt · · Score: 1

      I think you've got those turned around. Dragging a widget from one application to another would not be especially difficult to make happen. They would have to have some way to communicate the change (good luck getting that picked up... drag-and-drop file saving isn't even common yet), but assuming that each programs considers its windows to be reconfigurable, you've got a common pool of widgets, and a way for your programs to communicate, the problem is more one of actually writing a bunch of programs that agree to work together than a technical challenge. Making metadata out of an mp3 file or image strikes me as pretty tricky, and knowing what to do with that data as even trickier.

    23. Re:That's Nice by Max+Littlemore · · Score: 1

      Just as some examples:

      You forgot:
      Why doesn't the cup holder pour me a drink when I'm feeling thirsty?

      --
      I don't therefore I'm not.
    24. Re:That's Nice by poopdeville · · Score: 1

      Every picture will be have to compared with the rest of pictures in the folder, that is a very big number of comparison to make, which will require a lot of processing power. This might not be feasible to run on a regular hardware as it would require more time then manual sorting.

      Not true. That's the absolute worst case naive data miner. Things can be much better.

      --
      After all, I am strangely colored.
    25. Re:That's Nice by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I hope you are kidding.

      You speak of these magical features as if it were a matter of will, vs the huge amount of intellectual property it would take to achieve this.

    26. Re:That's Nice by davydmadeley · · Score: 1

      Some pretty serious research is going into these areas, (eg. see http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Music_information_ret rieval), but very few practical results so far.

    27. Re:That's Nice by ForumTroll · · Score: 1

      Currently I am running KDE and I am at a loss as to how to fix the poorly categorized 100 or so programs in the menu.
      Right click on the panel with the "K menu" icon and select "Unlock Panels" (if the panel is already unlocked you can skip this step). Then right click on the "K menu" icon and you'll see an option named "Menu Editor". From there you can drag and drop the programs to whichever category you like. You can also create new categories, rename programs, assign shortcuts etc. When you're done make sure to save the changes and you should be set.
      --
      "A Lisp programmer knows the value of everything, but the cost of nothing." - Alan Perlis
    28. Re:That's Nice by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Right Click -> Edit Menu

      Drag and drop to your hearts content.

    29. Re:That's Nice by nuzak · · Score: 1

      but assuming that each programs considers its windows to be reconfigurable, you've got a common pool of widgets, and a way for your programs to communicate

      I believe you're looking for this

      It's got your drag and drop widget goodness. It won't make them magically work of course.

      --
      Done with slashdot, done with nerds, getting a life.
    30. Re:That's Nice by Creepy+Crawler · · Score: 0, Offtopic

      ---because machine image recognition is an area of tricky tricky research and requires serious computational power. Note that spammers have yet to defeat the wonky text + squiggly lines test for posting on slashdot. And thats just OCR. (While people with very limited intellectual capacity seems to make it through in hoards ;)

      Spammers dont care about Slashdot, at least on posting here.

      We are bombarded with ads in email and web browsing. Last we want is "I work for Intel and we makes teh bestest produkt. Come ask us Q's that we can answer." (oh well, we do have that... but NON paid sponsorships... nevermind). Only greifers and trolls want to cause trouble for slashdot. Well, unless you all think that page widening posts were corporate ads.

      Now, how would I beat the captchas? It's easy. Just troll usenet for lots of porno images and serve them up to users. When you need a captcha broke, use a porn surfing user to "beat it" for you.

      Human based schemes will always be broken by using humans to break it for you. It just depends if you use a good enough bait to start it with. Next, it will be 2 minute vids for captchas. 2 captchas to 1 vid would be nice, for both spammers and pornsters alike.

      --
    31. Re:That's Nice by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      why duck? I mean, its true... most people who have been using any kind of computer for about 5 years, are *JUST* now figuring out that they can organize things into folders/hierarchical organizational conventions, not to mention that yes, they can delete unneeded icons, etc from their desktop (cuz you know, they've still yet to find "My Documents"/home directory...

    32. Re:That's Nice by Zantetsuken · · Score: 1

      yes, but even on something like Mac OS 10, which is touted as the supreme champion of simplicity and interoperability of programs, I doubt there is even this kind of functionality...

    33. Re:That's Nice by Kjella · · Score: 1

      Yeah, but the people got worse.

      Well, they did. Really. In the early 80s, you were using computers because you were in some geeky CS/number crunching job, which means you probably were above average intelligent and more often than not had domain-specific knowledge. Desktops are a lot more user-friendly, but in general a desktop isn't supposed to be "clippy"-style intelligent. You can still commit harakiri like "rm -f /" except now it comes in a beautifully themed 3D desktop using a point-and-click interface and maybe a helpful dialog saying "Do you really want to shoot yourself in the head with a shotgun?" but users are much the same. They do something stupid and blame it a bunch of bits that does exactly what you told it to, unless the programmer did something stupid. There's some impressive work being done on gating the clueless away from where they can injure themselves, but for many I guess that's not enough. Where do you want to end up? "I can't let you do that, Dave"?

      --
      Live today, because you never know what tomorrow brings
    34. Re:That's Nice by deadowl · · Score: 1

      netflixprize.com anyone? A good algorithm someone comes up with for this thing could probably be reapplied to the scenario you mention. The problem mentioned isn't exactly hard to master. However, the contexts in which such technologies would be used are very limited to a different user's tastes. You could make an algorithm that's perfect for yourself, but unless your program gathers extensive data from the user, it's just not going to be right for everyone. That limits the technology in the fact that it has to learn about the user rather than being ready to go. The amount of memory it would take to analyze a huge amount of photos or music in complete accuracy seems impractical, so you would probably end up making mass generalizations for an efficient algorithm. If you could analyze connections in the data, you could network songs or photos together. There's also the problem that a lot of music contains more than one mood, and some people might prefer their information sorted in different ways. One song or photo could be a part of several networks. Then there is always the possibility of the program categorizing something in a way in which an individual person disagrees. The job of such technologies should be simply to assist the user, not to make things a rule. Meanwhile, it should respond to the users actions in itself. As well, there are many things that are dependent on context rather than solely recognition (ex. fair use vs. copyright infringement). In these senses, I am personally unhappy with the fact that the GTK libraries will assume what is best for me as a user. I particularly have distaste for the GTK combobox in terms of visibility of information, which is more important to me than how far I have to move my mouse. GNOME simply makes too many assumptions of its users and that's why I don't use it. I praise KDE for being more configurable, but not for sensory overload on a new user. This can be improved, however. Meanwhile GNOME is handicapped in that it doesn't have a lot of functionality. You can't innovate on configuration usability in functionality that you don't have.

    35. Re:That's Nice by Tim+C · · Score: 1

      As an end-user why can't I extend applications by simply dragging and dropping features from one application to another? i.e. Dragging a search box from one app to another.

      That would be difficult to achieve between apps written against a single API by a coordinated team of developers writing them with such a feature in mind. To do it between arbitrary apps written by a random collection of (mostly) volunteer/part time developers targetting various APIs is utterly impracticable.

      Taking just your example of search, how would that work, dragging and dropping a search feature from (say) a text editor, and on to a photo management application? Or a music player? It's a great, sci-fi sounding idea, but I really can't see it being practical except in extremely limited situations.

    36. Re:That's Nice by paulbd · · Score: 1

      As an end-user why can't I extend applications by simply dragging and dropping features from one application to another? i.e. Dragging a search box from one app to another.

      Could it be that the semantics of such an operation are so poorly defined, and so hard to define, that actually implementing something like this is close to pointless? What would it mean even in the single case you mentioned?

      I have 1000s of photographs. How can these images be automatically categorized and displayed most effectively without having to manually add meta-data. It should be sorting images by looking at similarities between pictures, date taken and other automatically generated information.
      I have 1000s of mp3s. How can these songs be automatically categorized by mood, tempo, etc without manually entering in meta-data? Think of it as Pandora with your own music collection.

      Could it be that these are tasks that we actually don't know how to do yet, because they represent something beyond the frontier of our understanding of human intelligence and cognition? Pandora, for example, is fun and useful, but its fun and useful because thousands of people are effectively applying their own human judgement to the system. The computer is merely a data manager. And note that Pandora doesn't classify by mood, tempo etc., it classifies by "lots of other people who like this also like that" - associative classification, not content classification.
    37. Re:That's Nice by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      or like in the self video? (Morphic comes from that, I think)

      http://video.google.com/videoplay?docid=5776880551 404953752

      21 minutes is kinda long, but some of the ideas are interesting.

    38. Re:That's Nice by BurntNickel · · Score: 1

      Your suggestions such as "extending applications by simply dragging and dropping features from one application to another" is unfortunately not possible with our current(or dreamed-about) tech.

      That would truely be an awesome feature if it existed. Something headed in that direction existed with OpenDoc, but sadly that was a dead end.

      OpenDoc is a cross-platform technology that replaces conventional applications with user-assembled groups of software components. OpenDoc allows users to create virtually any kind of custom software solution. OpenDoc is not supported in Carbon.

      --
      And the knowledge that they fear is a weapon to be used against them...
    39. Re:That's Nice by mhall119 · · Score: 1

      You are obviously not a software developer. Things you are asking for are not design limitations, they are technical limitations.

      Media categorization based on content (images, music, etc) is just now stating to become viable due to new algorithms and faster hardware. Google probably has the infrastructure to do it, but your PC doesn't. It's not like what you see in the movies, computers are made for processing quantitative data, not qualitative data.

      Sun attempted to make drag-and-drop program development/extension with their Java Beans, but the problem turns out to be much harder than you would think. You can't make a program do something it wasn't designed to do.

      Maybe you would be happier with the HollywoodOS

      --
      http://www.mhall119.com
    40. Re:That's Nice by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Your post in 1985:

      * I want to move around fully 3D virtual environments rendered real-time in full color and high resolution
      * I want to use my computer as a VCR/tape deck with a library of hundreds of films and thousands of albums which I can select from a list with a few button clicks
      * I want vast amount of information available to me for free via my computer over my phone line or wirelessly, including access to commercial and goverment services. I want to be able to find the page I want almost instantly without remembering anything more than a rough idea of the content.

    41. Re:That's Nice by ucblockhead · · Score: 1

      Note: "we" implies more than one person, therefore the Lisa doesn't count.

      --
      The cake is a pie
    42. Re:That's Nice by nschubach · · Score: 1

      Not exactly as groundbreaking as your suggestion, but I still have no clue why an operating system aborts my entire copy procedure if one file fails to because of one reason or another. And why don't we have background copy? You drag 50 files to a directory and while the OS is asking you if you want to overwrite one of those 50 files it could be writing those that will copy without problem in the background queuing up the dialog boxes for the 5 other files that might exist.

      --
      Every time I start to have faith in humanity, I ruin it by driving to work between 7 and 8 am.
    43. Re:That's Nice by Eideewt · · Score: 1

      Or anything which supports dragging a widget. I believe you could even do it fairly easily in gtk. Any widget seems able to serve as a drag source or destination. Just set up the proper callbacks (with a data transfer mechanism) and you can remove and add widgets with a drag all you like. Of course your application would still have to provide some way to decide what a new widget would do (when I drag a search box from my address book to my media player does it keep listing addresses or search my music library?). If you want to be able to drag non-standard widgets then you probably do want a dynamic language, or at least a shared environment that programs will run in.

    44. Re:That's Nice by nuzak · · Score: 1

      > when I drag a search box from my address book to my media player does it keep listing addresses or search my music library?

      Presumably, when you drag across apps, it would be a "copy" operation, and you'd get a new copy of the widget that would need configuring to work in its new environment. Pointing the widget at a new data source would be the first thing you'd want to do -- in fact, you might just make the drop action a transactional thing that asks for a valid data source within the application, and will abort if it doesn't get one. You could perhaps point it to your library by pointing at the library browser's grid widget, and get some default semantics of grid-widget-searching built in (such as a lucene-ish syntax for addressing columns, or whatever). Assuming the protocols for inter-widget communication are well-designed (a generous assumption there), then you could conceivably replace a previous searchbox widget with a fancier one with a few clicks.

      Fact is, this ain't gonna happen in current environments, and it's fairly anathema to GNOME, which isn't exactly about maximum configurability.

      --
      Done with slashdot, done with nerds, getting a life.
    45. Re:That's Nice by HuguesT · · Score: 1

      Actually none of what you are writing is completely impossible. Face recognition essentially works in the lab, so it may one day make it to home-use apps. Voice recognition works even better, I'm sure some guy at the MIT media lab must have tried automated lyrics recognition.

    46. Re:That's Nice by bensch128 · · Score: 1

      * As an end-user why can't I extend applications by simply dragging and dropping features from one application to another? i.e. Dragging a search box from one app to another.

      What does it mean to share the search dialog between a textediting application and a image editing app? They work on different mediums and searching search box between them doesn't make much sense IMHO.

      I have 1000s of photographs. How can these images be automatically categorized and displayed most effectively without having to manually add meta-data. It should be sorting images by looking at similarities between pictures, date taken and other automatically generated information

      Sounds like one heck of a research project. Not only do you need to come up with algorithms which can do this kind of catergorization sanely, you'd also have to build a clean infrastructure to support it and not destabilize the current instructure. Actually, now that I think about it, this would probably be an easy plugin for digikam IF you can come up with a sane algorithm. (AFAIK it already supports grouping via date)

      I have 1000s of mp3s. How can these songs be automatically categorized by mood, tempo, etc without manually entering in meta-data? Think of it as Pandora with your own music collection.

      Again, this strikes me as better implemented as a plugin for a current audio player (amarok).

      Are open source desktop developers so focused on trying to make it "easy" for Windows user to convert they get Microsoft tunnel vision and can't innovate?

      The problem here is that big companies tend to spend major money on usability studies and focus major resources on finding good UI solutions to difficult problems. Money that OSS projects don't have and will never have. So it's easier+safer to copy the features and designs that the major players have already built then to go on a limb and come up with half baked UIs with no usability studies behind them.

      There are cases of innovative UIs coming from OSS (amarok, digikam) but IMHO they are few and far between because of the distributed+cooperative nature of OSS. I think digikam is an amazing example of photo management software but Adobe has really, really raised the standard with their lightroom software. I think OSS developers on major projects should ask themselves if a radical UI redesign is a good idea if the old method worked was reasonably usable. Of course, project forks work miracles in this situation...

      As an example, I work on krita and there's a question if the filter preview dialog should/could be redesigned to be modaless in krita2. The standard photoshop method (AFAIK) and current krita method is to preview filters in a modal dialog. Unfortunately, its hard to tell how this should be implemented so it's sematically easier for the user to use filters. How does he tell when only the preview is being shown or when the filter has actually be applied?

      Since 90% of the people active in OSS projects are programmers, we don't know how to do/don't want to do good usability studies. Personally, I'm satisfied when my bit works sensibly and corresponds to my mental model. If someone can come up with a usability study proving my feature wrong, then maybe me or someone else will change it. In business, money does the talking so if a UI is shown in a study to be more usable and will attact more clients, then thats the one implemented.

      The interesting thing will be when for-profit companies start implementing innovative UIs in OSS systems. Then, maybe we'll see major UI changes. But since UI testing costs money and time, why mess with what works?

      Cheers
      Ben

  16. Re:Yawn by Whiney+Mac+Fanboy · · Score: 4, Funny

    The way the post hyped it up, I was expecting something actually exciting.

    WTF? The post even says "Nothing revolutionary in this release".

    If that's hype, you must suffer from spontaneous ejeculation at a repubrocrats/demican rally.

    --
    There are shills on slashdot. Apparently, I'm one of them.
  17. Re:It has nearly caught up to KDE......... by thule · · Score: 2, Interesting

    KDE's KWallet has offered similar support for years. In combination with other KDE programs, such as the KMail mail client and the Kopete instant messenging software, KDE users have had access to such features for ages.

    I did not see in the KWallet docs (http://docs.kde.org/stable/en/kdeutils/kwallet/in dex.html) anything about it being a frontend to gpg. KWallet appears to be closer to the gnome password manager than the newer gpg management feature. Since I removed KDE from my system a year and a half ago, I cannot verify this.

    These features were supported back in KDE 2!

    I didn't see anything in the KDE 2 notes about supporting vertical text. Though it could be they didn't specifically mention it.

    Yep, KDE has offered such functionality for years. KDevelop is an extremely mature software development environment. It's of a far higher quality than Anjuta, and offers a far greater number of features.

    Most definately true. KDevelop is a pretty nice program.

  18. i've got a picture of it here by ElephanTS · · Score: 1
    --
    spoonerize "magic trackpad"
    1. Re:i've got a picture of it here by gardyloo · · Score: 2, Funny

      Christ. Not only did that squirrel give the gnome an entire basketful of red, painful-looking chancres, but it also ate off his left hand. And he's *smiling*. That's one badass gnome.

    2. Re:i've got a picture of it here by gardyloo · · Score: 1

      That's no squirrel! That's the XFCE mouse!

  19. Re:It has nearly caught up to KDE......... by muszek · · Score: 1

    I thought that the first "KDE is better" post in a Gnome thread will end with "first post!". I'm disappointed.

  20. Have they... by metamatic · · Score: 1, Flamebait

    ...removed Mono from it? Or is technology known to be covered by Microsoft patents still part of the GNOME desktop?

    --
    GCHQ Quantum Insert installed. If only our tongues were made of glass, how much more careful we would be when we speak
    1. Re:Have they... by SirTalon42 · · Score: 1

      Nope, more mono in fact (Tomboy is mono IIRC).

    2. Re:Have they... by thebluesgnr · · Score: 1

      The GNOME project never shipped Mono. What it ships is GTK#, a set of bindings for the .NET platform. In theory it should work on top of Mono, DotGNU or Microsoft's own .NET implementation. GNOME also ships bindings for many other languages (C++, Perl, Python, etc). The GNOME desktop includes one application that uses GTK#, a note taking panel applet (tomboy). It's an optional module that you are free to skip if you want (Debian doesn't install it by default, for example).

    3. Re:Have they... by Tweekster · · Score: 1

      Who gives a shit...you and three other people

      --
      The phrase "more better" is acceptable English. suck it grammar Nazis
    4. Re:Have they... by metamatic · · Score: 1

      The GNOME project never shipped Mono.

      So what? The full GNOME desktop environment, as released by the GNOME project, includes Tomboy and hence requires Mono. Therefore, Mono is a part of a working GNOME desktop environment.

      # apt-cache depends tomboy tomboy Depends: mono-runtime ...

      The fact that you can hack bits out of the full GNOME release and have it still work isn't good enough, which is why I've switched back to KDE.

      --
      GCHQ Quantum Insert installed. If only our tongues were made of glass, how much more careful we would be when we speak
    5. Re:Have they... by Chemicalscum · · Score: 1
      Zim which is a GTK2-Perl Application:

      http://www.pardus.nl/projects/

      Is far superior to Tomboy so you can get all of the functionality and not install Mono.

  21. 3D Chess is everywhere! by pizzach · · Score: 5, Funny

    With the release of GNOME 2.18, it appears there has been a change in the playing field. In order to be considered to a full fledged modern OS, a Three-Dee Chess program must be included with every new operating system. The Release of Mac OS X seems to have started this trend. Microsoft soon followed suit with Windows Vista. Now there is Gnome. Will KDE be pulled into this madness, or will it fall behind into oblivion?!

    Apple Chess

    Windows Chess

    GNOME Chess

    Feel free to flog me now.

    --
    Once you start despising the jerks, you become one.
    1. Re:3D Chess is everywhere! by mybecq · · Score: 1

      And a late entry:

      OS/2 Chess

    2. Re:3D Chess is everywhere! by chanchao · · Score: 1

      3D Chess ???

      "Unable to enable 3D mode -- Your system does not have the required software to enable 3D mode. Please contact your system administrator [..right.. -Cc] and ask them [sic] to install the OpenGL Python bindings and the GtkGLExt Python bindings."

      (Note that I don't have GtkGLExt Python Bindings anywhere in the repositories.. And I'm not going to hunt for it and MOST DEFINITELY not compile them myself)

      (Note that 3D works perfectly well elsewhere, such as in the screen savers and the utterly useless Compiz 'Cubed' workspaces. )

    3. Re:3D Chess is everywhere! by Bambi+Dee · · Score: 1

      I think the design of the three chess boards perfectly matches the aesthetics of their respective OS - much like Word 6's ballpoint pen matched that of Windows 3.x. Not that that's likely to be much of a coincidence.

    4. Re:3D Chess is everywhere! by sootman · · Score: 1

      "The Release of Mac OS X seems to have started this trend. Microsoft soon followed suit with Windows Vista."

      For very large values of 'soon.' :-)

      That said, I've launched OS X's chess a handful of times to show people how cool it looks... compared to the thousands of times I've launched Microsoft's included games (mostly Freecell.) If I ever get Vista, one of the first things I'll do is get the old games working on it--the new ones look like absolute SHIT. Multicolored, flashy shit, but shit nonetheless.

      --
      Dear Slashdot: next time you want to mess with the site, add a rich-text editor for comments.
    5. Re:3D Chess is everywhere! by sootman · · Score: 1

      Ah yes, doesn't that pretty much sum up Linux in a nutshell? (Pun not intended.) Bad grammar in the message that tells you about a broken feature.

      --
      Dear Slashdot: next time you want to mess with the site, add a rich-text editor for comments.
    6. Re:3D Chess is everywhere! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      one more: nextstep chess

    7. Re:3D Chess is everywhere! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yep, same problem. And I can't find the packages anywhere.

    8. Re:3D Chess is everywhere! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      What I can't find is how to play it 2D.
      I can't stand playing "3D" chess on the flat computer screen, I just don't have a feel for the board that way.
      (unlike real life, where really 3D chess seems fine)

  22. GNOME, Ubuntu, and the colour green... by babbling · · Score: 5, Interesting

    I'm looking at this screenshot and thinking that it looks quite good. People often complain about the brown in Ubuntu being "ugly", and Ubuntu has stated that they don't want to be "just like Windows" by going for blue. Well, based on that screenshot, I think green would be a good choice.

    1. Re:GNOME, Ubuntu, and the colour green... by Psychotria · · Score: 1

      I agree that it does look good. However, I will stick with blue because it sooths, calms and refreshes me so that I don't smash my monitor in uncontrollable rages.

    2. Re:GNOME, Ubuntu, and the colour green... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Luna looks just great in pale green.

    3. Re:GNOME, Ubuntu, and the colour green... by Max+Littlemore · · Score: 2, Interesting

      I will stick with blue because it sooths, calms and refreshes me so that I don't smash my monitor in uncontrollable rages.

      I thought green was better at soothing psychopathic behaviour. It's also suppoosed to be easier for people with various types of dyslexia to read and absorb information, so yeah, go green

      --
      I don't therefore I'm not.
    4. Re:GNOME, Ubuntu, and the colour green... by AusIV · · Score: 1

      I like blue myself, but when I set my girlfriend up with Kubuntu, she decked everything (and I mean everything) out in shades of green, and I was amazed how good it looked when she was done.

    5. Re:GNOME, Ubuntu, and the colour green... by tuxicle · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Green reminds people of SuSe/Novell, I suppose

    6. Re:GNOME, Ubuntu, and the colour green... by Psychotria · · Score: 1

      Ok, that sounds reasonable. Not that I really have any of those problems (it was a joke :-) I will trial a green desktop for a while though. Thanks

    7. Re:GNOME, Ubuntu, and the colour green... by pizzach · · Score: 1

      I started using green around a year ago for my background images. It felt so right started to wonder if my favorite color was actually green and not blue. It doesn't hurt my eyes like white. It isn't cold like blue. It isn't depressing like black. It's very lively and gives you energy.

      I use an e17 metacity theme to get some brown in there to mix up the look. After all, brown and green are complimentary colors and using one color for everything is a bit monotonous.

      --
      Once you start despising the jerks, you become one.
    8. Re:GNOME, Ubuntu, and the colour green... by coaxial · · Score: 1

      People often complain about the brown in Ubuntu being "ugly", and Ubuntu has stated that they don't want to be "just like Windows" by going for blue. Well, based on that screenshot, I think green would be a good choice.

      Ubuntu is ugly because they've gone with browns, oranges, and reds -- the worst part of the spectrum.

      What I noticed in the screenshot is that background is almost identical to MacOSX's default background. The only difference is that it's green, and MacOSX's is -- wait for it -- blue. If they went with blue, they wouldn't be emulating windows, but rather the mac.

      Again, FOSS copies what doesn't need to be copied. There are plenty of orginal backgrounds. Bowie Poag was the go-to guy back in the day. I'm sure you could either dust those off (assuming you can find them) or find someone else with something that isn't direct copy of another's style.

    9. Re:GNOME, Ubuntu, and the colour green... by rar · · Score: 1

      I'm looking at this screenshot and thinking that it looks quite good.

      I like it too. Does anyone know where one can find that specific wallpaper?

    10. Re:GNOME, Ubuntu, and the colour green... by dylan_- · · Score: 1

      Ubuntu is ugly because they've gone with browns, oranges, and reds -- the worst part of the spectrum.
      That's just a daft thing to say. BBC News has a similar colour scheme at the moment, getting away from the "everything blue" theme that was fashionable in 2000, and no-one complains about that. "worst part of the spectrum"...what is that even supposed to mean?
      --
      Igor Presnyakov stole my hat
    11. Re:GNOME, Ubuntu, and the colour green... by Chris_Keene · · Score: 1

      Pah, this is so typical, why do people always copy the god-like Atari GEM desktop

      http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Image:Atari_1040STf.j pg

      (PS Amigas suck)

      --
      You will forget this sig before you next see it
    12. Re:GNOME, Ubuntu, and the colour green... by rar · · Score: 1

      (Replying to myself, mumble mumble)

      I've done some research, and apparently the screenshot is from a Gnome showcase Linux distribution, Foresight Linux. It seems a nice green theme with that green wallpaper is the default on this distribution.

      Now I'm tempted to download and try it out if only for extracting the wallpaper file :). But it seems they have some other nice thing going for them, like a new package management tool.

    13. Re:GNOME, Ubuntu, and the colour green... by stanleypane · · Score: 1

      Red is green's complimentary color. Not brown. Unless I missed some advanced art class that went beyond the basics. I do get your point, though. Green and brown are found together in nature everywhere you look. Green is also associated with nature in the marketing circles. So, incorporating green and brown should make my purty desktop seem more like a tree. Great, and I've already been thinking my computer is alive!

    14. Re:GNOME, Ubuntu, and the colour green... by coaxial · · Score: 1

      Bah! What do the Brits know? They can't even spell the word "color." ;)

    15. Re:GNOME, Ubuntu, and the colour green... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
    16. Re:GNOME, Ubuntu, and the colour green... by evil_core · · Score: 1

      No ! Everything, but no green please. Its another desktop environment Kolor from years !

    17. Re:GNOME, Ubuntu, and the colour green... by coaxial · · Score: 1

      Okay, to seriously answer you for a moment...

      That's just a daft thing to say. BBC News has a similar colour scheme at the moment, getting away from the "everything blue" theme that was fashionable in 2000, and no-one complains about that.

      Similar yet different in a key respect. The BBC is high contrast, and contains basically red, gold, white, and black. Ubunutu's default desktop color scheme, on the other hand, is muted low contrast gradiets. The colors look like -- and I suspect this is intentional, given Ubuntu's multiracial group-hug photo-logos -- skin tones. It looks like your screen is clad in the skin flayed from an interracial family. It looks like organs. It looks biological, and not in a good way.

      People tend to prefer high contrast to low contrast. (Of course ulta-high contrast, can be equally as bad.) The borders of objects are too undefined. Everything flows together. It's basic graphic design.

      "worst part of the spectrum"...what is that even supposed to mean?

      It means that that color part of the spectrum is the least appealing. You can disagree, but you'd be wrong. :)

    18. Re:GNOME, Ubuntu, and the colour green... by Max+Littlemore · · Score: 1

      Red is green's complimentary color. Not brown. Unless I missed some advanced art class that went beyond the basics.

      Actually, brown and green are complimentary for certain shades of brown and green.

      See, a whole band of visible light from dark red to dark yellow is called brown and green fills that big bit between yellow and blue. Also, I once knew a kid who was colour blind and when I asked him what colour his breakfast cereal was (brown wheat flakes of some type) he said "green". Just shows ta go ya.

      But what's this got to do with gnome 2.18 being released?

      --
      I don't therefore I'm not.
    19. Re:GNOME, Ubuntu, and the colour green... by stanleypane · · Score: 1

      The complementary color for brown is cyan (if you want to beat a dead horse). I've a friend that is red-green color blind. Wonder why it's called red-green colorblind?

  23. Re:It has nearly caught up to KDE......... by SirTalon42 · · Score: 2, Informative

    "KWallet appears to be closer to the gnome password manager than the newer gpg management feature. Since I removed KDE from my system a year and a half ago, I cannot verify this."

    Sounds like you're looking for KGpg then.

  24. Re:It has nearly caught up to KDE......... by thule · · Score: 3, Insightful

    I think the thing they were going for in gnome is to start integrating, not just password management, but identity management. Thus, Gnome's new feature manages both gpg and ssh keys.

  25. That's Not Release Notes by Doc+Ruby · · Score: 4, Interesting

    That's not "detailed release notes", that's marketing spin. Release notes would mention specific apps, like evolution, and specific fixes, not just buzzwords and superficial brags about how the experience is better.

    Such marketsprach has its place. But the release notes are even more important. And even more important is not pretending that marketsprach is release notes.

    If GNOME release managers don't release that by themselves, then the project is in serious trouble.

    --

    --
    make install -not war

    1. Re:That's Not Release Notes by lahvak · · Score: 1

      That was my first reaction, too. Gnome releases used to come with nice detailed release notes, but this time I simply couldn't find them. Very disapointing!

      --
      AccountKiller
    2. Re:That's Not Release Notes by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

      Gnome releases used to come with nice detailed release notes, but this time I simply couldn't find them.
      They were found to be too confusing for users. They're on a hidden webpage somewhere on the GNOME site, though, so keep on typing those random URLs - you're bound to find it eventually!
    3. Re:That's Not Release Notes by i_should_be_working · · Score: 1

      Yes, that is odd. They did do real release notes with each development release this cycle, so it's not as if they are hiding something or have nothing to show. Weird.

    4. Re:That's Not Release Notes by krelian · · Score: 1

      That's not "detailed release notes", that's marketing spin. Damn those gnome developers, always after more money...
    5. Re:That's Not Release Notes by Doc+Ruby · · Score: 1

      Marketing doesn't always imply money. Or would you deny that GNOME has market share, just because it's free?

      --

      --
      make install -not war

  26. Actually, in a roundabout way.. by Junta · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Not fully automated, but we live in the internet world where an encyclopedia written by Wiki is among the most used references in the world...

    Namely, I'm talking about MusicBrainz. Programs will analyze and produce a fingerprint, and MusicBrainz will do a fairly good job of matching that fingerprint to the track. From there, tempo, mood, etc could all be community stored info. More esoteric tracks suffer, but as Wikipedia shows, things that don't work well in theory can sometimes work surprisingly well in practice... Esoteric tracks generally have a more fanatical/enthusiastic fanbase to offset their lack of popularity. Hell, such a system could one up the GP's requested behavior and be able to make recommendations of tracks based on community opinion, both implicit (tracks that tend to be submitted by the same people and rated highly) and explicit (users specifying related tracks).

    The photograph conundrum he poses is harder, since generally photographs are personal things. The low-hanging fruit of Date taken and some other things is handled by EXIF data most cameras record, and most photo managers deal with, but looking at similarities in photographs without context is more along the lines of the difficulty you bring up. Some heuristics would probably do interesting things, but a lot of environments will look too similar and sometimes related images couldn't be picked out by a person without any context. For example, a pictures taken of a landscape with some buddies on a road trip would group with some other buddies on the same roadtrip in a bar, no one could ever tell they belonged together without knowing the group and/or the circumstances. Simple fact is, if you have time to take your pictures, you have to be ready to organize them if you care, because no one or nothing could ever do a sufficiently accurate job on such individualized data.

    On the drag and drop a widget (in his example 'search'), that seems goofy and impractical. Drag and drop a text-entry widget that happens to be a search into an app with multiple child panes, wtf do you search? What if the child widgets don't have any text to export, or else format it differently? Anyone adding a search widget to most structures knows the complexities and pitfalls, occasionally it is a simple 'add toolkit search and do what makes most sence', but if your program is doing things that people care about, the situation is almost always too complex for that.

    However, specifically to his search inquiry, things are being tackled in a more structured way. I.e. beagle is intelligent about the filesystem and a number of popular programs and how they manage data, and how it makes sense to organize it. A popular app emerges and developers who know how to index it right and present it have to manually add the intelligence to do the right thing, and it's effective at keeping up because of a sufficiently healthy development community.

    However, in a more general sense of applications sharing features more intelligently, the good old pipes of the command line set the precedent here. NeXT brought that into the GUI world and extended it to know more about the context of the data and whether the operation was applicable before a user selected it. They were/are called services. I.e. you have a text editing application. It had a menu item called 'dictionary'. Well that menu item was actually a third party app that registered itself under the name 'Dictionary'. That same menu item and app would also appear in your Terminal application, letting you spellcheck your *nix commands, since that would be so effective... Probably also in the file management that dictionary item would appear. If you had text in the active context, it would spellcheck that. If it were a file, it would know and spellcheck the file. It's similar on a very basic level to the right-click context menu in windows explorer, but much more flexible and pervasive. Don't know how well it would scale in a highly competitive software market place (many companies wanting a 'Search for related info' menu item would undoubtedly happen and then it gets interesting), but it seems like the best approach to get close to what he describes.

    --
    XML is like violence. If it doesn't solve the problem, use more.
    1. Re:Actually, in a roundabout way.. by archen · · Score: 1

      The low-hanging fruit of Date taken and some other things is handled by EXIF data most cameras record, and most photo managers deal with, but looking at similarities in photographs without context is more along the lines of the difficulty you bring up

      And to tell you the truth EXIF data is about all you could realistically get out of it anyway. If you could seriously code something that would tell you meaningful things about arbitrary photographs, you've probably made the biggest breakthrough in AI ever. I mean there is realistically no way a program could really know what you are trying to do with pictures and why you would group them. If I'm taking pictures experimenting with perspective, there is obviously no way the program could know such things. I think a sort of tagging system could work well, but that's 'adding metadata' which is what the parent didn't want to do.

      Well if you want to make the next revolution in software, I guess that's one avenue to try.

  27. Re:Yawn by Hobbs0 · · Score: 1

    Its not like they released GNOME 3 here, what did you expect, a party?

  28. apples and oranges by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    In your link: I find it very annoying the the apple developers fail to provide many of the features that have been standard with oranges for years. For example in oranges there is a very hand segment feature which allows the fruit to be broken up into small convenient bite size peaces. With apples the only way to do this is to use a third party utility such as a knife. I have tried to submit patches to get segments into apples but the developers arn't interested telling me that it is just to much the orange way and thats not the way apples are. Against this kind of mentality what can you do. Lets not even get on to oranges convenient juice feature and how hard it is to get juice out of apples. (Hint requires a full application suit). This post isn't mine, but he posted anon too...

    1. Re:apples and oranges by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Posting anonymously so that I can use my mod points

      http://www.pubmedcentral.nih.gov/articlerender.fcg i?artid=27565%22
      http://www.improbable.com/airchives/paperair/volum e1/v1i3/air-1-3-apples.html

      Two links that compare apples and oranges.

      Mod me up!

  29. Gnome 2.18 Released by baomike · · Score: 3, Funny

    and with any luck it wont come back.

  30. KDE configurability? by njchick · · Score: 1

    Last time I tried KDE, I could not configure it to understand both Alt-Tab and Alt-Escape. I had to choose which of them I want and then assign the key! IceWM has no problem supporting both, by default. And Windows supported both at once at least from the 3.1 days.

    1. Re:KDE configurability? by thephotoman · · Score: 1

      See, this is where I just change my window manager to Beryl (or, for those less into 3D bling, Enlightenment, Fluxbox, or IceWM) and forget about Kwin. Once I learned to configure window managers in GNOME, Metacity went away very quickly.

      --
      Haec merda tauri est. Ceterum censeo Carthaginem esse delendam.
    2. Re:KDE configurability? by njchick · · Score: 1
      KWin is a part of KDE, and I was replying to a post mentioning KDE configurability. Sure, replacing KDE components with non-KDE components would help. Every time I tried KDE I could not use it for more than a day. It gives some visibility of choice, but I could not fix what annoyed me most. My impression is that KDE is for keyboard-challenged users. Many standard operations are hard to perform from the keyboard in a way similar to other environments. Also, all KDE themes are garish and hard on the eye. There are many themes, but none is close, say, to the default Firefox theme.

      GNOME is much better with the themes, but its configurability is next to none. Tweaking the "registry" is not my thing.

    3. Re:KDE configurability? by BrokenHalo · · Score: 1

      Every time I tried KDE I could not use it for more than a day.

      You've done better than I. The most I've managed is 3 hours before KDE makes me twitchy and irritable.

      Trouble is, I'm not even really able to say why. Everything more or less works, often better than Gnome. It even compiles cleanly - and anybody who has ever tried compiling Gnome by themselves will know what I'm talking about.

      But much has been made of KDE's configurability. It all rings a bit hollow, though. Gnome is configurable to pretty much exactly the same extent, and the means to do so should be no challenge for the average Slashdotter. I guess KDE is just too garish and cluttered for my taste.

  31. It is slow by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Im my old P4 1500 KDE is fust enough, but with Gnome I have to wait...

  32. OMG, I killed your DSP beat finder! by tepples · · Score: 1

    Defining songs by tempo and beat is as you say..completely possible using DSP and other techniques. And watch the DSP plug-in, which is more than likely tuned for 4/4 rock or 4/4 techno or both, utterly fail on songs that use frequent tempo changes (e.g. "Kalinka" by Red Army Choir), drum tracks that do not repeat (e.g. "Flutter" by Autechre), mixed meters (e.g. "Changes" by Yes), or polyrhythm.
  33. Slow news day by ari_j · · Score: 2, Insightful

    You have to love it when things get so slow around here that we post story blurbs that explicitly say they aren't news.

  34. Is GNOME stagnating? by 10Ghz · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Well, there were no major new features in 2.16 either. Is it just me or is GNOME.... stagnating? How about continuous versioning backup-tool? Infrastructure already exists, someone just has to create a GUI and tie it to the desktop. How about something like OS X's Expose? How about being able to re-arrange items in the Taskbar? How about looking in to Gimmie as a Taskbar-replacement? There are tons of useful features they could add to the desktop, but no. What do we get instead? "Using Tomboy to create lists is now as simple as adding a * or a -." Ooooooh, I have been waiting for THAT feature for a long time!

    This release gets a big fat yawn from me. Like 2.16 did as well.

    --
    Lesbian Nazi Hookers Abducted by UFOs and Forced Into Weight Loss Programs - -all next week on Town Talk.
    1. Re:Is GNOME stagnating? by arose · · Score: 1

      Ooooooh, I have been waiting for THAT feature for a long time!
      I have. Expose-cloning (depends on accelerated desktops) and window list item re-arranging would not be bigger features.
      --
      Analogies don't equal equalities, they are merely somewhat analogous.
    2. Re:Is GNOME stagnating? by 10Ghz · · Score: 1

      I have made lists with asterisks and dashes with Tomboy even before it was officially part of GNOME. So what new functionality does the new version offer? Some preset formatting? Well whooppee.

      And are you seriously claiming that this feature in Tomboy is bigger than Expose would be?

      --
      Lesbian Nazi Hookers Abducted by UFOs and Forced Into Weight Loss Programs - -all next week on Town Talk.
    3. Re:Is GNOME stagnating? by drinkypoo · · Score: 1

      And are you seriously claiming that this feature in Tomboy is bigger than Expose would be?

      You get a wonderful expose-like functionality with Beryl.

      Gnome doesn't force you to use metacity, you know.

      --
      "You're right," Fisheye says. "I should have set it on 'whip' or 'chop.'"
    4. Re:Is GNOME stagnating? by 10Ghz · · Score: 1

      "You get a wonderful expose-like functionality with Beryl."

      Beryl is not part of GNOME, so I fail to see how Beryl makes GNOME better.

      "Gnome doesn't force you to use metacity, you know."

      GNOME rules because it doesn't stop me from running third-party software that provides functionality GNOME is missing? Well, isn't that mighty nice of them?

      --
      Lesbian Nazi Hookers Abducted by UFOs and Forced Into Weight Loss Programs - -all next week on Town Talk.
    5. Re:Is GNOME stagnating? by drinkypoo · · Score: 2, Insightful

      GNOME rules because it doesn't stop me from running third-party software that provides functionality GNOME is missing? Well, isn't that mighty nice of them?

      Look, kid, don't put words in my mouth. I didn't say GNOME rules. What I said is that the functionality you want isn't in metacity and you're going to need Beryl to get there. It's all Free and free, so I'm not sure what you're complaining about.

      In fact, I don't think you really understand the Unix mindset, which is that everything starts small and simple, and you build more complex tools from the smaller tools. Come with me over to Sun-land for a moment for a prime example that has nothing to do with Linux. A lot of people think that Solaris is an operating system. It is not! It is a distribution of SunOS. It happens to be just about the only distribution thereof, but regardless, I shall continue; Solaris is the combination of SunOS, the operating system, and today GNOME (but formerly CDE, and before that OpenWindows), the windowing system. Both of these are made up of smaller packages. For example, Solaris today includes GNU tools. And the windowing system consists of the X server, the windowing environment, and the assorted X clients.

      In other words, you're complaining about a non-issue. You don't run GNOME on its own. Arguably, you don't run GNOME at all - it just runs for you when you log in with a GNOME session. What you're running (when you turn on the computer) is the distribution. If it doesn't include Beryl, you don't get that functionality. Big whoop. Find a distribution that includes the things you want (although I don't know of anyone actually including beryl at this point) and run it. You'll get your Expose-like functionality.

      You can complain all you want about how GNOME doesn't do everything you want it to, but what you're missing is that if you use Free Software instead of Apple or Microsoft proprietary stuff, you have the ability to swap in any window manager you like instead of being stuck with what you're provided.

      --
      "You're right," Fisheye says. "I should have set it on 'whip' or 'chop.'"
    6. Re:Is GNOME stagnating? by 10Ghz · · Score: 1

      "Look, kid, don't put words in my mouth. I didn't say GNOME rules. What I said is that the functionality you want isn't in metacity and you're going to need Beryl to get there. It's all Free and free, so I'm not sure what you're complaining about."

      The original question was that "is GNOME stagnating?". And the question stands. Yes, I could get Expose with Beryl. But Beryl is a totally separate project from GNOME, so it doesn't change the fact that _GNOME_ has been standing relatively still. It's a good thing that Beryl-guyes have been busy, but that does not change the fact that GNOME has been pretty damn boring recently. I'm not talking about Beryl, I'm not talking about KDE and I'm not talking about Ubuntu. I'm talking about GNOME. Only relevant thing to this discussion is the code that GNOME-project releases, period.

      "In fact, I don't think you really understand the Unix mindset,"

      I understand the UNIX-way just fine, thankyouverymuch. And all that UNIXness does not change the fact that recent few releases of GNOME have been downright BORING. Improvements have been marginal at best.

      "In other words, you're complaining about a non-issue."

      I'm not. Fact is that whereas GNOME progressed quite nicely just a while ago, it has clearly slowed down recently. Yes, distros have been progressing, but we are not talking about distros, we are talking about GNOME, and code that particular project provides. And last few releases they have made are a bit.... boring.

      "You can complain all you want about how GNOME doesn't do everything you want it to, but what you're missing is that if you use Free Software instead of Apple or Microsoft proprietary stuff, you have the ability to swap in any window manager you like instead of being stuck with what you're provided."

      Ah, the old argument of "don't like it? Use something else then!". And that argument does absolutely NOTHING to dispute my claim that last few releases of GNOME are lame. It merely tries to go around it ("you can use something else"). I'm not talking about some other desktops or WM's, I'm talking about _GNOME_.

      Only thing I have said is that GNOME has been sorely lacking in new features recently. Looking at the release-notes makes that quite obvious. Why is it so difficult for you to admit that? Instead, you just start telling me to use something else and you also blather about the "UNIX-way". Go on, just admit it. It's not THAT hard.

      --
      Lesbian Nazi Hookers Abducted by UFOs and Forced Into Weight Loss Programs - -all next week on Town Talk.
    7. Re:Is GNOME stagnating? by arose · · Score: 1

      And are you seriously claiming that this feature in Tomboy is bigger than Expose would be?
      It is for me, but I'm not claiming my opinion to be some god-given truth either... I don't care for Expose at all. Gimp has image windows thumbnails as icons -- distinctive enough. I don't have many instances of Inkscape or Blender open at once. And don't get me into a rant about thumbnailing windows full of text...
      --
      Analogies don't equal equalities, they are merely somewhat analogous.
    8. Re:Is GNOME stagnating? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "... but I'm not claiming my opinion to be some god-given truth either ..."

      That's funny, a lot of your posts (one liners) suggest this.

      http://slashdot.org/~arose

      Just an observation.

    9. Re:Is GNOME stagnating? by arose · · Score: 1

      Some are helpfull, some just point at something missed and often more isn't required.

      --
      Analogies don't equal equalities, they are merely somewhat analogous.
  35. "[OK] [Cancel]" vs. "[Cancel] [OK]" ? by KlaymenDK · · Score: 1

    This is an earnest question, which I hope you will answer:

    To me, the prime UI difference is that in dialogs, there is "[OK] [Cancel]" in one, and "[Cancel] [OK]" in the other. That is the #1 thing that keeps me from trying it out, because I instinctively mix those two up. I use mostly the keyboard to answer dialogs, so in Gnome I have a grim tendency to choose the wrong option...

    Do you have a way around that? Or do you just not have as much muscle memory (or whatever it is that applies)?

    1. Re:"[OK] [Cancel]" vs. "[Cancel] [OK]" ? by nxsty · · Score: 1

      ESC = cancel, enter = OK, no matter how they're arranged in the window. So how can you choose the wrong option when using the keyboard?

    2. Re:"[OK] [Cancel]" vs. "[Cancel] [OK]" ? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      In edit boxes, one might go type-typedi-type-tab-space.

      How do Yes/No boxes work (as opposed to Ok/Cancel?) In Windows at least, ESC won't select "No" ... so in this case, hitting tab-space would select the non-default button.

    3. Re:"[OK] [Cancel]" vs. "[Cancel] [OK]" ? by charlesnw · · Score: 1

      Actually I believe that = default selected button. So in particularly dangerous operations (like file deletion for example) Cancel is selected by default.

      --
      Charles Wyble System Engineer
  36. Here are the patches of Linus by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Here you can see the evolution of the patches: Dependency tree of the patches submited by Linus to GNOME: http://bugzilla.gnome.org/showdependencytree.cgi?i d=408898

    You can see how many "bugs" were solved.The two first patches were introduced immediately without discussion. The next was one of the most important and with more discussion, but finally it was introduced to next version of GNOME. The other patches seem to be discussed.

    Someone took the effort to put the patches on Bugzilla, and they are being handled conveniently by the people of GNOME. All the patches weren't integrated in a row, but each patch has his own way of discussion and modifications. GNOME has interest that his project is used by more people, including Linus.

  37. Evince pdf rendering improved? by gnalle · · Score: 1

    The evince document reader has had a problem of displaying pdf file with small writing. Try to open a random physics article with evince and xpdf: http://www.arxiv.org/pdf/quant-ph/0203118. Has problem this been solved in the latest version?

    1. Re:Evince pdf rendering improved? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      looks fine:
      www.student.dtu.dk/~s011272/gnome2.18

    2. Re:Evince pdf rendering improved? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Try reading a *real* physics paper :P

    3. Re:Evince pdf rendering improved? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      hehe.... I was a little fast there, but I can assure you that real physics papers have the same problem.

  38. Rock Gnomes by Pablo+El+Vagabundo · · Score: 1

    I have always liked gnome, it is simple and does what I want. It is a very clean experience. Gnome has been good enough for me since the 2 series started. It just works for me now and I do not think about it much.

    Since ubuntu I believe the quality has gone up and I like how ubuntu's features all integrate well.

    I do not understand why people who complain about gnome not being like KDE do not just use KDE. It is to everyones benefit that there are two DEs and both have different agendas, because it is unlikely that one DE would suit everyone.

    Much Appreciation to all the devs hard work.

    1. Re:Rock Gnomes by k1e0x · · Score: 1

      Yeah, I like the posts that say Gnome is "catching up" to KDE.. guys its not a race. There is a reason most distros default to gnome, (well a few but the big one is) Usability. Having used all major releases of KDE.. (and praticaly everything else too) I can say that I like KDE. There is nothing really wrong with KDE, but its not as usable. Gnome is just easier to use and I dont mean easier as I'm a computer novice and cant figure out KDE (although it is).. I mean its easier for a computer expert who does not want to have to spend 3 hours configuring his desktop so it operates as it should. People who want to *play with* their computer use KDE. People who want to work use Gnome.

      Even if Gnome didn't exist I dont think I would use KDE, I think maybe I would go for Fluxbox instead.

      --
      Bringing liberty to the masses. - http://freetalklive.com/
    2. Re:Rock Gnomes by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Another big reason why I go with Gnome over KDE is because Gnome just looks better. Just compare Gnome http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Image:Gnome-2.16-scre enshot.png to KDE http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Image:Kde35.png.

      Gnome is clean, simple and has stylish icons.
      KDE is cluttered, bulky with goofy looking icons.

      I love programming in QT but whenever I try migrating over to KDE I just can't stand the way the interface looks.

  39. My #1 wish for Gnome: A decent menu editor by jiawen · · Score: 1

    The current menu editing app in Gnome, Alacarte, is better than previous menu editors but is still quite bad. Creating new sub-menus is pretty much impossible, so if I have (say) a large number of Games, I end up with a huge list that takes forever to scroll through. It'd be nice if I could create (again using the Games example) a sub-menu for Strategy and then drag-and-drop strategy game icons into it. This supposedly works now, but not in actual fact; I can click on the icon and drag it, but it either doesn't drop into the sub-menu, or drops the wrong icon (!). And there's no way to delete a sub-menu once it's created, so trying to use the menu editor actually creates more of a mess than it gets rid of. Alacarte is still better than previous menu editors, but it has a long way to go before it's actually good.

    1. Re:My #1 wish for Gnome: A decent menu editor by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Debian (and presumably Ubuntu) provide a menuing infrastructure (i.e. the "menu" package) in which each user (or the administrator) may modify the Gnome/FVWM/KDE/whichever menuing under the Debian/ level, using simple per-package/program text files stored in ~/.menu/. Yeah, not as simple as Gnome/KDE menu context clicks or whatever, but certainly not impossible. What I really like about that infrastructure though, is that I can set up one menu structure that is followed in my FVWM desktop, as well as my son's Gnome desktop on virtual display F8, and my wife's Gnome desktop on display F9. In other words, one menuing infrastructure, that provides the ability for the administrator to provide a common application menu structure across users' various desktop environments, while still allowing users to override that with their own customizations. It's just that you have to manually fiddle with little text files to get it set up the way you want.

  40. donors????? by Danzigism · · Score: 1
    i donated $25 to gnome months ago.. and i all ever wanted was my name on their website :~(

    UPDATE THE DAMN DONORS LIST PLZKTHX....

    --
    *plays the Apogee theme song music*
  41. Technically, they're being driven to KDE by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    If the remaining people are enough to keep GNOME going, then it isn't failing, is it.

  42. You're not a programmer, are you? by wiredog · · Score: 1
    dragging and dropping features from one application to another How? Are you going to enforce some sort of data handling and data typing consistency between apps? Will word processors, spreadsheets, and graphics apps all be required to treat, say, text, the same way? (Is "5" text, or numeric? What about "C"?) Or will there be a nice interface for inter-program communication? (Called it, what, DCOM?)

    should be sorting images by looking at similarities between pictures, date taken and other automatically generated information Define "similarities between pictures". Define it closely enough that a programmer can look at two bitstreams (which is what the program sees) and determine the "degree of similarity". Note that you have to be able to use boolean algebra. "Sort of like this" doesn't work.

    How can these songs be automatically categorized by mood, tempo, etc without manually entering in meta-data? Define "mood". See above for the constraints.

  43. Did they... by C_Kode · · Score: 1

    Nothing revolutionary in this release but definitely some nice new features, bug fixes, and improvements.

    Did they fix the developer's smug bug in this release? :) Yeah, I know mod me down flame bait or what have ya. I hate you anyway! ;)

  44. GNOME: For dummies by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Urgh. GNOME. The distribution that treats its users like idiots.

    Drool 'n' Click computing at it's worse.

  45. Standard menus by gr8_phk · · Score: 1

    I've been complaining here and there for a while about this. The games menu in particular needs sub-menus. Someone needs to define a standard set of menus that will support applications other than those shipped. If not, packagers have a habit of making things go into one of the few existing standard menus. Games should have categories, for example: Action, Board, Cards, Gambling, Strategy, etc. There should be a standard place for things, for example kiCAD belongs under Engineering not Other. qCAD probably belongs there too, not under Graphics (these are Fedora examples, your distro may vary). It's ultimately up to the distros and the package maintainers to decide, but I think Gnome itself should provide some guidance on this issue. They could at least set an example in the games area where they ship enough things to make sub-menus sensible. The HIG tries to reduce menu levels, but there is a point where sub-menus are simpler than a big long list.

  46. What's this about features? by jonadab · · Score: 1

    > Nothing revolutionary in this release but definitely some nice new features, ...

    Hey! None of that! This is Gnome. Features are verboten.

    --
    Cut that out, or I will ship you to Norilsk in a box.
  47. Re:Who the fuck cares about Gnome by krelian · · Score: 1

    You must be a really fun guy to hang around with.

  48. I miss features: by rwa2 · · Score: 1

    * Pager Thumbnails
    I really miss the virtual desktop pager from Gnome 1.4. It had window thumbnailing that would update the screen contents of the thumbnailed views of all of the windows you had open, and you could use that little pager to move the real windows around your current desktop in addition to dragging them onto other virtual desktops. I really wish they hadn't removed all of that from Gnome 2 onwards. Seems like Enlightenment .16 and maybe KDE are the only other WM/environments that still retain this kind of functionality. I'm currently running Beryl now, and I kind of wonder why they haven't implemented a visual thumbnailing pager, since it seems they have the only compositing framework that could do that kind of live thumbnailing right.

    * Quicklaunch clustering
    Another feature I miss from the Gnome 1.4 panel are multiple rows/columns of quicklaunch icons. Right now if you have a wide panel but small icons, it just wastes a lot of space. I've resorted to hiding them in a drawer, but I get annoyed needing two clicks to launch a common app instead of one :P .

    * Panel interference
    Is there any way to make the panel less annoying, in terms of the way it tries to stay on top of fullscreen windows, or prevent other windows from overlapping its space? I just want it to behave like a normal window.... maybe it can jump to the top if I hit the "Super/Win" key or something. I realize this is mostly due to its WM hinting as a "panel" type, just wondering if there was some way to disable this behavior at the source rather than from any/every ICCM-compliant window manager I try to run (e.g. such as the way gkrellm's configuration works). I really hate it when I can't move a window over a clear patch of space because of a stupid panel I have tucked away in another corner.

    Other than those few peeves, I really like Gnome. Its relative simplicity and visual elegance has kept me from seriously trying to migrate over to KDE. KDE looks and works great in KNOPPIX, but every time I've tried to use it as my primary desktop, I kept running into progressively weirder quirks that I ran out of patience trying to resolve.

    Looking forward to when Gnome-terminal supports compositing hints so Beryl can give it true transparency!

    1. Re:I miss features: by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Looking forward to when Gnome-terminal supports compositing hints so Beryl can give it true transparency!
      I've used gnome-terminal with true transparency for quite some time now, I think it's been supported since version 2.16.
  49. Re:Yawn by Nimey · · Score: 1

    Fuckin' Slashdot.


    Better not. Do you have any idea what disease(s) you might get?

    You could get a Beowulf cluster of viruses.
    --
    Hail Eris, full of mischief...

    E pluribus sanguinem
  50. Re:It has nearly caught up to KDE......... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I didn't see anything in the KDE 2 notes about supporting vertical text. Though it could be they didn't specifically mention it.
    I'm not convinced Gnome 2.18 supports it properly.

    Certainly the screenshot of "vertical Japanese" in TFA is hideously incorrectly formatted; apparently whoever took it didn't realise that setting Japanese vertically isn't just a case of lining up the characters in a column (you have to rotate certain characters 90 degrees, and certain other characters need to be shifted up and right), nor that Japanese underlining normally goes to the right of the column, not to the left.
  51. And GnuStep apps by Colin+Smith · · Score: 1

    Can be built on OSX.

    Is it just me or have a lot of people not twigged to the point that GnuStep would essentially double the market for any application which was written to the API? OSX users should be able to use it with essentially a rebuild or relatively minor tweaks.

    --
    Deleted
  52. Re:I though MONO was a desease by Douglas+Goodall · · Score: 1

    I have been harping about Mono being based on ECMA standards documents that contain patented technology from Microsoft and have not received even one response after repeated emails to the EFF, DotGNU and Mono people. As Gnome moved toward Mono, I move away from Gnome. If Microsoft and the Trusted Computing Initiative get their way, the only people writing code will be Intel and Microsoft employees.