Slashdot Mirror


Xbox 360 Elite Officially Announced

It should come as no shock that Microsoft has finally announced an upgraded version of the Xbox 360: the 'Elite'. The worst-kept secret in the videogames industry is now official, offering a 120 GB HDD, an HDMI port, and a smooth black finish for $479. The new sku drops next month, and to fill up that new hard drive Microsoft has lined up seven new partners for their Xbox Live video distribution service. Outfits like Paramount and Warner Bros. are nice to hear about, but I'm equally excited about the likes of National Geographic and ADV Films. 1up has the market cornered on commentary at the moment, with reactions from the staff there, a comparison of the new 360's value vs. the PS3, and a few words from Sony's Dave Karraker. If you're looking for even more coverage, there are several links available below.

264 comments

  1. Worthless. by Seumas · · Score: 5, Interesting

    What a worthless bundle. First of all as we already covered in a previous XBOX 360 Elite article, there is no benefit to using HDMI instead of a component-cable. Second, by using HDMI, you are actually submitting to HDCP (DRM, content control stuff).

    So what you're really getting out of this product is a larger hard drive. Whether a bigger hard drive is worth an extra $80 to you is for you to decide. I fail, however, to understand how nothing more than a larger hard drive and a black paint job makes it elite.

    I'm going to guess there will be a flood of idiots rushing out to buy it - even to replace their existing boxes - because they think HDMI is some nifty high-definition thingamajig and then they'll rush home and plug it in and convince themselves that they really do see a difference.

    If you really want to make it elite, make it quieter, cooler and less prone to dying.

    1. Re:Worthless. by suv4x4 · · Score: 5, Insightful

      So what you're really getting out of this product is a larger hard drive. Whether a bigger hard drive is worth an extra $80 to you is for you to decide. I fail, however, to understand how nothing more than a larger hard drive and a black paint job makes it elite.

      I also wondered how *only* a black finish makes a MacBook $150 more expensive and "elite" but.. common sense isn't popular these days.

      If enough companies do this, one morning I could wake up and really believe that black color is extremely expensive and worth the extra cost, who knows.

    2. Re:Worthless. by atomicstrawberry · · Score: 2, Informative

      A lot of TVs and monitors don't support 1080p over component. I know mine doesn't. HDMI is certainly better than VGA on a decent TV, and let's face it, if you actually have HDMI, you probably have a TV that you'll notice the difference with.

      The extra $80 also gives you an Xbox Live headset, something the standard bundle doesn't. I agree that they've failed to justify the price though - the core unit should have been killed, the premium moved down to that price bracket, and this should have slotted in as a replacement for the premium system. Of course that may be what they're intending to do down the line.

      Myself, I'm more miffed at the stupidly high price of the 120gb Hard Drive. They're using laptop HDDs, thus the higher price, but even standard 120gb drives in that form factor are about half as much as they're asking for the add-on. As a reasonably early adopter of the 360, I don't really like feeling that I've been disadvantaged for jumping on early, and the price of extras gives me that feeling. Especially since I live in Australia where we inexplicably pay 20% more for the same things.

    3. Re:Worthless. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Good for you if component cables are enough for you, but there is a real difference qualitywise when you use a digital link like dvi or hdmi.

      Last year I participated in the development of ads pannels based on 40" tft displays, and we tested all connexion possible, the difference between analog (vga, components) and digital (hdmi, dvi) was sriking.

    4. Re:Worthless. by Corporate+Troll · · Score: 1

      If you really want to make it elite, make it quieter, cooler and less prone to dying.

      Yeah, that and release "Elite" for it. When I read the headline, I got exited and though I'd buy an XBox 360 just for that....

    5. Re:Worthless. by iainl · · Score: 1

      Phew, I thought it was just me that did that. Braben dropped some hints about Elite 4 about a year ago, but he's far too busy with that DC-set game at the mo.

      --
      "I Know You Are But What Am I?"
    6. Re:Worthless. by Corporate+Troll · · Score: 1

      Nah, not the only one... I found another post mentioning it when I read the comments. To be fair, my post should be redundant and that guys post informative, because I posted 7 minutes later.

    7. Re:Worthless. by RyuuzakiTetsuya · · Score: 2, Funny

      HDCP isn't that bad.

      HDCP IS DRM, and it IS evil. But let's face it, it's the Barney Fife of the DRM world.

      The only thing that kind of pisses me off about HDMI is that I can't record my own gameplay sessions from HDMI. Then again, I have nothing that could store raw 1080p either so...

      --
      Non impediti ratione cogitationus.
    8. Re:Worthless. by DrXym · · Score: 2, Insightful
      there is no benefit to using HDMI instead of a component-cable

      Seems a rather peculiar thing to say. Do you think the same thing when comparing VGA to DVI-D too? Even the best analogue signals is vulnerable to ghosting or slight interference.

      As for the HD, it's feature the 360 should have had since the beginning. Too bad that MS are still using a proprietary casing and circuitry to force people to buy their drive rather than allow them to buy and fit any that they like.

    9. Re:Worthless. by Mark+Gillespie · · Score: 2, Informative

      You know it's funny, those that say you don't need HDMI, are those that can't have it..

      I have seen the difference between HDMI and Component on my 42in Panasonic PX60 Plasma, it's a considerable improvement. Perhaps you don't need it on a 28in el-cheapo TV, but on a decent display HDMI is essential. 30 year old component ananlog interconnect technology is simply not cut out for it, and the D-A and A-D stages required for analog component does nothing but introduce unnecessary processing.

      Still back on topic, it's nice to see Microsoft trying to play catchup to the PS3, it's a shame they dumped on 9.5 million existing owners in the process.

    10. Re:Worthless. by Osty · · Score: 1

      The extra $80 also gives you an Xbox Live headset, something the standard bundle doesn't.

      I assume you're referring to the $399 "premium" 360, given the $80 price difference you quote. The only problem is that it does include the Xbox Live headset. At least, it does so in the US. I assumed the package was the same across the world (ignoring special bundles like the Blue Dragon bundle in Japan), as far as accessories were concerned. Do Australian premium 360s really not come packed with an Xbox Live headset?

      Myself, I'm more miffed at the stupidly high price of the 120gb Hard Drive. They're using laptop HDDs, thus the higher price, but even standard 120gb drives in that form factor are about half as much as they're asking for the add-on. As a reasonably early adopter of the 360, I don't really like feeling that I've been disadvantaged for jumping on early, and the price of extras gives me that feeling.

      Ignoring the price, I'd definitely upgrade to the 120GB drive on my current 360 just so long as they give you a way to easily transfer the contents of your old drive to the new one (no, copying files over by memory card doesn't count, especially since many games lock their saves to the storage device such that you can't copy them). I'd even shell out an extra $20 for a dock that I could plug two drives into and copy the contents from one to the other. Then again, at the rumored price for the 120GB drive it really should come with such a tool pre-packaged.

    11. Re:Worthless. by L4m3rthanyou · · Score: 1

      I also wondered how *only* a black finish makes a MacBook $150 more expensive and "elite" but.. common sense isn't popular these days.

      Yeah, it's just a skin... except for a few performance upgrades. ;)

      --
      One of these days, I'm going to cut you into little pieces.
    12. Re:Worthless. by @madeus · · Score: 1, Informative

      If you really want to make it elite, make it quieter, cooler and less prone to dying. You mean perhaps by also putting in a new lower power (and cooler running) 65 nm CPU instead of the existing 90 nm one and a new, quieter DVD drive?
    13. Re:Worthless. by Mark+Gillespie · · Score: 0, Flamebait

      "Myself, I'm more miffed at the stupidly high price of the 120gb Hard Drive. "

      How many more times will Microsoft have to screw you over before you work it out?

    14. Re:Worthless. by alexhs · · Score: 2, Interesting

      From the prices to the end of the table you would think that an XBox 360 is just a bit cheaper with more hard drive capacity for the otherwise same set of features.

      But I think the comparison isn't fair.
      First, the price for paying online is for one single year on XBox360 side, while it's free (except communication costs...) on Sony's side.

      Also you can buy cheaper parts to get the same functionnality for Sony, while to lower the price of the XBox360, you need to choose to lose some functionality.

      Also, adding an external hard drive to get the same capacity costs a lot :/ It would be more fair to add, say, an external hard drive extension of X GB for the XBox360 and an external hard drive extension of (X+60) GB for the PS3.

      It's a pity that the article gives all the info to see that PS3 is cheaper while at the same time somehow chooses to advertise the opposite :(

      --
      I have discovered a truly marvelous proof of killer sig, which this margin is too narrow to contain.
    15. Re:Worthless. by joshetc · · Score: 1

      Are you crazy man? HDMI That means it owns!!!

    16. Re:Worthless. by bradavon · · Score: 2, Insightful

      HDMI is Digital, offer up to 7.1 audio, HDCP (which if on the software you'll be forced to use HDMI) so you're mistaken very much offers an improvement over Component. HDMI is becoming the standard for HD.

    17. Re:Worthless. by Jellybob · · Score: 2, Informative

      I've heard it's possible to replace the hard disk yourself - just crack open the disk caddy, and drop in the disk of your choice. It'll be limited to 20GB (presumably 120GB once the Elites launch), but it's bound to be cheaper then paying the extra for a new caddy. It's also not nearly as impressive as the free SATA bay in PS3s, which is easily accessible and supported.

    18. Re:Worthless. by @madeus · · Score: 1

      Hmmm on my my 50" Pioneer good quality HD video input looks the same on component as via HDMI, and I've compared the two. The more expensive Pioneer systems have an external system for processing inputs though (meaning you don't just plug things into the back of the TV, and meaning you get a much larger number of inputs - like 2 HDMI ports, 1 component, 3 SCART, S-Video, VGA, etc.)

      If component is noticeably worse on your set, maybe it's the input processing hardware on your set? I know a few sets are unable to support 1080p over component, while others manage just fine, so it seems like the quality of different component input implementations certainly varies.

    19. Re:Worthless. by GundamFan · · Score: 1

      Not that it makes up for the price gap but the black Macbook comes standard with a larger hard drive, which if you upgrade to on a white one adds about $100... so really the black chassis is only a $50 or so upgrade if you think about it, I still think that is an enormous price jump for a change in color.

      --
      I don't give a damn for a man that can only spell a word one way.
      Mark Twain
    20. Re:Worthless. by Mark+Gillespie · · Score: 1

      but HMDI does seem consistent.

      At best, you MAY get as good a picture on Component depending on your setup, but if you want the guarenteed best picture your setup is capable of, HDMI is the way to go..

    21. Re:Worthless. by atomicstrawberry · · Score: 1

      Well, mine certainly didn't. I purchased it just before Christmas because they had a bundle deal going, but the way that worked was taking the premium system and adding a separate box of goodies to it. The Australian Xbox site agrees. As if I didn't feel ripped off enough paying an extra $125 USD for the thing.

      As for transferring data, the 120gb drive comes with some kind of device to transfer your data from your old 20gb to it, which as you said is something you'd expect to get at that kind of price.

    22. Re:Worthless. by twistedsymphony · · Score: 1

      A lot of TVs and monitors don't support 1080p over component. I know mine doesn't. HDMI is certainly better than VGA on a decent TV, and let's face it, if you actually have HDMI, you probably have a TV that you'll notice the difference with.
      I can stand behind that. I think anyone that's chosen to use DVI over VGA for their PC monitor doesn't have any right to claim there is no difference between Component and HDMI.

      DRM aside HDMI offers two benefits in my eyes, 1. the image construction is pure, that is to say if I set my Xbox 360 to output at 1280x768 my 1280x768 projector will reconstruct every last pixel in the appropriate location without playing marco-polo with the image construction, this is also do in part because the scaler chip has been upgraded from an analog chip to a digital one (ANA to HANA) to support HDMI output. And 2. Being that I use my 360 in my home theater room I close to 60ft of cable between the console and the projector, the stock cable is about 10' going into the switch box (unavoidable) then the switch box output routed through the floor around the back of the room up the wall and up over the ceiling... really it's only about 30'-35' needed by they only sell cables in 25' and 50' lengths. Even spending for the high gauge 4x shielded cables with some massive ferrite cores I got interference in the picture. Most of it was cleared up with about $80 worth of power conditioning equipment but some still remains. HDMI based components I'm using now don't have a lick of interference in the picture and it'd be worth the extra cash to get rid of it completely when using the 360.

      $480 is a hard pill to swallow when you already own one of these things. They don't even mention the fact that any content you've purchased from the Marketplace is tied to the original console it was downloaded to. meaning the account that purchased it will have to be logged into Xbox Live if you want to use it on your new console.

      Not to mention that since it doesn't include the rumored 65nm chip nor the rumored quieter DVD drive HDMI aside you can upgrade your current box with an off the shelf hard drive and a rattle can. Personally I'll wait for some others to buy one, if it's got the 65nm chip and quite drive I'll pick one up, else I'll wait for those to come out as I assume all future Xbox 360 consoles will include the HDMI port.
    23. Re:Worthless. by Gizzmonic · · Score: 1

      HDMI is certainly better than VGA on a decent TV

      Why? Because it's digital? HDMI is a horrible connector and a horrible signal. If you need to run it past 10 feet, good luck. It's also prone to screwing up when you switch inputs. All in all, it's a huge step backwards from VGA...especially if you don't have a fixed-pixel display (LCoS or CRT).

      --
      (-1, Raw and Uncut is the only way to read)
    24. Re:Worthless. by MikeBabcock · · Score: 5, Insightful

      I'm so sick of the anti-HDMI people.

      HDMI does not require the use of HDCP. Being compatible with it does not mean turning on Copyright protection features.

      HDMI can carry much higher bandwidth audio than optical or coax digital audio cables can right now, like TrueHD and uncompressed 7.1 PCM.

      HDMI can share live display capability information (like that nice monitor detection you have on your VGA-based PC).

      HDMI allows for better colour depth (higher bit per pixel values) and deeper blacks and brigther whites, combined with displays capable of these. This means displays can keep getting better and looking nicer and having richer colour because the capacity is already 'in the wire' so to speak.

      Next troll?

      --
      - Michael T. Babcock (Yes, I blog)
    25. Re:Worthless. by Gulthek · · Score: 1

      My HDTV will only accept a 1080p signal from a HDMI connection. But that's what I get for buying a Sony.

    26. Re:Worthless. by KDR_11k · · Score: 1

      What you mean to say is: The PS3 has a lower TCO than the 360!

      --
      Justice is the sheep getting arrested while an impartial judge declares the vote void.
    27. Re:Worthless. by TheNinjaroach · · Score: 1

      Although I don't know how many, I do know there are HD sets out there that only support 1080i/p over HDMI. Fortunately my set doesn't care where the source comes from, but HDMI matters to at least a handful of users out there.

      The thing that kills me about this decision is its lack of an HD DVD drive. All of this trouble to release a revised model but I still need to buy an external DVD drive? No thank you I don't need the equipment in my living room to look any more like a PC, and at that price I could still get Bluray / PS3 for cheaper than HD-DVD / X360.

      --
      I went to eat some animal crackers and the box said, "Do not eat if seal is broken." I opened the box and sure enough..
    28. Re:Worthless. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      So, to sum it up, people who buy shitty gear have fewer input options and poorer quality. Thanks.

    29. Re:Worthless. by DJCacophony · · Score: 1

      The black macbook gives you an extra 40gb of space for an extra $200.
      An extra 40gb of space costs about $40.
      So the remaining $160 is just for the different color.

      --
      Slow Down, Cowboy! It's been 60 minutes since you last successfully posted a comment.
    30. Re:Worthless. by DJCacophony · · Score: 1

      HDMI has better quality and support for higher resolutions than VGA. Furthermore, unlike VGA, HDMI incorporates error correction in the specs. Finally, if you are using CRT then you should get with the fucking program and upgrade to a display technology that isn't 110 years old.

      --
      Slow Down, Cowboy! It's been 60 minutes since you last successfully posted a comment.
    31. Re:Worthless. by Coraon · · Score: 1

      Quiet! With everyone selling theres so they can buy the elite the prices on e-bay should drop enough to allow me to buy one!

      --
      -Ours is the wisdom of Solomon, the magic of Merlyn, the fall of Icaris.
    32. Re:Worthless. by stratjakt · · Score: 1

      The XBox 360 has an upscaling chip. I use the VGA out on mine, everything displays at 1080p. It is noticably crisper than 1080i on component cables.

      It's just a hardware revision, so calm down. You dont have to trade in the 360 you have. I won't, I prefer VGA to HDMI. I'll probably upgrade the HDD though.

      --
      I don't need no instructions to know how to rock!!!!
    33. Re:Worthless. by @madeus · · Score: 1
      Ignoring the AC for a minute,

      but HMDI does seem consistent. True, which definitely makes it a positive thing to have on the console (that, and some TV's just don't have component inputs).

      At best, you MAY get as good a picture on Component depending on your setup, but if you want the guarenteed best picture your setup is capable of, HDMI is the way to go.. Personally I would phrase it as, both are actually the same quality (which is at least what I think the consensus is...), unless your component input is sub-par.

      I definitely see a difference between SCART and say S-Video (and between S-Video and composite) with previous generation consoles, and I'm a total SCART fan all the way. There honestly doesn't seem to be a difference the HD content when it comes to HDMI and component though (all 720p in my case).
    34. Re:Worthless. by Sancho · · Score: 1

      From Apple.com right this second:
      [url]http://store.apple.com/1-800-MY-APPLE/WebObje cts/AppleStore.woa/6974000/wo/aT5Gmqo1LBGP3aQy8rhX 0N7IF9O/2.?p=0[/url]

      $150 to go from 80gb to 120gb, which just so happens to be the base drive sizes for the high-end white Macbook and the black Macbook respectively.

    35. Re:Worthless. by ucblockhead · · Score: 1

      If you want to use a monitor instead of a TV, you can't use component cables. You can get an HDMI->DVI converter, but not a component cable->DVI converter.

      --
      The cake is a pie
    36. Re:Worthless. by MyDixieWrecked · · Score: 1

      I also wondered how *only* a black finish makes a MacBook $150 more expensive and "elite" but.. common sense isn't popular these days.

      As lame as it is, Apple only offers the black MacBook with a minimum of a 120GB harddrive. Once you upgrade the white model to a 120GB drive, the price reaches 1449.99, making the black model a $50 premium. Now, I agree that is very lame and Apple is profiting from the fact that black is a far cooler color to have for a laptop than white and is less prone to dirt and stains. My macbook has 2 dark spots where my palms rest. I really wish I could have afforded to get the black model.

      As for the 360's premium for the large harddrive, this is the way I see it... Microsoft is profiting from people's desire for a black 360, which, I must admit, I am drooling over. I don't have an HDTV, so the HDMI is lost on me. However, Microsoft is overcharging for a device which will most likely be used SOLELY for purchased content FROM Microsoft. I agree with Penny Arcade when they say that the cost of the larger drive should be subsidized by Microsoft. Sure, you can pick up an external USB drive weighing in at 400GB for $120-$200, depending on the brand, but you can't store premium content on there (ie: videos/music/games purchased from XBoxLive Marketplace and game demos). You can only store purchased content on the INTERNAL drive.

      It's an excellent business move, in terms of profitability, by Microsoft, however it's a move that was intended to fuck as much money out of their customers as they possibly can.

      I also feel that Microsoft dropped the ball when they failed to include the HD-DVD drive in the Elite system, especially considering that I believe it's sole purpose was to compete against the PS3. When the enormously upgraded device is still around 25$ cheaper than the least expensive model of Sony's PS3 and has a drive twice the size of the larger PS3, it makes the purchase decision a little easier for the customer.

      At least Sony made it possible to install your own drive in the PS3. That move was welcomed by all.

      --



      ...spike
      Ewwwwww, coconut...
    37. Re:Worthless. by inotocracy · · Score: 1

      They are selling the 120GB hard drive upgrade kit for ~$199 and they mentioned it comes with transfer software. Not quite sure what kind of drugs they were smoking when they concluded 120 gigs is worth $199.

    38. Re:Worthless. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Wow, your post is worthless considering it is all opinion and no fact.

      HDMI does give the added benefit of 1080p. When the 360 first announced 1080p support many users (myself included) came to the sad realization that most 1080p televisions don't accept a 1080p signal over component... only over HDMI or digital DVI. I may upgrade my 360 for this reason alone. I can finally enjoy 1080p HD-DVD's, and maybe even a few future games that will be offered in 1080p.

    39. Re:Worthless. by SpookyFish · · Score: 1

      Input processing is certainly a possible culprit, but the source is equally likely. One of the best things about DVI/HDMI is that they are far easier to generate an accurate signal from.. you basically just have to get the timing right. With component you have to deal with noise filtering, varying levels, synchronization between Y and the half-rate PbPr channels, all in the analog domain where there are a lot more variables to make things go wrong.

      A well designed source with extensive parametric analysis (Tek VM5000, etc) and tuning can output a stellar signal through component -- but a lot of equipment manufacturers just get it 'good enough' and ship it.

      I certainly agree with you that, done right, it can be difficult to tell.
      Considering the signal source is digital and limited in resolution anyhow, modern DACs and ADCs are more than good enough that a component signal can be completely indistinguishable from a digital one. Unfortunately it is all those other wonderful PITA variables inherent in analog that can lead to wide variations.

    40. Re:Worthless. by mr_zorg · · Score: 1

      ...there is no benefit to using HDMI instead of a component-cable.
      Wrong. There is a very real benefit. My TV does not accept 1080p over anything but HDMI, and neither do the majority of the sets on the market. So, if I want to take full advantage of the 360's resolution (which newer games are doing), I *have* to have that HDMI port.
    41. Re:Worthless. by SpookyFish · · Score: 1

      Though I certainly agree that HDMI is a good thing, the statement about it allowing better color depth is patently false.
      The analog signals in component can carry an effectively infinite amount of color variation, something the digital signal can not.
      Even considering the fact that the source is digital and display is digital, there are high enough resolution DACs/ADCs that an analog signal could convey a higher range of color than HDMI -- if sources and displays to exploit this actually existed.

      That is a moot point, of course, since they don't exist.

      The real quality advantage of HDMI, as I mentioned somewhere upthread, comes from the fact that the signal never enters the analog domain. Even though modern D/ACs are basically irrelevant to conversion loss at video bit depths, the rest of the signal after entering the analog domain sure isn't.

      Potential for noise ingress due to sketchy DAC power, signal filtering, proper Y to Pb/Pr sync etc, etc. make doing quality analog circuitry a real PITA.

      Achieving near-perfect quality on analog component circuitry takes a hell of a lot of work, extensive testing and tweaking with calibration equipment (e.g. Tek VM5000), and is damn near a black art. In contrast, a digital signal path clean enough to make sure all the 1's and 0's are right could be laid out on a board by a hung-over first year EE with with half a clue.

    42. Re:Worthless. by dank+zappingly · · Score: 1

      The extra price for the Elite version pales in comparison to the $180 dollars they're asking for the proprietary 120 GB external hard drive. Seems to be a $100 markup over similar drives. I guess it was to be expected from the creators of the $100 proprietary wifi adapter. I am shocked by the stupidity of this move. I had been thinking about how dead Sony would be if Microsoft had a price cut. What they decided to do was create a system that makes PS3 look more reasonably priced, and makes the Wii look even more dirt cheap. Elite + HD-DVD + 1 year live + Wifi= 830 dollars. That's not to mention that they're alienating all the early adopters who bought the core system and now are getting gouged on a proprietary hard drive, and confusing consumers with yet another SKU.

    43. Re:Worthless. by BobearQSI · · Score: 1

      I agree. On a 42" TV, HDMI vs Component may not be noticeable at all. But I sure as heck could tell the difference on my 1080p projector on a 90" image. Feeding a 1080p signal over VGA vs DVI->HDMI did have a big difference, not only in sharpness but there were artifacts in the VGA as well. It was a 6 ft normal VGA cable. So, you can buy an expensive $100 monster VGA cable or component cable, or use digital (HDMI) and use a cheap cable for the same clarity.

      Another thing I've been wondering about . . . the rumors say this Elite version uses a new scaling chip. Does this new chip also offer better scaling overall, on component and HDMI? Its been said that the XBox 360 has crappy standard def DVD upscaling.

      Maybe this new chip offers far superior image quality on SD material.
    44. Re:Worthless. by Spy+Hunter · · Score: 1

      He's right. Component with decent cables (and the ones that come with the 360 are fine) has no visible ghosting or interference. There are fewer compatibility issues and no DRM, and component video hardware and cables are far, far cheaper than HDMI. More compatible, quality indistinguishable, far cheaper, no DRM: component wins. HDMI's *only* real-world advantage is an easier physical plug-in process. But you only have to do that once.

      On the hard-drive front, I can't imagine why MS went with a laptop-size hard drive. Is the physical size of the hard drive really *that* big a deal? At newegg today, laptop hard drives are $120 for 160G, while desktop drives are $145 for 500G. MS have saved a ton of their own money and given us more space at the same time, just by compromising a bit on the size of the (already quite large) enclosure. What were they thinking? (Apple did the same thing on AppleTV, but at least the AppleTV is actually small.)

      --
      main(c,r){for(r=32;r;) printf(++c>31?c=!r--,"\n":c<r?" ":~c&r?" `":" #");}
    45. Re:Worthless. by Gizzmonic · · Score: 1

      HDMI has better quality and support for higher resolutions than VGA

      Wrong. VGA is an analog signal and its resolution is not limited. The highest common for resolution for VGA displays is 1920x1200 (2-page, WUXGA).

      HDMI incorporates error correction in the specs.

      Again, wrong. And might I add, error correction is useful for data, useless for video. You're not going to re-send a video frame when it gets screwed up unless you're not worried about sync.

      Finally, if you are using CRT then you should get with the fucking program and upgrade to a display technology that isn't 110 years old.

      CRT still has the best black levels and colors.

      It's obvious you don't know anything about video standards. Read up and compare HDMI to SDI for interfaces...it's not even close.

      --
      (-1, Raw and Uncut is the only way to read)
    46. Re:Worthless. by Gizzmonic · · Score: 1

      Theoretically, you are right about HDMI being able to describe the picture better...but-

      You're in for a rude awakening if you try to run HDMI over about 10 feet. The inventors of DVI/HDMI simply did not consider those lengths. You'll find that with HDMI, those zeroes turn into ones in the wire.

      I have done runs of 100+ feet with component or RGBHV with no interference multiple times. My advice to you, get some nice shielded RG6 and make the cables yourself (or pay someone to make them). Stay away from electrical outlets and you'll do just fine, unless you have a cheap switchbox, a poor connection at the wall or a projector with an extremely poor ADC. Try running the cables directly to the projector on the floor without any of that other stuff. You should not be running into those problems with coax cables.

      --
      (-1, Raw and Uncut is the only way to read)
    47. Re:Worthless. by twistedsymphony · · Score: 1

      Thanks for the advice but as I said before I'm already running HDMI at those lengths without any problems (or "sparkle" as most people describe digital interference) just not with the 360 (because mine doesn't have an HDMI port). FWIW I'm using Monoprice cables and I can't imagine I'd be able to build my own much better, particularly when you consider I'm using a VGA connection (because that's what the projector accepts), not Component. Also of course none of the wires are running anywhere near powerlines.

    48. Re:Worthless. by Mark+Gillespie · · Score: 1

      Well on a reasonably high end Plasma (Panasonic TH-42PX60), HDMI looks far superior to Component from my PS3 when playing Blu-Ray and games.

    49. Re:Worthless. by @madeus · · Score: 1

      Yes, as you've said and do I belive you. But on my Pinoneer, HD content looks the same on both, and a lot of other people say the same thing.

      We know that some TV's have problems with some types of component signals (something convered in other posts on this story alone) and we know RGB component is just fine for carrying an HD signal - people have been using it on high end computer monitors for years.

      It occured to me I wonder if you are thinking of a comparison with the (non-HD) S-Video type of component?

      (Which does look crappy not only as it's not HD, it even looks bad compared to SCART - and is pretty much only a step up from composite).

    50. Re:Worthless. by Gizzmonic · · Score: 1

      I'm glad to hear that your cables are okay.

      Could I ask you a little more about your system? Where does component get converted to VGA? At the projector, off of a VGA M to the component F cable? Or do you have an external scaler that's doing the conversion? Are you using a component switchbox or VGA switchbox?

      I'm curious, as you are good on HDMI and bad on component-completely the opposite of most of the systems I've set up.

      --
      (-1, Raw and Uncut is the only way to read)
  2. Interesting... by Anubis350 · · Score: 4, Interesting
    FTFA:

    We don't feel like the Wii customer and the Xbox customer are the same thing," he [Mr. Rodman] said. "We think that as soon as the Wii customer turns 14 they want something else. At my college, last generation the ps2 and xbox were pretty much in a dead heat for the top spot. Now though, the Wii is clearly winning over the ps3 and 360. The will may not be, by and large, the system you play by yourself, but it's the best system if you have people over. Also, the retro gaming is a huge hit here (may have something to do with it being an engineering and science school, maybe).

    That said, you haven't lived till you've played a real NES on 62" screen tv or a >100" projected screen :-D
    --
    "goodbye and hello, as always" ~Prince Corwin, from Zelazny's Amber series
    1. Re:Interesting... by suv4x4 · · Score: 2, Insightful
      We don't feel like the Wii customer and the Xbox customer are the same thing," he [Mr. Rodman] said. "We think that as soon as the Wii customer turns 14 they want something else.

      At my college, last generation the ps2 and xbox were pretty much in a dead heat for the top spot. Now though, the Wii is clearly winning over the ps3 and 360. The will may not be, by and large, the system you play by yourself, but it's the best system if you have people over. Also, the retro gaming is a huge hit here (may have something to do with it being an engineering and science school, maybe).

      There's a weird cognitive phenomenon called "wishful thinking". Somehow marketing departments think they if they just state out loud what they believe their customers are after, it'll magically manifestate into reality.

      So sad, really. Even further, since most people I know like both Wii and XBox, for different reasons. And the XBox marketing telling them "hey, you ALSO like Wii, so you're immature jerk", isn't going to win them over in their camp.
    2. Re:Interesting... by lilomar · · Score: 1

      Same at my college. If you ask anyone about the Wii, they babble on for hours about how fun it is to play. if you ask someone about the ps3, they say, "yeah, it has pretty good graphics, and blu-ray. Of course, I don't have any blu-ray disks, but I'm sure someone is willing to pay for it. You never hear much about the 360. I have been to several Wii parties since it came out, but I have never been to (or heard of) a PS3 or 360 party.

      --
      The creator of this post (Jacob Smith) hereby releases it, and all of his other posts, into the public domain.
    3. Re:Interesting... by Moocow660 · · Score: 3, Funny

      I'm 22 (and also went to engineering school,) and the last game console I bought before the Wii was a Sega Megadrive (Genesis in America) I'm mostly a PC gamer, and none of the other consoles really has anything extra to offer me to make me buy it instead of a new graphics card. Also, I never in a million years imagined I'd have girls I barely know turning up at my house to *ahem* play with my Wii. There you have it slashdot, Wii brings girls to your house*. *Disclaimer: Of course this still leaves you standing awkwardly in the corner of your own living room not quite sure how to start a conversation. Maybe they will fix this in the next hardware revision...

    4. Re:Interesting... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "We don't feel like the Wii customer and the Xbox customer are the same thing," he [Mr. Rodman] said. "We think that as soon as the Wii customer turns 14 they want something else."

      What a cunt. I enjoy my wii and my 360.

    5. Re:Interesting... by geminidomino · · Score: 1

      I have the solution to your girl problem, my friend.

      "Wii Bowling Drinking".

      The rules are simple. If the current thrower strikes, all other players drink. For a turkey (3 strikes in a row), they drink twice.

    6. Re:Interesting... by earthbound+kid · · Score: 1

      Dude, I totally heard a rumor from a guy who's uncle works at Nintendo that with the next Wii Channels update, they'll add one called, "Small Talk Age," that trains your brain to do small talk until you can do it as effortlessly as a 20 year old (girl).

      (Seriously, I love your story. You rock!)

    7. Re:Interesting... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "At my college, last generation the ps2 and xbox were pretty much in a dead heat for the top spot. Now though, the Wii is clearly winning over the ps3 and 360."
      Why do you even mention this? It is meaningless anecdotal evidence and doesn't appear to be part of your overall point at all.

      Take some logic and stats classes at that "engineering and science" school.

    8. Re:Interesting... by nutshell42 · · Score: 2, Funny
      At my college, last generation the ps2 and xbox were pretty much in a dead heat for the top spot.

      IOW, what you're saying is that your college anecdotes are useless for predicting the winner of the console wars?

      --
      Don't think of it as a flame---it's more like an argument that does 3d6 fire damage
    9. Re:Interesting... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Seriously man, chicks dig the Wii. I was looking through the Miis on my console last night and there were more Miis created by females that have come over to, uh, play with my Wii than guys, despite the fact that I know more guys than girls (being a techie, and all that). And I have several requests from other females to come over and play as well.

      Wii bowling in particular seems to be a favorite...

    10. Re:Interesting... by poot_rootbeer · · Score: 1

      you haven't lived till you've played a real NES on 62" screen tv or a >100" projected screen :-D

      On a 62" screen, the NES resolution density would be about 8 pixels per inch. (The same screen showing a native 1080p image would have about 40 pixels per inch.)

  3. Soooo... I can't type at night by Anubis350 · · Score: 1

    good god I need coffee, *wii*, not *will*

    --
    "goodbye and hello, as always" ~Prince Corwin, from Zelazny's Amber series
  4. Hardly elite by fahrvergnugen · · Score: 5, Interesting

    I'm a huge believer in the XBox 360 as a platform, and I'm delighted to have owned one since launch day. Wii's anemic release schedule and PS3's pathetic lineup of 360 ports / shitty first-party content (Resistance excepted) means that it's the best system out there.

    I'm one of those dorks that buys everything videogame-related, but I'm not motivated to upgrade at all. An HDMI port, quieter operation, and shiny black skin isn't enough to attract me, and I'm an enthusiast for their products. If they'd integrated the HD-DVD drive and the wireless adapter that would be one thing, but this is much too little, far too late.

    I mean, the PS3 comes with Blu-ray and wireless built-in on the high-end model. Meanwhile, the 360 costs $100 extra for 802.11 (an adapter that has shit range, by the way, on a shelf next to my wii and ps3 the 360 can't pick up a signal), and $200 extra for a hi-def video drive.

    So: Elite 360 + Wireless + HD-DVD = $780.
    PS3, with built-in wireless and built-in Blu-ray: $600. Way to destroy your price advantage, Microsoft!

    Obviously I'm not the target audience for this product, but I can't for the life of me figure out who is.

    --
    Even Jesus hates listening to Creed.
    1. Re:Hardly elite by B3ryllium · · Score: 1

      I haven't bought a 360 yet (nor a Wii, nor a PS3), so I'm glad that they came out with this option. I rented a 360 once and it was *sooo* loud; if the Elite is quieter, I would gladly buy it over the original XBox.

      Also, the HDMI would make the cable runs to a wall-mounted HDTV that much less ugly.

      Not that I have a wall-mounted HDTV yet :)

      All in good time ...

    2. Re:Hardly elite by Chess+Piece+Face · · Score: 1

      "So: Elite 360 + Wireless + HD-DVD = $780. PS3, with built-in wireless and built-in Blu-ray: $600. Way to destroy your price advantage, Microsoft! Obviously I'm not the target audience for this product, but I can't for the life of me figure out who is."

      People who are bad at math?

    3. Re:Hardly elite by optkk · · Score: 0

      This has been covered a couple of times over at the GamerCastNetowrk. I think that MicroSoft are actually doing the clever thing. If you want to go all out and get the new model, the HD-DVD drive, the wireless adapter in one go, you can, and it will cost you more. Likewise, if you already own a 360, be it core or premium, then you can also upgrade that. The fact is, nobody is forcing you to have these extras. The other benefit is that it you're on a budget, then you can buy these in chunks. I can afford £245 (although no doubt we here in the UK will get stiffed on that again), I can't afford £425. In a month or two's time I'll be able to afford the HD DVD drive. I would still rather see one model of each, like Nintendo has done with Wii.

    4. Re:Hardly elite by SuperKendall · · Score: 0

      It doesn't seem clever though when you look at the historical success of console upgrades. People just do not buy them in huge numbers.

      In my mind, they should have at least sold all units with an HD. Beyond that if MS was serious about HD support they should have included an HD-DVD drive. The flexibility they gained will be great when the market forces them to produce an external Blu-Ray player, but will make them end up looking a little silly.

      --
      "There is more worth loving than we have strength to love." - Brian Jay Stanley
    5. Re:Hardly elite by Duds · · Score: 2, Insightful

      The other way to put it is of course.

      PS3 + 120gb + a load of useless shit I don't need = $700.

      Xbox + 120gb = $479.

    6. Re:Hardly elite by Jtheletter · · Score: 1

      The fact is, nobody is forcing you to have these extras.

      Actually, for those of us who are big fans of Halo, MS is forcing us to buy the HD if we want to be able to play it on the 360. :/ Now, no one is holding a gun to our heads to migrate to the system, but it's MS's biggest title, of course they're using it to leverage sales of high-margin addons. I understand the business sense behind it, but it's still essentially a big FU to a loyal fanbase. "You want to continue to support us and play your favorite game on the new console? Cool, but it'll cost you $100 more than (almost) any other game's fans."

      Offtopic from accessories, sorta, but related to milking the Halo fans for all they're worth: the elite collector's edition for Halo3 was advertised for preorder at $100, then earlier this month they announced the "official" pricing (WTF was the $100 price then??) and jacked it up to $130. I had a preorder for it, I was able to stomach almost double the cost of the game for the extras, but $130? An extra $30 on top of the extra $45 for extra content that still isn't playable means I cancelled my preorder. And they did it because they could, they knew that the fans were loyal enough that they'd soldier on and buy it. It disgusts me how blantantly MS is screwing the fans of their most successful xbox franchise, way to reward the loyal Microsoft. :(

      --
      -- I'm not a pessimist, I'm a realist. It's not my fault that life sucks so much. --
    7. Re:Hardly elite by MikeBabcock · · Score: 1

      Disclaimer: I own a PS3

      Now that that's over with, I'm still waiting for all the nay-sayers claiming that the PS3 is 'overpriced' to realize that its actually competitively priced for what it is (ignoring titles and exclusives for the moment). A blu-ray player, media center, wireless capable, bluetooth enabled high definition gaming system (did I miss anything?).

      Again, assuming the games you want are/will be available for it and the movies you want to watch are on BD, it is an excellent value for the money.

      The XBox is also a great value right now, but only because there are more titles available. In straight features, I don't believe it is, especially if you factor in paying for Live Gold, but that's just me.

      --
      - Michael T. Babcock (Yes, I blog)
    8. Re:Hardly elite by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      > if the Elite is quieter, I would gladly buy it over the original XBox.

      It isn't, unfortunately. Wait for the 65nm process.

      The PS3 puts out a lot of heat, but it's also got a gigantic fan so it doesn't have to spin as fast.

    9. Re:Hardly elite by dnahelix1 · · Score: 1

      The pricing was estimated. But if you actually read the information about it at Bungie, they explain all the stuff you're getting. It is what it is. And almost double the first time around? Check your math. Halo3 regular is 60 bucks. so that's only 40 more going off of the estimated 100 price. so now you're looking at double when they made it to 130. But, is the 70 worth it? I know a lot of people who are. The helmet, the behind-the scenes stuff, all of the RvB... The real story, though I doubt will happen, is whether or not the Xbox 360 Pro version will have a slight price drop. I've been holding out on buying my console because of the price (I think it's ridiculous to spend that kind of money on a video game system, PS3 or Xbox). But, you know if the new maps for H2 are for the 360 only, I'll be out buying it. Hopefully, not.

    10. Re:Hardly elite by Belial6 · · Score: 1

      If the cables are not running through a conduit inside the wall, you've missed big opportunity. Once you've decided to wall mount the TV, you have decided that you are not going to move it. Spend the little extra time/money to cut the sheetrock, put in a conduit, cover the sheetrock, texture and paint. If fewer wires make you happy, no wires will make you much happier.

    11. Re:Hardly elite by B3ryllium · · Score: 1

      This is very true ... but I just bought the condo, and it was all nicely painted by the previous owner ... Ah well.

      This conduit of which you speak, how condusive is it to adding other devices to the TV, i.e. DVD player, Digital Terminal, Wii, etc? I guess standard cable-fishing rules would apply, but what diameter of tubing would you use to make it easier to add stuff?

    12. Re:Hardly elite by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      PS3 is definitely priced well for the features, but that lies the problem. There is simply too much combined into one device to try to target everybody instead of trying to target its main audience the gamers. A large part of the cost is the fact that it comes with blu-ray. That's something I don't need as well as many other people. It would be nice as an add-on option because at the point I could buy it if I wanted it. We're still in the middle of the next format war and until that has been decided I am not buying any next gen DVDs.

    13. Re:Hardly elite by Belial6 · · Score: 1

      The stuff I used was 2" if I'm not mistaken. It may have been 1 1/2". Just go to a hardware store and take a look. The 'industry' term for what you want is "Smurf Tubing". It is called that because it is blue. It is a flexible tube. Once it is in, running cables is a breeze. I did a complete renovation on my home the year before last, and ran this stuff to every room, since the sheetrock was already down. I didn't pre-run any kind of data cable. It was simple to add the cables after the house was done.

      Depending on your setup, you might be just running the conduit from behind the TV down to the baseboard. This would only require 3 holes. One behind the TV, which would be covered by a plate for connecting devices. One at the baseboard which would also be covered by a plate for connecting devices, and one where the fire block is in the middle of the wall where you would need to drill a hole for the tube. That is the only one that would need to be patched. Of course while you have the wall open, you should run an electric line up to have an outlet behind the TV. This will avoid having too short of a power cable to reach all the way to the outlet at the baseboard.

      As long as you don't go to small on the conduit, any future cabling changes will be extremely simple. It actually annoys me that builders don't run conduit instead of cable. The cost difference would be minimal, but the convenience benefit would be massive.

    14. Re:Hardly elite by Jtheletter · · Score: 1

      Well, I used a price estimate of $55 for the game, which is where the "almost double" came from. Wishful thinking, I know, since why would they charge $55 when they could charge $60? And likely it'll be $65 or $70 simply because they know we'll buy it. Granted, there is a good amount of extras in the legendary package, but I could care less about watching the behind the scenes, and even so, how many times is someone going to watch those DVDs? I was more interested in the replica helmet, but depsite what GameStop employees told me it's apparently only about 2/3rds scale. So what are we getting? DVDs we'll watch once (other than RvB which rocks), and a helmet that can't even be worn except by maybe small children. Not exactly blowing me away for $130. Plus the $100 "estimated" price point seems (in retrospect) to be suspiciously at one of the "trigger" points for consumers. I'm sure they were well aware it would be more than $100 but putting that number out there got them more preorders and people are lazy and so they're counting on people just letting the extra $30 slide. It's all quite maddening, but how does one vote with their dollars when there's X million consumers willing to take your place?.

      Also, I read somewhere, I believe on bungie.net, that new map packs will be for 360 only. Why? Well, to force the last of us that haven't migrated yet to do so, just as you said you would. I'm included in that group, I was already waiting on the 360 just to save up the money, but when I heard rumors of the elite balck version I figured it'd be worth waiting as that will almost surely mean a price drop for the other versions, or possibly picking one up used at a bit of a discount - assuming the warranty period on the used console is any good.

      In any case, at every turn it's pretty obvious MS is using Halo to leverage the hell out of the fanbase for cash. But considering how MS treats other loyal user groups - like MS Office users - it really shouldn't be a surprise, though it still pisses me off. :/

      --
      -- I'm not a pessimist, I'm a realist. It's not my fault that life sucks so much. --
    15. Re:Hardly elite by B3ryllium · · Score: 1

      Cool, thanks for the tips :)

    16. Re:Hardly elite by Danga · · Score: 1

      It doesn't seem clever though when you look at the historical success of console upgrades. People just do not buy them in huge numbers.

      Who cares if upgrades aren't bought in huge numbers, that just proves that it is better to have an option since not as many people want it forced on them but there are people who do want the upgrade. If they included it from the start the added cost might cost them sales to some people who can't afford all the bells and whistles. By offering it as an upgrade it still allows those who wish to have the added benefits. I can afford one but I still am not so sure I want to dump 200 bucks on something that I can only use with my 360.

      The flexibility they gained will be great when the market forces them to produce an external Blu-Ray player, but will make them end up looking a little silly.

      The HD-DVD vs. Blu-Ray war is FAR from over my friend, be careful with your predictions. I also highly doubt a Blu-Ray accessory will ever be available for the 360 since by the time the war is over (if Blu-Ray wins) then low cost Blu-Ray players will most likely be available so why would you buy one that only works with a 360?

      --
      Hey, there is only one Return and it's not of the King, it's of the Jedi.
    17. Re:Hardly elite by Ravatar · · Score: 1

      The other way being the slanted, free-of-logic way.

      You're right though. It's obviously a terrible idea to pay the extra $221 for the ability to play 1080p movies via blu-ray.

    18. Re:Hardly elite by Duds · · Score: 1

      You're joking of course.

      I don't want blu-ray. I don't expect it to survive and I have better ways of playing HD movies.

      I want a games machine.

      Your arguement is roughly the same as telling an office computer user choosing between Linux and Windows that he's obviously be an idiot not to pay the extra $149 to play Windows only games.

  5. ADV Films by Talisein · · Score: 0, Redundant

    So now there's a legal way to download anime? I don't believe it. I think I'll need more than 120 Gb though.

    --
    "The right to do something does not mean doing it is right." William Safire
  6. 120GB hdd by aegzorz · · Score: 0

    $180 for 120GB hdd is a bit steep, hopefully the Elite hdd signature can be used to replace the original 20GB hdd with a generic 120GB hdd.
    Now that it's got HDMI all we need is XBMC on it :)

    1. Re:120GB hdd by revlayle · · Score: 1

      $180??? try $80... the current premium xbox360 runs $399. (is $180 more than the CORE system, tho, if that is what you meant)

    2. Re:120GB hdd by typobox43 · · Score: 1

      I believe it's $180 for the standalone 120 GB drive. You know, for those of us who don't want to purchase a whole new system just for 100 GB of extra space.

    3. Re:120GB hdd by revlayle · · Score: 1

      oh oh oh, i get it now... stand alone unit; yeah that's a rip-off in ANY sense of the word

  7. Black by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    The Xbox is in black?

    Wow, I've never seen anything like this before.

  8. Slot loading drive by curmi · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Still no slot-loader?

    1. Re:Slot loading drive by iainl · · Score: 1

      Why do you want a slot-loader? I saw a post from someone in the last XBox thread about wanting a slot-loader, too. Personally, I've always found greater reliability from tray-loading drives, with the added advantage of not having to take the whole drive mechanism to bits if anything goes wrong.

      Is there an advantage to slot-loading drives I'm not aware of, then?

      --
      "I Know You Are But What Am I?"
    2. Re:Slot loading drive by Tony+Hoyle · · Score: 1

      They work vertically.

      Tray loaders are a bitch to use vertically, which means the 360 has to be basically horizontal all the time.

    3. Re:Slot loading drive by curmi · · Score: 1

      Not only do they work better vertically, they don't have a plastic tray that sticks out and can break off, once you take out a disc you don't have to push the tray back in, or press a button to retract the tray, and they look better.

      They also cost more, which is probably the reason Microsoft aren't using one.

    4. Re:Slot loading drive by geminidomino · · Score: 1

      Slot-loaders scare me. My Qosmio has one, with a big warning label that says "Don't use miniCDs." Now playing GCN games on my Wii makes me nervous...

    5. Re:Slot loading drive by iainl · · Score: 1

      My 360 is horizontal anyway; it's in an equipment rack and I've heard too many horror stories about what happens to discs that are running when it ineviatably gets knocked over by my 2-year-old. But I used to use my PS2 vertically without any problems - doesn't the 360 also have the little bits that hold the disc in the tray in vertical mode?

      --
      "I Know You Are But What Am I?"
    6. Re:Slot loading drive by Paradigm_Complex · · Score: 1

      The Wii's slot loader is in a way or two rather different then most. I had quite a few discussions trying to guess how exactly they were going to go about it, considering at the time there were no slot-loaders that support both full and mini optical disks. Don't worry about it - the Wii has more originality than just the controller.

      --
      "A witty saying proves nothing." - Voltaire
    7. Re:Slot loading drive by Loadmaster · · Score: 2, Funny

      I hope so, or I expect the magic that's been holding the discs in my vertical 360 will wear out sometime soon.

      Swi

    8. Re:Slot loading drive by hobbesx · · Score: 1

      I've also been told that they make a ridiculous amount of noise, because there is no drive tray as a sound barrier. Apparently this is why you see them in cars all the time, but not as often in home equipment. Have things gotten better?

      --
      This rating is Unfair ( ) ( ) Fair (*) Funny
      Sigh... If only. Modding would be so much more fun.
    9. Re:Slot loading drive by cxreg · · Score: 1

      the PS3's drive makes no noticable noise whatosever

    10. Re:Slot loading drive by Omestes · · Score: 1

      Not true. My Wii, My MacMini, and my old iBook have have slot loaders, and only one of them makes enough noise to be bothersome (the Macmini). They are as quiet, generally, as any tray loader, plus they do work better vertically, that said they still make me paranoid as there is no way to force the disc to eject if things break.

      I'm still amused at how the Wii lets me insert the smaller (GC) disks, while my iBook and MacMini's instruction manuals make it clear that no small disk shall EVER enter their slots.

      --
      A patriot must always be ready to defend his country against his government. -edward abbey
    11. Re:Slot loading drive by Danga · · Score: 1

      They work vertically.

      Tray loaders are a bitch to use vertically, which means the 360 has to be basically horizontal all the time


      Umm my 360 is setup vertically and at first I was worried about it being a pain to load discs but it really is not a pain at all. The tray is designed well enough that after loading the disc it will not fall out so there is no problem at all. Next time try actually using the device in question before assuming something that is not true.

      --
      Hey, there is only one Return and it's not of the King, it's of the Jedi.
  9. Cost of adding a Cell processor to Xbox ? by steveoc · · Score: 1

    Hey - Im very interested in getting a PS3, not for the games, but for writing code that works on a Cell processor, incl SPU's. That doesnt make me weird - its just that I have some signal processing applications that are currently running on clusters of 64bit unix boxes, and I reckon that Cell might be a good architecture to port these applications too.

    Question then : How much to add a Cell processor (or equivalent 6-8 core architecture) to an Xbox360, and also to provide a GNU compatible toolchain to build code with ?

    Not suggesting for one moment that the Xbox360 is MS-Rubbish, but for what I want a 'console' for, the XBox360 has nothing much to offer compared to a PS3.

    I know I know I know that they are supposed to be 'games consoles', and I sincerely hope that a lot of people buy a lot of expensive games and blu-ray movies for them, because that keeps the base price of the unit subsidised below cost, which is all I want anyway - cheap, readily available, parallel architecture linux machine. Awesome.

    1. Re:Cost of adding a Cell processor to Xbox ? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      $599 US DOLLARS. Then you have to open your XBOX360, get a bigger case, then add the PS3.

    2. Re:Cost of adding a Cell processor to Xbox ? by DrXym · · Score: 1
      I don't think the availability of Linux for the PS3 is a major selling point, but it's one I appreciate the option of having. I already have Yellowdog installed on my PS3, so I'm looking forward to playing around with it, and ultimately running VLC or MythTV through it. Unfortunately my SD TV set is no good for programming so I have to set it up with VNC or a remote desktop first. I only installed it yesterday so lots of tinkering to do.

      On a broader point I think a lot of people get very defensive when they see the PS3 can do a lot more than just play games. You see a lot of arguments starting such as "I wanted a HD-DVD / Blu-Ray player..." or "I don't want to play music..." or "I just want to play games..." etc. As is a console being able to do more is somehow a bad thing. Fact is that every console including the underpowered Wii can do more than play games if it wanted to, and indeed the Wii & 360 offer non-gaming functionality.

      Microsoft and Sony are taking it a step further and trying to extend into downloadable content - games, movies, IPTV etc. The problem for MS is that existing 360s are terrible for downloadable content. One SKU can't download content (and a bunch of other things) and the other has a paltry file storage. I see the upgrade as a long overdue revamp to make the console suitable for the download content, but even then it is missing things it should have such as wi-fi. It's almost as though MS crippled their device (perhaps so it wouldn't compete with Windows Media Centre) and now have to uncripple it as much as possible to compete with the PS3.

      While the revamp is long overdue, when you consider the cost of adding wi-fi, or HD-DVD (or Blu-Ray), or XBox Live sub the price difference between the 360 and PS3 disappears completely. Then it boils down to what service both products offer and what the games are like. The 360 is in the lead at the moment with more games, downloadable movies and XBox Live Arcade, but Sony really seems to be gaining a head of steam.

  10. Where's the Wi-fi? Where's the HD-DVD? by Rik+Sweeney · · Score: 5, Interesting

    Not only is this new version missing two features the PS3 has and will end up costing more than the PS3 with them added...

    IT CAN'T EVEN CURE CANCER

    Seriously though, if I'd just bought an Xbox 360, I'd be *very* pissed off right now.

    1. Re:Where's the Wi-fi? Where's the HD-DVD? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Seriously though, if I'd just bought an Xbox 360, I'd be *very* pissed off right now.

      You're right! Microsoft better not ship that thing right now. They'd better hold it until absolutely no one will be pissed.[1]

      [1] i.e., hold it forever

      Thanks for your insightful comment!

    2. Re:Where's the Wi-fi? Where's the HD-DVD? by iainl · · Score: 1

      Really? Admittedly my 360 is six months old, but even today I'd buy a normal white one instead of this device. The extra storage space is of no real use to me, and HDMI doesn't look any better than VGA on my TV (judging from having used them with my PC, anyway). I even think the white looks better, but then I got excited about the limited-edition white releases of the other consoles where black was the norm.

      --
      "I Know You Are But What Am I?"
    3. Re:Where's the Wi-fi? Where's the HD-DVD? by shoptroll · · Score: 1

      Why include the HD-DVD when it's not even being used by the games? Especially when the future of that format isn't even guaranteed? Why add a $100 feature that you have no guarantee people are going to use in the long term?

      --
      Insert Sig Here
    4. Re:Where's the Wi-fi? Where's the HD-DVD? by KDR_11k · · Score: 1

      Seriously though, if I'd just bought an Xbox 360, I'd be *very* pissed off right now.

      I'd be more pissed about the 100€ pricedrop for the Premium. Unless I bought it after the price drop in which case I wouldn't be annoyed since I just paid 180€ less and only miss out on 100GB harddrive space.

      --
      Justice is the sheep getting arrested while an impartial judge declares the vote void.
  11. HDMI and scaling by cxreg · · Score: 1

    My understanding is that the PS3's scaling limitations are at least partially a result of it's digital output, HDMI. The Xbox has an analog scaler, but is introducing HDMI only going to cause it to be prone to the same kind of issues?

    1. Re:HDMI and scaling by iainl · · Score: 1

      Sort of. It's my understanding that this console needs a new scaler over the 'normal' one, but digital scalers aren't difficult to find - there's one in every HDMI-capable DVD player, for instance. It's just that they cost a couple of dollars, and Sony didn't think it was worth it, when they can just ask developers to render directly to the different resolution. But that was when they just assumed that the PS3 was so monumentally powerful that everyone would be able to do 1920x1080 at 60fps without breaking a sweat.

      --
      "I Know You Are But What Am I?"
    2. Re:HDMI and scaling by DrXym · · Score: 1
      My understanding is that the PS3's scaling limitations are at least partially a result of it's digital output, HDMI. The Xbox has an analog scaler, but is introducing HDMI only going to cause it to be prone to the same kind of issues?

      I think its more because the PS3 doesn't automatically scale from the game resolution to the televisions natural resolution. If a game supports 720p and your TV doesn't support 720p, the game will use 480p instead rather than scaling 720p to 1080i (for example. So the PS3 assumes that modern TVs are quite capable of scaling for themselves. Which is mosly true in the US except for some small edge cases and 100% true in EU where 720p & 1080i interoperable support is the standard. The PS3 does have some kind of scaling functionality, but it must be explicitly supported by the game. Beyond3D described how it worked in detail but it didn't seem too useful.

      So it probably it boils down to Sony not wishing to throw another chip onto the PS3 just to deal with a few edge cases. I have no idea what Microsoft will do with their switch to HDMI but they were using an analogue scaler previously and the switch might see them take a similar stance.

  12. But every 360 addon is white.... by GreatDrok · · Score: 3, Insightful

    I have a 360 with HD-DVD drive and wireless adapter and a pair of wireless pads. If I was to switch to this just for the sake of HDMI and a bigger drive, bearing in mind that my HDTV doesn't support 1080p over HDMI, only over component and also I can't even see a difference between component and HDMI on the thing, I would also have to replace all the white extras. Oh, and I actually think the 360 looks better in white. Mind you, when I came to buy a new iPod Video I bought the white one because I didn't like the look of the black one.

    --
    "I have the attention span of a strobe lit goldfish, please get to the point quickly!"
    1. Re:But every 360 addon is white.... by iainl · · Score: 1

      I've got a white iPod and PSP too, so you're not the only one there. I'd also get a white DS over the black one, if I actually could face the idea of upgrading my blue Big Fat DS to the lite.

      But this isn't (for the most part) about getting 360 owners to upgrade. New add-ons will be coming out in black at the same time, and they'd just expect you to buy those instead.

      --
      "I Know You Are But What Am I?"
    2. Re:But every 360 addon is white.... by Mousit · · Score: 1

      > bearing in mind that my HDTV doesn't support 1080p over HDMI, only over component

      This is off-topic but wow, I seriously have to ask. What brand/model TV do you have? I have never heard of a TV that supports 1080p only on the analog component signal and not the HDMI. I have heard of the opposite though, where a TV will only do 1080p on HDMI, but limits the component input to 1080i. I'd be very curious to know your TV!

    3. Re:But every 360 addon is white.... by GreatDrok · · Score: 1

      "I'd be very curious to know your TV!"

      Yeah, I was surprised. I had assumed that since 1080p worked through component there would be no problem with HDMI. However, I have an upscaling DVD player with HDMI and it supports 1080p output but whenever I try to select 1080p it switches back to 1080i. Looking in the specs of my projector (InFocus In76) it does say that it only supports 1080i on HDMI but 1080p through DVI and component. I'm actually not bothered that much since I can't see any difference between 1080i and 1080p over component as far as resolution goes although with long cables there is some ghosting on the 1080p which is absent with 1080i so that is what I use. Too many people are fixated on the 'p' part and don't realise that 1080 is 1080. The only time the interlacing would have any impact is if input source was aquired that way. If the source is progressive but transmitted as 1080i and then deinterlaced at the other end it doesn't look any different to progressive all the way since the deinterlacing is perfect. With the Xbox HDDVD drive it forces 1080i over component but the disc is progressive so this isn't a handicap at all and I don't know why they insisted on it. Finally, although my projector has a native resolution of 1280x720 it looks better when driven with the 1080i output from the Xbox because the scaler in the projector does a better job of preserving the detail on HDDVD than the Xbox itself does. With my upscaling DVD player though, I run that at 1280x720 which means there is only one scaler involved. Running at 1080i would mean it is scaling up and then the projector is scaling down again and in my own tests this resulted in significant image degradation.

      Oh, and HDDVD blows even the best DVDs out of the water despite the fact that I am still only actually using about half the available resolution on the disc. Don't let anyone tell you that an upscaling DVD player is anything like as good as HDDVD or BluRay. Maybe on a small TV (32" or so) you might not be able to tell the difference but on my 70" front projector the difference is very apparent.

      --
      "I have the attention span of a strobe lit goldfish, please get to the point quickly!"
  13. L33T or 1337 edition. by Rastignac · · Score: 3, Funny

    That would have been a better name. For real elite gamers, L33T or 1337 is the right hyped choice.

    --
    -- Rastignac was here.
  14. You're indeed not their target by Moraelin · · Score: 1

    Well, as you've said, you're not the target audience for it.

    The target audience obviously isn't anyone who already has an XBox 360, for that matter. It's out to target people -- or at least blunt their arguments -- who've been whining, basically, "the XBox sucks because it doesn't have a HDMI port" or "the XBox sucks because it's too loud for my living room" or "yeah, but the PS3 is _black_". Now MS can tell them, basically, "So buy an Elite then."

    It's, if you will, like the pink PSP. It's not there so everyone with a black one will throw it into the garbage bin and run buy a pink one. It's there so maybe some father will go "omg, pink girly PSP" and buy one for his daughter.

    The price also isn't always calculated like that. Not everyone who bought an XBox will use it as a HD-DVD player, and not everyone is, basically, "OMG, must have wireless at all cost." I can tell you I'm perfectly content with cables, and haven't used the old XBox or PS2 for DVD playback either. The damn thing is there to play games, show me the games. I'm certainly not going to blow $600 on the PS3 just because it plays Blu-Ray movies.

    --
    A polar bear is a cartesian bear after a coordinate transform.
  15. I would think mostly gamers with HDMI TVs by Sycraft-fu · · Score: 1

    For example if I were to get a 360, I'd probably eye an elite. Reason being I have a DLP TV which likes HDMI input. Also, I might opt to instead hook it to my computer monitor, which also likes digital input the best.

    However the vast majority of people still don't have HDTVs (and some that do have tubes or older models that don't sport HDMI) and thus it isn't something they care about.

    I don't think it is really marketed as an upgrade for those that have 360s, I think it is more to try and draw in more of the hi-def crowd. I know a couple people who expressed some reservations about the lack of HDMI.

    As for HD-DVD, I don't think it is really that useful. In fact that think the addon is kinda retarded in general. If I get a game console, it is because I want to play games. I've seen people use them for DVD players, it is annoying. None of them have as nice an interface as a real DVD player. I'm sure there is a market of people who want both and want to save money, but I'd bet it isn't all that large, at least not enough to justify the cost.

    I could be wrong, of course, but that would be my thinking if I were choosing features for such a device.

    1. Re:I would think mostly gamers with HDMI TVs by ender- · · Score: 1

      As for HD-DVD, I don't think it is really that useful. In fact that think the addon is kinda retarded in general. If I get a game console, it is because I want to play games. I've seen people use them for DVD players, it is annoying. None of them have as nice an interface as a real DVD player. I'm sure there is a market of people who want both and want to save money, but I'd bet it isn't all that large, at least not enough to justify the cost.


      Actually, I really like the add-on HD-DVD drive. Sure, it would have been nice to have it built into the 360 itself, but other than that it's great, and it saves the built-in player for my games. Besides, there's really nothing wrong with the interface. Once you have the DVD/HDDVD in, the interface is the same as any other DVD player.

      As I see it, I already had an XBOX360 for gaming. A standalone HD/BR player [or a PS3 :) ] would have cost me $600-1000+. I added HD-DVD functionality to my living-room for $160 [$40 off coupon at Circuit City]. The fact that it included a copy of King Kong, normally $25 [ok not really worth the money cuz it sucked, but still] and a remote control, $30 [which I would have ended up buying anyway], really means I paid $105 for HD-DVD functionality. For that kind of savings, I can live with a slight delay when inserting a movie, and the add-on is selling quite well, so I'm not alone in that.

  16. BBC Model B - Elite by j6wbs · · Score: 1

    I almost dropped to the floor when I saw this announcement. Imagine my disappointment when I realised that this was not a new port of my favourite game from the 80's to the home console market.

    Does this mean that the name "Elite" can be used to market games again, not sure Mr Braben would agree...

    Perhaps finally all legal differences could be settled and the best space trading game could be in everyones home again :-)

    Jez

    1. Re:BBC Model B - Elite by Antony+T+Curtis · · Score: 1

      Elite has got to be one of my all-time favorite games. I spent many hours, first on a BBC Model B, then later on the PC version.

      For those who loved Elite, check out Oolite http://oolite.aegidian.org/
      It's reasonably faithful to the original... with a lot of enhancements.

      --
      No sig. Move along - nothing to see here.
    2. Re:BBC Model B - Elite by Alioth · · Score: 0, Redundant

      You can always try Oolite, which is a remake for modern computers (and easily expandible):

      http://oolite.aegidian.org/
      http://wiki.alioth.net/index.php/Oolite_Main_Page

  17. Why on earth would you want to? by Namarrgon · · Score: 1

    Just buy a PS3 instead. Sony are happy to heavily subsidise the hardware for you, and won't even complain if you don't buy any games or movies for it.

    Or, better still, port your signal processing code to a GPU instead. They're much cheaper and far more powerful than a Cell, and with far more local memory bandwidth too. GPUs aren't ideal for every algorithm, but they do work well for many forms of signal processing.

    --
    Why would anyone engrave "Elbereth"?
  18. HDMI is most beneficial for AUDIO by appleguru · · Score: 5, Interesting

    That's right, audio. While HDMI clearly presents a slight improvement for video (analog vs digital...), its real benefit is next generation audio support. While HDMI is a true digital picture and will give us a slightly better image, this improvement is negligible for the vast majority of people. With HD DVD content sporting DD+/TrueHD, and DTS HD audio that currently can't be handled over optical, HDMI provides us with a way of supporting that... Not that there's a whole lot of receivers that support those yet, but they'll be more available soon enough. You may think your A52/AC3 5.1 dolby digital compressed surround sound is good, but uncompressed TrueHD/DTS HD BLOWS IT AWAY. With even a half decent sound system, movies spring to life with the new audio formats.. Once you watch a film with a TrueHD or DTS HD audio track enabled, you wont be able to go back to "crappy" compressed Dolby Digital. Obviously, it depends on the mixing and the original soundtrack for the film your watching, but from what I've heard so far it's a real improvement across the board.

    And, as much as I hate DRM, ultimately the decision to flag HD DVDs to downconvert over component is up to the movie studios... And... should they go that route in the future (I don't see it happening, especially now that HD DVD is compromised...), M$ will be ready with HDCP compliant HDMI.

    1. Re:HDMI is most beneficial for AUDIO by Kjella · · Score: 5, Interesting

      You may think your A52/AC3 5.1 dolby digital compressed surround sound is good, but uncompressed TrueHD/DTS HD BLOWS IT AWAY. With even a half decent sound system, movies spring to life with the new audio formats.. Once you watch a film with a TrueHD or DTS HD audio track enabled, you wont be able to go back to "crappy" compressed Dolby Digital.

      Somehow I have a feeling I've heard this before, about MP3 vs CD or maybe even SACD and DVD-A. Extremely few people can tell the difference between CD and MP3 >256kbps, and even regular AC-3 DVDs have that + 192kbps to encode the rear channels and bass track. DTS goes much higher than that again, typically 768kbps+. Of course the new formats bring 7.1 to the table, but how many movies have 7.1 sound, are played in a 7.1 player to a 7.1 reciever with correctly placed 7.1 speakers? I doubt 95% of the people would be able to tell the difference, 4.9% wouldn't be "BLOWN AWAY" and the last 0.1% is you.

      The only thing I'm still missing is the option to go past 24p. If you've ever seen sports or anything else fast-moving high action in 720p60 progressive, you'll wonder how you ever survived with 24p/30i. They can quote whatever artistic reasons they want but 60p would improve a lot of movies IMO.

      --
      Live today, because you never know what tomorrow brings
    2. Re:HDMI is most beneficial for AUDIO by appleguru · · Score: 5, Interesting

      Perhaps your right. In fact, I'm sure I'm in the minority when it comes to being blown away by next generation audio (Though surely that minority is bigger than .1% ;)). Even so, the fact remains that having HDMI at least enables the xbox 360 to become a full blown HD DVD player, something it could only do with limited abilities in its non-hdmi version (if you play a truehd or dts hd track with the current generation xbox 360 it gets downconverted and encoded on the fly to dolby digital).

      Now, 60p I'm not disagreeing with, framerate definitely makes a difference. But things shot on film look like there were.. well.. shot on film *because* of the 24fps frame rate.. and because of the film grain... And just like you (well, I can anyways...) distinguish when something was shot with a 1 ccd mini-dv cam, or a 3ccd mini-dv cam, or an HDV camera, or a DVC Pro camera... you can just TELL when something is shot on film. And to a lot of people, that's part of what makes a movie.. what it is.

      Then again, there are some people that enjoyed the oh so cinematic experience of watching the blair witch project on the big screen... :P (That's not to say that movies shot digitally look like that piece of trash, merely making the point that you can tell the difference between film and digital).

      Now, with all of the digital effects in movies today, and movies going directly to theater digitally to be played on DLP projectors the argument becomes a bit less cohesive... but there's definitely something about 24 frames per second that makes a movie a movie.. and not an NFL football game.

    3. Re:HDMI is most beneficial for AUDIO by BlueTrin · · Score: 1

      I understand your point, most people do not notice it right away but you have a feeling if you get used to it and listen to another source audio that the audio quality went down ...

      It takes a while to get used to it but once you get used to it, you will really notice a difference ... like the sound seeming somewhat bland on your older system.

      --
      Don't you know it is now both immoral and criminal to think beyond the next quarterly report?
    4. Re:HDMI is most beneficial for AUDIO by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I understand your point, most people do not notice it right away but you have a feeling if you get used to it and listen to another source audio that the audio quality went down ...

      It takes a while to get used to it but once you get used to it, you will really notice a difference ... like the sound seeming somewhat bland on your older system.

      So you don't notice any benefit you only get the disadvantage of now being less happy with other sources that satisfied you before? Why would anyone want that?
    5. Re:HDMI is most beneficial for AUDIO by iainl · · Score: 1

      Hopefully, the difference in sound quality should even out a fair bit with the Spring Update - it's changing the audio side of the HD-DVD player so it downmixes DD+ and TrueHD to 1536kb/s DTS like the Toshiba standalone players use on their optical output, rather than the much-lower-bitrate DD it currently does.

      It's not lossless, but as anyone who bought into laserdisc knows, full-bitrate DTS is pretty darn spiffy. And I certainly defy you to tell the difference with the racket that is the 360's fan going in the background. If I could afford a whole new amp with HDMI in I could afford the extra few hundred for a standalone HD-DVD player, too.

      --
      "I Know You Are But What Am I?"
    6. Re:HDMI is most beneficial for AUDIO by BlueTrin · · Score: 1

      Yeah we better get to using rocks and making noises so anything would seem better in comparison.

      --
      Don't you know it is now both immoral and criminal to think beyond the next quarterly report?
    7. Re:HDMI is most beneficial for AUDIO by AnyNoMouse · · Score: 1

      The DD bitrate is 640kb currently on the 360, but you can't compare that directly to 1.5Mb DTS. It's like comparing AAC or WMA to MP3. Not saying that 640k DD is superior to 1.5Mb DTS, but don't fall into the trap of thinking that it's necessarily superior either.

      The problem with the current 360 DD output is that it is set to "night" mode playback. Apparently, in order to be license compliant, if you don't offer a user controllable setting to turn night mode on or off, you have to default to always on. The upcoming patch will not only add a DTS setting, but a Night Mode setting that is defaulted to off as well. Both DTS and DD will sound far better than DD currently sounds on the 360 add on.

      Also, just a note, my 360's fans aren't very loud. Sure, the DVD drive is a bit noisy (but apparently not as loud as others are), but the whole system is whisper quiet when I'm playing a movie through the HD-DVD player.

      --
      -Redundancy Man strikes again!
    8. Re:HDMI is most beneficial for AUDIO by poot_rootbeer · · Score: 2, Interesting

      With HD DVD content sporting DD+/TrueHD, and DTS HD audio that currently can't be handled over optical, HDMI provides us with a way of supporting that.

      Correct me if I'm wrong, but isn't the audio wiring within an HDMI cable electrically identical to an S/PDIF coaxial link?

    9. Re:HDMI is most beneficial for AUDIO by iainl · · Score: 1

      Really? With most films I hadn't noticed, but the dynamic range on M:i:III the other night was compressed to hell and back, and sounded pretty awful. So that's great news.

      I agree that DD generally seems to be more efficient than DTS, but in my experience it's not _that_ superior that good old 1.5Mb DTS won't be an improvement.

      I've heard a few 360s, and yes - some are quieter than mine. It's a right pain, but I've heard easily enough horror stories to warn me off invalidating the warranty to do anything about it so far.

      By the way, have you heard anything more on when we might expect such updates? The last I heard the HD-DVD one had been seperated from the main Spring update (which I'm guessing for sometime in March, based on when the last two came), and presumably that means its coming sooner, but how much sooner I've no idea. Before my Potter 4 disc arrives would be amazing.

      --
      "I Know You Are But What Am I?"
    10. Re:HDMI is most beneficial for AUDIO by benwaggoner · · Score: 1

      A couple of notes about HD DVD audio:

      There's no real need for recievers to support the new codecs. Since HD DVD can have three simultaneous audio tracks going at once (e.g. Main audio, commentary audio, and menu GUI feedback), the player itself decodes all three streams to PCM, mixes them together, and either recompresses them to the selected output codec or leaves them as PCM for HDMI.

      Also, there's an upgrade coming for the HD DVD player for the current Xbox allowing DTS audio instead of just Dolby. DTS is less compressed. There are other improvements in audio quality coming in that as well.

    11. Re:HDMI is most beneficial for AUDIO by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Are you serious?

      Situation 1 : Person listens to something new, thinks "wow, that sounds better than what I'm used to, I enjoy that, I'll get it". This makes sense.

      Situation 2 : Person listens to something new, thinks "oh, that's just like what I'm used to, I'm indifferent, but if I listen to it long enough I bet other things will sound worse. I'll get it". This doesn't make sense. The person doesn't benefit in any way.

      You appear to be advocating Situation 2. Can you explain why?

    12. Re:HDMI is most beneficial for AUDIO by Nozsd · · Score: 1

      You may think your A52/AC3 5.1 dolby digital compressed surround sound is good, but uncompressed TrueHD/DTS HD BLOWS IT AWAY.

      You're probably right about that, but honestly, how can a person possibly tell the difference unless they use a measuring device? I bet 99% of people out there won't be able to hear the difference between the two. Personally, if the number of speakers are the same, I can't tell the difference between CD audio and something of higher quality. Console manufacturers are really going overboard with all this HD crap. It increases the cost of the console tremendously without providing any serious benefit at all.

      The real shame about the 360 Elite is that it will NOT use the cooler running 65nm processors (no 65nm, no 65nm). Having that would have been much more preferable than a DRM ladened a/v port.

      --
      When you have finished this cup of coffee your adventure will begin again.
    13. Re:HDMI is most beneficial for AUDIO by Seumas · · Score: 1

      Since I haven't heard HD audio, I'll have to remain skeptical. All I can say is that I have not seen any videogame for the XBOX that supports anything more than DTS 5.1, so it would seem the point of having HDMI on an XBOX is rather moot.

      What content currently provides HD audio? I have a Denon 4306 tuner and a Bowers & Wilkins 8xx series speaker setup so I'm completely prepared for whatever tech has to throw at me audio-wise in the foreseeable future, but I have yet to see much content in that format.

      Also, I haven't found any decent tuners with many HDMI inputs on them. One or two seems typical. What are you going to do when your PS3, XBOX, HD-DVD and Blue-Ray DVD players and your cable box all require HDMI? Start plugging them directly into your television? Meh.

      Anyway, the issue here is "what is the point of HDMI on the xbox 360". So far, I see none. The 360 only does 1080i on videogames. It does 5.1 on the audio. I see no need for anything beyond a high quality set of component cables for this.

    14. Re:HDMI is most beneficial for AUDIO by Belial6 · · Score: 1

      That would be an argument AGAINST going HDMI. If you don't notice the improvement, but then will notice the poorer quality if you go back, you have made a bad choice with the move. That is like taking a drug that doesn't get you high, but gives you withdrawals anyway.

    15. Re:HDMI is most beneficial for AUDIO by suv4x4 · · Score: 1

      The only thing I'm still missing is the option to go past 24p. If you've ever seen sports or anything else fast-moving high action in 720p60 progressive, you'll wonder how you ever survived with 24p/30i. They can quote whatever artistic reasons they want but 60p would improve a lot of movies IMO.

      It would, but it'll obsolete all 24fps cinemas out there. Unlike higher definition sound and picture, framerate isn't so trivial to convert (and ending with good quality motion video).

      Also not to forget that 60fps vs 24fps movies means x2.5 more frames in a movie. It's bad enough for normal editing, but imagine how it'll blow up the costs of action films and sci-fi (which has tons of digital editing and rendering done per frame).

    16. Re:HDMI is most beneficial for AUDIO by AnyNoMouse · · Score: 1

      I agree that DD generally seems to be more efficient than DTS, but in my experience it's not _that_ superior that good old 1.5Mb DTS won't be an improvement.
      I've never taken one myself, but I've heard most people can't pick the "better" track in double-blind tests. The major differences between the two formats, however, seems to be that A) DTS is 3 DB louder than DD and B) when both versions were on DVD (at much lower bitrates), they rarely used the same mix.

      By the way, have you heard anything more on when we might expect such updates? The last I heard the HD-DVD one had been seperated from the main Spring update (which I'm guessing for sometime in March, based on when the last two came), and presumably that means its coming sooner, but how much sooner I've no idea. Before my Potter 4 disc arrives would be amazing.
      I've heard the same thing... I suspect the delay has more to do with fixing disk issues (some HD-DVD titles don't play properly on the 360) than the audio issues. There's only a couple of days left in March, so I'm not expecting either update until next month. Kind of sucks as I've put off watching my HD-DVDs until the issue's been resolved...

      --
      -Redundancy Man strikes again!
    17. Re:HDMI is most beneficial for AUDIO by hudsonhawk · · Score: 1

      Also, there's an upgrade coming for the HD DVD player for the current Xbox allowing DTS audio instead of just Dolby. DTS is less compressed. There are other improvements in audio quality coming in that as well.


      Do you have a source for this? Because if that's true I'd be extremely excited. That would address my main complaint about the 360's HD-DVD capabilities.
    18. Re:HDMI is most beneficial for AUDIO by tshak · · Score: 1

      doubt 95% of the people would be able to tell the difference, 4.9% wouldn't be "BLOWN AWAY" and the last 0.1% is you
       
      ... the elite ...

      --

      There is no longer anything that can be done with computers that is nontrivial and clearly legal. -- Paul Phillips
    19. Re:HDMI is most beneficial for AUDIO by brandond1976 · · Score: 1

      Check his profile. He is "Program Manger for Video Encoding in the Professional Content Group at Microsoft". Which he needs to update since Professional Content Group is now Consumer Media Technology.

  19. goddammit!!! by rucs_hack · · Score: 1

    I saw the title and thought "at last! David Braben's going to make the game!".

    I am so disappointed..

    (How he could do it well without Ian Bell is anyones guess however)

    1. Re:goddammit!!! by Pond823 · · Score: 1

      Yes if someone wants to really win the console war they'll do an updated version of Elite using Wii remote controls. I've still got a bone to pick with those Thargons.

    2. Re:goddammit!!! by sjf · · Score: 1

      Yes, my reaction too. On the otherhand, it seems like the perfect candidate for XBLA. I'd buy it - and I've managed to resist buying any other XBLA games.

  20. Hard Target by SuperKendall · · Score: 1

    The target audience obviously isn't anyone who already has an XBox 360, for that matter.

    If so, that is a huge problem for Microsoft - because they already have all the people that are the "core gamers", that buy systems early. How are they going to convince the more casual remainder to go to a system that is even labeled as "elite"?

    --
    "There is more worth loving than we have strength to love." - Brian Jay Stanley
    1. Re:Hard Target by BlueTrin · · Score: 1
      They plan to convince people who didn't buy yet a PS3. The PS3 is quite new in Europe ... They just launched a product quite similar (in appearance) but cheaper. People when they buy a console look for:
      • Specs - not the useful specs but the things they can understand - like does it have HDMI
      • Games they like (in my case like many other people I will buy a console almost only to play Final Fantasy)
      • Friends who have the same console to swap games or in some case so they can exchange their console with their friends and play games on both consoles ...
      • Gagets stuff that they almost never use, like DVD or blue ray capabilities, because alot of them are not really uber geeks and do NOT have a PC fitted with blue ray and/or HD DVD.
      • A new one is online gaming capabilities ... in this case PS3 online is alit bit inferior but it is free ! IMHO it should be free, MS should not charge to use it but charge only on companies using the Live! system ...
      --
      Don't you know it is now both immoral and criminal to think beyond the next quarterly report?
  21. I think Sony found a price point by bunbuntheminilop · · Score: 4, Insightful
    and M$, while watching the sales of the ps3, and realised that the older demographic that they are targeting is willing to pay more for a console.

  22. $180 for 120 gig drive what a load of BS by Is0m0rph · · Score: 1

    How about discontuing the 20 gig and sell the 120 gig for $100 or less. Throw the owners of the better looking pro 360 a bone. Guess if MS won't sell a 120 gig drive for a reasonable price I'll save my money and not download shit from Live that I would need the 120 gig for. Thanks for saving me money MS!

    1. Re:$180 for 120 gig drive what a load of BS by DrEldarion · · Score: 1

      Hah! You're talking about the same people that sell a $20 802.11g adapter for $100. Complete rip-off artists. It's cheaper to buy a nice, shiny new router and use it as a bridge than to get the adapter.

    2. Re:$180 for 120 gig drive what a load of BS by geminidomino · · Score: 1

      Can you recommend a router or WAP that can do bridging? All of the consumer ones I've tried seem to want to cripple that particular functionality out of it and I'm tired of having a wire running across my bedroom floor between two switches.

    3. Re:$180 for 120 gig drive what a load of BS by UserChrisCanter4 · · Score: 1

      $45 Linksys WRT54G (don't bother with the more expensive L-version if you're only looking for a bridge, but do bother if you're replacing your main router). Install DD-WRT. Bridging either in client mode or to a separate NAT subnet are now enabled.

    4. Re:$180 for 120 gig drive what a load of BS by geminidomino · · Score: 1

      Thanks, I'll try it.

  23. Someone else gets XBMC first by SuperKendall · · Score: 1

    $180 for 120GB hdd is a bit steep, hopefully the Elite hdd signature can be used to replace the original 20GB hdd with a generic 120GB hdd.
    Now that it's got HDMI all we need is XBMC on it :)


    The really funny thing is that well before we see XBMC running on this, it will be up and running on the AppleTV!

    The AppleTV has a smaller drive, but you can replace the drive on an AppleTV and it's much smaller and quieter (probably even than the Elite).

    --
    "There is more worth loving than we have strength to love." - Brian Jay Stanley
    1. Re:Someone else gets XBMC first by Anubis350 · · Score: 1

      Wouldn't that be good for MS? I seem to remember that MS sells the consoles at a loss and makes their profit on game licenses. In that case, people buying the 360 just to mod it *cost* MS money....

      --
      "goodbye and hello, as always" ~Prince Corwin, from Zelazny's Amber series
  24. Racist cracka'. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    n/t

  25. This sucks. by Cyno01 · · Score: 3, Interesting

    I understand they weren't gonna canibalize sales of their $100 wireless adaptor, but c'mon, they could have included HD-DVD in the thing... $80 more for an extra 100GB and HDMI?

    --
    "Sic Semper Tyrannosaurus Rex."
    1. Re:This sucks. by MojoStan · · Score: 2, Informative

      $80 more for an extra 100GB and HDMI? The Elite also replaces the wired headset ($20 seperately) with a wireless headset ($60). A 120GB 2.5" notebook hard drive (which the Xbox 360 uses) costs $80 at Newegg, while 20GB costs $30. HDMI output requires at least one more non-cheap chip and additional licensing costs (probably cheap). All that seems reasonably close to $80 in added costs to manufacture the Xbox 360 Elite.

      However, I am somewhat surprised MS isn't pricing the Elite at $400 (current price for Premium bundle) and reducing the price of the Premium bundle. The Xbox 360 has been out for about 16 months, right? The costs of other components have come down significantly since then. I also assumed that more video downloads ($6 for new HD movies) from their popular TV/movie download service would offset some of these added costs.

      I guess MS doesn't want to keep losing money on each console sold.

      --
      TO START
      PRESS ANY KEY

      Where's the 'ANY' key? I see Esk, Kitarl, and Pig-Up...

    2. Re:This sucks. by PSXer · · Score: 1

      Nope, the headset is still wired, according to this promo pic.

      It's funny how the promo pics never show the power brick. I wonder if it's black instead of the original's gray. Also, what is that short cable that's between the HDMI cable and the component/composite cable? I can't really tell as the resolution is too small, and it doesn't seem to be mentioned anywhere. Looks like it has a red RCA jack, a yellow one, and maybe S-video?

      By the way: obligatory Penny Arcade strip

    3. Re:This sucks. by SteelCougar307 · · Score: 1

      Also, what is that short cable that's between the HDMI cable and the component/composite cable? I can't really tell as the resolution is too small, and it doesn't seem to be mentioned anywhere. Looks like it has a red RCA jack, a yellow one, and maybe S-video? Its an "audio only" cable for people that can only receive the video from HDMI, ie. your TV has HDMI but your receiver has optical, or you use a DVI adapter which does not carry audio, etc. The cable has red/white RCA and optical audio connections. Major Nelson and Albert talk about it on "The one about the Xbox 360 Elite" blogcast.
  26. Who asked for $500 PS3? by ThePhilips · · Score: 1

    Who asked for $500 PS3?

    By all means it seems MS has heard you!

    --
    All hope abandon ye who enter here.
  27. Re:Hardly elite CONTROLLER by transami · · Score: 4, Interesting

    I would be happy to agree that the XBox rocks, but I have one glaring problem: I hate the controller. I have never liked the XBox controller and it's not for the lack of trying. But it just feels clumsy compared to the PlayStation's. I know that others will not understand this and probably think it silly if they don't have the same problem, but really the controller is the interface to everything. And if one doesn't feel comfortable with it, then everything else is moot. I think game machine designers should take note of that and consider offering a variety of controllers types.

    --
    :T:R:A:N:S:
  28. Hm. I just got Appled by MS. by MrPerfekt · · Score: 1

    I just got my 360 a few weeks ago. About 3 weeks if I recall. Now I'm out of date, something that Apple does to me on a regular basis.

    Oh well. The HDMI I can probably live without even though I have a TV that supports it. The bigger hard drive would certainly be nice though. I think the reason for the HDMI has less to do with "hey, this is cool, high-res and digital" and more to do with "hey, you're using HDCP now!".

    --
    I just wasted your mod points! HA!
    1. Re:Hm. I just got Appled by MS. by Paradigm_Complex · · Score: 1

      With your mentality one should pretty much never, ever buy electronics. I bought my 3G black-and-white-screen iPod quite a ways back. Now they have new-fangled colour screens and play videos. The thing is, however, I don't care for that - all I wanted to do is listen to my music. I guess a colour screen would be nice, but not enough to wait for. If you don't want to get "Appled" as you put it, just wait for a product that has what you want at price you'll accept. If no such thing exists, then wait. Technology has a habit of making the device you want eventually.

      --
      "A witty saying proves nothing." - Voltaire
    2. Re:Hm. I just got Appled by MS. by kris2112 · · Score: 1

      Seeing as your 360 no longer works, send it to me and I'll make sure it's disposed of properly.

  29. So... by Namarrgon · · Score: 1

    First you say it's not worth buying, then you say people are going to be pissed off that they didn't buy one. Which is it?

    Personally, I have no problem with extra choices (though some people do). I just want a bigger HDD - and I'd rather not pay US$180 for it, thanks MS, m'kay?

    --
    Why would anyone engrave "Elbereth"?
  30. Does anyone believe them about it *not*.. by Channard · · Score: 1

    ... eventually replacing the standard 360? They say it's going to stay a separate new SKU, but MS also denied that the Elite existed in the first place.

  31. Re:Hardly elite CONTROLLER by CyberNigma · · Score: 1

    There's absolutely nothing wrong with that. For different people there's no right or wrong controller. I love the XBox Controller-S (I hated the original, big, clunky one) so much that I use it to play PC games (WoW-360 mod for World of Warcraft, FPS games, not RTS though lol) as well as XBox games. I think the fact that it has triggers are pretty intuitive for FPS shooters as well as nice offset control sticks. I have a hard time using the PS2 controllers (which I also have) as I can't stand the shoulder buttons. That's just my hand preference though. Ultimately it would be nice if the controllers were somewhat compatible with each other so people can use whatever controller they want.

  32. I'll get one just for HDMI by Another+AC · · Score: 1
    I'm probably in the tiny minority here.. but I'm at least going to get one just for the HDMI port..

    And not because HDMI looks better than component either.. just because I ran out of component ports in my TV but I still have an HDMI one!

    My TV's got 2 HDMI, 2 Component, and 3 composite inputs.. it's also got one optical audio out which plugs in nicely to my cheapo receiver's one optical audio in.

    Currently, I have my cable box hooked up via HDMI, my Xbox 360 and Wii via component, my old modded xbox and chessvision! via composite. It's all fine, except my old xbox looks like crap on composite! AND, my xbox 360 isn't using 5.1 audio (which would be nice for the HD DVD drive!)

    Finally! I'll be able to move the xbox 360 to HDMI, meaning digital surround sound audio, and move my old xbox to component, meaning it's hd again! And, I've already got an HD DVD drive, so no big deal it doesn't come with it, and, I've got an ethernet cable so not too big a deal it doesn't come with wireless (though I REALLY don't understand why not.. actually wait, I do! It's because IPTV isn't going to work for crap over wireless.. so they want everybody to hook up their xboxes with real cable!)

    Just sayin'...

    1. Re:I'll get one just for HDMI by MrJynxx · · Score: 1

      So your going to buy another 360 just to put your xbox1 on component?

      Personally I'm REALLY hoping they have some type of conversion cable to HDMI for existing owners (looks like it's a no). My TV doesn't support 1080p over SVGA (damn sony's!) but over HDMI it should work. I only want HDMI for audio / HD-DVD, but i have noticed a few games appear to support 1080p (GRAW 2 has it listed), so I'd like to see if there is any differences..

      On the PS3 I noticed a remarkable difference when I went from my old HDTV(1080i) -> Sony SXRD(1080p) for gran turismoHD, it actually looked like a different game. I doubt GRAW2 will see that type of improvement, but I'd love to see.

    2. Re:I'll get one just for HDMI by RyuuzakiTetsuya · · Score: 1

      The original Xbox supports output via component btw...

      --
      Non impediti ratione cogitationus.
    3. Re:I'll get one just for HDMI by LeninZhiv · · Score: 1

      If I had the setup you describe I'd think the money would be better spent on upgrading your receiver than buying a second 360. Instead of using up your last digital input, you could open things up and have a bunch more digital audio and HDMI inputs at your disposal for whatever may come down the pipe in the next few years.

  33. $479... bargain! by AmiMoJo · · Score: 1

    $479... That's cheaper than the premium bundle at £299... oh, wait...

    We Brits love taking it up the arse. Fortunately, I am leaving soon, but I pity those other unfortunates.

    --
    const int one = 65536; (Silvermoon, Texture.cs)
    SJW, n: "Someone I don't like, and by the way I'm a fuckwit" - AC
    1. Re:$479... bargain! by Duds · · Score: 1

      The premium bundle is £279, not £299. The £279 includes tax, $479 doesn't.

      The premium bundle in the UK is $455+tax.

    2. Re:$479... bargain! by Rik+Sweeney · · Score: 1

      Nope, you're wrong too. Everyone knows that in the UK all they do is replace

      $479

      with

      £479

      because that makes sense!

    3. Re:$479... bargain! by Duds · · Score: 1

      Except that they don't, that's not true with any current console.

    4. Re:$479... bargain! by iainl · · Score: 1

      Not only is the Premium bundle actually £279, but it can quite easily be found in Blockbuster for £249, and bundled with a whole load of good stuff for something more akin to the £279 normal price if you want it.

      --
      "I Know You Are But What Am I?"
    5. Re:$479... bargain! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      there was a nice bonfire of jokes out there. and then came Duds (100643) and pissed all over it.

  34. Re:Congratulations Microsoft! by Duds · · Score: 1

    What, because they launched a special edition?

    Minus the black, this will be the standard machine and the standard price in 6 months.

  35. Not the Braben/Bell Game Reissued, Then by icarusfall · · Score: 0, Redundant

    Dammit, and I was hoping this was going to be an announcement that an updated Elite game was going to be released on the 360. That could almost have tempted me to buy one.

    1. Re:Not the Braben/Bell Game Reissued, Then by Alioth · · Score: 1
  36. Re: Elite (systems) by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
    Does this mean that the name "Elite" can be used to market games again, not sure Mr Braben would agree

    Well there is an entire games publisher called "Elite(R)" (I think the name was chosen in a C+VG readers' contest back in the days of type-in listings). They are still going (since 1984) with original people. Their 200 SKUs outnumber Mr Braben's masterpieces anyway. So they might have a better claim to be upset with microsoft than braben or bell.

  37. Re:Hardly elite CONTROLLER by fahrvergnugen · · Score: 1

    I'll agree that the original XBox controllers were sub-par, but the 360 controller is pretty much the perfect blend of size, shape, and weight. They got it 99.9% right (I wish start / select were a little further removed from Guide).

    Try one if you haven't. It's night & day.

    --
    Even Jesus hates listening to Creed.
  38. DRM *is* the keyword by DrYak · · Score: 1

    there is no benefit to using HDMI instead of a component-cable. Second, by using HDMI, you are actually submitting to HDCP (DRM, content control stuff).


    The DRM support *is* the benefit that Microsoft sees into the new XBox.

    See, for this new generations of consoles, there are two route to provide newer home video experience.

    1. - The new generation of HD media. The hopes of the company is that the console will also be bought and used like DVD based console did in previous generation : not only to play games, but also to rent DVDs from Blockbuster and watch them.
      The current problems are :
      • Market hasn't settled for a new standart yet. There's still battle going between HD-DVD and BlueRay.
      • HD-media aren't that much available for sell. (They are nearly absent in some markets)
      • Is cost expensive, specially for the blue laser used in Sony products.
      • Console maker doesn't have a share of the money earned by the Disc seller/renter.

    2. You have an HD console, the console is connected to the Net : Rent movies on the wire !
      For that to work, the console needs to have :
      o some DRM compliant piece of shit (hence the HDCP)
      o bigger drives to hold the downloaded movie for the period of time that is allowed.
      The rest they have it already :
      • The have a supposedly secure system that won't facilitate copying (or that's what they're thinking...)
      • The consoles already have HD support, surround support, newer compression scheme (H264 and such) support.
      • They have, and especially Microsoft, an existing standarised and unified network managing players account, handling player subscription and payment, download of content and such. Microsoft could leverage the exsiting XBox Live Network to distribute DRM-restricted movies, at low price.

      What Microsoft could earn :
      • They get money coming from the business (unlike the physical media renting/buying scheme)
      • They have DRM thus making the whole stuff non portable and forcing people to now buy an XBox Elite - even if they have another XBox - and later forcing people to rebuy newer version of the file for the next XBox ]I[ or XBox/Zune portable - with an upgrade discount lasting the first year of introduction. (and subsequently they can go for the Steve Jobs' "Media company made me do it !" defense if anyone is making commentary about the "have to rebuy everything you own already" policy that comes with DRM)



    For me, the Elite version looks exactly like the HD-DVD add-on : nothing more than a technique to have a foot into the potentially lucrative market of HD movie. In fact, Microsoft has officially made a public statement that they don't inted to release special HD-DVD games.
    --
    "Sufficiently advanced satire is indistinguishable from reality." - [Tips: 1DrYakQDKCQ6y52z6QbnkxHXAocMZJE61o ]
  39. The reason they didn't include HD-DVD by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    The Financial Times cites an analyst that claims that not including HD-DVD is an acknowledgement by MS that Blu-ray will win the format war against HD-DVD.

  40. Xbox 360 Elite Live Family Special Business soon by unity100 · · Score: 1

    - price $3600

    will not work with the present xbox games you have, will not work with the present tv you have. you have to buy at least $1500 worth LCD or Plasma to be able to play games with it. also, the new Xbox 360 Elite Live Family Special Business will be much slower in any operation than its predecessors, but rest assured you will have an easy mind knowing that copyrights of major companies are protected with it.

  41. Sounds familiar... by gamer4Life · · Score: 3, Insightful

    Feels like Microsoft is taking a page out of it's Windows business and putting it into the XBox 360. Vista Home Basic, Home Premium, Business, Ultimate... sound familiar? Not to mention tying in games development with Windows so developers feel the need to appeal to a greater audience and therefore develop for the Xbox/PC platform. All this sounds to reminiscent of what it's done to the PC market to the detriment of other platforms like Linux.

  42. Think I'll wait a while myself by Tinman_au · · Score: 1

    I'm going to wait for the "Super Mega Hugmoungous Elite XBox 10k Vista Pro Ultimate" edition that M$ will release next...you know, when they feel sales are starting to flag. It'll make ice cubes too!!

    I'd be semi amazed if any regular /. folks didn't see this coming (and the constant string of "must have" upgrades that M$ will keep releasing in the months/years to come). Console gaming cheaper than PC? Pft, I'll give it 3-5 years before M$ "fix" that little problem...

    1. Re:Think I'll wait a while myself by ab0mb88 · · Score: 1

      I'm going to wait for the "Super Mega Hugmoungous Elite XBox 10k Vista Pro Ultimate" edition that M$ will release next

      You are clearly new to the Microsoft business model. Wait until they release version 2 service pack 1 before you get your XBox, that is the model that will have most of the bugs fixed.

  43. Going to bite them in the ass eventually by Guppy06 · · Score: 2, Insightful

    One of the complaints I had about the PS3 was that, once you bought the cheaper SKU, you're locked into it, unable to "upgrade" it to the more expensive one, which contrasted with the difference between the two versions of the Xbox 360. With this addition of this HDMI port, one that can't be added to the console that's sitting on my shelf, however, the Xbox 360 loses this advantage.

    However, this probably won't affect sales of the Xbox 360 one way or the other. Current owners aren't likely to run out and buy a second Xbox 360 because of it, but they won't be getting rid of their old one either. The real problem, however, will be in a few years when it's time to release the next generation of consoles, and customers start saying "I'm really looking forward to the next Xbox, but I think I'll wait a year or so after launch for the 'elite' version to come out."

    1. Re:Going to bite them in the ass eventually by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      How are you "locked in" to the lower sku Ps3? The only thing you are missing that is not immediately replaceable is the chrome accent. The hard drive is upgradeable, the USB ports make putting media readers on it easily (and much cheaper), you get HDMI, you can upgrade the hard drive yourself (something you can't do once you get a 20GB HDD on the 360... you're stuck with a 20GB until they decide to release an overpriced add-on... like the 120GB HDD), and you can add your own wireless as well (not that you'd really need to... Remote play works on the 20GB just like the 60GB now...)

      So I fail to get where you are "locked in"... other than you save $100 on silly accessories and chrome.... The "elite" 360 is indeed locking you into the older "premium" because you can't just add an HDMI port... So in effect, MS is moving the earlier adopters of their "premium" system to what you would (I assume from your post) consider "locked in" and 2nd class... (Not that HDMI is all that big a deal... so far, neither movie format is even considering using HDCP... so 1080p over component is doable for the foreseeable future...)

      (I've got a "wind tunnel" 360 next to my 20GB PS3 "oven") What I'd like to see is as this "elite" ltd. edition goes away.. the core system having the quieter drive and cooler 65nm chip... that way I can just pop the HDD off my 360 and put it on a new, quieter model. ;) Dunno if you can do that easily with DRM and all.

    2. Re:Going to bite them in the ass eventually by oGMo · · Score: 1

      One of the complaints I had about the PS3 was that, once you bought the cheaper SKU, you're locked into it, unable to "upgrade" it to the more expensive one

      I'm pretty sure that was never a complaint, except by people who haven't even read basic press releases. You can go to the store and pick up as big a HDD as you want, slap it into the cheap PS3, and presto. You can also add USB wifi and memcard readers, if you really want. Of course, by the time you buy all of this, it will have cost you just as much as the more expensive PS3, belying the "PS3 is overpriced" mantra, but you can. And you don't have to buy Sony-branded parts, either, unlike the 360, where you have to pay $100 for a 20G Microsoft-branded drive. ($100 will normally buy you a 250G+ drive these days.)

      Sony has always been wanting to make the Playstation "more like a computer", and here it pays off... I have the 60G model, and I only have 21G left already. And the console is only 4 months old. Gonna need to upgrade before the year is up, probably.

      --

      Don't think of it as a flame---it's more like an argument that does 3d6 fire damage

  44. Where's the NextGen DVD? by FryingDutchman · · Score: 0

    You'd think if they were relegating themselves to re-packaging their flagship console, Microsoft would include the HD-DVD drive. They've already 'committed' to HD-DVD by releasing the dongle for the regular 360's, are they backing down? Would that make it an the PS3 such polar forces that them sharing the same entertainment center would cause a rift in space-time survivable only by insertion of a Wii into the gap?

    Sorry.

    I see this being the first in a chain of minor revisions. How many current 360 owners will buy this one - then the next one with HD-DVD, then the following one with Coax audio, et al.

    Still just wish they had included the HD-DVD.

  45. Re:Worthless.m - CORRECTION (?) by @madeus · · Score: 2, Informative

    Except err, some sites are now reporting that ISN'T the case despite that being touted as part of the rumour on gaming sites everywhere)...

    From Gizmondo:

    Microsoft told us there would be no new hardware inside the Elite except for that 120GB hard drive, alluding to the often-rumored cooler-running processors manufactured with the 65nm process

    I wanted to get one, and was going to give my existing 360 to someone I know who has kids but can't afford a console, and having it run more quietly was a big part of the attraction for me bothering to get a new 360. My TV already handles component well, and that leaves the bigger HD as the only compelling feature (I filled up my 20 GB for the first time ages ago and that's just with Live! games, demo's and trailers - TV/Movie downloads won't be available here in the UK till later this year).

    On it's own, a large HD (that I could get separately) is not a compelling enough reason for me to upgrade. The thing is, I like my 360 and I'm happy to pay a bit more for an improved version of the hardware.

  46. Batman would be impressed! let down to others by thecalster · · Score: 1

    While releasing a Xbox 360 Elite is a great idea, I feel that it's too early for it to come out. If you look at the extra add-ons you get an extra 100GB on your hard drive which will eventually be "must have" for serious Xbox players (Oblivion's expansion pack requires close to 1GB of space). The HDMI cables aren't a big deal to me (and probably a large percentage of 360 ownners) since I don't have a HDTV yet. While releasing an Xbox with HDMI cables is a great idea, the major addition that seems to be lacking from the Elite pack is the HD Drive. If you're going to release an "Elite" Xbox, shouldn't you have all the main accessories? It seems as if Microsoft decided not to include the drive due to cost reasons. I feel that they should have waited until they were able to produce the HD Elite version at a cheaper price and include the HD Drive in it. They tried to embrace the HD market, but excluding the HD drive from this edition might hurt them.

  47. I'd like to know.... by Grimmreaper74 · · Score: 1

    What happen to the Elite having an HD DVD player installed?

    --
    Live life to the fullest, you only get one chance at it.
  48. Re:Hardly elite CONTROLLER by TravisO · · Score: 1

    I'm also very picky about controllers (I NEVER like 3rd party ones) but I love the 360 controller. The PS style one is fine, but I think the 360's is my favorite now-a-days and I have to agree with the last guy who mentioned the triggers, I think they feel much better for FPSs (which currently dominate the game genre lately).

  49. Xbox Live Video? by TimeForGuinness · · Score: 1

    Sorry, a little new to the game on the Xbox Live Video, but why are they promoting it in conjunction with HD-DVD?

    Why invest in an HD-DVD player when 720p looks darn good?

    For that matter, why even invest in HD-DVD or Blu-ray if HD downloading is here? (granted you need high speed access and time to download)
    With AppleTV, XBLV,...it seems like the HD-DVD/Blu-ray is the "mini-disc" step before mp3s became the format of choice.

    1. Re:Xbox Live Video? by *weasel · · Score: 1

      Why invest in an HD-DVD player when 720p looks darn good?

      That's probably why they didn't bother putting HD-DVD into the Elite.

      Microsoft only backed HD-DVD to oppose the PS3.
      They don't really care about either little-plastic-disc format.
      They want to dominate the digital distribution channel.
      --
      // "Can't clowns and pirates just -try- to get along?"
  50. Re: Wireless adapter is more than 'G' by trdrstv · · Score: 1
    Hah! You're talking about the same people that sell a $20 802.11g adapter for $100. Complete rip-off artists. It's cheaper to buy a nice, shiny new router and use it as a bridge than to get the adapter.

    Though I go agree the Adapter is overpriced it should be noted that it does 802.11 b/g & a. Routers that use the faster 'a' protocol cost more than the b & g ones, but yeah... it shouldn't be $99.

  51. i was going to buy this, but... by insanius · · Score: 1

    i don't care about the color of the console or HDMI. i was looking forward to a processor that didn't act as a space heater in my room and a DVD player that didn't sound like an airbus taking off. i guess i'll have to wait a little longer for normal room temperature and decibel level....

  52. Insulted by NVP_Radical_Dreamer · · Score: 1

    Am I the only one who feels insulted by this comment?

    "We don't feel like the Wii customer and the Xbox customer are the same thing," he said. "We think that as soon as the Wii customer turns 14 they want something else."

    This seems like hes trying to say that the only people that buy a wii are kids under 14. I for one find this offensive. Since when does a game have to show extreme violence, language and nudity just to not be lumped into the "for kids" arena?

    There are a bit of fun games for the wii that arent "for kids" such as COD and Trauma Center. Just because nintendo ends up being the console that most "child friendly" developers choose does NOT mean the system is for kids

    --
    The best argument against democracy is a five-minute conversation with the average voter.

    - Winston Churchill
    1. Re:Insulted by trdrstv · · Score: 0, Troll
      This seems like hes trying to say that the only people that buy a wii are kids under 14. I for one find this offensive. Since when does a game have to show extreme violence, language and nudity just to not be lumped into the "for kids" arena?

      Who else but early teens and pre-teens would buy Manhunt 2?

    2. Re:Insulted by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      My ~60 year old father told me about a coworker that got this "Wii" thing for a golf game. The way my dad described it, I think you also have a warped perspective. You've grown up with Japanese cartoons and crap. People older than you just look at the Wii and see it as childish. That may not necessarily bother them, but they do perceive it as very much "for kids".

    3. Re:Insulted by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      People older than you just look at the Wii and see it as childish.

      But that is how they see the PS3 - as a (very expensive) kids toy.

  53. Eagerly Awaiting HDMI on the 360 by BrittShikhouse · · Score: 1

    I'm probably a rare case but I've been waiting for HDMI before I buy a 360. Why? Because I have an older 23" LCD monitor with only DVI-d input that is currently sitting next to my desk waiting to be hooked to a console.

    As the poster with no free component inputs mentioned, the economics of spending an extra $80 on the console compares very favorably with the other options. The extra $80 for the Elite with HDMI plus a few bucks for a HDMI to DVI cable gets me up and running on my existing hardware compared to the possibilities with a non-HDMI 360: sinking a couple hundred dollars for a VGA to DVI-d converter box or hundreds of dollars for a new monitor or HDTV.

    Why not buy a PS3? Because the 360 has the games I want to play (and at reasonable prices used) and watching movies on my console is not a priority. I'll buy an HD-DVD or BR player in a few years when they can be had for $40 and the movies are $5-10 each.

  54. Re:Congratulations Microsoft! by *weasel · · Score: 1

    I'd be surprised if it even takes 6 months.

    But they should've been advertising this as a limited edition.
    It blunts the bad reaction when you realize MS is just charging the more-money-than-sense crowd $80 for black.

    --
    // "Can't clowns and pirates just -try- to get along?"
  55. Re:Hardly elite CONTROLLER by elrous0 · · Score: 1
    Aren't there third party controllers for the 360 that are built just like the PS2 controller? I remember them for the Xbox 1. Surely it wouldn't be that hard for a third party developer to make one. But I agree that it might be good for MS to offer this too.

    I also sympathize with you on the "feel" of a controller that we get used to. I have the opposite problem (can't play with a PS2 controller because I'm too used to the Xbox-style controller). I'm showing my age here, but I remember being very frustrated with the original NES controllers too, since I was so used to the Atari/Commodore style joysticks. I actually bought a "thumbstick" adapter for the NES controller just to get the joystick "feel" back. I never could get used to the flat pad controller.

    --
    SJW: Someone who has run out of real oppression, and has to fake it.
  56. Microsoft System Patch 1- real product release by RichMan · · Score: 1

    Ok so it might work reliably now. The beta test is over and the actual product is shipping.

    only half a ;-)

  57. What are they thinking? by dlim · · Score: 1

    Maybe it's just me. I don't have a TV that supports HDMI. I don't care to replace all my DVDs with BluRay or HD-DVDs, or all my component video / digital audio cables with HDMI ones. So, "Elite"?.... meh.

    What I keep asking myself is "Why now?" I mean these features had been announced for the PS3 for over a year now at least. Did it just take MS this long to copy Sony? Or was it a conscious decision to wait until Sony launched the PS3? I mean the PS3 has been sitting on store shelves for months with more integrated features than the "Elite" 360, and it has only recently received positive attention with the announcement of "Home" and their Second Life clone. So after the public has given a lukewarm reaction to HDMI and a larger hard drive on their competitor's console, they decide to jump in with a "Me Too"? At a higher (w/ HD-DVD and wireless) overall price?

    I don't get it.

    1. Re:What are they thinking? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      If you had a TV that afforded you the opportunity to replace set of componant video with a tiny convienent little HDMI cable, you wouldn't have written this. Granted the improved audio experience is probably the best reason. But seriously, not having to fight cables, a lot of cables, is pretty nice. It's a significant convienence. This coming from 360 pro owner (with 1 free HDMI port).

      It should be mentioned with the downloads off Xbox Live it's pretty easy to fill up a 20 GB (14 usable) hd. Especially with the HD video and game demos which can often be a gig, and in some cases are pretty servicable as games in their own right.

    2. Re:What are they thinking? by KirkH · · Score: 1

      The Elite doesn't *only* support HDMI. You can still connect it up to your component, S-, or composite video.

      As for why now? Price. The probably made sacrifices on the initial design based on price (for the larger HDD) or compatibility (for HDMI). Now that they've reduced the overall cost of the box, they can add in more features. Now that the HDMI standard is more mature, they can add that in as well. This "Elite" moniker and the $480 price are probably temporary. They'll merge in all these features (minus the black color) into the $399 box before too long, I'd bet.

      Every console goes through revisions. This is just the first one for the 360, I'm sure.

  58. More versatile than Apple TV by Bones3D_mac · · Score: 1

    Despite being a long-term Mac user and owning a 5G iPod, I still consider the XBox 360 as being the far more worthwhile set-top device when faced with the Apple TV. Apple TV may look pretty, but it lacks several key elements that could keep the Apple TV out of the hands of the non-Mac using population.

    First, it seems almost too dependent on iTunes. If you look around at some of the early adopter reports, you can't access your iTMS paid content without at least one copy of the content stored on the machine your Apple TV box is synced with... even if you copy the files directly onto the Apple TV drive itself and give it internet access to verify the files with iTMS before playback. (For most Mac users, this means having the files crowding your primary HD.) This is a limitation that even most iPod users don't have to face.

    Next, there's no support for us non-HDTV users who are perfectly comfortable using their current low-definition displays. If Microsoft would only open the 360's supported playback codecs to included several of the non-Windows Media content formats common to the typical Mac user, utilities like Connect360 would become significantly more useful in allowing Microsoft to take control of the market. Otherwise such users are just going to invest in a 5G iPod and a remote-control based interface to get around the lack of low-definition support.

    Finally, the 360 has the added value of games. Not just the fancy 3D titles, but the entire XBox Live Arcade collection. The Apple TV docs specifically say it won't support the 5G iPod games (a huge mistake, IMHO), and the 5G iPods themselves won't play these games on any other screen than the built-in display. One should never completely overlook gaming options when trying to pitch a set-top box to non-techie users. It's hard to explain the value of a $300-400 device that isn't merely a DVD player or a game machine.

    Side-by-side, the XBox 360 is just going to put on a much better show, simply baded on features alone. If it wasn't for the fact that I don't particularly need an all-in-one set-top media player setup, I'd probably be giving the new 360 model some consideration. However, given that the file size restrictions for XBox Live Arcade downloads is much more lax now, users may quickly find themselves needing more than 20GB of storage.

    As for the media content, something like a slingbox-connected Mac Mini could handle most of what Apple TV already does, only without the imposed annoyances.

    --


    8==8 Bones 8==8
    1. Re:More versatile than Apple TV by thecalster · · Score: 1

      Agreed! I never thought about looking at the 360 in comparison to the iTV. When you look at it that way the 360 is the best media center out there.

  59. Re:Congratulations Microsoft! by Duds · · Score: 1

    Well an actually limited edition elite would be kinda cool. Now it's just an expensive version of same.

  60. Re:Worthless.m - CORRECTION (?) by Das+Modell · · Score: 1

    I'm saving up for the X360 and I was going to get the Elite because I naturally assumed that it would have the new 65 nm CPU. But nooo...

    I will probably end up buying a Premium when they start incorporating 65 nm CPUs into them. I like the white color and I have no need for a 120 Gb HDD, and probably no need for HDMI either. Just how long can it take for MS to get the new CPUs into production?

  61. Sigh. Close, but no banana by SpryGuy · · Score: 1

    I was waiting to buy an XBox until they came out with one that had a built in HD-DVD player. I want a new DVD player that can play HD DVDs, and if I can get a decent gaming console at the same time, more power to me. I was expecting the "refresh" to have this built in. I don't want a separate box hanging around. And I want the DVD player functionality to be well integrated.

    Do I have to wait for an "Ultimate" version? Or am I S.O.L. when I want something so *obvious*?

    --

    - Spryguy
    There are three kinds of people in this world: those that can count and those that can't
  62. re: PS3 content by King_TJ · · Score: 3, Interesting

    As a long-time PC gamer, I can't bring myself to buy an XBox 360 at all. Every time I look at one, I'm reminded that under the fancy plastic casing, it's just a rather non-upgradeable PC inside. There's *never* going to be a single piece of software developed for XBox 360 that can't run identically on a modern PC, because they're using the same architecture. (Of course, the modern PC could very well have a *superior* video card and more RAM....)

    I did, however, buy a PS3 - because the hardware is different. A Blue-Ray drive is something I didn't own yet on any of my hardware, for one thing. And the PowerPC cell architecture is sufficiently different from any PC or Mac I own to make me feel like I'm not just buying the same old thing again, repackaged in a different shell.

    I agree that PS3 content is sorely lacking right now - but it sounds like Sony is taking a pretty long-term view for the PS3 consoles. The last line of their quote in the original article commented on the "value" of buying a PS3 that you'd keep "for the next 10 years". Sure, some of that is just marketing-speak, but it also indicates they envision the PS3 as hardware that will be around for a while.

    I wouldn't say the ports of XBox games for PS3 are "pathetic" though. NHL Hockey '07 was highly rated in every online review I saw. I bought it and I'm impressed with it too. Same with Tiger Woods golf. You're certainly not seeing evidence that it's a "poor" port. Runs every bit as well as the 360 version.

  63. Bleh by Reapman · · Score: 1

    What I really wanted was the new CPU's that apparently run cooler then the existing ones, and I think from what I read on Engadget the Elite won't have em yet. HDMI and a real hard drive would have been nice, but I'm gonna keep on waiting me thinks. And right now my 8 year old TV only supports S-Video anyway until I upgrade later this year.

  64. Re:Hardly elite CONTROLLER by the+dark+hero · · Score: 1

    While i agree that a variety of controllers should be available, i don't understand your fascination with the Playstation controller. To me the Playstation controller is nothing more than a generic input device much like the SNES/Classic Controller from Nintendo. They both have a symetrical design that works, but fails to "fit" into your hands. I'm a fan of the Gamecube Controllers as well as the Xbox 360 Controllers for the fact that they conform to your grip. The Xbox 360 Controller not only fits right, but the analog/button placement is dead on. It seems to me that many people just have a hard time adopting a new controller when the ones they're so familiar with (playstation/snes) feel "the best."

    --
    You constantly struggle for self improvement - and it shows.

    Hooray for bad Engrish on fortune cookies

  65. Upconvert Standard DVDs? by NetJunkie · · Score: 1

    Anyone know if it will upconvert standard DVDs via the HDMI port? My upconverting player just died so may I'll put the money toward this and a trade-in of my launch console that's tooooo loud.

  66. It's all about the #'s by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    If 1/5th of current XB360 users (the one's who are concerned with being 1337!) trade in their regular 360 to get this one, then they will sell ~ 2 million extra 360s. It's all about number cushioning and exploiting the customer, two things which Microsoft has proven to be fully proficient at.

    Can we start referring to them as M$ again now? Or is that still not kosher due to the numerous Halo freaks out there? All I have to say is my PS3 with Linux/BitTorrent puts this thing to shame. If you want an OPEN media player, Sony delievered the goods. Not Apple, not Microsoft. I wish more people would look at the PS3 for what it is, because it was like fully designed to appeal to the average Slashdotter. The 360's popularity around here just proves that all the whining you guys do about proprietary formats, ugly business tactics, and featureless products is all just that: whining. When an open, powerful, and feature packed home Linux machine (the PS3) is released to the public you complain about its price and support the Windows competitor. Did you forget why Billy boy is represented by a Borg? Did you forget about embrace (XBox), extend (360), extinguish (DirectX/XNA)?

    This is the first time Linux has had a chance to make a breakthrough into the home market and the Slashdot geeks - who spend hundreds of dollars on phones, thousands of dollars on video cards and other computer upgrades, and attempts to install Linux on everything from iPods to toasters, won't be the early adopters for the Linux box. Way to screw over everything you believe in for a couple games of Halo.

  67. Re:Worthless.m - CORRECTION (?) by @madeus · · Score: 1

    I believe the HDMI is still going on the Premium as well (in the next few weeks or so).

    The larger HD might actually be useful to you (although YMMV - a lot of other people don't seem bothered about it). I filled up my 20 GB ages ago (some of the demo's are 1-2 GB - and I've got a bunch of free video content on it too now, Live has reasonable amount of cool stuff on it).

    It's in need of a hardware improvement soon though I think - it really is noisy (much more than my Mac Mini is). I don't notice it when playing games, but when I leave it on downloading a bunch of new demos and am watching TV it can be (especially if I'm watching later at night, with the volume turned down). Not sure what the PS3 is like - anyone care to comment?

    The Wii is very quiet, but then it doesn't have much right to be noisy. 8)

  68. Can record from HDMI by benwaggoner · · Score: 2, Interesting

    You can capture from HDMI just fine, if it's not HDCP, which games wouldn't be.

    Check out the Blackmagic Design BHDINT Intensity board ($249).

    1. Re:Can record from HDMI by RyuuzakiTetsuya · · Score: 1

      ...

      I think I love you.

      --
      Non impediti ratione cogitationus.
  69. This is what I've been wanting. by bigdady92 · · Score: 1

    HDMI-1 cable to plugin and run all my stuff. no need for 5 cables, 5 plugs even if they are all bundled together. 1 simple easy cable

    Bigger HD-20GB is not enough. HD content alone would fill that up in a few shows. 120GB I now have breathing room to use this.

    Quieter DVD- I believe this is coming with the new gen DVD player that is a helluva lot quieter than the previous one.

    Cooler CPU- I heard there is a die shrink. Is this one that qualifies on it? I hope so. I hate the furnace that the existing one is.

    Black- my 47" LCD tv is black, Reciever is black, stand is black, speakers black, smokey glass cover hides most displays but that garish xbox360. Black appeals to the eye.

    All in all when the prices drops to the current level of platinum I'll get it. I don't care about wireless A/B/G. I'll get an adaptor for it if I so choose as I don't do online games or connect for updates. I leave it offline.

    If the bundled the HD player in with it, then it'd be so hard not to splurge on it right away. sigh...

    --
    Wheel of Time: Book by Book and Sumview (summary review) Bigdady92 style: http://bigdady92.blogspot.com/
    1. Re:This is what I've been wanting. by Kenshin · · Score: 1

      "Black appeals to the eye."

      Black appeals to your eye.

      I still prefer the white one. I just wish it was getting the upgrade.

      --

      Does it make you happy you're so strange?

    2. Re:This is what I've been wanting. by Zed2K · · Score: 1

      This is not the cooler CPU, and there is no info that the drive is quieter. You'll soon realize how small 120GB is also, its not as big as you think when dealing with HD movies and shows.

  70. But is it quieter by tgibbs · · Score: 1

    For me, the noise level is the one thing that might convince me to upgrade, if it actually is quieter. Whether or not it includes the new processor, it could have better sound insulation, for example.

  71. Shocked... by supaneko · · Score: 1

    Am I the only one who is a little ticked that Microsoft is just now releasing this? If I would have known that Microsoft was going to release a "better" version of the 360, I would have held off and purchased this elite package instead of the premium. For another $80 and just a few months of waiting I could have purchased the top 360 package which I would have been pleased with. Now I feel like I am a little screwed because I didn't wait long enough to adopt something that I thought was already "finished." I would have thought that Microsoft would have offered some sort of rebate program for those who had already adopted their 360. You know, return their premium 360 and receive an elite 360 for a reduced price. I'm quite disappointed to say the least.

  72. Blu-ray next? by Mongoose · · Score: 1

    It's also interesting there is some speculation has already started over weather Microsoft will release a Blu-ray add-on now. I have to say I agree with the articles coming out this 'validates' the PS3. I know several people that got the '20GB model' and upgraded the HDD for more capacity. Here's an article I didn't see linked above:

    http://www.gamesindustry.biz/content_page.php?aid= 23840

  73. The reason for the $180 hard drive by Toasty16 · · Score: 1

    MS will drop the price of the 120GB hard drive as soon as all Core 360 SKUs are off the market, so that people who don't care about HDMI won't go buying a Core + hard drive at the same price as an Elite 360.

    Think about it, if the new hard drive cost less than $180, then it would make sense for new 360 buyers who don't need HDMI to buy a Core 360 and an accompanying drive at a cheaper price than the Elite 360, whereas with the current price points it's a better option for them to splurge on an Elite. This is product positioning 101, always make the case for the upsell!

  74. Are we SURE the new processor isn't in there? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Is it safe to assume that there isn't a new processor yet? I can see them deciding not to emphasize that in a press release: "NEW - no longer melts your circuit board!". Maybe it's in there but they couldn't find a way to spin it without admitting to mistakes.

    If someone has confirmation either way, I'd love to hear it. Yeah, I want a gaming machine but more importantly I want a v2 media extender and don't want to strain to hear my shows over the cooling fans.

  75. Re: PS3 content by Gulthek · · Score: 3, Interesting

    Why did you buy ports of the XBox 360 games for the PS3 when you, as you stipulate, could have bought them on a PC?

    Is it because playing some games on a console is more fun? If so, then what is the difference between a PS3 and an XBox 360 again?

    Of course the PS3 will be around in ten years, it'll just be two hardware cycles behind the PS5.

  76. And the wii... by bluefoxlucid · · Score: 1

    ...will still continue to sell out at maximum production until it sells 8-12 million units. If it rides into that near Christmas 2007, it'll get a big enough spike to keep selling out right until January, maybe adding an extra 2-3 million units on top of that before the market relaxes.

  77. Re:Worthless.m - CORRECTION (?) by king-manic · · Score: 1

    The PS3 is very quiet, 780p videos and games demos are available on the store. You can queue downloads but they seem to pause when you play a game or go online. The video playback for DVD/BD/mpegs are top notch. They beat my standalone panasonic player for quality althought he standalone plays a few more formats (some avi, vcd).

    --
    "There are more things in heaven and earth, Horatio, than are dreamt of in your philosophy."
  78. Re: PS3 content by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    As a long-time PC gamer, I can't bring myself to buy an XBox 360 at all. Every time I look at one, I'm reminded that under the fancy plastic casing, it's just a rather non-upgradeable PC inside.

    WTF?

    The original Xbox really is a non-upgradeable PC in a box. x86 chip even. But the 360 uses a custom triple-core PowerPC chip. So IMHO the Xbox 360 is a non-upgradeable PC exactly as much as a Playstation 3 is a non-upgradeable PC.

    Buy what you want, but your stated rationale makes no sense at all.

  79. And it shall be called... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    ..the 133760

  80. 65 nm processor not part of Elite by MrClear · · Score: 1

    And it's too bad, too. I'll wait.

    From http://www.1up.com/do/newsStory?cId=3158254

    Nitty gritty details aside, Penello did say the console is "the same." The almost-a-year-old announcement of a revised chipset -- one that will have the 360 running cooler and quieter -- hasn't bore fruit just yet, as the Elite SKU features the same 90 nm chip currently in Xbox 360 hardware.

  81. Re: PS3 content by flamingweasel · · Score: 1

    As a long-time PC gamer, I can't bring myself to buy an XBox 360 at all. Every time I look at one, I'm reminded that under the fancy plastic casing, it's just a rather non-upgradeable PC inside. There's *never* going to be a single piece of software developed for XBox 360 that can't run identically on a modern PC, because they're using the same architecture
    Uh, no. It's actually a fairly exotic 3 core, in-order CPU. Are you thinking of the original Xbox?
    --
    Cthulhu loves you.
  82. I beg to differ by Cocoshimmy · · Score: 1

    There are certainly some advantages to having HDMI over component:
    1. Higher audio and video quality. As someone else mentioned, audio quality is significantly better whereas video only offers marginal improvements.
    2. HDCP. While it isn't an issue right now, eventually it may become a requirement. If the output protection flag ever gets set then users will be screwed if they don't have a fully compliant video path. This is especially important for STB features for which many of the premium content providers will refuse to offer their content unless you have a protected video path (ex. Cablelabs, HBO and discovery). Whether or not this would actually prevent piracy is another issue altogether, but the fact is the content providers want it.
    3. Gives users more options. If you only have one component input but two devices that use component (blu-ray/hd-dvd player, nintendo wii) then you have the OPTION of using HDMI for the 360 instead of constantly swapping the plugs in the back. Giving the user more options isn't a bad thing
    4. There is only one input instead of FIVE (3 video and 2 audio). Its a pain in the ass to connect 5 colour coded cables especially if your LCD TV is mounted on a wall, is heavy as hell and you cannot see which input is which in the back because of limited space.
    5. Less susceptibility to noise since it's a digital signal (although this is somewhat disputable)

    As for the 120GB hard drive there are PLENTY of reasons to have more space:
    1. If you download lots of video content from the Live marketplace such as full-length movies, tv shows, music videos, game add-ons, etc, then you need a lot of space. Some games and addons such as episodic content, mods, user created games and casual games are available exclusively for download and of course require a lot of space.
    2. Eventually Microsoft will be releasing it's IPTV service which will allow users to use their 360 as a PVR. Obviously this requires plenty of space.
    3. More room to store your own music and videos.

    So stop spewing garbage like "only idiots would be buy this machine". There are plenty of good reasons for many people to go out and buy it, even if they don't apply to you directly.

  83. Re: PS3 content by king-manic · · Score: 3, Informative

    A pendantic note:
    The Xbox also uses PPC cores. Direct X API's make it easy to port but the hardware is not the same as a PC. Although 360 games tend to be PC style games, I can understand what you mean. The details however is that both the Ps3 and 360 and Wii use PPC cores. Likely due to their power efficiancy, thermal efficiancy, and size.

    PS. I own a PS3 and I like it very much. Now if only FFXIII and MGS4 would come out tommorow.

    --
    "There are more things in heaven and earth, Horatio, than are dreamt of in your philosophy."
  84. Re: PS3 content by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    This "under the hood" argument is just plain silly.

    The PC gaming market, with the exception of RTS, FPS, and MMOG games, has largely become the ghetto of gaming. If you are interested in really big budget titles (with the exception of the afformentioned genres), then you unfortunately have no other option but to buy a 360 or PS3. Sorry, but market forces have made it thus. Same goes for last generation (PS2, Xbox, GC) as well.

  85. Re:Worthless.m - CORRECTION (?) by Das+Modell · · Score: 1

    I imagine that 20 Gb is sufficient for disposable content like demos and videos.

    I noticed the PS3 vs. Xbox 360 value comparison by 1UP, and I can't figure out what they were thinking. If I want to play Advanced Warfighter, R6 Vegas, Gears of War, Halo 3 and Mass Effect, what the hell is the "value" of the PS3? You would think a gaming site would know better, but apparently it's all about the hardware and accessories. The quality of a console is defined first and foremost by its games, the rest is secondary.

  86. This is for early adopters by SlowEmotionReplay · · Score: 1

    I'm waiting for the Xbox 360 Elite eXtreme.

  87. I stand corrected.... by King_TJ · · Score: 1

    I was, indeed, still thinking of the original XBox. Now that you point it out, I *do* recall reading that the 360 was going to the PPC architecture ... but the fact just didn't stick in my head, I guess.

    In any case, I still can't help but view it as more like a standard PC than the competition. Perhaps that's partially because Microsoft manufactures them, and tends to only release game title that are "PC like" for it? But you're still getting a little more "exotic" hardware out of a PS3 purchase (blue-ray drive and all).

  88. Waste of Money by Plekto · · Score: 1

    The smart thing to do is just get a used 360, add the HDMI cables and swap out the puny HD with a normal 300 gigger for $100.

    Should be very easy with all of these early adopters tossing their original units.

    1. Re:Waste of Money by Jeremy+Erwin · · Score: 1

      No, it's not an HDMI cable that at issue, but an HDMI socket. The original Xbox 360 has only component video outputs.

      At present, the Component outs are capable of 1080i (or even p). But the HD-DVD spec includes a scheme to downgrade the effective resolution to 540p, if the poor sap of a viewer is using the unencrypted, insecure component connections. An HDMI socket would bypass this issue.

      The other point is that HD-DVD and Bluray both allow lossless soundtracks-- akin to the difference between a CD and an MP3. However, the Xbox360 only had a spdif or coax connection, which lacks the bandwidth required for multichannel PCM. HDMI does, assuming you've got one of those newfangled receivers. (The HD-A1, a consumer HD-DVD player has a multichannel analogue output as well).

    2. Re:Waste of Money by Zed2K · · Score: 1

      And how would you intend to do that since the normal 360 doesn't have an HDMI port and the firmware probably can't support a 300GB HD?

  89. Microsoft's strategy? by gamer4Life · · Score: 1

    I wonder what the reason is to bring the "Elite" version out...

    1) They are trying to phase out the core 360s, so developers don't have to program for them. Bringing an "Elite" version will make the Core version seem that much inadequate, thereby dissuading people from buying it.

    2) They are trying to compete against the PS3. By saying they have a larger hard drive, they can claim an upper hand to the non-technical people who associate a bigger hard drive as the most important factor.

    3) Downloading content will be a key part of their strategy. 20 GB isn't enough for their future plans.

  90. Re:Hardly elite CONTROLLER by davebo357 · · Score: 0

    I relate to what you're saying. I always bought arcade sticks for my consoles. NES, Genesis, SNES and finally Playstation 1. Once it got to playstation 1, there were just too many buttons for an arcade stick. Once the dual shock came out I was real happy with it, and i use the dual schock 2 for a lot of pc games. Even the GTA series i'll walk around with keyboard/mouse, then switch to the dual shock to drive with. I can see the use for the dreamcast-style triggers that the xbox, 360 and ps3 use, but frankly when i'm racing it tends to be pedal-to-the-metal anyway, and prefer a normal button.

    What I do like about the 360 controller is that it came out far enough before the Wii that they didn't try to integrate some half-assed gyroscope. Every ps3 game I've tried that made use of it just felt forced and unwanted. That being said, I'm sure they'll find a good use for it eventually, I'd just rather use the analog stick to steer than being made to "lean".

  91. PS3 better CONTROLLER... for 2D... by trdrstv · · Score: 1
    I would be happy to agree that the XBox rocks, but I have one glaring problem: I hate the controller. I have never liked the XBox controller and it's not for the lack of trying. But it just feels clumsy compared to the PlayStation's. I know that others will not understand this and probably think it silly if they don't have the same problem, but really the controller is the interface to everything. And if one doesn't feel comfortable with it, then everything else is moot. I think game machine designers should take note of that and consider offering a variety of controllers types.

    Ironically, I feel the same way about the PS3. The Playstation controller is based on the SNES design , and in the PS1 era they had the analogs bolted on mid-life. It's a 10 year old design that is suited best for 2D games, not 3D. This is why I wasn't upset for the Wii Classic controller. It is a superior design for the retro titles that are pretty much 2D prior to the N64. For the N64 games, I use a wavebird.

    There is a reason why Microsoft, Nintendo, and Sega put the analog in the primary position. For 3D games it offers superior control in a position that's comfortable. (IE: That's where it belongs.)

  92. HDMI == Next generation DRM, too... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    > While HDMI clearly presents a slight improvement for video (analog vs digital...), its real benefit is next generation audio support.

    And next generation DRM, which is why I'm avoiding it like the plague :/

  93. Bah! by HiggsBison · · Score: 1

    I'm waiting for the Xbox 360 Elite eXtreme.

    I'm waiting for the Xbox 370.

    --
    My other car is a 1984 Nark Avenger.
  94. Prediciton - Universal selling Blu-Ray this year by SuperKendall · · Score: 1

    The HD-DVD vs. Blu-Ray war is FAR from over my friend, be careful with your predictions.

    Like this one?

    I predict that in about four months, Universal will make an announcement they are also going to sell Blu-Ray movies (in addition to HD-DVD titles).

    The simply fact is that current DVD Emporium figures show Blu-Ray now outselling HD-DVD titles about 70% to 30%, trended Amazon data agrees with this assesment.

    As a greater number of big movies come online for Blu-Ray (like Pirates of the Carribean coming out this summer) that spread will only increase.

    There are rumors of large chains coming close to simply not offering HD-DVD in stores. Best-Buy already pushes Blu-Ray very heavily.

    Universal cannot afford to chuck a whole Christmas season of next-gen video profits into the dumpster - for economic reasons alone they will be forced to offer Blu-Ray options for popular titles.

    I also highly doubt a Blu-Ray accessory will ever be available for the 360 since by the time the war is over (if Blu-Ray wins) then low cost Blu-Ray players will most likely be available so why would you buy one that only works with a 360?

    Ask Microsoft, they are the ones that want the 360 to be a media hub. They would offer a Blu-Ray player for the same reason they offer a cheap HD-DVD option today, it's just the add-on at that point would be $50 and not $200. But it's pretty clear why they are not building HD-DVD into the console, so they have that option.

    --
    "There is more worth loving than we have strength to love." - Brian Jay Stanley
  95. Re:360 is well on it's way to losing its advantage by Khaed · · Score: 1

    600K. Wow.

    That brings them up to what, a fifth of the 360's sales? Half the Wii's sales?

    (note: I don't own either version of the X-Box, nor do I own a PS3 or a Wii.)

  96. Re:Prediciton - Universal selling Blu-Ray this yea by Danga · · Score: 1

    How can the war be over when high def DVD players account for less than 1% of all DVD player sales? Did you know that sales of ACTUAL high def DVD players have 200,000 HD-DVD players sold vs. 30,000 Blu-Ray players? You really can't count all of the PS3 sales in there since not everyone who has one uses it for a Blu-Ray player. The fact is it is still much cheaper to make HD-DVD players and HD-DVD media than it is to make the Blu-Ray counterparts. In my opinion the winner will be the first camp to get a cheap ($100-200) player available in Wal-Mart and HD-DVD has the edge there since the parts are cheaper.

    I just did a quick check of Wal-Mart's available HD DVD players and they have a HD-DVD player for $378 while the Blu-Ray player is $898. Hmm, I wonder which one I would buy if I was on a budget. Here are the players:

    http://www.walmart.com/catalog/catalog.gsp?cat=540 874&catNavId=62055

    The simply fact is that current DVD Emporium figures show Blu-Ray now outselling HD-DVD titles about 70% to 30%, trended Amazon data agrees with this assesment.

    Wow, I wonder how those numbers came about. Could it be all of the free vouchers for Blu-Ray discs that Sony gave away to purchasers of the PS3? While that is a significant percentage difference if you look at how it got that way you should come to the conclusion that the numbers have been fudged a little do to the free vouchers.

    Ask Microsoft, they are the ones that want the 360 to be a media hub. They would offer a Blu-Ray player for the same reason they offer a cheap HD-DVD option today, it's just the add-on at that point would be $50 and not $200. But it's pretty clear why they are not building HD-DVD into the console, so they have that option.

    The reason they did not build the HD drive into the unit was because they didn't want to drive the price of it up and thats it. I can't find the article but there was someone at MS who was quoted saying that they didn't include it in the Elite version for the very fact that they wanted to give the users a choice instead of automatically driving the price up. If you look at this http://www.technewsworld.com/rsstory/56565.html there is this quote:

    "Adding an HD DVD drive, now available as a plug-in accessory, "would have raised the Xbox cost another $200 and that would have gone over [the] PS3 price"

    Why would it go over the PS3 cost? Because Sony is selling the PS3 at a pretty hefty loss to them. MS doesn't want to go that route and would instead just like to give the user the choice to spend the extra $200.

    I also think that more people will purchase the HD-DVD drive once Halo 3 is released since it sounds like it will be an HD-DVD exclusive title. This will then add more potential players to the market and may result in increased HD-DVD movie sales.

    Either way even if they had included the HD-DVD drive they still would have "had the option" to offer a Blu-Ray add-on if they wished. They did not leave the HD-DVD drive out because they are worried the format is going to die.

    Believe what you wish but the fact remains that the HD-DVD vs. Blu-Ray war is far from over and it is much too early to declare a winner.

    --
    Hey, there is only one Return and it's not of the King, it's of the Jedi.
  97. Re:Prediciton - Universal selling Blu-Ray this yea by SuperKendall · · Score: 1

    How can the war be over when high def DVD players account for less than 1% of all DVD player sales?

    Because the war is between HD formats, not SD DVD. If one of two formats enjoys a 70% sales lead, an order of magnitude lead in players in people's homes, and a studio lead that includes Disney/Pixar and Sony, how do you suggest that equation is going to work out for anything but disaster for HD-DVD?

    I just did a quick check of Wal-Mart's available HD DVD players and they have a HD-DVD player for $378 while the Blu-Ray player is $898. Hmm, I wonder which one I would buy if I was on a budget.

    Neither. That's why people are buying PS3's instead. Why would you buy even a $400 HD-DVD player with hardly any content?

    On the other hand, 600k PS3's sold in the EU in just two days. How many of those "cheap" HD-DVD players sold in that same timeframe - in the whole world? Was it even 60k? It may even be closer to 6k than 60k. Even if only a small percentage of PS3 owners use the device to play movies, that small percentage in terms of pure numbers is growing much faster than HD-DVD sales.

    I also think that more people will purchase the HD-DVD drive once Halo 3 is released since it sounds like it will be an HD-DVD exclusive title.

    I have suspected that would be the case but many people do not think that possibiliy exists - Microsoft has said many times that games will not require HD-DVD. I think that will be more of an HD-DVD special edition of the game with more content or erhaps just extras - but it doesn't matter, because by the time Halo 3 is out the format war is even more over than it looks to be already, again due to the numbers I listed above.

    Either way even if they had included the HD-DVD drive they still would have "had the option" to offer a Blu-Ray add-on if they wished. They did not leave the HD-DVD drive out because they are worried the format is going to die.

    You're right about that - they were not worried at all. They knew HD-DVD was dead but.... they no longer care, since the 360 is now a vessel for IPTV. That is what they care about dominating, they have even said they believe these to be the last physical formats we will see (they are wrong, but that does not matter for now).

    Believe what you wish but the fact remains that the HD-DVD vs. Blu-Ray war is far from over and it is much too early to declare a winner.

    If you can describe a plausable scenario in which HD-DVD can back themselves out of even one of the three fatal flaws for the format I listed at the start of this message, people might start to believe that. But there is simply no way to do so, no way to overcome the mass advantage that Blu-Ray has given itself and is now in a virtuous feedback loop. More PS3's sold means more Blu-Ray movies sold means more releases from studios means more PS3's sold. And people come to the PS3 for games or movies, giving them an even greater spectrum of people to sell to.

    --
    "There is more worth loving than we have strength to love." - Brian Jay Stanley